The following table indicates the amount of regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on the
Companys consolidated balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Regulatory assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
$ |
15,387 |
|
|
$ |
16,724 |
|
Accrued cost-of-energy revenue |
|
|
15,410 |
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
Reacquisition premiums |
|
|
2,843 |
|
|
|
2,995 |
|
Deferred marked-to-market losses |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
Deferred conservation program costs |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
Accumulated ARO accretion/depreciation adjustment |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
Plant acquisition costs |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total regulatory assets |
|
$ |
35,893 |
|
|
$ |
33,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated reserve for estimated removal costs |
|
$ |
52,812 |
|
|
$ |
52,582 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,595 |
|
|
|
5,961 |
|
Deferred marked-to-market gains |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
Gain on sale of division office building |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total regulatory liabilities |
|
$ |
60,560 |
|
|
$ |
61,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net regulatory liability position |
|
$ |
24,667 |
|
|
$ |
28,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The regulatory assets and liabilities related to deferred income taxes result from changes in
statutory tax rates accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
Reacquisition premiums included in Unamortized debt expense and reacquisition premiums are being
recovered from electric utility customers over the remaining original lives of the reacquired debt
issues, the longest of which is 16.1 years. Deferred conservation program costs represent mandated
conservation expenditures recoverable through retail electric rates over the next 1.5 years. Plant
acquisition costs will be amortized over the next 3.9 years. Accrued cost-of-energy revenue
included in Accrued utility revenues will be recovered over the next 13 months. All deferred
marked-to-market gains and losses are related to forward purchases and sales of energy scheduled
for delivery prior to January 2007. The accumulated reserve for estimated removal costs is reduced
for actual removal costs incurred. The remaining regulatory assets and liabilities are being
recovered from, or will be paid to, electric customers over the next 30 years.
If for any reason, the Companys regulated businesses cease to meet the criteria for application of
SFAS No. 71 for all or part of their operations, the regulatory assets and liabilities that no
longer meet such criteria would be removed from the consolidated balance sheet and included in the
consolidated statement of income as an extraordinary expense or income item in the period in which
the application of SFAS No. 71 ceases.
Share-based Payments
On January 1, 2006 the Company adopted the accounting provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment, on a modified prospective basis. SFAS No. 123(R) is a revision of SFAS No.
123,
Accounting for Stock-based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees. Under SFAS No. 123(R), the Company records stock-based compensation as
an expense on its income statement over the period earned based on the estimated fair value of the
stock or options awarded on their grant date. The Company elected the modified prospective method
of adopting SFAS No. 123(R), under which prior periods are not retroactively revised. The valuation
provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) apply to awards granted after the effective date. Estimated
stock-based compensation expense for awards granted prior to the effective date but that remain
13
nonvested on the effective date will be recognized over the remaining service period using the
compensation cost estimated for the SFAS No. 123 pro forma disclosures. Additionally, the adoption
of SFAS No. 123(R) resulted in the reclassification of $798,000 in credits related to outstanding
restricted share-based compensation from equity on the Companys consolidated balance sheet to a
liability on January 1, 2006 because of income tax withholding provisions in the share-based award
agreements. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) also resulted in the elimination of Unearned compensation
(contra-equity account) from the equity section of the Companys consolidated balance sheet on
January 1, 2006 by netting the account balance of $1,720,000 against Premium on common shares.
On April 10, 2006, the Companys shareholders approved amendments to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan,
as Amended (Incentive Plan) increasing the number of common shares available under the Incentive
Plan from 2,600,000 common shares to 3,600,000 common shares, extending the term of the Incentive
Plan from December 13, 2008 to December 13, 2013 and making certain other changes to the terms of
the Incentive Plan.
As of June 30, 2006, the total remaining unrecognized amount of compensation expense related to
stock-based compensation was approximately $4.6 million (before income taxes), which will be
amortized over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years.
The Company has six share-based payment programs. The effect of SFAS No. 123(R) accounting on each
of these programs is explained in the following paragraphs.
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended (Purchase Plan)
On April 10, 2006, the Companys shareholders approved an amendment to the Purchase Plan increasing
the number of common shares available under the Purchase Plan from 400,000 common shares to 900,000
common shares.
The Purchase Plan allows employees through payroll withholding to purchase shares of the Companys
common stock at a 15% discount from the average market price on the last day of a six month
investment period. Under SFAS 123(R) the Company is required to record compensation expense related
to the 15% discount which was not required under APB No. 25. Based on the participants current
level of withholdings, the Company estimates that the 15% discount will amount to approximately
$240,000 in 2006. The Company recorded $120,000 in compensation expense for the six month period
ended June 30, 2006 related to the Purchase Plan. The 15% discount is not taxable to the employee
and is not a deductible expense for tax purposes for the Company. The shares to be purchased by
employees participating in the Purchase Plan are not considered dilutive for the purpose of
calculating diluted earnings per share during the investment period. At the discretion of the
Company, shares purchased under the Purchase Plan can be either new issue shares or shares
purchased in the open market. The purchase of 27,543 common shares in the open market to satisfy
the requirements of the Purchase Plan for the six month investment period ended June 30, 2006, was
completed on August 1, 2006.
Stock Options Granted Under the Incentive Plan
Since the inception of the Incentive Plan in 1999, the Company has granted 2,041,500 options for
the purchase of the Companys common stock. Of the options
granted, 2,000,286 had vested or were
forfeited and 41,214 were not vested as of June 30, 2006. The exercise price of the options granted
has been the average market price of the Companys common stock on the grant date. These options
were not compensatory under APB No. 25 accounting rules. Under SFAS No.123(R) accounting,
compensation expense will be recorded based on the estimated fair value of the options on their
grant date using a fair-value option pricing model. Under SFAS No. 123(R) accounting, the fair
value of the options granted will be recorded as compensation expense over the requisite service
period (the vesting period of the options). The estimated fair value of all options granted under
the Incentive Plan has been based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Under the modified prospective application of SFAS No.123(R) accounting requirements, the
difference between the intrinsic value of nonvested options and the fair value of those options of
$362,000 ($217,000 net-of-tax) on
14
January 1, 2006 is being recognized on a straight-line basis as compensation expense over the remaining vesting period of the nonvested options, which, for
nonvested options outstanding on January 1, 2006, will be from January 1, 2006 through April 30,
2007. Accordingly, the Company recorded compensation expense related to nonvested options issued
under the Incentive Plan for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 of $68,000
($41,000 net-of-tax) and $136,000 ($82,000 net-of-tax), respectively.
Had compensation expense for stock options been determined based on estimated fair value at the
award date, as prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Companys net income for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2005 would have decreased as presented in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
22,304 |
|
|
$ |
32,275 |
|
Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all
stock option awards net of related tax effects |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
22,127 |
|
|
$ |
31,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
For the purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share, the underlying shares of all vested and
nonvested in-the-money options (options where the reporting date market price of underlying shares
exceeds the exercise price of the options) are considered dilutive.
Presented below is a summary of the stock options activity for the six months ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
price |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2006 |
|
|
1,237,164 |
|
|
$ |
25.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
52,415 |
|
|
$ |
22.89 |
|
|
$ |
371 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
25,423 |
|
|
$ |
29.27 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, June 30, 2006 |
|
|
1,159,326 |
|
|
$ |
25.64 |
|
|
$ |
3,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, June 30, 2006 |
|
|
1,118,112 |
|
|
$ |
25.58 |
|
|
$ |
3,008 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total intrinsic value (before
income taxes), based on the average market price of the Companys common stock on June 30, 2006,
which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options
on that date.
The Company received cash of $1,200,000 for options exercised in the first half of 2006.
15
The following table summarizes information about options outstanding as of June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding |
|
|
Options exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
average |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
average |
|
Range of |
|
as of |
|
|
contractual |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
as of |
|
|
exercise |
|
exercise prices |
|
6/30/06 |
|
|
life (yrs) |
|
|
price |
|
|
6/30/06 |
|
|
price |
|
|
$18.80-$21.94 |
|
|
279,213 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
19.48 |
|
|
|
279,213 |
|
|
$ |
19.48 |
|
$21.95-$25.07 |
|
|
62,850 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
24.93 |
|
|
|
62,850 |
|
|
$ |
24.93 |
|
$25.08-$28.21 |
|
|
595,263 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
26.53 |
|
|
|
554,049 |
|
|
$ |
26.47 |
|
$28.22-$31.34 |
|
|
222,000 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
31.20 |
|
|
|
222,000 |
|
|
$ |
31.20 |
|
Restricted Stock Granted to Directors
Under the Incentive Plan, restricted shares of the Companys common stock have been granted to
members of the Companys Board of Directors as a form of compensation. Under APB No. 25 accounting
rules, the Company had recognized compensation expense for these restricted stock grants, ratably,
over the four-year vesting period of the restricted shares based on the market value of the
Companys common stock on the grant date. Under the modified prospective application of SFAS
No.123(R) accounting requirements, compensation expense related to nonvested restricted shares
outstanding will be recorded based on the estimated fair value of the restricted shares on their
grant dates. On April 9, 2006 the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors
granted 19,800 shares of restricted stock to the directors under the Incentive Plan. The restricted
shares vest ratably over a four-year vesting period. The amount of compensation expense recorded
related to nonvested restricted shares granted to directors under SFAS No. 123(R) for the three and
six month periods ended June 30, 2006 was $170,000 ($102,000 net-of-tax) and $241,000 ($145,000
net-of-tax), respectively. The amount of compensation expense recorded related to nonvested
restricted shares granted to directors based on the intrinsic value of the restricted stock grants
under APB No. 25 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 was $65,000 ($39,000
net-of-tax) and $119,000 ($71,000 net-of-tax), respectively. Nonvested restricted shares granted to
directors are considered dilutive for the purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share but are
considered contingently returnable and not outstanding for the purpose of calculating basic
earnings per share.
Presented below is a summary of the status of directors restricted stock awards for the six months
ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
grant-date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
Nonvested, January 1, 2006 |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
$ |
24.59 |
|
Granted |
|
|
19,800 |
|
|
$ |
28.24 |
|
Vested (fair
value: $376,000) |
|
|
14,025 |
|
|
$ |
26.82 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, June 30, 2006 |
|
|
32,775 |
|
|
$ |
27.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Granted to Employees
Under the Incentive Plan, restricted shares of the Companys common stock have been granted to
employees as a form of compensation. Under APB No. 25 accounting rules, the Company had recognized
compensation expense for these restricted stock grants, ratably, over the vesting periods of the
restricted shares based on the market value of the Companys common stock on the grant date.
