Proxy Statement_Taxonomy2019

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )



Filed by the Registrant  



Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  



Check the appropriate box:



  Preliminary Proxy Statement

  Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

  Definitive Proxy Statement

  Definitive Additional Materials

  Soliciting Material Pursuant to §14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12



AtriCure, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

_________________________________________________________________________

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):



 

 



 

 

No fee required

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.



1.

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:



 

 



2.

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:



 

 



3.

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):



 

 



4.

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:



 

 



5.

Total fee paid:



 

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.



1.

Amount previously paid:



 

 



2.

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:



 

 



3.

Filing Party:



 

 



4.

Date Filed:



 

 

 



 


 

Picture 1



ATRICURE, INC.

7555 Innovation Way

Mason, Ohio 45040

NOTICE OF 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 22, 2019



To Our Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Annual Meeting) of AtriCure, Inc. (the Company or AtriCure). The Annual Meeting will be held at our principal executive offices located at 7555 Innovation Way, Mason, Ohio 45040 on Wednesday, May 22, 2019, for the following purposes, as more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement:

1.To elect eight directors nominated by the Board of Directors, each to serve for a one-year term that expires at the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified;

2.To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019;

3.To approve an amendment to the AtriCure, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance thereunder by 900,000;

4.To conduct an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement;

5.To conduct an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on compensation of our named executive officers;  and

6.To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments.

The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 9:00 a.m. EDT, and check-in will begin at 8:30 a.m. EDT. Only holders of record of shares of AtriCure common stock (Nasdaq: ATRC) at the close of business on March 25, 2019 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any postponements or adjournments of the Annual Meeting.

Under U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules we are furnishing our proxy materials over the Internet and mailing our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (Notice). The Notice contains instructions on how to access and review our proxy statement and 2018 Annual Report over the Internet.

A complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination by any stockholder for any purpose in connection with the Annual Meeting during normal business hours at our principal executive offices for a period of at least 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting.





 

 

 



By order of the Board of Directors,



 



/s/ M. Andrew Wade



M. Andrew Wade



Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



Mason, Ohio
April 10, 2019



YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! ALL STOCKHOLDERS ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON. WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD, OR VOTE OVER THE TELEPHONE OR INTERNET AS INSTRUCTED IN THESE MATERIALS, AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE IN ORDER TO ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING. EVEN IF YOU HAVE VOTED BY PROXY, YOU MAY STILL VOTE IN PERSON IF YOU ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING. PLEASE NOTE, HOWEVER, THAT IF YOUR SHARES ARE HELD OF RECORD BY A BROKER, BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE AND YOU WISH TO VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU MUST OBTAIN A PROXY ISSUED IN YOUR NAME FROM THAT RECORD HOLDER IN ORDER TO BE ENTITLED TO VOTE IN PERSON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING.

 



 


 

 

ATRICURE, INC.

***IMPORTANT NOTICE***

Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

for the Annual Meeting to be held on May 22, 2019

You are receiving this communication because you hold shares in the above company, and the materials you should review before you cast your vote are now available.



The proxy statement and annual report to security holders are available at:

http://ir.atricure.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=189981&p=proxy 

 



 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS





 

PROXY STATEMENT

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

PROPOSAL ONE—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Director Skills and Qualifications

10 

Independence of the Board

10 

Meetings of the Board and Committees of the Board

10 

Director Compensation

11 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

12 

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

13 

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

13 

Board Evaluations

14 

MANAGEMENT

15 

PROPOSAL TWO—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

16 

Audit and Non-Audit Services

16 

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

17 

PROPOSAL THREE—AMENDMENT OF 2014 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

18 

PROPOSAL FOUR—ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

26 

PROPOSAL FIVE—ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

28 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

29 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

31 

Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

31 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

31 

Summary Compensation

37 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

38 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End

38 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

40 

Severance and Change in Control Arrangements

40 

Pay Ratio Disclosure

41 

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) FILING REQUIREMENTS

43 

OTHER MATTERS

44 

ANNEX A

A-45

ANNEX B

B-46



 


 

Table of Contents

 





Picture 2



ATRICURE, INC.



PROXY STATEMENT
FOR
2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

The Board of Directors of AtriCure, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is soliciting the enclosed proxy from you. The proxy will be used at our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, May 22, 2019, beginning at 9:00 a.m. EDT at our principal executive offices located at 7555 Innovation Way, Mason, Ohio 45040, and at any postponements or adjournments thereof. This proxy statement contains important information regarding the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Specifically, it identifies the matters upon which you are being asked to vote, provides information that you may find useful in determining how to vote and describes the voting procedures.

In this proxy statement: the terms “we”, “our”, “us”, “AtriCure” and the “Company” each refer to AtriCure, Inc.; the term “Board” means our Board of Directors; the term “proxy materials” means this proxy statement, the enclosed proxy card and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); and the term “meeting” means our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including any postponements or adjournments thereof.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS REGARDING THIS SOLICITATION

AND VOTING AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

How can I receive proxy materials?

Under rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders primarily via the Internet, instead of mailing printed copies of proxy materials to each stockholder. On or about April 10, 2019, we began mailing to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (Notice) containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement, the accompanying notice of annual meeting and our annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 online. If you received the Notice by mail, you will not automatically receive a printed copy of proxy materials in the mail. Instead, the Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials. The Notice also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy via the Internet.

You can receive a printed copy of our proxy materials by following the instructions contained in the Notice regarding how you may request to receive your materials electronically or in printed form. Requests for printed copies of the proxy materials can be made by Internet at http://www.proxyvote.com, by telephone at 1-800-579-1639 or by email at sendmaterial@proxyvote.com by sending a blank email with your control number in the subject line.

What information is contained in this proxy statement?

The information in this proxy statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the meeting, the voting process, the compensation of our directors and the most highly paid executive officers during 2018 and certain other required information.

Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?

Only stockholders who owned our common stock at the close of business on March 25, 2019 (the Record Date) are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and at any postponements or adjournments thereof. If you are not a stockholder of record but hold shares in street name (that is, through a broker or nominee), you will need to provide proof of beneficial ownership as of March 25, 2019, such as your most recent brokerage account statement, a copy of the voting instruction card provided by your broker, trustee or nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership. All stockholders should be prepared to present photo identification for admittance.

What items of business will be voted on at the meeting?

The items of business scheduled to be voted on at the meeting are:

1.The election of eight nominees to serve as directors on our Board;

2.The ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2019 year;

1

 


 

Table of Contents

 

3.Amending the AtriCure, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance thereunder by 900,000 shares;

4.An advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement; and

5.An advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on compensation of our named executive officers. 

These proposals are described more fully below. As of the date of this proxy statement, this is the only business that our Board intends to present or knows of that others will present at the meeting. If any other matter or matters are properly brought before the meeting, each properly executed proxy card will be voted in the discretion of the proxies named therein.

How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote?

Our Board recommends that you vote your shares:

1.“FOR” each of the director nominees;

2.“FOR” the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019;  

3.“FOR” the amendment of the AtriCure, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan;

4.“FOR” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers; and

5.“FOR” ONE YEAR as the frequency for future advisory votes on executive compensation.

What are my voting rights?

On each matter to be voted upon, you have one vote for each share of common stock you own as of March 25, 2019. You may vote all shares owned by you as of March 25, 2019, including (1) shares held directly in your name as the stockholder of record and (2) shares held for you as the beneficial owner through a broker, trustee or other nominee such as a bank.

What constitutes a quorum?

A quorum is required to conduct business at the meeting. The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the meeting will constitute a quorum. As of March 25, 2019, 38,647,527 shares of our common stock were outstanding. Both abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you by us. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the persons named as proxy holders or to vote in person at the meeting. We have enclosed a proxy card for your use.

If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by another nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you together with a voting instruction card. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, trustee or nominee how to vote and are also invited to attend the meeting. Please note that since a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares, which gives you the right to vote the shares at the meeting. Your broker, trustee or nominee has enclosed or provided voting instructions for your use in directing the broker, trustee or nominee as to how you would like them to vote your shares.

How can I vote my shares in person at the meeting?

Shares held in your name as the stockholder of record may be voted in person at the meeting. Shares held beneficially in street name may be voted in person only if you obtain a legal proxy from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares, which gives you the right to vote the shares. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy card or voting instructions as described below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to, or are unable to, attend the meeting.

2

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Can I vote my shares without attending the meeting?

Whether you hold shares directly as the stockholder of record or beneficially in street name, you may direct how your shares are voted without attending the meeting. Stockholders of record may submit proxies by the Internet by following the instructions in the Notice or by completing, signing and dating their proxy cards and mailing them in the accompanying pre-addressed envelope. Stockholders holding shares beneficially in street name may vote by following the instructions provided by the broker, trustee or nominee holding the shares.

What if I want to revoke and change my vote?

You may change your vote at any time prior to the vote at the meeting. If you are the stockholder of record, you may change your vote by granting a new proxy bearing a later date (which automatically revokes your earlier proxy), by providing a written notice of revocation to our Secretary prior to your shares being voted or by attending the meeting and voting in person. Please note that attending the meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request. For shares you hold beneficially in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, trustee or nominee, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker, trustee or nominee which gives you the right to vote your shares, by attending the meeting and voting in person.

What vote is required to approve each item and how are votes counted?

The vote required to approve each item of business and the method for counting votes is set forth below:

Election of Directors. AtriCure has adopted a majority voting standard for director elections which means that, subject to the provisions of Section 3.3 of our Bylaws, in an uncontested election of directors (i.e., an election where the number of nominees does not exceed the number of directors to be elected at the meeting), each director shall be elected by the vote of the majority of the votes cast with respect to that director’s election at any meeting for the election of directors at which a quorum is present. In any election of directors that is not an uncontested election, directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director’s election. “Abstentions” and “broker non-votes” shall not be counted as votes cast with respect to a director’s election. You may vote “FOR” all of the director nominees or “WITHHOLD” your vote for any or all director nominees. A properly executed proxy marked “WITHHOLD” with respect to the election of one or more director nominees will not be voted with respect to the director or directors indicated.

Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. For the approval of the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm, the affirmative “FOR” vote of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote will be required. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” for this item of business. If you “ABSTAIN”, your abstention has the same effect as a vote “AGAINST”.

Approval of Amendment to the AtriCure, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive PlanFor the amendment to the AtriCure, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, the affirmative “FOR” vote of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote will be required. You may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” for this item of business. If you “ABSTAIN”, your abstention has the same effect as a vote “AGAINST”.

Advisory Vote on Compensation of Named Executive Officers.  For the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers, the affirmative “FOR” vote of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote will be required. You may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” for this item of business. If you “ABSTAIN,” your abstention has the same effect as a vote “AGAINST”.

Advisory Vote on Frequency of Advisory Vote on Compensation of Named Executive Officers.  We will consider our stockholders to have expressed a non-binding preference for the frequency option for future advisory votes on executive compensation receiving the highest number of “FOR” votes.  You may vote “FOR” ONE YEAR, “TWO YEARS” OR “THREE YEARS” for this item of business.

If you provide specific instructions with regard to certain items, your shares will be voted as you instruct on such items. If you sign your proxy card or voting instruction card without giving specific instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board (“FOR” all of the nominees to the Board, “FOR” ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm, “FOR” the amendment to the AtriCure, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, “FOR” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, “FOR” ONE YEAR” as the preferred frequency for future advisory votes on executive compensation  and in the discretion of the proxy holders on any other matters that properly come before the meeting).

3

 


 

Table of Contents

 

What is a “broker non-vote”?

Under the rules that govern brokers who have record ownership of shares that are held in street name for their clients who are the beneficial owners of the shares, brokers have the discretion to vote such shares on routine matters. The ratification of the appointment of an independent public accounting firm (Proposal 2) is considered a routine matter. Your broker, therefore, may vote your shares in its discretion on this routine matter if you do not instruct your broker how to vote on them. If a matter is not considered routine, then your broker is prohibited from voting your shares on the matter unless you have given voting instructions on that matter to your broker. Because Proposal 1 (election of directors), Proposal 3 (amendment to the AtriCure, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan), Proposal 4 (advisory vote on compensation of named executive officers) and Proposal 5 (advisory vote on frequency of advisory vote on executive compensation) are not considered routine, brokers holding shares for their customers will not have the ability to cast votes with respect to Proposals 1, 3, 4 and 5 unless they have received instructions from their customers. It is important, therefore, that you provide instructions to your broker if your shares are held by a broker so that your votes with respect to Proposals 1, 3, 4 and 5 are counted. Your broker, therefore, will need to return a proxy card without voting on Proposals 1, 3, 4 and 5 if you do not give voting instructions with respect to these matters. This is referred to as a “broker non-vote”.

How are “broker non-votes” counted?

Broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum for the transaction of business, but they will not be counted in tabulating the voting result for any particular proposal.

How are abstentions counted?

If you return a proxy card that indicates an abstention from voting, the shares represented will be counted for the purpose of determining both the presence of a quorum and the total number of shares represented and entitled to vote with respect to a proposal (other than with respect to the election of directors), but they will not be voted on any matter at the meeting. Accordingly, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” for Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5.

What happens if additional matters are presented at the meeting?

Other than the five proposals described in this proxy statement, we are not aware of any other business to be acted upon at the meeting. If you grant a proxy, the persons named as proxy holders, Michael H. Carrel (our President and Chief Executive Officer) and M. Andrew Wade (our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer), will have the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting. If, for any unforeseen reason, any of our nominees are not available as a candidate for director, the persons named as proxy holders will vote your proxy for such other candidate or candidates as may be nominated by our Board.

Who will serve as inspector of election?

The Secretary of the Company will tabulate the votes and act as inspector of election at the meeting.

What should I do in the event that I receive more than one set of proxy/voting materials?

You may receive more than one set of these proxy materials, including multiple copies of this proxy statement and multiple proxy cards or voting instruction cards. For instance, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate voting instruction card for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. In addition, if you are a stockholder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you may receive more than one proxy card. Please complete, sign, date and return each proxy card and voting instruction card that you receive to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Who is soliciting my vote, and who will bear the costs of this solicitation?

