def14a
Table of Contents

SCHEDULE 14A
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:
o   Preliminary Proxy Statement
 
o   Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
 
þ   Definitive Proxy Statement
 
o   Definitive Additional Materials
 
o   Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
FIRST BANCORP.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Not Applicable
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ   No fee required.
 
o   Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
  1)   Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 
  2)   Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
  3)   Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
  4)   Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
  5)   Total fee paid:
o   Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 
o   Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule, and the date of its filing.
  1)   Amount Previously Paid:
 
  2)   Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
  3)   Filing Party:
 
  4)   Date Filed:


Table of Contents

 
(FIRST BANCORP. LOGO)
 
1519 PONCE DE LEON AVENUE
SANTURCE, PUERTO RICO 00908
(787) 729-8200
 
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
 
To the Stockholders of First BanCorp:
 
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors and Section 3 of the Corporation’s By-laws, that a Special Meeting of Stockholders of First BanCorp will be held at our principal offices located at 1519 Ponce de Leon Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico, on August 24, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., for the purpose of considering and taking action on the following matters, all of which are described in the accompanying Proxy Statement:
 
(1) To approve the issuance of up to 256,401,610 shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock in exchange (the “Exchange Offer”) for shares of the Corporation’s Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A, B, C, D and E (“Preferred Stock”), in accordance with applicable New York Stock Exchange rules;
 
(2) To approve the issuance of shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock in the Exchange Offer to Héctor M. Nevares-LaCosta, a member of the Board of Directors, in exchange for his shares of Preferred Stock in accordance with applicable New York Stock Exchange rules;
 
(3) To approve an amendment to Article Sixth of the Corporation’s Restated Articles of Incorporation to decrease the par value of the Corporation’s Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10;
 
(4) To approve the issuance of up to 28,476,121 shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock to The Bank of Nova Scotia (“BNS”), in accordance with applicable New York Stock Exchange rules, if it exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder Agreement, dated August 24, 2007 (the “Stockholder Agreement”), by and between us and BNS, in connection with the Exchange Offer;
 
(5) To approve the issuance of shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock to BNS, in accordance with applicable New York Stock Exchange rules, if it exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder Agreement, in connection with the conversion into Common Stock of the Fixed Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock, Series G;
 
(6) To approve an amendment to Article Sixth of the Corporation’s Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000; and
 
(7) To approve an amendment to Article Sixth of the Corporation’s Restated Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split.
 
Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 2, 2010 are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Special Meeting or any adjournment or adjournments thereof. A list of stockholders as of the Record Date will be open to the examination of any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the Special Meeting, during ordinary business hours, for a period of ten days prior to the Special Meeting, at our principal offices.
 
You are cordially invited to attend the Special Meeting. It is important that your shares be represented regardless of the number you own. Even if you plan to be present at the Special Meeting, you are urged to complete, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy in the envelope provided. If you attend the Special Meeting, you may vote either in person or by proxy. You may revoke any proxy that you give at any time prior to its exercise.
 
By Order of the Board of Directors
 
/s/  Lawrence Odell
Lawrence Odell
Secretary
 
Santurce, Puerto Rico
August 2, 2010


 

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
     
    Page
 
  1
  1
  4
  5
  5
  6
  7
  8
  11
  23
  24
  26
  27
  29
  32
  37
  38


Table of Contents

(FIRST BANCORP. LOGO)
1519 Ponce De Leon Avenue
Santurce, Puerto Rico 00908
 
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 24, 2010
 
This proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of First BanCorp (the “Corporation”) for use at the Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held at our offices located at 1519 Ponce de Leon Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico, on August 24, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof (the “Special Meeting”). This Proxy Statement is first being sent or given to holders of record of our common stock, par value $1.00 per share (the “Common Stock”), on or about August 2, 2010. The Board of Directors has designated two individuals to serve as proxies to vote the shares represented at the Special Meeting. Shares represented by properly executed proxies that are received will be voted at the Special Meeting in accordance with the instructions specified in the proxy. If you properly submit a proxy but do not give instructions on how you want your shares to be voted, your shares will be voted FOR each proposal by the designated proxies in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations, which are described below.
 
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING
 
What information is contained in this Proxy Statement?
 
The information in this Proxy Statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the Special Meeting, the voting process, and other required information.
 
What is the purpose of the Special Meeting?
 
At the Special Meeting, stockholders will act upon the following matters:
 
(i) the issuance of up to 256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in exchange (the “Exchange Offer”) for shares of our Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A, B, C, D, and E (“Preferred Stock”);
 
(ii) the issuance of shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer to Director Héctor M. Nevares-LaCosta, a member of our Board of Directors, upon his exchange of his shares of Preferred Stock for shares of Common Stock;
 
(iii) an amendment to Article Sixth of our Restated Articles of Incorporation (“Articles of Incorporation”) to decrease the par value of the Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 per share;
 
(iv) the issuance of up to 28,476,121 shares of Common Stock to The Bank of Nova Scotia (“BNS”) if it exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder Agreement dated August 24, 2007 (the “Stockholder Agreement”) in connection with the Exchange Offer;
 
(v) the issuance of shares of Common Stock to BNS if it exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder Agreement in connection with the conversion into Common Stock of the Fixed Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock, Series G (“Series G Preferred Stock”), owned by the United States Department of the Treasury (the “U.S. Treasury”);
 
(vi) an amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000; and
 
(vii) an amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split.


Table of Contents

What should I receive?
 
You should receive this Proxy Statement, including exhibits, the Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders and the proxy card.
 
How many votes do I have?
 
You will have one vote for every share of Common Stock you owned as of the close of business on August 2, 2010, the Record Date for the Special Meeting.
 
If I am a holder of shares of Common Stock, but I did not hold my shares of Common Stock as of the Record Date, am I entitled to vote?
 
If you were not a record or beneficial holder of shares of Common Stock as of the Record Date, you will not be entitled to vote with respect to such shares.
 
How many votes can all stockholders cast?
 
Stockholders may cast one vote for each of the Corporation’s 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock that were outstanding on the Record Date.
 
How many votes must be present to hold the Special Meeting?
 
A majority of the votes that can be cast must be present either in person or by proxy to hold the Special Meeting. Proxies received but marked as abstentions or broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the Special Meeting for purposes of determining whether the majority of the votes that can be cast are present. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or other nominee indicates on the proxy card that it does not have discretionary authority to vote on a particular matter. Votes cast by proxy or in person at the Special Meeting will be counted by The Bank of New York Mellon, an independent third party. We urge you to vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the Special Meeting so that we will know as soon as possible that enough votes will be present for us to hold the Special Meeting.
 
Why is my approval necessary for the issuances of shares of Common Stock?
 
Our Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “FBP.” As further discussed below, NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03 requires that we seek stockholder approval prior to the issuances of Common Stock contemplated by Proposal Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5.
 
What vote is required and how are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?
 
Approval of each of Proposal Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, relating to the issuance of shares of Common Stock in accordance with applicable New York Stock Exchange rules, requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast on each such proposal, provided that the total votes cast on such proposal, whether for or against, represent over 50% of all of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted in determining the number of votes cast.
 
Approval of Proposal Nos. 3, 6, and 7, relating to amendments to Article Sixth of the Articles of Incorporation, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Broker non-votes and abstentions will have the same effect as votes cast against the proposed amendments.
 
How does the Board recommend that I vote?
 
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote:
 
  •  FOR the issuance of up to 256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer;
 
  •  FOR the issuance of shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer to Director Nevares-LaCosta upon his exchange of his shares of Preferred Stock for shares of Common Stock;


2


Table of Contents

 
  •  FOR the amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles of Incorporation to decrease the par value of our Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 per share;
 
  •  FOR the issuance of up to 28,476,121 shares of Common Stock to BNS if it chooses to exercise its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder Agreement in connection with the Exchange Offer;
 
  •  FOR the issuance of shares of Common Stock to BNS if it chooses to exercise its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder Agreement in connection with the conversion of Series G Preferred Stock;
 
  •  FOR the amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000; and
 
  •  FOR the amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split.
 
How do I vote?
 
You can vote either in person at the Special Meeting or by proxy without attending the Special Meeting.
 
To vote by proxy, you must:
 
  •  fill out the enclosed proxy card, date, sign, and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope;
 
  •  vote by telephone (instructions are on the proxy card); or
 
  •  vote over the Internet (instructions are on the proxy card).
 
Please refer to the specific instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card. For security reasons, our electronic voting system has been designed to authenticate your identity as a stockholder.
 
If you hold your shares in “street name,” your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee will provide you with materials and instructions for voting your shares.
 
Can I vote my shares in person at the Special Meeting?
 
If you are a “stockholder of record,” you may vote your shares in person at the Special Meeting. If you hold your shares in “street name,” you must obtain a valid, legal proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Special Meeting.
 
What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?
 
Most of our stockholders hold their shares through a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some differences between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.
 
Stockholder of Record.  If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, The Bank of New York Mellon Shareowner Services, LLC, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you. As a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Special Meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the Special Meeting, we urge you to vote via the Internet, by telephone, or by completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card.
 
Beneficial Owner.  If your shares are held by a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee who is considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee on how to vote the shares held in your account, and it will enclose or provide voting instructions for you to use in directing it on how to vote your shares. The organization that holds your shares, however, is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Special Meeting. Accordingly, because you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the Special Meeting unless you request and


3


Table of Contents

obtain a valid, legal proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares at the Special Meeting. The organization that holds your shares cannot vote your shares without your instructions, so it is important that you exercise your right to vote.
 
Who will bear the costs of soliciting proxies for the Special Meeting?
 
We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies for the Special Meeting. In addition to solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited personally, by telephone or otherwise. The Board of Directors has engaged the firm of Morrow & Co., LLC to aid in the solicitation of proxies. The cost is estimated at $10,000, plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. Our directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies but will not receive any additional compensation for their services. Proxies and proxy materials will also be distributed at our expense by brokers, nominees, custodians and other similar parties.
 
Can I change my vote?
 
Yes, you may change your vote. If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by sending in a new proxy card with a later date, or casting a new vote by telephone or over the Internet, or sending a written notice of revocation to the President or Secretary of First BanCorp, at P.O. Box 9146, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00908-0146, delivered before the proxy is exercised. If you attend the Special Meeting and want to vote in person, you may request that your previously submitted proxy not be used. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, that institution will instruct you as to how your vote may be changed.
 
What should I do if I receive more than one set of proxy materials?
 
You may receive more than one set of voting materials, including multiple copies of this Proxy Statement and multiple proxy cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate proxy card for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. Please complete, sign, date and return each proxy card that you receive.
 
Could other matters be presented at the Special Meeting?
 
The Board of Directors does not intend to present any business at the Special Meeting other than that described in the Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders.
 
What happens if the Special Meeting is postponed or adjourned?
 
Your proxy will still be valid and may be voted at the postponed or adjourned Special Meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is voted.
 
Who can help answer my questions?
 
If you have any questions about how to grant or revoke your vote or need copies of our filings, you should contact Lawrence Odell, Secretary of the Board of Directors, by e-mail at lawrence.odell@firstbankpr.com or by telephone at 787-729-8109.
 
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 24, 2010
 
This Proxy Statement, including exhibits, and the 2009 annual report to security holders are available at http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/fbp. You may obtain directions to be able to attend the Special Meeting and vote in person by contacting Lawrence Odell, Secretary of the Board of Directors, by e-mail at lawrence.odell@firstbankpr.com or by telephone at 787-729-8109.


4


Table of Contents

 
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
 
The following tables sets forth certain information as of June 30, 2010, unless otherwise described, with respect to shares of our Common Stock and Preferred Stock beneficially owned (unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes) by: (1) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our Common Stock; (2) each director; (3) each named executive officer (as defined in Item 402(a)(2) of Regulation S-K); and (4) all current directors and executive officers as a group. Any ownership of Preferred Stock by executives who are not named executive officers is also shown. This information has been provided by each of the directors and executive officers at our request or derived from statements filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Beneficial ownership of securities, as shown below, has been determined in accordance with applicable guidelines issued by the SEC. Beneficial ownership includes the possession, directly or indirectly, through any formal or informal arrangement, either individually or in a group, of voting power (which includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of, such security) and/or investment power (which includes the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, such security).
 
(1)   Beneficial Owners of More Than 5% of our Common Stock:
 
                 
    Amount and
   
    Nature of
   
    Beneficial
  Percent of
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(a)
  Ownership   Class(b)
 
The Bank of Nova Scotia
    9,250,450 (c)     10.00 %
44 King Street West 6th Fl.
Toronto, Canada M5H 1H1
               
FMR LLC
    7,300,000 (d)     7.89 %
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109
               
Angel Alvarez-Pérez
    6,360,518 (e)     6.87 %
Condominio Plaza Stella Apt.1504
Avenida Magdalena 1362
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00907
               
BlackRock, Inc. 
    6,220,207 (f)     6.72 %
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
               
First Trust Portfolio L.P. 
    4,676,229 (g)     5.05 %
120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400
Wheaton, Illinois 60187
               
 
 
(a) This table does not include the shares of Common Stock that the U.S. Treasury may acquire pursuant to the warrant to purchase 5,842,259 shares of Common Stock, or 6.31% of the currently outstanding shares of Common Stock, at an initial exercise price of $0.7252 per share, or upon conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock that it recently acquired from us. The warrant was originally issued to the U.S. Treasury at the time it acquired our Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference per share (the “Series F Preferred Stock”), in January 2009 and was amended and restated at the time that we exchanged the Series F Preferred Stock and accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock for shares of a new series of Series G Preferred Stock, that is convertible into approximately 380.2 million shares of Common Stock based on the initial conversion price at any time by the U.S. Treasury or a successor holder and by us under certain conditions, as described below under “Overview of Proposals — Agreement with the U.S. Treasury.”
 
(b) Based on 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of June 30, 2010.
 
(c) On August 24, 2007, we entered into a Stockholder Agreement with BNS, which acquired 9,250,450 shares of Common Stock in a private placement at a price of $10.25 per share pursuant to the terms of an investment agreement dated February 15, 2007. BNS filed a Schedule 13D on September 4, 2007 reporting the beneficial ownership of 10% or 9,250,450 shares of Common Stock as of August 24, 2007 and reported that it possessed sole voting power and sole dispositive power over 9,250,450 shares.


5


Table of Contents

 
(d) Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2010 in which FMR LLC reported aggregate beneficial ownership of 7,300,000 shares of the Corporation as of December 31, 2009. FMR LLC reported that it possessed sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 7,300,000 shares. FMR LLC reported that it did not possess sole power to vote or direct the vote of any shares beneficially owned.
 
(e) Based solely on a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on May 13, 2009 by Mr. Angel Àlvarez-Pérez in which Mr. Àlvarez-Pérez reported aggregate beneficial ownership of 6,360,518 shares of the Corporation. Mr. Àlvarez-Pérez reported that he possessed sole voting power and sole dispositive power over 6,339,218 shares and shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 20,300 shares.
 
(f) Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 29, 2010 in which BlackRock, Inc. reported aggregate beneficial ownership of 6,220,207 shares of the Corporation as of December 31, 2009. BlackRock, Inc. reported that it possessed sole voting power and sole dispositive power over 6,220,227 shares.
 
(g) Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2010 in which First Trust Portfolios L.P. and certain of its affiliates reported aggregate beneficial ownership of 4,676,229 shares of the Corporation as of December 31, 2009. First Trust Portfolios L.P. and certain of its affiliates reported that they possessed shared power to vote or to direct the vote of and shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 4,676,229 shares beneficially owned.
 
(2)   Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock of Directors, Named Executive Officers and Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
 
                 
    Amount and
   
    Nature of
   
    Beneficial
  Percent of
Name of Beneficial Owner
  Ownership(1)   Class*
 
Directors
               
Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez, President and Chief Executive Officer
    872,000       *  
José Menéndez-Cortada, Chairman of the Board
    45,896       *  
Jorge L. Díaz-Irizarry
    62,737 (2)     *  
José Ferrer-Canals
    5,527       *  
Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi
    81,677 (3)     *  
Fernando Rodríguez-Amaro
    32,207       *  
Héctor M. Nevares-La Costa
    4,543,396 (4)     4.91 %
Frank Kolodziej-Castro
    2,762,483       2.99 %
José F. Rodríguez-Perelló
    324,077       *  
Executive Officers
               
Luis Beauchamp-Rodríguez, former President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board(5)
    17,000       *  
Orlando Berges-González, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    10,000       *  
Lawrence Odell, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
    225,000       *  
Randolfo Rivera-Sanfeliz, former Executive Vice President(6)
    24,340       *  
Calixto García-Vélez, Executive Vice President
          *  
Fernando Scherrer, former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(7)
    47,500       *  
Current Directors and Executive Officers as a group (17 persons)
    9,394,078       10.02 %
 
 
* Represents less than 1% of our outstanding Common Stock.
 
(1) For purposes of this table, “beneficial ownership” is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, pursuant to which a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of a security if that person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of such security within 60 days. Therefore, it includes the number of shares of Common Stock that could be purchased by exercising stock


6


Table of Contents

options that were exercisable as of June 30, 2010 or within 60 days after that date, as follows: Mr. Alemán-Bermúdez, 672,000; Mr. Odell, 175,000; and 1,221,000 shares for all current directors and executive officers as a group. Also, it includes shares granted under the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, subject to transferability restrictions and/or forfeiture upon failure to meet vesting conditions, as follows: Mr. Menéndez-Cortada, 2,685; Mr. Díaz-Irizarry, 2,685; Mr. Ferrer-Canals, 2,685; Ms. Umpierre-Catinchi, 2,685; Mr. Rodríguez-Amaro, 2,685; Mr. Nevares-LaCosta, 2,685; Mr. Kolodziej-Castro, 2,685; and Mr. Rodríguez-Perelló, 2,685; 21,480 shares for all current directors and executive officers as a group. The amount does not include shares of Common Stock acquired through the Corporation’s Defined Contribution Plan pursuant to which participants may acquire units equivalent to shares of Common Stock through a unitized stock fund.
 
(2) This amount includes 22,460 shares owned separately by his spouse.
 
(3) This amount includes 9,000 shares owned jointly with her spouse.
 
(4) This amount includes 3,941,459 shares owned by Mr. Nevares-LaCosta’s father over which he has voting and investment power as attorney-in-fact.
 
(5) Mr. Beauchamp-Rodríguez resigned as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation on September 28, 2009.
 
(6) Mr. Rivera-Sanfeliz is no longer an employee of the Corporation effective as of June 28, 2010.
 
(7) Mr. Scherrer resigned as Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation on July 31, 2009.
 
(3)   Beneficial Ownership of Preferred Stock by Directors and Executive Officers:
 
The following table sets forth information as of June 30, 2010 with respect to shares of our Preferred Stock beneficially owned by our directors and executive officers:
 
                         
    Amount of Beneficial Ownership
        Number of
   
        Preferred
   
        Shares
   
        Beneficially
  Percent of
Name of Beneficial Owner
 
Title of Securities
  Owned   Class
 
José Menéndez- Cortada
    Series A Preferred Stock       1,500       *  
Chairman of the Board of Directors
    Series B Preferred Stock       500       *  
      Series C Preferred Stock       2,000       *  
      Series D Preferred Stock       6,000       *  
Jorge L. Díaz-Irizarry
    Series B Preferred Stock       2,150       *  
Director
                       
Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi
    Series E Preferred Stock       92,000       *  
Director
                       
Héctor M. Nevares-La Costa
    Series A Preferred Stock       18,000 (1)     *  
Director
    Series B Preferred Stock       73,300 (2)     *  
      Series C Preferred Stock       22,000       *  
      Series D Preferred Stock       82,800 (3)     *  
Dacio Pasarell
    Series D Preferred Stock       300       *  
Executive Vice President
    Series E Preferred Stock       4,300       *  
 
 
Represents less than 1% of applicable class of Preferred Stock.
 
(1) This amount includes 8,000 shares held in a trust for the benefit of Mr. Nevares-LaCosta’s parents over which Mr. Nevares-LaCosta has voting and investment power as trustee.
 
(2) This amount includes 20,000 shares owned by Mr. Nevares-LaCosta’s parents over which he has voting and investment power as attorney-in-fact.
 
(3) This amount includes 6,400 shares owned by Mr. Nevares-LaCosta’s parents over which he has voting and investment power as attorney-in-fact.
 
José Menéndez-Cortada, Jorge L. Díaz-Irizarry, Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi, Héctor M. Nevares-LaCosta and Dacio Pasarell have advised us that they will tender all of their shares of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer.


7


Table of Contents

 
OVERVIEW OF PROPOSALS
 
Background
 
For the fiscal year ended 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, we reported losses of approximately $275 million and $107 million, respectively. These losses were primarily caused by specific reserves and provisions against our loan portfolios in Florida and Puerto Rico. The deterioration in the quality of these assets resulted from the economic recession being experienced in the United States and in Puerto Rico. Particularly hard hit by the recession were real estate values in the two principal markets in which we operate. This adverse financial downturn diminished the collateral values supporting many of the loans extended by us in those markets. In turn, this caused us to increase reserves and, in many cases, charge off substantial amounts. The downturn in the economy and the resulting deterioration of our credits increased our non-performing assets as of March 31, 2010 to approximately $1.8 billion. We announced in our earnings release issued on July 27, 2010 that our loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $90.6 million and our non-performing assets were $1.7 billion as of June 30, 2010.
 
As a result of the continuing difficult economic conditions, we are seeking to improve our capital structure. We have assured our regulators that we are committed to raising capital and we have submitted capital plans to our regulators regarding how we plan to raise capital. The capital plans were submitted in accordance with a Written Agreement dated June 3, 2010 (the “Agreement”) that we entered into with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “Fed”) and a Consent Order dated June 2, 2010 (the “Order” and collectively with the Agreement, the “Agreements”) that our subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank), entered into with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Pursuant to these Agreements, the Corporation and FirstBank agreed to take certain actions designed to improve our financial condition. These actions include the adoption and implementation of various plans, procedures and policies related to our capital, lending activities, liquidity and funds management and strategy. The Order requires FirstBank to develop and adopt a plan to attain a leverage ratio of at least 8%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 10% and a Total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 12%, and obtain approval prior to issuing, increasing, renewing or rolling over brokered deposits. The Agreement also requires the Corporation to obtain the approval of the Fed prior to paying dividends, receiving dividends from FirstBank, incurring, increasing or guaranteeing any debt, or purchasing or redeeming any stock, to comply with certain notice provisions prior to appointing any new directors or senior executive officers and to comply with certain restrictions on severance payments and indemnification. Concurrent with the issuance by the FDIC of its Order, the FDIC granted FirstBank a temporary waiver through June 30, 2010 to enable it to continue accessing the brokered deposit market. The FDIC has granted an additional waiver through September 30, 2010. FirstBank will request waivers for future periods. No assurance can be given that the FDIC will continue to issue waivers for amounts that will enable FirstBank to meet its funding needs. Any failure to obtain a waiver would have a significantly adverse effect on FirstBank, which has relied on brokered deposits to fund a major part of its operations and had, as of March 31, 2010, $7.4 billion in brokered deposits outstanding, representing approximately 57% of our total deposits. We announced in our earnings release issued on July 27, 2010 that our average balance of brokered CDs decreased to $7.21 billion for the second quarter of 2010.
 
We have been taking steps to implement strategies to increase tangible common equity and regulatory capital through (1) the Exchange Offer, which is being submitted for stockholder approval at the Special Meeting, (2) the issuance of approximately $500 million of equity in one or more public or private offerings (a “Capital Raise”), (3) the conversion into Common Stock of the shares of Series G Preferred Stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F Preferred Stock that we sold to the U.S. Treasury on January 16, 2009, and (4) a rights offering to common stockholders. With respect to a Capital Raise, we plan to seek to raise at least $500 million of equity because we believe that amount would enable us to absorb possible additional losses based on a worst case evaluation of possible losses over the next five years while


8


Table of Contents

maintaining the capital ratios required for a well-capitalized financial institution as well as those required by the FDIC’s Order. With respect to the conversion, under the conditions described below, we can compel the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into shares of Common Stock. See “— Agreement with the U.S. Treasury.” If we complete a Capital Raise, we expect to issue rights to the holders of our currently outstanding 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock that entitle them to acquire one share of Common Stock for each share of Common Stock they own at a price equal to the purchase price in a Capital Raise. No assurance can be given that we will complete the Exchange Offer, a Capital Raise, the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock or a rights offering.
 
We believe that the Exchange Offer and, to the extent completed, the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock and a Capital Raise would enhance our long-term financial stability, improve our ability to operate in the current economic environment, and improve our ability to access the capital markets in order to fund strategic initiatives or other business needs and to absorb any future credit losses.
 
Our inability to complete the Exchange would hinder our efforts to sell Common Stock in a Capital Raise. If we need to continue to recognize significant reserves and we cannot complete a Capital Raise, the Corporation and FirstBank may not be able to comply with the minimum capital requirements included in the capital plans required by the Agreements. These capital plans, which are subject to the approval of our regulators, set forth our plan to attain the capital ratio requirements set forth in the Order over time. If, at the end of any quarter, we do not comply with any specified minimum capital ratios, we must notify our regulators. The Corporation must notify the Fed within 30 days of the end of any quarter of its inability to comply with a capital ratio requirement and submit an acceptable written plan that details the steps it will take to comply with the requirement. FirstBank must immediately notify the FDIC of its inability to comply with a capital ratio requirement and, within 45 days, it must either increase its capital to comply with the ratio requirements or submit a contingency plan to the FDIC for its sale, merger, or liquidation. In the event of a liquidation of FirstBank, the holders of any outstanding preferred stock would rank senior to the holders of our Common Stock with respect to rights upon any liquidation of the Corporation.
 
The Exchange Offer for Preferred Stock
 
On July 16, 2010, we commenced the Exchange Offer. For each share of Preferred Stock that we accept for exchange in accordance with the terms of the Exchange Offer, we will issue a number of shares of our Common Stock having the aggregate dollar value (based on a price per share determined as described below) equal to $13.75, which is equal to 55% of the $25 liquidation preference of a share of Preferred Stock. The price per share will be based on the greater of the average Volume Weighted Average Price (or “VWAP”) during the five trading-day period ending on the second business day immediately preceding the expiration date of the Exchange Offer and the minimum share price of $1.18. As of July 21, 2010, the market value of a share of Common Stock was $0.51 and the market prices of a share of each series of Preferred Stock were as follows: Series A Preferred Stock - $4.77; Series B Preferred Stock — $4.70; Series C Preferred Stock — $4.77; Series D Preferred Stock - $4.89; and Series E Preferred Stock — $4.65. If the minimum share price is used to determine the number of shares to be issued in the Exchange Offer, we will issue 11.6525 shares of Common Stock in exchange for each share of Preferred Stock. As discussed below under “— Required Stockholder Action,” completion of the Exchange Offer is subject to stockholder approval.
 
Agreement with the U.S. Treasury
 
On July 7, 2010, we entered into an agreement with the U.S. Treasury regarding the exchange of our shares of Series F Preferred Stock, which has a liquidation preference of $400 million, and accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock, for shares of a new series of Fixed Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock, Series G. Based on accrued and unpaid dividends of $24.2 million as of July 20, 2010, we issued 424,174 shares of Series G Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury on July 20, 2010. Notice was mailed to our stockholders of record on July 9, 2010 that we obtained an exception from the shareholder approval policy set forth in Section 312.03 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual to issue the securities to the U.S. Treasury.


9


Table of Contents

The Series G Preferred Stock has terms similar to the Series F Preferred Stock (including the same $1,000 liquidation preference per share), but is convertible, under the conditions discussed below, into shares of Common Stock based on an initial conversion rate of 896.3045 shares of Common Stock for each share of Series G Preferred Stock, calculated by dividing $650, or a discount of 35% from the $1,000 liquidation preference per share of Series G Preferred Stock, by the initial conversion price of $0.7252 per share, which is subject to adjustment. Based on the initial conversion rate, the 424,174 shares of Series G Preferred Stock will be convertible into approximately 380.2 million shares of Common Stock. The conversion price of the Series G Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment, including if the shares of Common Stock issued in a Capital Raise are priced below 90% of the market price per share of Common Stock on the trading day immediately preceding the pricing date of such Capital Raise, or if shares of Common Stock are otherwise issued, except in certain circumstances, including the Exchange Offer, at a price below the then conversion price of the Series G Preferred Stock. We can compel conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock if, within nine months from the date of the agreement, (a) at least $385 million of the liquidation preference of our Series A through E Preferred Stock is tendered in the Exchange Offer, (b) we raise $500 million of additional capital, subject to terms, other than the price per share, reasonably acceptable to the U.S. Treasury in its sole discretion, (c) we obtain the approval of the holders of our Common Stock of an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 750,000,000 to at least 1,200,000,000 and to reduce the par value of a share of Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10, (d) we have received from the appropriate banking regulators all requisite approvals (which we expect to receive), (e) we have made any applicable anti-dilution adjustments and (f) none of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries has dissolved or became subject to insolvency or similar proceedings, or has become subject to other materially adverse regulatory or other actions. The U.S. Treasury, and any subsequent holder of the Series G Preferred Stock, has the right to convert the Series G Preferred Stock at any time. Unless earlier converted by the holder or the Corporation, the Series G Preferred Stock will automatically convert into shares of Common Stock on the seventh anniversary of the issuance of the Series G Preferred Stock at the then current market price of our Common Stock.
 
At the time we exchanged the Series F Preferred Stock for Series G Preferred Stock, we issued to the U.S. Treasury an amended and restated warrant having a 10-year term and exercisable at an initial exercise price of $0.7252 per share to replace the original warrant we issued to the U.S. Treasury when it acquired the Series F Preferred Stock. Like the original warrant, the amended and restated warrant has an anti-dilution right that will require an adjustment to the exercise price of, and the number of shares underlying, the warrant. This adjustment will be necessary under various circumstances, including if we issue shares of Common Stock for consideration per share that is lower than the initial conversion price of the Series G Preferred Stock, or $0.7252. Depending upon the market price of shares of Preferred Stock at the time we issue shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer, the amended and restated warrant may require adjustment to the exercise price of the warrant to equal the consideration per share received by us in the Exchange Offer and the number of shares underlying the amended and restated warrant would be increased by the number obtained by multiplying the initial number by a fraction equal to the exercise price prior to the Exchange Offer over the consideration per share we receive in the Exchange Offer.
 
The agreement with the U.S. Treasury includes various other provisions. Included among these provisions are the U.S. Treasury’s agreement to vote, or cause to be voted, any shares of Common Stock that it acquires pursuant to the terms of the Series G Preferred Stock or the amended and restated warrant, except with respect to certain matters, in the same proportion as the votes of all other outstanding shares of Common Stock. The U.S. Treasury will retain discretionary authority to vote on the election and removal of directors, the approval of any business combination or sale of substantially all of the assets or property of the Corporation, the approval of any dissolution of the Corporation, the approval of any issuance of any securities of the Corporation on which holders of Common Stock are entitled to vote and on any other matters reasonably incidental to those matters, as determined by the U.S. Treasury.


10


Table of Contents

Required Stockholder Action
 
We cannot complete the Exchange Offer unless our stockholders approve Proposal No. 1, which seeks approval of the issuance of up to 256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer. In addition, we may not be able to complete the Exchange Offer if our stockholders do not approve Proposal No. 3, which seeks stockholder approval of an amendment to Article Sixth of the Articles of Incorporation to decrease the par value of the Corporation’s Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 per share. The reduction in the par value of our Common Stock will be necessary to complete the Exchange Offer if, for example, the market value of a share of Preferred Stock tendered in the exchange is less than $10 at a time when the market value of the Common Stock would result in the issuance of more than 10 shares per tendered share of Preferred Stock.
 
We are also requesting stockholder approval of Proposal Nos. 2 and 4, which relate to the Exchange Offer. Adoption of these proposals is not a condition to the completion of the Exchange Offer. If stockholders do not approve Proposal No. 2, which seeks approval of the issuance of shares of Common Stock to Mr. Nevares-LaCosta upon his tender of shares of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer, or Proposal No. 4, which seeks stockholder approval of the issuance of shares of Common Stock to BNS upon its exercise of the anti-dilution right that it has under the Stockholder Agreement, we will be unable to issue shares to Mr. Nevares-LaCosta or BNS in an amount that exceeds 1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock prior to such issuances.
 
We are also requesting stockholder approval of Proposal No. 5, which relates to the issuance of shares of Common Stock to BNS upon its exercise of the anti-dilution right that it has under the Stockholder Agreement in connection with the conversion into Common Stock of the Series G Preferred Stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury. If stockholders do not approve Proposal No. 5, we will be unable to issue shares to BNS as a result of the conversion into Common Stock of the Series G Preferred Stock in an amount that exceeds 1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock prior to such issuance.
 
Finally, we are requesting stockholder approval of Proposal Nos. 6 and 7, which seek stockholder approval of amendments to Article Sixth of the Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock and to implement a reverse stock split. If stockholders do not approve Proposal No. 6, we will not have enough authorized shares of Common Stock to issue shares of Common Stock to investors in a Capital Raise for $500 million and to current stockholders in a rights offering. If stockholders do not approve Proposal No. 7, we may not be able to bring our Common Stock share price and average share price for 30 consecutive trading days above $1.00, which is a continued listing requirement of the NYSE. The NYSE will commence suspension and delisting procedures if we cannot regain compliance with this requirement by January 9, 2011.
 
