Allegheny Technologies Incorporated 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period From to
Commission File Number 1-12001
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
25-1792394 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1000 Six PPG Place |
|
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
|
15222-5479 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(412) 394-2800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
At
July 31, 2008, the registrant had outstanding 100,288,371 shares of its Common Stock.
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
SEC FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
310.2 |
|
|
$ |
623.3 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
738.3 |
|
|
|
652.2 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
1,171.2 |
|
|
|
916.1 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
2,268.0 |
|
|
|
2,248.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,446.9 |
|
|
|
1,239.5 |
|
Prepaid pension asset |
|
|
255.6 |
|
|
|
230.3 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
209.7 |
|
|
|
209.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
149.8 |
|
|
|
125.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,366.8 |
|
|
$ |
4,095.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
451.2 |
|
|
$ |
388.4 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
286.8 |
|
|
|
277.3 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
790.8 |
|
|
|
704.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
502.3 |
|
|
|
507.3 |
|
Retirement benefits |
|
|
464.9 |
|
|
|
469.6 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
181.7 |
|
|
|
191.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
1,939.7 |
|
|
|
1,872.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.10: authorized-
50,000,000 shares; issued-none |
|
|
¾ |
|
|
|
¾ |
|
Common stock, par value $0.10: authorized-500,000,000
shares; issued-102,404,256 shares at June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007; outstanding-100,685,024 shares at
June 30, 2008 and 101,586,334 shares at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
644.5 |
|
|
|
693.7 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,104.8 |
|
|
|
1,830.7 |
|
Treasury stock: 1,719,232 shares at June 30, 2008 and
817,922 shares at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(127.6 |
) |
|
|
(75.4 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(204.8 |
) |
|
|
(235.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
2,427.1 |
|
|
|
2,223.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
4,366.8 |
|
|
$ |
4,095.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
1,461.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,471.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,804.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,843.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
1,128.9 |
|
|
|
1,069.8 |
|
|
|
2,181.7 |
|
|
|
2,055.9 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
149.4 |
|
|
|
150.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before interest, other income (expense),
and income taxes |
|
|
253.1 |
|
|
|
328.8 |
|
|
|
473.5 |
|
|
|
637.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
250.1 |
|
|
|
325.9 |
|
|
|
470.0 |
|
|
|
630.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
81.2 |
|
|
|
119.4 |
|
|
|
159.1 |
|
|
|
226.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
168.9 |
|
|
$ |
206.5 |
|
|
$ |
310.9 |
|
|
$ |
404.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
3.09 |
|
|
$ |
3.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
$ |
3.06 |
|
|
$ |
3.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007* |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
310.9 |
|
|
$ |
404.3 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
48.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
(255.1 |
) |
|
|
(255.3 |
) |
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(86.1 |
) |
|
|
(99.0 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
62.8 |
|
|
|
90.2 |
|
Retirement benefits |
|
|
(13.8 |
) |
|
|
4.4 |
|
Accrued income taxes, net of tax benefits on share-based compensation |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
43.5 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
96.3 |
|
|
|
236.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(255.4 |
) |
|
|
(151.5 |
) |
Asset disposals and other |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(255.6 |
) |
|
|
(147.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
Net borrowings (repayments) under credit facilities |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in debt |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(88.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
|
|
(26.5 |
) |
Shares repurchased for income tax withholding on share-based compensation |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
(50.1 |
) |
Tax benefit on share-based compensation |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
22.4 |
|
Exercises of stock options |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(153.8 |
) |
|
|
(62.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(313.1 |
) |
|
|
27.3 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year |
|
|
623.3 |
|
|
|
502.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
310.2 |
|
|
$ |
529.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Certain amounts have been adjusted. See Note 3. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Unaudited
Note 1. Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and its subsidiaries. Unless the context requires otherwise, Allegheny
Technologies, ATI and the Company refer to Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and its
subsidiaries.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and note disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. In managements opinion, all adjustments (which include only
normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. The results of operations for these interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
the operating results for any future period. The December 31, 2007 financial information has been
derived from our audited financial statements.
New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
In the first quarter 2008, as required, ATI began the adoption process for the change in
measurement date provisions of FASB Statement No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (FAS 158), which amended the standards for defined
benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans accounting. These provisions require assets
and benefits to be measured at the date of the employers statement of financial position, which is
December 31 for ATI, rather than the Companys measurement date of November 30, as was previously
permitted. The adoption of these provisions did not have a material effect on ATIs financial
statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). This
Standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, but does not require any new fair
value measurements. The Standard covers financial assets and liabilities, as well as for any other
assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in financial statements.
FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 for financial assets and
liabilities, and for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for other nonfinancial assets
and liabilities. The adoption of FAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did not have a
material impact on ATIs financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (FAS
159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities. FAS 159 permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. If the fair
value option is elected, unrealized gains and losses will be recognized in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. FAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The adoption of FAS 159 did not have an impact on ATIs financial statements.
Pending New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162 (FAS 162),
The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. FAS 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting principles to be used in the preparation and
presentation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
This statement will be effective 60 days after the Securities and Exchange Commission approves the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Boards amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present
Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company does not
anticipate the adoption of FAS 162 will have an effect on the consolidated financial statements.
6
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS
161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. FAS 161 amends and
expands the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. It requires qualitative disclosures
about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value
amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related
contingent features in derivative agreements. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of FAS 161 on the consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (FAS
160), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. FAS 160 changes the
classification of noncontrolling (minority) interests on the balance sheet and the accounting for
and reporting of transactions between the reporting entity and holders of such noncontrolling
interests. Under the new standard, noncontrolling interests are considered equity and are to be
reported as an element of stockholders equity rather than within the mezzanine or liability
sections of the balance sheet. In addition, the current practice of reporting minority interest
expense or benefit also will change. Under the new standard, net income will encompass the total
income before minority interest expense. The income statement will include separate disclosure of
the attribution of income between the controlling and noncontrolling interests. Increases and
decreases in the noncontrolling ownership interest amount are to be accounted for as equity
transactions. FAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and earlier
application is prohibited. Upon adoption, the balance sheet and the income statement will be recast
retrospectively for the presentation of noncontrolling interests. The other accounting provisions
of the statement are required to be adopted prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of adopting FAS 160, including the reporting of the minority interest in the STAL joint
venture, on ATIs financial statements. As of June 30, 2008, other long-term liabilities included
$64 million for minority interest in the STAL joint venture.
Note 2. Inventories
Inventories at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Raw materials and supplies |
|
$ |
197.9 |
|
|
$ |
179.6 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
1,192.3 |
|
|
|
962.1 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
162.2 |
|
|
|
153.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories at current cost |
|
|
1,552.4 |
|
|
|
1,294.8 |
|
Less allowances to reduce current cost values to LIFO basis |
|
|
(379.3 |
) |
|
|
(374.6 |
) |
Progress payments |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
1,171.2 |
|
|
$ |
916.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out
(FIFO), and average cost methods) or market, less progress payments. Most of the Companys
inventory is valued utilizing the LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of the Companys non-U.S.
operations is valued using average cost or FIFO methods. The effect of using the LIFO methodology
to value inventory, rather than FIFO, increased cost of sales by $3.4 million for the 2008 second
quarter and $4.7 million for the first six months of 2008, compared to increases of $21.7 million
for the 2007 second quarter and $42.6 million for the first six months of 2007.
7
Note 3. Supplemental Financial Statement Information
Property, plant and equipment at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
30.1 |
|
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
272.9 |
|
|
|
261.6 |
|
Equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
2,335.1 |
|
|
|
2,102.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,638.1 |
|
|
|
2,389.4 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,191.2 |
) |
|
|
(1,149.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
1,446.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,239.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 includes a
presentation adjustment of $50.1 million pertaining to taxes on share-based compensation.
Consistent with the Companys presentation utilized in the 2007
Annual Report on
Form 10-K, cash
usage related to the repurchase of Company shares to satisfy employee-owed taxes on stock-based
compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2007 is presented as a financing activity rather
than an operating activity. As a result, cash flow from operating activities for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 increased from $186.7 million to $236.8 million, and cash used in financing
activities increased from $(12.1) million to $(62.2) million.
Fair values of financial instruments included $37.5 million of assets and $29.6 million of
liabilities associated with derivative financial instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges for
nickel, natural gas and foreign currencies. All fair values for these derivatives were measured
using Level 2 information as defined by FAS 157.
