defa14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
o |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
þ |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Lear Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required. |
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This filing consists of a press release issued by Lear Corporation (Lear) on June 22, 2007
reaffirming the Board of Directors recommendation in favor of the merger proposal with American
Real Estate Partners, L.P., an affiliate of Carl C. Icahn, and indicating the rescheduled date of
the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The press release attaches a letter to Lears
stockholders from an independent special committee of the Board of Directors of Lear, on behalf of
the full Board. The letter reviews the major reasons why the Board strongly recommends a vote in
favor of the merger proposal and addresses certain statements by opponents of the
transaction that Lear believes are inaccurate.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Investor Relations:
Mel Stephens
(248) 447-1624
Media:
Andrea Puchalsky
(248) 447-1651
Lear Reaffirms Recommendation in Favor of AREP Merger Proposal;
Reschedules Annual Meeting to July 12, 2007
Southfield, Mich., June 22, 2007 Lear Corporation [NYSE: LEA], a leading global
supplier of automotive seating, electronics and electrical distribution systems, today announced
that it has rescheduled its 2007 Annual Meeting to July 12, 2007 to allow stockholders sufficient
time to evaluate the Companys response to recent criticisms of the proposed merger with American
Real Estate Partners, L.P. [NYSE: ACP] AREP, a diversified holding company and an affiliate of
Carl C. Icahn. The Company has also filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a letter to
all stockholders from a special independent committee of Lears Board of Directors, reviewing the
major reasons why the Board strongly recommends a vote in favor of the AREP proposal and addressing
certain inaccurate statements by opponents of the transaction.
In the letter to stockholders, a copy of which is attached, the special committee emphasizes
that:
|
|
|
Under objective valuation measures, the $36 per share offer price is fair to
stockholders, and is more than double Lears stock price of just
over a year ago; |
|
|
|
|
The company aggressively sought out higher bids by contacting 41 potential strategic
and financial buyers, with no competing offers being
received; |
|
|
|
|
There is significant
execution risk to Lears long-term business plan: |
|
|
|
Lears results are highly dependent on SUV and light truck sales,
which are trending lower |
|
|
|
|
A significant labor disruption or strike would materially impact
Lear and its supply chain |
|
|
|
|
Recent improvements in the Companys financial performance do not
materially change the long-term outlook |
|
|
|
CEO Bob Rossiters personal interests had no impact on the merger decision-making
process or outcome. Ultimate authority for the merger rested with an active special
committee and Lears Board; |
|
|
|
|
Volatility and structural change within the automotive sector are likely to continue
for the foreseeable future. |
Lears Annual Meeting, originally scheduled for June 27, 2007, is now scheduled to be
held on July 12, 2007 at 10:00 a.m., (Eastern Time) at Hotel du Pont, located on 11th
and Market Streets, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, commencing at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time). Lear will
continue to solicit proxies between now and the Annual Meeting. The record date for stockholders
entitled to vote on the Merger Proposal and other such matters that may be considered at the Annual
Meeting remains May 14, 2007.
The Board of Directors, on the unanimous recommendation of a special committee of independent
directors, has approved the merger agreement and recommends that Lears stockholders vote FOR
adoption of the Merger Proposal. As announced on February 9, 2007, Lear entered into the merger
agreement pursuant to which Lears stockholders will be entitled to receive, subject to
consummation of the merger, $36.00 in cash for each share they own, without interest and less any
applicable withholding tax.
Stockholders who have questions about the merger, should call Lear Investor Relations at (800)
413-5327. Those who need assistance in submitting their proxy or voting their shares should
contact Lears proxy solicitor, MacKenzie Partners, Inc., 105 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016,
1-800-322-2885 (toll-free), Email: proxy@mackenziepartners.com. The vote of each Lear stockholder
is very important regardless of the number of shares of common stock that a stockholder owns.
Lear Corporation is one of the worlds largest suppliers of automotive seating systems,
electronic products and electrical distribution systems. Lears world-class products are designed,
engineered and manufactured by a diverse team of more than 90,000 employees at 236 facilities in 33
countries. Lears headquarters are in Southfield, Michigan. Lear is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol [LEA]. Further information about Lear is available on the Internet at
http://www.lear.com.
