UNITED STATES

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended July 4, 2004

OR

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to ________

Commission File Number: 0-11674

LSI LOGIC CORPORATION

1621 Barber Lane
Milpitas, California 95035
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)

(408) 433-8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES [X] NO [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) YES [X] NO [   ]

As of August 6, 2004, there were 384,900,567 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.

LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2004
INDEX

2

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

LSI LOGIC CORPORATION

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

LSI LOGIC CORPORATION

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

LSI LOGIC CORPORATION

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

LSI LOGIC CORPORATION

NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

     In the opinion of LSI Logic Corporation (the “Company” or “LSI”), the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and restructuring and other items, net as discussed in Note 5 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, hereafter referred to as the “Notes”), necessary to present fairly the financial information included herein. While the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information not misleading, it is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

     For financial reporting purposes, the Company reports on a 13 or 14-week quarter with a year ending December 31. The current quarter ended July 4, 2004. For presentation purposes, the consolidated financial statements refer to the calendar quarters for convenience. The results of operations for the quarter ended July 4, 2004, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The first six months of 2004 ended on July 4, 2004, and consisted of approximately 27 weeks, while the first six months of 2003 ended on June 29, 2003, and consisted of approximately 26 weeks. The second quarter of 2004 and 2003 both consisted of 13 weeks.

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.

     Certain items previously reported in specific financial statement captions have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     In July 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF Issue No. 02-14, “Whether an Investor Should Apply the Equity Method of Accounting to Investments Other Than Common Stock.” This issue addresses the determination of whether an investment is in-substance common stock and when to perform that evaluation, but does not address the determination of whether an investor has the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee. The pronouncement is effective for fiscal periods beginning after September 15, 2004. For existing investments, the investor should make an initial determination as to whether the investment is in-substance common stock based on the circumstances existing as of the date of first application of this issue. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated balance sheet or statement of operations.

     In March 2004, the EITF issued EITF Issue No. 03-06, “Participating Securities and the Two-class Method Under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share.” EITF Issue No. 03-06 addresses a number of questions regarding the computation of earnings per share (“EPS”) by companies that have issued securities other than common stock that contractually entitle the holder to participate in dividends and earnings of the company when, and if, it declares dividends on its common stock. The issue also provides further guidance in applying the two-class method of calculating EPS. It clarifies what constitutes a participating security and how to apply the two-class method of computing EPS once it is determined that a security is participating, including how to allocate undistributed earnings to such a security. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal periods beginning after March 31, 2004. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s computation of EPS.

     In March 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 03-01, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.” EITF No. 03-01 provides guidance on recording other-than-temporary impairments of cost method investments and requires additional disclosures for those investments. The recognition and measurement guidance in EITF No. 03-01 should be applied to other-than-temporary impairment evaluations in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. The disclosure requirements are effective for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004, and are required only for annual periods. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated balance sheet or statement of operations.

6

     In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) released a revision to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51.” FIN 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. A public entity shall apply the provisions of the FIN 46 revision no later than the end of the first reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004. However, a public entity shall apply FIN 46 to entities considered to be special-purpose entities no later than as of the end of the first reporting period that ends after December 15, 2003. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the consolidated balance sheet or statement of operations.

NOTE 2 — SEPARATION OF LSI LOGIC STORAGE SYSTEMS, INC.

     On November 13, 2003, the Company announced its intention to separate its wholly-owned subsidiary, Engenio Information Technologies, Inc. (“Engenio” or “Storage Systems segment”), and create an independent storage systems company. Engenio was formerly referred to as LSI Logic Storage Systems, Inc. The Company has entered into agreements to implement this separation and to address various arrangements between Engenio and the Company. On February 19, 2004, Engenio filed a registration statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). On July 27, 2004, Engenio filed Amendment No. 8 to the Registration Statement. On July 29, 2004, LSI announced jointly with Engenio the postponement of the initial public offering of its common stock due to market conditions. The Company has capitalized approximately $1.5 million in professional services that are directly and solely related to the initial public offering of Engenio common stock. If the offering does not occur, the Company will record such expenses as selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses in the statement of operations.

     The separation of Engenio from the Company, including the transfer of related assets, liabilities and intellectual property rights, was substantially completed in December 2003. At that time, the Company and Engenio entered into a Master Separation Agreement, General Assignment and Assumption Agreement, Intellectual Property Agreement, Employee Matters Agreement and an Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement as more fully described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. In March 2004, the Company and Engenio entered into the following additional agreements that further specify the terms of the separation.

     Tax Sharing Agreement. The Tax Sharing Agreement sets forth the principal arrangements between the Company and Engenio regarding the filing of tax returns, the payment of taxes and the conduct of tax audits or disputes. The Tax Sharing Agreement provides that Engenio’s stand-alone tax liability equals its taxable income multiplied by the highest corporate tax rate in effect for the year, modified by taking into account its losses and loss carryovers from prior years and, to the extent actually used, its credits. Engenio is obligated to pay the Company the amount of its stand-alone tax liability to the extent Engenio is included in any consolidated, combined or unitary tax return with the Company.

