Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the month of October, 2008
Commission File Number: 001-31994
Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation
(Translation of registrants name into English)
18 Zhangjiang Road
Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201203
Peoples Republic of China
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:
þ Form 20-F o Form 40-F
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934:
o Yes þ No
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant
in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): n/a
Table of Contents
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
43 |
|
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES
LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This interim report may contain, in addition to historical information, forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on SMICs current
assumptions, expectations and projections about future events. SMIC uses words like believe,
anticipate, intend, estimate, expect, project and similar expressions to identify
forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. These
forward-looking statements are necessarily estimates reflecting the best judgment of SMICs senior
management and involve significant risks, both known and unknown, uncertainties and other factors
that may cause SMICs actual performance, financial condition or results of operations to be
materially different from those suggested by the forward-looking statements including, among
others, risks associated with cyclicality and market conditions in the semiconductor industry,
risks of litigation, intense competition, timely wafer acceptance by SMICs customers, timely
introduction of new technologies, SMICs ability to ramp new products into volume, supply and
demand for semiconductor foundry services, industry overcapacity, shortages in equipment,
components and raw materials, availability of manufacturing capacity and financial stability in end
markets.
Except as required by law, SMIC undertakes no obligation and does not intend to update any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
References in this interim report to:
|
|
Company or SMIC are to Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation; |
|
|
China or the PRC are to the Peoples Republic of China, excluding for the purpose of this
interim report, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan; |
|
|
HK$ are to Hong Kong dollars; |
|
|
Rmb are to Renminbi, the legal currency of China; |
|
|
US$ or USD are to U.S. dollars; |
|
|
SEHK or Hong Kong Stock Exchange are to The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited |
|
|
SEC are to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; |
|
|
NYSE or New York Stock Exchange are to the New York Stock Exchange, Inc.; |
|
|
2008 AGM are to the Companys Annual General Meeting held on June 2, 2008; and |
|
|
global offering are to the initial public offering of our ADSs and our ordinary shares,
which offering was completed on March 18, 2004. |
All references in this interim report to silicon wafer quantities are to 8-inch wafer equivalents,
unless otherwise specified. Conversion of quantities of 12-inch wafers to 8-inch wafer equivalents
is achieved by multiplying the number of 12-inch wafers by 2.25. When we refer to the capacity of
wafer fabrication facilities, we are referring to the installed capacity based on specifications
established by the manufacturers of the equipment used in those facilities. References to key
process technology nodes, such as 0.35 micron, 0.25 micron, 0.18 micron, 0.15 micron, 0.13 micron,
90 nanometer, and 65 nanometer include the stated resolution of the process technology, as well as
intermediate resolutions down to but not including the next key process technology node of finer
resolution. For example, when we state 0.25 micron process technology, that also includes 0.22
micron, 0.21 micron, 0.20 micron and 0.19 micron technologies. 0.18 micron process technology
also includes 0.17 micron and 0.16 micron technologies; 0.15 micron process technology includes
0.14 micron technology; and 0.13 micron process technology includes 0.11 micron and 0.10 micron
technologies. References to U.S. GAAP mean the generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. Unless otherwise indicated, our financial information presented in this interim
report has been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
2
Chairmans Statement
Dear Shareholders,
The Chinese semiconductor industry has been experiencing rapid growth in the past several years and
has now become one of the fastest growing markets in the world. Within such a dynamic and exciting
market, SMIC, the third largest foundry in the world, is well positioned to capture this growth by
leveraging its proven technology and building upon its local and international customer base.
We are pleased with the progress of our various strategic initiatives in the first half of 2008.
Our effort in converting our DRAM into logic capacity is going full speed and will better position
us to deliver for our customers. Next, the addition of our Shenzhen fab will enable us to grow our
strategic partnerships and expand our customer base within China. Our operations in Beijing,
Shanghai, Tianjin, Chengdu, Wuhan and Shenzhen will enable us to better service our customers,
improve operational efficiency, and further capture the growth opportunities in China. Finally, we
are continuing our advanced technology research and development as this will be key to our future
success in meeting our customers demand. Our collaboration with IBM on the 45nm development is on
track, and we have commenced the 65nm internal library development. We are confident with our
overall strategic direction in light of these recent advances.
High-level transparency, accountability, and adherence to international standards of corporate
governance continue to be important pillars for SMIC as a world-class foundry. As a publicly listed
company on both the New York Stock Exchange and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited, we have
complied with various requirements including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We continually strive
to achieve the best-practice in corporate governance and in corporate disclosure in order to
enhance our shareholder value on a sustainable basis.
By leveraging our firm business values with our solid business strategy, we are well positioned for
continued growth and development and the further strengthening of our position in Mainland China.
Sincerely,
Yang Yuan Wang
Chairman of the Board
Shanghai, PRC
September 19, 2008
3
Chief Executive Officers Statement
Dear Shareholders,
For the first six months of 2008 our total revenue declined to US$705.3 million as compared to
US$763.1 million for the first six months of 2007 as we exited the commodity DRAM business.
However, in the first six months of 2008 we shipped 40% more logic wafers compared to the first six
months of 2007, and our second quarter losses were significantly narrowed to $45.6 million from a
$224.8 million loss in the first quarter which included an impairment loss of $105.8M.
The first six months losses were primarily due to the fact that we exited the commodity DRAM
business and are in transitioning from DRAM production to logic production in our Beijing facility.
The process of converting DRAM capacity into logic has been successful. A number of new logic
tape-outs with high yield are now in customer qualification and a few have entered into production.
The ramp-up of our logic capacity remains critical to our strategy, as it will better position us
to match the market demand for our services.
In the second quarter, we witnessed rather strong customer demand, despite the severe macroeconomic
situation in the U.S. The demand for our 8-inch fab logic service was very strong for the second
quarter, particularly in communications and consumer market segments. On a regional basis, revenue
from North America remains solid, while revenue from the Asia Pacific region, including Mainland
China and Taiwan, has seen the highest growth.
We are continuing our efforts in developing advanced technology nodes to meet the needs of our
customers. We have commenced our internal 65nm library and bit cell development, and our 45nm
collaboration with IBM is proceeding on schedule. I am also pleased to report the signing of a
strategic agreement with Spansion on the 43nm Flash technology.
We are pleased to see strong progress being made by our Chinese customers. We continue to serve a
few customers with our 90nm technology process, and have also engaged customers at the 65nm
technology node. One customer announced that their new RFID product, which was manufactured in our
factory, received EPC Global official certification this month. This is the first Chinese-made RFID
product to receive this international certification. Another customer started mass production of
their 3G CMMB mobile TV chipset in the second quarter in our fab. The demand appears to be strong
and should continue throughout to the rest of the year. Moving forward, we will continue to
strengthen our local advantage in China by furthering our collaboration with local fabless design
houses.
We are also pleased with our profitable solar business and approved expansion plan. We aim to
expand our solar capacity five to six times our current production output in the first half of
2009.
As we continue to execute on our growth plans, we believe we will continue to create value for our
customers worldwide and further enhance shareholder value in the coming years.
May God bless you and SMIC,
Richard R. Chang
Chief Executive Officer
Shanghai, PRC
September 19, 2008
4
Corporate Information
|
|
|
Registered name
|
|
Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation |
|
|
|
Chinese name
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered office
|
|
PO Box 309 |
|
|
Ugland House |
|
|
George Town, KY1-1104 |
|
|
Cayman Islands |
|
|
|
Head office and
|
|
18 Zhangjiang Road |
place of business
|
|
Pudong New Area |
in PRC
|
|
Shanghai 201203 |
|
|
PRC |
|
|
|
Place of business in
|
|
Suite 3003, 30th Floor |
Hong Kong registered
|
|
No. 9 Queens Road |
under Part XI of the
|
|
Central |
Companies Ordinance
|
|
Hong Kong |
|
|
|
Website address
|
|
http://www.smics.com |
|
|
|
Company secretary
|
|
Anne Wai Yui Chen |
|
|
|
Authorized
|
|
Richard R. Chang |
representatives
|
|
Anne Wai Yui Chen |
|
|
|
Places of listing
|
|
Hong Kong Stock Exchange |
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
|
|
|
Name of share
|
|
Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation |
|
|
|
Stock code
|
|
0981 (SEHK) |
|
|
SMI (NYSE) |
|
|
|
* |
|
For identification purposes only |
5
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The Board of Directors (the Board) of Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (the
Company) would like to announce the unaudited interim results of operations of the Company and
its subsidiaries for the six months ended June 30, 2008, and would like to express their gratitude
to the shareholders and their staff for the support of the Company.
Sales
Sales decreased by 7.6% from US$763.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to US$705.3
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily as a result of the companys exit from
the DRAM commodity business and transition to increased capacity for logic production. The number
of wafers the Company shipped decreased by 4.2%, from 894,038 8-inch wafer equivalents to 856,373
8-inch wafer equivalents, between these two periods. The simplified average selling price of total
revenue during this period decreased by 3.5% from US$854 per wafer to US$824 per wafer.
Nevertheless, the Companys non-DRAM business continues to grow strongly. Non-DRAM revenue
increased by 24.8% from US$520.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to US$649.3 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily from logic revenue associated with 0.35, 0.18 and
0.13 micron process technologies.
Cost of sales and gross profit (loss)
Cost of sales increased by 4.3% from US$687.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to
US$717 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. This increase was primarily due to a US$28.7
million additional loss provision taken against the remaining DRAM inventories.
The Company had a gross loss of US$11.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to
a gross profit of US$75.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Gross margins decreased
to -2% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from 9.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The
decrease in gross margin was primarily due to losses from the exit of the commodity DRAM business
and a resulting higher unit cost due to reduced loading in the Beijing Fab.
Operating income, expenses and loss from operations
Operating expenses increased by 30.3% from US$97.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007
to US$126.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 (excluding the income from the disposal
of properties and the $105.8 million impairment loss) primarily due to an increase in R&D expenses.
Research and development expenses increased by 60.1% from US$44.9 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 to US$71.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to start up
costs associated with the new 12-inch project in Shanghai.
Selling and marketing expenses increased by 13.7% from US$8.1 million for the six months ended June
30, 2007 to US$9.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily due to an increase in personnel
related expenses associated with sales activities.
6
General and administrative expenses remained relatively flat at US$31.9 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008, a slight 0.3% increase from US$31.8 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007.
An asset impairment loss of $105.8 million was recorded in Q1 2008 relating to the Beijing facility
as a result of the decision to exit the commodity DRAM business.
Income from the disposal of properties decreased from US$28.5 million for the six months ended June
30, 2007 to US$1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The Companys operating loss was US$242.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared
to operating gain of US$6.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
The Companys operating margin was (34.4)% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 0.9% for the
six months ended June 30, 2007.
Other income (expenses)
Other expenses increased by 44.0% from US$6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to
US$8.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. This increase was primarily attributable to
the increase in interest expense from US$11.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to
US$32.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The increase in interest expense was
primarily due to a decrease in government subsidy. However, interest income increased by 40.6%,
from US$5.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to US$7.8 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008. Also, foreign exchange increased to a gain of US$12.8 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 from a loss of US$1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
The Companys net foreign exchange gain and loss, including operating, financing, and investing
activities, was a gain of US$16.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to a gain
of US$2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Net income (loss)
Due to the factors described above, the Company had a net loss of US$270.5 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to a net gain of US$6.7 million for the six months ended June
30, 2007.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company incurred capital expenditures of US$460.9 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007 and US$367 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The Company has financed
substantial capital expenditure requirements through the proceeds received from the cash flows from
operations and bank borrowings.
As of June 30, 2008, the Company had US$480.3 million in cash and cash equivalents. These cash and
cash equivalents are held in the form of United States Dollars, Japanese Yen, European Euro, and
Chinese Renminbi. The net cash provided by operating activities decreased by 15.1% from US$333.7
million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to US$283.4 million for the six months ended June
30, 2008.
The Companys net cash used in investing activities was US$473.8 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008, primarily attributable to purchases of plant and equipment for the Mega Fab in
Shanghai, Mega Fab in Beijing, Fab 7 and Fab 8 as well as costs associated with the construction of
Fab 8. Net cash used in investing activities was US$324.1 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007, primarily attributable to purchases of plant and equipment for the Mega
Fab in Shanghai, Mega Fab in Beijing, Fab 7, and Fab 8 as well as costs associated with the
construction of Fab 8.
7
The Companys net cash used in financing activities was US$201.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008. This was primarily derived from US$280.5 million in proceeds from short-term
borrowings, US$250.7 million in proceeds from long-term debt, US$15.0 million in the repayment of
promissory notes, US$144.5 million in the repayment of short-term borrowings, and US$170.8 million
in the repayment of long-term debt.
The Companys net cash used in financing activities was US$0.7 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007. This was primarily due to repayment of US$70 million in short-term borrowings,
repayment of US$25.3 million in long-term debt borrowings, repayment of US$15.0 million in
promissory notes, and proceeds of US$107 million from short-term borrowings.
As of June 30, 2008, the Companys outstanding long-term liabilities primarily consisted of
US$1,036.9 million in secured bank loans, of which US$341.6 million is classified as the current
portion of long-term loans. The long-term loans are repayable in installments commencing in
December 2006 with the last payments due in August 2012.
Long-term debt. In June 2006, Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation
(SMIC Shanghai) entered into a new USD denominated long-term facility arrangement for US$600.0
million with a consortium of international and PRC banks. Of this principal amount, US$392.6
million was used to repay the principal amount outstanding under SMIC Shanghais bank facilities
from December 2001 and January 2004. The remaining principal amount will be used to finance future
expansion and general corporate requirement for SMIC Shanghai. The Company has guaranteed SMIC
Shanghais obligations under this facility. As of June 30, 2008, SMIC Shanghai had fully drawn down
US$600.0 million on this loan facility. The Company has repaid US$270.0 million and the remaining
balance of US$330.0 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2008. The interest rate on this loan
facility ranged from 3.7% to 5.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The interest expense
incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was US$9.2 million and US$8.8 million,
respectively, of which interest expense of 2007 was fully offset by the government subsidy granted
in the period and US$2.7 million was capitalized as additions to assets under construction for the
six months ended June 30, 2008.
The key financial covenants contained in the loan agreement entered into in June 2006 include the
following:
Any of the following in respect of SMIC Shanghai would constitute an event of default during
the term of the loan agreement (unless otherwise waived by the lenders to such agreement):
|
|
|
Consolidated tangible net worth of less than US$1.2 billion; |
|
|
|
The percentage of consolidated total borrowings to consolidated tangible net worth
of more than 60% for periods up to and including December 31, 2008 and exceeds 45%
thereafter; |
|
|
|
The ratio of consolidated total borrowings to EBITDA for the prior four quarters
exceeds 1.50x; or |
|
|
|
The debt service coverage ratio is less than 1.50x, where the debt service coverage
ratio is the ratio of EBITDA for the previous four quarters divided by scheduled
principal repayments and interest expense for all bank borrowings (including hire
purchases, leases and other borrowed monies) for the same period. |
Any of the following in respect of the Company would constitute an event of default during the
term of the loan agreement (unless otherwise waived by the lenders to such agreement):
|
|
|
Consolidated tangible net worth of less than US$2.3 billion; |
|
|
|
The percentage of consolidated net borrowings to consolidated tangible net worth of
more than 50% for periods up to and including June 30, 2009 and exceeds 40% thereafter;
or |
|
|
|
The ratio of consolidated net borrowings to EBITDA for the prior four quarters
exceeds 1.50x for periods up to and including June 30, 2009 and exceeds 1.3x thereafter. |
8
As of June 30, 2008, SMIC Shanghai had met these covenants such that no event of default had been
triggered.
In May 2005, Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Beijing) Corporation (SMIC Beijing)
entered into a five year USD denominated loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of
US$600.0 million, with a syndicate of financial institutions based in the PRC. This five-year bank
loan will be used to expand the capacity of SMIC Beijings fabs. The drawdown period of this
facility was twelve months from the sign off date of the agreement. As of June 30, 2008, SMIC
Beijing had fully drawn-down US$600.0 million on this loan facility. The interest rate on this loan
facility ranged from 4.8% to 6.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The principal amount is
repayable starting in December 2007 in six semi-annual installments. As of June 30, 2008, SMIC
Beijing had repaid US$200.0 million and the remaining balance of US$400.0 million was outstanding
as of June 30, 2008. The interest expense incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was
US$15.9 million, of which US$1.2 million was capitalized as additions to assets under construction.
