e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-22903
SYNTEL, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
38-2312018 |
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
525 E. Big Beaver Road, Suite 300, Troy, Michigan
|
|
48083 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(248) 619-2800
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer þ Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act.)
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock,
as of the latest practicable date.
Common
Stock, no par value: 41,144,583 shares issued and outstanding as of
May 2, 2007.
SYNTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
MARCH 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Net revenues |
|
$ |
75,430 |
|
|
$ |
63,496 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
45,902 |
|
|
|
39,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
29,528 |
|
|
|
24,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
12,939 |
|
|
|
10,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
16,589 |
|
|
|
13,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, principally interest |
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
17,832 |
|
|
|
14,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
2,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
12,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend per share |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
40,966 |
|
|
|
40,696 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
41,318 |
|
|
|
40,948 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
SYNTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
46,884 |
|
|
$ |
51,555 |
|
Short term investments |
|
|
41,458 |
|
|
|
42,319 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for
doubtful accounts of $309
and $2,828 at March 31, 2007 and December 31,
2006, respectively |
|
|
40,006 |
|
|
|
33,706 |
|
Revenue earned in excess of billings |
|
|
13,083 |
|
|
|
11,947 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other current assets |
|
|
17,085 |
|
|
|
13,983 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
158,516 |
|
|
|
153,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
81,365 |
|
|
|
69,672 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,581 |
|
|
|
31,358 |
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
47,784 |
|
|
|
38,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other non current assets |
|
|
3,421 |
|
|
|
4,959 |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
210,627 |
|
|
$ |
197,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
7,513 |
|
|
$ |
7,559 |
|
Accrued payroll and related costs |
|
|
18,612 |
|
|
|
20,034 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
5,968 |
|
|
|
2,732 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
9,492 |
|
|
|
9,244 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
4,740 |
|
|
|
5,960 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
2,492 |
|
|
|
2,418 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
48,817 |
|
|
|
47,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
161,810 |
|
|
|
149,742 |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
210,627 |
|
|
$ |
197,689 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
SYNTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency |
|
Total |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
Translation |
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Unrealized Gain |
|
Adjustment |
|
Equity |
Balance, January 1, 2006 |
|
|
40,679 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
$ |
1,942 |
|
|
$ |
60,460 |
|
|
$ |
89,022 |
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
377 |
|
|
$ |
152,278 |
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,055 |
|
Other comprehensive income,
after-tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
432 |
|
ESPP & stock options
activity |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
554 |
|
Restricted stock activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
|
Dividend Provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,443 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,443 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2006 |
|
|
40,712 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
60,981 |
|
|
|
98,634 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
163,067 |
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2007 |
|
|
40,915 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
$ |
3,390 |
|
|
$ |
63,373 |
|
|
$ |
79,299 |
|
|
$ |
2,649 |
|
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
|
$ |
149,742 |
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,376 |
|
Other comprehensive income,
after-tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
ESPP & stock options
activity |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
727 |
|
Restricted stock activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323 |
|
FIN 48 Transition Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,984 |
) |
Dividend Provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,528 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2007 |
|
|
40,971 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
$ |
3,713 |
|
|
$ |
64,100 |
|
|
$ |
89,163 |
|
|
$ |
3,182 |
|
|
$ |
1,651 |
|
|
$ |
161,810 |
|
|
|
|
5
SYNTEL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
|
MARCH 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
12,055 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by/(used in)
operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,917 |
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
Realized gains on sales of short term investments |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
Compensation expense related to restricted stock |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
Share based compensation expense |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and revenue earned in excess
of billings, net |
|
|
(7,073 |
) |
|
|
(7,245 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(2,183 |
) |
|
|
(3,340 |
) |
Accrued payroll and other liabilities |
|
|
(1,158 |
) |
|
|
(4,581 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(760 |
) |
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided/(used in) by operating activities |
|
|
7,372 |
|
|
|
(2,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment expenditures |
|
|
(10,694 |
) |
|
|
(3,169 |
) |
Purchase of short term investments : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in mutual funds |
|
|
(19,465 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Investments in term deposits with banks |
|
|
(12,472 |
) |
|
|
(14,953 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of short term investments : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of mutual funds |
|
|
23,994 |
|
|
|
6,754 |
|
Maturities of term deposits with banks |
|
|
9,590 |
|
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(9,047 |
) |
|
|
(9,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
Tax benefit on stock options exercised |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(2,464 |
) |
|
|
(2,443 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(1,820 |
) |
|
|
(2,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(4,671 |
) |
|
|
(13,510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
$ |
51,555 |
|
|
$ |
99,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
46,884 |
|
|
$ |
85,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared but unpaid |
|
$ |
2,492 |
|
|
$ |
2,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
|
3,873 |
|
|
|
6,379 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Syntel, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of Syntel, Inc. (the Company or
Syntel) have been prepared by management, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In
the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to
present fairly the financial position of Syntel and its subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007, the
results of their operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, and cash flows
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. The year-end condensed balance sheet as of
December 31, 2006 was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all
disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007.
2. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORGANIZATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Syntel, Inc. (Syntel), a
Michigan corporation, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and a joint venture. All significant
inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The wholly owned subsidiaries of Syntel, Inc. are:
|
|
Syntel Limited (Syntel India), an Indian limited
liability company formerly known
as Syntel (India) Limited.; |
|
|
|
Syntel Singapore PTE. Limited. (Syntel Singapore), a Singapore limited liability
company; |
|
|
|
Syntel Europe, Limited. (Syntel U.K.), a United Kingdom limited liability company; |
|
|
|
Syntel Canada Inc. (Syntel Canada), an Ontario limited liability company; |
|
|
|
Syntel Deutschland GmbH (Syntel Germany), a German limited liability company; |
|
|
|
Syntel Hong Kong Limited (Syntel Hong Kong), a Hong Kong limited liability company; |
|
|
|
Syntel (Australia) Pty. Limited (Syntel Australia), an Australian limited liability
company; |
|
|
|
Syntel Delaware LLC (Syntel Delaware), a Delaware limited liability company; |
|
|
|
SkillBay LLC (SkillBay), a Michigan limited liability company; |
|
|
|
Syntel (Mauritius) Limited (Syntel Mauritius), a Mauritius limited liability company; |
|
|
|
Syntel Consulting Inc. (Syntel Consulting), a Michigan corporation; |
|
|
|
Syntel Sterling BestShores (Mauritius) Limited (SSBML), a Mauritius limited liability
company; and |
|
|
|
Syntel Worldwide (Mauritius) Limited (Syntel Worldwide), a Mauritius limited liability
company. |
7
The formerly wholly owned subsidiary of Syntel Delaware (as of December 31, 2004) that became a
partially owned joint venture of Syntel Delaware LLC on February 1, 2005 is:
|
|
|
State Street Syntel Services (Mauritius) Limited. (SSSSML), a Mauritius limited
liability company formerly known as Syntel Solutions (Mauritius) Limited. |
The wholly owned subsidiary of SSSSML is:
|
|
|
Syntel Sourcing Private Limited. (Syntel Sourcing), an Indian limited liability
company. |
The wholly owned subsidiaries of Syntel Mauritius are:
|
|
|
Syntel International Private Limited. (Syntel International), an Indian limited
liability company; and |
|
|
|
|
Syntel Global Private Limited. (Syntel Global), an Indian limited liability company. |
The wholly owned subsidiary of SSBML is:
|
|
|
Syntel Sterling BestShores Solutions Private Limited (SSBSPL), an Indian limited
liability company. |
3. USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. Such estimates include, but are not limited to allowance
for doubtful accounts, impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, contingencies and
litigation, the recognition of revenues and profits based on the proportional performance method
and potential tax liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions
used in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements.
4. REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company recognizes revenues from time and material contracts as the services are performed.
Revenue from fixed-price applications management, maintenance and support engagements is
recognized as earned which generally results in straight-line revenue recognition as services
are performed continuously over the term of the engagement.
Revenue on fixed-price, applications development and integration projects in the Companys
application outsourcing and e-Business segments are measured using the proportional performance
method of accounting. Performance is generally measured based upon the efforts incurred to date
in relation to the total estimated efforts to the completion of the contract. The Company
monitors estimates of total contract revenues and cost on a routine basis throughout the
delivery period. The cumulative impact of any change in estimates of the contract revenues or
costs is reflected in the period in which the changes become known. In the event that a loss is
anticipated on a particular contract, provision is made for the estimated loss. The Company
issues invoices related to fixed price contracts based on either the achievement of milestones
during a project or other contractual terms. Differences between the timing of billings and the
recognition of revenue based upon the proportional performance method of accounting are recorded
as revenue earned in excess of billings or deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
Revenues are reported net of sales incentives.
Reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses are included in revenue in accordance with Emerging
Issues Task Force Consensus (EITF) 01-14,
Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursement Received for Out of Pocket Expenses
Incurred.
8
5. Stock-Based Employee Compensation Plans
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, utilizing the modified prospective method. SFAS No.
123R requires the recognition of stock-based compensation expense in the consolidated financial
statements for awards of equity instruments to employees and non-employee directors based on the
grant-date fair value of those awards, estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No.
123R. The Company recognizes these compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting term. Under the
modified prospective method, the provisions of SFAS No. 123R apply to all awards granted or
modified after the date of adoption. In addition, the unrecognized expense of awards not yet
vested at the date of adoption, determined under the original provisions of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123), are recognized in net income in the
periods after the date of adoption. SFAS No. 123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions
in excess of recognized compensation expense to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather
than as an operating cash flow as prescribed under the prior accounting rules. This requirement
reduces net operating cash flow and increases net financing cash flows in periods after
adoption. Total cash flow remains unchanged from what would have been reported under the prior
accounting rules.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company followed the intrinsic value method to
account for its employee stock option plans (ESOP Plans) and employee stock purchase plan (ESPP
Plans) in accordance with the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles
Board Opinion (APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and Related
Interpretations (APB No. 25), as allowed by SFAS No. 123 and as amended by SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. Accordingly, no
stock-based employee compensation cost was recognized on account of ESOP and ESPP plans, as all
options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant and, with respect to the employee stock purchase
plan, the discount did not exceed fifteen percent.
6. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
For the purpose of reporting Cash and Cash Equivalents, the Company considers all liquid
investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, approximately $7.55 million and $13.9 million,
respectively, represent corporate bonds and treasury notes held by JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, for
which AAA rated letters of credit have been provided by the bank. The remaining amounts of
cash and cash equivalents are invested in money market accounts with various banking and
financial institutions.
7. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Total Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Net income |
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
12,055 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Unrealized gain (loss)
on marketable securities |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
- Foreign Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
16,530 |
|
|
$ |
12,487 |
|
|
|
|
9
8. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128 Earnings Per
Share.
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
shares outstanding during the applicable period.
The Company has stock options, which are considered to be potentially dilutive to the basic
earnings per share. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using the treasury stock method for
the dilutive effect of shares which have been granted pursuant to the stock option plan, by
dividing the net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period
adjusted for these potentially dilutive options, except when the results would be anti-dilutive.
The potential tax benefits on exercise of stock options is considered as additional proceeds
while computing dilutive earnings per share using the treasury stock method.