Important Additional Information has been and will be filed with the SEC
In connection with the proposed merger, Lear filed a definitive proxy statement, and a
supplement thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on May 23, 2007 and June
18, 2007, respectively, for its shareholders meeting. Lear has also filed with the SEC additional
materials regarding the meeting. Before making any voting decision, Lears shareholders are urged
to read the proxy statement, as supplemented, regarding the merger carefully in its entirety
because it contains important information about the proposed transaction. Lears shareholders and
other interested parties may also obtain, without charge, a copy of the proxy statement and other
relevant documents filed with the SEC from the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov. Lears
shareholders and other interested parties may also obtain, without charge, a copy of the proxy
statement and other relevant documents by directing such request to Lear Corporation, 21557
Telegraph Road, P.O. Box 5008, Southfield, Michigan 48086-5008, Attention: Investor Relations, or
through Lears website at www.lear.com.
Lear and its directors and officers may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of
proxies from Lears shareholders with respect to the merger.
Information about Lears directors and executive officers and their ownership of Lears Common
Stock is set forth in the proxy statement. Shareholders and investors may obtain additional
information regarding the interests of Lear and its directors and executive officers in the merger,
which may be different than those of Lears shareholders generally, by reading the proxy statement
and other relevant documents regarding the merger, which have been, and which may in the future be,
filed with the SEC.
# # #
June 21, 2007
Lear Stockholders:
You are faced with a very important decision with respect to
your shares of Lear stock. American Real Estate Partners, L.P.
(AREP), an affiliate of Carl Icahn, has made an
offer of $36 per share in cash to purchase all the outstanding
shares of Lear. As members of an independent special committee
of the Lear Board, and on behalf of the full Board of Directors,
we recommend that you vote in favor of the AREP proposal. Our
position is outlined in the Proxy Statement that has been mailed
to you.
Some Lear stockholders have publicly opposed the merger. In
addition, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS)
has recommended a vote against the transaction. ISS states that
while the AREP merger proposal offers fair value, it does not
appear to offer an adequate control premium over the
companys standalone value. This led ISS to the conclusion
that the strategic rationale for the transaction although
reasonable, is not necessarily compelling.
In this letter, we would like to address the principal
concerns raised by critics of the transaction and review the
major reasons why Lears Board strongly recommends a vote
in favor of the AREP proposal. In order to provide additional
time for you to evaluate the companys response to recent
criticisms of the proposed merger with AREP, we have rescheduled
our Annual Meeting of Stockholders for July 12, 2007.
It was just over a year-ago, when Lear shares were trading in
the mid-teens and many industry analysts and observers were
speculating about the companys viability. Since then, Lear
has completed several strategic initiatives but key industry
trends and longer-term risks have not improved. At the time of
the AREP offer, $36 per share represented a meaningful premium
compared with Lears recent trading history: 29% above the
price one month prior to the offer and 55% above the 52-week
average price prior to the offer. ISS, our financial advisors,
the special committee and full Board of Directors, all concluded
that the AREP proposal offers fair value to Lear stockholders.
Traditional valuation techniques support the fairness of the $36
per share offer price and indeed, imply a premium valuation
depending on the assumptions and benchmarks utilized. ISS
acknowledges that the $36 offer is in-line with fair value based
on its own discounted cash flow analysis. The transaction value
(including off-balance sheet financing) represented a multiple
of 6.2x 2007 EBITDA at the time of the merger agreement and 6.1x
EBITDA based on our latest 2007 outlook. Additionally, there is
no dispute that Lear had a reasonable opportunity to seek out
higher offers and actively did so. We contacted 41 potential
strategic and financial buyers without receiving a single
competing acquisition proposal.
Fundamentally, the decision of whether to support the AREP
proposal comes down to whether the incremental value implied by
Lears Long-Range Plan outweighs the execution risk
inherent in that Plan. In this regard, even those who have
actively opposed the transaction acknowledge that there are
risks facing Lear as the automotive industry undergoes
unprecedented levels of distress and restructuring, particularly
in North America. The principal difference between those who
support and oppose the transaction lies in how one assesses the
significance of these risks relative to the opportunities
presented by Lears Long-Range Plan.
While we acknowledge that this assessment may very well depend
on a given stockholders investment horizon, we ultimately
concluded that industry conditions in the companys major
markets are likely to continue to be challenging for the
foreseeable future, posing significant execution risk to
Lears standalone plan. We strongly believe that the
special committee, the full Board of Directors, management and
our advisors are in the best position to weigh these risks and
opportunities. In our view, critics of the AREP transaction are
significantly underestimating these risks and the impact they
could have on Lears business.
In referring to execution risk, we are not speaking of the
traditional risks inherent in the cyclical automotive business,
but rather the impact of long-term structural change that is
taking place on a large scale. For example, in the second half
of 2006 Lears largest three customers announced capacity
reductions in North America totaling 2.6 million vehicles.