The interest expense incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2007 in the amount of US$21.0
million was partially offset by the government subsidy granted in the period and US$0.1 million was
capitalized as additions to assets under construction for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Any of the following would constitute an event of default for SMIC Beijing during the term of
the facility (unless otherwise waived by the lenders to such agreement):
|
|
|
[Net profit + depreciation + amortization + financial expenses (increase of
accounts receivable and advanced payments + increase of inventory increase in accounts
payable and advanced receipts)]/ financial expenses < 1; and |
|
|
|
(Total liability borrowings from shareholders, including principal and
interest)/Total assets > 60% (when SMIC Beijings capacity is less than 20,000 12-inch
wafers per month); and (Total liability borrowings from shareholders, including
principal and interest)/Total assets > 50% (when SMIC Beijings capacity exceeds
20,000 12-inch wafers per month). |
As of June 30, 2008, SMIC Beijing had met these covenants.
On December 15, 2005, the Company entered into a EUR denominated long-term loan facility agreement
in the aggregate principal amount of EUR 85 million (equivalent to approximately US$105 million)
with a syndicate of banks and ABN Amro Bank N.V. and Commerz Bank (Nederland) N.V. as the leading
bank. The drawdown period of the facility ends on the earlier of (i) twenty six months after the
execution of the agreement or (ii) the date which the loans have been fully drawn down. Each draw
down made under the facility shall be repaid in full by us in ten equal semi-annual installments.
As of June 30, 2008, Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Tianjin) Corporation (SMIC
Tianjin) had drawn down EUR 15.1 million and repaid an aggregated amount of EUR 7.5 million. As of
June 30, 2008, the remaining balance is EUR 7.6 million, with the U.S. dollar equivalent of US$12.0
million. The interest rate on this loan facility ranged from 4.7% to 5.9% for the six months ended
June 30, 2008. The interest expense incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were
US$0.4 and US$0.3 million of which US$0.05 million and US$0.1 million was capitalized additions to
assets under construction for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
As of June 30, 2008, SMIC Shanghai had drawdown EUR 28.4 million and repaid an aggregated amount of
EUR 5.7 million. As of June 30, 2008, the remaining balance is EUR 22.7 million, with the US dollar
equivalent of US$35.9 million. The interest rate on this loan facility ranged from 4.6% to 4.9% for
the six months ended June 30, 2008. The interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was
US$0.9 million of which US$0.3 million was capitalized as additions to assets under construction
for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
9
In May 2006, SMIC Tianjin entered into a loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of
US$300.0 million with a consortium of international and Chinese banks. This facility is secured by
the manufacturing equipment located in our Tianjin fab, except for the manufacturing equipment
purchased using the EUR denominated loan, and our land use rights and plant in proportion to the
principal amount outstanding under this facility and the EUR denominated loan. The Company has
guaranteed SMIC Tianjins obligations under this facility. As of June 30, 2008, SMIC Tianjin had
drawn down US$259.0 million on this loan facility. The principal amount is repayable starting from
2010 in six semi-annual installments. The interest rate on the loan ranged from 4.1% to 6.0% for
the six months ended June 30, 2008. The interest expense incurred for the six months ended June 30,
2008 was US$2.4 million, of which US$0.56 million was capitalized as additions to assets under
construction for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Any of the following in respect of SMIC Tianjin would constitute an event of default during
the term of the facility (unless otherwise waived by the lenders to such agreement):
|
|
|
[Net profit + depreciation + amortization + financial expenses (increase of
accounts receivable and advanced payments + increase of inventory increase in accounts
payable and advanced receipts)] / financial expenses < 1; and |
|
|
|
The ratio of total debt to total assets is more than 60% during the ramp up period
of SMIC Tianjin and more than 40% after the facility is at full capacity. |
As of June 30, 2008, SMIC Tianjin had met these covenants.
Short-term borrowings. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had short-term credit agreements that
provided total credit facilities up to approximately US$446 million on a revolving credit basis. As
of June 30, 2008, the Company had drawn down approximately US$243 million under these credit
agreements and approximately US$203 million is available for future borrowings. The outstanding
borrowings under the credit agreements are unsecured, except for the amount of US$87 million, which
is secured by term deposits. The interest expense incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007 were US$3.0 million and US$1.9 million, respectively. The interest rate on the loans
ranged from 3.3% to 7.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Capitalized Interest
Interest cost incurred on funds used to construct plant and equipment during the active
construction period is capitalized, net of government subsidies received. The interest capitalized
is determined by applying the borrowing interest rate to the average amount of accumulated capital
expenditures for the assets under construction during the period. Capitalized interest is added to
the cost of the underlying assets and is amortized over the useful life of the assets. Capitalized
interest of US$4.7 million and US$0.6 million have been added to the cost of the underlying assets
during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively, and is amortized over
the respective useful life of the assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007,
the Company recorded amortization expenses relating to the capitalized interest of US$3.4 million
and US$2.6 million, respectively.
Commitments
As of June 30, 2008, the Company had commitments of US$75.6 million for construction obligations
for the Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Energy Technology and Chengdu facilities, and US$369.4 million
to purchase machinery and equipment for the Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Energy Technology, Cayman
and Chengdu facilities.
10
Debt to Equity Ratio
As of June 30, 2008, the Companys debt to equity ratio was 46% calculated by dividing the sum of
the short-term borrowings, current portion of long-term debt and long-term debt by total
shareholders equity.
Contingent Liabilities
As of June 30, 2008, the Company did not have any material contingent liabilities.
Foreign Exchange Rate Fluctuation Risk
The Companys revenues, expenses, and capital expenditure are primarily transacted in United States
Dollars. However, since the Company has operations consisting of manufacturing, sales activities
and capital purchasing outside of the U.S., the Company enters into transactions in other
currencies and is primarily exposed to changes in exchange rates for the EURO, Japanese Yen, and
Chinese Renminbi.
To minimize these risks, the Company purchases foreign-currency forward exchange contracts with
contract terms normally lasting less than twelve months to protect against the adverse effect that
exchange rate fluctuations may have on foreign currency denominated activities. These forward
exchange contracts are principally denominated in Chinese Renminbi, Japanese Yen or EURO and do not
qualify for hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 133. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had
outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts with a notional amount of US$68.3 million
all of which matured in June 2009. Notional amounts are stated in U.S. dollar equivalent spot
market exchange rates, as of the respective dates.
As of June 30, 2008, the fair value of foreign currency forward exchange contracts was a loss of
approximately US$2.3 million, which is recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities.
The Company does not enter into foreign currency exchange contracts for speculative purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
The Companys exposure to interest rate risks relates primarily to the Companys long-term debt
obligations, which the Company generally assumes to fund capital expenditures and working capital
requirements. The Companys long-term debt obligations are all subject to variable interest rates.
The interest rates on the Companys U.S. dollar-denominated loans are linked to the LIBOR. The
interest on the Companys EURO denominated loans are linked to the EURIBOR. As a result, the
interest on the Companys loans are subject to fluctuations in the underlying interest rates to
which they are linked.
Cross Currency Swap Fluctuation Risk
On December 15, 2005, the Company entered into a long-term loan facility agreement in the aggregate
principal amount of EUR85 million. The company is primarily exposed to changes in exchange rate for
the EURO.
To minimize the risk, the company entered into a cross currency swap contract with contract terms
fully matching the repayment schedule of the long-term loan to protect against the adverse effect
of exchange rate fluctuations arising from the foreign-currency denominated loan. The cross
currency swap contract does not qualify for hedge accounting in
accordance with SFAS No. 133.
11
Litigation
On August 25, 2006, TSMC filed a lawsuit against the Company and certain subsidiaries (SMIC
(Shanghai), SMIC (Beijing) and SMIC (Americas)) in the Superior Court of the State of California,
County of Alameda for alleged breach of the Settlement Agreement, alleged breach of promissory
notes and alleged trade secret misappropriation by the Company. TSMC seeks, among other things,
damages, injunctive relief, attorneys fees, and the acceleration of the remaining payments
outstanding under the Settlement Agreement.
In the present litigation, TSMC alleges that the Company has incorporated TSMC trade secrets in the
manufacture of the Companys 0.13 micron or smaller process products. TSMC further alleges that as
a result of this claimed breach, TSMCs patent license is terminated and the covenant not to sue is
no longer in effect with respect to the Companys larger process products.
The Company has vigorously denied all allegations of misappropriation. The Court has made no
finding that TSMCs claims are valid, nor has it set a trial date.
On September 13, 2006, the Company announced that in addition to filing a response strongly denying
the allegations of TSMC in the United States lawsuit, it filed on September 12, 2006, a
cross-complaint against TSMC seeking, among other things, damages for TSMCs breach of contract and
breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
On November 16, 2006, the High Court in Beijing, the Peoples Republic of China, accepted the
filing of a complaint by the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, SMIC (Shanghai) and SMIC
(Beijing), regarding the unfair competition arising from the breach of bona fide (i.e. integrity,
good faith) principle and commercial defamation by TSMC (PRC Complaint). In the PRC Complaint,
the Company is seeking, among other things, an injunction to stop TSMCs infringing acts, public
apology from TSMC to the Company and compensation from TSMC to the Company, including profits
gained by TSMC from their infringing acts.
TSMC filed with the California court in January 2007 a motion seeking to enjoin the PRC action. In
February 2007, TSMC filed with the Beijing High Court a jurisdictional objection, challenging the
competency of the Beijing High Courts jurisdiction over the PRC action.
In March 2007, the California Court denied TSMCs motion to enjoin the PRC action. TSMC appealed
this ruling to California Court of Appeal. On March 26, 2008, the Court of Appeal, in a written
opinion, denied TSMCs appeal.
In July 2007, the Beijing High Court denied TSMCs jurisdictional objection and issued a court
order holding that the Beijing High Court shall have proper jurisdiction to try the PRC action.
TSMC appealed this order to the Supreme Court of the Peoples Republic of China. On January 7,
2008, the Supreme Court heard TSMCs appeal. On June 13, 2008, the Supreme Court denied TSMCs
appeal and affirmed the jurisdiction of the Beijing High Court.
On August 14, 2007, the Company filed an amended cross-complaint against TSMC seeking, among other
things, damages for TSMCs breach of contract and breach of patent license agreement. TSMC
thereafter denied the allegations of the Companys amended cross-complaint and subsequently filed
additional claims that the Company breached the Settlement Agreement by filing an action in the
Beijing High Court. The Company has denied these additional claims by TSMC.
On August 15-17, 2007, the California Court held a preliminary injunction hearing on TSMCs motion
to enjoin use of certain process recipes in certain of the Companys 0.13 micron logic process
flows. On September 7, 2007, the Court denied TSMCs preliminary injunction motion, thereby leaving
unaffected the Companys development and sales. However, the court required the Company to provide
10 days advance notice to TSMC if the Company plans to disclose logic technology to non-SMIC
entities under certain circumstances, to allow TSMC to object to the planned disclosure.
12
On March 11, 2008, TSMC filed an application for a right to attach order in the California Court.
By its application, TSMC sought an order securing an amount equal to the remaining balance on the
promissory notes issued by the Company in connection with the Settlement Agreement. The Company
opposed the application. A hearing was held on April 3, 2008. On June 24, 2008, the Court denied
TSMCs application.
In May 2008, TSMC filed a motion in the California Court for summary adjudication against the
Company on several of the Companys cross claims. The Company opposed the motion and on July 25,
2008, the Court granted in part and denied in part TSMCs motion.
On June 23, 2008, the Company filed with California court a cross-complaint against TSMC seeking,
among other things, damages for TSMCs unlawful misappropriation of trade secrets from SMIC to
improve its competitive position against SMIC.
On July 10, 2008, the California Court held and granted part of a preliminary injunction hearing on
TSMCs motion to enjoin disclosure of information on certain process recipes in the Companys 0.30
micron logic process flows to third parties.
Under the provisions of SFAS 144, the Company is required to make a determination as to whether or
not this pending litigation represents an event that requires a further analysis of whether the
patent license portfolio has been impaired. We believe that the lawsuit is at a preliminary stage
and we are still evaluating whether or not the litigation represents such an event. The Company
expects further information to become available to us which will aid us in making a determination.
The outcome of any impairment analysis performed under SFAS 144 might result in a material impact
to our financial position and results of operations. Because the case is in its preliminary stages,
the Company is unable to evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or to estimate the
amount or range of potential loss.
Employees
Save as disclosed in this interim report, there is no material change to the information disclosed
in the 2007 annual report of the Company in relation to the number and remuneration of employees,
remuneration policies, bonus and share option schemes of employees.
Prospects and Future Plan
In the second half of 2008, the Company will continue its strategic execution on several fronts.
First and foremost, the Company aims to continue the conversion efforts of DRAM to Logic production
in the Beijing facility. By leveraging existing Logic expertise, the conversion will further
expand the Companys service scale and create better positioning to meet customer demands. In
addition, the Company will continue its efforts in developing advanced technology capabilities to
meet customer needs. Enhancing resources to better service the current and future customer base
still remains a top priority.
13
Corporate Governance Report
The Company is committed to remaining an exemplary corporate citizen and maintaining a high level
of corporate governance in order to protect the interests of its shareholders.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES
The SEHKs Code on Corporate Governance Practices (the CG Code) as set out in Appendix 14 of the
Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on the SEHK (Listing Rules), which contains code
provisions to which an issuer such as the Company, is expected to comply or advise as to reasons
for deviations (the Code Provisions) and recommended best practices with which an issuer is
encouraged to comply (the Recommended Practices). At the meeting of the Board on January 25,
2005, the Board approved the Corporate Governance Policy (the CG Policy) (which was amended by
the Board on July 26, 2005) with effect from such date. The updated CG Policy, a copy of which can
be obtained on the Companys website at www.smics.com under Corporate Governance, incorporates
all of the code provisions of the CG Code and many of the Recommended Practices.
In addition, the Company has adopted or put in place various policies, procedures, and practices in
compliance with the provision of the CG Policy. None of the Directors are aware of any information
which would reasonably indicate that the Company is not, or was not, during the financial period
from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2008, in compliance with the CG Policy.
MODEL CODE FOR SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS BY DIRECTORS OF LISTED ISSUERS
The Company has adopted an Insider Trading Compliance Program (the Insider Trading Policy), which
encompasses the requirements of the Model Code as set out in Appendix 10 of the Listing Rules. The
Company, having made specific enquiry of all directors, confirms that all members of the Board have
complied with the Insider Trading Policy and the Model Code throughout the six months ended June
30, 2008. The senior management as well as all officers, directors, and employees of the Company
and its subsidiaries are also required to comply with the provisions of the Insider Trading Policy.
The Board
The Board has a duty to the Companys shareholders to direct and oversee the affairs of the Company
in order to maximize shareholder value. The Board acting itself and through the various committees
of the Board, actively participates in the determination of the overall strategy of the Company,
the establishment and monitoring of the achievements of corporate goals and objectives, the
oversight of the Companys financial performance, the establishment of corporate governance
practices and policies, and the review of the Companys system of internal controls. The management
of the Company is responsible for the implementation of the overall strategy of the Company and its
daily operations and administration. The Board has access to the senior management of the Company
to discuss enquiries on management information.
14
The Board consists of eight directors as at the date of the interim report. Directors may be
elected to hold office until the expiration of their respective terms upon a resolution passed at a
duly convened shareholders meeting by holders of a majority of the Companys outstanding shares
being entitled to vote in person or by proxy at such meeting. The Board is divided into three
classes with no more than one class eligible for re-election at any annual general meeting of
shareholders.
Each class of director will serve terms of three years. The Class I directors were elected for a
term of three years at the Companys 2008 Annual General Meeting (2008 AGM) of the shareholders
of the Company (except Dr. Albert Y. C. Yu who retired at the 2008 AGM). The Class II directors
were elected at the 2006 Annual General Meeting of the shareholders of the Company for a term of
three years. The Class III directors were elected at the 2007 Annual General Meeting of the
shareholders of the Company for a term of three years.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Board at all times exceeded the minimum requirements of
the Listing Rules relating to the appointment of at least three independent non-executive directors
on the board, and complied with the requirement that these should include one such director with
appropriate professional qualifications or accounting or related financial management expertise.
The roles of the chairman and chief executive officer are segregated and such roles are exercised
by Prof. Yang Yuan Wang and Dr. Richard Ru Gin Chang respectively.
At the 2008 AGM, Richard Ru Gin Chang and Henry Shaw were re-elected as Class I executive director
and independent non-executive director of the Company respectively and Albert Y. C. Yu retired as a
Class I independent non-executive director and did not offer himself for re-election.
Wang Zheng Gang was re-elected at the 2008 Annual General Meeting of the shareholders of the
Company as a Class III non-executive director of the Company.