The following table summarizes the movement in the Capital Structure from December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. Of Shares |
|
Particulars |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance as on December 31, 2006 |
|
|
40,915 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
Shares issued on exercise of stock options |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as on March 31, 2007 |
|
|
40,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the computation of earnings per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
Weighted |
|
Earnings |
|
Weighted |
|
Earnings |
|
|
Average |
|
per |
|
Average |
|
per |
|
|
Shares |
|
Shares |
|
Shares |
|
Share |
|
|
(in thousands, except per share earnings) |
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
40,966 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
40,696 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
Potential dilutive effect
of stock options
outstanding |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
41,318 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
|
40,948 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
9. SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company is organized geographically and by business segment. For management purposes, the
Company is primarily organized on a worldwide basis into four business segments:
|
|
|
Applications Outsourcing; |
|
|
|
|
e-Business; |
|
|
|
|
TeamSourcing; and |
|
|
|
|
Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) |
10
These segments are the basis on which the Company reports its primary segment information to
management. Management allocates all corporate expenses among the segments. No balance
sheet/identifiable assets data is presented since the Company does not segregate its assets by
segment. Financial data for each segment for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications Outsourcing |
|
$ |
52,703 |
|
|
$ |
46,310 |
|
e-Business |
|
|
9,642 |
|
|
|
9,168 |
|
TeamSourcing |
|
|
4,010 |
|
|
|
4,776 |
|
BPO |
|
|
9,075 |
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
75,430 |
|
|
$ |
63,496 |
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications Outsourcing |
|
$ |
19,124 |
|
|
$ |
18,512 |
|
e-Business |
|
|
3,596 |
|
|
|
2,401 |
|
TeamSourcing |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
BPO |
|
|
5,142 |
|
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,528 |
|
|
|
24,334 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
12,939 |
|
|
|
10,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
16,589 |
|
|
$ |
13,736 |
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 American Express Corp. and State Street Bank
contributed revenues in excess of 10% of total consolidated revenues. Revenue from American Express
Corp. and State Street Bank was $14.42 million and $10.44 million, respectively, during the three
months ended March 31, 2007, contributing approximately 19.12% and 13.84%, respectively of total
consolidated revenues. The corresponding revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from
American Express Corp. and State Street Bank was $11.81 million and $5.2 million, respectively,
contributing approximately 18.59% and 8.23%, respectively, of total consolidated revenues. At March
31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 accounts receivable, from American Express Corp were $4.8 million
and $2.7 million, respectively. Accounts receivable from State Street Bank were $4.9 million and
$2.9 million respectively as at March 31, 2007 and 2006.
11
10. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Customers of the Company are primarily located in the United States. Net revenues and net income
(loss) were attributed to each geographic location as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Net revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America, primarily United States |
|
$ |
74,806 |
|
|
$ |
61,226 |
|
India |
|
|
35,450 |
|
|
|
32,156 |
|
UK |
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
Far East, primarily Singapore and
Mauritius |
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
Germany |
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
Inter-company revenue elimination
(primarily India) |
|
|
(40,293 |
) |
|
|
(33,123 |
) |
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
75,430 |
|
|
$ |
63,496 |
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America, primarily United States |
|
$ |
4,970 |
|
|
$ |
2,714 |
|
India |
|
|
10,012 |
|
|
|
9,242 |
|
UK |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
Far East, primarily Singapore and
Mauritius |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
Germany |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
12,055 |
|
|
|
|
12
11. INCOME TAXES
The following table accounts for the differences between the federal statutory tax rate of 35%
and the Companys overall effective tax rate :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Statutory provision |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Tax-free investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
%) |
Foreign effective tax rates different from US
statutory rate |
|
|
(21.1 |
%) |
|
|
(18.0 |
%) |
Tax Reserve |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
(1.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Income Tax Rate |
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
|
On July 13, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released FASB Interpretation
No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance for how
uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial
statements. FIN 48 requires recognition in the financial statements of the impact of a tax
position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on examination, based on
the technical merits of the position. Adoption of FIN 48 is required for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date.
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 and as a result of the
implementation of FIN 48, the company recognized a $2.99 million increase in the liability for
unrecognized tax benefits, for various international jurisdiction where Syntel does business and
files tax returns, which was accounted for as a reduction to the January 1, 2007, balance of
retained earnings. The aforesaid amount is comprised of $2.36 million and $0.63 million towards
tax and interest liability, respectively. For the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the Company
recognized $0.13 million as a charge to Income Statement, which is comprised of $0.09 million
and $0.04 million tax and interest expense respectively.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in normal
income tax expense.
The tax years 2003 through 2006 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to
which the Company is subject. Further, Syntel India has disputed tax matters for the financial
years 1995-96 to 2003-04 pending at various levels of tax authorities. Financial year 2004-05
and onwards are open for regular tax scrutiny by the Indian tax authorities. However, the tax
authorities in India are authorized to re-open the already concluded tax assessments and may
re-open the case of Syntel India for financial year 2001-02 and onwards.
The Company records provisions for income taxes based on enacted tax laws and rates in the
various taxing jurisdictions in which it operates. In determining the tax provisions, the
Company has provided for tax contingencies based on FIN 48 and on the Companys assessment of
future regulatory reviews of filed tax returns. Such reserves, which are recorded in income
taxes payable, are based on FIN 48 interpretation and on managements estimates and accordingly
are subject to revision based on additional information. The provision no longer required for
any particular tax year, is credited to the current periods income tax expenses.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the effective income tax rate was 13.8%
and 17.6%, respectively. The tax rates for the three months March 31, 2007 is impacted by
additional tax reserve of $0.13 million and reversal of research and development tax credit of
$0.2
million.
13
Syntel India has not provided for disputed Indian income tax liabilities amounting to $1.16
million for the financial years 1995-96 to 2001-02, after recognizing tax liabilities
aggregating $1.32 million provided under the FIN 48. Syntel India has obtained an opinion from
one independent legal counsel (a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India) for the
financial year 1998-99 and two opinions from another independent legal counsel (also a former
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India) for the financial years 1995-96 to 1997-98 and
1999-2000 to 2001-02, which support Syntel Indias position in this matter.
Syntel India had earlier filed an appeal with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the
financial year 1998-99 and received a favorable decision. However the Income tax department has
gone into further appeal with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against this favorable decision.
During May 2006, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by the Income
tax department. The Income tax department has recourse to file further appeal.
A similar appeal filed by Syntel India with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the
financial year 1999-2000 was however dismissed in March 2004. Syntel India has appealed this
decision with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Syntel India has also received orders for
appeals filed with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the demands raised in March
2004 by the Income Tax Officer for similar matters relating to the financial years 1995-96 to
1997-98 and 2000-01 to 2001-02 and has received a favorable decision for 1995-96 and the
contention of Syntel India was partially upheld for the other years. Syntel India has gone into
further appeal with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the amounts not allowed by the
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Income Tax Department has appealed the favorable
decisions for 1995-96 and 1998-99 and the partially favorable decisions for the other years with
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Syntel India has also not provided for other disputed Indian income tax liabilities aggregating
$4.54 million for the financial years 2001-02 and 2002-03, after recognizing tax liabilities
aggregating $0.02 million provided under the FIN 48, against which Syntel India has filed an
appeal with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Syntel India has obtained opinions from
independent legal counsels, which support Syntel Indias stand in this matter. The contention of
Syntel India was partially upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the financial
year 2001-02. Syntel India has gone into further appeal with the ITAT in relation to the
amounts not allowed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Income tax department has
also filed further appeal against the relief granted to Syntel India by the Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals). Recently, Syntel India has received an order for appeal filed with
Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals) relating to financial year 2002-03, wherein the contention
of Syntel India is partially upheld. Syntel India has gone into further appeal with the ITAT for
the amounts not allowed by the Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals). The Income tax department
has recourse to file further appeal.
