Document


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
 
[x]      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018
 
OR
 
[  ]      TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____________to _____________
 
Commission File Number 001-34912
CELGENE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
 
22-2711928
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
 
 
 
86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ
 
07901
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
 
 
(908) 673-9000
 
 
 
 
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
 
Yes
X
 
No
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
 
Yes
X
 
No
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
X
 
Accelerated filer
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
 
Smaller reporting company
 
 
 
 
 
 
Emerging growth company
 
 
 
 
If an emerging growth company, indicated by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act.
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
 
Yes
 
 
No
X
 
 
As of July 23, 2018, 703,363,010 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.



CELGENE CORPORATION
 
FORM 10-Q TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
Page No.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Income - Three-Month and Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - Three-Month and Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets - As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
 
 
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Revenue:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net product sales
 
$
3,808

 
$
3,259

 
$
7,339

 
$
6,211

Other revenue
 
6

 
12

 
13

 
22

Total revenue
 
3,814

 
3,271

 
7,352

 
6,233

Expenses:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets)
 
126

 
111

 
261

 
224

Research and development
 
1,251

 
835

 
3,454

 
1,830

Selling, general and administrative
 
790

 
939

 
1,654

 
1,559

Amortization of acquired intangible assets
 
127

 
88

 
214

 
170

Acquisition related charges (income) and restructuring, net
 
34

 
(13
)
 
65

 
26

Total costs and expenses
 
2,328

 
1,960

 
5,648

 
3,809

Operating income
 
1,486

 
1,311

 
1,704

 
2,424

Other income and (expense):
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Interest and investment income, net
 
9

 
24

 
22

 
39

Interest (expense)
 
(192
)
 
(126
)
 
(358
)
 
(253
)
Other income (expense), net
 
4

 
(31
)
 
969

 
(18
)
Income before income taxes
 
1,307

 
1,178

 
2,337

 
2,192

Income tax provision
 
262

 
77

 
446

 
159

Net income
 
$
1,045

 
$
1,101

 
$
1,891

 
$
2,033

Net income per common share:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Basic
 
$
1.46

 
$
1.41

 
$
2.58

 
$
2.61

Diluted
 
$
1.43

 
$
1.36

 
$
2.52

 
$
2.51

Weighted average shares:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Basic
 
716.1

 
780.4

 
732.1

 
779.7

Diluted
 
732.6

 
811.7

 
750.6

 
811.5

 
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

3

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)

 
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Net income
 
$
1,045

 
$
1,101

 
$
1,891

 
$
2,033

Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
(28
)
 
31

 
(12
)
 
41

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net unrealized gains (losses) related to cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized holding gains (losses)
 
226

 
(198
)
 
127

 
(266
)
Tax benefit
 
—

 
7

 
1

 
7

Unrealized holding gains (losses), net of tax
 
226

 
(191
)
 
128

 
(259
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net income
 
13

 
(79
)
 
40

 
(163
)
Tax (benefit)
 
(1
)
 
(1
)
 
(1
)
 
(2
)
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in net income, net of tax
 
12

 
(80
)
 
39

 
(165
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Excluded component related to cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of excluded component (gains)
 
(7
)
 
(3
)
 
(15
)
 
(5
)
Reclassification of realized excluded component losses to net income
 
6

 
—

 
17

 
—

Net reclassification adjustment included in net income
 
(1
)
 
(3
)
 
2

 
(5
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt / marketable securities (see Note 1):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized holding gains (losses)
 
—

 
2

 
(9
)
 
229

Tax (expense) benefit
 
—

 
(1
)
 
2

 
(81
)
Unrealized holding gains (losses), net of tax
 
—

 
1

 
(7
)
 
148

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
 
—

 
34

 
18

 
34

Tax (benefit)
 
—

 
(13
)
 
(4
)
 
(13
)
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income, net of tax
 
—

 
21

 
14

 
21

Total other comprehensive income (loss)
 
209

 
(221
)
 
164

 
(219
)
Comprehensive income
 
$
1,254

 
$
880

 
$
2,055

 
$
1,814


See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

4


CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
 
 
June 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
Assets
 

 
 

Current assets:
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
$
1,503

 
$
7,013

Debt securities available-for-sale
79

 
3,219

Equity investments with readily determinable fair values
1,828

 
1,810

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $37 and $36 as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively
2,064

 
1,921

Inventory
555

 
541

Other current assets
824

 
388

Total current assets
6,853

 
14,892

Property, plant and equipment, net
1,292

 
1,070

Intangible assets, net
16,470

 
8,436

Goodwill
8,004

 
4,866

Other non-current assets
825

 
877

Total assets
$
33,444

 
$
30,141

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
 

 
 

Current liabilities:
 

 
 

Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
$
1,497

 
$
—

Accounts payable
294

 
305

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
2,615

 
2,523

Income taxes payable
32

 
84

Current portion of deferred revenue
64

 
75

Total current liabilities
4,502

 
2,987

Deferred revenue, net of current portion
63

 
34

Income taxes payable
2,368

 
2,490

Deferred income tax liabilities
2,771

 
1,327

Other non-current liabilities
556

 
544

Long-term debt, net of discount
19,754

 
15,838

Total liabilities
30,014

 
23,220

Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 15)


 


Stockholders’ Equity:
 

 
 

Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share, 5.0 million shares authorized; none outstanding as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
—

 
—

Common stock, $.01 par value per share, 1,150.0 million shares authorized; issued 977.5 million and 971.7 million shares as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively
10

 
10

Common stock in treasury, at cost; 274.9 million and 212.4 million shares as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively
(25,700
)
 
(20,243
)
Additional paid-in capital
13,835

 
13,806

Retained earnings
15,404

 
13,061

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
(119
)
 
287

Total stockholders’ equity
3,430

 
6,921

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
33,444

 
$
30,141

 
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

5


CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
Cash flows from operating activities:
 

 
 

Net income
$
1,891

 
$
2,033

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 

 
 

Depreciation
79

 
66

Amortization
217

 
174

Impairment charges
27

 
50

Deferred income taxes
(43
)
 
(186
)
Change in value of contingent consideration and success payments
(23
)
 
26

Net loss on sales of debt securities available-for-sale
18

 
—

Net (gain) on equity investments with and without a readily determinable fair value
(954
)
 
(15
)
Share-based compensation expense
492

 
323

Share-based employee benefit plan expense
20

 
22

Derivative instruments
8

 
60

Other, net
(10
)
 
(46
)
Change in current assets and liabilities, excluding the effect of acquisitions and disposals:
 

 
 

Accounts receivable
(157
)
 
(75
)
Inventory
(14
)
 
(32
)
Other operating assets
(323
)
 
(184
)
Accounts payable and other operating liabilities
(144
)
 
219

Income tax payable
(178
)
 
33

Payment of contingent consideration
(22
)
 
—

Deferred revenue
20

 
1

Net cash provided by operating activities
904

 
2,469

Cash flows from investing activities:
 

 
 

Proceeds from sales of debt securities available-for-sale
3,240

 
2,057

Purchases of debt securities available-for-sale
(110
)
 
(3,411
)
Capital expenditures
(168
)
 
(132
)
Proceeds from sales of equity investment securities
55

 
27

Purchases of equity investment securities
(155
)
 
(156
)
Payments for acquisition of business, net of cash acquired

(8,648
)
 
—

Net cash (used in) investing activities
(5,786
)
 
(1,615
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 

 
 

Payment for treasury shares
(6,096
)
 
(811
)
Proceeds from short-term borrowing
4,929

 
—

Principal repayments on short-term borrowing
(3,934
)
 
—

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
4,452

 
—

Payment of contingent consideration
(40
)
 
—

Net proceeds from share-based compensation arrangements
46

 
387

Net cash (used in) financing activities
(643
)
 
(424
)
Effect of currency rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
15

 
60

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(5,510
)
 
490

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
7,013

 
6,170

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
1,503

 
$
6,660


 See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

6


CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in millions)
 
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activity:
 

 
 

Change in net unrealized loss (gain) on debt securities available-for-sale/marketable securities available-for-sale

$
9

 
$
(229
)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 

 
 

Interest paid
300

 
262

Income taxes paid
786

 
333

  
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

7


CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In all accompanying tables, amounts of dollars expressed in millions,
except per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
 
1. Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and New Accounting Standards

Celgene Corporation, together with its subsidiaries (collectively “we,” “our,” “us,” “Celgene” or the “Company”), is an integrated global biopharmaceutical company engaged primarily in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative therapies for the treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases through next-generation solutions in protein homeostasis, immuno-oncology, epigenetics, immunology and neuro-inflammation. Celgene Corporation was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 1986.

Our commercial stage products include REVLIMID®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, OTEZLA®, ABRAXANE®, VIDAZA®, azacitidine for injection (generic version of VIDAZA®), THALOMID® (sold as THALOMID® or Thalidomide Celgene® outside of the U.S.) and IDHIFA®. In addition, we earn revenue from other product sales and licensing arrangements.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Celgene Corporation and its subsidiaries. Investments in limited partnerships and interests where we have an equity interest of 50% or less and do not otherwise have a controlling financial interest are accounted for by one of three methods: the equity method, as an investment without a readily determinable fair value or as an investment with a readily determinable fair value.

We operate in a single segment engaged in the discovery, development, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and sale of innovative therapies for the treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases. Consistent with our operational structure, our Chief Executive Officer (CEO), as the chief operating decision maker, manages and allocates resources at the global corporate level. Our global research and development organization is responsible for discovery of new drug candidates and supports development and registration efforts for potential future products. Our global supply chain organization is responsible for the manufacturing and supply of products. Regional/therapeutic area commercial organizations market, distribute and sell our products. The business is also supported by global corporate staff functions. Managing and allocating resources at the global corporate level enables our CEO to assess both the overall level of resources available and how to best deploy these resources across functions, therapeutic areas, regional commercial organizations and research and development projects in line with our overarching long-term corporate-wide strategic goals, rather than on a product or franchise basis. Consistent with this decision-making process, our CEO uses consolidated, single-segment financial information for purposes of evaluating performance, allocating resources, setting incentive compensation targets, as well as forecasting future period financial results.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We are subject to certain risks and uncertainties related to, among other things, product development, regulatory approval, market acceptance, scope of patent and proprietary rights, competition, outcome of legal and governmental proceedings, credit risk, technological change and product liability.
 
Interim results may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. In the opinion of management, these unaudited consolidated financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.


8
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation. During the first quarter of 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (ASU 2016-01). As such, we have recast our previously reported marketable securities available-for-sale of $5,029 million on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017 to conform to the current year presentation as shown in the table below. There were no changes to total current assets or total assets as a result of this reclassification.
 
December 31, 2017
 
As Reported
 
As Revised
Marketable securities available-for-sale
$
5,029

 
N/A

Debt securities available-for-sale
N/A

 
$
3,219

Equity investments with readily determinable fair values
N/A

 
1,810


In addition, as a result of adopting ASU 2016-01, we have also recast certain activity within our previously reported Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six-month period ended June 30, 2017 to conform to the current year presentation as shown in the table below. There were no changes to Net cash provided by operating activities, Net cash (used in) investing activities and Net cash (used in) financing activities as a result of this reclassification.
 
Six-Month Period Ended
 
June 30, 2017
 
As Reported
 
As Revised
Purchases of marketable securities available-for-sale
$
(3,482
)
 
N/A

Purchases of investment securities
(85
)
 
N/A

Purchases of debt securities available-for-sale
N/A

 
$
(3,411
)
Purchases of equity investment securities
N/A

 
(156
)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities available-for-sale
2,070

 
N/A

Proceeds from sales of investment securities
14

 
N/A

Proceeds from sales of debt securities available-for-sale
N/A

 
2,057

Proceeds from sales of equity investment securities
N/A

 
27


In addition, in August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities" (ASU 2017-12), which we adopted on August 31, 2017, with an initial application date as of January 1, 2017. As previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K), during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded pre-tax income of $48 million and $37 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017, respectively, as a result of applying the new guidance. As such, we have recast the financial statements for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 to reflect the adoption of ASU 2017-12 as follows:
 
Three-Month Period Ended
 
Six-Month Period Ended
 
June 30, 2017
 
June 30, 2017
 
As Reported
 
As Revised
 
As Reported
 
As Revised
Net product sales
$
3,256

 
$
3,259

 
$
6,206

 
$
6,211

Other (expense) income, net
(76
)
 
(31
)
 
(50
)
 
(18
)
Income tax provision
69

 
77

 
153

 
159

Net income
1,061

 
1,101

 
2,002

 
2,033

Diluted net income per common share
$
1.31

 
$
1.36

 
$
2.47

 
$
2.51

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such significant accounting policies are applicable for periods prior to the adoption of the following new accounting standards.


9
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


New accounting standards which have been adopted

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASU 2014-09) and has subsequently issued a number of amendments to ASU 2014-09. The new standard, as amended, provides a single comprehensive model to be used in the accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes previous revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The standard’s stated core principle is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this core principle, ASU 2014-09 includes provisions within a five step model that includes identifying the contract with a customer, identifying the performance obligations in the contract, determining the transaction price, allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations, and recognizing revenue when, or as, an entity satisfies a performance obligation. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. See Note 2 for revenue recognition disclosures.

The new standard was effective for us on January 1, 2018 and we elected to adopt it using a modified retrospective transition method, which required a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. The implementation of ASU 2014-09 using the modified retrospective transition method did not have a material quantitative impact on our consolidated financial statements as the timing of revenue recognition did not significantly change. We also elected the following practical expedients, which were available to us as a result of utilizing the modified retrospective transition method:

•
We applied the provisions of the standard only to contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018; and
•
We did not retrospectively restate contracts for contract modifications executed before the beginning of the earliest period presented.

In accordance with the transition provisions of ASU 2014-09, we recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $4 million to increase Retained earnings (net of a $1 million tax effect). In limited instances, the new standard permits us to recognize revenue earlier than under the previous revenue recognition guidance. Historically, we deferred certain revenue where the transaction price pursuant to the underlying customer arrangement was not fixed or determinable. Under the new standard, such customer arrangements are accounted for as variable consideration, which results in revenue being recognized earlier provided we can reliably estimate the ultimate price expected to be realized from the customer. In addition, ASU 2014-09 requires companies who elect to adopt the standard using the modified retrospective transition method to disclose within the footnotes the effects of applying the provisions of the previous standards to current year financial statements. Revenue and net income for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018, do not differ materially from amounts that would have resulted from application of the previous standards.

In January 2016 and February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 and Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-03, "Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments—Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities" (ASU-2018-03), respectively. ASU 2016-01 changes accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 does not apply to equity investments in consolidated subsidiaries or those accounted for under the equity method of accounting. In addition, the FASB clarified guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. Equity investments with readily determinable fair values will be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. We have elected to measure all of our equity investments without readily determinable fair values at cost adjusted for changes in observable prices minus impairment or at net asset value (NAV), as a practical expedient, if available. Changes in measurement of equity investments without readily determinable fair values will be recognized in net income. The guidance related to equity investments without readily determinable fair values, in which the practical expedient has not been elected, will be applied prospectively to equity investments that exist as of the date of adoption. For equity investments without a readily determinable fair value in which the NAV per share practical expedient is elected, ASU 2018-03 clarified that the transition should not be performed prospectively, but rather as a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Equity investments without readily determinable fair values are recorded within Other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We have not elected the fair value option for financial liabilities with instrument-specific credit risk. Companies must assess valuation allowances for deferred tax assets related to available-for-sale debt securities in combination with their other deferred tax assets. ASU 2016-01 was effective for us on January 1, 2018 which required a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings to be recorded for equity investments with readily determinable fair values and equity investments without readily determinable fair values in which the NAV per share practical expedient was elected. As of the adoption date, we held publicly traded equity investments with a fair value of approximately $1.8 billion in a net unrealized gain position of $875 million, and having an associated deferred tax liability of $188 million. We recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $687 million to decrease Accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) with a corresponding

10
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


increase to Retained earnings for the amount of unrealized gains or losses, net of tax as of the beginning of fiscal year 2018. In addition, we held an equity investment without a readily determinable fair value in which we elected the NAV per share practical expedient. As such, on January 1, 2018, we recorded an additional cumulative effect adjustment of $59 million to increase Equity investments without readily determinable fair values as the NAV was in excess of our cost basis as of the adoption date with a corresponding increase to Retained earnings of $44 million, net of the tax effect of $15 million. As a result of the implementation of ASU 2016-01, effective on January 1, 2018 unrealized gains and losses in equity investments with readily determinable fair values and equity investments without readily determinable fair values for which observable price changes for identical or similar (e.g. dividend rights, voting rights, etc.) investments occur are recorded on the Consolidated Statement of Income within Other income (expense), net. We recorded a net loss of $6 million and net gain of $953 million in Other income (expense), net for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as a result of adopting this standard. The implementation of ASU 2016-01 is expected to increase volatility in our net income as the volatility previously recorded in Other comprehensive income (OCI) related to changes in the fair market value of available-for-sale equity investments will now be reflected in net income effective with the adoption date.

In February 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-02, "Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income: Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income" (ASU 2018-02). The new standard is effective on January 1, 2019 with early adoption permitted. The guidance permits a reclassification from AOCI to Retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from U.S. tax reform legislation enacted in December 2017 (2017 Tax Act). We elected to early adopt ASU 2018-02 on January 1, 2018. We use a specific identification approach to release the income tax effects in AOCI. We have recast our previously reported Marketable securities available-for-sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017 to conform to the current year presentation as outlined earlier in this Note 1. As a result of adopting this standard, we recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to increase AOCI by $117 million with a corresponding decrease to Retained earnings. We recorded the impacts of adopting ASU 2018-02 prior to recording the impacts of adopting ASU 2016-01 and included state income tax related effects in the amounts reclassified to Retained earnings.

In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments" (ASU 2016-15). ASU 2016-15 clarifies how companies present and classify certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows where diversity in practice exists. ASU 2016-15 was effective for us in our first quarter of fiscal 2018 and did not result in any changes to the presentation of our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows upon adoption.

In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-16, "Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory” (ASU 2016-16). ASU 2016-16 requires the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory to be recognized as current period income tax expense or benefit and removes the requirement to defer and amortize the consolidated tax consequences of intra-entity transfers. The new standard was effective for us on January 1, 2018. As of the adoption date, we had net prepaid tax assets of $166 million related to intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory which was recorded in Other non-current assets. Using the modified retrospective approach, we recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $166 million to decrease Retained earnings with a corresponding decrease in prepaid tax assets as of the beginning of fiscal year 2018.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations” (ASU 2017-01). ASU 2017-01 provides guidance for evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The guidance provides a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities (a “set”) does not qualify to be a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in an identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. If the screen is not met, the guidance requires a set to be considered a business to include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs and removes the evaluation as to whether a market participant could replace the missing elements. The new standard was effective for us on January 1, 2018 and was adopted on a prospective basis. In the first quarter of 2018, we acquired Impact Biomedicines Inc. (Impact) and Juno Therapeutics Inc. (Juno) which were accounted for as an asset acquisition and a business combination, respectively. See Note 3 for further information on the acquisitions of Impact and Juno. We anticipate that the adoption of this standard will result in more acquisitions being accounted for as asset acquisitions.


11
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The following table presents a summary of cumulative effect adjustments to Retained earnings due to the adoption of new accounting standards on January 1, 2018 as noted above:
 
 
Cumulative Effect Adjustments to Retained Earnings on January 1, 2018 Increase / (Decrease)
Cumulative effect adjustment to Retained earnings due to the adoption of the following new accounting standards:
 
 
ASU 2014-09
$
4

 
ASU 2016-01
687

 
ASU 2018-03
44

 
ASU 2018-02
(117
)
 
ASU 2016-16
(166
)
 
Net cumulative effect adjustments to Retained earnings on January 1, 2018 due to the adoption of new accounting standards
$
452


New accounting standards which have not yet been adopted

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, "Leases" (ASU 2016-02). ASU 2016-02 provides accounting guidance for both lessee and lessor accounting models. Among other things, lessees will recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for leases with a duration of greater than one year. For income statement purposes, ASU 2016-02 will require leases to be classified as either an operating or finance lease. Operating leases will result in straight-line expense while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern. The new standard will be effective for us on January 1, 2019 and will be adopted using a modified retrospective approach which will require application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. We are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We expect the implementation of this standard to have an impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures as we had aggregate future minimum lease payments of approximately $235 million as of December 31, 2017 under our portfolio of non-cancelable leased office and research facilities. In addition, Juno had $106 million of aggregate future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2017. We anticipate recognition of additional assets and corresponding liabilities related to these leases on our consolidated balance sheet.

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments" (ASU 2016-13). ASU 2016-13 requires that expected credit losses relating to financial assets measured on an amortized cost basis and available-for-sale debt securities be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. ASU 2016-13 limits the amount of credit losses to be recognized for available-for-sale debt securities to the amount by which carrying value exceeds fair value and also requires the reversal of previously recognized credit losses if fair value increases. The new standard will be effective for us on January 1, 2020. Early adoption will be available on January 1, 2019. We are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

2. Revenue
 
Subsequent to January 1, 2018 we account for revenue in accordance with ASU 2014-09, which we adopted using the modified retrospective method. See Note 1 for further discussion of the adoption, including the impact on our consolidated financial statements. The majority of our revenue is derived from product sales. Our commercial stage products include REVLIMID®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, OTEZLA®, ABRAXANE®, IDHIFA®, VIDAZA®, azacitidine for injection (generic version of VIDAZA®) and THALOMID® (sold as THALOMID® or Thalidomide Celgene® outside of the U.S.). In addition, we recognize revenue from other product sales and royalties based on licensees’ sales of our products or products using our technologies. We do not consider royalty revenue to be a material source of our consolidated revenue. As such, the following disclosure only relates to revenue associated with net product sales.


12
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Performance Obligations

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer, and is the unit of account in the current revenue standard. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied.

At contract inception, we assess the goods promised in our contracts with customers and identify a performance obligation for each promise to transfer to the customer a good that is distinct. When identifying our performance obligations, we consider all goods promised in the contract regardless of whether explicitly stated in the customer contract or implied by customary business practices. Generally, our contracts with customers require us to transfer an individual distinct product, which would represent a single performance obligation. In limited situations, our contracts with customers will require us to transfer two or more distinct products, which would represent multiple performance obligations for each distinct product. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, we allocate the contract’s transaction price to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis. In determining our standalone selling prices for our products, we utilize observable prices for our goods sold separately in similar circumstances and to customers in the same geographical region or market. Our performance obligations with respect to our product sales are satisfied at a point in time, which transfer control upon delivery of product to our customers. We consider control to have transferred upon delivery because the customer has legal title to the asset, we have transferred physical possession of the asset, the customer has significant risks and rewards of ownership of the asset, and in most instances we have a present right to payment at that time. The aggregate dollar value of unfulfilled orders as of June 30, 2018 was not material.

Distribution

REVLIMID®, POMALYST® and THALOMID® are distributed in the United States primarily through contracted pharmacies under the REVLIMID Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), POMALYST REMS® and THALOMID REMS® programs, respectively. These are proprietary risk-management distribution programs tailored specifically to provide for the safe and appropriate distribution and use of REVLIMID®, POMALYST® and THALOMID®. Internationally, REVLIMID®, THALOMID®/Thalidomide Celgene® and IMNOVID® are distributed under mandatory risk-management distribution programs tailored to meet local authorities’ specifications to provide for the product’s safe and appropriate distribution and use. These programs may vary by country and, depending upon the country and the design of the risk-management program, the product may be sold through hospitals or retail pharmacies. OTEZLA®, ABRAXANE®, ISTODAX®, IDHIFA® and VIDAZA® are distributed through the more traditional pharmaceutical industry supply chain and are not subject to the same risk-management distribution programs as REVLIMID®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID® and THALOMID®/Thalidomide Celgene®.

Significant Payment Terms

Our contracts with our customers state the terms of the sale including the description, quantity, and price for each product purchased as well as the payment and shipping terms. Our contractual payment terms vary by jurisdiction. In the United States, our contractual payment terms are typically due in no more than 30 days. Sales made outside the United States typically have payment terms that are greater than 60 days, thereby extending collection periods beyond those in the United States. The period between when we transfer control of the promised goods to a customer and when we receive payment from such customer is expected to be one year or less. Any exceptions to this are either not material or we collect interest from the customer for the time period between the invoice due date and the payment date. As such, we do not adjust the invoice amount for the effects of a significant financing component as the impact is not material to our consolidated financial statements.
  
Contract Balances

When the timing of our delivery of product is different from the timing of payments made by the customers, we recognize either a contract asset (performance precedes the contractual due date) or a contract liability (customer payment precedes performance). There were no significant changes in our contract asset or liability balances during the three- or six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 other than from transactions in the ordinary course of operating activities as described above.

Contract Assets

In limited situations, certain customer contractual payment terms require us to bill in arrears; thus, we satisfy some or all of our performance obligations before we are contractually entitled to bill the customer. In these situations, billing occurs subsequent to revenue recognition, which results in a contract asset. We reflect these contract assets as Other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For example, certain of our contractual arrangements do not permit us to bill until the product is sold through to the end-customer. As of June 30, 2018, such contract assets were $25 million. For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018, we recognized revenue included in such contract assets of $5 million and $28 million, respectively.

13
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



Contract Liabilities

In other limited situations, certain customer contractual payment terms allow us to bill in advance; thus, we receive customer cash payment before satisfying some or all of its performance obligations. In these situations, billing occurs in advance of revenue recognition, which results in contract liabilities. We reflect these contract liabilities as Deferred revenue on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. For example, certain of our contractual arrangements provide the customer with free product after the customer has purchased a contractual minimum amount of product. We concluded the free product represents a future performance obligation in the form of a contractual material right. As such, we defer a portion of the transaction price as a contract liability upon each sale of product until the contractual minimum volume is achieved. As we satisfy our remaining performance obligations we release a portion of the deferred revenue balance. Revenue recognized for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 that was reflected in the deferred revenue balance at the beginning of the year was $82 million and $98 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2018, such contract liabilities were $127 million.

Gross to Net Sales Adjustments

We record gross to net sales accruals for government rebates, chargebacks, distributor service fees, other rebates and administrative fees, sales returns and allowances, and sales discounts. Provisions for discounts, early payments, rebates, sales returns, distributor service fees and chargebacks under terms customary in the industry are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. We record estimated reductions to revenue for volume-based discounts and rebates at the time of the initial sale based upon the sales terms, historical experience and trend analysis. We estimate these accruals using an expected value approach based primarily upon our historical rebate and discount payments made and the provisions included in current customer contracts and government regulations.

Government Rebates, including Medicaid and Medicare Rebates

Government rebate accruals are based on estimated payments due to governmental agencies for purchases made by third parties under various governmental programs. In the U.S., we participate in state government Medicaid programs and other Federal and state government programs, which require rebates to participating government entities. U.S. Medicaid rebate accruals are generally based on historical payment data and estimates of future Medicaid beneficiary utilization applied to the Medicaid unit rebate formula established by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. The Medicaid rebate percentage was increased and extended to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations in March 2010. The accrual of the rebates associated with Medicaid Managed Care Organizations is calculated based on estimated historical patient data related to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations. We also analyze actual billings received from the states to further support the accrual rates. Manufacturers of pharmaceutical products are responsible for 50% of the patient’s cost of branded prescription drugs related to the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap. In order to estimate the cost to us of this coverage gap responsibility, we analyze data for eligible Medicare Part D patients against data for eligible Medicare Part D patients treated with our products as well as the historical invoices. This expense is recognized throughout the year as costs are incurred. In certain international markets government-sponsored programs require rebates to be paid based on program specific rules and, accordingly, the rebate accruals are determined primarily on estimated eligible sales.

Chargebacks, Distributor Service Fees, Other Rebates and Administrative Fees

Chargeback accruals are based on the differentials between product acquisition prices paid by wholesalers and lower government contract pricing paid by eligible customers covered under federally qualified programs. Distributor service fee accruals are based on contractual fees to be paid to the wholesale distributor for services provided. TRICARE is a health care program of the U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System that provides civilian health benefits for military personnel, military retirees and their dependents. TRICARE rebate accruals are included in chargeback accruals and are based on estimated Department of Defense eligible sales multiplied by the TRICARE rebate formula.

Rebates or administrative fees are offered to certain wholesale customers, group purchasing organizations and end-user customers, consistent with pharmaceutical industry practices. Settlement of rebates and administrative fees may generally occur from one to 15 months from the date of sale. We record a provision for rebates at the time of sale based on contracted rates and historical redemption rates. Assumptions used to establish the provision include level of wholesaler inventories, contract sales volumes and average contract pricing. We regularly review the information related to these estimates and adjust the provision accordingly.



14
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Returns, Refunds and Warranties

We base our sales returns allowance on estimated on-hand retail/hospital inventories, measured end-customer demand as reported by third-party sources, actual returns history and other factors, such as the trend experience for lots where product is still being returned or inventory centralization and rationalization initiatives conducted by major pharmacy chains, as applicable. If the historical data we use to calculate these estimates do not properly reflect future returns, then a change in the allowance would be made in the period in which such a determination is made and revenues in that period could be materially affected. Under this methodology, we track actual returns by individual production lots. Returns on closed lots, that is, lots no longer eligible for return credits, are analyzed to determine historical returns experience. Returns on open lots, that is, lots still eligible for return credits, are monitored and compared with historical return trend rates. Any changes from the historical trend rates are considered in determining the current sales return allowance. We do not provide warranties on our products to our customers unless the product is defective as manufactured or damaged in transit within a reasonable period of time after receipt of the product by the customer.