The following table sets forth the names, classes and categories of the directors as at the date of
this report:
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Director |
|
Category of Director |
|
Class of Director |
|
Yang Yuan Wang
|
|
Chairman, Independent Non-executive Director
|
|
Class III |
Richard Ru Gin Chang
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, Executive Director
|
|
Class I |
Henry Shaw
|
|
Independent Non-executive Director
|
|
Class I |
Ta-Lin Hsu
|
|
Independent Non-executive Director
|
|
Class II |
Jiang Shang Zhou
|
|
Independent Non-executive Director
|
|
Class II |
Lip-Bu Tan
|
|
Independent Non-executive Director
|
|
Class II |
Tsuyoshi Kawanishi
|
|
Independent Non-executive Director
|
|
Class III |
Wang Zheng Gang
|
|
Non-executive Director
|
|
Class III |
On an annual basis, each independent non-executive director confirms his independence to the
Company, and the Company considers these directors to be independent as such term is defined in the
Listing Rules. There are no relationships among members of the Board, including between the
Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer.
The Board meets in person at least on a quarterly basis and on such other occasions as may be
required to discuss and vote upon significant issues affecting the Company. The regular Board
meeting schedule for a year is planned in the preceding year. The Company Secretary assists the
Chairman in preparing the agenda for meetings and the Board in complying with relevant rules and
regulations. The relevant papers for the Board meetings are dispatched to the Board members in
accordance with the CG code. Directors may include matters for discussion in the agenda if the need
arises. Upon the conclusion of the Board meeting, minutes are circulated to all directors for their
comment and review prior to their approval of the minutes at the following or a subsequent Board
meeting. Transactions in which directors are considered to have a conflict of interest or material
interests are not passed by written resolutions and the interested directors are not counted in the
quorum and abstain from voting on the relevant matters.
15
All directors have access to the Company Secretary who is responsible for assisting the Board in
complying with applicable procedures regarding compliance matters. Every Board member is entitled
to have access to documents provided at the Board meeting or filed into the Companys minute-book.
Furthermore, the Board has established the procedures pursuant to which a director, upon reasonable
request, may seek independent professional advice at the Companys expense in order for such
director to exercise such directors duties. The Company Secretary continuously updates all
directors on the latest development of the Listing Rules and other applicable regulatory
requirements to assist the Companys compliance with and maintenance of good corporate governance
practices. Each new director is provided with training with respect to such directors
responsibilities under the Listing Rules and other regulatory requirements and the Companys
corporate governance policies and practices.
BOARD COMMITTEES
The Board has established the following committees to assist it in exercising its obligations.
These committees consist of only independent non-executive directors who have been invited to serve
as members. The committees are governed by their respective charters setting out clear terms of
reference.
Audit Committee
As of June 30, 2008, the members of the Audit Committee were Henry Shaw (co-chairman of Audit
Committee), Lip-Bu Tan (co-chairman of Audit Committee) and Yang Yuan Wang. None of these members
of the Audit Committee have been an executive officer or employee of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries. In addition to acting as Audit Committee member of the Company, Mr. Lip-Bu Tan, one
of the members of the Audit Committee, currently also serves on the audit committee of three other
publicly traded companies, namely SINA Corporation, Flextronics International Ltd. and Integrated
Silicon Solution, Inc. In general and in accordance with section 303A.07(a) of the Listed Company
Manual of the New York Stock Exchange, the Board considered and determined that such simultaneous
service would not impair the ability of Mr. Tan to effectively serve on the Companys Audit
Committee.
The responsibilities of the Audit Committee include, among other things:
|
|
making recommendations to the Board concerning the appointment, reappointment, retention,
evaluation, oversight and termination of the work of the Companys independent auditor,
including reviewing the experience, qualifications and performance of the senior members of
the independent auditor team and pre-approving all non-audit services to be provided by the
Companys independent auditor; |
|
|
approving the remuneration and terms of engagement of the Companys independent auditor; |
|
|
reviewing reports from the Companys independent auditor regarding its internal
quality-control procedures and any material issues raised in the most recent review or
investigation of such procedures and regarding all relationships between the Company and the
independent auditor; |
|
|
pre-approving the hiring of any employee or former employee of the Companys independent
auditor who was a member of the audit team during the preceding two years; |
|
|
reviewing the Companys annual and interim financial statements, earnings releases, critical
accounting policies and practices used to prepare financial statements, alternative treatments
of financial information, the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures and important trends and developments in financial reporting practices and
requirements; |
|
|
reviewing the planning and staffing of internal audits, the organization, responsibilities,
plans, results, budget and staffing of the Companys Internal Audit Department (as defined and
discussed below) and the quality and effectiveness of the Companys internal controls; |
|
|
reviewing the Companys risk assessment and management policies; |
16
|
|
reviewing any legal matters that may have a material impact and the adequacy and
effectiveness of the Companys legal and regulatory compliance procedures; |
|
|
establishing procedures for the treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding
accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing matters, potential violations of law and
questionable accounting or auditing matters; and |
|
|
obtaining and reviewing reports from management, the Companys internal auditor and the
Companys independent auditor regarding compliance with applicable legal and regulatory
requirements. |
The Audit Committee reports its work, findings and recommendations to the Board during each
quarterly meeting.
The Audit Committee meets in person at least on a quarterly basis and on such other occasions as
may be required to discuss and vote upon significant issues affecting the audit policy of the
Company. The regular meeting schedule for a year is planned in the preceding year. The Company
Secretary assists the co-chairmen of the Audit Committee in preparing the agenda for meetings and
assists the Audit Committee in complying with the relevant rules and regulations. The relevant
papers for the Audit Committee meetings are dispatched to the Audit Committee members in accordance
with the CG Code. Members of the Audit Committee may include matters for discussion in the agenda
if the need arises. Upon the conclusion of the Audit Committee meeting, minutes are circulated to
the members of the Audit Committee for their comment and review prior to their approval of the
minutes at the following or a subsequent Audit Committee meeting.
At each quarterly Audit Committee meeting, the Audit Committee reviews with the Acting Chief
Financial Officer and the Companys outside auditors, the financial statements for the financial
period and the financial accounting principles, policies and controls of the Company and its
subsidiaries. In particular, the Committee discusses (i) the changes in accounting policies and
practices, if any; (ii) the going concern assumptions, (iii) compliance with accounting standards
and applicable rules and other legal requirements in relation to financial reporting and (iv) the
internal controls of the Company relating to financial reporting. Upon the recommendation of the
Audit Committee, the Board will approve the financial statements.
Compensation Committee
As of June 30, 2008, the members of the Companys Compensation Committee were Ta-Lin Hsu (chairman
of Compensation Committee), Tsuyoshi Kawanishi and Lip-Bu Tan. None of these members of the
Compensation Committee has been an executive officer or employee of the Company or any of its
subsidiaries.
The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include, among other things:
|
|
approving and overseeing the total compensation package for the Companys executive
officers/senior management (namely, the same category of persons referred to, and required to
be disclosed, in the Companys annual report), evaluating the performance of and determining
and approving the compensation to be paid to the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
reviewing the results of the Chief Executive Officers evaluation of the performance of the
Companys other executive officers; |
|
|
reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to Director compensation,
including equity-based compensation; |
|
|
administering and periodically reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding
the long-term incentive compensation or equity plans made available to the Directors,
employees and consultants; |
|
|
reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding executive compensation
philosophy, strategy and principles and reviewing new and existing employment, consulting,
retirement and severance agreements proposed for the Companys executive officers; and |
|
|
ensuring appropriate oversight of the Companys human resources policies and reviewing
strategies established to fulfill the Companys ethical, legal and human resources
responsibilities. |
17
The Compensation Committee reports its work, findings and recommendations to the Board during each
quarterly Board meeting.
The Compensation Committee meets in person at least on a quarterly basis and on such other
occasions as may be required to discuss and vote upon significant issues affecting the compensation
policy of the Company. The regular meeting schedule for a year is planned in the preceding year.
The Company Secretary assists the chairman of the Compensation Committee in preparing the agenda
for meetings and assists the Compensation Committee in complying with relevant rules and
regulations. The relevant papers for the Compensation Committee meeting are dispatched to
Compensation Committee members in accordance with the CG Code. Members of the Compensation
Committee may include matters for discussion in the agenda if the need arises. Upon the conclusion
of the Compensation Committee meeting, minutes are circulated to the members of the Compensation
Committee for their comment and review prior to their approval of the minutes at the following or a
subsequent Compensation Committee meeting.
Internal Audit Department
The internal audit department works with and supports the Companys management team and the Audit
Committee in monitoring the Companys compliance with its internal governance policies. On a
regular basis, the internal audit department audits the practices, procedures, expenditure and
internal controls of the various departments in the Company. After completing an audit, the
internal audit department furnishes the Companys management team and the Audit Committee with
analyses, appraisals, recommendations, counsel, and information concerning the activities reviewed.
The internal audit department can also conduct reviews and investigations on an ad hoc basis.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The Board has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics (the Code of Conduct) which provides
guidance about doing business with integrity and professionalism. The Code of Conduct addresses
issues including, among others, fraud, conflicts of interest, corporate opportunities, protection
of intellectual property, transactions in the Companys securities, use of the Companys assets,
and relationships with customers and third parties. Any violation of the Code of Conduct is
reported to the Compliance Office, which will subsequently report such violation to the Audit
Committee.
U.S. Corporate Governance Practices
Companies listed on the NYSE must comply with certain corporate governance standards under Section
303A of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual. However, foreign private issuers such as
the Company are permitted to follow home country practices in lieu of the provisions of Section
303A, except that such companies are required to comply with certain rules relating to the audit
committee. Please refer to the following website at
http://www.smics.com/website/enVersion/IR/corporateGovernance.htm for a summary of the significant
differences between the Companys corporate governance practices and those required of U.S.
companies under NYSE listing standards.
18
Other Information
The Board of the Company proposed not to declare an interim dividend for the period of the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company issued 17,316,642 Ordinary Shares to
certain of the Companys eligible participants including employees, directors, officers and
service providers of the Company (eligible participants) pursuant to the Companys 2004
stock option plan (the Stock Option Plan) and 16,683,981 ordinary shares to certain of the
eligible participants pursuant to the Companys 2004 equity incentive plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Share Capital as of June 30, 2008 |
|
|
18,592,920,335 |
|
Under the terms of the Companys 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee may
grant restricted share units (Restricted Share Units) to eligible participants. Each
Restricted Share Unit represents the right to receive one Ordinary Share. Restricted Share
Units granted to new employees generally vest at a rate of 10% upon the second anniversary of
the vesting commencement date, an additional 20% on the third anniversary of the vesting
commencement date, and an additional 70% upon the fourth anniversary of the vesting
commencement date. Restricted Share Units granted to existing employees generally vest at a
rate of 25% upon the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the vesting
commencement date. Upon vesting of the Restricted Share Units and subject to the terms of the
Insider Trading Policy and the payment by the participants of applicable taxes, the Company
will issue the relevant participants the number of Ordinary Shares underlying the awards of
Restricted Share Units.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, the Compensation Committee granted a total of
118,190,824 Restricted Share Units pursuant to which the Company issued an aggregate of
18,536,451 ordinary shares to its eligible participants on or around July 1, 2005. For the
twelve months ended December 31, 2005, the Compensation Committee granted a total of
122,418,740 Restricted Share Units pursuant to which the Company issued an aggregate of
27,591,342 ordinary shares to its eligible participants on or around January 1, 2006 and July
1, 2006. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, the Compensation Committee granted a
total of 16,058,864 Restricted Share Units pursuant to which the Company issued an aggregate
of 3,407,216 ordinary shares to its eligible participants on or around January 1, February 27,
March 1, March 3, March 23, May 30, July 1, September 1, September 16, October 1 and October
16, 2007.
19
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, the Compensation Committee granted a
total of 40,519,720 Restricted Share Units and for the six months ended June 30, 2008, the
Compensation Committee granted a total of 39,827,100 Restricted Share Units. The remaining
vesting dates of these Restricted Share Units (after deducting the number of Restricted Share
Units granted but cancelled due to the departure of eligible participants prior to vesting)
approximately are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Restricted Share Units |
|
|
|
(the actual number may change |
|
Vesting Dates |
|
due to the departure of employees prior to vesting) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
1-Jan |
|
|
14,777,833 |
|
19-Jan |
|
|
12,500 |
|
1-Feb |
|
|
250,000 |
|
1-Mar |
|
|
200,000 |
|
1-Mar |
|
|
45,790 |
|
3-Mar |
|
|
250,000 |
|
23-Mar |
|
|
175,000 |
|
1-Apr |
|
|
16,667 |
|
19-Apr |
|
|
17,760 |
|
25-Apr |
|
|
150,000 |
|
29-Apr |
|
|
400,000 |
|
1-May |
|
|
100,000 |
|
15-May |
|
|
83,333 |
|
25-May |
|
|
100,000 |
|
1-Jun |
|
|
178,423 |
|
16-Jun |
|
|
166,667 |
|
21-Jun |
|
|
100,000 |
|
1-Jul |
|
|
17,657,012 |
|
1-Aug |
|
|
590,000 |
|
1-Sep |
|
|
10,990,851 |
|
1-Sep |
|
|
693,900 |
|
1-Sep |
|
|
57,271 |
|
13-Sep |
|
|
375,000 |
|
16-Sep |
|
|
75,000 |
|
16-Sep |
|
|
50,000 |
|
1-Oct |
|
|
727,500 |
|
1-Oct |
|
|
96,563 |
|
16-Oct |
|
|
72,216 |
|
16-Oct |
|
|
150,000 |
|
1-Nov |
|
|
250,000 |
|
1-Dec |
|
|
101,930 |
|
1-Dec |
|
|
75,000 |
|
6-Dec |
|
|
100,000 |
|
12-Dec |
|
|
75,000 |
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Restricted Share Units |
|
|
|
(the actual number may change |
|
Vesting Dates |
|
due to the departure of employees prior to vesting) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
1-Jan |
|
|
23,930,096 |
|
19-Jan |
|
|
12,500 |
|
1-Feb |
|
|
250,000 |
|
1-Mar |
|
|
200,000 |
|
1-Mar |
|
|
45,790 |
|
3-Mar |
|
|
250,000 |
|
23-Mar |
|
|
175,000 |
|
1-Apr |
|
|
16,667 |
|
19-Apr |
|
|
17,760 |
|
1-May |
|
|
100,000 |
|
15-May |
|
|
83,333 |
|
25-May |
|
|
100,000 |
|
1-Jun |
|
|
178,423 |
|
16-Jun |
|
|
166,667 |
|
21-Jun |
|
|
100,000 |
|
1-Jul |
|
|
1,058,397 |
|
1-Aug |
|
|
590,000 |
|
1-Sep |
|
|
10,990,851 |
|
1-Sep |
|
|
693,900 |
|
1-Sep |
|
|
57,271 |
|
10-Sep |
|
|
9,450 |
|
13-Sep |
|
|
375,000 |
|
16-Sep |
|
|
75,000 |
|
16-Sep |
|
|
50,000 |
|
1-Oct |
|
|
727,500 |
|
1-Oct |
|
|
96,563 |
|
16-Oct |
|
|
72,216 |
|
16-Oct |
|
|
150,000 |
|
1-Nov |
|
|
250,000 |
|
1-Dec |
|
|
101,930 |
|
1-Dec |
|
|
75,000 |
|
6-Dec |
|
|
100,000 |
|
12-Dec |
|
|
75,000 |
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Restricted Share Units |
|
|
|
(the actual number may change |
|
Vesting Dates |
|
due to the departure of employees prior to vesting) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
1-Jan |
|
|
23,930,096 |
|
10-Jan |
|
|
8,750 |
|
19-Jan |
|
|
12,500 |
|
1-Feb |
|
|
250,000 |
|
1-Mar |
|
|
200,000 |
|
1-Mar |
|
|
45,790 |
|
3-Mar |
|
|
250,000 |
|
23-Mar |
|
|
175,000 |
|
1-Apr |
|
|
16,667 |
|
19-Apr |
|
|
17,760 |
|
1-May |
|
|
100,000 |
|
15-May |
|
|
83,333 |
|
25-May |
|
|
100,000 |
|
1-Jun |
|
|
178,423 |
|
16-Jun |
|
|
166,667 |
|
21-Jun |
|
|
100,000 |
|
1-Jul |
|
|
733,125 |
|
1-Sep |
|
|
693,900 |
|
1-Sep |
|
|
57,271 |
|
10-Sep |
|
|
9,450 |
|
16-Sep |
|
|
75,000 |
|
16-Sep |
|
|
50,000 |
|
1-Oct |
|
|
727,500 |
|
1-Oct |
|
|
96,563 |
|
16-Oct |
|
|
72,216 |
|
16-Oct |
|
|
150,000 |
|
1-Nov |
|
|
250,000 |
|
1-Dec |
|
|
101,930 |
|
1-Dec |
|
|
75,000 |
|
6-Dec |
|
|
100,000 |
|
12-Dec |
|
|
75,000 |
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Restricted Share Units |
|
|
|
(the actual number may change |
|
Vesting Dates |
|
due to the departure of employees prior to vesting) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
1-Jan |
|
|
10,092,846 |
|
10-Jan |
|
|
8,750 |
|
19-Jan |
|
|
12,500 |
|
1-Feb |
|
|
250,000 |
|
1-Mar |
|
|
45,790 |
|
1-Apr |
|
|
16,667 |
|
19-Apr |
|
|
17,760 |
|
1-May |
|
|
100,000 |
|
13-May |
|
|
12,500 |
|
15-May |
|
|
83,333 |
|
25-May |
|
|
100,000 |
|
1-Jun |
|
|
178,423 |
|
16-Jun |
|
|
166,667 |
|
21-Jun |
|
|
100,000 |
|
1-Jul |
|
|
628,125 |
|
1-Sep |
|
|
57,271 |
|
10-Sep |
|
|
9,450 |
|
16-Sep |
|
|
50,000 |
|
1-Oct |
|
|
96,563 |
|
16-Oct |
|
|
150,000 |
|
1-Nov |
|
|
250,000 |
|
1-Dec |
|
|
75,000 |
|
12-Dec |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
1-Jan |
|
|
9,314,763 |
|
10-Jan |
|
|
8,750 |
|
13-May |
|
|
12,500 |
|
1-Jul |
|
|
9,375 |
|
10-Sep |
|
|
9,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
10-Jan |
|
|
8,750 |
|
23
3. |
|
Substantial Shareholders Interest |
Set out below are the names of the parties (not being a director or chief executive of the
Company) which were interested in five percent or more of the nominal value of the share
capital of the Company and the respective relevant numbers of shares in which they were
interested as of June 30, 2008 as recorded in the register kept by the Company under section
336 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571 of the Laws of Hong Kong) (SFO).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Shareholder |
|
Number of Shares Held |
|
|
Percentage Held |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shanghai Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment (Holdings) |
|
36,310,000 (long position)(1) |
|
0.20% (long position) |
Company Limited (SIIC) |
|
1,814,991,340 (long position)(2) |
|
9.76% (long position) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
1,851,301,340 (long position) |
|
9.96% (long position) |
Notes:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All such ordinary shares are held by SIIC Treasury (B.V.I.) Limited which is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of SIIC. |
|
(2) |
|
All such ordinary shares are held by S.I. Technology Production Holdings Limited
