
Oilfield services company ProPetro (NYSE: PUMP) missed Wall Street’s revenue expectations in Q1 CY2026, with sales falling 24.7% year on year to $270.7 million. Its GAAP loss of $0.03 per share was 73% above analysts’ consensus estimates.
Is now the time to buy ProPetro? Find out by accessing our full research report, it’s free.
ProPetro (PUMP) Q1 CY2026 Highlights:
- Revenue: $270.7 million vs analyst estimates of $272.9 million (24.7% year-on-year decline, 0.8% miss)
- EPS (GAAP): -$0.03 vs analyst estimates of -$0.11 (73% beat)
- Adjusted EBITDA: $36.39 million vs analyst estimates of $36.47 million (13.4% margin, in line)
- Operating Margin: -3%, down from 2.6% in the same quarter last year
- Free Cash Flow was -$38.13 million, down from $21.54 million in the same quarter last year
- Market Capitalization: $2.23 billion
Sam Sledge, Chief Executive Officer, commented, “ProPetro’s first quarter results once again demonstrated the resiliency of our business model. Despite weather-related disruptions that impacted activity and profitability, we delivered positive financial results in our completions business, particularly when measured by Adjusted EBITDA less incurred capital expenditures. These results highlight the strength of our industrialized model, which is the result of strategic investments, disciplined asset deployment, and rigorous cost management. The actions we took throughout 2025 to protect our assets and right-size our cost structure are benefiting us today and position us to perform successfully in this market.
Company Overview
Operating exclusively in the Permian Basin—one of America's most prolific oil-producing regions—ProPetro (NYSE: PUMP) provides hydraulic fracturing services that pump high-pressure fluid and sand into oil wells to release trapped hydrocarbons.
Revenue Growth
A company’s long-term performance can give signals about its business quality. Even a bad business, especially in a cyclical industry, can shine for a year or so, but a top-tier one should exhibit resilience through cycles. Luckily, ProPetro’s sales grew at an impressive 16.3% compounded annual growth rate over the last five years. Its growth beat the average energy upstream and integrated energy company and shows its offerings resonate with customers.

Within Energy, a singular timeframe, even if it’s quite long-term, only sheds light on how well a company rode the last commodity cycle. To better assess whether a company compounds through cycles, we validate our view with an even longer, ten-year view. ProPetro’s annualized revenue growth of 9.3% over the last ten years is below its five-year trend, but we still think the results suggest decent demand.
This quarter, ProPetro missed Wall Street’s estimates and reported a rather uninspiring 24.7% year-on-year revenue decline, generating $270.7 million of revenue.
ONE MORE THING: The $21 AI Application Stock Wall Street Forgot. While Wall Street obsesses over who’s building AI, one company is already using it to print money. And nobody’s paying attention.
AI chip stocks trade at ridiculous valuations. This company processes a trillion consumer signals monthly using AI and trades at a third of the price. The gap won’t last. The institutions will figure it out. You need to see this first. Read the FREE Report Before They Notice.
Adjusted EBITDA Margin
Adjusted EBITDA margin captures the true operating profitability of an energy producer by removing accounting noise around depletion and capitalized drilling costs. It reveals how much cash the asset base generates before capital structure and reinvestment requirements shape reported earnings.
ProPetro was profitable over the last five years but held back by its large cost base. Its average EBITDA margin of 20.6% was weak for an upstream and integrated energy business.
Analyzing the trend in its profitability, ProPetro’s EBITDA margin decreased by 3.6 percentage points over the last year. This raises questions about the company’s expense base because its revenue growth should have given it leverage on its fixed costs, resulting in better economies of scale and profitability. ProPetro’s performance was poor no matter how you look at it - it shows that costs were rising and it couldn’t pass them onto its customers.

In Q1, ProPetro generated an EBITDA margin profit margin of 13.4%, down 6.8 percentage points year on year. This contraction shows it was less efficient because its expenses increased relative to its revenue. This adjusted EBITDA is in-line with Wall Street’s estimates.
Cash Is King
Adjusted EBITDA shows how profitable a company’s existing “rock” is before financing and reinvestment, while free cash flow shows how much value remains after paying to replace those wells. Because production declines over time, strong EBITDA can coexist with weak FCF if drilling is expensive or declines are steep. FCF therefore captures both operating efficiency and the cost of sustaining production.
ProPetro has shown weak cash profitability relative to peers over the last five years, giving the company fewer opportunities to return capital to shareholders. Its free cash flow margin averaged 2%, below what we’d expect for an upstream and integrated energy business.
Absolute FCF margin levels matter but so does stability of free cash flow. All else equal, we’d prefer a 25.0% average free cash flow margin that is quite steady no matter how commodity prices behave rather than extremely high margins when times are good and negative ones when they’re tough.
ProPetro’s ratio of quarterly free cash flow volatility to WTI crude price volatility over the past five years was 26.4 (lower is better), indicating that its cash generation is far more sensitive to commodity-price swings than most peers. This elevated volatility limits its access to capital in downturns and makes it unlikely to act as a consolidator when weaker competitors come under pressure.
You may be asking why we wait until the free cash flow line to perform this stability analysis versus commodity prices. Why not compare revenue or EBITDA to WTI Crude prices in the case of ProPetro? Because what ultimately matters is not how much revenue or profit you earn when prices are high but how much cash you can generate when prices are low. Free cash flow is the superior metric because it includes everything from hedging prowess to growth and maintenance capex to management behavior during good times and bad.

ProPetro burned through $38.13 million of cash in Q1, equivalent to a negative 14.1% margin. The company’s cash flow turned negative after being positive in the same quarter last year, prompting us to pay closer attention. Short-term fluctuations typically aren’t a big deal because investment needs can be seasonal, but we’ll be watching to see if the trend extrapolates into future quarters.
Key Takeaways from ProPetro’s Q1 Results
It was good to see ProPetro beat analysts’ EPS expectations this quarter. On the other hand, its revenue slightly missed. Overall, this print had some key positives. Investors were likely hoping for more, and shares traded down 9.5% to $16.48 immediately following the results.
Should you buy the stock or not? We think that the latest quarter is only one piece of the longer-term business quality puzzle. Quality, when combined with valuation, can help determine if the stock is a buy. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here (it’s free).