BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. POS AM
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 11, 2006
Registration
No. 333-125483
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
BPI ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
British Columbia, Canada |
|
1311 |
|
75-3183021 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(Primary standard industrial |
|
(I.R.S. employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
classification code number) |
|
identification number) |
30775 Bainbridge Road, Suite 280
Solon, Ohio 44139
(440) 248-4200
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of registrants principal executive
offices)
George J. Zilich
Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel
30775 Bainbridge Road, Suite 280
Solon, Ohio 44139
(440) 248-4200
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
Copies to:
Derek D. Bork
Thompson Hine LLP
127 Public Square, Suite 3900
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
(216) 566-5500
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: From time to time after the registration statement
becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. þ
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering: o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
16,595,200 Shares of Common Stock
This prospectus covers the offer and sale of
16,595,200 shares of our common stock, without par value,
by the selling shareholders named in this prospectus. These
shares consist of 10,372,000 shares that are currently
outstanding and 6,223,200 shares that are issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding warrants.
The selling shareholders may offer the common stock from time to
time through public or private transactions at prevailing market
prices, at prices related to prevailing market prices or at
other negotiated prices. The selling shareholders may sell none,
some or all of the common stock offered by this prospectus. We
cannot predict when or in what amounts the selling shareholders
may sell the common stock offered by this prospectus. We will
not receive any proceeds from the sale of common stock by the
selling shareholders, but if the selling shareholders exercise
any of their warrants, we will use the proceeds that we receive
to fund our plan of operations for the 12-months period ending
April 30, 2007 and for working capital and general
corporate purposes.
Our common stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange under
the symbol BPG. On May 1, 2006, the closing
price of our common stock was $1.46.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 8.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus is May 11, 2006.
Table of Contents
Prospectus Summary
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this
prospectus. This summary is not complete and does not contain
all of the information you should consider before investing in
our common stock. You should read the entire prospectus
carefully, including the sections entitled Risk
Factors and Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements and our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes contained in this prospectus
before making an investment decision. References in this
prospectus to we, us, our,
company, and BPI refer to BPI Energy
Holdings, Inc. You refers to a prospective investor
in the company through the purchase of shares offered by this
prospectus.
In this prospectus, unless otherwise indicated, amounts are
expressed in U.S. dollars. In addition, our financial
statements included in this prospectus have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
On February 9, 2006, the name of the company was changed
from BPI Industries Inc. to BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. Some of
the references to the company prior to that date, including in
our financial statements, use our former name.
Coalbed Methane
We are engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and
production of coalbed methane (CBM) reserves. CBM is
a form of natural gas that is generated during coal formation
and is contained in underground coal seams and abandoned mines.
Methane is the primary commercial component of natural gas
produced from conventional gas wells. Natural gas produced from
conventional wells generally contains other hydrocarbons in
varying amounts that require the natural gas to be processed.
CBM is generally pipeline-quality gas after simple water
dehydration and removal of traces of nitrogen and other
impurities.
CBM production is similar to conventional natural gas production
in terms of the physical producing facilities. However, the
subsurface mechanisms that allow gas movement to the wellbore
are very different. Conventional natural gas wells require a
subsurface that is porous, allows the gas to migrate easily, and
contains a natural trap to capture and hold the gas reservoir.
In contrast, CBM is held in place within coal seams in four ways:
|
|
|
|
|
as free gas within the micropores (pores with a diameter of less
than .0025 inch) and cleats (set of natural fractures) of
coal; |
|
|
|
as dissolved gas in water within the coal; |
|
|
|
as adsorbed gas held by molecular attraction on the surface of
macerals (organic constituents that comprise the coal mass),
micropores and cleats in the coal; and |
|
|
|
as adsorbed gas within the molecular structure of the coal. |
Coal at shallower depths with good cleat development contains
high concentrations of free and dissolved methane gas.
Adsorption is generally higher in coal that contains a higher
percentage of fixed carbon and generally increases with higher
pressure, which occurs at deeper depths. We currently intend to
drill and produce from coal seams ranging in depth from 400 to
1,200 feet beneath the surface.
CBM gas is released from the coal by pressure changes when water
is removed from coal. In contrast to conventional gas wells, new
CBM wells initially produce water for several months. As the
water pressure decreases in the coal formation, methane gas is
released from the coal.
To assist you in reading this prospectus and understanding our
business, we have included a glossary of selected natural gas
terms that are used in this prospectus. The glossary is set
forth as Appendix A beginning on
Page A-1.
1
Our Business
We focus on the acquisition, exploration, development and
production of CBM reserves located in the Illinois Basin, which
covers approximately 60,000 square miles in the mid to
southern part of Illinois, southwest Indiana and northwest
Kentucky. Through lease, option and farm-out agreements, we have
assembled CBM rights covering 530,435 acres in the Illinois
Basin (including our 43,000 acre Southern Illinois Basin
Project, where our acreage rights are currently subject to
litigation, as described in this summary below). We believe that
these rights currently give us control over more CBM acreage
than any other CBM company in the Illinois Basin.
A Gas Technology Institute report from 2001 estimates that 21
trillion cubic feet of CBM gas is in place in the Illinois
Basin. Although the Illinois Basin is believed to have
significant CBM potential, it is largely untested for commercial
CBM production. In addition, we have evaluated the CBM potential
in only a relatively small part of our acreage rights.
Our acreage rights in the Illinois Basin are currently divided
into three projects. Our Southern Illinois Basin Project
(formerly called our Delta Project) consists of
43,000 acres in the southern part of the Illinois Basin.
Our Southern Illinois Basin Project is currently subject to
litigation that challenges our acreage rights, and we may
therefore not retain any of these acreage rights. Our other
acreage holdings include our Northern Illinois Basin Project
(formerly called our Montgomery Project), located in the north
central part of the Illinois Basin, where we control through
lease, option and farm-out agreements an aggregate of
351,487 acres of CBM rights, and the Western Illinois Basin
Project (formerly called our Clinton/ Washington Project),
located in the northwestern part of the Illinois Basin, where we
control through lease, option and farm-out agreements an
aggregate of 135,948 acres of CBM rights. In addition, we
continue to look for opportunities to acquire additional CBM
acreage rights in the Illinois Basin.
As of May 1, 2006, we have drilled 107 wells. These
wells consist of 77 productive wells, 17 shut-in wells and
13 wells that have been drilled but are not in production,
including three test wells. All of our productive wells are
located at our Southern Illinois Basin Project. Since our
Southern Illinois Basin Project is currently subject to
litigation, we may lose our right to continue to operate and
produce CBM from all of our productive wells existing as of
May 1, 2006.
Our History
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of
British Columbia in 1980. Our corporate offices in the United
States are located at 30775 Bainbridge Road, Suite 280,
Solon, Ohio 44139, telephone
(440) 248-4200.
Our records office and registered office in Canada is located at
609 Granville Street, Suite 1600, Vancouver, British Columbia
V7Y 1C3, telephone (604) 685-8688. Our operations are
conducted from a field office located in Marion, Illinois.
Beginning in 1996, we had a minority involvement in the Southern
Illinois Basin Project. In 2001, Methane Management, Inc.
acquired the Southern Illinois Basin Project subject to our
minority interest. In August 2001, we acquired Methane
Management, Inc. and consolidated 100% of the Southern Illinois
Basin Project within BPI. James G. Azlein, President of Methane
Management, Inc. at the time, became our President, and we
created a new management team. We have since divested nearly all
of our assets that are not related to CBM projects in the
Illinois Basin.
Since 2001, we enlarged our acreage footprint from
43,000 acres to the 530,435 acres of CBM rights that
we control today (including our 43,000 acre Southern
Illinois Basin Project, where our acreage rights are currently
subject to litigation), drilled CBM test and production wells at
the Southern Illinois Basin and Northern Illinois Basin
Projects, and installed gathering and production facilities for
gas sales from the Southern Illinois Basin Project.
2
Business Strategy
The objectives of our business strategy are to generate growth
in gas reserves, production volumes and cash flows at a positive
return on invested capital. The principal elements of our
business strategy are to:
|
|
|
|
|
Explore and Develop Properties. As of May 1, 2006,
we have drilled 107 wells. These wells consist of 77
productive wells, 17 shut-in wells and 13 wells that have
been drilled but are not in production, including three test
wells. All of our productive wells are located at our Southern
Illinois Basin Project. Since our Southern Illinois Basin
Project is currently subject to litigation, we may lose our
right to continue to operate and produce CBM from all of our
productive wells existing as of May 1, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Due to the litigation with respect to our Southern Illinois
Basin Project, we are not drilling any new wells at our Southern
Illinois Basin Project and have moved the focus of our drilling
activities to our Northern Illinois Basin Project. During April
2006, we filed permit applications for drilling the first 10 CBM
production wells at our Northern Illinois Basin Project. |
|
|
|
|
During the 12-month
period ending April 30, 2007, we plan to drill 123 new
wells, including 115 vertical wells, three horizontal wells and
five test wells. This plan contemplates a capital expenditure
budget of approximately $30.0 million. Our cash balance as
of May 1, 2006 is approximately $25.0 million and
therefore not sufficient to fully fund these capital
expenditures and our anticipated cash needs through
April 30, 2007. In order to fully fund our operations
through April 30, 2007, we will need to raise additional
financing. |
|
|
|
|
The number of wells that we drill during the 12-month period
ending April 30, 2007 will be dependant on the success of
our initial production wells at our Northern Illinois Basin
Project, the additional capital that we are able to raise and
the risk factors described in this prospectus. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expand CBM Acreage Rights. We continue to look for
opportunities to acquire additional CBM acreage rights in the
Illinois Basin. Our strategy has been to acquire leases and
options on large acreage blocks in areas where the coal seams
are the thickest and there is currently pipeline delivery
infrastructure in place. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursue Joint Ventures. We continue to consider joint
venture opportunities. With our asset base and technical
expertise, we believe that we are well positioned to attract
industry joint venture partners for the purposes of providing
capital, technical operating expertise and development
opportunities to accelerate our growth. |
|
Competitive Strengths
We believe our competitive strengths include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Substantial CBM Acreage Position. The Illinois Basin is
one of the few remaining high potential CBM areas in North
America. We were the first company to begin acquiring
substantial blocks of CBM acreage rights in the Illinois Basin.
We believe that we currently control more CBM acreage than any
other CBM company in the Illinois Basin. |
|
|
|
|
Demonstrated Commercial Production. We believe that we
have taken the initial steps to demonstrate the commercial
production capabilities of the Illinois Basin. As of May 1,
2006, we have drilled 107 wells, including 77 productive
wells located at our Southern Illinois Basin Project, most of
which have not yet reached peak production. For the six months
ended January 31, 2006, our gas sales totaled $537,505.
Although it is possible that we may lose our productive wells at
our Southern Illinois Basin Project due to ongoing litigation,
we believe that our production at the Southern Illinois Basin
Project demonstrates the commercial viability of the Illinois
Basin. |
|
|
|
|
|
Short Drilling Permit Lead Times. We typically experience
short turnaround times in obtaining drilling permits as compared
to CBM drillers in other CBM basins. Historically, we have
enjoyed quick turnaround of vertical CBM well drilling permits
from state regulatory bodies. We have not yet |
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
submitted any permit applications for drilling horizontal wells.
However, we do not anticipate any significant delays in
obtaining permits for these wells. |
|
|
|
|
|
Low Water Disposal Costs. A significant advantage of
operating in the Illinois Basin is that we are not required to
build costly water disposal facilities. We have disposed of the
water we encounter in connection with our drilling and
production by re-injecting the water into disposal wells drilled
and operated by us. |
|
|
|
|
|
Substantial Interstate Pipeline Capacity and Low
Transportation Costs. A significant advantage that we have
over CBM producers in other basins is our proximity to a large
number of interstate gas pipelines that have substantial
take-away capacity. Because our operations and CBM acreage are
located near several large metropolitan gas consuming markets
(e.g., Chicago, St. Louis, Nashville, Indianapolis and
Detroit) and the fact that many interstate pipelines headed to
the East Coast pass through the Illinois Basin, we expect to
incur little or no pipeline related transportation charges. In
addition, we do not expect to experience any lost production or
sales due to insufficient local or interstate pipeline capacity
to transport the CBM that we produce and sell. |
|
|
|
|
|
Experienced and Incentivized Management and Operating
Teams. Our operating team includes individuals that have
been drilling or operating CBM wells in the Illinois Basin since
1996. In addition, James G. Azlein, our President and Chief
Executive Officer, George J. Zilich, our Chief Financial Officer
and General Counsel, and James E. Craddock, our Senior Vice
President of Operations, beneficially own 6.97% of our common
stock. In addition, the majority of BPIs management and
operating employees owns common stock and/or stock options in
the company. |
|
Risks Relating to BPI
In evaluating our business, you should consider that we are
subject to a number of risks. Among these risks are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are not currently generating net income or positive cash flow
from operations. In addition, it is possible that, due to our
ongoing litigation with respect to our CBM acreage rights at our
Southern Illinois Basin Project, we may lose all of our
productive wells existing as of May 1, 2006. Even if we
achieve increased revenues and positive cash flow from
operations in the future, we anticipate increased exploration,
development and other capital expenditures as we continue to
explore and develop our CBM rights. We will need to obtain
additional financing in the near future to fund these activities. |
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to raise the additional financing necessary to
fund our future operations. Interest rates and investor
expectations and demands are subject to change, and any change
in these areas could have a negative effect on the financing
terms that we are able to obtain. In addition, the terms of any
new financing may adversely affect your investment in us. |
|
|
|
CBM exploration is speculative in nature and may not result in
operating revenues or profits. The future wells that we drill
may not be successful, due to low CBM content in the coal, low
permeability, unusually low or high water quantities, low water
quality, incorrect forecasts or other factors. In addition, we
could determine in the future that the conditions in the
Illinois Basin are not conducive to commercially viable CBM
operations. |
|
|
|
We could experience delays in securing drilling equipment and
crews, which would cause us to fail to meet our drilling plans
and negatively impact our operations. We utilize drilling
contractors to perform all of the drilling on our projects and
maintain a limited number of supervisory and field personnel to
oversee drilling and production operations. Our plans to drill
additional wells are determined in large part by the anticipated
availability of acceptable drilling equipment and crews. We do
not currently have any contractual commitments that ensure we
will have adequate drilling equipment or crews to achieve our
drilling plans. |
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
We could lose significant portions of our CBM acreage rights and
all of our existing productive wells if we do not place into
production a sufficient number of CBM wells. The primary terms
of the lease agreements pursuant to which we hold, or upon the
exercise of options will hold, our CBM acreage rights have
expired or will expire between April 2006 and April 2026, after
which we will continue to hold our acreage rights only to the
extent that we are producing CBM from the covered acreage. We
are currently subject to litigation with respect to the lease
agreement covering the 43,000 acres of CBM rights at our
Southern Illinois Basin Project, where currently all of our
productive wells are located. Due to the litigation, we could
lose all of our acreage rights and productive wells at our
Southern Illinois Basin Project. |
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately 77% of our CBM rights are inferior to coal mining
rights covering the same properties, and our affected operations
could be displaced by coal mining operations, which would
negatively impact our operations. |
|
|
|
|
|
The issue of who owns CBM gas, as between the coal rights owner
and the oil and gas rights owner, is uncertain in Illinois.
Although the appellate court in Illinois for the district where
most of our acreage rights are situated has ruled that CBM gas
is owned by the coal rights owner, the issue has not been
addressed by the highest court in Illinois. We generally secure
CBM rights from the coal owners. Some of our lessors hold both
the coal rights and the oil and gas rights for the applicable
properties, but in some cases it is not certain that they also
hold the oil and gas rights. If any litigation in Illinois
concludes that CBM rights lie with the oil and gas owner, we
could lose some of our CBM rights. |
|
|
|
|
We have granted BHP Billiton a right of first refusal to acquire
us, which could deter other potential acquirors from seeking to
acquire us. We also agreed to issue BHP 4.0 million stock
appreciation rights, which may be exercised by BHP only if it
acquires us. A potential acquiror might decide that it does not
wish to expend its time and resources reviewing and negotiating
an acquisition with us if BHP can thwart the transaction by
exercising its right of first refusal. |
For further discussion of these and other factors that you
should carefully consider before making an investment decision,
see Risk Factors beginning on page 8 of this
prospectus.
Litigation Relating to Our CBM Rights at Our Southern
Illinois Basin Project
On March 15, 2006, we filed a complaint against Colt, LLC
and other defendants alleging tortious interference with
business relations and breach of contract relating to the
interruptions of our development plans at our Southern Illinois
Basin Project. We sought a preliminary injunction against Colt,
LLC and related parties from terminating the lease agreement
covering our CBM rights at the Southern Illinois Basin Project
or taking any other action that interferes with our right to
mine CBM under the lease agreement, pending a final judgment on
the merits of our complaint. We requested the preliminary
injunction to preserve the status quo until the case is resolved.
On April 3, 2006, the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Ohio denied our motion for a preliminary
injunction. Although the courts opinion provided that it
did not state the courts ultimate opinion on the merits of
the case, the opinion provided that we had failed, in connection
with our request for the preliminary injunction, to establish a
substantial likelihood or probability of success on the merits.
On April 5, 2006, Colt filed an answer and counterclaim in
response to our complaint. In its counterclaim, Colt seeks a
declaratory judgment asking the court to declare, among other
things, that: (a) we committed multiple breaches of the
lease agreement; (b) the lease agreement automatically
terminated due to our failure to cure our alleged breaches;
(c) the lease agreement automatically terminated by its own
terms on April 3, 2006; and (d) to the extent the
lease agreement already terminated, we are wrongfully holding
over and/or trespassing and Colt is entitled to an award of
damages as a result.
Apart from the claims that we are currently pursuing in the
litigation as to the entire 43,000 acres covered by the
lease, we believe that we should hold our CBM acreage rights as
to certain tracts of land subject to the lease. The lease has a
primary term that extended until April 3, 2006. After the
primary term, the lease provides that it shall extend as to a
particular tract so long as CBM is being produced from such tract
5
providing a royalty payment of not less than $1.00 per acre
per month; provided that, after the primary term, in the event
the aggregate royalties do no exceed $42,000 in any month, the
lease shall terminate. We believe that the wells that we have
drilled (including both productive wells and shut-in wells)
pursuant to the lease should hold tracts of land totaling
approximately 10,550 acres. The remaining 32,450 acres
under the lease do not have wells drilled.
These and related provisions of the lease, which we believe
permit us to maintain our rights to at least 10,550 acres
of CBM rights after the primary term of the lease, are subject
to varying interpretations. It is likely that, ultimately, the
interpretation of these lease provisions will be determined by
the court in the ongoing litigation. It is possible that the
court will not agree with our interpretation of the applicable
lease provisions. In that case, we would lose all of our CBM
acreage rights and productive wells at our Southern Illinois
Basin Project.
As of May 1, 2006, we have drilled 107 wells. These
wells consist of 77 productive wells, 17 shut-in wells and
13 wells that have been drilled but are not in production,
including three test wells. All of our productive wells are
located at our Southern Illinois Basin Project.
The effect of the loss of all of our acreage under this lease
would result in a write-down of capitalized net oil and gas and
other properties in a total amount of approximately
$26 million. The effect of the loss of only our
non-producing acreage (those areas in which wells have not yet
been established) may result in a write-down of capitalized net
oil and gas and other properties in an amount up to
approximately $4 million.
6
The Offering
|
|
|
|
Common stock available for offering by the selling shareholders |
|
16,595,200 shares of our common stock including 10,372,000
shares that are currently outstanding and 6,223,200 shares
that are issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants. For
additional information about the selling shareholders and the
common stock available for sale by them, see the section of this
prospectus entitled Selling Shareholders. |
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding |
|
As of May 1, 2006, we have 70,812,540 shares of our
common stock outstanding. As of the same date,
5,311,600 shares of our common stock are issuable upon
exercise of warrants held by third parties, and
1,872,812 shares of our common stock are issuable upon
exercise of options held by our officers, directors, employees
and others. See Description of Our Common Stock. |
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of common stock
by the selling shareholders, but will receive up to $9,075,500
in proceeds from the exercise by the selling shareholders of
warrants that are exercisable for common stock covered by this
prospectus. We intend to use the net proceeds from such
exercises to fund our plan of operations for the
12-month period ending
April 30, 2007 and for working capital and general
corporate purposes. |
|
|
Plan of distribution |
|
The offering is made by the selling shareholders named in this
prospectus, to the extent they sell any shares of common stock.
Sales may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions, at fixed or negotiated prices. See Plan of
Distribution. |
|
Risk factors |
|
An investment in our common stock is subject to risk. Please
read Risk Factors and the other information included
in this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should
consider before deciding to invest in our common stock. |
7
Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock is speculative in nature and
involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider
the following risks and the other information in this prospectus
before investing.
Risk Factors Relating to Our Business
|
|
|
Our current revenues are minimal and not sufficient to
support our operations. If we are unable to raise additional
financing, we may not be able to carry out our long-term
plans. |
The wells that we have drilled began producing CBM for sale only
in January 2005, and the amount of CBM gas that we are currently
selling is not significant. We are not currently generating net
income or positive cash flow from operations. In addition, it is
possible that, due to ongoing litigation with respect to our CBM
acreage rights at our Southern Illinois Basin Project, we may
lose all of our productive wells existing as of May 1,
2006. Even if we achieve increased revenues and positive cash
flow from operations in the future, we anticipate increased
exploration, development and other capital expenditures as we
continue to explore and develop our CBM rights. Therefore, in
order to achieve our long-term plans and maintain a viable
business, we will need to raise additional financing. If we are
unable to raise additional financing, we will likely be unable
to carry out our long-term plans, which would negatively impact
the value of your investment in us.
Even if we continue to demonstrate the commercial viability of
CBM wells in the Illinois Basin, we may encounter difficulty in
raising additional capital on favorable terms. Interest rates
and investor expectations and demands are subject to change, and
any change in these areas could have a negative effect on the
financing terms that we are able to obtain. In addition, the
terms of any new financing may adversely affect your investment.
If we issue preferred stock or additional common stock,
institutional investors may negotiate terms equal to or more
favorable than market prices or the terms of our prior
offerings, resulting in dilution to existing shareholders. Debt
financing could result in the lenders having a claim to assets
prior to the rights of our shareholders, divert cash flow to
service the debt, and restrict operations through compliance
with lenders restrictions. Any such terms could adversely
affect the return that you receive on your investment in us.
|
|
|
We have incurred significant operating losses since our
inception and may not achieve profitability in the
future. |
We have experienced significant operating losses and negative
cash flow from operations since our inception, and we currently
have an accumulated deficit. During our fiscal year ended
July 31, 2005, we incurred a net loss of $5,396,351. During
the six-month period ended January 31, 2006, we incurred a
net loss of $2,047,487. As of January 31, 2006, we have an
accumulated deficit of $20,404,770. We anticipate that our
operating costs and capital expenditures will continue to grow
as we continue to explore and develop our CBM rights. Even if we
significantly grow our revenues from the sale of CBM, it is
possible that our increased operating costs and capital
expenditures will prevent us from generating net income. In
addition, in the future we could incur greater than expected
drilling or other operating expenses, we could discover that our
properties are not commercially viable, or gas prices could
decline significantly. Any of these events would have a
significantly negative impact on our ability to generate net
income. If we are unable to achieve profitability at any time in
the near future, the value of your investment in us could be
adversely affected.
|
|
|
CBM exploration is speculative in nature and may not
result in operating revenues or profits. |
The Illinois Basin is largely untested for commercial CBM
production. In addition, we have evaluated the CBM potential in
only a relatively small part of our acreage rights. Only an
extended production history of the wells that we drill will
indicate whether our wells will be commercially productive over
the long-term. We could determine in the future that the
Illinois Basin does not contain enough CBM for commercially
viable operations, or that the conditions in the Illinois Basin
are not conducive for commercially viable operations. Any such
determination would have a significant negative effect on your
investment in us.
Future wells that we drill may not be successful, due to low CBM
content in the coal, low permeability, unusually low or high
water quantities, low water quality, incorrect forecasts or
other factors. We cannot be
8
sure that completed wells will produce enough CBM to recover our
capital investments. We can provide no assurance that the
exploration and development of our projects will occur as
scheduled, or that actual results will be in line with
expectations.
The cost of drilling, completing and operating wells is often
uncertain. Factors that can delay or prevent drilling
operations, include:
|
|
|
|
|
unexpected drilling conditions; |
|
|
|
pressure or irregularities in formations; |
|
|
|
equipment failures or accidents; |
|
|
|
shortages or delays in the availability of drilling rigs or the
delivery of equipment; |
|
|
|
the inability to hire personnel or engage other third parties
for drilling and completion services; |
|
|
|
the inability to obtain regulatory approvals to drill CBM wells
where planned; |
|
|
|
adverse weather; and |
|
|
|
the inability to sell CBM production, due to the loss of access
to the pipelines into which CBM production is sold or an
oversupply of natural gas in the market. |
Wells on some projects could require substantial dewatering
ahead of production, which could delay the start of production
by months and increase completion costs. Continued high volume
water pumping during production would increase operating costs.
If we experience significant setbacks in drilling, completing
and operating wells, or significantly increased costs due to
unexpected conditions, our financial performance will suffer.
|
|
|
We could experience delays in securing drilling equipment
and crews, which would cause us to fail to meet our drilling
plans and negatively impact our operations. |
We utilize drilling contractors to perform all of the drilling
on our projects. We maintain a limited number of supervisory and
field personnel to oversee drilling and production operations.
Our plans to drill additional wells are determined in large part
by the anticipated availability of acceptable drilling equipment
and crews. We do not currently have any contractual commitments
that ensure we will have adequate drilling equipment or crews to
achieve our drilling plans. If our anticipated levels of
drilling equipment are not made available to us, we will have to
modify our drilling plans, which would cause us to fail to meet
our drilling plan and negatively impact our operations. If we
cannot meet our drilling plans, the value of your investment in
us may decline.
|
|
|
We could lose significant portions of our CBM acreage
rights and all of our existing productive wells if we do not
place into production a sufficient number of CBM wells. |
The primary terms of the lease agreements pursuant to which we
hold, or upon the exercise of options will hold, our CBM acreage
rights have expired or will expire between April 2006 and April
2026, after which we will continue to hold our acreage rights
only to the extent that we are producing CBM from the covered
acreage. Under some of these leases, the wells that we place
into production must produce minimum royalties to the lessor
and, in some cases, we will retain only limited acreage rights
for each CBM well that we place into production. In addition,
under our farm-out agreement with Addington Exploration, LLC,
which covers 41,253 acres in the Northern Illinois Basin
Project and 22,997 acres in the Western Illinois Basin
Project, we earn CBM acreage rights only when we place CBM wells
into production. For each well that we place into production, we
will receive only a portion of the acreage rights covered by the
agreement. As of May 1, 2006, we have 77 productive wells,
17 shut-in wells and 13 wells that have been drilled but
are not in production, including three test wells. Since all of
our productive wells existing as of May 1, 2006 are located
at our Southern Illinois Basin Project, we could lose all of our
productive wells in connection with our ongoing litigation. For
us to maintain all of our CBM acreage rights beyond the primary
terms of our lease and farm-out agreements, we will be required
to significantly expand our drilling operations or renegotiate
the terms of
9
these agreements. If we are unable to retain our CBM acreage
rights, our growth potential will be negatively impacted, which
could cause the value of your investment in us to decline.
We are currently subject to litigation with respect to the lease
agreement covering the 43,000 acres of CBM rights at our
Southern Illinois Basin Project, where currently all of our
productive wells are located. The lease has a primary term that
extended until April 3, 2006. After the primary term, the
lease provides that it shall extend as to a particular tract so
long as CBM is being produced from such tract providing a
royalty payment of not less than $1.00 per acre per month;
provided that, after the primary term, in the event the
aggregate royalties do not exceed $42,000 in any month, the
lease shall terminate. The litigation will determine whether we
have satisfied these and related requirements to extend the
lease. Although under these provisions of the lease agreement we
believe the lease should extend at least as to certain acreage
under the lease, it is possible that the court will not agree
with our interpretation of these provisions. As a result, we
could lose all of our acreage rights and productive wells at our
Southern Illinois Basin Project. For more information about the
litigation relating to our Southern Illinois Basin Project, see
the section of the Summary entitled Litigation Relating to
Our CBM Rights at Our Southern Illinois Basin Project. It
is also possible that we will incur significant legal fees in
pursuing this litigation and defending against the counterclaims.
|
|
|
We could encounter strong competition for properties in
the Illinois Basin. |
The natural gas industry is highly competitive. We currently
hold substantial CBM acreage rights in the Illinois Basin, but
other companies may become active in the area. New entrants
could have greater financial and technological resources, which
might enable them to outbid us on new acreage or obtain
leaseholds, option agreements or farm-out agreements for which
we currently have agreements in place when our rights expire or
lapse. Any loss of acreage would negatively impact the potential
scope of our operations, which would likely have a negative
impact on the value of your investment in us.
|
|
|
Because approximately 77% of our CBM acreage rights are
inferior to coal mining rights covering the same properties, our
affected operations could be displaced by coal mining
operations, which would negatively impact our operations. |
Under most of the agreements pursuant to which we hold our CBM
acreage rights, our right to drill for and produce CBM is
expressly subject to the mining of coal on the acreage covered
by the agreement. Approximately 77% of our acreage rights are
subject to superior coal mining rights. We may not interfere
with any existing coal mining operations and, under certain
circumstances, may be required to cease drilling in locations
where coal mining operations will be undertaken. These superior
coal rights may restrict the locations where we can drill CBM
wells on our projects and may cause some of our CBM operations
to be displaced by coal operations. Any such displacement could
cover a significant portion of our CBM acreage rights. If we
face significant restrictions on where we can drill our CBM
wells or a significant number of our CBM wells are displaced by
coal mining operations, our operations and financial performance
will be negatively impacted.
|
|
|
The CBM rights that we have acquired under lease and
option agreements are subject to a number of uncertainties,
which, when resolved, could cause us to lose some of our CBM
rights. |
Under the terms of the lease and option agreements pursuant to
which we have acquired our CBM rights, we are entitled to all of
the CBM rights held by our lessors in the counties covered by
these agreements. However, we face a number of uncertainties
regarding what rights our lessors hold.
The issue of who owns CBM gas, as between the coal rights owner
and the oil and gas rights owner, is uncertain in Illinois.
Although the appellate court in Illinois for the district where
most of our acreage rights are situated has ruled that CBM gas
is owned by the coal rights owner, the issue has not been
addressed by the highest court in Illinois. We believe, based on
advice from legal counsel, that under Illinois law ownership
will ultimately be found to lie with the coal rights owner.
Based on this advice, we generally secure CBM rights from the
coal owners. Some of the lessors from which we have acquired CBM
rights may hold both the coal rights and the oil and gas rights
for the applicable properties, but in some cases it is not
certain that these
10
lessors also hold the oil and gas rights. If any litigation in
Illinois concludes that CBM rights lie with the oil and gas
owner, we could lose some of our CBM rights.
In addition, in some cases the extent of the coal and/or oil and
gas rights held by our lessors is uncertain. We conducted no
title or deed examinations prior to executing our lease and
option agreements, and our lessors made no warranties as to the
acreage or rights covered by the agreements. Although we have
now conducted title and deed examinations covering much of the
CBM properties under our leases, these examinations are ongoing
at all of our projects. There can be no assurance that our
rights under our lease and option agreements include all of the
acreage and rights identified in the agreements until title
examinations on all of the underlying properties have been
completed.
If any of these uncertainties is resolved unfavorably to us, we
could lose some of our CBM acreage rights. Any loss of our CBM
acreage rights would negatively impact our growth potential,
which could cause the value of your investment in us to decline.
|
|
|
We could incur significant costs in connection with
disputes over surface rights, which would have a negative impact
on our financial performance. |
We have been subject to legal complaints regarding the extent of
the surface rights that derive from our CBM rights. On occasion,
the owners of properties that are adjacent to our drilling
locations have challenged our right to cross their property in
accessing our drilling locations and our right to lay gas and
water flow lines across their property. The extent of our rights
in respect of these issues is uncertain in Illinois. If disputes
regarding our surface rights are not resolved in our favor, we
may be required to acquire surface rights or access our drilling
locations and lay gas and water flow lines in inefficient ways,
which would cause us to incur increased operating costs. In
addition, we could incur significant costs in legal disputes
over our surface rights. During our fiscal year ended
July 31, 2005, we incurred approximately $303,000 in legal
fees in connection with legal disputes over surface rights. We
incurred approximately $7,500 in legal fees in connection with
such disputes for the six-month period ended January 31,
2006. If for any reason these operating or legal costs increase
significantly, our financial performance will suffer.
|
|
|
We have granted BHP Billiton a right of first refusal to
acquire us, which could deter other potential acquirors from
seeking to acquire us. |
In connection with the Technical Services Agreement that we
entered into on March 31, 2005 with BHP Petroleum
(Exploration) Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of BHP Billiton,
we granted BHP a right of first refusal to acquire us. Before we
can extend or accept an offer for any third party to acquire a
majority of our stock or assets, we must permit BHP to acquire
the same stock or assets on the terms proposed to be extended to
or accepted from the third party. The right of first refusal
expires on September 30, 2006. We also agreed to issue BHP
4.0 million stock appreciation rights, which may be
exercised by BHP only if it acquires us. The stock appreciation
rights will have a value equal to the number of rights
multiplied by the difference between the market price of our
common stock on the date of exercise and the market price on
March 31, 2005 (which was CAD$2.18 per share). We are
required to issue BHP an additional 2.0 million stock
appreciation rights if BHP elects to extend the term of the
Technical Services Agreement for an additional six-month period.