Because of income tax withholding provisions in the restricted stock award agreements related to
restricted stock granted to employees, the value of these grants is considered variable, which,
under SFAS No. 123(R), will require the offsetting credit to compensation expense to be recorded as
a liability. Under the modified prospective application of SFAS No.123(R) accounting requirements and
16
accounting rules for variable awards, compensation expense related to nonvested restricted
shares granted to employees will be recorded based on the estimated fair value of the restricted
shares on their grant dates and adjusted for the estimated fair value of any nonvested restricted
shares on each subsequent reporting date. The reporting date fair value of nonvested restricted
shares under this program will be based on the average market value of the Companys common stock
on the reporting date.
The amount of compensation expense recorded related to nonvested restricted shares granted to
employees based on the estimated fair value of the restricted stock grants under SFAS No. 123(R)
for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 was $151,000 ($91,000 net-of-tax) and
$442,000 ($265,000 net-of-tax), respectively. The amount of compensation expense recorded related
to nonvested restricted shares granted to employees based on the intrinsic value of the restricted
stock grants under APB No. 25 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 was $278,000
($167,000 net-of-tax) and $549,000 ($329,000 net-of-tax), respectively. The equity account,
Unearned compensation, was credited when compensation expense was recorded related to these shares
under APB No. 25 accounting. Under SFAS 123(R) accounting, a current liability account is credited
when compensation expense is recorded. Accumulated liabilities related to nonvested restricted
shares issued to employees under this program will be reversed and credited to the Premium on
common shares equity account as the shares vest. Nonvested restricted shares granted to employees
are considered dilutive for the purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share but are
considered contingently returnable and not outstanding for the purpose of calculating basic
earnings per share.
Presented below is a summary of the status of employees restricted stock awards for the six months
ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reporting-date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
Nonvested, January 1, 2006 |
|
|
72,974 |
|
|
$ |
28.91 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested (fair value: $1,167,000) |
|
|
41,308 |
|
|
$ |
28.25 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, June 30, 2006 |
|
|
31,666 |
|
|
$ |
27.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units Granted to Employees
On April 9, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors granted 47,425
restricted stock units at a weighted average grant-date fair value of $25.41 per unit to key
employees under the Incentive Plan payable in common shares. Each unit is automatically converted
into one share of common stock on vesting. Vesting occurs from April 10, 2006 through April 8,
2010, with a weighted average contractual term of stock units outstanding as of June 30, 2006 of
3.1 years.
Presented below is a summary of the status of employees restricted stock unit awards for the six
months ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Aggregate grant- |
|
|
|
stock |
|
|
date fair value |
|
|
|
units |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Outstanding, January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
47,425 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
Converted |
|
|
7,450 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, June 30, 2006 |
|
|
39,045 |
|
|
$ |
962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of compensation expense recorded related to both vested and nonvested restricted stock
units granted to employees in April 2006 based on the estimated fair value of the restricted stock
unit grants under SFAS No.
17
123(R) using a Monte Carlo valuation method for both the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2006 was $289,000 ($173,000 net-of-tax). The underlying shares related
to nonvested restricted stock units granted to employees are considered dilutive for the purpose of
calculating diluted earnings per share.
Stock Performance Awards granted to Executive Officers
The Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors has approved stock performance award
agreements under the Incentive Plan for the Companys executive officers. Under these agreements,
the officers could be awarded shares of the Companys common stock based on the Companys total
shareholder return relative to that of its peer group of companies in the Edison Electric Institute
(EEI) Index over a three-year period beginning on January 1 of the year the awards are granted. The
number of shares earned, if any, will be awarded and issued at the end of each three-year
performance measurement period. The participants have no voting or dividend rights under these
award agreements until the shares are issued at the end of the performance measurement period.
Under APB No. 25 accounting, these awards were valued based on the average market price of the
underlying shares of the Companys common stock on the award grant date, multiplied by the
estimated probable number of shares to be awarded at the end of the performance measurement period
with compensation expenses recorded ratably over the related three-year measurement period.
Compensation expense recognized was adjusted at each reporting date subsequent to the grant date of
the awards for the difference between the market value of the underlying shares on their grant date
and the market value of the underlying shares on the reporting date. Under the modified prospective
application of SFAS No.123(R) accounting requirements, the amount of compensation expense that will
be recorded subsequent to January 1, 2006 related to awards granted in 2004 and 2005 and
outstanding on June 30, 2006 is based on the estimated grant-date fair value of the awards as
determined under the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
On April 9, 2006 the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors granted stock
performance awards to the Companys executive officers under the Incentive Plan. Under these
awards, the Companys executive officers could earn up to an aggregate of 88,050 common shares
based on the Companys total shareholder return relative to the total shareholder return of the
companies that comprise the EEI Index over the performance period of January 1, 2006 through
December 31, 2008. The aggregate target share award is 58,700 shares. Actual payment may range from
zero to 150 percent of the target amount. The executive officers have no voting or dividend rights
related to these shares until the shares, if any, are issued at the end of the performance period.
The amount of compensation expense that will be recorded related to awards granted in April 2006
and outstanding on June 30, 2006 is based on the estimated grant-date fair value of the awards as
determined under a Monte Carlo valuation method.
The table below provides a summary of amounts expensed for the stock performance awards for the
three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
Shares |
|
Amount of expense |
|
Amount of expense |
|
|
shares |
|
used to |
|
during the three |
|
during the six |
Performance |
|
subject |
|
estimate |
|
months ended |
|
months ended |
period |
|
to award |
|
expense |
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004-2006 |
|
|
70,500 |
|
|
|
23,500 |
|
|
$ |
47,000 |
|
|
$ |
323,000 |
|
|
$ |
94,000 |
|
|
$ |
323,000 |
|
2005-2007 |
|
|
75,150 |
|
|
|
50,872 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
169,000 |
|
|
|
187,000 |
|
|
|
169,000 |
|
2006-2008 |
|
|
88,050 |
|
|
|
58,700 |
|
|
|
254,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
233,700 |
|
|
|
133,072 |
|
|
$ |
395,000 |
|
|
$ |
492,000 |
|
|
$ |
535,000 |
|
|
$ |
492,000 |
|
|
For the purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share, shares expected to be awarded are
considered dilutive. Currently, the Company intends to purchase shares on the open market for stock
performance awards earned.
18
Class B Stock Options and Class B Stock of Subsidiary
In 2006, IPH granted 305 options to purchase IPH Class B Common Stock to five employees at an
exercise price of $2,085.88 per option. The options vested immediately on issuance. On the date the
options were granted the value of a share of IPH Class B common stock was estimated to be
$1,041.71. Therefore, the grant-date fair value of the options was $0 and no expense or liability
was recorded related to these options under SFAS No. 123(R). Prior to the 2006 grant there were
options for 755 shares of IPH Class B Common Stock outstanding. As of June 30, 2006, there were
1,060 options outstanding with a combined exercise price of $952,000, of which 755 options were
in-the-money with a combined exercise price of $316,000.
Common Shares and Earnings per Share
In the first six months of 2006 the Company issued 51,915 common shares for stock options
exercised, 1,111 common shares and 19,800 restricted common shares for directors compensation and
7,450 common shares for restricted stock units that vested on issuance in April 2006. The Company
retired 16,370 common shares for tax withholding purposes related to 39,825 restricted shares that
vested in the first six months of 2006.
Basic earnings per common share are calculated by dividing earnings available for common shares by
the average number of common shares outstanding during the period excluding any nonvested
restricted shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share are calculated
by adjusting outstanding shares, assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive stock options and
vesting of all nonvested restricted shares and restricted stock units outstanding and including
contingently issuable shares related to outstanding stock performance awards. Stock options with
exercise prices greater than the market price are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings
per common share.
Pension Plan and Other Postretirement Benefits
Pension PlanComponents of net periodic pension benefit cost of the Companys
noncontributory funded pension plan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Service costbenefit earned during the period |
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
$ |
1,034 |
|
|
$ |
2,420 |
|
|
$ |
2,068 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
|
|
5,088 |
|
|
|
4,896 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
|
(3,065 |
) |
|
|
(2,996 |
) |
|
|
(6,130 |
) |
|
|
(5,992 |
) |
Amortization of prior-service cost |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
1,253 |
|
|
$ |
726 |
|
|
$ |
2,506 |
|
|
$ |
1,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company made discretionary cash contributions to its pension plan of $4.0 million during each
of the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
19
Executive Survivor and Supplemental Retirement PlanComponents of net periodic pension
benefit cost of the Companys unfunded, nonqualified benefit plan for executive officers and
certain key management employees are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Service costbenefit earned during the period |
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
Amortization of prior-service cost |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
$ |
530 |
|
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement BenefitsComponents of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for health
insurance and life insurance benefits for retired electric utility and corporate employees are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Service costbenefit earned during the period |
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
668 |
|
|
$ |
622 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
1,332 |
|
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Amortization of prior-service cost |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
Effect of Medicare Part D expected subsidy |
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
(586 |
) |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost |
|
$ |
922 |
|
|
$ |
1,042 |
|
|
$ |
1,844 |
|
|
$ |
2,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations
In June 2006, OTESCO, the Companys energy services company, sold its gas marketing operations for
$0.5 million in cash. In 2005, the Company completed the sales of Midwest Information Systems, Inc.
(MIS), St. George Steel Fabrication, Inc. (SGS) and Chassis Liner Corporation (CLC). Net income
from OTESCOs gas marketing operations classified under discontinued operations includes an
after-tax gain on disposition of $0.3 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30,
2006 and 2005. Net income from MIS, SGS and CLC classified under discontinued operations includes
an after-tax gain on the sale of MIS of $11.9 million for the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2005, an after-tax loss on the sale of SGS of $1.8 million (an estimated after-tax loss of
$1.6 million recorded in the first quarter of 2005 plus an additional after-tax loss on disposition
of $0.2 million recorded in the second quarter of 2005) and an estimated after-tax loss related to
the sale of CLC of $0.2 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005. SFAS No.
144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets requires that OTESCOs gas
marketing operations, MIS, SGS and CLC be classified and reported separately as discontinued
operations.
