SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement |
[ ] Confidential, for use of the |
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
ELLSWORTH FUND LTD.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
| [X] | No fee required |
[ ] Fee computed on table below
per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11
| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| (5) | Total fee paid: |
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
| (3) | Filing Party: |
| (4) | Date Filed: |
ELLSWORTH
FUND LTD.
65 Madison Avenue
Morristown, New Jersey 07960
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
to be held
Monday, February 9, 2015
10:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time
at
The Madison Hotel
1 Convent Road, Morristown, New Jersey 07960
To Shareholders of Ellsworth Fund Ltd.:
We cordially invite you to attend our 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to vote on:
| 1. | Electing two trustees to three-year terms; |
| 2. | Ratifying the Audit Committee’s appointment of Tait, Weller & Baker LLP as independent registered public accountants for fiscal year 2015; |
| 3. | Considering and voting upon, if properly presented, a shareholder proposal that would request that the Board of Trustees begin the process of amending the Declaration of Trust; and |
| 4. | Transacting any other business that properly comes before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the meeting. |
We are holding the Annual Meeting on Monday, February 9, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, at The Madison Hotel located at 1 Convent Road, Morristown, New Jersey 07960.
You may vote on these proposals in person or by proxy. If you cannot attend the meeting in person, we ask that you return your proxy card promptly so that your vote is counted. Only shareholders of record on December 15, 2014 will be entitled to vote at the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.
Thomas H. Dinsmore
Chairman of the Board of Trustees
December 29, 2014
ELLSWORTH
FUND LTD.
65 Madison Avenue
Morristown, New Jersey 07960
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD
FEBRUARY 9, 2015
INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING
Proxy Statement
We are sending you this Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card because the Board of Trustees of Ellsworth Fund Ltd. (the Trust) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders and at any adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting (the Annual Meeting). This Proxy Statement summarizes the information you need to know to cast an informed vote at the Annual Meeting.
This Proxy Statement, the attached Notice of Annual Meeting and the enclosed proxy card will first be sent on or about December 29, 2014 to all shareholders entitled to vote. Shareholders who owned the Trust’s shares of beneficial interest on the record date of December 15, 2014 are entitled to vote. On this record date, there were 13,324,117 shares outstanding. Each share of the Trust that you own entitles you to one vote. (A fractional share has a corresponding fractional vote.)
We have previously sent to shareholders the Company’s 2014 Annual Report including financial statements. If you have not received such report or would like to receive an additional copy, please contact Gary I. Levine at 65 Madison Avenue, Morristown, NJ 07960 or call (800) 914-1177. The Trust will furnish such report free of charge. The report is also available online at www.ellsworthfund.com.
Time and Place of Meeting
We are holding the Annual Meeting on Monday, February 9, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, at The Madison Hotel located at 1 Convent Road, Morristown, New Jersey 07960.
Proposal Table
The following table summarizes each proposal to be presented at the Annual Meeting and the page number of this proxy statement where you will find a description of the proposal:
| Proposal | Page Number |
|
1. Electing trustees |
2 |
|
2. Ratifying the Audit Committee’s Appointment of Tait, Weller & Baker LLP as independent registered public accountants |
12 |
|
3. Considering a shareholder proposal that would request that the trustees of the Fund begin the process of amending the Declaration of Trust |
13 |
The Board of Trustees, including all of the independent trustees, recommends that you vote for Proposals 1 and 2 but AGAINST Proposal 3.
How to Vote
You do not need to attend the Annual Meeting in person to vote your shares. Instead, you may simply complete, sign and return the enclosed proxy card or use any of the available alternative proxy voting methods specified in the instructions that accompany this Proxy Statement.
If you are the record owner of your shares, the available alternative proxy voting methods are telephone and Internet voting. If your shares are held by a broker, the alternative proxy voting methods may include telephone, Internet and any alternative method of voting permitted by your broker. Please see “Additional Information on Voting” on page 15 below for a further discussion of how to vote your shares.
Broker Voting
Under rules applicable to broker-dealers, if your broker holds your shares in its name, we expect that the broker will be entitled to vote your shares on Proposals 1 and 2 even if it has not received instructions from you. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker has not received voting instructions from a shareholder and is barred from voting the shares without shareholder instructions because the proposal is considered to be non-routine. Because Proposals 1 and 2 are considered routine, the Trust does not expect to receive any broker non-votes with respect to those proposals. However, Proposal 3 is considered non-routine. Therefore, if you do not vote your shares, and do not provide voting instructions to your broker with respect to Proposal 3, a broker non-vote will occur with respect to your shares for Proposal 3. Any broker non-vote will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 3.
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF TRUSTEES
Board Leadership Structure
The primary responsibility of the Board of Trustees (the Board) is to represent the interests of the shareholders of the Trust and to provide oversight of the management of the Trust. The Trust’s day-to-day operations are managed by Dinsmore Capital Management Co. (Dinsmore Capital), the Trust’s investment adviser.
The Board is divided into three classes for purposes of election. One class is elected at each annual meeting of shareholders. Trustees in each class serve for a three-year term. Classifying the Board for election may be regarded as an “anti-takeover provision” because it has the effect of maintaining the continuity of the Board and requiring at least two years to change a majority of the Board.
The Board currently consists of six persons. Four of the trustees are “independent,” meaning they are not “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the Investment Company Act). Two of the Trust’s trustees are “interested persons” because of their business and financial relationships with the Trust and Dinsmore Capital. The Independent Trustees are represented by independent legal counsel at Board and committee meetings. Generally, the Board acts by majority vote of all the trustees, including a majority vote of the Independent Trustees if required by applicable law.
The Board has established four committees (Audit, Governance, Investment and Pricing, as described below). The Audit, Governance and Investment Committees are comprised solely of Independent Trustees. The Board and its committees meet periodically throughout the year to oversee the Trust’s activities, review contractual arrangements with service providers, review the Trust’s financial statements, oversee compliance with regulatory requirements, and review pricing of fair value securities. The Board has determined that this leadership structure, including having an Interested Trustee serve as
2
chairperson, a supermajority of Independent Trustees serve on the Board, Audit and Governance committee membership limited to Independent Trustees, and not having a lead independent trustee is appropriate because it allows the Board to exercise informed and independent judgment over the matters under its purview, and it allocates areas of responsibility among committees of Trustees and the full Board in a manner that enhances effective oversight.