PROPOSAL NO. 1 — ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER
 
Overview and Reason for the Proposal
 
The Board of Directors is seeking stockholder approval of the issuance of shares of Common Stock in exchange for shares of Preferred Stock. On July 16, 2010, we commenced an offer to issue 256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer. A special committee of the Board of Directors, comprised of Fernando Rodriguez-Amaro (Chairman), Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez, José Rodriguez-Perello, Frank Kolodziej-Castro and José Ferrer-Canals recommended to the full Board the terms of the Exchange Offer and the Board determined to conduct the Exchange Offer. None of the members of the special committee own shares of Preferred Stock.
 
Our Common Stock is listed on the NYSE and, thus, we are subject to NYSE listing requirements. Under NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03(c), stockholder approval is required prior to the issuance of Common Stock, or of securities convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock, in any transaction or series of related transactions, other than in certain circumstances that are inapplicable in this case, if (1) the Common Stock has, or will have upon issuance, voting power equal to or in excess of 20% of the voting power outstanding before the issuance of such stock or of securities convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock or (2) the number of shares of Common Stock to be issued is, or will be upon issuance, equal to or in


11


Table of Contents

excess of 20% of the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding before the issuance of the Common Stock or of securities convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock. Because 256,401,610 shares are being offered for issuance in the exchange, and that issuance would constitute over 20% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock prior to the completion of the Exchange Offer, we are required to seek stockholder approval prior to such issuance.
 
Purpose of the Exchange Offer
 
We decided to conduct the Exchange Offer to improve our capital structure given the continuing difficult economic conditions in the markets in which we operate and the evolving regulatory environment. We must increase our common equity to provide additional protection against future recognition of additional loan loss reserves against our loan portfolio and credit losses associated with the disposition of nonperforming assets due to the current economic situation in Puerto Rico and the United States that has impacted the Corporation’s asset quality and earnings performance. Total non-performing loans to total loans increased to 12.35% as of March 31, 2010 from 11.23% as of December 31, 2009 and from 5.27% as of March 31, 2009.
 
The restructuring of our equity components through the Exchange Offer will strengthen the quality of our regulatory capital position and enhance our ability to meet any new capital requirements. Furthermore, through the Exchange Offer, we are seeking to improve our common equity to risk weighted assets ratio. In the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program, the SCAP, applied to large money-center banks in the U.S., federal regulators established a 4% Tier 1 common equity to risk weighted assets ratio as the minimum threshold to determine the potential capital needs of such banks. While the SCAP is not applicable to us, we believe that the Tier 1 common equity ratio is being viewed by financial analysts and rating agencies as a guide for measuring the capital adequacy of banking institutions. The Exchange Offer will also improve our tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio, which is another metric used by financial analysts to determine a bank’s capital requirements. As of March 31, 2010, our Tier 1 common equity ratio was 3.36% and our tangible common equity ratio was 2.74%. If $385 million of the liquidation preference or approximately 70% of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock are exchanged in the Exchange Offer, our Tier 1 common equity ratio and tangible common equity ratio as of March 31, 2010 on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the Exchange Offer would have been 6.23% and 4.79%, respectively. This success rate would meet one of the conditions necessary for us to compel the U.S. Treasury to convert into Common Stock the Series G Preferred Stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F Preferred Stock. The other substantive conditions necessary for us to compel the conversion are our issuance of $500 million of additional capital, subject to terms, other than the price per share, reasonably acceptable to the U.S. Treasury in its sole discretion, and receipt of the approval by the holders of our Common Stock of an amendment to our Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 750,000,000 to at least 1,200,000,000 and reduce the par value of our Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 per share.
 
Terms of the Exchange
 
We are offering to exchange up to 256,401,610 newly issued shares of Common Stock for any and all issued and outstanding shares of Preferred Stock. For each share of Preferred Stock that we accept for exchange in accordance with the terms of the exchange offer, we will issue a number of shares of Common Stock having the Exchange Value set forth in the table below unless the average VWAP of the Common Stock is $1.18 or less, in which case we will issue 11.6525 shares of Common Stock for each share of Preferred Stock.
 


12


Table of Contents

                                       
        Aggregate
       
        Liquidation
  Liquidation
   
        Preference
  Preference
  Exchange
CUS IP
 
Title of Securities
  Outstanding   per Share   Value
 
 
318672201
    7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A   $ 90,000,000       $ 25       $ 13.75    
 
318672300
    8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series B   $ 75,000,000       $ 25       $ 13.75    
 
318672409
    7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series C   $ 103,500,000       $ 25       $ 13.75    
 
318672508
    7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series D   $ 92,000,000       $ 25       $ 13.75    
 
318672607
    7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series E   $ 189,600,000       $ 25       $ 13.75    
 
Depending on the trading price of our Common Stock, the market value of the Common Stock we issue on the settlement date in exchange for each share of Preferred Stock we accept for exchange may be less than, equal to or greater than the applicable Exchange Value referred to above. If the trading price of our Common Stock is below $1.18 per share, the market value of our Common Stock to be received in the exchange offer will be less than the applicable Exchange Value.
 
Consequences If Stockholders Approve the Proposal
 
The issuance of our shares of Common Stock in connection with the Exchange Offer would increase the number of outstanding shares. As shown in the tables below, the increased number of shares would reduce the loss per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and book value per share as of March 31, 2010 on a pro forma basis. In addition, the issuance of the additional shares would decrease any future earnings per share and would have a dilutive effect on each stockholder’s percentage voting power.
 
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information
 
The following selected unaudited pro forma financial information is presented to give effect to and show the pro forma impact of the Exchange Offer on First BanCorp’s balance sheet as of March 31, 2010 and First BanCorp’s results of operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and the quarter ended March 31, 2010 assuming two different levels of participation in the Exchange Offer as discussed below. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not give effect to our issuance of Series G Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F Preferred Stock or a Capital Raise.
 
The unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily indicate the financial position or results that would have been realized had the Exchange Offer been completed as of the dates indicated or that will be realized in the future when and if the Exchange Offer is completed. The selected unaudited pro forma financial information has been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with First BanCorp’s historical consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed with the SEC, which are included as Exhibits C and D, respectively, to this Proxy Statement.
 
Unaudited Pro Forma Balance Sheets
 
The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet of First BanCorp as of March 31, 2010 is presented as if the Exchange Offer had been completed on March 31, 2010. We have shown the pro forma impact of a “High Participation Scenario” and a “Low Participation Scenario” prepared using the assumptions set forth below.

13


Table of Contents

The “High Participation Scenario” assumes (i) the exchange of 90% of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock ($495.09 million aggregate liquidation preference) for 230,761,449 shares of our Common Stock, and (ii) a Relevant Price of $1.18 per share.
 
The “Low Participation Scenario” assumes (i) the exchange of 50% of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock ($275.05 million aggregate liquidation preference) for 128,200,805 shares of our Common Stock, and (ii) a Relevant Price of $1.18 per share.
 
If the Relevant Price is greater than the $1.18 per share amount assumed in the preceding paragraphs, there will be a decrease in the number of shares of Common Stock being issued and an increase in surplus, and increase in earnings per share relative to the pro forma financial statement information.
 
There can be no assurance that the foregoing assumptions will be realized in the future.


14


Table of Contents

Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information
 
High Participation Scenario
 
                         
    Adjustments  
    Actual
    Exchange of
    Pro Forma
 
    March 31, 2010     Preferred Stock     March 31, 2010  
    (In thousands, except per share amounts)  
 
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks
  $ 675,551     $ (6,876 )(5)   $ 668,675  
                         
Money market investments:
                       
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell
    331,677             331,677  
Time deposits with other financial institutions
    600             600  
Other short-term investments
    322,371             322,371  
                         
Total money market investments
    654,648             654,648  
                         
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value
    3,470,988             3,470,988  
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost
    564,931             564,931  
Other equity securities
    69,680             69,680  
                         
Total investment securities
    4,105,599             4,105,599  
                         
Loans receivable, net
    12,698,264             12,698,264  
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market
    19,927             19,927  
                         
Total loans, net
    12,718,191             12,718,191  
                         
Premises and equipment, net
    199,072             199,072  
Other real estate owned
    73,444             73,444  
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments
    70,955             70,955  
Due from customers on acceptances
    726             726  
Accounts receivable from investment sales
    62,575             62,575  
Other assets
    290,203             290,203  
                         
Total assets
  $ 18,850,964     $ (6,876 )   $ 18,844,088  
                         
 
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
                       
Non-interest-bearing deposits
  $ 703,394     $     $ 703,394  
Interest — bearing deposits
    12,174,840             12,174,840  
                         
Total deposits
    12,878,234             12,878,234  
                         
Advances from the Federal Reserve
    600,000             600,000  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    2,500,000             2,500,000  
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
    960,440             960,440  
Notes payable
    28,313             28,313  
Other borrowings
    231,959             231,959  
Bank acceptances outstanding
    726             726  
Accounts payable and other liabilities
    162,749             162,749  
                         
Total liabilities
    17,362,421             17,362,421  
                         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                       
Preferred stock
    929,660       (495,090 )(1)     434,570  
                         
Common stock
    102,440       230,761 (2)     333,201  
Less: Treasury stock (at cost)
    (9,898 )           (9,898 )
                         
Common stock outstanding
    92,542       230,761       323,303  
                         
Additional paid-in capital
    134,247       46,375 (3)     180,622  
Legal surplus
    299,006             299,006  
Retained earnings
    10,140       211,078 (4)     221,218  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    22,948             22,948  
                         
Total stockholders’ equity
    1,488,543       (6,876 )     1,481,667  
                         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 18,850,964     $     $ 18,844,088  
                         
Book Value per common share(6)
  $ 6.04     $ (2.80 )   $ 3.24  
Tangible book value per common share(7)
  $ 5.56     $ (2.46 )   $ 3.10  


15


Table of Contents

 
(1) Assumes Exchange Offer participation at 90% with a ratio of Exchange Value to liquidation preference equal to 55%.
 
(2) Represents the issuance of Common Stock at par value of $1.00.
 
(3) Represents the additional paid in capital with respect to newly issued Common Stock, net of exchange costs and adjusted for the issuance costs of preferred shares exchanged.
 
(4) Represents the excess of the Preferred Stock carrying value, reduced by the issuance costs of preferred shares exchanged, over the value of the Common Stock to be issued on the Exchange Offer considering the assumptions described in note 1 above.
 
(5) Represents the costs associated with this Exchange Offer calculated on a pro-rata basis according to the number of shares exchanged. The amount was reduced from additional paid in capital.
 
(6) Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced book value per common share as of June 30, 2010 of $5.48.
 
(7) Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced tangible book value per common share as of June 30, 2010 of $5.01.


16


Table of Contents

Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information
 
Low Participation Scenario
 
                         
    Adjustments  
    Actual
    Exchange of
    Pro Forma
 
    March 31, 2010     Preferred Stock     March 31, 2010  
    (In thousands, except per share amounts)  
 
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks
  $ 675,551     $ (4,126 )(5)   $ 671,425  
                         
Money market investments:
                       
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell
    331,677             331,677  
Time deposits with other financial institutions
    600             600  
Other short-term investments
    322,371             322,371  
                         
Total money market investments
    654,648             654,648  
                         
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value
    3,470,988             3,470,988  
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost
    564,931             564,931  
Other equity securities
    69,680             69,680  
                         
Total investment securities
    4,105,599             4,105,599  
                         
Loans receivable, net
    12,698,264             12,698,264  
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market
    19,927             19,927  
                         
Total loans, net
    12,718,191             12,718,191  
                         
Premises and equipment, net
    199,072             199,072  
Other real estate owned
    73,444             73,444  
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments
    70,955             70,955  
Due from customers on acceptances
    726             726  
Accounts receivable from investment sales
    62,575             62,575  
Other assets
    290,203             290,203  
                         
Total assets
  $ 18,850,964     $ (4,126 )   $ 18,846,838  
                         
 
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
                       
Non-interest-bearing deposits
  $ 703,394     $     $ 703,394  
Interest — bearing deposits
    12,174,840             12,174,840  
                         
Total deposits
    12,878,234             12,878,234  
                         
Advances from the Federal Reserve
    600,000             600,000  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    2,500,000             2,500,000  
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
    960,440             960,440  
Notes payable
    28,313             28,313  
Other borrowings
    231,959             231,959  
Bank acceptances outstanding
    726             726  
Accounts payable and other liabilities
    162,749             162,749  
                         
Total liabilities
    17,362,421             17,362,421  
                         
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                       
Preferred stock
    929,660       (275,050 )(1)     654,610  
                         
Common stock
    102,440       128,201 (2)     230,641  
Less: Treasury stock (at cost)
    (9,898 )           (9,898 )
                         
Common stock outstanding
    92,542       128,201       220,743  
                         
Additional paid-in capital
    134,247       25,458 (3)     159,705  
Legal surplus
    299,006             299,006  
Retained earnings
    10,140       117,265 (4)     127,405  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    22,948             22,948  
                         
Total stockholders’ equity
    1,488,543       (4,126 )     1,484,417  
                         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 18,850,964     $     $ 18,846,838  
                         
Book value per common share(6)
  $ 6.04     $ (2.28 )   $ 3.76  
Tangible book value per common share(7)
  $ 5.56     $ (2.00 )   $ 3.56  
 
 
(1) Assumes Exchange Offer participation at 50% with a ratio of Exchange Value to liquidation preference equal to 55%.
(2) Represents the issuance of Common Stock at par value of $1.00.
(3) Represents the additional paid in capital with respect to newly issued Common Stock, net of exchange costs and adjusted for the issuance costs of preferred shares exchanged.


17


Table of Contents

 
(4) Represents the excess of the Preferred Stock carrying value, reduced by the issuance costs of preferred shares exchanged, over the value of Common Stock to be issued on the Exchange Offer considering the assumptions described in note 1 above.
 
(5) Represents the costs associated with this Exchange offer calculated on a pro rata basis according to the number of shares exchanged. The amount was reduced from additional paid in capital.
 
(6) Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced book value per common share as of June 30, 2010 of $5.48.
 
(7) Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced tangible book value per common share as of June 30, 2010 of $5.01.
 
Pro Forma Earnings Implications
 
The following presents the pro forma impact of the Exchange Offer on certain statement of operations items and losses per share of Common Stock for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009 as if the Exchange Offer had been completed on January 1, 2009. We have calculated the pro forma information below by (1) eliminating all the actual dividends in 2009 paid to holders of shares of Preferred Stock who participate at the levels assumed in each of the High Participation Scenario and the Low Participation Scenario, and (2) assuming that the new shares of our Common Stock issuable in the Exchange Offer were issued on January 1, 2009 and received dividends through August 2009. The retained earnings impact of the Exchange Offer has not been included in the analysis because it is not recurring.
 
                                                 
    Pro Forma Implications
 
    Consolidated Statements of Operations  
          High
    Low
          High
    Low
 
          Participation
    Participation
          Participation
    Participation
 
    Actual     Scenario     Scenario     Actual     Scenario     Scenario  
    Q1 2010     Q1 2010     Q1 2010     FY ’09     FY ’09     FY ’09  
    (In thousands, except per share amounts)(Unaudited)  
 
Interest income
    220,988       220,988       220,988       996,574       996,574       996,574  
Interest expense
    104,125       104,125       104,125       477,532       477,532       477,532  
                                                 
Net interest income
    116,863       116,863       116,863       519,042       519,042       519,042  
Provision for loan losses
    170,965       170,965       170,965       579,858       579,858       579,858  
                                                 
Net interest (loss)after provision for loan and lease losses
    (54,102 )     (54,102 )     (54,102 )     (60,816 )     (60,816 )     (60,816 )
Non-interest income
    45,326       45,326       45,326       142,264       142,264       142,264  
Non-interest expenses
    91,362       91,362       91,362       352,101       352,101       352,101  
Income tax expense
    (6,861 )     (6,861 )     (6,861 )     (4,534 )     (4,534 )     (4,534 )
                                                 
Net (loss)
    (106,999 )     (106,999 )     (106,999 )     (275,187 )     (275,187 )     (275,187 )
                                                 
Dividends to preferred stockholders(a)
    5,000       5,000       5,000       42,661       21,516       30,914  
Preferred stock discount accretion
    1,152       1,152       1,152       4,227       4,227       4,227  
                                                 
Net (loss) attributable to common stockholders(b)
    (113,151 )     (113,151 )     (113,151 )     (322,075 )     (300,930 )     (310,328 )
                                                 
Pro forma Adjustments
                                               
Pro forma net (loss)
    (106,999 )     (106,999 )     (106,999 )     (275,187 )     (275,187 )     (275,187 )
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount
    (6,152 )     (6,152 )     (6,152 )     46,888       25,743       35,141  
Pro forma net (loss) attributable to common stockholders
    (113,151 )     (113,151 )     (113,151 )     (322,075 )     (300,930 )     (310,328 )
Common shares used to calculate actual (loss) per common share
    92,521       92,521       92,521       92,511       92,511       92,511  
Common shares newly issued
            230,761       128,201               230,761       128,201  
                                                 
Pro forma number of common shares
            323,282       220,722               323,272       220,712  
Pro forma losses per common share (basic and diluted)
          $ (0.35 )   $ (0.51 )           $ (0.93 )   $ (1.41 )


18


Table of Contents

 
(a) For the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009, reflects Series F Preferred Stock cumulative preferred dividends of $5.0 million and $12.6 million, respectively, not declared as of the end of the period related to the Series
 
(b) Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced net loss attributable to common stockholders for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of $96.8 million.
 
Consequences If Stockholders Do Not Approve the Proposal
 
We will not be able to complete the Exchange Offer if our stockholders do not approve this Proposal No. 1. Further, we may not be able to complete the Exchange Offer if stockholders do not approve Proposal No. 3, relating to the amendment of our Articles of Incorporation to reduce the par value of a share of our Common Stock, if this is necessary so that we can issue shares of Common Stock in exchange for tendered Preferred Stock. Our inability to complete the Exchange Offer would hinder our efforts to sell Common Stock in a Capital Raise. If we need to continue to recognize significant reserves and we cannot complete a Capital Raise, the Corporation and FirstBank may not be able to comply with the minimum capital requirements included in the capital plans required by the Agreements. These capital plans, which are subject to the approval of our regulators, set forth our plan to attain the capital ratio requirements set forth in the Order over time. If, at the end of any quarter, we do not comply with any specified minimum capital ratios, we must notify our regulators. The Corporation must notify the Fed within 30 days of the end of any quarter of its inability to comply with a capital ratio requirement and submit an acceptable written plan that details the steps it will take to comply with the requirement. FirstBank must immediately notify the FDIC of its inability to comply with a capital ratio requirement and, within 45 days, it must either increase its capital to comply with the ratio requirements or submit a contingency plan to the FDIC for its sale, merger, or liquidation. In the event of a liquidation of FirstBank, the holders of any outstanding preferred stock would rank senior to the holders of our Common Stock with respect to rights upon any liquidation of the Corporation. Finally, if we cannot complete the Exchange Offer and issue Common Stock in exchange for $385 million of liquidation preference of Preferred Stock, we will not be able to compel the exchange into Common Stock of the Series G Preferred Stock we issued to the U.S. Treasury on July 20, 2010, even if we are able to complete a Capital Raise for $500 million, which is another condition to our ability to compel the conversion.
 
Description and Comparison of Preferred Stock, Series G Preferred Stock and Common Stock Rights
 
Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of 750,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share. The following summary outlines the rights of holders of the shares of Preferred Stock, the holder of Series G Preferred Stock and the holders of the Common Stock to be issued in the exchange offer. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to our Articles of Incorporation, including the Certificates of Designation, and our by-laws (the “Bylaws”). We urge you to read these documents for a more complete understanding of the differences between the shares of Preferred Stock and the Common Stock. We issued shares of a new series of Series G Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for Series F Preferred Stock and accrued and unpaid dividends on such stock. The Series G Preferred Stock has terms similar to the Series F Preferred Stock but is convertible as described below.
 
Governing Documents
 
Shares of Preferred Stock:  Holders of shares of Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock have the rights set forth in our Articles of Incorporation, including the applicable Certificate of Designation, the Bylaws and Puerto Rico law.
 
Common Stock:  Holders of shares of our Common Stock have the rights set forth in our Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws and Puerto Rico law.


19


Table of Contents

Dividends and Distributions
 
On July 30, 2009, we announced the suspension of dividends on our Common Stock, Preferred Stock and Series F Preferred Stock (which has been exchanged for Series G Preferred Stock) effective with the preferred dividend for August 2009. We are generally not obligated or required to pay dividends on our Common Stock or preferred stock and no such dividends can be paid unless they are declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for payment. Moreover, the Agreement we entered with the Fed requires us to obtain its approval before we pay any dividends.
 
Shares of Preferred Stock:  The shares of Preferred Stock, as well as Series G Preferred Stock, rank senior to the Common Stock and any other stock that is expressly junior to Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock as to payment of dividends. Dividends on shares of Preferred Stock are payable monthly and are not mandatory or cumulative. Shares of Series G Preferred Stock pay cumulative compounding dividends quarterly in arrears of 5% per year until the fifth anniversary of the issuance of Series F Preferred Stock, and 9% thereafter. Holders of shares of Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends, when, as, and if declared by our Board of Directors, out of funds legally available for dividends.
 
Common Stock:  Subject to the preferential rights of any other class or series of capital stock, including Preferred Stock, holders of our Common Stock are entitled to receive, pro rata, dividends when and as declared by our Board of Directors out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends. In general, so long as any shares of Preferred Stock remain outstanding and until we meet various federal regulatory considerations, we cannot declare, set apart or pay any dividends on shares of our Common Stock unless all accrued and unpaid dividends on our Preferred Stock for the twelve monthly dividend periods ending on the immediately preceding dividend payment date have been paid or are paid contemporaneously and the full monthly dividend on our Preferred Stock for the then current month has been or is contemporaneously declared and paid or declared and set apart for payment. In addition, in general, and subject to certain limitations in the applicable certificate of designation, so long as any shares of Series G Preferred Stock remain outstanding, we cannot declare, set apart or pay any dividends on shares of our Common Stock unless all accrued and unpaid dividends for all past dividend periods, including the latest completed dividend period, on all outstanding shares of Series G Preferred Stock have been declared and paid in full.
 
Ranking
 
Shares of Preferred Stock:  Each series of Preferred Stock, as well as Series G Preferred Stock, currently ranks senior to the Common Stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of First BanCorp. Each series of Preferred Stock, as well as Series G Preferred Stock, is equal in right of payment with the other outstanding series of shares of preferred stock. The liquidation preference of the shares of Preferred Stock is $25 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon for the current monthly dividend period to the date of distribution. The liquidation preference of shares of Series G Preferred Stock is $1,000 per share, plus the amount of any accrued and unpaid dividends, whether or not declared, to the date of payment.
 
Common Stock:  The Common Stock ranks junior with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of First BanCorp to all other securities and indebtedness of First BanCorp.
 
Conversion Rights
 
None of the shares of Preferred Stock, or Common Stock are convertible into other securities. The Series G Preferred Stock is convertible under the conditions described below, into shares of Common Stock based on an initial conversion rate of 896.3045 shares of Common Stock for each share of Series G Preferred Stock, calculated by dividing $650, or a discount of 35% from the $1,000 liquidation preference per share of Series G Preferred Stock, by the initial conversion price of $0.7252 per share, which is subject to adjustment. Based on the initial conversion rate, the 424,174 shares of Series G Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury will be convertible into approximately 380.2 million shares of Common Stock. The conversion price of the Series G Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment, including if the shares of Common Stock issued in a Capital


20


Table of Contents

Raise are priced below 90% of the market price per share of Common Stock on the trading day immediately preceding the pricing date of such Capital Raise, or if shares of Common Stock are otherwise issued, except in certain circumstances, including the Exchange Offer, at a price below the then conversion price of the Series G Preferred Stock. We can compel conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock if, within nine months from the date of the agreement with the U.S. Treasury, (a) at least $385 million of the liquidation preference of our Series A through E Preferred Stock is tendered in the Exchange Offer, (b) we raise $500 million of additional capital, subject to terms, other than the price per share, reasonably acceptable to the U.S. Treasury in its sole discretion, (c) we obtain the approval of the holders of our Common Stock of an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 750,000,000 to at least 1,200,000,000 and to reduce the par value of a share of Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10, (d) we have received from the appropriate banking regulators all requisite approvals (which we expect to receive), (e) we have made any applicable anti-dilution adjustments, and (f) none of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries has dissolved or became subject to insolvency or similar proceedings, or has become subject to other materially adverse regulatory or other actions. The U.S. Treasury, and any subsequent holder of the Series G Preferred Stock, has the right to convert the Series G Preferred Stock at any time. Unless earlier converted by the holder or the Corporation, the Series G Preferred Stock will automatically convert into shares of Common Stock on the seventh anniversary of the issuance of the Series G Preferred Stock at the then current market price of our Common Stock.
 
Voting Rights
 
Shares of Preferred Stock:  Whenever dividends remain unpaid on the shares of preferred stock or any other class or series of preferred stock that ranks on parity with shares of preferred stock as to payment of dividends and having equivalent voting rights, the Parity Stock, for at least 18 monthly dividend periods (whether or not consecutive), the number of directors constituting our Board of Directors will be increased by two members and the holders of the shares of preferred stock together with holders of Parity Stock, voting separately as a single class, will have the right to elect the two additional members of our board of directors. When First BanCorp has paid full dividends on any class or series of noncumulative Parity Stock for at least 12 consecutive monthly dividend periods following such nonpayment, and has paid cumulative dividends in full on any class or series of cumulative Parity Stock, the voting rights will cease and the authorized number of directors will be reduced by two. Holders of shares of Preferred Stock currently have the right to vote as a separate class with all other series of Parity Stock adversely affected by and entitled to vote thereon (except Series G Preferred Stock, which votes as a separate class), with respect to:
 
  •  any amendment, alteration or repeal of the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation, including the relevant Certificates of Designation, or Bylaws that would alter or change the voting powers, preferences or special rights of such series of shares of Preferred Stock so as to affect them adversely; or
 
  •  any amendment or alteration of the Articles of Incorporation to authorize or increase the authorized amount of any shares of, or any securities convertible into shares of, any of First BanCorp’s capital stock ranking senior to such series of shares of Preferred Stock.
 
Approval of two-thirds of such shares is required.
 
So long as any shares of Series G Preferred Stock are outstanding, in addition to the voting rights set forth above, the vote or consent of the holders of at least of two-thirds of the shares of Series G Preferred Stock at the time outstanding, voting separately as a single class, shall be necessary for effecting or validating any consummation of a binding share exchange or reclassification involving Series G Preferred Stock or of a merger or consolidation of First BanCorp with another entity, unless the shares of Series G Preferred Stock remain outstanding following any such transaction or, if First BanCorp is not the surviving entity, are converted into or exchanged for preference securities and such remaining outstanding shares of Series G Preferred Stock or preference securities have rights, references, privileges and voting powers that are not materially less favorable than the rights, preferences, privileges or voting powers of Series G Preferred Stock, taken as a whole.


21


Table of Contents

Common Stock:  Holders of shares of our Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on by our stockholders. There are no cumulative voting rights for the election of directors.
 
Common Stock
 
We have no obligation or right to redeem our Common Stock.
 
Redemption
 
Preferred Stock: Optional Redemption by First BanCorp.  We may redeem all or a portion of each series of shares of Preferred Stock, at our option on or after the date set forth in the table below at the redemption prices set forth below, on any dividend payment date for which dividends have been declared in full.
 
                     
            Redemption
            Price per
CUSIP
 
Title of Securities Represented by Shares of Preferred Stock
  Redemption Period   Share
 
 
318672201
    7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A   April 30, 2006
and thereafter
    $25.00  
 
318672300
    8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series B   October 31, 2007
and thereafter
    $25.00  
 
318672409
    7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series C   June 30, 2008
and thereafter
    $25.00  
 
318672508
    7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series D   January 31, 2009
and thereafter
    $25.00  
 
318672607
    7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series E   September 30, 2009
to September 29, 2010
    $25.25  
            September 30, 2010
and thereafter
    $25.00  
        Fixed Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock, Series G   See below.     See below.  
 
Series G Preferred Stock may not be redeemed prior to January 16, 2012 unless we have received aggregate gross proceeds from one or more Qualified Equity Offerings (as defined below) of at least $100 million. In such a case, we may redeem Series G Preferred Stock, subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in whole or in part, up to a maximum amount equal to the aggregate net cash proceeds received by us from such qualified equity offerings. A “Qualified Equity Offering” is a sale and issuance for cash by us, to persons other than the Corporation or its subsidiaries after January 16, 2009, of shares of perpetual Preferred Stock, Common Stock or a combination thereof, that in each case qualify as Tier 1 capital of the Corporation at the time of issuance under the applicable risk-based capital guidelines. Qualified Equity Offerings do not include issuances made in connection with agreements or arrangements entered into, or pursuant to financing plans that were publicly announced, on or prior to October 13, 2008. After January 16, 2012, Series G Preferred Stock may be redeemed, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time, subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. In any redemption of Series G Preferred Stock, the redemption price is an amount equal to the per-share liquidation amount plus accrued and unpaid dividends to but excluding the date of redemption.
 
Redemption at Option of Holder.  The shares of Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock are not redeemable at the option of the holders.
 
Common Stock:  We have no obligation or right to redeem our Common Stock.
 
Listing
 
Shares of Preferred Stock:  Each series of Preferred Stock is listed on the NYSE. However, we intend to delist each series of Preferred Stock from the NYSE after completion of the Exchange Offer and we do not intend to apply for listing of any series of shares of Preferred Stock on any other securities exchange. To the extent permitted by law, we intend to deregister each outstanding series of Preferred Stock under the Exchange


22


Table of Contents

Act after delisting each such series from the NYSE. Series G Preferred Stock is not listed on a national securities exchange. If requested by the U.S. Treasury, we are required to list, and maintain such listing, of the Series G Preferred Stock and the amended warrant on the NYSE or a different national stock exchange, to the extent such securities comply with applicable listing requirements.
 
Common Stock:  The Common Stock is listed for trading on the NYSE.
 
No Appraisal Rights
 
Under Puerto Rico law, stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights with respect to the actions contemplated by Proposal No. 1.
 
Required Vote
 
Approval of this Proposal No. 1 to issue 256,401,610 newly issued shares of Common Stock in exchange for shares of Preferred Stock requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal, provided that the total votes cast on the proposal, whether for or against, represent over 50% of all of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted in determining the number of votes cast.
 
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
 
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK IN THE EXCHANGE BECAUSE IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF STOCKHOLDERS.
 
PROPOSAL NO. 2 — ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER TO DIRECTOR HÉCTOR M. NEVARES-LACOSTA
 
Overview and Reason for the Proposal
 
The Board of Directors seeks stockholder approval of the issuance of shares of Common Stock to Héctor M. Nevares-LaCosta in connection with his participation in the Exchange Offer. Mr. Nevares-LaCosta, a member of our Board of Directors, currently beneficially owns 196,100 shares of Preferred Stock. If stockholders approve Proposal No. 1 and this Proposal No. 2, we will issue shares of Common Stock to Mr. Nevares-LaCosta in the Exchange Offer based on the same terms as those offered to other holders of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer. Mr. Nevares-LaCosta has advised us that, if Proposal Nos. 1 and 2 are approved, he will tender all of his shares of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer.
 
Under NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03(b), stockholder approval is required prior to the issuance of Common Stock, or securities convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock, in any transaction or series of related transactions with a director or officer if “the number of shares of Common Stock to be issued, or if the number of shares of Common Stock into which the securities may be convertible or exercisable, exceeds either one percent of the number of shares of Common Stock or one percent of the voting power outstanding before the issuance.” Subject to stockholder approval of this Proposal No. 2 and Proposal No. 1 relating to the Exchange Offer itself, upon Mr. Nevares-LaCosta’s tender of shares of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer, we will issue shares of Common Stock to him based on the same terms as those offered to other participants in the Exchange Offer, which amount may exceed 1% of shares of outstanding Common Stock prior to the Exchange Offer depending upon the number of shares of Preferred Stock he tenders and the number of shares tendered by other participants. Accordingly, we are seeking stockholder approval of the issuance of such shares of Common Stock to Mr. Nevares-LaCosta.
 
Consequences if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
 
Dilution.  The issuance of our shares of Common Stock in connection with the Exchange Offer to Mr. Nevares-LaCosta would increase the number of outstanding shares. An increased number of shares would


23


Table of Contents

reduce the loss per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 on a pro forma basis, would decrease any future earnings per share and would have a dilutive effect on each stockholder’s percentage voting power.
 
The following table summarizes (1) the total number of shares that would be issued and outstanding assuming Proposal Nos. 1 and 2 are approved and all of the offered shares are issued in the Exchange Offer, (2) the total number of shares of Common Stock Mr. Nevares-LaCosta would beneficially own if he tenders all of his shares of Preferred Stock, and (3) the resulting percentage of outstanding shares that Mr. Nevares-LaCosta would beneficially own if we issue all of the shares offered in the Exchange Offer.
 
         
Total Number of Shares of
  Total Number of Shares of
   
Common Stock to be Outstanding
  Common Stock to be Owned by
  Mr. Nevares-LaCosta’s
if All Shares Offered in the
  Mr. Nevares-LaCosta after
  Percentage Ownership after
Exchange Offer are Issued   Tender of All Shares   Tender of All Shares
 
348,944,332
  6,828,451   1.96%(a)
 
 
(a) This percentage will decrease if (i) the Series G Preferred Stock is converted into Common Stock, (ii) we sell Common Stock in a Capital Raise or (iii) BNS acquires shares of Common Stock to maintain its percentage interest after the Exchange Offer, the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock or a Capital Raise.
 