Your vote is being solicited on behalf of the Board, and the Company will bear the entire cost of solicitation of proxies, including preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of this proxy statement. In addition to these mailed proxy materials, our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone, by e-mail or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners. We may also engage the services of a professional proxy solicitation firm to aid in the solicitation of proxies from certain brokers, bank nominees and other institutional owners. Our costs for such services, if retained, will not be material.

Where can I find the voting results of the meeting?

We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the meeting and publish final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission within four business days after the meeting.

4

 


 

Table of Contents

 

What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?

As a stockholder, you may be entitled to present proposals for action at a future meeting of stockholders, including director nominations.

Stockholder Proposals: For a stockholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for the annual meeting to be held in 2020 (2020 Annual Meeting), the written proposal must be received by the Secretary of AtriCure at our principal executive offices no earlier than November 11, 2019 and no later than December 11, 2019. However, if the date of our 2020 Annual Meeting changes by more than 30 days from the date of the meeting, then your notice must be received no later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 150th day prior to the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting or (ii) the 10th day following the date we make a public announcement of the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting. Any notices delivered outside of these dates shall be considered untimely. Such proposals must provide the information required by our Bylaws and also must comply with the requirements of Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and any other applicable rules established by the SEC. Proposals should be addressed to:



AtriCure, Inc.

Attn: Secretary

7555 Innovation Way

Mason, Ohio 45040

Nomination of Director Candidates: You may propose director candidates for consideration by our Board. Any such recommendations should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership and should be directed to our Secretary at the address set forth above. In addition, our Bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for election at an annual meeting of stockholders. To nominate a director, the stockholder must provide the information required by our Bylaws, as well as a statement by the nominee consenting to being named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. In addition, the stockholder must give timely notice to our Secretary in accordance with the provisions of our Bylaws, which require that the notice be received by our Secretary no earlier than November 11, 2019 and no later than December 11, 2019.

Copy of Bylaw Provisions: You may contact our Secretary at our principal executive offices for a copy of the relevant Bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates.

 

5

 


 

Table of Contents

 



PROPOSAL ONE—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that each director shall be elected at each annual meeting of stockholders for a term of one year. Our Board currently consists of the following eight directors: Michael H. Carrel, Mark A. Collar, Scott W. Drake, Regina E. Groves, B. Kristine Johnson, Mark R. Lanning, Sven A. Wehrwein and Robert S. White, each of whose terms expire at this meeting.

Director Nominees

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended, and the Board nominated, the following people, all of whom are current directors, for re-election as directors: Michael H. Carrel, Mark A. Collar, Scott W. Drake, Regina E. Groves, B. Kristine Johnson, Mark R. Lanning, Sven A. Wehrwein and Robert S. White. If elected, these nominees will hold office as directors until our 2020 Annual Meeting and until their respective successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal.







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018 Committee Membership

Name

 

Age

 

Director Since

 

Independent

 

Audit

 

Compensation

 

Compliance, Quality, and Risk

 

Nominating and
Corporate
Governance

 

Strategy

Michael H. Carrel

 

48

 

2012

 

No

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mark A. Collar

 

66

 

2008

 

Yes

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

C

 

 

Scott W. Drake

 

51

 

2013

 

Yes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

Regina E. Groves

 

60

 

2017

 

Yes

 

 

 

 

 

C

 

 

 

X

B. Kristine Johnson

 

67

 

2017

 

Yes

 

 X   

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

X

Mark R. Lanning

 

64

 

2006

 

Yes

 

X*

 

C

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sven A. Wehrwein

 

68

 

2016

 

Yes

 

C*

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Robert S. White

 

57

 

2013

 

Yes

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

C

_________________________________

C = Chair

* = Board designated "audit committee financial expert" under SEC rules

Biographical Information of Directors and Director Nominees

Biographical information about each of our directors and director nominees is set forth below. Information is provided as of the Record Date of March 25, 2019. The primary experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each director nominee that led to the conclusion that such nominee should serve as a member of the Board of Directors are also described below.

Michael H. Carrel. Mr. Carrel has served as President, Chief Executive Officer and director since November 2012. Before joining AtriCure, Mr. Carrel served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Vital Images, a publicly-traded medical imaging software company. During his tenure, he led Vital Images to a leading global position in the healthcare and medical software industry. Under his leadership, the company grew revenue and profitability, increased global market share and expanded its presence to over 90 countries. Prior to Vital Images, Mr. Carrel was President and CEO of Zamba Corporation, a publicly-traded technology company, and Chief Financial Officer of NextNet Wireless, a privately-held provider of non-line-of-sight plug and play broadband wireless access systems. Mr. Carrel recently served as a director of Lombard Medical, a medical device company focused on the minimally invasive treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms, until acquired by MicroPort Scientific Corporation in 2018. Mr. Carrel currently serves on the board of the Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA) and Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. Mr. Carrel holds a B.S. in Accounting from The Pennsylvania State University and an M.B.A. from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.

Mr. Carrel’s extensive understanding of our business, operations and strategy, as well as medical device industry experience qualify him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Mark A. Collar. Mr. Collar has served as one of our directors since February 2008. Mr. Collar is the owner of Collar, Ltd, an investment and consulting business. Mr. Collar retired in 2008 as an officer within the Procter and Gamble Company where his roles

6

 


 

Table of Contents

 

included President of the Global Pharmaceuticals and Personal Health business. Mr. Collar joined Procter and Gamble in 1975 as a sales representative, then moved into advertising, and subsequently assumed roles of progressive responsibility within the Health and Personal Care, Beauty Care, New Business Development, Pharmaceuticals and Personal Health Care Products divisions over his 32-year career. Mr. Collar recently served as a director of First Financial Bancorp; Enable Injections, a privately-held start-up company focusing on high volume injection devices for biologic drugs; and as Chairman and Director of Marketing at TTRC, LLC (Invisible Ink Tattoo Removers), a national tattoo removal chain. Mr. Collar also serves in director and advisory roles in several philanthropic, academic and economic development organizations. Mr. Collar received his B.S. from Northern Illinois University.

Mr. Collar’s experience as a public company executive and board member provides him insight into high-level corporate governance and business management matters which the Board considers on a regular basis. 

Scott W. Drake. Mr. Drake has served as one of our directors since September 2013 and as the Chairman of the Board since May 2018.  Mr. Drake currently serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of ViewRay, a publicly-held medical device company with global operations in radiation therapy and imaging technologies. Mr. Drake was most recently the President, Chief Executive Officer, and member of the Board of Directors of The Spectranetics Corporation from 2011 to 2017. Spectranetics, acquired by Royal Philips in August of 2017, was a publicly-held medical device company that developed, manufactured and distributed single-use medical devices used in minimally invasive procedures within the cardiovascular system. Prior to joining Spectranetics, Mr. Drake served as Senior Vice President, Operations, of DaVita, Inc., a leading U.S. provider of kidney care and dialysis. Previously, Mr. Drake spent 17 years in several leadership positions within numerous healthcare business units at Covidien. From 2006 to 2009, he was President of Covidien’s Respiratory and Monitoring Solutions Global Business Unit, a $1.5 billion business with 8,000 employees. Mr. Drake has also served on the Board of Directors for The Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. since November 2018. Mr. Drake is Chairperson of the AdvaMed Radiation Therapy Sector and a board member of the Medical Device Manufacturers Association (MDMA). Mr. Drake earned a B.S. in Business Administration from Miami University of Ohio.

Mr. Drake’s significant leadership experience in the medical device industry provides him insight into the high-level corporate governance, executive compensation, regulatory (including FDA) and business management matters that the Company and the Board consider on a regular basis and gives him skills which the Board considers as valuable for evaluating and improving the Company’s competitive position and serving as Chairman of the Board of Directors.

Regina E. Groves. Ms. Groves has served as one of our directors since March 2017. Ms. Groves was most recently the Chief Executive Officer at REVA Medical, Inc., a medical device company focused on the development and commercialization of bioresorbable polymer technologies for vascular applications from 2015 to March 2019. Prior to joining REVA Medical, Ms. Groves served as Vice President and General Manager of the AF Solutions, Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure division of Medtronic, Inc., a leading global medical technology company. In this position, she successfully developed and executed strategies to re-enter the catheter-based Afib ablation market and achieved the goal to be market leader in paroxysmal, or intermittent, Afib ablation. Additionally, Ms. Groves successfully acquired and integrated companies, completed numerous clinical trials and launch novel products in the United States and worldwide. Prior to this, she was the Vice President of Quality and Regulatory for Medtronic’s Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management (CRDM) business from 2006 to 2008 and before that was Vice President and General Manager for Patient Management CRDM at Medtronic from 2002 to 2006. Ms. Groves holds a B.S. in Pharmacy from the University of Florida and an M.B.A. from Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.

As a seasoned executive in the medical device industry, Ms. Groves has significant leadership experience managing growing businesses, achieving sustainable revenue growth, driving operational improvements and managing quality and regulatory (including FDA) matters which the Board considers as valuable skills for evaluating and improving the Company’s competitive position.

B. Kristine Johnson. Ms. Johnson has served as one of our directors since March 2017. Ms. Johnson is President of Affinity Capital Management, a venture capital firm that invests primarily in seed and early-stage health care companies in the United States. She has held this position since 2000. Prior to joining Affinity Capital Management in 1999, Ms. Johnson was Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Medtronic, Inc. During her seventeen years at Medtronic, she also served as President and General Manager of its vascular business and President and General Manager of its tachyarrhythmia management business. She currently serves on the Board of Directors of Piper Jaffray, a publicly-held middle market investment bank and asset management firm. She also serves as the Chair of the Investment Advisory Board of the University of Minnesota Foundation and on the boards of several private entities. Her previous public board experience includes service on the Boards of Directors of Spectranetics Corporation, which was acquired by Philips, ADC Telecommunications, which was acquired by Tyco Electronics, and Pentair. Ms. Johnson received her B.A. from St. Olaf College.

Ms. Johnson brings extensive knowledge of the health care and medical technology industries to the Board as well as broad experience in finance and corporate governance.

7

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Mark R. Lanning, C.P.A. Mr. Lanning has served as one of our directors since February 2006. Mr. Lanning currently is a financial consultant and a principal of the Lanning CPA Group. Previously Mr. Lanning served as Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Frisch’s Restaurants for over five years. During his tenure with Frisch’s, Mr. Lanning led the process of transforming then publicly-traded Frisch’s to a privately-held Company which included the strategic disposition of major operations. Prior to joining Frisch’s, Mr. Lanning served in various roles, including Vice President, Investor Relations Officer and Treasurer of publicly-traded Hillenbrand, Inc., Hill-Rom, Inc. and Hillenbrand Industries, diversified leaders in the healthcare equipment, funeral services, and material handling industries. Mr. Lanning also spent twelve years in increasing positions of responsibility with Ernst & Whinney (now EY). Mr. Lanning, a Certified Public Accountant, is presently a member of the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA), is past Chairman and Board member of the Indiana CPA Society and has served on the boards of several charitable and educational institutions over the years. Mr. Lanning received his B.S. in Accounting from Ball State University.

As a Certified Public Accountant, Mr. Lanning developed significant experience in preparing, auditing and evaluating financial statements and dealt with broad strategic and complex financial, accounting and reporting issues comparable to those of the Company, which qualifies him as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules.

Sven A. Wehrwein. Mr. Wehrwein has served as one of our directors since November 2016. Mr. Wehrwein has been an independent financial consultant to emerging companies since 1999. During his 35-plus years in accounting and finance, Mr. Wehrwein has experience as a certified public accountant (inactive), investment banker to emerging-growth companies, chief financial officer and audit committee chair. Mr. Wehrwein currently serves on the board of directors of Proto Labs, Inc., a custom prototype manufacturer, and SPS Commerce, Inc., a supply-chain management software company, both of which are publicly-traded companies. Mr. Wehrwein has also served on the boards of directors for a number of other medical device and high growth companies including tenures on the boards of Cogentix Medical, Inc., Compellent Technologies, Inc., Synovis Life Technologies, Inc. and Vital Images.  Mr. Wehrwein holds a B.S. in Business from Loyola University of Chicago and an M.S. in Management from the Sloan School, MIT.

Mr. Wehrwein brings capabilities in financial understanding, strategic planning and auditing to the Board, given his experiences in investment banking and financial leadership positions. Mr. Wehrwein qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules.

Robert S. White. Mr. White has served as one of our directors since March 2013. Most recently, Mr. White served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Entellus Medical, Inc. Entellus Medical, which was acquired by Stryker Corporation in February 2018, was a publicly-traded company that delivered innovative, high quality, minimally-invasive therapeutic solutions to healthcare providers and their patients who suffer from sinusitis. Prior to joining Entellus, Mr. White served as President and CEO of TYRX, a privately-held company acquired by Medtronic, Inc. TYRX commercialized innovative, implantable combination drug and device products focused on infection control. Prior to joining TYRX, Mr. White held several senior leadership positions with Medtronic, Inc. Mr. White served as President of Medtronic Kyphon following its $3.9 billion acquisition of the spinal treatment business. During his time with Medtronic, Mr. White also served as President of Physio Control and was responsible for commercial operations of the Cardiac Rhythm Disease Management business as Vice President of U.S. Sales and Global Marketing. Earlier in his career, Mr. White held positions with General Electric Company and Eli Lilly and Company, among others. Mr. White recently served on the Board of Directors of HyperBranch Medical Technology, a privately-held company that develops and markets products capable of adhering tissues, promoting healing, preventing fluid and air leaks, and reducing infections, until it was acquired by Stryker Corporation in October 2018. Mr. White also served on the Board of Directors of Novadaq, a publicly-traded provider of clinically relevant imaging solutions for use in surgical and diagnostic procedures, until it was acquired by Stryker Corporation in June 2018. Mr. White holds a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla and an M.B.A. from Cornell University.

Mr. White’s significant knowledge of the medical device industry and experience in growing companies commercially uniquely benefit AtriCure and enhance its capacities in business development initiatives.

Board of Directors’ Recommendation

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR LISTED ABOVE.