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
The day-to-day management of various risks relating to the administration and operation of the Trust is the responsibility of the Trust’s investment adviser, Dinsmore Capital, and other service providers retained by the Trust. The Board oversees this risk management function consistent with and as part of its oversight duties. The Board performs this risk management oversight function directly and, with respect to various matters, through committees established by the Board. Each committee reports its activities to the Board on a regular basis. The following description provides an overview of many, but not all, aspects of the Board’s oversight of risk management for the Trust. The Board does not believe it is practicable to identify all of the risks that may impact the Trust or to develop procedures or controls that are designed to eliminate all such risk exposures and that applicable securities law regulations do not contemplate that all such risks be identified and addressed.
The Board, working with personnel of Dinsmore Capital and other service providers, has endeavored to identify the primary risks that confront the Trust. In general, these risks include, among others, investment risks, credit risks, liquidity risks, valuation risks, operational risks, reputational risks, regulatory risks, risks related to potential legislative changes and the risk of conflicts of interest affecting affiliates of Dinsmore Capital in managing the Trust. The Board has adopted and periodically reviews various policies and procedures that are designed to address these and other risks confronting the Trust. A current copy of the Trust’s Code of Ethics for Principal Officers is available at the Trust’s website at www.ellsworthfund.com/ECFcorp.htm. In addition, the officers of the Trust, the Trust’s investment adviser and other service providers to the Trust have implemented a variety of processes, procedures and controls designed to address particular risks to the Trust. The Board and persons retained to render advice and service to the Board periodically review and/or monitor changes to and developments relating to the effectiveness of these policies and procedures.
The Board requires officers of the Trust to report to the full Board on a variety of matters at regular and special meetings of the Board and its committees, as applicable, including matters relating to risk management. The Audit Committee also receives reports from the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm on internal control and financial reporting matters. The Board meets with the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer periodically to discuss compliance matters and, on a quarterly basis, receives a report from the Chief Compliance Officer regarding compliance matters. The Independent Trustees meet in executive session with the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer at least annually. The Board, with the assistance of the Trust’s management, reviews investment policies and risks in connection with its review of the Trust’s performance. In addition, the Board receives reports from Dinsmore Capital on the investments and securities trading of the Trust. With respect to valuation, the Board has approved fair valuation procedures applicable to valuing the Trust’s securities, which the Board and the Audit Committee periodically review. The Board also requires Dinsmore Capital to report to the Board on other matters relating to risk management on a regular and as-needed basis.
Information About the Trust’s Nominees
At the 2015 Annual Meeting, the terms of two trustees are expiring. The Governance Committee of the Board nominated those two trustees, whose terms are expiring in 2015, as set forth below, to serve for terms that expire in 2018. Included below is a discussion regarding such nominees’ recent employment or principal occupation, a summary of their specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that they are qualified to serve as a trustee, the names of other public
3
companies for which they currently serve as board members or have served as a board member within the past five years, their period of service as a trustee and their age.
Other trustees will not stand for election this year and will continue in office for the rest of their respective terms.
Each of the nominees is willing to serve as a trustee. However, if a nominee becomes unavailable for election, proxies will vote for another nominee proposed by the Board or, as an alternative, the Board may keep the position vacant or reduce the number of trustees.
The Board has approved the nomination of the following individuals to serve as trustees until the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2018. The business address of each nominee and/or trustee listed below is c/o Ellsworth Fund Ltd., 65 Madison Avenue, Suite 550, Morristown, NJ 07960. All of the Trustees of the Trust are also trustees of another investment company, Bancroft Fund Ltd. (Bancroft Fund) for which Dinsmore Capital also serves as investment adviser. The two registered investment companies therefore make up a “fund complex” (Fund Complex), and if re-elected, each nominee would oversee the two registered investment companies in the Fund Complex.
Nominee Who Is an Independent Trustee
Kinchen C. Bizzell |
Trustee since 2008 |
Kinchen C. Bizzell, age 60, is a Managing Director of CAVU Securities, a New York institutional securities broker-dealer. From 2004 until 2013, Mr. Bizzell was a senior counselor with Burson-Marsteller, a global public relations and communications firm. Previously, he was a Managing Director of Burson-Marsteller’s corporate and financial practice. Mr. Bizzell is a CFA charterholder and is a member of the New York State Bar. He received a B.A. degree from North Carolina State University, a J.D. degree from Duke University, and holds numerous securities licenses from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).
As an attorney, CFA charterholder and FINRA licensee, Mr. Bizzell brings extensive legal and financial expertise and oversight skills to the Board. He has significant experience providing investor relations consulting services and analyzing financial statements. His insight and financial understanding have been of great benefit to the Board.
Mr. Bizzell serves on the Audit Committee and Pricing Committee.
Nominee Who Is an Interested Person
Jane D. O’Keeffe |
Trustee since 1995 |
Jane D. O’Keeffe, age 59, has been Executive Vice President of the Trust since February 2014 and was President of the Trust from 1996 until February 2014. Ms. O’Keeffe has been President of Bancroft Fund and Dinsmore Capital since 1996. Ms. O’Keeffe received a B.A. degree from the University of New Hampshire and attended the Lubin Graduate School of Pace University.
Ms. O’Keeffe brings to the Board extensive investment and research experience and expertise, as she has worked in the investment business since 1980. She has worked with mutual funds (IDS Progressive Fund), hedge funds (Soros Fund Management), individuals, endowments and foundations (Simms Capital and Fiduciary Trust). Her extensive experience researching companies for purposes of investment management, and investing in many different categories, styles and capital types, gives Ms. O’Keeffe a unique perspective in managing funds as well as serving as a trustee.
4
Ms. O’Keeffe is an interested person (within the meaning of the Investment Company Act) of the Trust and Dinsmore Capital because she is an officer of the Trust and officer, director and holder of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of voting common stock of Dinsmore Capital.
Required Vote
Trustees are elected by a plurality vote of shares cast at the Annual Meeting, meaning that the trustee nominee with the most affirmative votes for a particular seat on the Board is elected for such seat. In an uncontested election for trustees, the plurality requirement is not a factor. Abstentions will not count as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. We expect that brokers will be entitled to vote on this proposal even without instructions from shareholders; however, any broker non-vote will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
The Board recommends that you vote FOR these nominees.
Information About the Trust’s Other Trustees
Information about the Trust’s other trustees whose terms continue after the Annual Meeting is presented below. Included in the following discussion is their recent employment or principal occupation, a summary of their specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the conclusion that they are qualified to serve as a trustee, the names of other public companies for which they currently serve as board members or have served as a board member within the past five years, their period of service as a trustee and their age. Each trustee oversees two registered investment companies in the Fund Complex, the Trust and Bancroft Fund.