Note 4. Debt
Debt at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Allegheny Technologies $300 million 8.375% Notes
due 2011, net (a) |
|
$ |
304.8 |
|
|
$ |
305.4 |
|
Allegheny Ludlum 6.95% debentures, due 2025 |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
Domestic Bank Group $400 million unsecured credit agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory note for J&L asset acquisition |
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
Foreign credit agreements |
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
Industrial revenue bonds, due through 2020 |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
Capitalized leases and other |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term and long-term debt |
|
|
524.0 |
|
|
|
528.2 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
|
(20.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
502.3 |
|
|
$ |
507.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes fair value adjustments for settled interest rate swap contracts of $7.7
million at June 30, 2008 and $8.7 million at December 31, 2007. |
The Company has a $400 million senior unsecured domestic revolving credit facility (the
facility), which includes a $200 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit. As of
June 30, 2008, there had been no borrowings made under the facility, although a portion of the
facility was used to support approximately $42 million in letters of credit.
In addition, STAL, the Companys Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60%
interest, has approximately $20 million in letters of credit outstanding as of June 30, 2008,
related to the expansion of its operations in Shanghai, China. These letters of credit are
supported solely by STALs financial capability without any guarantees from the joint venture
partners.
8
Note 5. Per Share Information
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common
share (in millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Numerator for basic and diluted net income
per common share net income |
|
$ |
168.9 |
|
|
$ |
206.5 |
|
|
$ |
310.9 |
|
|
$ |
404.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income per common
share-weighted average shares |
|
|
100.7 |
|
|
|
101.8 |
|
|
|
100.7 |
|
|
|
101.6 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option equivalents |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Contingently issuable shares |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income per
common share adjusted weighted
average shares and assumed
conversions |
|
|
101.5 |
|
|
|
103.0 |
|
|
|
101.5 |
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
3.09 |
|
|
$ |
3.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
$ |
3.06 |
|
|
$ |
3.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6. Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income, net of tax, were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
168.9 |
|
|
$ |
206.5 |
|
|
$ |
310.9 |
|
|
$ |
404.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation gains |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on energy, raw material and
currency hedges, net of tax |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
Retirement benefits |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Unrealized losses on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
179.7 |
|
|
$ |
194.8 |
|
|
$ |
340.6 |
|
|
$ |
425.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7. Income Taxes
Results for the second quarter 2008 included a provision for income taxes of $81.2 million, or
32.5% of income before tax, compared to an income tax provision of $119.4 million, or 36.6% of
income before tax, for the comparable 2007 quarter. The second quarter 2008 included a discrete
benefit of $11.2 million primarily related to tax refunds and credits associated with prior years.
The income tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $159.1 million, or 33.9% of
income before tax, compared to an income tax provision of $226.2 million, or 35.6% of income before
tax, for the comparable prior year period.
As required, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007. For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Companys liability
for unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $8.0 million, primarily related to the favorable
resolution of uncertain tax positions taken in prior periods included in
the $11.2 million of tax refunds and credits described in the first paragraph. The long-term
liability for uncertain tax positions as of June 30, 2008 was $34.3 million.
9
Note 8. Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company has defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans covering
substantially all employees. Benefits under the defined benefit pension plans are generally based
on years of service and/or final average pay. The Company funds the U.S. pension plans in
accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the Internal
Revenue Code.
The Company also sponsors several postretirement plans covering certain salaried and hourly
employees. The plans provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees. In
most plans, Company contributions towards premiums are capped based on the cost as of a certain
date, thereby creating a defined contribution. For the non-collectively bargained plans, the
Company maintains the right to amend or terminate the plans at its discretion.
For the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the components of
pension (income) expense for the Companys defined benefit plans and components of other
postretirement benefit expense included the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Pension Benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
$ |
13.8 |
|
Interest cost on benefits earned in prior years |
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(50.2 |
) |
|
|
(46.7 |
) |
|
|
(100.4 |
) |
|
|
(93.4 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension (income) expense |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost benefits earned during the year |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Interest cost on benefits earned in prior years |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(10.6 |
) |
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other postretirement benefit expense |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retirement benefit expense |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2008, the Company entered into a new five-year labor agreement with United
Steelworkers represented employees at the ATI Wah Chang operation. As a result, retirement benefit
expense is expected to be $8 million for the full year 2008 due to the establishment of a Voluntary
Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) trust for certain post-retirement benefits. For the quarter
and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recognized
$3.1 million of expense for this VEBA, which is included in retirement benefit expense in Note 9. Business Segments.
10
Note 9. Business Segments
Following is certain financial information with respect to the Companys business segments for
the periods indicated (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Total sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
$ |
560.2 |
|
|
$ |
612.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,085.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,131.3 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
851.0 |
|
|
|
822.3 |
|
|
|
1,611.6 |
|
|
|
1,633.0 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
135.7 |
|
|
|
115.6 |
|
|
|
264.2 |
|
|
|
233.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,546.9 |
|
|
|
1,550.5 |
|
|
|
2,961.1 |
|
|
|
2,997.7 |
|
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
156.5 |
|
|
|
153.8 |
|
Sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
|
504.5 |
|
|
|
557.7 |
|
|
|
985.5 |
|
|
|
1,035.1 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
834.1 |
|
|
|
804.6 |
|
|
|
1,581.0 |
|
|
|
1,588.3 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
122.6 |
|
|
|
109.0 |
|
|
|
238.1 |
|
|
|
220.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,461.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,471.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,804.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,843.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
$ |
150.8 |
|
|
$ |
180.2 |
|
|
$ |
282.2 |
|
|
$ |
347.7 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
111.3 |
|
|
|
166.3 |
|
|
|
212.5 |
|
|
|
326.5 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit |
|
|
273.1 |
|
|
|
357.2 |
|
|
|
511.4 |
|
|
|
697.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
(33.1 |
) |
|
|
(38.4 |
) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
Retirement benefit expense |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
250.1 |
|
|
$ |
325.9 |
|
|
$ |
470.0 |
|
|
$ |
630.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement
benefit expense represents pension income or expense and other postretirement benefit
expense. Operating profit with respect to the Companys business segments excludes any retirement
benefit expense.
In March 2007, the Company reached early resolution on new labor agreements for ATI Allegheny
Ludlum and ATIs Allvac Albany, OR employees. Operating profit for the six months ended June 30,
2007 for the High Performance Metals and Flat-Rolled Products segments was negatively impacted by
$0.7 million and $4.8 million, respectively, of pre-tax, one-time costs related to the new labor
agreements.
Corporate expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $15.4 million, compared to
$17.4 million for the comparable period of 2007. This decrease is due primarily to lower expenses
associated with annual and long-term performance-based incentive compensation programs. For the six
months ended June 30, 2008, corporate expenses decreased to $33.1 million compared to $38.4 million
primarily related to annual and long-term performance-based incentive compensation programs.
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales, includes charges incurred in connection with
closed operations, pretax gains and losses on the sale of surplus real estate and other assets, and
other non-operating income or expense. These items are presented primarily in selling and
administrative expenses and in other expense in the statement of income. The decreases for the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 were primarily related to lower charges for
environmental costs at closed operations.
11
Note 10. Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
The payment obligations under the $150 million 6.95% debentures due 2025 issued by Allegheny
Ludlum Corporation (the Subsidiary) are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Allegheny
Technologies Incorporated (the Guarantor Parent). In accordance with positions established by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the following financial information sets forth separately
financial information with respect to the Subsidiary, the non-guarantor subsidiaries and the
Guarantor Parent. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries and
certain intercompany balances and transactions. Investments in subsidiaries, which are eliminated
in consolidation, are included in other assets on the balance sheets.
Allegheny Technologies is the plan sponsor for the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan
(the Plan) which covers certain current and former employees of the Subsidiary and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries. As a result, the balance sheets presented for the Subsidiary and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries do not include any Plan assets or liabilities, or the related deferred
taxes. The Plan assets, liabilities and related deferred taxes and pension income or expense are
recognized by the Guarantor Parent. Management and royalty fees charged to the Subsidiary and to
the non-guarantor subsidiaries by the Guarantor Parent have been excluded solely for purposes of
this presentation.
Cash flows related to intercompany activity between the Guarantor Parent, the Subsidiary, and
the non-guarantor subsidiaries are presented as financing activities on the condensed statements of
cash flows. Previously, cash flows related to this intercompany activity were presented as cash
flows from operating activities. The condensed statements of cash flows for prior periods have
been revised to conform to this current method of presentation. The effect of this presentation
change on the Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 was to:
|
- |
|
Increase cash flow from operating activities for the
Subsidiary by $151.2 million with
an offsetting decrease to cash flow from financing activities. |
|
|
- |
|
Reduce cash flow from operating activities for the
non-guarantor subsidiaries by $70.2
million with an offsetting increase to cash flow from financing activities. |
|
|
- |
|
Reduce cash flow from operating activities for the Guarantor Parent by $81.0 million
with an offsetting increase to cash flow from financing activities. |
This change in presentation did not have any impact on consolidated cash flows as the intercompany
activity eliminates in consolidation.