 

8

 


 

Table of Contents

 



CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Board Leadership Structure

The Company has separate Chief Executive Officer and Board Chairman positions. Mr. Drake serves as our Chairman of the Board and presides over Board meetings and provides the Company with the benefit of his strategic and creative vision, an appreciation for and understanding of the risks associated with the Company’s business and an intimate knowledge of the Company’s technologies and the medical device industry. Mr. Carrel serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer and provides the Company with the benefit of his extensive knowledge of the Company’s operations, an understanding of the day-to-day challenges faced by companies in the medical device industry and his business and financial know-how.

The Board currently believes that, at this time, based on the skills and responsibilities of the various members of the Board and management, and in light of the general economic, business and competitive environment facing the Company, the separation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles enhances appropriate oversight of management by the Board, Board independence, the accountability to our stockholders by the Board and our overall leadership structure. Furthermore, the Board believes that maintaining separation of the Chairman function from that of the Chief Executive Officer allows the Chief Executive Officer to properly focus on managing the business, rather than requiring a significant portion of his efforts to be spent on also overseeing Board matters.

Board Refreshment Initiative

Beginning in 2016, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considered the views of institutional investors and proxy advisory firms in engaging in a Board refreshment initiative. Recognizing that six members had served on the Board for ten or more years, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee used the Board and Committee evaluation processes to address the Board refreshment initiative. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considered the priority of diversity in the Board refreshment initiative.

As a result of the Board refreshment initiative, we announced that Sven A. Wehrwein joined the Board in November 2016 and that Regina E. Groves and B. Kristine Johnson were appointed to the Board of Directors in March 2017. In addition, we announced that Michael D. Hooven and Karen P. Robards, two existing members of the Board of Directors, would not stand for re-election at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. In February 2018, we announced that Richard M. Johnston and Elizabeth D. Krell, Ph.D., two existing members of the Board of Directors, would not stand for re-election and that Scott W. Drake would assume the position of Chairman of the Board effective May 22, 2018. Effective May 22, 2018, the size of the Board was reduced to eight members as a result of the actions taken in connection with the refreshment initiative.

Consideration of Director Nominees

Stockholder Nominations and Recommendations. As described above in the Question and Answer section under “What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year’s meeting of stockholders or to nominate individuals to serve as directors?” our Bylaws set forth the procedure for the proper submission of stockholder nominations for membership on our Board. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may consider properly submitted stockholder recommendations (as opposed to formal nominations) for candidates for membership on the Board. A stockholder may make such a recommendation by submitting the information required by our Bylaws and the following information to our Secretary at 7555 Innovation Way, Mason, Ohio 45040: the candidate’s name, age, home and business contact information, principal occupation or employment, the class and number of shares of AtriCure stock beneficially owned, information regarding any relationships, arrangements or understandings between the candidate and AtriCure and any other information relating to the candidate that is required to be disclosed in the solicitation of proxies for election of directors or is otherwise required, including the candidate’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement, if any, as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected.

Director Qualifications. Members of our Board should have the highest professional and personal ethics and values and conduct themselves consistent with our Code of Conduct. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee formally reviews each director’s continuation on the Board at the expiration of the director’s term. The Board also has set an age limit of 75 for directors, provided that directors turning 75 shall be permitted to serve the remainder of their term. The Board, through recommendation by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or otherwise, may waive the application of this age limit on a case by case basis. The Committee believes that candidates and nominees must reflect a Board that is comprised of directors who (i) are predominantly independent, (ii) are of high integrity, (iii) have qualifications that will increase overall Board effectiveness and (iv) meet other requirements as may be required by applicable rules, such as financial literacy or financial expertise with respect to audit committee members.

9

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Identifying and Evaluating Director Nominees. Typically new candidates for nomination to our Board are suggested by existing directors or by our executive officers. However, candidates may also come to the attention of our Board through professional search firms, stockholders or other persons. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will carefully review the qualifications of any candidates who have been properly brought to its attention. Such review may, in the Committee’s discretion, include a review solely of information provided to the Committee or may also include discussions with persons familiar with the candidate, an interview with the candidate or other actions that the Committee deems proper. The Committee will consider the suitability of each candidate, including the current members of our Board, in light of the current size and composition of the Board. In evaluating the qualifications of the candidates, the Committee considers many factors including issues of character, judgment, independence, age, expertise, diversity of experience, length of service, other commitments and the like. The Committee evaluates such factors, among others, and does not assign any particular weighting or priority to any of these factors nor does the Committee have a formal policy with respect to diversity. Candidates properly recommended by stockholders are evaluated by the independent directors using the same criteria as other candidates.

Director Skills and Qualifications

The following is a summary of relevant skills and qualifications of our existing directors.







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Board of Directors at a Glance

Independence

 

87.5% 

 

Independent

 

12.5% 

 

Non-independent

 

 

 

 

Gender Diversity

 

75.0% 

 

Men

 

25.0% 

 

Women

 

 

 

 

Age

 

25.0% 

 

< 55 years

 

25.0% 

 

56 - 60 years

 

50.0% 

 

61 -70 years

Tenure

 

37.5% 

 

< 5 years

 

37.5% 

 

5-10 years

 

25.0% 

 

> 10 years







 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Diverse Range of Qualifications and Skills Represented by Our Nominees

Significant M&A Experience

 

Afib

 

Sales & Marketing

Service on Public Boards

 

Strategy

 

CEO Experience

Finance & SOX Compliance

 

FDA

 

Risk Management

Medical Payment & Reimbursement

 

Investment

 

Medical Devices



Independence of the Board

The Nasdaq Stock Market (Nasdaq) listing standards require that a majority of the members of a listed company’s board of directors qualify as “independent”, as affirmatively determined by the board of directors. Our Board consists of the following eight directors: Scott W. Drake (Chairman), Michael H. Carrel, Mark A. Collar, Regina E. Groves, B. Kristine Johnson, Mark R. Lanning, Sven A. Wehrwein and Robert S. White. Our Board has affirmatively determined that each of the directors and nominees, other than Michael H. Carrel, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is independent under the listing standards established by Nasdaq.

As required under the Nasdaq listing standards, our non-management directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors are present.

Meetings of the Board and Committees of the Board

During 2018, the Board held eight meetings. The Audit Committee held six meetings, the Compensation Committee held six meetings, the Compliance, Quality and Risk Committee held four meetings, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings and the Strategy Committee held four meetings.

Our directors are strongly encouraged to attend the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. All of our directors attended the 2018 Annual Meeting. All of our directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all Board meetings and all meetings of Committees on which such directors served during 2018.

10

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Committees of the Board

Our Board has five standing committees: the Audit Committee; the Compensation Committee; the Compliance, Quality and Risk Committee; the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; and the Strategy Committee. Each committee has a written charter which is available on our website at ir.atricure.com under “Corporate Governance”. From time to time, our Board may also appoint committees for special purposes.

Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our financial controls, annual audit and financial reporting and reviews the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and accounting and reporting practices and procedures with our management and our independent registered public accountants. In addition, this Committee reviews the qualifications of our independent registered public accountants, is responsible for their appointment, compensation, retention and oversight and reviews the scope, fees and results of activities related to audit and non-audit services. Our Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence and financial literacy requirements of the Nasdaq rules and the independence requirements of the SEC. Our Board has also determined that Mark R. Lanning and Sven A. Wehrwein each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert”, as defined in SEC rules.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee’s principal responsibility is to assist the Board in overseeing the Company’s management compensation policies and practices. Responsibilities include determining and approving the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer; reviewing and approving compensation levels for our other executive officers, reviewing and approving management incentive compensation policies and programs; reviewing and approving equity compensation programs for employees and exercising discretion in the administration of those programs; reviewing with management our disclosures under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” or CD&A, and producing an annual report on executive compensation that contains a recommendation with respect to inclusion of the CD&A in our filings with the SEC. The composition of the Compensation Committee satisfies the independence requirements of Nasdaq.

Compliance, Quality and Risk Committee. The Compliance, Quality and Risk Committee is responsible for providing ongoing oversight over our Code of Conduct, compliance with applicable U.S. Food and Drug Administration and international requirements and other compliance activities which present significant regulatory risk to us, assisting the Board in evaluating the effectiveness of our compliance program, overseeing the Company’s quality systems and overseeing compliance, legal and enterprise risk management and control activities. The composition of the Compliance, Quality and Risk Committee satisfies the independence requirement of Nasdaq.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations on the composition of our Board and selection of directors, periodically assessing the functioning of our Board and its committees and making recommendations to our Board regarding corporate governance matters and practices. The composition of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee satisfies the independence requirements of Nasdaq. 

Strategy Committee. The Strategy Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in carrying out its oversight responsibilities relating to potential mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and other key strategic transactions outside the ordinary course of the Company’s business, in each case other than any transaction involving a sale or change of control of the Company. The composition of the Strategy Committee satisfies the independence requirements of Nasdaq.

Director Compensation

During 2018 we paid an annual retainer, to our non-employee directors of $50,000. We also paid an additional $50,000 retainer to the Chairman of the Board.  Each non-employee director receives additional retainers for service on the committees as follows:







 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Committee

 

Chair Retainer(1)

 

Membership Retainer

Audit

 

$

20,000 

 

$

10,000 

Compensation

 

 

15,000 

 

 

7,500 

Compliance, Quality and Risk

 

 

10,000 

 

 

7,500 

Nominating and Corporate Governance

 

 

10,000 

 

 

5,000 

Strategy

 

 

10,000 

 

 

7,500 

_________________________________

(1)Includes committee membership retainer.

Upon appointment to the Board, non-employee directors are granted approximately $175,000 of restricted stock, valued on the date of grant. In addition, annual grants to non-employee directors are approximately $125,000 of restricted stock immediately after

11

 


 

Table of Contents

 

each annual meeting of stockholders if such person is serving as a non-employee director at such time either by virtue of being re-elected. The annual grants are valued at the closing price on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders. The annual grants generally will vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, and the initial grants will generally vest annually over a three-year period. 

Director Compensation Table

The following table summarizes compensation earned by our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2018.







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash ($)

 

Stock Awards ($)(1)(2)

 

Option Awards ($)(1) (2)

 

Total ($)

 

Mark A. Collar 

 

$

67,500 

 

$

124,991 

 

$

 —

 

$

192,491 

 

Scott W. Drake 

 

 

91,437 

 

 

124,991 

 

 

 —

 

 

216,428 

 

Regina E. Groves

 

 

66,957 

 

 

249,990 

(3)

 

 —

 

 

316,947 

 

B. Kristine Johnson

 

 

69,457 

 

 

249,990 

(3)

 

 —

 

 

319,447 

 

Mark R. Lanning 

 

 

75,000 

 

 

124,991 

 

 

 —

 

 

199,991 

 

Sven A. Wehrwein

 

 

74,574 

 

 

124,991 

 

 

 —

 

 

199,565 

 

Robert S. White 

 

 

66,085 

 

 

124,991 

 

 

 —

 

 

191,076 

 



_________________________________

(1)Amounts in the stock awards column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards computed, as of each award date, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation” (ASC 718). No stock options were granted during 2018.

(2)The table below sets forth those non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2018 who had restricted stock or stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and the number outstanding as of that date.







 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Name

 

Outstanding Stock Awards (#)

 

Outstanding Option Awards (#)

Mark A. Collar 

 

5,221 

 

80,000 

Scott W. Drake 

 

5,221 

 

80,000 

Regina E. Groves

 

16,805 

 

 —

B. Kristine Johnson

 

16,805 

 

 —

Mark R. Lanning 

 

5,221 

 

80,000 

Sven A. Wehrwein

 

5,221 

 

50,000 

Robert S. White 

 

5,221 

 

80,000 



(3)Amounts in stock awards column represents the annual restricted stock award grant for 2018 board service and the restricted stock award received for 2017 board service.  The 2017 board service grant was awarded with the change in terms of non-employee director equity grants approved by security holders in the amendments to the AtriCure, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive plan in 2018.



Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to promote the effective functioning of the Board and its Committees, to promote the interests of stockholders and to create a common set of expectations as to how the Board, its Committees, individual directors and management should perform their respective functions. The Board believes that ethics and integrity cannot be legislated or mandated by directive or policy and that the ethics, character, integrity and values of our directors and management remain a critical safeguard in quality corporate governance. The Corporate Governance Guidelines establish the practices the Board will follow with respect to, among other practices, board composition and selection of board nominees, director responsibilities, chief executive officer evaluation, management development and succession planning, director compensation, board committees and annual board and committee performance evaluations. A copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines is available on our website at ir.atricure.com under “Corporate Governance”.

12

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Code of Conduct

AtriCure is committed to maintaining the highest standards of business conduct and ethics. Our Code of Conduct reflects our values and the business practices and principles of behavior that support this commitment. Our Code of Conduct is an integral part of our business conduct compliance program and embodies our commitment to conduct operations in accordance with the highest legal and ethical standards. The Code of Conduct applies to all of our officers, directors and employees. Each officer, director and employee is responsible for understanding and complying with the Code of Conduct. The Code of Conduct is supplemented by an additional Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and senior financial employees. The Code of Ethics is applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and any director level or higher employee with responsibility or authority for financial control, oversight or reporting matters. Each code is available on our website at ir.atricure.com under “Corporate Governance”. We will post any amendments to either code, as well as any waivers that are required to be disclosed by the rules of the SEC or Nasdaq, on our website.

We have also adopted and implemented voluntary standards established by the Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed), a United States trade association for medical device manufacturers, governing interactions between medical device manufacturers and healthcare professionals known as the AdvaMed Code of Ethics on Interactions with Health Care Professionals (AdvaMed Code). These standards are intended to ensure that such interactions are transparent and comply with applicable laws, regulations and government guidance. The standards address interactions related to sales and marketing practices, research and development, product training and education, grants and charitable contributions, support of third-party educational conferences and consulting arrangements.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2018 and through the date of this proxy statement, none of the members of our Compensation Committee were or are an officer or employee of the Company, had or have any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K and no executive officer of the Company served or serves on the compensation committee or board of any company that employed or employs any member of the Company’s Compensation Committee or Board of Directors.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

Our Audit Committee charter provides that the Audit Committee will review and discuss with management potential transactions with related parties. Related party transactions requiring Audit Committee approval include transactions that are significant in size and transactions that involve terms or aspects that differ from those which would be entered into between independent parties.