Further, the Income tax department has completed the tax scrutiny for financial year 2003-04 and
Syntel India has received an order during the month of December 2006. Syntel India has filed an
appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the order passed by the Income
tax department. Accordingly, Syntel India has not provided for the disputed Indian income tax
liabilities aggregating to $2.83 million for the financial year 2003-04, which is after reducing
tax liabilities aggregating $ 0.01 million provided under the FIN 48.
Further, Syntel India has not provided for disputed income tax liabilities aggregating to $0.08
million for various years, after recognizing tax liabilities aggregating $0.03 million provided
under the FIN 48, for which Syntel India has filed necessary appeals or petitions.
Syntel India has not recognized certain disputed tax liabilities under FIN 48 as it is more
likely than not that the said tax positions in respect of
which FIN 48 tax liability has not been recognized, would finally be resolved in favour of
Syntel India.
14
All the above tax positions involve complex issues and may need an extended period to resolve
the issues with the Indian income tax authorities. Management, after consultation with legal
counsel, believes that the resolution of the above matters will not have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial position.
On 28th February 2007, the Government of India announced Union Budget for the Financial Year
beginning 1st April 2007. Certain changes in the taxes in India
had been proposed in this Budget, which has since been passed by the
lower House of the Parliament, but has not yet been enacted. Some of
the changes, which might impact the Company, were with respect to introduction of a Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT)
of 11.33%, Service tax of 12.36% on rentals of non-residential property, increase in effective
Dividend Distribution Tax from 14.03% to 17% and Fringe Benefit Tax on Employee Stock
Options/Restricted Options. For certain items, detailed rules are awaited.
Tax credit
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the provision for income tax was reduced by
research and development tax credits of $0.2 million.
The tax credits relate to increased qualified expenditures for software development. During
2004, the Company had completed a review of such qualified expenditures and filed refund claims
for the tax years ended December 31, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002. The Company had recorded an
appropriate tax benefit of $0.5 million for these years in 2004 and an additional benefit of
$0.2 million has been recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries
The Company intends to use accumulated and future earnings of foreign subsidiaries to expand
operations outside the United States and accordingly undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely reinvested outside the United States and no
provision for U. S. federal and state income tax or applicable dividend distribution tax has
been provided thereon.
The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 provided a special one-time favorable effective federal
tax rate for U.S.-based organizations. The Company repatriated cash dividends of $61.0 million
during 2005 out of the retained earnings of its controlled foreign subsidiary, Syntel India, to
the U.S. in accordance with the Act. The Company recorded a tax charge of approximately $12.3
million, including U.S. Federal and state taxes and the Indian dividend distribution tax under
the Indian Income Tax laws, during the fourth quarter of 2005. Proceeds from these
extraordinary dividends are required to be invested in the United States for specific purposes
permitted under Act pursuant to an approved written domestic reinvestment plan. As of March 31,
2007, the Company had fully invested proceeds from these cash dividends towards permitted
investments under the Act.
If the Company determines to repatriate all undistributed repatriable earnings of controlled
foreign corporations as of March 31, 2007, the Company would have accrued taxes of approximately
$56.7 million.
12. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
Share Based Compensation:
The Company originally established a Stock Option and Incentive Plan in 1997 (the 1997 Plan).
On June 1, 2006 the Company adopted the Amended and Restated Stock Option and Incentive Plan
(the Stock Option Plan), which amended and extended the 1997 Plan. Under the plans, a total of
8 million shares of Common Stock were reserved for issuance. The dates on which options granted
under Stock Option Plan are first exercisable are
determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, but generally vest over a
four-year period from the date of grant. The term of any option may not exceed ten years from
the date of grant.
15
For certain options granted during 1997, the exercise price was less than the fair value of the
Companys stock on the date of grant and, accordingly, compensation expense is being recognized
over the vesting period for such difference. For the options granted thereafter, the Company
grants the options at the fair market value on the date of grant of the options.
The shares issued upon the exercise of the options are generally new share issues. In some
instances the shares are issued out of treasury stock purchased from the market.
Beginning January 1, 2006 the Company accounts for share-based compensation under the provisions
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123(R)).
SFAS 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the
date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is
ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in the
Companys Statement of Income. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company accounted for
stock-based awards to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method in accordance with
APB 25 as allowed under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123). Share-based compensation expense recognized under SFAS
123(R) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $0.41 million and $0.44 million
including charge for restricted stock.
Restricted Stock:
On different dates during the quarter ended June 30, 2004 the Company issued 319,300 shares of
incentive restricted stock to its non-employee directors and some employees as well as to some
employees of its subsidiaries. The shares were granted to employees for their future services as
a retention tool at a zero exercise price, with the restrictions on transferability lapsing with
regard to 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of the shares issued on or after the first, second, third and
fourth anniversary of the grant dates, respectively.
On different dates during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006 the Company issued 54,806
and 16,536 shares respectively, of incentive restricted stock to its non-employee directors and
some employees as well as to some employees of its subsidiaries. The shares were granted to
employees for their future services as a retention tool at a zero exercise price, with the
restrictions on transferability lapsing with regard to 25% of the shares issued on or after the
first, second, third and fourth anniversary of the grant dates. Generally, the shares to
non-employee directors are granted for their future services starting from the date of the
annual meeting to the date of the following annual meeting.