12
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Balance Sheets
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
|
$ |
257.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
310.2 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
350.7 |
|
|
|
386.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
738.3 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
383.6 |
|
|
|
787.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,171.2 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
785.5 |
|
|
|
1,473.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,268.0 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
378.7 |
|
|
|
1,067.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,446.9 |
|
Prepaid pension asset |
|
|
255.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255.6 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
97.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209.7 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries and other
assets |
|
|
4,374.0 |
|
|
|
1,543.2 |
|
|
|
1,637.1 |
|
|
|
(7,404.5 |
) |
|
|
149.8 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,676.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,819.5 |
|
|
$ |
4,275.3 |
|
|
$ |
(7,404.5 |
) |
|
$ |
4,366.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
215.0 |
|
|
$ |
233.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
451.2 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,843.8 |
|
|
|
268.5 |
|
|
|
826.3 |
|
|
|
(2,651.8 |
) |
|
|
286.8 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,877.7 |
|
|
|
494.0 |
|
|
|
1,070.9 |
|
|
|
(2,651.8 |
) |
|
|
790.8 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
304.8 |
|
|
|
377.0 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
(200.0 |
) |
|
|
502.3 |
|
Retirement benefits |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
274.2 |
|
|
|
180.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464.9 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
56.7 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
108.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181.7 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,249.4 |
|
|
|
1,161.6 |
|
|
|
1,380.5 |
|
|
|
(2,851.8 |
) |
|
|
1,939.7 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,427.1 |
|
|
|
1,657.9 |
|
|
|
2,894.8 |
|
|
|
(4,552.7 |
) |
|
|
2,427.1 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
4,676.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,819.5 |
|
|
$ |
4,275.3 |
|
|
$ |
(7,404.5 |
) |
|
$ |
4,366.8 |
|
|
|
|
13
Note 10. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Statements of Income
For the six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,463.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,341.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,804.6 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
1,238.6 |
|
|
|
948.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181.7 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
47.6 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149.4 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Other income (expense) including
equity in income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
513.5 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(525.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
470.0 |
|
|
|
215.5 |
|
|
|
310.3 |
|
|
|
(525.8 |
) |
|
|
470.0 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
159.1 |
|
|
|
79.6 |
|
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
(180.1 |
) |
|
|
159.1 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
310.9 |
|
|
$ |
135.9 |
|
|
$ |
209.8 |
|
|
$ |
(345.7 |
) |
|
$ |
310.9 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
(19.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(65.0 |
) |
|
$ |
180.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
96.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(26.1 |
) |
|
|
(229.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255.6 |
) |
Cash flows provided by (used in)
financing activities |
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
(52.5 |
) |
|
|
(128.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153.8 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
(143.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(177.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(313.1 |
) |
|
|
|
14
Note 10. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Balance Sheets
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
188.1 |
|
|
$ |
435.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
623.3 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
258.3 |
|
|
|
393.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
652.2 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
210.4 |
|
|
|
705.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
916.1 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Prepaid expenses, and other current
assets |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
662.8 |
|
|
|
1,566.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,248.7 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
371.2 |
|
|
|
867.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,239.5 |
|
Prepaid pension asset |
|
|
230.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230.3 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
97.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries and other
assets |
|
|
4,143.4 |
|
|
|
1,266.0 |
|
|
|
1,411.6 |
|
|
|
(6,695.8 |
) |
|
|
125.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,436.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,412.1 |
|
|
$ |
3,942.9 |
|
|
$ |
(6,695.8 |
) |
|
$ |
4,095.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
165.4 |
|
|
$ |
219.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
388.4 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,854.0 |
|
|
|
76.7 |
|
|
|
841.5 |
|
|
|
(2,477.5 |
) |
|
|
294.7 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,857.4 |
|
|
|
252.6 |
|
|
|
1,071.5 |
|
|
|
(2,477.5 |
) |
|
|
704.0 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
305.4 |
|
|
|
382.1 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
(200.0 |
) |
|
|
507.3 |
|
Retirement benefits |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
274.6 |
|
|
|
184.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469.6 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
134.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,212.9 |
|
|
|
926.8 |
|
|
|
1,409.9 |
|
|
|
(2,677.5 |
) |
|
|
1,872.1 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,223.5 |
|
|
|
1,485.3 |
|
|
|
2,533.0 |
|
|
|
(4,018.3 |
) |
|
|
2,223.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
4,436.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,412.1 |
|
|
$ |
3,942.9 |
|
|
$ |
(6,695.8 |
) |
|
$ |
4,095.6 |
|
|
|
|
15
Note 10. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Statements of Income
For the six months ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,480.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,363.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,843.9 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
1,146.5 |
|
|
|
904.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,055.9 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
79.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150.8 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
Other income (expense) including
equity in income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
696.3 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(707.6 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
630.5 |
|
|
|
325.9 |
|
|
|
381.7 |
|
|
|
(707.6 |
) |
|
|
630.5 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
226.2 |
|
|
|
122.6 |
|
|
|
128.2 |
|
|
|
(250.8 |
) |
|
|
226.2 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
404.3 |
|
|
$ |
203.3 |
|
|
$ |
253.5 |
|
|
$ |
(456.8 |
) |
|
$ |
404.3 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
(31.7 |
) |
|
$ |
178.0 |
|
|
$ |
90.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
236.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(32.9 |
) |
|
|
(114.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(147.3 |
) |
Cash flows provided by (used in)
financing activities |
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
(156.8 |
) |
|
|
62.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62.2 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.7 |
) |
|
$ |
39.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
|
|
|
Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to various domestic and international environmental laws and
regulations that govern the discharge of pollutants and disposal of wastes, and which may require
that it investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites
associated with past and present operations. The Company could incur substantial cleanup costs,
fines, and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage or personal injury claims as a
result of violations or liabilities under these laws or noncompliance with environmental permits
required at its facilities. The Company is currently involved in the investigation and remediation
of a number of its current and former sites, as well as third party sites.
Environmental liabilities are recorded when the Companys liability is probable and the costs
are reasonably estimable. In many cases, however, the Company is not able to determine whether it
is liable or, if liability is probable, to reasonably estimate the loss or range of loss. Estimates
of the Companys liability remain subject to additional uncertainties, including the nature and
extent of site contamination, available remediation alternatives, the extent of corrective actions
that may be required, and the number, participation, and financial condition of other potentially
responsible parties (PRPs). The Company expects that it will adjust its accruals to reflect new
information as appropriate. Future adjustments could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations in a given period, but the Company cannot reliably predict the
amounts of such future adjustments.
Based on currently available information, the Company does not believe that there is a
reasonable possibility that a loss exceeding the amount already accrued for any of the sites with
which the Company is currently associated
16
(either individually or in the aggregate) will be an amount that would be material to a decision to
buy or sell the Companys securities. Future developments, administrative actions or liabilities
relating to environmental matters, however, could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial condition or results of operations.
At June 30, 2008, the Companys reserves for environmental remediation obligations totaled
approximately $18 million, of which approximately $7.5 million were included in other current
liabilities. The reserve includes estimated probable future costs of $5 million for federal
Superfund and comparable state-managed sites; $7 million for formerly owned or operated sites for
which the Company has remediation or indemnification obligations; $4 million for owned or
controlled sites at which Company operations have been discontinued; and $2 million for sites
utilized by the Company in its ongoing operations. The Company continues to evaluate whether it may
be able to recover a portion of future costs for environmental liabilities from third parties.
The timing of expenditures depends on a number of factors that vary by site. The Company
expects that it will expend present accruals over many years and that remediation of all sites with
which it has been identified will be completed within thirty years.
See Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies to the Companys consolidated financial statements
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 for a
discussion of legal proceedings affecting the Company.
A number of other lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the
Company relating to the conduct of its currently and formerly owned businesses, including those
pertaining to product liability, patent infringement, commercial, government contracting work,
employment, employee benefits, taxes, environmental and health and safety, and stockholder matters.
While the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some of these lawsuits,
claims or proceedings may be determined adversely to the Company, management does not believe that
the disposition of any such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any reporting period of one
or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations for that period.
17
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) is a Delaware corporation with its principal
executive offices located at 1000 Six PPG Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-5479, telephone
number (412) 394-2800. References to Allegheny Technologies, ATI, the Company, the
Registrant, we, our and us and similar terms mean Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and
its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
Allegheny Technologies is one of the largest and most diversified specialty metals producers
in the world. We use innovative technologies to offer growing global markets a wide range of
specialty metals solutions. Our products include titanium and titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys
and superalloys, grain-oriented electrical steel, zirconium, hafnium and niobium, stainless and
specialty alloys, tungsten-based materials, and forgings and castings. Our specialty metals are
produced in a wide range of alloys and product forms and are selected for use in environments that
demand metals having exceptional hardness, toughness, strength, resistance to heat, corrosion or
abrasion, or a combination of these characteristics.