Consequences if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
 
If stockholders do not approve this Proposal, we will be unable to exchange Mr. Nevares-LaCosta’s tendered shares of Preferred Stock for Common Stock.
 
No Appraisal Rights
 
Under Puerto Rico law, stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights with respect to the actions contemplated by Proposal No. 2.
 
Required Vote
 
Approval of this Proposal No. 2 to exchange Mr. Nevares-LaCosta’s shares of Preferred Stock for shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast on such proposal, provided that the total votes cast on the proposal, whether for or against, represent over 50% of all of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted in determining the number of votes cast.
 
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER TO MR. NEVARES-LACOSTA.
 
PROPOSAL NO. 3 — AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF OUR RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO DECREASE OUR COMMON STOCK PAR VALUE
 
Overview and Reason for the Amendment
 
On July 27, 2010, our Board of Directors adopted a resolution to amend our Articles of Incorporation to decrease the par value of our shares of Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 per share if necessary to complete the Exchange Offer. Adoption of this amendment will be necessary to complete the Exchange Offer if, for example, the market value of a share of Preferred Stock tendered in the exchange is less than $10 at a time when the market value of the Common Stock would result in the issuance of more than 10 shares of Common Stock per tendered share of Preferred Stock. Under Puerto Rico law, shares of Common Stock, other than Treasury shares, cannot be sold for a price equal to less than the par value of the stock. In addition, adoption of this amendment is one of the conditions that must be satisfied for us to compel the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock.


24


Table of Contents

In accordance with Puerto Rico law, approval and adoption of an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to decrease the par value of our Common Stock requires stockholder approval.
 
Consequences if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
 
If stockholders approve this proposal, the Board of Directors currently intends to file, with the Secretary of Puerto Rico, the Articles of Incorporation reflecting such amendment as soon as practicable following stockholders approval. This amendment, if adopted, will not change or affect the number of shares of Common Stock held by any stockholder. The change in par value will cause technical changes on our balance sheet as to the amounts shown as “Common Stock” and “additional paid-in capital.”
 
If approved, the amendment would amend and restate Article Sixth of our Articles of Incorporation. The text of the proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is attached to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit A. The proposed amendment also reflects an increase in the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from 750,000,000 shares to 2,000,000,000 shares, as discussed in Proposal No. 6 below.
 
Consequences if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
 
If stockholders do not approve the proposal to reduce the par value of the Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 per share and the decrease in the par value of the Common Stock is necessary to complete the Exchange Offer, such as, because the market value of a share of Preferred Stock tendered in the Exchange Offer is less than $10 at a time when the market value of the Common Stock would result in the issuance of more than 10 shares of Common Stock for a share of Preferred Stock, we will not be able to complete the Exchange Offer. In addition, if stockholders do not approve this proposal, we will not meet one of the conditions necessary for us to compel the conversion into Common Stock of the Series G Preferred Stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F Preferred Stock on July 20, 2010. Finally, our inability to complete the Exchange Offer would hinder our efforts to sell Common Stock in a Capital Raise. If we need to continue to recognize significant reserves and we cannot complete a Capital Raise, the Corporation and FirstBank may not be able to comply with the minimum capital requirements included in the capital plans required by the Agreements. These capital plans, which are subject to the approval of our regulators, set forth our plan to attain the capital ratio requirements set forth in the Order over time. See “Overview of the Proposals — Background” for further discussion of consequences if we are unable to complete the Exchange Offer.
 
No Appraisal Rights
 
Under Puerto Rico law, our stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights with respect to this proposed amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to decrease the par value of our Common Stock.
 
Required Vote
 
Approval of Proposal No. 3 to amend our Articles of Incorporation to decrease the par value of our Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against this proposal.
 
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
 
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO DECREASE THE PAR VALUE OF OUR COMMON STOCK FROM $1.00 TO $0.10 PER SHARE.


25


Table of Contents

 
PROPOSAL NO. 4 — ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK TO THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXCHANGE OFFER
 
Overview and Reason for the Proposal
 
The Board of Directors seeks stockholder approval of the issuance of up to 28,476,121 shares of Common Stock to BNS if it exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder Agreement in connection with the Exchange Offer.
 
In connection with our sale in 2007 of 9,250,450 shares of Common Stock, or approximately 10%, to BNS at a price of $10.25 per share, we and BNS entered into the Stockholder Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Stockholder Agreement, for as long as BNS beneficially owns at least 5% of our outstanding Common Stock, BNS has a right of first refusal, which does not apply to our issuance of shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer, and an anti-dilution right. If we complete the Exchange Offer, BNS would be entitled to acquire up to the number of shares of our Common Stock that would enable it to maintain its percentage interest in the Corporation after we consummate the transaction. BNS’s anti-dilution right entitles it to pay a price equal to the price per share at which the shares of our Common Stock were issued in the transaction. If BNS declines to exercise its anti-dilution right, BNS’s beneficial ownership would be reduced by the issuance of the additional shares.
 
Under NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03(b), any sale of additional shares of Common Stock to BNS in an amount that exceeds 1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock requires the prior approval of our stockholders under the listing requirements of the NYSE unless the sale is at a price in cash at least as great as the higher of the book or market value of Common Stock, provided that the number of shares to be issued does not exceed 5% of the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding before the issuance. Since BNS’s anti-dilution right permits it to acquire more than 5% of the number of shares of common Stock outstanding before the issuance to BNS, stockholder approval is required.
 
Pursuant to the Federal Reserve’s Order approving BNS’s acquisition of our Common Stock in 2007, BNS is required to file an application and receive the Federal Reserve’s approval before it may directly or indirectly acquire additional shares of our Common Stock or attempt to exercise a controlling influence over First BanCorp. As a result, if BNS desires to exercise its anti-dilution right in connection with the Exchange Offer, BNS will be required to obtain the consent of the Federal Reserve.
 
Consequences if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
 
Dilution.  The issuance of our shares of Common Stock to BNS would increase the number of outstanding shares. An increased number of shares would reduce the loss per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 on a pro forma basis, would decrease any future earnings per share and would have a dilutive effect on each stockholder’s percentage voting power. Thus, current stockholders’ interests in the Corporation would be diluted while BNS would be able to maintain its ownership percentage.
 
The following table summarizes (1) the maximum number of shares that will be outstanding if Proposal Nos. 1 and 4 are approved, we issue all of the offered shares in the Exchange Offer, and BNS exercises its anti-dilution right in full, (2) the total number of shares of Common Stock that BNS will own if it fully exercises its anti-dilution right, and (3) BNS’s percentage ownership assuming the maximum number of shares of Common Stock are issued in the Exchange Offer and to BNS. This table does not include the shares of Common Stock that are issuable upon conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock, that may be issued in a Capital Raise or that may be acquired by BNS pursuant to its anti-dilution right in connection with the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock or a Capital Raise.
 
         
Total Number of Shares of
       
Common Stock to be Outstanding if
  Total Number of Shares of
   
All Shares Offered in the Exchange Offer
  Common Stock to be Owned by
  BNS’s Percentage Ownership
are Issued and BNS Acquires
  BNS Upon Acquisition of
  Upon Acquisition of
Maximum Number of Shares   Maximum Number of Shares   Maximum Number of Shares
 
377,420,453
  37,726,571   9.9959%


26


Table of Contents

Consequences if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
 
If BNS exercises its anti-dilution right and stockholders do not approve the issuance of such shares, we will not issue shares to BNS in an amount that exceeds 1% of the shares of Common Stock outstanding prior to the issuance, notwithstanding the terms of the Stockholder Agreement. This may constitute a breach of the Stockholder Agreement and might entitle BNS to damages or other relief against us.
 
No Appraisal Rights
 
Under Puerto Rico law, stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights with respect to the actions contemplated by Proposal No. 4.
 
Required Vote
 
Approval of this Proposal No. 4 to issue shares of Common Stock to BNS pursuant to its anti-dilution right in connection with the Exchange Offer requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal, provided that the total votes cast on the proposal, whether for or against, represent over 50% of all of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted in determining the number of votes cast.
 
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK TO BNS PURSUANT TO BNS’S ANTI-DILUTION RIGHT UNDER THE STOCKHOLDER AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE EXCHANGE OFFER.
 
PROPOSAL NO. 5 — ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK TO THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SERIES G PREFERRED STOCK
 
Overview and Reason for the Proposal
 
The Board of Directors seeks stockholder approval of the issuance of up to 42,224,017 shares of Common Stock to BNS if it exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder Agreement in connection with the conversion into Common Stock of the shares of Series G Preferred Stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F Preferred Stock or such higher number of shares of Common Stock determined as a result of the impact of any adjustment to the conversion price of the Series G Preferred Stock. The 42,224,017 shares is based on the current conversion price of the Series G.
 
As noted in Proposal No. 4, pursuant to the terms of the Stockholder Agreement, for as long as BNS beneficially owns at least 5% of our outstanding Common Stock, BNS has a right of first refusal, which does not apply to our issuance of the Series G Preferred Stock or the shares of Common Stock upon conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock, and an anti-dilution right. We have been discussing with BNS an amendment to the Stockholder Agreement pursuant to which BNS would have the ability to decide whether to exercise its anti-dilution right after we have issued shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer, any Capital Raise and the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock rather than in connection with the issuance of shares of Common Stock in each of those transactions. If BNS agrees, its anti-dilution right will entitle it to acquire as a result of the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock up to the number of shares of our Common Stock that would enable it to maintain its percentage interest in the Corporation after the conversion at a price equal to the price per share at which the Series G Preferred Stock is converted into Common Stock. If BNS declines to exercise its anti-dilution right, BNS’s beneficial ownership would be reduced by the issuance of the additional shares.
 
Under NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03(b), any sale of additional shares of Common Stock or securities convertible into Common Stock to BNS in an amount that exceeds 1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock requires the prior approval of our stockholders under the listing requirements of the NYSE unless the sale is at a price in cash at least as great as the higher of the book or market value of Common


27


Table of Contents

Stock, provided that the number of shares to be issued does not exceed 5% of the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding before the issuance. Since BNS’s anti-dilution right permits it to acquire more than 5% of the number of shares of common Stock outstanding before the issuance of shares to BNS, stockholder approval is required.
 
Pursuant to the Federal Reserve’s Order approving BNS’s acquisition of our Common Stock in 2007, BNS is required to file an application and receive the Federal Reserve’s approval before it may directly or indirectly acquire additional shares of our Common Stock or attempt to exercise a controlling influence over First BanCorp. As a result, if BNS desires to exercise its anti-dilution right and purchase additional shares of our Common Stock, BNS will be required to obtain the consent of the Federal Reserve.
 
Consequences if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
 
Dilution.  The issuance of our shares of Common Stock upon conversion of Series G Preferred Stock issued to BNS would increase the number of outstanding shares. An increased number of shares would reduce the loss per share for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 on a pro forma basis, would decrease any future earnings per share and would have a dilutive effect on each stockholder’s percentage voting power. Thus, while BNS would be able to maintain its ownership percentage, other stockholders’ interests in the Corporation would be diluted.
 
The following table summarizes (1) the maximum number of shares that will be outstanding if Proposal Nos. 1, 4, and 5 are approved, we issue all of the offered shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer, we issue shares of Common Stock to the U.S. Treasury in the conversion, and BNS exercises its anti-dilution right in full, (2) the total number of shares of Common Stock that BNS will own if it fully exercises its anti-dilution right in connection with the Exchange Offer and the conversion of Series G Preferred Stock, and (3) BNS’s percentage ownership assuming 636,590,675 shares of Common Stock are issued in the Exchange Offer and the conversion of Series G Preferred Stock and BNS fully exercises its anti-dilution rights. This table does not reflect the issuance of shares in a Capital Raise even though the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock by the Corporation requires the issuance of $500 million of equity in a Capital Raise. BNS has waived its right of first refusal in connection with a Capital Raise but will have an anti-dilution right in connection with a Capital Raise. This table also does not reflect the issuance of shares to BNS as a result of its exercise of its anti-dilution right in connection with a Capital Raise. Completion of such a Capital Raise may require stockholder approval.
 
                     
Total Number of Shares of
       
Common Stock to be Outstanding
       
if All Shares Offered in the Exchange
       
Offer and the Conversion are
  Total Number of Shares of
   
Issued and BNS Acquires the
  Common Stock to be Owned by
  BNS’s Percentage Ownership
Maximum Number of Shares to
  BNS Upon Acquisition of
  Upon Acquisition of
Maintain its Percentage Interest
  Maximum Number of Shares   Maximum Number of Shares
 
  799,833,535       79,950,588       9.9959 %
 
Consequences if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
 
If BNS exercises its anti-dilution right and stockholders do not approve the issuance of such shares, we will not issue shares of Common Stock to BNS in an amount that exceeds 1% of the shares outstanding prior to the issuance, notwithstanding the terms of the Stockholder Agreement. This may constitute a breach of the Stockholder Agreement and might entitle BNS to damages or other relief against us.
 
No Appraisal Rights
 
Under Puerto Rico law, stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights with respect to the actions contemplated by Proposal No. 5.


28


Table of Contents

Required Vote
 
Approval of this Proposal No. 5 to issue shares of Series G Preferred Stock convertible into Common Stock to BNS pursuant to its anti-dilution right in connection with the conversion of Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal, provided that the total votes cast on the proposal, whether for or against, represent over 50% of all of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted in determining the number of votes cast.
 
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK TO BNS PURSUANT TO BNS’S ANTI-DILUTION RIGHT UNDER THE STOCKHOLDER AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SERIES G PREFERRED STOCK.
 
PROPOSAL NO. 6 — AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF OUR
COMMON STOCK
 
Overview and Reasons for the Amendment
 
On July 27, 2010, our Board of Directors adopted resolutions approving and authorizing an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of our Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000 and directing that the amendment be submitted to a vote of the stockholders at the Special Meeting. In accordance with Puerto Rico law, approval and adoption of an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized shares of our Common Stock or Preferred Stock requires stockholder approval.
 
The Board of Directors determined that the amendment is in the best interests of First BanCorp and its stockholders. If the proposed amendment is approved by stockholders, the Board of Directors currently intends to file, with the Puerto Rico Department of State, the Articles of Incorporation reflecting such amendment as soon as practicable following stockholder approval. Attached hereto as Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement is the proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation. (The amendment included as Exhibit A also reflects the proposed amendment to decrease the par value of a share of Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 per share.)
 
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 27, 2010, our stockholders approved the increase in our authorized shares of Common Stock from 250,000,000 to 750,000,000. Since then, we have commenced the Exchange Offer to issue 256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in exchange for our outstanding Preferred Stock and issued shares of Series G Preferred Stock in exchange for Series F Preferred Stock. In addition, we plan to seek to raise $500 million in a Capital Raise. Finally, we expect to offer to our current stockholders the opportunity to buy one share of Common Stock for each share of Common Stock they own at the purchase price set forth in a Capital Raise. In our prospectus for the Exchange Offer, we disclosed that we estimated that we would issue an additional 1.43 billion shares after the completion of the Exchange Offer as a result of conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock, the Capital Raise and the issuance of shares to BNS. This estimate was based on a sale in a Capital Raise of $500 million at an assumed per-share price of $0.57, the market price of our Common Stock on July 14, 2010, and a sale to BNS of the maximum number of shares it could buy upon exercise of its anti-dilution right. No assurance can be given as to the price at which shares would be sold in any Capital Raise or whether any such Capital Raise can be completed. Since we had 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of July 22, 2010, we do not have enough shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance to complete the above transactions. Accordingly, our Board of Directors has proposed this increase to enable us to complete the transactions described above.


29


Table of Contents

Our Articles of Incorporation currently authorize the issuance of up to 750,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 50,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. If adopted, the proposed amendment will not result in an increase in the number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock.
 
Of the 750,000,000 shares of Common Stock currently authorized, as of the close of business on the Record Date, there were 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding. Furthermore, we have reserved for future issuance or are currently offering to issue:
 
a) 380,189,051 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance upon conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock, based on the initial conversion price;
 
b) 5,842,259 shares of Common Stock upon the exercise of an outstanding warrant held by the U.S. Treasury;
 
c) 2,073,200 shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding options under the 1997 Stock Option Plan;
 
d) 3,767,784 shares of Common Stock for issuance under the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan; and
 
e) subject to the approval of our stockholders, (i) 256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer, (ii) assuming the issuance of all of the offered shares in the Exchange Offer and subject to the approval of our stockholders, 28,476,121 shares of Common Stock for issuance to BNS if it exercises its anti-dilution right, and (iii) assuming the issuance of 380,189,065 shares of Common Stock in exchange for Series G Preferred Stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury, and subject to the approval of our stockholders, 42,224,017 shares of Common Stock for issuance to BNS if it exercises its anti-dilution right.
 
Consequences if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
 
Dilution.  As is the case with the current authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock, the additional shares of Common Stock authorized by this proposed amendment could be issued upon approval by our Board of Directors without further vote of our stockholders except as may be required in particular cases by our Articles of Incorporation, applicable law, regulatory agencies or the NYSE. Under our Articles of Incorporation, stockholders do not have preemptive rights to subscribe to additional securities that we issue, which means that current stockholders do not have a prior right to purchase any new issue of Common Stock in order to maintain their proportionate ownership interest in the Corporation. If we issue additional shares of Common Stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock, such issuances would have a dilutive effect on the voting power and would reduce loss per share and any future earnings per share of our currently outstanding shares of Common Stock. We will not need stockholder approval of a Capital Raise in the form of a public offering.
 
The following table sets forth the total number of (1) authorized shares of our Common Stock as of July 22, 2010, (2) outstanding shares of our Common Stock as of July 22, 2010, (3) reserved shares of our Common Stock, including pursuant to the Exchange Offer and the conversion of Series G Preferred Stock but excluding shares issuable to BNS upon its exercise of its anti-dilution right, (4) shares of our Common Stock available for issuance, which excludes the reserved shares, (5) proposed authorized shares, subject to stockholder approval pursuant to this Proposal 6 and (6) Common Stock available for issuance if this Proposal 6 is approved by the stockholders.
 
                     
Currently
  Currently
  Shares Currently
  Shares Currently
  Proposed
  Shares Potentially
Authorized
  Outstanding
  Reserved for
  Available for
  Authorized
  Available for
Shares   Shares   Issuance   Issuance   Shares   Issuance
 
750,000,000
  92,542,722   648,273,918   9,183,360   2,000,000,000   1,259,183,360
 
The number of shares potentially available for issuance if stockholders approve this Proposal would enable us to issue shares in a Capital Raise, if we can complete such a Capital Raise and obtain any required stockholder approval. This would enable us to convert the Series G Preferred Stock as long as we satisfy the


30


Table of Contents

other conditions to such conversion. In addition, we believe that we would have enough shares to conduct a rights offering.
 
Anti-takeover Effects.  Under certain circumstances, the proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation could have an anti-takeover effect. The proposed increase in the number of authorized shares of Common Stock may discourage or make more difficult a change in control of the Corporation. For example, we could issue additional shares to dilute the voting power of, create voting impediments for, or otherwise frustrate the efforts of persons seeking to take over or gain control of the Corporation, whether or not the change in control is favored by a majority of our unaffiliated stockholders. We could also privately place shares of Common Stock with purchasers who would side with our Board of Directors in opposing a hostile takeover bid, except that we would need stockholder approval of any such private sales that exceed 20% of the outstanding shares prior to the sale. Except for the possible acquisition of approximately 21% of Common Stock by the U.S. Treasury if we are able to compel the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock, assuming we issue approximately 1.68 billion shares in the Exchange Offer, in a Capital Raise and to BNS at the market price of our Common Stock on July 14, 2010 of $0.57, the Board of Directors is not aware of any plans for or attempt to effect a change in control of the Corporation.
 
Consequences if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
 
If stockholders do not approve this proposal, we will not be able to issue shares of Common Stock to investors in a $500 million Capital Raise, which will preclude us from compelling the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock. In addition, if stockholders do not approve this proposal, we will not be able to issue shares to BNS if it exercises its anti-dilution right or in a rights offering. If BNS exercises it anti-dilution right and we cannot issue shares to BNS, this may constitute a breach of the Stockholder Agreement and might entitle BNS to damages or other relief against us. If we need to continue to recognize significant reserves and we cannot complete a Capital Raise, the Corporation and FirstBank may not be able to comply with the minimum capital requirements included in the capital plans required by the Agreements. These capital plans, which are subject to the approval of our regulators, set forth our plan to attain the capital ratio requirements set forth in the Order over time. See “Overview of the Proposals — Background” for further discussion of consequences if we are unable to complete the Exchange Offer.
 
No Appraisal Rights
 
Under Puerto Rico law, our stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights with respect to this proposed amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock.
 
Required Vote
 
Approval of Proposal No. 6 to amend our Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000 requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against this proposal.
 
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
 
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK FROM 750,000,000 TO 2,000,000,000.


31


Table of Contents

 
PROPOSAL NO. 7 — AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO IMPLEMENT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
 
Overview and Reasons for the Amendment
 
On July 27, 2010, our Board of Directors adopted resolutions approving and authorizing an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split at a ratio of not less than one-for-ten and not more than one-for-twenty and directing that the amendment be submitted to a vote of the stockholders at the Special Meeting. In accordance with Puerto Rico law, approval and adoption of an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split requires stockholder approval.
 
On July 9, 2010, First BanCorp. received notice from the New York Stock Exchange that the Corporation was not in compliance with the minimum price per share continued listing requirement set forth in Section 802.01C of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the “Notice”). The Notice indicated that the Corporation was not in compliance with such continued listing requirement because, as of July 6, 2010, the average closing price of the Common Stock was less than $1.00 over the consecutive 30 trading-day period immediately prior to the Notice.
 
On July 22, 2009, the Corporation informed the NYSE that it intended to cure this deficiency within six months following the date of the Notice by bringing the Common Stock share price and average share price for 30 consecutive trading days above $1.00. Specifically, the Corporation has informed the NYSE of its intent to cure the deficiency by implementing a reverse stock split, if necessary.
 
If the proposed amendment is approved by stockholders, the Board of Directors will determine, prior to the filing of the amendment with the Puerto Rico Department of State, whether a reverse stock split is in the best interest of stockholders, and if so, the ratio for such split. The Board of Directors will consider, among other things, the market price and liquidity of our Common Stock prior to implementing a reverse stock split. Attached hereto as Exhibit B to this Proxy Statement is the proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation.
 
If stockholders approve this Proposal at the Special Meeting but the Board does not implement a reverse stock split by the close of business on January 9, 2011, the Board will not have authority to implement a reverse stock split pursuant to such approval.
 
Consequences if Stockholders Approve this Proposal and the Board Implements a Reverse Stock Split
 
If stockholders approve this proposal and the Board determines that it is in the best interests of stockholders to implement the reverse stock split, a number of outstanding shares of Common Stock ranging from 10 to 20 shares, depending on the reverse stock split ratio determined by the Board, of outstanding Common Stock will be converted into one share of Common Stock.
 
Reduction of Shares Held by Individual Stockholders.  Each common stockholder will own fewer shares of Common Stock, but the proposed reverse stock split will affect all common stockholders proportionately and will not affect any stockholder’s percentage ownership interest or proportionate voting power, except for differences resulting from the treatment of fractional shares.
 
However, if the reverse stock split were implemented, it may increase the number of stockholders who own “odd lots,” or a number of shares that is less than 100 shares. Such stockholders may find it difficult to sell such shares and in connection with any sale may have to pay higher commissions and other transaction costs as compared to a sale involving a “round lot,” or a number that is in even multiples of 100.
 
Impact on Authorized and Outstanding Shares.  In connection with the reverse stock split, we will not reduce the total number of authorized shares of Common Stock. As previously disclosed, as a result of the continuing difficult economic conditions, we decided to seek to improve our capital structure. Thus, we have been taking steps to implement strategies to increase tangible common equity and regulatory capital through (1) the issuance of shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer, (2) the issuance of approximately $500 million of equity in a Capital Raise, (3) the conversion into Common Stock of the shares of Series G


32


Table of Contents

Preferred Stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for Series F Preferred Stock, and (4) a rights offering to common stockholders. Since we have 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of July 22, 2010, we do not have enough shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance to complete the above transactions. As outlined in Proposal No. 6, the Board of Directors has proposed an increase in the number of authorized shares of Common Stock to enable us to complete the transactions described above.
 
If adopted and implemented by the Board of Directors, this amendment will become effective upon filing with the Puerto Rico Department of State. We expect that the Board will implement a reverse stock split only if necessary to comply with the NYSE continued listing requirement.
 
Anti-takeover Effects.  Similar to Proposal No. 6, under certain circumstances, the proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation could have an anti-takeover effect. The resulting increase in the number of authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock may discourage or make more difficult a change in control of the Corporation. For example, we could issue additional shares to dilute the voting power of, create voting impediments for, or otherwise frustrate the efforts of persons seeking to take over or gain control of the Corporation, whether or not the change in control is favored by a majority of our unaffiliated stockholders. We could also privately place shares of Common Stock with purchasers who would side with our Board of Directors in opposing a hostile takeover bid, except that we would need stockholder approval of any such private sales that exceed 20% of the outstanding shares prior to the sale. Except for the possible acquisition of approximately 21% of Common Stock by the U.S. Treasury if the Series G Preferred Stock is converted into Common Stock, assuming we issue approximately 1.68 billion shares in the Exchange Offer, in a Capital Raise and to BNS at the market price of our Common Stock on July 14, 2010 of $0.57, the Board of Directors is not aware of any plans for or attempt to effect a change in control of the Corporation.
 
Impact on Equity Compensation Plans and Outstanding Awards.  The reverse stock split will impact the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the Corporation’s equity incentive plans in proportion to the reverse stock split ratio. Under the terms of the Corporation’s outstanding equity awards, the reverse stock split would cause a reduction in the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise, settlement or vesting of such awards in proportion to the exchange ratio of the reverse stock split and would cause a proportionate increase in the exercise price of such awards to the extent they are stock options or similar awards. The aggregate number of shares authorized for future issuance under the Corporation’s equity incentive plans will also be proportionately reduced, as will the maximum aggregate limit on the number of shares that may be granted to any one participant under the respective plans. In implementing the proportionate reduction, the number of shares issuable upon exercise, settlement or vesting of outstanding equity awards will be rounded up to the nearest whole share.
 
No Assurance Regarding Impact on the Corporation’s Stock Price.  If the Board implements a reverse stock split, the Board expects that the reverse stock split would increase the market price of our Common Stock so that the Corporation is able to bring the Common Stock share price and average share price for 30 consecutive trading days above $1.00 and, thereby, regain compliance with this NYSE continued listing requirement. No assurance can be provided, however, that the market price of the Corporation’s Common Stock will exceed or remain in excess of the $1.00 per share minimum price after a reverse stock split. It is possible that the per share price of common stock after the reverse stock split will not rise in proportion to the reduction in the number of shares of common stock outstanding resulting from the reverse stock split. Furthermore, the market price of the stock may be affected by other factors that may be unrelated to the number of shares outstanding, including the Corporation’s performance.
 
Consequences if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
 
If stockholders do not approve this proposal we will not be able to implement a reverse stock split. The inability to implement a reverse stock split may hinder our ability to bring our Common Stock share price and average share price for 30 consecutive trading days above $1.00, which is a listing requirement of the NYSE. The NYSE will commence suspension and delisting procedures if we cannot regain compliance with this requirement by January 9, 2011. If the NYSE delisted the Common Stock, the market liquidity of our Common Stock would be adversely affected.


33


Table of Contents

Board Discretion to Implement the Reverse Stock Split
 
If the proposed amendment is approved by our stockholders, it will be implemented, if at all, only upon a determination by our Board of Directors that a reverse stock split, at a ratio determined by the Board of Directors within the range of one-for-ten and one-for-twenty, is in the best interests of stockholders. The Board of Directors’ determination as to whether such a split will be implemented and, if so, the ratio, will be based upon several factors, including existing and expected marketability and liquidity of our Common Stock, prevailing market conditions and the likely effect on the market price of our Common Stock. If our Board of Directors determines to implement a reverse stock split, the Board of Directors will consider various factors in selecting the ratio including the overall market conditions at the time and the recent trading history of our Common Stock.
 
Fractional Shares
 
Stockholders will not receive fractional shares in connection with a reverse stock split. Instead, our exchange agent, The Bank of New York Mellon Shareowner Services, LLC, will aggregate all fractional shares and arrange for them to be sold as soon as practicable after the split is implemented at the then prevailing prices on the open market on behalf of those stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional share. We expect that the exchange agent will cause the sale to be conducted in an orderly fashion at a reasonable pace and that it may take several days to sell all of the aggregated fractional shares of Common Stock. After completing the sale, stockholders will receive a cash payment from the exchange agent in an amount equal to the stockholder’s pro rata share of the total net proceeds of these sales. No transaction costs will be assessed on the sale; however, the proceeds will be subject to certain taxes as discussed below. In addition, stockholders will not be entitled to receive interest for the period of time between implementation of a reverse stock split and the date a stockholder receives payment for the cashed-out shares. The payment amount will be paid to the stockholder in the form of a check.
 
After a reverse stock split, stockholders will have no further interest in the Corporation with respect to their cashed-out fractional shares. A stockholder will not have any voting, dividend or other rights with respect to its fractional share except to receive payment as described above.
 
Stock Certificates
 
If stockholders approve the amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split and the reverse stock split is implemented, as soon as practicable after the date the Board decides to implement the reverse stock split and the amendment implementing the reverse stock split becomes effective, the Corporation will send a letter of transmittal to each stockholder of record at the effective time for use in transmitting old stock certificates to our transfer agent, The Bank of New York Mellon Shareowner Services, LLC, who will serve as our exchange agent. The letter of transmittal will contain instructions for the surrender of old certificates to the exchange agent in exchange for new certificates representing the number of shares of Common Stock into which such holders’ shares represented by the old certificates have been converted as a result of the reverse stock split. Until so surrendered, each current certificate representing shares of our stock will be deemed for all corporate purposes after the effective time of the amendment implementing the reverse stock split to evidence ownership of shares in the appropriately reduced whole number of shares of Common Stock. Stockholders should not destroy any stock certificates and should not send in their old certificates to the exchange agent until they have received the letter of transmittal.
 
Persons holding their shares in “street name” through banks, brokers or other nominees will be contacted by such banks, brokers or nominees and will not receive a letter of transmittal from the Corporation. Banks, brokers, and other nominees holding shares of Common Stock for stockholders will be instructed to implement the reverse stock split for such beneficial holders, and these banks, brokers, and other nominees may apply their own specific procedures for processing the reverse stock split.


34


Table of Contents

No Appraisal Rights
 
Under Puerto Rico law, our stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights with respect to this proposed amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split.
 
Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
 
The following is a general summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the reverse stock split that may be relevant to stockholders. This summary is based upon the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”), Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, published administrative rulings and judicial decisions as of the date hereof, all of which may change, possibly with retroactive effect, resulting in U.S. federal income tax consequences that may differ from those discussed below. This summary does not purport to be complete and does not address all aspects of federal income taxation that may be relevant to stockholders in light of their particular circumstances or to stockholders that may be subject to special tax rules, including, without limitation: (1) stockholders subject to the alternative minimum tax; (2) banks, insurance companies, or other financial institutions; (3) tax-exempt organizations; (4) dealers in securities or commodities; (5) regulated investment companies or real estate investment trusts; (6) traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings; (7) foreign stockholders or U.S. stockholders whose “functional currency” is not the U.S. dollar; (8) persons holding the Common Stock as a position in a hedging transaction, “straddle,” “conversion transaction” or other risk reduction transaction; (9) persons who acquire shares of the Common Stock in connection with employment or other performance of services; (10) dealers and other stockholders that do not own their shares of Common Stock as capital assets; (11) U.S. expatriates, (12) foreign entities; or (13) non-resident alien individuals. In addition, this summary does not address the tax consequences arising under the laws of any foreign, state or local jurisdiction and U.S. federal tax consequences other than federal income taxation. Furthermore, this summary also assumes that shares of Common Stock, both before and after the reverse stock split, are held as a “capital asset” as defined in the Code, which is generally property held for investment. If a partnership (including any entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds shares of the Common Stock, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership.
 
We have not sought, and will not seek, an opinion of counsel or a ruling from the IRS regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the reverse stock split and there can be no assurance the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) will not challenge the statements and conclusions set forth below or that a court would not sustain any such challenge. You should consult your tax advisor as to the application to your particular situation of the tax consequences discussed below, as well as the application of any state, local, foreign or other tax.
 
Tax Consequences Generally.  The reverse stock split should constitute a “recapitalization” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, a stockholder generally should not recognize gain or loss upon the reverse stock split, except with respect to cash received in lieu of a fractional share of the Common Stock, as discussed below. A stockholder’s aggregate tax basis in the shares of the Common Stock received pursuant to the reverse stock split should equal the aggregate tax basis of the shares of the Common Stock surrendered (excluding any portion of such basis that is allocated to any fractional share of the Common Stock), and such stockholder’s holding period (i.e., acquired date) in the shares of the Common Stock received should include the holding period in the shares of the Common Stock surrendered. Treasury regulations promulgated under the Code provide detailed rules for allocating the tax basis and holding period of the shares of the Common Stock surrendered to the shares of the Common Stock received pursuant to the reverse stock split. Stockholders who acquired their shares of Common Stock on different dates and at different prices should consult their tax advisors regarding the allocation of the tax basis and holding period of such shares.
 
Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares.  A stockholder who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of the Common Stock pursuant to the reverse stock split generally should recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount of cash received and the holder’s tax basis in the shares of the Common Stock surrendered that is allocated to such fractional share of the Common Stock. Such capital gain


35


Table of Contents

or loss should be long term capital gain or loss if the holder’s holding period for the Common Stock surrendered exceeded one year at the effective time of the reverse stock split.
 
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding.  Information returns generally will be required to be filed with the IRS with respect to the receipt of cash in lieu of a fractional share of the Common Stock pursuant to the reverse stock split. In addition, stockholders may be subject to a backup withholding tax (currently at an applicable rate of 28%) on the payment of such cash if they do not provide their taxpayer identification numbers in the manner required or otherwise fail to comply with applicable backup withholding tax rules. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be refunded or allowed as a credit against the stockholder’s federal income tax liability, if any, provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
 
Certain Puerto Rico Tax Consequences
 
The following discussion describes the material Puerto Rico tax consequences relating to the proposed stock split. It does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations arising from or relating to the proposed reverse stock split and does not describe any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, locality or taxing jurisdiction other than Puerto Rico. It does not address special classes of holders, such as life insurance companies, special partnerships, corporations of individuals, registered investment companies, estate and trusts and tax-exempt organizations.
 
This discussion is based on the tax laws of Puerto Rico as in effect on the date of this Proxy Statement, as well as regulations, administrative pronouncements and judicial decisions available on or before such date and now in effect. All of the foregoing are subject to change, which change could apply retroactively and could affect the continued validity of this summary.
 
You should consult your own tax advisor as to the application to your particular situation of the tax considerations discussed below, as well as the application of any state, local, foreign or other tax.
 
Subject to the above stated, Puerto Rico income tax consequences of the proposed reversed stock split described herein may be summarized as follows:
 
1. The reverse stock split will qualify as a tax-free recapitalization under the Puerto Rico Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended. Accordingly, except for any cash received in lieu of fractional shares, a shareholder will not recognize any gain or loss for Puerto Rico income tax purposes as a result of the receipt of the post-reverse stock split common stock pursuant to the reverse stock split.
 
2. The shares of post-reverse stock split common stock in the hands of a shareholder will have an aggregate basis for computing gain or loss on a subsequent disposition equal to the aggregate basis of the shares of pre-reverse stock split common stock held by that shareholder immediately prior to the reversed stock split, reduced by the basis allocable to any fractional shares which the shareholder is treated as having sold for cash, as discussed in paragraph 4 below.
 
3. A shareholder’s holding period for the post-reverse stock split common stock will include the holding period of the pre-reverse stock split common stock exchanged.
 
4. Shareholders who receive cash for fractional shares will generally be treated for Puerto Rico income tax purposes as having sold their fractional shares and will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the cash received and the portion of the of their basis for the pre-reverse stock split common stock allocated to the fractional shares. Such gain or loss will generally be a capital gain or loss if the stock was held as a capital asset, and such gain or loss will be long-term gain or loss to the extent that the shareholder’s holding period exceeds 6 months for Puerto Rico income tax purposes.
 
5. Shareholders who do not hold fractional shares and only receive post-reverse stock split common stock for their pre-reverse stock split common stock pursuant to the reverse stock split should not recognize any gain or loss for Puerto Rico income tax purposes as a result of the reverse stock split.


36


Table of Contents

6. Any gain or loss from the sale of fractional shares as discussed above realized by a shareholder that is not a resident of Puerto Rico will not be subject to income taxation in Puerto Rico.
 
7. Puerto Rico information reporting requirements will apply with respect to the cash proceeds to be received by the non-corporate shareholders in lieu of fractional shares.
 
Required Vote
 
Approval of Proposal No. 7 to amend our Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against this proposal.
 
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
 
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO IMPLEMENT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AT AN EXCHANGE RATIO THAT WILL BE WITHIN A RANGE OF ONE-FOR-TEN AND ONE-FOR-TWENTY, WHICH WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE CORPORATION’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
 
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
 
SEC rules provide that stockholders must submit to a company any proposals that they would like included in a company’s proxy statement no later than 120 days before the first anniversary of the date on which the previous year’s proxy statement was first mailed to stockholders unless the date of the annual meeting has been changed by more than 30 days from the date of the previous year’s meeting. When the date is changed by more than 30 days from the date of the previous year’s meeting, the deadline is a reasonable time before the company begins to print and send its proxy materials. In accordance with our By-laws, we expect to hold our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on or before April 26, 2011, subject to the right of the Board of Directors to change such date based on changed circumstances.
 
Any proposal that a stockholder wishes to have considered for presentation at the 2011 Annual Meeting and included in our proxy statement and form of proxy used in connection with such meeting must be forwarded to the Secretary of the Corporation at the principal executive offices of the Corporation no later than December 7, 2010. Any such proposal must comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
Under the Corporation’s By-laws, if a stockholder seeks to propose a nominee for director for consideration at the annual meeting of stockholders, notice must be received by the Secretary of the Corporation at least 30 days prior to the date of the annual meeting of stockholders. Accordingly, under the By-laws, any stockholders nominations for directors for consideration at the 2011 Annual Meeting must be received by the Secretary of the Corporation at the principal executive offices of the Corporation no later than March 25, 2011.


37


Table of Contents

 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND OTHER INFORMATION
 
The financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and the related management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, including the selected quarterly financial data and quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the financial statements for the interim period ended March 31, 2010 and the related management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, including quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, set forth in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 attached as Exhibits C and D, respectively, to this Proxy Statement, are incorporated herein by reference. Our auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, are not expected to be represented at the Special Meeting.
 
By Order of the Board of Directors,
 
/s/  Lawrence Odell
Lawrence Odell
Secretary
 
Santurce, Puerto Rico
August 2, 2010


38


Table of Contents

Exhibit A
 
Proposed Amendment to
Article SIXTH of the Restated Articles of Incorporation
 
(new language in bold and deleted language in brackets)
 
SIXTH
 
The authorized capital of the Corporation shall be [EIGHT HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS ($800,000,000)] TWO HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS ($250,000,000) represented by [SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION (750,000,000)] TWO BILLION (2,000,000,000) shares of common stock, [ONE DOLLAR ($1.00)] TEN CENTS ($0.10) par value per share, and FIFTY MILLION (50,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) par value per share.
 
The shares may be issued by the Corporation from time to time as authorized by the board of directors without the further approval of shareholders, except as otherwise provided in this Article Sixth or to the extent that such approval is required by governing law, rule or regulations. No shares of capital stock (including shares issuable upon conversion, exchange or exercise of other securities) shall be issued, directly or indirectly, to officers, directors or controlling persons of the Corporation other than as part of a general public offering, unless their issuance or the plan (including stock option plans) under which they would be issued has been approved by a majority of the total votes to be cast at a legal meeting of stockholders.
 
The board of directors is expressly authorized to provide, when it deems necessary, for the issuance of shares of preferred stock in one or more series, with such voting powers, and with such designations, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be expressed in resolution or resolutions of the board of directors, authorizing such issuance, including (but without limiting the generality of the foregoing) the following:
 
(a) the designation of such series;
 
(b) the dividend rate of such series, the conditions and dates upon which the dividends shall be payable, the preference or relation which such dividends shall bear to the dividends payable on any other class or classes of capital stock of the Corporation, and whether such dividends shall be cumulative or non-cumulative;
 
(c) whether the shares of such series shall be subject to redemption by the Corporation, and if made subject to such redemption, the terms and conditions of such redemption;
 
(d) the terms and amount of any sinking fund provided for the purchase or redemption of the shares of such series;
 
(e) whether the shares of such series shall be convertible and if provision be made for conversion, the terms of such conversion;
 
(f) the extent, if any, to which the holders of such shares shall be entitled to vote; provided however, that in no event, shall any holder of any series of preferred stock be entitled to more than vote for each such share;
 
(g) the restrictions and conditions, if any, upon the issue or re-issue of any additional preferred stock ranking on a parity with or prior to such shares as to dividends or upon dissolution; and
 
(h) the rights of the holders of such shares upon dissolution of, or upon distribution of assets of the Corporation, which rights may be different in the case of voluntary dissolution.


A-1


Table of Contents

Exhibit B
 
Proposed Amendment to
Article SIXTH of the Restated Articles of Incorporation
(new language in bold)
 
The following is hereby added to the end of Article SIXTH:
 
Effective upon the filing of this Restated Articles of Incorporation with Puerto Rico Department of State (the “Effective Time”), every [number ranging from 10 to 20] shares of Common Stock, par value [$1.00 per share][or $0.10 per share if Proposal No. 3 is adopted], issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, automatically and without any action on the part of the respective holders thereof, be combined, reclassified and changed into one fully paid and non-assessable share of Common Stock, par value [$1.00/$0.10] per share; provided, however, that no fractional shares shall be issued. Stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to a fractional share will receive a cash payment in lieu of such fractional share.
 
Any Stockholder who, immediately prior to the Effective Time, owns a number of shares of Old Common Stock which is not evenly divisible by [number ranging from 10 to 20] shall, with respect to such fractional interest, be entitled to receive cash in lieu of any fractional share of New Common Stock in an amount equal to the Stockholder’s pro rata share of net proceeds attributable to the sale of such fractional shares following the aggregation and sale by the Corporation’s exchange agent of all fractional shares of New Common Stock otherwise issuable. Each certificate that theretofore represented shares of Old Common Stock shall thereafter represent the number of shares of New Common Stock into which shares of Old Common Stock represented by such certificate shall have been reclassified and combined; provided, that each person holding of record a stock certificate or certificates that represented shares of Old Common Stock shall receive upon surrender of such certificate or certificates, a new certificate or certificates evidencing and representing the number of shares of New Common Stock to which such person is entitled under the foregoing reclassification and combination.


B-1


Table of Contents

Exhibit C
 
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2009


C-1


Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
 
     
(Mark One)    
þ
  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    For the transition period from          to          
 
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-14793
FIRST BANCORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
 
     
Puerto Rico
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  66-0561882
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
1519 Ponce de León Avenue, Stop 23
Santurce, Puerto Rico
(Address of principal executive office)
  00908
(Zip Code)
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
 
(787) 729-8200
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
     
Title of Each Class
 
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
 
Common Stock ($1.00 par value)
  New York Stock Exchange
7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
  New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series A (Liquidation Preference $25 per share)
   
8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
  New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series B (Liquidation Preference $25 per share)
   
7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
  New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series C (Liquidation Preference $25 per share)
   
7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
  New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series D (Liquidation Preference $25 per share)
   
7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
  New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Stock, Series E (Liquidation Preference $25 per share)
   
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
 
NONE
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well- known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o     No o
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definite proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
             
Large accelerated filer o
  Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller Reporting company o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o     No þ
 
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2009 (the last day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter) was $328,696,232 based on the closing price of $3.95 per share of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2009. The registrant had no nonvoting common equity outstanding as of June 30, 2009. For the purposes of the foregoing calculation only, registrant has treated as common stock held by affiliates only common stock of the registrant held by its directors and executive officers and voting stock held by the registrant’s employee benefit plans. The registrant’s response to this item is not intended to be an admission that any person is an affiliate of the registrant for any purposes other than this response.
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 92,542,722 shares as of January 31, 2010.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
 
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in April 2010, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, of this Form-10-K.
 


 

 
FIRST BANCORP
 
2009 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
             
  Business     5  
  Risk Factors     27  
  Unresolved Staff Comments     44  
  Properties     44  
  Legal Proceedings     44  
  Reserved     44  
  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities     44  
  Selected Financial Data     49  
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     50  
  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk     139  
  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data     139  
  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure     139  
  Controls and Procedures     139  
  Other Information     140  
  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance     140  
  Executive Compensation     140  
  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters     140  
  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence     140  
  Principal Accountant Fees and Services     140  
  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules     141  
    144  


2


Table of Contents

Forward Looking Statements
 
This Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Form 10-K or future filings by First BanCorp (the “Corporation”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in the Corporation’s press releases or in other public or stockholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the word or phrases “would be,” “will allow,” “intends to,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “should,” “anticipate” and similar expressions are meant to identify “forward-looking statements.”
 
First BanCorp wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such “forward-looking statements,” which speak only as of the date made, and represent First BanCorp’s expectations of future conditions or results and are not guarantees of future performance. First BanCorp advises readers that various factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any “forward-looking statement.” Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
 
  •  uncertainty about whether the Corporation’s actions to improve its capital structure will have their intended effect;
 
  •  the strength or weakness of the real estate market and of the consumer and commercial credit sector and their impact on the credit quality of the Corporation’s loans and other assets, including the Corporation’s construction and commercial real estate loan portfolios, which have contributed and may continue to contribute to, among other things, the increase in the levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs and the provision expense;
 
  •  adverse changes in general economic conditions in the United States and in Puerto Rico, including the interest rate scenario, market liquidity, housing absorption rates, real estate prices and disruptions in the U.S. capital markets, which may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect demand for all of the Corporation’s products and services and the value of the Corporation’s assets, including the value of derivative instruments used for protection from interest rate fluctuations;
 
  •  the Corporation’s reliance on brokered certificates of deposit and its ability to continue to rely on the issuance of brokered certificates of deposit to fund operations and provide liquidity;
 
  •  an adverse change in the Corporation’s ability to attract new clients and retain existing ones;
 
  •  a decrease in demand for the Corporation’s products and services and lower revenues and earnings because of the continued recession in Puerto Rico and the current fiscal problems and budget deficit of the Puerto Rico government;
 
  •  a need to recognize additional impairments of financial instruments or goodwill relating to acquisitions;
 
  •  uncertainty about regulatory and legislative changes for financial services companies in Puerto Rico, the United States and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, which could affect the Corporation’s financial performance and could cause the Corporation’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from prior results and anticipated or projected results;
 
  •  uncertainty about the effectiveness of the various actions undertaken to stimulate the U.S. economy and stabilize the U.S. financial markets, and the impact such actions may have on the Corporation’s business, financial condition and results of operations;
 
  •  changes in the fiscal and monetary policies and regulations of the federal government, including those determined by the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), government-sponsored housing agencies and local regulators in Puerto Rico and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands;
 
  •  the risk that the FDIC may further increase the deposit insurance premium and/or require special assessments to replenish its insurance fund, causing an additional increase in our non-interest expense;
 
  •  risks of an additional allowance as a result of an analysis of the ability to generate sufficient income to realize the benefit of the deferred tax asset;


3


Table of Contents

 
  •  risks of not being able to recover the assets pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.;
 
  •  changes in the Corporation’s expenses associated with acquisitions and dispositions;
 
  •  developments in technology;
 
  •  the impact of Doral Financial Corporation’s financial condition on the repayment of its outstanding secured loans to the Corporation;
 
  •  risks associated with further downgrades in the credit ratings of the Corporation’s securities;
 
  •  general competitive factors and industry consolidation; and
 
  •  the possible future dilution to holders of our Common Stock resulting from additional issuances of Common Stock or securities convertible into Common Stock.
 
The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any of the “forward- looking statements” to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements except as required by the federal securities laws.
 
Investors should carefully consider these factors and the risk factors outlined under Item 1A, Risk Factors, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


4


Table of Contents

 
PART I
 
FirstBanCorp, incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, is sometimes referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as “the Corporation”, “we”, “our”, “the Registrant”.
 
Item 1.   Business
 
GENERAL
 
First BanCorp is a publicly-owned financial holding company that is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Board (the “FED”). The Corporation was incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to serve as the bank holding company for FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank” or the “Bank”). The Corporation is a full service provider of financial services and products with operations in Puerto Rico, the United States and the US and British Virgin Islands. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had total assets of $19.6 billion, total deposits of $12.7 billion and total stockholders’ equity of $1.6 billion.
 
The Corporation provides a wide range of financial services for retail, commercial and institutional clients. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation controlled three wholly-owned subsidiaries: FirstBank, FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc. (“FirstBank Insurance Agency”) and Grupo Empresas de Servicios Financieros (d/b/a “PR Finance Group”). FirstBank is a Puerto Rico-chartered commercial bank, FirstBank Insurance Agency is a Puerto Rico-chartered insurance agency and PR Finance Group is a domestic corporation.
 
FirstBank is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of both the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“OCIF”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). Deposits are insured through the FDIC Deposit Insurance Fund. In addition, within FirstBank, the Bank’s United States Virgin Islands operations are subject to regulation and examination by the United States Virgin Islands Banking Board, and the British Virgin Islands operations are subject to regulation by the British Virgin Islands Financial Services Commission. FirstBank Insurance Agency is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the Office of the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and operates nine offices in Puerto Rico. PR Finance Group is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the OCIF.
 
FirstBank conducted its business through its main office located in San Juan, Puerto Rico, forty-eight full service banking branches in Puerto Rico, sixteen branches in the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) and British Virgin Islands (BVI) and ten branches in the state of Florida (USA). FirstBank had six wholly-owned subsidiaries with operations in Puerto Rico: First Leasing and Rental Corporation, a vehicle leasing company with two offices in Puerto Rico; First Federal Finance Corp. (d/b/a Money Express La Financiera), a finance company specializing in the origination of small loans with twenty-seven offices in Puerto Rico; First Mortgage, Inc. (“First Mortgage”), a residential mortgage loan origination company with thirty-eight offices in FirstBank branches and at stand alone sites; First Management of Puerto Rico, a domestic corporation; FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities Corp, a broker-dealer subsidiary created in March 2009 and engaged in municipal bond underwriting and financial advisory services on structured financings principally provided to government entities in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and FirstBank Overseas Corporation, an international banking entity organized under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico. FirstBank had three subsidiaries with operations outside of Puerto Rico: First Insurance Agency VI, Inc., an insurance agency with three offices that sells insurance products in the USVI; and First Express, a finance company specializing in the origination of small loans with three offices in the USVI.
 
Effective July 1, 2009, the Corporation consolidated the operations of FirstBank Florida, formerly a stock savings and loan association indirectly owned by the Corporation, with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico and dissolved Ponce General Corporation, former holding company of FirstBank Florida. On October 30, 2009, the Corporation divested its motor vehicle rental operations held through First Leasing and Rental Corporation through the sale of such business.


5


Table of Contents

BUSINESS SEGMENTS
 
The Corporation has six reportable segments: Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; Treasury and Investments; United States Operations; and Virgin Islands Operations. These segments are described below:
 
Commercial and Corporate Banking
 
The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s lending and other services for the public sector and specialized industries such as healthcare, tourism, financial institutions, food and beverage, shopping centers and middle-market clients. The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real estate and construction loans, and other products such as cash management and business management services. A substantial portion of this portfolio is secured by the underlying value of the real estate collateral, and collateral and the personal guarantees of the borrowers are taken in abundance of caution. Although commercial loans involve greater credit risk than a typical residential mortgage loan because they are larger in size and more risk is concentrated in a single borrower, the Corporation has and maintains a credit risk management infrastructure designed to mitigate potential losses associated with commercial lending, including strong underwriting and loan review functions, sales of loan participations and continuous monitoring of concentrations within portfolios.
 
Mortgage Banking
 
The Mortgage Banking segment conducts its operations mainly through FirstBank and its mortgage origination subsidiary, FirstMortgage. These operations consist of the origination, sale and servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loans products. Originations are sourced through different channels such as branches, mortgage bankers and real estate brokers, and in association with new project developers. FirstMortgage focuses on originating residential real estate loans, some of which conform to Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), Veterans Administration (“VA”) and Rural Development (“RD”) standards. Loans originated that meet FHA standards qualify for the federal agency’s insurance program whereas loans that meet VA and RD standards are guaranteed by their respective federal agencies. In December 2008, the Corporation obtained from the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) the necessary Commitment Authority to issue GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Under this program, during 2009, the Corporation completed the securitization of approximately $305.4 million of FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS.
 
Mortgage loans that do not qualify under these programs are commonly referred to as conventional loans. Conventional real estate loans could be conforming and non-conforming. Conforming loans are residential real estate loans that meet the standards for sale under the Fannie Mae (“FNMA”) and Freddie Mac (“FHLMC”) programs whereas loans that do not meet the standards are referred to as non-conforming residential real estate loans. The Corporation’s strategy is to penetrate markets by providing customers with a variety of high quality mortgage products to serve their financial needs faster and simpler and at competitive prices. The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires and sells mortgages in the secondary markets. Residential real estate conforming loans are sold to investors like FNMA and FHLMC. More than 90% of the Corporation’s residential mortgage loan portfolio consists of fixed-rate, fully amortizing, full documentation loans that have a lower risk than the typical sub-prime loans that have adversely affected the U.S. real estate market. The Corporation is not active in negative amortization loans or option adjustable rate mortgage loans (ARMs) including ARMs with teaser rates.
 
Consumer (Retail) Banking
 
The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment consists of the Corporation’s consumer lending and deposit-taking activities conducted mainly through its branch network and loan centers in Puerto Rico. Loans to consumers include auto, boat, lines of credit, and personal loans. Deposit products include interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking and savings accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) and retail certificates of deposit. Retail deposits gathered through each branch of FirstBank’s retail network serve as one of the funding sources for the lending and investment activities.


6


Table of Contents

Consumer lending has been mainly driven by auto loan originations. The Corporation follows a strategy of seeking to provide outstanding service to selected auto dealers that provide the channel for the bulk of the Corporation’s auto loan originations. This strategy is directly linked to our commercial lending activities as the Corporation maintains strong and stable auto floor plan relationships, which are the foundation of a successful auto loan generation operation. The Corporation’s commercial relations with floor plan dealers are strong and directly benefit the Corporation’s consumer lending operation and are managed as part of the consumer banking activities.
 
Personal loans and, to a lesser extent, marine financing and a small revolving credit portfolio also contribute to interest income generated on consumer lending. Credit card accounts are issued under the Bank’s name through an alliance with FIA Card Services (Bank of America), which bears the credit risk. Management plans to continue to be active in the consumer loans market, applying the Corporation’s strict underwriting standards.
 
Treasury and Investments
 
The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for the Corporation’s treasury and investment management functions. In the treasury function, which includes funding and liquidity management, this segment sells funds to the Commercial and Corporate Banking, Mortgage Banking, and Consumer (Retail) Banking segments to finance their lending activities and purchases funds gathered by those segments. Funds not gathered by the different business units are obtained by the Treasury Division through wholesale channels, such as brokered deposits, Advances from the FHLB and repurchase agreements with investment securities, among others.
 
Since the Corporation is a net borrower of funds, the securities portfolio does not result from the investment of excess funds. The securities portfolio is a leverage strategy for the purposes of liquidity management, interest rate management and earnings enhancement.
 
The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and Investments are based on market rates.
 
United States Operations
 
The United States operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank in the United States mainland. The Corporation provides a wide range of banking services to individual and corporate customers in the state of Florida through its ten branches and two specialized lending centers. In the United States, the Corporation originally had an agency lending office in Miami, Florida. Then, it acquired Coral Gables-based Ponce General (the parent company of Unibank, a savings and loans bank in 2005) and changed the savings and loan’s name to FirstBank Florida. Those two entities were operated separately. In 2009, the Corporation filed an application with the Office of Thrift Supervision to surrender the Miami-based FirstBank Florida charter and merge its assets into FirstBank Puerto Rico, the main subsidiary of First BanCorp. The Corporation placed the entire Florida operation under the control of a new appointed Executive Vice President. The merger allows the Florida operations to benefit by leveraging the capital position of FirstBank Puerto Rico and thereby provide them with the support necessary to grow in the Florida market.
 
Virgin Islands Operations
 
The Virgin Islands operations segment consists of all banking activities conducted by FirstBank in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, including retail and commercial banking services. In 2002, after acquiring Chase Manhattan Bank operations in the Virgin Islands, FirstBank became the largest bank in the Virgin Islands (USVI & BVI), serving St. Thomas, St. Croix, St. John, Tortola and Virgin Gorda, with 16 branches. In 2008, FirstBank acquired the Virgin Island Community Bank (“VICB”) in St. Croix, increasing its customer base and share in this market. The Virgin Islands operations segment is driven by its consumer and commercial lending and deposit-taking activities. Loans to consumers include auto, boat, lines of credit, personal loans and residential mortgage loans. Deposit products include interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking and savings accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) and retail certificates of deposit. Retail deposits gathered through each branch serve as the funding sources for the lending activities.


7


Table of Contents

For information regarding First BanCorp’s reportable segments, please refer to Note 33, “Segment Information,” to the Corporation’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
 
Employees
 
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation and its subsidiaries employed 2,713 persons. None of its employees are represented by a collective bargaining group. The Corporation considers its employee relations to be good.
 
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS DURING 2009
 
Participation in the U.S. Treasury Department’s Capital Purchase Program
 
On January 16, 2009, the Corporation entered into a Letter Agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) pursuant to which Treasury invested $400,000,000 in preferred stock of the Corporation under the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program. Under the Letter Agreement, which incorporates the Securities Purchase Agreement — Standard Terms (the “Purchase Agreement”), the Corporation issued and sold to Treasury (1) 400,000 shares of the Corporation’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference per share (the “Series F Preferred Stock”), and (2) a warrant dated January 16, 2009 (the “Warrant”) to purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporation’s common stock (the “Warrant shares”) at an exercise price of $10.27 per share. The exercise price of the Warrant was determined based upon the average of the closing prices of the Corporation’s common stock during the 20-trading day period ended December 19, 2008, the last trading day prior to the date the Corporation’s application to participate in the program was preliminarily approved. The Purchase Agreement is incorporated into Exhibit 10.4 hereto by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Corporation’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 20, 2009.
 
The Series F Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 regulatory capital. Cumulative dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock will accrue on the liquidation preference amount on a quarterly basis at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and thereafter at a rate of 9% per annum, but will only be paid when, as and if declared by the Corporation’s Board of Directors out of assets legally available therefore. The Series F Preferred Stock will rank pari passu with the Corporation’s existing 7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A, 8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series B, 7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series C, 7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series D, and 7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series E, in terms of dividend payments and distributions upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up of the Corporation. The Purchase Agreement contains limitations on the payment of dividends on common stock, including limiting regular quarterly cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.07 per share. The ability of the Corporation to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, any shares of its common stock, preferred stock or trust preferred securities are subject to restrictions outlined in the Purchase Agreement, including upon a default in the payment of dividends. The Corporation suspended the payment of dividends effective in August 2009. These restrictions will terminate on the earlier of (a) January 16, 2012 and (b) the date on which the Series F Preferred Stock is redeemed in whole or Treasury transfers all of the Series F Preferred Stock to third parties that are not affiliates of Treasury.
 
The shares of Series F Preferred Stock are non-voting, other than having class voting rights on certain matters that could adversely affect the Series F Preferred Stock. If dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock have not been paid for an aggregate of six quarterly dividend periods or more, whether or not consecutive, the Corporation’s authorized number of directors will be increased automatically by two and the holders of the Series F Preferred Stock, voting together with holders of any then outstanding parity stock, will have the right to elect two directors to fill such newly created directorships at the Corporation’s next annual meeting of stockholders or at a special meeting of stockholders called for that purpose prior to such annual meeting.


8


Table of Contents

These preferred share directors will be elected annually and will serve until all accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock have been declared and paid in full.
 
On January 13, 2009, the Corporation filed a Certificate of Designations (the “Certificate of Designations”) with the Puerto Rico Department of State for the purpose of amending its Certificate of Incorporation to fix the designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights of the Series F Preferred Stock.
 
As per the Purchase Agreement, prior to January 16, 2012, the Corporation may redeem, subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the shares of Series F Preferred Stock only with proceeds from one or more “Qualified Equity Offerings,” as such term is defined in the Certificate of Designations. After January 16, 2012, the Corporation may redeem, subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in whole or in part, out of funds legally available therefore, the shares of Series F Preferred Stock then outstanding. Pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, subject to consultation with the appropriate Federal banking agency, the Secretary of Treasury may permit a TARP recipient to repay any financial assistance previously provided under TARP without regard to whether the financial institution has replaced such funds from any other source.
 
The Warrant has a ten-year term and is exercisable at any time for 5,842,259 shares of First BanCorp common stock at an exercise price of $10.27. The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are adjustable in a number of circumstances, as discussed below. The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrant will be adjusted proportionately:
 
  •  in the event of a stock split, subdivision, reclassification or combination of the outstanding shares of common stock;
 
  •  until the earlier of the date the Treasury no longer holds the Warrant or any portion thereof or January 16, 2012, if the Corporation issues shares of common stock or securities convertible into common stock for no consideration or at a price per share that is less than 90% of the market price on the last trading day preceding the date of the pricing of such sale. Any amounts that the Corporation receives in connection with the issuance of such shares or convertible securities will be deemed to be equal to the sum of the net offering price of all such securities plus the minimum aggregate amount, if any, payable upon exercise or conversion of any such convertible securities; no adjustment will be required with respect to (i) consideration for or to fund business or asset acquisitions, (ii) shares issued in connection with employee benefit plans and compensation arrangements in the ordinary course consistent with past practice approved by the Corporation’s Board of Directors, (iii) a public or broadly marketed offering and sale by the Corporation or its affiliates of the Corporation’s common stock or convertible securities for cash pursuant to registration under the Securities Act or issuance under Rule 144A on a basis consistent with capital raising transactions by comparable financial institutions, and (iv) the exercise of preemptive rights on terms existing on January 16, 2009;
 
  •  in connection with the Corporation’s distributions to security holders (e.g., stock dividends);
 
  •  in connection with certain repurchases of common stock by the Corporation; and
 
  •  in connection with certain business combinations.
 
None of the shares of Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant, or the Warrant shares are subject to any contractual restriction on transfer. The Series F Preferred Stock and the Warrant were issued in a private placement exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Corporation registered for resale shares of Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant and the Warrant shares, and the sale of the Warrant shares by the Corporation to any purchasers of the Warrant. In addition, under the shelf registration, the Corporation registered the resale of 9,250,450 shares of common stock by or on behalf of the Bank of Nova Scotia, its pledges, donees, transferees or other successors in interest.
 
Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, (i) the Corporation amended its compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements and agreements (including severance and employment agreements), to the extent necessary to be in compliance with the executive compensation and corporate


9


Table of Contents

governance requirements of Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stability Act of 2008 and applicable guidance or regulations and (ii) each Senior Executive Officer, as defined in the Purchase Agreement, executed a written waiver releasing Treasury and the Corporation from any claims that such officers may otherwise have as a result of the Corporation’s amendment of such arrangements and agreements to be in compliance with Section 111(b). Until such time as Treasury ceases to own any debt or equity securities of the Corporation acquired pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Corporation must maintain compliance with these requirements.
 
Reduction of credit exposure with financial institutions
 
The Corporation has continued working on the reduction of its credit exposure with Doral and R&G Financial. During the second quarter of 2009, the Bank purchased from R&G Financial $205 million of residential mortgages that previously served as collateral for a commercial loan extended to R&G . The purchase price of the transaction was retained by the Corporation to fully pay off the commercial loan, thereby significantly reducing the Corporation’s exposure to a single borrower. As of December 31, 2009, there still an outstanding balance of $321.5 million due from Doral.
 
Surrender of the stock savings and loans association charter in Florida
 
Effective July 1, 2009 as part of the merger of FirstBank Florida with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico, FirstBank Florida surrendered its stock savings and loans association charter granted by the Office of Thrift Supervsion. Under the regulatory oversight of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and under the FirstBank Florida trade name, FirstBank continues to offer the same services offered by the former stock savings and loans association through its branch network in Florida.
 
Dividend Suspension
 
On July 30, 2009, after reporting a net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation announced that the Board of Directors resolved to suspend the payment of the common and preferred dividends, including the Series F Preferred Stock, effective with the preferred dividend payments for the month of August 2009.
 
Business Developments
 
Effective July 1, 2009, the Corporation consolidated the operations of FirstBank Florida, formerly a stock savings and loan association indirectly owned by the Corporation, with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico and dissolved Ponce General Corporation, former holding company of FirstBank Florida.
 
On October 31, 2009, First Leasing and Rental Corporation sold its motor vehicle rental operations and realized a nominal gain of $0.2 million.
 
Credit Ratings
 
The Corporation’s credit as long-term issuer is currently rated B by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) and B- by Fitch Ratings Limited (“Fitch”); both with negative outlook.
 
FirstBank’s long-term senior debt rating is currently rated B1 by Moody’s Investor Service (“Moodys”), four notches below their definition of investment grade; B by S&P, and B by Fitch, both five notches under their definition of investment grade. The outlook on the Bank’s credit ratings from the three rating agencies is negative.
 
WEBSITE ACCESS TO REPORT
 
The Corporation makes available annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, free of charge on or through its internet website at www.firstbankpr.com,


10


Table of Contents

(under the “Investor Relations” section), as soon as reasonably practicable after the Corporation electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC.
 
The Corporation also makes available the Corporation’s corporate governance guidelines, the charters of the audit, asset/liability, compensation and benefits, credit, strategic planning, corporate governance and nominating committees and the codes and principles mentioned below, free of charge on or through its internet website at www.firstbankpr.com (under the “Investor Relations” section):
 
  •  Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers
 
  •  Code of Ethics applicable to all employees
 
  •  Independence Principles for Directors
 
The corporate governance guidelines, and the aforementioned charters and codes may also be obtained free of charge by sending a written request to Mr. Lawrence Odell, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, PO Box 9146, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00908.
 