At the same time, demand for light trucks and large SUVs
is under continuing pressure, due to high fuel prices, increased
global competition and environmental concerns. According to a
June 9th New York
Times article, pickup truck sales are down 5% so far this year
from a weak market last year. For 2007,
U.S. automakers expect to post the lowest sales of pickups
in seven years. In addition, major Asian automakers are
aggressively seeking to further penetrate this vehicle segment.
These trends are very significant to Lear since about 85% of our
net sales in North America are from the domestic automakers and
about two-thirds of the companys revenue in North America
comes from light trucks. Light trucks in North America
constitute high-content platforms, and, therefore it will be
difficult to offset declines in this segment with new business
in Asia and other growth markets.
In addition, the combination of declining Big Three
market share in North America, lower sales of high-content
vehicles and an increasingly competitive global market, poses
challenges to our organic growth. Historically, Lear has enjoyed
a substantial sales backlog and robust revenue growth; however,
the outlook for net sales over the planning horizon is
relatively flat. Accordingly, the projected improvement in
Lears earnings is driven primarily by major restructuring
actions which are costly to implement and carry significant
execution risk. These restructuring actions began in 2005 and
are expected to continue for a number of years, with the most
challenging actions yet to come.
While Lear has a strong market share in Seating, it is weighted
toward SUVs and light trucks. Going forward, the company
needs to become more vertically integrated and accelerate its
move to low-cost regions to remain cost competitive and maintain
margins. While growth with Asian automakers offers significant
opportunity, this is a long-term prospect. Also, the emergence
of Asian suppliers is a potential longer-term threat. In the
Electronic and Electrical segment, Lears operating margins
and market share have declined, largely as a result of
aggressive global competition. In our view, this segment will
require significant investment to strengthen our market position
and continue to evolve our global footprint.
Focusing on recent improvements in the companys financial
performance, ISS and certain stockholders have suggested that
Lear is on the road to a significant recovery. To some extent,
this is true. Our Long-Range Plan forecasts improvements in our
earnings each year during the planning period, including 2007.
We would, however, caution against placing too much emphasis on
the first half of this year. Improved performance so far this
year is primarily due to higher-than-expected production on
certain platforms in North America and the accelerated
realization of cost improvements in International operations.
The more favorable performance in the first half of 2007 has not
materially changed our longer-term outlook. To this point, the
consensus 2007 full year forecast for industry production in
North America has remained largely unchanged; with J.D. Power
now forecasting lower production in 2007 and subsequent years,
as compared with prior forecasts, including lower production on
several key Lear platforms. While some are now taking a more
positive view of the near-term outlook, we would caution that in
the highly-competitive automotive market, sentiment can change
very quickly.
In its report, ISS suggested that the desire to invest for the
long-term and escape Wall Streets quarterly earnings focus
were driving forces behind the proposed AREP transaction. This
is not true. While the company does indeed need to maintain a
long-term focus to be successful and short-term expectations can
be distracting and potentially harmful, the driving force behind
the AREP transaction was the Boards commitment to maximize
shareholder value. The Boards decision to recommend
approval of the AREP transaction to stockholders followed a
Board-initiated strategic planning process that began in 2005.
We were quite prepared to consider the AREP proposal when it was
made and had the benefit of Board members with many years of
experience in the automotive industry and with acquisition
transactions. The Board took great care to evaluate every aspect
of the AREP proposal, and was actively involved in overseeing
the negotiations with Mr. Icahn, including with respect to
price.
While there has been much speculation about our CEO Bob
Rossiters motivation in this transaction, we can assure
you that Mr. Rossiters personal interests had no
impact on the decision-making process or outcome. While Bob had
a role in representing the company in the negotiations, given
his extensive knowledge of the company and industry, there was
active oversight by the special committee and significant
involvement by the committees financial and legal advisors
on all substantive issues. Ultimate authority for the AREP
negotiations rested with the special committee and the Board. In
this matter, Bob acted at the direction of the special committee
and, as he has consistently done during his entire
35-year
career, in the best interests of the company and its
stockholders.
Finally, the suggestion that the company was seeking to evade
intense corporate governance and social responsibility
scrutiny directed at public corporations is inaccurate.
Under the AREP transaction, Lear would be
2
the largest subsidiary of a publicly-traded NYSE corporation and
would be indirectly subject to many of the same public company
requirements it faces today. What Lear believes is important for
its business is stability not less scrutiny.