Results of Operations
We operate in three business segments: High Performance Metals, Flat-Rolled Products, and
Engineered Products. These segments represented the following percentages of our total revenues and
segment operating profit for the first six months of 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Profit |
|
Revenue |
|
Profit |
High Performance Metals |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
Sales for the second quarter 2008 were $1.46 billion, 0.7% lower than the second quarter 2007.
Compared to the second quarter 2007, sales increased 4% in the Flat-Rolled Products segment, and
12% for the Engineered Products segment but declined 10% in the High Performance Metals segment.
Our diversified global markets and products provided balance in the first half of 2008. Direct
international sales increased to a quarterly record of $395.4 million, and represented 27% of our
total sales. We believe that more than 50% of our sales are driven by demand from global markets
when we consider exports of our customers.
Demand from the aerospace and defense market was good and comprised 27% of first half 2008
sales, down slightly from last year due primarily to declines in average selling prices. Demand
continues to grow from the global infrastructure markets: chemical process, oil and gas, and
electrical energy. So far in 2008, we have signed long-term agreements (LTAs) in these same
markets that have the potential to deliver over $1.3 billion in revenue over the life of the LTAs,
which are generally 3-5 years, and we are working on several additional LTAs. Demand was weak from
the U.S. automotive and housing markets. ATI titanium product shipments, including ATI-produced
products for our Uniti titanium joint venture, were nearly 24 million pounds in the first half of
2008, a 19% increase over the same period of last year, as we leverage our manufacturing
capabilities across both our High Performance Metals and Flat-Rolled Products segments and
demonstrate our ability to supply diversified global markets with both long and flat-rolled
products.
Segment operating profit for the second quarter 2008 decreased 24%, compared to the second
quarter 2007, to $273.1 million, or 18.7% of sales. Segment operating profit for the first six
months of 2008 decreased 27% compared to the first six months of 2007, to $511.4 million, or 18.2%
of sales. The decreases in operating profit were primarily due to lower and less volatile raw
material costs on products which use raw material indices or surcharge pricing mechanisms, where
these pricing mechanisms were in better balance with manufacturing cycle times compared to the
prior year periods, more competitive pricing for certain products, and product mix. Segment
operating profit as a percentage of sales for the three month and six month periods ended June 30,
2008 and 2007 were:
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
High Performance Metals |
|
|
29.9 |
% |
|
|
32.3 |
% |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
33.6 |
% |
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
Engineered Products |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
Our measure of segment operating profit, which we use to analyze the performance and results
of our business segments, excludes income taxes, corporate expenses, net interest expense,
retirement benefit expense, and other costs net of gains on asset sales. We believe segment
operating profit, as defined, provides an appropriate measure of controllable operating results at
the business segment level.
Results for the second quarter 2008 included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $3.4
million. For the same 2007 period, the LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge was $21.7 million.
Raw material cost inflation for chromium, molybdenum oxide and iron scrap was partially offset by
raw material cost decreases in nickel and nickel-bearing scrap, and titanium scrap. For the first
six months of 2008, LIFO inventory valuation reserve charges were $4.7 million, compared to $42.6
million for the comparable 2007 period.
Second quarter and first half 2008 gross cost reductions, before the effects of inflation,
totaled $36 million and $69 million, respectively, as we remained focused on reducing costs through
improving operating efficiencies.
In the first quarter 2007, we entered into four-year labor agreements with United Steelworkers
represented employees at ATI Allegheny Ludlum and at ATIs Albany, OR titanium operations. As a
result of the new agreements, we recognized a non-recurring charge of $5.8 million, or $3.7 million
after-tax, in the first half 2007, which is primarily reflected in the operating results of the
High Performance Metals and Flat-Rolled Products business segments.
Income before tax for the second quarter 2008 was $250.1 million, a decrease of $75.8 million
compared to the second quarter 2007. Net income for the second quarter 2008 was $168.9 million, or
$1.66 per share, compared to the second quarter 2007 of $206.5 million, or $2.00 per share. Second
quarter 2008 results include an income tax provision of $81.2 million, or 32.5% of income before
tax, compared to an income tax provision of $119.4 million, or 36.6% of income before tax, for the
comparable 2007 quarter. The 2008 second quarter included a favorable one-time net tax benefit of
$11.2 million, primarily associated with tax refunds and credits related to prior years.
Income before tax for the first six months of 2008 was $470.0 million, a 25% decrease over the
first six months of 2007. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $310.9 million, or
$3.06 per share, compared to $404.3 million, or $3.93 per share for the first half of 2007. First
half 2008 results include an income tax provision of $159.1 million, or 33.9% of income before tax,
which included the favorable one-time net tax benefit of $11.2 million in the second quarter and a
discrete benefit of $2.6 million in the first quarter related to foreign taxes. Results for the
first six months of 2007 include an income tax provision of $226.2 million, or 35.9% of income
before tax, and benefited from a $4.2 million reduction in the valuation allowances associated with
state deferred tax assets recorded in the first quarter 2007.
In the first six months of 2008, our strong cash flow supported investments of over $500
million in capital expenditures and managed working capital, dividend payments of over $36 million,
and share repurchases of over $88 million. We ended the quarter with $310 million of cash on hand.
Aerospace and infrastructure continue to drive our results, and we believe these markets are
in a period of long-term growth. Our strategy is to deliver earnings stability and growth as we
move through this extended cycle.
Looking forward, we expect the normal third quarter seasonal slowdown. We believe we are
well-positioned to continue to achieve good performance in this uncertain U.S. economy due to our
product and market diversification and our global reach. At this point, we expect full-year 2008
earnings per share to be in the range of $5.80 to $6.10. This would be the second best year in
ATIs history.
19
High Performance Metals Segment
Second quarter 2008 sales were $504.5 million, 10% lower than second quarter 2007 primarily
due to lower shipments and selling prices for titanium and titanium alloys, and nickel-based and
specialty alloys, which partially offset improved exotic alloy shipments and pricing. Demand for
our titanium alloys, nickel-based superalloys, and specialty alloys was good for jet engine
applications. Demand for our airframe titanium alloys was steady. Demand for our exotic alloys
was strong from the chemical process industry and is growing from the nuclear energy market.
Segment operating profit in the quarter was $150.8 million, or 29.9% of sales, a $29.4 million
decrease compared to the second quarter 2007. The second quarter 2008 results included a closer
matching of raw material costs with raw material indices included in the selling prices due to less
volatile raw material cost, primarily nickel and nickel-bearing scrap. The second quarter 2007
benefited from the rapid increase in the cost of nickel during the first half of 2007, which
resulted in higher raw material indices compared to costs due to the long manufacturing cycle times
of some of our products. The second quarter 2008 benefited from a $14.7 million reduction in the
LIFO inventory valuation reserve, primarily due to lower titanium scrap costs. The second quarter
2007 had a LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $1.6 million. Results for the 2008 second
quarter benefited from $17.1 million of gross cost reductions, bringing first half 2008 gross cost
reductions to $31.4 million.
Certain comparative information on the segments major products for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
|
7,707 |
|
|
|
7,809 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
|
11,493 |
|
|
|
11,837 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Exotic alloys |
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
$ |
26.34 |
|
|
$ |
31.75 |
|
|
|
(17 |
)% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
$ |
18.30 |
|
|
$ |
19.75 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Exotic alloys |
|
$ |
48.64 |
|
|
$ |
38.66 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Shipments of titanium mill products decreased slightly due to lower shipments to distributors.
Shipments of nickel-based and specialty alloys declined primarily due to product mix and inventory
management actions at distributors. Shipments of exotic alloys increased primarily due to strong
demand for zirconium from the chemical process industry and growing demand from the nuclear energy
market.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, segment sales decreased 5% to $985 million. Operating
profit was $282.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, or 28.6% of sales, compared to
$347.7 million, or 33.6% of sales, for the comparable prior year to date period. Shipments of
titanium mill products increased primarily due to higher aerospace airframe volume. Shipments of
nickel-based and specialty alloys declined primarily due to product mix and inventory management
actions at distributors. The first half 2008 results also included a closer matching of raw
material costs with raw material indices included in the selling prices due to less volatile raw
material cost, primarily nickel and nickel-bearing scrap. The first half 2007 benefited from the
rapid increase in the cost of nickel, which resulted in higher raw material indices compared to
costs due to the long manufacturing cycle times of some of our products. Results for the first half
of 2008 included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $13.4 million, compared to a charge
of $8.2 million in the 2007 period.