Sales Discounts

Sales discounts are based on payment terms extended to customers, which are generally offered as an incentive for prompt payment. We record our best estimate of sales discounts to which customers are likely to be entitled based on both historical information and current trends.

The reconciliation of gross product sales to net product sales by each significant category of gross-to-net adjustments was as follows:
 
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Gross Product Sales
 
$
4,530

 
$
3,808

 
$
8,777

 
$
7,243

Gross-to-Net Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Government Rebates
 
(269
)
 
(216
)
 
(560
)
 
(434
)
Chargebacks and Distributor Services Fees
 
(390
)
 
(282
)
 
(757
)
 
(508
)
Sales Discounts
 
(59
)
 
(48
)
 
(115
)
 
(90
)
Sales Returns and Allowances
 
(4
)
 
(3
)
 
(6
)
 
—

Total Gross-to-Net Adjustments
 
(722
)
 
(549
)
 
(1,438
)
 
(1,032
)
Net Product Sales
 
$
3,808

 
$
3,259

 
$
7,339

 
$
6,211



15
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Total revenues from external customers by our franchises (Hematology / Oncology and Inflammation & Immunology), product and geography for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017 were as follows:
 
 
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Hematology / Oncology:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REVLIMID®
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.
 
$
1,586

 
$
1,358

 
$
3,073

 
$
2,592

 
International
 
867

 
676

 
1,614

 
1,326

 
Worldwide
 
2,453

 
2,034

 
4,687

 
3,918

POMALYST®/IMNOVID®
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.
 
341

 
241

 
641

 
457

 
International
 
166

 
150

 
319

 
298

 
Worldwide
 
507

 
391

 
960

 
755

ABRAXANE®
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.
 
152

 
161

 
311

 
303

 
International
 
91

 
93

 
194

 
187

 
Worldwide
 
243

 
254

 
505

 
490

VIDAZA®
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.
 
3

 
2

 
5

 
4

 
International
 
159

 
154

 
314

 
310

 
Worldwide
 
162

 
156

 
319

 
314

All Other
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.
 
52

 
47

 
107

 
95

 
International
 
16

 
19

 
33

 
39

 
Worldwide
 
68

 
66

 
140

 
134

Total Hematology / Oncology:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.
 
2,134

 
1,809

 
4,137

 
3,451

 
International
 
1,299

 
1,092

 
2,474

 
2,160

 
Worldwide
 
$
3,433

 
$
2,901

 
$
6,611

 
$
5,611

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Inflammation & Immunology:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTEZLA®
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.
 
$
291

 
$
306

 
$
567

 
$
505

 
International
 
84

 
52

 
161

 
95

 
Worldwide
 
$
375

 
$
358

 
$
728

 
$
600

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total net product sales
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S.
 
$
2,425

 
$
2,115

 
$
4,704

 
$
3,956

 
International
 
1,383

 
1,144

 
2,635

 
2,255

 
Worldwide
 
$
3,808

 
$
3,259

 
$
7,339

 
$
6,211

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other revenue
 
 
6

 
12

 
13

 
22

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenue
 
 
$
3,814


$
3,271

 
$
7,352


$
6,233


3. Acquisitions

Acquisitions in Fiscal 2018:

Impact Biomedicines, Inc. (Impact): On February 12, 2018, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Impact, a privately held biotechnology company which was developing fedratinib, a highly selective JAK2 kinase inhibitor, for myelofibrosis.

The consideration included an initial payment of approximately $1.1 billion. In addition, the sellers of Impact are eligible to receive contingent consideration based upon regulatory approvals of up to $1.4 billion and contingent consideration of up to $4.5 billion based upon the achievement of sales in any four consecutive calendar quarters between $1.0 billion and $5.0 billion. The acquisition of Impact was concentrated in one single identifiable asset and thus, for accounting purposes, we have concluded that the acquired assets do not meet the accounting definition of a business. The initial payment was allocated primarily to fedratinib, resulting in a $1.1 billion research and development asset acquisition expense and the balance of approximately $7 million was allocated to the remaining net assets acquired.

16
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



Juno Therapeutics, Inc. (Juno): On March 6, 2018 (Acquisition Date), we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Juno, resulting in Juno becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary. Juno is developing CAR (chimeric antigen receptor) T and TCR (T cell receptor) therapeutics with a broad, novel portfolio evaluating multiple targets and cancer indications. The acquisition added a novel scientific platform and scalable manufacturing capabilities including JCAR017 and JCARH125, both directed CAR T therapeutics currently in programs for relapsed and/or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, respectively.

Total consideration for the acquisition was approximately $10.4 billion, consisting of $9.1 billion for common stock outstanding, $966 million for the fair value of our investment in Juno and $367 million for the portion of equity compensation attributable to the pre-combination service period. In addition, the fair value of the awards attributed to post-combination service period was $666 million, which will be recognized as compensation expense over the requisite service period in the post-combination financial statements of Celgene. We recognized $150 million and $400 million of post combination share-based compensation for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

The acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting which requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date and requires the fair value of acquired in-process research and development (IPR&D) to be classified as indefinite-lived assets until the successful completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. A preliminary purchase price allocation has been performed and the recorded amounts for intangible assets, goodwill and current and deferred tax assets and liabilities are subject to change pending finalization of valuation efforts and review of tax matters. During the second quarter of 2018, the Company recorded certain measurement period adjustments that were not material. The amounts recognized will be finalized as the information necessary to complete the analysis is obtained, but no later than one year after the acquisition date.

The total consideration for the acquisition of Juno was $10.4 billion, which consisted of the following:
 
Total Consideration
Cash paid for outstanding common stock at $87.00 per share
$
9,101

Celgene investment in Juno at $87.00 per share (1)
966

Cash for equity compensation attributable to pre-combination service (2)
367

Total consideration
$
10,434


(1) The Company recognized a gain of $458 million as a result of remeasuring to fair value the equity interest in Juno held by us before the business combination, which was recorded in Other income (expense), net within the Consolidated Statement of Income during the first quarter of 2018. See Note 1 for further information on the adoption of ASU 2016-01.

(2) All equity compensation attributable to pre-combination service was paid during the first quarter of 2018.


17
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in the following amounts being allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the Acquisition Date based upon their respective preliminary fair values summarized below:
 
Amounts Recognized as of the Acquisition Date (Provisional)
Working capital (1)
$
437

In-process research and development (IPR&D)
6,980

Technology platform intangible asset
1,260

Property, plant and equipment, net
144

Other non-current assets
46

Deferred tax liabilities, net
(1,530
)
Other non-current liabilities
(41
)
Total identifiable net assets
7,296

Goodwill
3,138

Total net assets acquired
$
10,434


(1)  Includes cash and cash equivalents, debt securities available-for-sale, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities (including accrued litigation). See Note 16 for litigation matters related to Juno.

The fair value assigned to acquired IPR&D was based on the present value of expected after-tax cash flows attributable to JCAR017, which is in a pivotal phase II trial and JCARH125. The present value of expected after-tax cash flows attributable to JCAR017 and JCARH125 assigned to IPR&D was determined by estimating the after-tax costs to complete development of JCAR017 and JCARH125 into commercially viable products, estimating future revenue and ongoing expenses to produce, support and sell JCAR017 and JCARH125, on an after-tax basis, and discounting the resulting net cash flows to present value. The revenue and costs projections used were reduced based on the probability that products at similar stages of development will become commercially viable products. The rate utilized to discount the net cash flows to their present value reflects the risk associated with the intangible asset and is benchmarked to the cost of equity. Acquired IPR&D will be accounted for as indefinite-lived intangible assets until regulatory approvals for JCAR017 and JCARH125 in a major market or discontinuation of development.

The excess of purchase price over the fair value amounts assigned to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed represents the goodwill amount resulting from the acquisition. The goodwill recorded as part of the acquisition is primarily attributable to the broadening of our product portfolio and research capabilities in the hematology and oncology therapeutic area, the assembled workforce and the deferred tax consequences of the IPR&D asset recorded for financial statement purposes. We do not expect any portion of this goodwill to be deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill attributable to the acquisition has been recorded as a non-current asset in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and is not amortized, but is subject to review for impairment annually.


18
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Juno actual results for the three-months ended June 30, 2018 and from the Acquisition Date through June 30, 2018, which are included in the Consolidated Statement of Income are as follows:
Classification in the Consolidated Statements of Income
Three-Months Ended June 30, 2018
 
Acquisition Date Through June 30, 2018
Other revenue
$
1

 
$
1

Research and development (1)
225

 
385

Selling, general and administrative (1)
79

 
210

Amortization of acquired intangible assets
21

 
28

Acquisition related charges (income) and restructuring, net (2)
27

 
49

Interest and investment income, net
3

 
3

Other income (expense), net
15

 
11

Income tax provision (benefit), net
(63
)
 
(83
)
Total
$
(270
)
 
$
(574
)

(1) Includes share-based compensation expense related to the post-combination service period of $100 million and $50 million, which was recorded in Research and development and Selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively, for the three-months ended June 30, 2018. Also includes share-based compensation expense related to the post-combination service period of $233 million and $167 million, which was recorded in Research and development and Selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively, for the period from the acquisition date through June 30, 2018.
(2) Consists of acquisition related compensation expense, transaction costs and the change in fair value of contingent consideration and success payment liabilities. In addition, Celgene incurred incremental acquisition costs related to Juno of nil and $41 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 respectively.

Pro Forma Financial Information:

The following table provides unaudited pro forma financial information for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 and the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 as if the acquisition of Juno had occurred on January 1, 2017.
 
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2017
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
Total revenue
 
$
7,362

 
$
6,234

 
$
3,272

Net income
 
1,805

 
1,495

 
994

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income per common share: basic
 
$
2.47

 
$
1.92

 
$
1.27

Net income per common share: diluted
 
$
2.40

 
$
1.84

 
$
1.22


The unaudited pro forma financial information was prepared using the acquisition method of accounting and was based on the historical financial information of Celgene and Juno. The supplemental pro forma financial information reflects primarily the following pro forma adjustments:

•
Elimination of research related cost sharing transactions between Celgene and Juno;
•
The pro forma financial information assumes that the acquisition related transaction fees and costs, including post combination share-based compensation related to the acquisition, were removed from the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and were assumed to have been incurred during the first quarter of 2017;
•
The pro forma financial information assumes that the gain recognized as a result of remeasuring to fair value the equity interest we held in Juno prior to the business combination was removed from the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 and was assumed to have been recognized during the first quarter of 2017;
•
Additional interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs for a portion of the $4.5 billion of debt that was issued in February 2018 to partially finance the acquisition;

19
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


•
Additional amortization expense on the acquired technology platform asset; and
•
Statutory tax rates were applied, as appropriate, to each pro forma adjustment based on the jurisdiction in which the adjustment occurred.

The unaudited pro forma results do not reflect any operating efficiencies or potential cost savings that may result from the combined operations of Celgene and Juno. Accordingly, these unaudited pro forma results are presented for illustrative purposes and are not intended to represent or be indicative of the actual results of operations of the combined company that would have been achieved had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of the period presented, nor are they intended to represent or be indicative of future results of operations.

Acquisitions in Fiscal 2017:

Delinia, Inc. (Delinia): On February 3, 2017, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Delinia, a privately held biotechnology company focused on developing novel therapeutics for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. The transaction expands our Inflammation and Immunology pipeline primarily through the acquisition of Delinia’s lead program, DEL-106, as well as related second generation programs. DEL-106 is a novel IL-2 mutein Fc fusion protein designed to preferentially upregulate regulatory T cells (Tregs), immune cells that are critical to maintaining natural self-tolerance and immune system homeostasis.

The consideration included an initial payment of $302 million. In addition, the sellers of Delinia are eligible to receive up to $475 million in contingent development, regulatory and commercial milestones. The acquisition did not include any significant processes and thus, for accounting purposes, we have concluded that the acquired assets did not meet the definition of a business. The initial payment was allocated primarily to the DEL-106 program, resulting in a $300 million research and development asset acquisition expense and approximately $2 million of net assets acquired.

Other acquisitions: In addition, during the first quarter of 2017, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of a privately held biotechnology company for total initial consideration of $26 million. The sellers are also eligible to receive up to $210 million in contingent development and regulatory approval milestones. The acquisition did not include any significant processes and thus, for accounting purposes, we have concluded that the acquired assets did not meet the definition of a business. The consideration transferred resulted in a $25 million research and development asset acquisition expense and $1 million of net assets acquired. 

4. Earnings Per Share
 
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
(Amounts in millions, except per share)
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Net income
$
1,045

 
$
1,101

 
$
1,891

 
$
2,033

Weighted-average shares:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
716.1

 
780.4

 
732.1

 
779.7

Effect of dilutive securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Options, restricted stock units, performance-based restricted stock units and other
16.5

 
31.3

 
18.5

 
31.8

Diluted
732.6

 
811.7

 
750.6

 
811.5

Net income per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
1.46

 
$
1.41

 
$
2.58

 
$
2.61

Diluted
$
1.43

 
$
1.36

 
$
2.52

 
$
2.51

 
The total number of potential shares of common stock excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive was 45.6 million and 21.4 million shares for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and 41.3 million and 22.0 million shares for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Share Repurchase Program: In February and May 2018, our Board of Directors approved increases of $5.0 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively to our authorized share repurchase program, bringing the total amount authorized since April 2009 to $28.5 billion of our common stock. As part of the existing Board authorized share repurchase program, in May 2018, we entered into an Accelerated Share Repurchase (ASR) agreement with a bank to repurchase an aggregate of $2.0 billion of our common stock. As part of the ASR agreement, we received an initial delivery of approximately 18.0 million shares, which is included in Common

20
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


stock in treasury in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2018, at a cost of approximately $1.4 billion.  The initial delivery reduced our outstanding shares used to determine our weighted average shares outstanding for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share.  The remaining $600 million was included in Additional paid-in capital in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2018. The total number of shares that will ultimately be repurchased under the ASR agreement will be determined upon final settlement, which we anticipate will be in the third quarter of 2018 and will be based on a discount to the volume-weighted average price of our common stock during the ASR period. We have evaluated the ASR agreement for its potential dilution of earnings per share and determined that the additional shares to be received upon final settlement would have had an anti-dilutive effect and as a result, these shares were not included in our weighted average diluted earnings per share calculation.
 
As part of the management of our share repurchase program, we may, from time to time, sell put options on our common stock with strike prices that we believe represent an attractive price to purchase our shares. If the trading price of our shares exceeds the strike price of the put option at the time the option expires, we will have economically reduced the cost of our share repurchase program by the amount of the premium we received from the sale of the put option. If the trading price of our stock is below the strike price of the put option at the time the option expires, we would purchase the shares covered by the option at the strike price of the put option. During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, there were no gains or losses from the sale of put options. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had no outstanding put options.

We have purchased 32.8 million and 61.8 million shares of common stock under the share repurchase program from all sources at a total cost of $2.7 billion and $5.4 billion during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively. As of June 30, 2018, we had a remaining share repurchase authorization of $2.8 billion.


5. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

During the third quarter of 2017, we adopted ASU 2017-12 on a modified retrospective basis. As a result of applying the new guidance during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017, we recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $30 million to decrease AOCI as of the beginning of fiscal year 2017 and adjustments to pre-tax income of $48 million and $37 million, respectively for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 with corresponding decreases to AOCI. As such, certain disclosures for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 below have been recast to conform to the disclosure requirements related to the adoption of ASU 2017-12. See Note 1 for additional information related to the adoption of ASU 2017-12.

The components of other comprehensive income (loss) consist of changes in pension liability, changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on debt securities available-for-sale and equity investments with readily determinable fair values in 2017 and debt securities available-for-sale in 2018, net unrealized gains (losses) related to cash flow hedges, the amortization of the excluded component related to cash flow hedges and changes in foreign currency translation adjustments.


21
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The accumulated balances related to each component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, are summarized as follows:
 
Pension
Liability
Adjustment
 
Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses) On
Available-for-Sale Debt Securities / Marketable Securities (1)
 
Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
Related to Cash Flow Hedges
 
Amortization of Excluded Component Related to Cash Flow Hedges (See Note 1)
 
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
 

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Balance as of December 31, 2017
$
(22
)
 
$
562

 
$
(206
)
 
$
(15
)
 
$
(32
)
 
$
287

Cumulative effect adjustment for the adoption of ASU 2016-01 and ASU 2018-02 (See Note 1)
—

 
(566
)
 
(4
)
 
—

 
—

 
(570
)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications, net of tax
—

 
(7
)
 
128

 
(15
)
 
(12
)
 
94

Reclassified losses (gains) from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
—

 
14

 
39

 
17

 
—

 
70

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
—

 
7


167

 
2


(12
)

164

Balance as of June 30, 2018
$
(22
)
 
$
3


$
(43
)
 
$
(13
)

$
(44
)

$
(119
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 


Balance as of December 31, 2016
$
(38
)
 
$
144

 
$
415

 
$
—

 
$
(102
)
 
$
419

Cumulative effect adjustment for the adoption of ASU 2017-12
—

 
—

 
(12
)
 
(18
)
 
—

 
(30
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax
—

 
148

 
(259
)
 
(5
)
 
41

 
(75
)
Reclassified losses (gains) from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
—

 
21

 
(165
)
 
—

 
—

 
(144
)
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
—

 
169


(424
)
 
(5
)

41

 
(219
)
Balance as of June 30, 2017
$
(38
)
 
$
313


$
(21
)
 
$
(23
)

$
(61
)
 
$
170


(1) Balances as of December 31, 2017 are prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-01 and, as such, include equity securities with readily determinable fair values. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-01, we recorded a cumulative effect adjustment for our net unrealized gains related to our equity securities with readily determinable fair values as of January 1, 2018. Therefore, the unrealized gains (losses) position as of June 30, 2018 solely relate to debt securities available-for-sale. See Note 1 for further information related to the adoption of ASU 2016-01.


22
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


 
 
 
 
Gains (Losses) Reclassified Out of Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components
 
Classification in the
Consolidated Statements of Income
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
(Losses) gains related to cash-flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange contracts
 
Net product sales
 
$
(12
)
 
$
81

 
$
(38
)
 
$
167

Treasury rate lock agreements
 
Interest (expense)
 
(1
)
 
(2
)
 
(2
)
 
(3
)
Interest rate swap agreements
 
Interest (expense)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(1
)
 
 
Income tax provision - (expense) benefit
 
1

 
1

 
1

 
2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Excluded component related to cash-flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange contracts
 
Net product sales
 
1

 
3

 
(2
)
 
5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Losses) gains on available-for-sale debt securities / marketable securities (1):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Realized (loss) gain on sales of debt securities / marketable securities
 
Interest and investment income, net
 
—

 
(34
)
 
(18
)
 
(34
)
 
 
Income tax provision - (expense) benefit
 
—

 
13

 
4

 
13

Total reclassification, net of tax
 
 
 
$
(11
)
 
$
62

 
$
(55
)
 
$
149


(1) (Losses) gains reclassified out of Accumulated other comprehensive income prior to December 31, 2017 are prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-01 and, as such, include equity securities with readily determinable fair values. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-01, we recorded a cumulative effect adjustment for our net unrealized gains related to our equity securities with readily determinable fair values as of January 1, 2018. Therefore, unrealized gains (losses) for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 solely relate to debt securities available-for-sale. See Note 1 for further information related to the adoption of ASU 2016-01.

6. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement

The tables below present information about assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 and the valuation techniques we utilized to determine such fair value.
•
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Our level 1 assets consist of debt securities available-for-sale and equity investments with readily determinable fair values. Our level 1 liability relates to our publicly traded contingent value rights (CVRs). See Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of the CVRs.
•
Level 2 inputs utilize observable quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and observable quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not very active. From time to time, our level 2 assets consist of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS), global corporate debt securities, asset backed securities, ultra short income fund investments, time deposits and repurchase agreements with original maturities of greater than three months, foreign currency forward contracts, purchased foreign currency options and interest rate swap contracts. Our level 2 liabilities relate to written foreign currency options, foreign currency forward contracts and interest rate swap contracts.
•
Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable inputs and include valuations of assets or liabilities for which there is little, if any, market activity. We do not have any level 3 assets. Our level 3 liabilities consist of contingent consideration related to undeveloped product rights and technology platforms resulting from the acquisitions of Gloucester Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Gloucester), Nogra Pharma Limited (Nogra), Avila Therapeutics, Inc. (Avila) and Quanticel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Quanticel). In addition, in connection with our acquisition of Juno in the first quarter of 2018, we assumed Juno's contingent consideration and success payment liabilities.

Our contingent consideration obligations are recorded at their estimated fair values and we revalue these obligations each reporting period until the related contingencies are resolved. The fair value measurements are estimated using probability-weighted discounted cash flow approaches that are based on significant unobservable inputs related to product candidates acquired in business

23
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


combinations and are reviewed quarterly. These inputs include, as applicable, estimated probabilities and timing of achieving specified development and regulatory milestones, estimated annual sales and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of estimated future payments. Significant changes which increase or decrease the probabilities of achieving the related development and regulatory events, shorten or lengthen the time required to achieve such events, or increase or decrease estimated annual sales would result in corresponding increases or decreases in the fair values of these obligations. The fair value of our contingent consideration as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was calculated using the following significant unobservable inputs:
Inputs
Ranges (weighted average) utilized as of:
June 30, 2018
December 31, 2017
Discount rate
2.5% to 4.0% (3.2%)
2.7% to 12.0% (3.5%)
Probability of payment
0% to 68% (4.6%)
0% to 20% (4%)
Projected year of payment for development and regulatory milestones
2020 to 2029 (2023)
2020 to 2029 (2024)
Projected year of payment for sales-based milestones and other amounts calculated as a percentage of annual sales
N/A
2024 to 2030 (2028)

The maximum remaining potential payments related to the contingent consideration from the acquisitions of Gloucester, Avila, Quanticel and those assumed in our acquisition of Juno are estimated to be approximately $120 million, $475 million, $214 million and $296 million, respectively, and $1.8 billion plus other amounts calculated as a percentage of annual sales pursuant to the license agreement with Nogra.

Success payment obligations assumed through our acquisition of Juno are also recorded at their estimated fair values and are revalued quarterly. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration and success payment obligations are recognized in Acquisition related charges (income) and restructuring, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2016-01. Among other provisions, the new standard required modifications to existing presentation and disclosure requirements on a prospective basis. Certain disclosures as of December 31, 2017 below conform to the disclosure requirements of ASU 2016-01. See Note 1 for additional information related to the adoption of ASU 2016-01.

The following tables present the Company's hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements
as of June 30, 2018
 
Balance as of
June 30, 2018
 
Quoted Price in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt securities available-for-sale
$
79

 
$
—

 
$
79

 
$
—

Equity investments with readily determinable fair values
1,828

 
1,828

 
—

 
—

Forward currency contracts
27

 
—

 
27

 
—

Purchased currency options

33

 
—

 
33

 
—

Total assets
$
1,967

 
$
1,828

 
$
139

 
$
—

Liabilities:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Contingent value rights
$
(18
)
 
$
(18
)
 
$
—

 
$
—

Interest rate swaps
(27
)
 
—

 
(27
)
 
—

Written currency options
(81
)
 
—

 
(81
)
 
—

Other acquisition related contingent consideration and success payments
(193
)
 
—

 
—

 
(193
)
Total liabilities
$
(319
)
 
$
(18
)
 
$
(108
)
 
$
(193
)



24
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)





 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements
as of December 31, 2017
 
Balance as of December 31, 2017
 
Quoted Price in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Debt securities available-for-sale
$
3,219

 
$
—

 
$
3,219

 
$
—

Equity investments with readily determinable fair values
1,810

 
1,810

 
—

 
—

Purchased currency options
36

 
—

 
36

 
—

Total assets
$
5,065

 
$
1,810

 
$
3,255

 
$
—

Liabilities:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Contingent value rights
$
(42
)
 
$
(42
)
 
$
—

 
$
—

Forward currency contracts
(42
)
 
—

 
(42
)
 
—

Interest rate swaps
(7
)
 
—

 
(7
)
 
—

Written currency options
(172
)
 
—

 
(172
)
 
—

Other acquisition related contingent consideration
(80
)
 
—

 
—

 
(80
)
Total liabilities
$
(343
)
 
$
(42
)
 
$
(221
)
 
$
(80
)

As of result of the implementation of ASU 2016-01 and ASU 2018-03, effective on January 1, 2018, we measure equity investments without a readily determinable fair value at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for an identical or similar investment of the same issuer or at NAV, as a practical expedient, if available. We record upward adjustments, downward adjustments and impairments of equity investments without readily determinable fair values within Other income (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The following table represents a roll-forward of equity investments without readily determinable fair values:

 
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018
Balance as of December 31, 2017
$
513

Cumulative effect adjustment for the adoption of ASU 2018-03 (See Note 1)
59

Purchases
46

Upward adjustments
32

Sales
(23
)
Downward adjustments
(1
)
Impairments
(1
)
Transfer to readily determinable fair value
(20
)
Balance as of June 30, 2018
$
605


For equity investments with and without readily determinable fair values held as of June 30, 2018, we recorded a net unrealized loss of $11 million and a net unrealized gain of $435 million within Other income (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively.


25
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


There were no security transfers between levels 1, 2 and 3 during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. The following table represents a roll-forward of the fair value of level 3 instruments: 
 
 
Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018
Liabilities:
 
 
Balance as of March 31, 2018
 
$
(201
)
Amounts acquired from Juno, including measurement period adjustments
 
6

Settlements, including transfers to Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
2

  Balance as of June 30, 2018
 
$
(193
)

 
 
Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2017
Liabilities:
 
 
Balance as of March 31, 2017
 
$
(1,527
)
Net change in fair value
 
20

Settlements, including transfers to Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
19

  Balance as of June 30, 2017
 
$
(1,488
)

There were no security transfers between levels 1, 2 and 3 during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. The following table represents a roll-forward of the fair value of level 3 instruments: 

 
 
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018
Liabilities:
 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2017
 
$
(80
)
Amounts acquired from Juno, including measurement period adjustments
 
(116
)
Net change in fair value
 
1

Settlements, including transfers to Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
2

  Balance as of June 30, 2018
 
$
(193
)

 
 
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2017
Liabilities:
 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2016
 
$
(1,490
)
Net change in fair value
 
(17
)
Settlements, including transfers to Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
19

  Balance as of June 30, 2017
 
$
(1,488
)

As previously reported in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we reduced our contingent consideration liabilities related to Nogra by $1,397 million due to the discontinuance of the GED-0301 phase III REVOLVE (CD-002) trial in Crohn's disease and the SUSTAIN (CD-004) extension trial in the fourth quarter of 2017.

7. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
During the third quarter of 2017, we adopted ASU 2017-12 on a modified retrospective basis. We recorded pre-tax income of $48 million and $37 million for the three- and six-month period ended June 30, 2017 as a result of applying the new guidance during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017. As such, certain disclosures for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 below have been recast to conform to the disclosure requirements related to the adoption of ASU 2017-12. See Note 1 for additional information related to the adoption of ASU 2017-12.


26
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Our revenue and earnings, cash flows and fair values of assets and liabilities can be impacted by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. We actively manage the impact of foreign exchange rate and interest rate movements through operational means and through the use of various financial instruments, including derivative instruments such as foreign currency option contracts, foreign currency forward contracts, treasury rate lock agreements and interest rate swap contracts. In instances where these financial instruments are accounted for as cash flow hedges or fair value hedges we may from time to time terminate the hedging relationship. If a hedging relationship is terminated, we generally either settle the instrument or enter into an offsetting instrument.

Foreign Currency Risk Management

We maintain a foreign exchange exposure management program to mitigate the impact of volatility in foreign exchange rates on future foreign currency cash flows, translation of foreign earnings and changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.

Through our revenue hedging program, we endeavor to reduce the impact of possible unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates on our future U.S. Dollar cash flows that are derived from foreign currency denominated sales. To achieve this objective, we hedge a portion of our forecasted foreign currency denominated sales that are expected to occur in the foreseeable future, typically within the next three years, with a maximum of five years. We manage our anticipated transaction exposure principally with foreign currency forward contracts, a combination of foreign currency put and call options, and occasionally purchased foreign currency put options.
 
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts: We use foreign currency forward contracts to hedge specific forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies, manage exchange rate volatility in the translation of foreign earnings, and reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.

We manage a portfolio of foreign currency forward contracts to protect against changes in anticipated foreign currency cash flows resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily associated with non-functional currency denominated revenues and expenses of foreign subsidiaries. The foreign currency forward hedging contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 had settlement dates within 36 months and 20 months, respectively. The spot rate components of these foreign currency forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and any unrealized gains or losses are reported in OCI and reclassified to the Consolidated Statement of Income in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings. If a hedging relationship is terminated with respect to a foreign currency forward contract, accumulated gains or losses associated with the contract remain in OCI until the hedged forecasted transaction occurs and are reclassified to operations in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings. We recognize in earnings the initial value of the forward point components on a straight-line basis over the life of the derivative instrument within the same line item in the Consolidated Statements of Income that is used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item.