20
The results of discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
OTESCO |
|
|
OTESCO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Gas |
|
|
Gas |
|
MIS |
|
SGS |
|
CLC |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
7,263 |
|
|
|
$ |
10,579 |
|
|
$ |
1,729 |
|
|
$ |
1,459 |
|
|
$ |
2,067 |
|
|
$ |
15,834 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
(1,179 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(220 |
) |
Gain (loss) on disposition pretax |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,025 |
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
18,306 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7,467 |
|
|
|
(639 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
6,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
OTESCO |
|
|
OTESCO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Gas |
|
|
Gas |
|
MIS |
|
SGS |
|
CLC |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
28,234 |
|
|
|
$ |
26,628 |
|
|
$ |
3,773 |
|
|
$ |
6,329 |
|
|
$ |
3,772 |
|
|
$ |
40,502 |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
2,167 |
|
|
|
(1,563 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
567 |
|
Gain (loss) on disposition pretax |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,025 |
|
|
|
(3,046 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
15,679 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
7,975 |
|
|
|
(1,843 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
5,999 |
|
At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 the major components of assets and liabilities of the
discontinued operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTESCO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
SGS |
|
|
CLC |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Gas |
|
|
SGS |
|
|
CLC |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
600 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,384 |
|
|
$ |
857 |
|
|
$ |
1,455 |
|
|
$ |
13,696 |
|
Investments and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
600 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,384 |
|
|
$ |
857 |
|
|
$ |
1,460 |
|
|
$ |
13,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
|
$ |
10,611 |
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
10,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
|
$ |
10,611 |
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
10,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining assets and liabilities of SGS and CLC consist of accounts receivable, inventory at
estimated fair market value and accounts payable that were not settled or disposed of as of June
30, 2006.
21
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
Consolidated operating revenues were $279.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006
compared with
$245.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Operating income was $22.1 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2006 compared with $20.8 million for the three months ended June 30,
2005. The Company recorded diluted earnings per share from continuing operations of $0.37 for the
three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $0.37 for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and
total diluted earnings per share from continuing and discontinued operations of $0.38 for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $0.76 for the three months ended June 30, 2005, which
included $0.41 per share from a gain on the sale of Midwest Information Systems, Inc. (MIS).
Following is a more detailed analysis of our operating results by business segment for the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, followed by our outlook for the remainder of
2006 and a discussion of changes in our consolidated financial position during the six months ended
June 30, 2006.
Amounts presented in the segment tables that follow for operating revenues, cost of goods sold and
other nonelectric operating expenses for the three month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 will
not agree with amounts presented in the consolidated statements of income due to the elimination of
intersegment transactions. The amounts of intersegment eliminations by income statement line item
are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
953 |
|
|
$ |
899 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
Other nonelectric expenses |
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
Electric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Retail sales revenues |
|
$ |
61,805 |
|
|
$ |
59,532 |
|
|
$ |
2,273 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Wholesale revenues |
|
|
6,638 |
|
|
|
9,440 |
|
|
|
(2,802 |
) |
|
|
(29.7 |
) |
Net marked-to-market gain |
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
3,815 |
|
|
|
4,179 |
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
73,518 |
|
|
$ |
74,150 |
|
|
$ |
(632 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Production fuel |
|
|
11,456 |
|
|
|
10,549 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
Purchased power system use |
|
|
17,664 |
|
|
|
19,904 |
|
|
|
(2,240 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
Other operation and maintenance expenses |
|
|
28,049 |
|
|
|
25,334 |
|
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6,447 |
|
|
|
6,103 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Property taxes |
|
|
2,551 |
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
7,351 |
|
|
$ |
9,852 |
|
|
$ |
(2,501 |
) |
|
|
(25.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
The increase in retail electric revenue is due mainly to a $2.1 million increase in fuel clause
adjustment (FCA) revenues related to recognizing $4.2 million of revenue for uncollected fuel and
purchased power costs under an FCA true-up mechanism established by order of the Minnesota Public
Utilities Commission (MPUC), offset by a $2.1 million reduction in FCA revenues billed and accrued
related to lower costs for purchased power in the second quarter of 2006 compared to the second
quarter of 2005. The Minnesota FCA true-up relates to costs incurred from July 2004 through June
2006 and will be recovered from Minnesota customers from August 2006 through July 2007. On a
go-forward basis the electric utility will be on a yearly FCA true-up mechanism in Minnesota. The
remaining $0.2 million increase in retail revenues resulted from a 2.5% increase in retail
megawatt-hours (mwh) sold between the periods, reflecting increased mwh sales to residential,
commercial and industrial customers. Industrial mwh sales increased 10.4% between the quarters
mainly due to increased consumption by pipeline customers as higher oil prices have led to an
increase in the volume of product being transported from Canada and the Williston basin. A 13.7%
decrease in heating degree days was partially offset by a 21.0% increase in cooling degree days
with the net effect of weather having no discernable impact on the variance in mwh sales between
the periods.
Wholesale sales revenue from company-owned generation increased $2.1 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2006 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2005 as a result of a 39.9%
increase in mwhs sold combined with a 6.2% increase in the price per mwh sold between the periods.
Advance purchases of electricity in anticipation of coal supply constraints at Big Stone and Hoot
Lake plants in the second quarter of 2006 freed up more generation for wholesale sales when coal
supplies improved in May 2006. Net revenue from energy trading activities including net
mark-to-market gains on forward energy contracts were $1.5 million for the quarter ended June 30,
2006 compared with $6.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The $4.6 million decrease in
revenue from energy trading activities reflects a $3.3 million reduction in profits from purchased
power resold and a $2.5 million reduction in net profits from virtual transactions, offset by a
$0.9 million increase in profits from the purchase and sale of financial transmission rights and a
$0.3 million increase in net mark-to-market gains on forward energy contracts. Profits from virtual
transactions were $2.5 million in the second quarter of 2005 compared to only $24,000 in the second
quarter of 2006 as the MISO market has matured and become more efficient and as a result of a
reduction in virtual transactions due to uncertainties related to the status of Revenue Sufficiency
Guarantee (RSG) charges in MISOs Transmission and Energy Markets Tariff.
The decrease in other electric operating revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared
to the three months ended June 30, 2005 is mainly due to a reduction in MISO tariff revenue.
The increase in fuel costs for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the three months
ended June 30, 2005 reflects a 1.8% increase in mwhs generated combined with a 6.7% increase in the
cost of fuel per mwh generated. Generation used for wholesale electric sales increased 39.9% while
generation for retail sales decreased 5.5% between the periods. The increase in fuel costs per mwh
generated is a function of the mix of available generation resources. In the second quarter of
2006, our lowest cost base-load plant, Coyote Station, was off-line for five weeks for scheduled
maintenance. In the second quarter of 2005, the higher-cost Big Stone Plant was shutdown for seven
weeks for scheduled maintenance. Big Stone Plants generation increased 78.2% between the quarters
while Coyotes generation was down 47.5%. Increases in coal and coal transportation costs
contributed to a 6.1% increase in the cost of fuel per mwh generated at Hoot Lake plant. Much of
the increase in coal and coal transportation costs is directly related to higher diesel fuel
prices. Approximately 90% of the fuel cost increases associated with generation to serve retail
electric customers is subject to recovery through the fuel cost recovery component of retail rates.
The decrease in purchased power system use (to serve retail customers) is due to a 22.4% decrease
in the cost per mwh purchased partially offset by a 14.3% increase in mwhs purchased. Advance
purchases of electricity in anticipation of coal supply constraints at Big Stone and Hoot Lake
plants in the second quarter of 2006 contributed to the increase in mwh purchases for system use.
23
The increase in other operation and maintenance expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2006
compared with the three months ended June 30, 2005 includes $0.8 million for contracted services
related to the five-week scheduled maintenance shutdown at Coyote Station in the second quarter of
2006, a reduction of $0.7 million in cost reimbursements related to the proposed new generating
unit at the Big Stone Plant site, a $0.6 million increase in employee benefit expenses and $0.3
million increase in pollution control expenditures for bag replacement and service costs on the
advanced hybrid particulate collector at Big Stone Plant.
Depreciation expense increased in the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the three
months ended June 30, 2005 as a result of a $20.6 million increase in electric plant in service in
2005.
Plastics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
52,685 |
|
|
$ |
36,004 |
|
|
$ |
16,681 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
41,442 |
|
|
|
29,664 |
|
|
|
11,778 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
8,507 |
|
|
$ |
4,252 |
|
|
$ |
4,255 |
|
|
|
100.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues for the plastics segment increased between the periods as result of a 19.0%
increase in pounds of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe sold combined with a 20.4% increase in the
price per pound of PVC pipe sold. The increase in revenue reflects high demand from distributors
and the effect of a 10.9% increase in resin costs per pound of PVC pipe shipped between the
periods. The increase in cost of goods sold is a result of the increase in pounds of pipe sold
combined with higher resin costs. The increase in plastics segment operating expenses between the
quarters is directly related to the increases in sales and operating income. The increase in
depreciation and amortization expense is the result of $3.6 million in capital expenditures in
2005, mainly for production equipment.
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
81,631 |
|
|
$ |
67,858 |
|
|
$ |
13,773 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
63,256 |
|
|
|
51,519 |
|
|
|
11,737 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
6,890 |
|
|
|
5,332 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
2,345 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
8,775 |
|
|
$ |
8,662 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in revenues in our manufacturing segment relates to the following:
|
|
|
Revenues at DMI Industries, Inc. (DMI) increased $12.7 million, of which $3.8 million is
related to the new Ft. Erie plant, as a result of an increase in production and sales
activity due in part to plant additions and continued improvements in productivity and
capacity utilization. |
24
|
|
|
Revenues at T.O. Plastics increased $0.8 million between the quarters as a result of an
11.1% increase in revenue per unit sold directly related to increased material costs,
partially offset by a 2.1% reduction in unit sales. |
|
|
|
|
Revenues at ShoreMaster increased $0.7 million between the quarters mainly due to the
acquisition of Southeast Floating Docks on May 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Revenues at BTD Manufacturing, Inc. (BTD) decreased $0.4 million mainly as a result of a
4.2% decrease in units sold between the quarters. |
The increase in cost of goods sold in our manufacturing segment relates to the following:
|
|
|
DMIs cost of goods sold increased $11.3 million between the quarters, including $7.7
million in material cost increases. The increase in cost of goods sold is directly related
to the increase in DMIs production and sales activity. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold at T.O. Plastics increased $0.8 million, mainly due to $0.7 million
in material cost increases between the quarters. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold at ShoreMaster increased $0.7 million between the quarters as a
result of increases in aluminum, subcontractor and other costs, mainly related to the
acquisition of Southeast Floating Docks in May 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold at BTD decreased $1.1 million between the quarters mainly due to a
decrease in material costs related to the decrease in unit sales between the quarters. |
The increase in operating expenses in our manufacturing segment is due to the following:
|
|
|
Operating expenses at DMI increased $0.7 million as a result of increases in labor,
travel and professional service expenses mainly related to start-up costs at the Ft. Erie,
plant. |
|
|
|
|
T.O. Plastics operating expenses increased $0.3 million, which reflects a $0.2 reduction
in gains on sales of fixed assets related to fixed asset sales in the second quarter of
2005. |
|
|
|
|
ShoreMasters operating expenses increased $0.3 million as a result of a $0.2 million
increase in bad debt expense and an increase in labor costs between the quarters. |
|
|
|
|
An increase in incentive accruals contributed to a $0.3 million increase in BTDs
operating expenses between the quarters. |
Depreciation expense increased between the quarters as a result of the Southeast Floating Docks
acquisition and capital additions at all four manufacturing companies in 2005.