BHPs right of first refusal and related stock appreciation
rights may deter other potential acquirors from seeking to
acquire us. A potential acquiror might decide that it does not
wish to expend its time and resources reviewing and negotiating
an acquisition with us if BHP can thwart the transaction by
exercising its right of first refusal. If potential acquirors
are deterred from considering an acquisition of us, we may not
receive attractive acquisition offers, which might have a
negative effect on the value of your investment in us.
|
|
|
We could incur substantial costs to comply with
environmental regulations, and our failure to comply with
environmental regulations could result in significant fines
and/or penalties, either of which could adversely affect our
operations. |
Our operations are subject to federal, state and local
environmental laws and regulations. Although we believe that our
operations to date have been conducted in compliance with these
regulations, new more
11
restrictive laws or regulations could be adopted, which could
force us to expend significant resources to comply with the new
requirements. Because CBM exploration is relatively new in the
Illinois Basin, the governmental agencies that regulate us,
including the Illinois Department of Natural Resources
Office of Mines and Minerals, may determine that new laws and
regulations are required to govern the growing industry. CBM
operations are technologically different from conventional oil
and gas operations, and these agencies may determine that
existing regulations, which are generally focused on the oil and
gas industry, are not sufficient for CBM operations. As CBM
activity increases in the Illinois Basin, unexpected regulatory
issues may develop, which could impose additional compliance
costs on us. Any significant increase in compliance costs could
have a negative impact on our results of operations and could
prevent our properties from being commercially viable.
|
|
|
The occurrence of a significant adverse event that is not
covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition. |
The exploration for, development and production of CBM involves
a variety of operating risks, including the possibility of fire,
explosion and blow-out from abnormal formation pressure. It is
not always possible to fully insure against such risks. An
uninsured or underinsured loss could adversely impact our
financial condition.
|
|
|
Our ability to attain profitable operations could be
negatively impacted by any decline in natural gas prices. |
Our ability to grow our revenues, and ultimately attain
profitable operations, will depend not only on our ability to
place CBM wells into production but on the market for natural
gas. Natural gas prices have historically been volatile, and
they are likely to continue to be volatile in the future. If
natural gas prices decline significantly for extended periods of
time, the CBM wells that we place into production may not be
commercially viable and we might not be able to generate enough
revenues to reach profitable operations. Our failure to reach
profitable operations will negatively affect the value of your
investment in us.
|
|
|
We will incur increased costs as a result of registering
in the United States. |
In December 2005, we became subject to the reporting
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act). As an SEC registrant, we will incur
significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not
incur as a Canadian public company. We will incur costs
associated with complying with the rules and regulations of the
SEC, including those adopted under the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. We currently estimate that these costs will total
approximately $1.0 million on an annual basis. In addition,
we will continue to be subject to the securities laws and
reporting requirements of the British Columbia Securities
Commission and the Alberta Securities Commission. These dual
reporting obligations will result in increased compliance costs,
which could adversely affect our financial performance.
In addition, being subject to SEC regulation and the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act may
make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer
liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced
policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs
to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be
more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified
individuals to serve on our board of directors or as executive
officers.
Risks Relating to this Offering
|
|
|
You will experience dilution of your ownership interest if
we issue additional equity in the future. |
We are authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of common
stock. As of May 1, 2006, 70,812,540 shares of our
common stock are issued and outstanding, 5,311,600 shares
of our common stock are issuable upon exercise of warrants held
by third parties, and 1,872,812 shares of our common stock
are issuable upon exercise of options held by our officers,
directors, employees and others. We expect that we may issue
additional shares of our capital stock in the future to raise
funds in support of our operations. We may also issue additional
shares of capital stock in connection with hiring personnel,
joint venture arrangements or other
12
strategic transactions. The issuance of any such shares of
capital stock in the future will dilute your ownership interest
in the company.
|
|
|
There is no significant market for our common stock, which
could prevent you from selling your common stock at acceptable
prices or at all. |
Our common stock is currently traded on the American Stock
Exchange. There is not a substantial amount of trading in our
common stock on the American Stock Exchange. We are not certain
that a more active trading market in the stock will develop, or
that it will be sustained if it does develop. Because the market
for our common stock is limited and is likely to remain limited
in the near future, you may not be able to sell your common
stock at acceptable prices or at all.
The American Stock Exchange has adopted standards under which it
will normally give consideration to removing a security from
listing. However, the standards in no way limit the Exchange and
it may at any time, in view of the circumstances in each case,
remove a security from listing when in its opinion such security
is unsuitable for continued trading on the Exchange. These
standards include, but are not limited to, consideration of
(a) a companys financial condition and/or operating
results; (b) whether the company has sold or otherwise
disposed of its principal operating assets, ceased to be an
operating company or discontinued a substantial portion of its
operations; or (c) whether a companys common stock
sells for a substantial period of time at a low price per share.
It is possible that the Exchange could make a determination in
the future that our stock is unsuitable for continued trading on
the Exchange. If our stock is delisted from the Exchange, it
will likely be difficult to effect sales of our stock.
|
|
|
The trading price of our common stock may be volatile, and
resales under this prospectus may impact prices and
liquidity. |
The trading price of our common stock has fluctuated widely and
in the future may be subject to similar fluctuations. The
trading price may be affected by a number of factors, including
the risk factors described in this prospectus, developments in
our prospects, our future results of operations and our future
financial condition. In addition, the sale of a substantial
number of shares of our common stock under this prospectus may
depress share prices. In recent years, broad stock market
indices, in general, and smaller capitalization companies, in
particular, have experienced substantial price fluctuations. In
a volatile market, we may experience wide fluctuations in the
market price of our common stock, and this could adversely
impact your investment in us.
13
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements contained in this prospectus, including
statements containing the words believes,
anticipates, expects,
intends, plans, should,
may, might, continue and
estimate and similar words, constitute
forward-looking statements under the federal securities laws.
These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements, or the conditions in our
industry, on our properties or in the Illinois Basin, to be
materially different from any future results, performance,
achievements or conditions expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that could cause
actual results or conditions to differ materially from our
expectations include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
failure to accurately forecast operating and capital
expenditures and capital needs due to rising costs or different
drilling or production conditions in the field; |
|
|
|
the inability to attract or retain qualified personnel with the
requisite CBM or other experience; |
|
|
|
unexpected economic and market conditions, in the general
economy or the market for natural gas; and |
|
|
|
the other factors discussed in this prospectus under the heading
Risk Factors and elsewhere. |
Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance
on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking
statements in this prospectus speak only as of the date of this
prospectus. You should assume that the information contained in
this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front
cover of this prospectus. Our business, financial condition,
results of operations or prospects may have changed since that
date. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor the resale of
our common stock means that information contained in this
prospectus is correct after the date of this prospectus. Except
as otherwise required by applicable law, we undertake no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, the risk factors or other information described in
this prospectus, whether as a result of new information, future
events, changed circumstances or any other reason after the date
of this prospectus.
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not authorized any other person to provide
you with information that is different from or in addition to
that contained in this prospectus. If anyone provides you with
different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it.
Use of Proceeds
We will not receive any proceeds from sales of our common stock
by the selling shareholders pursuant to this prospectus. We will
receive up to $9,075,500 from the exercise of warrants that are
exercisable for common stock covered by this prospectus. These
proceeds will be used to fund our plan of operations for the
12-month period ending April 30, 2007 and for working
capital and general corporate purposes.
14
Market for Our Common Stock
Our common stock is currently traded on the American Stock
Exchange under the symbol BPG. Prior to
December 13, 2005, our common stock was traded on the
TSX Venture Exchange in Vancouver, British Columbia under
the symbol BPR. The following table sets forth the
high and low sales prices per share, in U.S. dollars, as
reported by the American Stock Exchange or the TSX Venture
Exchange, during each of our quarterly periods ending in our
2004 and 2005 fiscal years and the first three quarters of our
current fiscal year. Prices reported on the TSX Venture Exchange
in Canadian dollars have been converted to U.S. dollars based on
exchange rates in effect on the applicable date. The last sales
price reported on the American Stock Exchange on May 1,
2006 was $1.46.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fiscal Year Ended July 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended October 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
Quarter ended January 31, 2004
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
Quarter ended April 30, 2004
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
Quarter ended July 31, 2004
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
Fiscal Year Ended July 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended October 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
Quarter ended January 31, 2005
|
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
Quarter ended April 30, 2005
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
Quarter ended July 31, 2005
|
|
|
1.96 |
|
|
|
1.37 |
|
Fiscal Year Ended July 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended October 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
Quarter ended January 31, 2006
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
1.92 |
|
|
Quarter ended April 30, 2006
|
|
|
3.60 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
As of May 1, 2006, we had 70,812,540 shares of our
common stock outstanding, which were held by approximately
900 shareholders of record. The transfer agent and
registrar for our common stock is Pacific Corporate Trust,
Vancouver, British Columbia. In addition to our outstanding
shares of common stock, as of May 1, 2006, we have reserved
1,872,812 shares of our common stock for issuance upon the
exercise of outstanding stock options and 5,311,600 shares
of our common stock for issuance upon the exercise of
outstanding warrants.
Our outstanding shares of common stock may not be sold in the
United States other than in compliance with the registration
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities
Act) or pursuant to Rule 144 or another exemption
from such registration requirements.
Dividend Policy
We have not paid any cash dividends to date, and currently have
no intention of paying any cash dividends on our common stock in
the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of dividends
is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors. The
timing, amount and form of dividends, if any, will depend on our
results of operations, financial condition and cash requirements.
15
Capitalization
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and
our capitalization as of January 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
January 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
26,623,707 |
|
|
Capitalization:
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes payable(1)
|
|
|
333,839 |
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized,
of which 64,378,087 shares issued and outstanding (actual)
|
|
|
64,573,394 |
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
4,891,266 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(20,404,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
49,059,890 |
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
49,393,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Long-term notes payable (including current portion) consists of
notes used to finance vehicles and equipment. The notes are
secured by the underlying vehicles and equipment. |
On September 26, 2005, we completed a private placement of
our common stock to a small number of institutional buyers. We
issued 18,000,000 shares of our common stock at a per share
price of CAD$2.00 (approximately USD$1.69), resulting in gross
proceeds to us of approximately $30.5 million. After the
payment of fees and expenses, the net proceeds to us from the
private placement was approximately $28.0 million.
Our capitalization may change significantly in the near future,
as we fund our plan of operations and if we issue additional
shares of capital stock or incur indebtedness to fund our future
plans of operations. See the section of this prospectus entitled
Business Plan of Operations for the 12-Month
Period Ending April 30, 2007.
16
Selected Historical Financial Data
The following sets forth our selected historical financial data
as of July 31, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and for our
five fiscal years then ended, which has been derived from our
financial statements for those years, and as of January 31,
2006 and for the six months ended January 31, 2006 and
2005, which were derived from our unaudited financial statements
for those periods. Our financial statements as of July 31,
2005 and for our fiscal year ended July 31, 2005 and
related notes thereto have been audited by Meaden & Moore,
Ltd., an independent registered public accounting firm. Our
financial statements as of July 31, 2004 and 2003 and for
our fiscal years ended July 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and
related notes thereto have been audited by De Visser Gray, an
independent registered public accounting firm. The unaudited
financial statements as of January 31, 2006 and for the six
months ended January 31, 2006 and 2005, in our opinion,
have been prepared on the same basis as our audited financial
statements, and include all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of this
information.
The period-to-period comparability of the financial data shown
below is materially affected by our acquisition of Methane
Management, Inc. in August 2001 and our consolidation of 100% of
the Southern Illinois Basin Project within BPI in connection
with that acquisition.
This information should be read together with the section of
this prospectus entitled Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and our financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended January 31, | |
|
For the Year Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas sales(1)
|
|
$ |
537,505 |
|
|
$ |
6,341 |
|
|
$ |
117,835 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
397,586 |
|
|
|
2,200,777 |
|
|
|
3,344,738 |
|
|
|
193,796 |
|
|
|
515,286 |
|
|
|
439,860 |
|
|
|
256,684 |
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,047,487 |
) |
|
|
(3,218,907 |
) |
|
|
(6,120,821 |
) |
|
|
(1,091,227 |
) |
|
|
(1,109,218 |
) |
|
|
(1,245,853 |
) |
|
|
(184,475 |
) |
Net loss
|
|
|
(2,047,487 |
) |
|
|
(2,874,190 |
) |
|
|
(5,396,351 |
) |
|
|
(793,116 |
) |
|
|
(934,305 |
) |
|
|
(1,129,209 |
) |
|
|
(184,475 |
) |
Net loss per common share
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
57,889,094 |
|
|
|
32,018,325 |
|
|
|
37,665,019 |
|
|
|
25,007,237 |
|
|
|
21,485,381 |
|
|
|
18,300,433 |
|
|
|
14,588,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
As of July 31, | |
|
|
January 31, | |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
50,998,590 |
|
|
$ |
23,527,712 |
|
|
$ |
9,382,977 |
|
|
$ |
6,328,178 |
|
|
$ |
5,418,158 |
|
|
$ |
1,970,104 |
|
Long-term notes payable (including
current maturities)
|
|
|
333,839 |
|
|
|
549,822 |
|
|
|
462,177 |
|
|
|
378,174 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Gas sales commenced in January 2005. All of our productive wells
existing as of May 1, 2006 are located at our Southern
Illinois Basin Project. Since our Southern Illinois Basin
Project is currently subject to litigation, we may lose our
right to continue to operate and produce CBM from all of these
productive wells. |
17
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and
Results of Operations
The discussion and analysis that follows should be read together
with the accompanying financial statements and notes related
thereto that are included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview and Outlook
We are an independent energy company incorporated in British
Columbia, Canada and primarily engaged, through our wholly owned
U.S. subsidiary, BPI Energy, Inc., in the exploration for
and development of coalbed methane (CBM). Our
exploration and development efforts are concentrated in the
Illinois Basin (the Basin). Our Canadian activities
are limited to administrative reporting obligations to the
province of British Columbia and regulatory reporting to the
British Columbia Securities Commission. As of May 1, 2006,
we owned or controlled CBM rights, through mineral leases,
options to acquire mineral leases, and a farm-out agreement,
covering 530,435 total acres in the Basin (including our 43,000
acre Southern Illinois Basin Project, where our acreage rights
are currently subject to litigation). A substantial majority of
the acreage under our control was undeveloped as of May 1,
2006.
Although we capitalize exploration costs, we have historically
experienced significant losses. The primary costs that generated
these losses were compensation-related expenses and general and
administrative expenses. We commenced CBM sales from our first
producing wells in January 2005, generating $117,835 in gas
sales during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005. During
the six months ended January 31, 2006, we generated gas
sales of $537,505. Since our Southern Illinois Basin Project is
currently subject to litigation, we may lose our right to
continue to operate and produce CBM from all of our productive
wells existing as of May 1, 2006. During the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2004 and for the preceding fiscal year we
had no revenues. Our focus during those years was the
acquisition of CBM rights and exploration for CBM in the
Illinois Basin. Future revenues are primarily dependent on our
ability to produce and sell CBM.
We are not currently generating net income or positive cash flow
from operations. Even if we achieve increased revenues and
positive cash flow from operations in the future, we anticipate
increased exploration, development and other capital
expenditures as we continue to explore and develop our mineral
rights.
Our capital expenditure budget for the 12-month period ending
April 30, 2007 totals approximately $30.0 million.
This anticipates drilling 115 vertical wells, three horizontal
wells and five test wells throughout the Basin. In addition,
this amount includes installing a gathering system and
processing yard to handle the anticipated production from the
wells that we plan to drill at our Northern Illinois Basin
Project. Our current cash balance is insufficient to fully fund
our forecasted capital expenditures and net cash used by
operating activities over the 12-month period ending
April 30, 2007. Although management has no specific
agreements in place to raise the additional capital necessary to
fund our plan of operations and forecasted capital expenditures,
management plans to raise the additional required capital
through a combination of additional stock sales, the issuance of
debt securities, borrowing and/or entering into joint ventures.
However, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to
raise the additional required capital to meet our plan or if we
are able to raise the funds that it will be on terms similar to
past financings.
Several factors, over which we have little or no control, could
impact our future economic success. These factors include
natural gas prices, limitations imposed by the terms and
conditions of our lease agreements, the extent of our rights
under mineral leases as determined by further title
investigation, possible court rulings concerning our property
interests in CBM, availability of drilling rigs, operating
costs, and environmental and other regulatory matters. In our
planning process, we have attempted to address these issues by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
negotiating to obtain leases that grant us the broadest possible
rights to CBM for any given tract of land; |
|
|
|
|
conducting ongoing title reviews of existing mineral interests; |
18
|
|
|
|
|
where possible, negotiating and securing long-term service
company commitments to insure availability of equipment and
services; and |
|
|
|
|
attempting to create a low cost structure in order to reduce our
vulnerability to many of these factors. |
|
From early 2002 until 2005, our strategic focus was on building
our acreage footprint in the Basin. BPI was built around the
primary strategic objective of acquiring CBM rights in the
Basin. As we began accumulating CBM rights we began testing our
acreage to determine its CBM potential. Having accumulated CBM
rights to just over 530,000 acres in the Basin (including
our 43,000 acre Southern Illinois Basin Project, where our
acreage rights are currently subject to litigation) and
conducting extensive testing at our Southern Illinois Basin
Project, we embarked (in late 2004) on a pilot production
program at our Southern Illinois Basin Project. Encouraged by
the results, we expanded our drilling and production activities
and began installing the infrastructure necessary to enable us
to begin sales of CBM at our Southern Illinois Basin Project.
As our drilling and production operations have grown, we have
not abandoned our goal of adding additional acreage and mineral
rights; however, we have new additional goals and we realize
that we must build and add to our organization in other critical
areas as well. These new goals require us to bring in additional
capital, resources and people with the technical and managerial
expertise to assist us in achieving these goals. These
additional goals include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
developing the in-house capabilities necessary to enable us to
meet our regulatory and reporting obligations to various
regulatory agencies, constituencies and our shareholders; |
|
|
|
|
|
raise the capital necessary to achieve our plans and
goals; and |
|
|
|
|
|
transition BPI from a company focused primarily on the
acquisition of mineral rights to a company focused on producing
CBM. |
|
We have registered our stock with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission and our stock is now listed on the American
Stock Exchange. These developments brought with them new and
additional regulatory and reporting obligations, which meant we
needed the personnel and resources to meet these obligations. We
began addressing this aspect of our business when we moved our
corporate headquarters to the United States from Vancouver, B.C.
and brought in our CFO and General Counsel, George Zilich, and
our controller, Randy Elkins, early in 2005. We will continue to
add resources as necessary to meet our obligations in this area.
In September 2005 we sold 18,000,000 shares of our common
stock to a limited number of institutional investors and brought
in approximately $28 million of new capital.
We have stopped drilling new wells at our Southern Illinois
Basin Project due to a dispute with our lessors and the coal
owners. We have initiated a lawsuit in federal court in order to
preserve our rights under the lease covering our Southern
Illinois Basin Project. For more information about the
litigation relating to our Southern Illinois Basin Project, see
the section of the Summary entitled Litigation Relating to
Our CBM Rights at Our Southern Illinois Basin Project. As
of May 1, 2006, we had 77 wells that were in production, 17
shut-in wells and 13 wells that were drilled but not yet in
production. All of our productive wells are on our Southern
Illinois Basin Project.
In April 2006, we began our second development front by
beginning drilling on 10 pilot development wells at our Northern
Illinois Basin Project. Our CBM rights in the Northern Illinois
Basin Project cover 351,487 acres in Montgomery, Shelby,
Christian, Fayette and Macoupin counties in Illinois, which are
located in the north central part of the Basin. The coal seams
at our Northern Illinois Basin Project are some of the thickest
found in the Basin, with some seams as thick as 10 feet. We
believe there are up to nine seams that could be commercially
viable.
Until recently, we have had limited in-house CBM operating and
engineering resources. As a result, in the initial stages of our
drilling and production activities, we have utilized outside
contractors to perform most of these activities. We have focused
on increasing our internal engineering and operating resources
as a
19
primary goal of BPI over the coming years. In April 2006, we
hired James Craddock as our Senior Vice President of Operations.
Mr. Craddock is an engineer with extensive experience in
CBM drilling and operations. We are continuing our efforts to
add to our operating team individuals with the technical skills
we believe are necessary to help BPI become a world
class CBM drilling and production company. This will take
time, but we believe it is necessary in order to realize the
value of the CBM assets we have assembled.
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical Accounting Policies
and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of
these financial statements requires our management to make
estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an
ongoing basis, we evaluate the accounting policies and estimates
that we use to prepare financial statements. We base our
estimates on historical experience and assumptions believed to
be reasonable under current facts and circumstances. Actual
amounts and results could differ from these estimates used by
management.
Certain accounting policies that require significant management
estimates and are deemed critical to our results of operations
or financial position are discussed below. Our management
reviews our critical accounting policies with the Audit
Committee of our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
Accounting for CBM Projects |
We follow the full cost method of accounting for CBM operations.
Under this method, all costs associated with the acquisition of,
exploration for and development of gas reserves are capitalized
in cost centers on a country-by-country basis (currently we have
one cost center, the United States). Such costs include lease
acquisition costs, geological and geophysical studies, carrying
charges on non-producing properties, costs of drilling both
productive and non-productive wells, and overhead expenses
directly related to these activities. Internal costs associated
with CBM activities that are not directly attributable to
acquisition, exploration or development activities are expensed
as incurred.
Unevaluated CBM properties and major development projects are
excluded from amortization until a determination of whether
proved reserves can be assigned to the properties or impairment
occurs. Unevaluated properties are assessed at least annually to
ascertain whether an impairment occurs. Sales or dispositions of
properties are credited to their respective cost centers and a
gain or loss is recognized when all the properties in a cost
center have been disposed of, unless such sale or disposition
significantly alters the relationship between capitalized costs
and proved reserves attributable to the cost center.
Capitalized costs of proved CBM properties, including estimated
future costs to develop the reserves and estimated abandonment
cost, net of salvage, are amortized on the units-of-production
method using estimates of proved reserves.
A ceiling test is applied to a cost center by comparing the net
capitalized costs, less related deferred income taxes, to the
estimated future net revenues from production of proved
reserves, discounted at 10%, plus the costs of unproved
properties net of impairment. Any excess capitalized costs are
written-off in the current year. The calculation of future net
revenues is based upon prices, costs and regulations in effect
at each year end.
In general, we determine if a property is impaired if one or
more of the following conditions exist:
|
|
|
|
|
there are no firm plans for further drilling on the unproved
property; |
|
|
|
negative results were obtained from studies of the unproved
property; |
|
|
|
negative results were obtained from studies conducted in the
vicinity of the unproved property; or |
|
|
|
the remaining term of the unproved property does not allow
sufficient time for further studies or drilling. |
20
Our estimate of proved reserves is based on the quantities of
gas that engineering and geological analysis demonstrate, with
reasonable certainty, to be recoverable from established
reservoirs in the future under current operating and economic
parameters. Reserves and their relation to estimated future net
cash flows impact our depletion and impairment calculations. As
a result, adjustments to depletion and impairment are made
concurrently with changes to reserve estimates. Our reserve
estimates and the projected cash flows are derived from a report
prepared by an independent engineering firm, in accordance with
SEC guidelines, based in part on data provided by us. The
accuracy of our reserve estimates depends in part on the quality
and quantity of available data, the interpretation of that data,
the accuracy of various mandated economic assumptions, and the
judgments of the individuals preparing the estimates.
Prior to December 13, 2005 we had a stock-based
compensation plan (the Incentive Stock Option Plan)
under which stock options were issued to directors, officers and
employees as determined by the Board of Directors and subject to
the provisions of the Incentive Stock Option Plan. We recognized
compensation expense under the Incentive Stock Option Plan in
accordance with the fair value provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, which permits the
recognition of expense for stock-based compensation based on the
fair value of the stock option on the measurement date.
The fair value of stock options granted under the Incentive
Stock Option Plan was estimated using the Black-Scholes Option
Pricing Model. Option pricing models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions, particularly as to the expected price
volatility of our stock. Changes in these assumptions can
materially affect the fair value estimate, and therefore it is
our view that the existing models do not necessarily provide a
single reliable measure of the fair value of our stock option
grants.
The Incentive Stock Option Plan permitted options to be issued
with exercise prices at a discount to the market price of our
common stock on the day prior to the date of grant. However, the
majority of all stock options issued under the Incentive Stock
Option Plan were issued with exercise prices equal to the quoted
market price of the stock on the date of grant. Options granted
under the Incentive Stock Option Plan vested immediately and
were exercisable over a period not exceeding five years.
On December 13, 2005, our shareholders approved the BPI
Energy Holdings, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Stock Plan (the Omnibus
Stock Plan) and it became effective on that date. The
Omnibus Stock Plan replaces the Incentive Stock Option Plan
under which stock options were previously granted. The Omnibus
Stock Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors (the Committee) and will
remain in effect for five years. All employees and Directors of
the Company and its subsidiaries, and all consultants or agents
of the Company designated by the Committee, are eligible to
participate in the Omnibus Stock Plan. The Committee has
authority to: grant awards; select the participants who will
receive awards; determine the terms, conditions, vesting periods
and restrictions applicable to the awards; determine how the
exercise price is to be paid; modify or replace outstanding
awards within the limits of the Omnibus Stock Plan; accelerate
the date on which awards become exercisable; waive the
restrictions and conditions applicable to awards; and establish
rules governing the Omnibus Stock Plan.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment. This Statement revises
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
SFAS No. 123(R) focuses primarily on the accounting
for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in
share-based payment transactions. The key provision of
SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to record
share-based payment transactions as compensation expense at fair
market value based on the grant-date fair value of those awards.
Previously under SFAS No. 123, companies had the option of
either recording expense based on the fair value of stock
options granted or continuing to account for stock-based
compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB
No. 25.
We adopted SFAS No. 123(R), using the
modified-prospective method, effective August 1, 2005.
Since August 1, 2001, we have followed the fair value
provisions of SFAS 123 and have recorded all share-based
21
payment transactions as compensation expense at fair market
value based on the grant-date fair value of those awards. In
addition, all stock options granted prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R) vested immediately on the date of grant
and, thus, there was no unvested portion of previous stock
option grants that vested subsequent to the adoption of SFAS
No. 123(R). Therefore, SFAS No. 123(R) had no impact
on our consolidated financial position or results of operations
for the quarter and six months ended January 31, 2006. No
stock options have been issued under the Omnibus Stock Plan.
All revenue from gas sales is recognized after the gas is
produced and delivery takes place. We currently sell all of our
gas to one gas marketing company, Atmos Energy Marketing, LLC.
|
|
|
Asset Retirement Obligations |
We follow Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations. SFAS No. 143 requires us to record
the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability
in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate
of fair value can be made. The present value of the estimated
asset retirement costs is capitalized as part of the carrying
amount of the associated long-lived asset. Amortization of the
capitalized asset retirement cost is determined on a
units-of-production method. Accretion of the asset retirement
obligation is recognized over time until the obligation is
settled. Our asset retirement obligations relate to the plugging
of wells upon exhaustion of gas reserves.
The fair value of the liability associated with these retirement
obligations is determined using significant assumptions,
including current estimates of the plugging costs, annual
inflation of these costs, the productive life of the wells and
our risk-adjusted interest rate. Changes in any of these
assumptions can result in significant revisions to the estimated
asset retirement obligation. Revisions to the asset retirement
obligation are recorded with an offsetting change to the
carrying amount of the related long-lived asset, resulting in
prospective changes to depreciation, depletion and amortization
expense and accretion. Because of the subjectivity of
assumptions and the relatively long life of our wells, the costs
to ultimately retire these assets may vary significantly from
previous estimates.
We operate in two tax jurisdictions, the United States and
Canada. Primarily as a result of the net losses that we have
generated, we have generated deferred tax benefits available for
tax purposes to offset net income in future periods. However, a
full valuation allowance has been recorded against all deferred
tax assets in Canada as there have historically been no income
generating operations in Canada. We have recorded tax benefits
in the United States for our fiscal years ending July 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003. These benefits partially offset a
previously recorded deferred tax liability.
22
Results of Operations
Six
Months Ended January 31, 2006 Compared to Six Months Ended
January 31, 2005
The following table presents our unaudited financial data for
the first six months of fiscal year 2006 compared to the first
six months of fiscal year 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended January 31 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Dollar | |
|
% | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
Variance | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas sales
|
|
$ |
537,505 |
|
|
$ |
6,341 |
|
|
$ |
531,164 |
|
|
|
8,377 |
% |
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense
|
|
|
461,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461,610 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
2,437,239 |
|
|
|
3,165,087 |
|
|
|
(727,848 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
)% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
212,692 |
|
|
|
57,562 |
|
|
|
155,130 |
|
|
|
270 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,111,541 |
|
|
|
3,222,649 |
|
|
|
(111,108 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Other income (expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
402,804 |
|
|
|
4,847 |
|
|
|
397,957 |
|
|
|
8,210 |
% |
Interest expense
|
|
|
(13,778 |
) |
|
|
(10,582 |
) |
|
|
(3,196 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
)% |
Other income
|
|
|
137,523 |
|
|
|
3,246 |
|
|
|
134,277 |
|
|
|
4,137 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526,549 |
|
|
|
(2,489 |
) |
|
|
529,038 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,047,487 |
) |
|
|
(3,218,797 |
) |
|
|
1,171,310 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,717 |
|
|
|
(344,717 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(2,047,487 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,874,080 |
) |
|
$ |
826,593 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue During the first six months of fiscal
year 2006, revenue increased $531,164 over the first six months
of fiscal year 2005. We realized our first revenues from the
sale of CBM in January 2005. Net sales of gas (net of royalties)
were 47,462 Mcf and our average realized selling price per
Mcf was $11.32 for the first six months of fiscal year 2006. All
of our productive wells during these periods are located at our
Southern Illinois Basin Project. Since our Southern Illinois
Basin Project is currently subject to litigation, we may lose
our right to continue to operate and produce CBM from all of
these wells.
Lease operating expense During the first six
months of fiscal year 2006, lease operating expense increased
$461,610 over the first six months of 2005. Lease operating
expenses represent production expenses, consisting primarily of
repairs and maintenance, fuel and electricity, equipment rental
and other overhead expenses related to producing wells. We
commenced production toward the end of January 2005 and, thus,
incurred no lease operating expense during the first six months
of fiscal year 2005.
General and administrative expense General
and administrative expense consisted of the following for the
first six months of fiscal year 2006 and 2005, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Dollar | |
|
% | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
Variance | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Salaries and benefits
|
|
$ |
727,240 |
|
|
$ |
410,249 |
|
|
$ |
316,991 |
|
|
|
77 |
% |
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
397,586 |
|
|
|
2,200,777 |
|
|
|
(1,803,191 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
)% |
Professional fees
|
|
|
858,002 |
|
|
|
240,125 |
|
|
|
617,877 |
|
|
|
257 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
454,411 |
|
|
|
313,936 |
|
|
|
140,475 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general and administrative expense
|
|
$ |
2,437,239 |
|
|
$ |
3,165,087 |
|
|
$ |
(727,848 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
During the first six months of fiscal year 2006, salaries and
benefits increased $316,991 over the first six months of fiscal
year 2005. The increase was primarily the result of hiring
additional personnel to support our growth, including both a
chief financial officer and controller.
During the first six months of fiscal year 2006, stock-based
compensation decreased $1,803,191 over the first six months of
fiscal year 2005. During the first six months of fiscal year
2006, we granted options to purchase 495,000 shares of
our common stock that were valued at $.80 per option.
During the first six months of fiscal year 2005, we granted
options to purchase 2,950,056 shares of our common
stock that were valued at $.75 per option. The award of
these options was consistent with our belief that it is
necessary to provide this form of compensation for us to attract
and retain qualified individuals.
During the first six months of fiscal year 2006, professional
fees increased $617,877 over the first six months of fiscal year
2005. The increase was primarily the result of increased
professional fees incurred in connection with SEC filings,
American Stock Exchange listing fees, higher audit and audit
related fees and additional legal services.
During the first six months of fiscal year 2006, other general
and administrative expenses increased $140,475 over the first
six months of fiscal year 2005, primarily as a result of
increased insurance costs.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
expense During the first six months of fiscal
year 2006, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense
(DD&A) increased $155,130 over the first six
months of fiscal year 2005. We compute DD&A on capitalized
drillings costs and gas collection equipment using the
units-of-production
method based on estimates of proved reserves, and on all other
property and equipment using the straight-line method based on
estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years. The
increase is primarily due to the fact that there was very little
production in the first six months of fiscal year 2005.
Additionally, depreciation expense increased due to additions to
other support equipment.
Interest income During the first six months
of fiscal year 2006, interest income increased $397,957 over the
first six months of fiscal year 2005 due to significantly higher
average cash balances during the first six months of fiscal year
2006. The higher cash balances are the result of net proceeds of
$27,883,954 we received in September 2005 related to the private
placement of our common shares.
Other income During the first six months of
fiscal year 2006, other income increased $134,277 over the first
six months of fiscal year 2005, primarily due to us recognizing
a gain of $127,416 on the sale of our investment in Hite Coalbed
Methane, L.L.C. in January 2006.
Deferred income tax benefit During the first
six months of fiscal year 2006, deferred income tax benefit
decreased $344,717 over the first six months of fiscal year
2005. We recorded a tax benefit in the United States in the
first six months of fiscal year 2005 to partially offset a net
recorded deferred tax liability at January 31, 2005;
however, no tax benefit was recognized for the first six months
of fiscal year 2006, as we had no net deferred tax liability to
offset.
24
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended
July 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, | |
|
July 31, | |
|
Dollar | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Variance | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gas sales
|
|
$ |
117,835 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
117,835 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
307,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307,178 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Salaries and benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
516,961 |
|
|
|
262,223 |
|
|
|
254,738 |
|
|
|
97 |
% |
|
Field administration
|
|
|
261,692 |
|
|
|
112,408 |
|
|
|
149,284 |
|
|
|
133 |
% |
|
Field operations
|
|
|
115,488 |
|
|
|
44,070 |
|
|
|
71,418 |
|
|
|
162 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894,141 |
|
|
|
418,701 |
|
|
|
475,440 |
|
|
|
114 |
% |
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,344,738 |
|
|
|
193,796 |
|
|
|
3,150,942 |
|
|
|
1626 |
% |
General and administrative:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travel
|
|
|
161,371 |
|
|
|
139,273 |
|
|
|
22,098 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
Office
|
|
|
266,875 |
|
|
|
146,969 |
|
|
|
119,906 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
|
Professional and regulatory
|
|
|
1,137,996 |
|
|
|
98,458 |
|
|
|
1,039,538 |
|
|
|
1056 |
% |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
(2,910 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,566,242 |
|
|
|
387,610 |
|
|
|
1,178,632 |
|
|
|
304 |
% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
260,141 |
|
|
|
80,417 |
|
|
|
179,724 |
|
|
|
223 |
% |
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
123,219 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
121,211 |
|
|
|
6036 |
% |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(24,820 |
) |
|
|
(15,165 |
) |
|
|
(9,655 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
)% |
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
35,385 |
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
32,931 |
|
|
|
1342 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,784 |
|
|
|
(10,703 |
) |
|
|
144,487 |
|
|
|
1350 |
% |
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$ |
(6,120,821 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,091,227 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,029,594 |
) |
|
|
(461 |
)% |
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
724,470 |
|
|
|
298,111 |
|
|
|
426,359 |
|
|
|
143 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(5,396,351 |
) |
|
$ |
(793,116 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,603,235 |
) |
|
|
(580 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes. We incurred a loss before
income taxes of ($6,120,821) for the year ended July 31,
2005, compared to a loss before income taxes of ($1,091,227) for
the preceding year. The largest factors in this 461% increase in
net loss related to increases in salaries and benefits,
stock-based compensation and general and administrative expenses
as discussed below.