Continuing Independent Trustees
Elizabeth C. Bogan, Ph.D. |
Trustee since 1986 |
Elizabeth C. Bogan, Ph.D., age 70, has been Senior Lecturer in Economics at Princeton University since 1992. Dr. Bogan was formerly Chair of the Economics and Finance Department, Fairleigh Dickinson University, and a member of the Executive Committee for the College of Business Administration. She received an A.B. degree in Economics from Wellesley College, an M.A. degree in Quantitative Economics from the University of New Hampshire, and a Ph.D. degree in Economics from Columbia University.
As a scholar and educator, Dr. Bogan brings to the Board significant economic and financial expertise and a unique approach to examining issues. She has been involved in several decades of research and scholarship and has authored several published writings on finance. Her writings on finance have been published in The Financial Analysts Journal and in other journals. Dr. Bogan was formerly Chair of the Audit Committee.
Dr. Bogan serves on the Audit Committee and Governance Committee. Her term as trustee will expire in 2016.
Daniel D. Harding |
Trustee since 2007 |
Daniel D. Harding, age 62, is co-founder and was Chief Investment Officer of Harding Loevner Management LP, an investment advisory firm, from 1989 through 2003. He received his undergraduate degree from Colgate University and is a CFA charterholder. Mr. Harding is a director of Tax Receivables Corporation, a private asset management company. He is a managing general partner of Global Equity Income Fund and a general partner of Latitude Capital Partners, LLC, a private investment firm. He was a member of Legg Mason Investment Counsel, LLC from 2010 to 2012.
5
Mr. Harding has extensive experience in investment management and financial research. As a founder of a highly successful global investment management company, he provides an important world view of the financial markets. The Board has determined that Mr. Harding is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Mr. Harding is Chair of the Audit Committees, and a member of the Pricing and Investment Committees. His term as trustee will expire in 2017.
Nicolas W. Platt |
Trustee since 1997 |
Nicolas W. Platt, age 61, is a private investor. He was formerly Managing Director of FTI Consulting Inc. (FCN-NYSE), an international consulting company, from March 2009 to May 2011. Mr. Platt is a member of the NYSE MKT LLC U.S. Committee of Securities Listing Qualifications Panel which reviews the continued listing qualifications for companies on the NYSE MKT LLC. He currently serves as the Mayor of the Township of Harding, New Jersey. Mr. Platt received a B.A. degree from Skidmore College and an M.A. degree in Economics from Columbia University.
Based on Mr. Platt’s experience in public relations, crisis communications and financial consultancy, as a former executive of both the New York and American Stock Exchanges and his continued experience on the NYSE MKT LLC Panel, he is able to deliver important insights to our management and other trustees on subjects ranging from corporate governance and trustee compensation to corporate strategy and management oversight. As a result of his current and prior leadership responsibilities, management expertise and independence, Mr. Platt’s fellow trustees have elected him to serve as Chair of the Trust’s Governance Committee and Pricing Committee.
Mr. Platt is Chair of both the Governance Committee and the Pricing Committee. His term as trustee will expire in 2016.
Continuing Trustee Who Is an Interested Person
Thomas H. Dinsmore |
Trustee since 1986 |
Thomas H. Dinsmore, age 61, has been Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and portfolio manager of the Trust and Bancroft Fund since 1996. Mr. Dinsmore is a member of the Executive Committee of the Closed-End Fund Association, and formerly served as its president. He received a B.S. degree in Economics from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania and an M.A. degree in Economics from Fairleigh Dickinson University. Mr. Dinsmore is a CFA charterholder.
Mr. Dinsmore brings to the Board significant executive experience including current and past service as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Funds and Dinsmore Capital. He has extensive experience as a portfolio manager, a research analyst, and co-founder of the Trust.
Mr. Dinsmore is Chairman of the Board and a member of the Pricing Committee. His term as trustee will expire in 2017.
Mr. Dinsmore is an interested person (within the meaning of the Investment Company Act) of the Trust and Dinsmore Capital because he is an officer of the Trust and officer, director and holder of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of voting common stock of Dinsmore Capital.
Certain Relationships
Thomas H. Dinsmore and Jane D. O’Keeffe are brother and sister.
6
Committees of the Board of Trustees
The Board has four committees: an Audit Committee; a Governance Committee; an Investment Committee; and a Pricing Committee.
Audit Committee
The Trust has an Audit Committee that is separately designated and established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). The Audit Committee is comprised entirely of independent trustees (Mr. Bizzell, Dr. Bogan and Mr. Harding, serving as Chairman). All such members are independent as such term is defined by the NYSE MKT LLC Company Guide.
In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee oversees the Trust’s accounting and financial reporting policies and practices, as well as the quality and objectivity of the Trust’s financial statements and the independent audit of the financial statements. Among other duties, the Committee is responsible for: (i) the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of any independent registered public accountants employed by the Trust (including monitoring the independence qualifications and performance of such accountants and resolution of disagreements between the Trust’s management and the accountants regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services; (ii) overseeing the accounting and financial reporting process of the Trust; (iii) monitoring management’s preparation of financial statements of the Trust to promote accuracy and integrity of such financial statements and asset valuation; (iv) assisting the Board in its oversight of the Trust’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements that relate to the Trust’s accounting and financial reporting, internal control over financial reporting and independent audits; (v) pre-approving all permissible audit and non-audit services provided to the Trust by its independent accountants, to the extent required by Section 10A of the Exchange Act; (vi) pre-approving, in accordance with Item 2.01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X, certain non-audit services provided by the Trust’s independent registered public accountants to the Trust’s investment adviser and certain other affiliated entities if the Trust’s independent registered public accountants are the same as, or affiliated with, the investment adviser’s or affiliated entities’ accountants; and (vii) to the extent required by Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, preparing an audit committee report for inclusion in the Trust’s annual proxy statement.
A current copy of the Charter of the Audit Committee is available at the Trust’s website at www.ellsworthfund.com/ECFcorp.htm.
Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the Trust’s audited financial statements with management and its independent registered public accountants, Tait, Weller & Baker LLP (Tait Weller). The Audit Committee has also discussed with Tait Weller the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. These discussions included the accountant’s judgments about the quality, not just acceptability, of the Trust’s accounting principles as applied in its financial reporting. Tait Weller, the Audit Committee, and management also discussed matters such as the clarity, consistency and completeness of the accounting policies and disclosures, with a particular focus on critical accounting policies.
The Audit Committee has received written disclosures and a letter from Tait Weller required by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board disclosing all relationships between Tait Weller and its related entities and the Trust. The Audit Committee discussed with Tait Weller its independence as the Trust’s independent registered public accountants. In addition, the Audit Committee has considered
7
whether the provision by Tait Weller of non-audit services to the Trust and to Bancroft Fund is compatible with the continuing independence of Tait Weller. The Audit Committee also reviewed and discussed the Trust’s audited financial statements with management.