Foreign currency forward contracts entered into to hedge forecasted revenue and expenses were as follows as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
 
 
Notional Amount
Foreign Currency
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Australian Dollar
 
$
46

 
$
61

British Pound
 
134

 
97

Canadian Dollar
 
190

 
227

Euro
 
962

 
954

Japanese Yen
 
508

 
356

Total
 
$
1,840

 
$
1,695

 
 We consider the impact of our own and the counterparties’ credit risk on the fair value of the contracts as well as the ability of each party to execute its obligations under the contract on an ongoing basis. As of June 30, 2018, credit risk did not materially change the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts.
 
We also manage a portfolio of foreign currency contracts to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain recognized assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and, from time to time, we enter into foreign currency contracts to manage exposure related to translation of foreign earnings. These foreign currency forward contracts have not been designated as hedges

27
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


and, accordingly, any changes in their fair value are recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Income in Other income (expense), net in the current period. The aggregate notional amount of the foreign currency forward non-designated hedging contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were $748 million and $885 million, respectively.

Foreign Currency Option Contracts: From time to time, we may hedge a portion of our future foreign currency exposure by utilizing a strategy that involves both a purchased local currency put option and a written local currency call option that are accounted for as hedges of future sales denominated in that local currency. Specifically, we sell (or write) a local currency call option and purchase a local currency put option with the same expiration dates and local currency notional amounts but with different strike prices. This combination of transactions is generally referred to as a “collar.” The expiration dates and notional amounts correspond to the amount and timing of forecasted foreign currency sales. The foreign currency option contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 had settlement dates within 30 months and 36 months, respectively. If the U.S. Dollar weakens relative to the currency of the hedged anticipated sales, the purchased put option value reduces to zero and we benefit from the increase in the U.S. Dollar equivalent value of our anticipated foreign currency cash flows; however, this benefit would be capped at the strike level of the written call, which forms the upper end of the collar. The premium collected from the sale of the call option is equal to the premium paid for the purchased put option, resulting in a net zero cost for each collar.

Outstanding foreign currency option contracts entered into to hedge forecasted revenue were as follows as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
 
Notional Amount (1)
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Foreign currency option contracts designated as hedging activity:
 
 
 
Purchased Put
$
2,756

 
$
3,319

Written Call
3,131

 
3,739

(1) U.S. Dollar notional amounts are calculated as the hedged local currency amount multiplied by the strike value of the foreign currency option. The local currency notional amounts of our purchased put and written call that are designated as hedging activities are equal to each other.
We also have entered into foreign currency put option contracts to hedge forecasted revenue which were not part of a collar strategy. Such put option contracts had a notional amount of $129 million and $258 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, and settlement dates within 6 months and 12 months, respectively.
Interest Rate Risk Management
Forward Starting Interest Rate Swaps and Treasury Rate Locks: In anticipation of issuing fixed-rate debt, we may use forward starting interest rate swaps (forward starting swaps) or treasury rate lock agreements (treasury rate locks) that are designated as cash flow hedges to hedge against changes in interest rates that could impact expected future issuances of debt. To the extent these hedges of cash flows related to anticipated debt are effective, any realized or unrealized gains or losses on the forward starting swaps or treasury rate locks are reported in OCI and are recognized in income over the life of the anticipated fixed-rate notes. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we did not have any outstanding forward starting swaps or treasury rate locks.

Interest Rate Swap Contracts: From time to time we hedge the fair value of certain debt obligations through the use of interest rate swap contracts. The interest rate swap contracts are designated hedges of the fair value changes in the notes attributable to changes in benchmark interest rates. Gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value of the underlying debt attributable to the hedged benchmark interest rate risk are recorded on the Consolidated Statement of Income within Interest (expense) with an associated offset to the carrying value of the notes recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Since the specific terms and notional amount of the swap are intended to match those of the debt being hedged all changes in fair value of the swap are recorded on the Consolidated Statement of Income within Interest (expense) with an associated offset to the derivative asset or liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Consequently, there is no net impact recorded in income. Any net interest payments made or received on interest rate swap contracts are recognized as interest expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. If a hedging relationship is terminated for an interest rate swap contract, accumulated gains or losses associated with the contract are measured and recorded as a reduction or increase of current and future interest expense associated with the previously hedged debt obligations.


28
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The following table summarizes the notional amounts of our outstanding interest rate swap contracts as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017: 
 
Notional Amount
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Interest rate swap contracts entered into as fair value hedges of the following fixed-rate senior notes:
 
 
 
3.875% senior notes due 2025
$
200

 
$
200

3.450% senior notes due 2027
550

 
250

3.900% senior notes due 2028
200

 
—

Total
$
950

 
$
450


We have entered into swap contracts that were designated as hedges of certain of our fixed rate notes in 2018 and 2017, and also terminated the hedging relationship by settling certain of those swap contracts during 2018 and 2017. In 2018, we settled $150 million notional amount of certain swap contracts. There were no material cash proceeds as a result of settling such swap contracts. During 2017, we terminated the hedging relationship on certain outstanding swap contracts amounting to $200 million notional amount by settling such swap contracts. The settlement of swap contracts resulted in the receipt of net proceeds of $3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, which are accounted for as a reduction of current and future interest expense associated with these notes. See Note 11 for additional details related to reductions of current and future interest expense.

The following tables summarize the fair value and presentation in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for derivative instruments as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
 
 
 
 
June 30, 2018
 
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Fair Value
Instrument
 
 
Asset
Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
Foreign exchange contracts (1)
 
Other current assets
 
$
56

 
$
29

 
 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
4

 
10

 
 
Other non-current assets
 
4

 
—

 
 
Other non-current liabilities
 
34

 
68

Interest rate swap agreements
 
Other current assets
 
7

 
—

 
 
Other non-current liabilities
 
—

 
36

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
Foreign exchange contracts (1)
 
Other current assets
 
25

 
3

 
 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
3

 
37

Interest rate swap agreements
 
Other current assets
 
2

 
1

 
 
Other non-current assets
 
7

 
6

Total
 
 
 
$
142

 
$
190


(1) Derivative instruments in this category are subject to master netting arrangements and are presented on a net basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in accordance with ASC 210-20.

29
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


 
 
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
Fair Value
Instrument
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
Asset Derivatives
 
Liability Derivatives
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange contracts (1)
 
Other current assets
 
$
5

 
$
1

 
 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
30

 
79

 
 
Other non-current assets
 
1

 
—

 
 
Other non-current liabilities
 
36

 
159

Interest rate swap agreements
 
Other current assets
 
3

 
—

 
 
Other non-current liabilities
 
—

 
11

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
Foreign exchange contracts (1)
 
Other current assets
 
8

 
1

 
 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
 
4

 
22

Interest rate swap agreements
 
Other current assets
 
2

 
2

 
 
Other non-current assets
 
4

 
3

Total
 
 
 
$
93

 
$
278


(1) Derivative instruments in this category are subject to master netting arrangements and are presented on a net basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in accordance with ASC 210-20.

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the following amounts were recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet related to cumulative basis adjustments for fair value hedges:
 
 
Carrying Amount of the Hedged Liability
 
Cumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of the Hedged Liability
Consolidated Balance Sheet Classification in Which the Hedged Item Is Included
 
June 30, 2018 (1)
 
December 31, 2017 (1)
 
June 30, 2018 (2)
 
December 31, 2017 (2)
Current portion of long-term debt, net of discount
 
$
503

 
$
—

 
$
4

 
$
—

Long-term debt, net of discount
 
8,173

 
7,270

 
84

 
128


(1) The current portion of long-term debt, net of discount includes approximately $503 million of carrying value with discontinued hedging relationships at June 30, 2018. The long-term debt, net of discount includes approximately $3.2 billion and $3.8 billion of carrying value with discontinued hedging relationships as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

(2) The current portion of long-term debt, net of discount includes $4 million of discontinued hedging relationships at June 30, 2018. The long-term debt, net of discount includes $120 million and $139 million of hedging adjustment on discontinued hedging relationships on long-term debt as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

The following tables summarize the effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedging instruments in Accumulated OCI for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018
Instrument
Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in OCI
on Derivative (1), (2)
 
Classification of
Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
into Income
 
Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
into Income
 
Classification of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income Related to Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
 
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative Related to Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
Foreign exchange contracts
$
226

 
Net product sales
 
$
(12
)
 
Net product sales
 
$
1

Treasury rate lock agreements
—

 
Interest (expense)
 
(1
)
 
N/A
 
—



30
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


(1) Net losses of $7 million are expected to be reclassified from Accumulated OCI into income in the next 12 months.

(2) For the three-month period ended June 30, 2018, the straight-line amortization of the initial value of the amount excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness for our foreign exchange contracts recognized in OCI was a gain of $1 million. There were no excluded components for our treasury rate lock and interest rate swap agreements.
 
 
Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2017
Instrument
 
Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in OCI
on Derivative
 
Classification of
Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
into Income
 
Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
into Income
 
Classification of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income Related to Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
 
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative Related to Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
Foreign exchange contracts
 
$
(181
)
 
Net product sales
 
$
81

 
Net product sales
 
$
3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income (expense), net
 
1

Treasury rate lock agreements
 
—

 
Interest (expense)
 
(2
)
 
N/A
 
—

Forward starting interest rate swaps
 
(17
)
 
Interest (expense)
 
—

 
N/A
 
—

 
The following tables summarize the effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedging instruments in Accumulated OCI for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018
Instrument
Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in OCI
on Derivative (1), (2)
 
Classification of
Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
into Income
 
Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
into Income
 
Classification of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income Related to Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
 
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative Related to Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
Foreign exchange contracts
$
131

 
Net product sales
 
$
(38
)
 
Net product sales
 
$
(2
)
Treasury rate lock agreements
(4
)
 
Interest (expense)
 
(2
)
 
Other income (expense), net
 
—


(1) Net losses of $7 million are expected to be reclassified from Accumulated OCI into income in the next 12 months.

(2) For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, the straight-line amortization of the initial value of the amount excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness for our foreign exchange contracts recognized in OCI was a loss of $2 million. There were no excluded components for our treasury rate lock and interest rate swap agreements.
 
 
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2017
Instrument
 
Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in OCI
on Derivative
 
Classification of
Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
into Income
 
Amount of
Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
into Income
 
Classification of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income Related to Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
 
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative Related to Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing
Foreign exchange contracts
 
$
(249
)
 
Net product sales
 
$
167

 
Net product sales
 
$
5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other income (expense), net
 
8

Treasury rate lock agreements
 
—

 
Interest (expense)
 
(3
)
 
N/A
 
—

Forward starting interest rate swaps
 
(17
)
 
Interest (expense)
 
(1
)
 
N/A
 
—



31
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


(1) For the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, the straight-line amortization of the initial value of the amount excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness for our foreign exchange contracts recognized in OCI was a gain of $5 million. There were no excluded components for our treasury rate lock and interest rate swap agreements.

The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments which were designated as fair value hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
 
 
Amount of (Loss)/Gain Recognized in
Income on Derivative
 
 
 
 
Three-Month Periods Ended
June 30,
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
Instrument
 
Classification of (Loss)/Gain Recognized in Income on Derivative
 
2018 (1)
 
2017 (1)
 
2018 (1)
 
2017 (1)
Interest rate swap agreements
 
Interest (expense)
 
$
(2
)
 
$
11

 
$
(7
)
 
$
20


(1) The amounts include a benefit of $8 million and $9 million for the three-month periods ending June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively and a benefit of $16 million and $18 million for the six-months periods ending June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, relating to the amortization of the cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount of the hedged liability for discontinued hedging relationships.

The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
 
 
Classification of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
 
 
 
 
Three-Month Periods Ended
June 30,
 
Six-Month Periods Ended
June 30,
Instrument
 
Classification of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Foreign exchange contracts
 
Other income (expense), net
 
$
22

 
$
(19
)
 
$
9

 
$
(42
)
 
The impact of gains and losses on foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments related to changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are generally offset by net foreign exchange gains and losses, which are also included on the Consolidated Statements of Income in Other income (expense), net for all periods presented. When we enter into foreign exchange contracts not designated as hedging instruments to mitigate the impact of exchange rate volatility in the translation of foreign earnings, gains and losses will generally be offset by fluctuations in the U.S. Dollar translated amounts of each Income Statement account in current and/or future periods. 

32
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


 
 
 
 
 
Classification and Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
 
 
 
 
 
Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
Net product sales
 
Interest (expense)
 
Other income (expense), net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total amounts of income and expense line items presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income in which the effects of fair value or cash flow hedges are recorded
 
$
3,808

 
$
(192
)
 
$
4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The effects of fair value and cash flow hedging:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) on fair value hedging relationships
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap agreements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hedged items
 
—

 
11

 
—

 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments (1)
 
—

 
(2
)
 
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
 
(12
)
 
—

 
—

 
 
 
Amount excluded from effectiveness testing recognized using a systematic and rational amortization approach / changes in fair value
 
7

 
—

 
—

 
 
 
Reclassification adjustment for excluded component (loss) gain
 
(6
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Treasury rate lock agreements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
 
—

 
(1
)
 
—


(1) The amounts include a benefit of $8 million relating to the amortization of the cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount of the hedged liability for discontinued hedging relationships for the three-month period ending June 30, 2018.

 
 
 
 
 
Classification and Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
 
 
 
 
 
Three-Month Period Ended June 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
Net product sales
 
Interest (expense)
 
Other income (expense), net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total amounts of income and expense line items presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income in which the effects of fair value or cash flow hedges are recorded
 
$
3,259

 
$
(126
)
 
$
(31
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The effects of fair value and cash flow hedging:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) on fair value hedging relationships
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap agreements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hedged items
 
—

 
(2
)
 
—

 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments (1)
 
—

 
11

 
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
 
81

 
—

 
—

 
 
 
Amount excluded from effectiveness testing recognized using a systematic and rational amortization approach / changes in fair value
 
3

 
—

 
1

 
 
Treasury rate lock agreements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
 
—

 
(2
)
 
—


(1) The amounts include a benefit of $9 million relating to the amortization of the cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount of the hedged liability for discontinued hedging relationships for the three-month period ending June 30, 2017.



33
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


 
 
 
 
 
Classification and Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
 
 
 
 
 
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
Net product sales
 
Interest (expense)
 
Other income (expense), net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total amounts of income and expense line items presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income in which the effects of fair value or cash flow hedges are recorded
 
$
7,339

 
$
(358
)
 
$
969

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The effects of fair value and cash flow hedging:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) on fair value hedging relationships
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap agreements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hedged items
 
—

 
25

 
—

 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments (1)
 
—

 
(7
)
 
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
 
(38
)
 
—

 
—

 
 
 
Amount excluded from effectiveness testing recognized using a systematic and rational amortization approach / changes in fair value
 
15

 
—

 
—

 
 
 
Reclassification adjustment for excluded component (loss) gain
 
(17
)
 
—

 
—

 
 
Treasury rate lock agreements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
 
—

 
(2
)
 
—


(1) The amounts include a benefit of $16 million relating to the amortization of the cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount of the hedged liability for discontinued hedging relationships for the six-month period ending June 30, 2018.






34
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


 
 
 
 
 
Classification and Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Fair Value and Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
 
 
 
 
 
Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
Net product sales
 
Interest (expense)
 
Other income (expense), net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total amounts of income and expense line items presented in the Consolidated Statements of Income in which the effects of fair value or cash flow hedges are recorded
 
$
6,211

 
$
(253
)
 
$
(18
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The effects of fair value and cash flow hedging:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) on fair value hedging relationships
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap agreements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hedged items
 
—

 
(1
)
 
—

 
 
 
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments (1)
 
—

 
20

 
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedging relationships
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange contracts:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
 
167

 
—

 
—

 
 
 
Amount excluded from effectiveness testing recognized using a systematic and rational amortization approach / changes in fair value
 
5

 
—

 
8

 
 
Treasury rate lock agreements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
 
—

 
(3
)
 
—

 
 
Interest rate swap agreements:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amount of gain or (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income
 
—

 
(1
)
 
—


(1) The amounts include a benefit of $18 million relating to the amortization of the cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount of the hedged liability for discontinued hedging relationships for the six-month period ending June 30, 2017.

8. Cash, Cash Equivalents, Debt Securities Available-for-Sale and Equity Investments with Readily Determinable Fair Values
 
Time deposits, repurchase agreements, and commercial paper instruments with original maturities less than three months and money market funds are included in Cash and cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2018, the carrying value of our time deposits and repurchase agreements was $11 million and money market funds was $507 million, all of which are included in Cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2017, the carrying value of our time deposits and repurchase agreements was $1.2 billion, commercial paper instruments was $35 million, and money market funds was $4.5 billion, all of which were included in Cash and cash equivalents. The carrying values approximated fair value as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2016-01. Among other provisions, the new standard required modifications to existing presentation and disclosure requirements on a prospective basis. As such, certain disclosures as of December 31, 2017 below conform to the disclosure requirements prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-01. See Note 1 for additional information related to the adoption of ASU 2016-01.

The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains, gross unrealized holding losses and estimated fair value of debt securities available-for-sale by major security type and class of security and equity investments with readily determinable fair values as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were as follows:
June 30, 2018
 
Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized Gain
 
Gross Unrealized Loss
 
Estimated Fair Value
Time deposits (1) and Repurchase agreements (1)
 
$
79

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
79

Total debt securities available-for-sale
 
$
79

 
$
—

 
$
—


$
79

 

35
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


December 31, 2017
 
Amortized Cost
 
Gross Unrealized Gain
 
Gross Unrealized Loss
 
Estimated Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities
 
$
445

 
$
—

 
$
(3
)
 
$
442

U.S. government-sponsored agency securities
 
42

 
—

 
—

 
42

U.S. government-sponsored agency MBS
 
17

 
—

 
—

 
17

Corporate debt - global
 
2,080

 
—

 
(5
)
 
2,075

Asset backed securities
 
203

 
—

 
(1
)
 
202

Ultra short income fund
 
352

 
—

 
—

 
352

Time deposits (1) and Repurchase agreements (1)
 
89

 
—

 
—

 
89

Total debt securities available-for-sale
 
$
3,228

 
$
—


$
(9
)

$
3,219

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity securities with readily determinable fair values
 
$
935

 
$
881

 
$
(6
)
 
$
1,810

(1) Have original maturities of greater than three months.

U.S. Treasury securities include government debt instruments issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. U.S. government-sponsored agency securities include general unsecured obligations either issued directly by or guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored enterprises. U.S. government-sponsored agency MBS include mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association. Corporate debt-global includes obligations issued by investment-grade corporations, including some issues that have been guaranteed by governments and government agencies. Asset backed securities consist of triple-A rated securities with cash flows collateralized by credit card receivables and auto loans. Ultra short income fund includes investments in certificates of deposit, repurchase agreements, commercial paper and corporate notes. Time deposits and repurchase agreements in the tables above have original maturities greater than three months. Our repurchase agreements are collateralized by U.S. government securities, cash, bonds, commercial paper and bank certificates of deposit. As of June 30, 2018, all of our time deposits and repurchase agreements had original maturities less than one year.

Equity securities with readily determinable fair values, which consist of investments in publicly traded equity securities, were $1,828 million as of June 30, 2018.

Duration periods of available-for-sale debt securities as of June 30, 2018 were as follows:
 
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Fair
Value
Duration of one year or less
 
$
79

 
$
79


9. Inventory

Inventories as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are summarized by major category as follows:
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Raw materials
$
344

 
$
289

Work in process
68

 
89

Finished goods
143

 
163

Total
$
555

 
$
541




36
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


10. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
 
Intangible Assets: Our finite-lived intangible assets primarily consist of developed product rights and technology obtained from the Pharmion Corp. (Pharmion), Gloucester, Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (Abraxis), Avila, Quanticel and Juno acquisitions. The remaining weighted-average amortization period for finite-lived intangible assets not fully amortized is approximately 8.9 years. Our indefinite lived intangible assets consist of acquired IPR&D product rights from the Receptos Inc. (Receptos), Gloucester and Juno acquisitions.

The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of intangible assets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are summarized as follows:
June 30, 2018
 
Gross Carrying Value
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Intangible Assets, Net
Amortizable intangible assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Acquired developed product rights
 
$
3,406

 
$
(2,087
)
 
$
1,319

Technology
 
1,743

 
(474
)
 
1,269

Licenses
 
66

 
(32
)
 
34

Other
 
54

 
(37
)
 
17

 
 
5,269

 
(2,630
)

2,639

Non-amortizable intangible assets:
 


 


 
 

Acquired IPR&D product rights
 
13,831

 
—

 
13,831

Total intangible assets
 
$
19,100

 
$
(2,630
)

$
16,470

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
Gross Carrying Value
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Intangible Assets, Net
Amortizable intangible assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Acquired developed product rights
 
$
3,406

 
$
(1,939
)
 
$
1,467

Technology
 
483

 
(410
)
 
73

Licenses
 
66

 
(30
)
 
36

Other
 
43

 
(34
)
 
9

 
 
3,998

 
(2,413
)
 
1,585

Non-amortizable intangible assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Acquired IPR&D product rights
 
6,851

 
—

 
6,851

Total intangible assets
 
$
10,849

 
$
(2,413
)
 
$
8,436


The increase in the gross carrying value of intangible assets during the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 was primarily due to the addition of approximately $7.0 billion of IPR&D and $1.3 billion of a technology platform asset from the Juno acquisition. The economic useful life of the technology platform asset is 15 years (see Note 3).

Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $129 million and $89 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively and $217 million and $173 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. Effective for the second quarter of 2018, we reduced the remaining estimated useful life of our ABRAXANE® intangible assets, which will result in full amortization by 2022 in conjunction with the recent settlements of patent-related proceedings (see Note 16). Assuming no changes in the gross carrying amount of finite-lived intangible assets, the future annual amortization expense related to intangible assets is expected to be approximately $474 million in 2018, $442 million in 2019, $440 million in 2020, $438 million in 2021 and $179 million in 2022.

Goodwill: The carrying value of goodwill increased to approximately $8.0 billion as of June 30, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017 due to the acquisition of Juno (see Note 3).

37
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


11. Debt
 
Short-Term Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-Term Debt: The carrying value of short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 includes:

 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Commercial paper
$
995

 
$
—

2.250% senior notes due 2019
502

 
—

Total short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
$
1,497

 
$
—


Long-Term Debt: Our outstanding senior notes with maturity dates in excess of one year after June 30, 2018 have an aggregate principal amount of $19.850 billion with varying maturity dates and interest rates. The carrying values of the long-term portion of these senior notes as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 includes:
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
2.250% senior notes due 2019
$
—

 
$
505

2.875% senior notes due 2020
1,496

 
1,495

3.950% senior notes due 2020
511

 
514

2.250% senior notes due 2021
497

 
497

2.875% senior notes due 2021
498

 
—

3.250% senior notes due 2022
1,039

 
1,044

3.550% senior notes due 2022
995

 
994

2.750% senior notes due 2023
746

 
746

3.250% senior notes due 2023
993

 
—

4.000% senior notes due 2023
734

 
737

3.625% senior notes due 2024
1,001

 
1,001

3.875% senior notes due 2025
2,472

 
2,478

3.450% senior notes due 2027
974

 
991

3.900% senior notes due 2028
1,486

 
—

5.700% senior notes due 2040
247

 
247

5.250% senior notes due 2043
393

 
393

4.625% senior notes due 2044
987

 
987

5.000% senior notes due 2045
1,975

 
1,975

4.350% senior notes due 2047
1,234

 
1,234

4.550% senior notes due 2048
1,476

 
—

Total long-term debt
$
19,754

 
$
15,838

 
As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the fair value of our outstanding Senior Notes was approximately $19.6 billion and $16.6 billion, respectively, and represented a level 2 measurement within the fair value measurement hierarchy.

Debt Issuance: In February 2018, we issued $500 million principal amount of 2.875% senior notes due 2021 (2021 Notes), $1.000 billion principal amount of 3.250% senior notes due 2023 (2023 Notes), $1.500 billion principal amount of 3.900% senior notes due 2028 (2028 Notes) and $1.500 billion principal amount of 4.550% senior notes due 2048 (2048 Notes). The 2021 Notes, 2023 Notes, 2028 Notes and 2048 Notes were issued at 99.954%, 99.758%, 99.656% and 99.400% of par, respectively, and the discount is being amortized as additional interest expense over the period from issuance through maturity. Offering costs of approximately $32 million were recorded as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the 2021 Notes, 2023 Notes, 2028 Notes and 2048 Notes on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The offering costs are being amortized as additional interest expense using the effective interest rate method over the period from issuance through maturity. Interest on the 2021 Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 19 and August 19 of each year, beginning August 19, 2018 and the principal is due in full at the maturity date. Interest on the 2023 Notes, 2028 Notes and 2048 Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 20 and August 20 of each year,

38
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


beginning August 20, 2018 and the principal is due in full at the maturity date. The 2021 Notes, 2023 Notes, 2028 Notes and 2048 Notes may be redeemed at our option, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equaling accrued and unpaid interest plus the greater of 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed or the sum of the present values of the remaining schedule payments of interest and principal discounted to the date of redemption on a semi-annual basis plus 10 basis points for the 2021 Notes, 15 basis points for the 2023 Notes, 20 basis points for the 2028 Notes and 25 basis points for the 2048 Notes. If we experience a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the debt to below investment grade, we will be required to offer to repurchase the 2021 Notes, 2023 Notes, 2028 Notes and 2048 Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. We are subject to covenants which limit our ability to pledge properties as security under borrowing arrangements and limit our ability to perform sale and leaseback transactions involving our property.

From time to time, we have used treasury rate locks and forward starting interest rate swap contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates in anticipation of issuing fixed-rate notes. As of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017 a balance of $33 million and $31 million, respectively, in net losses remained in accumulated OCI related to the settlement of these derivative instruments and will be recognized as interest expense over the life of the notes.
 
As of June 30, 2018, we were party to pay-floating, receive-fixed interest rate swap contracts designated as fair value hedges of fixed-rate notes as described in Note 7. Our swap contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2018 effectively converted the hedged portion of our fixed-rate notes to floating rates. From time to time, we terminate the hedging relationship on certain of our swap contracts by settling the contracts or by entering into offsetting contracts. Any net proceeds received or paid in these settlements are accounted for as a reduction or increase of current and future interest expense associated with the previously hedged notes. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had balances of $125 million and $139 million, respectively, of unamortized gains recorded as a component of our debt as a result of past swap contract settlements. See Note 7 for additional details related to interest rate swap contract activity.

Commercial Paper: As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had available capacity to issue up to $2.0 billion of Commercial Paper. The carrying value of Commercial Paper as of June 30, 2018 was $995 million. As of December 31, 2017 there were no borrowings under the program. The effective interest rate on our outstanding Commercial Paper as of June 30, 2018 was 2.3%

Senior Unsecured Credit Facility: We maintain a senior unsecured revolving credit facility (Credit Facility) that provides revolving credit in the aggregate amount of $2.0 billion. During the second quarter of 2018, we amended our Credit Facility to extend the expiration date to April 25, 2023. Amounts may be borrowed in U.S. Dollars for general corporate purposes. The Credit Facility currently serves as backup liquidity for our commercial paper borrowings. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, there was no outstanding borrowings against the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants, including certain customary financial covenants. We were in compliance with all financial covenants as of June 30, 2018. 

12. Share-Based Compensation
 
We have stockholder-approved stock incentive plans, the Celgene Corporation 2017 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (formerly known as the Juno Therapeutics, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan) (collectively, the Plans) that provide for the granting of options, restricted stock units (RSUs), performance stock units (PSUs) and other share-based and performance- based awards to our employees, officers and non-employee directors. The Management Compensation and Development Committee of the Board of Directors (Compensation Committee) may determine the type, amount and terms, including vesting, of any awards made under the Plans.

Shares of common stock available for future share-based grants under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan were 13.9 million at the Acquisition Date.


39
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


The following table summarizes the components of share-based compensation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:
 
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets)
 
$
9

 
$
8

 
$
18

 
$
15

Research and development (1)
 
157

 
70

 
356

 
135

Selling, general and administrative (2)
 
118

 
92

 
311

 
173

Total share-based compensation expense
 
284

 
170

 
685

 
323

Tax benefit related to share-based compensation expense
 
37

 
46

 
74

 
87

Reduction in net income
 
$
247

 
$
124

 
$
611

 
$
236


(1) The three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 include Juno related share-based compensation expense related to the post-combination service period of $100 million and $233 million, respectively.

(2) The three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 include Juno related share-based compensation expense related to the post-combination service period of $50 million and $167 million, respectively.