The public may read and copy any materials First BanCorp files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. In addition, the public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy, and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at its website (www.sec.gov).
 
MARKET AREA AND COMPETITION
 
Puerto Rico, where the banking market is highly competitive, is the main geographic service area of the Corporation. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation also had a presence in the state of Florida and in the United States and British Virgin Islands. Puerto Rico banks are subject to the same federal laws, regulations and supervision that apply to similar institutions in the United States mainland.
 
Competitors include other banks, insurance companies, mortgage banking companies, small loan companies, automobile financing companies, leasing companies, brokerage firms with retail operations, and credit unions in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and the state of Florida. The Corporation’s businesses compete with these other firms with respect to the range of products and services offered and the types of clients, customers, and industries served.
 
The Corporation’s ability to compete effectively depends on the relative performance of its products, the degree to which the features of its products appeal to customers, and the extent to which the Corporation meets clients’ needs and expectations. The Corporation’s ability to compete also depends on its ability to attract and retain professional and other personnel, and on its reputation.
 
The Corporation encounters intense competition in attracting and retaining deposits and its consumer and commercial lending activities. The Corporation competes for loans with other financial institutions, some of which are larger and have greater resources available than those of the Corporation. Management believes that the Corporation has been able to compete effectively for deposits and loans by offering a variety of transaction account products and loans with competitive features, by pricing its products at competitive interest rates, by offering convenient branch locations, and by emphasizing the quality of its service. The Corporation’s ability to originate loans depends primarily on the rates and fees charged and the service it provides to its borrowers in making prompt credit decisions. There can be no assurance that in the future the Corporation will be able to continue to increase its deposit base or originate loans in the manner or on the terms on which it has done so in the past.
 
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
 
Recent Events affecting the Corporation
 
Events since early 2008 affecting the financial services industry and, more generally, the financial markets and the economy as a whole, have led to various proposals for changes in the regulation of the financial


11


Table of Contents

services industry. In 2009, the House of Representatives passed the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009, which, among other things, calls for the establishment of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency having broad authority to regulate providers of credit, savings, payment and other consumer financial products and services; creates a new structure for resolving troubled or failed financial institutions; requires certain over-the-counter derivative transactions to be cleared in a central clearinghouse and/or effected on the exchange; revises the assessment base for the calculation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) assessments; and creates a structure to regulate systemically important financial companies, including providing regulators with the power to require such companies to sell or transfer assets and terminate activities if they determine that the size or scope of activities of the company pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the company or the financial stability of the United States. Other proposals have been made, including additional capital and liquidity requirements and limitations on size or types of activity in which banks may engage. It is not clear at this time which of these proposals will be finally enacted into law, or what form they will take, or what new proposals may be made, as the debate over financial reform continues in 2010. The description below summarizes the current regulatory structure in which the Corporation operates. In the event the regulatory structure change significantly, the structure of the Corporation and the products and services it offers could also change significantly as a result.
 
Bank Holding Company Activities and Other Limitations
 
The Corporation is subject to ongoing regulation, supervision, and examination by the Federal Reserve Board, and is required to file with the Federal Reserve Board periodic and annual reports and other information concerning its own business operations and those of its subsidiaries. In addition, the Corporation is subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“Bank Holding Company Act”). Under the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act, a bank holding company must obtain Federal Reserve Board approval before it acquires direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of another bank, or merges or consolidates with another bank holding company. The Federal Reserve Board also has authority under certain circumstances to issue cease and desist orders against bank holding companies and their non-bank subsidiaries.
 
A bank holding company is prohibited under the Bank Holding Company Act, with limited exceptions, from engaging, directly or indirectly, in any business unrelated to the businesses of banking or managing or controlling banks. One of the exceptions to these prohibitions permits ownership by a bank holding company of the shares of any corporation if the Federal Reserve Board, after due notice and opportunity for hearing, by regulation or order has determined that the activities of the corporation in question are so closely related to the businesses of banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto.
 
Under the Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company such as the Corporation is expected to act as a source of financial strength to its banking subsidiaries and to commit support to them. This support may be required at times when, absent such policy, the bank holding company might not otherwise provide such support. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and be entitled to a priority of payment. In addition, any capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks must be subordinated in right of payment to deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary bank. As of December 31, 2009, FirstBank was the only depository institution subsidiary of the Corporation.
 
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the “GLB Act”) revised and expanded the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act by including a section that permits a bank holding company to elect to become a financial holding company and engage in a full range of financial activities. In April 2000, the Corporation filed an election with the Federal Reserve Board and became a financial holding company under the GLB Act. The GLB Act requires a bank holding company that elects to become a financial holding company to file a written declaration with the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and comply with the following (and such compliance must continue while the entity is treated as a financial holding company): (i) state that the bank holding company elects to become a financial holding company; (ii) provide the name and head office address of the bank holding company and each depository institution controlled by the bank holding company; (iii) certify


12


Table of Contents

that all depository institutions controlled by the bank holding company are well-capitalized as of the date the bank holding company files for the election; (iv) provide the capital ratios for all relevant capital measures as of the close of the previous quarter for each depository institution controlled by the bank holding company; and (v) certify that all depository institutions controlled by the bank holding company are well-managed as of the date the bank holding company files the election. All insured depository institutions controlled by the bank holding company must have also achieved at least a rating of “satisfactory record of meeting community credit needs” under the Community Reinvestment Act during the depository institution’s most recent examination.
 
A financial holding company ceasing to meet these standards is subject to a variety of restrictions, depending on the circumstances. If the Federal Reserve Board determines that any of the financial holding company’s subsidiary depository institutions are either not well-capitalized or not well-managed, it must notify the financial holding company. Until compliance is restored, the Federal Reserve Board has broad discretion to impose appropriate limitations on the financial holding company’s activities. If compliance is not restored within 180 days, the Federal Reserve Board may ultimately require the financial holding company to divest its depository institutions or in the alternative, to discontinue or divest any activities that are permitted only to non-financial holding company bank holding companies.
 
The potential restrictions are different if the lapse pertains to the Community Reinvestment Act requirement. In that case, until all the subsidiary institutions are restored to at least “satisfactory” Community Reinvestment Act rating status, the financial holding company may not engage, directly or through a subsidiary, in any of the additional activities permissible under the GLB Act or make additional acquisitions of companies engaged in the additional activities. However, completed acquisitions and additional activities and affiliations previously begun are left undisturbed, as the GLB Act does not require divestiture for this type of situation.
 
Financial holding companies may engage, directly or indirectly, in any activity that is determined to be (i) financial in nature, (ii) incidental to such financial activity, or (iii) complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally. The GLB Act specifically provides that the following activities have been determined to be “financial in nature”: (a) lending, trust and other banking activities; (b) insurance activities; (c) financial or economic advice or services; (d) pooled investments; (e) securities underwriting and dealing; (f) existing bank holding company domestic activities; (g) existing bank holding company foreign activities; and (h) merchant banking activities. The Corporation offers insurance agency services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, FirstBank Insurance Agency and through First Insurance Agency V. I., Inc., a subsidiary of FirstBank. In association with JP Morgan Chase, the Corporation, through FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of FirstBank, also offers municipal bond underwriting services focused mainly on municipal and government bonds or obligations issued by the Puerto Rico government and its public corporations. Additionally, FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities, Inc. offers financial advisory services.
 
In addition, the GLB Act specifically gives the Federal Reserve Board the authority, by regulation or order, to expand the list of “financial” or “incidental” activities, but requires consultation with the Treasury, and gives the Federal Reserve Board authority to allow a financial holding company to engage in any activity that is “complementary” to a financial activity and does not “pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally.”
 
Under the GLB Act, if the Corporation fails to meet any of the requirements for being a financial holding company and is unable to resolve such deficiencies within certain prescribed periods of time, the Federal Reserve Board could require the Corporation to divest control of one or more of its depository institution subsidiaries or alternatively cease conducting financial activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies that are not financial holding companies.
 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
 
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOA”) implemented a range of corporate governance and accounting measures to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies, and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability


13


Table of Contents

of disclosures under federal securities laws. In addition, SOA has established membership requirements and responsibilities for the audit committee, imposed restrictions on the relationship between the Corporation and external auditors, imposed additional responsibilities for the external financial statements on our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, expanded the disclosure requirements for corporate insiders, required management to evaluate its disclosure controls and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting, and required the auditors to issue a report on the internal control over financial reporting.
 
Since the 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Corporation has included in its annual report on Form 10-K its management assessment regarding the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report includes a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Corporation; management’s assessment as to the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on management’s evaluation, as of year-end; and the framework used by management as criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. As of December 31, 2009, First BanCorp’s management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective. The Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm reached the same conclusion.
 
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
 
On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”) was signed into law. The EESA authorized the Treasury to access up to $700 billion to protect the U.S. economy and restore confidence and stability to the financial markets. One such program under the Treasury Department’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) was action by Treasury to make significant investments in U.S. financial institutions through the Capital Purchase Program (CPP). The Treasury’s stated purpose in implementing the CPP was to improve the capitalization of healthy institutions, which would improve the flow of credit to businesses and consumers, and boost the confidence of depositors, investors, and counterparties alike. All federal banking and thrift regulatory agencies encouraged eligible institutions to participate in the CPP.
 
The Corporation applied for, and the Treasury approved, a capital purchase in the amount of $400,000,000. The Corporation entered into a Letter Agreement with the Treasury, pursuant to which the Corporation issued and sold to the Treasury for an aggregate purchase price of $400,000,000 in cash (i) 400,000 shares of the Series F Preferred Stock, and (2) the Warrant to purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $10.27 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution and other adjustments. The TARP transaction closed on January 16, 2009.
 
Under the terms of the Letter Agreement with the Treasury, (i) the Corporation amended its compensation, bonus, incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements and agreements (including severance and employment agreements) to the extent necessary to be in compliance with the executive compensation and corporate governance requirements of Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stability Act of 2008 and applicable guidance or regulations issued by the Secretary of Treasury on or prior to January 16, 2009 and (ii) each Senior Executive Officer, as defined in the Purchase Agreement, executed a written waiver releasing Treasury and the Corporation from any claims that such officers may otherwise have as a result the Corporation’s amendment of such arrangements and agreements to be in compliance with Section 111(b). Until such time as Treasury ceases to own any debt or equity securities of the Corporation acquired pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Corporation must maintain compliance with these requirements.
 
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
 
On February 17, 2009, the Congress enacted the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“Stimulus Act”). The Stimulus Act includes federal tax cuts, expansion of unemployment benefits and other social welfare provisions, and domestic spending in education, health care, and infrastructure, including energy sector. The Stimulus Act includes new provisions relating to compensation paid by institutions that receive government assistance under TARP, including institutions that have already received such assistance, effectively amending the existing compensation and corporate governance requirements of Section 111(b) of the EESA. The provisions include restrictions on the amounts and forms of compensation payable, provision


14


Table of Contents

for possible reimbursement of previously paid compensation and a requirement that compensation be submitted to non-binding “say on pay” shareholders votes.
 
On June 10, 2009, the Treasury issued regulations implementing the compensation requirements under ARRA, which amended the requirements of EESA. The regulations became applicable to existing and new TARP recipients upon publication in the Federal Register on June 15, 2009. The regulations make effective the compensation provisions of ARRA and include rules requiring: (i) review of prior compensation by a Special Master; (ii) restrictions on paying or accruing bonuses, retention awards or incentive compensation for certain employees; (iii) regular review of all employee compensation arrangements by the company’s senior risk officer and compensation committee to ensure that the arrangements do not encourage unnecessary and excessive risk-taking or manipulation of reporting earnings; (iv) recoupment of bonus payments based on materially inaccurate information; (v) prohibition on severance or change in control payments for certain employees; (vi) adoption of policies and procedures to avoid excessive luxury expenses; and (vii) mandatory “say on pay” votes (which was effective beginning in February 2009). In addition, the regulations also introduce several additional requirements and restrictions, including: (i) Special Master review of ongoing compensation in certain situations; (ii) prohibition on tax gross-ups for certain employees; (iii) disclosure of perquisites; and (iv) disclosure regarding compensation consultants.
 
Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan
 
On February 18, 2009, President Obama announced a comprehensive plan to help responsible homeowners avoid foreclosure by providing affordable and sustainable mortgage loans. The Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, a $75 billion federal program, provides for a sweeping loan modification program targeted at borrowers who are at risk of foreclosure because their incomes are not sufficient to make their mortgage payments. It also includes refinancing opportunities for borrowers who are current on their mortgage payments but have been unable to refinance because their homes have decreased in value. Under the Homeowner Stability Initiative, Treasury will spend up to $50 billion dollars to make mortgage payments affordable and sustainable for middle-income American families that are at risk of foreclosure. Borrowers who are delinquent on the mortgage for their primary residence and borrowers who, due to a loss of income or increase in expenses, are struggling to keep their payments current may be eligible for a loan modification. Under the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, borrowers who are current on their mortgage but have been unable to refinance because their house has decreased in value may have the opportunity to refinance into a 30-year, fixed-rate loan. Through the program, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will allow the refinancing of mortgage loans that they hold in their portfolios or that they guarantee in their own mortgage-backed securities. Lenders were able to begin accepting refinancing applications on March 4, 2009. The Obama Administration announced on March 4, 2009 the new U.S. Department of the Treasury guidelines to enable servicers to begin modifications of eligible mortgages under the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan. The guidelines implement financial incentives for mortgage lenders to modify existing first mortgages and sets standard industry practice for modifications.
 
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
 
The FDIC adopted the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (“TLGP”) in October 2008 following a determination of systemic risk by the Secretary of the Treasury (after consultation with the President) that was supported by recommendations from the FDIC and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The TLGP is part of a coordinated effort by the FDIC, the Treasury, and the Federal Reserve System to address unprecedented disruptions in the credit markets and the resultant difficulty of many financial institutions to obtain funds and to make loans to creditworthy borrowers. On October 23, 2008, the FDIC’s Board of Directors (Board) authorized the publication in the Federal Register of an interim rule that outlined the structure of the TLGP. The interim rule was finalized and a final rule was published in the Federal Register on November 26, 2008. Designed to assist in the stabilization of the nation’s financial system, the FDIC’s TLGP is composed of two distinct components: the Debt Guarantee Program (“DGP”) and the Transaction Account Guarantee Program (“TAG program”). Under the DGP, the FDIC guarantees certain senior unsecured debt issued by participating entities. Under the TAG program, the FDIC guarantees all funds held in qualifying


15


Table of Contents

noninterest-bearing transaction accounts at participating insured depository institutions (“IDIs”). The DGP initially permitted participating entities to issue FDIC-guaranteed senior unsecured debt until June 30, 2009, with the FDIC’s guarantee for such debt to expire on the earlier of the maturity of the debt (or the conversion date, for mandatory convertible debt) or June 30, 2012. To reduce the potential for market disruptions at the conclusion of the DGP and to begin the orderly phase-out of the program, on May 29, 2009 the Board issued a final rule that extended for four months the period during which certain participating entities could issue FDIC-guaranteed debt. All IDIs and those other participating entities that had issued FDIC-guaranteed debt on or before April 1, 2009 were permitted to participate in the extended DGP without application to the FDIC. Other participating entities that received approval from the FDIC also were permitted to participate in the extended DGP. The expiration of the guarantee period was also extended from June 30, 2012 to December 31, 2012. As a result, all such participating entities were permitted to issue FDIC-guaranteed debt through and including October 31, 2009, with the FDIC’s guarantee expiring on the earliest of the debt’s mandatory conversion date (for mandatory convertible debt), the stated maturity date, or December 31, 2012.
 
On October 20, 2009, the FDIC established a limited, six-month emergency guarantee facility upon expiration of the DGP. Under this emergency guarantee facility, certain participating entities can apply to the FDIC for permission to issue FDIC-guaranteed debt during the period starting October 31, 2009 through April 30, 2010. The fee for issuing debt under the emergency facility will be at least 300 basis points, which the FDIC reserves the right to increase on a case-by-case basis, depending upon the risks presented by the issuing entity. The TAG Program has been extended until June 30, 2010. The cost of participating in the program increased after December 31, 2009. Separately, Congress extended the temporary increase in the standard coverage limit to $250,000 until December 31, 2013. FirstBank currently participates in the TLGP solely through the TAG program.
 
USA Patriot Act
 
Under Title III of the USA Patriot Act, also known as the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act of 2001, all financial institutions are required to, among other things, identify their customers, adopt formal and comprehensive anti-money laundering programs, scrutinize or prohibit altogether certain transactions of special concern, and be prepared to respond to inquiries from U.S. law enforcement agencies concerning their customers and their transactions. Presently, only certain types of financial institutions (including banks, savings associations and money services businesses) are subject to final rules implementing the anti-money laundering program requirements of the USA Patriot Act.
 
Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA Patriot Act’s requirements could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institutions. The Corporation has adopted appropriate policies, procedures and controls to address compliance with the USA Patriot Act and Treasury regulations.
 
Privacy Policies
 
Under Title V of the GLB Act, all financial institutions are required to adopt privacy policies, restrict the sharing of nonpublic customer data with parties at the customer’s request and establish policies and procedures to protect customer data from unauthorized access. The Corporation and its subsidiaries have adopted policies and procedures in order to comply with the privacy provisions of the GLB Act and the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act of 2003 and the regulations issued thereunder.
 
State Chartered Non-Member Bank and Banking Laws and Regulations in General
 
FirstBank is subject to regulation and examination by the OCIF and the FDIC, and is subject to certain requirements established by the Federal Reserve Board. The federal and state laws and regulations which are applicable to banks regulate, among other things, the scope of their businesses, their investments, their reserves against deposits, the timing and availability of deposited funds, and the nature and amount of and collateral for certain loans. In addition to the impact of regulations, commercial banks are affected significantly by the actions of the Federal Reserve Board as it attempts to control the money supply and credit availability in order to influence the economy. Among the instruments used by the Federal Reserve Board to implement these


16


Table of Contents

objectives are open market operations in U.S. government securities, adjustments of the discount rate, and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. These instruments are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic growth and the distribution of credit, bank loans, investments and deposits. Their use also affects interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits. The monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. The effects of such policies upon our future business, earnings, and growth cannot be predicted.
 
References herein to applicable statutes or regulations are brief summaries of portions thereof which do not purport to be complete and which are qualified in their entirety by reference to those statutes and regulations. Any change in applicable laws or regulations may have a material adverse effect on the business of commercial banks, and bank holding companies, including FirstBank and the Corporation.
 
As a creditor and financial institution, FirstBank is subject to certain regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board, including, without limitation, Regulation B (Equal Credit Opportunity Act), Regulation DD (Truth in Savings Act), Regulation E (Electronic Funds Transfer Act), Regulation F (Limits on Exposure to Other Banks), Regulation O (Loans to Executive Officers, Directors and Principal Shareholders), Regulation W (Transactions Between Member Banks and Their Affiliates), Regulation Z (Truth in Lending Act), Regulation CC (Expedited Funds Availability Act), Regulation X (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act), Regulation BB (Community Reinvestment Act) and Regulation C (Home Mortgage Disclosure Act).
 
During 2008, federal agencies adopted revisions to several rules and regulations that will impact lenders and secondary market activities. In 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank revised Regulation Z, adopted under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), by adopting a final rule which prohibits unfair, abusive or deceptive home mortgage lending practices and restricts certain mortgage lending practices. The final rule also establishes advertisement standards and requires certain mortgage disclosures to be given to the consumers earlier in the transaction. The rule was effective in October 2009. The final rule regarding the TILA also includes amendments revising disclosures in connection with credit cards accounts and other revolving credit plans to ensure that information provided to customers is provided in a timely manner and in a form that is readily understandable.
 
There are periodic examinations by the OCIF and the FDIC of FirstBank to test the Bank’s compliance with various statutory and regulatory requirements. This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution can engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the FDIC’s insurance fund and depositors. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions against banking organizations and institution-affiliated parties. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and regulations and for engaging in unsafe or unsound practices. In addition, certain bank actions are required by statute and implementing regulations. Other actions or failure to act may provide the basis for enforcement action, including the filing of misleading or untimely reports with regulatory authorities.
 
Dividend Restrictions
 
The Corporation is subject to certain restrictions generally imposed on Puerto Rico corporations with respect to the declaration and payment of dividends (i.e., that dividends may be paid out only from the Corporation’s net assets in excess of capital or, in the absence of such excess, from the Corporation’s net earnings for such fiscal year and/or the preceding fiscal year). The Federal Reserve Board has also issued a policy statement that as a matter of prudent banking, a bank holding company should generally not maintain a given rate of cash dividends unless its net income available to common shareholders has been sufficient to fund fully the dividends and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears to be consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality, and overall financial condition.


17


Table of Contents

On February 24, 2009, the Federal Reserve published the “Applying Supervisory Guidance and Regulations on the Payment of Dividends, Stock Redemptions, and Stock Repurchases at Bank Holding Companies” (the “Supervisory Letter”) which discusses the ability of bank holding companies to declare dividends and to redeem or repurchase equity securities. The Supervisory Letter is generally consistent with prior Federal Reserve supervisory policies and guidance, although places greater emphasis on discussions with the regulators prior to dividend declarations and redemption or repurchase decisions even when not explicitly required by the regulations. The Federal Reserve provides that the principles discussed in the letter are applicable to all bank holding companies, but are especially relevant for bank holding companies that are either experiencing financial difficulties and/or receiving public funds under the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program. To that end, the Supervisory Letter specifically addresses the Federal Reserve’s supervisory considerations for TARP participants.
 
The Supervisory Letter provides that a board of directors should “eliminate, defer, or severely limit” dividends if: (i) the bank holding company’s net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (ii) the bank holding company’s rate of earnings retention is inconsistent with capital needs and overall macroeconomic outlook; or (iii) the bank holding company will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. The Supervisory Letter further suggests that bank holding companies should inform the Federal Reserve in advance of paying a dividend that: (i) exceeds the earnings for the quarter in which the dividend is being paid; or (ii) could result in a material adverse change to the organization’s capital structure.
 
As of December 31, 2009, the principal source of funds for the Corporation’s parent holding company is dividends declared and paid by its subsidiary, FirstBank. The ability of FirstBank to declare and pay dividends on its capital stock is regulated by the Puerto Rico Banking Law, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDIA”), and FDIC regulations. In general terms, the Puerto Rico Banking Law provides that when the expenditures of a bank are greater than receipts, the excess of expenditures over receipts shall be charged against undistributed profits of the bank and the balance, if any, shall be charged against the required reserve fund of the bank. If the reserve fund is not sufficient to cover such balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount must be charged against the bank’s capital account. The Puerto Rico Banking Law provides that, until said capital has been restored to its original amount and the reserve fund to 20% of the original capital, the bank may not declare any dividends.
 
In general terms, the FDIA and the FDIC regulations restrict the payment of dividends when a bank is undercapitalized, when a bank has failed to pay insurance assessments, or when there are safety and soundness concerns regarding such bank.
 
In addition, the Purchase Agreement entered into with the Treasury contains limitations on the payment of dividends on common stock, including limiting regular quarterly cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.07 per share. Also, upon issuance of the Series F Preferred Stock, the ability of the Corporation to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, any shares of its common stock, preferred stock or trust preferred securities is subject to restrictions, including limitations when the Corporation has not paid dividends. These restrictions will terminate on the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of the closing date of the issuance of the Series F Preferred Stock and (b) the date on which the Series F Preferred Stock has been redeemed in whole or Treasury has transferred all of the Series F Preferred Stock to third parties that are not affiliates of Treasury. The restrictions described in this paragraph are set forth in the Purchase Agreement.
 
On July 30, 2009, after reporting a net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation announced that the Board of Directors resolved to suspend the payment of the common and preferred dividends, including the TARP preferred dividends, effective with the preferred dividend payments for the month of August 2009.


18


Table of Contents

Limitations on Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders
 
Certain transactions between financial institutions such as FirstBank and its affiliates are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and by Regulation W. An affiliate of a financial institution is any corporation or entity, that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the financial institution. In a holding company context, the parent bank holding company and any companies which are controlled by such parent bank holding company are affiliates of the financial institution. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (i) limit the extent to which the financial institution or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” (defined below) with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of such financial institution’s capital stock and surplus, and contain an aggregate limit on all such transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such financial institution’s capital stock and surplus and (ii) require that all “covered transactions” be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the financial institution or affiliate, as those provided to a non-affiliate. The term “covered transaction” includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a guarantee and other similar transactions. In addition, loans or other extensions of credit by the financial institution to the affiliate are required to be collateralized in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act.
 
The GLB Act requires that financial subsidiaries of banks be treated as affiliates for purposes of Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, but (i) the 10% capital limitation on transactions between the bank and such financial subsidiary as an affiliate is not applicable, and (ii) notwithstanding other provisions in Sections 23A and 23B, the investment by the bank in the financial subsidiary does not include retained earnings of the financial subsidiary. The GLB Act provides that: (1) any purchase of, or investment in, the securities of a financial subsidiary by any affiliate of the parent bank is considered a purchase or investment by the bank; and (2) if the Federal Reserve Board determines that such treatment is necessary, any loan made by an affiliate of the parent bank to the financial subsidiary is to be considered a loan made by the parent bank.
 
The Federal Reserve Board has adopted Regulation W which interprets the provisions of Sections 23A and 23B. The regulation unifies and updates staff interpretations issued over the years, incorporates several new interpretations and provisions (such as to clarify when transactions with an unrelated third party will be attributable to an affiliate), and addresses new issues arising as a result of the expanded scope of nonbanking activities engaged in by banks and bank holding companies in recent years and authorized for financial holding companies under the GLB Act.
 
In addition, Sections 22(h) and (g) of the Federal Reserve Act, implemented through Regulation O, place restrictions on loans to executive officers, directors, and principal stockholders. Under Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act, loans to a director, an executive officer, a greater than 10% stockholder of a financial institution, and certain related interests of these, may not exceed, together with all other outstanding loans to such persons and affiliated interests, the financial institution’s loans to one borrower limit, generally equal to 15% of the institution’s unimpaired capital and surplus. Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act also requires that loans to directors, executive officers, and principal stockholders be made on terms substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to other persons and also requires prior board approval for certain loans. In addition, the aggregate amount of extensions of credit by a financial institution to insiders cannot exceed the institution’s unimpaired capital and surplus. Furthermore, Section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act places additional restrictions on loans to executive officers.
 
Federal Reserve Board Capital Requirements
 
The Federal Reserve Board has adopted capital adequacy guidelines pursuant to which it assesses the adequacy of capital in examining and supervising a bank holding company and in analyzing applications to it under the Bank Holding Company Act. The Federal Reserve Board capital adequacy guidelines generally require bank holding companies to maintain total capital equal to 8% of total risk-adjusted assets, with at least one-half of that amount consisting of Tier I or core capital and up to one-half of that amount consisting of Tier II or supplementary capital. Tier I capital for bank holding companies generally consists of the sum of


19


Table of Contents

common stockholders’ equity and perpetual preferred stock, subject in the case of the latter to limitations on the kind and amount of such perpetual preferred stock that may be included as Tier I capital, less goodwill and, with certain exceptions, other intangibles. Tier II capital generally consists of hybrid capital instruments, perpetual preferred stock that is not eligible to be included as Tier I capital, term subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock and, subject to limitations, allowances for loan losses. Assets are adjusted under the risk-based guidelines to take into account different risk characteristics, with the categories ranging from 0% (requiring no additional capital) for assets such as cash to 100% for the bulk of assets, which are typically held by a bank holding company, including multi-family residential and commercial real estate loans, commercial business loans and commercial loans. Off-balance sheet items also are adjusted to take into account certain risk characteristics.
 
The federal bank regulatory agencies’ risk-based capital guidelines for years have been based upon the 1988 capital accord (“Basel I”) of the Basel Committee, a committee of central bankers and bank supervisors from the major industrialized countries. This body develops broad policy guidelines for use by each country’s supervisors in determining the supervisory policies they apply. In 2004, it proposed a new capital adequacy framework (“Basel II”) for large, internationally active banking organizations to replace Basel I. Basel II was designed to produce a more risk-sensitive result than its predecessor. However, certain portions of Basel II entail complexities and costs that were expected to preclude their practical application to the majority of U.S. banking organizations that lack the economies of scale needed to absorb the associated expenses.
 
Effective April 1, 2008, the U.S. federal bank regulatory agencies adopted Basel II for application to certain banking organizations in the United States. The new capital adequacy framework applies to organizations that: (i) have consolidated assets of at least $250 billion; or (ii) have consolidated total on-balance sheet foreign exposures of at least $10 billion; or (iii) are eligible to, and elect to, opt-in to the new framework even though not required to do so under clause (i) or (ii) above; or (iv) as a general matter, are subsidiaries of a bank or bank holding company that uses the new rule. During a two-year phase in period, organizations required or electing to apply Basel II will report their capital adequacy calculations separately under both Basel I and Basel II on a “parallel run” basis. Given the high thresholds noted above, FirstBank is not required to apply Basel II and does not expect to apply it in the foreseeable future.
 
On January 21, 2010, the federal banking agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board, issued a final risk-based regulatory capital rule related to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s adoption of amendments to the accounting requirements relating to transfers of financial assets and variable interests in variable interest entities. These accounting standards make substantive changes to how banks account for securitized assets that are currently excluded from their balance sheets as of the beginning of the Corporation’s 2010 fiscal year. The final regulatory capital rule seeks to better align regulatory capital requirements with actual risks. Under the final rule, banks affected by the new accounting requirements generally will be subject to higher minimum regulatory capital requirements.
 
The final rule permits banks to include without limit in tier 2 capital any increase in the allowance for lease and loan losses calculated as of the implementation date that is attributable to assets consolidated under the requirements of the variable interests accounting requirements. The rule provides an optional delay and phase-in for a maximum of one year for the effect on risk-based capital and the allowance for lease and loan losses related to the assets that must be consolidated as a result of the accounting change. The final rule also eliminates the risk-based capital exemption for asset-backed commercial paper assets. The transitional relief does not apply to the leverage ratio or to assets in conduits to which a bank provides implicit support. Banks will be required to rebuild capital and repair balance sheets to accommodate the new accounting standards by the middle of 2011.
 
Deposit Insurance
 
Under current FDIC regulations, each depository institution is assigned to a risk category based on capital and supervisory measures. In 2009, the FDIC revised the method for calculating the assessment rate for depository institutions by introducing several adjustments to an institution’s initial base assessment rate. A depository institution is assessed premiums by the FDIC based on its risk category as adjusted and the amount


20


Table of Contents

of deposits held. Higher levels of banks failures over the past two years have dramatically increased resolution costs of the FDIC and depleted the deposit insurance fund. In addition, the amount of FDIC insurance coverage for insured deposits has been increased generally from $100,000 per depositor to $250,000 per depositor. In light of the increased stress on the deposit insurance fund caused by these developments, and in order to maintain a strong funding position and restore the reserve ratios of the deposit insurance fund, the FDIC: (i) imposed a special assessment in June, 2009, (ii) increased assessment rates of insured institutions generally, and (iii) required them to prepay on December 30, 2009 the premiums that are expected to become due over the next three years. FirstBank obtained a waiver from the FDIC to make such prepayment.
 
FDIC Capital Requirements
 
The FDIC has promulgated regulations and a statement of policy regarding the capital adequacy of state-chartered non-member banks like FirstBank. These requirements are substantially similar to those adopted by the Federal Reserve Board regarding bank holding companies, as described above.
 
The regulators require that banks meet a risk-based capital standard. The risk-based capital standard for banks requires the maintenance of total capital (which is defined as Tier I capital and supplementary (Tier 2) capital) to risk-weighted assets of 8%. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, weights used (ranging from 0% to 100%) are based on the risks inherent in the type of asset or item. The components of Tier I capital are equivalent to those discussed below under the 3.0% leverage capital standard. The components of supplementary capital include certain perpetual preferred stock, mandatorily convertible securities, subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock and, generally, allowances for loan and lease losses. Allowance for loan and lease losses includable in supplementary capital is limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Overall, the amount of capital counted toward supplementary capital cannot exceed 100% of core capital.
 
The capital regulations of the FDIC establish a minimum 3.0% Tier I capital to total assets requirement for the most highly-rated state-chartered, non-member banks, with an additional cushion of at least 100 to 200 basis points for all other state-chartered, non-member banks, which effectively will increase the minimum Tier I leverage ratio for such other banks from 4.0% to 5.0% or more. Under these regulations, the highest-rated banks are those that are not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and have well-diversified risk, including no undue interest rate risk exposure, excellent asset quality, high liquidity and good earnings and, in general, are considered a strong banking organization and are rated composite I under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System. Leverage or core capital is defined as the sum of common stockholders’ equity including retained earnings, non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus, and minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries, minus all intangible assets other than certain qualifying supervisory goodwill and certain purchased mortgage servicing rights.
 
In August 1995, the FDIC published a final rule modifying its existing risk-based capital standards to provide for consideration of interest rate risk when assessing the capital adequacy of a bank. Under the final rule, the FDIC must explicitly include a bank’s exposure to declines in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates as a factor in evaluating a bank’s capital adequacy. In June 1996, the FDIC adopted a joint policy statement on interest rate risk. Because market conditions, bank structure, and bank activities vary, the agency concluded that each bank needs to develop its own interest rate risk management program tailored to its needs and circumstances. The policy statement describes prudent principles and practices that are fundamental to sound interest rate risk management, including appropriate board and senior management oversight and a comprehensive risk management process that effectively identifies, measures, monitors and controls such interest rate risk.
 
Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject an insured bank to a variety of prompt corrective actions and enforcement remedies under the FDIA (as amended by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”), and the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994, including, with respect to an insured bank, the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, and certain restrictions on its business.


21


Table of Contents

Under certain circumstances, a well-capitalized, adequately capitalized or undercapitalized institution may be treated as if the institution were in the next lower capital category. A depository institution is generally prohibited from making capital distributions (including paying dividends), or paying management fees to a holding company if the institution would thereafter be undercapitalized. Institutions that are adequately capitalized but not well-capitalized cannot accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits except with a waiver from the FDIC and are subject to restrictions on the interest rates that can be paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions may not accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits.
 
The federal bank regulatory agencies are permitted or, in certain cases, required to take certain actions with respect to institutions falling within one of the three undercapitalized categories. Depending on the level of an institution’s capital, the agency’s corrective powers include, among other things:
 
  •  prohibiting the payment of principal and interest on subordinated debt;
 
  •  prohibiting the holding company from making distributions without prior regulatory approval;
 
  •  placing limits on asset growth and restrictions on activities;
 
  •  placing additional restrictions on transactions with affiliates;
 
  •  restricting the interest rate the institution may pay on deposits;
 
  •  prohibiting the institution from accepting deposits from correspondent banks; and
 
  •  in the most severe cases, appointing a conservator or receiver for the institution.
 
A banking institution that is undercapitalized is required to submit a capital restoration plan, and such a plan will not be accepted unless, among other things, the banking institution’s holding company guarantees the plan up to a certain specified amount. Any such guarantee from a depository institution’s holding company is entitled to a priority of payment in bankruptcy.
 
As of December 31, 2009, FirstBank was well-capitalized. A bank’s capital category, as determined by applying the prompt corrective action provisions of law, however, may not constitute an accurate representation of the overall financial condition or prospects of the Bank, and should be considered in conjunction with other available information regarding financial condition and results of operations.
 
Set forth below are the Corporation’s, FirstBank’s capital ratios as of December 31, 2009, based on Federal Reserve and FDIC guidelines, respectively.
 
                         
            Well-Capitalized
    First BanCorp   First Bank   Minimum
 
As of December 31, 2009
                       
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)
    13.44 %     12.87 %     10.00 %
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets)
    12.16 %     11.70 %     6.00 %
Leverage ratio(1)
    8.91 %     8.53 %     5.00 %
 
 
(1) Tier 1 capital to average assets.
 
Activities and Investments
 
The activities as “principal” and equity investments of FDIC-insured, state-chartered banks such as FirstBank are generally limited to those that are permissible for national banks. Under regulations dealing with equity investments, an insured state-chartered bank generally may not directly or indirectly acquire or retain any equity investments of a type, or in an amount, that is not permissible for a national bank.
 
Federal Home Loan Bank System
 
FirstBank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system. The FHLB system consists of twelve regional Federal Home Loan Banks governed and regulated by the Federal Housing Finance Agency.


22


Table of Contents

The Federal Home Loan Banks serve as reserve or credit facilities for member institutions within their assigned regions. They are funded primarily from proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB system, and they make loans (advances) to members in accordance with policies and procedures established by the FHLB system and the board of directors of each regional FHLB.
 
FirstBank is a member of the FHLB of New York (FHLB-NY) and as such is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in that FHLB for a certain amount, which is calculated in accordance with the requirements set forth in applicable laws and regulations. FirstBank is in compliance with the stock ownership requirements of the FHLB-NY. All loans, advances and other extensions of credit made by the FHLB-NY to FirstBank are secured by a portion of FirstBank’s mortgage loan portfolio, certain other investments and the capital stock of the FHLB-NY held by FirstBank.
 
Ownership and Control
 
Because of FirstBank’s status as an FDIC-insured bank, as defined in the Bank Holding Company Act, First BanCorp, as the owner of FirstBank’s common stock, is subject to certain restrictions and disclosure obligations under various federal laws, including the Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in Bank Control Act (the “CBCA”). Regulations pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act generally require prior Federal Reserve Board approval for an acquisition of control of an insured institution (as defined in the Act) or holding company thereof by any person (or persons acting in concert). Control is deemed to exist if, among other things, a person (or persons acting in concert) acquires more than 25% of any class of voting stock of an insured institution or holding company thereof. Under the CBCA, control is presumed to exist subject to rebuttal if a person (or persons acting in concert) acquires more than 10% of any class of voting stock and either (i) the corporation has registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or (ii) no person will own, control or hold the power to vote a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction. The concept of acting in concert is very broad and also is subject to certain rebuttable presumptions, including among others, that relatives, business partners, management officials, affiliates and others are presumed to be acting in concert with each other and their businesses. The regulations of the FDIC implementing the CBCA are generally similar to those described above.
 
The Puerto Rico Banking Law requires the approval of the OCIF for changes in control of a Puerto Rico bank. See “Puerto Rico Banking Law.”
 
Standards for Safety and Soundness
 
The FDIA, as amended by FDICIA and the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994, requires the FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies to prescribe standards of safety and soundness, by regulations or guidelines, relating generally to operations and management, asset growth, asset quality, earnings, stock valuation, and compensation. The FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies adopted, effective August 9, 1995, a set of guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards pursuant to FDIA, as amended. The guidelines establish general standards relating to internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth and compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder.
 
Brokered Deposits
 
FDIC regulations adopted under the FDIA govern the receipt of brokered deposits by banks. Well-capitalized institutions are not subject to limitations on brokered deposits, while adequately-capitalized institutions are able to accept, renew or rollover brokered deposits only with a waiver from the FDIC and subject to certain restrictions on the interest paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions are not permitted to accept brokered deposits. As of December 31, 2009, FirstBank was a well-capitalized institution


23


Table of Contents

and was therefore not subject to these limitations on brokered deposits. The FDIC and other bank regulators may also exercise regulatory discretion to enforce limits on the acceptance of brokered deposits if they have safety and soundness concerns as to an over reliance on such funding.
 
Puerto Rico Banking Law
 
As a commercial bank organized under the laws of the Commonwealth, FirstBank is subject to supervision, examination and regulation by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Commissioner of Financial Institutions (“Commissioner”) pursuant to the Puerto Rico Banking Law of 1933, as amended (the “Banking Law”). The Banking Law contains provisions governing the incorporation and organization, rights and responsibilities of directors, officers and stockholders as well as the corporate powers, lending limitations, capital requirements, investment requirements and other aspects of FirstBank and its affairs. In addition, the Commissioner is given extensive rule-making power and administrative discretion under the Banking Law.
 
The Banking Law authorizes Puerto Rico commercial banks to conduct certain financial and related activities directly or through subsidiaries, including the leasing of personal property and the operation of a small loan business.
 
The Banking Law requires every bank to maintain a legal reserve which shall not be less than twenty percent (20%) of its demand liabilities, except government deposits (federal, state and municipal) that are secured by actual collateral. The reserve is required to be composed of any of the following securities or combination thereof: (1) legal tender of the United States; (2) checks on banks or trust companies located in any part of Puerto Rico that are to be presented for collection during the day following the day on which they are received; (3) money deposited in other banks provided said deposits are authorized by the Commissioner, subject to immediate collection; (4) federal funds sold to any Federal Reserve Bank and securities purchased under agreements to resell executed by the bank with such funds that are subject to be repaid to the bank on or before the close of the next business day; and (5) any other asset that the Commissioner identifies from time to time.
 
The Banking Law permits Puerto Rico commercial banks to make loans to any one person, firm, partnership or corporation, up to an aggregate amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the sum of: (i) the bank’s paid-in capital; (ii) the bank’s reserve fund; (iii) 50% of the bank’s retained earnings; subject to certain limitations; and (iv) any other components that the Commissioner may determine from time to time. If such loans are secured by collateral worth at least twenty five percent (25%) more than the amount of the loan, the aggregate maximum amount may reach one third (33.33%) of the sum of the bank’s paid-in capital, reserve fund, 50% of retained earnings and such other components that the Commissioner may determine from time to time. There are no restrictions under the Banking Law on the amount of loans that are wholly secured by bonds, securities and other evidence of indebtedness of the Government of the United States, or of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or by bonds, not in default, of municipalities or instrumentalities of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The revised classification of the mortgage-related transactions as secured commercial loans to local financial institutions described in the Corporation’s restatement of previously issued financial statements (Form 10-K/A 2004) caused the mortgage-related transactions to be treated as two secured commercial loans in excess of the lending limitations imposed by the Banking Law. In this regard, FirstBank received a ruling from the Commissioner that results in FirstBank being considered in continued compliance with the lending limitations. The Puerto Rico Banking Law authorizes the Commissioner to determine other components which may be considered for purposes of establishing its lending limit, which components may lie outside the traditional elements mentioned in Section 17. After consideration of other components, the Commissioner authorized the Corporation to retain the secured loans to the two financial institutions as it believed that these loans were secured by sufficient collateral to diversify, disperse and significantly diffuse the risks connected to such loans thereby satisfying the safety and soundness considerations mandated by Section 28 of the Banking Law. In July 2009, FirstBank entered into a transaction with one of the institutions to purchase $205 million in mortgage loans that served as collateral to the loan to this institution.
 
The Banking Law prohibits Puerto Rico commercial banks from making loans secured by their own stock, and from purchasing their own stock, unless such purchase is made pursuant to a stock repurchase


24


Table of Contents

program approved by the Commissioner or is necessary to prevent losses because of a debt previously contracted in good faith. The stock purchased by the Puerto Rico commercial bank must be sold by the bank in a public or private sale within one year from the date of purchase.
 
The Banking Law provides that no officers, directors, agents or employees of a Puerto Rico commercial bank may serve as an officer, director, agent or employee of another Puerto Rico commercial bank, financial corporation, savings and loan association, trust corporation, corporation engaged in granting mortgage loans or any other institution engaged in the money lending business in Puerto Rico. This prohibition is not applicable to the affiliates of a Puerto Rico commercial bank.
 
The Banking Law requires that Puerto Rico commercial banks prepare each year a balance summary of their operations, and submit such balance summary for approval at a regular meeting of stockholders, together with an explanatory report thereon. The Banking Law also requires that at least ten percent (10%) of the yearly net income of a Puerto Rico commercial bank be credited annually to a reserve fund. This credit is required to be done every year until such reserve fund shall be equal to the total paid-in-capital of the bank.
 
The Banking Law also provides that when the expenditures of a Puerto Rico commercial bank are greater than receipts, the excess of the expenditures over receipts shall be charged against the undistributed profits of the bank, and the balance, if any, shall be charged against the reserve fund, as a reduction thereof. If there is no reserve fund sufficient to cover such balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount shall be charged against the capital account and no dividend shall be declared until said capital has been restored to its original amount and the reserve fund to twenty percent (20%) of the original capital.
 
The Banking Law requires the prior approval of the Commissioner with respect to a transfer of capital stock of a bank that results in a change of control of the bank. Under the Banking Law, a change of control is presumed to occur if a person or a group of persons acting in concert, directly or indirectly, acquire more than 5% of the outstanding voting capital stock of the bank. The Commissioner has interpreted the restrictions of the Banking Law as applying to acquisitions of voting securities of entities controlling a bank, such as a bank holding company. Under the Banking Law, the determination of the Commissioner whether to approve a change of control filing is final and non-appealable.
 
The Finance Board, which is composed of the Commissioner, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Consumer Affairs, the President of the Economic Development Bank, the President of the Government Development Bank, and the President of the Planning Board, has the authority to regulate the maximum interest rates and finance charges that may be charged on loans to individuals and unincorporated businesses in Puerto Rico. The current regulations of the Finance Board provide that the applicable interest rate on loans to individuals and unincorporated businesses, including real estate development loans but excluding certain other personal and commercial loans secured by mortgages on real estate properties, is to be determined by free competition. Accordingly, the regulations do not set a maximum rate for charges on retail installment sales contracts, small loans, and credit card purchases and set aside previous regulations which regulated these maximum finance charges. Furthermore, there is no maximum rate set for installment sales contracts involving motor vehicles, commercial, agricultural and industrial equipment, commercial electric appliances and insurance premiums.
 
International Banking Act of Puerto Rico (“IBE Act”)
 
The business and operations of First BanCorp Overseas (“First BanCorp IBE”, the IBE division of First BanCorp), FirstBank International Branch (“FirstBank IBE”, the IBE division of FirstBank) and FirstBank Overseas Corporation (the IBE subsidiary of FirstBank) are subject to supervision and regulation by the Commissioner. Under the IBE Act, certain sales, encumbrances, assignments, mergers, exchanges or transfers of shares, interests or participation(s) in the capital of an international banking entity (an “IBE”) may not be initiated without the prior approval of the Commissioner. The IBE Act and the regulations issued thereunder by the Commissioner (the “IBE Regulations”) limit the business activities that may be carried out by an IBE. Such activities are limited in part to persons and assets located outside of Puerto Rico.


25


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the IBE Act and the IBE Regulations, each of First BanCorp IBE, FirstBank IBE and FirstBank Overseas Corporation must maintain books and records of all its transactions in the ordinary course of business. First BanCorp IBE, FirstBank IBE and FirstBank Overseas Corporation are also required thereunder to submit to the Commissioner quarterly and annual reports of their financial condition and results of operations, including annual audited financial statements.
 
The IBE Act empowers the Commissioner to revoke or suspend, after notice and hearing, a license issued thereunder if, among other things, the IBE fails to comply with the IBE Act, the IBE Regulations or the terms of its license, or if the Commissioner finds that the business or affairs of the IBE are conducted in a manner that is not consistent with the public interest.
 
Puerto Rico Income Taxes
 
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994 (the “Code”), all companies are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns. The Corporation, and each of its subsidiaries are subject to a maximum statutory corporate income tax rate of 39% or an alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) on income earned from all sources, whichever is higher. The excess of AMT over regular income tax paid in any one year may be used to offset regular income tax in future years, subject to certain limitations. The Code provides for a dividend received deduction of 100% on dividends received from wholly owned subsidiaries subject to income taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on dividends received from other taxable domestic corporations.
 
On March 9, 2009, the Puerto Rico Government approved Act No. 7 (the “Act”), to stimulate Puerto Rico’s economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico Government’s fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a 5% surtax over the total income tax determined, which is applicable to corporations, among others, whose combined income exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an increase in the maximum statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95%. This temporary measure is effective for tax years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012.
 
In computing the interest expense deduction, the Corporation’s interest deduction will be reduced in the same proportion that the average exempt assets bear to the average total assets. Therefore, to the extent that the Corporation holds certain investments and loans that are exempt from Puerto Rico income taxation, part of its interest expense will be disallowed for tax purposes.
 
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory tax rate of 40.95% during 2009 mainly by investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from U.S. and Puerto Rico income tax combined with income from the IBE units of the Corporation and the Bank and the Bank’s subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas Corporation. The IBE, and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were created under the IBE Act, which provides for Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico (except for year tax years commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012, in which all IBE’s are subject to the special 5% tax on their net income not otherwise subject to tax pursuant to the PR Code, as provided by Act. No. 7). Pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 13 of January 8, 2004, the IBE Act was amended to impose income tax at regular rates on an IBE that operates as a unit of a bank, to the extent that the IBE net income exceeds 20% of the bank’s total net taxable income (including net income generated by the IBE unit) for taxable years that commenced on July 1, 2005, and thereafter. These amendments apply only to IBEs that operate as units of a bank; they do not impose income tax on an IBE that operates as a subsidiary of a bank.
 
United States Income Taxes
 
The Corporation is also subject to federal income tax on its income from sources within the United States and on any item of income that is, or is considered to be, effectively connected with the active conduct of a trade or business within the United States. The U.S. Internal Revenue Code provides for tax exemption of portfolio interest received by a foreign corporation from sources within the United States; therefore, the Corporation is not subject to federal income tax on certain U.S. investments which qualify under the term “portfolio interest”.


26


Table of Contents

Insurance Operations Regulation
 
FirstBank Insurance Agency is registered as an insurance agency with the Insurance Commissioner of Puerto Rico and is subject to regulations issued by the Insurance Commissioner relating to, among other things, licensing of employees, sales, solicitation and advertising practices, and by the FED as to certain consumer protection provisions mandated by the GLB Act and its implementing regulations.
 
Community Reinvestment
 
Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), federally insured banks have a continuing and affirmative obligation to meet the credit needs of their entire community, including low- and moderate-income residents, consistent with their safe and sound operation. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the type of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA. The CRA requires the federal supervisory agencies, as part of the general examination of supervised banks, to assess the bank’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community, assign a performance rating, and take such record and rating into account in their evaluation of certain applications by such bank. The CRA also requires all institutions to make public disclosure of their CRA ratings. FirstBank received a “satisfactory” CRA rating in their most recent examinations by the FDIC.
 
Mortgage Banking Operations
 
FirstBank is subject to the rules and regulations of the FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, HUD and GNMA with respect to originating, processing, selling and servicing mortgage loans and the issuance and sale of mortgage-backed securities. Those rules and regulations, among other things, prohibit discrimination and establish underwriting guidelines that include provisions for inspections and appraisals, require credit reports on prospective borrowers and fix maximum loan amounts, and with respect to VA loans, fix maximum interest rates. Moreover, lenders such as FirstBank are required annually to submit to FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA and HUD audited financial statements, and each regulatory entity has its own financial requirements. FirstBank’s affairs are also subject to supervision and examination by FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA and HUD at all times to assure compliance with the applicable regulations, policies and procedures. Mortgage origination activities are subject to, among others, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Federal Truth-in-Lending Act, and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder which, among other things, prohibit discrimination and require the disclosure of certain basic information to mortgagors concerning credit terms and settlement costs. FirstBank is licensed by the Commissioner under the Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law, and as such is subject to regulation by the Commissioner, with respect to, among other things, licensing requirements and establishment of maximum origination fees on certain types of mortgage loan products.
 
Section 5 of the Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law requires the prior approval of the Commissioner for the acquisition of control of any mortgage banking institution licensed under such law. For purposes of the Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law, the term “control” means the power to direct or influence decisively, directly or indirectly, the management or policies of a mortgage banking institution. The Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law provides that a transaction that results in the holding of less than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of a mortgage banking institution shall not be considered a change in control.
 
Item 1A.   Risk Factors
 
Certain risk factors that may affect the Corporation’s future results of operations are discussed below.
 
RISK RELATING TO THE CORPORATION’S BUSINESS
 
Credit quality, which is continuing to deteriorate, may result in future additional losses.
 
The quality of First BanCorp’s credits has continued to be under pressure as a result of continued recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico and the state of Florida that have led to, among other things, higher


27


Table of Contents

unemployment levels, much lower absorption rates for new residential construction projects and further declines in property values. The Corporation’s business depends on the creditworthiness of its customers and counterparties and the value of the assets securing its loans or underlying our investments. When the credit quality of the customer base materially decreases or the risk profile of a market, industry or group of customers changes materially, the Corporation’s business, financial condition, allowance levels, asset impairments, liquidity, capital and results of operations are adversely affected.
 
While the Corporation has substantially increased our allowance for loan and lease losses in 2009, there is no certainty that it will be sufficient to cover future credit losses in the portfolio because of continued adverse changes in the economy, market conditions or events negatively affecting specific customers, industries or markets both in Puerto Rico and Florida. The Corporation periodically review the allowance for loan and lease losses for adequacy considering economic conditions and trends, collateral values and credit quality indicators, including charge-off experience and levels of past due loans and non-performing assets. First BanCorp’s future results may be materially and adversely affected by worsening defaults and severity rates related to the underlying collateral.
 
The Corporation may have more credit risk and higher credit losses due to its construction loan portfolio.
 
The Corporation has a significant construction loan portfolio, in the amount of $1.49 billion as of December 31, 2009, mostly secured by commercial and residential real estate properties. Due to their nature, these loans entail a higher credit risk than consumer and residential mortgage loans, since they are larger in size, concentrate more risk in a single borrower and are generally more sensitive to economic downturns. Rapidly changing collateral values, general economic conditions and numerous other factors continue to create volatility in the housing markets and have increased the possibility that additional losses may have to be recognized with respect to the Corporation’s current nonperforming assets. Furthermore, given the current slowdown in the real estate market, the properties securing these loans may be difficult to dispose of if they are foreclosed.
 
The Corporation is subject to default risk on loans, which may adversely affect its results.
 
The Corporation is subject to the risk of loss from loan defaults and foreclosures with respect to the loans it originates. The Corporation establishes a provision for loan losses, which leads to reductions in its income from operations, in order to maintain its allowance for inherent loan losses at a level which its management deems to be appropriate based upon an assessment of the quality of the loan portfolio. Although the Corporation’s management utilizes its best judgment in providing for loan losses, there can be no assurance that management has accurately estimated the level of inherent loan losses or that the Corporation will not have to increase its provision for loan losses in the future as a result of future increases in non-performing loans or for other reasons beyond its control.
 
Any such increases in the Corporation’s provision for loan losses or any loan losses in excess of its provision for loan losses would have an adverse effect on the Corporation’s future financial condition and results of operations. Given the difficulties facing some of the Corporation’s largest borrowers, the Corporation can give no assurance that these borrowers will continue to repay their loans on a timely basis or that the Corporation will continue to be able to accurately assess any risk of loss from the loans to these financial institutions.
 
Changes in collateral valuation for properties located in stagnant or distressed economies may require increased reserves.
 
Substantially all of the loan portfolio of the Corporation is located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands or the U.S. mainland, the performance of the Corporation’s loan portfolio and the collateral value backing the transactions are dependent upon the performance of and conditions within each specific real estate market. Recent economic reports related to the real estate market in Puerto Rico indicate that certain pockets of the real estate market are subject to readjustments in value driven not by demand but more by the purchasing


28


Table of Contents

power of the consumers and general economic conditions. In South Florida, we have been seeing the negative impact associated with low absorption rates and property value adjustments due to overbuilding. A significant decline in collateral valuations for collateral dependent loans may require increases in the Corporation’s specific provision for loan losses and an increase in the general valuation allowance. Any such increase would have an adverse effect on the Corporation’s future financial condition and results of operations.
 
Worsening in the financial condition of critical counterparties may result in higher losses than expected.
 
The financial stability of several counterparties is critical for their continued financial performance on covenants that require the repurchase of loans, posting of collateral to reduce our credit exposure or replacement of delinquent loans. Many of these transactions expose the Corporation to credit risk in the event of a default by one of the Corporation’s counterparties. Any such losses could adversely affect the Corporation’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
Interest rate shifts may reduce net interest income.
 
Shifts in short-term interest rates may reduce net interest income, which is the principal component of the Corporation’s earnings. Net interest income is the difference between the amount received by the Corporation on its interest-earning assets and the interest paid by the Corporation on its interest-bearing liabilities. When interest rates rise, the Corporation must pay more in interest on its liabilities while the interest earned on its assets does not rise as quickly. This may cause the Corporation’s profits to decrease. This adverse impact on earnings is greater when the slope of the yield curve flattens, that is, when short-term interest rates increase more than long-term rates.
 
Increases in interest rates may reduce the value of holdings of securities.
 
Fixed-rate securities acquired by the Corporation are generally subject to decreases in market value when interest rates rise, which may require recognition of a loss (e.g., the identification of other-than-temporary impairment on its available for sale or held to maturity investments portfolio), thereby adversely affecting the results of operations. Market-related reductions in value also affect the capabilities of financing these securities.
 
Increases in interest rates may reduce demand for mortgage and other loans.
 
Higher interest rates increase the cost of mortgage and other loans to consumers and businesses and may reduce demand for such loans, which may negatively impact the Corporation’s profits by reducing the amount of loan origination income.
 
Accelerated prepayments may adversely affect net interest income.
 
Net interest income of future periods may be affected by the acceleration in prepayments of mortgage-backed securities. Acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would lower yields on securities purchased at a premium, as the amortization of premiums paid upon acquisition of these securities would accelerate. Conversely, acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would increase yields on securities purchased at a discount, as the amortization of the discount would accelerate.
 
Also, net interest income in future periods might be affected by the Corporation’s investment in callable securities. Approximately $945 million of U.S. Agency debentures with an average yield of 5.82% were called during 2009. The Corporation re-invested the proceeds of the securities calls in callable Agency debentures of approximately 2.7 years average final maturity with a weighted average yield to maturity of 2.12%.
 
Decreases in interest rates may increase the probability embedded call options in investment securities are exercised. Future net interest income could be affected by the Corporation’s holding of callable securities. The recent drop in long-term interest rates has the effect of increasing the probability of the exercise of embedded calls in U.S. Agency securities portfolio of approximately $1.1 billion that if substituted with new lower-yield investments may negatively impact the Corporation’s interest income.


29


Table of Contents

Decreases in interest rates may reduce net interest income due to the current unprecedented re-pricing mismatch of assets and liabilities tied to short-term interest rates, which is referred to as basis risk.
 
Basis risk occurs when market rates for different financial instruments or the indices used to price assets and liabilities, change at different times or by different amounts. The liquidity crisis that erupted in late 2008, and that slowly began to subside during 2009 caused a wider than normal spread between brokered CD costs and LIBOR rates for similar terms. This in turn, has prevented the Corporation from capturing the full benefit of drops in interest rates as the Corporation’s loan portfolio, funded by LIBOR-based brokered CDs, continue to maintain the same spread to short-term LIBOR rates, while the spread on brokered CD’s widened. To the extent that such pressures fail to subside in the near future, the margin between the Corporation’s LIBOR-based assets and LIBOR-based liabilities may compress and adversely affect net interest income.
 
If all or a significant portion of the unrealized losses in our investment securities portfolio on our consolidated balance sheet were determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired, we would recognize a material charge to our earnings and our capital ratios would be adversely affected.
 
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation recognized $1.7 million in other than temporary impairments. To the extent that any portion of the unrealized losses in its investment securities portfolio is determined to be other than temporary, and the loss is related to credit factors, the Corporation recognizes a charge to earnings in the quarter during which such determination is made and capital ratios could be adversely affected. If any such charge is significant, a rating agency might downgrade the Corporation’s credit rating or put it on credit watch. Even if the Corporation does not determine that the unrealized losses associated with this portfolio requires an impairment charge, increases in these unrealized losses adversely affect the tangible common equity ratio, which may adversely affect credit rating agency and investor sentiment towards the Corporation. This negative perception also may adversely affect the Corporation’s ability to access the capital markets or might increase the cost of capital.
 
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation recognized other-than-temporary impairment on its private label MBS. Valuation and other-than-temporary impairment determinations will continue to be affected by external market factors including default rates, severity rates and macro-economic factors.
 
Downgrades in the Corporation’s credit ratings could further increase the cost of borrowing funds.
 
Both, the Corporation and the Bank suffered credit rating downgrades in 2009. Fitch Ratings Ltd. (“Fitch”) currently rates the Corporation’s long-term senior debt “B-,” six notches below investment grade. Standard and Poors rates the Corporation B, or five notches below investment grade. Moody’s Investor Service (“Moodys”) rates FirstBank’s long-term senior debt “B1,” and Standard & Poor’s rates it “B”. The three rating agencies’ outlooks on FirstBank and the Corporation’s credit ratings are negative. The Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements that would be affected by a credit downgrade. The Corporation’s liquidity is contingent upon its ability to obtain external sources of funding to finance its operations. Any future downgrades in credit ratings could put additional pressure on the Corporation’s access to external funding and/or cause external funding to be more expensive, which could in turn adversely affect the results of operations. Changes in credit ratings may also affect the fair value of certain liabilities and unsecured derivatives, measured at fair value in the financial statements, for which the Corporation’s own credit risk is an element considered in the fair value determination.
 
These debt and financial strength ratings are current opinions of the rating agencies. As such, they may be changed, suspended or withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies as a result of changes in, or unavailability of, information or based on other circumstances.
 
The Corporation’s funding is significantly dependent on brokered deposits.
 
The Corporation’s funding sources include core deposits, brokered deposits, borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank and repurchase agreements with several counterparties.


30


Table of Contents

A large portion of the Corporation’s funding is retail brokered CDs issued by FirstBank. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had $7.6 billion in brokered deposits outstanding, representing approximately 60% of our total deposits, and a reduction from $8.4 billion at year end 2008. The Corporation issues brokered CDs to, among other things, pay operating expenses, maintain our lending activities, replace certain maturing liabilities, and to control interest rate risk.
 
FDIC regulations govern the issuance of brokered deposit instruments by banks. Well-capitalized institutions are not subject to limitations on brokered deposits, while adequately-capitalized institutions are able to accept, renew or rollover brokered deposits only with a waiver from the FDIC and subject to certain restrictions on the interest paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions are not permitted to accept brokered deposits. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation was a well-capitalized institution and was therefore not subject to these limitations on brokered deposits. If the Corporation became subject to such restrictions on its brokered deposits, the availability of such deposits would be limited and could, in turn, adversely affect the results of operations and the liquidity of the Corporation. The FDIC and other bank regulators may also exercise regulatory discretion to enforce limits on the acceptance of brokered deposits if they have safety and soundness concerns as to an over reliance on such funding.
 
The use of brokered CDs has been particularly important for the growth of the Corporation. The Corporation encounters intense competition in attracting and retaining regular retail deposits in Puerto Rico. The brokered CDs market is very competitive and liquid, and the Corporation has been able to obtain substantial amounts of funding in short periods of time. This strategy enhances the Corporation’s liquidity position, since the brokered CDs are insured by the FDIC up to regulatory limits and can be obtained faster compared to regular retail deposits. Demand for brokered CDs has recently increased as a result of the move by investors from riskier investments, such as equities, to federally guaranteed instruments such as brokered CDs and the recent increase in FDIC deposit insurance from $100,000 to $250,000. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation issued $8.3 billion in brokered CDs (including rollover of short-term broker CDs and replacement of brokered CDs called) compared to $9.8 billion for the 2008 year.
 
The average term to maturity of the retail brokered CDs outstanding as of December 31, 2009 was approximately 1.08 years. Approximately 1.55% of the principal value of these certificates is callable at the Corporation’s option.
 
Another source of funding is Advances from the Discount Window of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Currently, the Corporation has $800 million of borrowings outstanding with the Federal Reserve Bank. As part of the mechanisms to ease the liquidity crisis, during 2009 the Federal Reserve Bank encouraged banks to utilize the Discount Window as a source of funding. With the market conditions improving, the Federal Reserve announced in early 2010 its intention of withdrawing part of the economic stimulus measures, including replacing restrictions on the use of Discount Window borrowings, thereby returning to its function of lender of last resort.
 
The Corporation’s funding sources may prove insufficient to replace deposits and support future growth.
 
The Corporation’s banking subsidiary relies on customer deposits, brokered deposits and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) to fund its operations. Although the Bank has historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances if desired, no assurance can be given that it would be able to replace these funds in the future if the Corporation’s financial condition or general market conditions were to change. The Corporation’s financial flexibility will be severely constrained if the Bank is unable to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not available to accommodate future growth at acceptable interest rates. Finally, if the Corporation is required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to support future growth, revenues may not increase proportionately to cover costs. In this case, profitability would be adversely affected. Although the Corporation considers such sources of funds adequate for its liquidity needs, the Corporation may seek additional debt financing in the future to achieve its long-term business objectives. There can be no assurance additional borrowings, if sought, would be available to the Corporation or, on what terms. If additional financing sources are unavailable or are not available on reasonable terms, growth and future prospects could be adversely affected.


31


Table of Contents

Adverse credit market conditions may affect the Corporation’s ability to meet liquidity needs.
 
The Corporation needs liquidity to, among other things, pay its operating expenses, interest on its debt and dividends on its capital stock, maintain its lending activities and replace certain maturing liabilities. Without sufficient liquidity, the Corporation may be forced to curtail its operations. The availability of additional financing will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit and the Corporation’s credit ratings and credit capacity. The Corporation’s financial condition and cash flows could be materially affected by continued disruptions in financial markets.
 
Our controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented, our risk management policies and procedures may be inadequate, and operational risk could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations.
 
The Corporation may fail to identify and manage risks related to a variety of aspects of its business, including, but not limited to, operational risk, interest-rate risk, trading risk, fiduciary risk, legal and compliance risk, liquidity risk and credit risk. The Corporation has adopted various controls, procedures, policies and systems to monitor and manage risk. While the Corporation currently believes that its risk management process is effective, the Corporation cannot provide assurance that those controls, procedures, policies and systems will always be adequate to identify and manage the risks in the various businesses. In addition, the Corporation’s businesses and the markets in which it operates are continuously evolving. The Corporation may fail to fully understand the implications of changes in its businesses or the financial markets and fail to adequately or timely enhance its risk framework to address those changes. If the Corporation’s risk framework is ineffective, either because it fails to keep pace with changes in the financial markets or its businesses or for other reasons, the Corporation could incur losses, suffer reputational damage or find itself out of compliance with applicable regulatory mandates or expectations.
 
The Corporation may also be subject to disruptions from external events that are wholly or partially beyond its control, which could cause delays or disruptions to operational functions, including information processing and financial market settlement functions. In addition, our customers, vendors and counterparties could suffer from such events. Should these events affect us, or the customers, vendors or counterparties with which we conduct business, our consolidated results of operations could be negatively affected. When we record balance sheet reserves for probable loss contingencies related to operational losses, we may be unable to accurately estimate our potential exposure, and any reserves we establish to cover operational losses may not be sufficient to cover our actual financial exposure, which may have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition for the periods in which we recognize the losses.
 