Based on the review and discussions described
above, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Trust’s
annual report to shareholders for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 for filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Daniel D. Harding, Chairman
Kinchen C. Bizzell
Elizabeth C. Bogan, Ph.D.
Governance Committee
The Governance Committee is comprised entirely of independent trustees (Dr. Bogan and Mr. Platt, serving as Chairman). In addition, all such members are independent as such term is defined by the NYSE MKT LLC Company Guide.
In accordance with its charter, the Committee, among other duties, is responsible for: (i) nominating persons for election or appointment: (a) as additions to the Board; (b) to fill vacancies which, from time to time, may occur on the Board; and (c) for election by shareholders of the Trust at meetings called for the election of trustees; (ii) nominating persons for appointment as members of each committee of the Board, including, without limitation, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, and the Pricing Committee; (iii) reviewing from time to time the compensation, if any, payable to the trustees and making recommendations to the Board regarding compensation; (iv) reviewing and evaluating from time to time the functioning of the Board and the various committees of the Board; (v) overseeing the selection of independent legal counsel to the independent trustees; and (vi) monitoring the performance of independent legal counsel employed by the Trust and the independent trustees.
A current copy of the Governance Committee’s Charter is available at the Trust’s website at www.ellsworthfund.com/ECFcorp.htm.
Prior to a meeting of the shareholders of the Trust called for the purpose of electing trustees, the Governance Committee will nominate one or more persons for election as trustees at such meeting. The Governance Committee is also responsible for nominating trustees to fill vacancies resulting from an increase in the size of the Board or as a result of the resignation, death or removal of a trustee. The independent trustees are generally authorized to elect nominees to fill such vacancies.
Evaluation by the Governance Committee of a person as a potential nominee to serve as a trustee, including a person nominated by a shareholder, should result in the following findings by the Governance Committee: (i) with respect to the nomination of independent trustees only, upon advice of independent legal counsel to the independent trustees, that the person will qualify as an independent trustee, and that the person is otherwise not disqualified under the Investment Company Act or the rules of the NYSE MKT LLC stock exchange from serving as a trustee of the Trust; (ii) with respect to the nomination of independent trustees only, that the person is free of any material relationship with the Trust (other than as a shareholder of the Trust), that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment; (iii) that the person is willing to serve, and willing and able to commit the time necessary for the performance of the duties of a trustee; (iv) that the person can make a positive contribution to the Board and the Trust, with consideration being given to the person’s education, business experience, and such other factors as the Governance Committee may consider relevant; (v) that the person is of good character and high integrity; (vi) that the person has desirable personality traits including independence, leadership and the ability to work with the other members of the Board; and (vii) that the person is not an NYSE MKT LLC stock exchange employee or floor member. Although the Board does not have a formal written policy with
8
regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying nominees, the Governance Committee considers diversity as to educational background, skills, business experience, viewpoints, occupation, gender and race when considering potential nominees.
Consistent with the Investment Company Act, the Governance Committee can consider recommendations from management in its evaluation process.
The Governance Committee will consider nominees recommended by a shareholder to serve as trustee, provided that: (i) such nominating person is a shareholder of record at the time he or she submits the name of such nominee, (ii) such person is a shareholder of record at the time of the meeting at which shareholders are elected, (iii) such shareholder is entitled to vote at the meeting of shareholders at which trustees will be elected; and (iv) the Governance Committee shall make the final determination of persons to be nominated. The Governance Committee will evaluate nominees recommended by a shareholder to serve as trustees in the same manner as they evaluate nominees identified by the Governance Committee.
A shareholder may, at the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, nominate an individual for election to the Board at such meeting if the shareholder: (i) is a shareholder of record at the time of giving notice to the Trust as described in (iv) below; (ii) is a shareholder of record at the time of the 2016 Annual Meeting, (iii) is entitled to vote at the 2016 Annual Meeting; and (iv) has complied with the notice procedures in the Trust’s bylaws. Such notice procedures require that a shareholder submit the nomination in writing to the Secretary of the Trust no earlier than October 12, 2015 but no later than November 11, 2015. The notice must contain all information relating to the nominee required for proxy solicitations by Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (including the individual’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a trustee if elected). The notice must also contain the shareholder’s name and address as they appear on the Trust’s books (and the name and address of any beneficial owner, on whose behalf the nomination is made) and the number of shares of beneficial interest owned beneficially and of record by such shareholder and beneficial owner.
Investment Committee
The Investment Committee is comprised of one member, Mr. Harding, who is an independent trustee. In accordance with its charter, the Committee assists the Board in the oversight, monitoring, and evaluation of the investment advisory services provided by the adviser of the Trust and to Bancroft Fund, and reviews from time to time materials supplied by the adviser regarding investment performance and expenses. The Committee meets periodically with the portfolio managers of the Trust and of Bancroft Fund and obtains from them information on such investment related matters as it deems appropriate, including by way of example and not by way of limitation: (i) performance attribution, (ii) trading practices, and (iii) asset allocation.
Pricing Committee
The Pricing Committee is comprised of four members, three of whom are independent trustees (Mr. Bizzell, Mr. Harding and Mr. Platt, serving as Chairman) and one of whom is an interested person (Mr. Dinsmore). In accordance with its charter, the Committee assists the Trust’s investment adviser, Dinsmore Capital, in its valuation of the Trust’s portfolio securities when pricing anomalies arise and the full Board is not available to assist Dinsmore Capital in making a fair value determination, and is also responsible for the fair value pricing of any securities held by the Trust as necessary.
Board and Committee Meeting Attendance
During the 2014 fiscal year, the Board met eight times, the Audit Committee met four times, the Governance Committee met three times, the Pricing Committee met two times and the Investment Committee met eight times. During the 2014 fiscal year, each trustee attended at least 75% of meetings of the Board and of each Committee on which such trustee served. The Trust’s policy regarding trustee
9
attendance at annual meetings of shareholders is that trustees are encouraged but not required to attend such annual meetings. Each of the Trust’s then current trustees attended the Trust’s 2014 annual meeting of shareholders.
Shareholder Communications with the Board of Trustees
The Trust adopted Shareholder Communication Procedures (the Procedures) that set forth the process by which shareholders of the Trust may send communications to the Board. If a shareholder sends a recommendation of a nominee to the Board or to an individual trustee, such communication would be covered by the Procedures. Shareholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, and communications made in connection with such proposals, are not subject to the Procedures. The Trust’s bylaws also contain provisions requiring a shareholder to provide advance notice of his or her intention to nominate, at the Trust’s annual meeting of shareholders, an individual for election as trustee.