The tax benefit related to share-based compensation expense above excludes excess tax benefits of $5 million and $95 million from share-based compensation awards that vested or were exercised during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and $16 million and $170 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

The following table summarizes the activity for stock options, RSUs and PSUs for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 (in millions unless otherwise noted):
 
Stock
Options
 
RSUs
 
PSUs (in thousands)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2017
67.8

 
7.7

 
558

Changes during the Year:
 

 
 

 
 

     Conversion of Juno awards
3.7

 
2.5

 
336

Granted
6.8

 
3.4

 
162

Exercised / Released
(3.5
)
 
(2.1
)
 
(247
)
Forfeited
(1.8
)
 
(0.4
)
 
(28
)
Outstanding as of June 30, 2018
73.0

 
11.1


781


Total compensation cost related to unvested awards not yet recognized and the weighted-average periods over which the awards are expected to be recognized as of June 30, 2018 were as follows (dollars in millions):
 
Stock
Options
 
RSUs
 
PSUs
Unrecognized compensation cost
$
641

 
$
566

 
$
43

Expected weighted-average period in years of compensation cost to be recognized
2.2

 
1.9

 
1.5

  

13. Income Taxes

We adopted ASU 2016-01, ASU 2016-16 and ASU 2018-2, effective January 1, 2018. See Note 1 for additional information related to the adoption of these accounting standard updates.

The 2017 Tax Act was enacted on December 22, 2017 which reduced the U.S. statutory tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018. The 2017 Tax Act requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred and introduces a new U.S. tax on certain off-shore earnings referred to as Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) beginning in 2018.


40
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


We are applying the guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 when accounting for the enactment-date effects of the 2017 Tax Act. The guidance provides for a measurement period up to one year in which provisional amounts may be adjusted as an income tax expense or benefit in the period the adjustment is determined.

As of June 30, 2018, we have not completed our accounting for the tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act and the provisional amounts recorded at December 31, 2017 were not adjusted during the quarter ended June 30, 2018. We will continue to analyze the impact of the 2017 Tax Act during the accounting measurement period. Our actual results may materially differ from our current estimates due to, among other things, further guidance that may be issued by U.S. tax authorities or regulatory bodies to interpret the 2017 Tax Act.

The FASB allows companies to adopt an accounting policy to either recognize deferred taxes for GILTI or treat such as a tax cost in the year incurred. We have not yet determined our tax accounting policy and we have included in current income tax expense an amount related to our estimate of 2018 current year GILTI.

We regularly evaluate the likelihood of the realization of our deferred tax assets and reduce the carrying amount of those deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent we believe a portion will not be realized. We consider many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of our deferred tax assets, including recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income, the carryforward periods available to us for tax reporting purposes and other relevant factors. Significant judgment is required in making this assessment.

Our tax returns are under routine examination in many taxing jurisdictions. The scope of these examinations includes, but is not limited to, the review of our taxable presence in a jurisdiction, our deduction of certain items, our claims for research and development credits, our compliance with transfer pricing rules and regulations and the inclusion or exclusion of amounts from our tax returns as filed. Our U.S. federal income tax returns have been audited by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) through the year ended December 31, 2008. Tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011 are currently under examination by the IRS. We are also subject to audits by various state and foreign taxing authorities, including most U.S. states and countries where we have operations.
 
We regularly reevaluate our tax positions and the associated interest and penalties, if applicable, resulting from audits of federal, state and foreign income tax filings, as well as changes in tax law (including regulations, administrative pronouncements, judicial precedents, etc.) that would reduce the technical merits of the position to below more likely than not. We believe that our accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open years. Many factors are considered in making these evaluations, including past history, recent interpretations of tax law and the specifics of each matter. Because tax regulations are subject to interpretation and tax litigation is inherently uncertain, these evaluations can involve a series of complex judgments about future events and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. We apply a variety of methodologies in making these estimates and assumptions, which include studies performed by independent economists, advice from industry and subject matter experts, evaluation of public actions taken by the IRS and other taxing authorities, as well as our industry experience. These evaluations are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management. However, if management’s estimates are not representative of actual outcomes, our results of operations could be materially impacted.
 
Unrecognized tax benefits, generally represented by liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and all subject to tax examinations, arise when the estimated benefit recorded in the financial statements differs from the amounts taken or expected to be taken in a tax return because of the uncertainties described above. These unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to issues common among multinational corporations. Virtually all of these unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would impact the effective income tax rate. We account for interest and potential penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of our provision for income taxes. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 gross unrecognized tax benefits increased by $200 million, including interest, primarily due to prior year tax positions. Of this amount, $38 million was an increase to income tax expense during the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 and the remainder were adjustments to non-current assets and non-current liabilities. The liability for unrecognized tax benefits is expected to increase in the next 12 months relating to operations occurring in that period. Any settlements of examinations with taxing authorities or statute of limitations expirations would likely result in a decrease in our liability for unrecognized tax benefits and a corresponding increase in taxes paid or payable and/or a decrease in income tax expense. It is reasonably possible that the amount of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits could change by a significant amount during the next twelve-month period as a result of settlements or statute of limitations expirations. Finalizing examinations with the relevant taxing authorities can include formal administrative and legal proceedings and, as a result, it is difficult to estimate the timing and range of possible change related to the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits. An estimate of the range of possible change cannot be made until issues are further developed or examinations close. Our estimates of tax benefits

41
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


and potential tax benefits may not be representative of actual outcomes and variation from such estimates could materially affect our consolidated financial statements in the period of settlement or when the statutes of limitations expire.


14. Collaboration Arrangements

We enter into collaborative arrangements for the research and development, license, manufacture and/or commercialization of products and/or product candidates. In addition, we also acquire products, product candidates and research and development technology rights and establish research and development collaborations with third parties to enhance our strategic position within our industry by strengthening and diversifying our research and development capabilities, product pipeline and marketed product base. These arrangements may include non-refundable, upfront payments, payments by us for options to acquire rights to products and product candidates and other rights, as well as contingent obligations by us for potential development, regulatory and commercial performance milestone payments, cost sharing arrangements, royalty payments, profit sharing and equity investments (including equity investments in the event of an initial public offering of equity by our partners). The activities under these collaboration agreements are performed with no guarantee of either technological or commercial success. Although we do not consider any individual alliance to be material, certain of the more notable alliances are described in Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following is a brief description for notable new collaborations and for those collaborations which we have described in detail in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K if there has been significant activity during the six months ended June 30, 2018. Amounts related to collaborations that are not specifically presented are included in the aggregate as Other Collaboration Arrangements.

Lycera Corp. (Lycera):

In June 2018, our collaboration and option agreement with Lycera expired. As a result, we do not have an exclusive right to acquire Lycera. We have retained our equity interest in Lycera, an exclusive license for Lycera’s portfolio of novel ex-vivo RORγ
agonist compounds and an exclusive license for Lycera’s RORγ antagonist compounds.

Prothena Corporation plc (Prothena):

On March 20, 2018, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Prothena to develop new therapies for a broad range of neurodegenerative diseases. The collaboration is focused on three proteins implicated in the pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative diseases, including tau, TDP-43 and an undisclosed target. In addition, we purchased approximately 1.2 million of Prothena's ordinary shares. We made a total payment of $150 million, which was accounted for as a $40 million equity investment with a readily determinable fair value and $110 million as upfront collaboration consideration that was expensed immediately as research and development.

For each of the programs, we have an exclusive right to license clinical candidates in the U.S. at the investigational new drug (IND) filing and if exercised, would also have a right to expand the license to global rights at the completion of Phase 1. Following the exercise of global rights, we will be responsible for funding all further global clinical development and commercialization. Prothena may receive future potential exercise payments and regulatory and commercial milestones for each licensed program. Prothena will also receive additional royalties on net sales of any resulting marketed products.

The collaboration agreement has an initial term of six years, which may be extended up to two additional years. The collaboration agreement may be terminated at our discretion upon 60 days prior written notice to Prothena and by either party upon material breach of the other party, subject to cure periods.


42
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


A financial summary of certain period activity and the period-end balances related to Prothena is presented below (1):
 
Six-Month Period Ended June 30,
 
Research and Development Expense
 
 
 
Upfront Fees
 
Milestones
 
Extension/Termination of Arrangements
 
Amortization of Prepaid Research and Development
 
Equity Investments Made During Period
2018
$
110

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
40

Balances as of:
 
Intangible Asset Balance
 
Equity Investment Balance
 
Percentage of Outstanding Equity
June 30, 2018
 
$
—

 
$
17

 
2.9
%

(1) There was no collaboration activity related to Prothena during the three-month period ended June 30, 2018. In addition to the expenses noted in the table above, we may also incur expenses for collaboration agreement related activities that are managed or funded by us.

Vividion Therapeutics, Inc. (Vividion):

On March 1, 2018, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Vividion for the identification and development of small molecules against targets for a range of oncology, inflammatory and neurodegenerative indications. In addition, we purchased an immaterial amount of Vividion's Series A-3 preferred shares. We made a total upfront payment of $101 million, which was accounted for as a $4 million equity investment without a readily determinable fair value and $97 million as upfront collaboration consideration that was expensed immediately as research and development.

Vividion will lead initial discovery efforts and identification of programs to be included in the collaboration, and we have the right to opt in on certain programs at a defined stage of development. For certain programs, including the first program, we will have the exclusive worldwide rights, with the potential for Vividion to receive up to double-digit royalties on sales and milestone payments. In accordance with the collaboration agreement, other programs will allow for us and Vividion to share equally either U.S. or worldwide development costs and profits and losses.

The collaboration agreement has an initial term of four years, which may be extended up to two additional years. The collaboration agreement may be terminated at our discretion upon 90 days prior written notice to Vividion and by either party upon material breach of the other party, subject to cure periods.

A financial summary of certain period activity and the period-end balances related to Vividion is presented below (1):

 
Six-Month Period Ended June 30,
 
Research and Development Expense
 
 
 
Upfront Fees
 
Milestones
 
Extension/Termination of Arrangements
 
Amortization of Prepaid Research and Development
 
Equity Investments Made During Period
2018
$
97

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
4


Balances as of:
 
Intangible Asset Balance
 
Equity Investment Balance
 
Percentage of Outstanding Equity
June 30, 2018
 
$
—

 
$
4

 
5.8
%

(1) There was no collaboration activity related to Vividion during the three-month period ended June 30, 2018. In addition to the expenses noted in the table above, we may also incur expenses for collaboration agreement related activities that are managed or funded by us.


43
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Other Collaboration Arrangements in 2018:

In addition to the collaboration arrangements described above, we entered into collaboration arrangements for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 that include the potential for future milestone payments of $177 million related to the attainment of specified development, regulatory and sales milestones over a period of several years. Our obligation to fund these efforts is contingent upon our continued involvement in the programs and/or the lack of any adverse events which could cause the discontinuance of the programs.

A financial summary of certain period activity and the period-end balances related to our other collaboration arrangements is presented below (1):
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Research and Development Expense
 
 
 
Upfront Fees
 
Milestones
 
Extension/Termination of Arrangements
 
Amortization of Prepaid Research and Development
 
Equity Investments Made During Period
2018
$
146

 
$
15

 
$
4

 
$
2

 
$
20

2017
75

 
—

 
—

 
3

 
67


 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Research and Development Expense
 
 
 
Upfront Fees
 
Milestones
 
Extension/Termination of Arrangements
 
Amortization of Prepaid Research and Development
 
Equity Investments Made During Period
2018
$
184

 
$
15

 
$
4

 
$
4

 
$
77

2017
85

 
—

 
7

 
7

 
79

Balances as of:
 
Intangible Asset Balance
 
Equity Investment Balance
 
Percentage of Outstanding Equity
June 30, 2018
 
$
7

 
$
1,710

 
N/A
December 31, 2017
 
12

 
1,806

 
N/A

(1) In addition to the expenses noted in the table above, we may also incur expenses for collaboration agreement related activities that are managed or funded by us.

In addition to the collaboration arrangements described above, in conjunction with the acquisition of Juno we assumed Juno's legacy collaboration arrangements including Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

15. Commitments and Contingencies

Collaboration Arrangements and Acquired Research and Development Assets: We have entered into certain research and development collaboration arrangements with third parties that include our funding of certain development, manufacturing and commercialization efforts and the potential for making future milestone and royalty payments upon the achievement of pre-established developmental, regulatory and/or commercial targets. In addition, we have also made certain acquisitions that included potential future development, regulatory and commercial milestones. Our obligation to fund these efforts and make milestone payments is contingent upon our continued involvement in the programs and/or the lack of any adverse events which could cause the discontinuance of the programs. Due to the nature of these arrangements, the future potential payments are inherently uncertain, and accordingly no amounts have been recorded for the potential future achievement of these targets in our accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. With our acquisition of Juno, we have assumed additional research and development collaboration arrangements with third parties that include our funding of certain development, manufacturing and commercialization efforts and the potential for making future milestone and royalty payments upon the achievement of pre-established developmental, regulatory and/or commercial targets. See Note 3 for additional details related to our acquisitions and Note 14 for additional details related to collaboration arrangements.
 

44
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


Contingencies: We believe we maintain insurance coverage adequate for our current needs. Our operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations which, among other things, impose limitations on the discharge of pollutants into the air and water and establish standards for the treatment, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. We review the effects of such laws and regulations on our operations and modify our operations as appropriate. We believe we are in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations.

We have ongoing customs, duties and value-added-tax examinations in various countries that have yet to be settled. Based on our knowledge of the claims and facts and circumstances to date, none of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, are deemed to be material to our financial condition.

16. Legal Proceedings

Like many companies in our industry, we have, from time to time, received inquiries and subpoenas and other types of information requests from government authorities and others and we have been subject to claims and other actions related to our business activities. While the ultimate outcome of investigations, inquiries, information requests and legal proceedings is difficult to predict, adverse resolutions or settlements of those matters may result in, among other things, modification of our business practices, product recalls, costs and significant payments, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
 
Pending patent proceedings include challenges to the scope, validity and/or enforceability of our patents relating to certain of our products, uses of products or processes. Further, as certain of our products mature or they near the end of their regulatory exclusivity periods, it is more likely that we will receive challenges to our patents, and in some jurisdictions we have received such challenges. We are also subject, from time to time, to claims of third parties that we infringe their patents covering products or processes. Although we believe we have substantial defenses to these challenges and claims, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of these matters and an adverse decision in these proceedings could result in one or more of the following: (i) a loss of patent protection, which could lead to a significant reduction of sales that could materially affect our future results of operations, cash flows or financial condition; (ii) our inability to continue to engage in certain activities; and (iii) significant liabilities, including payment of damages, royalties and/or license fees to any such third party.
 
Among the principal matters pending are the following:

Patent-Related Proceedings:

REVLIMID®: In 2012, our European patent EP 1 667 682 (the ’682 patent) relating to certain polymorphic forms of lenalidomide expiring in 2024 was opposed in a proceeding before the European Patent Office (EPO) by Generics (UK) Ltd. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. On July 21, 2015, the EPO determined that the ’682 patent was not valid. Celgene appealed the EPO ruling to the EPO Board of Appeal, thereby staying any revocation of the patent until the appeal is finally adjudicated. No appeal hearing date has been set.

We believe that our patent portfolio for lenalidomide in Europe, including the composition of matter patent which expires in 2022, is strong. In the event that we do not prevail on the appeal relating to the ’682 patent, we still expect that we will have protection in the EU for lenalidomide until at least 2022.

In June 2017, Accord Healthcare Ltd. (Accord) commenced lawsuits against us in the United Kingdom (UK) seeking to revoke our UK patents protecting REVLIMID®. In June 2018, we entered into a settlement agreement with Accord resolving the lawsuits.

We received a Notice of Allegation dated June 13, 2017 from Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. (DRL) notifying us of the filing of DRL’s Abbreviated New Drug Submission (ANDS) with Canada’s Minister of Health, with respect to Canadian Letters Patent Nos. 2,261,762; 2,476,983; 2,477,301; 2,537,092; 2,687,924; 2,687,927; 2,688,694; 2,688,695; 2,688,708; 2,688,709; 2,741,412; and 2,741,575. DRL is seeking to manufacture and market a generic version of 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, 20mg, and 25mg REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) capsules in Canada. We commenced a proceeding in the Federal Court of Canada on July 27, 2017, seeking an order prohibiting the Minister of Health from granting marketing approval to DRL until expiry of these patents.

We received a further Notice of Allegation dated September 20, 2017 from DRL relating to the same submission, but also referencing 2.5mg REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) capsules. DRL’s Notices of Allegation contains invalidity allegations relating to Canadian Letters Patent Nos. 2,537,092; 2,687,924; 2,687,927; 2,688,694; 2,688,695; 2,688,708; 2,688,709; 2,741,412; and 2,741,575. We commenced a proceeding in the Federal Court of Canada on November 2, 2017, seeking an order prohibiting the Minister of Health

45
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


from granting marketing approval to DRL until expiry of these patents. The hearings for these proceedings are scheduled for September 23-24, 2019 and September 30-October 3, 2019, respectively.

We received a Notice Letter dated September 9, 2016 from DRL notifying us of its Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) which contains Paragraph IV certifications against U.S. Patent Nos. 7,465,800; 7,855,217; 7,968,569; 8,530,498; 8,648,095; 9,101,621; and 9,101,622 that are listed in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) list of Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, commonly referred to as the Orange Book (Orange Book), for REVLIMID®. DRL is seeking to manufacture and market a generic version of 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, 20mg, and 25mg REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) capsules in the United States. In response to the Notice Letter, we timely filed an infringement action against DRL in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on October 20, 2016. As a result of the filing of our action, the FDA cannot grant final approval of DRL's ANDA until the earlier of (i) a final decision that each of the patents is invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed, and (ii) March 10, 2019. On November 18, 2016, DRL filed an answer and counterclaims asserting that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed. On December 27, 2016, we filed a reply to DRL’s counterclaims. Fact discovery is set to close on August 31, 2018. The court has not yet entered a schedule for expert discovery or trial.

We received an additional Notice Letter from DRL dated June 8, 2017 notifying us of additional Paragraph IV certifications against U.S. Patent Nos. 7,189,740; 8,404,717; and 9,056,120 that are listed in the Orange Book for REVLIMID®. In response to that Notice Letter, we timely filed an infringement action against DRL in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on July 20, 2017. As a result of the filing of our action, the FDA cannot grant final approval of DRL's ANDA until the earlier of (i) a final decision that each of the patents is invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed, and (ii) December 9, 2019. On October 18, 2017, DRL filed an amended answer and counterclaims asserting that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed. We filed our reply to DRL’s counterclaims on November 15, 2017. Fact discovery is set to close on March 15, 2019. The court has not yet entered a schedule for expert discovery or trial.

We received another Notice Letter from DRL dated February 26, 2018 notifying us of additional Paragraph IV certifications against U.S. Patent Nos. 6,315,720; 6,561,977; 6,755,784; 8,315,886; and 8,626,531 that are listed in the Orange Book for REVLIMID®. In response to the Notice Letter, we timely filed an infringement action against DRL in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on April 12, 2018. As a result of the filing of our action, the FDA cannot grant final approval of DRL's ANDA until the earlier of (i) a final decision that each of the patents is invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed, and (ii) August 27, 2020. DRL filed an amended answer and counterclaims on May 31, 2018 asserting that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed. We filed our reply to DRL’s counterclaims on June 28, 2018. The court has not yet entered a schedule for fact discovery, expert discovery, or trial.

We received a Notice Letter dated February 27, 2017 from Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. (Zydus) notifying us of Zydus’ ANDA which contains Paragraph IV certifications against U.S. Patent Nos. 7,465,800; 7,855,217; 7,968,569; 8,530,498; 8,648,095; 9,101,621; and 9,101,622 that are listed in the Orange Book for REVLIMID®. Zydus is seeking to manufacture and market a generic version of 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25mg REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) capsules in the United States. In response to the Notice Letter, we timely filed an infringement action against Zydus in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on April 12, 2017. As a result of the filing of our action, the FDA cannot grant final approval of Zydus’ ANDA at least until the earlier of (i) a final decision that each of the patents is invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed, and (ii) August 28, 2019. On August 7, 2017, Zydus filed an answer and counterclaims asserting that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed. On September 11, 2017, we filed a reply to Zydus’s counterclaims. Fact discovery is set to close on March 15, 2019. The court has yet to enter a schedule for expert discovery and trial.

On April 27, 2018, we filed another infringement action against Zydus in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 7,977,357; 8,193,219 and 8,431,598, which are patents not listed in the Orange Book. Zydus filed its answer on July 9, 2018 asserting that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed. The court has not yet entered a schedule for fact discovery, expert discovery, or trial.

We received a Notice Letter dated June 30, 2017 from Cipla Ltd., India (Cipla) notifying us of Cipla’s ANDA which contains Paragraph IV certifications against U.S. Patent Nos. 7,465,800; 7,855,217; 7,968,569; 8,530,498; 8,648,095; 9,101,621 and 9,101,622 that are listed in the Orange Book for REVLIMID®. Cipla is seeking to manufacture and market a generic version of 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, 20mg, and 25mg REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) capsules in the United States. In response to the Notice Letter, on August 15, 2017, we timely filed an infringement action against Cipla in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. As a result of the filing of our action, the FDA cannot grant final approval of Cipla’s ANDA until the earlier of (i) a final decision that each of the patents is invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed, and (ii) January 5, 2020. On October 13, 2017, Cipla filed an answer and counterclaims asserting that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed. We filed our reply to Cipla’s

46
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


counterclaims on November 17, 2017. Fact discovery is set to close on March 15, 2019. The court has yet to enter a schedule for expert discovery and trial.

On May 8, 2018, we filed another infringement action against Cipla in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 7,977,357; 8,193,219 and 8,431,598, which are patents that are not listed in the Orange Book. Cipla has not yet responded to the complaint.

We received a Notice Letter dated July 24, 2017 from Lotus Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. (Lotus) notifying us of Lotus’s ANDA which contains Paragraph IV certifications against U.S. Patent Nos. 5,635,517; 6,315,720; 6,561,977; 6,755,784; 7,189,740; 7,465,800; 7,855,217; 7,968,569; 8,315,886; 8,404,717; 8,530,498; 8,626,531; 8,648,095; 9,056,120; 9,101,621; and 9,101,622 that are listed in the Orange Book for REVLIMID®. Lotus is seeking to manufacture and market a generic version of 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, 20mg, and 25mg REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) capsules in the United States. In response to the Notice Letter, we timely filed an infringement action against Lotus in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on September 6, 2017. As a result of the filing of our action, the FDA cannot grant final approval of Lotus’s ANDA until the earlier of (i) a final decision that each of the patents is invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed, and (ii) January 25, 2020. On October 5, 2017, Lotus filed an answer and counterclaims asserting that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed. We filed our reply to Lotus’s counterclaims on November 9, 2017. Fact discovery is set to close on March 15, 2019. The court has yet to enter a schedule for expert discovery and trial.

On July 10, 2018, we filed another infringement action against Lotus in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 7,977,357; 8,193,219 and 8,431,598, which are patents that are not listed in the Orange Book. Lotus has not yet responded to the complaint.

We received a Notice Letter dated November 28, 2017 from Apotex Inc. (Apotex) notifying us of Apotex’s ANDA, which contains Paragraph IV certifications against U.S. Patent Nos. 6,315,720; 6,561,977; 6,755,784; 7,465,800; 7,468,363; 7,855,217; 8,315,886; 8,626,531; and 8,741,929 that are listed in the Orange Book for REVLIMID®. Apotex is seeking to manufacture and market a generic version of 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, 20mg, and 25mg REVLIMID® (lenalidomide) capsules in the United States. In response to the Notice Letter, we timely filed an infringement action against Apotex in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on January 11, 2018. As a result of the filing of our action, the FDA cannot grant final approval of Apotex’s ANDA until at least the earlier of (i) a final decision that each of the patents is invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed, and (ii) May 29, 2020. On April 2, 2018, Apotex responded to the complaint by filing a motion to dismiss the case for failure to join a necessary party. We filed our response on May 21, 2018. Apotex filed its reply brief on June 11, 2018. The court has not yet decided Apotex's motion or entered a schedule for fact discovery, expert discovery, or trial.

POMALYST®: We received a Notice Letter dated March 30, 2017 from Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (Teva) (the Teva Notice Letter) notifying us of Teva’s ANDA submitted to the FDA, which contains Paragraph IV certifications against U.S. Patent Nos. 6,316,471; 8,198,262; 8,673,939; 8,735,428 and 8,828,427 that are listed in the Orange Book for POMALYST®. Teva is seeking to manufacture and market a generic version of 1 mg, 2 mg, 3 mg, and 4 mg POMALYST® (pomalidomide) capsules in the United States. We later received similar Notice Letters (together with the Teva Notice Letter, the Pomalidomide Notice Letters) from other generic drug manufacturers -Apotex; Hetero USA, Inc. (Hetero); Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. (Aurobindo); Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Mylan); and Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Breckenridge) - relating to these and other POMALYST® patents listed in the Orange Book. In May 2018, we received a similar Notice Letter from Synthon Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Synthon Notice Letter).
 
In response to the Pomalidomide Notice Letters, we timely filed infringement actions in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against Teva on May 4, 2017 and against Apotex, Hetero, Aurobindo, Mylan, and Breckenridge on May 11, 2017. As a result of the filing of our actions, the FDA cannot grant final approval of these ANDAs at least until the earlier of (i) a final decision that each of the patents is invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed, and (ii) August 8, 2020.  

On July 13, 2017, Apotex and Hetero each filed answers and counterclaims asserting that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed, and further seeking declaratory judgments of noninfringement and invalidity for additional patents listed in the Orange Book for POMALYST®, namely U.S. Patent Nos. 6,315,720; 6,561,977; 6,755,784; 8,315,886 and 8,626,531. On August 17, 2017, we filed replies to Apotex’s and Hetero’s counterclaims, as well as counter-counterclaims against Apotex and Hetero asserting infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,315,720; 6,561,977; 6,755,784; 8,315,886 and 8,626,531. Apotex and Hetero filed replies to our counter-counterclaims on September 6 and September 8, 2017, respectively.


47
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


On July 31, 2017, Breckenridge filed an answer and counterclaims asserting that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed. We filed our reply to Breckenridge’s counterclaims on September 5, 2017. On December 6, 2017, Breckenridge filed an amended pleading to include counterclaims seeking declaratory judgments of noninfringement and invalidity for additional patents listed in the Orange Book for POMALYST®, namely U.S. Patent Nos. 6,315,720; 6,561,977; 6,755,784; 8,315,886 and 8,626,531. Celgene replied to Breckenridge’s amended counterclaims and asserted counter-counterclaims on January 3, 2018.

On August 7, 2017, Teva filed an answer and counterclaims asserting that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed. On September 11, 2017, we filed a reply to Teva’s counterclaims.

On August 9, 2017, Mylan filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, and on March 2, 2018, the court denied Mylan’s motion to dismiss without prejudice and granted our request for venue-related discovery.

On September 15, 2017, Aurobindo filed an answer and counterclaims asserting that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed, and further seeking declaratory judgments of noninfringement and invalidity for additional patents listed in the Orange Book for POMALYST®, namely U.S. Patent Nos. 6,315,720; 6,561,977; 6,755,784; 8,315,886; and 8,626,531. We filed our reply to Aurobindo’s counterclaims and counter-counterclaims concerning U.S. Patent Nos. 6,315,720; 6,561,977; 6,755,784; 8,315,886; and 8,626,531 on October 20, 2017. Aurobindo filed its answer to our counter-counterclaims on November 24, 2017.

In response to the Synthon Notice Letter, we timely filed an infringement action against Synthon in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on June 19, 2018. As a result of the filing of our actions, the FDA cannot grant final approval of Synthon’s ANDA at least until the earlier of (i) a final decision that each of the patents is invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed, and (ii) November 7, 2020. On July 16, 2018, Synthon filed an answer and counterclaims asserting that each of the patents asserted in the complaint is invalid and/or not infringed.

Fact discovery in the Apotex, Aurobindo, Breckenridge, Hetero, Mylan, and Teva cases is scheduled to close on March 1, 2019 and expert discovery in these cases is scheduled to close on September 30, 2019. Trial has not been scheduled in any POMALYST® litigation.

ABRAXANE®: We received a Notice Letter dated February 23, 2016 from Actavis LLC (Actavis) notifying us of Actavis’s ANDA which contains Paragraph IV certifications against U.S. Patent Nos. 7,820,788; 7,923,536; 8,138,229; and 8,853,260 that are listed in the Orange Book for ABRAXANE®. We then received a Notice Letter dated October 25, 2016 from Cipla notifying us of Cipla’s ANDA, which contains Paragraph IV certifications against the same four patents for ABRAXANE®. Actavis and Cipla are each seeking to manufacture and market a generic version of ABRAXANE® 100 mg/vial.

On April 6, 2016, we filed an infringement action against Actavis in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. We entered into a settlement with Actavis, effective January 23, 2018, to terminate that patent litigation and Inter Partes Review (IPR) challenges between the parties relating to certain patents for ABRAXANE®. As part of the settlement, the parties filed a Consent Judgment with the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, which was entered on January 26, 2018, enjoining Actavis from marketing generic paclitaxel protein-bound particles for injectable suspension before expiration of the patents-in-suit, except as provided for in the settlement. In the settlement, we agreed to provide Actavis with a license to our patents required to manufacture and sell a generic paclitaxel protein-bound particles for injectable suspension product in the United States beginning on March 31, 2022.

On December 7, 2016, we filed an infringement action against Cipla in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. As a result of the filing of our action, the FDA cannot grant final approval of Cipla’s ANDA until the earlier of (i) a final decision that each of the patents is invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed, and (ii) April 25, 2019. On January 20, 2017, Cipla filed an answer and counterclaims asserting that each of the patents is invalid and/or not infringed. Our reply was filed on February 24, 2017. The court has not yet set a date for trial.