     Under the Tax Sharing Agreement, the Company is required to prepare and file all consolidated, combined or unitary tax returns of the Company and Engenio through the date that Engenio ceases to be a member of the Company’s consolidated or combined group, including the final consolidated federal income tax return. The Company has the right to review and consent to the federal and state income tax returns filed for the first tax year after Engenio ceases to be a member of the Company’s consolidated group, which may not be withheld unreasonably. In addition, the Company has sole and complete authority to control and resolve all tax audits and other disputes relating to any consolidated, combined or unitary returns filed by the Company. However, the Company may not enter into any dispute settlement that would materially increase Engenio’s liability under the Tax Sharing Agreement without Engenio’s consent, which cannot be withheld unreasonably.

     Transition Services Agreement. The Transition Services Agreement governs the provisions by the Company to Engenio of services such as finance, accounting and treasury, human resources, sales support, legal matters and information technology.

     Real Estate Matters Agreement. The Real Estate Matters Agreement describes the manner in which the Company will transfer to or share with Engenio various properties leased and owned by the Company. The agreement provides that all reasonable costs required to effect the transfers, including landlord consent fees and landlord attorneys’ fees, will be paid by the Company.

     Investor Rights Agreement. The Investor Rights Agreement provides for specified registration and other rights relating to the Company’s ownership of Engenio’s shares of Class B common stock.

7

NOTE 3 — BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

     Acquisition of Accerant Inc. On May 11, 2004, the Company acquired Accerant Inc. (“Accerant”). The acquisition is anticipated to expand consumer product offerings within the Semiconductor segment. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase of a business.

     The Company paid approximately $14.1 million in cash for the acquisition. The Company will also issue approximately 234,000 restricted common shares to certain Accerant employees hired as part of the transaction. Resulting deferred stock compensation will be amortized over a vesting period of two years using the straight-line method. The total purchase price was allocated to the estimated fair value of net assets acquired based on management estimates as follows:

     The Company may also pay additional cash of up to $4.0 million if certain revenue targets are achieved over a period ending December 31, 2005. Such contingent consideration will represent additional purchase price and accordingly goodwill when and if such targets are met.

     Useful lives of intangible assets. The amounts allocated to current technology and non-compete agreements are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of 5 and 2 years, respectively using the straight-line method.

     Acquisition of Velio Communications. On April 2, 2004, the Company acquired Velio Communications, Inc. (“Velio”). The acquisition is anticipated to expand product offerings for high-speed interconnect and switch fabric application specific standard products (“ASSPs”) in the global communications market within the Semiconductor segment. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase of a business.

     The Company paid approximately $19.8 million in cash for the acquisition. The Company will also issue approximately 100,000 restricted common shares to certain Velio employees hired as part of the transaction. Resulting deferred stock compensation will be amortized over a vesting period of two years using the straight-line method. The total purchase price was allocated to the estimated fair value of net assets acquired based on management estimates as follows:

     Useful lives of intangible assets. The amounts allocated to current technology, customer base, non-compete agreements and existing purchase orders are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of 9 months to 5.5 years using the straight-line method.

     Pro forma statements of earnings information have not been presented because the effect of these acquisitions was not material either individually or on an aggregate basis.

8

NOTE 4 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

     The following table provides pro forma disclosures as if the Company had recorded compensation costs based on the estimated grant date fair value, as defined by the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, for awards granted under its stock option and stock purchase plans. The estimated weighted-average grant date fair value, as defined by SFAS No. 123, was calculated using the Black-Scholes model. The Black-Scholes model was developed to estimate the fair value of freely tradable, fully transferable options without vesting restrictions, which significantly differ from the Company’s stock option awards. These models also require highly subjective assumptions, including future stock price volatility and expected time until exercise, which greatly affect the calculated grant date fair value.

* This amount excludes amortization of non-cash deferred stock compensation on restricted stock awards.

** The amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 have been adjusted to reflect higher calculated fair values for the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which resulted in a 1% increase in the pro forma net loss for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.

NOTE 5 — RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER ITEMS

     The Company recorded charges of $3.0 million and $2.4 million in restructuring of operations and other items for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively primarily in the Semiconductor segment. The Company recorded a charge of $125 million and $160 million in restructuring of operations and other items for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. For a complete discussion of the 2003 restructuring actions, please refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Restructuring and impairment of long-lived assets:

First quarter of 2004:

     The Company recorded a gain of $3.3 million on the sale of fixed assets that had previously been held for sale and an expense of $1.1 million for the abandonment of fixed assets that had previously been held for sale. In addition, an expense of $1.1 million was recorded for the write-down of fixed assets due to impairment.

     An expense of $0.3 million was recorded to reflect the change in time value of accruals for facility lease termination costs, net of adjustments for changes in sublease assumptions for certain previously accrued facility lease termination costs. An expense of $0.2 million was recorded primarily for severance and termination benefits for four employees involved in research and development.