25
Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
32,833 |
|
|
$ |
31,324 |
|
|
$ |
1,509 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
25,225 |
|
|
|
22,795 |
|
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
5,568 |
|
|
|
5,272 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
|
$ |
2,247 |
|
|
$ |
(1,086 |
) |
|
|
(48.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in health services operating revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006
compared with the three months ended June 30, 2005 reflects a $0.8 million increase in revenues
from rentals and interim installations of scanning equipment along with providing technical support
services for those rental and interim installations, a $0.5 million increase in scanning services
revenue and $0.2 million reduction in returns and allowances. A 12.1% increase in the revenue per
scan was partially offset by a 7.9% decrease in the number of scans performed between the quarters.
Revenues from sales and servicing of equipment and sales of supplies and accessories were unchanged
between the periods. The increase in health services revenue was more than offset by the increase
in health services cost of goods sold, mainly as a result of increases in unit rental costs and
sublease costs. Health services general and administrative expenses were also up by $0.3 million
mainly due to higher insurance, education and licensing expenses. The decrease in depreciation and
amortization expense is the result of certain assets reaching the ends of their depreciable lives.
When these assets are replaced, they are generally replaced with assets leased under operating
leases.
Food Ingredient Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
9,811 |
|
|
$ |
8,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,577 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
9,691 |
|
|
|
6,421 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,618 |
) |
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
$ |
(2,074 |
) |
|
|
(454.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in food ingredient processing revenues reflects a 3.9% increase in pounds sold
combined with a 14.7% increase in sales price per pound of product sold between the periods. The
food ingredient processing segment has been negatively impacted by raw potato supply shortages in
Idaho and Prince Edward Island. Higher than expected raw potato costs related to the supply
shortages have resulted in operating inefficiencies and a 45.2% increase in the cost per pound of
product sold. The increase in operating expenses is due to an increase in contracted service
expenses between the quarters.
26
Other Business Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
30,379 |
|
|
$ |
29,128 |
|
|
$ |
1,251 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
17,197 |
|
|
|
19,645 |
|
|
|
(2,448 |
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
Operating expenses |
|
|
14,505 |
|
|
|
13,485 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(2,040 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,648 |
) |
|
$ |
2,608 |
|
|
|
(56.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in revenues in the other business operations segment relates to the following:
|
|
|
Revenues at Foley Company increased $3.9 million in the second quarter of 2006 compared
to the second quarter of 2005 due to an increase in the volume of work performed between
the periods. |
|
|
|
|
Revenues at E.W. Wylie Corporation (Wylie) increased $1.9 million between the quarters
mainly due to a 13.0% net increase in miles driven by owner-operated and company-operated
trucks. Miles driven by owner-operated trucks increased 62.5% while miles driven by
company-operated trucks decreased 6.5% between the quarters. Wylies increased revenues
also reflect increased fuel costs recovered through fuel surcharges between the quarters. |
|
|
|
|
Revenues at Midwest Construction Services, Inc. (MCS) decreased $4.5 million between the
quarters as a result of a delay on the start-up of several wind projects. Selected projects
have been delayed nationwide due to Federal Aviation Administration actions related to
possible radar issues. |
The increase in cost of goods sold in the other business operations segment relates to the
following:
|
|
|
Foley Companys cost of goods sold increased $2.7 million mainly in the areas of
subcontractor and labor costs as a result of increased volume of work performed between the
periods. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold at MCS decreased $5.1 million mainly due to a reduction in material
and labor costs between the quarters. |
The increase in operating expenses in the other business operations segment is due to the
following:
|
|
|
Wylies revenue increase was mostly offset by a $1.8 million increase in operating
expenses, mainly contractor costs related to the increase in miles driven by owner-operated
trucks between the periods. |
|
|
|
|
Foley Companys operating expenses increased $0.4 million between the quarters, mainly
as a result of increases in compensation costs. |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses in this segment decreased $1.2 million mainly due to a decrease in
self-insurance costs related to health insurance. |
27
Income Taxes Continuing Operations
The $1.3 million (24.6%) increase in income taxes continuing operations between the quarters is
primarily the result of a $1.5 million (9.1%) increase in income from continuing operations before
income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the three months ended June 30,
2005. The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was
37.1% compared to 32.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The increase in the effective tax
rate is related to a change in estimate in the reversal of regulatory deferred tax liabilities at
the electric utility, a $0.5 million write-down of deferred tax assets in the second quarter of
2006 related to the expected expiration of operating loss carryforwards at the end of 2006 at IPHs
Canadian operations and an increase in taxable income relative to a fixed level of tax credits
between the quarters.
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations includes the operating results of the gas marketing operation of OTESCO,
the Companys energy services company, for the three month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and
of Midwest Information Systems, Inc. (MIS), St. George Steel Fabrication, Inc. (SGS) and Chassis
Liner Corporation (CLC) for the three months ended June 30, 2005. In June 2006, OTESCO sold its gas
marketing operations for $0.5 million in cash. The Company completed the sales of MIS and SGS in
the second quarter of 2005 and the sale of CLC was pending as of June 30, 2005. Discontinued
operations include net (loss) income from discontinued operations for the three months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005 and net after-tax gains and losses on the disposition of discontinued operations
during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
OTESCO |
|
|
|
OTESCO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Gas |
|
|
|
Gas |
|
|
MIS |
|
|
SGS |
|
|
CLC |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
(120 |
) |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
897 |
|
|
$ |
(1,179 |
) |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
(220 |
) |
Gain (loss) on disposition pretax |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,025 |
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
18,306 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7,467 |
|
|
|
(639 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
6,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
12,455 |
|
|
$ |
(959 |
) |
|
$ |
(159 |
) |
|
$ |
11,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
Consolidated operating revenues were $537.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared
with
$461.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Operating income was $49.5 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with $41.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
The Company recorded diluted earnings per share from continuing operations of $0.86 for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $0.74 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and total
diluted earnings per share from continuing and discontinued operations of $0.87 for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 compared to $1.09 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, which included $0.41
per share from a gain on the sale of MIS and a reduction of $0.06 per share from a loss on the sale
of SGS.
Amounts presented in the segment tables that follow for operating revenues, cost of goods sold and
other nonelectric operating expenses for the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 will
not agree with amounts presented in the consolidated statements of income due to the elimination of
intersegment transactions. The amounts of intersegment eliminations by income statement line item
are listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
1,797 |
|
|
$ |
1,883 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
Other nonelectric expenses |
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
Electric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Retail sales revenues |
|
$ |
135,164 |
|
|
$ |
122,847 |
|
|
$ |
12,317 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Wholesale revenues |
|
|
12,296 |
|
|
|
14,357 |
|
|
|
(2,061 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
Net marked-to-market gain |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
(68.2 |
) |
Other revenues |
|
|
8,291 |
|
|
|
9,326 |
|
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
156,102 |
|
|
$ |
147,633 |
|
|
$ |
8,469 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Production fuel |
|
|
26,262 |
|
|
|
25,726 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Purchased power system use |
|
|
36,400 |
|
|
|
31,442 |
|
|
|
4,958 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
Other operation and maintenance expenses |
|
|
51,456 |
|
|
|
49,252 |
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,804 |
|
|
|
12,203 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Property taxes |
|
|
5,169 |
|
|
|
5,081 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
24,011 |
|
|
$ |
23,929 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in retail electric revenue is due mainly to an $11.6 million increase in FCA revenues
related to increases in fuel and purchased power costs for system use, but also includes $4.2
million of revenue for uncollected fuel and purchased power costs under a FCA true-up mechanism
established by order of the MPUC and $1.9 million related to the reversal of the refund provision
established in December 2005 relating to MISO costs. The Minnesota FCA true-up relates to costs
incurred from July 2004 through June 2006 and will be recovered from Minnesota customers from
August 2006 through July 2007. On a go-forward basis the electric utility will be on a yearly FCA
true-up mechanism in Minnesota. In December 2005, the MPUC issued an order denying recovery of
certain MISO related costs through the FCA in Minnesota retail rates and requiring a refund of
amounts previously collected. In February 2006 the MPUC reconsidered its order and eliminated the
refund requirement. The remaining $0.7 million increase
29
in retail revenues resulted from a 1.8% increase in retail mwhs sold between the periods, reflecting increased sales
to industrial customers partially offset by decreased sales to residential customers. Mwh sales to
commercial customers increased by only 0.4% between the periods. Industrial mwh sales increased
17.9% between the periods mainly due to increased consumption by pipeline customers as higher oil
prices have led to an increase in the volume of product being transported from Canada and the
Williston basin. A 10.0% decrease in heating degree days was partially offset by a 21.0% increase
in cooling degree days with the net effect of weather having no discernable impact on the variance
in mwh sales between the periods.
Wholesale sales revenue from company-owned generation increased $3.3 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2006 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005 as a result of a 26.7% increase
in mwhs sold combined with a 9.4% increase in the price per mwh sold between the periods. Advance
purchases of electricity in anticipation of normal winter weather resulted in increased wholesale
electric sales in January 2006 due to unseasonably mild weather. Wholesale sales from company-owned
generation were curtailed in February and March 2006 as generation levels were restricted due to
coal supply constraints at Big Stone and Hoot Lake plants. Advance purchases of electricity in
anticipation of continuing coal supply constraints in the second quarter of 2006 freed up more
generation for wholesale sales when coal supplies improved in May 2006. Net revenue from energy
trading activities including net mark-to-market gains on forward energy contracts were $0.9 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30,
2005. The $6.1 million decrease in revenue from energy trading activities reflects a $4.6 million
reduction in profits from purchased power resold, a $1.5 million reduction in net profits from
virtual transactions and a $0.8 million decrease in net mark-to-market gains on forward energy
contracts, offset by a $0.8 increase in profits from the purchase and sale of financial
transmission rights. Profits from virtual transactions were $2.5 million in the first six months of
2005 compared to $1.0 million in the first six months of 2006 as the MISO market has matured and
become more efficient and as a result of a reduction in virtual transactions due to uncertainties
related to the status of RSG charges in MISOs Transmission and Energy Markets Tariff. Of the $2.9
million in net mark-to-market gains recognized on open forward energy contracts at December 31,
2005, $2.3 million was realized and $0.5 million was reversed in the first six months of 2006 as
market prices on forward electric contracts declined in response to decreased demand for
electricity due, in part, to regional winter weather that was milder than expected.