20
Certain comparative information on the segments major products for the six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
|
16,477 |
|
|
|
14,877 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
|
21,030 |
|
|
|
22,189 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Exotic alloys |
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
$ |
25.92 |
|
|
$ |
32.29 |
|
|
|
(20 |
)% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
$ |
18.42 |
|
|
$ |
18.89 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Exotic alloys |
|
$ |
46.70 |
|
|
$ |
40.65 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
In April 2008, we entered into a new labor agreement with the United Steelworkers represented
employees at ATIs Wah Chang operations. The new agreement expires on March 31, 2013. The new
agreement provides for profit sharing above specified minimum pre-tax profit for ATIs Wah Chang
operations and is capped to provide for no more than $9 million of profit sharing payments under
this provision over the five-year life of the contract. Any profit sharing payments under this
provision are contributed to an independently administered VEBA (Voluntary Employee Benefit
Association) trust. As a result of this new agreement, we expect to recognize additional retirement
benefit expense of approximately $8 million in 2008.
Flat-Rolled Products Segment
Second quarter 2008 sales were $834.1 million, 4% higher than the second quarter 2007, due
primarily to increased shipments, including higher foreign sales, partially offset by lower raw
material surcharges. Direct international sales increased $38.9 million to 26.5% of total 2008
segment sales. Demand was strong for our industrial titanium sheet, grain-oriented electrical
steel, and nickel-based and specialty alloy products from the chemical process industry, oil and
gas markets, and electrical energy markets. Shipments of our standard stainless products improved
due to better inventory balance at our U.S. service center customers, good demand from the chemical
process industry, oil and gas, and electrical energy markets, and improved international shipments.
Shipments of standard stainless products increased 20% while total high-value products shipments
increased 10%. Within high-value products, shipments of industrial titanium sheet and
grain-oriented electrical steel improved, significantly exceeding year-ago levels, offsetting lower
shipments of a specialty alloy for a large project last year. Average transaction prices for all
products were 10% lower, primarily due to lower raw material surcharges, product mix, and more
competitive prices for standard stainless sheet and plate.
Segment operating profit was $111.3 million or 13.3% of sales, a decrease of $55 million
compared to the second quarter 2007, primarily as a result of lower average base selling prices for
standard stainless products and the timing difference between raw material surcharges and costs.
The second quarter 2008 results included a closer matching of raw material costs with raw material
surcharges included in the selling prices due to less volatile raw material cost, primarily nickel
and nickel-bearing scrap. The second quarter 2007 benefited from the rapid increase in the cost of
nickel during the first half of 2007, which resulted in higher raw material surcharges compared to
costs due to the long manufacturing cycle times of some of our products. The negative impacts
described above were partially offset by increased shipments and higher selling prices for our
grain-oriented electrical steel, increased shipments of our flat-rolled titanium products,
increased shipments of standard grade sheet products, and the benefits of gross cost reductions.
Raw material cost inflation, primarily chromium, molybdenum oxide, and iron scrap, resulted in a
LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $16.4 million in the second quarter 2008. The second
quarter 2007 included a LIFO inventory valuation charge of $20.2 million.
Results benefited from $17.0 million in gross cost reductions, bringing first half 2008 gross
cost reductions in this segment to $33.2 million. We continue to benefit from the ongoing
transformation of this segment. Product, market and geographic diversification have greatly
improved. In addition, the segment is benefitting from approximately $400 million in gross cost
reductions since 2003.
21
Comparative information on the segments products for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
|
132,999 |
|
|
|
120,869 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Standard |
|
|
179,864 |
|
|
|
149,437 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
312,863 |
|
|
|
270,306 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per lb.): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
$ |
3.21 |
|
|
$ |
3.34 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Standard |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
2.63 |
|
|
|
(16 |
)% |
Combined Average |
|
$ |
2.64 |
|
|
$ |
2.95 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, Flat-Rolled Products sales were unchanged at $1.6
billion, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007, however segment operating profit declined
$114 million to $212.5 million, or 13.4% of sales, compared to $326.5 million, or 20.6% of sales,
for the prior year-to-date period. Average prices for the first half 2008, which include
surcharges, were 8% lower than the same period of last year. Demand was strong from the segments
largest markets: chemical process industry, oil and gas, and electrical energy, which accounted for
54% of year-to-date segment sales. The first half 2008 results included a closer matching of raw
material costs with raw material surcharges included in the selling prices due to less volatile raw
material cost, primarily nickel and nickel-bearing scrap. The first half 2007 benefited from the
rapid increase in the cost of nickel, which resulted in higher raw material surcharges compared to
costs due to the long manufacturing cycle times of some of our products. Segment results for the
2008 year-to-date period included a LIFO inventory reserve charge of $16.4 million, compared to a
prior year LIFO inventory reserve charge of $34.2 million in 2007, due primarily to raw material
cost inflation for chromium, molybdenum oxide, and iron scrap.
Comparative information on the segments products for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
|
252,791 |
|
|
|
248,677 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Standard |
|
|
350,484 |
|
|
|
311,117 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
603,275 |
|
|
|
559,794 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per lb.): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
$ |
3.21 |
|
|
$ |
3.28 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Standard |
|
$ |
2.15 |
|
|
$ |
2.46 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Combined Average |
|
$ |
2.59 |
|
|
$ |
2.82 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)% |
Engineered Products Segment
Sales for the second quarter 2008 of $122.6 million were 12% higher than the second quarter
2007. Demand for our tungsten and tungsten carbide products improved from the aerospace and
defense, electrical energy and mining markets. Demand was stable for our forged products from the
construction and mining, and oil and gas markets. Demand for our cast products was strong from the
electrical energy market, particularly for wind and gas turbine components. Demand from the
aerospace market remained very strong for our titanium precision metal processing conversion
services. Segment operating profit in the second quarter 2008 was essentially flat at $11.0
million, or 9.0% of sales, compared to $10.7 million, or 9.8% of sales, for the comparable 2007
period. The increase in 2008 operating profit due to the higher sales level was offset by start-up
expenses with our Alpena, MI casting operation, and the negative impact of higher raw material
costs which resulted in a LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $1.7 million. The second
quarter 2007 included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $0.1 million. Prior
year results were also impacted by start-up costs of our operation to internally produce ammonium
paratungstate (APT), a key raw material of the tungsten and tungsten carbide products.
22
Results benefited from $2.2 million of gross cost reductions, bringing year-to-date gross cost
reductions in this segment to $4.0 million.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, sales increased 8% to $238.1 million, and operating
profit was $16.7 million, or 7.0% of sales, compared to $23.3 million, or 10.6% of sales in 2007.
Operating results for the first half of 2008 include LIFO inventory valuation reserve charges of
$1.7 million, whereas the first six months of 2007 include LIFO inventory valuation reserve charges
of $0.2 million. Operating results for the first half 2008 were affected by higher raw material
costs, operational execution issues, and start-up expenses associated with our Alpena, MI casting
operation. First half 2007 results were negatively impacted by higher purchased raw material costs
and APT plant start-up costs.
We expect slowly improving operating results in the Engineered Products segment. The product
mix in our tungsten products business is improving and sales are growing in the aerospace and
defense, electrical energy, and mining markets. We also expect to see improved sales to the oil
and gas market beginning in the second half of 2008. Also, our new casting shop in Alpena, MI is
expected to complete qualifications in the third quarter for wind energy production, and ramp up in
the second half of 2008. Demand for our castings is robust in wind energy applications.
Corporate Items
Corporate expenses decreased to $15.4 million for the second quarter of 2008, compared to
$17.4 million in the year-ago period. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, corporate expenses
were $33.1 million compared to $38.4 million in the prior year-to-date period. Changes in
corporate expenses for the quarter and six month periods are primarily due to lower expenses
associated with annual and long-term performance-based cash incentive compensation programs.
Net interest expense in the second quarter 2008 decreased to $1.3 million from $2.6 million
for the same period last year. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, net interest expense was
$1.1 million compared to $6.9 million in the prior year-to-date period. The declines in net
interest expense in 2008 were primarily due to interest capitalization on capital projects. As a
result of capitalization of interest costs, interest expense was reduced by $11.6 million in the
first six months of 2008, and by $3.2 million in the first six months of 2007.
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales, includes charges incurred in connection with
closed operations, pretax gains and losses on the sale of surplus real estate and other assets, and
other non-operating income or expense. These items are presented primarily in selling and
administration expenses, and in other income (expense) in the statement of income and resulted in
other expense of $3.0 million for the second quarter of 2008 and $3.8 million for the second
quarter of 2007. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, other expense, net of gains on asset
sales was $3.9 million, compared to $6.6 million for the comparable 2007 period.