9

Second quarter of 2004:

     The Company recorded a gain of $1.0 million on the sale of fixed assets that had previously been held for sale and an expense of $4.0 million primarily for the write-down of the Colorado Springs fabrication facility to reflect a decline in fair market value and to write down certain spare parts for fixed assets.

     An expense of $0.4 million was recorded to reflect the change in time value of accruals for facility lease termination costs, net of adjustments for changes in sublease assumptions for certain previously accrued facility lease termination costs. Previously accrued contract termination fees of $0.4 million were reversed as the result of more favorable than expected negotiations to terminate those contracts.

     The fair values of impaired equipment and facilities were estimated by management. Given that current market conditions for the sale of older fabrication facilities and related equipment may fluctuate, there can be no assurance that the Company will realize the current net carrying value of the assets held for sale. The Company reassesses the realizability of the carrying value of these assets at the end of each quarter until the assets are sold or otherwise disposed of and additional adjustments may be necessary. Assets held for sale of $25 million and $30 million were included as a component of prepaid expenses and other current assets as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Assets classified as held for sale are not depreciated.

     The following table sets forth the Company’s restructuring reserves as of June 30, 2004, which are included in other accrued liabilities on the balance sheet:

     Other Items

     During the second quarter of 2004, the Company reclassified a parcel of land in Colorado with a book value of $1.4 million from a long-term asset to a current asset held for sale. The land is part of total assets in the Semiconductor segment. The Company expects to sell the property within the next 12 months for an amount in excess of book value.

10

NOTE 6 —INVESTMENTS

     An unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities of $4 million, net of the related tax effect of $2 million, and $8 million, net of the related tax effect of $4 million, was included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Net realized losses on sales of available-for-sale debt securities were $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale debt securities were $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale debt securities were $2 million and $9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.

     The Company realized pre-tax gains of $8 million related to the following for the six months ended June 30, 2004:

• A $5 million pre-tax gain related to the sales of certain marketable available-for-sale equity securities in the second quarter of 2004; and

• A $3 million pre-tax gain associated with marketable available-for-sale equity securities of a certain technology company that was acquired by another technology company in the first quarter of 2004.

     The following table includes the details of pre-tax losses related to investments in equity securities that the Company has recorded during the first six months of 2004 and 2003. Management believed that the declines in value were other than temporary.

11

NOTE 7 — DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Foreign currency risk

     The Company enters into forward contracts that are designated as foreign currency cash-flow hedges of forecasted payments in Euros. Changes in the fair value of the forward contracts due to changes in time value are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness and are recognized in interest income and other, net. As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Company held forward contracts designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges of forecasted Euro payment transactions that were set to expire over six-month and twelve-month periods, respectively. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, the change in time value of these forward contracts was not significant. As of June 30, 2004, unrealized losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income, which will be recorded in the income statement over the next six months, were not significant. There were no unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2003. The expense for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004 and the benefit for three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 recorded in the income statement was not significant. The Company did not record any gains or losses due to hedge ineffectiveness for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.

     Forward exchange contracts and options are also used to hedge certain foreign currency-denominated assets or liabilities. These derivatives do not qualify for SFAS No. 133 hedge accounting treatment. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of these hedges are recorded immediately in earnings to offset the changes in fair value of the assets or liabilities being hedged. The related gains and losses included in interest income and other, net were not significant.

Interest rate risk

     With the objective of protecting cash flows and earnings of the Company from the impact of fluctuations in interest rates, while minimizing the cost of capital, the Company may enter into or terminate interest rate swaps, such as the below mentioned transactions.

     In the second quarter of 2003, the Company entered into an interest rate swap transaction to effectively convert the LIBOR-based floating rate interest payments on the equipment operating leases discussed in Note 14 of the Notes, with an initial notional amount of $395 million, to a fixed interest rate (the “Lease Swap”). The Lease Swap qualifies to be accounted for as a cash flow hedge of the forecasted interest payments attributable to the benchmark interest rate on the equipment operating leases through September 2006. The unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income will be recorded in cost of revenues on a quarterly basis as lease payments are made. An unrealized gain as of June 30, 2004, which is expected to be recorded in cost of revenues within the next 12 months, was not significant. An unrealized loss of approximately $1 million, net of tax of $1 million was included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2003, and is expected to be recorded in cost of revenues within the next 12 months. The gain due to ineffectiveness recorded in interest income and other, net during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004 was not significant. The loss due to ineffectiveness recorded in interest income and other, net during the three months ended June 30, 2003 was not significant. Under the terms of the Lease Swap, the Company must provide collateral to match any mark-to-market exposure on the swap. As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, collateral of approximately $8 million was included in other long-term assets.

12

     NOTE 8 — BALANCE SHEET DETAIL

     The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2004 are as follows (in thousands):

     The Company monitors the recoverability of goodwill recorded in connection with acquisitions annually, or sooner if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment, if any, would be determined in accordance with SFAS No. 142, which uses a fair value model for determining the carrying value of goodwill. See the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.