(SITPHL) which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Shanghai Industrial Holdings Limited
(SIHL). SIHL is an indirect non-wholly owned subsidiary of SIIC which holds SIHLs
shares through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, namely, SIIC CM Development Limited, SIIC
Capital (B.V.I.) Limited and Shanghai Investment Holdings Limited, which together are
entitled to exercise or control the exercise of more than one-third of the voting power
at the general meetings of SI HL. By virtue of the SFO, SIIC and its subsidiaries namely,
Shanghai Investment Holdings Limited and Shanghai Industrial Investment Treasury Company
Limited are deemed to be interested in the 1,814,991,340 Shares held by SITPHL. The
Companys Director as of June 30, 2008, Wang Zheng Gang, is the Chief Representative of
the Shanghai Representative Office of SIHL and the chairman and general manager of SIIC
Management (Shanghai) Limited. It is the Companys understanding that voting and
investment control over the ordinary shares beneficially owned by SIHL are maintained by
the board of directors of SIHL. |
24
4. |
|
Shareholding Interests Of The Directors Of The Company |
As of June 30, 2008, the interests or short positions of the directors in the Ordinary Shares,
underlying shares and debentures of the Company (within the meaning of Part XV of the SFO, as
recorded in the register required to be kept under section 352 of the SFO or as otherwise
notified to the Company and SEHK pursuant to the Model Code) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
to Total Issued |
|
Board Member |
|
Nature of Interest |
|
Shares |
|
|
Share Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Ru Gin Chang |
|
Personal Interest (1) |
|
|
35,579,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Interest (2)(6) |
|
|
17,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Interest (3) |
|
|
20,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest of Spouse |
|
|
9,790,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest of Child under 18 |
|
|
11,200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
94,169,550 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ta-Lin Hsu |
|
Corporate Interest (4) |
|
|
15,300,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Interest (5)(6) |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
16,300,010 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tsuyoshi Kawanishi |
|
Personal Interest (5)(6) |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal Interest (7) |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Shaw |
|
Personal Interest (5)(6) |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Lip-Bu Tan |
|
Personal Interest (5)(6) |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Yang Yuan Wang |
|
Personal Interest (5)(6) |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Albert Y. C. Yu |
|
Personal Interest |
|
|
1,350,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
Personal Interest (6)(8) |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
2,350,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates less than 1%. |
25
Notes:
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pursuant to a Charitable Pledge Agreement dated December 1, 2003, Richard Ru Gin
Chang and his spouse, Scarlett K. Chang (collectively, the Donors) have pledged to
transfer 10,000,000 of such ordinary shares as a charitable gift to The Richard and
Scarlett Chang Family Foundation, a Delaware nonprofit nonstock corporation organized
exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary and education purposes within
the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the US Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
such transfer to be made in full at or prior to the death of the surviving Donor. In
addition, 2,639,550 of such ordinary shares are jointly held by Richard Ru Gin Chang and
his spouse, Scarlett K. Chang. |
|
(2) |
|
The Compensation Committee has granted Dr. Chang options to purchase an aggregate
of 15,100,000 ordinary shares if fully exercised, and an award of 2,000,000 RSUs (each
representing the right to receive one ordinary share). As of June 30, 2008, none of these
options have been exercised and 75% of the RSUs have vested. |
|
(3) |
|
These ordinary shares are held by Jade Capital Company, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (the LLC), of which Richard Ru Gin Chang and his spouse, Scarlett K.
Chang (collectively, the Members), are the sole Members. It is the current intention of
the Members that all or a portion of the net income of the LLC be used for philanthropic
purposes, including but not limited to contributions to charitable organizations that are
tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the US Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. |
|
(4) |
|
Ta-Lin Hsu has a controlling interest in AP3 Co-Investment Partners, LDC, which
holds 15,300,010 ordinary shares. |
|
(5) |
|
Each independent Non-executive Director and Non-executive Director was granted an
option to purchase 500,000 ordinary shares at a price per ordinary share of US$0.22.
These options were fully vested on March 19, 2005 and will expire on November 9, 2009. As
of June 30, 2008, these options have not been exercised. Lai Xing Cai (who resigned as an
Non-executive Director on February 6, 2006) has declined such option. The option granted
to Mr. Yen-Pong Jou (who retired as an Independent Non-executive Director at the annual
general meeting held on May 30, 2006) lapsed and was cancelled on September 27, 2006. |
|
(6) |
|
Each Director was granted an option to purchase 500,000 ordinary shares at a price
per ordinary share of US$0.132. These options were fully vested on May 30, 2008 and will
expire on the earlier of September 29, 2016 or 120 days after termination of the
directors service to the Board. As of June 30, 2008, these options have not been
exercised. Fang Yao (who resigned as non-executive director on August 30, 2007) and Jiang
Shang Zhou have declined such option. |
|
(7) |
|
Tsuyoshi Kawanishi has been granted options to purchase an aggregate of 1,500,000
ordinary shares, if fully exercised. As of June 30, 2008, these options have not been
exercised. |
|
(8) |
|
On September 29, 2006, the Board granted to Dr. Albert Y. C. Yu 500,000 Restricted
Share Units. Shares under the Restricted Share Units are to be automatically vested as to
50% per year starting from May 30, 2007. As of June 30, 2008, all such Restricted Share
Units have vested. |
26
2001 Stock Option Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Price of |
|
|
Closing Price of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Lapsed Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares immediately |
|
|
Shares immediately |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Repurchase of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before Dates |
|
|
before Dates |
|
Name/Eligible |
|
|
|
|
|
Period during which |
|
|
No. of Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Lapsed |
|
|
Ordinary Shares |
|
|
Options Exercised |
|
|
Options Cancelled |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
on which Options |
|
|
on which Options |
|
Employees |
|
Date Granted |
|
|
Rights Exercisable |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
as of 12/31/07 |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
During Period* |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
as of 06/30/08 |
|
|
were Exercised |
|
|
were Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
28/3/2001 |
|
|
|
3/28/2001 - 3/27/2011 |
|
|
|
89,385,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
4,756,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,716,500 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
2/4/2001 |
|
|
|
4/02/2001 - 4/01/2011 |
|
|
|
2,216,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
281,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
16/4/2001 |
|
|
|
4/16/2001 - 4/15/2011 |
|
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
28/4/2001 |
|
|
|
4/28/2001 - 4/27/2011 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
42,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
14/5/2001 |
|
|
|
5/14/2001 - 5/13/2011 |
|
|
|
1,597,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
15/5/2001 |
|
|
|
5/15/2001 - 5/14/2011 |
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
1/6/2001 |
|
|
|
6/01/2001 - 5/31/2011 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
1/7/2001 |
|
|
|
7/1/2001 - 6/30/2011 |
|
|
|
745,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
15/7/2001 |
|
|
|
7/15/2001 - 7/14/2011 |
|
|
|
1,045,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
314,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
16/7/2001 |
|
|
|
7/16/2001 - 7/15/2011 |
|
|
|
2,220,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
88,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
27/7/2001 |
|
|
|
7/27/2001 - 7/26/2011 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
30/7/2001 |
|
|
|
7/30/2001 - 7/29/2011 |
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
1/8/2001 |
|
|
|
8/01/2001 - 7/31/2011 |
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
7/8/2001 |
|
|
|
8/07/2001 - 8/06/2011 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
15/8/2001 |
|
|
|
8/15/2001 - 8/14/2011 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
20/8/2001 |
|
|
|
8/20/2001 - 8/19/2011 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
24/9/2001 |
|
|
|
9/24/2001 - 9/23/2011 |
|
|
|
98,708,500 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
18,536,700 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,167,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,319,700 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
28/9/2001 |
|
|
|
9/28/2001 - 9/27/2011 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
24/1/2002 |
|
|
|
1/24/2002 - 1/23/2012 |
|
|
|
47,653,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
11,836,500 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
840,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,986,500 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
24/1/2002 |
|
|
|
1/24/2002 - 1/23/2012 |
|
|
|
7,684,500 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
1,156,800 |
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,109,300 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
10/4/2002 |
|
|
|
4/10/2002 - 4/09/2012 |
|
|
|
1,315,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Employees |
|
|
10/4/2002 |
|
|
|
4/10/2002 - 4/09/2012 |
|
|
|
47,349,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
11,915,900 |
|
|
|
340,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,070,900 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Employees |
|
|
11/4/2002 |
|
|
|
4/11/2002 - 4/10/2012 |
|
|
|
4,100,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
2,100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,100,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Employees |
|
|
28/6/2002 |
|
|
|
6/28/2002 - 6/27/2012 |
|
|
|
39,740,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
10,544,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,806,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,738,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Employees |
|
|
28/6/2002 |
|
|
|
6/28/2002 - 6/27/2012 |
|
|
|
18,944,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
7,734,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,724,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Kawanishi, Tsuyoshi |
|
|
11/7/2002 |
|
|
|
7/11/2002 - 7/10/2012 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Employees |
|
|
11/7/2002 |
|
|
|
7/11/2002 - 7/10/2012 |
|
|
|
2,780,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Service Providers |
|
|
26/9/2002 |
|
|
|
9/26/2002 - 9/25/2012 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Employees |
|
|
26/9/2002 |
|
|
|
9/26/2005 - 9/25/2012 |
|
|
|
5,770,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
1,555,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,505,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Employees |
|
|
26/9/2002 |
|
|
|
9/26/2005 - 9/25/2012 |
|
|
|
65,948,300 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
20,006,310 |
|
|
|
34,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,738,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,233,910 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Employees |
|
|
9/1/2003 |
|
|
|
1/09/2003 - 1/08/2013 |
|
|
|
53,831,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
21,090,400 |
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,726,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,336,400 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Price of |
|
|
Closing Price of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Lapsed Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares immediately |
|
|
Shares immediately |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Repurchase of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before Dates |
|
|
before Dates |
|
Name/Eligible |
|
|
|
|
|
Period during which |
|
|
No. of Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Lapsed |
|
|
Ordinary Shares |
|
|
Options Exercised |
|
|
Options Cancelled |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
on which Options |
|
|
on which Options |
|
Employees |
|
Date Granted |
|
|
Rights Exercisable |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
as of 12/31/07 |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
During Period* |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
as of 06/30/08 |
|
|
were Exercised |
|
|
were Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
10/1/2003 |
|
|
|
1/10/2003 - 1/09/2013 |
|
|
|
720,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
720,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Employees |
|
|
22/1/2003 |
|
|
|
1/22/2003 - 1/21/2013 |
|
|
|
1,060,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
1,060,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Employees |
|
|
1/4/2003 |
|
|
|
4/01/2003 - 3/31/2013 |
|
|
|
18,804,900 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
7,995,638 |
|
|
|
127,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,404,218 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Employees |
|
|
15/4/2003 |
|
|
|
4/15/2003 - 4/14/2013 |
|
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Senior Management |
|
|
24/4/2003 |
|
|
|
4/24/2003 - 4/23/2013 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
1,450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,450,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Employees |
|
|
24/4/2003 |
|
|
|
4/24/2003 - 4/23/2013 |
|
|
|
58,838,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
23,369,400 |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,838,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,513,400 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Employees |
|
|
15/7/2003 |
|
|
|
7/15/2003 - 7/14/2013 |
|
|
|
59,699,900 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
20,347,020 |
|
|
|
172,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,282,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,893,020 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Employees |
|
|
10/10/2003 |
|
|
|
10/10/2003 - 10/09/2013 |
|
|
|
49,535,400 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
24,161,900 |
|
|
|
4,543,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,618,900 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Employees |
|
|
5/1/2004 |
|
|
|
1/05/2004 - 1/04/2014 |
|
|
|
130,901,110 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
68,598,317 |
|
|
|
2,576,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,908,840 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Kawanishi, Tsuyoshi |
|
|
15/1/2004 |
|
|
|
1/15/2004 - 1/14/2014 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Service Providers |
|
|
15/1/2004 |
|
|
|
1/15/2004 - 3/01/2005 |
|
|
|
4,100,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Senior Management |
|
|
15/1/2004 |
|
|
|
1/15/2004 - 1/14/2014 |
|
|
|
10,700,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
1,955,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,955,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Others |
|
|
15/1/2004 |
|
|
|
1/15/2004 - 1/14/2014 |
|
|
|
4,600,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Employees |
|
|
15/1/2004 |
|
|
|
1/15/2004 - 1/14/2014 |
|
|
|
20,885,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
8,004,000 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,604,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Senior Management |
|
|
16/2/2004 |
|
|
|
2/16/2004 - 2/15/2014 |
|
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Others |
|
|
16/2/2004 |
|
|
|
2/16/2004 - 2/15/2014 |
|
|
|
12,300,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
6,130,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,130,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Employees |
|
|
16/2/2004 |
|
|
|
2/16/2004 - 2/15/2014 |
|
|
|
14,948,600 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
4,953,500 |
|
|
|
271,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,682,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Employees |
|
|
16/2/2004 |
|
|
|
2/16/2004 - 2/15/2014 |
|
|
|
76,454,880 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
44,616,360 |
|
|
|
1,938,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,677,730 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
28
2001 Preference Share Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Price of |
|
|
Closing Price of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Lapsed Due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares immediately |
|
|
Shares immediately |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Repurchase of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before Dates |
|
|
before Dates |
|
Name/Eligible |
|
|
|
|
|
Period during which |
|
|
No. of Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Lapsed |
|
|
Ordinary Shares |
|
|
Options Exercised |
|
|
Options Cancelled |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
on which Options |
|
|
on which Options |
|
Employees |
|
Date Granted |
|
|
Rights Exercisable |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
as of 12/31/07 |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
During Period* |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
as of 6/30/08 |
|
|
were Exercised |
|
|
were Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
24/9/2001 |
|
|
|
9/24/2001 - 9/23/2011 |
|
|
|
249,098,700 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
22,274,200 |
|
|
|
724,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,550,200 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Employees |
|
|
28/9/2001 |
|
|
|
9/28/2001 - 9/27/2011 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Employees |
|
|
3/11/2001 |
|
|
|
11/03/2001 - 11/02/2011 |
|
|
|
780,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
515,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Employees |
|
|
24/1/2002 |
|
|
|
1/24/2002 - 1/23/2012 |
|
|
|
58,357,500 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
5,771,500 |
|
|
|
185,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,586,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
Employees |
|
|
10/4/2002 |
|
|
|
4/10/2002 - 4/09/2012 |
|
|
|
51,384,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
3,351,900 |
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,216,900 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
Employees |
|
|
28/6/2002 |
|
|
|
6/28/2002 - 6/27/2012 |
|
|
|
63,332,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
9,282,500 |
|
|
|
1,420,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,862,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Service Providers |
|
|
11/7/2002 |
|
|
|
7/11/2002 - 7/10/2012 |
|
|
|
462,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
202,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Employees |
|
|
11/7/2002 |
|
|
|
7/11/2002 - 7/10/2012 |
|
|
|
4,530,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
805,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
805,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Service Providers |
|
|
26/9/2002 |
|
|
|
9/26/2002 - 9/25/2012 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Employees |
|
|
26/9/2002 |
|
|
|
9/26/2002 - 9/25/2012 |
|
|
|
73,804,800 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
12,383,900 |
|
|
|
364,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,019,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Employees |
|
|
9/1/2003 |
|
|
|
1/09/2003 - 1/08/2013 |
|
|
|
12,686,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
1,237,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,237,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
29
2004 Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Price of |
|
|
Closing Price of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Lapsed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares immediately |
|
|
Shares immediately |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to Repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before Dates on |
|
|
before Dates |
|
Name/Eligible |
|
|
|
|
|
Period during which |
|
|
No. of Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Additional Options |
|
|
Options Lapsed |
|
|
of Ordinary Shares |
|
|
Options Exercised |
|
|
Options Cancelled |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
which Options were |