Competition for our employees is intense, and we may not be able to attract and retain the highly skilled people we need to support our business.
 
Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and/or retain key people. Competition for the best people in most activities in which we engage can be intense, and we may not be able to hire people or retain them, particularly in light of uncertainty concerning evolving compensation restrictions applicable to banks but not applicable to other financial services firms. The unexpected loss of services of one or more of our key personnel could adversely affect our business because the loss of their skills, knowledge of our markets, and years of industry experience and, in some cases, because of the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. Similarly, the loss of key employees, either individually or as a group, can adversely affect our customers’ perception of our ability to continue to manage certain types of investment management mandates.
 
Banking regulators could take adverse action against the Corporation.
 
The Corporation is subject to supervision and regulation by the FED. The Corporation is a bank holding company that qualifies as a financial holding corporation. As such, the Corporation is permitted to engage in a broader spectrum of activities than those permitted to bank holding companies that are not financial holding companies. To continue to qualify as a financial holding corporation, each of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries must continue to qualify as “well-capitalized” and “well-managed.” As of December 31, 2009, the


32


Table of Contents

Corporation and the Bank continue to satisfy all applicable capital guidelines. This, however, does not prevent banking regulators from taking adverse actions against the Corporation if they should conclude that such actions are warranted. If the Corporation were not to continue to qualify as a financial holding corporation, it might be required to discontinue certain activities and may be prohibited from engaging in new activities without prior regulatory approval. The Bank is subject to supervision and regulation by the FDIC, which conducts annual inspections, and, in Puerto Rico the OCIF. The primary regulators of the Corporation and the Bank have significant discretion and power to initiate enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices in the performance of their supervisory and enforcement duties and may do so even if the Corporation and the Bank continue to satisfy all capital requirements. Adverse action against the Corporation and/or the Bank by their primary regulators may affect their businesses.
 
Further increases in the FDIC deposit insurance premium may have a significant financial impact on the Corporation.
 
The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC insured financial institutions up to certain limits. The FDIC charges insured financial institutions premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”). Current economic conditions have resulted in higher bank failures and expectations of future bank failures. In the event of a bank failure, the FDIC takes control of a failed bank and ensures payment of deposits up to insured limits (which have recently been increased) using the resources of the DIF. The FDIC is required by law to maintain adequate funding of the DIF, and the FDIC may increase premium assessments to maintain such funding.
 
On February 27, 2009, the FDIC determined that it would assess higher rates for institutions that relied significantly on secured liabilities or on brokered deposits but, for well-managed and well-capitalized banks, only when accompanied by rapid asset growth. On May 22, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a 5 basis-point special assessment on each insured depository institution’s assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. On November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a 13-quarter prepayment of FDIC premiums due on December 30, 2009. Although FirstBank obtained a waiver from the FDIC to make such prepayment, the FDIC may further increase our premiums or impose additional assessments or prepayment requirements on the Corporation in the future.
 
The Corporation may not be able to recover all assets pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.
 
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (“Lehman”) was the counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constitutes an event of default under those interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman and replaced them with other counterparties under similar terms and conditions. In connection with the unpaid net cash settlement due as of December 31, 2009 under the swap agreements, the Corporation has an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This exposure was reserved in the third quarter of 2008. The Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with Lehman to guarantee its performance under the swap agreements in the event payment thereunder was required. The book value of pledged securities with Lehman as of December 31, 2009 amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
 
The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as collateral should not be part of the Lehman bankruptcy estate given that the posted collateral constituted a performance guarantee under the swap agreements and was not part of a financing agreement, and that ownership of the securities was never transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest rate swap agreements Lehman’s obligation was to return the collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc., acting as agent of Lehman, had deposited the securities in a custodial account at JP Morgan/Chase, and that, shortly before the filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided instructions to have most of the securities transferred to Barclay’s Capital in New York. After Barclay’s refusal to turn over the securities, the Corporation, during the month of December, 2009, filed a lawsuit against Barclay’s Capital in federal court in New York demanding the return of the securities. While the Corporation believes it has valid reasons to support its claim for the return of the securities, there are no assurances that it


33


Table of Contents

will ultimately succeed in its litigation against Barclay’s Capital to recover all or a substantial portion of the securities.
 
Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim filed in January 2009 in the proceedings under the Securities Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. The Corporation can provide no assurances that it will be successful in recovering all or substantial portion of the securities through these proceedings.
 
Our businesses may be adversely affected by litigation.
 
From time to time, our customers, or the government on their behalf, may make claims and take legal action relating to our performance of fiduciary or contractual responsibilities. We may also face employment lawsuits or other legal claims. In any such claims or actions, demands for substantial monetary damages may be asserted against us resulting in financial liability or having an adverse effect on our reputation among investors or on customer demand for our products and services. We may be unable to accurately estimate our exposure to litigation risk when we record balance sheet reserves for probable loss contingencies. As a result, any reserves we establish to cover any settlements or judgments may not be sufficient to cover our actual financial exposure, which may have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
 
In the ordinary course of our business, we are also subject to various regulatory, governmental and law enforcement inquiries, investigations and subpoenas. These may be directed generally to participants in the businesses in which we are involved or may be specifically directed at us. In regulatory enforcement matters, claims for disgorgement, the imposition of penalties and the imposition of other remedial sanctions are possible.
 
In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of legal actions and regulatory matters, we cannot provide assurance as to the outcome of any pending matter or, if determined adversely against us, the costs associated with any such matter, particularly where the claimant seeks very large or indeterminate damages or where the matter presents novel legal theories, involves a large number of parties or is at a preliminary stage. The resolution of certain pending legal actions or regulatory matters, if unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the quarter in which such actions or matters are resolved or a reserve is established.
 
Further information with respect to the foregoing and our other ongoing litigation matters is provided in Legal Proceedings included under Item 3 herein.
 
Our businesses may be negatively affected by adverse publicity or other reputational harm.
 
Our relationships with many of our customers are predicated upon our reputation as a fiduciary and a service provider that adheres to the highest standards of ethics, service quality and regulatory compliance. Adverse publicity, regulatory actions, litigation, operational failures, the failure to meet customer expectations and other issues with respect to one or more of our businesses could materially and adversely affect our reputation, ability to attract and retain customers or sources of funding for the same or other businesses. Preserving and enhancing our reputation also depends on maintaining systems and procedures that address known risks and regulatory requirements, as well as our ability to identify and mitigate additional risks that arise due to changes in our businesses, the market places in which we operate, the regulatory environment and customer expectations. If any of these developments has a material adverse effect on our reputation, our business will suffer.
 
Changes in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other standard-setting bodies may adversely affect the Corporation’s financial statements.
 
The Corporation’s financial statements are subject to the application of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”), which is periodically revised and/or expanded. Accordingly, from time to time, the Corporation is required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued by FASB.


34


Table of Contents

Market conditions have prompted accounting standard setters to promulgate new requirements that further interprets or seeks to revise accounting pronouncements related to financial instruments, structures or transactions as well as to issue new standards expanding disclosures. The impact of accounting pronouncements that have been issued but not yet implemented is disclosed in the Corporation’s annual and quarterly reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q. An assessment of proposed standards is not provided as such proposals are subject to change through the exposure process and, therefore, the effects on the Corporation’s financial statements cannot be meaningfully assessed. It is possible that future accounting standards that the Corporation is required to adopt could change the current accounting treatment that the Corporation applies to its consolidated financial statements and that such changes could have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations.
 
The Corporation may need additional capital resources in the future and these capital resources may not be available when needed or at all.
 
Due to financial results during 2009 the Corporation may need to access the capital markets in order to raise additional capital in the future to absorb potential future credit losses due to the distressed economic environment, maintain adequate liquidity and capital resources or to finance future growth, investments or strategic acquisitions. The Corporation cannot provide assurances that such capital will be available on acceptable terms or at all. If the Corporation is unable to obtain additional capital, it may not be able to maintain adequate liquidity and capital resources or to finance future growth, make strategic acquisitions or investments.
 
Unexpected losses in future reporting periods may require the Corporation to adjust the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.
 
The Corporation evaluates the deferred tax assets for recoverability based on all available evidence. This process involves significant management judgment about assumptions that are subject to change from period to period based on changes in tax laws or variances between the future projected operating performance and the actual results. The Corporation is required to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if the Corporation determines, based on available evidence at the time the determination is made, that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining the more-likely-than-not criterion, the Corporation evaluates all positive and negative evidence as of the end of each reporting period. Future adjustments, either increases or decreases, to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance will be determined based upon changes in the expected realization of the net deferred tax assets. The realization of the deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income in either the carryback or carryforward periods under the tax law. Due to significant estimates utilized in establishing the valuation allowance and the potential for changes in facts and circumstances, it is reasonably possible that the Corporation will be required to record adjustments to the valuation allowance in future reporting periods. Such a charge could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and capital position.
 
If the Corporation’s goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired, it may adversely affect the operating results.
 
If the Corporation’s goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired the Corporation may be required to record a significant charge to earnings. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the Corporation reviews its amortizable intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicated the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of the goodwill or amortizable intangible assets may not be recoverable, include reduced future cash flow estimates, and slower growth rates in the industry.
 
The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the Corporation to make estimates and assumptions with regards to the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ significantly from these


35


Table of Contents

estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill that would, in turn, negatively impact the Corporation’s results of operations and the reporting unit where goodwill is recorded.
 
The Corporation conducted its annual evaluation of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2009. This evaluation is a two-step process. The Step 1 evaluation of goodwill allocated to the Florida reporting unit, which is one level below the United States business segment, indicated potential impairment of goodwill. The Step 1 fair value for the unit was below the carrying amount of its equity book value as of the December 31, 2009 valuation date, requiring the completion of Step 2. The Step 2 required a valuation of all assets and liabilities of the Florida unit, including any recognized and unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair value of net assets. To complete Step 2, the Corporation subtracted from the unit’s Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill. The results of the Step 2 analysis indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value of $27 million, resulting in no goodwill impairment. If the Corporation is required to record a charge to earnings in the consolidated financial statements because an impairment of the goodwill or amortizable intangible assets is determined, the Corporation’s results of operations could be adversely affected.
 
RISK RELATED TO BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND OUR INDUSTRY
 
Difficult market conditions have affected the financial industry and may adversely affect the Corporation in the future.
 
Given that almost all of our business is in Puerto Rico and the United States and given the degree of interrelation between Puerto Rico’s economy and that of the United States, the Corporation is particularly exposed to downturns in the U.S. economy. Dramatic declines in the U.S. housing market over the past few years, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures, unemployment and under-employment, have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities as well as major commercial banks and investment banks. These write-downs, initially of mortgage-backed securities but spreading to credit default swaps and other derivative and cash securities, in turn, have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital from private and government entities, to merge with larger and stronger financial institutions and, in some cases, fail.
 
Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets in general and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced or ceased providing funding to borrowers, including other financial institutions. This market turmoil and tightening of credit have led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, erosion of consumer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction of business activity in general. The resulting economic pressure on consumers and erosion of confidence in the financial markets has already adversely affected our industry and may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The Corporation does not expect that the difficult conditions in the financial markets are likely to improve in the near future. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market conditions on the Corporation and other financial institutions. In particular, the Corporation may face the following risks in connection with these events:
 
  •  The Corporation expects to face increased regulation of the financial industry resulting from the recent instability in capital markets, financial institutions and financial system in general. Compliance with such regulation may increase our costs and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities.
 
  •  The Corporation’s ability to assess the creditworthiness of our customers may be impaired if the models and approaches we use to select, manage, and underwrite the loans become less predictive of future behaviors.
 
  •  The models used to estimate losses inherent in the credit exposure require difficult, subjective, and complex judgments, including forecasts of economic conditions and how these economic predictions might impair the ability of the borrowers to repay their loans, which may no longer be capable of accurate estimation and which may, in turn, impact the reliability of the models.


36


Table of Contents

 
  •  The Corporation’s ability to borrow from other financial institutions or to engage in sales of mortgage loans to third parties (including mortgage loan securitization transactions with government-sponsored entities) on favorable terms, or at all could be adversely affected by further disruptions in the capital markets or other events, including deteriorating investor expectations.
 
  •  Competitive dynamics in the industry could change as a result of consolidation of financial services companies in connection with current market conditions.
 
A prolonged economic slowdown or decline in the real estate market in the U.S. mainland could continue to harm the results of operations.
 
The residential mortgage loan origination business has historically been cyclical, enjoying periods of strong growth and profitability followed by periods of shrinking volumes and industry-wide losses. The market for residential mortgage loan originations is currently in decline and this trend could also reduce the level of mortgage loans the Corporation may produce in the future and adversely affect our business. During periods of rising interest rates, refinancing originations for many mortgage products tend to decrease as the economic incentives for borrowers to refinance their existing mortgage loans are reduced. In addition, the residential mortgage loan origination business is impacted by home values. Over the past eighteen months, residential real estate values in many areas of the U.S. mainland have decreased significantly, which has led to lower volumes and higher losses across the industry, adversely impacting our mortgage business.
 
The actual rates of delinquencies, foreclosures and losses on loans have been higher during the current economic slowdown. Rising unemployment, higher interest rates or declines in housing prices have had a greater negative effect on the ability of borrowers to repay their mortgage loans. Any sustained period of increased delinquencies, foreclosures or losses could continue to harm the Corporation’s ability to sell loans, the prices the Corporation receives for loans, the values of mortgage loans held-for-sale or residual interests in securitizations, which could harm the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, any material decline in real estate values would weaken the collateral loan-to-value ratios and increase the possibility of loss if a borrower defaults. In such event, the Corporation will be subject to the risk of loss on such real asset arising from borrower defaults to the extent not covered by third-party credit enhancement.
 
The Corporation’s business concentration in Puerto Rico imposes risks.
 
The Corporation conducts its operations in a geographically concentrated area, as its main market is Puerto Rico. This imposes risks from lack of diversification in the geographical portfolio. The Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations are highly dependent on the economic conditions of Puerto Rico, where adverse political or economic developments, natural disasters, and other events could affect among others, the volume of loan originations, increase the level of non-performing assets, increase the rate of foreclosure losses on loans, and reduce the value of the Corporation’s loans and loan servicing portfolio.
 
The Corporation’s credit quality may be adversely affected by Puerto Rico’s current economic condition.
 
Beginning in March 2006 and continuing to today’s date, a number of key economic indicators have showed that the economy of Puerto Rico has been in recession during that period of time.
 
Construction remained weak during 2009, as the Commonwealth’s fiscal situation and decreasing public investment in construction projects affected the sector. During the period from January to December 2009, cement sales, an indicator of construction activity, declined by 29.6% as compared to 2008. As of October 2009, exports decreased by 6.8%, while imports decreased by 8.9%, a negative trade, which continues since the first negative trade balance of the last decade was registered in November 2006. Tourism activity also declined during 2009. Total hotel registrations for January to October 2009 declined 0.8% as compared to the same period for 2008. During January to September 2009 new vehicle sales decreased by 23.7%. In 2009, unemployment in Puerto Rico reached 15.0%, up 3.5 points compared with 2008.
 
On January 14, 2010 the Puerto Rico Planning Board announced the release of Puerto Rico’s macroeconomic data for fiscal year 2009, ended June 30, 2009, as well as projected figures for fiscal year ending on


37


Table of Contents

June 30, 2010. The fiscal year 2009 showed a reduction of real GNP of -3.7%, while the projections for the fiscal year of 2010 point toward a positive growth of 0.7%. In general, the Puerto Rico economy continued its trend of decreasing growth, primarily due to weaker manufacturing, softer consumption and decreased government investment in construction.
 
The above economic concerns and uncertainty in the private and public sectors may also have an adverse effect on the credit quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolios, as delinquency rates are expected to increase in the short-term, until the economy stabilizes. Also, a potential reduction in consumer spending may also impact growth in other interest and non-interest revenue sources of the Corporation.
 
Rating downgrades on the Government of Puerto Rico’s debt obligations may affect the Corporation’s credit exposure.
 
Even though Puerto Rico’s economy is closely integrated to that of the U.S. mainland and its government and many of its instrumentalities are investment-grade rated borrowers in the U.S. capital markets, the current fiscal situation of the Government of Puerto Rico has led nationally recognized rating agencies to downgrade its debt obligations in the past.
 
Between May 2006 and mid-2009, the Government’s bonds were downgraded as a result of factors such as the Government’s inability to implement meaningful steps to curb operating expenditures, improve managerial and budgetary controls, high debt levels, chronic deficits, and the government’s continued reliance on operating budget loans from the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico.
 
In October and December 2009 both S&P and Moody’s confirmed the Government’s bond rating at BBB- and Baa3 with stable outlook, respectively. At present, both rating agencies maintain the stable outlooks for the general obligation bonds. In May 2009, S&P and Moody’s upgraded the sales and use tax senior bonds from A+ to AA- and from A1 to Aa3, respectively due to a modification in its bond resolution.
 
It is uncertain how the financial markets may react to any potential future ratings downgrade in Puerto Rico’s debt obligations. However, the fallout from the recent budgetary crisis and a possible ratings downgrade could adversely affect the value of Puerto Rico’s Government obligations.
 
The failure of other financial institutions could adversely affect the Corporation.
 
The Corporation’s ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty and other relationships. The Corporation has exposure to different industries and counterparties, and routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, investment companies and other institutional clients. In certain of these transactions the Corporation is required to post collateral to secure the obligations to the counterparties. In the event of a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving one of such counterparties, the Corporation may experience delays in recovering the assets posted as collateral or may incur a loss to the extent that the counterparty was holding collateral in excess of the obligation to such counterparty. There is no assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations.
 
In addition, many of these transactions expose the Corporation to credit risk in the event of a default by our counterparty or client. In addition, the credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by the Corporation cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due to the Corporation. There is no assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations.


38


Table of Contents

Legislative and regulatory actions taken now or in the future as a result of the current crisis in the financial industry may impact our business, governance structure, financial condition or results of operations.
 
Current economic conditions, particularly in the financial markets, have resulted in government regulatory agencies and political bodies placing increased focus and scrutiny on the financial services industry. The U.S. government has intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to what has been commonly referred to as the financial crisis, by temporarily enhancing the liquidity support available to financial institutions, establishing a commercial paper funding facility, temporarily guaranteeing money market funds and certain types of debt issuances and increasing insurance on bank deposits.
 
These programs have subjected financial institutions, particularly those participating in the U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (the “TARP”), to additional restrictions, oversight and costs. In addition, new proposals for legislation continue to be introduced in the U.S. Congress that could further substantially increase regulation of the financial services industry, impose restrictions on the operations and general ability of firms within the industry to conduct business consistent with historical practices, including in the areas of compensation, interest rates, financial product offerings and disclosures, and have an effect on bankruptcy proceedings with respect to consumer residential real estate mortgages, among other things. Federal and state regulatory agencies also frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in which existing regulations are applied.
 
The Corporation also faces increased regulation and regulatory scrutiny as a result of our participation in the TARP. In January 2009, the Corporation issued Series F Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase the Corporation’s Common Stock to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP. Pursuant to the terms of this issuance, the Corporation is prohibited from increasing the dividend rate on our Common Stock in an amount exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of Common Stock prior to October 14, 2008, which was $0.07 per share, without approval. Furthermore, as long as Series F Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury is outstanding, dividend payments and repurchases or redemptions relating to certain equity securities, including the Corporation’s Common Stock, are prohibited unless all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on Series F Preferred Stock, subject to certain limited exceptions.
 
On January 21, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives approved legislation amending the TARP provisions of Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (“EESA”) to include quarterly reporting requirements with respect to lending activities, examinations by an institution’s primary federal regulator of the use of funds and compliance with program requirements, restrictions on acquisitions by depository institutions receiving TARP funds and authorization for the U.S. Treasury to have an observer at board meetings of recipient institutions, among other things. On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 (the “ARRA”). The ARRA contains expansive new restrictions on executive compensation for financial institutions and other companies participating in the TARP. The ARRA amends the executive compensation and corporate governance provisions of EESA. In doing so, it continues all the same compensation and governance restrictions and adds substantially to restrictions in several areas. In addition, on June 10, 2009, the U.S. Treasury issued regulations implementing the compensation requirements under the ARRA. The regulations became applicable to existing TARP recipients upon publication in the Federal Register on June 15, 2009. The aforementioned compensation requirements and restrictions may adversely affect our ability to retain or hire senior bank officers.
 
The U.S. House of Representatives approved a regulatory reform package on December 11, 2009 (H.R. 4173). The U.S. Senate is also expected to consider financial reform legislation during 2010. H.R. 4173 and a “Discussion Draft” of legislation that may be introduced in the U.S. Senate contain provisions, which would, among other things, establish a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, establish a systemic risk regulator, consolidate federal bank regulators and give shareholders an advisory vote on executive compensation. Separate legislative proposals call for partial repeal of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the “GLB Act”), which is discussed below.
 
The Obama administration is also requesting Congressional action to limit the growth of the largest U.S. financial firms and to bar banks and bank-related companies from engaging in proprietary trading and


39


Table of Contents

from owning, investing in or sponsoring hedge funds or private equity funds. A separate legislative proposal would impose a new fee or tax on U.S. financial institutions as part of the 2010 budget plans in an effort to reduce the anticipated budget deficit and to recoup losses anticipated from the TARP. Such an assessment is estimated to be 15-basis points, levied against bank assets minus Tier 1 capital and domestic deposits. It appears that this fee or tax would be assessed only against the 50 or so largest financial institutions in the U.S., which are those with more than $50 billion in assets, and therefore would not directly affect First BanCorp. However, the large banks that are affected by the tax may choose to seek additional deposit funding in the marketplace, driving up the cost of deposits for all banks. The administration has also considered a transaction tax on trades of stock in financial institutions and a tax on executive bonuses.
 
The U.S. Congress has also recently adopted additional consumer protection laws such as the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, and the Federal Reserve has adopted numerous new regulations addressing banks’ credit card, overdraft and mortgage lending practices. Additional consumer protection legislation and regulatory activity is anticipated in the near future.
 
Internationally, both the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) and the Financial Stability Board (established in April 2009 by the Group of Twenty Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors to take action to strengthen regulation and supervision of the financial system with greater international consistency, cooperation and transparency) have committed to raise capital standards and liquidity buffers within the banking system.
 
Such proposals and legislation, if finally adopted, would change banking laws and our operating environment and that of our subsidiaries in substantial and unpredictable ways. The Corporation cannot determine whether such proposals and legislation will be adopted, or the ultimate effect that such proposals and legislation, if enacted, or regulations issued to implement the same, would have upon its financial condition or results of operations.
 
Monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
In addition to being affected by general economic conditions, the earnings and growth of First BanCorp are affected by the policies of the Federal Reserve. An important function of the Federal Reserve is to regulate the money supply and credit conditions. Among the instruments used by the Federal Reserve to implement these objectives are open market operations in U.S. Government securities, adjustments of the discount rate and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. These instruments are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic growth and the distribution of credit, bank loans, investments and deposits. Their use also affects interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits.
 
On January 6, 2010, the member agencies of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (the “FFIEC”), which includes the Federal Reserve, issued an interest rate risk advisory reminding banks to maintain sound practices for managing interest rate risk, particularly in the current environment of historically low short-term interest rates.
 
The monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. The effects of such policies upon our business, financial condition and results of operations cannot be predicted.
 
The Corporation faces extensive and changing government regulation, which may increase our costs of and expose us to risks related to compliance.
 
Most of our businesses are subject to extensive regulation by multiple regulatory bodies. These regulations may affect the manner and terms of delivery of our services. If we do not comply with governmental regulations, we may be subject to fines, penalties, lawsuits or material restrictions on our businesses in the jurisdiction where the violation occurred, which may adversely affect our business operations. Changes in these regulations can significantly affect the services that we are asked to provide as well as our costs of compliance with such regulations. In addition, adverse publicity and damage to our reputation arising


40


Table of Contents

from the failure or perceived failure to comply with legal, regulatory or contractual requirements could affect our ability to attract and retain customers. In recent years, regulatory oversight and enforcement have increased substantially, imposing additional costs and increasing the potential risks associated with our operations. If this regulatory trend continues, it could adversely affect our operations and, in turn, our consolidated results of operations.
 
We are subject to regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, and if we fail to meet these guidelines our business and financial condition may be adversely affected.
 
Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, and other regulatory requirements, the Corporation and the Bank must meet guidelines that include quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items, subject to qualitative judgments by regulators regarding components, risk weightings and other factors. If we fail to meet these minimum capital guidelines and other regulatory requirements, our business and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected. If we fail to maintain well-capitalized status under the regulatory framework, or are deemed to be not well-managed under regulatory exam procedures, or if we experience certain regulatory violations, our status as a financial holding company and our related eligibility for a streamlined review process for acquisition proposals, and our ability to offer certain financial products will be compromised.
 
The imposition of additional property tax payments in Puerto Rico may further deteriorate our commercial, consumer and mortgage loan portfolios.
 
On March 9, 2009, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into law the Special Act Declaring a State of Fiscal Emergency and Establishing an Integral Plan of Fiscal Stabilization to Save Puerto Rico’s Credit, Act No. 7 the “Act”). The Act imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a 0.591% special tax applicable to properties used for residential (excluding those exempt as detailed in the Act) and commercial purposes, and payable to the Puerto Rico Treasury Department. This temporary measure will be effective for tax years that commenced after June 30, 2009 and before July 1, 2012. The imposition of this special property tax could adversely affect the disposable income of borrowers from the commercial, consumer and mortgage loan portfolios and may cause an increase in our delinquency and foreclosure rates.
 
RISKS RELATING TO AN INVESTMENT IN THE CORPORATION’S SECURITIES
 
The market price of the Corporation’s common stock may be subject to significant fluctuations and volatility.
 
The stock markets have recently experienced high levels of volatility. These market fluctuations have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, the trading price of the Corporation’s common stock. In addition, the market price of the Corporation’s common stock has been subject to significant fluctuations and volatility because of factors specifically related to its businesses and may continue to fluctuate or further decline. Factors that could cause fluctuations, volatility or further decline in the market price of the Corporation’s common stock, many of which could be beyond its control, include the following:
 
  •  changes or perceived changes in the condition, operations, results or prospects of the Corporation’s businesses and market assessments of these changes or perceived changes;
 
  •  announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions and other material events by the Corporation or its competitors;
 
  •  changes in governmental regulations or proposals, or new governmental regulations or proposals, affecting the Corporation, including those relating to the recent financial crisis and global economic downturn and those that may be specifically directed to the Corporation;
 
  •  the continued decline, failure to stabilize or lack of improvement in general market and economic conditions in the Corporation’s principal markets;
 
  •  the departure of key personnel;


41


Table of Contents

 
  •  changes in the credit, mortgage and real estate markets;
 
  •  operating results that vary from the expectations of management, securities analysts and investors; and
 
  •  operating and stock price performance of companies that investors deem comparable to the Corporation.
 
Our suspension of dividends could adversely affect our stock price and result in the expansion of our board of directors.
 
In March of 2009, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a supervisory guidance letter intended to provide direction to bank holding companies (“BHCs”) on the declaration and payment of dividends, capital redemptions and capital repurchases by BHCs in the context of their capital planning process. The letter reiterates the long-standing Federal Reserve supervisory policies and guidance to the effect that BHCs should only pay dividends from current earnings. More specifically, the letter heightens expectations that BHCs will inform and consult with the Federal Reserve supervisory staff on the declaration and payment of dividends that exceed earnings for the period for which a dividend is being paid. In consideration of the financial results reported for the second quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation decided, as a matter of prudent fiscal management and following the Federal Reserve guidance, to suspend payment of common stock dividends and dividends on all series of preferred stock. The Corporation cannot anticipate if and when the payment of dividends might be reinstated.
 
This suspension could adversely affect the Corporation’s stock price. Further, in general, if dividends on our preferred stock are not paid for six quarterly dividend periods or more, the authorized number of directors of the board will be increased by two and the preferred stockholders will have the right to elect two additional members of the Corporation’s board of directors until all accrued and unpaid dividends for all past dividend periods have been declared and paid in full.
 
Dividends on the Corporation’s common stock have been suspended and a holder may not receive funds in connection with its investment in our common stock without selling its shares of common stock.
 
Holders of common stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as the Corporation’s board of directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. The Corporation announced the suspension of dividend payments on its common stock. In general, so long as any shares of preferred stock remain outstanding and until the Corporation satisfies various Federal regulatory considerations, the Corporation cannot declare, set apart or pay any dividends on shares of the Corporation’s common stock unless all accrued and unpaid dividends on its preferred stock for the twelve monthly dividend periods ending on the immediately preceding dividend payment date have been paid or are paid contemporaneously and the full monthly dividend on its preferred stock for the then current month has been or is contemporaneously declared and paid or declared and set apart for payment. Furthermore, prior to January 16, 2012, unless the Corporation has redeemed all of the shares of Series F Preferred Stock (or any successor security) or the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of Series F Preferred Stock (or any successor security) to third parties, the consent of the U.S. Treasury will be required for the Corporation to, among other things, increase the dividend rate per share of Common Stock above $0.07 per share or to repurchase or redeem equity securities, including the Corporation’s common stock, subject to certain limited exceptions. This could adversely affect the market price of the Corporation’s common stock. Also, the Corporation is a bank holding company and its ability to declare and pay dividends is dependent on certain Federal regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends. Moreover, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC have issued policy statements stating that bank holding companies and insured banks should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings. In the current financial and economic environment, the Federal Reserve has indicated that bank holding companies should carefully review their dividend policy and has discouraged dividend pay-out ratios that are at the 100% or higher level unless both asset quality and capital are very strong.
 
In addition, the terms of the Corporation’s outstanding junior subordinated debt securities held by trusts that issue trust preferred securities prohibit the Corporation from declaring or paying any dividends or distributions on its capital stock, including its common stock and preferred stock, or purchasing, acquiring, or


42


Table of Contents

making a liquidation payment on such stock, if the Corporation has given notice of its election to defer interest payments but the related deferral period has not yet commenced or a deferral period is continuing.
 
Offerings of debt, which would be senior to the common stock upon liquidation and/or to preferred equity securities, which may be senior to the common stock for purposes of dividend distributions or upon liquidation, may adversely affect the market price of the common stock.
 
The Corporation may attempt to increase its capital resources or, if its or the capital ratios of FirstBank fall below the required minimums, the Corporation or FirstBank could be forced to raise additional capital by making additional offerings of debt or preferred equity securities, including medium-term notes, trust preferred securities, senior or subordinated notes and preferred stock. Upon liquidation, holders of debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive distributions of the Corporation’s available assets prior to the holders of the common stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of existing stockholders or reduce the market price of the common stock, or both.
 
The Corporation’s board of directors is authorized to issue one or more classes or series of preferred stock from time to time without any action on the part of the stockholders. The Corporation’s board of directors also has the power, without stockholder approval, to set the terms of any such classes or series of preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights and preferences over the common stock with respect to dividends or upon the Corporation’s dissolution, winding up and liquidation and other terms. If the Corporation issues preferred shares in the future that have a preference over the common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or upon liquidation, or if the Corporation issues preferred shares with voting rights that dilute the voting power of the common stock, the rights of holders of the common stock or the market price of the common stock could be adversely affected.
 
There may be future dilution of the Corporation’s common stock.
 
In January 2009, in connection with the U.S. Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, established as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury 400,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference value per share. In connection with this investment, the Corporation also issued to the U.S. Treasury a warrant to purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporation’s common stock (the “Warrant”) at an exercise price of $10.27 per share. The Warrant has a 10-year term and is exercisable at any time. The exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments. In addition, in connection with its sale of 9,250,450 shares of common stock to the Bank of Nova Scotia (“BNS”), the Corporation agreed to give BNS an anti-dilution right and a right of first refusal when the Corporation sells shares of common stock to third parties. The possible future issuance of equity securities through the exercise of the Warrant or to BNS as a result of its rights could affect the Corporation’s current stockholders in a number of ways, including by:
 
  •  diluting the voting power of the current holders of common stock (the shares underlying the Warrant represent approximately 6% of the Corporation’s outstanding shares of common stock as of December 31, 2009 and BNS owns 10% of the Corporation’s shares of common stock);
 
  •  diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the outstanding shares of common stock; and
 
  •  making the payment of dividends on common stock more expensive.
 
Also, recent increases in the allowance for loan and lease losses resulted in a reduction in the amount of the Corporation’s tangible common equity. Given the focus on tangible common equity by regulatory authorities and rating agencies, the Corporation may be required to raise additional capital through the issuance of additional common stock in future periods to increase that tangible common equity. However, no assurance can be given that the Corporation will be able to raise additional capital. An increase in the Corporation’s capital through an issuance of common stock could have a dilutive effect on the existing holders of our Common Stock and may adversely affect its market price.


43


Table of Contents

Item 1B.   Unresolved Staff Comments
 
None.
 
Item 2.   Properties
 
As of December 31, 2009, First BanCorp owned the following three main offices located in Puerto Rico:
 
Main offices:
 
  •  Headquarters — Located at First Federal Building, 1519 Ponce de Leïon Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico, a 16 story office building. Approximately 60% of the building, an underground three level parking lot and an adjacent parking lot are owned by the Corporation.
 