In addition to the shares of restricted stock described above, on different dates during the year
ended December 31, 2006 the Company issued another 57,500 shares of incentive restricted stock to
some employees as well as to some employees of its subsidiaries. The shares were granted to
employees for their future services as a retention tool at a zero exercise price, with the
restrictions on transferability lapsing with regard to 20% of the shares issued on or after the
first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversary of the grant dates.
During the year ended December 31, 2006 the Company issued 153,500 shares of performance
restricted stock to some employees as well as to some employees of its subsidiaries. Each such
performance restricted stock grant is divided in a pre-defined proportion with the vesting
(lifting of restriction) of one portion based on the overall annual performance of the
Company and the vesting (lifting of restriction) of the other portion based on the achievement of
pre-defined long term goals of the Company. These stocks will vest (have the restrictions lifted)
over a period of 5 years (at each anniversary) in equal installments, subject to meeting the
above pre-defined criterias of overall annual performance and achievement of the long term goal.
The stock linked to overall annual performance would lapse (revert to the Company) on
non-achivement of the overall annual performance
16
in the given year. However the stock linked to
achievement of the long term goal would roll over into a common pool and would lapse only on the
non-achievement of the long term goal on or prior to the end of fiscal year 2012.
Based upon the market value on the grant dates, the Company recorded $5.84 million, $0.89 million
and $0.01 million during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively of
unearned compensation included as a separate component of shareholders equity to be expensed
over the service period on a straight line basis. During the three months ended March 31, 2007
and 2006 the Company reversed $0.0 million and $0.14 million, respectively, of unearned
compensation towards forfeiture of restricted stock on account of termination of employees and
expensed $0.32 million and $0.22 million, respectively as compensation cost on account of these
stock grants.
The recipients are also eligible for dividends declared on their restricted stock. The dividends
accrued or paid on shares of unvested restricted stock are charged to compensation cost. For the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded $0.01 million and $0.01 million,
respectively as compensation cost for dividends paid on shares of unvested restricted stock.
For the restricted stock issued during the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the dividend is
accrued and paid subject to the same restriction as the restriction on transferability.
Impact of FAS 123(R)
The impact on the Companys results of operations of recording stock-based compensation
(including impact of restricted stock) for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
179 |
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
|
|
Cash received from option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, was $0.51 million and $0.25 million, respectively. New
shares were issued for all options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2007. Prior
to the adoption of FAS 123(R), the intrinsic value of restricted stock was recorded as unearned
stock-based compensation as of December 31, 2005. Upon the adoption of FAS 123(R) in January
2006, the unearned stock-based compensation balance of approximately $3.17 million was
reclassified to additional-paid-in-capital.
As of March 31, 2007, the estimated compensation cost of non-vested options (excluding restricted
stock) is $0.14 million to be vested mainly over the next two years.
Valuation Assumptions
The Company calculates the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following assumptions were used for each respective
period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Assumptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
4.51 |
% |
|
|
4.78 |
% |
Expected life |
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
64.85 |
% |
|
|
67.56 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.67 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
The Companys computation of expected volatility for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
is based on a combination of historical volatility
17
from exercised options on Companys stock. Prior
to 2006 also, Companys computation of expected volatility was based on historical volatility. The
Companys computation of expected life in 2006 was determined based on historical experience of
similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting
schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. The interest rate for periods within the
contractual life of the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant. The expected dividend yield is estimated based on the dividend yield at the time of grant,
adjusted for expected dividend increases of historical pay out policy.
Share-based Payment Award Activity
The following table summarizes activity under our equity incentive plans for the three months ended
March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Term (in |
|
Value (in |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
years) |
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
208,869 |
|
|
$ |
13.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
48,835 |
|
|
|
10.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired / Cancelled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
160,034 |
|
|
$ |
13.84 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
$ |
3,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable at March,
31, 2007 |
|
|
134,884 |
|
|
$ |
12.53 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
|
|
$ |
3,310 |
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the quarter ended March 31,
2007 and 2006 were $0 and $0, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised,
during the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was $1.15 million and $0.38 million, respectively.
The aggregate fair value of shares vested, during the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was
$0.16 million and $0.04 million, respectively.
13. PROVISION FOR UNUTILIZED LEAVE
The gross charge for unutilized earned leave was $0.83 million and $0.62 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The amounts accrued for unutilized earned leave are $6.82 million and $6.06 million as of March 31,
2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, and are included within `Accrued payroll and related
costs.
14. RECLASSIFICATION
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current period
presentation.
18
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SYNTEL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues. The Companys revenues consist of fees derived from its Applications Outsourcing,
e-Business, TeamSourcing and Business Process Outsourcing business segments. Net revenues in the
three months ended March 31, 2007 increased to $75.4 million from $63.5 million in the three
months ended March 31, 2006, representing an 18.8% increase. The Companys verticalization sales
strategy focusing on Banking and Financial Services; Healthcare; Insurance; Telecom; Automotive;
Retail; Logistics and Travel has enabled better focus and relationships with key customers
leading to continued growth in business. Further, continued focus on execution and investments
in new offerings such as our Testing Center of Excellence have started producing results. The
focus is to continue investments in more new offerings. Worldwide billable headcount, including
personnel employed by Syntel India, Syntel Singapore, Syntel U.K., and Syntel Germany as of
March 31, 2007 increased by 33.4% to 5,910 employees as compared to 4,429 employees as of March
31, 2006. However, the growth in revenues was not commensurate with the growth in the billable
headcount. This is primarily because a significant growth in the billable headcount was in
India, where our revenues per offshore billable resource are generally lower as compared to an
on-site based resource. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had approximately 75.3% of its
billable workforce in India as compared to 67.5% as of March 31, 2006. The Companys top five
customers accounted for 52.6% of the total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2007, up
from 50.2% of its total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2006. Moreover, the
Companys top 10 customers accounted for 71.5% of the total revenues in the three months ended
March 31, 2007 as compared to 69.6% in the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Applications Outsourcing Revenues. Applications Outsourcing revenues increased to $52.7 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2007, or 69.9% of total revenues, from $46.3 million, or
72.9% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The $6.4 million increase was
attributable primarily to revenues from new engagements and net increase in revenues from
existing projects by $21.4 million, largely offset by $15.0 million in lost revenues as a result
of project completion.