Revenue. We realized our first revenues from the sale of
CBM in January 2005. Sales of CBM generated revenues of $117,835
during the year ended July 31, 2005 (all in the period of
January through July 2005) compared to $0 sales during the
preceding year. All of our productive wells during the fiscal
year ended July 31, 2005 are located at our Southern
Illinois Basin Project. Since our Southern Illinois Basin
Project is currently subject to litigation, we may lose our
right to continue to operate and produce CBM from all of these
wells.
Salaries and benefits. Salaries and benefits increased
$475,440 in the year ended July 31, 2005, a 114% increase
over the preceding year. The increase was primarily the result
of bonuses paid to various employees, hiring both a vice
president of field operations and a chief financial officer, and
general salary increases.
Stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation
increased $3,150,942 in the year ended July 31, 2005, an
increase of 1626% over the preceding year. The increase in this
expense resulted primarily from the granting of additional
options to various key employees and directors of the company
and the general increase in our stock price. During the year
ended July 31, 2005, we granted options to purchase
4,276,056 shares of our common stock that were valued at
$3,344,738. This compares with the options to purchase 475,000
shares of
25
our common stock that were granted during the preceding year and
were valued at $193,796. The award of these options was
consistent with our belief that it is necessary to provide this
form of compensation for us to attract and retain qualified
individuals.
General and administrative office expense.
The 82% increase over the comparable expenses during the
preceding year resulted primarily from costs incurred in opening
our headquarters office in Solon, Ohio.
General and administrative professional and
regulatory fees. The 1056% increase over the comparable
expenses during the preceding year resulted from the following
expense increases:
|
|
|
|
|
Additional legal fees incurred in connection with
surface disputes
|
|
$ |
303,305 |
|
Increase in fees related to accounting, auditing and
tax services
|
|
|
193,046 |
|
Increase in legal fees incurred in connection with
SEC filings
|
|
|
175,567 |
|
Increase in fees related to general corporate legal
and professional advice
|
|
|
150,522 |
|
Increase in fees related to outside investor
relations services
|
|
|
141,757 |
|
Increase in other professional fees
|
|
|
75,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase over corresponding period in the
preceding year
|
|
$ |
1,039,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit. The 143% increase in the
deferred income tax benefit over the preceding year resulted
primarily from the increase in our loss before income taxes. The
effect of the increase in our loss before income taxes was
partially offset by a decrease in the effective tax rate to
11.8% during the period as compared to 27.3% for the preceding
year. The decrease in rate was primarily the result of an
increase in stock-based compensation expense, which is
non-deductible for U.S. tax purposes.
Year Ended July 31,
2004 Compared to Year Ended July 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, | |
|
July 31, | |
|
Dollar | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Variance | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gas sales
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Salaries and benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
262,223 |
|
|
|
220,198 |
|
|
|
42,025 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
Field administration
|
|
|
112,408 |
|
|
|
68,704 |
|
|
|
43,704 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
Field operations
|
|
|
44,070 |
|
|
|
16,890 |
|
|
|
27,180 |
|
|
|
161 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418,701 |
|
|
|
305,792 |
|
|
|
112,909 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
193,796 |
|
|
|
515,286 |
|
|
|
(321,490 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
)% |
General and administrative:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Travel
|
|
|
139,273 |
|
|
|
79,975 |
|
|
|
59,298 |
|
|
|
74 |
% |
|
Office
|
|
|
146,969 |
|
|
|
68,814 |
|
|
|
78,155 |
|
|
|
114 |
% |
|
Professional and regulatory
|
|
|
98,458 |
|
|
|
60,296 |
|
|
|
38,162 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,910 |
|
|
|
6,240 |
|
|
|
(3,330 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,610 |
|
|
|
215,325 |
|
|
|
172,285 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
80,417 |
|
|
|
58,593 |
|
|
|
21,824 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
3,550 |
|
|
|
(1,542 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
)% |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(15,165 |
) |
|
|
(17,772 |
) |
|
|
2,607 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,703 |
) |
|
|
(14,222 |
) |
|
|
3,519 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$ |
(1,091,227 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,109,218 |
) |
|
$ |
17,991 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
298,111 |
|
|
|
174,913 |
|
|
|
123,198 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(793,116 |
) |
|
$ |
(934,305 |
) |
|
$ |
141,189 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Loss before income taxes. Loss before income taxes
decreased $17,991, or 2%, from the year ended July 31, 2003
to the year ended July 31, 2004. We incurred a loss before
income taxes of ($1,091,227) for the year ended July 31,
2004, compared to a loss before income taxes of ($1,109,218) for
the preceding year. The principal factor in the reduced loss was
a $321,490 decrease in stock-based compensation expense. That
decrease was partially offset by increases in salaries and
benefits along with general and administrative expenses, which
corresponded to an increase in the size of our CBM projects in
the Illinois Basin.
Deferred income tax benefit. The 70% increase over the
comparable deferred income tax benefit for the preceding year
resulted primarily from the decrease in stock-based compensation
expense, which is non-deductible for U.S. tax purposes. This
reduction in stock-based compensation expense caused the
effective tax rate for the year ended July 31, 2004 to
increase to 27.3% as compared to 15.8% for the preceding year.
Applying this higher effective tax rate to our loss before
income taxes resulted in an increased deferred tax benefit.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary source of liquidity historically has come from the
sale of shares of our common stock in private placements and the
proceeds from the exercise of warrants and options to acquire
our common stock. To date, we have not relied significantly on
borrowing to finance our operations or provide cash. As of
January 31, 2006, we had only $333,839 in long-term notes
payable. From July 31, 2002 until January 31, 2006, we
raised $43,866,649 from the sale of our common stock.
Additionally, during that same period, we collected $3,730,470
and $2,118,320 as a result of the exercise of warrants and stock
options, respectively. Our primary use of these funds has been
the acquisition, exploration, testing and development of our CBM
properties and rights.
We did not begin to generate revenues from CBM sales until
January 2005. Revenues from CBM sales were $537,505 and $6,341
for the six months ended January 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Subject to the various risks described in this
report, we expect revenue from the sale of our CBM to increase
due to (i) increased production from existing wells as they
proceed through the initial dewatering phase and
(ii) additional production generated as a result of
drilling and production from additional wells. However, in view
of the fact that we have very little historical experience of
dewatering and gas production in the Illinois Basin, we can
provide no assurance that we will achieve a trend of increased
production and revenue in the future. In addition, since our
Southern Illinois Basin Project is currently subject to
litigation, we may lose our right to continue to operate and
produce CBM from all of our productive wells existing as of
May 1, 2006.
In addition, CBM wells typically must go through a lengthy
dewatering phase before making a significant contribution to gas
production. We estimate that a typical vertical well will
require an average of 18 months to reach peak production.
(Note that when we talk about average dewatering times, the
early wells at any of our projects are expected to take longer
to dewater than are later wells that are drilled and tied into
our gathering system after a field or area has been undergoing
dewatering by previously drilled wells). The impact on our cash
position is that there will be a delay of up to 18 months
between the time we initially invest in drilling and completing
a well and the time when a typical well will begin to make a
significant contribution to our cash from operations.
Additionally, net cash generated (used) by operating
activities is dependent on a number of factors over which we
have little or no control. These factors include, but are not
limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the price of, and demand for, natural gas; |
|
|
|
|
|
availability of drilling equipment; |
|
|
|
|
|
lease terms; |
|
|
|
|
|
availability of sufficient capital resources; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of production estimates for current and future
wells. |
|
We had a cash balance of approximately $25.0 million as of
May 1, 2006, compared to $7,251,503 at July 31, 2005.
The net increase in our cash balance is primarily due to the
$27,883,954 of net proceeds we
27
received from the sale of common stock in a private placement
that closed on September 26, 2005. We raised an amount in
the private placement we felt was required to fund our
development plans through April 2006. However, because our
drilling progress at our Southern Illinois Basin Project slowed
due to a dispute and subsequent litigation with the lessors and
coal owners, we have not yet spent the majority of the cash
raised in this most recent private placement.
Our capital expenditure budget for the 12-month period ending
April 30, 2007, totals approximately $30.0 million.
Our current cash balance is insufficient to fully fund our
forecasted capital expenditures and net cash used by operating
activities over the 12-month period ending April 30, 2007.
Although management has no specific plans in place to raise the
additional capital necessary to fund our plan of operations and
forecasted capital expenditures, management is evaluating
raising the additional required capital through a combination of
additional stock sales, the issuance of debt securities,
borrowing and/or entering into joint ventures. However, we can
provide no assurance that we will be able to raise the
additional required capital to meet our plan or if we are able
to raise the funds that it will be on terms similar to past
financings.
Cash Used in Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended
July 31, 2005 was $877,171. This compares with
$591,167 net cash used in operating activities in the prior
year. The increase in net cash used by operating activities
corresponds with the growth in the size of our projects in the
Illinois Basin. Net cash used in operating activities for the
year ended July 31, 2003 was $709,333. Since July 31,
2002, we have substantially increased the amount of CBM rights
we control in the Illinois Basin. This has resulted in increases
in personnel and operating activities conducted by us. Since we
did not generate any CBM revenues until January 2005, the costs
associated with the additional personnel and activities resulted
in year-to-year
increases in net cash used in operations. The decrease in net
cash used in operating activities between the year ended
July 31, 2003 and the year ended July 31, 2004 was the
result of timing of our accounts payable and is not indicative
of any trend.
Net cash used by operating activities is dependent on a number
of factors over which we have little or no control. These
factors include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
the price of, and demand for, natural gas; |
|
|
|
availability of drilling equipment; |
|
|
|
|
lease terms; |
|
|
|
|
availability of sufficient capital resources; and |
|
|
|
the accuracy of production estimates for current and future
wells. |
In addition, CBM wells typically must go through a lengthy
dewatering phase before making a significant contribution to gas
production. We estimate that a typical vertical well will
require an average of 18 months to reach peak production.
(Note that when we talk about average dewatering times, the
early wells at any of our projects are expected to take longer
to dewater than are later wells that are drilled and tied into
our gathering system after a field or area has been undergoing
dewatering by previously drilled wells). The impact on our cash
position is that there will be a delay of up to 18 months
between the time we initially invest in drilling and completing
a well and the time when a typical well will begin to make a
significant contribution to our cash from operations.
Capital Expenditure Plan
We have no contractual commitments for capital expenditures.
However, our plan anticipates that over the
12-month period ending
April 30, 2007, we will spend approximately
$30.0 million on capital expenditures. We plan to drill 123
new wells during that period, including 115 new vertical
production wells, three horizontal wells and five new test
wells. In addition to our drilling program, we expect to pursue
the acquisition of additional CBM rights during that
12-month period. We
expect that this capital expenditure program and our other cash
requirements will be funded by our cash balance, which as of
May 1, 2006 is approximately
28
$25.0 million, and cash raised through the sale of debt
securities, equity securities, borrowings and/or joint ventures.
Although we are currently evaluating the best methods of raising
these funds, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to
raise the necessary funds.
Qualitative and Quantitative Exposure to Market Risk
Our major risk exposure is the commodity pricing applicable to
our CBM production. Realized commodity prices received for our
production are primarily driven by the spot prices attributable
to natural gas. The effects of price volatility are expected to
continue.
All of our debt has fixed interest rates, so consequently we are
not exposed to cash flow or fair value risk from market interest
rate changes on this debt.
Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable and long-term notes payable. The carrying
amount of cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts
payable approximate fair market value due to the highly liquid
nature of these short-term instruments.
|
|
|
Inflation and Changes in Prices |
The general level of inflation affects our costs. Salaries and
other general and administrative expenses are impacted by
inflationary trends and the supply and demand of qualified
professionals and professional services. Inflation and price
fluctuations affect the costs associated with exploring for and
producing CBM, which has a material impact on our financial
performance.
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Less Than | |
|
|
|
More Than | |
|
|
|
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Contractual Obligations As of July 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
26,624 |
|
|
$ |
50,075 |
|
|
$ |
15,158 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
91,857 |
|
Equipment leases
|
|
|
69,063 |
|
|
|
165,760 |
|
|
|
13,813 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
248,626 |
|
Other leases(1)
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
12,730 |
|
|
|
13,763 |
|
|
|
146,171 |
|
|
|
178,669 |
|
Long-term notes payable(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
101,687 |
|
|
$ |
228,555 |
|
|
$ |
434,739 |
|
|
$ |
146,171 |
|
|
$ |
911,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
These amounts do not include annual minimum royalty payments
required to hold mineral lease and farm-out agreements. Although
we are not obligated to make these payments under existing
mineral leases and farm-out agreements, these payments are
required to maintain individual leases/farm-out agreements after
the expiration of the initial terms of the lease/farm-out
agreements. The mineral leases/farm-out agreements in existence
as of November 1, 2005 expire at various times beginning in
April 2006. If we were to pay the total minimum royalty payments
due under all mineral leases/farm-out agreements in existence as
of November 1, 2005, the amount would initially total
approximately $702,000 annually and could increase to as much as
$831,000 annually. |
|
|
(2) |
The long-term note payable was cancelled in connection with our
sale of our interest in Hite Coalbed Methane, L.L.C. on
January 4, 2006. |
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of July 31,
2005.
29
Business
Coalbed Methane
We are engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and
production of coalbed methane (CBM) reserves. CBM is
a form of natural gas that is generated during coal formation
and is contained in underground coal seams and abandoned mines.
Methane is the primary commercial component of natural gas
produced from conventional gas wells. Natural gas produced from
conventional wells generally contains other hydrocarbons in
varying amounts that require the natural gas to be processed.
CBM is generally pipeline-quality gas after simple water
dehydration and removal of traces of nitrogen and other
impurities.
CBM production is similar to conventional natural gas production
in terms of the physical producing facilities. However, the
subsurface mechanisms that allow gas movement to the wellbore
are very different. Conventional natural gas wells require a
subsurface that is porous, allows the gas to migrate easily, and
contains a natural trap to capture and hold the gas reservoir.
In contrast, CBM is held in place within coal seams in four ways:
|
|
|
|
|
as free gas within the micropores (pores with a diameter of less
than .0025 inch) and cleats (set of natural fractures) of
coal; |
|
|
|
as dissolved gas in water within the coal; |
|
|
|
as adsorbed gas held by molecular attraction on the surface of
macerals (organic constituents that comprise the coal mass),
micropores and cleats in the coal; and |
|
|
|
as adsorbed gas within the molecular structure of the coal. |
Coal at shallower depths with good cleat development contains
high concentrations of free and dissolved methane gas.
Adsorption is generally higher in coal that contains a higher
percentage of fixed carbon and generally increases with higher
pressure, which occurs at deeper depths. We currently intend to
drill and produce from coal seams ranging in depth from 400 to
1,200 feet beneath the surface.
CBM gas is released from the coal by pressure changes when water
is removed from coal. In contrast to conventional gas wells, new
CBM wells initially produce water for several months. As the
water pressure decreases in the coal formation, methane gas is
released from the coal.
To assist you in reading this prospectus and understanding our
business, we have included a glossary of selected natural gas
terms that are used in this prospectus. The glossary is set
forth as Appendix A beginning on
Page A-1.
Overview
We focus on the acquisition, exploration, development and
production of CBM reserves located in the Illinois Basin, which
covers approximately 60,000 square miles in the mid to
southern part of Illinois, southwest Indiana and northwest
Kentucky. Through lease, option and farm-out agreements, we have
assembled CBM rights covering 530,435 acres in the Illinois
Basin (including our 43,000 acre Southern Illinois Basin
Project, where our acreage rights are currently subject to
litigation). We believe that these rights currently give us
control over more CBM acreage than any other CBM company in the
Illinois Basin.
A Gas Technology Institute report from 2001 estimates that 21
trillion cubic feet of CBM gas is in place in the Illinois
Basin. Although the Illinois Basin is believed to have
significant CBM potential, it is largely untested for commercial
CBM production. In addition, we have evaluated the CBM potential
in only a relatively small part of our acreage rights.
Our acreage rights in the Illinois Basin are currently divided
into three projects. Our Southern Illinois Basin Project
(formerly called our Delta Project) consists of
43,000 acres in the southern part of the Illinois Basin.
Our Southern Illinois Basin Project is currently subject to
litigation that challenges our acreage rights,
30
and we may therefore not retain any of these acreage rights. Our
other acreage holdings include our Northern Illinois Basin
Project (formerly called our Montgomery Project), located in the
north central part of the Illinois Basin, where we control
through lease, option and farm-out agreements an aggregate of
351,487 acres of CBM rights, and the Western Illinois Basin
Project (formerly called our Clinton/ Washington Project),
located in the northwestern part of the Illinois Basin, where we
control through lease, option and farm-out agreements an
aggregate of 135,948 acres of CBM rights. In addition, we
continue to look for opportunities to acquire additional CBM
acreage rights in the Illinois Basin.
As of May 1, 2006, we have drilled 107 wells. These
wells consist of 77 productive wells, 17 shut-in wells and
13 wells that have been drilled but are not in production,
including three test wells. All of our productive wells are
located at our Southern Illinois Basin Project. Since our
Southern Illinois Basin Project is currently subject to
litigation, we may lose our right to continue to operate and
produce CBM from all of our productive wells existing as of
May 1, 2006.
On March 31, 2005, we entered into a Technical Services
Agreement with BHP Petroleum (Exploration) Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of BHP Billiton, a major international resources
company. As part of this agreement, BHP agreed to provide us, on
an exclusive basis in the Illinois Basin, technical services
related to BHPs techniques and know how in the areas of
drilling and completion of CBM wells. BHP agreed to provide its
medium radius drilling (MRD) techniques to assist BPI in
drilling three initial pilot wells and to provide an assessment
of the application of its tight radius drilling
(TRD) technology at our projects. For more information
about our Technical Services Agreement with BHP, see the section
below entitled Technical Services Agreement with BHP
Billiton.
History
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of
British Columbia in 1980. Our corporate offices in the United
States are located at 30775 Bainbridge Road,
Suite 280, Solon, Ohio 44139, telephone
(440) 248-4200.
Our records office and registered office in Canada is located at
609 Granville Street, Suite 1600, Vancouver, British
Columbia V7Y 1C3, telephone
(604) 685-8688.
Our operations are conducted from a field office located in
Marion, Illinois.
Beginning in 1996, we had a minority involvement in the Southern
Illinois Basin Project. In 2001, Methane Management, Inc.
acquired the Southern Illinois Basin Project subject to our
minority interest. In August 2001, we acquired Methane
Management, Inc. and consolidated 100% of the Southern Illinois
Basin Project within BPI. James G. Azlein, President of Methane
Management, Inc. at the time, became our President, and we
created a new management team. We have since divested nearly all
of our assets that are not related to CBM projects in the
Illinois Basin.
Since 2001, we enlarged our acreage footprint from
43,000 acres to the 530,435 acres of CBM rights that
we control today (including our 43,000 acre Southern
Illinois Basin Project, where our acreage rights are currently
subject to litigation), drilled CBM test and production wells at
the Southern Illinois Basin and Northern Illinois Basin
Projects, and installed gathering and production facilities for
gas sales from the Southern Illinois Basin Project.
Business Strategy
The objectives of our business strategy are to generate growth
in gas reserves, production volumes and cash flows at a positive
return on invested capital. The principal elements of our
business strategy are to:
|
|
|
|
|
Explore and Develop Properties. As of May 1, 2006,
we have drilled 107 wells. These wells consist of 77
productive wells, 17 shut-in wells and 13 wells that have
been drilled but are not in production, including three test
wells. All of our productive wells are located at our Southern
Illinois Basin Project. Since our Southern Illinois Basin
Project is currently subject to litigation, we may lose our
right to continue to operate and produce CBM from all of our
productive wells existing as of May 1, 2006. |
|
|
|
Due to the litigation with respect to our Southern Illinois
Basin Project, we are not drilling any new wells at our Southern
Illinois Basin Project and have moved the focus of our drilling
activities to our |
31
|
|
|
|
Northern Illinois Basin Project. During April 2006, we filed
permit applications for drilling the first 10 CBM production
wells at our Northern Illinois Basin Project. |
|
|
|
|
During the 12-month period ending April 30, 2007, we plan
to drill 123 new wells, including 115 vertical wells, three
horizontal wells and five test wells. This plan contemplates a
capital expenditure budget of approximately $30.0 million.
Our cash balance as of May 1, 2006 is approximately
$25.0 million and therefore not sufficient to fully fund
these capital expenditures and our anticipated cash needs
through April 30, 2007. In order to fully fund our
operations through April 30, 2007, we will need to raise
additional financing. |
|
|
|
|
The number of wells that we drill during the 12-month period
ending April 30, 2007 will be dependant on the success of
our initial production wells at our Northern Illinois Basin
Project, the additional capital that we are able to raise and
the risk factors described in this prospectus. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expand CBM Acreage Rights. We continue to look for
opportunities to acquire additional CBM acreage rights in the
Illinois Basin. Our strategy has been to acquire leases and
options on large acreage blocks in areas where the coal seams
are the thickest and there is currently pipeline delivery
infrastructure in place. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursue Joint Ventures. We continue to consider joint
venture opportunities. With our asset base and technical
expertise, we believe that we are well positioned to attract
industry joint venture partners for the purposes of providing
capital, technical operating expertise and development
opportunities to accelerate our growth. |
|
Competitive Strengths
We believe our competitive strengths include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Substantial CBM Acreage Position. The Illinois Basin is
one of the few remaining high potential CBM areas in North
America. We were the first company to begin acquiring
substantial blocks of CBM acreage rights in the Illinois Basin.
We believe that we currently control more CBM acreage than any
other CBM company in the Illinois Basin. |
|
|
|
|
Demonstrated Commercial Production. We believe that we
have taken the initial steps to demonstrate the commercial
production capabilities of the Illinois Basin. As of May 1,
2006, we have drilled 107 wells, including 77 productive
wells located at our Southern Illinois Basin Project, most of
which have not yet reached peak production. For the six months
ended January 31, 2006, our gas sales totaled $537,505.
Although it is possible that we may lose our productive wells at
our Southern Illinois Basin Project due to ongoing litigation,
we believe that our production at the Southern Illinois Basin
Project demonstrates the commercial viability of the Illinois
Basin. |
|
|
|
|
|
Short Drilling Permit Lead Times. We typically experience
short turnaround times in obtaining drilling permits as compared
to CBM drillers in other CBM basins. Historically, we have
enjoyed quick turnaround of vertical CBM well drilling permits
from state regulatory bodies. We have not yet submitted any
permit applications for drilling horizontal wells. However, we
do not anticipate any significant delays in obtaining permits
for these wells. |
|
|
|
|
|
Low Water Disposal Costs. A significant advantage of
operating in the Illinois Basin is that we are not required to
build costly water disposal facilities. We have disposed of the
water we encounter in connection with our drilling and
production by re-injecting the water into disposal wells drilled
and operated by us. |
|
|
|
|
|
Substantial Interstate Pipeline Capacity and Low
Transportation Costs. A significant advantage that we have
over CBM producers in other basins is our proximity to a large
number of interstate gas pipelines that have substantial
take-away capacity. Because our operations and CBM acreage are
located near several large metropolitan gas consuming markets
(e.g., Chicago, St. Louis, Nashville, Indianapolis and
Detroit) and the fact that many interstate pipelines headed to
the East Coast pass through the Illinois Basin, we expect to
incur little or no pipeline related transportation charges. In |
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
addition, we do not expect to experience any lost production or
sales due to insufficient local or interstate pipeline capacity
to transport the CBM that we produce and sell. |
|
|
|
|
|
Experienced and Incentivized Management and Operating
Teams. Our operating team includes individuals that have
been drilling or operating CBM wells in the Illinois Basin since
1996. In addition, James G. Azlein, our President and Chief
Executive Officer, George J. Zilich, our Chief Financial Officer
and General Counsel, and James E. Craddock, our Senior Vice
President of Operations, beneficially own 6.97% of our common
stock. In addition, the majority of BPIs management and
operating employees owns common stock and/or stock options in
the company. |
|
CBM Acreage Rights
As of May 1, 2006, our CBM acreage rights, controlled
through lease, option and farm-out agreements, include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed | |
|
Undeveloped | |
|
Total | |
Project |
|
Acres | |
|
Acres | |
|
Acres(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Southern Illinois Basin Project(2)
|
|
|
10,550 |
|
|
|
32,450 |
|
|
|
43,000 |
|
Northern Illinois Basin Project
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
351,487 |
|
|
|
351,487 |
|
Western Illinois Basin Project
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
135,948 |
|
|
|
135,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,550 |
|
|
|
519,885 |
|
|
|
530,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Because we are the exclusive owner of the CBM rights under each
of our lease, option and farm-out agreements, our acreage rights
are shown on a gross (as opposed to net) basis. |
|
|
(2) |
In connection with ongoing litigation relating to our Southern
Illinois Basin Project, it is possible that we will lose all of
our acreage rights at this Project. For more information about
the litigation relating to our Southern Illinois Basin Project,
see the section of the Summary entitled Litigation
Relating to Our CBM Rights at Our Southern Illinois Basin
Project. |
|
Under the terms of the lease and option agreements pursuant to
which we have acquired our CBM rights, we are entitled to all of
the CBM rights held by our lessors in the counties covered by
these agreements. However, we face a number of uncertainties
regarding what rights our lessors hold.
The issue of who owns CBM gas, as between the coal rights owner
and the oil and gas rights owner, is uncertain in Illinois.
Although the appellate court in Illinois for the district where
most of our acreage rights are situated has ruled that CBM gas
is owned by the coal rights owner, the issue has not been
addressed by the highest court in Illinois. We believe, based on
advice from legal counsel, that under Illinois law ownership
will ultimately be found to lie with the coal rights owner.
Based on this advice, we generally secure CBM rights from the
coal owners. Some of the lessors from which we have acquired CBM
rights may hold both the coal rights and the oil and gas rights
for the applicable properties, but in some cases it is not
certain that these lessors also hold the oil and gas rights. If
any litigation in Illinois concludes that CBM rights lie with
the oil and gas owner, we could lose some of our CBM rights.
In addition, in some cases the extent of the coal and/or oil and
gas rights held by our lessors is uncertain. We conducted no
title or deed examinations prior to executing our lease and
option agreements, and our lessors made no warranties as to the
acreage or rights covered by the agreements. Although we have
now conducted title and deed examinations covering much of the
CBM properties under our leases, these examinations are ongoing
at all of our projects. There can be no assurance that our
rights under our lease and option agreements include all of the
acreage and rights identified in the agreements until title
examinations on all of the underlying properties have been
completed.
We have been subject to legal complaints regarding the extent of
the surface rights that derive from our CBM rights. On occasion,
the owners of properties that are adjacent to our drilling
locations have challenged our right to cross their property in
accessing our drilling locations and our right to lay gas and
water flow lines across their property. The extent of our rights
in respect of these issues is uncertain in Illinois. If disputes
33
regarding our surface rights are not resolved in our favor, we
may be required to acquire surface rights or access our drilling
locations and lay gas and water flow lines in inefficient ways,
which would cause us to incur increased operating costs. In
addition, we could incur significant costs in legal disputes
over our surface rights. During our fiscal year ended
July 31, 2005, we incurred approximately $303,000 in legal
fees in connection with legal disputes over surface rights. We
incurred approximately $7,500 in legal fees in connection with
such disputes for the six-month period ended January 31,
2006. If for any reason these operating or legal costs increase
significantly, our financial performance will suffer.
|
|
|
Southern Illinois Basin Project |
Our CBM rights in the Southern Illinois Basin Project (formerly
called our Delta Project) cover 43,000 acres in the
southern part of the Illinois Basin. We hold our CBM rights on
this acreage pursuant to a lease agreement the primary term of
which extended until April 3, 2006. After the primary term,
the lease provides that it shall extend as to a particular tract
so long as CBM is being produced from such tract providing a
royalty payment of not less than $1.00 per acre per month;
provided that, after the primary term, in the event the
aggregate royalties do not exceed $42,000 in any month, the
lease shall terminate.
Our right to drill for and produce CBM under this lease is
expressly subject to the mining of coal on the acreage covered
by the lease. We may not interfere with any existing coal mining
operations and, under certain circumstances, may be required to
cease drilling in locations where coal mining operations will be
undertaken.
We are required to pay the lessor a royalty equal to 15% of our
gross proceeds from the sale of CBM produced from the covered
acreage. In addition, the lease is subject to two overriding
royalty interests of 3% and 4%, both of which are calculated
based on 43.35% of gross revenues.
As of May 1, 2006, we have 77 productive wells,
17 shut-in wells and eight wells that have been
drilled but are not in production at our Southern Illinois Basin
Project. In connection with ongoing litigation relating to our
Southern Illinois Basin Project, it is possible that we will
lose all of our acreage rights and wells at this Project. For
more information about the litigation relating to our Southern
Illinois Basin Project, see the section of the Summary entitled
Litigation Relating to Our CBM Rights at Our Southern
Illinois Basin Project.
|
|
|
Northern Illinois Basin Project |
Our CBM rights in the Northern Illinois Basin Project (formerly
called our Montgomery Project) cover 351,487 acres in
Montgomery, Shelby, Christian, Fayette and Macoupin Counties in
Illinois, which are located in the north central part of the
Illinois Basin. We hold our CBM rights on this acreage pursuant
to mineral leases, an option to acquire a mineral lease and a
farm-out agreement.
We have entered into a lease agreement with Montgomery County
covering 120,951 acres of CBM rights in Montgomery County,
Illinois. The lease agreement extends until November 27,
2010. After the initial term of the agreement, we can continue
to hold the lease as long as we are producing CBM from the
covered acreage. Under the lease agreement, we will be required
to pay royalties to the lessor equal to 12.5% of our gross
proceeds from the sale of CBM produced from the covered acreage.
We have also entered into a lease agreement with Shelby County
covering 63,250 acres of CBM rights in Shelby County,
Illinois. This lease agreement extends until November 12,
2008. After the initial term of the agreement, we can continue
to hold the lease as long as we are producing CBM from the
covered acreage, with each productive vertical well holding
320 acres and each productive horizontal well holding
1,920 acres. We are required to pay royalties to the lessor
equal to 12.5% of our gross proceeds from the sale of CBM
produced from the covered acreage.
We have also entered into a lease agreement with IEC
(Montgomery), LLC covering approximately 100,000 acres of
CBM rights in Christian, Fayette, Montgomery and Shelby Counties
in Illinois. The lease agreement extends until April 26,
2026. After the initial term of the agreement, we can continue
to hold the lease as to each acreage block where we are
producing CBM in commercially reasonable quantities sufficient
to yield a return in excess of operating costs. We are required
to pay royalties to the lessor on our gross
34
proceeds from the sale of CBM produced from the covered acreage
at a rate of 6.25% until May 1, 2011 and thereafter at a
rate between 6.25% to 12.5%, depending on the price we receive
for CBM at the time.
We have also entered into a lease agreement with Christian Coal
Holdings, LLC covering approximately 12,000 acres of CBM
rights in Christian and Montgomery Counties in Illinois. The
lease agreement extends until April 26, 2026. After the
initial term of the agreement, we can continue to hold the lease
as to each acreage block where we are producing CBM in
commercially reasonable quantities sufficient to yield a return
in excess of operating costs. We are required to pay royalties
to the lessor on our gross proceeds from the sale of CBM
produced from the covered acreage at a rate of 12.5%.
We also hold an option from Christian County to lease
14,033 acres of CBM rights in Christian County, Illinois.
The option extends until January 20, 2007. The lease
agreement underlying the option will extend for a period of five
years from the date we exercise the option. After the initial
term of the agreement, we can continue to hold the lease as long
as we are producing CBM from the covered acreage. Under the
lease agreement, we will be required to pay royalties to the
lessor equal to 12.5% of our gross proceeds from the sale of CBM
produced from the covered acreage. If we do not commence
exploration of CBM within one year from the commencement of the
lease, we will be required to pay advance royalties to the
lessor equal to $7,016.50 for each one-year period that we delay
commencing exploration. Any payment of advance royalties can be
credited against royalties that may later become payable to the
lessor from our production of CBM.
Under the lease agreements with Montgomery and Shelby Counties
and the lease agreement underlying the option agreement with
Christian County, our right to drill for and produce CBM is
expressly subject to the mining of coal on the covered acreage.
We may not interfere with any existing coal mining operations
and, under certain circumstances, may be required to cease
drilling in locations where coal mining operations will be
undertaken.
Under the lease agreements with IEC (Montgomery), LLC and
Christian Coal Holdings, LLC, any drilling operations that we
set up can be displaced by coal mining operations. However, the
lessor is required to provide us with a mine plan for the leased
acreage indicating the acreage blocks that the lessor plans to
mine and the order of priority for the acreage blocks that it
plans to mine. If the lessor displaces a well ahead of the
schedule outlined in the mine plan, the lessor may be required
to reimburse us for the cost of plugging the well and, depending
on how long the well has been in production and the cumulative
gross income generated by the well, the value of the CBM that
could be recovered from the well in the remainder of an
eight-year term.
Also included in the Northern Illinois Basin Project is
41,253 acres of CBM rights in Macoupin County, Illinois,
which we can earn under a farm-out agreement with Addington
Exploration, LLC, as described below.