Volatile industry and market conditions can, and have, impacted
the ability of the company to execute its Long-Range Plan. Lear
management does believe with a strong financial sponsor the
company can more efficiently accomplish the major restructuring
necessary to remain competitive and better respond to strategic
opportunities when they arise, without being impacted by
fluctuations in the price of its stock and the perceptions they
create. In this regard, we would again point to the first
quarter of 2006 when unfounded market speculation and panic led
to fears of a Lear bankruptcy.
In summary, Lear is a great company operating in a volatile
industry that is undergoing unprecedented levels of distress and
massive restructuring. Longer-term trends are not
favorable and it will take a continuation of
industry-wide consolidation and restructuring, including
substantial additional investment to secure the longer-term
future. While the company has implemented a number of near-term
initiatives to improve shareholder value, significant industry
risk remains. ISS acknowledges that there are indeed
significant challenges facing Lear and the industry. We
believe that the companys management and Board of
Directors are in the best position to assess these risks, and
the potential impact on Lears future results. In this
regard, some of the views expressed by opponents of the
transaction, including attempts to minimize the potential impact
of the serious financial issues impacting our major customers,
are totally inaccurate.
Based on a very careful, deliberate and objective process of
assessing Lears overall business outlook, the Board has
concluded that the offer of $36 per share is a fair price, and
we urge you to vote in favor of the merger proposal at our
Annual Meeting of Stockholders now scheduled for July 12,
2007.
Respectfully,
|
|
|
|
|
Larry W. McCurdy
Lead Independent Director
and Chairman of the
Special Committee
|
|
James A. Stern
Independent Director,
Member of Special
Committee
|
|
Henry D.G. Wallace
Independent Director,
Member of Special
Committee
|
3
GENERAL
INFORMATION
This letter is being mailed to the stockholders of Lear
Corporation who are eligible to vote at the annual meeting of
stockholders being held for the purposes set forth in the proxy
statement which was first mailed to Lear stockholders on or
about May 23, 2007, as supplemented by a Supplement first
mailed to stockholders on or about June 19, 2007. All
holders of record of Lear common stock as of the close of
business on May 14, 2007 are entitled to notice of, and to
vote at, the meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the
meeting. This letter, together with a proxy card and return
envelope, are first being mailed to stockholders on or about
June 22, 2007. The annual meeting of the stockholders of
Lear Corporation will be held at Hotel du Pont, located on
11th and Market Streets, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, on
July 12, 2007, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, to
consider and act upon the matters set forth in the proxy
statement.
Stockholders are urged to read the definitive proxy statement,
dated May 23, 2007, as supplemented by the Supplement dated
June 18, 2007. If you need another copy of the definitive
proxy statement, the supplement or proxy card, you may obtain
them free of charge from Lear by directing such request to: Lear
Corporation, Attention: Investor Relations, 21557 Telegraph
Road, Southfield, Michigan 48033, or by calling Lears
Investor Relations department at
(800) 413-5327.
The definitive proxy statement and Supplement may also be found
on the internet at www.sec.gov.
Your vote is important. Properly executed proxy cards with no
instructions indicated on the proxy card will be voted
FOR the adoption of the merger agreement. Your
failure to vote in person at the annual meeting or to submit a
properly executed proxy card will effectively have the same
effect as a vote AGAINST the adoption of the merger
agreement. Your prompt cooperation is greatly appreciated.
VOTING
AND REVOCABILITY OF PROXIES
Holders of record of Lear common stock may vote their shares by
attending the annual meeting and voting their shares of common
stock in person or by completing the enclosed proxy card,
signing and dating it and mailing it in the enclosed
postage-prepaid envelope.
NO ACTION IS REQUIRED BY ANY STOCKHOLDER WHO HAS PREVIOUSLY
DELIVERED A PROXY AND WHO DOES NOT WISH TO REVOKE OR CHANGE THAT
PROXY.
You can change your vote and revoke your proxy at any time
before it is voted at the meeting by:
|
|
|
|
|
delivering to Wendy L. Foss, our Vice President,
Finance & Administration and Corporate Secretary, a
signed, written revocation letter dated later than the date of
your proxy;
|
|
|
|
submitting a proxy to Lear with a later date; or
|
|
|
|
attending the meeting and voting in person (your attendance at
the meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy; you must
vote in person at the meeting to revoke your proxy).
|
If you are not the record holder of your shares, you must follow
the instructions of your bank or brokerage firm in order to
change your vote. Stockholders who have questions or requests
for assistance in completing and submitting proxy cards, or in
obtaining a proxy card, should contact our proxy solicitor:
MacKenzie Partners, Inc.
