UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
o |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
þ |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
HEALTHCARE REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required. |
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 3, 2006
Dear Healthcare Realty Trust Shareholder:
The Board of Directors requests your vote in favor of the 2007 Employees Stock Incentive
Plan (the 2007 Plan), which is Proposal No. 2 in the 2007 proxy statement mailed to
shareholders on April 4, 2007. The 2007 Plan will allow HRs independent compensation
committee to grant performance-based awards of restricted stock and restricted stock units to
HR employees.
Yesterday, ISS recommended a vote against the 2007 Plan. ISSs recommendation is based
on a flawed formula which counts restricted shares that were issued to HR employees under
prior incentive plans as having potential dilutive effect under the proposed plan. The
restricted but unvested shares that were issued under previous incentive plans are already
factored into HRs fully diluted shares outstanding and have no potentially dilutive effect
under the 2007 Plan.
Consider the following facts:
|
|
Glass Lewis & Co. recommends that HR shareholders vote in favor of the 2007
Plan. Glass Lewis notes in its report: Given past issuing patterns, we calculate that
the Company will issue approximately 36,386 shares under the plan on an annual basis over
the next several years. . . . Our analysis here indicates that [HR] uses a reasonable
amount of equity in its various programs. |
|
|
|
The 2007 Plan reserves a fixed number of shares equal to 5% of fully diluted outstanding
stock for issuance, which is equal to ISSs 5% company-specific allowable cap for HR. |
|
|
|
ISS assumes all shares reserved for issuance under the 2007 Plan will be issued.
However, ISSs own analysis reveals that the highest number of restricted shares
awarded in any of the last three years was 46,928. |
|
|
|
ISSs own analysis reveals that HRs three-year average burn rate is 0.30%, well
below the industry burn rate of 2.23% and ISSs de minimis threshold of 2%. |
|
|
|
Restricted shares issued under HRs predecessor plans are factored into HRs fully
diluted share base and have no potentially dilutive effect under the 2007 Plan, contrary to
ISSs erroneous assumption. |
ISSs recommendation against the 2007 Plan is illogical, especially given its own
analysis of HRs conservative history of equity grants. The 2007 Plan does not reflect a shift
in HRs historically conservative use of equity incentives to reward performance.
The Board of Directors urges your vote in favor of the 2007 Plan. In the event that you
have already voted against the 2007 Plan, we encourage you to change your vote, which you may
change at any time prior to the Annual Meeting on May 15, 2007. If you have additional
questions or concerns, please contact John Bryant, S.V.P. and General Counsel, at (615)
269-8175.
Sincerely,
David R. Emery,
Chairman & CEO