|
|
on which Options |
|
Employees |
|
Date Granted |
|
|
Rights Exercisable |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
as of 12/31/07 |
|
|
Granted During Period |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
During Period* |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
as of 06/30/08 |
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
were Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Management |
|
|
18/3/2004 |
|
|
|
3/18/2004 - 3/17/2014 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Others |
|
|
18/3/2004 |
|
|
|
3/18/2004 - 3/17/2014 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Employees |
|
|
18/3/2004 |
|
|
|
3/18/2004 - 3/17/2014 |
|
|
|
49,949,700 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
29,733,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,769,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,963,700 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Richard Chang |
|
|
7/4/2004 |
|
|
|
4/07/2004 - 4/06/2014 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
Employees |
|
|
25/4/2004 |
|
|
|
4/25/2004 - 4/24/2014 |
|
|
|
22,591,800 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
|
14,511,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,491,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,020,200 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Others |
|
|
27/7/2004 |
|
|
|
7/27/2004 - 7/26/2014 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Employees |
|
|
27/7/2004 |
|
|
|
7/27/2004 - 7/26/2014 |
|
|
|
35,983,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
19,257,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,483,200 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Kawanishi, Tsuyoshi |
|
|
10/11/2004 |
|
|
|
11/10/2004 - 11/09/2009 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Employees |
|
|
10/11/2004 |
|
|
|
11/10/2004 - 11/09/2014 |
|
|
|
52,036,140 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
27,125,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,223,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,901,980 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Ta-Lin Hsu |
|
|
10/11/2004 |
|
|
|
11/10/2004 - 11/09/2009 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Henry Shaw |
|
|
10/11/2004 |
|
|
|
11/10/2004 - 11/09/2009 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Lip-Bu Tan |
|
|
10/11/2004 |
|
|
|
11/10/2004 - 11/09/2009 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Wang Yang Yuan |
|
|
10/11/2004 |
|
|
|
11/10/2004 - 11/09/2009 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Senior Management |
|
|
11/5/2005 |
|
|
|
5/11/2005 - 5/10/2015 |
|
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Others |
|
|
11/5/2005 |
|
|
|
5/11/2005 - 5/10/2015 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Employees |
|
|
11/5/2005 |
|
|
|
5/11/2005 - 5/10/2015 |
|
|
|
94,381,300 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
62,441,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,239,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,201,941 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Richard Chang |
|
|
11/5/2005 |
|
|
|
5/11/2005 - 5/10/2015 |
|
|
|
15,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
15,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Employees |
|
|
11/8/2005 |
|
|
|
8/11/2005 - 8/10/2015 |
|
|
|
32,279,500 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
17,821,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,594,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,227,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Senior Management |
|
|
11/11/2005 |
|
|
|
11/11/2005 - 11/10/2015 |
|
|
|
11,640,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
8,240,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,240,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Others |
|
|
11/11/2005 |
|
|
|
11/11/2005 - 11/10/2015 |
|
|
|
3,580,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
3,580,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,580,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Employees |
|
|
11/11/2005 |
|
|
|
11/11/2005 - 11/10/2015 |
|
|
|
149,642,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
114,736,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,654,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,081,800 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Price of |
|
|
Closing Price of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Lapsed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares immediately |
|
|
Shares immediately |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to Repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before Dates on |
|
|
before Dates |
|
Name/Eligible |
|
|
|
|
|
Period during which |
|
|
No. of Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Additional Options |
|
|
Options Lapsed |
|
|
of Ordinary Shares |
|
|
Options Exercised |
|
|
Options Cancelled |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
which Options were |
|
|
on which Options |
|
Employees |
|
Date Granted |
|
|
Rights Exercisable |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
as of 12/31/07 |
|
|
Granted During Period |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
During Period* |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
as of 06/30/08 |
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
were Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
20/2/2006 |
|
|
|
2/20/2006 - 2/19/2016 |
|
|
|
62,756,470 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
45,087,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,132,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,955,699 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
12/5/2006 |
|
|
|
5/12/2006 - 5/11/2016 |
|
|
|
22,216,090 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
17,319,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,160,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,158,600 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Kawanishi, Tsuyoshi |
|
|
29/9/2006 |
|
|
|
9/29/2006 - 9/28/2011 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
29/9/2006 |
|
|
|
9/29/2006 - 9/28/2011 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
29/9/2006 |
|
|
|
9/29/2006 - 9/28/2016 |
|
|
|
40,394,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
32,359,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,676,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,683,100 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Chang |
|
|
29/9/2006 |
|
|
|
9/29/2006 - 9/28/2016 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ta-Lin Hsu |
|
|
29/9/2006 |
|
|
|
9/29/2006 - 9/28/2011 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Shaw |
|
|
29/9/2006 |
|
|
|
9/29/2006 - 9/28/2011 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lip-Bu Tan |
|
|
29/9/2006 |
|
|
|
9/29/2006 - 9/28/2011 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Wang Yang Yuan |
|
|
29/9/2006 |
|
|
|
9/29/2006 - 9/28/2011 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Y.C. Yu |
|
|
29/9/2006 |
|
|
|
9/29/2006 - 9/28/2011 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
10/11/2006 |
|
|
|
11/10/2006 - 11/09/2016 |
|
|
|
2,450,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
2,150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,150,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
10/11/2006 |
|
|
|
11/10/2006 - 11/09/2016 |
|
|
|
33,271,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
24,821,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,486,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,335,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
16/5/2007 |
|
|
|
5/16/2007 - 5/15/2017 |
|
|
|
123,528,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
112,975,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,428,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,546,750 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Management |
|
|
16/5/2007 |
|
|
|
5/16/2007 - 5/15/2017 |
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
16/5/2007 |
|
|
|
5/16/2007 - 5/15/2017 |
|
|
|
5,421,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
5,421,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,001,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
28/12/2007 |
|
|
|
12/28/2007 - 12/27/2017 |
|
|
|
88,339,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
88,339,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,356,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,983,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
28/12/2007 |
|
|
|
12/28/2007 - 12/27/2017 |
|
|
|
5,300,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
5,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,300,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
12/2/2008 |
|
|
|
2/12/2008 - 2/11/2018 |
|
|
|
127,441,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,441,000 |
|
|
|
8,577,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,863,300 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
12/2/2008 |
|
|
|
2/12/2008 - 2/11/2018 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Management |
|
|
12/2/2008 |
|
|
|
2/12/2008 - 2/11/2018 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
31
2004 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Price of |
|
|
Closing Price of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Lapsed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares immediately |
|
|
Shares immediately |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to Repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before Dates on |
|
|
before Dates on |
|
Name/Eligible |
|
|
|
|
|
Period during which |
|
|
No. of Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Additional Options |
|
|
Options Lapsed |
|
|
of Ordinary Shares |
|
|
Options Exercised |
|
|
Options Cancelled |
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
which Restricted |
|
|
which Restricted |
|
Employees |
|
Date Granted |
|
|
Rights Exercisable |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
as of 12/31/07 |
|
|
Granted During Period |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
During Period* |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
During Period |
|
|
as of 06/30/08 |
|
|
Share Units were Vested |
|
|
Share Units were Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
(USD) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees |
|
|
1/7/2004 |
|
|
|
7/01/2005 - 6/30/2015 |
|
|
|
96,856,590 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
14,775,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,462,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,298,611 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Senior Management |
|
|
27/7/2004 |
|
|
|
7/27/2005 - 7/26/2015 |
|
|
|
1,130,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
257,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Employees |
|
|
27/7/2004 |
|
|
|
7/27/2005 - 7/26/2015 |
|
|
|
19,447,520 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
3,086,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,951,880 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Employees |
|
|
11/5/2005 |
|
|
|
5/11/2006 - 5/10/2016 |
|
|
|
4,630,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
740,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,500 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Richard Chang |
|
|
11/5/2005 |
|
|
|
5/11/2006 - 5/10/2016 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Senior Management |
|
|
11/8/2005 |
|
|
|
8/11/2005 - 8/10/2015 |
|
|
|
916,830 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
409,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360,720 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Others |
|
|
11/8/2005 |
|
|
|
8/11/2005 - 8/10/2015 |
|
|
|
156,888 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
18,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,788 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Employees |
|
|
11/8/2005 |
|
|
|
8/11/2005 - 8/10/2015 |
|
|
|
69,430,022 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
25,158,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,607,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,114,742 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Senior Management |
|
|
11/11/2005 |
|
|
|
11/11/2005 - 11/10/2015 |
|
|
|
2,910,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
1,545,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Others |
|
|
11/11/2005 |
|
|
|
11/11/2005 - 11/10/2015 |
|
|
|
2,100,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
1,075,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Employees |
|
|
11/11/2005 |
|
|
|
11/11/2005 - 11/10/2015 |
|
|
|
40,275,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
24,046,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,326,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Employees |
|
|
20/2/2006 |
|
|
|
2/20/2006 - 2/19/2016 |
|
|
|
3,110,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
1,647,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
595,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
610,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Employees |
|
|
12/5/2006 |
|
|
|
5/12/2006 - 5/11/2016 |
|
|
|
2,700,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
2,450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Employees |
|
|
29/9/2006 |
|
|
|
9/29/2006 - 9/28/2016 |
|
|
|
720,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
Albert Y.C. Yu |
|
|
29/9/2006 |
|
|
|
9/29/2006 - 9/28/2016 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
Others |
|
|
10/11/2006 |
|
|
|
11/10/2006 - 11/09/2016 |
|
|
|
1,688,864 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
1,616,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,266,648 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Employees |
|
|
10/11/2006 |
|
|
|
11/10/2006 - 11/09/2016 |
|
|
|
7,340,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
4,425,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,483,750 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Employees |
|
|
16/5/2007 |
|
|
|
5/16/2007 - 5/15/2017 |
|
|
|
33,649,720 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
29,930,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,657,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,162,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,111,040 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Others |
|
|
16/5/2007 |
|
|
|
5/16/2007 - 5/15/2017 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Employees |
|
|
28/12/2007 |
|
|
|
12/28/2007 - 12/27/2017 |
|
|
|
4,910,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
4,910,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,610,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Others |
|
|
28/12/2007 |
|
|
|
12/28/2007 - 12/27/2017 |
|
|
|
960,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
960,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
960,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Employees |
|
|
12/2/2008 |
|
|
|
2/12/2008 - 2/11/2018 |
|
|
|
38,817,100 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,817,100 |
|
|
|
2,308,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,508,550 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Others |
|
|
12/2/2008 |
|
|
|
2/12/2008 - 2/11/2018 |
|
|
|
270,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
Senior Management |
|
|
12/2/2008 |
|
|
|
2/12/2008 - 2/11/2018 |
|
|
|
740,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
32
5. |
|
Repurchase, Sale Or Redemption Of Securities |
The Company has not repurchased, sold or redeemed any of its securities during the six months
ended June 30, 2008.
6. |
|
Material Litigation And Arbitration |
Overview of TSMC Litigation:
Beginning in December 2003 through August 2004, the Company became subject to several lawsuits
brought by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Limited (TSMC) relating to alleged
infringement of certain patents and misappropriation of alleged trade secrets relating to
methods for conducting semiconductor fab operations and manufacturing integrated circuits.
On January 31, 2005, the Company entered into a settlement agreement, without admission of
liability, which provided for the dismissal of all pending legal actions without prejudice
between the two companies (the Settlement Agreement). The terms of the Settlement Agreement
also included:
|
1) |
|
The Company and TSMC agreed to cross-license each others patent portfolio for all
semiconductor device products, effective from January 2005 through December 2010. |
|
2) |
|
TSMC covenanted not to sue the Company for trade secret misappropriation as alleged
in TSMCs legal actions as it related to .15um and larger processes subject to certain
conditions (TSMC Covenant). The TSMC Covenant did not cover .13um and smaller
technologies after 6 months following execution of the Settlement Agreement (July 31,
2005). Excluding the .13um and smaller technologies, the TSMC Covenant remains in effect
indefinitely, terminable upon a breach by the Company. |
|
3) |
|
The Company is required to deposit certain Company materials relating to .13ìm and
smaller technologies into an escrow account until December 31, 2006 or under certain
circumstances for a longer period of time. |
|
4) |
|
The Company agreed to pay TSMC an aggregate of $175 million in installments of $30
million for each of the first five years and $25 million in the sixth year. |
Accounting under the Settlement Agreement:
In accounting for the Settlement Agreement, the Company determined that there were several
components of the Settlement Agreement settlement of litigation, covenant not to sue,
patents licensed by us to TSMC and the use of TSMCs patent license portfolio both prior and
subsequent to the settlement date.
The Company does not believe that the settlement of litigation, covenant not to sue or patents
licensed by us to TSMC qualify as accounting elements. In regard to the settlement of
litigation, the Company cites the following:
|
|
|
The settlement agreement reached between TSMC and SMIC clearly stated that there
was no admission of liability by either party; |
|
|
|
The settlement agreement required all parties to bear their own legal costs; |
|
|
|
There were no other damages associated with the Settlement Agreement; |
|
|
|
There was a provision in the Settlement Agreement for a grace period to resolve any
misappropriation issues had they existed; |
|
|
|
Although a complaint had been filed by TSMC on trade secret infringement, TSMC has
never identified which trade secrets it claimed were being infringed upon by the Company; |
|
|
|
The Settlement Agreement was concluded when the litigation process was still at a
relatively early stage and the outcome of the litigation was therefore highly uncertain. |
33
The TSMC covenant not to sue for alleged trade secrets misappropriation does not qualify as a
separable asset in accordance with either SFAS 141 or SFAS 142 as TSMC had never specified the
exact trade secrets that it claimed were misappropriated, the Companys belief that TSMCs
trade secrets may be obtained within the marketplace by other legal means and the Company
never obtained the legal right to use TSMCs trade secrets.
In addition, the Company did not attribute any value to the patents licensed to TSMC under the
Settlement Agreement due to the limited number of patents held by the Company at the time of
the Settlement Agreement.
As a result, the Company determined that only the use of TSMCs patent license portfolio prior
and subsequent to the settlement date were considered elements of an arrangement for
accounting purposes. In attributing value to these two elements, the Company first discounted
the payment terms of the $175 million settlement amount using an annual 3.4464% interest rate
to arrive at a net present value of $158 million. This amount was then allocated to the pre-
and post-settlement periods based on relative fair value, as further described below.
Based on this approach, $16.7 million was allocated to the pre-settlement period, reflecting
the amount that the Company would have paid for use of the patent license portfolio prior to
the date of the Settlement Agreement. The remaining $141.3 million, representing the relative
fair value of the licensed patent license portfolio, was recorded on the Companys
consolidated balance sheets as a deferred cost and is being amortized over a six-year period,
which represents the life of the licensed patent license portfolio. The amortization of the
deferred cost is included as a component of cost of sales in the consolidated statements of
operations.
Valuation of Deferred Cost
The fair value of the patent license portfolio was calculated by applying the estimated
royalty rate to the specific revenue generated and expected to be generated from the specific
products associated with the patent license portfolio.
The selected royalty rate was based on the review of median and mean royalty rates for the
following categories of licensing arrangements:
|
a) |
|
Existing third-party license agreements with SMIC; |
|
b) |
|
The analysis of comparable industry royalty rates related to semiconductor
chip/integrated circuit (IC) related technology; and |
|
c) |
|
The analysis of comparable industry royalty rates related to semiconductor
fabrication. |
On an annualized basis, the amounts allocated to past periods was lower than that allocated to
future periods as the Company assumed increases in revenues relating to the specific products
associated with the patent license portfolio.