On January 13, 2017, the UK High Court of Justice handed down a ruling after a hearing held on December 20, 2016 in which we argued that the UK Intellectual Property Office improperly rejected our request for an SPC to the ABRAXANE® patent UK No. 0 961 612 (the ’612 patent). In that ruling, the High Court referred the matter to the Court of Justice for the EU (CJEU). A hearing was held at the CJEU on June 21, 2018. We expect a decision from the CJEU later this year. If the CJEU were to find in our favor, the ruling would need to be implemented in other jurisdictions in which the proceedings are pending, potentially resulting in the grant of SPCs not only in the UK, but also in other jurisdictions that have previously rejected our initial request including Germany and Ireland. The ’612 patent expired in Europe in September 2017. However, if granted, the SPCs will expire in 2022. Data exclusivity in Europe will expire in January 2019.

48
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)



We received a Notice of Allegation (NOA) dated March 22, 2018 from Panacea Biotec Ltd. (Panacea) notifying us of the filing of Panacea’s ANDS with Canada’s Minister of Health, with respect to Canadian Letters Patent No. 2,509,365 (the '365 patent). Panacea is seeking to manufacture and market a generic version of 100 mg/vial ABRAXANE® (paclitaxel powder for injectable suspension, nanoparticle, albumin-bound (nab®) paclitaxel) in Canada. On May 4, 2018, our subsidiaries, Abraxis BioScience, LLC and Celgene Inc. commenced an action for patent infringement in the Federal Court of Canada seeking, among other relief, a declaration of infringement in relation to the ‘365 patent.

In June 2018, Celgene and Apotex settled certain patent disputes involving ABRAXANE® that were triggered by Apotex filing an ANDA in the United States, IPR patent challenges before the U.S. Patent Office (see below), and the aforementioned NOA filed by Apotex's marketing partner, Panacea. In addition to dismissing the patent proceedings, in the settlement we agreed to provide Apotex with a license to our patents required to manufacture and sell a generic paclitaxel protein-bound particles for injectable suspension product in the United States beginning on September 27, 2022, and in certain countries outside of the United States, including Canada, beginning on a later date.

OTEZLA®: We received Notice Letters from each of the following companies between May 14, 2018 and June 8, 2018: Alkem Laboratories Ltd. (Alkem); Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (Amneal); Annora Pharma Private Ltd. (Annora); Aurobindo; Cipla; DRL and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc.; Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Emcure); Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Glenmark); Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Macleods); Mankind Pharma Ltd. (Mankind); MSN Laboratories Private Ltd. (MSN); Pharmascience Inc. (Pharmascience); Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc. (Prinston); Sandoz Inc. (Sandoz); Shilpa Medicare Ltd. (Shilpa); Teva; Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Torrent); Unichem Laboratories, Ltd. (Unichem); and Zydus notifying us of their ANDAs, which contain Paragraph IV certifications against one or more of the following patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,962,940; 7,208,516; 7,427,638; 7,659,302; 7,893,101; 8,455,536; 8,802,717; 9,018,243; and 9,872,854, which are listed in the Orange Book for OTEZLA®. Each of the companies is seeking to market a generic version of OTEZLA®. In response to the Notice Letters, we timely filed infringement actions in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. As a result of the filing of our actions, the FDA cannot grant final approval of any of these companies' ANDAs until the earlier of (i) a final decision that each of the asserted patents is invalid, unenforceable, and/or not infringed, and (ii) September 21, 2021.
 
Juno patent-related proceedings:

KITE: On October 18, 2017, the day on which the FDA approved Kite Pharma, Inc.’s (Kite) Yescarta™ KTE-C19 product, Juno filed a complaint against Kite in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged that Yescarta™ infringes claims 1-3, 5, 7-9, and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 7,446,190 (the ’190 Patent). Kite answered the complaint on November 28, 2017, and filed counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity against Juno. Juno filed a motion to dismiss Kite’s counterclaims and to strike certain affirmative defenses on December 19, 2017.

On March 8, 2018, the court granted Juno’s motion to dismiss and strike, and ordered Kite to file an amended answer and counterclaims. On the same day, the court denied Kite’s motion to stay. On March 29, 2018, Kite filed an amended answer and counterclaims, asserting that the ’190 Patent is invalid and/or not infringed. On April 9, 2018, we filed an answer to Kite’s counterclaims. Fact and expert discovery are set to close on September 24, 2018 and December 10, 2018, respectively, and trial is scheduled to begin on March 26, 2019.

CITY OF HOPE: On August 22, 2017, City of Hope (COH) filed a lawsuit against Juno in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California alleging that Juno, prior to its acquisition by Celgene, breached an exclusive license agreement (ELA) between Juno and COH by sublicensing COH intellectual property to Celgene without COH’s consent and by failing to pay COH related sublicensing revenues. COH sought damages in an amount no less than $93.75 million in alleged sublicense revenues and a judicial declaration that the ELA has terminated. In July 2018, Juno and COH entered into a confidential settlement agreement dismissing the lawsuit and reinstating the ELA. The settlement amount was not materially different than the amount we had previously accrued for this matter.

Proceedings involving the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO):

REMS IPR: Under the America Invents Act (AIA), any person may seek to challenge an issued patent by petitioning the USPTO to institute a post grant review. On April 23, 2015, we were informed that the Coalition for Affordable Drugs VI LLC filed petitions for IPR challenging the validity of our U.S. Patent Nos. 6,045,501 (the ’501 patent) and 6,315,720 (the ’720 patent) covering certain aspects of our REMS program. On October 27, 2015, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted IPR proceedings relating to these patents. An oral hearing was held on July 21, 2016. The PTAB's decisions, rendered on October 26,

49
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


2016, held that the ’501 and ’720 patents are invalid, primarily due to obviousness in view of certain publications. On November 25, 2016, we requested a rehearing with respect to certain claims of these patents. On September 8, 2017, the PTAB denied our rehearing request for the ’501 patent, but granted our rehearing request pertaining to a certain claim of the ’720 patent.

We timely appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit the PTAB’s determinations regarding certain claims of the ’720 patent and the ’501 patent on November 6, 2017 and on November 9, 2017, respectively. On February 26, 2018, the USPTO intervened in our appeal. Our opening briefs were filed on May 31, 2018. The ’501 and ’720 patents remain valid and enforceable pending appeal. We retain other patents covering certain aspects of our REMS program, as well as patents that cover our products that use our REMS system.

ABRAXANE® IPR: On April 4, 2017, Actavis filed petitions for IPRs challenging the validity of our U.S. Patent Nos. 8,138,229 (the ’229 patent); 7,923,536 (the ’536 patent); 7,820,788 (the ’788 patent); and 8,853,260 (the ’260 patent) covering certain aspects of our ABRAXANE® product. On October 10, 2017, the PTAB instituted IPR proceedings on the ’229, ’536, and ’788 patents and on October 11, 2017 denied institution of the IPR on the ‘260 patent. On January 29, 2018, the parties submitted a joint motion to terminate all three IPRs in connection with the settlement entered into with Actavis mentioned above. On May 8, 2018, the PTAB granted the parties’ joint motion to terminate.

On November 9, 2017, Apotex and Cipla each filed petitions for IPRs challenging the validity of the ’229, ’536, and’788 patents. On May 8, 2018, the PTAB denied institution of all IPRs.

REVLIMID® IPR: On February 23, 2018, Apotex filed a petition for IPR challenging the validity of our U.S. Patent Nos. 8,741,929 (the ’929 patent). Our preliminary response was filed on June 28, 2018. The PTAB has until September 28, 2018 to determine whether it will institute the IPR.

JUNO IPR: On August 13, 2015, Kite filed a petition for IPR challenging the validity of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,446,190 (the ’190 Patent), exclusively licensed from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. On February 11, 2016, the PTAB instituted the IPR proceedings. A hearing was held before the PTAB on October 20, 2016. On December 16, 2016, the PTAB issued a final written decision upholding all claims of the ’190 Patent. On February 16, 2017, Kite filed a notice of appeal of the PTAB’s final written decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On June 6, 2018, the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, upholding all claims of the ’190 Patent.

Other Proceedings:
 
MYLAN: On April 3, 2014, Mylan filed a lawsuit against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging that we violated various federal and state antitrust and unfair competition laws by allegedly refusing to sell samples of our THALOMID® and REVLIMID® brand drugs so that Mylan may conduct the bioequivalence testing necessary to submit ANDAs to the FDA for approval to market generic versions of these products. Mylan is seeking injunctive relief, damages and a declaratory judgment. We filed a motion to dismiss Mylan’s complaint on May 25, 2014. Mylan filed its opposition to our motion to dismiss on June 16, 2014. The Federal Trade Commission filed an amicus curiae brief in opposition to our motion to dismiss on June 17, 2014.

On December 22, 2014, the court granted our motion to dismiss (i) Mylan’s claims based on Section 1 of the Sherman Act (without prejudice), and (ii) Mylan's related claims arising under the New Jersey Antitrust Act. The court denied our motion to dismiss the remaining claims which primarily relate to Section 2 of the Sherman Act. On January 6, 2015, we filed a motion to certify for interlocutory appeal the order denying our motion to dismiss with respect to the claims relating to Section 2 of the Sherman Act, which appeal was denied by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on March 5, 2015. On January 20, 2015, we filed an answer to Mylan’s complaint. Fact discovery closed in June 2016 and expert discovery closed in November 2016. On December 16, 2016, we moved for summary judgment, seeking a ruling that judgment be granted in our favor on all claims. The motion for summary judgment was argued on December 13, 2017. Thereafter, the court ordered the parties to mediate and administratively stayed the case pending the mediation. The mediation was held on January 25, 2018, but no settlement was reached. Supplemental briefing on the motion for summary judgment was filed on February 1, 2018. No trial date has been set.

THALOMID AND REVLIMID ANTITRUST LITIGATION: On November 7, 2014, the International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craft Workers Local 1 Health Fund (IUB) filed a putative class action lawsuit against us in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging that we violated various antitrust, consumer protection, and unfair competition laws by (a) allegedly securing an exclusive supply contract with Seratec S.A.R.L. so that Barr Laboratories allegedly could not secure its own supply of thalidomide active pharmaceutical ingredient, (b) allegedly refusing to sell samples of our THALOMID® and REVLIMID® brand drugs to various generic manufacturers for the alleged purpose of bioequivalence testing necessary for

50
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


ANDAs to be submitted to the FDA for approval to market generic versions of these products, and (c) allegedly bringing unjustified patent infringement lawsuits in order to allegedly delay approval for proposed generic versions of THALOMID® and REVLIMID®. IUB, on behalf of itself and a putative class of third party payers, is seeking injunctive relief and damages.

In February 2015, we filed a motion to dismiss IUB’s complaint, and upon the filing of a similar putative class action making similar allegations by the City of Providence (Providence), the parties agreed that the decision in the motion to dismiss IUB’s complaint would apply to the identical claims in Providence’s complaint. In October 2015, the court denied our motion to dismiss on all grounds. 

We filed our answers to the IUB and Providence complaints in January 2016. On June 14, 2017, a new complaint was filed by the same counsel representing the plaintiffs in the IUB case, making similar allegations and adding three new plaintiffs - International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39 Health and Welfare Trust Fund (Local 39), The Detectives’ Endowment Association, Inc. (DEA) and David Mitchell. Plaintiffs added allegations that our settlements of patent infringement lawsuits against certain generic manufacturers have had anticompetitive effects. Counsel identified the new complaint as related to the IUB and Providence cases and, on August 1, 2017, filed a consolidated amended complaint on behalf of IUB, Providence, Local 39, DEA, and Mitchell. On September 28, 2017, the same counsel filed another complaint, which it identified as related to the consolidated case, and which made similar allegations on behalf of an additional asserted class representative, New England Carpenters Health Benefits Fund (NEC). The NEC action has been consolidated with the original action involving IUB, Providence, DEA, Local 39, and Mitchell into a master action for all purposes.

On October 2, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a motion for certification of two damages classes under the laws of thirteen states and the District of Columbia and a nationwide injunction class. On February 26, 2018, we filed our opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion and a motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing all state law claims where the plaintiffs no longer seek to represent a class. The plaintiffs filed their opposition to our motion for judgment on the pleadings on April 2, 2018, and we filed our reply on April 13, 2018. The plaintiffs filed their reply in support of their class certification motion on May 18, 2018. Fact discovery in these cases closed on May 17, 2018. The plaintiffs filed opening expert reports on June 18, 2018; responsive and rebuttal reports are due on August 27, 2018 and October 15, 2018, respectively. Expert discovery in these cases is scheduled to close on October 29, 2018. No trial date has been set.

In December 2015, we received a subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts, and in November 2016, we received a second subpoena related to the same inquiry. The materials requested primarily relate to patient assistance programs, including our support of 501(c)(3) organizations that provide financial assistance to eligible patients. We are cooperating with these requests.

In August 2017, we received an order issued by the Federal Court in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada at the request of the Canadian Competition Bureau, requiring that we provide certain materials and information relating to our risk management program and requests by generic manufacturers to purchase our products in Canada. We are cooperating with this request.

JUNO SECURITIES CLASS ACTION: In July 2016, two putative securities class action complaints (the Veljanoski Complaint and the Wan Complaint) were filed against Juno and its chief executive officer, Hans E. Bishop, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. On September 7, 2016, an additional putative securities class action complaint (the Paradisco Complaint and, together with the Velianoski Complaint and the Wan Complaint, the Complaints) was filed against Juno, Mr. Bishop, and its chief financial officer, Steve Harr, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The Complaints generally allege material misrepresentations and omissions in public statements regarding patient deaths in Juno’s Phase II clinical trial of JCAR015 as well as, violations by all named defendants of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act. On October 7, 2016, the Complaints were consolidated into a single action. On December 12, 2016, the court-appointed lead plaintiff and a named plaintiff filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint (Consolidated Complaint), which includes claims against Juno, Mr. Bishop, Dr. Harr, and Juno’s chief medical officer, Dr. Mark J. Gilbert (the Defendants). The Consolidated Complaint includes allegations similar to those in the previous Complaints, as well as additional allegations regarding purported material misrepresentations and omissions in public statements after July 7, 2016 regarding the safety of JCAR015. The parties mediated on May 9, 2018, following which the parties agreed to a settlement in principle of the class action for which the parties will be seeking court approval. The settlement amount was not materially different than the amount we had previously accrued for this matter.

CELGENE SECURITIES CLASS ACTION: On March 29, 2018, the City of Warren General Employees’ Retirement System filed a putative class action against us and certain of our officers in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated federal securities laws by making misstatements and/or omissions concerning (1)

51
CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)


trials of GED-0301, (2) 2020 outlook and projected sales of OTEZLA®, and (3) the new drug application for Ozanimod. On May 3, 2018, a similar putative class action lawsuit against us and certain of our officers was filed by Charles H. Witchcoff in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint alleges that defendants violated federal securities laws by making material misstatements and/or omissions concerning (1) trials of GED-0301, (2) 2020 outlook and projected sales of OTEZLA®, and (3) the new drug application for Ozanimod. The date by which defendants will be obligated to answer or otherwise respond to the claims against them will be set after the court appoints a lead plaintiff, which has not yet occurred.

On July 12, 2018, Saratoga Advantage Trust Health and Biotechnology Portfolio filed a shareholder derivative complaint against certain members of our board of directors in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.  The complaint alleges that (1) certain defendants made misrepresentations and omissions of material fact concerning, among other things, trials of GED-0301, sales of OTEZLA®, 2017 and 2020 fiscal guidance, and the new drug application for Ozanimod and (ii) all defendants failed to adequately supervise Celgene with regard to trials of GED-0301, sales of OTEZLA®, 2017 and 2020 fiscal guidance, the new drug application for Ozanimod, and the promotion and marketing of REVLIMID®.

The plaintiff has agreed to stay the defendants’ obligation to answer or otherwise respond to the allegations in the complaint in deference to the Celgene Securities Class Actions and subject to thirty days’ notice by either plaintiff or defendants of an intent to proceed.

HUMANA, INC (HUMANA):  On May 16, 2018, Humana filed a lawsuit against us in the Pike County Circuit Court of the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Humana’s complaint alleges we engage in unlawful off-label marketing in connection with sales of THALOMID® and REVLIMID® and asserts claims against us for fraud, breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment, and violations of New Jersey’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. The complaint seeks, among other things, treble and punitive damages, injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees and costs. On June 13, 2018, we removed Humana’s lawsuit to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky and, on July 11, 2018, filed a motion to dismiss Humana’s complaint in full. On July 12, 2018, Humana moved to remand the case to state court. The court has not set a hearing date for the motions.


52


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Forward-Looking Information
 
This report contains forward-looking statements that reflect the current views of our management with respect to future events, results of operations, economic performance and/or financial condition. Any statements contained in this report that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “aims,” “plans,” “may,” “could,” “will,” “will continue,” “seeks,” “should,” “predicts,” “potential,” “outlook,” “guidance,” “target,” “forecast,” “probable,” “possible” or the negative of such terms and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current plans, estimates, assumptions and projections, which are subject to change and may be affected by risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and are generally beyond our control. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement in light of new information or future events, although we intend to continue to meet our ongoing disclosure obligations under the U.S. securities laws and other applicable laws. We caution you that a number of important factors could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements and therefore you should not place too much reliance on them. These factors include, among others, those described in the sections “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” contained in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and in this report and our other public reports filed with the SEC. If these or other risks and uncertainties materialize, or if the assumptions underlying any of the forward-looking statements prove incorrect, our actual performance and future actions may be materially different from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. We can offer no assurance that our estimates or expectations will prove accurate or that we will be able to achieve our strategic and operational goals. 

Executive Summary
 
Celgene Corporation, together with its subsidiaries (collectively “we,” “our,” “us,” “Celgene” or the “Company”), is an integrated global biopharmaceutical company engaged primarily in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative therapies for the treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases through next-generation solutions in protein homeostasis, immuno-oncology, epigenetics, immunology and neuro-inflammation. Celgene Corporation was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 1986.

Our commercial stage products include REVLIMID®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, OTEZLA®, ABRAXANE®, VIDAZA®, azacitidine for injection (generic version of VIDAZA®), THALOMID® (sold as THALOMID® or Thalidomide Celgene® outside of the U.S.) and IDHIFA®. In addition, we earn revenue from other product sales and licensing arrangements.

We continue to invest substantially in research and development in support of multiple ongoing proprietary clinical development programs which support our existing products and pipeline of new drug candidates. Our clinical trial activity includes trials across the disease areas of hematology, solid tumors, and inflammation and immunology. REVLIMID® is in several phase III trials covering a range of hematological malignancies that include lymphomas. Also, within hematological malignancies, POMALYST® is in several phase III and post-approval trials for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In solid tumors, ABRAXANE® is currently in various stages of investigation for pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancers. In inflammation and immunology, OTEZLA® is being evaluated in phase III trials for Behçet's disease and scalp psoriasis. We also have a growing number of potential products in phase III trials across multiple diseases. In the inflammation and immunology therapeutic area, we have completed two phase III trials (RADIANCE® and SUNBEAM®) for ozanimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and phase III trials are underway in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. In hematology, the phase III trial (MEDALIST®) for luspatercept in patients with low-to-intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) achieved primary and key secondary endpoints during 2018. In addition, the phase III trial (BELIEVE®) for luspatercept in patients with Transfusion- dependent Beta-thalassemia achieved primary and key secondary endpoints during 2018. Phase III trials are underway for CC-486 in MDS and in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We also initiated the pivotal TRANSCEND WORLD® trial evaluating JCAR017 (lisocabtagene maraleucel) in R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).  In July 2017, we entered into global strategic immuno-oncology collaboration with BeiGene, Ltd. (BeiGene) to advance a PD-1 Inhibitor (BGB-A317) program for solid tumor cancers. In 2018, our partner, BeiGene, initiated a phase III trial for BGB-A317 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
 
Beyond our phase III programs, we have access to a growing early-to-mid-stage pipeline of novel potential therapies to address significant unmet medical needs that consists of new drug candidates and cell therapies developed in-house, licensed from other companies or able to be optioned from collaboration partners. We believe that continued use of our primary commercial stage products, participation in research and development collaboration arrangements, depth of our product pipeline, potential regulatory approvals of new products and new indications for existing products will provide the catalysts for future growth.

53



Recent Developments

A comprehensive list of the diseases that our primary commercial stage products are approved to treat for the major markets of the United States, the European Union and Japan is provided in Part I, Item 1. Business in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. The following tables present significant developments in our pivotal and phase III clinical trials and regulatory approval requests that occurred during the three-month period ended June 30, 2018, as well as developments that are expected to occur if the future occurrence is material and reasonably certain:

Pivotal and Phase III Trials:
Product Candidate
Trial
Disease Indication
Action
JCAR017 (lisocabtagene maraleucel)
TRANSCEND WORLD (BCM-001)
R/R DLBCL
Initiated
Ozanimod
RPC01-3201
Crohn's disease
Initiated
Ozanimod
RPC01-3202
Crohn's disease
Initiated

Regulatory agency actions:
Product
Disease Indication
Major Market
Regulatory Agency
Action
IDHIFA
rrAML
EU
EMA
Filing Accepted

Recent Transactions

Accelerated Share Repurchase: In May 2018, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreement to repurchase an aggregate of $2 billion of our common stock. The ASR utilized part of the existing Board authorized share repurchase program which was increased by $5 billion and $3 billion in February and May 2018, respectively. During the three-month period ended June 30, 2018, we used $3.4 billion of cash for purchases of our common stock measured on a settlement date basis, including the $2 billion paid for the ASR for which we have received a partial delivery of approximately 18 million shares as of June 30, 2018.

Financial Update

In August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities" (ASU 2017-12) which we adopted on August 31, 2017 with an initial application date of January 1, 2017. As previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded pre-tax income of $48 million and $37 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 as a result of applying the new guidance. As such, we have recast the financial statements for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017 to reflect the adoption of ASU 2017-12 as follows:

 
Three-Month Period Ended
 
Six- Month Period Ended
 
June 30, 2017
 
June 30, 2017
 
As Reported
 
As Revised
 
As Reported
 
As Revised
Net product sales
$
3,256

 
$
3,259

 
$
6,206

 
$
6,211

Other (expense) income, net
(76
)
 
(31
)
 
(50
)
 
(18
)
Income tax provision
69

 
77

 
153

 
159

Net income
1,061

 
1,101

 
2,002

 
2,033

Diluted net income per common share
$
1.31

 
$
1.36

 
$
2.47

 
$
2.51



54


The following table summarizes net product sales, total revenue and earnings for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (dollar amounts in millions, except per share amounts):

 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Net product sales
$
3,808

 
$
3,259

 
$
549

 
16.8
 %
Total revenue
3,814

 
3,271

 
543

 
16.6
 %
Net income
1,045

 
1,101

 
(56
)
 
(5.1
)%
Diluted earnings per share
$
1.43

 
$
1.36

 
$
0.07

 
5.1
 %

Total net product sales for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 increased by $549 million, or 16.8%, to approximately $3.8 billion compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017. The increase was comprised of net volume increases of $492 million, or 15.1%, and net price increases of $77 million, or 2.3%. The increase in volume was primarily driven by increased unit sales of REVLIMID®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID® and OTEZLA®. The price impact was primarily attributable to net price increases in the U.S., which were partially offset by price decreases in Europe. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates including the impact of foreign exchange hedging activity unfavorably impacted net product sales by $20 million, or (0.6)%.

Total revenue increased by $543 million, or 16.6%, to approximately $3.8 billion for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017, reflecting increases of $306 million, or 14.4%, in the United States and $237 million, or 20.6%, in international markets.

In addition to the increase in total revenue discussed above, notable items impacting net income and diluted earnings per share for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 are as follows (dollar amounts in millions):

 
 
Income Statement Classification
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
Collaboration arrangements (see Note 14*)
 
Research and development
 
$
167

 
$
78

 
$
89

Litigation-related loss contingency accrual expense (see Note 16*)
 
Selling, general and administrative
 
—

 
315

 
(315
)
Amortization of acquired intangible assets (see Note 10)*
 
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
 
127

 
88

 
39

Juno acquisition costs (see Note 3*)
 
Acquisition related charges (income) and restructuring, net
 
27

 
—

 
27

Share-based compensation expense (1)
 
Cost of goods sold, Research and development, and Selling, general and administrative
 
284

 
170

 
114


(1) Includes share-based compensation expense related to the acquisition of Juno post-combination service period of $100 million and $50 million, which was recorded in Research and development and Selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively, for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018. See Notes 3 and 12 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report.

* References to Notes in this table are to the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report.

The following table summarizes net product sales, total revenue and earnings for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (dollar amounts in millions, except per share amounts):

 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Net product sales
$
7,339

 
$
6,211

 
$
1,128

 
18.2
 %
Total revenue
7,352

 
6,233

 
1,119

 
18.0
 %
Net income
1,891

 
2,033

 
(142
)
 
(7.0
)%
Diluted earnings per share
$
2.52

 
$
2.51

 
$
0.01

 
0.4
 %
 

55


Total net product sales for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 increased by approximately $1.1 billion, or 18.2%, to approximately $7.3 billion compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. The increase was comprised of net volume increases of $950 million, or 15.3%, and net price increases of $193 million, or 3.1%. The increase in volume was primarily driven by increased unit sales of REVLIMID®, OTEZLA® and POMALYST®/IMNOVID®. The price impact was primarily attributable to net price increases in the U.S., which were partially offset by price decreases in Europe. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates including the impact of foreign exchange hedging activity unfavorably impacted net product sales by $15 million, or (0.2)%.

Total revenue increased by approximately $1.1 billion, or 18.0%, to approximately $7.4 billion for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, reflecting increases of $740 million, or 18.6%, in the United States and $379 million, or 16.7%, in international markets.

In addition to the increase in total revenue discussed above, notable items impacting net income and diluted earnings per share for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 are as follows (dollar amounts in millions):
 
 
Income Statement Classification
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
Collaboration arrangements (see Note 14*)
 
Research and development
 
$
414

 
$
99

 
$
315

Research and development asset acquisition expenses (see Note 3*)
 
Research and development
 
1,125

 
325

 
800

Adjustment of clinical trial and development activity wind-down costs
 
Selling, general and administrative
 
(60
)
 
—

 
(60
)
Amortization of acquired intangible assets (see Note 10*)
 
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
 
214

 
170

 
44

Litigation-related loss contingency accrual expense
 
Selling, general and administrative
 
—

 
315

 
(315
)
Juno acquisition costs (see Note 3*)
 
Acquisition related charges (income) and restructuring, net
 
88

 
—

 
88

Fair value adjustments on equity investments (see Note 1*)
 
Other income (expense), net
 
953

 
—

 
953

Share-based compensation expense (1)
 
Cost of goods sold, Research and development, and Selling, general and administrative
 
685

 
323

 
362


(1) Includes share-based compensation expense related to the post-combination service period of $233 million and $167 million, which was recorded in Research and development and Selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018. See Notes 3 and 12 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report.

* References to Notes in this table are to the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report.

Three-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

Net Product Sales and Other Revenues

Net product sales and other revenues for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (dollar amounts in millions):
 
REVLIMID® 
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
U.S.
$
1,586

 
$
1,358

 
$
228

 
16.8
%
International
867

 
676

 
191

 
28.3
%
Worldwide
$
2,453

 
$
2,034

 
$
419

 
20.6
%

REVLIMID® net sales increased by $419 million, or 20.6%, to approximately $2.5 billion for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017. Sales growth was primarily volume-driven due to global increases in treatment duration and market share. Outside the U.S., customer buying patterns and sales of product for use in clinical trials

56


favorably impacted the 2018 period. International volume growth was partially offset by net price decreases. In the U.S., sales growth increased due to increases in both unit sales and price.

POMALYST®/IMNOVID® 
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
U.S.
341

 
241

 
$
100

 
41.5
%
International
166

 
150

 
16

 
10.7
%
Worldwide
$
507

 
$
391

 
$
116

 
29.7
%

POMALYST®/IMNOVID® net sales increased by $116 million, or 29.7%, to $507 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to increased sales in the U.S. market. In the U.S., sales growth increased due to both unit sales and price increases. Increases in market share and treatment duration contributed to the increase in U.S. unit sales. In addition, international unit sales increased, primarily due to increased treatment duration in Europe. International volume growth was partially offset by net price decreases.

OTEZLA® 
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
(Decrease) Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
U.S.
$
291

 
$
306

 
$
(15
)
 
(4.9
)%
International
84

 
52

 
32

 
61.5
 %
Worldwide
$
375

 
$
358

 
$
17

 
4.7
 %

OTEZLA® net sales increased by $17 million, or 4.7%, to $375 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to increased international sales. Volume increased in all international markets led by Japan, where it was launched in 2017. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in net sales in the U.S. primarily due to a reduction in net selling prices as a result of managed care contracts executed in 2017 which resulted in increased gross-to-net charges.

ABRAXANE® 
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Decrease
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
U.S.
$
152

 
$
161

 
$
(9
)
 
(5.6
)%
International
91

 
93

 
(2
)
 
(2.2
)%
Worldwide
$
243

 
$
254

 
$
(11
)
 
(4.3
)%

ABRAXANE® net sales decreased by $11 million, or 4.3%, to $243 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to decreased sales in the U.S. market. The volume decline in the U.S. was partially offset by price increases. International volume growth was more than offset by net price decreases.