Applications Outsourcing Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues consists of costs directly
associated with billable consultants in the US and offshore, including salaries, payroll taxes,
benefits, relocation costs, immigration costs, finders fees, trainee compensation and travel.
Applications Outsourcing costs of revenues increased to 63.7% of total Applications Outsourcing
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007, from 60.0% for the three months ended March
31, 2006. The 3.7 percentage point increase in cost of revenues, as a percent of revenues for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 was attributable primarily to, onsite wage inflation and
increased offshore headcount.
e-Business Revenues. e-Business revenues increased to $9.6 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2007, or 12.8% of total revenues, from $9.2 million, or 14.4% of total revenues for
the three months ended March 31, 2006. The $0.4 million increase was attributable primarily to
revenues from new engagements and net increase in revenues from existing projects by $2.6
million largely offset by $2.2 million in lost revenues as a result of project completion.
e-Business Cost of Revenues. e-Business cost of revenues consists of costs directly associated
with billable consultants in the US and offshore, including salaries, payroll taxes, benefits,
relocation costs, immigration costs, finders fees, trainee compensation, and travel.
e-Business cost of revenues decreased to 62.7% of total e-Business revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2007, from 73.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The 11.1
percentage point decrease in cost of revenues as a percent of revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 is
19
principally attributable to increase in e-Business revenue by $0.4
million and better utilization of resources, during three months ended March 31 2007, as
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006, partly offset by an increase in onsite wages
due to wage inflation.
TeamSourcing Revenues. TeamSourcing revenues decreased to $4.0 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007, or 5.3% of total revenues, from $4.8 million, or 7.5% of total revenues
for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The $0.8 million decrease was attributable primarily
to revenues from new engagements and revenue from the SkillBay web portal, which helps clients
of Syntel with their supplemental staffing requirements contributing $0.8 million offset by $1.6
million in lost revenues as a result of project completion and net reduction in revenues from
existing projects.
TeamSourcing Cost of Revenues. TeamSourcing cost of revenues consists of costs directly
associated with billable consultants in the US, including salaries, payroll taxes, benefits,
relocation costs, immigration costs, finders fees, trainee compensation, and travel.
TeamSourcing cost of revenues decreased to 58.5% of TeamSourcing revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2007, from 67.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This decrease in
cost of revenues, as a percent of total TeamSourcing revenues, was attributable primarily to the
better utilization of TeamSourcing resources and by net revenues from Skillbay web portal
placements.
BPO Revenues. This segment started contributing revenues during the first quarter of 2004.
Revenues from this segment were $9.1 million or 12.0% of total revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 as against $3.2 million or 5.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
The $5.9 million increase was attributable primarily to revenues from new engagements and net
increase in revenues from existing projects.
BPO Cost of Revenues. BPO cost of revenues consists of costs directly associated with billable
consultants, including salaries, payroll taxes, benefits, finders fees, trainee compensation,
and travel. Cost of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased to 43.3% of BPO
revenues from 42.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The 0.5% increase in cost of
revenues, as a percent of total BPO revenues, was attributable primarily to increased billable
headcount due to increased operations.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative expenses
consist primarily of salaries, payroll taxes and benefits for sales, solutions, finance,
administrative, and corporate staff; travel; telecommunications; business promotions; and
marketing and various facility costs for the Companys global development centers and other
offices. Selling, general, and administrative costs for the three months ended March 31, 2007
were $12.9 million or 17.2% of total revenues, compared to $10.6 million or 16.7% of total
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
The $2.3 million increase is primarily due to increases in certain costs in the three months
ended March 31, 2007 as against the three months ended March 31, 2006 and increases in revenue
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as against three months ended March 31, 2006. Cost
increases include compensation of $0.6 million, depreciation of $0.7 million primarily due to
capitalization of the Companys Pune Global Development Center, rent of $0.4 million towards the
additional new facilities at Mumbai, Pune and Chennai in India, telecommunication expenses of
$0.1 million, training expenses of $ 0.1 million and office expenses of $0.8 million partially
offset by decrease in travel expenses of $0.3 million, all of which has resulted in an
approximately 3.1 percentage point increase which was partially offset by the increase in
revenue, resulting in an
approximately 2.6 percentage point decrease.
20
Income Taxes
The Company records provisions for income taxes based on enacted tax laws and rates in the
various taxing jurisdictions in which it operates. In determining the tax provisions, the
Company has provided for tax contingencies based on FIN 48 and on the Companys assessment of
future regulatory reviews of filed tax returns. Such reserves, which are recorded in income
taxes payable, are based on FIN 48 interpretation and on managements estimates and accordingly
are subject to revision based on additional information. The provision no longer required for
any particular tax year, is credited to the current periods income tax expenses.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the effective income tax rate was 13.8%
and 17.6% respectively. The tax rates for the three months March 31, 2007 is impacted by
additional tax reserve of $0.13 million and reversal of research and development tax credit of
$0.2 million.
21
FINANCIAL POSITION
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and Cash equivalents reduced from $ 51.6 million to $46.9
million primarily due to the capital expenditures and increase in accounts receivables during
the three months ended March 31, 2007.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company generally has financed its working capital needs through operations. The Companys
cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of certificates of deposit, corporate bonds and
treasury notes. These amounts are held by various banking institutions including US-based and
India-based banks.
Net cash generated by operating activities was $7.4 million for the three months ended March 31,
2007. The net cash used by operating activities was $2.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2006. The number of days sales outstanding in net accounts receivable was
approximately 63 days and 62 days as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in
the number of days sales outstanding in net accounts receivable was due to lower collections.
Net cash used in investing activities was $9.0 million for the three months ended March 31,
2007, consisting principally of $31.9 million for the purchase of short term investments and
$10.7 million of capital expenditures principally for construction / acquisition of Global
Development Center at Pune, Business Process Outsourcing facility at Mumbai and an additional
facility in Chennai, computers and software and communications equipment and also capital
advance for guest house at Mumbai, partially offset by the sale of short term investments of
$33.5 million. Net cash used by investing activities was $9.1 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2006, consisting principally of $14.9 million for the purchase of short term
investments and $3.2 million of capital expenditures consisting principally of computer
hardware, software, communications equipment, infrastructure and facilities, partially offset by
the sale of short term investments of $9.0 million.