13

NOTE 9 — DEBT

* The interest rate on a portion of the Convertible Subordinated Notes (“Convertible Notes”) was converted to floating rates through interest rate swaps. Interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $740 million were terminated in the second quarter of 2003. The weighted average interest rate on the Convertible Subordinated Notes, after adjusting for the impact of the interest rate swaps, for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, was 4.00% and 2.94%, respectively and 4.00% and 2.54% for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

NOTE 10 — COMMON STOCK

     Stock purchase plans. In May 2004, the stockholders approved an increase in the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan by 10 million shares. As of June 30, 2004 there were approximately 19 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

NOTE 11 — RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED INCOME/(LOSS) PER SHARE

     A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted income/(loss) per share computations is as follows:

* Numerator

+ Denominator

14

     Weighted average options to purchase 53,566,120 and 50,709,797 shares were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted shares because the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of common shares for the above period. The exercise price of these options ranged from $8.24 to $72.25 and from $9.12 to $72.25 as of June 30, 2004, respectively. Weighted average options to purchase 54,111,587 and 55,140,797 shares were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted shares because the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market price of common shares for the above period. The exercise price of these options ranged from $5.86 to $72.25 and from $5.38 to $72.25 as of June 30, 2004, respectively.

     For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004, weighted average potentially dilutive shares of 44,684,052 shares associated with the 2003 and 2001 Convertible Notes were excluded from the calculation of diluted shares because of their antidilutive effect on net income per share. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, weighted average potentially dilutive shares of 54,720,989 and 49,819,986, respectively, associated with the 2003, 2001, 2000 and 1999 Convertible Notes were excluded from the calculation of diluted shares because of their antidilutive effect on loss per share.

NOTE 12 — COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)

     Comprehensive income/(loss) is defined as a change in equity of a company during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances, excluding transactions resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Comprehensive income/(loss), net of taxes for the current reporting period and comparable period in the prior year is as follows:

NOTE 13 — SEGMENT REPORTING

     The Company operates in two reportable segments: the Semiconductor segment and the Storage Systems segment. The Storage Systems segment may also be referred to as Engenio. In the Semiconductor segment, the Company uses advanced process technology and comprehensive design methodologies to design, develop, manufacture and market highly complex integrated circuits. These system-on-a-chip solutions include application specific integrated circuits, commonly referred to as ASICs, RapidChip™ Platform ASICs and application specific standard products in silicon, or ASSPs. Semiconductor segment product offerings also include RAID host bus adapters and related products, and services. In the Storage Systems segment, the Company provides modular, high-performance, disk storage systems and sub-assemblies to server and storage original equipment manufacturers. The products of the Storage Systems segment are sold as complete storage systems or sub-assemblies configured from modular components, including storage controller modules, disk drive enclosure modules and related management software.

15

     The following is a summary of operations by segment for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:

     Intersegment revenues for the periods presented above were not significant. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, restructuring of operations and other items, net of $3 million and $2.4 million, respectively were primarily included in the Semiconductor segment. For the three months ended June 30, 2003, restructuring of operations and other items, net of $125 million primarily impacted the Semiconductor segment. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, restructuring of operations and other items, net of $145 million and $15 million were included in the Semiconductor segment and the Storage Systems segment, respectively.

     Significant Customers. The following table summarizes the number of the Company’s significant customers, each of whom accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s revenues, along with the percentage of revenues they individually represent on a consolidated basis and by segment:

     The following is a summary of total assets by segment as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003:

     Revenues from domestic operations were $243 million, representing 54% of consolidated revenues for the second quarter of 2004 compared to $217 million, representing 53% of consolidated revenues for the same period of 2003.

16

     Revenues from domestic operations were $488 million, representing 54% of consolidated revenues, for the first six months of 2004 compared to $424 million, representing 54% of consolidated revenues, for the same period of 2003.

NOTE 14 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

     On March 28, 2003, the Company entered into two lease and security agreements, each with Bank of America, National Association (“BANA”), acting as the Lessor, and Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, as the Agent, for a total of $395 million for certain wafer fabrication equipment (the “Equipment”). The leases qualify for operating lease accounting treatment. As of March 31, 2004, the amount under both leases was fully drawn. Each lease has a term of 3.5 years with no option for renewal. The Company may, at the end of the lease term, return or purchase, at a pre-determined amount, all of the Equipment. The first lease was for $235 million and was for equipment that was previously on lease immediately prior to closing this transaction. In October 2003, BANA, with the Company’s approval, assigned its rights as Lessor on the first lease to Bank of the West. The second lease was for $160 million and was for Equipment that was sold to BANA and then immediately leased back in a transaction commonly referred to as a sale-leaseback. The Equipment sold had a book value of approximately $103 million. The resulting $57 million gain on the sale of the Equipment will be deferred until the end of the lease term and has been recorded as a non-current liability as of June 30, 2004. The Company has $328 million in cash that is posted as collateral for the leases as of June 30, 2004. The lessor has access to the Company’s cash collateral only in the event of a default. Of this cash collateral, $51 million, representing the amount of cash collateral to be released in the next 12 months, is reflected in other current assets and the remaining cash collateral of $277 million is recorded in other non-current assets. In addition, the Company is required to maintain unrestricted cash and short-term investments reserves in an amount no less than $350 million. The Company was in compliance with this requirement as of June 30, 2004.