Retirement benefit expense decreased to $3.3 million in the second quarter 2008, compared to
$7.5 million in the second quarter 2007, primarily as a result of higher than expected returns on
plan assets in 2007 and the positive benefits of voluntary pension contributions made over the last
several years. In April 2008, we entered into a new five-year labor agreement with USW represented
employees at our ATI Wah Chang operation. As a result, retirement benefit expense will be
approximately $8 million for the full year 2008 due to the establishment of a VEBA for certain
post-retirement benefits. This expense is being recognized over the last three quarters of 2008,
with $3.3 million included in the second quarter 2008. For the second quarter 2008, the amount of
retirement benefit expense included in cost of sales was $2.1 million, and the amount included in
selling and administrative expenses was $1.2 million. For the second quarter 2007, the amount of
retirement benefit expense included in cost of sales was $5.1 million, and the amount included in
selling and administrative expenses was $2.4 million.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, retirement expense was $3.3 million, compared to $15.1
million in the same period of 2007. Retirement benefit expense increased cost of sales for the six
months ended June 2008 by $1.8 million, and increased selling and administrative expenses by $1.5
million. For the six months ended June 2007, retirement benefit expenses increased cost of sales
by $10.1 million and increased selling and administrative expenses by $5.0 million.
23
Income Taxes
Results for the second quarter 2008 included a provision for income taxes of $81.2 million, or
32.5% of income before tax, for U.S. Federal, foreign and state income taxes. The second quarter
2007 included a provision of $119.4 million, or 36.6% of income before tax. The second quarter
2008 tax provision included a favorable one-time net tax benefit of $11.2 million, primarily
associated with tax refunds and credits related to prior years. For the first half 2008, the
provision for income taxes was $159.1 million, or 33.9% of sales, compared to $226.2 million, or
35.9% of sales, for the first half 2007. The 2008 first quarter included a discrete benefit of
$2.6 million related to foreign taxes. The 2007 first quarter benefited from a lower income tax
provision due to a $4.2 million reduction in the valuation allowances associated with state
deferred tax assets as a result of the increased profitability of the Flat-Rolled Products segment.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
We believe that internally generated funds, current cash on hand, and available borrowings
under existing credit lines will be adequate to meet foreseeable liquidity needs, including a
substantial expansion of our production capabilities over the next few years. We did not borrow
funds under our domestic senior unsecured credit facility during the first six months of 2008.
However, a portion of this facility is utilized to support letters of credit.
Our ability to access the credit markets in the future to obtain additional financing, if
needed, may be influenced by our credit rating. As of June 30, 2008, Moodys Investor Services
senior unsecured debt rating for our Company was Baa3 with a stable outlook. As of June 30, 2008,
Standard & Poors Ratings Services corporate credit and senior unsecured debt rating for our
Company was BBB- with a stable outlook. Changes in our credit rating do not impact our access to,
or the cost of, our existing credit facilities.
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Cash Flow and Working Capital
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, cash provided by operating activities was
$96.3 million, as operating earnings were offset by a $271.3 million increase in managed working
capital, primarily as a result of higher operating volumes in our Flat-Rolled Products segment.
Investing activities included capital expenditures of $255.4 million. Cash used in financing
activities was $153.8 million in the first six months of 2008, and included purchases of $88.4
million of the Companys common stock, dividend payments of $36.4 million, cash usage related to
the repurchase of shares to satisfy employee-owed taxes on share-based compensation of $15.5
million, reductions in estimated federal and state income tax benefits from share-based
compensation of $9.2 million, and a reduction in borrowings of $5.4 million. At June 30, 2008, cash
and cash equivalents totaled $310.2 million, a decrease of $313.1 million from year end 2007.
As part of managing the liquidity of our business, we focus on controlling managed working
capital, which is defined as gross accounts receivable and gross inventories, less accounts
payable. In measuring performance in controlling this managed working capital, we exclude the
effects of LIFO inventory valuation reserves, excess and obsolete inventory reserves, and reserves
for uncollectible accounts receivable which, due to their nature, are managed separately. At June
30, 2008, managed working capital was 31.8% of annualized sales, compared to 32.2% of annualized
sales at December 31, 2007. During the first six months of 2008, managed working capital increased
by $271.3 million, to $1,897.8 million. The increase in managed working capital from December 31,
2007, was due to increased accounts receivable of $85.3 million, which reflects the timing of sales
in the second quarter 2008 compared to the fourth quarter 2007, and increased inventory of $249.7
million, mostly as a result of increased business activity plus a planned inventory build to
support third quarter 2008 planned equipment maintenance outages in the Flat-Rolled Products
segment, which was partially offset by increased accounts payable of $63.7 million. While accounts
receivable and inventory balances have increased during second quarter 2008, days sales
outstanding, which measures actual collection timing for accounts receivable, have stayed
relatively constant. Gross inventory turns, which excludes the effect of LIFO inventory valuation
reserves, declined compared to year-end 2007, due primarily to a shift in mix to more value-added
products and the increase in Flat-Rolled Products segment inventory balances.
24
The components of managed working capital were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
738.3 |
|
|
$ |
652.2 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,171.2 |
|
|
|
916.1 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(451.2 |
) |
|
|
(388.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,458.3 |
|
|
|
1,179.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
LIFO reserves |
|
|
379.3 |
|
|
|
374.6 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital |
|
$ |
1,897.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,626.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized prior two months sales |
|
$ |
5,962.1 |
|
|
$ |
5,058.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital as a
% of annualized sales |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
32.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in managed working capital from December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
271.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
In the 2008 first six months, we spent $255 million on capital expenditures. We currently
expect ATI direct capital expenditures for 2008 to be approximately $550 million, with additional
capital expenditures related to STAL, our Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60%
interest, to be approximately $95 million. The STAL expansion is expected to be funded through
existing cash on-hand and internal cash flow of the joint venture plus bank credit lines of the
joint venture. The financial results of STAL are consolidated into our financial statements with
the 40% interest of our minority partner recognized as other income or expense in the consolidated
statements of income and as a liability in the consolidated statements of financial position.
We are significantly expanding our manufacturing capabilities to meet current and expected
long-term demand growth from the aerospace (engine and airframe) and defense, chemical process
industry, oil and gas, electrical energy, and medical markets, especially for titanium and
titanium-based alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys, specialty alloys, and exotic alloys.
These self-funded capital investments continue to progress and include:
|
|
The expansion of ATIs aerospace quality titanium sponge production capabilities, including
our titanium sponge facility in Albany, OR, and our greenfield premium-grade titanium sponge
facility in Rowley, UT. The last reduction furnace at our Albany facility went into operation
at the end of the first quarter, which was ahead of schedule. With this approximately $100
million capital investment, this facility now has the capacity to produce aerospace quality
titanium sponge at an annualized rate of 22 million pounds. Primarily due to the announced
push-outs in Boeings 787 ramp-up schedule, we now intend to begin initial production at the
Rowley, UT premium-grade sponge facility by the end of the first quarter 2009, about three
months later than previously planned. At full production, this facility is expected to
produce 24 million pounds of premium-grade titanium sponge annually and will represent a total
capital investment of approximately $460 million. Upon completion of these titanium sponge
expansion projects, our annual sponge production capacity is projected to be 46 million
pounds. In addition, the Utah facility will have the infrastructure in place to further expand
annual capacity by approximately 18 million pounds, bringing the total annual capacity at that
facility to 42 million pounds, if needed. We expect to supplement our requirements with
titanium sponge and titanium scrap purchases from external sources. |
|
|
|
The expansion of ATIs melting capabilities for titanium and titanium-based alloys,
nickel-based alloys and superalloys, and specialty alloys. For titanium melting, four new
vacuum-arc remelt (VAR) furnaces are on line, and we plan to have one more titanium VAR
furnace customer qualified by the end of the third quarter 2008. VAR melting is a consumable
electrode re-melting process that improves the cleanliness and chemical homogeneity of the
alloys. Our third Plasma Arc Melt (PAM) premium titanium melt furnace is in production and has
completed initial customer qualifications. We expect to have this PAM furnace qualified for
all
products, including premium grade jet engine rotating quality products, during the fourth
quarter 2008. Plasma arc melting is a superior cold-hearth melting process for making alloyed
titanium products for jet engine rotating parts, medical applications, and other critical
applications. One new VAR furnace for nickel-based alloys and superalloys was qualified and
began commercial production in the first quarter of 2008, and we expect up to |
25
|
|
three more VARs to
be added through 2009 based on production requirements to support titanium and titanium-based
alloys and premium nickel-based alloys and superalloys growth. |
|
|
|
The expansion of ATIs mill products processing and finishing capabilities for titanium and
titanium-based alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys, and specialty alloys. Announced
projects include a $260 million expansion of our titanium and superalloy forging capacity at
our Bakers, NC facility through the addition of an integrated 10,000 ton press forge, 700mm
rotary forge, and conditioning, finishing and inspection facilities to support increased
forged product requirements, which is expected to be operational by the third quarter 2009.