The decrease in other electric operating revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared
to the six months ended June 30, 2005 is mainly due to a reduction in transmission services revenue
related to the initiation of the MISO Day 2 market in April 2005. Certain revenues that were billed
separately prior to inception of the MISO Day 2 market are now included in revenue from wholesale
energy sales or reflected as a reduction in purchased power costs.
The increase in fuel costs for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the six months
ended June 30, 2005 reflects a 5.8% increase in the cost of fuel per mwh generated partially offset
by a 3.5% reduction in mwhs generated. Generation used for wholesale electric sales increased 26.7%
while generation for retail sales decreased 8.2% between the periods. Fuel costs per mwh increased
at all three of our coal-fired generating plants as a result of increases in coal and coal
transportation costs between the periods. Much of the increase in coal and coal transportation
costs is directly related to higher diesel fuel prices. The mix of available generation resources
in the first six months of 2006 compared to the first six months of 2005 was also a contributing
factor to the increase in the cost of fuel per mwh generated. Big Stone Plants generation
increased 12.3% between the periods while Coyote Stations generation was down 21.1%. In the second
quarter of 2006, Coyote Station, our lowest cost base-load plant, was off-line for five weeks for
scheduled maintenance. In the second quarter of 2005, the higher-cost Big Stone Plant was shutdown
for seven weeks for scheduled maintenance. Approximately 90% of the fuel cost increases associated
with generation to serve retail electric customers is subject to recovery through the fuel cost
recovery component of retail rates.
The increase in purchased power system use (to serve retail customers) is due to a 16.8% increase
in mwhs purchased only slightly offset by a 0.8% reduction in the cost per mwh purchased. An
increase in mwh purchases for
30
system use was necessary to make up for reductions in generation
levels caused by delayed coal shipments to Big Stone and Hoot Lake Plants in February and March of
2006. Additional advance purchases of electricity in anticipation of
continued coal supply constraints in the second quarter of 2006 also contributed to the increase in
mwh purchases for system use.
The increase in other operation and maintenance expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006
compared with the six months ended June 30, 2005 includes $0.8 million for contracted services
related to the five-week scheduled maintenance shutdown at Coyote Station in the second quarter of
2006, $0.6 million in increased costs related to contracted construction work performed for other
area utilities, $0.3 million for major repairs to our combustion turbine at Lake Preston, a $0.3
million increase in pollution control expenditures for bag replacement and service costs on the
advanced hybrid particulate collector at Big Stone Plant and $0.2 million in higher fuel costs for
fleet vehicles.
Depreciation expense increased in the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the six months
ended June 30, 2005 as a result of a $20.6 million increase in electric plant in service in 2005.
Plastics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
90,790 |
|
|
$ |
68,159 |
|
|
$ |
22,631 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
69,622 |
|
|
|
55,081 |
|
|
|
14,541 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
3,506 |
|
|
|
2,969 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
16,254 |
|
|
$ |
8,890 |
|
|
$ |
7,364 |
|
|
|
82.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues for the plastics segment increased between the periods as result of a 2.7%
increase in pounds of PVC pipe sold and a 25.2% increase in the price per pound of PVC pipe sold.
The increase in revenue reflects high demand from distributors and the effect of a 16.7% increase
in resin costs per pound of PVC pipe shipped between the periods. The increase in cost of goods
sold is a result of higher resin costs in combination with the increase in pounds of pipe sold. The
increase in plastics segment operating expenses between the periods is mainly due to increases
directly related to the increases in sales and operating income. The increase in depreciation and
amortization expense is the result of $3.6 million in capital expenditures in 2005, mainly for
production equipment.
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
149,888 |
|
|
$ |
123,387 |
|
|
$ |
26,501 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
117,655 |
|
|
|
96,878 |
|
|
|
20,777 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
13,105 |
|
|
|
10,754 |
|
|
|
2,351 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,279 |
|
|
|
4,550 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
13,849 |
|
|
$ |
11,205 |
|
|
$ |
2,644 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
The increase in revenues in our manufacturing segment relates to the following:
|
|
|
Revenues at DMI increased $23.1 million as a result of increases in production and sales
activity due in part to plant additions, including initial operations at the Ft. Erie
facilities, and continued improvements in productivity and capacity utilization. |
|
|
|
|
Revenues at ShoreMaster increased $2.2 million between the periods mainly due to the
acquisition of Southeast Floating Docks in May 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Revenues at T.O. Plastics increased $1.2 million between the periods as a result of a
2.8% increase in unit sales combined with a 4.3% increase in revenue per unit sold. |
|
|
|
|
Revenues at BTD were essentially unchanged between the periods. |
The increase in cost of goods sold in our manufacturing segment relates to the following:
|
|
|
DMIs cost of goods sold increased $19.3 million between the periods, including
increases of $14.1 million in material costs, $3.5 million in labor and benefit costs and
$1.6 in tools and supplies expenditures. The increase in cost of goods sold is directly
related to the increase in DMIs production and sales activity and start up costs at its
Ft. Erie facilities. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold at ShoreMaster increased $1.5 million between the periods as a result
of increases in labor and other direct costs, mainly related to the acquisition of
Southeast Floating Docks in May 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold at T.O. Plastics increased $1.5 million, reflecting $1.2 million in
material cost increases and $0.3 million in increased labor and benefit costs between the
periods. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold at BTD decreased $1.7 million between the periods due to a $0.9
million decrease in material costs related to a 6.5% decrease in unit sales between the
periods and a $0.8 million decrease in labor costs. The decrease in production labor costs
is related to a reduction in the number of production employees and a decrease in overtime
pay between the periods. Productivity gains at BTD were achieved through efforts to better
utilize and allocate available labor resources. |
The increase in operating expenses in our manufacturing segment is due to the following:
|
|
|
Operating expenses at DMI increased $1.3 million as a result of increases in labor,
professional services and maintenance expenses mainly related to start-up costs at the Ft.
Erie plant. |
|
|
|
|
ShoreMasters operating expenses increased $0.5 million as a result of increases in wage
and benefit expenses mainly related to the May 2005 acquisition of Southeast Floating
Docks. |
|
|
|
|
An increase in incentive accruals contributed to a $0.4 million increase in BTDs
operating expenses between the periods. |
|
|
|
|
T.O. Plastics operating expenses increased $0.2 million due to a reduction in gains on
sales of fixed assets related to fixed asset sales in the second quarter of 2005. |
Depreciation expense increased between the periods as a result of the Southeast Floating Docks
acquisition and capital additions at all four manufacturing companies in 2005.
32
Health Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
64,909 |
|
|
$ |
59,122 |
|
|
$ |
5,787 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
50,047 |
|
|
|
43,087 |
|
|
|
6,960 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
11,082 |
|
|
|
10,185 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,836 |
|
|
|
2,077 |
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
1,944 |
|
|
$ |
3,773 |
|
|
$ |
(1,829 |
) |
|
|
(48.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in health services operating revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared
with the six months ended June 30, 2005 reflects a $5.2 million increase in imaging revenues
combined with a $0.6 million increase in revenues from sales and servicing of diagnostic imaging
equipment. On the imaging side of the business, $3.2 million of the $5.2 million increase in
revenue came from imaging services where the revenue per scan increased 15.0% between the periods
while the number of scans completed decreased 4.8%. Revenues from rentals and interim installations
of scanning equipment along with providing technical support services for those rental and interim
installations increased $2.3 million between the periods. The increase in health services revenue
was more than offset by the increase in health services cost of goods sold, reflecting increased
equipment rental and labor costs related to an increase in imaging and interim services activity
and maintenance and sublease costs related to units that were out of service in the first six
months of 2006. The increase in operating expenses is mainly due to higher labor and benefit costs
and increases in travel, licensing and insurance expenses. The decrease in depreciation and
amortization expense is the result of certain assets reaching the ends of their depreciable lives.
When these assets are replaced, they are generally replaced with assets leased under operating
leases.
Food Ingredient Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
19,161 |
|
|
$ |
17,489 |
|
|
$ |
1,672 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
19,010 |
|
|
|
13,106 |
|
|
|
5,904 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
$ |
(3,190 |
) |
|
$ |
1,658 |
|
|
$ |
(4,848 |
) |
|
|
(292.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in food ingredient processing revenues reflects a 10.2% increase in sales price per
pound of product sold slightly offset by a 0.6% decrease in pounds sold between the periods. The
food ingredient processing segment has been negatively impacted by raw potato supply shortages in
Idaho and Prince Edward Island. Higher than expected raw product costs related to the supply
shortages have resulted in operating inefficiencies and a 45.9% increase in the cost per pound of
product sold. The increase in operating expenses is due to an increase in contracted service
expenses between the periods.