OTHER PRODUCT SALES
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
U.S.
$
55

 
$
49

 
$
6

 
12.2
%
International
175

 
173

 
2

 
1.2
%
Worldwide
$
230

 
$
222

 
$
8

 
3.6
%


57


All other product sales, which include IDHIFA®, VIDAZA®, generic azacitidine for injection, THALOMID®, and ISTODAX®, increased by $8 million primarily due to net sales from IDHIFA®, which launched in the third quarter of 2017, partially offset by decreases in net sales from THALOMID® and generic azacitidine for injection.

Other Revenue: Other revenue decreased by $6 million to $6 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017. Beginning in 2018, we are no longer entitled to receive royalties from Novartis on sales of RITALIN® and FOCALIN XR®, which primarily contributed to the decrease in Other revenue.

Gross to Net Sales Accruals: We record gross to net sales accruals for government rebates, chargebacks and distributor service fees, sales discounts, and sales returns and allowances. For a discussion of our gross to net sales accruals, see Critical Accounting Estimates and Significant Accounting Policies in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Gross to net sales accruals and the balance in the related allowance accounts for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in millions):
 
Government
Rebates
 
Chargebacks
and Distributor
Service Fees
 
Sales Discounts
 
Sales Returns and Allowances
 
Total
Balance as of March 31, 2018
$
659

 
$
316

 
$
19

 
$
15

 
$
1,009

Allowances for sales during prior periods
(12
)
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(12
)
Allowances for sales during 2018
281

 
390

 
59

 
4

 
734

Credits/deductions issued for sales during prior periods
(41
)
 
(27
)
 
—

 
(2
)
 
(70
)
Credits/deductions issued for sales during 2018
(207
)
 
(373
)
 
(57
)
 
(1
)
 
(638
)
Balance as of June 30, 2018
$
680

 
$
306

 
$
21

 
$
16

 
$
1,023

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of March 31, 2017
$
447

 
$
199

 
$
17

 
$
13

 
$
676

Allowances for sales during prior periods
2

 
(3
)
 
—

 
—

 
(1
)
Allowances for sales during 2017
214

 
285

 
48

 
3

 
550

Credits/deductions issued for sales during prior periods
(29
)
 
(19
)
 
—

 
(3
)
 
(51
)
Credits/deductions issued for sales during 2017
(141
)
 
(249
)
 
(47
)
 
—

 
(437
)
Balance as of June, 2017
$
493

 
$
213

 
$
18

 
$
13

 
$
737


A comparison of provisions for allowances for sales within each of the four categories noted above for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
 
Government rebate provisions increased by $53 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017, due to a $39 million increase in international government rebates and a $14 million increase in the U.S. market. The increase in international government rebates was primarily driven by higher sales volumes and increased rebate rates. The increase in the U.S. market was primarily due to higher sales volumes and increased rebate rates, with $14 million due to an increase in Medicaid rebates (primarily in the managed care channel). In 2019, we expect the rebate provision for the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap to increase as a result of a planned increase in the portion manufacturers of pharmaceutical products are responsible for.

Chargebacks and distributor service fees provisions increased by $108 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017. Chargebacks increased by approximately $40 million and distributor service fees increased by approximately $68 million. The increase in chargebacks was primarily due to higher sales volumes and a greater portion of sales qualifying for chargeback rebates. The distributor service fee increase was primarily attributable to increased sales volumes and new managed care contracts for OTEZLA®, which accounted for $67 million of the increase, as well as a $5 million increase in commercial copayment program expense and a $2 million increase in the distributor service fee expense, both of which also were attributable to higher sales volumes.

Discount provisions increased by $11 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to higher sales volumes. The increase was primarily comprised of an increase of $6 million related to REVLIMID® as well as increases related to OTEZLA® and POMALYST®.


58


Provisions for sales returns and allowances increased by $1 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017 due to an increase in the OTEZLA® returns reserve in the second quarter of 2018.

Operating Costs and Expenses

Operating costs, expenses and related percentages for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (dollar amounts in millions):

Cost of Goods Sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets)
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets)
$
126

 
$
111

 
$
15

 
13.5
%
Percent of Net product sales
3.3
%
 
3.4
%
 
 

 
 


Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) increased by $15 million to $126 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017. As a percent of net product sales, cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) remained virtually unchanged for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017.

Research and Development
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Research and development
$
1,251

 
$
835

 
$
416

 
49.8
%
Percent of Total revenue
32.8
%
 
25.5
%
 
 

 
 


Research and development expenses increased by $416 million to approximately $1.3 billion for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to $225 million of incremental research and development expense related to the acquisition of Juno, including $100 million of share-based compensation expense. Also contributing to the increase in Research and development expense was an increase in expenses related to collaboration agreements of $89 million. Lastly, higher expenses related to submission-related work on multiple programs also contributed to the increase. See Note 3 and Note 14 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details related to our acquisitions and our collaboration arrangements, respectively. Our research and development expenses may fluctuate from period-to-period based on the volume and timing of closing asset acquisitions and collaboration arrangements and associated obligations pursuant to such arrangements.

The following table provides a breakdown of research and development expenses (in millions):
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Human pharmaceutical clinical programs
$
508

 
$
349

 
$
159

 
45.6
 %
Other pharmaceutical programs
368

 
197

 
171

 
86.8
 %
Drug discovery and development
208

 
194

 
14

 
7.2
 %
Collaboration arrangements (See Note 14*)
167

 
78

 
89

 
114.1
 %
Cellular therapy
—

 
17

 
(17
)
 
(100.0
)%
Total
$
1,251

 
$
835

 
$
416

 
49.8
 %
* References to Notes in this table are to the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report.


59


Selling, General and Administrative
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Decrease
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Selling, general and administrative
$
790

 
$
939

 
$
(149
)
 
(15.9
)%
Percent of Total revenue
20.7
%
 
28.7
%
 
 

 
 


Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $149 million to $790 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017. The decrease primarily relates to the litigation-related loss contingency accrual expense of $315 million related to the previously disclosed Brown Action, which was recorded in the second quarter of 2017. This decrease was partially offset by incremental expense of $79 million due to the acquisition of Juno, including share-based compensation expense of $50 million. The decrease is further offset by an increase of approximately $40 million in marketing related expenses. See Note 3 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details related to our acquisition of Juno.

Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
$
127

 
$
88

 
$
39

 
44.3
%

Amortization of intangible assets acquired as a result of business combinations is summarized below for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease)
Acquisitions
2018
 
2017
 
Abraxis
$
88

 
$
38

 
$
50

Avila
—

 
8

 
(8
)
Gloucester
—

 
23

 
(23
)
Juno
21

 
—

 
21

Pharmion
—

 
1

 
(1
)
Quanticel
18

 
18

 
—

Total amortization
$
127

 
$
88

 
$
39


Effective for the second quarter of 2018, we reduced the remaining estimated useful life of our ABRAXANE® intangible assets as a result of recent settlements of patent-related proceedings (see Note 16 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details related to the settlements), which resulted in approximately $50 million of accelerated amortization. Amortization expense also increased as a result of the technology platform asset acquired through our acquisition of Juno. These increases were partially offset by reductions in amortization expense as the Gloucester and Avila intangible assets were fully amortized in the first quarter of 2018 and the second quarter of 2017, respectively. See Note 3 and Note 16 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional information regarding our acquisition of Juno and the recent settlements regarding patent litigation, respectively.

Acquisition Related Charges (Income) and Restructuring, Net
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Acquisition related charges (income) and restructuring, net
$
34

 
$
(13
)
 
$
47

 
N/A

Acquisition related charges (income) and restructuring, net was a net charge of $34 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018, compared to a net benefit of $13 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2017. The net charge in 2018 primarily relates to $27 million of restructuring and acquisition costs associated with the acquisition of Juno. The net benefit in

60


2017 primarily related to a reduction in the fair value of our contingent liabilities associated with the acquisition of Quanticel. See Notes 3 and 6 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details related to our acquisition of Juno and contingent consideration liabilities, respectively.

Other Income and Expenses

Interest and Investment Income, Net: Interest and investment income, net decreased by $15 million to $9 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to lower investment balances as compared to the prior year.
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Decrease
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Interest and investment income, net
$
9

 
$
24

 
$
(15
)
 
(62.5
)%

Interest (Expense): Interest (expense) increased by $66 million to $192 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to the interest expense associated with the issuance of $3.5 billion of senior notes during the second half of 2017 as well as the issuance of $4.5 billion of senior notes during February of 2018. See Note 11 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details related to debt issuances.
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Interest (expense)
$
(192
)
 
$
(126
)
 
$
(66
)
 
52.4
%

Other Income (Expense), Net: Other income (expense), net and fluctuations in the components of Other income (expense), net is summarized below for three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
 
Three-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
2018
 
2017
 
Foreign exchange (losses) gains, including foreign exchange derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments (See Note 7*)
$
(4
)
 
$
6

 
$
(10
)
Fair value adjustments on equity investments (see Note 1*)

(6
)
 
—

 
(6
)
Investment impairment charge
—

 
(45
)
 
45

Gain on sale of equity investment in Flexus Biosciences, Inc.
—

 
9

 
(9
)
Other
14

 
(1
)
 
15

Total Other income (expense), net
$
4

 
$
(31
)
 
$
35

* References to Notes in this table are to the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report.

Income Tax Provision: The income tax provision increased by $185 million to $262 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2017, primarily as a result of an increase in the effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 was 20.0%, an increase of 13.5 percentage points from our effective tax rate of 6.5% for the three-month period ended June 30, 2017. The increase in our effective tax rate was primarily due to a decrease in excess tax benefits from employee stock compensation deductions, for which our effective tax rate was increased by 7.7 percentage points. Our effective tax rate was also increased by our estimate of U.S. tax on forecasted Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (subject to taxation at an effective statutory tax rate of 10.5%), non-deductible research expenses incurred in our acquisition of Impact, and a decrease in tax benefits of lower statutory tax rates on pre-tax income earned outside the U.S., all of which were partially offset by a reduction in the U.S. statutory tax rate from 35% to 21%, which was enacted on December 22, 2017 as part of the U.S. tax reform legislation (2017 Tax Act).

Our effective tax rate in 2018 is a function of the distribution of our pre-tax income earned inside and outside of the U.S. Our pre-tax income earned in the U.S. is taxed at a U.S. statutory tax rate of 21%. Our pre-tax income earned outside the U.S. is taxed both

61


in the U.S. at an effective federal statutory tax rate of 10.5% and in the foreign jurisdictions where we have operations at lower effective tax rates. Our global pre-tax income is also subject to taxation in most U.S. states. Our future effective tax rate can be materially impacted by shifts in the distribution of our pre-tax income among the jurisdictions where we operate, the amount of research tax credits, the amount of foreign tax credits, the timing and amount of tax benefits from employee stock compensation, payments to collaboration partners, acquisitions, divestitures, changes in tax laws, audit settlements and many other factors which are difficult to forecast.

Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

Net Product Sales and Other Revenues

Net product sales and other revenues for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (dollar amounts in millions):
 
REVLIMID® 
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
U.S.
$
3,073

 
$
2,592

 
$
481

 
18.6
%
International
1,614

 
1,326

 
288

 
21.7
%
Worldwide
$
4,687

 
$
3,918

 
$
769

 
19.6
%

REVLIMID® net sales increased by $769 million, or 19.6%, to approximately $4.7 billion for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. Sales growth was primarily volume-driven due to global increases in treatment duration and market share. Outside the U.S., customer buying patterns and sales of product for use in clinical trials favorably impacted the 2018 period. International volume growth was partially offset by net price decreases. In the U.S., sales growth increased due to increases in both unit sales and price.

POMALYST®/IMNOVID® 
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
U.S.
$
641

 
$
457

 
$
184

 
40.3
%
International
319

 
298

 
21

 
7.0
%
Worldwide
$
960

 
$
755

 
$
205

 
27.2
%

POMALYST®/IMNOVID® net sales increased by $205 million, or 27.2%, to $960 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to increased sales in the U.S. market. In the U.S., sales growth increased due to both unit sales and price increases. Increases in market share and treatment duration contributed to the increase in U.S. unit sales. In addition, international unit sales increased, primarily due to sales growth in Europe as a result of increased treatment duration. International volume growth was partially offset by net price decreases.

OTEZLA® 
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
U.S.
$
567

 
$
505

 
$
62

 
12.3
%
International
161

 
95

 
66

 
69.5
%
Worldwide
$
728

 
$
600

 
$
128

 
21.3
%

OTEZLA® net sales increased by $128 million, or 21.3%, to $728 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, due to increased worldwide sales. Volume increased in all international markets led by Japan, where it was launched in 2017. Net sales in the U.S. increased primarily due to an increase in unit sales partially offset

62


by a reduction in net selling prices as a result of managed care contracts executed in 2017 which resulted in increased gross-to-net charges.

ABRAXANE® 
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
U.S.
$
311

 
$
303

 
$
8

 
2.6
%
International
194

 
187

 
7

 
3.7
%
Worldwide
$
505

 
$
490

 
$
15

 
3.1
%

ABRAXANE® net sales increased by $15 million, or 3.1%, to $505 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to unit sales and price increases in the U.S. market. International volume growth was partially offset by net price decreases.

OTHER PRODUCT SALES
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
U.S.
$
112

 
$
99

 
$
13

 
13.1
 %
International
347

 
349

 
(2
)
 
(0.6
)%
Worldwide
$
459

 
$
448

 
$
11

 
2.5
 %

All other product sales, which include IDHIFA®, VIDAZA®, generic azacitidine for injection, THALOMID®, and ISTODAX®, increased by $11 million primarily due to net sales from IDHIFA®, which launched in the third quarter of 2017, partially offset by decreases in net sales from THALOMID® and generic azacitidine for injection.

Other Revenue: Other revenue decreased by $9 million to $13 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. Beginning in 2018, we are no longer entitled to receive royalties from Novartis on sales of RITALIN® and FOCALIN XR®, which primarily contributed to the decrease in Other revenue.

Gross to Net Sales Accruals: We record gross to net sales accruals for government rebates, chargebacks and distributor service fees, sales discounts, and sales returns and allowances. For a discussion of our gross to net sales accruals, see Critical Accounting Estimates and Significant Accounting Policies in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


63


Gross to net sales accruals and the balance in the related allowance accounts for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in millions):
 
Government
Rebates
 
Chargebacks
and Distributor
Service Fees
 
Sales Discounts
 
Sales Returns and Allowances
 
Total
Balance as of December 31, 2017
$
544

 
$
270

 
$
20

 
$
15

 
$
849

Allowances for sales during prior periods
(18
)
 
(3
)
 
—

 
—

 
(21
)
Allowances for sales during 2018
578

 
760

 
115

 
6

 
1,459

Credits/deductions issued for sales during prior periods
(188
)
 
(163
)
 
(19
)
 
(3
)
 
(373
)
Credits/deductions issued for sales during 2018
(236
)
 
(558
)
 
(95
)
 
(2
)
 
(891
)
Balance as of June 30, 2018
$
680

 
$
306

 
$
21

 
$
16

 
$
1,023

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2016
$
371

 
$
190

 
$
16

 
$
18

 
$
595

Allowances for sales during prior periods
10

 
(23
)
 
—

 
(5
)
 
(18
)
Allowances for sales during 2017
424

 
531

 
90

 
5

 
1,050

Credits/deductions issued for sales during prior periods
(164
)
 
(95
)
 
(16
)
 
(4
)
 
(279
)
Credits/deductions issued for sales during 2017
(148
)
 
(390
)
 
(72
)
 
(1
)
 
(611
)
Balance as of June 30, 2017
$
493

 
$
213

 
$
18

 
$
13

 
$
737


A comparison of provisions for allowances for sales within each of the four categories noted above for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:
 
Government rebate provisions increased by $126 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, due to an $80 million increase in international government rebates and a $46 million increase in the U.S. market. The increase in international government rebates was primarily driven by higher sales volumes and increased rebate rates. The increase in the U.S. market was primarily due to higher sales volumes and increased rebate rates, with $40 million due to an increase in Medicaid rebates (primarily in the managed care channel) and $6 million due to an increase in expense related to Medicare Part D Coverage Gap. In 2019, we expect the rebate provision for the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap to increase as a result of a planned increase in the portion manufacturers of pharmaceutical products are responsible for.

Chargebacks and distributor service fees provisions increased by $249 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. Chargebacks increased by approximately $102 million and distributor service fees increased by approximately $147 million. The increase in chargebacks was primarily due to higher sales volumes and a greater portion of sales qualifying for chargeback rebates, including a $5 million increase related to the TRICARE program driven by higher sales volumes. The distributor service fee increase was primarily attributable to increased sales volumes and new managed care contracts for OTEZLA®, which accounted for $122 million of the increase, as well as a $19 million increase in commercial copayment program expense and a $6 million increase in the distributor service fee expense, both of which also were attributable to higher sales volumes.

Discount provisions increased by $25 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, primarily due to higher sales volumes. The increase was primarily comprised of an increase of $13 million related to REVLIMID® as well as increases related to OTEZLA® and POMALYST®.

Provisions for sales returns and allowances increased by $6 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017 as the prior year period included a $5 million reduction in the ABRAXANE® returns reserve allowance related to inventory levels held by certain distributors at the end of 2016 which were sold to end customers during the first quarter of 2017 and due to an increase in the OTEZLA® returns reserve in the second quarter of 2018.


64


Operating Costs and Expenses

Operating costs, expenses and related percentages for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (dollar amounts in millions):

Cost of Goods Sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets)
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets)
$
261

 
$
224

 
$
37

 
16.5
%
Percent of Net product sales
3.6
%
 
3.6
%
 
 

 
 


Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) increased by $37 million to $261 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. Despite the increase, as a percent of net product sales, cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) remained flat at 3.6% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017.

Research and Development
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Research and development
$
3,454

 
$
1,830

 
$
1,624

 
88.7
%
Percent of Total revenue
47.0
%
 
29.4
%
 
 

 
 


Research and development expenses increased by approximately $1.6 billion to approximately $3.5 billion for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. The increase was primarily due to higher research and development asset acquisition expense related to our purchase of Impact Biomedicines, Inc. for $1.1 billion in 2018 as compared to $325 million for two acquisitions in 2017. Also contributing to the increase was $385 million of incremental research and development expense related to the acquisition of Juno, including $233 million of share-based compensation expense. Lastly, expense related to collaboration agreements increased by $315 million in 2018. See Note 3 and Note 14 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details related to our acquisitions and our collaboration arrangements, respectively. Our research and development expenses may fluctuate from period-to-period based on the volume and timing of closing asset acquisitions and collaboration arrangements and associated obligations pursuant to such arrangements.

The following table provides a breakdown of research and development expenses (dollar amounts in millions):
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Human pharmaceutical clinical programs
$
976

 
$
642

 
$
334

 
52.0
 %
Other pharmaceutical programs
558

 
389

 
169

 
43.4
 %
Drug discovery and development
381

 
351

 
30

 
8.5
 %
Collaboration arrangements (See Note 14*)
414

 
99

 
315

 
318.2
 %
Research and development asset acquisition expenses (See Note 3*)
1,125

 
325

 
800

 
246.2
 %
Cellular therapy
—

 
24

 
(24
)
 
(100.0
)%
Total
$
3,454

 
$
1,830

 
$
1,624

 
88.7
 %
* References to Notes in this table are to the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report.


65


Selling, General and Administrative
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Selling, general and administrative
$
1,654

 
$
1,559

 
$
95

 
6.1
%
Percent of Total revenue
22.5
%
 
25.0
%
 
 

 
 


Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $95 million to $1,654 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. The increase is primarily due to incremental expense of $210 million related to the acquisition of Juno, including $167 million of share-based compensation expense. Additionally, the increase was also due to an increase of approximately $80 million of marketing related expenses and an increase of $48 million in donations to independent non-profit patient assistance organizations in the U.S. These increases were partially offset by a litigation-related loss contingency accrual expense of $315 million related to the previously disclosed Brown Action, which was recorded in the second quarter of 2017. See Note 3 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details related to our acquisition of Juno.

Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
$
214

 
$
170

 
$
44

 
25.9
%

Amortization of intangible assets acquired as a result of business combinations is summarized below for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease)
Acquisitions
2018
 
2017
 
Abraxis
$
126

 
$
76

 
$
50

Avila
—

 
10

 
(10
)
Gloucester
23

 
46

 
(23
)
Juno
28

 
—

 
28

Pharmion
1

 
2

 
(1
)
Quanticel
36

 
36

 
—

Total amortization
$
214

 
$
170

 
$
44


Effective for the second quarter of 2018, we reduced the remaining estimated useful life of our ABRAXANE® intangible assets as a result of recent settlements of patent-related proceedings (see Note 16 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details related to the settlements), which resulted in approximately $50 million of accelerated amortization. Amortization expense also increased as a result of the technology platform asset acquired through our acquisition of Juno. These increases were partially offset by reductions in amortization expense as the Gloucester and Avila intangible assets were fully amortized in the first quarter of 2018 and the second quarter of 2017, respectively. See Note 3 and Note 16 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional information regarding our acquisition of Juno and the recent settlements regarding patent litigation, respectively.

Acquisition Related Charges (Income) and Restructuring, net
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Acquisition related charges (income) and restructuring, net
$
65

 
$
26

 
$
39

 
150.0
%

Acquisition related charges (income) and restructuring, net was a net charge of $65 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, compared to a net charge of $26 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. The net charge in 2018 primarily

66


relates to $88 million of acquisition and restructuring costs associated with the acquisition of Juno, which were partially offset by a benefit related to the decrease in the fair value of our liability related to publicly traded Contingent Value Rights (CVRs) of $24 million that were issued as part of the acquisition of Abraxis BioSciences, Inc. The net charge in 2017 related to an increase in the fair value of our contingent liabilities primarily due to the accretion of the liability associated with the acquisition of Nogra Pharma Limited. See Note 3 and Note 6 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details related to our acquisition of Juno and contingent consideration liabilities, respectively.

Other Income and Expenses

Interest and Investment Income, Net: Interest and investment income, net decreased by $17 million to $22 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to lower investment balances as compared to the prior year.
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Decrease
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Interest and investment income, net
$
22

 
$
39

 
$
(17
)
 
(43.6
)%

Interest (Expense): Interest (expense) increased by $105 million to $358 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017 primarily due to the interest expense associated with the issuance of $3.5 billion of senior notes during the second half of 2017 as well as the issuance of $4.5 billion of senior notes during February of 2018. See Note 11 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details related to debt issuances.
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase
 
Percent Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
Interest (expense)
$
(358
)
 
$
(253
)
 
$
(105
)
 
41.5
%

Other Income (Expense), Net: Other income (expense), net and fluctuations in the components of Other income (expense), net is summarized below for six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in millions):
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
Increase (Decrease)
 
2018
 
2017
 
Foreign exchange gains, including foreign exchange derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments (See Note 7*)
$
3

 
$
7

 
$
(4
)
Fair value adjustments of forward point amounts (See Note 7*)
—

 
8

 
(8
)
Fair value adjustments on equity investments (see Note 1*)

953

 
—

 
953

Investment impairment charges
—

 
(48
)
 
48

Gain on sale of equity investment in Flexus Biosciences, Inc.
—

 
9

 
(9
)
Other
13

 
6

 
7

Total Other income (expense), net
$
969

 
$
(18
)
 
$
987

* References to Notes in this table are to the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report.

Income Tax Provision: The income tax provision increased by $287 million to $446 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, primarily as a result of an increase in the effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 was 19.1%, an increase of 11.8 percentage points from our effective tax rate of 7.3% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. The increase in our effective tax rate was primarily due to a decrease in excess tax benefits from employee stock compensation deductions, for which our effective tax rate was increased by 7.1 percentage points. Our effective tax rate was also increased by our estimate of U.S. tax on forecasted Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (subject to taxation at an effective statutory tax rate of 10.5%), non-deductible research expenses incurred in our acquisition of Impact, and a decrease in tax benefits of lower statutory tax rates on pre-tax income earned outside the U.S., all of which were partially offset by a reduction in the U.S. statutory tax rate from 35% to 21%, which was enacted on December 22, 2017 as part of the 2017 Tax Act.

67



Our effective tax rate in 2018 is a function of the distribution of our pre-tax income earned inside and outside of the U.S. Our pre-tax income earned in the U.S. is taxed at a U.S. statutory tax rate of 21%. Our pre-tax income earned outside the U.S. is taxed both in the U.S. at an effective federal statutory tax rate of 10.5% and in the foreign jurisdictions where we have operations at lower effective tax rates. Our global pre-tax income is also subject to taxation in most U.S. states. Our future effective tax rate can be materially impacted by shifts in the distribution of our pre-tax income among the jurisdictions where we operate, the amount of research tax credits, the amount of foreign tax credits, the timing and amount of tax benefits from employee stock compensation, payments to collaboration partners, acquisitions, divestitures, changes in tax laws, audit settlements and many other factors which are difficult to forecast.


Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
The following table summarizes the components of our financial condition as of (in millions):
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
 
Increase (Decrease)
Financial assets:
 
 
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
$
1,503

 
$
7,013

 
$
(5,510
)
Debt securities available-for-sale
79

 
3,219

 
(3,140
)
Equity investments with readily determinable fair values
1,828

 
1,810

 
18

Total financial assets
$
3,410

 
$
12,042

 
$
(8,632
)
Debt:
 

 
 

 
 

Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
$
1,497

 
$
—

 
$
1,497

Long-term debt, net of discount
19,754

 
15,838

 
3,916

Total debt
$
21,251

 
$
15,838

 
$
5,413

 
 
 
 
 
 
Working capital (1)
$
2,415

 
$
11,980

 
$
(9,565
)
 
(1) 
Includes Cash and cash equivalents, Debt securities available-for-sale, Equity investments with readily determinable fair values, Accounts receivable, net of allowances, Inventory and Other current assets, less Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt, Accounts payable, Accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and the current portion of Income taxes payable.

We rely primarily on positive cash flows from operating activities, proceeds from sale of debt securities available-for-sale and borrowings in the form of long-term notes payable and short-term commercial paper to provide for our liquidity requirements. We expect continued growth in our expenditures, particularly those related to research and development, clinical trials, commercialization of new products, international expansion and capital investments. However, we anticipate that existing cash and cash equivalent balances, debt securities available-for-sale, cash generated from operations and existing sources of and access to financing are adequate to fund our operating needs, capital expenditures, debt service requirements and our plans to purchase our stock and pursue strategic business initiatives for the foreseeable future.

Many of our operations are conducted outside the United States and significant portions of our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are held internationally. As of June 30, 2018, we held approximately $2.6 billion of these short-term funds in foreign tax jurisdictions. As a result of the 2017 Tax Act, we expect to have access to this cash with minimal to no additional U.S. tax impact. Therefore, we no longer consider these funds permanently reinvested offshore. The amount of funds held in U.S. tax jurisdictions can fluctuate due to the timing of receipts and payments in the ordinary course of business, including intercompany transactions, as well as for other reasons, such as repurchases of our common stock, internal reorganizations, business-development activities, restrictions on distributions out of foreign tax jurisdictions and debt issuances. As part of our ongoing liquidity assessments, we regularly monitor the mix of domestic and international cash flows (both inflows and outflows). Under the 2017 Tax Act, a company’s post-1986 previously untaxed foreign Earnings and Profits (E&P) was mandatorily deemed to be repatriated and taxed, which is also referred to as the toll charge. We have elected to pay the toll charge in annual installments over eight years through 2025.

Share Repurchase Program: In February and May 2018, our Board of Directors approved increases of $5.0 billion and $3.0 billion to our authorized share repurchase program, respectively, bringing the total amount authorized since April 2009 to an aggregate of up to $28.5 billion for our common stock repurchase program of which we have approximately $2.8 billion remaining for future share repurchases as of June 30, 2018, after deducting $2 billion paid in May 2018 pursuant to an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreement. During the three- and six-month period ended June 30, 2018, we used $3.4 billion and $6.1 billion of cash for

68


purchases of our common stock measured on a settlement date basis, respectively, including the $2 billion paid for the ASR for which we have received a partial delivery of shares.

Components of Working Capital

Cash, Cash Equivalents, Debt Securities Available-for-Sale and Equity Investments with Readily Determinable Fair Values: From time to time, we invest our excess cash primarily in money market funds, repurchase agreements, time deposits, commercial paper, U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS), global corporate debt securities, asset backed securities and ultra-short income fund investments. All liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents and all investments with maturities of greater than three months from the date of purchase are classified as debt securities available-for-sale. See Note 8 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report. The $8.6 billion decrease in cash, cash equivalents, debt securities available-for-sale, and equity investments with readily determinable fair values as of June 30, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017 was primarily due to $8.6 billion of payments for the acquisition of Juno, net of cash acquired, and $6.1 billion of payments under our share repurchase program, partially offset by $4.5 billion in proceeds from the February 2018 issuance of senior notes and approximately $995 million in net proceeds from borrowings of Commercial Paper.

Accounts Receivable, Net:  Accounts receivable, net increased by $143 million to approximately $2.1 billion as of June 30, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017. Sales made outside the United States typically have payment terms that are greater than 60 days, thereby extending collection periods beyond those in the United States. We expect our accounts receivable balance to grow as our international sales continue to expand.