Due to the litigation with respect to our Southern Illinois
Basin Project, we are not drilling any new wells at our Southern
Illinois Basin Project and have moved the focus of our drilling
activities to our Northern Illinois Basin Project. During April
2006, we filed permit applications for drilling the first 10 CBM
production wells at our Northern Illinois Basin Project.
|
|
|
Western Illinois Basin Project |
Our CBM rights in the Western Illinois Basin Project (formerly
called our Clinton/Washington Project) cover 135,948 acres
in Clinton, Washington, Marion and Perry Counties in Illinois,
which are located in the northwestern part of the Illinois
Basin. We hold our CBM rights on this acreage pursuant to a
mineral lease, options to acquire mineral leases and a farm-out
agreement.
We have entered into a lease agreement with Clinton County
covering 55,900 acres of CBM rights in Clinton County,
Illinois. The lease agreement extends until October 24,
2010. After the initial term of the agreement, we can continue
to hold the lease as long as we are producing CBM from the
covered acreage. We are required to pay royalties to the lessor
equal to 12.5% of our gross proceeds from the sale of CBM
produced from the covered acreage. If we do not commence
exploration of CBM within one year from the commencement of the
lease, we will be required to pay advance royalties to the
lessor equal to $27,950 for
35
each one-year period that we delay commencing exploration. Any
payment of advance royalties can be credited against royalties
that may later become payable to the lessor from our production
of CBM.
We also hold an option from Washington County to lease
39,169 acres of CBM rights in Washington County, Illinois.
The option extends until September 9, 2006. The lease
agreement underlying the option will extend for a period of five
years from the date we exercise the option. After the initial
term of the agreement, we can continue to hold the lease as long
as we are producing CBM from the covered acreage, with each
productive vertical well holding 320 acres and each
productive horizontal well holding 1,920 acres. Under the
lease agreement, we will be required to pay royalties to the
lessor from our gross proceeds from the sale of CBM produced
from the covered acreage. The royalty will be equal to 12.5% or
6.25% of our gross proceeds, depending on whether it is
determined that Washington Counties CBM rights, if any,
are derived from coal rights or oil and gas rights. If we do not
commence exploration of CBM within one year from the
commencement of the lease, we will be required to pay advance
royalties to the lessor equal to $18,084.50 for each one-year
period that we delay commencing exploration. Any payment of
advance royalties can be credited against royalties that may
later become payable to the lessor from our production of CBM.
We also hold an option from Marion County to lease
17,882 acres of CBM rights in Marion County, Illinois. The
option extends until June 8, 2007. The lease agreement
underlying the option will extend for a period of five years
from the date we exercise the option. After the initial term of
the agreement, we can continue to hold the lease as long as we
are producing CBM from the covered acreage. Under the lease
agreement, we will be required to pay royalties to the lessor
equal to 12.5% of our gross proceeds from the sale of CBM
produced from the covered acreage. If we do not commence
exploration of CBM within one year from the commencement of the
lease, we will be required to pay advance royalties to the
lessor equal to $8,941 for each
one-year period that we
delay commencing exploration. Any payment of advance royalties
can be credited against royalties that may later become payable
to the lessor from our production of CBM.
Under the lease agreements underlying the option agreements with
Washington and Marion Counties, our right to drill for and
produce CBM is expressly subject to the mining of coal on the
covered acreage. We may not interfere with any existing coal
mining operations and, under certain circumstances, may be
required to cease drilling in locations where coal mining
operations will be undertaken. Under the lease agreement with
Clinton County, any coal mining rights granted to third parties
may not interfere with our CBM operations.
Also included in the Western Illinois Basin Project is
22,997 acres in Perry County, Illinois, which we can earn
under a farm-out agreement with Addington Exploration, LLC, as
described below.
As of May 1, 2006, we have not yet undertaken any testing
or development activities on the Western Illinois Basin Project.
|
|
|
Farm-out Agreement with Addington Exploration, LLC |
We have entered into a farm-out agreement with Addington
Exploration, LLC covering 41,253 acres of CBM rights in
Macoupin County, Illinois and 22,997 acres of CBM rights in
Perry County, Illinois that Addington controls pursuant to coal
seam gas leases. The farm-out agreement provides for an initial
36-month evaluation
period, during which we may test and evaluate the covered
properties. The
36-month evaluation
period can be extended by us on unearned acreage through the
payment of a fee equal to $0.50 per acre, increasing over
five years to $2.50 per acre. For each vertical and
horizontal well that we place into production during the term of
the agreement, Addington will assign to us its CBM rights
covering the surrounding 160 acres penetrated by one of our
wells.
We are required to pay Addington a royalty equal to 3% of our
proceeds from the sale of CBM produced from the covered acreage.
In addition, we must pay royalties totaling 12.5% to the lessors
under the coal seam gas leases underlying this farm-out
agreement.
36
|
|
|
Technical Services Agreement with BHP Billiton |
On March 31, 2005, we entered into a Technical Services
Agreement with BHP Petroleum (Exploration) Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of BHP Billiton, a major international resources
company. As part of this agreement, BHP has agreed to provide
us, on an exclusive basis in the Illinois Basin, the following
services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
BHP agreed to support us in connection with BPIs drilling
of three initial pilot wells utilizing BHPs medium radius
drilling (MRD) techniques and the appraisal and subsequent
development and production of these wells; and |
|
|
|
|
|
BHP agreed to provide an assessment of its tight radius drilling
(TRD) technology at our projects, and to provide a field
test of the TRD technology at our projects at such time as BHP
is satisfied that its TRD technology is commercially and
technically viable. |
|
If BHP becomes satisfied that its TRD technology is commercially
and technically viable, BHP is required to offer us a right of
first refusal to use its TRD technology at our projects on
mutually acceptable terms during the term of the Technical
Services Agreement and any extension of the term.
As of May 1, 2006, due to the dispute with our lessor at
our Southern Illinois Basin Project, we have not yet drilled any
MRD pilot wells but are in the process of identifying sites to
drill these wells. In addition, as of May 1, 2006, BHP has
not completed an assessment of its TRD technology at any of our
projects.
BHPs MRD techniques are refinements to the horizontal
drilling techniques that are currently being used in North
America. We believe BHP has demonstrated that MRD drilling
techniques provide for a more cost effective approach to the
production of CBM than many of the current horizontal drilling
and standard vertical drilling techniques used in North America.
TRD technology would be utilized in the drilling and completion
of vertical wells. TRD, if it proves technically and
commercially viable, would drain more acreage than a traditional
fractured vertical well, resulting in lower total capital costs
and less surface disruption in draining a CBM reservoir.
During the term of the Technical Services Agreement, any
extension of the term and the six-month period after the
expiration of the term, none of BHP or any of its affiliates may
enter into any agreement to provide technical assistance to a
CBM operator within the Illinois Basin or acquire a direct or
indirect interest in any CBM assets located in the Illinois
Basin without our prior consent. However, BHP can terminate the
Technical Services Agreement and these exclusivity restrictions
if it acquires an equity interest in any company that holds
mineral rights in the Illinois Basin, so long as such mineral
rights do not constitute a majority of the economic value of the
subject company.
In connection with the Technical Services Agreement, we have
granted BHP a right of first refusal to acquire us. Before we
can extend or accept an offer for any third party to acquire a
majority of our stock or assets, we must permit BHP to acquire
the same stock or assets on the terms proposed to be extended to
or accepted from the third party. The right of first refusal
expires on September 30, 2006.
In consideration for BHP entering into the Technical Services
Agreement, we agreed to issue BHP 4.0 million stock
appreciation rights. The stock appreciation rights, which may be
exercised by BHP only in connection with its acquisition of us,
will have a value equal to the number of stock appreciation
rights multiplied by the difference between the market price of
our common stock on the date of exercise and the market price on
March 31, 2005 (which was CAD $2.18 per share). BHP may
exercise the stock appreciation rights only during the term of
the Technical Services Agreement, any extension of the term and
the six-month period after the expiration of the term. In
connection with the exercise of the stock appreciation rights,
BHP may elect to convert the rights into cash or a credit
against the consideration payable by BHP in connection with its
acquisition of us. The stock appreciation rights will terminate
if BHP materially breaches the Technical Services Agreement or
we are sold to a third party or a majority of our stock or
assets is acquired by a third party. We are required to issue
BHP an additional 2.0 million stock appreciation rights
upon the commencement of the first six-month extension of the
term of the Technical Services Agreement.
37
The term of the Technical Services Agreement extends until
September 30, 2006, and BHP may elect to extend the term of
the agreement for additional six-month periods. BHP may
terminate the agreement at any time upon 90 days notice to
us, and we may terminate the agreement if BHP materially
breaches the agreement. If BHP elects to terminate the
agreement, its stock appreciation rights and right of first
refusal will immediately expire. The agreement terminates if we
are sold to a third party or a majority of our stock or assets
is acquired by a third party.
Plan of Operations for the 12-Month Period Ending
April 30, 2007
|
|
|
General and Administrative Operations |
We moved our corporate headquarters from Vancouver, British
Columbia to Solon, Ohio in early 2005. We have added
administrative, accounting and legal personnel to our staff to
handle the increased responsibilities brought about by the
growth of our Illinois Basin projects and our additional SEC and
American Stock Exchange reporting obligations. Additionally, we
expect our overall general and administrative activities and
expenses will continue to increase as we drill additional wells
and grow our projects in the Illinois Basin.
The following table summarizes the status of wells we have
drilled as of May 1, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Drilled | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive | |
|
but not yet in | |
|
Shut-in | |
|
Test | |
|
Total | |
Project |
|
Wells | |
|
Production | |
|
Wells | |
|
Wells | |
|
Wells | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Southern Illinois Basin Project(1)
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Northern Illinois Basin Project
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Western Illinois Basin Project
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In connection with ongoing litigation relating to our Southern
Illinois Basin Project, it is possible that we will lose all of
our wells at this Project. For more information about the
litigation relating to our Southern Illinois Basin Project, see
the section of the Summary entitled Litigation Relating to
Our CBM Rights at Our Southern Illinois Basin Project. |
As of May 1, 2006, all of the wells that we have drilled
are vertical wells. We estimate that a typical vertical well
will require an average of 18 months to reach peak
production. (Note that when we talk about average dewatering
times, the early wells at any of our projects are expected to
take longer to dewater than are later wells that are drilled and
tied into our gathering system after a field or area has been
undergoing dewatering by previously drilled wells). We began
selling gas from our first productive wells in
January 2005. As of May 1, 2006, most of our
productive wells have not yet reached peak production. Although
we have drilled wells on only a relatively small part of our
projects, we have not to date determined that any well we have
drilled is a dry hole.
The following table sets forth BPIs net sales volume for
the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 (1) (2) | |
|
2004(2) | |
|
2003(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total produced (Mcf)
|
|
|
17,885 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Total production represents gross production and omits
(i) gas consumed in operations and (ii) gas sales
equivalent to royalty interests held by our various lessors. |
38
|
|
(2) |
No gas was produced until January 2005. All of our productive
wells are located at our Southern Illinois Basin Project. Since
our Southern Illinois Basin Project is currently subject to
litigation, we may lose our right to continue to operate and
produce CBM from all of our productive wells existing as of
May 1, 2006. |
|
|
|
Average Sales Prices and Lifting Costs |
The following table sets forth the average sales price and
average lifting costs for all of our gas production for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended | |
|
|
July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Average gas sales price (per Mcf)
|
|
$ |
6.59 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Average lifting cost (per Mcf)
|
|
|
14.97 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
The following table summarizes the wells that we plan to drill
in the Illinois Basin during the
12-month period ending
April 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
Vertical | |
|
Horizontal | |
|
Test | |
|
Additional | |
Wells | |
|
Wells | |
|
Wells | |
|
Wells | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
115 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Our ability to drill additional wells is primarily limited by
the availability of (i) capital, (ii) drilling
contractors and (iii) equipment. Our drilling plan and our
overall capital expenditure budget is based upon our available
and anticipated cash resources. In addition to our drilling
plan, we expect to pursue the acquisition of additional CBM
rights during the 12-month period ending April 30, 2007.
Proved reserves are the estimated quantities which geological
and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recovered in future years from known reservoirs under existing
economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of
the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of
changes in existing prices provided only by contractual
arrangements (of which none existed as of July 31, 2005,
the date of our estimate of proved reserves prepared by our
independent reservoir engineer consultants, Schlumberger
Data & Consulting Services), but not on escalations
based on future conditions. The following table shows our
estimated proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves.
Reserve information is net of royalty interests owned by our
lessors. Proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves are
reserves that could be commercially recovered under current
economic conditions, operating methods and government
regulations. Proved developed and undeveloped reserves are
defined by SEC Rule 4.10(a) of
Regulation S-X.
All of our proved reserves are held pursuant to the lease
relating to our Southern Illinois Basin Project, where our
rights are currently subject to litigation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Reserves (MMcf) | |
|
|
As of July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Estimated proved developed reserves
|
|
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Estimated proved undeveloped reserves
|
|
|
7,321 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated proved developed and undeveloped reserves
|
|
|
10,292 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted Future Cash Flows |
The following table shows our estimated future net cash flows,
based on estimated proved developed and undeveloped reserves
(all of which are located at our Southern Illinois Basin
Project, where our rights are
39
currently subject to litigation), and total standardized measure
of discounted future net cash flows (discounted at a rate of
10%):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted Future Net | |
|
|
Cash Flows (Dollars in | |
|
|
thousands) | |
|
|
As of July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Future net cash flows (net of taxes)
|
|
$ |
43,940 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Total standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
(net of taxes)
|
|
|
23,068 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Total standardized measure of pre-tax discounted future net cash
flows
|
|
|
30,767 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used by Operations and Cash Resources |
We do not expect to generate any substantial cash contribution
from operations during the
12-month period ending
April 30, 2007. Our plan anticipates that over the 12-month
period ending April 30, 2007, we will spend approximately
$30.0 million on capital expenditures. We plan to drill 123
new wells during that period, including 120 new production
wells and three new test wells. In addition to our drilling
program, we expect to pursue the acquisition of additional CBM
rights during that 12-month period. Our current cash balance is
insufficient to fully fund our forecasted capital expenditures
and net cash used by operating activities over the 12-month
period ending April 30, 2007. Although management has no
specific plans in place to raise the additional capital
necessary to fund our plan of operations and forecasted capital
expenditures, management is evaluating raising the additional
required capital through a combination of additional stock
sales, the issuance of debt securities, borrowing and/or
entering into joint ventures. However, we can provide no
assurance that we will be able to raise the additional required
capital to meet our plan or if we are able to raise the funds
that it will be on terms similar to past financings.
|
|
|
Operational Needs as We Increase Our Drilling and
Production |
Although we plan on drilling additional wells at other projects,
our operating plan for the
12-month period ending
April 30, 2007 anticipates that most of our CBM production
will occur at our Southern Illinois Basin Project, assuming that
we do not lose our productive wells at our Southern Illinois
Basin Project due to our ongoing litigation. Our processing
includes a glycol tower that removes excess moisture from the
CBM and a compression facility that provides compression
sufficient to allow our CBM to enter the pipeline transporting
our CBM. During the
12-month period ending
April 30, 2007, we anticipate adding additional compression
and processing equipment as our production requires. In terms of
personnel, in connection with our plan of operations for the
12-month period ending
April 30, 2007 we believe that we will need additional
personnel to handle the expected increased drilling, production
and related activities. In the future, we may need to hire
additional personnel and add additional equipment to handle
future growth in development and production. We do not
anticipate that we will experience any difficulties obtaining
the appropriate personnel or processing equipment at any of our
projects, although we can provide no assurance in this regard.
Sales and Distribution of Our Gas
Our current and future plans anticipate that we will sell all of
our CBM to natural gas marketing companies. These marketing
companies secure space on pipelines that they utilize to
transport the CBM we sell them. There are multiple gas marketing
companies we could choose to deal with in selling our CBM. These
marketing companies have multiple pipeline companies they can
secure space from to transport our CBM. There are multiple
interstate pipeline companies that have pipelines that cross or
are in close proximity to all of our current acreage in the
Illinois Basin. These pipelines include lines owned by Texas
Eastern, Northern Borders, NGPL and Ameren. These pipelines are
available to the marketing companies to whom we anticipate
selling our CBM. We believe that these marketing companies will
have adequate capacity from the
40
existing pipelines in the Illinois Basin to be able to purchase
all of the CBM we anticipate producing and selling within the
next three to five years, although we can provide no assurance
in this regard.
We currently sell all of our CBM production to one gas marketing
company, Atmos Energy Marketing, LLC, pursuant to monthly
contracts. Under these monthly contracts, Atmos is required to
buy all of our CBM production, up to a maximum of 2,500 MMBtus
per day (which equates to approximately four times our current
daily production of 625 Mcfe), at the NYMEX (New York Mercantile
Exchange) price as of the close of business on the last day of
the most recently ended month less twenty-five cents. If we are
unable to extend our monthly contracts with Atmos, we believe
that we will have multiple gas marketing companies available to
us for the sale of our CBM production.
We currently have no fixed price contracts for the sale of our
CBM. We do not anticipate entering into any fixed price
contracts for the sale of our CBM during the next
24 months. We will reevaluate the risks and benefits of
entering into fixed price contracts after our projects and wells
become more mature.
Availability of Drilling Equipment and Personnel
We utilize drilling contractors to perform all of the drilling
on our projects. We maintain a limited number of supervisory and
field personnel to oversee drilling and production operations.
Our plans to drill additional wells are determined in large part
by the anticipated availability of acceptable drilling equipment
and crews. We do not currently have any contractual commitments
that ensure we will have adequate drilling equipment or crews to
achieve our drilling plans. As of May 1, 2006, we have two
drilling rigs in operation at our projects. We have working
relationships with two drilling companies that we believe will
make available to us on a continuous basis at least two drilling
rigs for drilling vertical wells. In addition, we believe that
we currently can secure a commitment from one of three other
drilling companies to drill three pilot horizontal wells in the
Fall of 2006. However, we can provide no assurance that our
expectations regarding the availability of drilling equipment
from these companies will be met.
If these levels of drilling equipment are made available to us
and if we are able to raise the necessary capital, we expect to
be able to achieve our drilling plan during the
12-month period ending
April 30, 2007. This plan anticipates drilling
115 vertical wells, three horizontal wells and five test
wells. If we are able to secure additional drilling equipment
commitments and raise the necessary financing, we may modify our
drilling plan accordingly.
Governmental Regulations
Our business is affected by numerous laws and regulations,
including those relating to energy, the environment and
conservation. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations
may result in increased compliance costs and the assessment of
administrative, civil or criminal penalties and/or the
imposition of injunctive relief. Changes in any of these laws
and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our
business. In view of the many uncertainties with respect to
current and future laws and regulations, including their
applicability to us, we cannot predict the overall effect of
such laws and regulations on our future operations.
We believe that our current operations comply in all material
respects with applicable laws and regulations, and that they
have no more restrictive effect on us than on other similar
companies in the energy industry.
41
The following discussion describes certain laws and regulations
that apply to us and is qualified in its entirety by the
foregoing.
Our operations are subject to regulation at the state level and,
in some cases, county, municipal and local governmental levels.
Such regulation includes:
|
|
|
|
|
requiring permits for the drilling of wells; |
|
|
|
maintaining bonding requirements to drill or operate wells; |
|
|
|
regulating the location of wells, the method of drilling and
casing wells, surface use and the restoration of properties upon
which wells are drilled; and |
|
|
|
regulating the plugging and abandoning of wells and the
disposing of fluids used and produced in connection with
operations. |
Our operations are also subject to various conservation laws and
regulations relating to well spacing and safety issues for gas
gathering systems.
|
|
|
Environmental Regulations |
We are subject to extensive federal, state and local
environmental laws and regulations that, among other things,
regulate the discharge or disposal of substances into the
environment and otherwise are intended to protect the
environment. Numerous governmental agencies issue rules and
regulations to implement and enforce such laws, which are often
difficult and costly to comply with and which carry substantial
administrative, civil and/or criminal penalties and, in some
cases, injunctive relief for failure to comply. Some laws and
regulations relating to the protection of the environment may,
in certain circumstances, impose strict liability
for environmental contamination. Other laws and regulations may
impose restrictions that prevent the rate of natural gas
production from being economically optimal or restrict or
prohibit exploration or production activities in environmentally
sensitive areas. In addition, state laws often require some form
of remedial action such as the closure of inactive pits and the
plugging of abandoned wells to prevent pollution from former or
suspended operations.
We believe that we are in substantial compliance with current
applicable laws and regulations and that continued compliance
with existing requirements will not have a material adverse
impact on us. However, from time to time, legislation or other
initiatives are proposed to place more onerous conditions on our
operations. Adoption of any such proposals could adversely
impact our operating costs, capital expenditures, earnings or
competitive position.
Our CBM operations require the hydraulic fracturing of coal
seams. We believe that this technique is in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations, but neither the Illinois Office
of Mines and Minerals nor the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency regulates the hydraulic fracturing of coal bed formations
as a form of underground injection. It is possible that the
hydraulic fracturing of coal beds for CBM production will become
regulated within the United States as a form of underground
injection, resulting in the imposition of stricter performance
standards, which, if not met, could result in diminished
opportunities for CBM production enhancement and increased
administrative and operating costs.
In CBM production, naturally occurring groundwater is pumped to
the surface as a by-product. We currently dispose of water from
our wells through water flow lines that reinject the water into
water disposal wells. Discharge of this water is subject to
federal and local regulation, and we are required to obtain
permits from the State of Illinois to reinject the water that
our wells produce. We have received permits from the State of
Illinois that allow us to dispose of all the water that we
anticipate producing at our Southern Illinois Basin Project
during the 12-month
period ending April 30, 2007. As we drill additional wells
in areas not currently serviced by our existing water disposal
wells, we believe that we will be able to obtain the necessary
permits for additional disposal wells, although we can make no
assurance in this regard. If the water produced from our
42
wells increases substantially and/or the water quality falls
below acceptable standards, other disposal or treatment methods
may be required to be implemented.
Competition
We operate in the highly competitive natural gas market. We face
competition from other energy companies in each of the following
areas:
|
|
|
|
|
acquiring CBM acreage rights; |
|
|
|
selling our natural gas production; |
|
|
|
identifying and employing new technologies; and |
|
|
|
acquiring the equipment and expertise necessary to develop and
operate our properties. |
Many of our competitors have financial, technological and other
resources that are greater than ours. These companies may be
able to pay more for CBM acreage rights and exploratory
prospects and may be able to evaluate and purchase more acreage
rights and prospects than our resources permit. To the extent
our competitors are able to pay more for properties than we are,
we will be at a competitive disadvantage. In addition, many of
our competitors may enjoy technological advantages and may be
able to identify, develop or implement new technologies more
rapidly than we can. Our ability to acquire additional acreage
rights and explore for CBM prospects in the future will depend
upon our ability to successfully conduct operations, implement
advanced technologies, evaluate and select suitable properties
and consummate transactions in this competitive environment.
Legal Proceedings
On March 15, 2006, we filed a complaint against Colt, LLC
and other defendants alleging tortious interference with
business relations and breach of contract relating to the
interruptions of our development plans at our Southern Illinois
Basin Project. We sought a preliminary injunction against Colt,
LLC and related parties from terminating the lease agreement
covering our CBM rights at the Southern Illinois Basin Project
or taking any other action that interferes with our right to
mine CBM under the lease agreement, pending a final judgment on
the merits of our complaint. We requested the preliminary
injunction to preserve the status quo until the case is resolved.
On April 3, 2006, the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Ohio denied our motion for a preliminary
injunction. Although the courts opinion provided that it
did not state the courts ultimate opinion on the merits of
the case, the opinion provided that we had failed, in connection
with our request for the preliminary injunction, to establish a
substantial likelihood or probability of success on the merits.
On April 5, 2006, Colt filed an answer and counterclaim in
response to our complaint. In its counterclaim, Colt seeks a
declaratory judgment asking the court to declare, among other
things, that: (a) we committed multiple breaches of the
lease agreement; (b) the lease agreement automatically
terminated due to our failure to cure our alleged breaches;
(c) the lease agreement automatically terminated by its own
terms on April 3, 2006; and (d) to the extent the
lease agreement already terminated, we are wrongfully holding
over and/or trespassing and Colt is entitled to an award of
damages as a result.
Apart from the claims that we are currently pursuing in the
litigation as to the entire 43,000 acres covered by the
lease, we believe that we should hold our CBM acreage rights as
to certain tracts of land subject to the lease. The lease has a
primary term that extended until April 3, 2006. After the
primary term, the lease provides that it shall extend as to a
particular tract so long as CBM is being produced from such
tract providing a royalty payment of not less than
$1.00 per acre per month; provided that, after the primary
term, in the event the aggregate royalties do no exceed $42,000
in any month, the lease shall terminate. We believe that the
wells that we have drilled (including both productive wells and
shut-in wells) pursuant to the lease should hold tracts of land
totaling approximately 10,550 acres. The remaining
32,450 acres under the lease do not have wells drilled.
43
These and related provisions of the lease, which we believe
permit us to maintain our rights to at least 10,550 acres
of CBM rights after the primary term of the lease, are subject
to varying interpretations. It is likely that, ultimately, the
interpretation of these lease provisions will be determined by
the court in the ongoing litigation. It is possible that the
court will not agree with our interpretation of the applicable
lease provisions. In that case, we would lose all of our CBM
acreage rights and productive wells at our Southern Illinois
Basin Project.
As of May 1, 2006, we have drilled 107 wells. These
wells consist of 77 productive wells,
17 shut-in wells
and 13 wells that have been drilled but are not in
production, including three test wells. All of our productive
wells are located at our Southern Illinois Basin Project.
The effect of the loss of all of our acreage under this lease
would result in a write-down of capitalized net oil and gas and
other properties in a total amount of approximately
$26 million. The effect of the loss of only our
non-producing acreage (those areas in which wells have not yet
been established) may result in a write-down of capitalized net
oil and gas and other properties in an amount up to
approximately $4 million.
Employees
We have 16 full-time employees, including our executive
officers. We utilize independent consultants to perform various
professional services and for drilling, testing and completion
work.
44
Management
Executive Officers and Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
James G. Azlein
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
George J. Zilich
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Director |
James E. Craddock
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Operations |
Costa Vrisakis
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Director |
William J. Centa
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Director |
Dennis Carlton
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Director |
David E. Preng
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Director |
James G. Azlein has been President, Chief Executive
Officer and a Director since August 23, 2001. From 1979 to
1998, Mr. Azlein held positions including President and
Chief Financial Officer and was a principal of Cyrus Eaton Group
(CEG), a private company that specialized in project
development, including securing technologies, management,
financing and marketing for a variety of projects, for hotels
and resorts, agricultural projects and manufacturing plants. CEG
concentrated on projects in conjunction with government
authorities in Eastern Europe, the former U.S.S.R. and China. In
1998, Mr. Azlein and a partner acquired the interests of
CEG when its founder retired, and formed International Resource
Management, Inc., which continued project development in India
and Mexico through June 2001. In early 2000, Mr. Azlein
formed Methane Management, Inc. to acquire the interest of
various partners in a 43,000 acre CBM project in southern
Illinois in which BPI owned a minority interest. In August 2001,
BPI acquired Methane Management, Inc. and Mr. Azlein became
President of BPI and began assembling a new management team that
refocused BPIs attention on CBM development in the
Illinois Basin, which started with the 43,000 acre project
that is now referred to as the Southern Illinois Basin Project.
George J. Zilich is an attorney and a certified public
accountant. He was appointed to our Board of Directors and as
our Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel on
January 21, 2005. From June 2004 through January 2005,
Mr. Zilich was an attorney at the law firm Jones Day where
he concentrated in the areas of corporate finance and mergers
and acquisitions. From 2001 through 2004, Mr. Zilich was an
independent financial consultant and attended law school. Before
entering the practice of law, Mr. Zilich worked for over
20 years as a certified public accountant and an
entrepreneur. From 1994 through 2000, he was the Chief Financial
Officer and a director for Archer Steel (a private company based
in Aurora, Ohio). Mr. Zilich received his undergraduate
degree from Ohio State University in 1979 where he graduated at
the top of his class in accounting. In 2004, he received his
juris doctorate from Cleveland-Marshall College of Law where he
served as
Editor-in-Chief of the
Cleveland-Marshall Law Review and graduated at the top of his
class. Mr. Zilich is a graduate of, and former graduate
instructor for, the Dale Carnegie courses in human relations,
leadership and public speaking. Mr. Zilich is a member of
the American Bar Association, the Ohio Bar Association, the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Ohio
Society of Certified Public Accountants.
James E. Craddock has been Senior Vice
President Operations since April 2006. From 2004 to
April 2006, Mr. Craddock served as Chief Engineer for
Burlington Resources Inc., an independent oil and gas company
that was recently acquired by ConocoPhillips. Mr. Craddock
worked for Burlington Resources Inc. for 21 years and held
various positions during that time including General
Manager Asset Development, General
Manager Production and Director of Strategic
Planning.
Costa Vrisakis has been a Director since January 2002.
Based in Sydney, Australia, Mr. Vrisakis is a financier and
entrepreneur. In 1959, Mr. Vrisakis founded, along with two
employees, Snap-Apart Pty. Ltd., a printing company. In 1985,
Snap-Apart Pty. Ltd. was listed on the Sydney Stock Exchange
under the name Computer Resources Ltd. In 1993, Moore Corp. of
Toronto, Canada acquired Computer Resources. Since 1993, when he
sold his interest in Computer Resources, he has focused his
attention on various real estate
45
projects and stock market investments. Since 2000 through the
present time, Mr. Vrisakis has devoted the majority of his
time to managing his 50% interest in various hotels in Sydney,
Australia.
William J. Centa has been a Director since March 28,
2005. Since March 2004, Mr. Centa has served as Executive
Vice President and one of the co-founders of Mayfran Holdings,
Inc., a multi-national manufacturing and engineering company
that designs conveyor and filtration equipment used in the
machine tool industry. From October 2000 through March 2004,
Mr. Centa served as Chief Operating and Financial Officer
for iPower Logistics, a supply chain solutions and outsourcing
firm providing services to industrial companies in North
America. From February 1998 until October 2000, he served as
Associate Director, Mergers & Acquisitions at the
international accounting firm of Ernst & Young.
Mr. Centa earned his MBA in 1977 from Cleveland State
University. He is a certified public accountant and has been a
member of the AICPAs Business & Industry
Executive Committee since 2002 and the Enhanced Business
Reporting Task Force since 2003.
Dennis Carlton has been a Director since May 2005.
Mr. Carlton has been involved in CBM since 1989. In
September 2005, Mr. Carlton became VP Exploration-Western
Division for Pioneer Resources. From 1995 through September
2004, he served as a director and worked in several senior
executive positions with Evergreen Resources, Inc., serving most
recently as Executive Vice President Exploration and
Chief Operating Officer, as well as President of Evergreen
Operating Corp. His primary responsibilities included management
of all geoscience, engineering, land matters and domestic and
international business development activities. Since October
2004, when Evergreen was acquired by Pioneer Natural Resources,
Inc., Mr. Carlton has served as a technical and business
advisor to Pioneers Western Division. Prior to joining
Evergreen Resources, he held positions in several companies
including Mobil Oil Corporation. Mr. Carltons
experience in CBM has included the Rocky Mountain Basins,
Mid-Continent, United Kingdom and Alaska. His efforts in the
Raton Basin with Evergreen were recognized when he was
recognized as the Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists
Outstanding Explorer in 2000.
David E. Preng has been a Director since February 2006.
Mr. Preng is the Chief Executive Officer and President of
Preng & Associates, an international executive search
firm specializing in placements within the oil and gas industry.
He has served in that position since he founded the company in
1980. Prior to founding Preng & Associates, he spent
six years in the executive search industry. His industry
background includes financial, managerial and executive
positions with Shell Oil Company, Litton Industries and
Southwest Industries. Mr. Preng also serves on the board of
directors of Maverick Oil & Gas, Inc., where he is
chairperson of its compensation committee, and Remington Oil and
Gas, Inc., which are both publicly held oil and gas companies.
Significant Employees
The following persons are not executive officers, but make
significant contributions to our business:
Randy Oestreich, 50, has been Vice President of Field
Operations since March 2005. Mr. Oestreich owns A-Strike
Consulting, a private consulting company formed in April 2003 to
provide consulting services to the CBM industry. From 1976 to
2003, Mr. Oestreich worked for Halliburton Energy Services.
With Halliburton, Mr. Oestreich worked in conventional oil
and gas exploration and development, as well as unconventional
gas, including CBM, primarily in the Illinois Basin, but also in
Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. In
addition, he was a member of Halliburtons Coalbed Methane
Solutions Team. For the past 10 years, his work has focused
on CBM, mine methane and New Albany shale exploration and
development. Mr. Oestreich has worked on, and is familiar
with, the majority of unconventional gas projects that have been
initiated in the Illinois Basin and has worked on the Southern
Illinois Basin Project since its inception.
Dan Anderson, 57, has been Director of Property
Acquisitions since January 2002. Mr. Anderson has over
25 years of oil and gas and real estate experience: from
1976 to 1983 as Land Department Manager with John Carey Oil
Company, Inc.; from 1983 to 1989 as president of his own oil and
gas investment consulting company, and as President of a private
real estate development company, DAPA Investments, Inc. Prior to
joining BPI, Mr. Anderson worked with DeMier Oil in
securing oil, gas and CBM leases in central and southern
Illinois, as well as pipeline
right-of-way easements.
He has extensive experience in the oil, gas and
46
CBM business in the Illinois Basin, including oil and gas and
CBM leasing terms and agreements. In addition, he has extensive
experience in the workings of land title and registrar offices
on both a local and state level. Mr. Anderson is a member
of the Illinois Oil and Gas Association and holds an Illinois
real estate broker license.
Advisory Board
Members of the Advisory Board are appointed by the Board of
Directors to provide advice and guidance to the Board of
Directors and our employees concerning various aspects of our
business.
Clyde House, 72, has been involved in the oil and gas
business most of his adult life. He has overseen field
operations both domestically and internationally for major oil
and gas exploration and development companies including Devon
Energy. Over the past 15 years, Mr. House has focused
his attention on development of CBM. Mr. House directed
field operations and the development of the first 300 wells
that the River Gas Company (subsequently acquired by Phillips
Petroleum) drilled in the Black Warrior Basin. Mr. House
originally identified the potential for a gas project in the
Illinois Basin, and his research and past experience in CBM and
shale production provided the basis for the Southern Illinois
Basin Project.