33
Other Business Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
58,658 |
|
|
$ |
47,976 |
|
|
$ |
10,682 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
33,191 |
|
|
|
30,033 |
|
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
27,415 |
|
|
|
24,227 |
|
|
|
3,188 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(3,358 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,527 |
) |
|
$ |
4,169 |
|
|
|
(55.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in revenues in the other business operations segment relates to the following:
|
|
|
Revenues at Foley Company increased $11.1 million in the first six months of 2006
compared to the first six months of 2005 due to an increase in the volume of work performed
between the periods. |
|
|
|
|
Revenues at Wylie increased $2.7 million between the periods mainly due to a 7.8% net
increase in miles driven by owner-operated and company-operated trucks. Miles driven by
owner-operated trucks increased 55.9% while miles driven by company-operated trucks
decreased 9.8% between the periods. Wylies increased revenues also reflect increased fuel
costs recovered through fuel surcharges between the periods. |
|
|
|
|
Revenues at MCS decreased $3.1 million between the periods as a result of a delay on the
start-up of several wind projects. Selected projects have been delayed nationwide due to
Federal Aviation Administration actions related to possible radar issues. |
The increase in cost of goods sold in the other business operations segment relates to the
following:
|
|
|
Foley Companys cost of goods sold increased $9.0 million mainly in the areas of
materials, subcontractor costs and labor as a result of an increase in the volume of work
performed between the periods. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold at MCS decreased $5.8 million mainly due to a reduction in material
and labor costs between the periods related to a reduction in job activity. |
The increase in operating expenses in the other business operations segment is due to the
following:
|
|
|
Wylies revenue increase was entirely offset by a $2.7 million increase in operating
expenses, including $2.2 million in contractor costs related to the increase in miles
driven by owner-operated trucks between the periods, $0.3 million in increased insurance
costs and $0.2 million in increased fuel costs. |
|
|
|
|
Foley Companys operating expenses increased $0.5 million between the periods, mainly as
a result of increases in compensation costs. |
|
|
|
|
MCS operating expenses increased $0.4 million between the periods, mainly due to
increases in salary and benefit expenses. |
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses in this segment decreased $0.4 million mainly due to a decrease in
self-insurance costs related to health insurance. |
34
Income Taxes Continuing Operations
The $4.1 million (37.8%) increase in income taxes continuing operations between the periods is
primarily the result of an $8.1 million (24.6%) increase in income from continuing operations
before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the six months ended June
30, 2005. The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006
was 36.7% compared to 33.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase in the effective
tax rate is related to a change in estimate in the reversal of regulatory deferred tax liabilities
at the electric utility, a $0.5 million write-down of deferred tax assets in the second quarter of
2006 related to the expected expiration of operating loss carryforwards at the end of 2006 at IPHs
Canadian operations and an increase in taxable income relative to a fixed level of tax credits
between the periods.
Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations includes the operating results of the gas marketing operation of OTESCO,
the Companys energy services company, for the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 and
of MIS, SGS and CLC for the six month period ended June 30, 2005. In June 2006, OTESCO sold its gas
marketing operations for $0.5 million in cash. The Company completed the sales of MIS and SGS in
the second quarter of 2005 and the sale of CLC was pending as of June 30, 2005. Discontinued
operations include net income (loss) from discontinued operations for the six month periods ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005 and net after-tax gains and losses on the disposition of discontinued
operations in the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
OTESCO |
|
|
|
OTESCO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Gas |
|
|
|
Gas |
|
|
MIS |
|
|
SGS |
|
|
CLC |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
2,167 |
|
|
$ |
(1,563 |
) |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
567 |
|
Gain (loss) on disposition pretax |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,025 |
|
|
|
(3,046 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
15,679 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
7,975 |
|
|
|
(1,843 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
5,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
362 |
|
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
13,217 |
|
|
$ |
(2,766 |
) |
|
$ |
(193 |
) |
|
$ |
10,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 OUTLOOK
The statements in this section are based on our current outlook for 2006 and are subject to risks
and uncertainties described under Forward Looking Information Safe Harbor Statement Under the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
We are revising our guidance upward to be in the range of $1.55 to $1.75 of diluted earnings per
share from continuing operations from $1.50 to $1.70. Items contributing to the current earnings
guidance for 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
Due to the coal supply issues in the first quarter and early second quarter of 2006,
decreasing margins on wholesale energy sales involving the purchase and sale of electric
energy contracts and increasing transmission and wage and benefit costs, we expect earnings
in the electric segment in 2006 to be in a range of $26.5 million to $28.0 million. |
|
|
|
|
We expect plastics segment earnings for 2006 to be similar to 2005 levels due to the
strong performance in the first and second quarters of 2006 and continued high prices for
PVC resin. |
35
|
|
|
Our forecasted 2006 net income from our manufacturing segment is in line with initial
2006 expectations. The improving economy, continued enhancements in productivity and
capacity utilization, expanded markets, and expansion of production capacity with the
opening of a new wind tower production facility in Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada, are expected
to result in increased net income in our manufacturing segment in 2006. |
|
|
|
|
The health services segment is expected to have lower earnings than original 2006
guidance due to the lower than expected results in the first half of 2006. |
|
|
|
|
We expect to record a net loss in the range of $1.6 million to $3.4 million from our
food ingredient processing business in 2006. This is a reduction from the break-even
expectation announced in our first quarter earnings release. This change in guidance is due
to lower than expected results in the first half of 2006 and the continuing shortage of raw
potato supplies, which are expected to continue through most of 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Our other business operations segment is expected to show improved results over 2005,
consistent with our expectations at the beginning of 2006, due to an improving economy and
an increase in its backlog of construction contracts. An increase in wind energy projects
activity is expected to have a positive impact on our electrical contracting business. |
FINANCIAL POSITION
For the period 2006 through 2010, we estimate funds internally generated net of forecasted dividend
payments will be sufficient to meet scheduled debt retirements (excluding the scheduled retirement
of the $50 million 6.375% senior debentures due December 1, 2007), to repay currently outstanding
short-term debt and to provide for our estimated consolidated capital expenditures (excluding
expenditures related to the proposed generating unit at the Big Stone Plant site). Reduced demand
for electricity, reductions in wholesale sales of electricity or margins on wholesale sales, or
declines in the number of products manufactured and sold by our companies could have an effect on
funds internally generated. Additional equity or debt financing will be required in the period 2006
through 2010 in the event we decide to refund or retire early any of our presently outstanding debt
or cumulative preferred shares, to retire the $50 million 6.375% senior debentures due December 1,
2007, to complete acquisitions, to fund the construction of the proposed generating unit at the Big
Stone Plant site or for other corporate purposes. There can be no assurance that any additional
required financing will be available through bank borrowings, debt or equity financing or
otherwise, or that if such financing is available, it will be available on terms acceptable to us.
If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, our businesses, results of operations and
financial condition could be adversely affected.
During the first six months of 2006 the Company issued 52,415 common shares for stock options
exercised and 1,111 common shares for directors compensation and retired 16,370 common shares for
tax withholding purposes related to restricted shares that vested in March and April 2006.
We have the ability to issue up to $256 million of common stock, preferred stock, debt and certain
other securities from time to time under our universal shelf registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
On April 26, 2006 we renewed our line of credit with U.S. Bank National Association, JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Harris Nesbitt Financing, Inc., Keybank
National Association, Union Bank of California, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Bank Hapoalim B.M.,
and Bank of the West and increased the amount available under the line from $100 million to $150
million. The renewed agreement expires on April 26, 2009. The terms of the renewed line of credit
are essentially the same as those in place prior to the renewal. However, outstanding letters of
credit issued by the Company can reduce the amount available for borrowing under the line by up to
$30 million and we can increase our commitments under the renewed line of
36
credit up to $200 million. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.4%, subject to adjustment based
on the ratings of our senior unsecured debt. This line is an unsecured revolving credit facility
available to support borrowings of our nonelectric operations. We anticipate that the electric
utilitys cash requirements through April 2009 will be provided for by cash flows from electric
utility operations or through other borrowing arrangements. Our obligations under this line of
credit are guaranteed by a 100%-owned subsidiary that owns substantially all of our nonelectric
companies. As of June 30, 2006, $59.0 million of the $150 million line of credit was in use and
$18.3 million was restricted from use to cover outstanding letters of credit.
Our line of credit, $90 million 6.63% senior notes and Lombard US Equipment Finance note contain
the following covenants: a debt-to-total capitalization ratio not in excess of 60% and an interest
and dividend coverage ratio of at least 1.5 to 1. The 6.63% senior notes also require that priority
debt not be in excess of 20% of total capitalization. We were in compliance with all of the
covenants under our financing agreements as of June 30, 2006.
Our obligations under the 6.63% senior notes are guaranteed by our 100%-owned subsidiary that owns
substantially all of our nonelectric companies. Our Grant County and Mercer County pollution
control refunding revenue bonds and our 5.625% insured senior notes require that we grant to Ambac
Assurance Corporation, under a financial guaranty insurance policy relating to the bonds and notes,
a security interest in the assets of the electric utility if the rating on our senior unsecured
debt is downgraded to Baa2 or below (Moodys) or BBB or below (Standard & Poors).
Our current securities ratings are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys |
|
|
|
|
Investors |
|
Standard |
|
|
Service |
|
& Poors |
|
|
|
Senior unsecured debt |
|
|
A3 |
|
|
BBB+ |
Preferred stock |
|
Baa2 |
|
BBB- |
Outlook |
|
Stable |
|
Stable |
Our disclosure of these securities ratings is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold our
securities. Downgrades in these securities ratings could adversely affect our company. Further
downgrades could increase borrowing costs resulting in possible reductions to net income in future
periods and increase the risk of default on our debt obligations.
Cash used in operating activities for continuing operations was $2.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 compared with cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations
of $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The $5.1 million increase in cash used for
operating activities by continuing operations reflects an increase in cash used for working capital
items of $13.1 million between the periods, offset by a $4.0 million increase in net income from
continuing operations plus increases in non-cash items included in net income of $2.7 million
related to mark-to-market changes in derivate energy contracts and $1.7 million in depreciation
expense between the quarters. Cash used for working capital items during the six months ended June
30, 2006 was $55.8 million compared with $42.7 million used for working capital items during the
six months ended June 30, 2005.
Major uses of funds for working capital items in the first six months of 2006 were an increase in
other current assets of $25.6 million, an increase in inventories of $18.0 million, an increase in
receivables of $14.8 million and a decrease in payables and other current liabilities of $7.4
million, mainly related to a normal seasonal reduction in accounts payable from December to June at
the electric utility, offset by a $10.1 million increase in interest and income taxes payable,
mainly due to the timing of estimated tax payments.
37
The increase in other current assets includes an increase of $23.0 million in costs in excess of
billings at DMI mainly related to wind tower production to fill a large order that extends into
2007. While a number of units in this order have
been completed, the terms of the contract specify that the customer, who has a strong senior
unsecured debt rating, will not be billed until the units are shipped. The increase in other
current assets also includes a $1.8 million increase in prepaid expenses at the health services
companies.
DMIs inventories increased $8.1 million in the first six months of 2006 as a result of increases
in raw material costs and in response to increased demand for wind towers. Our food ingredient
processing companies inventories increased $3.4 million mainly as a result of increases in raw
material costs (prices paid for process-grade potatoes), and related to a seasonal build-up of
finished goods inventory as the processing season nears its end. Our construction companies
inventories increased $2.8 million mostly related to a build up of electronic surveillance and
security products at MCS. Inventories at the electric utility increased $3.0 million, of which $1.4
million relates to a build up of coal stockpiles at Big Stone and Hoot Lake plants since year-end
2005 and $1.6 million relates to a build-up of materials for the summer construction season.