Communications with the Board of Directors

Stockholders are invited to communicate to the Board or its committees by writing to: AtriCure, Inc., Chairman of the Board of Directors or the Chair of a Board committee, 7555 Innovation Way, Mason, Ohio 45040. All such stockholder communications (except for spam, junk mail, mass mailings, resumes, job inquiries, surveys, business solicitations or advertisements, or patently offensive, hostile, threatening or otherwise unsuitable or inappropriate material) will be forwarded to the specific director or directors to whom the communications are addressed.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board has two primary methods of overseeing risk. The first method is through our Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) program which provides a process which allows for full Board oversight of the most significant risks facing us. The second is through the functioning of the Board committees.

The goal of ERM is to provide an ongoing process, effected at all levels across each business unit and corporate function, to identify, assess and monitor risk, and to implement mitigating actions, if possible. Where the ERM process identifies a material risk, it will be elevated through the CEO to the Board for its consideration. The Board established the Compliance, Quality and Risk Committee in 2016 to oversee management’s processes to manage our enterprise-wide risk.

Both the full Board and the Compliance, Quality and Risk Committee periodically receives and reviews presentations from management regarding the ERM process to assess whether it is functioning effectively.

Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks we face, while the Board, as a whole and through its committees, has the responsibility for the oversight of our risk management processes. Senior management attends regular meetings of the Board, provides presentations on operations, including significant risks, and is available to address any questions raised by the Board. Specific examples of risks primarily overseen by the full Board include, but are not limited to, legal risks, competition risks, industry risks, economic risks, business operations risks, commercial and regulatory compliance risks, quality risks, cybersecurity risks, reputational risks and risks related to acquisitions and dispositions.

13

 


 

Table of Contents

 

 Our Board committees assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities in the ERM process.

The Audit Committee regularly reviews with management and the independent auditors significant financial risk exposures and the processes management has implemented to monitor, control and report such exposures. Specific examples of risks primarily overseen by the Audit Committee include, but are not limited to, risks related to preparing our financial statements, disclosure controls and procedures, internal controls over financial reporting, accounting, financial, auditing, treasury and cybersecurity risks.

The Compensation Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding the management of risks arising from our compensation policies and programs.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding the management of risks associated with Board organization, membership and structure, succession planning and corporate governance.

The Compliance, Quality and Risk Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding the management of risks relating to the Company’s Code of Conduct, compliance with applicable U.S. Food and Drug Administration requirements and international law, compliance program and enterprise risk management and control activities.

The Strategy Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding the management of risks relating to potential mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and other key strategic transactions outside the ordinary course of the Company’s business.

Our Board is apprised by the chairperson of each Board committee of significant risks and management’s responses via periodic updates at regularly scheduled Board meetings. The leadership structure of our Board supports the Board’s effective oversight of our risk management.

Board Evaluations

The Board of Directors and committees conduct self-evaluations to assess the qualifications, attributes, skills and experience represented on the Board and to determine whether the Board and its committees are functioning effectively. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives input on the Board’s performance from directors and, through its Chairman, discusses the input with the full Board and oversees the full Board’s review of its performance. The self-assessments focus on the Board’s and committees’ contribution to the Company and on areas in which the Board or management believes that the Board or any of its committees could improve. The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee use the self-evaluations in making determinations regarding which directors will be nominated for election at the Annual Meeting. The Board and committee evaluation process also informs Board and committee composition, which includes evolution of the director skills and experience qualifications criteria to meet the current and anticipated needs of the business.

 

14

 


 

Table of Contents

 

MANAGEMENT

Our directors, nominees for director and executive officers are set forth below. Information regarding our directors and director nominees is set forth above under “Proposal One—Election of Directors—Biographical Information of Directors and Director Nominees”. 







 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Name

 

Age

 

Position

Scott W. Drake 

 

51

 

Chairman of the Board

Michael H. Carrel 

 

48

 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Mark A. Collar 

 

66

 

Director

Regina E. Groves

 

60

 

Director

B. Kristine Johnson

 

67

 

Director

Mark R. Lanning, C.P.A. 

 

64

 

Director

Sven A. Wehrwein

 

68

 

Director

Robert S. White 

 

57

 

Director

M. Andrew Wade, C.P.A. 

 

44

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Justin J. Noznesky 

 

41

 

Senior Vice President, Marketing and Business Development

Salvatore Privitera

 

52

 

Chief Technology Officer

Douglas J. Seith 

 

53

 

Chief Operating Officer



M. Andrew Wade, C.P.A. has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2015, having previously served as our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2013. From 2007 to 2013, Mr. Wade worked in various financial positions at AtriCure including Manager of Financial Planning & Analysis and Director of Finance. Prior to joining AtriCure, Mr. Wade held various financial positions with Macy’s Inc. and Saks Inc. Mr. Wade started his career with Arthur Andersen LLP in the audit practice, serving clients in various industries. Mr. Wade serves on the Boards of Directors of the Cincinnati Chapter of the American Heart Association and the Mason, Ohio Port Authority. Mr. Wade received his B.S.B.A. in Accounting from Xavier University and his M.B.A from the Owen School at Vanderbilt University and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Justin J. Noznesky has served as our Senior Vice President, Marketing and Business Development since March 2016, having previously served as our Vice President, Marketing and Business Development since May 2014 and as our Vice President, Corporate Development from January 2014 to May 2014. From 2004 to 2013, Mr. Noznesky held progressive financial and business development positions at Vital Images, a subsidiary of Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, including Vice President, Marketing and Business Development. Prior to working for Vital Images, Mr. Noznesky worked at UnitedHealth Group in Corporate Finance and at Arthur Andersen LLP as a senior auditor. Mr. Noznesky received his B.A. from Bethel University.

Salvatore Privitera, J.D. has served as our Chief Technology Officer since July 2017. Prior to joining AtriCure, Mr. Privitera served as Vice President of Research and Development at Bard Medical (“BMD”), a division of C.R. Bard, where he helped grow BMD to over $1 billion in global revenue. He was responsible for a broad range of clinical platforms including Therapeutic Hypothermia, Urologic Drainage, Endourology, Brachytherapy, and Home Care where they impacted over 150 million patients on an annual basis. Prior to his role at BMD, Mr. Privitera worked for AtriCure as the Vice President of Engineering and Product Development for nine years. During his tenure at AtriCure, the company grew from a small startup into a public company, and he led development of many platform technologies including the AtriClip product line and the PMA approved Isolator® Synergy™ Ablation System. Prior to AtriCure, Mr. Privitera worked at Ethicon Endo-Surgery, a Johnson and Johnson company, in a variety of research, development and operations roles for over twelve years. Mr. Privitera received his B.S. from the University of Buffalo, his M.B.A. from Xavier University and his J.D. from Northern Kentucky University.

Douglas J. Seith has served as our Chief Operating Officer since January 2015, having previously served as our Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing from 2013 to 2014 and as our Vice President, United States Sales from 2011 to 2013. Since joining AtriCure in 2004 as a Regional Sales Leader, Mr. Seith has held a variety of progressive sales and sales leadership positions, including Area Director roles. Mr. Seith has over 25 years of cardiology and general surgery sales and sales leadership experience. Prior to joining AtriCure, Mr. Seith held sales leadership and/or sales positions with A-Med/EmoblX, Inc., where he was the Vice President of Sales, Heartport, Inc., Scimed Life Systems, a division of Boston Scientific, Inc. and Automated Instruments (a division of Unites States Surgical Corporation). Mr. Seith received his B.A. from Ohio Wesleyan University.

 

15

 


 

Table of Contents

 



PROPOSAL TWO—RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to perform the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2019. Deloitte & Touche LLP has audited the Company’s financial statements since 2002.

The Board is asking the stockholders to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2019. Although not required by law, the rules of Nasdaq or the Company’s Bylaws, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee may reconsider whether it should appoint another independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from the Company’s stockholders.

Board of Directors’ Recommendation

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2019.

Audit and Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. In addition to retaining Deloitte & Touche LLP to audit the Company’s financial statements for 2018, the Audit Committee retained Deloitte & Touche LLP to provide audit-related services in 2018. The Audit Committee understands the need for Deloitte & Touche LLP to maintain objectivity and independence in its audits of the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee evaluates Deloitte’s qualifications, performance and independence, and presents its conclusions to the full Board on an annual basis.

The aggregate fees billed or to be billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP for audit services provided to the Company for 2018 and 2017 and billed related to other services provided during 2018 and 2017 were as follows:







 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Service Category

 

2018

 

2017

Audit Fees

 

$

696,301 

 

$

648,500 

Audit-Related Fees

 

 

2,884 

 

 

2,877 

Tax Fees

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

All Other Fees

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total

 

$

699,185 

 

$

651,377 



In the above table, in accordance with the SEC’s definitions and rules, “audit fees” are fees for professional services and reimbursement for out of pocket expenses for the audit of a company’s financial statements, and for services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements; “audit-related fees” are fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of a company’s financial statements; “tax fees” are fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning; and “all other fees” are fees for any services not included in the first three categories.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

To help ensure the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm, all audit and permitted non-audit services, including the fees and terms thereof, to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee as a Committee, or the Committee may delegate to one or more of its members the authority to grant the required approvals.

 

16

 


 

Table of Contents

 



REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Management has the primary responsibility for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for preparing AtriCure’s financial statements. AtriCure’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing independent audits of AtriCure’s financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include monitoring and oversight of corporate accounting and financial reporting processes on behalf of the Board of Directors. In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed with management the audited financial statements included in AtriCure’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, including a discussion of significant accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant estimates and judgments made in preparing the financial statements and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of AtriCure the certifications required to be given by such officers in connection with AtriCure’s Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Securities and Exchange Commission rules adopted thereunder, including the subject matter of such certifications and the procedures followed by such officers and other management in connection with giving such certifications. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities are set forth in a written charter, a copy of which is available on our website at ir.atricure.com under “Corporate Governance.

The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing, approving and managing the engagement of AtriCure’s independent registered public accounting firm, including the scope, extent and procedures of the annual audit and compensation to be paid therefore, and all other matters the Audit Committee deems appropriate, including the independent registered public accounting firm’s accountability to the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with AtriCure’s independent registered public accounting firm its judgments as to the acceptability as well as the appropriateness of AtriCure’s application of accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and relevant listing standards. AtriCure’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity, in all material respects, of AtriCure’s financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, has discussed with AtriCure’s independent registered public accounting firm its independence from management and AtriCure and has considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the independence of AtriCure’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee discussed with AtriCure’s independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for its audit. The Audit Committee meets with the independent registered public accounting firm to discuss the results of its examinations, its evaluation of the effectiveness of AtriCure’s internal control over financial reporting and the overall quality of AtriCure’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee held six meetings during the year ended December 31, 2018.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in AtriCure’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has also selected, subject to stockholder ratification, Deloitte & Touche LLP as AtriCure’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019.

Submitted by the following members of the Audit Committee:

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Sven A. Wehrwein, Chair
B. Kristine Johnson

Mark R. Lanning

 

17

 


 

Table of Contents

 



PROPOSAL THREE—AMENDMENT OF 2014 Stock Incentive Plan

Based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board voted to approve and recommend to stockholders that they approve the amendment of the AtriCure, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (2014 Plan). The amendments consist of an increase of 900,000 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2014 Plan, from 3,450,000 to 4,350,000. The increase in the total number of common shares available for issuance with respect to incentive stock options in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code (Code) is also 900,000. The 2014 Plan includes other amendments that stockholders are not being asked to approve, which were effective upon the Board’s approval on February 26, 2019. The 2014 Plan as it is proposed to be amended and restated would allow us to continue to attract and retain high quality and higher performing directors, executives and other employees with equity incentives. If we cannot offer equity-based compensation we may have to increase our use of cash compensation which could have an adverse impact on our business plans and operations.

This 2014 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (Amended 2014 Plan) document is attached as Annex B and is marked to show all of these amendments.

Set forth below are: a summary of the principal features of the Amended 2014 Plan and a description of the U.S. federal income tax consequences under the Amended 2014 Plan. The summary of the principal features of the Amended 2014 Plan does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Annex B.

1.Summary of the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended 

Objectives of the Amended 2014 Plan 

The Board believes that stock-based awards are an important element of the Company’s compensation programs. The Amended 2014 Plan promotes the Company’s compensation philosophy and objectives by:  (i) providing long-term incentives to those persons with responsibility for the success and growth of the Company, (ii) motivating participants to achieve the long-term success and growth of the Company, (iii) providing a vehicle to tie a significant portion of compensation to the long-term performance of the Company’s shares, (iv) enabling the Company to attract and retain skilled and qualified officers, other employees, directors, and consultants who are expected to contribute to the Company’s success in a competitive market for such individuals, (v) facilitating ownership of the Company’s shares, and (vi) aligning the personal interests of officers, employees, and others in the Company’s long-term growth and profitability with the interests of the Company’s stockholders.

In May 2014, stockholders approved the 2014 Plan which authorized the issuance of 1,300,000 shares. In May 2016, stockholders approved an amendment to the 2014 Plan that increased the number of shares authorized for issuance by 450,000. In May 2017, stockholders approved another amendment to the 2014 Plan that increased the number of shares authorized for issuance by 850,000. In May 2018, stockholders approved additional amendments to the 2014 Plan that increased the number of shares authorized for issuance by 850,000 and changed certain terms of equity awards payable to non-employee directors.  As of March 31, 2019, approximately 832,000 shares remained available for grant under the 2014 Plan. Information on the total number of shares available under the Company’s existing equity compensation plans and subject to outstanding options and rights is presented in the Equity Compensation Plan Information table on page 22.  

During 2018, we engaged stockholders in discussion regarding the 2014 Plan and received the advice of a leading provider of compensation and governance tools and advisory services with respect to the 2014 Plan. In particular, we solicited comment on the number of shares of common stock to be authorized for issuance under the 2014 Plan and discussed with stockholders our anticipated needs around long-term incentives for those persons with responsibility for the success and growth of the Company. Stockholders provided feedback regarding dilution and our burn rate.