Pursuant to the Procedures, shareholders should send their communications to the Trust’s Shareholder Relations Group. Communications may be sent by regular mail or delivery service to the following address: 65 Madison Avenue, Suite 550, Morristown, NJ 07960. Email communications may be sent to: info@ellsworthfund.com. All shareholder communications that are directed to the Board or an individual trustee of the Trust in his or her capacity as trustee and received by the Shareholder Relations Group shall be promptly forwarded to the individual trustee of the Trust to whom they were addressed or to the full Board, as applicable. Copies of all such shareholder communications will also be distributed to the Chairs of the Trust’s Audit Committee and Governance Committee, and to counsel for the Trust and for the independent trustees. Counsel for the Trust and for the independent trustees, upon receipt of its copy of a shareholder communication, shall work with such Chairs and counsel for the independent trustees to determine whether such shareholder communication should be distributed to any trustees to whom it was not sent and whether and in what manner the trustees should respond to such shareholder communication. Responses, if any, to shareholder communications shall be coordinated by counsel for the Trust and for the independent trustees, working with the Chairs.
Trustees’ Compensation
Mr. Dinsmore and Ms. O’Keeffe are the only trustees of the Trust who are officers of the Trust or Dinsmore Capital. Each trustee who is not an officer of the Trust or Dinsmore Capital currently receives (1) an annual fee of $8,500, (2) $1,000 plus expenses for each Board meeting attended, (3) $1,000 for each shareholders’ meeting attended, and (4) $500 for each Committee meeting attended, with the exception of the sole member of the Investment Committee who received $29,250 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. Each chairperson of the Audit and Governance Committees receives an additional $2,000 annual fee.
Set forth in the table below is the compensation that was paid to the trustees solely by the Trust as well as by the Fund Complex as a whole (which consists of two registered investment companies, the Trust and Bancroft Fund) during the 2014 fiscal year.
10
| Aggregate Compensation From Trust |
Total Compensation From Fund Complex |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thomas H. Dinsmore |
$ | –0– | $ | –0– | ||||||
Jane D. O’Keeffe |
$ | –0– | $ | –0– | ||||||
Kinchen C. Bizzell |
$ | 20,500 | $ | 41,000 | ||||||
Elizabeth C. Bogan, Ph.D. |
$ | 21,000 | $ | 42,000 | ||||||
Daniel D. Harding |
$ | 51,750 | $ | 74,250 | ||||||
Nicolas W. Platt |
$ | 22,000 | $ | 44,000 | ||||||
Security Ownership
The Trust’s trustees, nominees for trustee and officers owned the Trust’s shares as shown on the following table as of November 18, 2014 (officers of the Trust are identified in the “Additional Information – Executive Officers” section of this proxy). The address of each such person is c/o the Trust, 65 Madison Avenue, Morristown, New Jersey 07960.
| Shares of Trust Owned Beneficially * |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kinchen C. Bizzell |
5,081 | |||||
Elizabeth C. Bogan, Ph.D. |
12,339 | |||||
Thomas H. Dinsmore |
73,077 | (1) | ||||
Daniel D. Harding |
11,742 | |||||
Jane D. O’Keeffe |
22,594 | (2) | ||||
Nicolas W. Platt |
500 | |||||
James A. Dinsmore |
3,138 | |||||
H. Tucker Lake, Jr. |
6,236 | (3) | ||||
Gary I. Levine |
4,357 | (4) | ||||
Germaine M. Ortiz |
3,333 | (5) | ||||
Mercedes A. Pierre |
4,731 | (6) | ||||
_________________________________
* Represents for each trustee and officer less than 1% of the outstanding shares of the Trust.
As of November 18, 2014, trustees and officers of the Trust beneficially owned in the aggregate 147,128 shares of the Trust, representing
approximately 1.1% of the outstanding shares. Except as otherwise indicated, each trustee and officer possesses sole investment
and voting power with respect to shares beneficially owned.
(1) Includes (i) 1,662 shares owned by Mr. Dinsmore’s daughter, as to which shares Mr. Dinsmore disclaims beneficial ownership, (ii) 12,288 shares which Mr. Dinsmore owned jointly with his wife, and (iii) 5,350 shares owned solely by his wife, as to which shares Mr. Dinsmore disclaims beneficial ownership.
(2) Includes (i) 2,088 shares held in trust for the benefit of Ms. O’Keeffe’s minor child, (ii) 2,088 shares owned by her daughter, as to which shares Ms. O’Keeffe disclaims beneficial ownership, (iii) 1,386 shares owned jointly with her husband, and (iv) 1,118 shares owned solely by her husband, as to which shares Ms. O’Keeffe disclaims beneficial ownership.
(3) Includes 2,553 shares owned by Mr. Lake’s spouse.
(4) Includes (i) 547 shares as to which Mr. Levine possesses shared investment and voting power, (ii) 881 shares held in trust for the benefit of Mr. Levine’s minor children, and (iii) 2,929 shares owned by his wife.
(5) Includes 928 shares as to which Ms. Ortiz possesses shared investment and voting power.
(6) Includes 679 shares as to which Ms. Pierre possesses shared investment and voting power.
11
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
Based solely on a review of filings with the SEC, the following table provides information about those shareholders that beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Trust.
| Name |
Number of Shares Owned |
Percent of Outstanding Shares |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Trust Portfolios L.P. 120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400 Wheaton, IL 60187(1) |
1,082,966 | 8.1% | ||||||||
| (1) | Based upon information disclosed in a Form 13G dated December 31, 2012 and a Form 13F dated September 30, 2014. |
PROPOSAL 2
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Although not required to do so, the Board seeks your ratification of the Audit Committee’s appointment of Tait Weller as the Trust’s independent registered public accountants for the 2015 fiscal year. The Board believes that shareholders should have the opportunity to vote on this matter. If the appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will meet to select new independent registered public accountants for the Trust’s 2015 fiscal year. We do not expect that a representative from Tait Weller will be present at the Annual Meeting. However, should a Tait Weller representative choose to attend, he or she will have an opportunity to make a statement and to respond to appropriate questions.