Inventories at our PVC pipe companies are up $1.1 million from December 31, 2005 to meet increased
demand in the summer construction season. The $14.8 million increase in receivables includes $11.4
million at our plastic pipe company located in Fargo, North Dakota related to the seasonal increase
in sales in this region of the country.
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations was $34.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 compared to $36.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Cash used for
capital expenditures increased by $6.8 million between the periods. Cash used for capital
expenditures at the electric utility increased by $2.5 million mainly related to replacement of
assets damaged in the November 2005 ice storm. Cash used for capital expenditures in the plastics
segment increased by $0.5 million between the periods mainly related to the installation of
additional equipment at the production plant in Phoenix, Arizona. Cash used for capital
expenditures in the manufacturing segment increased by $2.7 million between the periods mainly at
DMI in connection with the start up of its Ft. Erie plant. Cash used for capital expenditures in
the health services segment increased by $0.9 million between the periods including $0.6 million
related to office remodeling and $0.3 million for the purchase of imaging equipment. Net proceeds
from the sale of noncurrent assets decreased $2.5 million between the periods reflecting $1.1
million from the sale of several trucks by Wylie in 2005, $0.8 million from the sale of a building
for by T.O. Plastics in 2005 and $0.8 million from the sale of equipment at BTD in 2005. We
invested $10.7 million in cash, net of cash acquired, in the acquisitions of Performance Tool &
Die, Shoreline and Southeast Floating Docks in the first six months of 2005. We made no acquisition
expenditures in the first six months of 2006.
Net cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations increased $9.9 million in the
six months ended June 30, 2006 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2005 mainly due to a
$12.5 million increase in short-term borrowings and checks issued in excess of cash between the
periods. A decrease in proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $3.8 million between the
quarters reflects the issuance of common stock related to the partial exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option in January 2005. Payments for the retirement of long-term debt decreased by
$2.3 million between the periods. The $0.3 million increase in cash paid for debt issuance expenses
between the periods relates to the renegotiation and three-year extension of our line-of-credit
agreement in April 2006. The $0.6 million increase in dividends paid between the periods is due to
an increase of 1.5 cents in the dividend paid per common share in the first six months of 2006
compared with the first six months of 2005 combined with the issuance of additional common shares
between the periods.
There were no material changes as of June 30, 2006 in our contractual obligations from those
reported under the caption Capital Requirements on page 24 of our 2005 Annual Report to
Shareholders. We do not have any material off-balance-sheet arrangements or any relationships with
unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships.
38
Critical Accounting Policies Involving Significant Estimates
The discussion and analysis of the financial statements and results of operations are based on our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities.
We use estimates based on the best information available in recording transactions and balances
resulting from business operations. Estimates are used for such items as depreciable lives, asset
impairment evaluations, tax provisions, collectability of trade accounts receivable, self-insurance
programs, valuation of forward energy contracts, unbilled electric revenues, unscheduled power
exchanges, MISO electric market residual load adjustments, service contract maintenance costs,
percentage-of-completion, valuation of stock-based payments and actuarially determined benefits
costs. As better information becomes available or actual amounts are known, estimates are revised.
Operating results can be affected by revised estimates. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management has discussed the application of
these critical accounting policies and the development of these estimates with the Audit Committee
of the Board of Directors.
Goodwill Impairment
We currently have $24.2 million of goodwill recorded on our balance sheet related to the
acquisition of IPH in 2004. If current conditions of low sales volumes and prices, increasing raw
material costs, high energy costs and the increasing value of the Canadian dollar relative to the
U.S. dollar persist and operating margins do not improve according to our projections, the
reductions in anticipated cash flows from this business may indicate that its fair value is less
than its book value resulting in an impairment of goodwill and a corresponding charge against
earnings.
We evaluate goodwill for impairment on an annual basis and as conditions warrant. As of December
31, 2005 an assessment of the carrying values of our goodwill indicated no impairment.
A discussion of critical accounting policies is included under the caption Critical Accounting
Policies Involving Significant Estimates on pages 30 through 32 of our 2005 Annual Report to
Shareholders. There were no material changes in critical accounting policies or estimates during
the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
Forward Looking Information Safe Harbor Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995
In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 (the Act), we have filed cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause
our actual results to differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements made by
or on behalf of the Company. When used in this Form 10-Q and in future filings by the Company with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, in our press releases and in oral statements, words such as
may, will, expect, anticipate, continue, estimate, project, believes or similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act and
are included, along with this statement, for purposes of complying with the safe harbor provision
of the Act.
The following factors, among others, could cause actual results for the Company to differ
materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
We are subject to government regulations and actions that may have a negative impact on
our business and results of operations. |
39
|
|
|
Certain MISO-related costs currently included in the FCA in Minnesota retail rates may
be excluded from recovery through the FCA and subject to future recovery through rates
established in a general rate case. |
|
|
|
|
Weather conditions can adversely affect our operations and revenues. |
|
|
|
|
Electric wholesale margins could be reduced as the MISO market becomes more efficient. |
|
|
|
|
Electric wholesale trading margins could be reduced or eliminated by losses due to trading activities. |
|
|
|
|
Wholesale sales of electricity from excess generation could be reduced by reductions in
coal shipments to Big Stone and Hoot Lake plants due to supply constraints or rail
transportation problems beyond our control. |
|
|
|
|
The FERC issued an order on April 25, 2006 that could require MISO to make refunds
related to real-time revenue sufficiency guarantee charges that were not allocated to
day-ahead virtual supply offers in accordance with MISOs Transmission and Energy Markets
Tariff going back to the commencement of the MISO Day 2 market in April 2005. On May 17,
2006 the FERC issued a Notice of Extension of Time permitting MISO to delay compliance with
the directives contained in its April 2006 order, including the requirement to refund
customers the amounts due, with interest, from April 1, 2005 and the requirement to submit
a compliance filing. The Notice stated that the order on rehearing would provide the
appropriate guidance regarding the timing of compliance filing. We are not yet able to
assess what financial impact, if any, this order will have on our operations. |
|
|
|
|
Our electric utility has capitalized $3.3 million in costs related to the planned
construction of a second electric generating unit at its Big Stone Plant site as of June
30, 2006. Should approvals of permits not be received on a timely basis, the project could
be at risk. If the project is abandoned for permitting or other reasons, these capitalized
costs and others incurred in future periods would be subject to expense and may not be
recoverable. |
|
|
|
|
Our manufacturer of wind towers operates in a market that has been dependent on the
Production Tax Credit. This tax credit is currently in place through December 31, 2007.
Should this tax credit not be renewed, the revenues and earnings of this business could be
reduced. |
|
|
|
|
Federal and state environmental regulation could cause us to incur substantial capital
expenditures which could result in increased operating costs. |
|
|
|
|
Our plans to grow and diversify through acquisitions may not be successful and could
result in poor financial performance. |
|
|
|
|
Competition is a factor in all of our businesses. |
|
|
|
|
Economic uncertainty could have a negative impact on our future revenues and earnings. |
|
|
|
|
Volatile financial markets could restrict our ability to access capital and could
increase borrowing costs and pension plan expenses. |
|
|
|
|
Our food ingredient processing segment operates in a highly competitive market and is
dependent on adequate sources of raw materials for processing. Should the supply of these
raw materials be affected by poor growing conditions, this could negatively impact the
results of operations for this segment. This segment could also be impacted by foreign
currency changes between Canadian and United States currency and prices of natural gas. |
40
|
|
|
Our plastics segment is highly dependent on a limited number of vendors for PVC resin.
In the first six months of 2006, 98% of resin purchased was from two vendors, 51% from one
and 47% from the other. The
loss of a key vendor or an interruption or delay in the supply of PVC resin could result in
reduced sales or increased costs for this business. Reductions in PVC resin prices could
negatively impact PVC pipe prices, profit margins on PVC pipe sales and the value of PVC
pipe held in inventory. |
|
|
|
|
Our health services businesses may not be able to retain or comply with the dealership
arrangement and other agreements with Philips Medical. |
For a further discussion of other risk factors and cautionary statements, refer to Risk Factors
and Cautionary Statements and Critical Accounting Policies Involving Significant Estimates on
pages 26 through 32 of our 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders. These factors are in addition to any
other cautionary statements, written or oral, which may be made or referred to in connection with
any such forward-looking statement or contained in any subsequent filings by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
At June 30, 2006 we had limited exposure to market risk associated with interest rates and
commodity prices and limited exposure to market risk associated with changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. Outstanding trade accounts receivable of the Canadian operations of IPH are not at
risk of valuation change due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates because the Canadian
company transacts all sales in U.S. dollars. However, IPH does have market risk related to changes
in foreign currency exchange rates because approximately 30% of IPH sales are outside the United
States and the Canadian operations of IPH pays its operating expenses in Canadian dollars.
The majority of our consolidated long-term debt has fixed interest rates. The interest rate on
variable rate long-term debt is reset on a periodic basis reflecting current market conditions. We
manage our interest rate risk through the issuance of fixed-rate debt with varying maturities,
through economic refunding of debt through optional refundings, limiting the amount of variable
interest rate debt, and the utilization of short-term borrowings to allow flexibility in the timing
and placement of long-term debt. In April 2006, we negotiated a fixed rate of 6.76% on our Lombard
US Equipment Finance note (the Lombard note) over the remaining term of the note that has a final
payment due on October 2, 2010. As of June 30, 2006 we had $10.4 million of long-term debt subject
to variable interest rates. Assuming no change in our financial structure, if variable interest
rates were to average one percentage point higher or lower than the average variable rate on June
30, 2006, annualized interest expense and pretax earnings would change by approximately $104,000.
We have not used interest rate swaps to manage net exposure to interest rate changes related to our
portfolio of borrowings. We maintain a ratio of fixed-rate debt to total debt within a certain
range. It is our policy to enter into interest rate transactions and other financial instruments
only to the extent considered necessary to meet our stated objectives. We do not enter into
interest rate transactions for speculative or trading purposes.
The plastics companies are exposed to market risk related to changes in commodity prices for PVC
resins, the raw material used to manufacture PVC pipe. The PVC pipe industry is highly sensitive to
commodity raw material pricing volatility. Historically, when resin prices are rising or stable,
margins and sales volume have been higher and when resin prices are falling, sales volumes and
margins have been lower. Gross margins also decline when the supply of PVC pipe increases faster
than demand. Due to the commodity nature of PVC resin and the dynamic supply and demand factors
worldwide, it is very difficult to predict gross margin percentages or to assume that historical
trends will continue.