     The Company guarantees residual values related to leased equipment. As of June 30, 2004, its maximum potential exposure to residual value guarantees was approximately $163 million and the Company does not expect to have a loss on such guarantees. The fair value of the guarantee of the residual value of the equipment was determined using management estimates and was recorded as a non-current asset and liability each in the amount of $7 million as of June 30, 2004.

     In connection with the equipment operating leases described above, the Company entered into standby letters of credit for $63 million to expire at the end of the lease term. These instruments are off-balance sheet commitments to extend financial guarantees. The fair value of the letters of credit approximates the contract amount.

     No officer or employee of the Company has any financial interest in these leasing arrangements. The minimum lease payments, excluding the residual value guarantees, under the two lease agreements are $32 million, $62 million and $45 million in 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively.

     The Company leases the majority of its facilities under non-cancelable operating leases, which expire through 2014. The facility lease agreements typically provide for base rental rates that are increased at various times during the terms of the lease and for renewal options at the fair market rental value. During the first six months of 2004, the Company renegotiated the existing lease agreements for six buildings located in California. The future minimum payments for these renegotiated building leases will be $2 million, $3 million, $4 million, $5 million, $5 million and $21 million for the years ending December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and thereafter, respectively.

     The Company is a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which it may be obligated to indemnify the other party with respect to certain matters. Typically, these obligations arise in connection with contracts and license agreements or the sale of assets, under which the Company customarily agrees to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from a breach of warranties, representations and covenants related to such matters as title to assets sold, validity of certain intellectual property rights, non-infringement of third-party rights, and certain income tax related matters. In each of these circumstances, payment by the Company is typically subject to the other party making a claim to and cooperating with the Company pursuant to the procedures specified in the particular contract. This usually allows the Company to challenge the other party’s claims or, in case of breach of intellectual property representations or covenants, to control the defense or settlement of any third-party claims brought against the other party. Further, the Company’s obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of activity (typically to replace or correct the products or terminate agreement with a refund to the other party), duration and/or amounts. In some instances, the Company may have recourse against third parties and/or insurance covering certain payments made by the Company.

17

NOTE 15 — LEGAL MATTERS

     In February 1999, a lawsuit alleging patent infringement was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona by the Lemelson Medical, Education & Research Foundation, Limited Partnership (“Lemelson”) against 88 electronics industry companies, including us. The case number is CIV990377PHXRGS. The patents involved in this lawsuit are alleged to relate to semiconductor manufacturing and computer imaging, including the use of bar coding for automatic identification of articles. The plaintiff has sought a judgment of infringement, an injunction, treble damages, attorneys’ fees and further relief as the court may provide. In September 1999, the Company filed an answer denying infringement and raising affirmative defenses. In addition, the Company asserted a counterclaim for declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity and unenforceability of Lemelson’s patents. As of June 30, 2004, a claim construction hearing has been set to be held in November of 2004, but no trial date has been set. While the Company cannot make any assurance regarding the eventual resolution of this matter, the Company does not believe it will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

     On June 14, 2002, Plasma Physics Corporation (“Plasma Physics”) filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, alleging that the Company is willfully and deliberately infringing two U.S. patents. LSI was served with the lawsuit in December of 2002. The case is number CV 02-3462 (LDW) (WDW). The two Plasma Physics patents at issue are numbered 5,470,784 and 6,245,648. No specific Company products were identified in the complaint. The plaintiff has sought a judgment of infringement, an injunction, treble damages, attorneys’ fees and further relief as the court may provide. Similar lawsuits were also filed at the same time against several other corporations. In January of 2003, the Company answered the complaint denying infringement and asserting affirmative defenses. In addition, the Company asserted counterclaims seeking declaratory judgments of patent non-infringement, patent invalidity, and that the patents are unenforceable. In June of 2004, the parties agreed to submit to the Court a Voluntary Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice. Although the terms of the agreement are confidential, the agreement did not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

     The Company is a party to other litigation matters and claims that are normal in the course of its operations, and while the results of such litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes that the final outcome of such matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

NOTE 16 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

     Restructuring of operations:

     In July of 2004, the Company continued to consolidate non-manufacturing facilities and recorded $4.7 million for costs associated with exiting certain operating leases for real estate as the facilities ceased being used. In addition, the Company recorded severance and termination benefits of $0.5 million for 38 employees involved in manufacturing operations and research and development activities.