105 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016
Phone:
800-322-2885
(toll-free)
4
ADMISSION TICKET
LEAR CORPORATION
ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
JULY 12, 2007 AT
10:00 A.M. (EASTERN TIME)
HOTEL DU PONT
11TH AND MARKET STREETS
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801
ADMITS ONE
STOCKHOLDER AND UP TO TWO GUESTS
▼
DETACH PROXY CARD
HERE
▼
|
|
|
|
|
Mark, Sign, Date and Return the Proxy
Card Promptly Using the Enclosed Envelope. |
x Votes must be indicated
(x) in Black or Blue Ink. |
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
THAT YOU VOTE FOR ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT IN
PROPOSAL NO. 1, THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL IN PROPOSAL NO. 2, THE
NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL NO. 3 AND FOR PROPOSAL NO. 4 AND
PROPOSAL NO. 5. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE
AGAINST PROPOSAL NO. 6 AND PROPOSAL NO. 7.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
1. |
|
Approve the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 9, 2007, by and
among Lear Corporation, AREP Car Holdings Corp. and AREP Car
Acquisition Corp., and the merger contemplated thereby. |
o |
o |
o |
|
2. |
|
Approve the
adjournment or postponement of the 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of Lear Corporation, if necessary, to permit further
solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes at the time
of the Annual Meeting to approve Proposal No. 1 described on this
proxy card. |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
3. |
|
Election of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
FOR all nominees listed below |
o |
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees listed below |
o |
*EXCEPTIONS |
o |
|
4. |
|
Approve an
amendment to the Lear Corporation Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to provide for the annual election of directors. |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
Nominees: Larry W.
McCurdy, Roy E. Parrott and Richard F. Wallman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority
to vote for any individual nominee, mark the Exceptions
box and write that nominees name in the space provided below). |
|
6. |
|
Stockholder
proposal requesting a majority vote standard in the election of
directors. |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
|
AGAINST |
|
ABSTAIN |
* Exceptions |
|
|
7. |
|
Stockholder
proposal regarding global human rights standards. |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YES |
|
NO |
5. |
|
Ratify the
appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Lear Corporation's
independent registered
public accounting firm for 2007. |
o |
o |
o |
|
8. |
|
Do you plan to
attend the Meeting? |
|
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign this proxy and return it promptly whether or not you expect to attend the meeting.
You may nevertheless vote in person if you attend. Please sign
exactly as your name appears herein. Give full title if an Attorney,
Executor, Administrator, Trustee, Guardian, etc. For an account in
the name of two or more persons, each should sign, or if one signs,
he should attach evidence of his authority. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Share Owner sign here |
|
Co-Owner sign here |
Dear Stockholder:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Meeting) of Lear Corporation (the Company) will be
held at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern time)
on July 12, 2007 at Hotel Du Pont, 11th and Market Streets,
Wilmington, Delaware 19801.
To be sure that your vote is counted, we urge you to complete and sign the proxy/voting
instruction card below, detach it from this letter and return it in the postage paid envelope
enclosed in this package. The giving of such proxy does not affect your right to vote in person if
you attend the Meeting. The prompt return of your signed proxy will aid the Company in reducing the
expense of additional proxy solicitation.
In
order to assist the Company in preparing for the Meeting, please indicate in item 8 on the
proxy whether you currently plan to attend the Meeting.
If you attend the Meeting in person, detach and bring this letter to the Meeting as an
admission ticket for you and up to two of your guests.
LEAR CORPORATION
PROXY/VOTING INSTRUCTION CARD
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Lear Corporation for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders on July 12, 2007 or any adjournment or postponement thereof (the Meeting).
The undersigned appoints James H. Vandenberghe and Daniel A. Ninivaggi, and each of them, with full
power of substitution in each of them, the proxies of the undersigned, to vote for and on behalf of
the undersigned all shares of Lear Corporation Common Stock which the undersigned may be entitled
to vote on all matters properly coming before the Meeting, as set forth in the related Notice of
Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, both of which have been received by the undersigned.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned
stockholder. If no direction is given, this proxy will be voted FOR
the adoption of the Merger Agreement in proposal 1, the adjournment
proposal in proposal 2 and the nominees in proposals 3, FOR proposals
4 and 5, and AGAINST proposals 6 and 7.
To change your address, please mark this box. o
|
|
|
|
|
Change of address
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LEAR CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 11211
NEW YORK, NY 10203-0211 |