William Ginn, 82, is currently a retired partner of
Thompson Hine LLP in its Cleveland, Ohio office. In addition to
his numerous community endeavors, Mr. Ginn is a
long-standing member of the Board of Directors of Nordson
Corporation. Mr. Ginn recently retired as a long-standing
director of the Davey Tree Expert Company, where he was
responsible for structuring and financing the employee
acquisition of that once family owned company. Mr. Ginn
graduated from Bates College and Yale Law School.
Kevin W. Reimer, 45, is a certified petroleum geologist
and certified professional geologist with over 22 years of
experience in oil and gas exploration and development, both as a
principal and a consultant. Mr. Reimer has significant
experience in research and evaluation of CBM projects in the
United States and Western Europe. Mr. Reimer has expertise
in the extraction of coal mine methane gas from abandoned
underground coal mines and has seven years of research and
experience in gas-fired power generation. Mr. Reimer was
one of the first persons to successfully develop coal mine
methane gas reserves and sell the resource to an interstate
pipeline in Illinois. He has organized and operated three CBM
pilot projects in the Illinois Basin starting in 1996.
Mr. Reimer is currently a principal and President of Finite
Resources, LTD. and a principal of KWR Ventures, LLC and KWR
Consulting, LLC.
Dr. Luc Berthoud, 67, based in Zurich, Switzerland,
holds a Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Lausanne,
following an MBA in Paris. Since 1968, he has been active in
international investment banking, holding senior management
positions at both the Schroeder and Mercury (Warburg) groups in
London. Since 1998, Dr. Berthoud has been a consultant to
private clients for investment management and venture capital.
47
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our
executive officers in the three fiscal years ended July 31,
2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards | |
|
Payouts | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Restricted | |
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Stock Wards | |
|
Underlying | |
|
LTIP | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compensation | |
|
and SARs | |
|
Options | |
|
Payouts | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
James G. Azlein
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
163,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
1,422,278 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
CEO and President |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
111,286 |
|
|
|
7,808 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
320,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
145,917 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
320,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
George J. Zilich(1)
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
475,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and General Counsel |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keith A. Ebert(2)
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
44,200 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
341,667 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Vice President |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
58,338 |
|
|
|
7,479 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
47,272 |
|
|
|
6,705 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Mr. Zilich became our Chief Financial Officer and General
Counsel on January 21, 2005. |
(2) |
Mr. Ebert resigned as an officer and director on
March 28, 2005. |
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
The following options to purchase shares of our common stock
were granted to our executive officers during the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
Potential Realizable Value | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
at Assumed Annual Rate of | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Options | |
|
|
|
Stock Price Appreciation | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Granted to | |
|
|
|
for Option Term(2) | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Employees in | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
|
|
Granted | |
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
Price(1) | |
|
Date | |
|
5% | |
|
10% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
James G. Azlein
|
|
|
456,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
|
11/29/09 |
|
|
$ |
157,949 |
|
|
$ |
349,026 |
|
|
|
|
965,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
1/20/10 |
|
|
|
524,342 |
|
|
|
1,158,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,422,278 |
|
|
|
51.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
682,291 |
|
|
$ |
1,507,684 |
|
George J. Zilich
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.97 |
|
|
|
1/20/10 |
|
|
$ |
95,028 |
|
|
$ |
209,986 |
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.79 |
|
|
|
3/27/10 |
|
|
|
148,371 |
|
|
|
327,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,000 |
|
|
|
17.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
243,399 |
|
|
$ |
537,847 |
|
Keith A. Ebert
|
|
|
341,667 |
|
|
|
12.47 |
% |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
|
11/29/09 |
|
|
$ |
94,380 |
|
|
$ |
208,556 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The exercise price per share of each option is equal to the fair
market value per share of the underlying stock on the date of
grant, as determined by quoted market prices, and converted from
Canadian dollars to U.S. dollars using the published
exchange rate on the date of grant. |
|
(2) |
The potential realizable value shown is calculated based on the
term of the option at the time of grant. Stock price
appreciation of 5% and 10% is assumed pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the SEC and does not represent our prediction of
stock price performance. The potential realizable values at 5%
and 10% appreciation are calculated by assuming that the
U.S. dollar equivalent exercise price on the date of grant
appreciates at the indicated rate for the entire term of the
option and that the option is exercised at the U.S. dollar
equivalent exercise price and sold on the last day of its term
at the U.S. dollar equivalent appreciated price, assuming a
constant exchange rate from the date of grant. |
48
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal
Year-End Option Values
The following table shows the number of shares underlying
options that were exercised by our executive officers in our
fiscal year ended July 31, 2005. The table also shows the
value as of July 31, 2005 of all outstanding options for
our common stock held by our executive officers on that date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised | |
|
In-the-Money | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options at FY-End | |
|
Options at FY-End(1) | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Acquired | |
|
Value | |
|
Exercisable/ | |
|
Exercisable/ | |
Name |
|
on Exercise | |
|
Realized | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
James G. Azlein
|
|
|
445,555 |
|
|
$ |
317,569 |
|
|
|
1,985,612/0 |
|
|
$ |
660,983/$0 |
|
George J. Zilich
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,000/0 |
|
|
|
$0/$0 |
|
Keith A. Ebert
|
|
|
313,889 |
|
|
$ |
246,054 |
|
|
|
341,667/0 |
|
|
$ |
192,339/$0 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Value is determined based on the closing market price of our
common stock on July 31, 2005 as reported by the TSX
Venture Exchange, converted from Canadian dollars to
U.S. dollars using the published exchange rate on
July 31, 2005. |
Agreements with Our Employees
We entered into an employment agreement on January 6, 2005
with George J. Zilich, our Chief Financial Officer and General
Counsel. Mr. Zilichs employment agreement provides
that he will be an at-will employee of the company.
Mr. Zilichs employment agreement entitles him to a
base salary of $120,000 per year, a grant of options to
purchase 175,000 shares of our common stock pursuant
to our Incentive Stock Option Plan, and the right to participate
in the benefits offered to our other senior executives. If
Mr. Zilich is terminated by us without cause,
he is entitled to receive a severance payment equal to two times
his salary and benefits.
We also entered into an employment agreement on January 31,
2005 with Randy Elkins, our Controller. Mr. Elkins
employment agreement provides that he will be an at-will
employee of the company. Mr. Elkins employment
agreement entitles him to a base salary of $80,000 per
year, an immediate grant of 25,000 options, a grant of 25,000
options after three months, and additional grants of 25,000
options based upon the achievement of performance goals after
12 months and every six months thereafter, subject to a
maximum of 175,000 options. Mr. Elkins employment
agreement also gives him the right to receive health insurance
through the plan that we maintain for our employees.
We also entered into an agreement on April 17, 2004 with
James G. Azlein, our President and Chief Executive Officer,
pursuant to which we agreed to grant to Mr. Azlein, in
exchange for personally guaranteeing 11.025% of a $2,000,000
loan to a company 11.025% of which is indirectly owned by us, a
number of shares of our common stock equal to 10% of the value
of the guarantee. Pursuant to this agreement, we have issued
50,990 shares of our common stock to Mr. Azlein. Under
the terms of this agreement, if Mr. Azlein is required to
perform under the guarantee, he has no recourse to pursue any
legal action for contribution or indemnification against us. On
January 4, 2006, Mr. Azleins guarantee was
released as part of our sale of our interest in Hite Coalbed
Methane, L.L.C.
On April 18, 2006, we entered into an employment
relationship with James E. Craddock pursuant to which
Mr. Craddock agreed to serve as our Senior Vice
President Operations. As compensation for this
position, Mr. Craddock is entitled to receive an initial
base salary of $250,000 per year and a $100,000 signing bonus, a
stock grant, on April 18, 2006, of 300,000 fully vested and
unrestricted common shares, a stock grant, on April 18,
2006, of 300,000 restricted common shares, which will vest at
the rate of 100,000 shares per year over the next three
years, reimbursement of certain relocation expenses,
participation in our stock-based compensation plans and our
other standard benefit programs, a company car and five weeks
vacation per year.
49
Stock-Based Compensation Plans
On November 9, 2005, our Board of Directors unanimously
approved and adopted the BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. 2005 Omnibus
Stock Plan, subject to approval by our shareholders at the 2005
Annual Meeting of Shareholders and our common stock being
delisted from the TSX Venture Exchange. The Plan became
effective on December 13, 2005, when our shareholders
approved the Plan and our common stock was delisted from the TSX
Venture Exchange. We have ceased making option grants under our
existing Incentive Stock Option Plan and expect to make any
future stock-based awards under the Omnibus Stock Plan.
The Omnibus Stock Plan is administered by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors and will remain in effect
for five years. All of our employees and Directors, and any of
our consultants or agents designated by the Compensation
Committee, are eligible to participate in the Omnibus Stock
Plan. The Omnibus Stock Plan provides for the grant of stock
options (incentive stock options or non-qualified
stock options), restricted stock, stock appreciation rights,
stock purchase rights, cash awards and other stock or
performance-based incentives. These awards are payable in cash
or common stock, or any combination thereof, as established by
the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee also has
authority to grant awards, select the participants who will
receive awards, determine the terms, conditions, vesting periods
and restrictions applicable to the awards, determine how the
exercise price is to be paid, modify or replace outstanding
awards within the limits of the Omnibus Stock Plan, accelerate
the date on which awards become exercisable, waive the
restrictions and conditions applicable to awards and establish
rules governing the Omnibus Stock Plan.
As of May 1, 2006, we have options outstanding to purchase
1,872,812 shares of our common stock, all of which were
issued with an exercise price equal to the market price of our
common stock on the date of grant. All of the options granted by
us to U.S. plan participants since November 2004 and all
other participants since January 2005 have exercise prices equal
to the closing market price of our common stock on the date of
grant.
Directors Fees and Other Compensation
All non-management Directors are reimbursed for reasonable
expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings. During
the most recently completed fiscal year our independent
Directors were granted options to purchase the following number
of shares under our Incentive Stock Option Plan:
Mr. Vrisakis 600,000;
Mr. Centa 125,000; and
Mr. Carlton 115,000. There were no standard
compensation arrangements (including any additional amounts
payable for committee participation or special assignments) or
any other arrangements in addition to, or in lieu of, standard
arrangements under which our Directors were compensated by us in
their capacity as Directors during such fiscal year. During the
most recently completed fiscal year, none of our Directors were
compensated for services rendered to us as consultants or
experts.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
None of our executive officers serve as a member of the board of
directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one
or more executive officers who serve on our board of directors
or compensation committee.
50
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Randy Oestreich, our Vice President of Field Operations, owns
and operates A-Strike Consulting, a consulting company that
provides, among other things, laboratory testing related to CBM.
We own a lab testing facility and allow A-Strike Consulting to
operate the facility. We pay all expenses related to the
facility and, in return, receive 80% of the revenue generated
from the operations of the facility as reimbursement of our
expenses. During the year ended July 31, 2005, we received
approximately $59,000 in expense reimbursement related to this
arrangement.
Mr. Oestreichs brother owns Dependable Service
Company, a company that provides general labor services to us.
We paid Dependable Services Company $147,000 and $16,000 in
fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
51
Our Shareholders
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of May 1, 2006
by (i) each of our executive officers and directors;
(ii) all of our executive officers and directors as a
group; and (iii) each person or entity that, to our
knowledge, beneficially owns more than 5% of our common stock.
The table includes shares underlying options and warrants held
by executive officers and directors and warrants held by
shareholders that own more than 5% of our common stock. All of
these options and warrants are currently exercisable. Percentage
ownership is calculated in accordance with
Rule 13d-3 of the
Exchange Act based on the total number of shares outstanding as
of May 1, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Underlying Options | |
|
Percent | |
Name and Address |
|
Shares | |
|
and Warrants | |
|
Ownership | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
James G. Azlein
|
|
|
2,124,296 |
|
|
|
1,402,812 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
% |
|
30775 Bainbridge Road, Suite 280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solon, Ohio 44139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George J. Zilich
|
|
|
841,523 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
% |
|
30775 Bainbridge Road, Suite 280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solon, Ohio 44139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James E. Craddock
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
30775 Bainbridge Road, Suite 280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solon, Ohio 44139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costa Vrisakis
|
|
|
1,945,522 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
30775 Bainbridge Road, Suite 280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solon, Ohio 44139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Centa
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
30775 Bainbridge Road, Suite 280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solon, Ohio 44139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis Carlton
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
30775 Bainbridge Road, Suite 280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solon, Ohio 44139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David E. Preng
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
30775 Bainbridge Road, Suite 280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solon, Ohio 44139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and
|
|
|
6,311,341 |
|
|
|
1,442,812 |
|
|
|
10.73 |
% |
|
executive officers as a group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 persons) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advisory Research, Inc.(1)
|
|
|
9,372,500 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13.23 |
% |
|
180 N. Stetson Street, Suite 5500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago, Illinois 60601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CFSIL a/c Colonial First
|
|
|
3,900,000 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
7.08 |
% |
|
State Wholesale Global |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 29, 52 Martin Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sydney, Australia NSW 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jennison Associates LLC(2)
|
|
|
6,400,000 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
10.55 |
% |
|
466 Lexington Avenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, New York 10017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wellington Capital Management(3)
|
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
8.47 |
% |
|
227 West Monroe Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago, Illinois 60606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The common stock listed was reported by Advisory Research, Inc.
in a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 10, 2006. |
|
|
|
(2) |
The common stock listed was reported by Jennison Associates LLC
in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 14, 2006. |
|
|
|
(3) |
The common stock listed was reported by Wellington Capital
Management in a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 14, 2006. |
|
52
Selling Shareholders
This prospectus covers the offer and sale by the selling
shareholders of up to 16,595,200 shares of our common stock
owned by the selling shareholders, including shares of our
common stock that can be acquired by such shareholders upon the
exercise of our warrants held by them. All of the warrants are
fully vested and exercisable.
The following is a list of our shareholders that may sell shares
of our common stock pursuant to this prospectus. Each of the
shares offered by this prospectus was purchased in our December
2004/January 2005 private placement. If a selling shareholder
sells all of the shares of our common stock beneficially owned
by the shareholder that are offered for sale by this prospectus,
the shareholder will hold none of our shares, except as noted in
the footnotes below. All of the information contained in the
table below is based upon information provided to us by the
selling shareholders, and we have not independently verified
this information. Percentage ownership is calculated in
accordance with
Rule 13d-3 under
the Exchange Act using the 70,812,540 shares of our common
stock outstanding as of May 1, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
Shares Owned | |
|
Number of | |
|
Owned | |
|
|
Before | |
|
Shares | |
|
Before this | |
Name of Selling Shareholder |
|
Offering(1) | |
|
Offered(1) | |
|
Offering | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Sanders Morris Harris Inc.(2)
|
|
|
1,037,200 |
|
|
|
1,037,200 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
% |
Jennison Associates LLC(3)
|
|
|
7,600,000 |
|
|
|
3,600,000 |
|
|
|
10.55 |
% |
Jan Bartholomew
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
IRA FBO Melton R. Pipes Pershing LLC as Custodian
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
George J. Zilich(4)
|
|
|
841,523 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
% |
Seth Silberman
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Crestview Capital Funds
|
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
|
3.33 |
% |
JMG Trinton Offshore Fund, Ltd.
|
|
|
420,000 |
|
|
|
420,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
JMG Capital Partners, LP
|
|
|
420,000 |
|
|
|
420,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
George L. Ball(5)(6)
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Richard E. Bean(5)(7)
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Robert E. Garrison, II(5)(8)
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Ben T. Morris(5)(9)
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Frederic L. Saalwachter(5)(10)
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Don A. Sanders(5)(11)
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Sanders Opportunity Fund, L.P.(5)(11)
|
|
|
107,439 |
|
|
|
107,439 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Sanders Opportunity Fund (Institutional), L.P.(5)(11)
|
|
|
342,561 |
|
|
|
342,561 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Katherine U. Sanders(5)
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Donald V. Weir and Julie Ellen Weir T/ I/ C(5)(12)
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Donald V. Weir TTEE Sanders 1998 Childrens Trust DTD
12/01/97(5)(12)
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Eric G. Weir TTEE FBO Weir 1998 Childrens Trust U/ A/
D 08/14/98(5)
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Lee H. Corbin & Daniel A. Corbin JT/ TEN
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
T. Buchanan & J. Buchanan CO/ TTEEs for the Buchanan
Advisors, Inc. Defined Benefit Plan V/ A DTD 1/1/2002
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Hunter & Company LLC Pension Trust
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Rune Medhus and Elisa Medhus MD TIC(5)(13)
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Elisa Medhus TTEE for the Atlantis Software Company Employee Pro
SH PL UAD 01/01/93(5)(13)
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
T. Scott OKeefe
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
Shares Owned | |
|
Number of | |
|
Owned | |
|
|
Before | |
|
Shares | |
|
Before this | |
Name of Selling Shareholder |
|
Offering(1) | |
|
Offered(1) | |
|
Offering | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Jan Rask
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Vincent Vazquez
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mark Newton Davis
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Steven R. Elliott
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Marie Mildren
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Gerald W. Pope TTEE for the Gerald W. Pope REV TR U/A DTD
11/30/78
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David L. Shadid
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Edwin Freedman
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
John H. Malanga and Jodi F. Malanga JT/ TEN(5)(14)
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Carl Pipes
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mark Leszczynski
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Vessels Coal Gas, Inc.(15)
|
|
|
2,925,000 |
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
4.08 |
% |
Thomas Asarch and Barbara Asarch JT/ TEN
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
IRA FBO Scott M Marshall Pershing LLC as Custodian
|
|
|
111,600 |
|
|
|
111,600 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Bascom Baynes
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Lenny Olim
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
CFSIL a/c Colonial First State Wholesale Global Resources
Fund(16)
|
|
|
5,100,000 |
|
|
|
3,600,000 |
|
|
|
7.08 |
% |
Crescent International, Ltd.
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Brian Kuhn
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Rose Anna Marshall
|
|
|
73,200 |
|
|
|
73,200 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Nite Capital L.P.
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Delaware Charter Guarantee and Trust Co. F/ B/ O Erik Klefos
IRA(5)(17)
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Delaware Charter Guarantee and Trust Co. F/ B/ O Brede C. Klefos
IRA(5)(18)
|
|
|
85,200 |
|
|
|
85,200 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mathew Dobbs
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mark Bridgeman
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Sarah-Jane Bridgeman
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Peter Bridgeman
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
IRA FBO Charles L. Ramsay, Jr.
Pershing LLC as Custodian
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes shares underlying options and warrants that may not
have yet been exercised. |
|
|
(2) |
Represents shares underlying the warrant owned by Sanders Morris
Harris Inc., the placement agent for our December 2004/ January
2005 private placement. This warrant was issued to Sanders
Morris Harris Inc. as compensation for serving as placement
agent in connection with our December 2004/ January 2005 private
placement. Sanders Morris Harris Inc. is a registered broker
dealer and member of the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc. |
|
|
|
(3) |
If Jennison Associates LLC sells all of its shares offered by
this prospectus, the remaining shares of our common stock
beneficially owned by it will constitute 5.55% of our
outstanding shares. |
|
54
|
|
(4) |
Mr. Zilich became our Chief Financial Officer and General
Counsel and a Director on January 21, 2005, subsequent to
his purchase of the shares of our common stock and warrants
currently held by him. If Mr. Zilich sells all of his
shares offered by this prospectus, the remaining shares of our
common stock beneficially owned by him will constitute 1.19% of
our outstanding shares. |
|
|
(5) |
May be deemed to be an affiliate of Sanders Morris Harris Inc.,
the placement agent in our December 2004/January 2005 private
placement and a registered broker dealer. At the time of our
December 2004/ January 2005 private placement, each of these
selling shareholders represented to us that they acquired their
securities for their own account, for investment, and not with a
view to or for resale in connection with any distribution. |
|
|
(6) |
Mr. Ball is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Sanders Morris Harris Inc. |
|
|
(7) |
Mr. Bean is a director of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc.,
the parent of Sanders Morris Harris Inc. |
|
|
(8) |
Mr. Garrison is President of Sanders Morris Harris Inc. |
|
|
(9) |
Mr. Morris is Chief Executive Officer of Sanders Morris
Harris Inc. |
|
|
(10) |
Mr. Saalwachter is Managing Director of Sanders Morris
Harris Inc. |
|
(11) |
Mr. Sanders is the Chairman of the Executive Committee of
Sanders Morris Harris Inc. Mr. Sanders also is Chief
Investment Officer for Sanders Opportunity Fund, L.P., and
exercises voting and investment authority over the shares held
by this fund. Mr. Sanders also is Chief Investment Officer
for Sanders Opportunity Fund (Institutional), L.P., and
exercises voting and investment authority over the shares held
by this fund. |
|
(12) |
Mr. Weir is an employee of Sanders Morris Harris Inc. As
trustee of the Sanders 1998 Childrens Trust, Mr. Weir
exercises voting and investment authority over the shares held
by the trust. |
|
(13) |
Mr. Medhus is an employee of Sanders Morris Harris Inc. |
|
(14) |
Mr. Malanga is an employee of Sanders Morris Harris Inc. |
|
|
(15) |
Thomas J. Vessels is the Chief Executive Officer of Vessels Coal
Gas, Inc. and is a member of our Advisory Board. If Vessels Coal
Gas, Inc. sells all of its shares offered by this prospectus,
the remaining shares of our common stock beneficially owned by
it will constitute 2.86% of our outstanding shares. |
|
|
|
(16) |
If CFSIL sells all of its shares offered by this prospectus, the
remaining shares of our common stock beneficially owned by it
will constitute 2.08% of our outstanding shares. |
|
|
(17) |
Mr. Klefos is an employee of Sanders Morris Harris Inc. |
|
(18) |
Mr. Klefos is an employee of Sanders Morris Harris Inc. |
The shares covered by this prospectus, and the transactions in
which the selling shareholders acquired their shares and
warrants, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
10,372,000 shares of our common stock and warrants to
purchase 5,186,000 shares of our common stock, at an
exercise price of $1.50 per share, were issued by us in a
private placement completed in December 2004 and January 2005.
The selling shareholders paid us $2.50 per unit, which
consisted of two shares of our common stock and a warrant to
purchase one share of common stock. |
|
|
|
Warrants to purchase 1,037,200 shares of our common
stock, at an exercise price of $1.25 per share, were issued
by us to Sanders Morris Harris Inc. in connection our December
2004/ January 2005 private placement as partial compensation for
services as placement agent. |
The common stock covered by this prospectus has been registered
by us under the Securities Act pursuant to our obligations under
the Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 30,
2004, as amended, that we entered into in connection with our
December 2004/ January 2005 private placement. We were also
required to register under the Securities Act the shares of
common stock that we issued in our September 2005 private
placement.
The shares beneficially owned by the selling shareholders are
registered under Rule 415 under the Securities Act
concerning delayed and continuous offers and sales of
securities. In regard to the offer and sale of such shares, we
have made certain undertakings in Part II of the
registration statement of which this
55
prospectus is part, by which, in general, we have committed to
keep this prospectus current during any period in which the
selling shareholders may make offers to sell the covered
securities pursuant to Rule 415. We are required to make
this prospectus available to the selling shareholders until the
earlier of December 30, 2006 and the date that all of the
shares of our common stock covered by this prospectus have been
sold by the selling shareholders.
All of the shares of common stock sold by the selling
shareholders will be freely tradable without restriction or
limitation under the Securities Act, except for any shares of
common stock purchased by any of our affiliates,
which generally includes our directors, executive officers and
stockholders that hold at least 10% of our common stock. The
common stock that is held by our affiliates is subject to
Rule 144 under the Securities Act, and may not be sold by
an affiliate other than in compliance with the registration
requirements of the Securities Act or pursuant to Rule 144
or another exemption from such registration requirements.
One of the purchasers in our December 2004/ January 2005 private
placement became an affiliate of us after the completion of the
offering. George J. Zilich became our Chief Financial Officer
and General Counsel and a Director on January 21, 2005,
subsequent to his purchase of shares and warrants in the private
placement.
56
Plan of Distribution
The selling shareholders and their assignees may, from time to
time, sell any or all of their shares of our common stock that
are covered by this prospectus on any stock exchange, market or
trading facility on which the shares may then be listed or
quoted or in private transactions. These sales may be at
prevailing market prices, at prices related to prevailing market
prices or at other negotiated prices. The selling shareholders
may use any one or more of the following methods when selling
shares:
|
|
|
|
|
privately negotiated transactions; |
|
|
|
ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the
broker-dealer solicits purchasers; |
|
|
|
block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the
shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the
block as principal to facilitate the transaction; |
|
|
|
purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the
broker-dealer for its account; |
|
|
|
an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the
applicable exchange; |
|
|
|
settlement of short sales entered into after the date of this
prospectus (a short sale occurs when shares, not owned by the
seller, are sold in hopes of a decline in market price so the
seller can purchase shares in the market at a lower price to be
able to replace the shares sold); |
|
|
|
broker-dealers may agree with the selling shareholders to sell a
specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share; |
|
|
|
through the writing or settlement of options or other hedging
transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise; |
|
|
|
a combination of any such methods of sale; or |
|
|
|
any other method permitted by applicable law. |
The selling shareholders also may sell shares under
Rule 144 under the Securities Act, if available, rather
than under this prospectus. Broker-dealers engaged by the
selling shareholders may arrange for other brokers-dealers to
participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or
discounts from the selling shareholders (or, if any
broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of shares, from
the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated. These commissions
and discounts may or may not exceed what is customary in the
types of transactions involved. Broker-dealers may agree to sell
a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per
share and, to the extent such broker-dealer is unable to do so
acting as agent for a selling shareholder, purchase as principal
any unsold shares at the price required to fulfill the
broker-dealer commitment. Broker-dealers who acquire shares as
principal may thereafter resell such shares from time to time in
transactions, which may involve block transactions and sales to
and through other broker-dealers, including transactions of the
nature described above, in the
over-the-counter
markets or otherwise at prices and on terms then prevailing at
the time of sale, at prices related to the prevailing market
price or in negotiated transactions. In connection with such
resales, broker-dealers may pay to or receive from the
purchasers such commissions as described above.
In connection with the sale of shares or interests therein, the
selling shareholders may enter into hedging transactions with
broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in
turn engage in short sales of the common stock in the course of
hedging the positions they assume. The selling shareholders may
also sell shares of our common stock short and deliver shares
covered by this prospectus to close out their short positions,
or loan or pledge such shares to broker-dealers that in turn may
sell such shares. The selling shareholders may also enter into
option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other
financial institutions or create one or more derivative
securities that require the delivery to such broker-dealer or
other financial institution of shares offered by this
prospectus, which shares such broker-dealer or other financial
institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus.
The selling shareholders also may transfer the shares of common
stock in other circumstances, in which case the transferee,
pledgee or other
successor-in-interest
will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this
prospectus.
57
The selling shareholders and any broker-dealers or agents that
are involved in selling the shares may be deemed to be
underwriters within the meaning of the Securities
Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any
commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any
profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be
deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the
Securities Act.
We have paid all fees and expenses incurred in connection with
the registration of the resale of the shares of our common stock
covered by this prospectus. We have agreed to indemnify the
selling shareholders against certain losses, claims, damages and
liabilities in connection with the registration of the shares of
common stock that are subject to this prospectus, including
certain liabilities under the Securities Act.
In some jurisdictions, the selling shareholders may be required
to sell common stock only through registered or licensed brokers
or dealers. In addition, in some states the selling shareholders
may be required to register the common stock for sale in such
state, unless an exemption from registration is available.
Because the selling shareholders may be deemed to be
underwriters within the meaning of
Section 2(11) of the Securities Act, the selling
shareholders will be subject to the prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act.
Description of Our Common Stock
Common Stock
We are authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of common
stock, without par value. As of May 1, 2006, we have
70,812,540 shares of common stock outstanding. As of the
same date, we also have outstanding warrants to purchase
5,311,600 shares of our common stock and outstanding
options to purchase 1,872,812 shares of our common stock.
The following is a summary of the terms of our common stock. The
rights of the holders of our common stock are defined by our
Articles of Incorporation and the British Columbia Business
Corporations Act. You should refer to those documents and
provisions for more complete information regarding our common
stock.
Holders of our common stock have one vote per share on all
matters upon which our shareholders are entitled to vote,
including the election of directors. In the election of
directors, holders of our common stock do not have cumulative
voting rights. The holders of our common stock have no
preemptive right to purchase any of our securities or any
securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for any of
our securities. Our common stock is not subject to any
provisions relating to redemption. Our common stock is not by
its terms subject to any restrictions on alienation. Our common
stock has no conversion rights and is not subject to further
calls or assessments by us. All outstanding shares of our common
stock are fully paid and nonassessable.
Holders of our common stock have equal rights to receive
dividends when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors,
out of funds legally available therefor. See the section of this
prospectus entitled Dividend Policy. Holders of our
common stock are entitled, upon the liquidation of the company,
to share ratably in the net assets available for distribution,
subject to the rights, if any, of holders of any preferred stock
then outstanding. We currently have no class of preferred stock
authorized or outstanding. To increase the authorized number of
shares of common stock outstanding or create a class of
preferred stock, the affirmative vote of the holders of
two-thirds of our common stock represented in person or by proxy
at a meeting of our shareholders would be required.
Our common stock is currently traded on the American Stock
Exchange under the symbol BPG.
Comparison of Shareholder Rights Under British Columbia and
Delaware Law
The shareholder rights that exist under the terms of our common
stock and British Columbia law are in some instances different
than what they would be, for example, under the laws of the
State of Delaware, where many U.S. corporations are
incorporated. Although some differences exist between the
corporation laws of the two jurisdictions, we believe that the
differences are not significant.
For example, neither British Columbia law nor Delaware law
requires corporations to provide shareholders with cumulative
voting rights. Neither British Columbia law nor Delaware law
requires corporations to
58
provide shareholders with preemptive rights to purchase any
securities of the corporation. Under both British Columbia law
and Delaware law, shareholders have the right to dissent from
most cash-for-stock mergers of a corporation and seek an
appraisal of the value of their shares. Under British Columbia
law such dissenters rights extend to the sale of all or
substantially all of a corporations assets, although under
Delaware law they do not.
Under both British Columbia law and Delaware law, shareholders
may generally approve corporate matters in a written action
taken without a formal meeting of shareholders. Although
Delaware law does not require that shareholders have the right
to call a special meeting, British Columbia law provides that
one or more shareholders holding at least five percent of the
voting shares of a corporation may cause a shareholders meeting
to be called. Under our Articles of incorporation, holders of
331/3
% of our shares of common stock constitute a quorum for
the purpose of transacting business at a meeting. Under Delaware
law, a majority of the shares entitled to vote, unless the
corporations certificate of incorporation provides for a
lower percentage not less than one-third of the shares entitled
to vote, constitute a quorum at a meeting of shareholders.
Under British Columbia law and our Articles of Incorporation, we
may in general alter our Articles only with the approval of the
holders of two-thirds of our common stock represented in person
or by proxy at a meeting of our shareholders. Delaware law
requires the approval of the holders of at least a majority of
the outstanding stock of a corporation to amend a Delaware
corporations certificate of incorporation. In addition,
under British Columbia law and our Articles of Incorporation,
shareholders that hold at least two-thirds of our common stock
represented in person or by proxy at a meeting of our
shareholders may remove a director before the end of the
directors term of office. Under Delaware law, a director
may generally be removed from office before the end of the
directors term by the holders of a majority of the
corporations outstanding stock.
Under British Columbia law, we may generally not enter into an
amalgamation (which is referred to as a merger in the United
States) or sell all or substantially all of our assets unless
the transaction is approved by the holders of two-thirds of our
common stock represented in person or by proxy at a meeting of
our shareholders. Delaware law generally requires the approval
of mergers, consolidations and sales of all or substantially all
of a corporations assets by a majority of the voting power
of the corporation.
Both British Columbia law and Delaware law generally permit
corporations to issue preferred stock or shareholder rights
(also known as a poison pill). A British Columbia or
Delaware corporation may generally issue preferred stock or
shareholder rights that would have the effect of deterring a
takeover attempt, including a takeover attempt that might be in
the best interests of the corporation or its shareholders. We do
not currently have either preferred stock or shareholder rights
outstanding, although our Articles of Incorporation permit us to
issue preferred stock and do not restrict us from issuing
shareholder rights. We currently have no plans to issue any
preferred stock or shareholder rights, but we will be able to do
so at any time in the future.
Investment Canada Act
There is no limitation imposed by the laws of Canada, the laws
of British Columbia or our Articles of Incorporation on the
right of a non-resident to hold or vote our common stock, other
than as provided in the Investment Canada Act, which generally
prohibits a reviewable investment by an entity that is not a
Canadian entity, unless after review the applicable
minister is satisfied that the investment is likely to be of
net benefit to Canada.
An investment in our common stock by a non-Canadian who is not a
WTO investor, at a time when we are not already
controlled by a WTO investor, would be reviewable under the
Investment Canada Act if it is an investment to acquire control
and the value of our assets is CAD$5 million or more.
Regardless of the value of the proposed transaction, an order
for review may be made by the Canadian government if the
investment is related to Canadas cultural heritage or
national identity.
An investment in our common stock by a WTO investor, or by a
non-Canadian at a time when we are already controlled by a WTO
investor, would be reviewable under the Investment Canada Act if
it is an investment to acquire control and the value of our
assets is not less than a specified amount (CAD$265 million
in 2006).
59
The Investment Canada Act has detailed rules to determine
control. For example, a non-Canadian would acquire control of us
for purposes of the Investment Canada Act if a majority of our
outstanding common stock was acquired; acquisition of less than
a majority but more than one-third of our outstanding common
stock would be a rebuttable presumption of a control acquisition
having occurred. Control also could be deemed to occur through
the acquisition of all or substantially all of our assets.
A WTO investor generally includes governments of, or
individuals who are nationals of, member states of the World
Trade Organization and corporations and other entities that are
controlled by them. The United States and most all of the
principal economies of the world are currently members of the
World Trade Organization.
If any of the thresholds described above is exceeded, an
application for review must be filed with the Investment Review
Division of Industry Canada and/or, if the business is related
to Canadas cultural heritage or national identity, with
the Department of Canadian Heritage. Reviews are undertaken by
the Minister of Industry, the Minister of Cultural Heritage or
both ministers, depending on the nature of the business under
review.
The Investment Canada Act provides for an initial
45-day review period.