  •  EDP & Operations Center — A five-story structure located at 1506 Ponce de Leïon Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico. These facilities are fully occupied by the Corporation.
 
  •  Consumer Lending Center — A three-story building with a three-level parking lot located at 876 Muônoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. These facilities are fully occupied by the Corporation.
 
  •  In addition, during 2006, First BanCorp purchased a building located on 1130 Muônoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. These facilities are being renovated and expanded to accommodate branch operations, data processing, administrative and certain headquarter offices. FirstBank expects to commence occupancy in summer 2010.
 
The Corporation owned 24 branch and office premises and auto lots and leased 117 branch premises, loan and office centers and other facilities. In certain situations, financial services such as mortgage, insurance businesses and commercial banking services are located in the same building. All of these premises are located in Puerto Rico, Florida and in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands. Management believes that the Corporation’s properties are well maintained and are suitable for the Corporation’s business as presently conducted.
 
Item 3.   Legal Proceedings
 
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are defendants in various lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of the Corporation’s management the pending and threatened legal proceedings of which management is aware will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Corporation.
 
Item 4.   Reserved
 
PART II
 
Item 5.   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
Information about Market and Holders
 
The Corporation’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol FBP. On December 31, 2009, there were 540 holders of record of the Corporation’s common stock.


44


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low closing sales prices and the cash dividends declared on the Corporation’s common stock during such periods.
 
                                 
                Dividends
Quarter Ended
  High   Low   Last   per Share
 
2009:
                               
December
  $ 2.88     $ 1.51     $ 2.30     $  
September
    4.20       3.01       3.05        
June
    7.55       3.95       3.95       0.07  
March
    11.05       3.63       4.26       0.07  
2008:
                               
December
  $ 12.17     $ 7.91     $ 11.14     $ 0.07  
September
    12.00       6.05       11.06       0.07  
June
    11.20       6.34       6.34       0.07  
March
    10.97       7.56       10.16       0.07  
2007:
                               
December
  $ 10.16     $ 6.15     $ 7.29     $ 0.07  
September
    11.06       8.62       9.50       0.07  
June
    13.64       10.99       10.99       0.07  
March
    13.52       9.08       13.26       0.07  
 
First BanCorp has five outstanding series of non convertible preferred stock: 7.125% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series A (liquidation preference $25 per share); 8.35% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series B (liquidation preference $25 per share); 7.40% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series C (liquidation preference $25 per share); 7.25% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series D (liquidation preference $25 per share,); and 7.00% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series E (liquidation preference $25 per share) (collectively “Preferred Stock”), which trade on the NYSE.
 
On January 16, 2009, the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury the Series F Preferred Stock and the Warrant, which transaction is described in Item 1 — Recent Significant Events on page 9.
 
The Series A, B, C, D, E and F Preferred Stock rank on parity with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, winding up or dissolution. Holders of each series of preferred stock are entitled to receive cash dividends, when, as and if declared by the board of directors of First BanCorp out of funds legally available for dividends. The Purchase Agreement of the Series F Preferred stock contains limitations on the payment of dividends on common stock, including limiting regular quarterly cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.07 per share.
 
The terms of the Corporation’s preferred stock do not permit the Corporation to declare, set apart or pay any dividend or make any other distribution of assets on, or redeem, purchase, set apart or otherwise acquire shares of common stock or of any other class of stock of First BanCorp ranking junior to the preferred stock, unless all accrued and unpaid dividends on the preferred stock and any parity stock, for the twelve monthly dividend periods ending on the immediately preceding dividend payment date, shall have been paid or are paid contemporaneously; the full monthly dividend on the preferred stock and any parity stock for the then current month has been or is contemporaneously declared and paid or declared and set apart for payment; and the Corporation has not defaulted in the payment of the redemption price of any shares of the preferred stock and any parity stock called for redemption. If the Corporation is unable to pay in full the dividends on the preferred stock and on any other shares of stock of equal rank as to the payment of dividends, all dividends declared upon the preferred stock and any such other shares of stock will be declared pro rata.
 
The Corporation may not issue shares ranking, as to dividend rights or rights on liquidation, winding up and dissolution, senior to the Series A, B, C, D, E and F Preferred Stock, except with the consent of the


45


Table of Contents

holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding aggregate liquidation preference of the Series A, B, C, D, E and F Preferred Stock.
 
Dividends
 
The Corporation has a policy of paying quarterly cash dividends on its outstanding shares of common stock subject to its earnings and financial condition. On July 30, 2009 after reporting a net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation announced that the Board of Directors resolved to suspend the payment of the common and preferred dividends (including the Series F Preferred Stock dividends), effective with the preferred dividend for the month of August 2009. During 2009, the Corporation declared a cash dividend of $0.07 per share for the first two quarters of the year. During years 2008 and 2007, the Corporation declared a cash dividend of $0.07 per share for each quarter of such years. The Corporation’s ability to pay future dividends will necessarily depend upon its earnings and financial condition. See the discussion under “Dividend Restrictions” under Item 1 for additional information concerning restrictions on the payment of dividends that apply to the Corporation and FirstBank.
 
First BanCorp did not purchase any of its equity securities during 2009 or 2008.
 
The Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code requires the withholding of income tax from dividend income derived by resident U.S. citizens, special partnerships, trusts and estates and non-resident U.S. citizens, custodians, partnerships, and corporations from sources within Puerto Rico.
 
Resident U.S. Citizens
 
A special tax of 10% is imposed on eligible dividends paid to individuals, special partnerships, trusts, and estates to be applied to all distributions unless the taxpayer specifically elects otherwise. Once this election is made it is irrevocable. However, the taxpayer can elect to include in gross income the eligible distributions received and take a credit for the amount of tax withheld. If the taxpayer does not make this election on the tax return, then he can exclude from gross income the distributions received and reported without claiming the credit for the tax withheld.
 
Nonresident U.S. Citizens
 
Nonresident U.S. citizens have the right to certain exemptions when a Withholding Tax Exemption Certificate (Form 2732) is properly completed and filed with the Corporation. The Corporation, as withholding agent, is authorized to withhold a tax of 10% only from the excess of the income paid over the applicable tax-exempt amount.
 
U.S. Corporations and Partnerships
 
Corporations and partnerships not organized under Puerto Rico laws that have not engaged in trade or business in Puerto Rico during the taxable year in which the dividend is paid are subject to the 10% dividend tax withholding. Corporations or partnerships not organized under the laws of Puerto Rico that have engaged in trade or business in Puerto Rico are not subject to the 10% withholding, but they must declare the dividend as gross income on their Puerto Rico income tax return.


46


Table of Contents

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans
 
The following summarizes equity compensation plans approved by security holders and equity compensation plans that were not approved by security holders as of December 31, 2009:
 
                         
                Number of Securities
 
          Weighted-Average
    Remaining Available for
 
    Number of Securities
    Exercise Price of
    Future Issuance Under
 
    to be Issued Upon
    Outstanding
    Equity Compensation
 
    Exercise of Outstanding
    Options, Warrants
    Plans (Excluding Securities
 
Plan Category
  Options     and Rights     Reflected in Column (A))  
    (A)     (B)     (C)  
 
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders
    2,481,310 (1)   $ 13.46       3,767,784 (2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
    N/A       N/A       N/A  
                         
Total
    2,481,310     $ 13.46       3,767,784  
                         
 
 
(1) Stock options granted under the 1997 stock option plan which expired on January 21, 2007. All outstanding awards under the stock option plan continue in full forth and effect, subject to their original terms and the shares of common stock underlying the options are subject to adjustments for stock splits, reorganization and other similar events.
 
(2) Securities available for future issuance under the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”) approved by stockholder on April 29, 2008. The Omnibus Plan provides for equity-based compensation incentives (the “awards”) through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock-based awards. This plan allows the issuance of up to 3,800,000 shares of common stock, subject to adjustments for stock splits, reorganization and other similar events.


47


Table of Contents

 
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
 
The following Performance Graph shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Annual Report on Form 10-K into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that First BanCorp specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under these Acts.
 
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return of First BanCorp during the measurement period with the cumulative total return, assuming reinvestment of dividends, of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Supercom Banks Index (the “Peer Group”). The Performance Graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2004 in each of First BanCorp’ common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the Peer Group. The comparisons in this table are set forth in response to SEC disclosure requirements, and are therefore not intended to forecast or be indicative of future performance of First BanCorp’s common stock.
 
The cumulative total stockholder return was obtained by dividing (i) the cumulative amount of dividends per share, assuming dividend reinvestment since the measurement point, December 31, 2004, plus (ii) the change in the per share price since the measurement date, by the share price at the measurement date.
 
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)


48


Table of Contents

ITEM 6.   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
The following table sets forth certain selected consolidated financial data for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2009. This information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto.
 
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
                                         
    Year Ended December 31,
    2009   2008   2007   2006   2005
    (Dollars in thousands except for per share data and financial ratios results)
 
Condensed Income Statements:
                                       
Total interest income
  $ 996,574     $ 1,126,897     $ 1,189,247     $ 1,288,813     $ 1,067,590  
Total interest expense
    477,532       599,016       738,231       845,119       635,271  
Net interest income
    519,042       527,881       451,016       443,694       432,319  
Provision for loan and lease losses
    579,858       190,948       120,610       74,991       50,644  
Non-interest income
    142,264       74,643       67,156       31,336       63,077  
Non-interest expenses
    352,101       333,371       307,843       287,963       315,132  
(Loss) income before income taxes
    (270,653 )     78,205       89,719       112,076       129,620  
Income tax (expense) benefit
    (4,534 )     31,732       (21,583 )     (27,442 )     (15,016 )
Net (loss) income
    (275,187 )     109,937       68,136       84,634       114,604  
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
    (322,075 )     69,661       27,860       44,358       74,328  
Per Common Share Results:
                                       
Net (loss) income per common share basic
  $ (3.48 )   $ 0.75     $ 0.32     $ 0.54     $ 0.92  
Net (loss) income per common share diluted
  $ (3.48 )   $ 0.75     $ 0.32     $ 0.53     $ 0.90  
Cash dividends declared
  $ 0.14     $ 0.28     $ 0.28     $ 0.28     $ 0.28  
Average shares outstanding
    92,511       92,508       86,549       82,835       80,847  
Average shares outstanding diluted
    92,511       92,644       86,866       83,138       82,771  
Book value per common share
  $ 7.25     $ 10.78     $ 9.42     $ 8.16     $ 8.01  
Tangible book value per common share(1)
  $ 6.76     $ 10.22     $ 8.87     $ 7.50     $ 7.29  
Balance Sheet Data:
                                       
Loans and loans held for sale
  $ 13,949,226     $ 13,088,292     $ 11,799,746     $ 11,263,980     $ 12,685,929  
Allowance for loan and lease losses
    528,120       281,526       190,168       158,296       147,999  
Money market and investment securities
    4,866,617       5,709,154       4,811,413       5,544,183       6,653,924  
Intangible Assets
    44,698       52,083       51,034       54,908       58,292  
Deferred tax asset, net
    109,197       128,039       90,130       162,096       130,140  
Total assets
    19,628,448       19,491,268       17,186,931       17,390,256       19,917,651  
Deposits
    12,669,047       13,057,430       11,034,521       11,004,287       12,463,752  
Borrowings
    5,214,147       4,736,670       4,460,006       4,662,271       5,750,197  
Total preferred equity
    928,508       550,100       550,100       550,100       550,100  
Total common equity
    644,062       940,628       896,810       709,620       663,416  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
    26,493       57,389       (25,264 )     (30,167 )     (15,675 )
Total equity
    1,599,063       1,548,117       1,421,646       1,229,553       1,197,841  
Selected Financial Ratios (In Percent):
                                       
Profitability:
                                       
Return on Average Assets
    (1.39 )     0.59       0.40       0.44       0.64  
Return on Average Total Equity
    (14.84 )     7.67       5.14       7.06       8.98  
Return on Average Common Equity
    (34.07 )     7.89       3.59       6.85       10.23  
Average Total Equity to Average Total Assets
    9.36       7.74       7.70       6.25       7.09  
Interest Rate Spread(1)(2)
    2.62       2.83       2.29       2.35       2.87  
Interest Rate Margin(1)(2)
    2.93       3.20       2.83       2.84       3.23  
Tangible common equity ratio(1)
    3.20       4.87       4.79       3.60       2.97  
Dividend payout ratio
    (4.03 )     37.19       88.32       52.50       30.46  
Efficiency ratio(3)
    53.24       55.33       59.41       60.62       63.61  


49


Table of Contents

                                         
    Year Ended December 31,
    2009   2008   2007   2006   2005
    (Dollars in thousands except for per share data and financial ratios results)
 
Asset Quality:
                                       
Allowance for loan and lease losses to loans receivable
    3.79       2.15       1.61       1.41       1.17  
Net charge-offs to average loans
    2.48       0.87       0.79       0.55       0.39  
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs
    1.74 x     1.76 x     1.36 x     1.16 x     1.12 x
Non-performing assets to total assets
    8.71       3.27       2.56       1.54       0.75  
Non-performing loans to total loans receivable
    11.23       4.49       3.50       2.24       1.06  
Allowance to total non-performing loans
    33.77       47.95       46.04       62.79       110.18  
Allowance to total non-performing loans, excluding residential real estate loans
    47.06       90.16       93.23       115.33       186.06  
Other Information:
                                       
Common Stock Price: End of period
  $ 2.30     $ 11.14     $ 7.29     $ 9.53     $ 12.41  
 
 
(1) Non-gaap measures. Refer to “Capital” discussion below for additional information of the components and reconciliation of these measures.
 
(2) On a tax equivalent basis (see “Net Interest Income” discussion below).
 
(3) Non-interest expenses to the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. The denominator includes non-recurring income and changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and financial instruments measured at fair value.
 
ITEM 7.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations relates to the accompanying consolidated audited financial statements of First BanCorp (the “Corporation” or “First BanCorp”) and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto.
 
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
 
First BanCorp is a diversified financial holding company headquartered in San Juan, Puerto Rico offering a full range of financial products to consumers and commercial customers through various subsidiaries. First BanCorp is the holding company of FirstBank Puerto Rico (“FirstBank” or the “Bank”), Grupo Empresas de Servicios Financieros (d/b/a “PR Finance Group”) and FirstBank Insurance Agency. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Corporation operates offices in Puerto Rico, the United States and British Virgin Islands and the State of Florida (USA) specializing in commercial banking, residential mortgage loan originations, finance leases, personal loans, small loans, auto loans, insurance agency and broker-dealer activities.
 
OVERVIEW OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
First BanCorp’s results of operations depend primarily upon its net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on its interest-earning assets, including investment securities and loans, and the interest expense on its interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by various factors, including: the interest rate scenario; the volumes, mix and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and the re-pricing characteristics of these assets and liabilities. The Corporation’s results of operations also depend on the provision for loan and lease losses, which significantly affected the results for the year ended December 31, 2009, non-interest expenses (such as personnel, occupancy and other costs), non-interest income (mainly service charges and fees on loans and deposits and insurance income), the results of its hedging activities, gains (losses) on investments, gains (losses) on mortgage banking activities, and income taxes which also significantly affected 2009 results.

50


Table of Contents

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 amounted to $275.2 million or $(3.48) per diluted common share, compared to net income of $109.9 million or $0.75 per diluted common share for 2008 and net income of $68.1 million or $0.32 per diluted common share for 2007.
 
The Corporation’s financial results for 2009, as compared to 2008, were principally impacted by: (i) an increase of $388.9 million in the provision for loan and lease losses attributable to the significant increase in the volume of non-performing and impaired loans, the migration of loans to higher risk categories, increases in loss factors used to determine general reserves to account for increases in charge-offs, delinquency levels and weak economic conditions, and the overall growth of the loan portfolio, (ii) an increase of $36.3 million in income tax expense, affected by a non-cash increase of $184.4 million in the Corporation’s deferred tax asset valuation allowance due to losses incurred in 2009, (iii) an increase of $18.7 million in non-interest expenses driven by increases in the FDIC deposit insurance premium partially offset by a reduction in employees’ compensation and benefit expenses, and (iv) a decrease of $8.8 million in net interest income mainly due to lower loan yields adversely affected by the higher volume of non-performing loans and the repricing of adjustable rate commercial and construction loans tied to short-term indexes. These factors were partially offset by an increase of $67.6 million in non-interest income primarily due to realized gains of $86.8 million on the sale of investment securities in 2009, mainly U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities.
 
The following table summarizes the effect of the aforementioned factors and other factors that significantly impacted financial results in previous years on net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders and (loss) earnings per common share for the last three years:
 
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2009     2008     2007  
    Dollars     Per Share     Dollars     Per Share     Dollars     Per Share  
    (In thousands, except for per common share amounts)  
 
Net income attributable to common stockholders for prior year
  $ 69,661     $ 0.75     $ 27,860     $ 0.32     $ 44,358     $ 0.53  
Increase (decrease) from changes in:
                                               
Net interest income
    (8,839 )     (0.10 )     76,865       0.88       7,322       0.09  
Provision for loan and lease losses
    (388,910 )     (4.20 )     (70,338 )     (0.81 )     (45,619 )     (0.55 )
Net gain (loss) on investments and impairments
    63,953       0.69       23,919       0.28       5,468       0.06  
Gain (loss) on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of secured commercial loans to local financial institutions
                (2,497 )     (0.03 )     13,137       0.16  
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio
                (2,819 )     (0.03 )     2,319       0.03  
Insurance reimbursement and other agreements related to a contingency settlement
                (15,075 )     (0.17 )     15,075       0.18  
Other non-interest income
    3,668       0.04       3,959       0.05       (179 )      
Employees’ compensation and benefits
    9,119       0.10       (1,490 )     (0.02 )     (12,840 )     (0.15 )
Professional fees
    592       0.01       4,942       0.06       11,344       0.13  
Deposit insurance premium
    (30,471 )     (0.33 )     (3,424 )     (0.04 )     (5,073 )     (0.06 )
Net loss on REO operations
    (490 )     (0.01 )     (18,973 )     (0.22 )     (2,382 )     (0.03 )
Core deposit intangible impairment
    (3,988 )     (0.04 )                        
All other operating expenses
    6,508       0.07       (6,583 )     (0.08 )     (10,929 )     (0.13 )
Income tax provision
    (36,266 )     (0.39 )     53,315       0.61       5,859       0.07  
                                                 
Net (loss) income before changes in preferred stock dividends, preferred discount amortization and change in average common shares
    (315,463 )     (3.41 )     69,661       0.80       27,860       0.33  
Change in preferred dividends and preferred discount amortization
    (6,612 )     (0.07 )                        
Change in average common shares(1)
                      (0.05 )           (0.01 )
                                                 
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
  $ (322,075 )   $ (3.48 )   $ 69,661     $ 0.75     $ 27,860     $ 0.32  
                                                 
 
 
(1) For 2008, mainly attributed to the sale of 9.250 million common shares to the Bank of Nova Scotia (“Scotiabank”) in the second half of 2007.


51


Table of Contents

 
  •  Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $275.2 million compared to net income of $109.9 million and net income of $68.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
 
  •  Diluted loss per common share for the year ended December 31, 2009 amounted to $(3.48) compared to earnings per diluted share of $0.75 and $0.32 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
 
  •  Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $519.0 million compared to $527.9 million and $451.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net interest spread and margin on an adjusted tax equivalent basis (for definition and reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure, refer to the “Net Interest Income” discussion below) were 2.62% and 2.93%, respectively, down 21 and 27 basis points from 2008. The decrease for 2009 compared to 2008 was mainly associated with a significant increase in non-performing loans and the repricing of floating-rate commercial and construction loans at lower rates due to decreases in market interest rates such as three-month LIBOR and the Prime rate, even though the Corporation is actively increasing spreads on loan renewals. The Corporation increased the use of interest rate floors in new commercial and construction loans agreements and renewals in 2009 to protect net interest margins going forward. Lower loan yields more than offset the benefit of lower short-term rates in the average cost of funding and the increase in average interest-earning assets. Refer to the “Net Interest Income“discussion below for additional information.
 
The increase in net interest income for 2008, compared to 2007, was mainly associated with a decrease in the average cost of funds resulting from lower short-term interest rates and, to a lesser extent, a higher volume of interest-earning assets. The decrease in funding costs more than offset lower loans yields resulting from the repricing of variable-rate construction and commercial loans tied to short-term indexes and from a higher volume of non-accrual loans.
 
  •  The provision for loan and lease losses for 2009 was $579.9 million compared to $190.9 million and $120.6 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase for 2009, as compared to 2008, was mainly attributable to the significant increase in non-performing loans and increases in specific reserves for impaired commercial and construction loans. Also, the migration of loans to higher risk categories and increases to loss factors used to determine the general reserve allowance contributed to the higher provision.
 
The increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, was mainly attributable to the significant increase in delinquency levels and increases in specific reserves for impaired commercial and construction loans. During 2008, the Corporation experienced continued stress in the credit quality of and worsening trends on its construction loan portfolio, in particular, condo-conversion loans affected by the continuing deterioration in the health of the economy, an oversupply of new homes and declining housing prices in the United States and on its commercial loan portfolio which was adversely impacted by deteriorating economic conditions in Puerto Rico. Also, higher reserves for residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico and in the United States were necessary to account for the credit risk tied to recessionary conditions in the economy.
 
Refer to the “Provision for Loan and Lease Losses” and “Risk Management” discussions below for additional information and further analysis of the allowance for loan and lease losses and non-performing assets and related ratios.
 
  •  Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $142.3 million compared to $74.6 million and $67.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in non-interest income in 2009, compared to 2008, was mainly related to a $59.6 million increase in realized gains on the sale of investment securities, primarily reflecting a $79.9 million gain on the sale of mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) (mainly U.S. agency fixed-rate MBS), compared to realized gains on the sale of MBS of $17.7 million in 2008. In an effort to manage interest rate risk, and taking advantage of favorable market valuations, approximately $1.8 billion of U.S. agency MBS (mainly


52


Table of Contents

  30 year fixed-rate U.S. agency MBS) were sold in 2009, compared to approximately $526 million of U.S. agency MBS sold in 2008. Also contributing to higher non-interest income was the $5.3 million increase in gains from mortgage banking activities, due to the increased volume of loan sales and securitizations. Servicing assets recorded at the time of sale amounted to $6.1 million for 2009 compared to $1.6 million for 2008. The increase was mainly related to $4.6 million of capitalized servicing assets in connection with the securitization of approximately $305 million FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS. For the first time in several years, the Corporation has been engaged in the securitization of mortgage loans since early 2009.
 
The increase in non-interest income in 2008, compared to 2007, was related to a realized gain of $17.7 million on the sale of investment securities (mainly U.S. sponsored agency fixed-rate MBS) and to the gain of $9.3 million on the sale of part of the Corporation’s investment in VISA in connection with VISA’s initial public offering (“IPO”). A surge in MBS prices, mainly due to announcements of the Federal Reserve (“FED”) that it will invest up to $600 billion in obligations from U.S. government-sponsored agencies, including $500 billion in MBS, provided an opportunity to realize a sale of approximately $284 million fixed-rate U.S. agency MBS at a gain of $11.0 million. Early in 2008, a spike and subsequent contraction in yield spread for U.S. agency MBS also provided an opportunity for the sale of approximately $242 million and a realized gain of $6.9 million. Higher point of sale (POS) and ATM interchange fee income and an increase in fee income from cash management services provided to corporate customers also contributed to the increase in non-interest income. The increase in non-interest income attributable to these activities was partially offset, when comparing 2008 to 2007, by isolated events such as the $15.1 million income recognition for reimbursement of expenses, mainly from insurance carriers, related to the class action lawsuit settled in 2007, and a gain of $2.8 million on the sale of a credit card portfolio and of $2.5 million on the partial extinguishment and recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local financial institution that were all recognized in 2007.
 
Refer to “Non-Interest Income” discussion below for additional information.
 
  •  Non-interest expenses for 2009 was $352.1 million compared to $333.4 million and $307.8 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in non-interest expenses for 2009, as compared to 2008, was principally attributable to: (i) an increase of $30.5 million in the FDIC deposit insurance premium, including $8.9 million for the special assessment levied by the FDIC in 2009 and increases in regular assessment rates, (ii) a $4.0 million core deposit intangible impairment charge, and (iii) a $1.8 million increase in the reserve for probable losses on outstanding unfunded loan commitments. The aforementioned increases were partially offset by decreases in certain controllable expenses such as: (i) a $9.1 million decrease in employees’ compensation and benefit expenses, due to a lower headcount and reductions in bonuses, incentive compensation and overtime costs, (ii) a $3.4 million decrease in business promotion expenses due to a lower level of marketing activities, and (iii) a $1.1 million decrease in taxes, other than income taxes, driven by a reduction in municipal taxes which are assessed based on taxable gross revenues.
 
The increase in non-interest expenses for 2008, as compared to 2007, was principally attributable to: (i) a higher net loss on REO operations that increased to $21.4 million for 2008 from $2.4 million for 2007, driven by a higher inventory of repossessed properties and declining real estate prices, mainly in the U.S. mainland, that have caused write-downs on the value of repossessed properties, and (ii) an increase of $3.4 million in deposit insurance premium expense, as the Corporation used available one-time credits to offset the premium increase in 2007 resulting from a new assessment system adopted by the FDIC, and (iii) higher occupancy and equipment expenses, an increase of $2.9 million tied to the growth of the Corporation’s operations. The Corporation was able to continue the growth of its operations without incurring substantial additional non-interest expenses as reflected by a slight increase of 2% in non-interest expenses, excluding the increase in REO operations losses. Modest increases were observed in occupancy and equipment expenses, an increase of $2.9 million, and in employees’ compensation and benefit, an increase of $1.5 million. Refer to “Non-Interest Expenses“discussion below for additional information.


53


Table of Contents

  •  For 2009, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of $4.5 million, compared to an income tax benefit of $31.7 million for 2008. The income tax expense for 2009 mainly resulted from the aforementioned $184.4 million non-cash increase in the valuation allowance for the Corporation’s deferred tax asset. The increase in the valuation allowance was driven by the losses incurred in 2009 that placed FirstBank in a three-year cumulative loss position as of the end of the third quarter of 2009.
 
For 2008, the Corporation recorded an income tax benefit of $31.7 million, compared to an income tax expense of $21.6 million for 2007. The fluctuation was mainly related to lower taxable income. A significant portion of revenues was derived from tax-exempt assets and operations conducted through the international banking entity, FirstBank Overseas Corporation. Also, the positive fluctuation in financial results was impacted by two transactions: (i) a reversal of $10.6 million of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (“UTBs”) during the second quarter of 2008 for positions taken on income tax returns due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for the 2003 taxable year, and (ii) the recognition of an income tax benefit of $5.4 million in connection with an agreement entered into with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury during the first quarter of 2008 that established a multi-year allocation schedule for deductibility of the $74.25 million payment made by the Corporation during 2007 to settle a securities class action suit.
 
Refer to “Income Taxes” discussion below for additional information.
 
  •  Total assets as of December 31, 2009 amounted to $19.6 billion, an increase of $137.2 million compared to $19.5 billion as of December 31, 2008. The Corporation’s loan portfolio increased by $860.9 million (before the allowance for loan and lease losses), driven by new originations, mainly credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government and/or its political subdivisions. Also, an increase of $298.4 million in cash and cash equivalents contributed to the increase in total assets, as the Corporation improved its liquidity position as a precautionary measure given current volatile market conditions. Partially offsetting the increase in loans and liquid assets was a $790.8 million decrease in investment securities, driven by sales and principal repayments of MBS.
 
  •  As of December 31, 2009, total liabilities amounted to $18.0 billion, an increase of $86.2 million as compared to $17.9 billion as of December 31, 2008. The increase in total liabilities was mainly attributable to an increase of $818 million in short-term advances from the FED and FHLB and an increase of $480 million in non-brokered deposits, partially offset by a decrease of $868.4 million in brokered CDs and a decrease of $344.4 million in repurchase agreements. The Corporation has been reducing the reliance on brokered CDs and is focused on core deposit growth initiatives in all of the markets served.
 
  •  The Corporation’s stockholders’ equity amounted to $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2009, an increase of $50.9 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2008, driven by the $400 million investment by the United States Department of the Treasury (the “U.S. Treasury”) in preferred stock of the Corporation through the U.S. Treasury Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program. This was partially offset by the net loss of $275.2 million recorded for 2009, dividends paid amounting to $43.1 million in 2009 ($13.0 million on common stock, or $0.14 per share, and $30.1 million on preferred stock) and a $30.9 million decrease in other comprehensive income mainly due to a noncredit-related impairment of $31.7 million on private label MBS.
 
  •  Total loan production, including purchases and refinancings, for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $4.8 billion compared to $4.2 billion and $4.1 billion for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in loan production in 2009, as compared to 2008, was mainly associated with a $977.9 million increase in commercial loan originations driven by approximately $1.7 billion in credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government and/or its political subdivisions. Partially offsetting the increase in the originations of commercial loans was a decrease of $303.3 million in originations of consumer loans and of $98.5 million in residential mortgage loan originations adversely affected by weak economic conditions in Puerto Rico. The increase in loan production in 2008, as compared to 2007, was mainly associated with an increase in commercial loan originations and the purchase of a $218 million auto loan portfolio.


54


Table of Contents

 
  •  Total non-performing assets as of December 31, 2009 was $1.71 billion compared to $637.2 million as of December 31, 2008. Even though deterioration in credit quality was observed in all of the Corporation’s portfolios, it was more significant in the construction and commercial loan portfolios, which were affected by both the stagnant housing market and further weakening in the economies of the markets served during most of 2009. The increase in non-performing assets was led by an increase of $518.0 million in non-performing construction loans, of which $314.1 million is related to the construction loan portfolio in the Puerto Rico portfolio and $205.2 million is related to construction projects in Florida. Other portfolios that experienced a significant growth in credit risk, mainly in Puerto Rico, include: (i) a $183.0 million increase in non-performing commercial and industrial (“C&I) loans, (ii) a $166.7 million increase in non-performing residential mortgage loans, and (ii) a $110.6 million increase in non-performing commercial mortgage loans. Also, during 2009, the Corporation classified as non-performing investment securities with a book value of $64.5 million that were pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc., in connection with several interest rate swap agreements entered into with that institution. Considering that the investment securities have not yet been recovered by the Corporation, despite its efforts, the Corporation decided to classify such investments as non-performing. Refer to the “Risk Management — Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets” section below for additional information with respect to non-performing assets by geographic areas and recent actions taken by the Corporation to reduce its exposure to troubled loans.
 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES
 
The accounting principles of the Corporation and the methods of applying these principles conform with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The Corporation’s critical accounting policies relate to the 1) allowance for loan and lease losses; 2) other-than-temporary impairments; 3) income taxes; 4) classification and related values of investment securities; 5) valuation of financial instruments; 6) derivative financial instruments; and 7) income recognition on loans. These critical accounting policies involve judgments, estimates and assumptions made by management that affect the recorded assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities disclosed as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from estimates, if different assumptions or conditions prevail. Certain determinations inherently require greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than those originally reported.
 
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
 
The Corporation maintains the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level considered adequate to absorb losses currently inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance for loan and lease losses provides for probable losses that have been identified with specific valuation allowances for individually evaluated impaired loans and for probable losses believed to be inherent in the loan portfolio that have not been specifically identified. Internal risk ratings are assigned to each business loan at the time of approval and are subject to subsequent periodic reviews by the Corporation’s senior management. The allowance for loan and lease losses is reviewed on a quarterly basis as part of the Corporation’s continued evaluation of its asset quality
 
A specific valuation allowance is established for those commercial and real estate loans classified as impaired, primarily when the collateral value of the loan (if the impaired loan is determined to be collateral dependent) or the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate is lower than the carrying amount of that loan. To compute the specific valuation allowance, commercial and real estate, including residential mortgage loans with a principal balance of $1 million or more are evaluated individually as well as smaller residential mortgage loans considered impaired based on their high delinquency and loan-to-value levels. When foreclosure is probable, the impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the collateral is generally obtained from appraisals. Updated appraisals are obtained when the Corporation determines that loans are impaired and are updated annually thereafter. In addition, appraisals are also obtained for certain residential mortgage loans on a spot basis based on specific


55


Table of Contents

characteristics such as delinquency levels, age of the appraisal, and loan-to-value ratios. Deficiencies from the excess of the recorded investment in collateral dependent loans over the resulting fair value of the collateral are charged-off when deemed uncollectible.
 
For all other loans, which include, small, homogeneous loans, such as auto loans, consumer loans, finance lease loans, residential mortgages, and commercial and construction loans not considered impaired or in amounts under $1 million, the Corporation maintains a general valuation allowance. The methodology to compute the general valuation allowance has not change in the past 2 years. The Corporation updates the factors used to compute the reserve factors on a quarterly basis. The general reserve is primarily determined by applying loss factors according to the loan type and assigned risk category (pass, special mention and substandard not impaired; all doubtful loans are considered impaired). The general reserve for consumer loans is based on factors such as delinquency trends, credit bureau score bands, portfolio type, geographical location, bankruptcy trends, recent market transactions, and other environmental factors such as economic forecasts. The analysis of the residential mortgage pools are performed at the individual loan level and then aggregated to determine the expected loss ratio. The model applies risk-adjusted prepayment curves, default curves, and severity curves to each loan in the pool. The severity is affected by the expected house price scenario based on recent house price trends. Default curves are used in the model to determine expected delinquency levels. The risk-adjusted timing of liquidation and associated costs are used in the mod