As the total estimated fair value of the patent license portfolio exceeded the present value
of the settlement amount, the Company allocated the present value of the settlement amount
based on the relative fair value of the amounts calculated prior and subsequent to the
settlement date.
34
Recent TSMC Legal Developments:
On August 25, 2006, TSMC filed a lawsuit against the Company and certain subsidiaries (SMIC
(Shanghai), SMIC (Beijing) and SMIC (Americas)) in the Superior Court of the State of
California, County of Alameda for alleged breach of the Settlement Agreement, alleged breach
of promissory notes and alleged trade secret misappropriation by the Company. TSMC seeks,
among other things, damages, injunctive relief, attorneys fees, and the acceleration of the
remaining payments outstanding under the Settlement Agreement.
In the present litigation, TSMC alleges that the Company has incorporated TSMC trade secrets
in the manufacture of the Companys 0.13 micron or smaller process products. TSMC further
alleges that as a result of this claimed breach, TSMCs patent license is terminated and the
covenant not to sue is no longer in effect with respect to the Companys larger process
products.
The Company has vigorously denied all allegations of misappropriation. The Court has made no
finding that TSMCs claims are valid, nor has it set a trial date.
On September 13, 2006, the Company announced that in addition to filing a response strongly
denying the allegations of TSMC in the United States lawsuit, it filed on September 12, 2006,
a cross-complaint against TSMC seeking, among other things, damages for TSMCs breach of
contract and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
On November 16, 2006, the High Court in Beijing, the Peoples Republic of China, accepted the
filing of a complaint by the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, SMIC (Shanghai) and
SMIC (Beijing), regarding the unfair competition arising from the breach of bona fide (i.e.
integrity, good faith) principle and commercial defamation by TSMC (PRC Complaint). In the
PRC Complaint, the Company is seeking, among other things, an injunction to stop TSMCs
infringing acts, public apology from TSMC to the Company and compensation from TSMC to the
Company, including profits gained by TSMC from their infringing acts.
TSMC filed with the California court in January 2007 a motion seeking to enjoin the PRC
action. In February 2007, TSMC filed with the Beijing High Court a jurisdictional objection,
challenging the competency of the Beijing High Courts jurisdiction over the PRC action.
In March 2007, the California Court denied TSMCs motion to enjoin the PRC action. TSMC
appealed this ruling to California Court of Appeal. On March 26, 2008, the Court of Appeal, in
a written opinion, denied TSMCs appeal.
In July 2007, the Beijing High Court denied TSMCs jurisdictional objection and issued a court
order holding that the Beijing High Court shall have proper jurisdiction to try the PRC
action. TSMC appealed this order to the Supreme Court of the Peoples Republic of China. On
January 7, 2008, the Supreme Court heard TSMCs appeal. On June 13, 2008, the Supreme Court
denied TSMCs appeal and affirmed the jurisdiction of the Beijing High Court.
On August 14, 2007, the Company filed an amended cross-complaint against TSMC seeking, among
other things, damages for TSMCs breach of contract and breach of patent license agreement.
TSMC thereafter denied the allegations of the Companys amended cross-complaint and
subsequently filed additional claims that the Company breached the Settlement Agreement by
filing an action in the Beijing High Court. The Company has denied these additional claims by
TSMC.
On August 15-17, 2007, the California Court held a preliminary injunction hearing on TSMCs
motion to enjoin use of certain process recipes in certain of the Companys 0.13 micron logic
process flows. On September 7, 2007, the Court denied TSMCs preliminary injunction motion,
thereby leaving unaffected the Companys development and sales. However, the court required
the Company to provide 10 days advance notice to TSMC if the Company plans to disclose logic
technology to non-SMIC entities under certain circumstances, to allow TSMC to object to the
planned disclosure.
35
On March 11, 2008, TSMC filed an application for a right to attach order in the California
Court. By its application, TSMC sought an order securing an amount equal to the remaining
balance on the promissory notes issued by the Company in connection with the Settlement
Agreement. The Company opposed the application. A hearing was held on April 3, 2008. On June
24, 2008, the Court denied TSMCs application.
In May 2008, TSMC filed a motion in the California Court for summary adjudication against the
Company on several of the Companys cross claims. The Company opposed the motion and on July
25, 2008, the Court granted in part and denied in part TSMCs motion.
On June 23, 2008, the Company filed with California court a cross-complaint against TSMC
seeking, among other things, damages for TSMCs unlawful misappropriation of trade secrets
from SMIC to improve its competitive position against SMIC.
On July 10, 2008, the California Court held and granted part of a preliminary injunction
hearing on TSMCs motion to enjoin disclosure of information on certain process recipes in the
Companys 0.30 micron logic process flows to 3rd parties.
Under the provisions of SFAS 144, the Company is required to make a determination as to
whether or not this pending litigation represents an event that requires a further analysis of
whether the patent license portfolio has been impaired. We believe that the lawsuit is at a
preliminary stage and we are still evaluating whether or not the litigation represents such an
event. The Company expects further information to become available to us which will aid us in
making a determination. The outcome of any impairment analysis performed under SFAS 144 might
result in a material impact to our financial position and results of operations. Because the
case is in its preliminary stages, the Company is unable to evaluate the likelihood of an
unfavorable outcome or to estimate the amount or range of potential loss.
36
7. |
|
Changes In The Members Of The Board Of Directors |
At the 2008 AGM, Dr. Richard R. Chang and Mr. Henry Shaw were re-elected as Class I executive
director and Class I non-executive director of the Company respectively and Mr. Wang Zheng
Gang was re-elected as Class III non-executive director of the Company. At the 2008 AGM, Dr.
Albert Y. C. Yu retired as a Class I non-executive director of the Company and did not offer
himself for re-election.
On August 11, 2008, Mr. Henry Shaw resigned as a member of the Audit Committee of the Company
and on the same day, Mr. Jiang Shang Zhou was appointed as a member of the Audit Committee in
place of Mr. Shaw.
8. |
|
Waiver From Compliance With The Listing Rules |
The Stock Exchange has granted a conditional waiver (the Waiver) to the Company from the
strict compliance with rule 3.24 of the Listing Rules. Under rule 3.24 of the Listing Rules,
the Company must employ an individual on a full-time basis who, amongst other things, must be
a qualified accountant and a fellow or associate member of the Hong Kong Institute of
Certified Public Accountants (the HKICPA) (previously known as the Hong Kong Society of
Accountants) or a similar body of accountants recognized by HKICPA for the purpose of granting
exemptions from the examination requirement for membership of HKICPA.
The Waiver is subject to the following conditions:
|
1. |
|
Ms. Morning Wu (Ms. Wu), the Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, being
a member of the senior management of the Company, is able to meet all the requirements
set out in rule 3.24 of the Listing Rules, save for being a fellow or associate member of
the HKICPA or a similar body of accountants recognized by the HKICPA for the purpose of
granting exemptions from the examination requirement for membership of HKICPA; and |
|
2. |
|
the Company has in place arrangement(s) providing Ms. Wu with access to the
assistance of Ms. Mei Fung Hoo, who shall continue to be a member of the HKICPA and
Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia, to provide assistance to Ms. Wu in the
discharge of her duties as the Qualified Accountant of the Company during the period of
the Waiver. |
The Waiver was extended on April 15, 2008 by the SEHK for a further period of 9 months
commencing from April 15, 2008 (the Extended Waiver). The Extended Waiver will cease on
January 14, 2009 or when the Company fails to fulfill any of the above conditions to the
Waiver, whichever is earlier.
Save as disclosed above and in the prospectus of the Company dated March 8, 2004, the Company
has not received any waivers from compliance with the Listing Rules
37
9. |
|
Review By Audit Committee |
The Audit Committee has reviewed with the management of the Company, the accounting principles
and practices accepted by the Group and the interim financial statements of the Company for
the six months ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
By order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation |
|
|
Richard R. Chang |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Shanghai, PRC
September 19, 2008
38
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(in US$ thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
NOTES |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
14 |
|
|
$ |
705,288 |
|
|
$ |
763,114 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
717,016 |
|
|
|
687,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,728 |
) |
|
|
75,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,917 |
|
|
|
44,927 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,934 |
|
|
|
31,834 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,240 |
|
|
|
8,127 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,683 |
|
|
|
12,442 |
|
Impairment loss of long-lived assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from sales of manufacturing equipment and other fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
|
|
(28,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,902 |
|
|
|
68,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from operations |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(242,630 |
) |
|
|
6,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,817 |
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,547 |
) |
|
|
(11,660 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,796 |
|
|
|
(1,086 |
) |
Others, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,789 |
) |
|
|
(6,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251,419 |
) |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes benefit (expense) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(21,188 |
) |
|
|
7,585 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
Loss from equity investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(2,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to holders of ordinary shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(270,484 |
) |
|
|
6,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) per ordinary share, basic |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) per ordinary share, diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculating basic income (loss) per ordinary share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,583,169,690 |
|
|
|
18,465,759,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in calculating diluted income (loss) per ordinary share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,583,169,690 |
|
|
|
18,718,977,415 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
39
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007
(in US$ thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
NOTES |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
480,265 |
|
|
$ |
469,284 |
|
Restricted Cash |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
91,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,326 |
|
|
|
7,638 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of
$4,491,881 and of $4,492,090 on June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
262,418 |
|
|
|
298,388 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
252,394 |
|
|
|
248,310 |
|
Prepaid expense and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,758 |
|
|
|
31,237 |
|
Receivable for sale of manufacturing equipments and
other fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,504 |
|
|
|
17,321 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183,300 |
|
|
|
1,075,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land use rights, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,973 |
|
|
|
57,552 |
|
Plant and equipment, net |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3,073,940 |
|
|
|
3,202,958 |
|
Acquired intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,543 |
|
|
|
232,195 |
|
Deferred cost, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,864 |
|
|
|
70,637 |
|
Equity investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,570 |
|
|
|
9,896 |
|
Other long-term prepayments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,431 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
44,483 |
|
|
|
56,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,649,104 |
|
|
$ |
4,708,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
345,801 |
|
|
$ |
301,993 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
242,908 |
|
|
|
107,000 |
|
Current portion of long-term debts |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
341,630 |
|
|
|
340,693 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,233 |
|
|
|
150,110 |
|
Current portion of promissory notes |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
29,242 |
|
|
|
29,242 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,090,296 |
|
|
|
930,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory notes |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
37,441 |
|
|
|
51,057 |
|
Long-term debts |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
695,292 |
|
|
|
616,295 |
|
Long-term payables relating to license agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,489 |
|
|
|
62,833 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
776,843 |
|
|
|
730,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,867,139 |
|
|
|
1,660,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,496 |
|
|
|
34,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares, $0.0004 par value, 50,000,000,000 authorized, 18,592,920,335 and 18,558,919,712 shares issued and outstanding on June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,437 |
|
|
|
7,424 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,320,932 |
|
|
|
3,313,376 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(578,763 |
) |
|
|
(308,279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,749,469 |
|
|
|
3,012,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTEREST, AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,649,104 |
|
|
$ |
4,708,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,004 |
|
|
$ |
145,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets less current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,558,808 |
|
|
$ |
3,778,254 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
40
Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Stockholders Equity And Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(in US$ thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Ordinary shares |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
stockholders |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
capital |
|
|
income |
|
|
deficit |
|
|
equity |
|
|
Income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
18,558,919,712 |
|
|
$ |
7,424 |
|
|
$ |
3,313,376 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(308,279 |
) |
|
$ |
3,012,519 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Exercise of employee stock options |
|
|
34,000,623 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(270,484 |
) |
|
|
(270,484 |
) |
|
|
(270,484 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
18,592,920,335 |
|
|
$ |
7,437 |
|
|
$ |
3,320,932 |
|
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
$ |
(578,763 |
) |
|
$ |
2,749,469 |
|
|
$ |
(270,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
18,432,756,463 |
|
|
$ |
7,373 |
|
|
$ |
3,288,765 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
(288,810 |
) |
|
$ |
3,007,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of employee stock options |
|
|
60,427,587 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
2,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,706 |
|
|
|
6,706 |
|
|
$ |
6,706 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
18,493,184,050 |
|
|
$ |
7,397 |
|
|
$ |
3,302,276 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
(282,104 |
) |
|
$ |
3,027,634 |
|
|
$ |
6,679 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
41
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(in US$ thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
(270,484 |
) |
|
$ |
6,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(2,449 |
) |
|
|
(840 |
) |
Deferred tax |
|
|
12,449 |
|
|
|
(7,777 |
) |
Gain on disposal of plant and equipment |
|
|
(1,646 |
) |
|
|
(28,495 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
379,641 |
|
|
|
348,558 |
|
Non-cash interest expense on promissory notes and
long-term payable relating to license agreements |
|
|
3,912 |
|
|
|
2,403 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
13,683 |
|
|
|
12,442 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
6,890 |
|
|
|
11,003 |
|
Loss from equity investment |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
2,213 |
|
Loss on impairment of long-lived assets |
|
|
105,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
35,970 |
|
|
|
(48,194 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(4,084 |
) |
|
|
37,213 |
|
Prepaid expense and other current assets |
|
|
(13,321 |
) |
|
|
8,276 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
17,130 |
|
|
|
(10,790 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
4,209 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
(671 |
) |
|
|
87 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
283,442 |
|
|
|
333,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of plant and equipment |
|
|
(318,564 |
) |
|
|
(317,723 |
) |
Proceeds received from assets held for sale |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
6,466 |
|
Proceeds from disposal of plant & equipment |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
9,751 |
|
Purchase of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
(41,292 |
) |
|
|
(6,452 |
) |
Acquisition of minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
Purchase of short-term investments |
|
|
(136,822 |
) |
|
|
(63,844 |
) |
Sale of short-term investments |
|
|
112,134 |
|
|
|
48,715 |
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
(91,130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(473,847 |
) |
|
|
(324,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term debts |
|
|
280,488 |
|
|
|
107,000 |
|
Repayment of short-term debts |
|
|
(144,580 |
) |
|
|
(70,000 |
) |
Repayment of promissory notes |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term debts |
|
|
250,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debts |
|
|
(170,781 |
) |
|
|
(25,271 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
201,521 |
|
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
10,981 |
|
|
|
8,829 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
469,284 |
|
|
|
363,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
480,265 |
|
|
$ |
372,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
9,410 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
26,717 |
|
|
$ |
18,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH
INVESTING OR FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception of accounts payable for plant and equipment |
|
$ |
(165,518 |
) |
|
$ |
(351,415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception of long-term payable for acquired intangible assets |
|
$ |
(43,489 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception of receivable for sales of manufacturing equipment
and other fixed assets |
|
$ |
19,504 |
|
|
$ |
109,908 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
42
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(unaudited; in US$ thousands)
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of Semiconductor
Manufacturing International Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company). All inter-company
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The interim consolidated
financial statements included herein are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United State of America, or GAAP and
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, regarding interim
financial reporting and Appendix 16, Disclosure of financial information, of the Rules
Governing the Listing of Securities on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited. They do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting
principles for complete financial statements. Accordingly, these interim consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes thereto contained in the Companys Annual Report for the
year ended December 31, 2007 dated on April 25, 2008. The December 31, 2007 consolidated
balance sheet included herein was derived from the audited financial statements as of that
date, but does not include all disclosures including notes required by GAAP. In the opinion of
management, these interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a
normal recurring nature necessary to present fairly the Companys results for the interim
periods. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management
to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the
reported amount of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. In addition, the Companys operating results for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 may not be indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or
any other future period.
2. |
|
Recently Issued Accounting Standards |
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157) for
all financial assets and financial liabilities and for all non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on
a recurring basis (at least annually). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value, and enhances fair value measurement disclosure. The
adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial
statements, and the resulting fair values calculated under SFAS No. 157 after adoption were
not significantly different than the fair values that would have been calculated under
previous guidance. See Note 3: Fair Value for further details on our fair value
measurements.
In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other
Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease
Classification or Measurement under Statement 13 (FSP 157-1) and FSP 157-2, Effective Date
of FASB Statement No. 157 (FSP 157-2). FSP 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 to remove certain
leasing transactions from its scope. FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for
all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are recognized
or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least
annually), until January 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS No. 157
will have on our consolidated financial statements when it is applied to non-financial assets
and non-financial liabilities that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis on
January 1, 2009.