The Compensation Committee and the Board considered the feedback from stockholders, the advice of compensation consultants, the Company’s historical rates of equity award issuances, the expected increase in hiring of new employees to support our anticipated growth, the practices of companies in our peer group, the equity plan guidelines established by certain institutional investors and proxy advisory firms and the dilutive impact to stockholders.  Based on these considerations and the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board approved the Amended 2014 Plan (subject to shareholder approval) to provide for an additional 900,000 shares of stock-based awards to be granted under it which we believe would provide a sufficient number of shares to enable the Company to make awards at historical average annual rates (adjusted to account for the Company’s anticipated increased headcount) for at least two years.  The Compensation Committee determined that reserving shares sufficient for approximately two years of new awards at historical grant rates is in line with the practices of other companies in our peer group. However, the actual number of shares subject to awards under the Amended 2014 Plan is dependent on a number of factors, including the future trading price of our common stock, our promotion and hiring activity, our retention needs and market practices within our industry. As a result, the share reserve under the Amended 2014 Plan could last for a longer or shorter period of time than currently expected.

18

 


 

Table of Contents

 

All stock incentive awards to the Company’s most highly compensated executives that may be made over the next few years are expected to be granted under the Amended 2014 Plan. The Amended 2014 Plan allows the Company the flexibility to grant a variety of stock and stock-based awards, including stock options and stock appreciation rights, granted separately or in tandem with each other, restricted shares and restricted share units, both time vested or conditioned on the attainment of performance goals and unrestricted shares.

Shares Subject to the Amended 2014 Plan

The aggregate number of common shares that may be issued under the Amended 2014 Plan, assuming approval by stockholders, is 4,350,000. The Amended 2014 Plan provides for appropriate adjustments in the number of shares subject to the Amended 2014 Plan (and other share limitations contained therein and described below) and to grants previously made if there is a share split, dividend, reorganization, or other relevant change affecting the Company’s corporate structure or its shares. If shares under an award are not issued prior to the expiration, termination, cancellation or forfeiture of the award, then those shares would again be available for inclusion in future grants.

Other Share Limitations

The maximum number of shares subject to full-value awards and incentive stock options (ISOs) that may be granted under the Amended 2014 Plan is 4,350,000. The maximum number of shares subject to full-value awards that may be granted to an individual (other than a non-employee director) in a calendar year is 4,350,000 shares, and the maximum number of shares subject to stock options or stock appreciation rights that may be granted to an individual (other than a non-employee director) in a calendar year is 4,350,000.

Eligible Participants

Officers and key employees of the Company, any consultant to the Company, and the Company’s non-employee directors are eligible to receive awards under the Amended 2014 Plan. Awards are granted to those persons with significant responsibility for the Company’s success and growth. The number of executive officers eligible to participate in the Amended 2014 Plan is eight. The number of non-employee directors eligible to participate in the Amended 2014 Plan is seven. The number of all employees who are not executive officers eligible to participate in the Amended 2014 Plan is 630.

Administration

The terms of the Amended 2014 Plan require that it shall be administered by a committee consisting of at least three directors appointed by the Board, all of whom meet the definitions of the terms “outside director” set forth in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (as in effect prior to its amendment by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act) and regulations thereunder, “independent director” set forth in Nasdaq rules and “non-employee director” set forth in Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. Unless determined otherwise by the Board, the Compensation Committee will administer the Amended 2014 Plan and has the authority under the Amended 2014 Plan to: (i) select the employees, consultants, and directors to whom awards are granted; (ii) determine the type and timing of awards and the appropriate award agreement evidencing each award; (iii) determine the number of shares covered by each award and all other terms and conditions of awards, not inconsistent with the terms of the Amended 2014 Plan; (iv) determine whether an award is, or is intended to be, performance based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) (as in effect prior to its amendment by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act); (v) with respect to any performance based compensation, certify that any performance goals have been achieved; (vi) determine whether terms, conditions, and objectives have been met or, if permissible, should be modified or waived, not inconsistent with the terms of the Amended 2014 Plan; (vii) cancel or suspend an award, or determine whether an amount or payment of an award should be reduced or eliminated; (viii) determine administrative rules, guidelines, and practices governing the Amended 2014 Plan; and (ix) interpret the provisions of and otherwise supervise the administration of the Amended 2014 Plan. The terms and conditions of each award agreement may vary. The Amended 2014 Plan contemplates that the Committee may delegate its authority to certain officers of the Company.

Market Value of AtriCure Shares

 As of April 1, 2019, the closing price per share of our common stock as quoted on the Nasdaq market was $27.37.

Stock Options

Stock options granted under the Amended 2014 Plan must be in the form of either incentive stock options (ISOs), which meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, or nonqualified stock options (NQSOs), which do not meet those requirements. The term of a stock option is fixed by the Committee, but may not exceed ten years, and stock options are exercisable at such time or times as determined by the Committee. The exercise price of a stock option cannot be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant, which generally means the last closing price of a share as reported on Nasdaq on the date of the grant. The grantee may pay the stock option exercise price either in cash or such other manner authorized in the Amended 2014 Plan or the

19

 


 

Table of Contents

 

applicable award agreement, including the tender of shares. Shares tendered by participants as full or partial payment of the exercise price will not become available for issuance under the Amended 2014 Plan. The Amended 2014 Plan prohibits stock option repricing.

Code Limitations on Incentive Stock Options

The Internal Revenue Code currently places certain limitations on ISO awards. In addition to the other limitations described in the Amended 2014 Plan, an ISO may only be granted to full or part-time employees (including officers and Directors who are also employees) of the Company. The total fair market value of shares subject to ISOs which are exercisable for the first time by any participant in any given calendar year cannot exceed $100,000 (valued as of the date of grant). No ISO may be exercisable more than three months following termination of employment for any reason other than death or disability, nor more than one year with respect to disability terminations. ISOs will also be non-transferable in accordance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Additional restrictions apply to the grant of ISOs to holders of in excess of 10% of the Company’s outstanding common stock.  

Stock Appreciation Rights

The Committee may grant stock appreciation rights (SAR) separately or in connection with a stock option granted under the Amended 2014 Plan. If a grantee exercises a SAR, the grantee will receive an amount equal to the excess of the then-fair market value of the shares with respect to which the SAR is being exercised over the stock option exercise price of the shares, in the case of a SAR in connection with a stock option, or the exercise price of the SAR, in the case of an independent SAR. The SAR exercise price must be at least 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant, and the term of such SAR may not exceed ten years. Payment may be made in cash, in shares, or in a combination of cash and shares, as the Committee determines. If a SAR granted in connection with a stock option is exercised in whole or in part, the right under the related stock option to purchase shares with respect to which the SAR has been exercised will terminate to the same extent. If a stock option is exercised, any SAR related to the shares purchased upon exercise of the stock option will terminate. To the extent that the number of shares reserved for issuance upon the grant of a SAR exceeds the number actually issued upon exercise of a SAR, such shares will not become available for issuance under the Amended 2014 Plan. The Amended 2014 Plan prohibits SAR repricing. 

Restricted Share and Restricted Share Unit Awards

The Committee may grant restricted share awards which consist of shares issued by the Company to a participant for no consideration, or for a purchase price which may be below their fair market value and are subject to forfeiture in the event of termination of the participant’s employment prior to vesting and subject to restrictions on sale or other transfer by the participant. Participants who hold restricted shares have the right to receive dividend distributions, in cash or shares, payable to the extent the restrictions on the applicable restricted shares lapse (and in no event shall be distributed unless and until the restrictions lapse). Our award agreements also provide that recipients of restricted share awards may vote their shares after the date of grant.

The Committee may also grant restricted share unit awards which are substantially similar to restricted share awards but which generally do not give the participant-holder any rights of a stockholder prior to lapse of the restrictions and, upon such lapse, may be settled in cash, shares, or a combination of both. The Committee may provide for the payment in cash or shares equal to the amount of dividends paid from time to time on the number of shares that would become payable upon vesting of the restricted share unit award. The Committee may provide that restrictions lapse after the passage of time (time-vested), upon certain events (such as death or disability) or upon the attainment of specified performance objectives (performance-vested). Subject to certain exceptions, the Committee may waive restrictions or accelerate the date or dates on which restrictions lapse.  

Performance Based Awards 

The Committee may grant awards conditioned upon the achievement of performance goals as the Committee shall determine, in its sole discretion. The performance goals shall be based on one or more performance measures, and the Committee shall specify the time period or periods during which the performance goals must be met. The performance measure(s) may be described in terms of objectives that are related to the individual participant, the Company, or a subsidiary, division, department, region, function, or business unit of the Company, and shall consist of one or more or any combination of the following criteria: cash flow, profit, revenue, stock price, market share, sales, net income, operating income, return ratios, earnings per share, compound annual growth rate, earnings (which may include certain add backs, such as taxes, interest, and/or depreciation and amortization), operating earnings, profit margins, earnings per common share, favorable comparison to established budgets, return on stockholders’ equity, return on assets, attainment of strategic and operational initiatives, comparisons with various stock market indices, reduction in costs or a combination of such factors, personal performance measures, working capital, total assets, net assets, return on sales, return on invested capital, gross margin, costs, stockholders’ equity, stockholder return and/or productivity or productivity improvement. Performance goals may be expressed in absolute terms or relative to the performance of other entities or the Company’s prior performance. 

20

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Unrestricted Share Awards 

The Committee may grant unrestricted shares on a bonus or other basis for no cash consideration.

Restricted Share Awards for Non-Employee Directors 

Under the Amended 2014 Plan, each non-employee director is granted a value of approximately $175,000 of restricted shares upon appointment by the Board (or election at an annual meeting if not appointed beforehand) (the “New Director Restricted Share Grant”). The New Director Restricted Share Grant is valued as of the closing price on the date of appointment (or election at the annual meeting if not appointed beforehand).  The restricted shares vest annually over a three-year period.

Each non-employee director also is granted a value of approximately $125,000 of shares of restricted stock immediately after each annual meeting if such person is serving as a non-employee director at such time by virtue of being re-elected (the “Annual Meeting Restricted Share Grant”). The Annual Meeting Director Restricted Share Grant is valued as of the closing price on the date of the annual meeting. The restricted shares generally vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant.

Minimum Vesting Requirement 

Under the Amended 2014 Plan the Committee is limited in its ability to grant awards that vest in less than one year. Except with respect to five percent (5%) of the maximum aggregate number of shares that may be issued under the Amended 2014 Plan with vesting, no award may vest earlier than one year following the date of grant. However, this limitation does not preclude the acceleration of vesting of an award upon death or disability or in connection with a change in control, as determined by the Committee in its discretion.

Transferability of Awards

No award is transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, except the Committee may, in its discretion, provide that an award (other than an ISO) is transferable without consideration to a participant’s family member (as defined in the Amended 2014 Plan) or trusts established by the participant, subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may impose. All awards shall be exercisable, during the participant’s lifetime, only by the participant or a permitted transferee. 

Termination of Employment

Generally, and subject to the Amended 2014 Plan’s minimum vesting provisions, the vesting of awards is accelerated upon a participant’s termination of employment by death, disability or retirement (for any reason other than for cause), with a participant being allowed to exercise vested stock options or SARs for a period of time after termination. In the case of a participant’s termination of employment for cause, unless otherwise provided in an award agreement, all awards, whether vested or not, are immediately forfeited.

Change in Control

Unless the award is assumed by an acquiring entity and except as otherwise provided in an award agreement, upon a “change in control” as defined in the Amended 2014 Plan: (i) all outstanding stock options and SARs automatically become fully exercisable; and (ii) all restricted share and restricted share unit awards automatically become fully vested.

Recoupment Policy

Awards are subject to forfeiture or repayment pursuant to the terms of any applicable compensation recoupment or recovery policy adopted by the Company, Committee, or Board, including any policy adopted to comply with the rules of any stock exchange on which the shares are traded or the SEC.

Amendments and Award Substitutions; Discontinuation of Amended 2014 Plan

The Board may amend, alter, or discontinue the Amended 2014 Plan at any time, provided that any such amendment, alteration, or discontinuance has been approved by the Company’s stockholders, if stockholder approval is required under applicable laws, regulations, or exchange requirements (including for the purpose of qualification under Section 162(m) as “performance-based compensation”), and does not materially and adversely impair the rights of any grantee, without his or her consent, under any award previously granted. The Amended 2014 Plan could be amended without stockholder approval in certain nonmaterial ways that could result in an increased cost to the Company. No awards shall be made under the Amended 2014 Plan after the tenth anniversary of the effective date.  

21

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Plan Benefits

Below is a table that discloses awards granted to the Company’s executives and directors in the last twelve months under the 2014 Plan.







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name and Position

 

Restricted
Stock Awards

 

Performance Awards

 

Restricted Stock Units

Michael H. Carrel
President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

38,999 

 

 

90,997 

 

 

 —

Justin J. Noznesky
Senior Vice President, Marketing and Business Development

 

 

10,562 

 

 

10,562 

 

 

 —

Salvatore Privitera
Chief Technology Officer

 

 

10,562 

 

 

10,562 

 

 

 —

Douglas J. Seith
Chief Operating Officer

 

 

17,874 

 

 

17,874 

 

 

 —

M. Andrew Wade
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

15,437 

 

 

15,437 

 

 

 —

Executive Group

 

 

29,248 

 

 

29,248 

 

 

 —

Non-Executive Director Group

 

 

47,091 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Non-Executive Officer Employee Group

 

 

98,631 

 

 

 —

 

 

18,633 

The following table presents information about the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2018.









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights (1)

 

Weighted average exercise
price of outstanding
options, warrants and
rights (2) 

 

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))

Plan category

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved
   by security holders (3)

 

 

3,868,445 

 

$

13.76 

 

 

1,319,287 

Equity compensation plans not approved
   by security holders

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

Total

 

 

3,868,445 

 

$

13.76 

 

 

1,319,287 

_________________________________

(1)Represents outstanding stock options,  restricted stock and performance shares as of December 31, 2018.