     Commitments and Contingencies:

     On August 6, 2004, the Company entered into two lease and security agreements, each with Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, acting as the Agent. One lease for $134 million is with Bank of the West acting as the Lessor, and the second lease for $201 million is with BTM Capital Corporation acting as the Lessor. The leases are for wafer fabrication equipment (the “Equipment”) that was previously on lease immediately prior to closing this transaction. See Note 14 for a discussion of these former leases entered into on March 28, 2003. The new leases qualify for operating lease accounting treatment. Each lease has a term of 3 years. The Company may, at the end of the lease term, return or purchase, at a pre-determined amount, all of the Equipment. The Company has $313 million in cash that is posted as collateral for the leases as of August 6, 2004. The Company is required to maintain unrestricted cash and short-term investments reserves in an amount no less than the higher of a) the sum of $100 million plus the principal amount of the Company’s 2001 Convertible Subordinated Notes due in 2006 or b) $350 million. The Company was in compliance with this requirement as of August 6, 2004.

     The Company guarantees residual values related to the leased equipment. As of August 6, 2004, its maximum potential exposure to residual value guarantees was approximately $142 million and the Company does not expect to have a loss on such guarantees.

   Separation of LSI Logic Storage Systems. Inc. or Engenio:

     On July 29, 2004, LSI announced jointly with Engenio the postponement of the initial public offering of its common stock due to market conditions.

18

  Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

SAFE HARBOR REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. In many cases you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “intend” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. In addition, forward-looking statements in this document include, but are not limited to, those regarding: our expectation that revenues will be in the $435 million to $465 million range for the third quarter of 2004; our expectation that our consolidated gross profit margin will be in the range of 44% to 46% in the third quarter of 2004; our expectation that products utilizing RapidChip technology will have performance comparable to cell-based ASICs at a cost significantly lower than Field Programmable Gate Arrays; our expectation that we will sell a parcel of land in Colorado within the next 12 months; our expectation that capital expenditures will be approximately $100 million in 2004; our belief that our existing liquid resources and funds generated from operations, combined with funds from such financing and our ability to borrow funds, will be adequate to meet our operating and capital requirements and obligations for the foreseeable future; our belief that if our convertible notes do not convert to equity, that our current cash position and expected future operating cash flows will be adequate to meet these obligations as they mature; and the impact regarding the adoption of new accounting standards on our consolidated balance sheet or statement of operations. We assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements, and these statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. For a summary of such risks and uncertainties, please see the paragraphs located at the end of this Item 2 entitled “Factors that May Affect Future Operating Results” and please also see the risk factors located in the Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

OVERVIEW

     Revenues for the second quarter ended June 30, 2004 were $448 million representing a 10% increase over the second quarter of 2003 and a 1% decrease from the first quarter of 2004. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $847 million as of June 30, 2004. We generated positive operating cash flows for the ninth consecutive quarter. Late in the second quarter of 2004, we experienced some slowing of the overall business that will carry over into the third quarter of 2004. Accordingly, we expect revenues to be in the $435 million to $465 million range for the third quarter of 2004.

     Design wins and product shipments for RapidChip platform products continued to increase in the second quarter of 2004, and we expect steady growth in this area leading to higher volumes in 2005.

     Separation of our Storage Systems business. On November 13, 2003, we announced our intention to separate our storage systems operations – Engenio Information Technologies, Inc. (“Engenio” or “Storage Systems segment”) and create an independent storage systems company. Engenio was formerly referred to as LSI Logic Storage Systems, Inc. We have entered into agreements to implement this separation and to address various arrangements between Engenio and us. A more comprehensive discussion of the separation agreements is set forth in Note 2 of the Notes. On February 19, 2004, Engenio filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1, (the “Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). On July 27, 2004, Engenio filed Amendment No. 8 to the Registration Statement. On July 29, 2004, we announced jointly with Engenio the postponement of the initial public offering of its common stock due to market conditions.

     Significant acquisitions. We are continually exploring strategic acquisitions that build upon our existing library of intellectual property, human capital and engineering talent, and increase our leadership position in the markets in which we operate. We acquired Velio Communications, Inc. (“Velio”) during the first quarter of 2004 and Accerant Inc. (“Accerant”) during the second quarter of 2004. Both were accounted for as purchases of businesses and, accordingly, the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the results of operations were included in our Consolidated Financial Statements as of the effective date of the acquisitions. The transactions are summarized in the table below. There were no significant differences between our accounting policies and those of the companies acquired. (See Note 3 of the Notes.)

19

     Where more than one significant factor contributed to changes in results from year to year, we have quantified such factors throughout the Management’s Discussion & Analysis, where practicable.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     Revenues:

There were no significant intersegment revenues during the periods presented.

     Second quarter of 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2004

     Total consolidated revenues for the second quarter of 2004 decreased $4.5 million or 1% from the first quarter of 2004.

     Revenues for the Semiconductor segment decreased slightly by $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2004 as compared to the first quarter of 2004. The decrease in the Semiconductor segment was primarily attributable to a decrease in demand for semiconductors used in storage component applications, such as storage ASICs products, partially offset by an increase in demand for semiconductors used in consumer product applications, such as DVD-recordable.