43
2. |
|
Recently Issued Accounting Standards (Continued) |
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No.159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. The standard requires unrealized gains and losses to be included in
earnings for items reported using the fair value option. SFAS No.159 permits companies to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS
No.159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November
15, 2007. The Company did not elect the fair value option described in SFAS No.159 for
financial instruments and certain other items.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised 2007) Business Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)). SFAS 141(R) retains the fundamental requirements of the original
pronouncement requiring that the purchase method be used for all business combinations. SFAS
141(R) defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in
the business combination, establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer
achieves control and requires the acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities
assumed and any non-controlling interest at their fair values as of the acquisition date. SFAS
141(R) also requires that acquisition-related costs be recognized separately from the
acquisition. SFAS 141(R) is applicable to the Companys business combinations, if any,
occurring after January 1, 2009. SFAS 141(R) has no impact on previously consummated business
combinations. The adoption of SFAS No. 141 (R) will change the Companys accounting treatment
for business combinations on a prospective basis, beginning January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160 Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB 51 (SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires non-controlling
interests in subsidiaries initially to be measured at fair value and classified as a separate
component of equity. SFAS 160 also requires that when a parent company acquires control of a
subsidiary, it must include 100% of the fair value of all the acquired companys assets and
liabilities in its consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 is effective for us on January
1, 2009. SFAS 160 is to be applied prospectively to business combinations occurring; certain
disclosure and presentation requirements are to be applied retrospectively upon adoption. The
Company is currently evaluating whether the adoption of SFAS 160 will have a material impact
on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow.
On March 19, 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activitiesan Amendment of FASB Statement 133, or Statement 161.
Statement 161 enhances required disclosures regarding derivatives and hedging activities,
including enhanced disclosures regarding how: (a) an entity uses derivative instruments;
(b) derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No
133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. and (c) derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. Specifically, Statement 161 requires:
|
|
|
Disclosure of the objectives for using derivative instruments in terms of
underlying risk and accounting designation; |
|
|
|
|
Disclosure of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses
in a tabular format; |
|
|
|
|
Disclosure of information about credit-risk-related contingent features; and |
|
|
|
|
Cross-reference from the derivative footnote to other footnotes in which
derivative-related information is disclosed. |
SFAS 161 is effective for periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company has not yet
determined the impact on its consolidated financial statements of adopting SFAS No. 161.
44
2. |
|
Recently Issued Accounting Standards (Continued) |
In April, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP FAS 142-3). In determining the useful life of
acquired intangible assets, FSP FAS 142-3 removes the requirement to consider whether an
intangible asset can be renewed without substantial cost of material modifications to the
existing terms and conditions and, instead, requires an entity to consider its own historical
experience in renewing similar arrangements. FSP FAS 142-3 also requires expanded disclosure
related to the determination of intangible asset useful lives. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The guidance for determining the useful life
of a recognized intangible asset must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired
after the effective date. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating
the potential impact of FSP FAS 142-3 on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and provides
entities with a framework for selecting the principles used in preparation of financial
statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. The current GAAP hierarchy has been
criticized because it is directed to the auditor rather than the entity, it is complex, and it
ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which are subject to the same level of
due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, below industry practices
that are widely recognized as generally accepted but that are not subject to due process. The
adoption of FASB 162 is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities
required or permitted to be recorded at fair value, we consider the principal or most
advantageous market in which we would transact and we consider assumptions that market
participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer
restrictions, and risk of nonperformance.
Fair Value Hierarchy
SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
Observable inputs are obtained from independent sources and can be validated by a third party,
whereas unobservable inputs reflect assumptions regarding what a third party would use in
pricing an asset or liability. A financial instruments categorization within the fair value
hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. SFAS No. 157 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair
value:
Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 1 assets and liabilities consist of money market fund deposits that are traded in an
active market with sufficient volume and frequency of transactions.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities; quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions
(less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are
observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 2 assets include derivative financial instruments priced using inputs that are
observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data.
45
3. |
|
Fair Value (Continued) |
Fair Value Hierarchy (Continued)
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the
measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities.
Assets/Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest
components, consisted of the following types of instruments as of June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market fund deposits |
|
|
46,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,043 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
46,043 |
|
|
$ |
4,282 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
measured at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,313 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,313 |
|
46
3. |
|
Fair Value (Continued) |
Fair Value Hierarchy (Continued)
Assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding
accrued interest components, were presented on our consolidated balance sheets as of June 30,
2008 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
46,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,043 |
|
Prepaid expense and other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
46,043 |
|
|
$ |
4,282 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and
other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
measured at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,313 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,313 |
|
We price our derivative financial instruments, consisting of forward foreign exchange
contracts and interest rate swap contracts using quoted market prices for similar instruments
or pricing models, such as discounted cash flow techniques, with all significant inputs
derived from or corroborated by observable market data. Discounted cash flow techniques use
observable market inputs, such as LIBOR-based yield curves, currency spot, forward rates, and
credit ratings.
47
The Company manufactures semiconductor wafers for its customers based on the customers
designs and specifications pursuant to manufacturing agreements and/or purchase orders. The
Company also sells certain semiconductor standard products to customers. The Company
recognizes revenue to customers upon shipment and title transfer. The Company also provides
certain services, such as mask making, testing and probing. Revenue is recognized when the
services are completed or upon shipment of semiconductor products.
Customers have the right of return within one year pursuant to warranty and sales return
provisions, which has been minimal. The Company typically performs tests of its products prior
to shipment to identify yield rate per wafer. Occasionally, product tests performed after
shipment identify yields below the level agreed with the customer. In those circumstances, the
customer arrangement may provide for a reduction to the price paid by the customer or for the
costs to return products and to ship replacement products to the customer. The Company
estimates the amount of sales returns and the cost of replacement products based on the
historical trend of returns and warranty replacements relative to sales as well as a
consideration of any current information regarding specific known product defects at customers
that may exceed historical trends.
The Company was contracted to provide management services to certain government-owned
foundries. Service revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
service has been performed, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably
assured.
5. |
|
Share-based Compensation |
The Company grants stock options to its employees and certain non-employees. The Company
adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), (SFAS
123(R)) Share-Based Payment, which establishes accounting for equity instruments exchanged
for services, on January 1, 2006.
Under the provisions of SFAS 123(R), share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant
date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the
employees requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity grant).
The Companys total actual share-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007 are $6,890,000 and $11,003,000, respectively.
The fair value of each option grant and share granted are estimated on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants during
the applicable period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average risk-free rate of return |
|
|
2.42 |
% |
|
|
4.64 |
% |
Expected term |
|
1-4 years |
|
|
2-4 years |
|
Volatility rate |
|
|
36.45 |
% |
|
|
37.61 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
48
5. |
|
Share-based Compensation (Continued) |
Share-based compensation plans
The Companys employee stock option plans (the Plans) allow the Company to offer a variety
of incentive awards to employees, consultants or external service advisors of the Company.
In 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Stock Option Plan (2004 Option Plan) whereby the
Company grants stock options to attract, retain and motivate employees, directors and service
providers. Following the completion of the IPO, the Company began issuing stock options solely
through the 2004 Option Plan. Options to purchase 1,317,000,000 ordinary shares are authorized
under the 2004 Option Plan. Under the terms of the 2004 Option Plan options are granted at the
fair market value of the Companys ordinary shares. The majority of the options have a
contractual life of 10 years from the date of grant and vest over a requisite service period
of 4 years. Any compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the employee
service period. As of June 30, 2008, options to purchase 721,861,645 ordinary shares were
outstanding. As of June 30, 2008, options to purchase 594,454,845 ordinary shares were
available for future grants.
In 2001, the Company adopted the 2001 Stock Option Plan (2001 Option Plan). Options to
purchase 998,675,840 ordinary shares and 536,566,500 Series A convertible preference shares
are authorized under the 2001 Option Plan. Options to purchase Series A convertible preference
shares were converted into options to purchase ordinary shares immediately prior to the
completion of the IPO. Under the terms of the 2001 Option Plan, options are generally granted
at prices equal to the fair market value as estimated by the Board of Directors. The majority
of the options have a contractual life of 10 years from the date of grant and vest over a
requisite service period of 4 years. Any compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line
basis over the employee service period. As of June 30, 2008, options to purchase 357,059,386
ordinary shares were outstanding. As of June 30, 2008, options to purchase 399,085,607
ordinary shares were available for future grant. However, following the IPO, the Company no
longer issues stock options under the 2001 Option Plan.
A summary of the stock option activities and additional information regarding options
outstanding as of June 30, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
average |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
of options |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
intrinsic value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
1,042,398,482 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
129,841,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
17,323,422 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled or forfeited |
|
|
75,995,029 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
1,078,921,031 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
6.96 years |
|
|
35,880,135 |
|
Vested or expected to vest at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
896,839,933 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
6.72 years |
|
|
30,743,470 |
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
494,533,238 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
5.34 years |
|
|
35,130,292 |
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the total intrinsic value of the options
exercised were $970,000 and $4,780,000, respectively.
49
5. |
|
Share-based Compensation (Continued) |
Share-based compensation plans (Continued)
Certain options were granted to non-employees that resulted in a share-based compensation of
$211,000 and $318,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The weighted-averaged grant date fair value of options granted for the six months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007 was $0.03 and $0.05, respectively.
Restricted share units
In January 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (2004 EIP) whereby the
Company provided additional incentives to the Companys employees, directors and external
consultants through the issuance of restricted shares, restricted share units and stock
appreciation rights to the participants at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Under the
2004 EIP, the Company was authorized to issue up to 2.5% of the issued and outstanding
ordinary shares immediately following the closing of its initial public offering in March
2004, which were 455,409,330 ordinary shares. As of June 30, 2008, 131,929,729 restricted
share units were outstanding and 196,692,231 ordinary shares were available for future grant
through the issuance of restricted shares, restricted share units and stock appreciation
rights. The RSUs vest over a requisite service period of four years and expire 10 years from
the date of grant. Any compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
employee service period.
A summary of the restricted share unit activities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
average |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
of share units |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
119,442,808 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
39,827,100 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(17,900,836 |
) |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled or forfeited |
|
|
(9,439,343 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
131,929,729 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
8.18 years |
|
|
16,669,108 |
|
Vested or expected to vest at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
54,871,533 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
9.49 years |
|
|
5,016,675 |
|
Pursuant to the 2004 EIP, the Company granted 39,827,100 restricted share units during the six
months ended June 30, 2008 and the fair value of the restricted share units at the date of
grant was $3,268,830 which is expensed over the vesting period. As a result, the Company has
recorded a compensation expense of $3,692,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation
As of June 30, 2008, there was $18,098,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the 2001 Stock Option Plan,
2004 Stock Option Plan and 2004 EIP. The cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.30 years.
50
Restricted cash consists of bank time deposits pledged against short-term loans granted to the
Company.
7. |
|
Account Receivable, Net Of Allowances |
The Company determines credit terms for each customer on a case-by-case basis, based on its
assessment of such customers financial standing.
An aging analysis of trade debtors is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
200,084 |
|
|
$ |
249,490 |
|
Overdue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 30 days |
|
|
17,010 |
|
|
|
39,132 |
|
Between 31 to 60 days |
|
|
10,144 |
|
|
|
6,108 |
|
Over 60 days |
|
|
35,180 |
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
262,418 |
|
|
$ |
298,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
97,433 |
|
|
$ |
83,646 |
|
Work in progress |
|
|
109,604 |
|
|
|
139,959 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
45,357 |
|
|
|
24,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
252,394 |
|
|
$ |
248,310 |
|
9. |
|
Plant and equipment, net |
During the six month ended June 30, 2008, the Company reached an agreement with certain
customers to discontinue production of DRAM products and subsequently the Companys Board of
Directors decided to exit the commodity DRAM business as a whole. The Company considered these
actions to be an indicator of impairment in regard to the plant and equipment in the Companys
Beijing facility. Based on a detailed analysis, the Company recorded an impairment loss of
$105,774,000, equal to the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the associated
assets. The Company computed the fair value of the plant and equipment utilizing a discounted
cash flow approach.
51
An aging analysis of the accounts payable is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
266,053 |
|
|
$ |
223,528 |
|
Overdue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 30 days |
|
|
33,250 |
|
|
|
46,572 |
|
Between 31 to 60 days |
|
|
18,669 |
|
|
|
10,227 |
|
Over 60 days |
|
|
27,829 |
|
|
|
21,666 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
345,801 |
|
|
$ |
301,993 |
|
Long-term and short-term debt is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shanghai USD syndicate loan |
|
|
2006-2010 |
|
|
|
3.65%-5.76 |
% |
|
$ |
329,980 |
|
|
$ |
393,910 |
|
Beijing USD syndicate loan |
|
|
2006-2010 |
|
|
|
4.78%-6.38 |
% |
|
|
400,040 |
|
|
|
500,020 |
|
EUR syndicate loan |
|
|
2005-2012 |
|
|
|
4.62%-5.87 |
% |
|
|
47,902 |
|
|
|
51,058 |
|
Tianjin USD syndicate loan |
|
|
2007-2012 |
|
|
|
4.08%-6.03 |
% |
|
|
259,000 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,036,922 |
|
|
|
956,988 |
|
Less: Current portion of long-term debts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341,630 |
|
|
|
340,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
695,292 |
|
|
$ |
616,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.32%-7.30 |
% |
|
$ |
242,908 |
|
|
$ |
107,000 |
|
52
In 2005, the Company reached a settlement and license agreement with Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company Ltd. (TSMC). Under this agreement, the Company issued thirteen
non-interest bearing promissory notes with an aggregate amount of $175,000,000 as the
settlement consideration. The Company has recorded a discount of $17,031,000 for the imputed
interest on the notes, which was calculated using an effective interest rate of 3.45% per
annum and has been recorded as a reduction of the face amounts of the promissory notes. The
Company repaid $15,000,000 and $15,000,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
respectively. The outstanding promissory notes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted |
|
Maturity |
|
Face value |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
14,746 |
|
2009 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
28,747 |
|
2010 |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
23,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
66,683 |
|
Less: Current portion of promissory notes |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
|
29,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of promissory notes |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
|
37,441 |
|
The Company is a tax exempted company incorporated in the Cayman Islands.
Prior to January 1, 2008, the subsidiaries incorporated in the PRC are governed by the Income
Tax Law of the PRC Concerning Foreign Investment and Foreign Enterprises and various local
income tax laws (the FEIT Laws).
On March 16, 2007, the National Peoples Congress of China enacted a new Enterprise Income Tax
Law (New EIT Law) which is effective January 1, 2008. Under the New EIT Law,
domestically-owned enterprises and foreign invested enterprises (FIEs) are subject to a
uniform tax rate of 25%. The New EIT Law also provides a transition period starting from its
effective date for those enterprises which were established before the promulgation date of
the new EIT Law and which are entitled to a preferential lower tax rate and/or tax holiday
under the FEIT Law or other related regulations. Based on the New EIT Law, the tax rate of
such enterprises will transit to the uniform tax rate within a five-year transition period.
The tax holiday, which has been enjoyed by such enterprises before the effective date of the
New EIT law, may continue to be enjoyed until the end of the holiday, and the tax holiday
which has not been started due to the enterprise has not been profitable, is forced to take
effect regardless whether the FIEs become profitable or not since 2008.
According to Guofa [2007] No. 39 the Notice of the State Council Concerning Implementation
of Transitional Rules for Enterprise Income Tax Incentives (Circular 39) issued on 26
December 2007, from January 1, 2008, the enterprises that originally enjoy the preferential
policies of low tax rate shall gradually transit to statutory tax rate within 5 years after
the enforcement of the new EIT Law. The enterprises that enjoyed a tax rate of 15% under the
FEIT Law shall be levied at a rate of 18% in 2008, 20% in 2009, 22% in 2010, 24% in 2011 and
25% in 2012.
53
13. |
|
Income Taxes (Continued) |
Later, on February 22, 2008, the PRC government promulgated Caishui [2008] No.1, the Notice of
the Ministry of Finance and State Administration of Tax concerning Certain Enterprise Income
Tax Preferential Policies (Caishui No.1). Pursuant to Caishui No.1, integrated circuit
production enterprises whose total investment exceeds RMB 8,000 million (approximately
US$1,095 million) or whose integrated circuits have a line width of less than 0.25 micron are
entitled to preferential tax rate of 15%. If the operation period is more than 15 years, those
enterprises are entitled to a full exemption from income tax for five years starting from the
first profitable year after utilizing all prior years tax losses and 50% reduction for the
following five years.
The detailed tax status of SMICs PRC entities is elaborated as follows:
|
1) |
|
Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation (SMIC Shanghai) |
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the preferential tax policy available under the FEIT law as well as other
related tax regulation, SMIC Shanghai was subject to a reduced income tax rate of 15%.