Fees Billed by Tait Weller Related to the Trust
Set forth in the table below are the aggregate fees billed to the Trust by Tait Weller for services rendered to the Trust during the Trust’s last two fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2014.
| Fiscal Year Ended September 30 |
Audit Fees |
Audit-Related Fees(1) |
Tax Fees (2) |
All Other Fees |
||||||||||||||
2013 |
$ | 37,500 | $ | 0 | $ | 3,500 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
2014 |
$ | 38,500 | $ | 0 | $ | 3,600 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Tait Weller billed the Trust aggregate non-audit fees of $3,600 for the fiscal year ended 2014, and $3,500 for the fiscal year
ended 2013, for non-audit services rendered to the Trust.
_________________________________
| (1) | The Trust’s Audit Committee pre-approves all Audit-Related Fees. For the Trust’s last two fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and 2014, no Audit-Related Fees were approved by the Trust’s Audit Committee pursuant to section 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X, which waives the pre-approval requirement for certain de minimis fees. |
| (2) | “Tax Fees” include those fees billed by Tait Weller in connection with their review of the Trust’s income tax returns for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and 2014. The Trust’s Audit Committee pre-approves all Tax Fees. For the Trust’s last two fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and 2014, no Tax Fees were approved by the Trust’s Audit Committee pursuant to section 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X, which waives the pre-approval requirement for certain de minimis fees. |
12
Non-Audit Services Billed to Dinsmore Capital
During each of the last two fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2014, Tait Weller did not provide any non-audit services to Dinsmore Capital or its affiliates or otherwise bill Dinsmore Capital or its affiliates for any non-audit services.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services that are proposed to be provided to the Trust by its independent registered public accountants before they are provided to the Trust. Such pre-approval also includes the proposed fees to be charged by the independent registered public accountants for such services. The Audit Committee may delegate the pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services and related fees to one or more members of the Audit Committee who are “independent,” as such term is defined in Rule 10A-3(b)(1)(iii) under the Exchange Act. Any such member’s decision to pre-approve audit and/or non-audit services and related fees shall be presented to the full Audit Committee, solely for informational purposes, at its next scheduled meeting.
The Audit Committee also pre-approves non-audit services to be provided by the Trust’s independent registered public accountants to the Trust’s investment adviser if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Trust and if the Trust’s independent registered public accountants are the same as, or affiliated with, the investment adviser’s registered public accountants.
Required Vote
The affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast is needed to approve the ratification of the Audit Committee’s appointment of the independent registered public accountants. Abstentions will not count as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. We expect that brokers will be entitled to vote on this proposal, but any broker non-vote will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
The Board recommends that you vote FOR Proposal 2.
PROPOSAL 3
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL
A shareholder, Mr. Robert H. Daniels (the Proponent), has informed the Trust that he intends to submit a proposal at the Annual Meeting and has requested that the Trust include the proposal in this year’s proxy material. The Board of Trustees unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST the proposal. The proposal and the Proponent’s supporting statement, exactly as received from the Proponent, are set forth below and are followed by the Board’s explanation of its reasons for opposing the proposal. The Trust will provide promptly to any shareholder, upon receipt of any oral or written request, the Proponent’s address and the number of shares of the Trust’s Shares of Beneficial Interest held by him.
Proposal:
RESOLVED: The shareholders of Ellsworth Fund request that the Trustees begin the process of amending the Declaration of Trust to provide that:
If the shares of Ellsworth Fund Ltd. have traded at an average discount to net asset value of more than 10% during a fiscal year of the Fund, then the Fund will promptly make an [sic] self-tender offer to
13
all shareholders to repurchase 20% of its outstanding shares for cash at 98% of net asset value, with proration if more than 20% are tendered.
Proponent’s Supporting Statement:
Fellow long-term shareholders
The market price of our fund has languished far too long at discounts of 15% or more below net asset value. Ellsworth Fund regularly appears high on the list of closed-end funds ranked by market discount to NAV.
These excessive discounts are not in the interest of long-term holders, for “long-term” does not mean “forever”. Someday we may decide to sell - to pay tuition, to fund retirement, to meet redemption requests. And while anyone can buy shares trading far below market, those selling at depressed prices are by definition existing shareholders. Someday we may be in their position.
We commend the Trustees for their recent decision to buy back 3% of the shares through open market purchases. It is time to follow up. This resolution sets a target of a 10% discount, and lets the Trustees and the Adviser decide how best to achieve it. If -- and only if -- they fall short, the fund would then make a self-tender for 20% of its shares at 98% of NAV. If, as I hope, the Trustees and Adviser succeed in managing the discount, then no self-tender would be required.
Thank you for your support.
***End of Shareholder Proposal***
The Board of Trustees opposes the Shareholder Proposal for the reasons discussed below, and recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 3.
The Board’s Statement of Opposition
After careful and thoughtful consideration, the Board, including all of the independent Trustees, has unanimously concluded that the Shareholder Proposal is not in the best interests of, and would, in fact, be harmful to, the Trust and you, its shareholders. The self-tender offer contemplated by the Shareholder Proposal would require the Trust to purchase up to 20% of its outstanding shares at a price equal to 98% of their net asset value per share (“NAV”). The Board does not believe that such a tender offer balances the interests of all shareholders and does not believe it is appropriate to benefit shareholders with shorter-term investment horizons to the detriment of shareholders with longer-term investment horizons. The Board believes that implementing the tender offer as contemplated by the Shareholder Proposal would have significant adverse effects, including those mentioned below, which would be borne completely or disproportionately by those shares not tendered or taken.
The Board believes that a tender offer for 20% of the Trust’s outstanding shares of beneficial interest, as set forth in the Shareholder Proposal:
| · | Would make the Trust less economical to operate because some expenses cannot be reduced even though the Trust will be smaller. Further since the Management Contract contains a significant break point at $100 million in assets, the average cost per dollar managed will increase if the assets are reduced; |
| · | Could pressure the Trust to quickly sell a large portion of its portfolio and the Trust might be forced to sell securities for lower prices than if it were able to sell those securities over a longer period of time; |
14
| · | Could force the Trust to sell attractive positions at a time when the Portfolio Managers believe such sales would be inadvisable from an investment perspective; |
| · | Would require the Trust to incur significant costs and transactional expenses, resulting from the sale of securities that consequently, to the extent these costs and expenses are not accrued prior to expiration of the proposed tender offer, would be borne either completely or disproportionately by shareholders who do not tender their shares in the proposed tender offer. A significant decrease in assets would lead to an increase in the Trust’s expense ratio, which would affect long-term shareholders who do not tender their shares; |
| · | Would make it possible for some short-term shareholders to pressure the price of the shares to remain at a high discount in order to force the Trust to tender; and |
| · | Could lead to a series of detrimental self-liquidating 20% annual tenders, which would sharply reduce Trust assets, and affect the Trust’s ability to retain an investment manager and continue operations. |
Additionally, the Board has proactively sought to improve share valuation. It authorized a 3% share buy-back program in 2013 that was executed and completed in 2014. The Board also authorized on October 20, 2014 a substantial $0.35 per share distribution of net investment income and long-term capital gains payable November 26, 2014. Further on November 19, 2014, the Board announced a 5% minimum distribution policy effective in calendar year 2015, and a second 3% share repurchase program that was recently increased to 7%.