Forging is a hot-forming process that produces wrought forging billet and forged machining bar
from an ingot. In June 2008, we commissioned the $60 million expansion of our titanium and
specialty plate facility located in Washington, PA. In addition to titanium and titanium
alloys, ATIs specialty plate products include duplex alloys, superaustenitic alloys,
nickel-based alloys, zirconium alloys, armor plate, and specialty and standard stainless
grades. The Washington, PA expansion included increasing reheat furnace, annealing, and
flattening capacity at the existing plate mill, expanding plate size capabilities, and
implementing productivity improvements. |
|
|
|
We are increasing our capacity to produce zirconium products
through capital expansions of zirconium sponge production and VAR
melting. This new zirconium sponge and melting capacity better
positions ATI for the strong nuclear electrical energy and chemical process industry markets. |
Finally, our STAL joint venture commenced an expansion of its operations in Shanghai, China in
late 2006. This expansion, which is expected to more than triple STALs rolling and slitting
capacity to produce Precision Rolled Strip® products, is estimated to cost approximately $110
million and is expected to be operational in the first quarter 2009.
Debt
At June 30, 2008, we had $524.0 million in total outstanding debt, compared to $528.2 million
at December 31, 2007, a decrease of $4.2 million. The decrease in debt was primarily due to
scheduled debt maturity payments.
In managing our overall capital structure, some of the measures on which we focus are net debt
to total capitalization, which is the percentage of our debt, net of cash that may be available to
reduce borrowings, to our total invested and borrowed capital, and total debt to total
capitalization, which excludes cash balances. Net debt as a percentage of capitalization was 8.1%
at June 30, 2008, compared to a negative 4.5% at December 31, 2007, as cash on hand exceeded total
debt at the end of last year. The net debt to capitalization was determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
524.0 |
|
|
$ |
528.2 |
|
Less: cash |
|
|
(310.2 |
) |
|
|
(623.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt (cash) |
|
$ |
213.8 |
|
|
$ |
(95.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt (cash) |
|
$ |
213.8 |
|
|
$ |
(95.1 |
) |
Stockholders equity |
|
|
2,427.1 |
|
|
|
2,223.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital |
|
$ |
2,640.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,128.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt (cash) to capital ratio |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
26
Total debt to total capitalization improved to 17.8% at June 30, 2008 from 19.2% at December 31,
2007. Total debt to total capitalization was determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
524.0 |
|
|
$ |
528.2 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
2,427.1 |
|
|
|
2,223.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital |
|
$ |
2,951.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,751.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt to total capital ratio |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We did not borrow funds under our $400 million senior unsecured domestic credit facility
during the first six months of 2008, although a portion of the facility has been utilized to
support the issuance of letters of credit. Outstanding letters of credit issued under the facility
at June 30, 2008, were approximately $42 million.
STAL, our Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60% interest, has a 741 million
renminbi (approximately $108 million at June 30, 2008 exchange rates) revolving credit facility
with a group of banks. This credit facility is supported solely by STALs financial capability
without any guarantees from the joint venture partners, and is intended to be utilized in the
future for the expansion of STALs operations, which are located in Shanghai, China. As of June
30, 2008, there were no borrowings under this credit facility although STAL had approximately $20
million in letters of credit outstanding related to the expansion of its operations.
The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008
was 22.5 and 21.3, respectively.
Dividends
We paid a regular quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share of common stock on June 16, 2008 to
stockholders of record at the close of business on May 29, 2008. On August 1, 2008, a regular
dividend of $0.18 was declared, payable on September 9, 2008 to stockholders of record at the close
of business on August 22, 2008. The payment of dividends and the amount of such dividends depends
upon matters deemed relevant by our Board of Directors, such as our results of operations,
financial condition, cash requirements, future prospects, any limitations imposed by law, credit
agreements or senior securities, and other factors deemed relevant and appropriate.
Share Repurchase Program
On November 1, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of $500
million. Repurchases of Company common stock have been, and are expected to be made on the open
market or in unsolicited or privately negotiated transactions. Share repurchases have been, and are
expected to be funded from internal cash flow and cash on hand. The number of shares to be
purchased, and the timing of the purchases, will be based on several factors, including other
investment opportunities, the level of cash balances, and general business conditions. During the
second quarter 2008, 425,000 shares of common stock were purchased at a cost of $26.1 million under
this program. For 2008 first half, 1,312,200 shares of common stock were purchased at a cost of
$88.4 million. As of June 30, 2008, 1,987,000 shares of common stock had been purchased under this
program at a cost of $149.6 million.
Critical Accounting Policies
Inventory
At June 30, 2008, we had net inventory of $1,171.2 million. Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out (FIFO) and average cost methods) or
market, less progress payments. Costs include direct material, direct labor and applicable
manufacturing and engineering overhead, and other direct costs. Most of our inventory is valued
utilizing the LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of our non-U.S. operations is valued using
average cost or FIFO methods. Under the LIFO inventory valuation method, changes in the cost of raw
materials and production activities are recognized in cost of sales in the current period even
though these material and other costs may have been incurred at significantly different values due
to the length of time of our production cycle. The prices
for many of the raw materials we use have been volatile. Since we value most of our inventory
27
utilizing the LIFO inventory costing methodology, a rise in raw material costs has a negative
effect on our operating results, while conversely, a fall in material costs results in a benefit to
operating results. For example, in 2007, the effect of falling raw material costs on our LIFO
inventory valuation method resulted in cost of sales which was $92.1 million lower than would have
been recognized if we utilized the FIFO methodology to value our inventory. In a period of rising
prices, cost of sales expense recognized under LIFO is generally higher than the cash costs
incurred to acquire the inventory sold. Conversely, in a period of declining raw material prices,
cost of sales recognized under LIFO is generally lower than cash costs incurred to acquire the
inventory sold.
Since the LIFO inventory valuation methodology is designed for annual determination, interim
estimates of the annual LIFO valuation are required. We recognize the effects of the LIFO
inventory valuation method on an interim basis by projecting the expected annual LIFO cost and
allocating that projection to the interim quarters equally. These projections of annual LIFO
inventory valuation reserve changes are updated quarterly and are evaluated based upon material,
labor and overhead costs and projections for such costs at the end of the year plus projections
regarding year-end inventory levels.
The LIFO inventory valuation methodology is not utilized by many of the companies with which
we compete, including foreign competitors. As such, our results of operations may not be
comparable to those of our competitors during periods of volatile material costs due, in part, to
the differences between the LIFO inventory valuation method and other acceptable inventory
valuation methods.
We evaluate product lines on a quarterly basis to identify inventory values that exceed
estimated net realizable value. The calculation of a resulting reserve, if any, is recognized as
an expense in the period that the need for the reserve is identified. At June 30, 2008, no such
reserves were required. It is our general policy to write-down to scrap value any inventory that
is identified as obsolete and any inventory that has aged or has not moved in more than twelve
months. In some instances this criterion is up to twenty-four months due to the longer
manufacturing and distribution process for such products.
Other Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of other significant accounting policies is discussed in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions regarding
uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Significant areas of
uncertainty that require judgments, estimates and assumptions include the accounting for
derivatives, retirement plans, income taxes, environmental and other contingencies as well as asset
impairment, inventory valuation and collectability of accounts receivable. We use historical and
other information that we consider to be relevant to make these judgments and estimates. However,
actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions that are used to prepare our
financial statements.
New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
In the first quarter 2008, as required, we began the adoption process for the change in
measurement date provisions of FASB Statement No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (FAS 158), which amended the standards for defined
benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans accounting. These provisions require assets
and benefits to be measured at the date of the employers statement of financial position, which is
December 31 in our case, rather than our measurement date of November 30, as was previously
permitted. The adoption of these provisions did not have a material effect on our financial
statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). This
Standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, but does not require any new fair
value measurements. The Standard covers financial assets and liabilities, as well as for any other
assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in financial statements.
FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 for financial assets and
liabilities, and for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008 for other nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The adoption
of FAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on our financial
statements.
28
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (FAS
159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities. FAS 159 permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. If the fair
value option is elected, unrealized gains and losses will be recognized in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. FAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The adoption of FAS 159 did not have an impact on our financial statements.