According to Circular Guofa (2000) No. 18 New Policy Implemented for Software and
Semiconductor Industries (Circular 18) issued by the State Council of China, SMIC
Shanghai is entitled to a 10-year tax holiday, i.e. 5-year full exemption followed by
5-year half reduction for FEIT rate starting from the first profit-making year after
utilizing all prior years tax losses. The tax holiday enjoyed by SMIC Shanghai took
effect in 2004 when the company entered into its first profit-making year. |
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the tax incentives stipulated by the New EIT Law and Caishui No.1, the
company should be eligible to enjoy the tax holiday through its expiry in 2013. The tax
rate applicable to SMIC Shanghai should be 15% as it meets the qualifying criteria
proscribed in Caishui No.1. |
|
|
2) |
|
Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Beijing) Corporation (SMIC Beijing)
and Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Tianjin) Corporation (SMIC Tianjin) |
|
|
|
|
SMIC Beijing and SMIC Tianjin are manufacturing enterprises and according to Circular 18,
SMIC Beijing and SMIC Tianjin were also entitled to a 10-year tax holiday, i.e. 5-year
full exemption followed by 5-year half reduction in FEIT rate starting from its first
profit-making year after utilizing all prior years tax losses. However, both entities
were in a loss position as of June 30, 2008, and the tax holiday has yet to take effect. |
|
|
|
|
SMIC Beijing and Tianjin, which meet the qualifying criteria in Caishui No.1, are
eligible to enjoy the preferential tax rate of 15% and 10-year tax holiday, i.e. 5-year
full exemption followed by 5-year half reduction since the first profit-making year after
utilizing all prior years tax losses. |
|
|
3) |
|
Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Chengdu) Corporation (SMIC Chengdu) |
|
|
|
|
Under FEIT law, SMIC Chengdu was qualified to enjoy a 5-year tax holiday, i.e. 2-year
full exemption followed by 3-year half reduction in FEIT rate starting from its first
profit-making year after utilizing all prior years tax losses. Until June 30, 2008, SMIC
Chengdu was still in a loss position. |
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the New EIT Law, the company is forced to start the tax holiday in 2008 at
the statutory tax rate of 25% regardless of whether or not it is profitable. |
54
13. |
|
Income Taxes (Continued) |
|
4) |
|
SMIC Energy Technology (Shanghai) Corporation (SMIC Energy Technology) |
|
|
|
|
SMIC Energy Technology is a manufacturing enterprise located in the Shanghai Pudong New
Area. Pursuant to the preferential tax policy granted to the Pudong New Area under FEIT
Law, SMIC Energy Technology was subject to a reduced income tax rate of 15% and qualified
to enjoy a 5-year tax holiday, i.e. 2-year full exemption followed by 3-year half
reduction in FEIT rate starting from its first profit-making year after utilizing all
prior year tax losses. The above mentioned tax holiday enjoyed by SMIC Energy Technology
was triggered in 2007. The tax holiday enjoyed by the company is eligible to continue
until its expiry in 2011 in accordance with the transition rules stipulated by the New
EIT Law and Gircular 39. In the meantime, the tax rate will gradually transit to 25%
within a 5-year transition period starting from 2008. |
For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded withholding income tax expense of
$8,150,000 for license income generated from its PRC subsidiaries.
The Companys other subsidiaries are subject to respective local countrys income tax law of
their respective jurisdictions. i.e., including those of Japan, the United States of America,
Taiwan, Europe and Hong Kong. The Company had minimal taxable income in Japan, the United
States of America, Europe and Hong Kong. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company
recorded income tax expense of $405,000 for the service income generated in Japan.
As part of the process of preparing financial statements, the Company is required to estimate
its income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. The Company accounts for
income taxes by the liability method. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized
for tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and
liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end, based on enacted laws and
statutory tax rates applicable for the difference that are expected to affect taxable income.
Valuation allowances are provided if based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more
likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The provision for income tax by location of the tax jurisdiction for the six months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
PRC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
12,449 |
|
|
|
(7,776 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
8,739 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,188 |
|
|
$ |
(7,585 |
) |
55
13. |
|
Income Taxes (Continued) |
The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2008 is 5%. The effective tax rate is
based on expected income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the
various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. For interim financial reporting, the
Company estimates the annual tax rate based on projected taxable income for the full year and
records a quarterly income tax provision in accordance with the anticipated annual rate. As
the year progresses, the Company refines the estimates of the years taxable income as new
information becomes available, including year-to-date financial results. This continual
estimation process often results in a change to the expected effective tax rate for the year.
When this occurs, the Company adjusts the income tax provision during the quarter in which the
change in estimate occurs so that the year-to-date provision reflects the expected annual tax
rate. Significant judgment is required in determining the effective tax rate and in evaluating
the tax positions.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48), which
prescribes a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This
interpretation also provides guidance on de-recognition of income tax assets and liabilities,
classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, accounting for
interest and penalties associated with tax positions, accounting for income taxes in interim
periods and income tax disclosures. Based on its FIN 48 analysis documentation, the Company
has made its assessment of the level of tax authority for each tax position (including the
potential application of interest and penalties) based on the technical merits. The adoption
of FIN 48 did not have any impact on the Company total liabilities or shareholders equity.
The Company has no material uncertain tax positions as of June 30, 2008 or unrecognized tax
benefit which would favourably affect the effective income tax rate in future periods. The
Company classifies interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax
expense. As of June 30, 2008, the amount of interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions is immaterial. The Company does not anticipate any significant increases or
decreases to its liability for unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.
Under the Corporate Income Tax Law, the profits of a foreign invested enterprise arising in
year 2008 and beyond which will be distributed to its immediate holding company outside China
will be subject to withholding tax at 10%. A lower withholding tax rate may be applied if
there is a favorable tax treaty between mainland China and the jurisdiction of the foreign
holding company. For example, holding companies in Hong Kong which are also tax residents in
Hong Kong will be eligible for a reduced 5% withholding tax on dividends under the Tax
Memorandum between China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Since the Company
intends to reinvest its earnings to further expand its businesses in mainland China, its PRC
subsidiaries do not intend to distribute any profit arising in year 2008 and beyond to their
immediate foreign holding companies in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, as of June 30,
2008, the Company has not recorded any withholding tax on the retained earnings of its PRC
subsidiaries.
56
14. |
|
Segment And Geographic Information |
The Company is engaged primarily in the computer-aided design, manufacturing, packaging,
testing and trading of integrated circuits and other semiconductor services, and manufacturing
design of semiconductor masks. In accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of
an Enterprise and Related Information, the Companys chief operating decision maker has been
identified as the Chief Executive Officer, who reviews consolidated results of manufacturing
operations when making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance of the
Company. The Company believes it operates in one segment, and all financial segment
information required by SFAS No. 131 can be found in the consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
383,126 |
|
|
$ |
306,108 |
|
Europe |
|
|
68,360 |
|
|
|
181,766 |
|
Asia Pacific (Excluding Japan, Korea and Taiwan) |
|
|
112,863 |
|
|
|
105,110 |
|
Taiwan |
|
|
101,912 |
|
|
|
92,724 |
|
Japan |
|
|
26,398 |
|
|
|
72,089 |
|
Korea |
|
|
12,629 |
|
|
|
5,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
705,288 |
|
|
$ |
763,114 |
|
Revenue is attributed to countries based on location of customers headquarters.
Substantially all of the Companys long-lived assets are located in the PRC.
15. |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from operations is arrived at after charging (crediting): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
367,247 |
|
|
$ |
336,194 |
|
Amortization of land use rights |
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
Amortization of deferred cost |
|
|
11,773 |
|
|
|
11,773 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
13,683 |
|
|
|
12,442 |
|
57
16. |
|
Transactions With Managed Government-Owned Foundries |
The Company provides management services to Cension Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation
(Cension) and Wuhan Xinxin Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation, which are
government-owned foundries.
On April 10, 2007, Cension entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the Agreement) with
Elpida Memory, Inc. (Elpida), a Japan based memory chip manufacturer, for the purchase of
Elpidas 200mm wafer processing equipment currently located in Hiroshima, Japan for the total
price of approximately $320 million.
As part of the Agreement, the Company provided a corporate guarantee for a maximum guarantee
liability of $163.2 million on behalf of Cension in favour of Elpida. The Companys guarantee
liability will terminate upon full payment of the purchase price by Cension to Elpida. In
return for providing the above corporate guarantee, the Company received a guarantee fee from
Cension based on 1.5% of the guarantee amount, or $2.4 million. Some 200mm wafer processing
equipment purchased under the Agreement, with the total amount of $160 million, was held as
collateral under the guarantee.
Of the $320 million of processing equipment (Equipment), a portion remained in Hiroshima and
continued to be operated by Elpida until June 30, 2008. The Company is entitled to the net
profit (loss) associated with the ongoing operations of this equipment, net of a guaranteed
fixed share of revenue for Elpida, during the transitional period when the equipment acquired
by Cension is relocated from Hiroshima to Chengdu.
On August 30, 2007, Cension negotiated with Elpida and subsequently reduced the purchase price
to US$309.5 million.
In April 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with Cension to purchase roughly half of
the Equipment from Cension for approximately US$152 million. These equipment will be used for
the Companys future expansion.
As of June 30, 2008 the Company had the following commitments to purchase machinery,
equipment and construction obligations. The machinery and equipment is scheduled to be
delivered at the Companys facility by June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility construction |
|
$ |
75,616 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
369,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445,010 |
|
58
17. |
|
Commitments (Continued) |
Beginning in 2002, the Company has entered into several license and technology agreements
with third parties. The terms of the contracts range from 3 to 10 years. The Company is
subject to royalty payments based on a certain percentage of product sales, using the
third parties technology or license. In the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the
Company incurred royalty expenses of $9,871,000 and $4,572,000, respectively.
Beginning in 2003, the Company has entered into several license agreements with third
parties where the Company provides access to certain licensed technology. The Company
will receive royalty payments based on a certain percentage of product sales using the
Companys licensed technology. In the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the
Company earned royalty income of $882,000 and $675,000, respectively, which is included
as net revenue in the statement of operations.
|
(c) |
|
Operating lease as lessor |
The Company owns apartment facilities that are leased to the Companys employees at
negotiated prices. The apartment rental agreement is renewed on an annual basis. The
Company also leases office space to non-related third parties. Office lease agreements
are renewed on an annual basis as well. The total amount of rental income recorded in the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $2,520,978 and $3,181,000, respectively.
|
(d) |
|
Operating lease as lessee |
The Company leases land use rights, gas tanks and other operational equipment under
non-cancellable leases expiring at various times through 2053. Future minimum lease
payments under these leases at June 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
522 |
|
2009 |
|
|
216 |
|
2010 |
|
|
182 |
|
2011 |
|
|
183 |
|
2012 |
|
|
155 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
3,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,331 |
|
The total operating lease expenses recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007 was $344,000 and $515,000, respectively.
59
18. |
|
Reconciliation Of Basic And Diluted Income (Loss) Per Ordinary Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
(in US$ thousands except per share data) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (loss) |
|
|
(270,484 |
) |
|
|
6,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding |
|
|
18,583,252,272 |
|
|
|
18,471,431,795 |
|
Less: Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding subject to repurchase |
|
|
(82,582 |
) |
|
|
(5,672,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic income (loss) per ordinary share |
|
|
18,583,169,690 |
|
|
|
18,465,759,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding subject to repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,672,122 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,408,934 |
|
Restricted share units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,136,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing
diluted income (loss) per ordinary share |
|
|
18,583,169,690 |
|
|
|
18,718,977,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
As of June 30, 2008, the Company had 128,831,259 ordinary share equivalents outstanding that
could have potentially diluted loss per share in the future, but which were excluded in the
computation of diluted loss per share in the six months ended June 30, 2008, as its effect
would have been anti-dilutive due to the net loss reported in the period.
As of June 30, 2007, the Company had 492,183,214 ordinary share equivalents outstanding that
could have potentially diluted income per share in the future, but which were excluded in the
computation of diluted income per share in 2007, as their exercise prices were above the
average market values in the six months ended June 30, 2007.
No dividend has been paid or declared by the Company during the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
60
On August 25, 2006, TSMC filed a lawsuit against the Company and certain subsidiaries (SMIC
(Shanghai), SMIC (Beijing) and SMIC (Americas)) in the Superior Court of the State of
California, County of Alameda for alleged breach of the Settlement Agreement, alleged breach
of promissory notes and alleged trade secret misappropriation by the Company. TSMC seeks,
among other things, damages, injunctive relief, attorneys fees, and the acceleration of the
remaining payments outstanding under the Settlement Agreement.
In the present litigation, TSMC alleges that the Company has incorporated TSMC trade secrets
in the manufacture of the Companys 0.13 micron or smaller process products. TSMC further
alleges that as a result of this claimed breach, TSMCs patent license is terminated and the
covenant not to sue is no longer in effect with respect to the Companys larger process
products.
The Company has vigorously denied all allegations of misappropriation. The Court has made no
finding that TSMCs claims are valid, nor has it set a trial date.
On September 13, 2006, the Company announced that in addition to filing a response strongly
denying the allegations of TSMC in the United States lawsuit, it filed on September 12, 2006,
a cross-complaint against TSMC seeking, among other things, damages for TSMCs breach of
contract and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
On November 16, 2006, the High Court in Beijing, the Peoples Republic of China, accepted the
filing of a complaint by the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, SMIC (Shanghai) and
SMIC (Beijing), regarding the unfair competition arising from the breach of bona fide (i.e.
integrity, good faith) principle and commercial defamation by TSMC (PRC Complaint). In the
PRC Complaint, the Company is seeking, among other things, an injunction to stop TSMCs
infringing acts, public apology from TSMC to the Company and compensation from TSMC to the
Company, including profits gained by TSMC from their infringing acts.
TSMC filed with the California court in January 2007 a motion seeking to enjoin the PRC
action. In February 2007, TSMC filed with the Beijing High Court a jurisdictional objection,
challenging the competency of the Beijing High Courts jurisdiction over the PRC action.
In March 2007, the California Court denied TSMCs motion to enjoin the PRC action. TSMC
appealed this ruling to California Court of Appeal. On March 26, 2008, the Court of Appeal, in
a written opinion, denied TSMCs appeal.
In July 2007, the Beijing High Court denied TSMCs jurisdictional objection and issued a court
order holding that the Beijing High Court shall have proper jurisdiction to try the PRC
action. TSMC appealed this order to the Supreme Court of the Peoples Republic of China. On
January 7, 2008, the Supreme Court heard TSMCs appeal. On June 13, 2008, the Supreme Court
denied TSMCs appeal and affirmed the jurisdiction of the Beijing High Court.
On August 14, 2007, the Company filed an amended cross-complaint against TSMC seeking, among
other things, damages for TSMCs breach of contract and breach of patent license agreement.
TSMC thereafter denied the allegations of the Companys amended cross-complaint and
subsequently filed additional claims that the Company breached the Settlement Agreement by
filing an action in the Beijing High Court. The Company has denied these additional claims by
TSMC.
On August 15-17, 2007, the California Court held a preliminary injunction hearing on TSMCs
motion to enjoin use of certain process recipes in certain of the Companys 0.13 micron logic
process flows. On September 7, 2007, the Court denied TSMCs preliminary injunction motion,
thereby leaving unaffected the Companys development and sales. However, the court required
the Company to provide 10 days advance notice to TSMC if the Company plans to disclose logic
technology to non-SMIC entities under certain circumstances, to allow TSMC to object to the
planned disclosure.
61
20. |
|
Litigation (Continued) |
On March 11, 2008, TSMC filed an application for a right to attach order in the California
Court. By its application, TSMC sought an order securing an amount equal to the remaining
balance on the promissory notes issued by the Company in connection with the Settlement
Agreement. The Company opposed the application. A hearing was held on April 3, 2008. On June
24, 2008, the Court denied TSMCs application.
In May 2008, TSMC filed a motion in the California Court for summary adjudication against the
Company on several of the Companys cross claims. The Company opposed the motion and on July
25, 2008, the Court granted in part and denied in part TSMCs motion.
On June 23, 2008, the Company filed with California court a cross-complaint against TSMC
seeking, among other things, damages for TSMCs unlawful misappropriation of trade secrets
from SMIC to improve its competitive position against SMIC.
On July 10, 2008, the California Court held and granted part of a preliminary injunction
hearing on TSMCs motion to enjoin disclosure of information on certain process recipes in the
Companys 0.30 micron logic process flows to 3rd parties.
Under the provisions of SFAS 144, the Company is required to make a determination as to
whether or not this pending litigation represents an event that requires a further analysis of
whether the patent license portfolio has been impaired. We believe that the lawsuit is at a
preliminary stage and we are still evaluating whether or not the litigation represents such an
event. The Company expects further information to become available to us which will aid us in
making a determination. The outcome of any impairment analysis performed under SFAS 144 might
result in a material impact to our financial position and results of operations. Because the
case is in its preliminary stages, the Company is unable to evaluate the likelihood of an
unfavorable outcome or to estimate the amount or range of potential loss.
62
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation
|
|
Date: October 10, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Richard R. Chang
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Richard R. Chang |
|
|
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|