The reviewing minister may unilaterally extend the review period
for an additional 30 days and, with the consent of the
proposed investor, for longer periods of time. In reviewing
whether an investment is of net benefit to Canada,
the reviewing minister is directed to take into account the
following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
the effect of the investment on the level and nature of economic
activity in Canada; |
|
|
|
the degree of involvement by Canadians in the business; |
|
|
|
the effect of the investment on productivity, industrial
efficiency, technological development, product innovation and
product variety in Canada; |
|
|
|
the effect of the investment on competition within any industry
in Canada; |
|
|
|
the compatibility of the investment with national industrial,
economic and cultural policies; and |
|
|
|
the effect of the investment on Canadas ability to compete
in world markets. |
If none of the thresholds described above are exceeded and no
review is required, a notification may generally still be
required to be filed with Industry Canada and/or the Department
of Canadian Heritage.
Material Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders
A brief description is included below of certain taxes,
including withholding taxes, to which U.S. security holders
are subject under existing tax laws and regulations of Canada.
The consequences, if any, of Canadian provincial taxes are not
discussed. The following information is general, and holders of
our common stock should seek the advice of their own tax
advisors with respect to the applicability or effect on their
own individual circumstances of the matters described below.
U.S. citizens and individual residents and domestic
corporations are taxed on their worldwide income. Therefore,
dividends and capital gains of U.S. taxpayers will be
subject to U.S. income tax. U.S. holders should
consult their own tax advisors regarding specific questions as
to U.S. federal, state or local taxes.
The following summarizes the principal Canadian federal income
tax consequences of acquiring, holding and disposing of our
common stock by a shareholder who is not a resident of Canada
but is a resident of the United States and who will acquire and
hold our common stock as capital property. This summary does not
apply to a shareholder who carries on business in Canada through
a permanent establishment situated in Canada or
performs independent personal services in Canada. This summary
is based on the provisions of the Income Tax Act (Canada), the
regulations thereunder and the administrative practices of the
Canada Revenue Agency as of the date of this prospectus. It has
been assumed that there will be no amendment of any applicable
law, although no assurance can be given in this regard. This
discussion is general only and is not a substitute for
independent advice from a shareholders own Canadian and
U.S. tax advisor.
The provisions of the Income Tax Act are subject to income tax
treaties to which Canada is a party, including the Canada-United
States Income Tax Convention (1980) (the Convention).
60
Dividends on Common Stock
Under the Income Tax Act, a nonresident of Canada is subject to
Canadian withholding tax at the rate of 25% on dividends paid by
a corporation resident in Canada. The Convention limits the rate
to 15% if the shareholder is a resident of the United States and
the dividends are beneficially owned by and paid to the
shareholder, and to five percent if the shareholder is a
corporation that beneficially owns at least 10% of our common
stock.
The Convention generally exempts from Canadian income tax
dividends paid to a religious, scientific, literary, educational
or charitable organization if the organization is a resident of
the United States and such dividend income is exempt from income
tax under the laws of the United States or to an organization
constituted and operated exclusively to administer a pension,
retirement or employee benefit fund or plan.
Disposition of Common Stock
The Convention will relieve U.S. residents from liability
for Canadian tax on capital gains derived on a disposition or
deemed disposition of our common stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the shareholder was resident in Canada for 120 months
during any period of 20 consecutive years preceding, and at any
time during the 10 years immediately preceding, the
disposition and the shares were owned by the shareholder when
the shareholder ceased to be resident in Canada; or |
|
|
|
the shares formed part of the business property of a
permanent establishment that the shareholder has or
had in Canada within the 12 months preceding the
disposition. |
If the Convention does not relieve a U.S. resident from
Canadian tax on capital gains, the U.S. resident will,
under the Income Tax Act, be subject to Canadian tax on
taxable capital gains (as defined below), and may
deduct allowable capital losses (as defined below),
realized on a disposition of taxable Canadian
property. Our common stock will constitute taxable
Canadian property of a shareholder at a particular time if
the shareholder used the shares in carrying on business in
Canada, or if at any time in the five years immediately
preceding the disposition 25% or more of the issued shares of
any class or series of our capital stock belonged to one or more
persons in a group comprising the shareholder and persons with
whom the shareholder did not deal at arms length.
Under the Income Tax Act, a taxpayers capital gain (or
capital loss) from the disposition of our common stock is the
amount, if any, by which his or her proceeds of disposition
exceed (or are exceeded by) the aggregate of his or her adjusted
cost base of such shares and reasonable expenses of disposition.
Fifty percent of a capital gain (the taxable capital
gain) is included in income, and fifty percent of a
capital loss in a year (the allowable capital loss)
is deductible from taxable capital gains realized in the same
year. The amount by which a shareholders allowable capital
loss exceeds the taxable capital gain in a year may be deducted
from a taxable capital gain realized by the shareholder in the
three previous or any subsequent year, subject to certain
restrictions in the case of a corporate shareholder and subject
to adjustment when the capital gains inclusion rate in the year
of disposition differs from the inclusion rate in the year the
deduction is claimed.
When a holder dies holding shares of our common stock, such
holder will be deemed for Canadian tax purposes to have disposed
of such shares for an amount equal to the fair market value of
the shares immediately before such holders death and will
be subject to the tax treatment with respect to dispositions
described above. Any person who acquires such shares as a
consequence of the death of such holder will be deemed to have
acquired such shares for the fair market value at that time.
There is currently no Canadian federal estate tax.
61
Where You Can Find More Information
We have filed a post-effective amendment to our registration
statement on
Form S-1 with the
SEC relating to the shares covered by this prospectus. This
prospectus is a part of the post-effective amendment to the
registration statement and does not contain all of the
information in the post-effective amendment. Whenever a
reference is made in this prospectus to one of our contracts or
other documents, the reference is not necessarily complete and
you should refer to the exhibits that are a part of the
post-effective amendment to our registration statement for a
copy of the contract or other document. You may review a copy of
the post-effective amendment to our registration statement at
the SECs public reference room located at Headquarters
Office, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549 or
through the SECs website located at http://www.sec.gov.
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange
Act. In connection with such requirements, we are required to
file annual, quarterly and current reports and other information
with the SEC. You may read and copy any documents filed by us at
the SECs public reference room located at Headquarters
Office, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549.
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330 for
further information regarding the public reference room. Our
periodic filings with the SEC are also available through the
SECs website located at http://www.sec.gov. We maintain a
website located at
http://www.bpi-energy.com.
The information contained on our website is not incorporated by
reference in this prospectus, and you should not consider it to
be a part of this prospectus.
Legal Matters
The validity of the common stock that may be offered pursuant to
this prospectus has been passed upon by Anfield Sujir
Kennedy & Durno. A copy of this opinion is included as
an exhibit to the post-effective amendment to our registration
statement that we have filed with the SEC and of which this
prospectus is a part.
62
Change of Auditor
Effective August 15, 2005, De Visser Gray, Chartered
Accountants, resigned as our auditor by mutual agreement between
us and De Visser.
The audit report issued by De Visser dated October 12,
2004 was an unqualified opinion that included an explanatory
paragraph describing conditions that raised substantial doubt
about our ability to continue as a going concern due to our
(1) lack of revenue and (2) dependence on our ability
to raise funds via equity financings.
The decision to change auditors has been considered and approved
by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
During our two most recent fiscal years and all subsequent
interim periods preceding De Vissers resignation
there were no disagreements with De Visser concerning
accounting principles or practices, financial statement
disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.
During our two most recent fiscal years and all subsequent
interim periods preceding De Vissers resignation
De Visser did not advise us of any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
that the internal controls necessary for us to develop reliable
financial statements do not exist; |
|
|
|
that information came to De Vissers attention that
led it to no longer be able to rely on managements
representations, or that made it unwilling to be associated with
the financial statements prepared by management; |
|
|
|
(1) the need for De Visser to expand significantly the
scope of its audit, or that information came to its attention
during our two most recent fiscal years or any subsequent
interim period preceding De Vissers resignation, that
if further investigated may have: (i) materially impacted
the fairness or reliability of either: a previously issued audit
report or the underlying financial statements; or the financial
statements issued or to be issued covering the fiscal period(s)
subsequent to the date of the most recent financial statements
covered by an audit report (including information that may have
prevented it from rendering an unqualified audit report on those
financial statements), or (ii) caused De Visser to be
unwilling to rely on managements representations or be
associated with our financial statements, and |
(2) that, due to their resignation, or for any other
reason, De Visser did not so expand the scope of its audit
or conduct such further investigation; or
|
|
|
|
|
(1) that information has come to their attention that it
has concluded materially impacts the fairness or reliability of
either (i) a previously issued audit report or the
underlying financial statements, or (ii) the financial
statements issued or to be issued covering the fiscal period(s)
subsequent to the date of the most recent financial statements
covered by an audit report (including information that, unless
resolved to De Vissers satisfaction, would prevent it
from rendering an unqualified audit report on those financial
statements), and |
(2) that, due to their resignation, or for any other
reason, the issue has not been resolved to De Vissers
satisfaction prior to its resignation.
Effective August 15, 2005, we engaged a new independent
accountant, Meaden & Moore, Ltd., Certified Public
Accountants, to audit our financial statements. In addition,
during our two most recent fiscal years, and subsequent interim
periods prior to engaging Meaden & Moore, neither BPI nor
someone on our behalf consulted Meaden & Moore regarding:
(i) the application of accounting principles to a specified
transaction, either completed or proposed; (ii) the type of
audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial
statements; or (iii) any matter that was either the subject
of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of
Item 304 of Regulation S-K) or a reportable event (as
described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of
Regulation S-K).
This disclosure first appeared in our registration statement on
Form S-1 filed with the SEC on October 28, 2005 (File
No. 333-125483). We provided De Visser with a copy of
the disclosures set forth in this section above prior to the
date of such registration statement. We also requested that
De Visser furnish us
63
with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether it agrees
with the statements made above in response to Item 304(a)
of Regulation S-K
and, if not, stating the respects in which it does not agree.
The letter of De Visser provided in response to that
request, which states that De Visser is in agreement with
the above disclosures (apart from the second sentence of the
immediately preceding paragraph regarding Meaden &
Moore, with which De Visser stated that it was not in a
position to agree or disagree), was filed as an exhibit to such
registration statement.
Experts
Our consolidated balance sheet as of July 31, 2005, and the
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity
and cash flows for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005,
have been audited by Meaden & Moore, Ltd., Certified Public
Accountants, and are included in this prospectus, along with the
audit report from Meaden & Moore, in reliance upon the
authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
Our consolidated balance sheets as of July 31, 2004 and
July 31, 2003, and the consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders equity and cash flows for the two
fiscal years ended July 31, 2004 and July 31, 2003,
have been audited by De Visser Gray, Chartered Accountants, and
are included in this prospectus, along with the audit report
from De Visser Gray, in reliance upon the authority of such firm
as experts in accounting and auditing.
64
Appendix A
Glossary of Natural Gas Terms
The following are definitions of selected terms relating to the
natural gas industry that are used in this prospectus:
Adsorption. The attachment, through physical or chemical
bonding, of gas molecules to the coal surface. The adsorbed gas
molecules are trapped within the coal, the stability of which is
strongly affected by changes in temperature and pressure.
Average finding cost. The amount of total capital
expenditures, including acquisition, exploration and abandonment
costs, for natural gas activities divided by the amount of
proved reserves added in a specified period.
Casing. Steel pipe set in a well to prevent the hole from
sloughing or caving and to enable formations to be isolated.
There may be several strings of casing in a well, one inside the
other.
Completion. The activities necessary to prepare a well
for the production of gas.
Core sample. A cylindrical sample taken from a formation
for geological analysis. Typically, a conventional core barrel
is substituted for the drill bit and procures a sample as it
penetrates the formation.
Desorption. A test that measures the gas evolved from a
core sample to determine gas content.
Developed acreage. The number of acres that are allocated
or assignable to productive wells or wells capable of production.
Dewatering. A CBM well typically begins dewatering with
almost all water production and little or no natural gas
production. The continuous production of water from a well that
is dewatering reduces the water reservoir pressure on the coals.
The reduced reservoir pressure enables the release of the gas
within the coal to the wellbore. This results in an increase in
the amount of gas production relative to the amount of water
production. Dewatering ceases when peak gas production is
reached.
Dry hole. A well found to be incapable of producing
hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities such that proceeds from
the sale of the production will exceed production expenses and
taxes.
Farm-out agreement. An agreement where the owner of a
working interest in a gas lease assigns the working interest or
a portion thereof to another party who desires to drill on the
leased acreage. Generally, the assignee is required to drill one
or more wells in order to earn its interest in the acreage. The
assignor usually retains a royalty or reversionary interest in
the lease.
Fracture. A man-made or hydraulic fracture is formed when
a fluid is pumped down a well at high pressures for short
periods of time causing a split in the rock formation. As part
of this technique, sand or other material may also be injected
into the formation to keep the channel open. This technique
allows gas to move more freely from the rock pores where they
are trapped to a producing well that can bring the gas to the
surface.
Horizontal drilling. A drilling operation in which a
portion of the well is drilled horizontally within a productive
or potentially productive formation. This operation typically
yields a well that has the ability to produce higher volumes
than a vertical well drilled in the same formation. A horizontal
well is designed to replace multiple vertical wells, resulting
in lower capital expenditures for draining like acreage and
limiting surface disruption.
Isotherm test. An adsorption isotherm test measures the
storage capacity of coal in terms of gas content.
Logging. The systematic recording of data obtained from
the drillers log and mud log at the surface, and
electrical and radioactive logs obtained from instrumentation
lowered into and retrieved from the drill hole after drilling.
A-1
Mcf. One thousand cubic feet of natural gas at standard
atmospheric conditions.
Mcfe. One thousand cubic feet of natural gas equivalent
at standard atmospheric conditions, determined using the ratio
of one barrel of oil to six Mcf of natural gas.
MMBtus. One million British thermal units. One British
thermal unit is the quantity of heat required to raise the
temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit.
MMcf. One million cubic feet of natural gas at standard
atmospheric conditions.
Operator. The individual or company responsible to the
working interest owners for the exploration, development and
production of a natural gas well or lease.
Permeability. The capacity of a geologic formation to
allow water or natural gas to pass through it.
Productive well. A well that has been completed and is
tied into our gas and dewatering system. A productive well may
produce only water for a period of time before gas begins to
flow through the gas gathering system.
Proved reserves. The estimated quantities of natural gas
that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable
certainty to be commercially recoverable in future years from
known reservoirs under existing economic and operating
conditions. This definition is consistent with
Rule 4-10(a)(2) of
Regulation S-X of
the rules and regulations of the SEC. In reporting proved
reserves, we are required to comply with
Rule 4-10(a)(2).
Reserves. The quantity of natural gas that is estimated
to be commercially recoverable from specific acreage.
Reservoir. A porous and permeable underground formation,
including a coal seam, containing a natural accumulation of
producible natural gas that is confined by impermeable rock or
water barriers and is separate from other reservoirs.
Royalty interest. An interest in a natural gas lease that
gives the owner of the interest the right to receive a portion
of the production from the leased acreage, but generally does
not require the owner to pay any portion of the costs of
drilling or operating the wells on the leased acreage. Royalties
may be either landowners royalties, which are reserved by
the owner of the leased acreage at the time the lease is
granted, or overriding royalties, which are usually reserved by
an owner of the leasehold in connection with a transfer to a
subsequent owner.
Undeveloped acreage. Acreage on which wells have not been
drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production
of commercial quantities of natural gas, regardless of whether
or not such acreage contains proved reserves.
Vertical drilling. A hole drilled vertically into the
earth from which gas or water flows or is pumped.
Working interest. An interest in a natural gas lease that
gives the owner of the interest the right to drill and produce
natural gas on the leased acreage and requires the owner to pay
its proportionate share of the costs of drilling and production
operations.
A-2
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
|
|
|
F-27 |
|
|
|
|
F-28 |
|
|
|
|
F-29 |
|
|
|
|
F-30 |
|
|
|
|
F-31 |
|
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders of
BPI Industries Inc.
Solon, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
BPI Industries Inc. and Subsidiaries as of July 31, 2005,
and the related statements of operations, shareholders
equity, and cash flows for the fiscal year ended July 31,
2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The
financial statements of BPI Industries Inc. and Subsidiaries as
of July 31, 2004 and 2003 were audited by other auditors
whose unqualified opinion dated October 12, 2004, on those
statements included an explanatory paragraph describing
conditions that raised substantial doubt about the
Companys ability to continue as a going concern as
discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of BPI Industries Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
July 31, 2005, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
MEADEN & MOORE, LTD.
Certified Public Accountants
September 21, 2005
Cleveland, Ohio
F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of BPI Industries Inc.,
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
BPI Industries Inc. and subsidiaries as of July 31, 2004
and the accompanying consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity and cash flows for the fiscal years
ended July 31, 2004 and 2003. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of BPI Industries Inc. and its subsidiaries as of
July 31, 2004, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2004
and 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared
assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As
discussed in note 1 to the financial statements, the
Company has no established source of revenue and is dependent on
its ability to raise funds via equity financings. This raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Vancouver, British Columbia
October 12, 2004
F-3
BPI INDUSTRIES INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
7,251,503 |
|
|
$ |
970,795 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
34,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,281 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
23,534 |
|
|
|
44,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
7,309,708 |
|
|
|
1,087,002 |
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties, full cost method of accounting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amortization of $58,523 and $0
|
|
|
10,190,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
3,149,372 |
|
|
|
6,772,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net oil and gas properties
|
|
|
13,340,301 |
|
|
|
6,772,177 |
|
|
Other property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
and amortization of $398,988 and $217,144
|
|
|
1,769,812 |
|
|
|
447,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
15,110,113 |
|
|
|
7,219,209 |
|
Equity investment in joint venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,500 |
|
Investment in Hite Coalbed Methane, L.L.C.
|
|
|
846,766 |
|
|
|
846,766 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
161,125 |
|
|
|
129,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,527,712 |
|
|
$ |
9,382,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
2,144,066 |
|
|
$ |
465,881 |
|
|
Current maturity of long-term notes payable
|
|
|
42,227 |
|
|
|
21,977 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other
|
|
|
31,405 |
|
|
|
20,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,217,698 |
|
|
|
508,251 |
|
Long-term notes payable, less current portion
|
|
|
507,595 |
|
|
|
440,200 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$ |
2,725,293 |
|
|
$ |
1,672,921 |
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, no par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares,
43,912,961 and 28,374,296 issued and outstanding
|
|
|
34,666,022 |
|
|
|
19,236,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
4,493,680 |
|
|
|
1,162,768 |
|
|
Common shares issuable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,440 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(18,357,283 |
) |
|
|
(12,960,932 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
20,802,419 |
|
|
|
7,710,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,527,712 |
|
|
$ |
9,382,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-4
BPI Industries Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas sales
|
|
$ |
117,835 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense
|
|
|
307,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
894,141 |
|
|
|
418,701 |
|
|
|
305,792 |
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,344,738 |
|
|
|
193,796 |
|
|
|
515,286 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,566,242 |
|
|
|
387,610 |
|
|
|
215,325 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
260,141 |
|
|
|
80,417 |
|
|
|
58,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,372,440 |
|
|
|
1,080,524 |
|
|
|
1,094,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,254,605 |
) |
|
|
(1,080,524 |
) |
|
|
(1,094,996 |
) |
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
123,219 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
3,550 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(24,820 |
) |
|
|
(15,165 |
) |
|
|
(17,772 |
) |
|
Other income
|
|
|
35,385 |
|
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,784 |
|
|
|
(10,703 |
) |
|
|
(14,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(6,120,821 |
) |
|
|
(1,091,227 |
) |
|
|
(1,109,218 |
) |
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
724,470 |
|
|
|
298,111 |
|
|
|
174,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(5,396,351 |
) |
|
$ |
(793,116 |
) |
|
$ |
(934,305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
37,665,019 |
|
|
|
25,007,327 |
|
|
|
21,485,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-5
BPI Industries Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
Paid-in | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
Shareholders | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Issuable | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, July 31, 2002
|
|
|
19,283,035 |
|
|
$ |
14,874,211 |
|
|
$ |
439,860 |
|
|
$ |
(11,233,511 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,080,560 |
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
78,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,900 |
|
Proceeds from warrants exercised
|
|
|
1,065,000 |
|
|
|
371,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371,549 |
|
Proceeds from shares issued in
private placement November 7, 2002(1)
|
|
|
1,780,717 |
|
|
|
628,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
628,528 |
|
Proceeds from shares issuable in
private placement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,579 |
|
|
|
30,579 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,826 |
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515,286 |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(934,305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(934,305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2003
|
|
|
22,278,752 |
|
|
|
15,953,188 |
|
|
|
968,972 |
|
|
|
(12,167,816 |
) |
|
|
30,579 |
|
|
|
4,784,923 |
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
69,444 |
|
|
|
43,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,036 |
|
Proceeds from shares issued in private placement
September 18, 2003
|
|
|
725,000 |
|
|
|
339,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,579 |
) |
|
|
309,208 |
|
Proceeds from shares issued in private placement
December 22, 2003(2)
|
|
|
1,975,000 |
|
|
|
928,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
928,259 |
|
Proceeds from shares issued in private placement
April 27, 2004
|
|
|
3,326,100 |
|
|
|
1,972,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,972,510 |
|
Proceeds from shares issuable for warrants exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,440 |
|
|
|
271,440 |
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,796 |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(793,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(793,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2004
|
|
|
28,374,296 |
|
|
|
19,236,780 |
|
|
|
1,162,768 |
|
|
|
(12,960,932 |
) |
|
|
271,440 |
|
|
|
7,710,056 |
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
2,254,333 |
|
|
|
1,617,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,617,005 |
|
Proceeds from warrants exercised
|
|
|
2,861,342 |
|
|
|
1,714,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(271,440 |
) |
|
|
1,443,442 |
|
Proceeds from shares issued in private placement
December 29, 2004(3)
|
|
|
2,400,000 |
|
|
|
2,793,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,793,854 |
|
Proceeds from shares issued in
private placement December 30, 2004(4)
|
|
|
4,032,000 |
|
|
|
4,693,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,693,675 |
|
Proceeds from shares issued in
private placement January 6, 2005(5)
|
|
|
3,723,200 |
|
|
|
4,334,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,334,199 |
|
Proceeds from shares issued in
private placement January 12, 2005(6)
|
|
|
216,800 |
|
|
|
252,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,378 |
|
Bonus shares
|
|
|
50,990 |
|
|
|
23,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,249 |
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,344,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,344,738 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,826 |
) |
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,396,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,396,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 31, 2005
|
|
|
43,912,961 |
|
|
$ |
34,666,022 |
|
|
$ |
4,493,680 |
|
|
$ |
(18,357,283 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,802,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
net of share issue costs of $59,220 |
|
(2) |
net of share issue costs of $18,730 |
|
(3) |
net of share issue costs of $206,146 |
|
(4) |
net of share issue costs of $346,325 |
|
(5) |
net of share issue costs of $319,801 |
|
(6) |
net of share issue costs of $18,622 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-6
BPI Industries Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended July 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash Provided by (Used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(5,396,351 |
) |
|
$ |
(793,116 |
) |
|
$ |
(934,305 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
260,141 |
|
|
|
80,417 |
|
|
|
58,593 |
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
3,344,738 |
|
|
|
193,796 |
|
|
|
515,286 |
|
|
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
(42,276 |
) |
|
|
(2,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
16,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
(724,470 |
) |
|
|
(298,111 |
) |
|
|
(174,913 |
) |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
20,339 |
|
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
20,417 |
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(34,671 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
21,392 |
|
|
|
(26,909 |
) |
|
|
(14,035 |
) |
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
(31,625 |
) |
|
|
(88,000 |
) |
|
|
(41,500 |
) |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,678,185 |
|
|
|
323,381 |
|
|
|
(138,876 |
) |
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other
|
|
|
11,012 |
|
|
|
20,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(877,171 |
) |
|
|
(591,167 |
) |
|
|
(709,333 |
) |
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
113,557 |
|
|
|
5,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(857,638 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to oil and gas properties
|
|
|
(5,629,953 |
) |
|
|
(1,729,411 |
) |
|
|
(78,522 |
) |
|
Additions to other property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,383,208 |
) |
|
|
(191,794 |
) |
|
|
(24,972 |
) |
|
Acquisition of equity interest in joint venture
|
|
|
(78,112 |
) |
|
|
(100,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Hite Coalbed Methane, L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86,766 |
) |
|
|
(340,097 |
) |
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(7,935,354 |
) |
|
|
(2,103,064 |
) |
|
|
(443,591 |
) |
Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term notes payable
|
|
|
(41,320 |
) |
|
|
(26,014 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common shares
|
|
|
15,134,553 |
|
|
|
3,524,453 |
|
|
|
1,109,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
15,093,233 |
|
|
|
3,498,439 |
|
|
|
1,109,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,280,708 |
|
|
|
804,208 |
|
|
|
(43,368 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
|
|
|
970,795 |
|
|
|
166,587 |
|
|
|
209,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
|
|
$ |
7,251,503 |
|
|
$ |
970,795 |
|
|
$ |
166,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
11,540 |
|
|
$ |
2,425 |
|
|
$ |
15,967 |
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of equipment by issuance of notes payable
|
|
$ |
118,049 |
|
|
$ |
105,847 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
F-7
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
July 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
|
Basis of Presentation and Going Concern |
The Company is incorporated in British Columbia, Canada and is
involved in the acquisition, exploration and development of
coalbed methane properties located in the United States of
America. The Company conducts its operations in one reportable
segment, which is oil and gas exploration and production.
These financial statements have been prepared on the basis of
accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which
contemplates the Companys ability to realize its assets
and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business;
however, the occurrence of significant losses to date raises
doubt upon the validity of this assumption. The ability of the
Company to realize the costs it has incurred to date on these
properties is dependent upon the Company being able to sell the
properties or to develop profitable operations, to finance their
exploration and development costs and to resolve any
environmental, regulatory or other constraints which may hinder
the successful development of the properties.
The Company has experienced significant losses over the past
five years, including $5,396,351 in the current year, and has an
accumulated deficit of $18,357,283 at July 31, 2005. The
Companys continued existence as a going concern is
dependent upon its ability to continue to obtain adequate
financing arrangements and to achieve and maintain profitable
operations. As disclosed in Note 16, the Company has
obtained approximately $28 million in net cash proceeds
from the issuance of its common stock in September 2005 to
fund its operations.
The Company has financed its activities primarily from the
proceeds of various share issues. As a result of the Company
being in the early stages of operations, the recoverability of
assets on the balance sheet will be dependent on the
Companys ability to obtain additional financing and to
attain a level of profitable operations from the existing
facilities production and/or the disposition thereof.
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements
requires the use of certain estimates by management in
determining the Companys assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses. Actual results could differ from such estimates.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization of oil and gas
properties and the impairment of oil and gas properties are
determined using estimates of oil and gas reserves. There are
numerous uncertainties in estimating the quantity of reserves
and in projecting the future rates of production and timing of
development expenditures, including future costs to dismantle,
dispose of and restore the Companys properties. Oil and
gas reserve engineering must be recognized as a subjective
process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas
that cannot be measured in an exact way. Proved reserves of oil
and natural gas are estimated quantities that geological and
engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable in the future from known reservoirs under existing
conditions.
All revenue from gas sales is recognized after the gas is
produced and delivery takes place. The Company currently sells
all of its gas to one gas marketing company, Atmos Energy
Marketing, LLC.
|
|
|
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities |
The equity method of accounting is used to account for
investments in and earnings or losses of affiliates that it does
not control, but over which it does exert significant influence.
The cost method of accounting is used for all other
non-controlled investments. The Company uses the cost method to
account for its indirect interest in the Jericho Project through
its 49% interest in Hite Coalbed Methane, L.L.C.
(HCM), as the
F-8
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Company does not exert significant influence over HCM. The
Company considers whether the fair values of any of its
investments have declined below their carrying value whenever
adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate that
recorded values may not be recoverable. If the Company
considered any such decline to be other than temporary, a
write-down would be recorded to estimated fair value.
|
|
|
Translation of Foreign Currency |
The Companys Canadian operations were limited to its
headquarters office in Vancouver, British Columbia until March
2005 when the Company moved its headquarters to Solon, Ohio. The
Company maintains a registered records office in Vancouver,
British Columbia and incurs expenses in Canada related to
investor relations and regulatory matters in conjunction with
its listing on the TSX Venture Exchange.
Amounts shown in the financial statements and footnotes are in
U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted. The Companys
functional currency is U.S. Dollars.
|
|
|
Principles of Consolidation |
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiaries: Methane Management Inc.
(100%), BPI Industries (USA), Inc. (100%), and Illinois Mine
Gas, L.L.C. (100% from acquisition date of March 3,
2005). The Company has presented these financial statements in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). All inter-company transactions and balances
have been eliminated upon consolidation.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments
with a maturity date of three months or less when purchased and
are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.
Accounts receivable represents the amount due from Atmos Energy
Marketing, LLC as of July 31, 2005 for July gas sales.
Management regularly reviews accounts receivable to determine
whether amounts are collectible and records a valuation
allowance to reflect managements best estimate of any
amount that may not be collectible. At July 31, 2005, the
Company has determined that no allowance for uncollectible
receivables is necessary.
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The carrying amount reported in the balance sheet for cash,
accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities
approximates fair value because of the immediate or short-term
maturity of these financial instruments.
The carrying amount of long-term notes payable approximates fair
value based on current rates available to the Company for
instruments of the same remaining terms and maturities.
The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for oil
and gas properties. Under this method, all costs associated with
the acquisition of, exploration for and development of oil and
gas reserves are capitalized in cost centers on a
country-by-country basis (currently the Company has one cost
center, the United States). Such costs include lease acquisition
costs, geological and geophysical studies, carrying charges on
non-producing properties, costs of drilling both productive and
non-productive wells, and overhead
F-9
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
expenses directly related to these activities. Internal costs
associated with oil and gas activities that are not directly
attributable to acquisition, exploration or development
activities are expensed as incurred.
Unevaluated oil and gas properties and major development
projects are excluded from amortization until a determination of
whether proved reserves can be assigned to the properties or
impairment occurs. Unevaluated properties are assessed at least
annually to ascertain whether an impairment has occurred. Sales
or dispositions of properties are credited to their respective
cost centers and a gain or loss is recognized when all the
properties in a cost center have been disposed of, unless such
sale or disposition significantly alters the relationship
between capitalized costs and proved reserves attributable to
the cost center.
Capitalized costs of proved oil and gas properties, including
estimated future costs to develop the reserves and estimated
abandonment cost, net of salvage, are amortized on the
units-of-production method using estimates of proved reserves.
A ceiling test is applied to each cost center by comparing the
net capitalized costs, less related deferred income taxes, to
the estimated future net revenues from production of proved
reserves, discounted at 10%, plus the costs of unproved
properties net of impairment. Any excess capitalized costs are
written off in the current year. The calculation of future net
revenues is based upon prices, costs and regulations in effect
at each year end.
In general, the Company determines if a property is impaired if
one or more of the following conditions exist:
|
|
|
i) there are no firm plans for further drilling on the
unproved property; |
|
|
ii) negative results were obtained from studies of the
unproved property; |
|
|
iii) negative results were obtained from studies conducted
in the vicinity of the unproved property; |
|
|
iv) the remaining term of the unproved property does not
allow sufficient time for further studies or drilling. |
No impairment existed as of July 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
The Securities and Exchange Commission has issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 106 regarding the
application of SFAS 143, Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations, on oil and gas producing entities
that use the full cost accounting method. It states that the
future cash outflows associated with settling asset retirement
obligations that have been accrued on the balance sheet should
be excluded from the present value of estimated future net cash
flows used for the full cost ceiling test calculation.
SAB No. 106 currently has no effect on the
Companys financial statements.
|
|
|
Other Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Gas collection
equipment is depreciated on the units-of-production method based
on proved developed reserves. Support equipment and other
property and equipment
F-10
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
are depreciated using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from three to five
years. Major classes of property and equipment consisted of the
following at July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Other Property and Equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas collection equipment
|
|
$ |
1,332,012 |
|
|
$ |
106,899 |
|
|
Support equipment
|
|
|
760,467 |
|
|
|
501,418 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
76,321 |
|
|
|
55,859 |
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(398,988 |
) |
|
|
(217,144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,769,812 |
|
|
$ |
447,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Retirement Obligations |
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations
(SFAS No. 143). SFAS No. 143
requires the Company to record the fair value of an asset
retirement obligation as a liability in the period in which it
incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of
tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition,
construction, development and/or normal use of the assets with a
corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related
long-lived asset. The Company has assessed its asset retirement
obligation as of July 31, 2005 and has currently deemed it
to be immaterial.
|
|
|
Accounting for Long-Lived Assets |
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144).
Under SFAS No. 144, all long-lived assets are tested
for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. The
carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it
exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to
result from its use and eventual disposition. An impairment loss
is recognized when the carrying value of a long-lived asset is
not recoverable and exceeds its fair value.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method that requires deferred income taxes to reflect the future
tax consequences attributable to differences between the tax and
financial reporting bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities recognized are based on the tax rates
in effect in the year in which differences are expected to
reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation
allowance when, in the opinion of management based on available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of any net
deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Stock-Based Compensation and
Other Stock-Based Payments
The Company has a stock-based compensation plan (the
Plan) under which stock options are issued to
directors, officers, employees and consultants as determined by
the Board of Directors and subject to the provisions of the
Plan. The Company recognizes the compensation expense under the
Plan in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, which requires the recognition of expense
for stock-based compensation on their fair value on the
measurement date. The Plan permits options to be issued with
exercise prices at a discount to the market price of the
Companys common stock on the day prior to the date of
grant. However, the majority of all stock options
F-11
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
issued under the Plan were issued with exercise prices equal to
the quoted market price of the stock on the date of grant.
Options granted under the Plan are exercisable over a period not
exceeding five years. The maximum number of shares that may be
reserved for issuance under the Plan is a rolling number not to
exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company
at the time of the stock option grant. The Company had 4,227,279
options outstanding at July 31, 2005 and an additional
164,017 options available for issuance under the Plan.
Loss Per Share
Loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted loss per
share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock. Diluted loss per share
is not disclosed as it is anti-dilutive. Outstanding options and
warrants that were excluded from the computation of diluted loss
per share, as the effect of their assumed exercises would be
anti-dilutive, totaled 15,786,491, 10,427,910 and 5,010,275 at
July 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Reclassifications
Certain items included in prior years consolidated
financial statements have been reclassified to conform to
current year presentation.