(2)The weighted average exercise price is calculated without taking into account restricted stock and performance shares that will become issuable, without any cash consideration or other payment, as vesting requirements and/or performance goals are achieved.

(3)Amounts include awards under our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and 2014 Stock Incentive Plan but exclude shares purchased under our 2018 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

22

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Current Awards Outstanding

Set forth below is information regarding shares currently outstanding under the 2014 Plan and prior plans. The Company made its annual award grant to employees in March 2019. Those awards are included in the information below.







 

 



 

 

Plan category

 

Number of shares as of March 31, 2019

Shares available for future awards

 

832,125 

Outstanding stock options - time based

(remaining term: 4.9 years, weighted exercise price of $14.02)

 

1,561,295 

Outstanding stock options - performance based

(remaining term: 4.2 years, weighted exercise price of $13.48)

 

450,000 

Outstanding restricted stock awards/units

 

1,364,052 

Outstanding performance share awards

 

264,420 

Outstanding shares of common stock

 

38,657,527 



For additional information regarding stock-based awards previously granted, please see Note 15 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.  

2.Certain Federal Tax Consequences with Respect to Awards

The following information is not intended to be a complete discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of participation in the Amended 2014 Plan and is qualified in its entirety by references to the Code and the regulations adopted under the Code. The provisions of the Code described in this section include current tax law only and do not reflect any proposals to revise current tax law. The federal income tax consequences applicable to officers, directors, and other persons who are subject to potential liability under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act may be different than the federal income tax consequences applicable to persons who are not subject to Section 16(b). The federal income tax consequences applicable to all persons, whether or not subject to Section 16(b), are described below.

Incentive Stock Options 

Generally, under the Code, an optionee will not realize taxable income by reason of the grant or exercise of an ISO granted pursuant to the Amended 2014 Plan (see, however, discussion of the alternative minimum tax below). If an optionee exercises an ISO and does not dispose of the shares until the later of (i) two years from the date the option was granted and (ii) one year from the date of exercise, the entire gain, if any, realized upon disposition of such shares will be taxable to the optionee as long-term capital gain, and AtriCure will not be entitled to any deduction. If an optionee disposes of the shares within the period of two years from the date of grant or one year from the date of exercise (a  disqualifying disposition), the optionee generally will realize ordinary income in the year of disposition and  AtriCure will receive a corresponding deduction in an amount equal to the excess of (i) the lesser of (a) the amount, if any, realized on the disposition and (b) the fair market value of the shares on the date the option was exercised over (ii) the option price. Any additional gain realized on the disposition will be short-term or long-term capital gain and any loss will be long-term or short-term capital loss. The optionee will be considered to have disposed of a share if he or she sells, exchanges, makes a gift of or transfers legal title to the shares (except transfers, among others, by pledge, on death or to a spouse). If the disposition is by sale or exchange, the optionee’s tax basis will equal the amount paid for the shares plus any ordinary income realized as a result of the disqualifying disposition.

The exercise of an ISO may subject the optionee to the so-called “alternative minimum tax” (AMT). The amount by which the fair market value of the shares purchased at the time of the exercise exceeds the option exercise price is an adjustment for purposes of computing the AMT. In the event of a disqualifying disposition of the shares in the same taxable year as exercise of the ISO, no adjustment is then required for purposes of the AMT, but regular income tax, as described above, may result from such disqualifying disposition.

An optionee who surrenders shares as payment of the exercise price of his or her ISO generally will not recognize gain or loss on his or her surrender of such shares. The surrender of shares previously acquired upon exercise of an ISO in payment of the exercise price of another ISO, is, however, a “disposition” of such stock.  If the ISO holding period requirements described above have not been satisfied with respect to such surrendered stock, such disposition will be a disqualifying disposition that may cause the optionee to recognize ordinary income as discussed above.

23

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Under the Code, all of the shares received by an optionee upon exercise of an ISO by surrendering shares will be subject to the ISO holding period requirements. Of those shares, a number of shares (Exchange Shares) equal to the number of shares surrendered by the optionee will have the same tax basis for capital gains purposes (increased by any ordinary income recognized as a result of a disqualifying disposition of the surrendered shares if they were ISO shares) and the same capital gains holding period as the shares surrendered. For purposes of determining ordinary income upon a subsequent disqualifying disposition of the Exchange Shares, the amount paid for such shares will be deemed to be the fair market value of the shares surrendered. The balance of the shares received by the optionee will have a tax basis (and a deemed purchase price) of zero and a capital gains holding period beginning on the date of exercise. The ISO holding period for all shares will be the same as if the option had been exercised for cash.  

Non-Qualified Stock Options 

Generally, there will be no federal income tax consequences to either the optionee or AtriCure on the grant of a NQSO pursuant to the Amended 2014 Plan. On the exercise of a NQSO, the optionee has taxable ordinary income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares acquired on the exercise date over the option price of the shares. AtriCure will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction in an amount equal to such excess,  subject to the Section 162(m) $1 million compensation deduction limitation applicable to compensation paid to specified executives.  

Upon the sale of stock acquired by exercise of a NQSO, optionees will realize long-term or short-term capital gain or loss depending upon their holding period for such stock. For individuals, capital losses are deductible only to the extent of capital gains for the year plus $3,000. An optionee who surrenders shares in payment of the exercise price of a NQSO will not recognize gain or loss with respect to the shares so delivered unless such shares were acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO and the delivery of such shares is a disqualifying disposition. See “Incentive Stock Options” above. The optionee will recognize ordinary income on the exercise of the NQSO as described above. Of the shares received in such an exchange, that number of shares equal to the number of shares surrendered have the same tax basis and capital gains holding period as the shares surrendered. The balance of shares received will have a tax basis equal to their fair market value on the date of exercise and the capital gains holding period will begin on the date of exercise. 

Stock Appreciation Rights 

A participant who is awarded a SAR will not have taxable income upon the grant of such SAR and AtriCure will not be entitled to a tax deduction by reason of such grant. Upon the exercise of a SAR, a participant will recognize taxable ordinary income equal to the amount of cash and the fair market value of any shares of common stock received. AtriCure may generally claim a deduction at that time equal to the amount recognized as ordinary income by the participant, subject to the application of Section 162(m).

Restricted Share Awards

The taxability of restricted share awards to a participant is dependent upon the extent to which the award is restricted on the date of grant. If the award is either transferable or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, a participant will recognize taxable ordinary income on the date of grant. If the award is both non-transferable and subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture on the date of grant, then unless an election is made as described below, a participant will not recognize taxable ordinary income on the date of grant, but will recognize taxable ordinary income at such time or times as an award becomes either transferable or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares at that time. Within thirty days of receipt of an award that is not transferable and subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, a participant may file an election with the Internal Revenue Service to include as taxable ordinary income in the year of receipt an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares subject to the award at the time of receipt. In such event, any subsequent appreciation in the value of such shares will not be taxable as compensation to a participant upon the vesting of shares subject to the award. However, if shares subject to the award are forfeited subsequent to such election, a participant will not be entitled to a tax deduction. For purposes of determining the amount of taxable gain or loss upon a subsequent disposition of shares issued pursuant to such an award, the amount of ordinary income to a participant will be treated as the cost basis for such shares. Shares which are held for more than one year after vesting (or in the event of an election as described above, the date of receipt) generally will qualify for long-term capital gain treatment. AtriCure will be entitled to a deduction in such amount and at such time as ordinary income becomes taxable to the participant, subject to the application of Section 162(m).

Restricted Share Unit Awards

A participant who is awarded restricted share units generally will not recognize taxable income at the time of the grant. When vested restricted share units are paid or settled and distributed, the participant will generally recognize ordinary income equal to the amount of cash and/or the fair market value of the shares received less the amount paid for such share units (if any) at such time, and AtriCure will receive a corresponding deduction, subject to the application of Section 162(m).

24

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Performance Based Awards

A participant who is awarded performance shares generally will not recognize taxable income at the time of the grant. When vested performance shares are paid or settled and distributed, the participant will generally recognize ordinary income equal to the amount of cash and/or the fair market value of the shares received less the amount paid for such share units (if any) at such time, and AtriCure will receive a corresponding deduction, subject to the application of Section 162(m).

Application of Section 409A to Deferred Compensation Arrangements 

The Amended 2014 Plan provides that the Committee may permit recipients of awards to defer the distribution of all or part of any award in accordance with such terms and conditions as the Committee shall establish. To the extent that a participant makes such a deferral election, Section 409A of the Code subjects the deferral arrangement to certain substantive requirements including (among other items) deferral election and payment timing requirements. In the event that a deferral arrangement fails to comply with Code Section 409A in form or operation, a participant may become subject to: (i) the imposition of Federal income tax on all amounts deferred in the tax year in which the amounts are deferred (or, if later, in the tax year when the receipt of the benefits are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture); (ii) a penalty tax of 20 percent of the includable amount (in addition to the regular income tax at ordinary income rates); and (iii) interest at the underpayment rate plus one percent from the time the amount was first deferred (or, if later, the tax year when the benefits are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture) until the time the amount is included in income.  

Conclusion 

The foregoing summarizes the U.S. federal income tax consequences and does not include a discussion of state and local income tax or foreign tax consequences of participation in the Amended 2014 Plan. Participants are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the federal, state and local tax consequences in their particular circumstances and with respect to their particular awards. 

Board of Directors’ Recommendation

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENTS TO THE 2014 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN.

 

25

 


 

Table of Contents

 



PROPOSAL FOUR—ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd Act), enacted in July 2010, requires that we provide our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers (NEOs) as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (Say on Pay).

As described in detail below under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 31 of this proxy statement, we seek to closely align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. We structure our programs to discourage excessive risk-taking through a balanced use of compensation vehicles and metrics with an overall goal of delivering sustained long-term stockholder value while aligning our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. Further, our programs require that a substantial portion of each named executive officer’s compensation be contingent on delivering performance results that benefit our stockholders. Our compensation programs are designed to reward our named executive officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals and the achievement of increased total stockholder return. Stockholders should note that, because the advisory vote on executive compensation occurs well after the beginning of the compensation year and because the different elements of our executive compensation programs are designed to operate in an integrated manner and to complement one another, in many cases it may not be appropriate or feasible to change our executive compensation programs in consideration of any one year’s advisory vote on executive compensation by the time of the following year’s annual meeting of stockholders.

Stockholder Outreach and Say On Pay Response

Annually, AtriCure offers stockholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on our executive compensation program. This annual vote is known as the “say-on-pay” proposal. At our annual meeting in May 2018,  84.3% of the votes were in favor of the say-on-pay proposal covering our executive compensation program for 2018. Although a majority of stockholders expressed support for the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, the Compensation Committee values any additional stockholder feedback and endeavors to respond to stockholders’ concerns. We regularly communicate with our stockholders to better understand their opinions on our business strategy and objectives and to obtain feedback regarding other matters of investor interest, such as executive compensation. Throughout 2017 and in early 2018, in addition to our regular communications with stockholders during which the Company receives feedback in the normal course, we engaged in a focused outreach effort to many of our institutional stockholders to solicit their feedback on our executive pay program as well as potential changes for fiscal year 2018. Additionally, the Compensation Committee obtained feedback, advice, and recommendations on compensation best practices from its independent external compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson, and assessed the reports and publications of Institutional Shareholder Services and other proxy advisory firms. The Compensation Committee also reviewed the Company's performance, the compensation practices of its peers and compensation surveys and other materials regarding general and executive compensation.

In January and February 2018, with the assistance of Alliance Advisors, the Company’s stockholder engagement consultant, the Company proactively reached out to select stockholders to discuss the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, goals and plans and to obtain an understanding of our stockholders’ concerns. Noting that the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock were owned approximately 4% by management, 1% by retail investors and 95% by institutional stockholders, the Company focused its outreach on institutional stockholders. The Company contacted 25 institutional stockholders representing approximately 74% of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2017, including the top five stockholders who represent approximately 41% of the Company’s outstanding common stock, to better understand their votes on the 2017 “say-on-pay” proposal and obtain feedback on executive compensation. During meetings with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Chairman of the Board (who was also a member of the Compensation Committee) and outside general counsel, many of those stockholders expressed positive views regarding the Company’s strong and stable management team and the encouraging financial and operational results enjoyed by stockholders. Based on feedback from both 2017 and 2018 stockholder outreach efforts, the Compensation Committee took away from conversations with certain stockholders their concerns on the Company’s equity compensation practices in connection with their votes against the “say-on-pay” proposal. Stockholders also expressed a desire for changes in the compensation plans, including: 1) addition of a multi-year performance program for equity awards; 2) elimination, or limitation on use, of overlapping metrics as goals for different executive compensation plan components; 3) the adoption of certain best practices with respect to the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan; and 4) implementation of more robust governance policies.

The Compensation Committee carefully considered this feedback as part of its annual review of our executive compensation program and has responded to the stockholder concerns communicated to the Committee. The Compensation Committee approved several changes to the Company’s executive compensation program and corporate governance practices, as follows:



26

 


 

Table of Contents

 



 

Stockholder Concern / Reason for Change

Compensation Program / Governance Change

Stockholders’ concern that executives’ annual restricted stock grants vest ratably over time, rather than vesting based on achievement of performance goals.

Revised equity incentive grant practices to increase performance focus. The Compensation Committee adjusted the mix of March 2019 equity grants to NEOs other than the CEO to 50% time-based restricted stock and 50% long-term performance share awards. For the CEO’s March 2019 equity grant, 30% are time-based restricted stock awards and 70% are long-term performance share awards.

Stockholder feedback that the performance period for the long-term incentive performance metric should be longer than one year.

Engaged Willis Towers Watson as a compensation consultant to design and implement a performance share award plan to provide for a three-year performance metric for long-term performance shares.

Improved stockholder alignment.

In order to even more closely align long-term incentives with stockholder results, the restructured equity incentive plan provides for adjustment of the long-term performance shares issued to executives based on the Company’s revenue.

Stockholder feedback that performance metrics should differ in annual and long-term incentive plans.