Our energy services subsidiary exited the natural gas marketing business and sold its
over-the-counter natural gas forward swap transactions that qualified as derivatives subject to
mark-to-market accounting with the sale of its
41
natural gas marketing operations in June 2006.
Therefore we are no longer exposed to price, market or credit risk from these operations.
The electric utility has market, price and credit risk associated with forward contracts for the
purchase and sale of electricity. As of June 30, 2006 the electric utility had recognized, on a
pretax basis, $997,000 in net unrealized gains on open forward contracts for the purchase and sale
of electricity. Due to the nature of electricity and the physical aspects of the electricity
transmission system, unanticipated events affecting the transmission grid can cause transmission
constraints that result in unanticipated gains or losses in the process of settling transactions.
The market prices used to value the electric utilitys forward contracts for the purchases and
sales of electricity are determined by survey of counterparties by the electric utilitys power
services personnel responsible for contract pricing and are benchmarked to regional hub prices as
published in Megawatt Daily and as observed in the Intercontinental Exchange trading system. Of the
forward energy contracts that are marked-to-market as of June 30, 2006, 95% of the forward
purchases of electricity had offsetting sales in terms of volumes and delivery periods. The amount
of net unrealized marked-to-market gains recognized on forward purchases of electricity not offset
by forward sales of electricity as of June 30, 2006 was $71,000.
We have in place an energy risk management policy with a goal to manage, through the use of defined
risk management practices, price risk and credit risk associated with wholesale power purchases and
sales. With the advent of the MISO Day 2 market in April 2005, several changes were made to the
energy risk management policy to recognize new trading opportunities created by this new market.
Most of the changes were in new volumetric limits and loss limits to adequately manage the risks
associated with these new opportunities. In addition, a Value at Risk (VaR) limit was also
implemented to further manage market price risk. Exposure to price risk on any open positions as of
June 30, 2006 was not material.
The following tables show the effect of marking-to-market forward contracts for the purchase and
sale of electricity on our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2006 and the change in our
consolidated balance sheet position from December 31, 2005 to June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
Current asset marked-to-market gain |
|
$ |
5,883 |
|
Regulatory asset deferred marked-to-market loss |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
7,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liability marked-to-market loss |
|
|
(4,372 |
) |
Regulatory liability deferred marked-to-market gain |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
(6,372 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value of marked-to-market energy contracts |
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-date |
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
Fair value at beginning of year |
|
$ |
2,916 |
|
Amount realized on contracts entered into in 2005 and settled in 2006 |
|
|
(2,253 |
) |
Changes in fair value of contracts entered into in 2005 |
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net fair value of contracts entered into in 2005 at end of period |
|
|
108 |
|
Changes in fair value of contracts entered into in 2006 |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value end of period |
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
|
|
|
42
The $997,000 recognized but unrealized net gain on the forward energy purchases and sales marked to
market on June 30, 2006 is expected to be realized on physical settlement as scheduled over the
following quarters in the amount listed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3rd Quarter |
|
4th Quarter |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
Net gain |
|
$802 |
|
$195 |
|
$997 |
We have credit risk associated with the nonperformance or nonpayment by counterparties to our
forward energy purchases and sales agreements. We have established guidelines and limits to manage
credit risk associated with wholesale power purchases and sales. Specific limits are determined by
a counterpartys financial strength. Our credit risk with our largest counterparty on delivered and
marked-to-market forward contracts as of June 30, 2006 was $2.0 million. As of June 30, 2006 we had
a net credit risk exposure of $9.8 million from 17 counterparties with investment grade credit
ratings. We have no exposure at June 30, 2006 to counterparties with credit ratings below
investment grade. Counterparties with investment grade credit ratings have minimum credit ratings
of BBB- (Standard & Poors), Baa3 (Moodys) or BBB- (Fitch).
The $9.8 million credit risk exposure includes net amounts due to the electric utility on
receivables/payables from completed transactions billed and unbilled plus marked-to-market
gains/losses on forward contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity scheduled for delivery
after June 30, 2006. Individual counterparty exposures are offset according to legally enforceable
netting arrangements.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of the
design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2006, the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2006.
During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, there were no changes in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
43
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is the subject of various pending or threatened legal actions and proceedings in the
ordinary course of its business. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties and to outcomes
that are not predictable with assurance. The Company records a liability in its consolidated
financial statements for costs related to claims, including future legal costs, settlements and
judgments, where it has assessed that a loss is probable and an amount can be reasonably estimated.
The Company believes that the final resolution of currently pending or threatened legal actions
and proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect
on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There has been no material change in the risk factors set forth under the caption Risk Factors and
Cautionary Statements on pages 26 through 28 of the Companys 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders,
which is incorporated by reference to Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The Company does not have a publicly announced stock repurchase program. The following table shows
previously issued common shares that were surrendered to the Company by employees to pay taxes in
connection with the vesting of restricted stock granted to such employees under the Companys 1999
Stock Incentive Plan during the quarter ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of |
|
|
Average price |
|
Calendar Month |
|
shares purchased |
|
|
paid per share |
|
|
April 2006 |
|
|
16,302 |
|
|
$ |
28.28 |
|
May 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
16,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company was held on April 10, 2006, to consider and act
upon the following matters: (1) to elect three nominees to the Board of Directors with terms
expiring in 2009, (2) to amend the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of
available common shares from 400,000 to 900,000, (3) to amend the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan to
increase the number of available common shares from 2,600,000 to 3,600,000, to extend the term of
the Plan from December 13, 2008 to December 13, 2013, and to make certain other changes to the
terms of the Plan, and (4) to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. All
nominees for directors as listed in the proxy statement were elected. The names of each other
director whose term of office continued after the meeting are as follows: Dennis R. Emmen, Arvid R.
Liebe, John C. MacFarlane, Kenneth L. Nelson, Nathan I. Partain and Gary J. Spies. The voting
results are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Shares Voted |
|
Broker |
Election of Directors |
|
Voted For |
|
Withheld Authority |
|
Non-Votes |
Karen M. Bohn |
|
|
23,718,943 |
|
|
|
492,645 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Edward J. McIntyre |
|
|
23,730,820 |
|
|
|
480,768 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Joyce Nelson Schuette |
|
|
23,779,920 |
|
|
|
431,668 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Voted |
|
Voted |
|
Broker |
|
|
Voted For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Non-Votes |
1999 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan
Amendment |
|
|
17,022,566 |
|
|
|
718,582 |
|
|
|
836,390 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999 Stock Incentive
Plan Amendment |
|
|
12,936,097 |
|
|
|
4,789,615 |
|
|
|
851,826 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratification of
Deloitte & Touche LLP
as Independent
Registered
Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
23,597,802 |
|
|
|
384,857 |
|
|
|
228,928 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Item 5. Other Information
On June 1, 2006, Otter Tail Corporation dba Otter Tail Power Company, Minnesota Municipal Power
Agency, Great River Energy, Heartland Consumers Power District, Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., a
division of MDU Resources Group, Inc., Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency and Western
Minnesota Municipal Power Agency (collectively, Owners) entered into an Amendment No. 1 to
Participation Agreement (Amendment No. 1), amending the Participation Agreement, dated June 30,
2005 (the Participation Agreement), among the Owners. The Participation Agreement, which relates
to the planned construction of a new 600 megawatt coal fueled, base-load electric generation plant
(the Big Stone II Plant) adjacent to the existing 450 megawatt electric generation plant near Big
Stone, South Dakota, is an agreement to jointly develop, finance, construct, own (as tenants in
common) and manage the Big Stone II Plant and includes provisions which obligate the parties to the
agreement to obtain financing and pay their share of development, construction, operating and
maintenance costs for the Big Stone II Plant. The Participation Agreement establishes a
Coordinating Committee (the Coordinating Committee) and an Engineering and Operating Committee
(the E&O Committee) to manage the development, design, construction, operation and maintenance of
the Big Stone II Plant. Amendment No. 1 (i) extends the date by which the E&O Committee must make
certain determinations from June 20, 2006 to July 27, 2006, (ii) extends the date on which the
Owners, through the Coordinating Committee, must meet to vote on whether to continue the
45
project from June 30, 2006 to a date agreed upon by all of the Owners that shall be on or before August 31, 2006, and (iii) extends the
deadline for payment of the amount required under the Participation Agreement to be paid by an
Owner withdrawing after continuation of the project is approved from July 31, 2006 to September 30,
2006.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
4.1 |
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2006, among the Company, the Banks
named therein, U.S. Bank National Association, as Agent and Lead Arranger; JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent; and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Documentation Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Form 8-K
filed May 2, 2006) |
|
|
10.1 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Directors (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed April 13, 2006) * |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Form of 2006 Performance Award Agreement (Effective April 1, 2006)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Form 8-K filed April 13,
2006) * |
|
|
10.3 |
|
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Companys Form 8-K filed April 13, 2006) * |
|
|
10.4 |
|
1999 Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 to the Companys Form 8-K filed April 13, 2006) * |
|
|
10.5 |
|
Form of 2006 Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement * |
|
|
10.6 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2006, by and among
Central Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, Great River Energy, Heartland Consumers Power
District, Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., a division of MDU Resources Group, Inc., Otter
Tail Corporation dba Otter Tail Power Company, Southern Minnesota Municipal Power
Agency and Western Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, as Owners, amending the
Participation Agreement, dated June 30, 2005, by and among the Owners |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed pursuant to
Item 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K. |
46
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTER TAIL CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Kevin G. Moug
Kevin G. Moug
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
(Chief Financial Officer/Authorized Officer)
|
|
|
Dated: August 9, 2006
47
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
4.1
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2006, among the Company, the Banks named
therein, U.S. Bank National Association, as Agent and Lead Arranger; JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A., as Syndication Agent; and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Documentation
Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed May 2,
2006) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Directors (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed April 13, 2006) * |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Form of 2006 Performance Award Agreement (Effective April 1, 2006) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Form 8-K filed April 13, 2006) * |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as Amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 to the Companys Form 8-K filed April 13, 2006) * |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
1999 Stock Incentive Plan, as Amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
the Companys Form 8-K filed April 13, 2006) * |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Form of 2006 Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement * |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2006, by and among
Central Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, Great River Energy, Heartland Consumers Power
District, Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., a division of MDU Resources Group, Inc., Otter
Tail Corporation dba Otter Tail Power Company, Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency
and Western Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, as Owners, amending the Participation
Agreement, dated June 30, 2005, by and among the Owners |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed
pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K |