The Company sold its remaining 432,000 shares of Pyng
Technologies Corp. (Pyng), a TSX Venture listed
public company, during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005
and recognized a gain on the sale in the amount of $42,276. The
gain is included within other income in the statement of
operations. The Company considered these shares of Pyng to be
trading securities and recorded unrealized holding gains and
losses directly to earnings. The unrealized holding gains and
losses were not material for the fiscal years ended
July 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
|
|
3. |
Purchase of Illinois Mine Gas, L.L.C. |
On March 3, 2005, the Company purchased the remaining
interest in Illinois Mine Gas, L.L.C. (IMG), a 50%
Joint Venture with Vessels Coal Gas, Inc. (Vessels)
the Companys original 50% interest in which was acquired
in the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004. IMG was created to
explore and develop abandoned mine works in the Illinois Basin
for the extraction and sale of methane gas. The Company
previously accounted for its 50% investment in IMG under the
equity method of accounting. The Companys share of the net
earnings of IMG in the fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and
2004 was not material.
The acquisition was made pursuant to a clause in the J.V.
Agreement which grants the Company the option to purchase the
remaining interest prior to June 30, 2005 at a stipulated
priced computed based on a predetermined internal rate of return
to Vessels on its capital contributions. The aggregate purchase
price of $899,681 in cash, less cash received in the amount of
$42,043, was assigned entirely to IMGs coal mine methane
properties. IMG has not yet commenced operations and thus has
not recorded any revenue since its inception. In addition, the
Companys share of IMGs expenses were not material.
|
|
4. |
Investment in Hite Coalbed Methane, L.L.C. |
The Company indirectly has an interest in the Jericho Project
(Jericho), based on its 49% interest in Hite Coalbed
Methane, L.L.C. (HCM). HCM has a 45% interest in
Pulse Energy, L.L.C. (Pulse),
F-12
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
which in turn has an interest in Jericho. Pulses interest
in Jericho currently entitles Pulse to receive 20% of any
distributions made by Jericho. This interest can increase to 50%
if Jerichos cumulative distributions exceed $5,000,000.
The Company made total cash contributions of $454,766 and issued
a convertible note with a face value of $392,000 maturing on
June 10, 2008 to acquire this interest (see Note 6).
The investment in HCM is accounted for by the cost method and is
included as an acquisition cost of the Jericho Project. Jericho
obtained a $2 million line of credit to finance development
of this project. The President of the Company personally
guaranteed BPIs portion of the line of credit and was
subsequently issued 50,990 shares of the Company as
consideration.
The Company negotiated an agreement (Agreement) with
one of the surface rights owners of its Southern Illinois Basin
Project to ensure the Companys access to its wells and gas
gathering systems. As part of the Agreement, the Company
deposited $100,000 in a trust account to serve as a performance
bond to ensure the Company performs its obligations under the
terms of the Agreement. The Company has recorded this amount as
a non-current asset at July 31, 2005.
|
|
6. |
Long-Term Notes Payable |
The Company has outstanding notes payable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Case Credit term note due in fiscal year 2006, 6.50%
|
|
$ |
32,833 |
|
|
$ |
49,163 |
|
GMAC term notes due in fiscal year 2009, 6.50%
|
|
|
26,633 |
|
|
|
31,930 |
|
GMAC term notes due in fiscal year 2010, 6.1% to 6.50%
|
|
|
98,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible note due in fiscal year 2008, 3.25%
|
|
|
392,000 |
|
|
|
381,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549,822 |
|
|
|
462,177 |
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
42,227 |
|
|
|
21,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes payable
|
|
$ |
507,595 |
|
|
$ |
440,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Case Credit and GMAC notes are collateralized by the related
vehicles and equipment. The convertible note payable outstanding
was issued in June 2003 with a face value of $392,000 and
maturing on June 10, 2008, bearing interest at 3.25%. The
note is convertible at the option of the holder, prior to
June 10, 2008, into 390,537 common shares of the Company.
The annual maturities of all notes for the five fiscal years
subsequent to July 31, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal | |
|
Interest | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
42,227 |
|
|
$ |
8,654 |
|
|
$ |
50,881 |
|
2007
|
|
|
41,712 |
|
|
|
5,995 |
|
|
|
47,707 |
|
2008
|
|
|
419,981 |
|
|
|
67,555 |
|
|
|
487,536 |
|
2009
|
|
|
29,766 |
|
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
31,836 |
|
2010
|
|
|
16,136 |
|
|
|
1,702 |
|
|
|
17,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
549,822 |
|
|
$ |
85,976 |
|
|
$ |
635,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The income tax benefit consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
(581,582 |
) |
|
|
(239,314 |
) |
|
|
(140,415 |
) |
|
U.S. state taxes
|
|
|
(142,888 |
) |
|
|
(58,797 |
) |
|
|
(34,498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(724,470 |
) |
|
|
(298,111 |
) |
|
|
(174,913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax benefit
|
|
$ |
(724,470 |
) |
|
$ |
(298,111 |
) |
|
$ |
(174,913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of income tax computed at the statutory
Canadian Tax Rate and the Companys effective rate is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Statutory Canadian income tax rate
|
|
|
(36.00 |
)% |
|
|
(36.00 |
)% |
|
|
(36.00 |
)% |
Non-deductible stock compensation
|
|
|
21.09 |
% |
|
|
6.39 |
% |
|
|
16.72 |
% |
Current year Canadian loss with no tax benefit
|
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
|
6.14 |
% |
|
|
2.83 |
% |
Net increase in deductible temporary differences due to foreign
currency conversion and expired losses
|
|
|
(5.38 |
)% |
|
|
(4.47 |
)% |
|
|
(15.26 |
)% |
Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance
|
|
|
7.32 |
% |
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
17.31 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
(1.19 |
)% |
|
|
(1.95 |
)% |
|
|
(1.37 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
(11.84 |
)% |
|
|
(27.32 |
)% |
|
|
(15.77 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the net deferred tax liability at
July 31, 2005 and 2004 are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
United States | |
|
Canada | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$ |
4,130,549 |
|
|
$ |
643,332 |
|
|
$ |
4,773,881 |
|
Resource related allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705,249 |
|
|
|
1,705,249 |
|
|
Investments and advances to subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,215 |
|
|
|
375,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current deferred tax asset
|
|
|
4,130,549 |
|
|
|
2,723,796 |
|
|
|
6,854,345 |
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(261,405 |
) |
|
|
(2,640,396 |
) |
|
|
(2,901,801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
3,869,144 |
|
|
|
83,400 |
|
|
|
3,952,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property plant and equipment
|
|
|
(3,869,144 |
) |
|
|
(83,400 |
) |
|
|
(3,952,544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current deferred tax liability
|
|
|
(3,869,144 |
) |
|
|
(83,400 |
) |
|
|
(3,952,544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
United States | |
|
Canada | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$ |
1,497,594 |
|
|
$ |
602,531 |
|
|
$ |
2,100,125 |
|
|
Resource related allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,573,717 |
|
|
|
1,573,717 |
|
|
Investments and advances to subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345,543 |
|
|
|
345,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current deferred tax asset
|
|
|
1,497,594 |
|
|
|
2,521,791 |
|
|
|
4,019,385 |
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,425,233 |
) |
|
|
(2,425,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,497,594 |
|
|
|
96,558 |
|
|
|
1,594,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property plant and equipment
|
|
|
(2,222,064 |
) |
|
|
(96,558 |
) |
|
|
(2,318,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current deferred tax liability
|
|
|
(2,222,064 |
) |
|
|
(96,558 |
) |
|
|
(2,318,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$ |
(724,470 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(724,470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company considers the need to record a valuation allowance
against deferred tax assets on a country-by-country basis,
taking into account the effects of local tax law. A valuation
allowance is not recorded when it is determined that sufficient
positive evidence exists to demonstrate that it is more likely
than not that a deferred tax asset will be realized. The main
factors considered are: (1) the nature, amount and expected
timing of reversal of taxable temporary differences, and
(2) opportunities to implement tax plans that affect
whether tax assets can be realized.
Currently the Company has two brother-sister operating
subsidiaries in the United States. The deferred tax liability of
one is being used to justify not recording a valuation allowance
on the deferred tax assets of the other. The Company plans to
restructure the U.S. group to avail itself of the ability to
file a consolidated return. This will allow the Company to
offset any tax liability arising as a result of reversing
deferred tax liabilities of one subsidiary with net operating
loss carryforwards (deferred tax assets) of the other. There are
no adverse consequences to this planned restructuring. A
valuation allowance of $261,405 has been recorded during the
current fiscal year to reduce the amount of the
U.S. deferred tax assets to an amount equal to the recorded
deferred tax liabilities. An increase in the valuation allowance
of $215,163 has been recorded in the current fiscal year to
offset the deferred tax assets in Canada. Historically, the
Company has had no income generating operations in Canada and
any future income is too uncertain to justify not recording a
valuation allowance.
The Companys Net Operating Loss Carryforward at
July 31, 2005 expires as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2010 and Later | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Canadian
|
|
$ |
338,308 |
|
|
$ |
292,245 |
|
|
$ |
46,297 |
|
|
$ |
442,034 |
|
|
$ |
668,151 |
|
|
$ |
1,787,035 |
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,591,151 |
|
|
|
10,591,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
338,308 |
|
|
$ |
292,245 |
|
|
$ |
46,297 |
|
|
$ |
442,034 |
|
|
$ |
11,259,302 |
|
|
$ |
12,378,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At July 31, 2005 the Company also has $4,736,802 of
Canadian Resource Related Deductions that have no expiration
date.
F-15
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
8. Shareholders Equity
Common shares The Company has authorized
100,000,000 shares without par value for which 43,912,961
and 28,374,296 were issued and outstanding as of July 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
Additional paid-in capital Amounts recorded
of $4,493,690 and $1,162,768 at July 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, represent the cumulative amounts charged to
stock-based compensation expense as of each fiscal year-end.
Common stock issuable Amount recorded of
$271,440 at July 31, 2004 represents proceeds received in
advance of the exercise of warrants to purchase common shares.
In January 2005, the Company issued 10,372,000 shares at
$1.25 per share with 5,186,000 share purchase warrants
exercisable at $1.50 for a period of two years (Investor
Warrants). The Companys agent received a commission
of 5% and 1,037,200 broker warrants exercisable at $1.25 for a
period of two years (Agent Warrants). The shares and
warrants, when issued, were restricted under the
U.S. Securities Act, and the Company is required to
register the resale of the shares and the shares underlying the
warrants with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Upon
registration of the shares underlying the warrants and the
delisting of such shares from the TSX Venture Exchange, the
Investor Warrants will be extended to be exercisable for two
years after such delisting and the Agent warrants will be
extended to be exercisable for five years after the closing of
the share placement.
Share purchase warrants outstanding at July 31, 2005 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Exercise |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Price |
|
Expiry Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
644,375 |
|
|
CAD $ |
0.80 |
|
|
|
September 19, 2005 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
CAD $ |
0.80 |
|
|
|
December 10, 2005 |
|
|
3,301,100 |
|
|
CAD $ |
1.00 |
|
|
|
April 29, 2006 |
|
|
1,037,200 |
|
|
USD $ |
1.25 |
|
|
|
January 15, 2007 |
|
|
5,186,000 |
|
|
USD $ |
1.50 |
|
|
|
January 15, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,168,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
The Company has operating lease commitments expiring at various
dates. Such leases generally contain renewal options. At
July 31, 2005, future minimum lease payments under
non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$ |
128,483 |
|
2007
|
|
|
107,409 |
|
2008
|
|
|
20,562 |
|
2009
|
|
|
7,019 |
|
2010
|
|
|
7,300 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
144,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
415,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
The leases are principally for office space and gas collection
equipment. Rental payments for all operating leases amounted to
approximately $128,000 during the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2005.
F-16
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Certain of the Companys mineral leases and farm-out
agreements are subject to annual minimum royalty payments
required to hold the mineral leases and farm-out agreements.
Although the Company is not obligated to make these payments
under existing mineral leases and farm-out agreements, these
payments are required to maintain individual leases/farm-out
agreements after the expiration of the initial terms of the
lease/farm-out agreements. The mineral leases/farm-out
agreements in existence as of July 31, 2005 expire at
various dates beginning in April 2006. If the Company were to
pay the total minimum royalty payments due under all mineral
leases/farm-out agreements in existence as of July 31,
2005, the amount would initially total approximately $702,000
annually and could increase to as much as $831,000 annually.
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash
equivalents, which are held at one large high quality financial
institution. The Company periodically evaluates the credit
worthiness of the financial institution. The Company has not
incurred any credit risk losses related to its cash and cash
equivalents.
We utilize a limited number of drilling contractors to perform
all of the drilling on our projects. We maintain a limited
number of supervisory and field personnel to oversee drilling
and production operations. Our plans to drill additional wells
are determined in large part by the anticipated availability of
acceptable drilling equipment and crews. We do not currently
have any contractual commitments that ensure we will have
adequate drilling equipment or crews to achieve our drilling
plans. We believe that we can secure the necessary commitments
from drilling companies as required. However, we can provide no
assurance that our expectations regarding the availability of
drilling equipment and crews from these companies will be met. A
significant delay in securing the necessary drilling equipment
and crews could cause a delay in production and sales, which
would affect operating results adversely.
|
|
11. |
Stock-Based Compensation |
The table below summarizes stock options activity for the three
years ended July 31, 2005. Stock options are granted with
exercise prices denominated in Canadian Dollars.
U.S. Dollar amounts shown in the table below were derived
using published exchange rates on the date of the transaction
for grants, cancellations, exercises and expirations and at
year-end exchange rates for options outstanding as of
July 31, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
| |
|
|
Options | |
|
CAD$ | |
|
USD$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at July 31, 2002
|
|
|
1,555,000 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
Granted exercise price less than market price of
stock on date of grant
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
Granted exercise price exceeds market price of stock
on date of grant
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(800,000 |
) |
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
|
Exercised/expired
|
|
|
(480,000 |
) |
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2003
|
|
|
1,825,000 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
Granted exercise price less than market price of
stock on date of grant
|
|
|
475,000 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
Exercised/expired
|
|
|
(69,444 |
) |
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,230,556 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
F-17
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
| |
|
|
Options | |
|
CAD$ | |
|
USD$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Granted exercise price equals market price of stock
on date of grant
|
|
|
3,423,278 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
|
Granted exercise price less than market price of
stock on date of grant
|
|
|
852,778 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
Exercised/expired
|
|
|
(2,254,333 |
) |
|
|
0.87 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2005
|
|
|
4,227,279 |
|
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of
$3,344,738, $193,796 and $515,286 in fiscal years ended
July 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The fair value
of stock options granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes
Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.0-3.7% |
|
|
|
4.1% |
|
|
|
4.0-4.3% |
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
69-81% |
|
|
|
105% |
|
|
|
109% |
|
Expected option life
|
|
|
3 years |
|
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
5 years |
|
The weighted average fair value per option at the date of the
grant for options granted in fiscal years ended July 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Exercise price equals market price of stock on date of grant
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Exercise price is less than market price of stock on date of
grant
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
Exercise price exceeds market price of stock on date of grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total grants
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective
assumptions, particularly as to the expected price volatility of
the stock. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect
the fair value estimate, and therefore it is managements
view that the existing models do not necessarily provide a
single reliable measure of the fair value of the Companys
stock option grants.
F-18
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following table summarizes information about options
outstanding as of July 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Number |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
CAD$ |
|
Outstanding |
|
Life (Years) |
|
Expiry Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
November 3, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
143,334 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
January 10, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
April 10, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
September 22, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
341,667 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
November 29, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
January 10, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
755,666 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
November 29, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
911,000 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
March 27, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 12, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
May 23, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
1,140,612 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
January 20, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
|
|
4,227,279 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
Other Income (Expense), Net |
Other income (expense), net consisted of the following for the
fiscal years ended July 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003,
respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gain on sale of marketable securities
|
|
$ |
42,276 |
|
|
$ |
2,454 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
(16,415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution from Hite Coalbed Methane, L.L.C.
|
|
|
6,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,385 |
|
|
$ |
2,454 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
Oil and Gas Properties |
The Companys oil and gas properties are all located in the
United States of America and consist solely of its coalbed
methane projects in the Illinois Basin. Following is a
discussion of each of the Companys coalbed methane
projects.
Southern Illinois Basin Project
On April 3, 2001, the Company acquired a 50% interest in a
mineral lease on 43,000 acres of property in Williamson,
Saline and Franklin Counties in the State of Illinois. On
August 1, 2001, the Company acquired all the issued shares
of Methane Management, Inc. (MMI), a private Ohio
company that owned the other 50% interest in the mineral lease,
through the issuance of 1,025,000 common shares of the Company.
The lease is subject to a 15% royalty and two overriding royalty
interests of 3% and 4%, both of which are calculated on 43.35%
of gross revenues. The lease expires in April 2006. After
the initial term of the agreement, the Company can continue to
hold the lease through the production of coalbed methane. For
each well that continues to produce coalbed methane after the
initial term of the agreement, providing a royalty payment to
the lessor of the least $1.00 per acre per month, the lease will
continue as to the 320 acres on
F-19
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
which the well is located, with the applicable well located in
the center thereof, or, if the well is drilled into an abandoned
mine works, the entire acreage of the mineworks that is drained
by the applicable well. However, if at any time after the
initial term of the lease the aggregate royalties do not exceed
$42,000 per month, the lease will terminate.
Northern Illinois Basin Project
On October 10, 2002, the Company acquired an option to
purchase a mineral lease for rights to coalbed methane gas, oil,
natural gas and other hydrocarbons other than coal on
approximately 121,000 acres in Montgomery County in the
State of Illinois. The original option expired on July 14,
2004 but was extended for an additional 540 days. The
lease, upon exercise of the option, has a primary term of five
years, with production holding the lease thereafter, and is
subject to a 12.5% royalty.
On January 20, 2004, the Company acquired an option to
purchase a mineral lease for rights to coalbed methane gas, oil,
natural gas and other hydrocarbons other than coal on
approximately 14,000 acres in Christian County in the State
of Illinois. The option expires January 20, 2007. The
lease, upon exercise of the option, has a primary term of five
years, with production holding the lease thereafter, and is
subject to a 12.5% royalty.
Shelby County
On November 12, 2003, the Company acquired a mineral lease
on approximately 63,000 acres of property in Shelby County
in the State of Illinois. The lease grants the Company the
mineral rights to coalbed methane gas, oil, natural gas and
other hydrocarbons other than coal. The lease has a primary term
of five years, with production holding the lease thereafter.
The lease is subject to a 12.5% royalty and requires the Company
to commence operations for the exploration of minerals on the
leased property within one year of the date of the lease or be
subject to an advanced royalty payment of $0.50 per acre to
defer commencement of such operations for an additional year.
Also included in the Northern Illinois Basin Project is
41,253 acres of coalbed methane rights in Macoupin County,
Illinois, which the Company can earn under a farm-out agreement
with Addington Exploration, LLC, as described below.
Western Illinois Basin Project
Clinton County
On November 3, 2003, the Company acquired an option to
purchase a mineral lease for rights to coalbed methane gas, oil,
natural gas and other hydrocarbons other than coal on
approximately 56,000 acres in Clinton County in the State
of Illinois. The option expires November 3, 2005. The
lease, upon exercise of the option, has a primary term of five
years, with production holding the lease thereafter, and is
subject to a 12.5% royalty.
Washington County
On September 9, 2003, the Company acquired an option to
purchase a mineral lease for rights to coalbed methane gas, oil,
natural gas and other hydrocarbons other than coal on
approximately 39,000 acres in Washington County in the
State of Illinois. The option expires September 9, 2006.
The lease, upon exercise of
F-20
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
the option, has a primary term of five years, with production
holding the lease thereafter, and is subject to a 12.5% royalty.
Marion County
On June 8, 2004, the Company acquired an option to purchase
a mineral lease for rights to coalbed methane gas, oil, natural
gas and other hydrocarbons other than coal on approximately
18,000 acres in Marion County in the State of Illinois.
The option expires June 8, 2007. The lease, upon exercise
of the option, has a primary term of five years, with production
holding the lease thereafter, and is subject to a 12.5% royalty.
Also included in the Western Illinois Basin Project is
22,997 acres in Perry County, Illinois, which the Company
can earn under a farm-out agreement with Addington Exploration,
LLC, as described below.
As of July 31, 2005, the Company has not yet undertaken any
testing or development activities on the Western Illinois Basin
Project.
Farm-out Agreement with Addington Exploration, LLC
On November 2, 2004, the Company entered into a farm-out
agreement with Addington Exploration, LLC covering
41,253 acres of coalbed methane rights in Macoupin County,
Illinois and 22,997 acres in Perry County, Illinois that
Addington controls pursuant to coal seam gas leases. The
farm-out agreement provides for an initial
36-month evaluation
period, during which the Company may test and evaluate the
covered properties. The
36-month evaluation
period can be extended by the Company on unearned acreage
through the payment of a fee equal to $0.50 per acre,
increasing over five years to $2.50 per acre. The Company
has up to 24 months following this
36-month evaluation
period to commence production. For each vertical and horizontal
well that the Company places into production during the term of
the agreement, Addington will assign to the Company its coalbed
methane rights covering the surrounding 160 acres
penetrated by one of the Companys wells.
The Company is required to pay Addington a royalty equal to 3%
of its proceeds from the sale of coalbed methane produced from
the covered acreage. In addition, the Company must pay royalties
totaling 12.5% to the lessors under the coal seam gas leases
underlying this farm-out agreement.
Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Exploration and Development
Activities
Costs related to oil and gas activities of the Company were
incurred as follows for the fiscal years ended July 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Property acquisition proved
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Property acquisition unproved
|
|
|
341,634 |
|
|
|
2,664 |
|
|
|
2,896 |
|
Exploration
|
|
|
743,991 |
|
|
|
1,778,517 |
|
|
|
75,626 |
|
Development
|
|
|
5,541,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,626,647 |
|
|
$ |
1,781,181 |
|
|
$ |
78,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to fiscal year 2005, the Companys properties were
all considered unproved and all costs to drill and equip wells
and gain access to and prepare well locations for drilling were
classified as exploration costs.
F-21
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following table sets forth a summary of oil and gas property
costs not being amortized at July 31, 2005, by the year in
which such costs were incurred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
Total | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
and Prior | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Property acquisition costs
|
|
$ |
2,404,887 |
|
|
$ |
341,634 |
|
|
$ |
2,664 |
|
|
$ |
2,896 |
|
|
$ |
2,057,693 |
|
Exploration and development, net of transfers to proved oil and
gas properties
|
|
|
744,485 |
|
|
|
742,005 |
|
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,149,372 |
|
|
$ |
1,083,639 |
|
|
$ |
5,144 |
|
|
$ |
2,896 |
|
|
$ |
2,057,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No interest has been capitalized and included in the cost of
unproved properties as of July 31, 2002 or in the fiscal
years ended July 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, as such amounts
were not material. The Company expects to include the costs
associated with unproved properties in its amortization
computation over the next two to four years when future
development of the projects is expected to result in additional
reserves being classified as proved. Depletion expense related
to proved oil and gas properties was $58,523, $0, and $0 or
$1.72/Mcf, $0/Mcf, and $0/Mcf in the fiscal years ended
July 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
|
|
14. |
Related Party Transaction |
The Company enters into various transactions with related
parties in the normal course of business operations.
Randy Oestreich, the Companys Vice President of Field
Operations, owns and operates A-Strike Consulting, a consulting
company that provides, among other things, laboratory testing
related to coalbed methane. Beginning in fiscal year ended
July 31, 2005, the Company owns and maintains a lab testing
facility and allows A-Strike Consulting to operate the facility.
The Company pays all expenses related to the facility and, in
return, receives 80% of the revenue generated from the
operations of the facility as reimbursement of the
Companys expenses. During the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2005, the Company received approximately $59,000
in expense reimbursement related to this arrangement.
Mr. Oestreichs brother owns Dependable Service
Company, a company that provides general labor services to the
Company. The Company paid Dependable Services Company $147,000
and $16,000 in fiscal years ended July 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
The President of the Company personally guaranteed the
Companys portion of the line of credit in the Jericho
Project and was subsequently issued 50,990 shares of the
Company as consideration during the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2005.
|
|
15. |
Technical Services Agreement |
On March 31, 2005, the Company signed a Technical Services
Agreement (TSA) with BHP Petroleum (Exploration)
Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of BHP Billiton,
(BHP) to provide technical services related to
BHPs techniques and know-how in the areas of drilling and
completion of in-seam coalbed methane wells as well as methane
recovery from coal mining operations. These techniques and
know-how will be utilized on the Companys projects in the
Illinois Basin.
During the term of the TSA, any extension of the term and the
six-month period after the expiration of the term, none of BHP
or any of its affiliates may enter into any agreement to provide
technical assistance to a coalbed methane operator within the
Illinois Basin or acquire a direct or indirect interest in any
coalbed methane assets located in the Illinois Basin without our
prior consent. However, BHP can terminate the TSA and these
exclusivity restrictions if it acquires an equity interest in
any company that holds mineral rights in
F-22
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
the Illinois Basin, so long as such mineral rights do not
constitute a majority of the economic value of the subject
company.
In connection with the TSA, we have granted BHP a right of first
refusal to acquire us. Before we can extend or accept an offer
for any third party to acquire a majority of our stock or
assets, we must permit BHP to acquire the same stock or assets
on the terms proposed to be extended to or accepted from the
third party. The right of first refusal expires on
September 30, 2006.
In consideration for BHP entering into the TSA, we agreed to
issue BHP 4.0 million stock appreciation rights. The stock
appreciation rights, which may be exercised by BHP only in
connection with its acquisition of us, will have a value equal
to the number of stock appreciation rights multiplied by the
excess of the market price of our common stock on the date of
exercise over CAD$2.18/share (the market price on March 31,
2005 as reported by the TSX Venture Exchange). BHP may exercise
the stock appreciation rights only during the term of the TSA,
any extension of the term and the six-month period after the
expiration of the term. In connection with the exercise of the
stock appreciation rights, BHP may elect to convert the rights
into cash or a credit against the consideration payable by BHP
in connection with its acquisition of us. The stock appreciation
rights will terminate if BHP materially breaches the TSA or we
are sold to a third party or a majority of our stock or assets
is acquired by a third party. We are required to issue BHP an
additional 2.0 million stock appreciation rights upon the
commencement of the first six-month extension of the term of the
TSA.
The term of the TSA extends until September 30, 2006, and
BHP may elect to extend the term of the agreement for additional
six-month periods. BHP may terminate the agreement at any time
upon 90 days notice to us, and we may terminate the
agreement if BHP materially breaches the agreement. If BHP
elects to terminate the agreement, its stock appreciation rights
and right of first refusal will immediately expire. The
agreement terminates if we are sold to a third party or a
majority of our stock or assets is acquired by a third party.
The Company has accounted for the stock appreciation rights
granted to BHP in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS No. 123). Under
SFAS No. 123, all transactions in which goods or
services are the consideration received for the issuance of
equity instruments shall be accounted for based on the fair
value of the consideration received or the fair value of the
equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably
measurable, by recording an increase in oil and gas
properties unproved and recognizing an accrued
liability for a corresponding amount. The Company has estimated
the value of the stock appreciation rights granted to BHP to be
$18,000 based on the estimated fair value of technical services
to be received by the Company from BHP, because the fair value
of such services was more readily determinable than the fair
value of the stock appreciation rights.
The Companys policy is to reassess the amount of liability
associated with this TSA in each reporting period by first
determining whether the fair value of the stock appreciation
rights is more readily determinable than the fair market value
of the technical services received by the Company from BHP. In
reassessing the fair value of the technical services received,
the reassessment is based on the services currently being
provided by BHP, as well as any additional services the Company
anticipates BHP will provide over the remaining term of the TSA.
After determining which amount is more readily determinable, the
Companys policy is to record an additional liability for
any increase in the estimated amount of the future liability
over the liability previously recorded.
F-23
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In September 2005, the Company sold 18,000,000 shares of
common stock in a private placement to five institutional
investors. The net proceeds from this private placement of
approximately $28,000,000 will be used to fund the
Companys plan of operations and for working capital and
general corporate purposes.
In connection with this private placement, the Company entered
into an agreement with the investors that subjects the Company
to cash penalties if the Company fails to file a registration
statement and cause that registration statement to become
effective within 90 days (or 150 days if the
Securities and Exchange Commission decides to review the
registration statement) after the September 26, 2005
closing date. In addition, the Company is subject to penalties
if the investors covered by this agreement are prohibited from
selling shares under the registration statement for a period
exceeding 90 days during any 12 month period as a
result of suspensions effected by the Company. The aggregate
amount of payments to the investors under these provisions
together may not exceed 13% of the aggregate purchase price paid
by the investors. Based on this 13% cap, the Company will not be
required to make payments to the investors under these
provisions in excess of $3,965,508.
|
|
17. |
Supplemental Oil and Gas Data (Unaudited) |
The following unaudited information was prepared in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69,
Disclosures About Oil and Gas Producing Activities
and related accounting rules.
The table below sets forth the Companys results of
operations from oil and gas producing activities for the fiscal
year ended July 31, 2005. The Company commenced production
and sales of gas during fiscal year ended July 31, 2005.
The Company had no revenues or operating expenses of oil and gas
activities in fiscal years ended July 31, 2004 or 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
Gas revenues
|
|
$ |
117,835 |
|
Production costs
|
|
|
(307,178 |
) |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(238,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax operating loss
|
|
|
(427,709 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
|
166,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from oil and gas producing activities
|
|
$ |
(260,902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The following estimates of proved reserve quantities and related
standardized measure of discounted net cash flows are estimates
only, and do not purport to reflect realizable values or fair
market values of the Companys reserves. The Company
emphasizes that reserve estimates are inherently imprecise and
that estimates of new discoveries are more imprecise than those
of producing oil and gas properties. Accordingly, these
estimates are expected to change as future information becomes
available. All of the Companys reserves are located in the
United States.
Proved reserves are estimated reserves of crude oil (including
condensate and natural gas liquids) and natural gas that
geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable
certainty to be recoverable in future years from known
reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions.
Proved developed reserves are those expected to be recovered
through existing wells, equipment and operating methods.
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows is
computed by applying year-end prices of oil and gas (with
consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by
contractual arrangements) to the estimated future production of
proved oil and gas reserves, less estimated future expenditures
(based on year-end costs) to be incurred in developing and
producing the proved reserves, less estimated future income tax
expenses (based on year-end statutory tax rates, with
consideration of future tax rates already legislated)
F-24
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
to be incurred on pretax net cash flows less tax basis of the
properties and available credits, and assuming continuation of
existing economic conditions. The estimated future net cash
flows are then discounted using a rate of 10% per year to
reflect the estimated timing of the future cash flows. The
average net price used at July 31, 2005 was $7.44 per
Mcf.
The following summaries of changes in reserves and standardized
measure of discounted future net cash flows were prepared from
estimates of proved reserves developed by our independent
petroleum engineers.
Summary of Changes in Proved Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Mcf | |
|
Mcf | |
|
Mcf | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Proved reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of reserves in place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
10,325,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(33,967 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
|
10,292,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
|
2,970,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
Relating to Proved Gas Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Future cash inflows
|
|
$ |
76,608 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Future production costs and taxes
|
|
|
(10,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future development costs
|
|
|
(7,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future income tax expenses
|
|
|
(14,663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net future cash flows
|
|
|
43,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted at 10% for estimated timing of cash flows
|
|
|
(20,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
|
$ |
23,068 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
BPI Industries Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash
Flows
Relating to Proved Gas Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended July 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Standardized measure, beginning of year
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Sales, net of production costs and taxes
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extensions and discoveries
|
|
|
27,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of reserves in place
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net changes in prices and production costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions of quantity estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net changes in development costs
|
|
|
(5,541 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest factor accretion of discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in production rates (timing) and other
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase
|
|
|
23,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure, end of year
|
|
$ |
23,068 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2006 | |
|
July 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
26,623,707 |
|
|
$ |
7,251,503 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
159,634 |
|
|
|
34,671 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
270,445 |
|
|
|
23,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
27,053,786 |
|
|
|
7,309,708 |
|
Property and equipment, at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties, full cost method of accounting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved, net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization of $142,023 and $58,523
|
|
|
15,970,561 |
|
|
|
10,190,929 |
|
|
|
Unproved
|
|
|
3,244,807 |
|
|
|
3,149,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net oil and gas properties
|
|
|
19,215,368 |
|
|
|
13,340,301 |
|
|
Other property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
and amortization of $462,530 and $398,988
|
|
|
4,434,311 |
|
|
|
1,769,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
23,649,679 |
|
|
|
15,110,113 |
|
Investment in Hite Coalbed Methane, L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
846,766 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
134,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
161,125 |
|
|
|
161,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,998,590 |
|
|
$ |
23,527,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
1,486,767 |
|
|
$ |
2,144,066 |
|
|
Current maturity of long-term notes payable
|
|
|
239,071 |
|
|
|
42,227 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other
|
|
|
72,145 |
|
|
|
31,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,797,983 |
|
|
|
2,217,698 |
|
Long-term notes payable, less current portion
|
|
|
94,768 |
|
|
|
507,595 |
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
45,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,938,700 |
|
|
|
2,725,293 |
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, no par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares,
64,378,087 and 43,912,961 outstanding
|
|
|
64,573,394 |
|
|
|
34,666,022 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
4,891,266 |
|
|
|
4,493,680 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(20,404,770 |
) |
|
|
(18,357,283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
49,059,890 |
|
|
|
20,802,419 |
|
|
|
$ |
50,998,590 |
|
|
$ |
23,527,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-27
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended January 31 | |
|
Six Months Ended January 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas sales
|
|
$ |
327,811 |
|
|
$ |
6,341 |
|
|
$ |
537,505 |
|
|
$ |
6,341 |
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expense
|
|
|
300,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,165,483 |
|
|
|
2,752,852 |
|
|
|
2,437,239 |
|
|
|
3,165,087 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
117,890 |
|
|
|
34,086 |
|
|
|
212,692 |
|
|
|
57,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,584,179 |
|
|
|
2,786,938 |
|
|
|
3,111,541 |
|
|
|
3,222,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
270,186 |
|
|
|
4,353 |
|
|
|
402,804 |
|
|
|
4,847 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(6,234 |
) |
|
|
(5,407 |
) |
|
|
(13,778 |
) |
|
|
(10,582 |
) |
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
138,191 |
|
|
|
3,246 |
|
|
|
137,523 |
|
|
|
3,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402,143 |
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
526,549 |
|
|
|
(2,489 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(854,225 |
) |
|
|
(2,778,405 |
) |
|
|
(2,047,487 |
) |
|
|
(3,218,907 |
) |
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(854,225 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,485,843 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,047,487 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,874,190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
63,654,794 |
|
|
|
34,790,336 |
|
|
|
57,889,094 |
|
|
|
32,018,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-28
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Shareholder | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amounts | |
|
Capital | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, July 31, 2005
|
|
|
43,912,961 |
|
|
$ |
34,666,022 |
|
|
$ |
4,493,680 |
|
|
$ |
(18,357,283 |
) |
|
$ |
20,802,419 |
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
391,667 |
|
|
|
379,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379,379 |
|
Proceeds from warrants exercised
|
|
|
2,073,459 |
|
|
|
1,644,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,644,039 |
|
Net proceeds from shares issued in private placement
September 23, 2005(1)
|
|
|
18,000,000 |
|
|
|
27,883,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,883,954 |
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397,586 |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,047,487 |
) |
|
|
(2,047,487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 31, 2006
|
|
|
64,378,087 |
|
|
$ |
64,573,394 |
|
|
$ |
4,891,266 |
|
|
$ |
(20,404,770 |
) |
|
$ |
49,059,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Net of share issuance costs of $2,619,953 |
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-29
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended January 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(2,047,487 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,874,190 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
212,692 |
|
|
|
57,672 |
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
397,586 |
|
|
|
2,200,777 |
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investment
|
|
|
(127,416 |
) |
|
|
(3,246 |
) |
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344,717 |
) |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,881 |
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(124,963 |
) |
|
|
(6,341 |
) |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(246,911 |
) |
|
|
(17,714 |
) |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(657,299 |
) |
|
|
(99,039 |
) |
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other
|
|
|
71,922 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
45,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(2,475,927 |
) |
|
|
(1,071,421 |
) |
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investment
|
|
|
551,000 |
|
|
|
43,956 |
|
|
Additions to oil and gas properties
|
|
|
(5,958,567 |
) |
|
|
(1,907,403 |
) |
|
Additions to other property and equipment
|
|
|
(2,560,216 |
) |
|
|
(371,736 |
) |
|
Acquisition of equity interest in joint venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,112 |
) |
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(34,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investment activities
|
|
|
(8,001,783 |
) |
|
|
(2,313,295 |
) |
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term notes payable
|
|
|
(57,458 |
) |
|
|
(14,828 |
) |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common shares
|
|
|
29,907,372 |
|
|
|
14,140,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
29,849,914 |
|
|
|
14,125,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
19,372,204 |
|
|
|
10,740,671 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
|
|
|
7,251,503 |
|
|
|
970,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
|
$ |
26,623,707 |
|
|
$ |
11,711,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of equipment by issuance of notes payable
|
|
$ |
233,475 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest paid approximates interest expense.