We continue to monitor economic conditions, including the volatility associated with international economies, the sovereign debt situation in certain European countries and associated impacts on the financial markets and our business. Our current business model in these markets is typically to sell our hematology/oncology products directly to principally government owned or controlled hospitals, which in turn directly deliver critical care to patients. Many of our products are used to treat life-threatening diseases and we believe this business model enables timely delivery and adequate supply of products. Many of the outstanding receivable balances are related to government-funded hospitals and we believe the receivable balances are ultimately collectible. Similarly, we believe that future sales to these customers will continue to be collectible.
 
Inventory:  Inventory balances increased by $14 million to $555 million as of June 30, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017.

Other Current Assets:  Other current assets increased by $436 million to $824 million as of June 30, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017 primarily due to increases of $190 million in tax receivable, $163 million in prepaid taxes, $43 million in the fair value of derivative instruments, $25 million earned but unbilled revenue associated with contract assets (See Note 2 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report) and $15 million of net other increases.
 
Commercial Paper:  We have a commercial paper program (Program) under which we issue unsecured commercial paper notes (Commercial Paper) on a private placement basis, the proceeds of which are used for general corporate purposes. As of June 30, 2018, we had available capacity to issue up to $2.0 billion of Commercial Paper and there was $995 million of borrowings under the Program bearing an effective interest rate of 2.3%. The maturities of the Commercial Paper may vary, but may not exceed 270 days from the date of issue. The Commercial Paper is sold under customary terms to a dealer or in the commercial paper market and is issued at a discount from par or, alternatively, is sold at par and bears varying interest rates on a fixed or floating basis. Borrowings under the Program, if any, are accounted for as short-term borrowings.
 
Senior Unsecured Credit Facility:  We maintain a senior unsecured revolving credit facility (Credit Facility) that provides revolving credit in the aggregate amount of $2.0 billion. During the second quarter of 2018, we amended our Credit Facility to extend the expiration date to April 25, 2023. Amounts may be borrowed in U.S. Dollars for general corporate purposes. The Credit Facility currently serves as backup liquidity for our Commercial Paper borrowings. As of June 30, 2018, there was no outstanding borrowing against the Credit Facility.

The Credit Facility and the Revolving Credit Agreement contain affirmative and negative covenants, including certain customary financial covenants. We were in compliance with all financial covenants as of June 30, 2018.
 
Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities:  Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities increased by $81 million to approximately $2.9 billion as of June 30, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to increases of $173 million for sales adjustment accruals, $66 million for accrued interest expense, and an

69


increase of $27 million for accounts payable and other accruals. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $185 million associated with the adjustment of clinical trial and development activity wind-down costs associated with the discontinuance of GED-0301 clinical trials in Crohn's disease which was settled.
   
Income Taxes Payable (Current and Non-Current): Income taxes payable decreased by $174 million to approximately $2.4 billion as of June 30, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017, primarily from the current provision for income taxes of $490 million and an increase in prepaid income taxes of $118 million, which were partially offset by income tax payments of $786 million.

Analysis of Cash Flows

Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in millions):
 
Six-Month Periods Ended June 30,
 
 
 
2018
 
2017
 
Change
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
904

 
$
2,469

 
$
(1,565
)
Net cash (used in) investing activities
(5,786
)
 
(1,615
)
 
(4,171
)
Net cash (used in) financing activities
(643
)
 
(424
)
 
(219
)
 
Operating Activities:  Net cash provided by operating activities was $904 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $2.5 billion for the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. The $1.6 billion decrease in net cash provided by operating activities was driven by the $1.1 billion initial payment made in 2018 for the acquisition of Impact as well as an increase of $306 million in upfront payments for collaboration arrangements and an increase of $453 million in cash paid for income taxes. See Notes 3 and 14 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details related to the Impact acquisition and collaboration arrangements, respectively.

Investing Activities: Net cash used in investing activities increased by approximately $4.2 billion to $5.8 billion for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. The increase in net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to approximately $8.6 billion of payments for the acquisition of Juno, net of cash acquired, partially offset by approximately $3.1 billion of net sales of debt securities available-for-sale in 2018 compared to approximately $1.4 billion of net purchases of debt securities available-for-sale in 2017. See Note 3 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details related to the Juno acquisition.

Financing Activities: Net cash used in financing activities increased by $219 million to $643 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. Net cash used in financing activities increased due to approximately $6.1 billion of payments under our share repurchase program during 2018 compared to $811 million of payments under our share repurchase program during 2017. See Note 4 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details. This increase in net cash used in financing activities was partially offset by proceeds from the February 2018 debt issuance which provided approximately $4.5 billion as well as $995 million of net commercial paper borrowings under the Program. See Note 11 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details.

Contractual Obligations
 
For a discussion of our contractual obligations, see “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes to such contractual obligations or potential milestone payments since December 31, 2017 aside from those disclosed in Note 3 and Note 14 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report except as follows:

Collaboration Arrangements and Acquired Research and Development Assets: In addition to the research and development collaboration agreements with third parties and acquired research and development assets from third parties with the potential for future milestone and royalty payments upon the achievement of pre-established developmental, regulatory and/or commercial targets disclosed in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the acquisition of Juno added additional research and development collaboration agreements with third parties and acquired research and development assets from third parties with the potential for future milestone and royalty payments upon the achievement of pre-established developmental, regulatory and/or commercial targets. Our obligation to fund these additional efforts is contingent upon continued involvement in the programs and/or the lack

70


of any adverse events which could cause the discontinuance of the programs. Due to the nature of these arrangements, the future potential payments related to the attainment of specified development, regulatory approval and sales-based milestones over a period of several years are inherently uncertain, and accordingly, no amounts have been recorded for these future potential payments in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2018 contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Potential milestone payments (not including potential royalty payments) under these acquired arrangements from Juno total approximately $2.5 billion.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Significant Accounting Policies
 
A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operation and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting estimates are disclosed in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K. See Note 1 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for new accounting standards adopted during the first quarter of 2018.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
The following discussion provides forward-looking quantitative and qualitative information about our potential exposure to market risk. Market risk represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in the value of financial instruments. The risk of loss is assessed based on the likelihood of adverse changes in fair values, cash flows or future earnings.

We have established guidelines relative to the diversification and maturities of investments to maintain safety and liquidity. These guidelines are reviewed periodically and may be modified depending on market conditions. Although investments may be subject to credit risk, our investment policy specifies credit quality standards for our investments and limits the amount of credit exposure from any single issue, issuer or type of investment. As of June 30, 2018, our market risk sensitive instruments consisted of debt securities available-for-sale and equity investments with readily determinable fair values, our long-term debt and certain derivative contracts (See Notes 8, 11 and 7 of Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional details, respectively).

Debt Securities Available-for-Sale: As of June 30, 2018, the principal amounts, fair values and related weighted-average interest rates of our investments in debt securities classified as debt securities available-for-sale were as follows (dollar amounts in millions):

 
Duration
 
Less Than
1 Year
 
1 to 3 Years
 
3 to 5 Years
 
Total
Principal amount
$
79

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
79

Fair value
79

 
—

 
—

 
79

Weighted average interest rate
2.5
%
 
—
%
 
—
%
 
2.5
%

Equity Investments with Readily Determinable Fair Values

Our equity investments with readily determinable fair values are primarily equity investments in the publicly traded common stock of companies, including common stock of companies with whom we have entered into collaboration arrangements. Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to such securities are included in Other income (expense), net on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Debt Obligations

Short-Term Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-Term Debt: The carrying value of short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 includes:


71


 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Commercial paper
$
995

 
$
—

2.250% senior notes due 2019
502

 
—

Total short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
$
1,497

 
$
—



Long-Term Debt: Our outstanding senior notes with maturity dates in excess of one year after June 30, 2018 have an aggregate principal amount of $19.850 billion with varying maturity dates and interest rates. The principal amounts and carrying values of these senior notes as of June 30, 2018 are summarized below (in millions):
 
Principal
Amount
 
Carrying
Value
2.875% senior notes due 2020
$
1,500

 
$
1,496

3.950% senior notes due 2020
500

 
511

2.250% senior notes due 2021
500

 
497

2.875% senior notes due 2021
500

 
498

3.250% senior notes due 2022
1,000

 
1,039

3.550% senior notes due 2022
1,000

 
995

2.750% senior notes due 2023
750

 
746

3.250% senior notes due 2023
1,000

 
993

4.000% senior notes due 2023
700

 
734

3.625% senior notes due 2024
1,000

 
1,001

3.875% senior notes due 2025
2,500

 
2,472

3.450% senior notes due 2027
1,000

 
974

3.900% senior notes due 2028
1,500

 
1,486

5.700% senior notes due 2040
250

 
247

5.250% senior notes due 2043
400

 
393

4.625% senior notes due 2044
1,000

 
987

5.000% senior notes due 2045
2,000

 
1,975

4.350% senior notes due 2047
1,250

 
1,234

4.550% senior notes due 2048
1,500

 
1,476

Total long-term debt
$
19,850

 
$
19,754


As of June 30, 2018, the fair value of our senior notes outstanding was $19.6 billion.

MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT
During the third quarter of 2017, we adopted ASU 2017-12 on a modified retrospective basis. We recorded pre-tax income of $48 million and $37 million for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 as a result of applying the new guidance during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2017. As such, certain disclosures for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 below have been recast to conform to the disclosure requirements related to the adoption of ASU 2017-12. See Note 1 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report for additional information related to the adoption of ASU 2017-12.

Our revenue and earnings, cash flows and fair values of assets and liabilities can be impacted by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. We actively manage the impact of foreign exchange rate and interest rate movements through operational means and through the use of various financial instruments, including derivative instruments such as foreign currency option contracts, foreign currency forward contracts, treasury rate lock agreements and interest rate swap contracts. In instances where these financial instruments are accounted for as cash flow hedges or fair value hedges we may from time to time terminate the hedging relationship. If a hedging relationship is terminated, we generally either settle the instrument or enter into an offsetting instrument.


72


Foreign Currency Risk Management

We maintain a foreign exchange exposure management program to mitigate the impact of volatility in foreign exchange rates on future foreign currency cash flows, translation of foreign earnings and changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.

Through our revenue hedging program, we endeavor to reduce the impact of possible unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates on our future U.S. Dollar cash flows that are derived from foreign currency denominated sales. To achieve this objective, we hedge a portion of our forecasted foreign currency denominated sales that are expected to occur in the foreseeable future, typically within the next three years, with a maximum of five years. We manage our anticipated transaction exposure principally with foreign currency forward contracts, a combination of foreign currency put and call options, and occasionally purchased foreign currency put options.

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts: We use foreign currency forward contracts to hedge specific forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies, manage exchange rate volatility in the translation of foreign earnings, and reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.

We manage a portfolio of foreign currency forward contracts to protect against changes in anticipated foreign currency cash flows resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily associated with non-functional currency denominated revenues and expenses of foreign subsidiaries. The foreign currency forward hedging contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 had settlement dates within 36 months and 20 months, respectively. The spot rate components of these foreign currency forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and any unrealized gains or losses are reported in Other comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified to the Consolidated Statement of Income in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings. If a hedging relationship is terminated with respect to a foreign currency forward contract, accumulated gains or losses associated with the contract remain in OCI until the hedged forecasted transaction occurs and are reclassified to operations in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings. We recognize in earnings the initial value of the forward point components on a straight-line basis over the life of the derivative instrument within the same line item in the Consolidated Statements of Income that is used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item.

Foreign currency forward contracts entered into to hedge forecasted revenue and expenses were as follows as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 (in millions):
 
 
Notional Amount
Foreign Currency
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Australian Dollar
 
$
46

 
$
61

British Pound
 
134

 
97

Canadian Dollar
 
190

 
227

Euro
 
962

 
954

Japanese Yen
 
508

 
356

Total
 
$
1,840

 
$
1,695

 
We consider the impact of our own and the counterparties’ credit risk on the fair value of the contracts as well as the ability of each party to execute its obligations under the contract on an ongoing basis. As of June 30, 2018, credit risk did not materially change the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts.
 
We also manage a portfolio of foreign currency contracts to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain recognized assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and, from time to time, we enter into foreign currency contracts to manage exposure related to translation of foreign earnings. These foreign currency forward contracts have not been designated as hedges and, accordingly, any changes in their fair value are recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Income in Other income (expense), net in the current period. The aggregate notional amount of the foreign currency forward non-designated hedging contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were $748 million and $885 million, respectively.

Although not predictive in nature, we believe a hypothetical 10% threshold reflects a reasonably possible near-term change in foreign currency rates. Assuming that the June 30, 2018 exchange rates were to change by a hypothetical 10%, the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts would change by approximately $248 million. However, since the contracts either hedge specific forecasted intercompany transactions denominated in foreign currencies or relate to assets and liabilities denominated in

73


currencies other than the entities' functional currencies, any change in the fair value of the contract would be either reported in OCI and reclassified to earnings in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings or re-measured through earnings each period along with the underlying asset or liability.
Foreign Currency Option Contracts: From time to time, we may hedge a portion of our future foreign currency exposure by utilizing a strategy that involves both a purchased local currency put option and a written local currency call option that are accounted for as hedges of future sales denominated in that local currency. Specifically, we sell (or write) a local currency call option and purchase a local currency put option with the same expiration dates and local currency notional amounts but with different strike prices. This combination of transactions is generally referred to as a “collar.” The expiration dates and notional amounts correspond to the amount and timing of forecasted foreign currency sales. The foreign currency option contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 had settlement dates within 30 months and 36 months, respectively. If the U.S. Dollar weakens relative to the currency of the hedged anticipated sales, the purchased put option value reduces to zero and we benefit from the increase in the U.S. Dollar equivalent value of our anticipated foreign currency cash flows; however, this benefit would be capped at the strike level of the written call, which forms the upper end of the collar. The premium collected from the sale of the call option is equal to the premium paid for the purchased put option, resulting in a net zero cost for each collar.
Outstanding foreign currency option contracts entered into to hedge forecasted revenue were as follows as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 (in millions):
 
Notional Amount (1)
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Foreign currency option contracts designated as hedging activity:
 
 
 
Purchased Put
$
2,756

 
$
3,319

Written Call
3,131

 
3,739

(1) U.S. Dollar notional amounts are calculated as the hedged local currency amount multiplied by the strike value of the foreign currency option. The local currency notional amounts of our purchased put and written call that are designated as hedging activities are equal to each other.

We also have entered into foreign currency put option contracts to hedge forecasted revenue which were not part of a collar strategy. Such put option contracts had a notional amount of $129 million and $258 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, and settlement dates within 6 months and 12 months, respectively.

Assuming that the June 30, 2018 exchange rates were to change by a hypothetical 10%, the fair value of the foreign currency option contracts would increase by approximately $169 million if the U.S. Dollar were to strengthen and decrease by approximately $197 million if the U.S. Dollar were to weaken. However, since the contracts hedge specific forecasted intercompany transactions denominated in foreign currencies, any change in the fair value of the contract would be reported in OCI and reclassified to earnings in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings.

Interest Rate Risk Management

Forward Starting Interest Rate Swaps and Treasury Rate Locks: In anticipation of issuing fixed-rate debt, we may use forward starting interest rate swaps (forward starting swaps) or treasury rate lock agreements (treasury rate locks) that are designated as cash flow hedges to hedge against changes in interest rates that could impact expected future issuances of debt. To the extent these hedges of cash flows related to anticipated debt are effective, any realized or unrealized gains or losses on the forward starting swaps or treasury rate locks are reported in OCI and are recognized in income over the life of the anticipated fixed-rate notes. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we did not have any outstanding forward starting swaps or treasury rate locks.

Interest Rate Swap Contracts: From time to time we hedge the fair value of certain debt obligations through the use of interest rate swap contracts. The interest rate swap contracts are designated hedges of the fair value changes in the notes attributable to changes in benchmark interest rates. Gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value of the underlying debt attributable to the hedged benchmark interest rate risk are recorded on the Consolidated Statement of Income within Interest (expense) with an associated offset to the carrying value of the notes recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Since the specific terms and notional amount of the swap are intended to match those of the debt being hedged all changes in fair value of the swap are recorded on the Consolidated Statement of Income within Interest (expense) with an associated offset to the derivative asset or liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Consequently, there is no net impact recorded in income. Any net interest payments made or received on interest rate swap contracts are recognized as interest expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. If a hedging relationship is terminated for an interest rate swap contract, accumulated gains or losses associated with the contract are measured and recorded as a reduction or increase of current and future interest expense associated with the previously hedged debt obligations.

74



The following table summarizes the notional amounts of our outstanding interest rate swap contracts as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 (in millions): 

 
Notional Amount
 
June 30, 2018
 
December 31, 2017
Interest rate swap contracts entered into as fair value hedges of the following fixed-rate senior notes:
 
 
 
3.875% senior notes due 2025
$
200

 
$
200

3.450% senior notes due 2027
550

 
250

3.900% senior notes due 2028
200

 
—

Total
$
950

 
$
450


We have entered into swap contracts that were designated as hedges of certain of our fixed rate notes in 2018 and 2017, and also terminated the hedging relationship by settling certain of those swap contracts during 2018 and 2017. In 2018, we settled $150 million notional amount of certain swap contracts. There were no material cash proceeds as a result of settling such swap contracts. During 2017, we terminated the hedging relationship on certain outstanding swap contracts amounting to $200 million notional amount by settling such swap contracts. The settlement of swap contracts resulted in the receipt of net proceeds of $3 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, which are accounted for as a reduction of current and future interest expense associated with these notes. See Note 11 for additional details related to reductions of current and future interest expense.

A sensitivity analysis to measure potential changes in the market value of our debt and interest rate swap contracts from a change in interest rates indicated that a one percentage point increase in interest rates as of June 30, 2018 would have reduced the aggregate fair value of our net payable by approximately $1.4 billion. A one percentage point decrease as of June 30, 2018 would have increased the aggregate fair value of our net payable by approximately $1.6 billion.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), or the Exchange Act). Based upon the foregoing evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management (including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
 
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
 
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 

75


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
 
The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to Note 16 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this report.
 
Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following describes major risks to our business and should be considered carefully. Any of these factors could significantly and negatively affect our business, prospects, financial condition, operating results or credit ratings, which could cause the trading prices of our equity securities to decline. The risks described below are not the only risks we may face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or risks that we currently consider immaterial, could also negatively affect us.
 
Our operating results may be subject to significant fluctuations.
 
Our operating results may fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year for a number of reasons, including the risks discussed elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section. Events such as a delay in product development or a revenue shortfall may cause financial results for a particular period to be below our expectations. In addition, we have experienced and may continue to experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to the timing of charges that we may take. We have recorded, or may be required to record, charges that include development milestone and license payments under collaboration and license agreements, amortization of acquired intangibles and other acquisition related charges, and impairment charges. Several other factors, including government rebates, distributor buying patterns and government tender timing, impact the dollar value of product sales recorded in any particular quarter.

Our revenues are also subject to foreign exchange rate fluctuations due to the global nature of our operations. We recognize foreign currency gains or losses arising from our operation in the period in which we incur those gains or losses. Although we utilize foreign currency forward contracts, a combination of foreign currency put and call options, and occasionally purchased put options to manage foreign currency risk, our efforts to reduce currency exchange losses may not be successful. As a result, currency fluctuation among our reporting currency, the U.S. Dollar, and the currencies in which we do business will affect our operating results. Our net income may also fluctuate due to the impact of charges we may be required to take with respect to foreign currency and other hedge transactions. In particular, we may incur higher than expected charges from hedge ineffectiveness or from the termination of a hedge arrangement. For more information, see Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are dependent on the continued commercial success of our primary products, REVLIMID®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, OTEZLA®, ABRAXANE®, and VIDAZA®.
 
Our business is largely dependent on the commercial success of REVLIMID®, POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, OTEZLA®, ABRAXANE®, and VIDAZA®. REVLIMID® currently accounts for over half of our total revenue. As new products, such as POMALYST®/IMNOVID® and OTEZLA®, have obtained regulatory approval and gained market acceptance, our dependence on REVLIMID® has decreased, a trend that we expect to continue. A significant decline in REVLIMID® net revenue, in the absence of offsetting increases in revenue from our other marketed products, would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. The success of these products depends on acceptance by regulators, key opinion leaders, physicians, and patients as effective drugs with certain advantages over other therapies. A number of factors, as discussed in greater detail below, may adversely impact the degree of acceptance of these products, including their efficacy, safety, price and benefits over competing products, as well as the reimbursement policies of third-party payers, such as government and private insurance plans.
 
If unexpected adverse events are reported in connection with the use of any of these products, physician and patient acceptance of the product could deteriorate and the commercial success of such product could be adversely affected. We are required to report to the FDA or similar bodies in other countries events associated with our products relating to death or serious injury. Adverse events could result in additional regulatory controls, such as the imposition of costly post-approval clinical studies or revisions to our approved labeling which could limit the indications or patient population for a product or could even lead to the withdrawal of a product from the market. THALOMID® is known to be toxic to the human fetus and exposure to the drug during pregnancy could result in significant deformities. REVLIMID® and POMALYST®/IMNOVID® are also considered toxic to the human fetus and their respective labels contain warnings against use which could result in embryo-fetal exposure. While we have restricted

76


distribution systems for THALOMID®, REVLIMID®, and POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, and endeavor to educate patients regarding the potential known adverse events, including pregnancy risks, we cannot ensure that all such warnings and recommendations will be complied with or that adverse events resulting from non-compliance will not occur.

Our future commercial success depends on gaining regulatory approval for products in development, and obtaining approvals for our current products for additional indications.
 
The testing, manufacturing and marketing of our products require regulatory approvals, including approval from the FDA and similar bodies in other countries. Our future growth would be negatively impacted if we fail to obtain timely, or at all, requisite regulatory approvals in the United States and internationally for products in development and approvals for our existing products for additional indications.

The principal risks to obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals are as follows:

•
In general, preclinical tests and clinical trials can take many years and require the expenditure of substantial resources, and the data obtained from these tests and trials may not lead to regulatory approval;
•
Delays or rejections may be encountered during any stage of the regulatory process if the clinical or other data fails to demonstrate compliance with a regulatory agency’s requirements for safety, efficacy and quality;
•
Requirements for approval may become more stringent due to changes in regulatory agency policy or the adoption of new regulations or legislation;
•
Even if a product is approved, the scope of the approval may significantly limit the indicated uses or the patient population for which the product may be marketed and may impose significant limitations in the nature of warnings, precautions and contra-indications that could materially affect the sales and profitability of the product;
•
After a product is approved, the FDA or similar bodies in other countries may withdraw or modify an approval in a significant manner or request that we perform additional clinical trials or change the labeling of the product due to a number of reasons, including safety concerns, adverse events and side effects;
•
Products, such as REVLIMID® and POMALYST®/IMNOVID®, that receive accelerated approval can be subject to an expedited withdrawal if post-marketing restrictions are not adhered to or are shown to be inadequate to assure safe use, or if the drug is shown to be unsafe or ineffective under its conditions of use;
•
Guidelines and recommendations published by various governmental and non-governmental organizations can reduce the use of our approved products;
•
Approved products, as well as their manufacturers, are subject to continuing and ongoing review by regulatory agencies, and the discovery of previously unknown problems with these products or the failure to comply with manufacturing or quality control requirements may result in restrictions on the manufacture, sale or use of a product or its withdrawal from the market; and
•
Changes in regulatory agency policy or the adoption of new regulations or legislation could impose restrictions on the sale or marketing of our approved products.
If we fail to comply with laws or government regulations or policies our business could be adversely affected.

The discovery, preclinical development, clinical trials, manufacturing, risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (such as our REMS program), marketing and labeling of pharmaceuticals and biologics are all subject to extensive laws and government regulations and policies. In addition, individual states, acting through their attorneys general, are increasingly seeking to regulate the marketing of prescription drugs under state consumer protection and false advertising laws. If we fail to comply with the laws and regulations regarding the promotion and sale of our products, appropriate distribution of our products under our restricted distribution systems, off-label promotion and the promotion of unapproved products, government agencies may bring enforcement actions against us or private litigants may assert claims on behalf of the government against us that could inhibit our commercial capabilities and/or result in significant damage awards and penalties.
 

77


Other matters that may be the subject of governmental or regulatory action which could adversely affect our business include laws, regulations and policies governing:
•
protection of the environment, privacy, healthcare reimbursement programs, and competition;
•
parallel importation of prescription drugs from outside the United States at prices that are regulated by the governments of various foreign countries; and
•
mandated disclosures of clinical trial or other data, such as the EMA’s policy on publication of clinical data.
Sales of our products will be significantly reduced if access to and reimbursement for our products by governmental and other third-party payers are reduced or terminated.

Sales of our current and future products depend, in large part, on the conditions under which our products are paid for by health maintenance, managed care, pharmacy benefit and similar health care management organizations (HCMOs), or reimbursed by government health administration authorities, private health coverage insurers and other third-party payers.

The influence of HCMOs has increased in recent years due to the growing number of patients receiving coverage through a few large HCMOs as a result of industry consolidation. One objective of HCMOs is to contain and, where possible, reduce healthcare expenditures. HCMOs typically use formularies (lists of approved medicines available to members of a particular HCMO), clinical protocols, volume purchasing, long-term contracts and other methods to negotiate prices with pharmaceutical providers. Due to their lower cost generally, generic medicines are typically placed in preferred tiers of HCMO formularies. Additionally, many formularies include alternative and competitive products for treatment of particular medical problems. Exclusion of our products from a formulary or HCMO-implemented restrictions on the use of our products can significantly impact drug usage in the HCMO patient population, and consequently our revenues.

Generally, in Europe and other countries outside the United States, the government-sponsored healthcare system is the primary payer of patients’ healthcare costs. These health care management organizations and third-party payers are increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products and services, seeking to implement cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products. Our products continue to be subject to increasing price and reimbursement pressure due to price controls imposed by governments in many countries; increased difficulty in obtaining and maintaining satisfactory drug reimbursement rates; and the tendency of governments and private health care providers to favor generic pharmaceuticals. In addition, governmental and private third-party payers and purchasers of our products may restrict access to formularies or otherwise discourage use of our products. Limitations on patient access to our drugs, adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures could adversely affect our business. In addition, our operating results may also be affected by distributors seeking to take advantage of price differences among various markets by buying our products in low cost markets for resale in higher cost markets.

The Affordable Care Act and other federal and state legislation may affect our pricing policies and government reimbursement of our products which may adversely impact our revenues and profitability.

In the U.S. there have been and are likely to continue to be a number of legislative and regulatory proposals and enactments related to drug pricing and reimbursement at both the federal and state level that could impact our profitability. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 were signed into law in March 2010, and are referred to collectively as the Healthcare Reform Acts. These reforms have significantly impacted the pharmaceutical industry and, in the coming years, it is likely that additional changes, including the possible repeal of all or certain aspects of these reforms, will be made. Moreover, changes could be made to governmental healthcare and insurance reimbursement programs that could significantly impact the profitability of our products. Additionally, the pricing and reimbursement of pharmaceutical products, in general and specialty drugs in particular, have received the attention of U.S. policymakers, state legislators and others. At this time, we cannot predict the impact of this increased scrutiny on the pricing or reimbursement of our products or pharmaceutical products generally.

The Healthcare Reform Acts, among other things, made significant changes to the Medicaid rebate program by increasing the minimum rebates that manufacturers like us are required to pay. These changes also expanded the government’s 340B drug discount program by expanding the category of entities qualified to participate in the program and benefit from its deeply discounted drug pricing. The Healthcare Reform Acts also obligate the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), which administers the 340B program, to update the agreement that each manufacturer must sign to participate in the 340B program to require each manufacturer to offer the 340B price to covered entities if the manufacturer makes the drug product available to any other purchaser

78


at any price, and to report the ceiling prices for its drugs to the government. HRSA issued this update in late 2016, and we signed an amendment to our agreement on December 29, 2016.

HRSA also issued proposed regulations to implement an administrative dispute resolution (ADR) process for certain disputes arising under the 340B program, including (1) claims by covered entities that they have been overcharged for covered outpatient drugs by manufacturers; and (2) claims by manufacturers, after a manufacturer has conducted an audit, that a covered entity has violated the prohibition on diversion of covered outpatient drugs to ineligible patients or duplicate discounts. The exact timing and content of final action on these matters is uncertain at this time. Depending on their final form, these actions could affect our obligations under the 340B program in ways that may have an adverse impact on our business. Additionally, in early 2016, HRSA finalized a regulation regarding the 340B pricing methodology and providing guidelines for when civil monetary penalties may be issued for “knowing and intentional” manufacturer overcharges of 340B covered entities. HRSA has delayed the effective date of this regulation to July 1, 2019.

We have received an inquiry from HRSA regarding our limited distribution networks for REVLIMID®, POMALYST®, and THALOMID® and our compliance with the 340B program. We have cooperated fully in responding to this inquiry and believe that we have complied with applicable legal requirements. If, however, we are ultimately required to change our sales or pricing practices with regard to the distribution of these drugs, there would be an adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.

Our ability to sell our products to hospitals in the United States depends in part on our relationships with group purchasing organizations.