Net cash used in financing activities was $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2007, consisting principally of $2.4 million in dividends paid out partially offset by $0.6
million of proceeds from the issuance of shares under the Companys employee stock option plan
and employee stock purchase plan and $0.1 million of tax benefit on stock option exercised
during the quarter. Net cash used in financing activities was $2.1 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006, consisting principally of $2.4 million in dividends paid out, partially
offset by $0.2 million of proceeds from the issuance of shares under the Companys employee
stock option plan and employee stock purchase plan and $0.06 million of tax benefit on stock
option exercised during the quarter.
The Company has a line of credit with JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, which provides for borrowings up
to $20.0 million. The line of credit expires on August 31, 2007. The line of credit has a
sub-limit of $5.0 million for letters of credit, which bear a fee of 1% per annum of the face
value of each standby letter of credit issued. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest
at (i) a formula approximating the Eurodollar rate plus the applicable margin of 1.25%, (ii) the
banks prime rate minus 1.0% or (iii) negotiated rate plus 1.25%. There were no outstanding
borrowings at March 31, 2007 and 2006.
The Company believes that the combination of present cash balances and future operating cash
flows will be sufficient to meet the Companys currently anticipated cash requirements for at
least the next 12 months.
22
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
We believe the following critical accounting policy, among others, affects the more significant
judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The
Company has discussed this critical accounting policy and the estimates with the Audit Committee
of the Board of Directors.
Revenue Recognition. Revenue recognition is the most significant accounting policy for the
Company. The Company recognizes revenue from time and material contracts as services are
performed. During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, revenues from time and
material contracts constituted 59% and 56% of total revenues, respectively. Revenue from
fixed-price, application management, maintenance and support engagements is recognized as
earned, which generally results in straight-line revenue recognition as services are performed
continuously over the term of the engagement. During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
2006, revenues from fixed price application management and support engagements constituted 27%
and 25% of total revenues, respectively.
Revenue on fixed price development projects is measured using the proportional performance
method of accounting. Performance is generally measured based upon the efforts incurred to date
in relation to the total estimated efforts required through the completion of the contract. The
Company monitors estimates of total contract revenues and cost on a routine basis throughout the
delivery period. The cumulative impact of any change in estimates of the contract revenues or
costs is reflected in the period in which the changes become known. In the event that a loss is
anticipated on a particular contract, provision is made for the estimated loss. The Company
issues invoices related to fixed price contracts based on either the achievement of milestones
during a project or other contractual terms. Differences between the timing of billings and the
recognition of revenue based upon the proportional performance method of accounting are recorded
as revenue earned in excess of billings or deferred revenue in the accompanying financial
statements. During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, revenues from fixed price
development contracts constituted 14% and 19% of total revenues, respectively.
Significant Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the reporting period. By their nature, these
estimates and judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. The Company bases its
estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Revenue Recognition. The use of the proportional performance method of accounting requires that
the Company makes estimates about its future efforts and costs relative to its fixed price
contracts. While the Company has procedures in place to monitor the estimates throughout the
performance period, such estimates are subject to change as each contract progresses. The
cumulative impact of any such changes is reflected in the period in which the changes become
known.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts based on
a specific review of aged receivables. The provision for the allowance for doubtful accounts is
recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. These estimates are based on our
assessment of the probable collection from specific customer accounts, the aging of the accounts
receivable, analysis of credit data, bad debt write-offs, and other known factors.
23
Income TaxesEstimates of Effective Tax Rates and Reserves for Tax Contingencies. The Company
records provisions for income taxes based on enacted tax laws and rates in the various taxing
jurisdictions in which it operates. In determining the tax provisions, the Company has provided
for tax contingencies based on FIN 48 and on the Companys assessment of future regulatory
reviews of filed tax returns. Such reserves, which are recorded in income taxes payable, are
based on FIN 48 interpretation and on managements estimates and accordingly are subject to
revision based on additional information. The provision no longer required for any particular
tax year, is credited to the current periods income tax expenses.
Accruals for Legal Expenses and Exposures. The Company estimates the costs associated with known
legal exposures and their related legal expenses and accrues reserves for either the probable
liability, if that amount can be reasonably estimated, or otherwise the lower end of an
estimated range of potential liability.
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The Company intends to use accumulated and
future earnings of foreign subsidiaries to expand operations outside the United States and
accordingly undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely
reinvested outside the United States and no provision for U. S. federal and state income tax or
applicable dividend distribution tax has been provided thereon.
24
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS / RISK FACTORS
Certain information and statements contained in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this report, including the allowance
for doubtful accounts, contingencies and litigation, potential tax liabilities, interest rate or
foreign currency risks, and projections regarding our liquidity and capital resources, could be
construed as forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Forward-looking statements include statements containing words such as could, expects, may,
anticipates, believes, estimates, plans, and similar expressions. In addition, the
Company or persons acting on its behalf may, from time to time, publish other forward looking
statements. Such forward looking statements are based on managements estimates, assumptions and
projections and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements. Some of the factors that
could cause future results to materially differ from the recent results or those projected in the
forward looking statements include the following, which factors are more fully discussed in the
Companys most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K and other SEC filings, in each case
under the section entitled Risk Factors:
|
|
|
Recruitment and Retention of IT Professionals |
|
|
|
|
Government Regulation of Immigration |
|
|
|
|
Customer Concentration; Risk of Termination |
|
|
|
|
Exposure to Political and Regulatory Conditions in India |
|
|
|
|
Wage Pressure in India |
|
|
|
|
Ability to Repatriate Earnings |
|
|
|
|
Intense Competition |
|
|
|
|
Ability to Manage Growth |
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Price Engagements |
|
|
|
|
Potential Liability to Customers |
|
|
|
|
Dependence on Key Personnel |
|
|
|
|
Limited Intellectual Property Protection |
|
|
|
|
Potential Anti-Outsourcing Legislation |
|
|
|
|
Adverse Economic Conditions |
|
|
|
|
Failure to Successfully Develop and Market New Products and Services |
|
|
|
|
Benchmarking Provisions |
|
|
|
|
Corporate Governance Issues |
|
|
|
|
Telecom/Infrastructure Issues |
|
|
|
|
New Facilities |
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Accounting |
|
|
|
|
Terrorist Activity, War or Natural Disasters |
|
|
|
|
Instability and Currency Fluctuations |
|
|
|
|
Risks Related to Possible Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
Variability of Quarterly Operating Results |
The Company does not intend to update the forward looking statements or risk factors to reflect
future events or circumstances.