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-30
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation
These unaudited consolidated interim financial statements
include the accounts of BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and its wholly
owned U.S. subsidiary, BPI Energy, Inc. (collectively,
the Company). All inter-company transactions and
balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. is incorporated in British Columbia,
Canada and, through its wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, BPI
Energy, Inc., is involved in the acquisition, exploration and
development of coalbed methane properties located in the United
States of America. The Company conducts its operations in one
reportable segment, which is oil and gas exploration and
production. On December 13, 2005, the Companys common
shares began trading on the American Stock Exchange
(AMEX) under the symbol BPG. As a result of the
shares being listed on the AMEX, the Company voluntarily
de-listed from trading its shares on the TSX Venture Exchange.
Amounts shown are in U.S. Dollars unless otherwise
indicated.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles for interim financial information and with
the instructions to
Form 10-Q and
Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management,
all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
Operating results for the quarter and six months ended
January 31, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the full fiscal year. For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in the Companys
Form S-1 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 5,
2005. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to
conform to current period presentation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of these unaudited consolidated financial
statements requires the use of certain estimates by management
in determining the Companys assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses. Actual results could differ from such estimates.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization of oil and gas
properties and the impairment of oil and gas properties are
determined using estimates of oil and gas reserves. There are
numerous uncertainties in estimating the quantity of reserves
and in projecting the future rates of production and timing of
development expenditures, including future costs to dismantle,
dispose of, and restore the Companys properties. Oil and
gas reserve engineering must be recognized as a subjective
process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas
that cannot be measured in an exact way. Proved reserves of oil
and natural gas are estimated quantities that geological and
engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable in the future from known reservoirs under existing
conditions.
Oil and Gas
Properties
The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for oil
and gas properties. Under this method, all costs associated with
the acquisition of, exploration for and development of oil and
gas reserves are capitalized in cost centers on a
country-by-country basis (currently the Company has one cost
center, the United States). Such costs include lease acquisition
costs, geological and geophysical studies, carrying charges on
non-producing properties, costs of drilling both productive and
non-productive wells, and overhead expenses directly related to
these activities. Internal costs associated with oil and gas
activities that are not directly attributable to acquisition,
exploration or development activities are expensed as incurred.
F-31
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Unevaluated oil and gas properties and major development
projects are excluded from amortization until a determination of
whether proved reserves can be assigned to the properties or
impairment occurs. Unevaluated properties are assessed at least
annually to ascertain whether an impairment has occurred. Sales
or dispositions of properties are credited to their respective
cost centers and a gain or loss is recognized when all the
properties in a cost center have been disposed of, unless such
sale or disposition significantly alters the relationship
between capitalized costs and proved reserves attributable to
the cost center.
Capitalized costs of proved oil and gas properties, including
estimated future costs to develop the reserves and estimated
abandonment cost, net of salvage, are amortized on the
units-of-production
method using estimates of proved reserves.
A ceiling test is applied to each cost center by comparing the
net capitalized costs, less related deferred income taxes, to
the estimated future net revenues from production of proved
reserves, discounted at 10%, plus the costs of unproved
properties net of impairment. Any excess capitalized costs are
written off in the current year. The calculation of future net
revenues is based upon prices, costs and regulations in effect
at each year end.
In general, the Company determines if a property is impaired if
one or more of the following conditions exist:
|
|
|
|
i) there are no firm plans for further drilling on the
unproved property; |
|
|
|
|
ii) negative results were obtained from studies of the
unproved property; |
|
|
|
|
iii) negative results were obtained from studies conducted
in the vicinity of the unproved property; or |
|
|
|
|
iv) the remaining term of the unproved property does not
allow sufficient time for further studies or drilling. |
|
Other Property and
Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Gas collection
equipment is depreciated on the
units-of-production
method based on proved reserves. Support equipment and other
property and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging
from three to ten years. Major classes of property and equipment
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, | |
|
July 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Other Property and Equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas collection equipment
|
|
$ |
3,758,264 |
|
|
$ |
1,332,012 |
|
|
Support equipment
|
|
|
1,058,731 |
|
|
|
760,467 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
79,846 |
|
|
|
76,321 |
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(462,530 |
) |
|
|
(398,988 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,434,311 |
|
|
$ |
1,769,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Retirement
Obligations
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations. SFAS No. 143 requires the Company to
record the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a
liability in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable
estimate of fair value can be made. The present value of the
estimated asset retirement costs is capitalized as part of the
carrying
F-32
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
amount of the associated long-lived asset. Amortization of the
capitalized asset retirement cost is determined on a
units-of-production
method. Accretion of the asset retirement obligation is
recognized over time until the obligation is settled. The
Companys asset retirement obligations relate to the
plugging of wells upon exhaustion of gas reserves. The Company
assessed its asset retirement obligation in prior periods and
deemed it to be immaterial. The initial liability for our asset
retirement obligations was recorded as of August 1, 2005 in
the amount of $19,778.
The following table summarizes the activity for the
Companys asset retirement obligations for the six months
ended January 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Asset retirement obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
19,778 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accretion expense
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities incurred
|
|
|
24,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation at end of period
|
|
$ |
45,949 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Per Share
Loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted loss per
share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock. Diluted loss per share
is not disclosed as all common share equivalents were
anti-dilutive for the quarter and six months ended
January 31, 2006. Outstanding options and warrants that
were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share, as
the effect of their assumed exercises would be anti-dilutive,
totaled 14,844,215 at October 31, 2005 and 13,150,828 at
January 31, 2006.
Share-Based Payment
Prior to December 13, 2005 the Company had a stock-based
compensation plan (the Incentive Stock Option Plan)
under which stock options were issued to directors, officers,
employees and consultants as determined by the Board of
Directors and subject to the provisions of the Incentive Stock
Option Plan. The Incentive Stock Option Plan permitted options
to be issued with exercise prices at a discount to the market
price of the Companys common stock on the day prior to the
date of grant. However, the majority of all stock options issued
under the Incentive Stock Option Plan were issued with exercise
prices equal to the quoted market price of the stock on the date
of grant. Options granted under the Incentive Stock Option Plan
vested immediately and were exercisable over a period not
exceeding five years. The Company had options to
purchase 4,030,612 shares of common stock outstanding
under the Incentive Stock Option Plan at January 31, 2006.
On December 13, 2005, the shareholders of the Company
approved the BPI Industries Inc. 2005 Omnibus Stock Plan (the
Omnibus Stock Plan) and it became effective on that
date. The Omnibus Stock Plan replaces the Incentive Stock Option
Plan under which stock options were previously granted. The
Omnibus Stock Plan will be administered by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee)
and will remain in effect for five years. All employees and
Directors of the Company and its subsidiaries, and all
consultants or agents of the Company designated by the
Committee, are eligible to participate in the Omnibus Stock
Plan. The Committee has authority to: grant awards; select the
participants who will receive awards; determine the terms,
conditions, vesting periods and restrictions applicable to the
awards; determine how the exercise price is to be paid; modify
or replace outstanding awards within the limits
F-33
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
of the Omnibus Stock Plan; accelerate the date on which awards
become exercisable; waive the restrictions and conditions
applicable to awards, and establish rules governing the Omnibus
Stock Plan. No options have been issued under the Omnibus Stock
Plan as of January 31, 2006.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment. This Statement revises
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
SFAS No. 123(R) focuses primarily on the accounting
for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in
share-based payment transactions. The key provision of
SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to record
share-based payment transactions as compensation expense at fair
market value based on the grant-date fair value of those awards.
Previously under SFAS 123, companies had the option of
either recording expense based on the fair value of stock
options granted or continuing to account for stock-based
compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB
No. 25.
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), using the
modified-prospective method, effective August 1, 2005.
Since August 1, 2001, the Company followed the fair value
provisions of SFAS 123 and recorded all share-based payment
transactions as compensation expense at fair market value based
on the grant-date fair value of those awards. In addition, all
stock options previously granted by the Company vested
immediately on the date of grant, and thus there was no unvested
portion of previous stock option grants which vested during the
quarter or six months ended January 31, 2006. Therefore,
SFAS 123(R) had no impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position or results of operations for the
quarter and six months ended January 31, 2006. The Company
continues to use the Black-Scholes formula to estimate the fair
value of stock options previously granted under the Incentive
Stock Option Plan.
|
|
2. |
Stock-Based Compensation |
The tables below summarize stock options activity for the six
months ended January 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. All
stock options were granted with exercise prices denominated in
Canadian Dollars. U.S. Dollar amounts shown in the tables
below were derived using published exchange rates on the date of
the transaction for grants, cancellations, exercises and
expirations and at period-end exchange rates for options
outstanding as of July 31, 2005 and 2004 and
January 31, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
| |
Six Months Ended January 31, 2006: |
|
Options | |
|
CAD$ | |
|
USD$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at July 31, 2005
|
|
|
4,227,279 |
|
|
$ |
1.82 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
Granted exercise price equal to market price of
stock on date of grant
|
|
|
495,000 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(341,667 |
) |
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(300,000 |
) |
|
|
1.82 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 31, 2005
|
|
|
4,080,612 |
|
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 31, 2006
|
|
|
4,030,612 |
|
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Six Months Ended January 31, 2005: |
|
Number of Options | |
|
CAD$ | |
|
USD$ | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at July 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,230,556 |
|
|
$ |
.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(13,889 |
) |
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,216,667 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
Granted exercise price equal to market price of
stock on date of grant
|
|
|
2,097,278 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
Granted exercise price less than market price of
stock on date of grant
|
|
|
852,778 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
.96 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,040,000 |
) |
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(11,111 |
) |
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 31, 2005
|
|
|
4,115,612 |
|
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of
$397,586 and $2,200,777 in the six months ended January 31,
2006, and 2005, respectively. The fair value of stock options
granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing
Model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
January 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
3.0 - 3.5 |
% |
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
Nil |
|
|
|
Nil |
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
74 - 81 |
% |
Expected option life
|
|
|
3 years |
|
|
|
3 years |
|
Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective
assumptions, particularly as to the expected price volatility of
the stock. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect
the fair value estimate, and therefore it is managements
view that the existing models do not necessarily provide a
single reliable measure of the fair value of the Companys
stock option grants.
The following table summarizes information about options
outstanding as of January 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Number |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
CAD$ |
|
Outstanding |
|
Life (Years) |
|
Expiry Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
November 3, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
143,334 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
January 10, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
April 10, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
September 22, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
January 10, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
710,666 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
November 29, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
495,000 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
September 22, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
911,000 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
March 27, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
May 23, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
1,140,612 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
January 20, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
|
|
4,030,612 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
We operate in two tax jurisdictions, the United States and
Canada. Primarily as a result of the net operating losses that
we have generated (NOL Carryforwards) in both Canada
and the United States, we have generated deferred tax benefits
available for tax purposes to offset net income in future
periods. SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, requires that we record a valuation allowance when it
is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred
tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of
deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of
sufficient future taxable income before the expiration of the
NOL Carryforwards. Because of the Companys limited
operating history, limited financial performance and cumulative
tax loss from inception, it is managements judgment that
SFAS No. 109 requires the recording of a full
valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets in both Canada
and the United States as of January 31, 2006.
We recorded a tax benefit in the United States for the six
months ended January 31, 2005 to partially offset a net
deferred tax liability at January 31, 2005; however, no tax
benefit was recognized for the six months ended January 31,
2006 as the Company had no net deferred tax liability to offset.
|
|
4. |
Long-Term Notes Payable |
The Company has outstanding notes payable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, | |
|
July 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Case Credit term note due in fiscal year 2006, 6.50%
|
|
$ |
28,582 |
|
|
$ |
32,833 |
|
GMAC term notes due in fiscal year 2009, 6.50%
|
|
|
25,163 |
|
|
|
26,633 |
|
GMAC term notes due in fiscal year 2010, 6.1% to 6.50%
|
|
|
94,979 |
|
|
|
98,356 |
|
Convertible note due in fiscal year 2008, 3.25%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392,000 |
|
Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.
|
|
|
195,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333,839 |
|
|
|
549,822 |
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
(239,071 |
) |
|
|
(42,227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes payable
|
|
$ |
94,768 |
|
|
$ |
507,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes are collateralized by the related vehicles and
equipment. The convertible note payable outstanding at
July 31, 2005 was issued in June 2003 with a face value of
$392,000 and maturing on June 10, 2008, bearing interest at
3.25%, convertible at the option of the holder, prior to
June 10, 2008, into 390,537 common shares of the Company.
The convertible note payable was cancelled on January 4,
2005 pursuant to the sale of the Companys interest in Hite
Coalbed Methane, L.L.C. see Note 7.
The annual maturities of all notes for the remaining six months
of fiscal year 2006 and the four fiscal years thereafter are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal | |
|
Interest | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
137,451 |
|
|
$ |
9,201 |
|
|
$ |
146,652 |
|
2007
|
|
|
121,239 |
|
|
|
7,160 |
|
|
|
128,399 |
|
2008
|
|
|
27,982 |
|
|
|
3,855 |
|
|
|
31,837 |
|
2009
|
|
|
29,767 |
|
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
31,837 |
|
2010
|
|
|
17,400 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
17,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
333,839 |
|
|
$ |
22,726 |
|
|
$ |
356,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In September 2005, the Company sold 18,000,000 common shares in
a private placement. The proceeds from this private placement of
$27,883,954 net of $2,619,953 of share issuance costs, will
be used to fund the Companys plan of operations and for
working capital and general corporate purposes.
The Company has share purchase warrants outstanding at
January 31, 2006 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Exercise |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Price |
|
Expiry Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,177,016 |
|
|
CAD $ |
1.00 |
|
|
|
April 29, 2006 |
|
|
4,906,000 |
|
|
USD $ |
1.50 |
|
|
|
December 13, 2007 |
|
|
1,037,200 |
|
|
USD $ |
1.25 |
|
|
|
January 15, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,120,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
Related Party Transactions |
The Company enters into various transactions with related
parties in the normal course of business operations.
Randy Oestreich, the Companys Vice President of Field
Operations, owns and operates A-Strike Consulting, a consulting
company that provides, among other things, laboratory testing
related to CBM. Beginning in the fiscal year ended July 31,
2005, the Company owns and maintains a lab testing facility and
allows A-Strike Consulting to operate the facility. The Company
pays all expenses related to the facility and, in return,
receives 80% of the revenue generated from the operations of the
facility as reimbursement of the Companys expenses. The
Company received approximately $38,451 and $0 in expense
reimbursement related to this arrangement during the six months
ended January 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Mr. Oestreichs brother owns Dependable Service
Company, a company that provides general labor services to the
Company. The Company paid Dependable Services Company $160,679
and $54,929 during the six months ended January 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively.
|
|
7. |
Sale of Investment in Hite Coalbed Methane, L.L.C. |
On January 4, 2006, the Company sold its 49% interest in
Hite Coalbed Methane, L.L.C. (HCM) for $551,000 in
cash and cancellation of the Companys convertible note
payable in the amount of $392,000, plus accrued interest of
$31,182. The note was convertible into 390,537 of the
Companys common shares. The Company accounted for its
investment in HCM under the cost method of accounting. The total
consideration received of $974,182 resulted in a gain on the
sale of the investment of $127,416, which is included in other
income in the Companys statement of operations for the
quarter and six months ended January 31, 2006.
On March 15, 2006, we filed a complaint against Colt, LLC
and other defendants alleging tortious interference with
business relations and breach of contract relating to the
interruptions of our development plans at our Southern Illinois
Basin Project. We sought a preliminary injunction against Colt,
LLC and related parties from terminating the lease agreement
covering our CBM rights at the Southern Illinois Basin Project
or taking any other action that interferes with our right to
mine CBM under the lease agreement, pending a final judgment on
the merits of our complaint. We requested the preliminary
injunction to preserve the status quo until the case is resolved.
F-37
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
On April 3, 2006, the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Ohio denied our motion for a preliminary
injunction. Although the courts opinion provided that it
did not state the courts ultimate opinion on the merits of
the case, the opinion provided that we had failed, in connection
with our request for the preliminary injunction, to establish a
substantial likelihood or probability of success on the merits.
On April 5, 2006, Colt filed an answer and counterclaim in
response to our complaint. In its counterclaim, Colt seeks a
declaratory judgment asking the court to declare, among other
things, that: (a) we committed multiple breaches of the
lease agreement; (b) the lease agreement automatically
terminated due to our failure to cure our alleged breaches;
(c) the lease agreement automatically terminated by its own
terms on April 3, 2006; and (d) to the extent the
lease agreement already terminated, we are wrongfully holding
over and/or trespassing and Colt is entitled to an award of
damages as a result.
Apart from the claims that we are currently pursuing in the
litigation as to the entire 43,000 acres covered by the
lease, we believe that we should hold our CBM acreage rights as
to certain tracts of land subject to the lease. The lease has a
primary term that extended until April 3, 2006. After the
primary term, the lease provides that it shall extend as to a
particular tract so long as CBM is being produced from such
tract providing a royalty payment of not less than
$1.00 per acre per month; provided that, after the primary
term, in the event the aggregate royalties do no exceed $42,000
in any month, the lease shall terminate. We believe that the
wells that we have drilled (including both productive wells and
shut-in wells) pursuant to the lease should hold tracts of land
totaling approximately 10,550 acres. The remaining
32,450 acres under the lease do not have wells drilled.
As of May 1, 2006, we have drilled 107 wells. These
wells consist of 77 productive wells, 17 shut-in wells and
13 wells that have been drilled but are not in production,
including three test wells. All of our productive wells are
located at our Southern Illinois Basin Project.
The effect of the loss of all of our acreage under this lease
would result in a write-down of capitalized net oil and gas and
other properties in a total amount of approximately
$26 million. The effect of the loss of only our
non-producing acreage (those areas in which wells have not yet
been established) may result in a write-down of capitalized net
oil and gas and other properties in an amount up to
approximately $4 million.
On February 9, 2006, at a special meeting of the
Companys shareholders, the shareholders voted to approve
amendments to the Companys governing documents that:
1. changed the name of the Company to BPI Energy Holdings,
Inc.;
2. increased the number of shares of common stock that the
Company is authorized to issue from 100 million shares to
200 million shares;
3. increased the quorum necessary to transact business at a
meeting of the Companys shareholders to the holders of
331/3
% of the Companys shares of common stock; and
4. permit meetings of the Companys shareholders to be
held outside of British Columbia, Canada.
Each of the amendments to the Companys governing documents
was previously approved by the unanimous vote of the
Companys Board of Directors.
F-38
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13. |
Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution |
The following are the estimated expenses in connection with the
registration and sale of the securities covered by this
registration statement:
|
|
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$ |
3,570 |
|
Accounting
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Printing
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
193,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Registrant will pay all of these expenses.
|
|
Item 14. |
Indemnification of Directors and Officers |
In accordance with the British Columbia Business Corporations
Act, we may indemnify our directors and officers against any
judgment, penalty or fine awarded against or imposed upon them
in connection with, or amounts paid in settlement by them of,
any legal proceeding or investigative action and, after the
final disposition of a legal proceeding or investigative action,
may pay the costs, charges and expenses actually and reasonably
incurred by them by reason of the fact that they were or are
directors or officers of the corporation. Pursuant to the
British Columbia Business Corporations Act, we are required to
pay to our directors and officers the costs, charges and
expenses (including legal and other fees) actually and
reasonably incurred by them in connection with any legal
proceeding or investigative action brought by third parties by
reason of the fact that they were or are directors or officers
of the corporation, if the directors or officers acted honestly
and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the
corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or
proceeding, had no reasonable grounds to believe their conduct
was unlawful. We may not indemnify our directors or officers or
pay their expenses in connection with a derivative action
against us (i.e., one that is brought by or on behalf of the
corporation).
Subject to the British Columbia Business Corporations Act, our
Articles require us to indemnify our directors and former
directors and their heirs and legal personal representatives
against all judgments, penalties and fines awarded or imposed in
connection with, or an amount paid in settlement of, any legal
proceeding or investigative action pursuant to which such person
is or may be liable. We must, after the final disposition of a
legal proceeding or investigative action, pay the expenses
actually and reasonably incurred by such persons in respect of
that proceeding. We may indemnify any other person, subject to
the restrictions of the British Columbia Business Corporations
Act.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the company pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that in the
opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy
as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the company
of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or
controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit
or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or
controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the
matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a
court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act, and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
|
|
Item 15. |
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities |
In the three years prior to the filing of this registration
statement, we issued the following unregistered securities. We
did not use a principal underwriter for any of the issuances
listed in the first table. Each such
II-1
sale was exempt from registration under the Securities Act in
reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and/or
regulations issued thereunder as sales principally to accredited
investors not involving a public offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering | |
Date of Sale |
|
Title and Amount of Securities Sold |
|
Offering Price | |
|
Price | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
9/18/03
|
|
Units consisting of 725,000 shares of common stock and
warrants to purchase 725,000 shares of common stock
for CAD$0.80 per share. |
|
|
USD$0.47 per Unit |
|
|
|
USD$340,076 |
|
12/3/03
|
|
Units consisting of 1,950,000 shares of common stock and
warrants to purchase 1,950,000 shares of common stock
for CAD$0.80 per share. |
|
|
USD$0.49 per Unit |
|
|
|
USD$960,000 |
|
4/29/04
|
|
Units consisting of 3,326,100 shares of common stock and
warrants to purchase 3,326,100 shares of common stock
for CAD$1.00 per share. |
|
|
USD$0.58 per Unit |
|
|
|
USD$1,942,674 |
|
In December 2004 and January 2005, we issued the following
unregistered securities. Included in these shares is the warrant
to purchase 1,037,200 shares of our common stock, at a
price equal to USD$1.25 per share, that we issued to
Sanders Morris Harris Inc. as compensation for serving as
placement agent for the offering. Each such sale was exempt from
registration under the Securities Act in reliance on
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and/or regulations
issued thereunder as sales to accredited investors not involving
a public offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering | |
Date of Sale |
|
Title and Amount of Securities Sold |
|
Offering Price | |
|
Price | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
12/30/04 to 1/13/05
|
|
Units consisting of 10,372,000 shares of common stock and
warrants to purchase 5,186,000 shares of common stock
for USD$1.50 per share. |
|
|
USD$2.50 per Unit |
|
|
|
USD$12,965,000 |
|
|
|
A warrant to purchase 1,037,200 shares of common stock
for USD$1.25 per share. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 26, 2005, we issued the following unregistered
securities. KeyBanc Capital Markets, a division of McDonald
Investments, Inc., and Sanders Morris Harris, Inc. acted as
placement agents. Each such sale was exempt from registration
under the Securities Act in reliance on Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act and/or regulations issued thereunder as sales to
qualified purchasers not involving a public offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering | |
Date of sale |
|
Title and Amount of Securities Sold |
|
Offering Price | |
|
Price | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
9/26/05
|
|
18,000,000 shares of common stock |
|
|
USD$1.69 |
|
|
|
USD$30,500,000 |
|
During the three years prior to the filing of this registration
statement, we issued the following unregistered securities to
our employees and Directors: 5,346,056 options to purchase
common stock, 2,325,000 shares of restricted common stock
and 440,000 shares of unrestricted common stock. These
issuances were exempt from registration under the Securities Act
in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, as sales
not involving a public offering, and/or Rule 701 of the
Securities Act, as an offering to employees under a compensatory
benefit plan. As of May 1, 2006, there are
1,872,812 options to purchase common stock outstanding.
II-2
|
|
Item 16. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule |
(a) Exhibits:
|
|
|
See the Exhibit Index, which is hereby incorporated herein
by reference. |
(b) Financial Statement Schedules:
|
|
|
All schedules are omitted since the required information is not
present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require
submission of the schedules, or because the information required
is included in the financial statements and notes thereto. |
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
|
|
|
(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are
being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration
statement: |
|
|
|
(i) To include any prospectus required by
Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933; |
|
|
(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events
arising after the effective date of the registration statement
(or in the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which,
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to
Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and
price represent no more than 20% change in the maximum aggregate
offering price set forth in the Calculation of
Registration Fee table in the effective registration
statement; |
|
|
(iii) To include any material information with respect to
the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the
registration statement or any material change to such
information in the registration statement; |
|
|
|
(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective
amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof; and |
|
|
(3) To remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
which remain unsold at the termination of the offering. |
(h) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers, and controlling persons of the registrant, the
registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment
by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director,
officer or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
II-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this post-effective amendment to
registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Solon,
Ohio, on May 11, 2006.
|
|
|
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. |
Date: May 11, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
George J. Zilich, |
|
Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
post-effective amendment to registration statement has been
signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James G. Azlein
James
G. Azlein |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
/s/ George J. Zilich
George
J. Zilich |
|
Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Director |
|
/s/ Costa Vrisakis
Costa
Vrisakis |
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ William J. Centa
William
J. Centa |
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ Dennis Carlton
Dennis
Carlton |
|
Director |
|
|
|
/s/ David E. Preng
David
E. Preng |
|
Director |
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ George J. Zilich
George
J. Zilich,
Attorney-in-Fact for the officers and directors signing in the
capacities indicated |
|
Date: May 11, 2006 |
|
|
II-4
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Articles of Incorporation of BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
(Incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Proxy
Statement filed by BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. with the SEC
on January 12, 2006.) |
|
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated September 20, 2005, by and
among BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and the investors party
thereto.(***) |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Stock Plan (Filed as
Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K of BPI Energy Holdings,
Inc. filed with the SEC on December 15, 2005 and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
5 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of Anfield Sujir Kennedy & Durno.(+) |
|
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Financial Advisor Agreement, dated as of September 29,
2004, by and between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and Sanders
Morris Harris Inc.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Placement Agent Agreement, dated as of December 8, 2004, by
and between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and Sanders Morris Harris
Inc.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 30,
2004, by and between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and Sanders
Morris Harris Inc., individually and as Agent and
Attorney-in-Fact for the Purchasers listed on Exhibit A
thereto.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.4 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement, dated as
of April 20, 2005, by and among BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
and the holders of shares of its common stock executing
signatures pages attached thereto.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Technical Services Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2005,
by and between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and BHP Petroleum
(Exploration) Inc.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Oil, Gas and Coalbed Methane Gas Lease, dated as of
April 3, 2001, by and among BPI Industries (USA), Inc., AFC
Coal Properties, Inc., American Premier Underwriters, Inc. and
Methane Management, Inc. (Southern Illinois Basin Project).(*) |
|
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Amendment to Oil, Gas and Coalbed Methane Gas Lease, dated as of
November 23, 2004, by and among BPI Industries (USA), Inc.,
AFC Coal Properties, Inc. and American Premier Underwriters,
Inc. (Southern Illinois Basin Project).(*) |
|
|
10 |
.8 |
|
Option to Purchase Mineral Lease, dated as of October 10,
2002, by and between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and the County of
Montgomery, Illinois (Northern Illinois Basin Project).(*) |
|
|
10 |
.9 |
|
Option to Purchase Mineral Lease, dated as of January 20,
2004, by and between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and the County of
Christian, Illinois (Northern Illinois Basin Project).(*) |
|
|
10 |
.10 |
|
Mineral Lease, dated as of November 12, 2003, by and
between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and the County of Shelby,
Illinois (Northern Illinois Basin Project).(*) |
|
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Option to Purchase Mineral Lease, dated as of November 3,
2003, by and between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and the County of
Clinton, Illinois (Western Illinois Basin Project).(*) |
|
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Option to Purchase Mineral Lease, dated as of September 9,
2003, by and between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and the County of
Washington, Illinois (Western Illinois Basin Project).(*) |
|
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Option to Purchase Mineral Lease, dated as of June 8, 2004,
by and between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and the County of
Marion, Illinois (Western Illinois Basin Project).(*) |
|
|
10 |
.14 |
|
Farmout Agreement, dated as of November 2, 2004, by and
between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and Addington Exploration, LLC
(Northern Illinois Basin and Western Illinois Basin Projects).(*) |
|
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Incentive Stock Option Plan of BPI Energy Holdings, Inc., dated
as of December 16, 2002.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.16 |
|
Employment Letter Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2005,
by and between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and George J. Zilich.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Employment Letter Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2005,
by and between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and Randy Elkins.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.18 |
|
Agreement, dated as of April 17, 2004, by and between BPI
Energy Holdings, Inc. and James G. Azlein.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.19 |
|
Confidential Lock-Up Agreement, dated as of December 31,
2004, by and between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. and James G.
Azlein.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.20 |
|
Form of Confidential Lock-Up Agreement, dated as of
December 31, 2004.(*) |
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.21 |
|
Letter agreement, dated as of July 7, 2005, by and among
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc., KeyBanc Capital Markets, a division
of McDonald Investments, Inc., and Sanders Morris Harris,
Inc.(**) |
|
|
10 |
.22 |
|
Base Contract for Sale and Purchase of Natural Gas, dated as of
December 1, 2004, by and between BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
and Atmos Energy Marketing, LLC.(**) |
|
|
10 |
.23 |
|
Form of Confidential Lock-up Agreement, dated September 26,
2005.(***) |
|
|
10 |
.24 |
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by BPI Energy Holdings,
Inc. on December 31, 2004 to Sanders Morris Harris Inc.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.25 |
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by BPI Energy Holdings,
Inc. on January 12, 2005 to Sanders Morris Harris Inc.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.26 |
|
Form of Warrant Certificate issued by BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.
in its December 2004/ January 2005 private placement.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.27 |
|
Form of Subscription Agreement entered into by the investors in
the December 2004/ January 2005 private placement of
BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.(*) |
|
|
10 |
.28 |
|
Coal Seam Gas Lease Agreement, dated April 26, 2006, by and
between BPI Energy, Inc. and IEC (Montgomery), LLC (Northern
Illinois Basin Project) (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 8-K of BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. filed with the SEC on
April 28, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
10 |
.29 |
|
Coal Seam Gas Lease Agreement, dated April 26, 2006, by and
between BPI Energy, Inc. and Christian Coal Holdings, LLC
(Northern Illinois Basin Project) (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
the Form 8-K of BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. filed with the
SEC on April 28, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
16 |
.1 |
|
Letter from former independent accounting firm, De Visser
Gray, Chartered Accountants, pursuant to Item 304 of
Regulation S-K.(***) |
|
|
21 |
.1 |
|
Subsidiaries of BPI Energy Holdings, Inc.(+) |
|
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of De Visser Gray, Chartered Accountants.(+) |
|
|
23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of Anfield Sujir Kennedy & Durno (included in
Exhibit 5.1). |
|
|
23 |
.3 |
|
Consent of Schlumberger Technology Corporation.(+) |
|
|
23 |
.4 |
|
Consent of Meaden & Moore, Ltd.(+) |
|
|
24 |
.1 |
|
Power of Attorney, dated as of April 28, 2006.(+) |
|
|
|
(*) |
Incorporated by reference to the
S-1 Registration
Statement filed by BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. with the SEC on
June 3, 2005 (File
No. 333-125483). |
|
|
|
(**) |
Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to the
S-1 Registration
Statement filed by BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. with the SEC on
September 6, 2005 (File
No. 333-125483). |
|
|
|
(***) |
Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 3 to the
S-1 Registration
Statement filed by BPI Energy Holdings, Inc. with the SEC on
October 28, 2005 (File
No. 333-125483). |
|
|
|
(+) |
Filed herewith. |
|