From the time the Trust was founded through 2006 the Trust had a provision in its charter that was similar, but not exactly the same as the Shareholder Proposal. This provision required a vote allowing the possible presentment of shares in each year that the discount exceeded 5% for a specified period of time. The provision did not seem to affect the discount and never received as much as 20% of the shares in favor.
Although the Board believes the Shareholder Proposal is not in the best interests of the Trust and its shareholders, the Board has examined and continues to examine options to enhance long-term shareholder value, including ways to address the Trust’s discount from NAV, in a suitable manner in light of the current economic environment.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS PROTECTING THE LONG-TERM INTERESTS OF THE SHAREHOLDERS OF THE TRUST BY VOTING “AGAINST” THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.
Required Vote
The vote of a majority of the shares cast is needed to adopt the proposed resolution in Proposal 3. Abstentions will not count as votes cast, and will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 3. Any broker non-vote will have no effect on the outcome of Proposal 3.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON VOTING
Voting by Proxy
Whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting or not, we urge you to complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and to return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you are the record owner of your shares on the books of the Trust’s transfer agent, then you may also submit your proxy vote by telephone or via the Internet, by following the instructions accompanying this Proxy Statement. If your
15
broker holds your shares in its name, you may submit your proxy vote by any other means specified in the instructions that accompany this Proxy Statement. Returning the proxy card or using any of the available alternative proxy voting methods will not affect your right to attend the Annual Meeting and vote.
If you properly fill in your proxy card and send it to us in time to vote or use any of the available alternative proxy voting methods, your “proxy” (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares as you have directed. If you sign the proxy card or use any of the available alternative proxy voting methods but do not make specific choices, your proxy will vote your shares as recommended by the Board as follows and in accordance with management’s recommendation on other matters:
| · | FOR the election of all nominees for trustees. |
| · | FOR ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accountants for 2015. |
| · | AGAINST the shareholder proposal that would request that the trustees of the Trust begin the process of amending the Declaration of Trust. |
Your proxy will also have authority to vote and act on your behalf at any adjournment of the meeting.
If you authorize a proxy to vote for you, you may revoke the authorization at any time before it is exercised. You can do this in one of four ways:
| · | You may send in another proxy with a later date. |
| · | If you submitted a proxy by telephone, via the Internet or via an alternative method of voting permitted by your broker, you may submit another proxy by telephone, via the Internet, or via such alternative method of voting, or send in another proxy with a later date. |
| · | You may notify the Trust’s Secretary in writing before the Annual Meeting that you have revoked your proxy. |
| · | You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting if you were the record owner of your shares on the record date. |
Voting in Person
If you do attend the Annual Meeting, were the record owner of your shares on the record date, and wish to vote in person, we will give you a ballot when you arrive. However, if your shares were held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee on the record date, you must bring a letter from the nominee indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on December 15, 2014, the record date for voting, and authorizing you to vote. The letter must also state whether you authorized a proxy to vote for you before the Annual Meeting and, if so, how you instructed such proxy to vote.
Quorum Requirement
A quorum of shareholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will exist if shareholders entitled to vote a majority of all shares outstanding on the record date are present in person or by proxy. Broker non-votes, if any, and abstentions will count as present for establishing a quorum.
16
Adjournments
If a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting or a quorum is present but sufficient votes to approve a proposal are not received, the persons named as proxies may propose one or more adjournments of the Annual Meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies. Any such adjournment will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy.
The persons named as proxies will vote those proxies they are entitled to vote “for” a proposal in favor of such an adjournment and will vote those proxies required to be voted “against” such proposal against such an adjournment. A shareholder vote may be taken on a proposal in this Proxy Statement prior to any such adjournment if sufficient votes have been received and it is otherwise appropriate.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Investment Adviser
Dinsmore Capital Management Co., 65 Madison Avenue, Morristown, New Jersey 07960, is the Trust’s investment adviser.
Executive Officers
The Trust’s executive officers are elected by the Board, receive no compensation from the Trust and hold office until the meeting of the Board following the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. Information about these officers is presented below.
|
Name,
Age and Position(s) |
Officer Since |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
| Thomas H. Dinsmore – 61 Trustee, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
1986 | Information about Mr. Dinsmore is presented earlier in this proxy statement under “Proposal 1, Election of Trustees – Information About the Trust’s Other Trustees - Continuing Trustee Who Is an Interested Person.” |
| James A. Dinsmore – 32 President |
2007 | President of the Trust (since February 2014). Executive Vice President of the Trust (January 2013 until February 2014). Executive Vice President of Bancroft Fund and Dinsmore Capital (since January 2013); Vice President of the Trust, Bancroft Fund and Dinsmore Capital (2009 through 2012), Director of Dinsmore Capital. |
| Jane D. O’Keeffe – 59 Trustee and Executive Vice President |
1994 | Information about Ms. O’Keeffe is presented earlier in this proxy statement under “Proposal 1, Election of Trustees – Information About the Trust’s Nominees - Nominee Who Is an Interested Person.” |
| H. Tucker Lake, Jr. – 67 Vice President |
1994 | Vice President of the Trust, Bancroft Fund and Dinsmore Capital. |
| Gary I. Levine – 57 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
1986 | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Trust, Bancroft Fund and Dinsmore Capital. |
| Germaine M. Ortiz – 45 Vice President |
1998 | Vice President of the Trust, Bancroft Fund and Dinsmore Capital. |
17
|
Name,
Age and Position(s) |
Officer Since |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
| Mercedes A. Pierre – 53 Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer |
1997 | Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust, Bancroft Fund and Dinsmore Capital. |
Certain Relationships
Thomas H. Dinsmore and Ms. O’Keeffe are brother and sister. Thomas H. Dinsmore is the father of, and Ms. O’Keeffe is the aunt of, James A. Dinsmore. H. Tucker Lake, Jr. is the first cousin of Thomas H. Dinsmore and Ms. O’Keeffe. Ms. Ortiz is the first cousin of Mr. Levine’s wife.