Adopted distinct performance metrics as follows:

•     Annual incentive plan – objectives for innovation, clinical science, education, worldwide revenue growth and worldwide adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. (Note that while EBITDA was a performance measure in the 2018 annual incentive plan, EBITDA is not a performance measure in the 2019 annual incentive plan.) See Annex A for a discussion of management’s use of EBITDA and its reconciliation to GAAP measures.

•     Performance shares – 3-year cumulative revenue goal.

Stockholder feedback to adopt best practices in equity compensation plan.

Engaged a leading provider of compensation and governance tools and advisory services to advise on the Stock Incentive Plan. Amended Stock Incentive Plan to include minimum vesting provisions.

Improved corporate governance.

In response to discussions with stockholders regarding best practices in corporate governance, we adopted majority voting.

The vote on this matter is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. This vote is advisory, which means that the vote is not binding on the Company, our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. The Board and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results when making future decisions regarding our executive compensation program.

Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.

Board of Directors’ Recommendation

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

27

 


 

Table of Contents

 



PROPOSAL FIVE—ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The Dodd Act provides that stockholders must be given the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, for their preference as to how frequently we should seek future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as an advisory vote on executive compensation. By voting with respect to this proposal, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer that we conduct future advisory votes on executive compensation every year, every two years or every three years.

Our Board of Directors has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs each year is the most appropriate alternative for the Company at this time, and therefore, our Board recommends that you vote for annual advisory votes on executive compensation. The Board has determined that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation will allow our stockholders to provide timely, direct input on the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement each year. The Board believes that an annual vote is therefore consistent with the Company’s efforts to engage in an ongoing dialogue with our stockholders on executive compensation and corporate governance matters. However, as discussed above in Proposal Four, stockholders should note that because the timing of the advisory vote on executive compensation, in many cases it may not be appropriate or feasible to change our executive compensation programs in consideration of any one year’s advisory vote on executive compensation by the time of the following year’s annual meeting of stockholders.

This vote is advisory and not binding on the Company or our Board of Directors in any way. The Board and the Compensation Committee will carefully review the voting results. Notwithstanding the Board’s recommendation and the outcome of the stockholder vote, the Board may in the future decide to conduct advisory votes on a more or less frequent basis and may vary its practice based on factors such as discussions with stockholders and the adoption of material changes to compensation programs.

Stockholders may cast a vote on the preferred voting frequency by selecting the option of one year, two years or three years (or abstain) when voting in response to this proposal and, therefore, stockholders will not be voting to approve or disapprove the recommendation of the Board of Directors.

Board of Directors’ Recommendation

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE OPTION OF “ONE YEAR” AS THE PREFERRED FREQUENCY FOR FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.



 

28

 


 

Table of Contents

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the beneficial ownership, calculated in accordance with SEC rules, of AtriCure common stock as of March 25, 2019 by each of our executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table set forth below, each of our directors, all of our directors and executive officers as a group and each stockholder known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our common stock.





 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Beneficial Ownership

Beneficial Owner

 

Shares

 

Options
Exercisable
Within
60 Days

 

Percent
of Class

Holders of More Than 5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BlackRock, Inc. (1) 
   55 East 52nd Street
   New York, NY 10055

 

3,075,083 

 

 —

 

7.7 

%

FMR LLC (2) 
   245 Summer Street
   Boston, MA 02210

 

5,778,999 

 

 —

 

14.4 

%

T Rowe Price Associates Inc. (3) 
   100 E. Pratt Street
   Baltimore, MD 21202

 

2,180,333 

 

 —

 

5.4 

%

Wellington Management Group LLP (4) 
   280 Congress Street
   Boston, MA 02210

 

2,727,614 

 

 —

 

6.8 

%

Named Executive Officers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael H. Carrel 

 

635,668 

 

600,000 

 

3.1 

%

M. Andrew Wade 

 

176,674 

 

161,000 

 

 *

 

Justin J. Noznesky 

 

116,637 

 

60,000 

 

 *

 

Salvatore Privitera

 

90,910 

 

 —

 

 *

 

Douglas J. Seith 

 

251,850 

 

125,000 

 

 *

 

Directors and Nominees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mark A. Collar 

 

82,198 

 

70,000 

 

 *

 

Scott W. Drake 

 

22,026 

 

80,000 

 

 *

 

Regina E. Groves

 

20,962 

 

 —

 

 *

 

B. Kristine Johnson

 

21,462 

 

 —

 

 *

 

Mark R. Lanning 

 

106,026 

 

80,000 

 

 *

 

Sven A. Wehrwein

 

11,026 

 

25,000 

 

 *

 

Robert S. White 

 

13,826 

 

80,000 

 

 *

 

All executive officers and directors as a group (15 persons)

 

1,841,065 

 

1,368,500 

 

8.0 

%



_________________________________

*       Indicates ownership of less than 1%.

(1)This information is based on the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 4, 2019.  

(2)This information is based on the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019.

(3)This information is based on the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019.

(4)This information is based on the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2019.



29

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Ownership Guidelines

Consistent with its compensation philosophy and the principle of aligning the interests of management and directors of the Company with the interests of its stockholders, the Board of Directors has implemented stock ownership guidelines for “Specified Officers” (defined in the guidelines as those officers required to file beneficial ownership reports with the SEC) and non-employee directors. Under the guidelines, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer is required to own an amount of our common stock which is equal to or exceeds three times such Chief Executive Officer’s annual base salary, and Specified Officers other than the Chief Executive Officer are required to own an amount of our common stock which is equal to or exceeds such officer’s annual base salary. Also under the guidelines, within three (3) years of the later of the date of adoption of these guidelines or the appointment to the Board of Directors, each of the Company’s non-employee directors is required to have a stock ownership position in the Company in an amount no less than three times their annual cash retainer for their director service, exclusive of any retainers for committee membership or committee chair service.

Holding Period Requirements

Our mandatory holding period policy for long-term incentive awards requires “Specified Officers” (defined in the policy as those officers required to file beneficial ownership reports with the SEC) to retain 50% of the net after-tax shares that are earned pursuant to long-term incentive awards, including stock option and restricted stock awards, until the earlier of (i) the end of a two-year period commencing on the date any shares earned under the award are issued and (ii) the executive’s termination of employment. The mandatory holding period applies to long-term incentive awards granted on or after January 1, 2012.

Pledging and Hedging

Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits directors, officers and employees, including named executive officers, from engaging in hedging or monetization transactions, such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, forward-sale contracts, put options, collars and exchange funds, and from engaging in borrowing against AtriCure’s securities held in a margin account, or pledging AtriCure’s securities as collateral for a loan.

 

30

 


 

Table of Contents

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Submitted by the following members of the Compensation Committee:

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Mark R. Lanning, Chair

Mark A. Collar
B. Kristine Johnson

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Please also refer to Proposal Four and Proposal Five for additional information about our engagement with stockholders regarding executive compensation.

Executive Summary

Most of our compensation decisions are made in the first three months of the year, after review of our performance and the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers. We believe the compensation of all of our named executive officers for 2018 aligned well with both our performance in 2018 and the objectives of our executive compensation policies:

Our revenue for 2018 was $201.6 million, an increase of $26.9 million or 15.4%, compared to 2017 revenue. Included in this are revenue increases of 17.2% of U.S. sales and 8.7% of international sales. Our gross profit for 2018 was $147.1 million compared to $126.2 million for 2017. Our gross margin for 2018 increased to 73.0% compared to 72.2% for 2017. Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, was a loss of $2.7 million for 2018, compared to a $5.3 million loss for 2017. See Annex A for a discussion of management’s use of adjusted EBITDA and reconciliation to GAAP measures.

Actual revenue results compared to 2018 performance goals resulted in above target annual incentive award payouts to our named executive officers for 2018. Even though our  adjusted EBITDA improved, our EBITDA performance goal required a level of achievement higher than we delivered.

Based on 2017 results and the 2018 evaluation by the Compensation Committee with respect to Mr. Carrel, and the Compensation Committee and Mr. Carrel with respect to the other named executive officers, our named executive officers received increases in their base salary. The Compensation Committee and Mr. Carrel also utilized available market data and assistance from compensation consultants to determine required salaries. These increases ranged from 3% to 13% of 2017 base salary.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our compensation philosophy is rooted in a pay for performance approach that is designed to strongly link executive officer compensation to our performance. Executive incentive compensation is tied to measurable results intended to create long-term value for our stockholders. Our executive compensation program is designed to promote the following objectives:

To align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders who intend to stay invested over a multi-year period;

To attract, motivate and retain talented executives; and

To compensate executives based upon the value of their individual and collective contributions to achieving corporate goals and objectives.

Our executive compensation program provides for base salaries that reflect the following primary factors: level of responsibility, individual performance, internal fairness and external competitiveness. Additionally, the program provides for both annual incentive awards that are payable upon our achievement of annual financial and management objectives, as well as long-term equity incentives that are intended to align and strengthen the mutuality of interest between management, other key employees and our stockholders. With

31

 


 

Table of Contents

 

respect to Chief Executive Officer compensation, initial base salary, target annual incentive compensation and equity incentive award compensation were set forth in his employment agreement. We believe the compensation provisions contained in the employment agreement entered into with our Chief Executive Officer at the time he joined AtriCure in 2012 are consistent with our market-driven and performance-driven compensation policies and objectives.

Below we summarize certain executive compensation program and governance practices – both the practices we have implemented to drive performance and the practices we avoid because we do not believe they would serve our shareholders’ long-term interests.





What AtriCure Does

Pays for performance. A significant portion of executive pay is not guaranteed, but rather is at-risk and tied to the achievement of various performance metrics that are disclosed to shareholders. In addition, a significant portion of CEO and NEO compensation consists of equity incentive awards. The value of equity from these awards is related to the Company’s stock price, which aligns with the interests of all shareholders.

Sets NEO salary guidelines on an annual basis. The Company generally considers NEO salaries as part of its annual performance review process in an effort to be responsive to industry trends.

Balances short-term and long-term incentives. The incentive programs provide an appropriate balance of annual and longer-term incentives, with long-term incentive compensation comprising a substantial percentage of target total compensation.

Uses multiple performance metrics. These mitigate the risk of the undue influence of a single metric by utilizing multiple performance measures for annual incentive awards and multi-year vesting for long-term incentive awards.

Caps award payouts. Amounts of payments under the Annual Incentive Plan are capped. Amounts or shares that can be earned under our equity plans are capped, both for stock options and for full value awards.

Uses market-based approach for determining NEO target pay. Target compensation for NEOs is set after consideration of market data on compensation at other medical device and life science companies.

Maintains double-trigger change in control agreements. The Company maintains change in control agreements with certain of its NEOs, which require termination during a change in control period for severance payments to occur.

Maintains stock ownership guidelines for all NEOs. The Company has the following minimum stock ownership requirements: CEO – three times base salary; Other NEOs – one time base salary. All NEOs meet these requirements.

Evaluates risk related to executive compensation. The Committee regularly evaluates the Company’s compensation policies and practices, or components thereof, for risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Acts through an independent Compensation Committee. The Committee consists entirely of independent directors.

Seeks investor feedback. The Company considers the say-on-pay vote and discusses its compensation practices with investors.



 



What AtriCure Does Not Do

Provide excise tax gross-up payments. The Company has not entered into any new contractual agreements that include excise tax gross-up payments.

Reprice options. The Company has never repriced or otherwise reduced the per-share exercise price of any outstanding stock options. Repricing of stock options is not permitted under the Amended and Restated 2014 Stock Incentive Plan without first obtaining approval from the stockholders of the Company. The Company and the Compensation Committee will not reprice underwater options without the consent of the Company’s stockholders.

Allow pledging or hedging of shares. The Company’s insider trading policy prohibits directors and executive officers from entering into hedging transactions with respect to the Company’s securities and from holding the Company’s securities in margin accounts or otherwise pledging such securities as collateral for loans. No directors or executive officers have in place any pledges or hedging transactions.

Provide special perquisites to executives. The Company does not provide executives with programs that are not made available to all Company employees, except in extremely limited circumstances.

Executive Compensation Program and Process

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee oversees and administers our executive compensation policies and plans. The Compensation Committee makes determinations and reports to the Board regarding general recommendations on compensation policies and plans for employees, setting salaries and incentive compensation and approving equity incentive awards for executives. In determining executive compensation,  we evaluate a variety of factors relating to the Company’s performance as a whole during the year, including financial performance, product development and regulatory and clinical progress. We also review market data and the individual performance of all key executives. Our management team supports and makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee in fulfilling its

32

 


 

Table of Contents

 

responsibilities and gathers information and performs administrative tasks delegated to it by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee performs the same analysis in connection with determining the compensation of Mr. Carrel, our President and Chief Executive Officer, as it does in determining the compensation of other executive officers. We believe that Mr. Carrel’s compensation is fair, competitive and consistent with the Company’s corporate results and compensation philosophy.

During 2018, the Compensation Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson as an independent compensation consultant and also secured the approval of Mr. Carrel’s compensation by all non-employee directors as recommended by the Compensation Committee.

Compensation Consultants

The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage the services of outside advisors as necessary to meet its responsibilities.

In 2018 the Compensation Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson to conduct a competitive pay assessment with respect to the compensation of the Company’s executive officers. Before the Compensation Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson, it considered the factors identified in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5650(d)(3)(D) in connection with its determination that Willis Towers Watson is independent. As part of the executive competitive pay assessment, Willis Towers Watson conducted a review of our peer group based on industry (i.e., healthcare equipment/supplies), revenue (i.e., between $100 million and $700 million), business life cycle and other pertinent criteria to verify current peers and identify new peers. As a result of the peer group review, Willis Towers Watson presented proposed changes to the peer group which the Compensation Committee reviewed, discussed and approved. The changes include the addition of Glaukos Corporation, RTI Surgical, Inc. and Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (K2M Group Holdings was acquired by Stryker Corporation in November 2018.) The approved peer group for 2018 consisted of the following companies:







 

 

ABIOMED, Inc.

Endologix Inc.

LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.

AngioDynamics, Inc.

Glaukos Corp.

Nevro Corp.

Atrion Corp.

Insulet Corp.

RTI Surgical, Inc.

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.

iRhythm Technologies, Inc.