25
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which addresses how
companies should measure fair value when they are required to use a fair value measure for
recognition or disclosure purposes under generally accepted accounting principles. SFAS No. 157 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact; SFAS No. 157 will have on the Companys financial position, results of operations and
liquidity and its related disclosures.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (FAS 159). The Statement allows
companies to make an election, on an individual instrument basis, to report financial assets and
liabilities at fair value. The election must be made at the inception of a transaction and may not
be reversed. The election may also be made for existing financial assets and liabilities at the
time of adoption. Unrealized gains and losses on assets or liabilities for which the fair value
option has been elected are to be reported in earnings. The Statement requires additional
disclosures for instruments for which the election has been made, including a description of
managements reasons for making the election. The Statement is effective as of fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007 and is to be adopted prospectively and concurrent with the
adoption of FAS 157. The Company is currently evaluating the impact; SFAS No. 157 will have on the
Companys financial position, results of operations and liquidity and its related disclosures.
26
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
The Company is exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company considers investments purchased with an original or remaining maturity of less than
three months at date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The following table summarizes Companys
cash and cash equivalents and short term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
46,884 |
|
|
$ |
51,555 |
|
Short term Investments |
|
|
41,458 |
|
|
|
42,319 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
88,342 |
|
|
$ |
93,874 |
|
|
|
|
The Companys exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to its
investment portfolio. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments in its investment
portfolio. The Companys investments are in high-quality Indian Mutual Funds and, by policy,
limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. At any time, changes in interest rates
could have a material impact on interest earnings for our investment portfolio. The Company
strives to protect and preserve our invested funds by limiting default, market and reinvestment
risk. Investments in interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Floating
rate securities may produce less income than expected if there is a decline in interest rates.
Due in part to these factors, the Companys future investment income may fall short of
expectations, or the Company may suffer a loss in principal if the Company is forced to sell
securities, which have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates as stated above.
Foreign Currency Risk
The Companys sales are primarily sourced in the United States and its subsidiary in the United
Kingdom and are mostly denominated in U.S. dollars or UK pounds respectively. Its foreign
subsidiaries incur most of their expenses in the local currency. Accordingly, all foreign
subsidiaries use the local currency as their functional currency. The Companys business is
subject to risks typical of an international business, including, but not limited to differing
economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, other regulations
and restrictions, and foreign exchange rate volatility. Accordingly, the Companys future results
could be materially adversely impacted by changes in these or other factors. The risk is
partially mitigated as the Company has sufficient resources in the respective local currencies to
meet immediate requirements. The Company is also exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations
as the financial results of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars in
consolidation. As exchange rates vary, these results, when translated, may vary from
expectations.
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Indian rupee has appreciated, against U.S.
dollar, by 1.4% as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2006. The impact of this rupee
appreciation negatively impacted the Companys gross margin by 38 basis points, operating income
by 51 basis points and net income by 50 basis points, each as a percentage of revenue. The Indian
rupee denominated cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expense was 42% and
53%, respectively, which did not have a material impact on the operating results of the company.
Although the Company cannot predict future movement in interest rates or fluctuations in foreign
currency rates, the Company does not currently
anticipate that interest rate risk or foreign currency risk will have a significant impact.
27
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2007 as well as mirror certifications from
senior management, the Companys Chairman & Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial
Officer & Chief Information Security Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the
Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and are operating in an effective
manner. There have been no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the last quarter that materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls. Disclosure Controls are procedures designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as
this Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions (the SEC) rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are
also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Internal Controls are procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that (1)
our transactions are properly authorized; (2) our assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or
improper use; and (3) our transactions are properly recorded and reported, all to permit the
preparation of our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. The Companys management, including the CEO and
CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls or our Internal Controls will prevent all error
and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control systems objectives will be met. Because of
the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been
detected. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. The design
of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of
future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with its policies or
procedures.
Scope of the Controls Evaluation. In the course of the Controls Evaluation, we sought to identify
data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and confirm that appropriate corrective actions,
including process improvements, were being undertaken. Our Internal Controls are also evaluated
on an ongoing basis by our Internal Audit Department and by other personnel in our organization.
The overall goals of these various evaluation activities are to monitor our Disclosure Controls
and our Internal Controls, and to modify them as necessary; our intent is to maintain the
Disclosure Controls and the Internal Controls as dynamic systems that change as conditions
warrant.
Among other matters, we sought in our evaluation to determine whether there were any
significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the Companys Internal Controls, and
whether the company had identified any acts of fraud involving personnel with a significant role
in the Companys Internal Controls. This information was important both for the Controls
Evaluation generally, and because the Rule 13a-14 Certifications of the CEO and CFO require that
the CEO and CFO disclose that information to our
Boards Audit Committee and our independent auditors. We also sought to
28
deal with other controls
matters in the Controls Evaluation, and in each case if a problem was identified, we considered
what revision, improvement and/or correction to make in accordance with our ongoing procedures.
Conclusions. Based upon the Controls Evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that as of March
31, 2007 our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information
relating to Syntel and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including the
CEO and CFO, particularly during the period when our periodic reports are being prepared, and
that our Internal Controls are effective to provide reasonable assurance that our financial
statements are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States of America.
29
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
While the Company is a party to ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business, the Company
is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes in the Companys risk factors as disclosed in the Companys
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 8, 2006, by and among the Registrant,
Bharat Desai and Neerja Sethi, filed as an exhibit to the Registrants Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement on Form S-3/A dated January 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. |
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYNTEL, INC.
|
|
Date : May 8, 2007 |
/s/ Bharat Desai
|
|
|
Bharat Desai, |
|
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date : May 8, 2007 |
/s/ Arvind Godbole
|
|
|
Arvind Godbole, |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer &
Chief Information Security Officer |
|
31
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. |
32