Dollar Range of Securities Held by Trustees and Nominees
Set forth below is the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned (1) in both the Trust and Fund Complex by each trustee and each nominee for election as a trustee of the Trust as of November 18, 2014. (2)
|
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Trust (3) |
Aggregate Dollar Range in Fund Complex (4) |
|||
| Kinchen C. Bizzell | $10,001-$50,000 | $50,001-$100,000 | |||
| Elizabeth C. Bogan, Ph.D | over $100,000 | over $100,000 | |||
| Thomas H. Dinsmore | over $100,000 | over $100,000 | |||
| Daniel D. Harding | $50,001-$100,000 | over $100,000 | |||
| Jane D. O’Keeffe | over $100,000 | over $100,000 | |||
| Nicolas W. Platt | $1-$10,000 | $1-$10,000 | |||
| _______________________________ |
| (1) | Beneficial ownership has been determined based upon the trustee’s or nominee’s direct or indirect pecuniary interest in the equity securities. |
| (2) | The dollar ranges are: $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000, $50,001-$100,000, or over $100,000. |
| (3) | The dollar range of equity securities owned in the Trust is based on the closing price of $8.51 on November 18, 2014 on the NYSE MKT LLC stock exchange. |
| (4) | The dollar range of equity securities owned in the Fund Complex is based on the closing price of $8.51 for the Trust and $20.13 for Bancroft Fund on November 18, 2014 on the NYSE MKT LLC stock exchange. |
Proxy Solicitation
The Trust expects to solicit proxies principally by mail. The Trust will pay the cost of soliciting proxies and may reimburse third parties for their expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of the Trust’s shares. Officers of the Trust may also solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile, the Internet or personal interview, and will not receive any additional compensation for such solicitation.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, Section 30(h) of the Investment Company Act, and the regulations of the SEC thereunder, require the Trust’s officers and trustees and direct or indirect
18
beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Trust’s shares, as well as Dinsmore Capital, its directors and officers and certain of its other affiliated persons (collectively, Reporting Persons), to file initial reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Reporting Persons are required to furnish the Trust with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on its review of the copies of such forms received by it and written representations, the Trust believes that all filing requirements applicable to the Reporting Persons have been complied with on a timely basis during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.
Shareholder Proposals
If you would like us to consider including a shareholder proposal in the Trust’s proxy statement for the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders, we must receive it from you no later than August 1, 2015. To be eligible to submit a proposal, you must demonstrate satisfaction of the requirements for making shareholder proposals set forth in the proxy rules promulgated by the SEC.
A shareholder may bring other business before the 2016 Annual Meeting of shareholders if: (1) the shareholder is a shareholder of record at the time of giving notice to the Trust; (2) the shareholder is entitled to vote at the 2016 Annual Meeting; (3) the shareholder has complied with the notice procedures in the Trust’s bylaws; and (4) such other business is otherwise a proper matter for action by shareholders. The notice procedures require that a shareholder submit the proposal in writing to the Secretary of the Trust no earlier than October 12, 2015 but no later than November 11, 2015. The notice must include a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the 2016 Annual Meeting, the reasons for conducting such business at the 2016 Annual Meeting, and any material interest the shareholder and any beneficial owners on whose behalf the proposal is made may have in such business. The notice must also include the shareholder’s name and address as they appear on the Trust’s books (and the name and address of any beneficial owner on whose behalf the proposal is made), as well as the number of shares owned of record and beneficially by such shareholder and beneficial owner.
Householding of Proxy Materials
Certain shareholders who share the same address may receive only one copy of this Proxy Statement and the Trust’s annual report to shareholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 in accordance with a notice delivered from such shareholders’ bank, broker or other holder of record, unless the applicable bank, broker or other holder of record received contrary instructions. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce printing and postage costs. Shareholders who own their shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record who wish either to discontinue or commence householding, or wish to receive a separate copy of the Proxy Statement or the Trust’s annual report to shareholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, may do so by contacting their bank, broker or other holder of record at the telephone number or address provided in the above referenced notice. Shareholders who are requesting to commence or discontinue householding should provide their name, the name of their broker, bank or other record holder and their account information.
By order
of the Board of Trustees, |
|||||||||
/s/ THOMAS H. DINSMORE |
|||||||||
Thomas
H. Dinsmore Chairman of the Board of Trustees |
|||||||||
December 29, 2014
19
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
ELLSWORTH FUND LTD.
February 9, 2015
GO GREEN:
e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy
material, statements and other
eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and
paper waste. Enroll today via www.amstock.com to enjoy online
access.
NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL:
The Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement and Proxy Card
are available at http://www.astproxyportal.com/ast/12198/
Please sign, date and mail
your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon
as possible.
ê Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided. ê
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
||||||
|
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR |
|
2. PROPOSAL TO RATIFY SELECTION OF ACCOUNTANTS. |
o |
o |
o |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
1. ELECTION OF TRUSTEES: |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS VOTING AGAINST PROPOSAL 3. |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
NOMINEES: |
|
||||||||||
|
o |
FOR ALL NOMINEES |
|
m |
Kinchen C. Bizzell |
|
|
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAIN |
|||||
|
|
|
|
m |
Jane D. O’Keeffe |
|
3. If properly presented, to act upon a shareholder proposal recommending that the Board of Trustees consider amending the Trust’s Declaration of Trust. |
o |
o |
o |
|||||
|
o |
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
o |
FOR ALL EXCEPT |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
INSTRUCTIONS: |
To withhold authority to vote for any individual l |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method. |
o |
|
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote on such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting. This proxy when properly executed will be voted as directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR ALL NOMINEES in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposal 2. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature of Shareholder |
|
Date: |
|
Signature of Shareholder |
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
|
ELLSWORTH FUND LTD.
Proxy for Annual Meeting of Shareholders on February 9, 2015
Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Trustees
The undersigned hereby appoints Thomas H. Dinsmore, Gary I. Levine, and Jane D. O Keeffe, and any one of them separately, attorneys and proxies, with power of substitution in each, to vote and act on behalf of the undersigned at the annual meeting of shareholders of Ellsworth Fund Ltd. (the “Trust”) at The Madison Hotel, 1 Convent Road, Morristown, New Jersey 07960 on February 9, 2015 at 10 a.m., and at all adjournments or postponements thereof, according to the number of beneficial shares which the undersigned could vote if present, upon such subjects as may properly come before the meeting, all as set forth in the notice of the meeting and the proxy statement furnished therewith. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE SHAREHOLDER(S). IF NO SUCH DIRECTIONS ARE MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES.
PLEASE FILL IN, DATE AND SIGN THE PROXY CARD ON THE OTHER SIDE
AND RETURN IT PROMPTLY IN THE ACCOMPANYING ENVELOPE
|
|
|
|
|
|
14475 |
|