Tactile Systems Technology, Inc.

CryoLife Inc.

K2M Group Holdings, Inc.

Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.



Willis Towers Watson’s review of executive compensation covered base salary, target short-term incentives, total target cash compensation, long-term incentives and total target direct compensation. Based on Willis Towers Watson’s review and analysis, as well as other factors, the Compensation Committee implemented the compensation adjustments described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and the other compensation related discussion included in this Proxy Statement.

In addition to peer compensation data, we review life sciences and general industry survey data for assessing pay competitiveness relative to market. Market data is used as a reference point for understanding the external market. The goal in using market survey data is to strike a balance between external competitiveness and internal equity and to align pay to the Company’s compensation philosophy

Elements of Executive Compensation

Compensation to our executive officers generally consists of the following elements: base salary, annual incentive bonuses, annual grants of equity awards and generally the same health and welfare benefits package available to all of our employees. We believe this mix of cash and equity compensation and short and long-term compensation afforded to all of our executives is consistent with our compensation philosophy and furthers our overall compensation objectives by encouraging short and long-term performance and creating an effective management team which can lead our growth and expansion and maximize stockholder value.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed the risk profile of the various elements of our executive compensation program, including the performance objectives and target levels used in connection with incentive awards, and has considered the risks our executive officers might be incentivized to take with respect to such elements. When establishing the mix among these elements, the Compensation Committee is careful not to encourage excessive risk taking and, as a result, the Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation program does not incentivize the executive officers to engage in business activities or other behavior that would threaten the value of the Company or the investments of its stockholders.

1. Base Salary. We pay a base salary to attract talented executives and provide a secure base level of compensation. In determining base salaries, we consider a variety of factors, including the officer’s job scope and level of responsibility, as well as individual factors such as experience, skills and performance. We also consider market data relating to compensation for similar positions at other medical

33

 


 

Table of Contents

 

device and life science companies and competitive factors in the industry. In addition, we consider relative levels of pay among our officers and recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer.

Salary levels are generally considered annually as part of our annual performance review process, as well as upon a promotion or other change in job responsibility. Salary guidelines are set each year to reflect our industry’s competitive environment, balanced by the desire to control the overall cost of salaries and wages.

2. Annual Incentive Plan. We pay annual incentives to management which vary in size depending on the level of achievement of specific operational, financial and strategic goals considered by the Board to be critical in building long-term value for stockholders. Annual incentives earned during 2018 were paid in cash. In future years, annual incentives may be paid in cash, through equity awards or through a combination of both.

For executive officers, annual incentive targets and objectives are designed to advance key strategic initiatives and build stockholder value and, therefore, primarily relate to the achievement of company-wide revenue and functional goals. We believe that company-wide goals help to foster effective cross-functional performance and a culture of collaboration. Annual objectives and targets are developed with guidance from management and approved by the Compensation Committee. Levels of performance are measured and communicated by management to the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors on a regular basis.

The Compensation Committee generally sets target objectives that the Committee believes will be difficult to attain. For 2018, the determination of the annual incentive targets was based on the financial and functional measures described in detail below, which resulted in a performance payout factor of 149.9%.

2018 financial performance measures included worldwide revenue growth and positive worldwide adjusted EBITDA and comprised 70% of the total award opportunity, while 2018 functional performance measures related to specific Innovation, Clinical Science and Training and Education objectives comprised 30% of the total award opportunity.





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Objectives

Maximum

 

Target

 

Threshold

 

Weight

 

Actual Results

Target Payout

200%

 

100%

 

50%

 

 

 

 

Worldwide Revenue Growth

16%

 

13%

 

9%

 

50%

 

15.4%

Worldwide Adjusted EBITDA(1)

 

 

Positive

 

 

 

20%

 

Loss of $2.7 million

Innovation(2)

Achieve 5+ goals

 

Achieve 4 goals

 

Achieve 3 goals

 

10%

 

5 goals

Clinical Science(2)

Achieve 4+ goals

 

Achieve 3 goals

 

Achieve 2 goals

 

10%

 

5 goals

Training and Education(2)

Achieve 5+ goals

 

Achieve 4 goals

 

Achieve 3 goals

 

10%

 

5 goals









_________________________________

(1)See Annex A for a discussion of management’s use of Adjusted EBITDA and reconciliation to GAAP measures. Unlike other objectives, the EBITDA objective was based solely on achievement of positive EBITDA, with a corresponding Target payout. No Threshold or Maximum payout was available for this objective.

(2)The six Innovation goals include FDA clearance of existing products, progress milestones of product development projects and achievement of a pre-determined vitality index. The five Clinical Science goals encompasses trial approvals and specific enrollment levels for our clinical trials. There were six Training and Education goals that involved addition of new faculty, training minimums for specific courses and development of training courses and databases.











34

 


 

Table of Contents

 

For the named executive officers, the base salary and target annual incentive were determined in accordance with the Company’s executive compensation philosophy and objectives described above, and as part of the Chief Executive Officer’s annual compensation and performance review. For non-strategic metrics, performance between goals is linearly interpolated. These amounts for 2018 are as follows: 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Officer

 

Base Salary
($)

 

Target
Annual
Incentive of
Base Salary
(%)

 

Target
Incentive ($)

Michael H. Carrel 

 

$

722,250 

 

76 

%

 

$

548,910 

M. Andrew Wade 

 

 

400,243 

 

50 

 

 

 

200,122 

Justin J. Noznesky

 

 

347,372 

 

50 

 

 

 

173,686 

Salvatore Privitera

 

 

351,750 

 

50 

 

 

 

175,875 

Douglas J. Seith 

 

 

438,124 

 

75 

 

 

 

328,593 

For 2018, the Compensation Committee approved an incentive program that would have enabled these executive officers to earn the target and maximum incentives set forth below as a percentage of their base salaries.







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Officer

 

Percentage of

2018 Base

Salary at

Threshold

Goals (%)

 

Percentage of

2018 Base

Salary at

Target Goals

(%)

 

Percentage of

2018 Base

Salary at

Maximum

Goals (%)

Michael H. Carrel

 

38 

%

 

76 

%

 

152 

%

M. Andrew Wade

 

25 

 

 

50 

 

 

100 

 

Justin J. Noznesky

 

25 

 

 

50 

 

 

100 

 

Salvatore Privitera

 

25 

 

 

50 

 

 

100 

 

Douglas J. Seith

 

38 

 

 

75 

 

 

150 

 

Total revenue used to calculate the incentives for 2018 was $201.6 million, resulting in a 179.8% payout related to the revenue goal. Adjusted EBITDA was a loss of $2.7 million, resulting in no payout related to the Adjusted EBITDA goal. See Annex A for a discussion of management’s use of Adjusted EBITDA and reconciliation to GAAP measures. The functional goals were achieved in varying degrees, resulting in a 200% payout. In the aggregate, the participants earned their incentives at 149.9% of their targets. 





 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Officer

 

Percentage of
Base Salary
Earned (%)

 

Amount of
Award ($)

Michael H. Carrel 

 

114 

%

 

$

822,816 

M. Andrew Wade 

 

75 

 

 

 

299,982 

Justin J. Noznesky 

 

75 

 

 

 

260,355 

Salvatore Privitera

 

75 

 

 

 

263,637 

Douglas J. Seith 

 

112 

 

 

 

492,561 



3.  Equity Incentive Awards. We issue equity awards to our executive officers and employees under our Amended and Restated 2014 Stock Incentive Plan to create an opportunity for our executive officers and employees to acquire an equity ownership interest in the Company and thereby motivate and retain executive talent and align employees and executives with the long-term interests of stockholders. The Compensation Committee continually reviews the value and mix of equity awards granted to executive officers in light of equity awards at peer group companies but does not target any specific position with respect to these peer group companies. The Compensation Committee also considers wealth accumulation for executive officers as a factor in making additional equity awards both as to type of award and number of underlying shares.

35

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Share-based incentives are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee at committee meetings. Grants of restricted stock vest in 25% increments over four years or in 33% increments over three years. Stock option grants typically vest 25% on the first anniversary of the grant, and the remaining 75% thereafter vests and is exercisable in equal monthly installments on the same day of the month over the following three years or in 33% increments over three years. In 2018, after receiving and considering the input of investors and institutional advisory firms, the Compensation Committee adjusted the mix of equity grants to NEOs to 25% long-term performance share awards (with a revenue performance goal tied to three-year compound annual growth rate) and 75% time-based restricted stock. In 2018, performance share awards had respective threshold, target and maximum objectives of 8%, 10% and 16% growth in three-year compound annual worldwide revenue. Satisfaction of these threshold, target and maximum objectives would have resulted in respective payouts of up to 50%, 100% and 200% of the executive officer’s base salary. In 2019, the Compensation Committee adjusted the mix of equity grants to NEOs (other than the CEO) to 50% long-term performance share awards (with a revenue performance goal tied to a three-year compound annual growth rate) and 50% time-based restricted stock. For the 2019 equity grants to the CEO, this mix was 70% performance share awards and 30% time-based restricted stock. Share-based awards are intended to reflect the participant’s position, responsibility, contributions and performance and to consider market data and each individual’s current equity position. We believe that share-based awards will stimulate pride in ownership and motivate employees and executives to commit themselves to our performance and increasing stockholder value.

Each year, the Compensation Committee considers grants for executive officers and employees based on recommendations from the CEO, as well as the factors described above. With respect to newly hired executives, the size of the initial equity grants are determined based on the individual’s position, experience and competitive market information. New hire grants are generally made at the date of hire. The exercise price for options equals the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the grant.

Recovery of Prior Incentive Compensation

Our Clawback Policy provides that in the event the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the Board of Directors shall require reimbursement to the Company of any performance-based award made to any officer of the Company where: (i) the payment was predicated upon achieving certain financial results that were subsequently the subject of a substantial restatement of Company financial statements filed with the SEC; (ii) the members of the Board of Directors who are considered “independent” for purposes of the listing standards of Nasdaq determine the officer engaged in intentional misconduct that caused or substantially caused the need for the accounting restatement; and (iii) a lower payment would have been made to such officer based upon the restated financial results. In each such instance, the Company will, to the extent practicable, seek to recover from the officer the amount by which any performance-based awards paid to such officer for the relevant period exceeded the lower payment that would have been made based on the restated financial results.

AtriCure’s Amended and Restated 2014 Stock Incentive Plan provides that any award issued under it shall be subject to forfeiture or repayment pursuant to the terms of any applicable compensation recoupment or recovery policy adopted by the Company, Compensation Committee or Board, as thereafter amended, including any policy adopted to comply with the rules of Nasdaq or the SEC. As a result, awards issued pursuant to the Amended and Restated 2014 Stock Incentive Plan are subject to the Clawback Policy.

The Company reserves the right to include these and other additional compensation recovery provisions in equity award agreements for executive officers.

The Company expects to revisit its compensation recovery policies after the SEC adopts final rules relating to clawbacks pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act.

Perquisites

We do not generally provide executives with perquisites other than programs made available to all Company employees. Mr. Carrel’s employment agreement provides for reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket expenses, including temporary housing and for reimbursement for incremental term life insurance. Mr. Seith receives an annual car allowance of $7,200, consistent with the car allowances provided to other AtriCure field-based personnel.

The Compensation Committee adopted a policy that states that NEOs of the Company will not be reimbursed by the Company for personal taxes owed by them resulting from their receipt of perquisites, other than for relocation expenses. The Committee has made an exception to this policy for Mr. Carrel’s life insurance premium payments, which was part of the incentive package offered to Mr. Carrel when he joined the Company.

The business purpose and rationale of these perquisites relates to the Company’s interest in providing executive compensation that attracts and retains its executive officers.

36

 


 

Table of Contents

 

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth summary compensation information for 2018, 2017 and 2016 for our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving in such capacities as of December 31, 2018. Except as provided below, none of our named executive officers received any other compensation required to be disclosed by law or in excess of 10% of their total annual compensation.





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Salary

 

Stock Awards

 

Option Awards

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation

 

All Other
Compensation

 

Total

Name and Position

 

Year

 

($)

 

($) (1)

 

($) (2)

 

($) (3)

 

($) (4)

 

($)

Michael H. Carrel 

 

2018

 

$

714,375 

 

$

2,249,984 

 

$

 —

 

$

822,816 

 

$

20,822 

(5)

 

$

3,807,997 

  President and Chief

 

2017

 

 

670,650 

 

 

3,032,000 

 

 

 —

 

 

432,459 

 

 

21,240 

(5)

 

 

4,156,349 

  Executive Officer

 

2016

 

 

645,750 

 

 

3,667,500 

 

 

 —

 

 

183,720 

 

 

21,090 

(5)

 

 

4,518,060 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M. Andrew Wade 

 

2018

 

 

392,569 

 

 

849,974 

 

 

 —

 

 

299,982 

 

 

8,250 

 

 

 

1,550,775 

  Senior Vice President

 

2017

 

 

349,825 

 

 

568,500 

 

 

 —

 

 

149,294 

 

 

8,100 

 

 

 

1,075,719 

  and Chief Financial 

 

2016

 

 

322,992 

 

 

815,000 

 

 

 —

 

 

61,903 

 

 

7,950 

 

 

 

1,207,845 

  Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Justin J. Noznesky 

 

2018

 

 

342,109 

 

 

607,470 

 

 

 —

 

 

260,355 

 

 

8,250 

 

 

 

1,218,184 

  Senior Vice President,  

 

2017

 

 

313,290 

 

 

568,500 

 

 

 —

 

 

133,107 

 

 

8,100 

 

 

 

1,022,997 

  Marketing and Business

 

2016

 

 

294,813 

 

 

815,000 

 

 

 —

 

 

56,771 

 

 

7,950 

 

 

 

1,174,534 

  Development

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salvatore Privitera

 

2018

 

 

348,958 

 

 

499,989 

 

 

 —

 

 

263,637 

 

 

8,250 

 

 

 

1,120,834 

Chief Technology Officer (6)

 

2017

 

 

147,197 

 

 

1,414,800 

 

 

 —

 

 

62,284 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

1,624,281 



 

2016

 

 

 —

 

 

 —