     Revenues for the Storage Systems segment decreased $3.2 million or 3% from the first quarter of 2004. The decrease is primarily attributable to a $7.0 million decline in revenues from the Teradata division of NCR. This decline was due to the timing of two large customer shipments for our controllers and disk enclosure related products in the first quarter of 2004 and led to strong sales to the Teradata division of NCR in that quarter. The decline was partially offset by a $2.2 million increase in revenues from IBM and a net increase of $1.6 million in revenues from our other customers.

20

     Three and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same periods of 2003

     Total consolidated revenues for the second quarter of 2004 increased $40.7 million or 10% as compared to the second quarter of 2003. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, revenues increased $120.3 million or 15% as compared to the same period of the prior year.

     Revenues for the Semiconductor segment increased $29.4 million or 10% for the second quarter of 2004 and increased $93.3 million or 16% for the first six months of 2004 as compared to the same periods of the previous year. The increase in revenues in the Semiconductor segment in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 as compared to the same periods of 2003 is attributable to an increased demand for semiconductors used in storage component applications, communications ASIC applications such as routers and switches and certain consumer product applications, such as DVD-recordable. These increases were partially offset by lower demand for semiconductors used in other consumer product applications such as video games platforms.

     Revenues for the Storage Systems segment increased $11.3 million or 11% for the second quarter of 2004 and increased $27.0 million or 13% for the first six months of 2004 as compared to the same periods of 2003. The increase in revenues in the Storage Systems segment for the second quarter and first six months of 2004 as compared to the same periods of 2003, is primarily due to a significant increase in demand from IBM, StorageTek and SGI for new controller products that were introduced in late April 2003 and increased demand for our other controller and disk enclosure related products. Although revenues from the Teradata division of NCR declined to less than 10% of Storage Systems revenues in the second quarter of 2004, this decline was primarily the result of the timing of two large customer shipments for our high-end controllers and disk enclosure related products, which occurred in the first quarter of 2004 and led to strong sales to the Teradata division of NCR in that quarter. Revenues from this customer represented 11% of Storage Systems revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2004. As a percentage of total Storage Systems revenues, revenues from IBM increased from 50% in the second quarter of 2003 to 55% in the second quarter of 2004 and from 45% to 53% during the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

     Significant Customers. The following table summarizes the number of our significant customers, each of whom accounted for 10% or more of our revenues, along with the percentage of revenues they individually represent on a consolidated basis and by segment:

Revenues by geography. The following table summarizes our revenues by geography:

21

     Second quarter of 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2004

     In the second quarter of 2004, revenues remained relatively flat in North America and Asia, including Japan, as compared to the first quarter of 2004. Revenues decreased in Europe in the second quarter of 2004 as compared to the first quarter of 2004 due mainly to a decline in demand for semiconductors used in communication ASIC applications, such as routers and switches.

     Three and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same periods of 2003

     Revenues in North America and Asia, including Japan and Europe increased in the second quarter of 2004 as compared to the second quarter of 2003. The growth in North America is mainly due to an increase in demand for semiconductors used in communication ASIC applications, such as routers and switches, and modular storage products associated with Engenio. The increase in revenues from Asia is primarily due to increased demand for semiconductors used in consumer and storage standard product applications, such as DVD-recordable and disk drive solutions. The majority of the increase from Europe was attributable to an increase in demand for semiconductors used in storage and communication ASIC applications, such as routers, switches and disk drive solutions.

     In the first six months of 2004, revenues increased in all geographic regions as compared to the same period in 2003. Demand for semiconductors used in consumer products, such as DVD-recorders, increased, although demand decreased for semiconductors used in video games platforms.

Operating costs and expenses. Key elements of the consolidated statements of operations for the respective segments are as follows:

Gross profit margin:

     Second quarter of 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2004

     The consolidated gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues increased to 47% in the second quarter of 2004 from 45% in the first quarter of 2004.

     The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Semiconductor segment increased to 50% in the second quarter of 2004 from 46% in the first quarter of 2004. The improvement in gross profit margin for the semiconductor segment was primarily attributable to the following factors:

     The favorable impacts on gross profit margin in the Semiconductor segment were partially offset by the following factors:

22

     The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Storage Systems segment decreased to 38% in the second quarter of 2004 from 39% in the first quarter of 2004. The decrease is mainly a result of an unfavorable change in the mix of products sold and higher charges for warranties.

     We expect our consolidated gross profit margin to be in the range of 44% to 46% in the third quarter of 2004.

     Three and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same periods of 2003

     The consolidated gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues increased to 47% in the second quarter of 2004 from 41% in the second quarter of 2003. The consolidated gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues increased to 46% in the first six months of 2004 as compared to 38% in the same period of 2003.