Many existing and potential customers for our products become members of group purchasing organizations (GPOs). GPOs negotiate pricing arrangements and contracts, sometimes on an exclusive basis, with medical supply manufacturers and distributors, and these negotiated prices are made available to a GPO’s affiliated hospitals and other members. If we are not one of the providers selected by a GPO, affiliated hospitals and other members may be less likely to purchase our products, and if the GPO has negotiated a strict sole source, market share compliance or bundling contract for another manufacturer’s products, we may be precluded from making sales to members of the GPO for the duration of that contractual arrangement. Our failure to enter into or renew contracts with GPOs may cause us to lose market share and could adversely affect our sales.
 
Our long-term success depends, in part, on intellectual property protection.
 
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain and enforce patents, protect trade secrets, obtain licenses to technology owned by third parties and to conduct our business without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies, including ours, can be uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. There can be no assurance that if claims of any of our owned or licensed patents are challenged by one or more third parties (through, for example, litigation or post grant review in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or European Patent Office (EPO)), a court or patent authority ruling on such challenge will ultimately determine, after all opportunities for appeal have been exhausted, that our patent claims are valid and enforceable. If a third party is found to have rights covering products or processes used by us, we could be forced to cease using such products or processes, be subject to significant liabilities to such third party and/or be required to obtain license rights from such third party. Lawsuits involving patent claims are costly and could affect our results of operations, result in significant expense and divert the attention of managerial and scientific personnel. For more information on challenges to certain of our patents and settlement of certain of these challenges, see Note 16 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report.

In addition, we do not know whether any of our owned or licensed pending patent applications will result in the issuance of patents or, if patents are issued, whether they will be dominated by third-party patent rights, provide significant proprietary protection or commercial advantage or be circumvented, opposed, invalidated, rendered unenforceable or infringed by others.
 
Our intellectual property rights may be affected by certain provisions of the America Invents Act (“AIA”) enacted in 2011. For example, under the AIA, members of the public may seek to challenge an issued patent by petitioning the USPTO to institute a post grant proceeding, such as a Post Grant Review (PGR) or Inter Partes Review (IPR). Once a post grant proceeding is instituted, the USPTO may find grounds to revoke the challenged patent or specific claims therein. For more information with respect to IPRs, see Note 16 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report. A similar procedure (known as a patent opposition) has existed in Europe for many years and we have defended our European patents in certain of those proceedings. We cannot predict whether any other Celgene patents will ever become the subject of a post grant proceeding or patent opposition. If a significant product patent is successfully challenged in a post grant proceeding or patent opposition, it may

79


be revoked, which would have a serious negative impact on our ability to maintain exclusivity in the market-place for our commercial products affected by such revocation and could adversely affect our future revenues and profitability.

On October 2, 2014, the EMA adopted its clinical transparency policy, "Policy on Publication of Clinical Data for Medicinal Products for Human Use" (Clinical Data Policy), which became effective on January 1, 2015. In general, under the Clinical Data Policy, clinical data is not deemed to be commercially confidential data. Therefore, there is a risk that unpublished proprietary information, including trade secrets that are incorporated into a marketing application before the EMA may be made publicly available. It is difficult to predict how any public disclosure of our trade secrets or other confidential and proprietary information made available under the Clinical Data Policy may adversely impact our patent rights and our competitive advantage in the marketplace.

Also, procedures for obtaining patents and the degree of protection against the use of a patented invention by others vary from country to country. There can be no assurance that the issuance to us in one country of a patent covering an invention will be followed by the issuance in other countries of patents covering the same invention or that any judicial interpretation of the validity, enforceability or scope of the claims in a patent issued in one country will be similar to or recognized by the judicial interpretation given to a corresponding patent issued in another country.

The USPTO and various foreign governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. While an inadvertent lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction.

We also rely upon unpatented, proprietary and trade secret technology that we seek to protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our collaborative partners, employees, consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors. Despite precautions taken by us, there can be no assurance that these agreements provide meaningful protection, that they will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for any such breach or that our proprietary and trade secret technologies will not otherwise become known to others or found to be non-proprietary.

We receive confidential and proprietary information from collaborators, prospective licensees and other third parties. In addition, we employ individuals who were previously employed at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies. We may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed confidential information of these third parties or our employees’ former employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims, which can result in significant costs if we are found to have improperly used the confidential or proprietary information of others. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of personnel and resources.

Our products may face competition from lower cost generic or follow-on products.
 
Manufacturers of generic drugs are seeking to compete with our drugs and present a significant challenge to us. Those manufacturers may challenge the scope, validity or enforceability of our patents in court, requiring us to engage in complex, lengthy and costly litigation. If any of our owned or licensed patents are infringed or challenged, we may not be successful in enforcing or defending those intellectual property rights and, as a result, may not be able to develop or market the relevant product exclusively, which would have a material adverse effect on our sales of that product. In addition, manufacturers of innovative drugs as well as generic drug manufacturers may be able to design their products around our owned or licensed patents and compete with us using the resulting alternative technology. For more information concerning certain pending proceedings relating to our intellectual property rights and settlements of certain challenges, see Note 16 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report.

Upon the expiration or loss of patent protection for a product, or upon the “at-risk” launch by a manufacturer of a generic version of one of our products, we can quickly lose a significant portion of our sales of that product. In addition, as additional competitors enter the market, our patented products may face increased competition or pricing pressure.

Orphan exclusivity and regulatory data protection for REVLIMID®’s multiple myeloma indication in Europe expired in June 2017. The regulatory marketing protection for REVLIMID® in Europe expires in June 2018. Notwithstanding that our intellectual property rights for REVLIMID® in Europe are due to remain in force through at least 2022, we expect that some generic drug companies may attempt to market a generic version of REVLIMID® in various countries in Europe before this time. We have recently been

80


made aware of a generic drug manufacturer receiving regulatory clearance for a generic version of REVLIMID® in some European countries. While we intend to enforce our intellectual property rights to the fullest extent possible, it may be possible for generic drug companies either to challenge successfully our rights in advance of launch or to otherwise gain entry into the market following the expiration of regulatory marketing protection for REVLIMID®.

Certain novel approaches to the treatment of diseases, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, may present significant challenges and risks for us.

The development of novel approaches for the treatment of diseases, such as our recent acquisition of Juno’s CAR T cell immunotherapy and related technologies, presents many new challenges and risks due to the unique nature of genetic modification of patient cells ex vivo using certain viruses to reengineer these cells to ultimately treat diseases. The use of reengineered cells as a potential cancer treatment is a recent development and may not be broadly accepted by the regulatory, patient or medical communities. Further, we may not be able to satisfactorily establish the safety and efficacy or the reliability of these therapies. Regulatory requirements governing gene and cell therapy products have changed frequently and may continue to change in the future. To date, only a few products that involve the genetic modification of patient cells have been approved for commercial sale. Moreover, public perception of therapy safety issues may adversely influence the willingness of subjects to participate in clinical trials, or if approved, of physicians and payors to subscribe to these novel treatment approaches. If we fail to overcome these and other challenges, or if significant adverse events are reported from similar therapies, our development of these novel treatment approaches may be hampered or delayed, which could adversely affect our future anticipated revenues and/or profitability related to this therapeutic program.

Our business operates in an extremely competitive environment.
 
The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries in which we operate are highly competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change. Our present and potential competitors include major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as specialty pharmaceutical firms, including, but not limited to:

•
Hematology and Oncology: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Eisai, Gilead, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi and Takeda; and
•
Inflammation and Immunology: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB S.A.
Some of these companies have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we have, enabling them, among other things, to make greater research and development investments. We also experience competition in drug development from universities and other research institutions, and we compete with others in acquiring technology from these sources. The pharmaceutical industry has undergone, and is expected to continue to undergo, rapid and significant technological change, and we expect competition to intensify as technical advances are made and become more widely known. The development of products or processes by our competitors with significant advantages over those that we are developing could adversely affect our future revenues and profitability.

A decline in general economic conditions would adversely affect our results of operations.
 
Sales of our products are dependent, in large part, on third-party payers. As a result of global credit and financial market conditions, these organizations may be unable to satisfy their reimbursement obligations or may delay payment. For information about receivable balances relating to government-owned or -controlled hospitals in European countries, see Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

In addition, due to tightened global credit, there may be a disruption or delay in the performance of our third-party contractors, suppliers or collaborators. We rely on third parties for several important aspects of our business, including portions of our product manufacturing, clinical development of future collaboration products, conduct of clinical trials and supply of raw materials. If such third parties are unable to satisfy their commitments to us, our business could be adversely affected.
 

81


We may be required to modify our business practices, pay fines and significant expenses or experience other losses due to governmental investigations or other enforcement activities.
 
We may become subject to litigation or governmental investigations in the United States and foreign jurisdictions that may arise from the conduct of our business. Like many companies in our industry, we have from time to time received inquiries and subpoenas and other types of information requests from government authorities and we have been subject to claims and other actions related to our business activities.

While the ultimate outcomes of investigations and legal proceedings are difficult to predict, adverse resolutions or settlements of those matters could result in, among other things:

•
significant damage awards, fines, penalties or other payments, and administrative remedies, such as exclusion and/or debarment from government programs, or other rulings that preclude us from operating our business in a certain manner;
•
changes and additional costs to our business operations to avoid risks associated with such litigation or investigations;
•
product recalls;
•
reputational damage and decreased demand for our products; and
•
expenditure of significant time and resources that would otherwise be available for operating our business.
For more information relating to governmental investigations and other legal proceedings and recent settlements of legal proceedings, see Note 16 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report.

The development of new biopharmaceutical products involves a lengthy and complex process and we may be unable to commercialize any of the products we are currently developing.
 
Many of our drug candidates are in the early or mid-stages of research and development and will require the commitment of substantial financial resources, extensive research, development, preclinical testing, clinical trials, manufacturing scale-up and regulatory approval prior to being ready for sale. This process takes many years of effort without any assurance of ultimate success. Our product development efforts with respect to a product candidate may fail for many reasons, including:

•
the failure of the product candidate in preclinical or clinical studies;

•
adverse patient reactions to the product candidate or indications of other safety concerns;

•
insufficient clinical trial data to support the effectiveness or superiority of the product candidate;

•
our inability to manufacture sufficient quantities of the product candidate for development or commercialization activities in a timely and cost-efficient manner;

•
our failure to obtain, or delays in obtaining, the required regulatory approvals for the product candidate, the facilities or the process used to manufacture the product candidate;

•
changes in the regulatory environment, including pricing and reimbursement, that make development of a new product or of an existing product for a new indication no longer attractive;

•
the failure to obtain or maintain satisfactory drug reimbursement rates by governmental or third-party payers; and

•
the development of a competitive product or therapy.

If a product were to fail to be approved or if sales fail to materialize for a newly approved product, we may incur losses related to the write-down of inventory, impairment of property, plant and equipment dedicated to the product or expenses related to restructuring.


82


Disruptions of our manufacturing and distribution operations could significantly interrupt our production and distribution capabilities.

We have our own manufacturing facilities for many of our products and we have contracted with third parties to provide other manufacturing, finishing, and packaging services. Any of those manufacturing processes could be partially or completely disrupted by fire, contamination, natural disaster, terrorist attack or governmental action. A disruption could lead to substantial production delays and the need to establish alternative manufacturing sources for the affected products requiring additional regulatory approvals. In the interim, our finished goods inventories may be insufficient to satisfy customer orders on a timely basis. Further, our business interruption insurance may not adequately compensate us for any losses that may occur.
 
In all the countries where we sell our products, governmental regulations define standards for manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distributing and storing pharmaceutical products. Our failure to comply, or the failure of our contract manufacturers and distributors to comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on them or us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, disgorgement, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions.
 
We have contracted with various distributors to distribute most of our branded products. If our distributors fail to perform and we cannot secure a replacement distributor within a reasonable period of time, our revenue could be adversely affected.

We have limited experience manufacturing CAR T cell immunotherapies, and our processes may be more difficult or more expensive than the approaches taken by our current and future competitors. We cannot be sure that the manufacturing processes employed by us will result in CAR T cell immunotherapies that will be safe and effective. Logistical and shipment delays and other factors not in our control could prevent or delay the delivery of our product candidates to patients. Additionally, we are required to maintain a complex chain of identity and custody with respect to patient material as such material moves through the manufacturing process, and failure to maintain such chain of identity and custody could result in adverse patient outcomes, loss of product or regulatory remedial action, which could adversely affect our future anticipated revenues and/or profitability related to this therapeutic program.

The consolidation of drug wholesalers and other wholesaler actions could increase competitive and pricing pressures.
 
We sell our pharmaceutical products in the United States primarily through wholesale distributors and contracted pharmacies. These wholesale customers comprise a significant part of our distribution network for pharmaceutical products in the United States. This distribution network is continuing to undergo significant consolidation. As a result, a smaller number of large wholesale distributors and pharmacy chains control a significant share of the market. We expect that consolidation of drug wholesalers and pharmacy chains will increase competitive and pricing pressures on pharmaceutical manufacturers, including us. In addition, wholesalers may apply pricing pressure through fee-for-service arrangements and their purchases may exceed customer demand, resulting in increased returns or reduced wholesaler purchases in later periods.

Risks from the improper conduct of employees, agents, contractors or collaborators could adversely affect our business or reputation.

We cannot ensure that our compliance controls, policies and procedures will in every instance protect us from acts committed by our employees, agents, contractors or collaborators that violate the laws or regulations of the jurisdictions in which we operate, including employment, anti-corruption, environmental, competition and privacy laws. Such improper actions, particularly with respect to foreign healthcare professionals and government officials, could subject us to civil or criminal investigations, monetary and injunctive penalties, adversely impact our ability to conduct business in certain markets, negatively affect our results of operations and damage our reputation.

We are subject to a variety of risks related to the conduct and expansion of our business internationally, particularly in emerging markets.

As our operations expand globally, we are subject to risks associated with conducting business in foreign markets, particularly in emerging markets. Those risks include:

•
increased management, travel, infrastructure and legal compliance costs;
•
longer payment and reimbursement cycles;

83


•
difficulties in enforcing contracts and collecting accounts receivable;
•
local marketing and promotional challenges;
•
lack of consistency, and unexpected changes, in foreign regulatory requirements and practices;
•
increased risk of governmental and regulatory scrutiny and investigations;
•
increased exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
•
the burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and legal standards;
•
operating in locations with a higher incidence of corruption and fraudulent business practices;
•
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign sales and development operations;
•
import and export requirements, tariffs, taxes and other trade barriers;
•
weak or no protection of intellectual property rights;
•
possible enactment of laws regarding the management of and access to data and public networks and websites;
•
possible future limitations on foreign-owned businesses;
•
increased financial accounting and reporting burdens and complexities; and
•
other factors beyond our control, including political, social and economic instability, popular uprisings, war, terrorist attacks and security concerns in general.
As we continue to expand our business into multiple international markets, our success will depend, in large part, on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks associated with our international operations. Any of these risks could harm our international operations and reduce our sales, adversely affecting our business, results of operations, financial condition and growth prospects.

We may not realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and strategic initiatives.
 
We may face significant challenges in effectively integrating entities and businesses that we acquire, including the acquisitions of Impact Biomedicines, Inc. and Juno Therapeutics, Inc., and we may not realize the benefits anticipated from such acquisitions. Achieving the anticipated benefits of our acquired businesses will depend in part upon whether we can integrate our
businesses in an efficient and effective manner. Our integration of acquired businesses involves a number of risks, including:
 
•
demands on management related to the increase in our size after an acquisition;
•
the diversion of management’s attention from daily operations to the integration of acquired businesses and personnel;
•
higher than anticipated integration costs;
•
failure to achieve expected synergies and costs savings;
•
difficulties in the assimilation and retention of employees;
•
difficulties in the assimilation of different cultures and practices, as well as in the assimilation of broad and geographically dispersed personnel and operations; and
•
difficulties in the integration of departments, systems, including accounting systems, technologies, books and records and procedures, as well as in maintaining uniform standards and controls, including internal control over financial reporting, and related procedures and policies.

In addition, we may not be able to realize the projected benefits of corporate strategic initiatives we may pursue in the future.


84


We may not be able to continue to attract and retain highly qualified managerial, scientific, manufacturing and commercial talent.
 
The success of our business depends, in large part, on our continued ability to attract and retain highly qualified managerial, scientific, medical, manufacturing, commercial and other professional personnel, and competition for these types of personnel is intense. We cannot be sure that we will be able to attract or retain skilled personnel or that the costs of doing so will not materially increase.
 
Risks associated with using hazardous materials in our business could subject us to significant liability.
 
We use certain hazardous materials in our research, development, manufacturing and other business activities. If an accident or environmental discharge occurs, or if we discover contamination caused by prior owners and operators of properties we acquire, we could be liable for remediation obligations, damages and fines that could exceed our insurance coverage and financial resources. Additionally, the cost of compliance with environmental and safety laws and regulations may increase in the future, requiring us to expend more financial resources either in compliance or in purchasing supplemental insurance coverage.

We are subject to various legal proceedings, claims and investigative demands in the ordinary course of our business, the ultimate outcome of which may result in significant expense, payments and penalties.

We and certain of our subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings that include patent, product liability, consumer, commercial, antitrust and other claims that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. Litigation is inherently unpredictable. Although we believe we have substantial defenses in these matters, we could in the future be subject to adverse judgments, enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcomes of certain matters, and such developments could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which such judgments are received or settlements occur. For more information regarding settlement of certain legal proceedings, see Note 16 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report.

Our activities relating to the sale and marketing and the pricing of our products are subject to extensive regulation under the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, the False Claims Act, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other federal and state statutes, including those discussed elsewhere in this report, as well as anti-kickback and false claims laws, and similar laws in international jurisdictions. Like many companies in our industry, we have from time to time received inquiries and subpoenas and other types of information demands from government authorities, and been subject to claims and other actions related to our business activities brought by governmental authorities, as well as by consumers, third-party payers, stockholders and others. There can be no assurance that existing or future proceedings will not result in significant expense, civil payments, fines or other adverse consequences. For more information relating to governmental investigations and other legal proceedings and recent settlements of legal proceedings, see Note 16 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report.

Product liability claims could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Product liability claims could result in significant damage awards or settlements. Such claims can also be accompanied by consumer fraud claims or claims by third-party payers seeking reimbursement of the cost of our products. In addition, adverse determinations or settlements of product liability claims may result in suspension or withdrawal of a product marketing authorization or changes to our product labeling, including restrictions on therapeutic indications, inclusion of new contraindications, warnings or precautions, which would have a material adverse effect on sales of such product. We have historically purchased product liability coverage from third-party carriers for a portion of our potential liability. Such insurance has become increasingly difficult and costly to obtain. In this context and in light of the strength of our balance sheet we now self-insure these risks beginning in 2016. Product liability claims, regardless of their merits or ultimate outcome, are costly, divert management's attention, may harm our reputation and can impact the demand for our products. There can be no assurance that we will be able to recover under any existing third-party insurance policy or that such coverage will be adequate to fully cover all risks or damage awards or settlements. Additionally, if we are unable to meet our self-insurance obligations for claims that are more than we estimated or reserved for that require substantial expenditures, there could be a material adverse effect on our financial statements and results of operations.

Changes in our effective income tax rate could adversely affect our results of operations.
 
We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions and our domestic and international tax liabilities are largely dependent upon the distribution of income among these different jurisdictions. Various factors may have

85


favorable or unfavorable effects on our effective income tax rate. These factors include interpretations of existing tax laws, the accounting for stock options and other share-based compensation, changes in tax laws and rates, future levels of research and development spending, changes in accounting standards, changes in the mix of earnings in the various tax jurisdictions in which we operate, the outcome of examinations by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities, the accuracy of our estimates for unrecognized tax benefits and realization of deferred tax assets and changes in overall levels of pre-tax earnings. See ‘Liquidity and Capital Resources’ within Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as well as Note 13 of Unaudited Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report. For additional details related to the 2017 Tax Act, see Note 16 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
 
Currency fluctuations and changes in exchange rates could adversely affect our revenue growth, increase our costs and cause our profitability to decline.
 
We collect and pay a substantial portion of our sales and expenditures in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Therefore, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates affect our operating results. We utilize foreign currency forward contracts, a combination of foreign currency put and call options, and occasionally purchased put options, all of which are derivative instruments, to manage foreign currency risk. We use these derivative instruments to hedge certain forecasted transactions, manage exchange rate volatility in the translation of foreign earnings and reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain balance sheet items denominated in foreign currencies. The use of these derivative instruments is intended to mitigate a portion of the exposure of these risks with the intent to reduce our risk or cost, but generally would not fully offset any change in operating results as a consequence of fluctuations in foreign currencies. Any significant foreign exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. See Note 5 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk contained elsewhere in this Report.

We may experience an adverse market reaction if we are unable to meet our financial reporting obligations.
 
As we continue to expand at a rapid pace, the development of new and/or improved automated systems will remain an ongoing priority. During this expansion period, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements in our financial reporting. Such misstatements may result in litigation and/or negative publicity and possibly cause an adverse market reaction that may negatively impact our growth plans and the value of our common stock.

Impairment charges or write downs in our books and changes in accounting standards could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

The value allocated to certain of our assets could be substantially impaired due to a number of factors beyond our control. Also, if any of our strategic equity investments decline in value, we may be required to write down such investments. In addition, new or revised accounting standards, rules and interpretations could result in changes to the recognition of income and expense that may materially and adversely affect our financial results.

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.
 
The market for our shares of common stock may fluctuate significantly. The following key factors may have an adverse impact on the market price of our common stock:

•
results of our clinical trials or adverse events associated with our marketed products;
•
fluctuations in our commercial and operating results;
•
announcements of technical or product developments by us or our competitors;
•
market conditions for pharmaceutical and biotechnology stocks in particular;
•
changes or anticipated changes in laws and governmental regulations, including changes in tax, healthcare, environmental, competition and patent laws;
•
new accounting pronouncements or regulatory rulings;
•
public announcements regarding medical advances in the treatment of the disease states that we are targeting;

86


•
patent or proprietary rights developments;
•
changes in pricing and third-party reimbursement policies for our products;
•
the outcome of litigation involving our products, processes or intellectual property;
•
the existence and outcome of governmental investigations and proceedings;
•
regulatory actions that may impact our products or potential products;
•
disruptions in our manufacturing processes or supply chain;
•
failure of our collaboration partners to successfully develop potential drug candidates;
•
competition; and
•
investor reaction to announcements regarding business or product acquisitions.
In addition, a market downturn in general and/or in the biopharmaceutical sector in particular, may adversely affect the market price of our securities, which may not necessarily reflect the actual or perceived value of our Company.
 
Our business would be adversely affected if we are unable to service our debt obligations.
 
We have incurred various forms of indebtedness, including senior notes, commercial paper and a senior unsecured credit facility. Our ability to pay interest and principal amounts when due, comply with debt covenants or repurchase the senior notes if a change of control occurs, will depend upon, among other things, continued commercial success of our products and other factors that affect our future financial and operating performance, including prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and regulatory factors, many of which are beyond our control.
 
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service the debt service requirements under our debt instruments, we may be forced to take remedial actions such as:

•
restructuring or refinancing our debt;
•
seeking additional debt or equity capital;
•
reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures, including research and development expenditures; or
•
selling assets, businesses, products or other potential revenue streams.
Such measures might not be successful and might not enable us to service our debt obligations. In addition, any such financing, refinancing or sale of assets might not be available on economically favorable terms, if at all.
 
A breakdown or breach of our information technology systems and cyber security efforts could subject us to liability, reputational damage or interrupt the operation of our business.

We rely upon our information technology systems and infrastructure for our business. The size and complexity of our computer systems make them potentially vulnerable to breakdown and unauthorized intrusion. We could also experience a business interruption, theft of confidential information, or reputational damage from industrial espionage attacks, malware or other cyber attacks, which may compromise our system infrastructure or lead to data leakage, either internally or at our third-party providers. Similarly, data privacy breaches by those who access our systems may pose a risk that sensitive data, including intellectual property, trade secrets or personal information belonging to us, our patients, employees, customers or other business partners, may be exposed to unauthorized persons or to the public. Although the aggregate impact on our operations and financial condition has not been material to date, we have been the target of events of this nature and expect them to continue. We continuously monitor our data, information technology systems (and those of our third-party providers where appropriate) and our personnel's usage of these systems to reduce these risks and potential threats. However, cyber-attacks are increasing in their frequency, sophistication and intensity, and have become increasingly difficult to detect. There can be no assurance that our efforts to protect our data and information technology systems will prevent breakdowns or breaches in our systems (or that of our third-party providers) that

87


could adversely affect our business and result in financial and reputational harm to us, theft of trade secrets and other proprietary information, legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, and regulatory penalties.

The illegal distribution and sale by third parties of counterfeit versions of our products or stolen products could have a negative impact on our reputation and business.

Third parties might illegally distribute and sell counterfeit or unfit versions of our products, which do not meet our rigorous manufacturing and testing standards. A patient who receives a counterfeit or unfit drug may be at risk for a number of dangerous health consequences. Our reputation and business could suffer harm as a result of counterfeit or unfit drugs sold under our brand name. In addition, thefts of inventory at warehouses, plants or while in-transit, which are not properly stored and which are sold through unauthorized channels, could adversely impact patient safety, our reputation and our business.

We have certain charter and by-law provisions that may deter a third-party from acquiring us and may impede the stockholders’ ability to remove and replace our management or board of directors.
 
Our board of directors has the authority to issue, at any time, without further stockholder approval, up to 5.0 million shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, privileges and preferences of those shares. An issuance of preferred stock could discourage a third-party from acquiring a majority of our outstanding voting stock. Additionally, our by-laws contain provisions intended to strengthen the board’s position in the event of a hostile takeover attempt. These provisions could impede the stockholders’ ability to remove and replace our management and/or board of directors. Furthermore, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, an anti-takeover law, which may also dissuade a potential acquirer of our common stock.
 
In addition to the risks relating to our common stock, holders of our CVRs are subject to additional risks.
 
On October 15, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. (Abraxis) and in connection with our acquisition, contingent value rights (CVRs) were issued entitling each holder of a CVR to a pro rata portion of certain net sales payments if certain specified conditions are satisfied. In addition to the risks relating to our common stock, CVR holders are subject to additional risks, including:

•
an active public market for the CVRs may not continue to exist or the CVRs may trade at low volumes, both of which could have an adverse effect on the market price of the CVRs;
•
if the net sales targets specified in the CVR Agreement are not achieved within the time periods specified, no payment will be made and the CVRs will expire valueless;
•
since the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the CVRs is unclear, any part of a CVR payment could be treated as ordinary income and the tax thereon may be required to be paid prior to the receipt of the CVR payment;
•
any payments in respect of the CVRs are subordinated to the right of payment of certain of our other indebtedness;
•
we may under certain circumstances redeem the CVRs; and
•
upon expiration of our obligations under the CVR Agreement to continue to commercialize ABRAXANE® or any of the other Abraxis pipeline products, we may discontinue such efforts, which would have an adverse effect on the value of the CVRs.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
(c)    Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
From April 2009 through June 2018, our Board of Directors approved purchases of up to $28.5 billion of our common stock, including increases of $5.0 billion and $3.0 billion approved by our Board of Directors in February and May 2018, respectively. Approved amounts exclude share purchase transaction fees.

As part of the existing Board authorized share repurchase program, in May 2018 we entered into an ASR agreement with an investment bank to repurchase an aggregate of $2.0 billion of our common stock.

88



The following table presents the number of shares purchased during the three-month period ended June 30, 2018, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that were purchased and the dollar value of shares that still could have been purchased, pursuant to our repurchase authorization:
Period
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased (1)
 
Average Price Paid
per Share (2)
 
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)
 
Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
April 1 - April 30
 
11,366,771

 
$
89.29

 
11,366,771

 
$
5,083,278,166

May 1 - May 31
 
21,456,623

 
$
80.60

 
21,456,623

 
$
2,803,704,460

June 1 - June 30
 
—

 
$
—

 
—

 
$
2,803,704,460

Total
 
32,823,394

 
$
87.26

 
32,823,394

 
 
 
(1) As part of the ASR agreement we received an initial delivery of 17,987,922 shares at a cost of $1.4 billion. The initial delivery of 17,987,922 shares reduced our outstanding shares used to determine our weighted average shares outstanding for purposes of calculating basic and diluted earnings per share. The total number of shares that will ultimately be repurchased under the ASR agreement will be determined upon final settlement in August 2018 and will be based on a discount to the volume-weighted average price of our common stock during the ASR period.

(2) The Average Price Paid per Share is based on the price paid per share in the open market and does not include ASR transactions.

During the three-month period ended June 30, 2018, we purchased approximately 32.8 million shares of common stock under the share repurchase program from all sources at a cost of approximately $2.7 billion, excluding transaction costs. As of June 30, 2018, we had a remaining purchase authorization of approximately $2.8 billion.

During the period covered by this report, we did not sell any of our equity shares that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.




89


Item 6. Exhibits

3.1

 
 
10.1

 
 
10.2

 
 
31.1*

 

 
31.2*

 

 
32.1*

 

 
32.2*

 

 
101*

The following materials from Celgene Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
 
 
* Filed herewith.

90


SIGNATURE
 
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
CELGENE CORPORATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
July 26, 2018
By:
/s/Peter N. Kellogg
 
 
 
 
Peter N. Kellogg
 
 
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
(principal financial and accounting officer)

91