Pending New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162 (FAS 162),
The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. FAS 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting principles to be used in the preparation and
presentation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
This statement will be effective 60 days after the Securities and Exchange Commission approves the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Boards amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present
Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not anticipate the
adoption of FAS 162 will have an effect on the consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS
161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. FAS 161 amends and
expands the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. It requires qualitative disclosures
about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value
amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related
contingent features in derivative agreements. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal periods beginning after Nov. 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of
FAS 161 on the consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (FAS
160), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. FAS 160 changes the
classification of noncontrolling (minority) interests on the balance sheet and the accounting for
and reporting of transactions between the reporting entity and holders of such noncontrolling
interests. Under the new standard, noncontrolling interests are considered equity and are to be
reported as an element of stockholders equity rather than within the mezzanine or liability
sections of the balance sheet. In addition, the current practice of reporting minority interest
expense or benefit also will change. Under the new standard, net income will encompass the total
income before minority interest expense. The income statement will include separate disclosure of
the attribution of income between the controlling and noncontrolling interests. Increases and
decreases in the noncontrolling ownership interest amount are to be accounted for as equity
transactions. FAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and earlier
application is prohibited. Upon adoption, the balance sheet and the income statement will be recast
retrospectively for the presentation of noncontrolling interests. The other accounting provisions
of the statement are required to be adopted prospectively. We are currently evaluating the impact
of adopting FAS 160, including the reporting of the minority interest in our STAL joint venture, on
our financial statements. As of June 30, 2008, other long-term liabilities included $64 million for
minority interest in our STAL joint venture.
Forward-Looking and Other Statements
From time to time, we have made and may continue to make forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain statements in this
report relate to future events and expectations and, as such, constitute forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements include those containing such words as anticipates,
believes, estimates, expects, would, should, will, will likely result, forecast,
outlook, projects, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on
managements current expectations and include known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors, many of which we are unable to predict or control, that may cause our actual results,
performance or achievements to materially differ from those expressed or implied in the
forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those in the forward-looking statements include: (a) material adverse changes in economic or
industry conditions generally, including credit market conditions and
related issues, and global supply and demand conditions and prices for our
specialty metals; (b) material adverse changes in the markets we serve, including the aerospace and
defense, construction and mining, automotive, electrical energy, chemical process industry, oil and
gas, medical and other markets; (c) our inability to achieve the level of cost savings,
productivity improvements, synergies, growth or other
benefits anticipated by management, including those anticipated from strategic investments and
the integration of acquired businesses, whether due to significant increases in energy, raw
materials or employee benefits costs, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated
costs and expenses, or other factors; (d) volatility of prices and availability of supply of the
raw materials that are critical to the manufacture of our products; (e) declines in the
29
value of
our defined benefit pension plan assets or unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that govern
pension plan funding; (f) significant legal proceedings or investigations adverse to us; and
(g) the other risk factors summarized in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007, and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume
no duty to update our forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk. We attempt to maintain a reasonable balance between fixed- and floating-rate
debt to keep financing costs as low as possible. At June 30, 2008, we had approximately $59 million
of floating rate debt outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 3.8%.
Approximately $36 million of this floating rate debt is capped at a 6% maximum interest rate. Since
the interest rate on floating rate debt changes with the short-term market rate of interest, we are
exposed to the risk that these interest rates may increase, raising our interest expense in
situations where the interest rate is not capped. For example, a hypothetical 1% in rate of
interest on the $23 million of our outstanding floating rate debt not subjected to a cap would
result in increased annual financing costs of approximately $0.2 million.
Volatility of Energy Prices. Energy resources markets are subject to conditions that create
uncertainty in the prices and availability of energy resources. The prices for and availability of
electricity, natural gas, oil and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions.
These market conditions often are affected by political and economic factors beyond our control.
Increases in energy costs, or changes in costs relative to energy costs paid by competitors, have
and may continue to adversely affect our profitability. To the extent that these uncertainties
cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive, increased energy prices may have an
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We use approximately 10 to 12
million MMBtus of natural gas annually, depending upon business conditions, in the manufacture of
our products. These purchases of natural gas expose us to risk of higher gas prices. For example, a
hypothetical $1.00 per MMBtu increase in the price of natural gas would result in increased annual
energy costs of approximately $10 to $12 million. We use several approaches to minimize any
material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations from volatile energy
prices. These approaches include incorporating an energy surcharge on many of our products and
using financial derivatives to reduce exposure to energy price volatility.
At June 30, 2008, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge our exposure to natural
gas cost volatility represented approximately 30% of our forecasted requirements for the next three
years. The net mark-to-market valuation of these outstanding hedges at June 30, 2008 was an
unrealized pre-tax gain of $37.2 million, of which $19.1 million was presented in prepaid expenses
and other current assets on the balance sheet with the remainder included in other assets. The
effects of the hedging activity will be recognized in income over the designated hedge periods.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the effects of natural gas hedging activity reduced cost of
sales by $6.7 million.
Volatility of Raw Material Prices. We use raw materials surcharge and index mechanisms to offset
the impact of increased raw material costs; however, competitive factors in the marketplace can
limit our ability to institute such mechanisms, and there can be a delay between the increase in
the price of raw materials and the realization of the benefit of such mechanisms. For example, in
2007 we used approximately 80 million pounds of nickel; therefore a hypothetical change of $1.00
per pound in nickel prices would result in increased costs of approximately $80 million. In
addition, in 2007 we also used approximately 500 million pounds of ferrous scrap in the production
of our flat-rolled products and a hypothetical change of $0.01 per pound would result in increased
costs of approximately $5 million. While we enter into raw materials futures contracts from
time-to-time to hedge exposure to price fluctuations, such as for nickel, we cannot be certain that
our hedge position adequately reduces exposure. We believe that we have adequate controls to
monitor these contracts, but we may not be able to accurately assess exposure to price volatility
in the markets for critical raw materials.
The majority of our products are sold utilizing raw material surcharges and index mechanisms.
However as of June 30, 2008, we had entered into financial hedging arrangements at the request of
our customers related to firm orders for approximately 9% of our total annual nickel requirements.
Any gain or loss associated with these hedging arrangements is included in the selling price to the
customer requesting the hedge over the designated hedge period. At June 30, 2008, the net
mark-to-market valuation of these outstanding hedges was an unrealized pre-tax loss of
$19.1 million, of which $17.9 million is included in accrued liabilities on the balance sheet
with the remainder included in other long-term liabilities.
30
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
|
(a) |
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures as of June 30, 2008, and they concluded that these controls and
procedures are effective.
|
(b) |
|
Changes in Internal Controls |
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection
with the evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2008,
conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, that occurred during the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
A number of lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the Company
relating to the conduct of its business, including those pertaining to product liability, patent
infringement, commercial, government contract work, employment, employee benefits, environmental
and health and safety, and stockholder matters. Certain of such lawsuits, claims and proceedings
are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and addressed
in Note 11 to the unaudited interim financial statements included herein. While the outcome of
litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some of these lawsuits, claims or proceedings
may be determined adversely to the Company, management does not believe that the disposition of any
such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these
matters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations for that
period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks
facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Value) of Shares (or |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Average Price |
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
Units) that May Yet Be |
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Paid per Share |
|
Publicly Announced |
|
Purchased Under the |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
(or Unit) |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
April 1-30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
376,479,144 |
|
May 1-31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,479,144 |
|
June 1-30, 2008 |
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
61.46 |
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
350,349,494 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
$ |
61.46 |
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
$ |
350,359,494 |
|
31
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders was held on May 9, 2008. Proxies for the meeting were
solicited by us pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. At that
meeting, three proposals were submitted to a vote of the stockholders.
Item A Election of Directors. The three nominees for election as directors named in the proxy
statement for the meeting were elected, having received the following number of votes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Number of Votes For |
|
Number of Votes Withheld |
James C. Diggs |
|
|
86,262,873 |
|
|
|
972,292 |
|
J. Brett Harvey |
|
|
79,331,783 |
|
|
|
7,903,382 |
|
Michael J. Joyce |
|
|
86,248,983 |
|
|
|
986,182 |
|
Item B Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent auditors of the Company for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Votes For |
|
Number of Votes Against |
|
Number of Votes Abstained |
85,787,409
|
|
|
748,711 |
|
|
|
699,045 |
|
Item C Stockholder proposal regarding majority voting in director elections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Votes For |
|
Number of Votes Against |
|
Number of Votes Abstained |
|
Number of Broker Non-Votes |
37,201,944 |
|
|
40,581,087 |
|
|
|
1,198,988 |
|
|
|
8,253,146 |
|
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
12.1 |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a) (filed herewith). |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a) (filed herewith). |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (filed herewith). |
32
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 5, 2008 |
By |
/s/ Richard J. Harshman
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Harshman |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 5, 2008 |
By |
/s/ Dale G. Reid
|
|
|
|
Dale G. Reid |
|
|
|
Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
33
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
12.1 |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a). |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a). |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
34