     The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Semiconductor segment increased to 50% in the second quarter of 2004 from 43% in the second quarter of 2003. The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Semiconductor segment increased to 48% in the first six months of 2004 as compared to 38% in the same period of 2003. The improvement in gross profit margin for the Semiconductor segment was primarily attributable to the following factors:

     The favorable impacts on gross margin in the Semiconductor segment were partially offset by a one percentage point decrease in gross margin due to lower sales of previously reserved inventory in the second quarter and first six months of 2004 as compared to the same periods of 2003.

     The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Storage Systems segment remained flat at 38% in the second quarter of 2004 as compared with the second quarter of 2003. The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Storage Systems segment increased to 38% in the first six months of 2004 from 37% in the first six months of 2003. The improvement in gross profit margin as a percentage of Storage Systems segment revenues is primarily a result of a reduction in the amortization of capitalized software due to the restructuring actions taken during the first quarter of 2003, lower charges for excess and obsolete inventory, a favorable mix of products sold, and lower freight charges. The improvements noted above were offset in part by higher compensation costs due to increased headcount, and higher expenses for outside services related to production line modifications to meet new customer requirements.

     Factors that may affect gross profit margins

     We have advanced wafer-manufacturing operations in Gresham, Oregon, which is our primary manufacturing site. We also acquire wafers from foundries in other locations. Utilizing a diversity of manufacturing locations allows us to better manage potential disruption in the manufacturing process due to economic and geographic risks associated with each location.

     Our operating environment, combined with the resources required to operate in the Semiconductor and Storage Systems industries, requires that we manage a variety of factors which impact gross margin. These factors include, among other things:

23

     These and other factors could have a significant effect on our gross profit margin in future periods.

Research and development:

     Second quarter of 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2004

     Research and development (“R&D”) expenses increased $1.2 million or 1% in the second quarter of 2004 as compared to the first quarter of 2004 on a consolidated basis. As a percentage of revenues, consolidated R&D expenses increased to 25% in the second quarter of 2004 from 24% in the first quarter of 2004.

     R&D expenses in the Semiconductor segment increased $1.3 million or 1% in the second quarter of 2004 as compared to the first quarter of 2004. The increase in R&D expenses for the Semiconductor segment is primarily related to continued research and development spending associated with the acquisitions in the first six months of 2004 (see Note 3 of the Notes). R&D expenses for the Semiconductor segment increased to 29% of revenues in the second quarter of 2004 from 28% in the first quarter of 2004.

     We continued the build-out of the RapidChip platform infrastructure in the second quarter of 2004. Products utilizing RapidChip technology combine the high-density, high-performance and proven intellectual property benefits of cell-based ASICs with the advantages of lower development costs and faster time to market. We expect products utilizing RapidChip technology to have performance comparable to cell-based ASICs at a cost significantly lower than Field Programmable Gate Arrays (“FPGAs”). Markets for our RapidChip platform ASIC solutions will include communications, storage, consumer, industrial and others. Our customer base for RapidChip technology encompasses a range from small start-up companies to major system OEMs throughout all of our geographic markets. We shipped our first RapidChip platform products in the fourth quarter of 2003. Design wins and product shipments for RapidChip platform products continued to increase in the second quarter of 2004.

     R&D expenses in the Storage Systems segment remained relatively flat in the second quarter of 2004 as compared to the first quarter of 2004. R&D expenses as a percentage of revenues for the Storage Systems segment remained unchanged at 12% in the first and second quarters of 2004.

24

     Three and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same periods of 2003

     R&D expenses, on a consolidated basis, decreased $1.2 million or 1% during the second quarter of 2004 as compared to the second quarter of 2003. R&D expenses for the first six months of 2004 decreased by $7.5 million or 3% as compared to the first six months of 2003 on a consolidated basis.

     R&D expenses for the Semiconductor segment decreased $4.3 million or 4% in the second quarter of 2004 and $14.7 million or 7% for the first six months of 2004 as compared to the same periods of 2003. The decrease in R&D expenses for the Semiconductor segment is primarily a result of benefits from the cost-cutting measures implemented as part of the restructuring actions in 2003 (see Note 5 of the Notes), partially offset by increased spending for RapidChip technology development.

     R&D expenses as a percentage of revenues for the Semiconductor segment decreased to 29% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to 33% in the same quarter of 2003. R&D expenses as a percentage of revenues for the Semiconductor segment decreased to 28% in the first six months of 2004 as compared to 35% in the same period of 2003.

     R&D expenses for the Storage Systems segment increased by $3.1 million or 28% in the second quarter of 2004 and $7.2 million or 34% in the first six months of 2004 as compared to the same periods of 2003 primarily as a result of increased compensation costs due to higher headcount and related expenses, higher expenses for outside service providers related to development programs and higher depreciation related to new assets purchased for product development.

     R&D expenses as a percentage of revenues for the Storage Systems segment increased to 12% in the second quarter of 2004 from 11% in the same quarter of 2003. R&D expenses as a percentage of revenues for the Storage Systems segment increased to 12% in the first six months of 2004 as compared to 10% in the same period of 2003.

     Selling, general and administrative: