prer14a
SCHEDULE 14A
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 1)
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
þ |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
o |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12 |
FIRST BANCORP.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Not Applicable
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required. |
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the
amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
|
|
4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule, and the date of its filing. |
|
1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
4) |
|
Date Filed: |
1519 PONCE DE LEON AVENUE
SANTURCE, PUERTO RICO 00908
(787) 729-8200
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
To the Stockholders of First BanCorp:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of
Directors and Section 3 of the Corporations By-laws,
that a Special Meeting of Stockholders of First BanCorp will be
held at our principal offices located at 1519 Ponce de Leon
Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico, on August 24, 2010, at
10:00 a.m., for the purpose of considering and taking
action on the following matters, all of which are described in
the accompanying Proxy Statement:
(1) To approve the issuance of up to
256,401,610 shares of the Corporations Common Stock
in exchange (the Exchange Offer) for shares of the
Corporations Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
Preferred Stock, Series A, B, C, D and E (Preferred
Stock), in accordance with applicable New York Stock
Exchange rules;
(2) To approve the issuance of shares of the
Corporations Common Stock in the Exchange Offer to
Héctor M. Nevares-LaCosta, a member of the Board of
Directors, in exchange for his shares of Preferred Stock in
accordance with applicable New York Stock Exchange rules;
(3) To approve an amendment to Article Sixth of the
Corporations Restated Articles of Incorporation to
decrease the par value of the Corporations Common Stock
from $1.00 to $0.10;
(4) To approve the issuance of up to 28,476,121 shares
of the Corporations Common Stock to The Bank of Nova
Scotia (BNS), in accordance with applicable New York
Stock Exchange rules, if it exercises its anti-dilution right
under the Stockholder Agreement, dated August 24, 2007 (the
Stockholder Agreement), by and between us and BNS,
in connection with the Exchange Offer;
(5) To approve the issuance of shares of the
Corporations Common Stock to BNS, in accordance with
applicable New York Stock Exchange rules, if it exercises its
anti-dilution right under the Stockholder Agreement, in
connection with the conversion into Common Stock of the Fixed
Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock,
Series G;
(6) To approve an amendment to Article Sixth of the
Corporations Restated Articles of Incorporation to
increase the number of authorized shares of the
Corporations Common Stock from 750,000,000 to
2,000,000,000; and
(7) To approve an amendment to Article Sixth of the
Corporations Restated Articles of Incorporation to
implement a reverse stock split.
Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on
August 2, 2010 are entitled to receive notice of and to
vote at the Special Meeting or any adjournment or adjournments
thereof. A list of stockholders as of the Record Date will be
open to the examination of any stockholder, for any purpose
germane to the Special Meeting, during ordinary business hours,
for a period of ten days prior to the Special Meeting, at our
principal offices.
You are cordially invited to attend the Special Meeting. It is
important that your shares be represented regardless of the
number you own. Even if you plan to be present at the Special
Meeting, you are urged to complete, sign, date and promptly
return the enclosed proxy in the envelope provided. If you
attend the Special Meeting, you may vote either in person or by
proxy. You may revoke any proxy that you give at any time prior
to its exercise.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Lawrence Odell
Secretary
Santurce, Puerto Rico
August 2, 2010
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
1519 Ponce De Leon Avenue
Santurce, Puerto Rico 00908
TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 24,
2010
This proxy statement (the Proxy Statement) is
furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on
behalf of the Board of Directors of First BanCorp (the
Corporation) for use at the Special Meeting of
Stockholders to be held at our offices located at 1519 Ponce de
Leon Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico, on August 24, 2010 at
10:00 a.m., and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof
(the Special Meeting). This Proxy Statement is first
being sent or given to holders of record of our common stock,
par value $1.00 per share (the Common Stock), on or
about August 2, 2010. The Board of Directors has designated
two individuals to serve as proxies to vote the shares
represented at the Special Meeting. Shares represented by
properly executed proxies that are received will be voted at the
Special Meeting in accordance with the instructions specified in
the proxy. If you properly submit a proxy but do not give
instructions on how you want your shares to be voted, your
shares will be voted FOR each proposal by the designated proxies
in accordance with the Board of Directors recommendations,
which are described below.
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING
What
information is contained in this Proxy Statement?
The information in this Proxy Statement relates to the proposals
to be voted on at the Special Meeting, the voting process, and
other required information.
What is
the purpose of the Special Meeting?
At the Special Meeting, stockholders will act upon the following
matters:
(i) the issuance of up to 256,401,610 shares of Common
Stock in exchange (the Exchange Offer) for shares of
our Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series A, B, C, D, and E (Preferred Stock);
(ii) the issuance of shares of Common Stock in the Exchange
Offer to Director Héctor
M. Nevares-LaCosta,
a member of our Board of Directors, upon his exchange of his
shares of Preferred Stock for shares of Common Stock;
(iii) an amendment to Article Sixth of our Restated
Articles of Incorporation (Articles of
Incorporation) to decrease the par value of the Common
Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 per share;
(iv) the issuance of up to 28,476,121 shares of Common
Stock to The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) if it
exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder
Agreement dated August 24, 2007 (the Stockholder
Agreement) in connection with the Exchange Offer;
(v) the issuance of shares of Common Stock to BNS if it
exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder
Agreement in connection with the conversion into Common Stock of
the Fixed Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred
Stock, Series G (Series G Preferred
Stock), owned by the United States Department of the
Treasury (the U.S. Treasury);
(vi) an amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000; and
(vii) an amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles of
Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split.
What
should I receive?
You should receive this Proxy Statement, including exhibits, the
Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders and the proxy card.
How many
votes do I have?
You will have one vote for every share of Common Stock you owned
as of the close of business on August 2, 2010, the Record
Date for the Special Meeting.
If I am a
holder of shares of Common Stock, but I did not hold my shares
of Common Stock as of the Record Date, am I entitled to
vote?
If you were not a record or beneficial holder of shares of
Common Stock as of the Record Date, you will not be entitled to
vote with respect to such shares.
How many
votes can all stockholders cast?
Stockholders may cast one vote for each of the
Corporations 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock that
were outstanding on the Record Date.
How many
votes must be present to hold the Special Meeting?
A majority of the votes that can be cast must be present either
in person or by proxy to hold the Special Meeting. Proxies
received but marked as abstentions or broker non-votes will be
included in the calculation of the number of shares considered
to be present at the Special Meeting for purposes of determining
whether the majority of the votes that can be cast are present.
A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or other nominee
indicates on the proxy card that it does not have discretionary
authority to vote on a particular matter. Votes cast by proxy or
in person at the Special Meeting will be counted by The Bank of
New York Mellon, an independent third party. We urge you to
vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the Special Meeting so
that we will know as soon as possible that enough votes will be
present for us to hold the Special Meeting.
Why is my
approval necessary for the issuances of shares of Common
Stock?
Our Common Stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol
FBP. As further discussed below, NYSE Listed Company
Manual Section 312.03 requires that we seek stockholder
approval prior to the issuances of Common Stock contemplated by
Proposal Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5.
What vote
is required and how are abstentions and broker non-votes
treated?
Approval of each of Proposal Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, relating
to the issuance of shares of Common Stock in accordance with
applicable New York Stock Exchange rules, requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast
on each such proposal, provided that the total votes cast on
such proposal, whether for or against, represent over 50% of all
of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and
broker non-votes will not be counted in determining the number
of votes cast.
Approval of Proposal Nos. 3, 6, and 7, relating to
amendments to Article Sixth of the Articles of
Incorporation, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of
the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Broker non-votes and
abstentions will have the same effect as votes cast against the
proposed amendments.
How does
the Board recommend that I vote?
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the issuance of up to 256,401,610 shares of
Common Stock in the Exchange Offer;
|
|
|
|
FOR the issuance of shares of Common Stock in the
Exchange Offer to Director Nevares-LaCosta upon his exchange of
his shares of Preferred Stock for shares of Common Stock;
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles
of Incorporation to decrease the par value of our Common Stock
from $1.00 to $0.10 per share;
|
|
|
|
FOR the issuance of up to 28,476,121 shares of
Common Stock to BNS if it chooses to exercise its anti-dilution
right under the Stockholder Agreement in connection with the
Exchange Offer;
|
|
|
|
FOR the issuance of shares of Common Stock to BNS if it
chooses to exercise its anti-dilution right under the
Stockholder Agreement in connection with the conversion of
Series G Preferred Stock;
|
|
|
|
FOR the amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles
of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000; and
|
|
|
|
FOR the amendment to Article Sixth of our Articles
of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split.
|
How do I
vote?
You can vote either in person at the Special Meeting or by proxy
without attending the Special Meeting.
To vote by proxy, you must:
|
|
|
|
|
fill out the enclosed proxy card, date, sign, and return it in
the enclosed postage-paid envelope;
|
|
|
|
vote by telephone (instructions are on the proxy card); or
|
|
|
|
vote over the Internet (instructions are on the proxy card).
|
Please refer to the specific instructions set forth on the
enclosed proxy card. For security reasons, our electronic voting
system has been designed to authenticate your identity as a
stockholder.
If you hold your shares in street name, your
broker, bank, trustee or other nominee will provide you with
materials and instructions for voting your shares.
Can I
vote my shares in person at the Special Meeting?
If you are a stockholder of record, you may
vote your shares in person at the Special Meeting. If you hold
your shares in street name, you must obtain a
valid, legal proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or other
nominee, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Special
Meeting.
What is
the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record
and as a beneficial owner?
Most of our stockholders hold their shares through a broker,
bank, trustee or other nominee rather than directly in their own
name. As summarized below, there are some differences between
shares held of record and those owned beneficially.
Stockholder of Record. If your shares are
registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, The
Bank of New York Mellon Shareowner Services, LLC, you are
considered the stockholder of record with respect to those
shares, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to
you. As a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the
Special Meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to
attend the Special Meeting, we urge you to vote via the
Internet, by telephone, or by completing, signing, dating and
returning the proxy card.
Beneficial Owner. If your shares are held by a
broker, bank, trustee or other nominee, you are considered the
beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and
these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker,
bank, trustee or other nominee who is considered the stockholder
of record with respect to those shares. As a beneficial owner,
you have the right to direct your broker, bank, trustee or other
nominee on how to vote the shares held in your account, and it
will enclose or provide voting instructions for you to use in
directing it on how to vote your shares. The organization that
holds your shares, however, is considered the stockholder of
record for purposes of voting at the Special Meeting.
Accordingly, because you are not the stockholder of record, you
may not vote your shares in person at the Special Meeting unless
you request and
3
obtain a valid, legal proxy from your broker, bank, trustee or
other nominee giving you the right to vote the shares at the
Special Meeting. The organization that holds your shares
cannot vote your shares without your instructions, so it is
important that you exercise your right to vote.
Who will
bear the costs of soliciting proxies for the Special
Meeting?
We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies for the Special
Meeting. In addition to solicitation by mail, proxies may be
solicited personally, by telephone or otherwise. The Board of
Directors has engaged the firm of Morrow & Co., LLC to
aid in the solicitation of proxies. The cost is estimated at
$10,000, plus reimbursement of reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses. Our directors, officers and employees may also solicit
proxies but will not receive any additional compensation for
their services. Proxies and proxy materials will also be
distributed at our expense by brokers, nominees, custodians and
other similar parties.
Can I
change my vote?
Yes, you may change your vote. If you are a stockholder of
record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is
exercised by sending in a new proxy card with a later date, or
casting a new vote by telephone or over the Internet, or sending
a written notice of revocation to the President or Secretary of
First BanCorp, at P.O. Box 9146, San Juan, Puerto
Rico
00908-0146,
delivered before the proxy is exercised. If you attend the
Special Meeting and want to vote in person, you may request that
your previously submitted proxy not be used. If your shares are
held in the name of a broker, bank, trustee or other nominee,
that institution will instruct you as to how your vote may be
changed.
What
should I do if I receive more than one set of proxy
materials?
You may receive more than one set of voting materials, including
multiple copies of this Proxy Statement and multiple proxy
cards. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one
brokerage account, you may receive a separate proxy card for
each brokerage account in which you hold shares. Please
complete, sign, date and return each proxy card that you receive.
Could
other matters be presented at the Special Meeting?
The Board of Directors does not intend to present any business
at the Special Meeting other than that described in the Notice
of Special Meeting of Stockholders.
What
happens if the Special Meeting is postponed or
adjourned?
Your proxy will still be valid and may be voted at the postponed
or adjourned Special Meeting. You will still be able to change
or revoke your proxy until it is voted.
Who can
help answer my questions?
If you have any questions about how to grant or revoke your vote
or need copies of our filings, you should contact Lawrence
Odell, Secretary of the Board of Directors, by
e-mail at
lawrence.odell@firstbankpr.com or by telephone at
787-729-8109.
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 24,
2010
This Proxy Statement, including exhibits, and the 2009 annual
report to security holders are available at
http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/fbp.
You may obtain directions to be able to attend the Special
Meeting and vote in person by contacting Lawrence Odell,
Secretary of the Board of Directors, by
e-mail at
lawrence.odell@firstbankpr.com or by telephone at
787-729-8109.
4
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following tables sets forth certain information as of
June 30, 2010, unless otherwise described, with respect to
shares of our Common Stock and Preferred Stock beneficially
owned (unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes) by:
(1) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of
more than 5% of our Common Stock; (2) each director;
(3) each named executive officer (as defined in
Item 402(a)(2) of
Regulation S-K);
and (4) all current directors and executive officers as a
group. Any ownership of Preferred Stock by executives who are
not named executive officers is also shown. This information has
been provided by each of the directors and executive officers at
our request or derived from statements filed with the SEC
pursuant to Section 13(d) or 13(g) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
Beneficial ownership of securities, as shown below, has been
determined in accordance with applicable guidelines issued by
the SEC. Beneficial ownership includes the possession, directly
or indirectly, through any formal or informal arrangement,
either individually or in a group, of voting power (which
includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting of, such
security)
and/or
investment power (which includes the power to dispose of, or to
direct the disposition of, such security).
|
|
(1)
|
Beneficial
Owners of More Than 5% of our Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Percent of
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(a)
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Class(b)
|
|
The Bank of Nova Scotia
|
|
|
9,250,450
|
(c)
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
44 King Street West 6th Fl.
Toronto, Canada M5H 1H1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMR LLC
|
|
|
7,300,000
|
(d)
|
|
|
7.89
|
%
|
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Angel Alvarez-Pérez
|
|
|
6,360,518
|
(e)
|
|
|
6.87
|
%
|
Condominio Plaza Stella Apt.1504
Avenida Magdalena 1362
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock, Inc.
|
|
|
6,220,207
|
(f)
|
|
|
6.72
|
%
|
40 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Trust Portfolio L.P.
|
|
|
4,676,229
|
(g)
|
|
|
5.05
|
%
|
120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400
Wheaton, Illinois 60187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
This table does not include the shares of Common Stock that the
U.S. Treasury may acquire pursuant to the warrant to purchase
5,842,259 shares of Common Stock, or 6.31% of the currently
outstanding shares of Common Stock, at an initial exercise price
of $0.7252 per share, or upon conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock that it recently acquired from us.
The warrant was originally issued to the U.S. Treasury at the
time it acquired our Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred
Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference per share
(the Series F Preferred Stock), in January 2009
and was amended and restated at the time that we exchanged the
Series F Preferred Stock and accrued and unpaid dividends
on the Series F Preferred Stock for shares of a new series
of Series G Preferred Stock, that is convertible into
approximately 380.2 million shares of Common Stock based on
the initial conversion price at any time by the U.S. Treasury or
a successor holder and by us under certain conditions, as
described below under Overview of Proposals
Agreement with the U.S. Treasury. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Based on 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock outstanding as
of June 30, 2010. |
|
(c) |
|
On August 24, 2007, we entered into a Stockholder Agreement
with BNS, which acquired 9,250,450 shares of Common Stock
in a private placement at a price of $10.25 per share pursuant
to the terms of an investment agreement dated February 15,
2007. BNS filed a Schedule 13D on September 4, 2007
reporting the beneficial ownership of 10% or
9,250,450 shares of Common Stock as of August 24, 2007
and reported that it possessed sole voting power and sole
dispositive power over 9,250,450 shares. |
5
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on
February 16, 2010 in which FMR LLC reported aggregate
beneficial ownership of 7,300,000 shares of the Corporation
as of December 31, 2009. FMR LLC reported that it possessed
sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of
7,300,000 shares. FMR LLC reported that it did not possess
sole power to vote or direct the vote of any shares beneficially
owned. |
|
(e) |
|
Based solely on a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on
May 13, 2009 by Mr. Angel Àlvarez-Pérez in
which Mr. Àlvarez-Pérez reported aggregate beneficial
ownership of 6,360,518 shares of the Corporation. Mr.
Àlvarez-Pérez reported that he possessed sole voting
power and sole dispositive power over 6,339,218 shares and
shared voting power and shared dispositive power over
20,300 shares. |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
January 29, 2010 in which BlackRock, Inc. reported
aggregate beneficial ownership of 6,220,207 shares of the
Corporation as of December 31, 2009. BlackRock, Inc.
reported that it possessed sole voting power and sole
dispositive power over 6,220,227 shares. |
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on
February 10, 2010 in which First Trust Portfolios L.P.
and certain of its affiliates reported aggregate beneficial
ownership of 4,676,229 shares of the Corporation as of
December 31, 2009. First Trust Portfolios L.P. and certain
of its affiliates reported that they possessed shared power to
vote or to direct the vote of and shared power to dispose or to
direct the disposition of 4,676,229 shares beneficially
owned. |
|
|
(2)
|
Beneficial
Ownership of Common Stock of Directors, Named Executive Officers
and Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Percent of
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Ownership(1)
|
|
Class*
|
|
Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez, President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
872,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
José Menéndez-Cortada, Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
45,896
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jorge L. Díaz-Irizarry
|
|
|
62,737
|
(2)
|
|
|
*
|
|
José Ferrer-Canals
|
|
|
5,527
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi
|
|
|
81,677
|
(3)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Fernando Rodríguez-Amaro
|
|
|
32,207
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Héctor M. Nevares-La Costa
|
|
|
4,543,396
|
(4)
|
|
|
4.91
|
%
|
Frank Kolodziej-Castro
|
|
|
2,762,483
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
%
|
José F. Rodríguez-Perelló
|
|
|
324,077
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luis Beauchamp-Rodríguez, former President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board(5)
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Orlando Berges-González, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Lawrence Odell, Executive Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Randolfo Rivera-Sanfeliz, former Executive Vice President(6)
|
|
|
24,340
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Calixto García-Vélez, Executive Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Fernando Scherrer, former Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer(7)
|
|
|
47,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Current Directors and Executive Officers as a group
(17 persons)
|
|
|
9,394,078
|
|
|
|
10.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 1% of our outstanding Common Stock. |
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of this table, beneficial ownership is
determined in accordance with
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act, pursuant to which a person or group of
persons is deemed to have beneficial ownership of a
security if that person has the right to acquire beneficial
ownership of such security within 60 days. Therefore, it
includes the number of shares of Common Stock that could be
purchased by exercising stock |
6
|
|
|
|
|
options that were exercisable as of June 30, 2010 or within
60 days after that date, as follows:
Mr. Alemán-Bermúdez, 672,000; Mr. Odell,
175,000; and 1,221,000 shares for all current directors and
executive officers as a group. Also, it includes shares granted
under the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, subject to
transferability restrictions and/or forfeiture upon failure to
meet vesting conditions, as follows:
Mr. Menéndez-Cortada, 2,685;
Mr. Díaz-Irizarry, 2,685; Mr. Ferrer-Canals,
2,685; Ms. Umpierre-Catinchi, 2,685;
Mr. Rodríguez-Amaro, 2,685; Mr. Nevares-LaCosta,
2,685;
Mr. Kolodziej-Castro,
2,685; and Mr. Rodríguez-Perelló, 2,685;
21,480 shares for all current directors and executive
officers as a group. The amount does not include shares of
Common Stock acquired through the Corporations Defined
Contribution Plan pursuant to which participants may acquire
units equivalent to shares of Common Stock through a unitized
stock fund. |
|
(2) |
|
This amount includes 22,460 shares owned separately by his
spouse. |
|
(3) |
|
This amount includes 9,000 shares owned jointly with her
spouse. |
|
(4) |
|
This amount includes 3,941,459 shares owned by
Mr. Nevares-LaCostas father over which he has voting
and investment power as attorney-in-fact. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Beauchamp-Rodríguez resigned as Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation on September 28, 2009. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Rivera-Sanfeliz is no longer an employee of the
Corporation effective as of June 28, 2010. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Scherrer resigned as Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation on July 31, 2009. |
|
|
(3)
|
Beneficial
Ownership of Preferred Stock by Directors and Executive
Officers:
|
The following table sets forth information as of June 30,
2010 with respect to shares of our Preferred Stock beneficially
owned by our directors and executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Percent of
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Title of Securities
|
|
Owned
|
|
Class
|
|
José Menéndez- Cortada
|
|
|
Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Series C Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jorge L. Díaz-Irizarry
|
|
|
Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi
|
|
|
Series E Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Héctor M. Nevares-La Costa
|
|
|
Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Series B Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
73,300
|
(2)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Series C Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
82,800
|
(3)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dacio Pasarell
|
|
|
Series D Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
Series E Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 1% of applicable class of Preferred Stock. |
|
(1) |
|
This amount includes 8,000 shares held in a trust for the
benefit of Mr. Nevares-LaCostas parents over which
Mr. Nevares-LaCosta has voting and investment power as
trustee. |
|
(2) |
|
This amount includes 20,000 shares owned by
Mr. Nevares-LaCostas parents over which he has voting
and investment power as attorney-in-fact. |
|
(3) |
|
This amount includes 6,400 shares owned by
Mr. Nevares-LaCostas parents over which he has voting
and investment power as attorney-in-fact. |
José Menéndez-Cortada, Jorge L. Díaz-Irizarry,
Sharee Ann Umpierre-Catinchi, Héctor M. Nevares-LaCosta and
Dacio Pasarell have advised us that they will tender all of
their shares of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer.
7
OVERVIEW
OF PROPOSALS
Background
For the fiscal year ended 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, we
reported losses of approximately $275 million and
$107 million, respectively. These losses were primarily
caused by specific reserves and provisions against our loan
portfolios in Florida and Puerto Rico. The deterioration in the
quality of these assets resulted from the economic recession
being experienced in the United States and in Puerto Rico.
Particularly hard hit by the recession were real estate values
in the two principal markets in which we operate. This adverse
financial downturn diminished the collateral values supporting
many of the loans extended by us in those markets. In turn, this
caused us to increase reserves and, in many cases, charge off
substantial amounts. The downturn in the economy and the
resulting deterioration of our credits increased our
non-performing assets as of March 31, 2010 to approximately
$1.8 billion. We announced in our earnings release issued
on July 27, 2010 that our loss for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010 was $90.6 million and our non-performing
assets were $1.7 billion as of June 30, 2010.
As a result of the continuing difficult economic conditions, we
are seeking to improve our capital structure. We have assured
our regulators that we are committed to raising capital and we
have submitted capital plans to our regulators regarding how we
plan to raise capital. The capital plans were submitted in
accordance with a Written Agreement dated June 3, 2010 (the
Agreement) that we entered into with the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York (the Fed) and a Consent
Order dated June 2, 2010 (the Order and
collectively with the Agreement, the Agreements)
that our subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico (FirstBank),
entered into with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the
FDIC) and the Commissioner of Financial Institutions
of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Pursuant to these
Agreements, the Corporation and FirstBank agreed to take certain
actions designed to improve our financial condition. These
actions include the adoption and implementation of various
plans, procedures and policies related to our capital, lending
activities, liquidity and funds management and strategy. The
Order requires FirstBank to develop and adopt a plan to attain a
leverage ratio of at least 8%, a Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 10% and a Total capital
to risk-weighted assets ratio of at least 12%, and obtain
approval prior to issuing, increasing, renewing or rolling over
brokered deposits. The Agreement also requires the Corporation
to obtain the approval of the Fed prior to paying dividends,
receiving dividends from FirstBank, incurring, increasing or
guaranteeing any debt, or purchasing or redeeming any stock, to
comply with certain notice provisions prior to appointing any
new directors or senior executive officers and to comply with
certain restrictions on severance payments and indemnification.
Concurrent with the issuance by the FDIC of its Order, the FDIC
granted FirstBank a temporary waiver through June 30, 2010
to enable it to continue accessing the brokered deposit market.
The FDIC has granted an additional waiver through
September 30, 2010. FirstBank will request waivers for
future periods. No assurance can be given that the FDIC will
continue to issue waivers for amounts that will enable FirstBank
to meet its funding needs. Any failure to obtain a waiver would
have a significantly adverse effect on FirstBank, which has
relied on brokered deposits to fund a major part of its
operations and had, as of March 31, 2010, $7.4 billion
in brokered deposits outstanding, representing approximately 57%
of our total deposits. We announced in our earnings release
issued on July 27, 2010 that our average balance of
brokered CDs decreased to $7.21 billion for the second
quarter of 2010.
We have been taking steps to implement strategies to increase
tangible common equity and regulatory capital through
(1) the Exchange Offer, which is being submitted for
stockholder approval at the Special Meeting, (2) the
issuance of approximately $500 million of equity in one or
more public or private offerings (a Capital Raise),
(3) the conversion into Common Stock of the shares of
Series G Preferred Stock that we issued to the
U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F Preferred
Stock that we sold to the U.S. Treasury on January 16,
2009, and (4) a rights offering to common stockholders.
With respect to a Capital Raise, we plan to seek to raise at
least $500 million of equity because we believe that amount
would enable us to absorb possible additional losses based on a
worst case evaluation of possible losses over the next five
years while
8
maintaining the capital ratios required for a well-capitalized
financial institution as well as those required by the
FDICs Order. With respect to the conversion, under the
conditions described below, we can compel the conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock into shares of Common Stock. See
Agreement with the U.S. Treasury. If we
complete a Capital Raise, we expect to issue rights to the
holders of our currently outstanding 92,542,722 shares of
Common Stock that entitle them to acquire one share of Common
Stock for each share of Common Stock they own at a price equal
to the purchase price in a Capital Raise. No assurance can be
given that we will complete the Exchange Offer, a Capital Raise,
the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common
Stock or a rights offering.
We believe that the Exchange Offer and, to the extent completed,
the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common
Stock and a Capital Raise would enhance our long-term financial
stability, improve our ability to operate in the current
economic environment, and improve our ability to access the
capital markets in order to fund strategic initiatives or other
business needs and to absorb any future credit losses.
Our inability to complete the Exchange would hinder our efforts
to sell Common Stock in a Capital Raise. If we need to continue
to recognize significant reserves and we cannot complete a
Capital Raise, the Corporation and FirstBank may not be able to
comply with the minimum capital requirements included in the
capital plans required by the Agreements. These capital plans,
which are subject to the approval of our regulators, set forth
our plan to attain the capital ratio requirements set forth in
the Order over time. If, at the end of any quarter, we do not
comply with any specified minimum capital ratios, we must notify
our regulators. The Corporation must notify the Fed within
30 days of the end of any quarter of its inability to
comply with a capital ratio requirement and submit an acceptable
written plan that details the steps it will take to comply with
the requirement. FirstBank must immediately notify the FDIC of
its inability to comply with a capital ratio requirement and,
within 45 days, it must either increase its capital to
comply with the ratio requirements or submit a contingency plan
to the FDIC for its sale, merger, or liquidation. In the event
of a liquidation of FirstBank, the holders of any outstanding
preferred stock would rank senior to the holders of our Common
Stock with respect to rights upon any liquidation of the
Corporation.
The
Exchange Offer for Preferred Stock
On July 16, 2010, we commenced the Exchange Offer. For each
share of Preferred Stock that we accept for exchange in
accordance with the terms of the Exchange Offer, we will issue a
number of shares of our Common Stock having the aggregate dollar
value (based on a price per share determined as described below)
equal to $13.75, which is equal to 55% of the $25 liquidation
preference of a share of Preferred Stock. The price per share
will be based on the greater of the average Volume Weighted
Average Price (or VWAP) during the five
trading-day
period ending on the second business day immediately preceding
the expiration date of the Exchange Offer and the minimum share
price of $1.18. As of July 21, 2010, the market value of a
share of Common Stock was $0.51 and the market prices of a share
of each series of Preferred Stock were as follows: Series A
Preferred Stock - $4.77; Series B Preferred
Stock $4.70; Series C Preferred
Stock $4.77; Series D Preferred Stock - $4.89;
and Series E Preferred Stock $4.65. If the
minimum share price is used to determine the number of shares to
be issued in the Exchange Offer, we will issue
11.6525 shares of Common Stock in exchange for each share
of Preferred Stock. As discussed below under
Required Stockholder Action, completion
of the Exchange Offer is subject to stockholder approval.
Agreement
with the U.S. Treasury
On July 7, 2010, we entered into an agreement with the
U.S. Treasury regarding the exchange of our shares of
Series F Preferred Stock, which has a liquidation
preference of $400 million, and accrued and unpaid
dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock, for shares of a
new series of Fixed Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible
Preferred Stock, Series G. Based on accrued and unpaid
dividends of $24.2 million as of July 20, 2010, we
issued 424,174 shares of Series G Preferred Stock to
the U.S. Treasury on July 20, 2010. Notice was mailed
to our stockholders of record on July 9, 2010 that we
obtained an exception from the shareholder approval policy set
forth in Section 312.03 of the New York Stock Exchange
Listed Company Manual to issue the securities to the
U.S. Treasury.
9
The Series G Preferred Stock has terms similar to the
Series F Preferred Stock (including the same $1,000
liquidation preference per share), but is convertible, under the
conditions discussed below, into shares of Common Stock based on
an initial conversion rate of 896.3045 shares of Common
Stock for each share of Series G Preferred Stock,
calculated by dividing $650, or a discount of 35% from the
$1,000 liquidation preference per share of Series G
Preferred Stock, by the initial conversion price of $0.7252 per
share, which is subject to adjustment. Based on the initial
conversion rate, the 424,174 shares of Series G
Preferred Stock will be convertible into approximately
380.2 million shares of Common Stock. The conversion price
of the Series G Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment,
including if the shares of Common Stock issued in a Capital
Raise are priced below 90% of the market price per share of
Common Stock on the trading day immediately preceding the
pricing date of such Capital Raise, or if shares of Common Stock
are otherwise issued, except in certain circumstances, including
the Exchange Offer, at a price below the then conversion price
of the Series G Preferred Stock. We can compel conversion
of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock if,
within nine months from the date of the agreement, (a) at
least $385 million of the liquidation preference of our
Series A through E Preferred Stock is tendered in the
Exchange Offer, (b) we raise $500 million of
additional capital, subject to terms, other than the price per
share, reasonably acceptable to the U.S. Treasury in its
sole discretion, (c) we obtain the approval of the holders
of our Common Stock of an amendment to our Articles of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock from 750,000,000 to at least 1,200,000,000 and to
reduce the par value of a share of Common Stock from $1.00 to
$0.10, (d) we have received from the appropriate banking
regulators all requisite approvals (which we expect to receive),
(e) we have made any applicable anti-dilution adjustments
and (f) none of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries
has dissolved or became subject to insolvency or similar
proceedings, or has become subject to other materially adverse
regulatory or other actions. The U.S. Treasury, and any
subsequent holder of the Series G Preferred Stock, has the
right to convert the Series G Preferred Stock at any time.
Unless earlier converted by the holder or the Corporation, the
Series G Preferred Stock will automatically convert into
shares of Common Stock on the seventh anniversary of the
issuance of the Series G Preferred Stock at the then
current market price of our Common Stock.
At the time we exchanged the Series F Preferred Stock for
Series G Preferred Stock, we issued to the
U.S. Treasury an amended and restated warrant having a
10-year term
and exercisable at an initial exercise price of $0.7252 per
share to replace the original warrant we issued to the
U.S. Treasury when it acquired the Series F Preferred
Stock. Like the original warrant, the amended and restated
warrant has an anti-dilution right that will require an
adjustment to the exercise price of, and the number of shares
underlying, the warrant. This adjustment will be necessary under
various circumstances, including if we issue shares of Common
Stock for consideration per share that is lower than the initial
conversion price of the Series G Preferred Stock, or
$0.7252. Depending upon the market price of shares of Preferred
Stock at the time we issue shares of Common Stock in the
Exchange Offer, the amended and restated warrant may require
adjustment to the exercise price of the warrant to equal the
consideration per share received by us in the Exchange Offer and
the number of shares underlying the amended and restated warrant
would be increased by the number obtained by multiplying the
initial number by a fraction equal to the exercise price prior
to the Exchange Offer over the consideration per share we
receive in the Exchange Offer.
The agreement with the U.S. Treasury includes various other
provisions. Included among these provisions are the
U.S. Treasurys agreement to vote, or cause to be
voted, any shares of Common Stock that it acquires pursuant to
the terms of the Series G Preferred Stock or the amended
and restated warrant, except with respect to certain matters, in
the same proportion as the votes of all other outstanding shares
of Common Stock. The U.S. Treasury will retain
discretionary authority to vote on the election and removal of
directors, the approval of any business combination or sale of
substantially all of the assets or property of the Corporation,
the approval of any dissolution of the Corporation, the approval
of any issuance of any securities of the Corporation on which
holders of Common Stock are entitled to vote and on any other
matters reasonably incidental to those matters, as determined by
the U.S. Treasury.
10
Required
Stockholder Action
We cannot complete the Exchange Offer unless our stockholders
approve Proposal No. 1, which seeks approval of the
issuance of up to 256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in the
Exchange Offer. In addition, we may not be able to complete the
Exchange Offer if our stockholders do not approve
Proposal No. 3, which seeks stockholder approval of an
amendment to Article Sixth of the Articles of Incorporation
to decrease the par value of the Corporations Common Stock
from $1.00 to $0.10 per share. The reduction in the par value of
our Common Stock will be necessary to complete the Exchange
Offer if, for example, the market value of a share of Preferred
Stock tendered in the exchange is less than $10 at a time when
the market value of the Common Stock would result in the
issuance of more than 10 shares per tendered share of
Preferred Stock.
We are also requesting stockholder approval of
Proposal Nos. 2 and 4, which relate to the Exchange Offer.
Adoption of these proposals is not a condition to the completion
of the Exchange Offer. If stockholders do not approve
Proposal No. 2, which seeks approval of the issuance
of shares of Common Stock to Mr. Nevares-LaCosta upon his
tender of shares of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer, or
Proposal No. 4, which seeks stockholder approval of
the issuance of shares of Common Stock to BNS upon its exercise
of the anti-dilution right that it has under the Stockholder
Agreement, we will be unable to issue shares to
Mr. Nevares-LaCosta or BNS in an amount that exceeds 1% of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock prior to such issuances.
We are also requesting stockholder approval of
Proposal No. 5, which relates to the issuance of
shares of Common Stock to BNS upon its exercise of the
anti-dilution right that it has under the Stockholder Agreement
in connection with the conversion into Common Stock of the
Series G Preferred Stock that we issued to the
U.S. Treasury. If stockholders do not approve
Proposal No. 5, we will be unable to issue shares to
BNS as a result of the conversion into Common Stock of the
Series G Preferred Stock in an amount that exceeds 1% of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock prior to such issuance.
Finally, we are requesting stockholder approval of
Proposal Nos. 6 and 7, which seek stockholder approval of
amendments to Article Sixth of the Articles of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock and to implement a reverse stock split. If
stockholders do not approve Proposal No. 6, we will
not have enough authorized shares of Common Stock to issue
shares of Common Stock to investors in a Capital Raise for
$500 million and to current stockholders in a rights
offering. If stockholders do not approve
Proposal No. 7, we may not be able to bring our Common
Stock share price and average share price for 30 consecutive
trading days above $1.00, which is a continued listing
requirement of the NYSE. The NYSE will commence suspension and
delisting procedures if we cannot regain compliance with this
requirement by January 9, 2011.
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER
Overview
and Reason for the Proposal
The Board of Directors is seeking stockholder approval of the
issuance of shares of Common Stock in exchange for shares of
Preferred Stock. On July 16, 2010, we commenced an offer to
issue 256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in the Exchange
Offer. A special committee of the Board of Directors, comprised
of Fernando
Rodriguez-Amaro
(Chairman), Aurelio Alemán-Bermúdez, José
Rodriguez-Perello, Frank
Kolodziej-Castro
and José Ferrer-Canals recommended to the full Board the
terms of the Exchange Offer and the Board determined to conduct
the Exchange Offer. None of the members of the special committee
own shares of Preferred Stock.
Our Common Stock is listed on the NYSE and, thus, we are subject
to NYSE listing requirements. Under NYSE Listed Company Manual
Section 312.03(c), stockholder approval is required prior
to the issuance of Common Stock, or of securities convertible
into or exercisable for Common Stock, in any transaction or
series of related transactions, other than in certain
circumstances that are inapplicable in this case, if
(1) the Common Stock has, or will have upon issuance,
voting power equal to or in excess of 20% of the voting power
outstanding before the issuance of such stock or of securities
convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock or (2) the
number of shares of Common Stock to be issued is, or will be
upon issuance, equal to or in
11
excess of 20% of the number of shares of Common Stock
outstanding before the issuance of the Common Stock or of
securities convertible into or exercisable for Common Stock.
Because 256,401,610 shares are being offered for issuance
in the exchange, and that issuance would constitute over 20% of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock prior to the completion
of the Exchange Offer, we are required to seek stockholder
approval prior to such issuance.
Purpose
of the Exchange Offer
We decided to conduct the Exchange Offer to improve our capital
structure given the continuing difficult economic conditions in
the markets in which we operate and the evolving regulatory
environment. We must increase our common equity to provide
additional protection against future recognition of additional
loan loss reserves against our loan portfolio and credit losses
associated with the disposition of nonperforming assets due to
the current economic situation in Puerto Rico and the United
States that has impacted the Corporations asset quality
and earnings performance. Total non-performing loans to total
loans increased to 12.35% as of March 31, 2010 from 11.23%
as of December 31, 2009 and from 5.27% as of March 31,
2009.
The restructuring of our equity components through the Exchange
Offer will strengthen the quality of our regulatory capital
position and enhance our ability to meet any new capital
requirements. Furthermore, through the Exchange Offer, we are
seeking to improve our common equity to risk weighted assets
ratio. In the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program, the SCAP,
applied to large money-center banks in the U.S., federal
regulators established a 4% Tier 1 common equity to risk
weighted assets ratio as the minimum threshold to determine the
potential capital needs of such banks. While the SCAP is not
applicable to us, we believe that the Tier 1 common equity
ratio is being viewed by financial analysts and rating agencies
as a guide for measuring the capital adequacy of banking
institutions. The Exchange Offer will also improve our tangible
common equity to tangible assets ratio, which is another metric
used by financial analysts to determine a banks capital
requirements. As of March 31, 2010, our Tier 1 common
equity ratio was 3.36% and our tangible common equity ratio was
2.74%. If $385 million of the liquidation preference or
approximately 70% of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock
are exchanged in the Exchange Offer, our Tier 1 common
equity ratio and tangible common equity ratio as of
March 31, 2010 on a pro forma basis after giving effect to
the Exchange Offer would have been 6.23% and 4.79%,
respectively. This success rate would meet one of the conditions
necessary for us to compel the U.S. Treasury to convert
into Common Stock the Series G Preferred Stock that we
issued to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the
Series F Preferred Stock. The other substantive conditions
necessary for us to compel the conversion are our issuance of
$500 million of additional capital, subject to terms, other
than the price per share, reasonably acceptable to the
U.S. Treasury in its sole discretion, and receipt of the
approval by the holders of our Common Stock of an amendment to
our Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of Common Stock from 750,000,000 to at least
1,200,000,000 and reduce the par value of our Common Stock from
$1.00 to $0.10 per share.
Terms
of the Exchange
We are offering to exchange up to 256,401,610 newly issued
shares of Common Stock for any and all issued and outstanding
shares of Preferred Stock. For each share of Preferred Stock
that we accept for exchange in accordance with the terms of the
exchange offer, we will issue a number of shares of Common Stock
having the Exchange Value set forth in the table below unless
the average VWAP of the Common Stock is $1.18 or less, in which
case we will issue 11.6525 shares of Common Stock for each
share of Preferred Stock.
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preference
|
|
Preference
|
|
Exchange
|
CUS IP
|
|
Title of Securities
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
per Share
|
|
Value
|
|
|
318672201
|
|
|
7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series A
|
|
$
|
90,000,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
|
318672300
|
|
|
8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series B
|
|
$
|
75,000,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
|
318672409
|
|
|
7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series C
|
|
$
|
103,500,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
|
318672508
|
|
|
7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series D
|
|
$
|
92,000,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
|
318672607
|
|
|
7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series E
|
|
$
|
189,600,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.75
|
|
|
Depending on the trading price of our Common Stock, the market
value of the Common Stock we issue on the settlement date in
exchange for each share of Preferred Stock we accept for
exchange may be less than, equal to or greater than the
applicable Exchange Value referred to above. If the trading
price of our Common Stock is below $1.18 per share, the market
value of our Common Stock to be received in the exchange offer
will be less than the applicable Exchange Value.
Consequences
If Stockholders Approve the Proposal
The issuance of our shares of Common Stock in connection with
the Exchange Offer would increase the number of outstanding
shares. As shown in the tables below, the increased number of
shares would reduce the loss per share for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 and book value per share as of
March 31, 2010 on a pro forma basis. In addition, the
issuance of the additional shares would decrease any future
earnings per share and would have a dilutive effect on each
stockholders percentage voting power.
Unaudited
Pro Forma Financial Information
The following selected unaudited pro forma financial information
is presented to give effect to and show the pro forma impact of
the Exchange Offer on First BanCorps balance sheet as of
March 31, 2010 and First BanCorps results of
operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and
the quarter ended March 31, 2010 assuming two different
levels of participation in the Exchange Offer as discussed
below. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not
give effect to our issuance of Series G Preferred Stock to
the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F
Preferred Stock or a Capital Raise.
The unaudited pro forma financial information is presented for
illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily indicate the
financial position or results that would have been realized had
the Exchange Offer been completed as of the dates indicated or
that will be realized in the future when and if the Exchange
Offer is completed. The selected unaudited pro forma financial
information has been derived from, and should be read in
conjunction with First BanCorps historical consolidated
financial statements included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed with the SEC,
which are included as Exhibits C and D, respectively, to
this Proxy Statement.
Unaudited
Pro Forma Balance Sheets
The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet of First
BanCorp as of March 31, 2010 is presented as if the
Exchange Offer had been completed on March 31, 2010. We
have shown the pro forma impact of a High Participation
Scenario and a Low Participation Scenario
prepared using the assumptions set forth below.
13
The High Participation Scenario assumes (i) the
exchange of 90% of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock
($495.09 million aggregate liquidation preference) for
230,761,449 shares of our Common Stock, and (ii) a
Relevant Price of $1.18 per share.
The Low Participation Scenario assumes (i) the
exchange of 50% of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock
($275.05 million aggregate liquidation preference) for
128,200,805 shares of our Common Stock, and (ii) a
Relevant Price of $1.18 per share.
If the Relevant Price is greater than the $1.18 per share amount
assumed in the preceding paragraphs, there will be a decrease in
the number of shares of Common Stock being issued and an
increase in surplus, and increase in earnings per share relative
to the pro forma financial statement information.
There can be no assurance that the foregoing assumptions will be
realized in the future.
14
Unaudited
Pro Forma Financial Information
High
Participation Scenario
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Exchange of
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
675,551
|
|
|
$
|
(6,876
|
)(5)
|
|
$
|
668,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to
resell
|
|
|
331,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,677
|
|
Time deposits with other financial institutions
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
322,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total money market investments
|
|
|
654,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
654,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
3,470,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,470,988
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost
|
|
|
564,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,931
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
|
69,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
4,105,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,105,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
12,698,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,698,264
|
|
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market
|
|
|
19,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
|
12,718,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,718,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
199,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,072
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
73,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,444
|
|
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments
|
|
|
70,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,955
|
|
Due from customers on acceptances
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Accounts receivable from investment sales
|
|
|
62,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,575
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
290,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
18,850,964
|
|
|
$
|
(6,876
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,844,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
703,394
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
703,394
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
12,174,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,174,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
12,878,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,878,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from the Federal Reserve
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
|
|
|
960,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
960,440
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
28,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,313
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
Bank acceptances outstanding
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
162,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
17,362,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,362,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
929,660
|
|
|
|
(495,090
|
)(1)
|
|
|
434,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
102,440
|
|
|
|
230,761
|
(2)
|
|
|
333,201
|
|
Less: Treasury stock (at cost)
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
230,761
|
|
|
|
323,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
134,247
|
|
|
|
46,375
|
(3)
|
|
|
180,622
|
|
Legal surplus
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
10,140
|
|
|
|
211,078
|
(4)
|
|
|
221,218
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,488,543
|
|
|
|
(6,876
|
)
|
|
|
1,481,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
18,850,964
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,844,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book Value per common share(6)
|
|
$
|
6.04
|
|
|
$
|
(2.80
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.24
|
|
Tangible book value per common share(7)
|
|
$
|
5.56
|
|
|
$
|
(2.46
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.10
|
|
15
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes Exchange Offer participation at 90% with a ratio of
Exchange Value to liquidation preference equal to 55%. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the issuance of Common Stock at par value of $1.00. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the additional paid in capital with respect to newly
issued Common Stock, net of exchange costs and adjusted for the
issuance costs of preferred shares exchanged. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents the excess of the Preferred Stock carrying value,
reduced by the issuance costs of preferred shares exchanged,
over the value of the Common Stock to be issued on the Exchange
Offer considering the assumptions described in note 1 above. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the costs associated with this Exchange Offer
calculated on a pro-rata basis according to the number of shares
exchanged. The amount was reduced from additional paid in
capital. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced book value per
common share as of June 30, 2010 of $5.48. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced tangible book
value per common share as of June 30, 2010 of $5.01. |
16
Unaudited
Pro Forma Financial Information
Low
Participation Scenario
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Exchange of
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
675,551
|
|
|
$
|
(4,126
|
)(5)
|
|
$
|
671,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to
resell
|
|
|
331,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
331,677
|
|
Time deposits with other financial institutions
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
322,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total money market investments
|
|
|
654,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
654,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
3,470,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,470,988
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost
|
|
|
564,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,931
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
|
69,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
4,105,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,105,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
12,698,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,698,264
|
|
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market
|
|
|
19,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
|
12,718,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,718,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
199,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,072
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
73,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,444
|
|
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments
|
|
|
70,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,955
|
|
Due from customers on acceptances
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Accounts receivable from investment sales
|
|
|
62,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,575
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
290,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
18,850,964
|
|
|
$
|
(4,126
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,846,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
703,394
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
703,394
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
12,174,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,174,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
12,878,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,878,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from the Federal Reserve
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
|
|
|
960,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
960,440
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
28,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,313
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,959
|
|
Bank acceptances outstanding
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
162,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
17,362,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,362,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
929,660
|
|
|
|
(275,050
|
)(1)
|
|
|
654,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
102,440
|
|
|
|
128,201
|
(2)
|
|
|
230,641
|
|
Less: Treasury stock (at cost)
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,898
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding
|
|
|
92,542
|
|
|
|
128,201
|
|
|
|
220,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
134,247
|
|
|
|
25,458
|
(3)
|
|
|
159,705
|
|
Legal surplus
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,006
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
10,140
|
|
|
|
117,265
|
(4)
|
|
|
127,405
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,488,543
|
|
|
|
(4,126
|
)
|
|
|
1,484,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
18,850,964
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,846,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share(6)
|
|
$
|
6.04
|
|
|
$
|
(2.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.76
|
|
Tangible book value per common share(7)
|
|
$
|
5.56
|
|
|
$
|
(2.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.56
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes Exchange Offer participation at 50% with a ratio of
Exchange Value to liquidation preference equal to 55%. |
(2) |
|
Represents the issuance of Common Stock at par value of $1.00. |
(3) |
|
Represents the additional paid in capital with respect to newly
issued Common Stock, net of exchange costs and adjusted for the
issuance costs of preferred shares exchanged. |
17
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Represents the excess of the Preferred Stock carrying value,
reduced by the issuance costs of preferred shares exchanged,
over the value of Common Stock to be issued on the Exchange
Offer considering the assumptions described in note 1 above. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the costs associated with this Exchange offer
calculated on a pro rata basis according to the number of shares
exchanged. The amount was reduced from additional paid in
capital. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced book value per
common share as of June 30, 2010 of $5.48. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced tangible book
value per common share as of June 30, 2010 of $5.01. |
Pro
Forma Earnings Implications
The following presents the pro forma impact of the Exchange
Offer on certain statement of operations items and losses per
share of Common Stock for the quarter ended March 31, 2010
and the year ended December 31, 2009 as if the Exchange
Offer had been completed on January 1, 2009. We have
calculated the pro forma information below by
(1) eliminating all the actual dividends in 2009 paid to
holders of shares of Preferred Stock who participate at the
levels assumed in each of the High Participation Scenario and
the Low Participation Scenario, and (2) assuming that the
new shares of our Common Stock issuable in the Exchange Offer
were issued on January 1, 2009 and received dividends
through August 2009. The retained earnings impact of the
Exchange Offer has not been included in the analysis because it
is not recurring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Implications
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
Participation
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
|
Q1 2010
|
|
|
Q1 2010
|
|
|
Q1 2010
|
|
|
FY 09
|
|
|
FY 09
|
|
|
FY 09
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
220,988
|
|
|
|
220,988
|
|
|
|
220,988
|
|
|
|
996,574
|
|
|
|
996,574
|
|
|
|
996,574
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
104,125
|
|
|
|
104,125
|
|
|
|
104,125
|
|
|
|
477,532
|
|
|
|
477,532
|
|
|
|
477,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
116,863
|
|
|
|
116,863
|
|
|
|
116,863
|
|
|
|
519,042
|
|
|
|
519,042
|
|
|
|
519,042
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
170,965
|
|
|
|
170,965
|
|
|
|
170,965
|
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (loss)after provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(54,102
|
)
|
|
|
(54,102
|
)
|
|
|
(54,102
|
)
|
|
|
(60,816
|
)
|
|
|
(60,816
|
)
|
|
|
(60,816
|
)
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
45,326
|
|
|
|
45,326
|
|
|
|
45,326
|
|
|
|
142,264
|
|
|
|
142,264
|
|
|
|
142,264
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
91,362
|
|
|
|
91,362
|
|
|
|
91,362
|
|
|
|
352,101
|
|
|
|
352,101
|
|
|
|
352,101
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(6,861
|
)
|
|
|
(6,861
|
)
|
|
|
(6,861
|
)
|
|
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to preferred stockholders(a)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
42,661
|
|
|
|
21,516
|
|
|
|
30,914
|
|
Preferred stock discount accretion
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) attributable to common stockholders(b)
|
|
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
|
(322,075
|
)
|
|
|
(300,930
|
)
|
|
|
(310,328
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net (loss)
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
(106,999
|
)
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends and accretion of discount
|
|
|
(6,152
|
)
|
|
|
(6,152
|
)
|
|
|
(6,152
|
)
|
|
|
46,888
|
|
|
|
25,743
|
|
|
|
35,141
|
|
Pro forma net (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
|
(113,151
|
)
|
|
|
(322,075
|
)
|
|
|
(300,930
|
)
|
|
|
(310,328
|
)
|
Common shares used to calculate actual (loss) per common share
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
92,521
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
Common shares newly issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,761
|
|
|
|
128,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,761
|
|
|
|
128,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma number of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,282
|
|
|
|
220,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,272
|
|
|
|
220,712
|
|
Pro forma losses per common share (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.41
|
)
|
18
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and the year ended
December 31, 2009, reflects Series F Preferred Stock
cumulative preferred dividends of $5.0 million and
$12.6 million, respectively, not declared as of the end of
the period related to the Series |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Our July 27, 2010 earnings release announced net loss
attributable to common stockholders for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010 of $96.8 million. |
Consequences
If Stockholders Do Not Approve the Proposal
We will not be able to complete the Exchange Offer if our
stockholders do not approve this Proposal No. 1.
Further, we may not be able to complete the Exchange Offer if
stockholders do not approve Proposal No. 3, relating
to the amendment of our Articles of Incorporation to reduce the
par value of a share of our Common Stock, if this is necessary
so that we can issue shares of Common Stock in exchange for
tendered Preferred Stock. Our inability to complete the Exchange
Offer would hinder our efforts to sell Common Stock in a Capital
Raise. If we need to continue to recognize significant reserves
and we cannot complete a Capital Raise, the Corporation and
FirstBank may not be able to comply with the minimum capital
requirements included in the capital plans required by the
Agreements. These capital plans, which are subject to the
approval of our regulators, set forth our plan to attain the
capital ratio requirements set forth in the Order over time. If,
at the end of any quarter, we do not comply with any specified
minimum capital ratios, we must notify our regulators. The
Corporation must notify the Fed within 30 days of the end
of any quarter of its inability to comply with a capital ratio
requirement and submit an acceptable written plan that details
the steps it will take to comply with the requirement. FirstBank
must immediately notify the FDIC of its inability to comply with
a capital ratio requirement and, within 45 days, it must
either increase its capital to comply with the ratio
requirements or submit a contingency plan to the FDIC for its
sale, merger, or liquidation. In the event of a liquidation of
FirstBank, the holders of any outstanding preferred stock would
rank senior to the holders of our Common Stock with respect to
rights upon any liquidation of the Corporation. Finally, if we
cannot complete the Exchange Offer and issue Common Stock in
exchange for $385 million of liquidation preference of
Preferred Stock, we will not be able to compel the exchange into
Common Stock of the Series G Preferred Stock we issued to
the U.S. Treasury on July 20, 2010, even if we are
able to complete a Capital Raise for $500 million, which is
another condition to our ability to compel the conversion.
Description
and Comparison of Preferred Stock, Series G Preferred Stock
and Common Stock Rights
Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of
750,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $1.00 per
share, and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$1.00 per share. The following summary outlines the rights of
holders of the shares of Preferred Stock, the holder of
Series G Preferred Stock and the holders of the Common
Stock to be issued in the exchange offer. This summary is
qualified in its entirety by reference to our Articles of
Incorporation, including the Certificates of Designation, and
our by-laws (the Bylaws). We urge you to read these
documents for a more complete understanding of the differences
between the shares of Preferred Stock and the Common Stock. We
issued shares of a new series of Series G Preferred Stock
to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for Series F
Preferred Stock and accrued and unpaid dividends on such stock.
The Series G Preferred Stock has terms similar to the
Series F Preferred Stock but is convertible as described
below.
Governing
Documents
Shares of Preferred Stock: Holders of shares
of Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock have the
rights set forth in our Articles of Incorporation, including the
applicable Certificate of Designation, the Bylaws and Puerto
Rico law.
Common Stock: Holders of shares of our Common
Stock have the rights set forth in our Articles of
Incorporation, the Bylaws and Puerto Rico law.
19
Dividends
and Distributions
On July 30, 2009, we announced the suspension of dividends
on our Common Stock, Preferred Stock and Series F Preferred
Stock (which has been exchanged for Series G Preferred
Stock) effective with the preferred dividend for August 2009. We
are generally not obligated or required to pay dividends on our
Common Stock or preferred stock and no such dividends can be
paid unless they are declared by our board of directors out of
funds legally available for payment. Moreover, the Agreement we
entered with the Fed requires us to obtain its approval before
we pay any dividends.
Shares of Preferred Stock: The shares of
Preferred Stock, as well as Series G Preferred Stock, rank
senior to the Common Stock and any other stock that is expressly
junior to Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock as
to payment of dividends. Dividends on shares of Preferred Stock
are payable monthly and are not mandatory or cumulative. Shares
of Series G Preferred Stock pay cumulative compounding
dividends quarterly in arrears of 5% per year until the fifth
anniversary of the issuance of Series F Preferred Stock,
and 9% thereafter. Holders of shares of Preferred Stock are
entitled to receive dividends, when, as, and if declared by our
Board of Directors, out of funds legally available for dividends.
Common Stock: Subject to the preferential
rights of any other class or series of capital stock, including
Preferred Stock, holders of our Common Stock are entitled to
receive, pro rata, dividends when and as declared by our Board
of Directors out of funds legally available for the payment of
dividends. In general, so long as any shares of Preferred Stock
remain outstanding and until we meet various federal regulatory
considerations, we cannot declare, set apart or pay any
dividends on shares of our Common Stock unless all accrued and
unpaid dividends on our Preferred Stock for the twelve monthly
dividend periods ending on the immediately preceding dividend
payment date have been paid or are paid contemporaneously and
the full monthly dividend on our Preferred Stock for the then
current month has been or is contemporaneously declared and paid
or declared and set apart for payment. In addition, in general,
and subject to certain limitations in the applicable certificate
of designation, so long as any shares of Series G Preferred
Stock remain outstanding, we cannot declare, set apart or pay
any dividends on shares of our Common Stock unless all accrued
and unpaid dividends for all past dividend periods, including
the latest completed dividend period, on all outstanding shares
of Series G Preferred Stock have been declared and paid in
full.
Ranking
Shares of Preferred Stock: Each series of
Preferred Stock, as well as Series G Preferred Stock,
currently ranks senior to the Common Stock with respect to
dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of First BanCorp. Each series of Preferred Stock, as well as
Series G Preferred Stock, is equal in right of payment with
the other outstanding series of shares of preferred stock. The
liquidation preference of the shares of Preferred Stock is $25
per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon for the
current monthly dividend period to the date of distribution. The
liquidation preference of shares of Series G Preferred
Stock is $1,000 per share, plus the amount of any accrued and
unpaid dividends, whether or not declared, to the date of
payment.
Common Stock: The Common Stock ranks junior
with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation,
dissolution or
winding-up
of First BanCorp to all other securities and indebtedness of
First BanCorp.
Conversion
Rights
None of the shares of Preferred Stock, or Common Stock are
convertible into other securities. The Series G Preferred
Stock is convertible under the conditions described below, into
shares of Common Stock based on an initial conversion rate of
896.3045 shares of Common Stock for each share of
Series G Preferred Stock, calculated by dividing $650, or a
discount of 35% from the $1,000 liquidation preference per share
of Series G Preferred Stock, by the initial conversion
price of $0.7252 per share, which is subject to adjustment.
Based on the initial conversion rate, the 424,174 shares of
Series G Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury
will be convertible into approximately 380.2 million shares
of Common Stock. The conversion price of the Series G
Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment, including if the
shares of Common Stock issued in a Capital
20
Raise are priced below 90% of the market price per share of
Common Stock on the trading day immediately preceding the
pricing date of such Capital Raise, or if shares of Common Stock
are otherwise issued, except in certain circumstances, including
the Exchange Offer, at a price below the then conversion price
of the Series G Preferred Stock. We can compel conversion
of the Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock if,
within nine months from the date of the agreement with the
U.S. Treasury, (a) at least $385 million of the
liquidation preference of our Series A through E Preferred
Stock is tendered in the Exchange Offer, (b) we raise
$500 million of additional capital, subject to terms, other
than the price per share, reasonably acceptable to the
U.S. Treasury in its sole discretion, (c) we obtain
the approval of the holders of our Common Stock of an amendment
to our Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of Common Stock from 750,000,000 to at least
1,200,000,000 and to reduce the par value of a share of Common
Stock from $1.00 to $0.10, (d) we have received from the
appropriate banking regulators all requisite approvals (which we
expect to receive), (e) we have made any applicable
anti-dilution adjustments, and (f) none of the Corporation
or any of its subsidiaries has dissolved or became subject to
insolvency or similar proceedings, or has become subject to
other materially adverse regulatory or other actions. The
U.S. Treasury, and any subsequent holder of the
Series G Preferred Stock, has the right to convert the
Series G Preferred Stock at any time. Unless earlier
converted by the holder or the Corporation, the Series G
Preferred Stock will automatically convert into shares of Common
Stock on the seventh anniversary of the issuance of the
Series G Preferred Stock at the then current market price
of our Common Stock.
Voting
Rights
Shares of Preferred Stock: Whenever dividends
remain unpaid on the shares of preferred stock or any other
class or series of preferred stock that ranks on parity with
shares of preferred stock as to payment of dividends and having
equivalent voting rights, the Parity Stock, for at least
18 monthly dividend periods (whether or not consecutive),
the number of directors constituting our Board of Directors will
be increased by two members and the holders of the shares of
preferred stock together with holders of Parity Stock, voting
separately as a single class, will have the right to elect the
two additional members of our board of directors. When First
BanCorp has paid full dividends on any class or series of
noncumulative Parity Stock for at least 12 consecutive monthly
dividend periods following such nonpayment, and has paid
cumulative dividends in full on any class or series of
cumulative Parity Stock, the voting rights will cease and the
authorized number of directors will be reduced by two. Holders
of shares of Preferred Stock currently have the right to vote as
a separate class with all other series of Parity Stock adversely
affected by and entitled to vote thereon (except Series G
Preferred Stock, which votes as a separate class), with respect
to:
|
|
|
|
|
any amendment, alteration or repeal of the provisions of the
Articles of Incorporation, including the relevant Certificates
of Designation, or Bylaws that would alter or change the voting
powers, preferences or special rights of such series of shares
of Preferred Stock so as to affect them adversely; or
|
|
|
|
any amendment or alteration of the Articles of Incorporation to
authorize or increase the authorized amount of any shares of, or
any securities convertible into shares of, any of First
BanCorps capital stock ranking senior to such series of
shares of Preferred Stock.
|
Approval of two-thirds of such shares is required.
So long as any shares of Series G Preferred Stock are
outstanding, in addition to the voting rights set forth above,
the vote or consent of the holders of at least of two-thirds of
the shares of Series G Preferred Stock at the time
outstanding, voting separately as a single class, shall be
necessary for effecting or validating any consummation of a
binding share exchange or reclassification involving
Series G Preferred Stock or of a merger or consolidation of
First BanCorp with another entity, unless the shares of
Series G Preferred Stock remain outstanding following any
such transaction or, if First BanCorp is not the surviving
entity, are converted into or exchanged for preference
securities and such remaining outstanding shares of
Series G Preferred Stock or preference securities have
rights, references, privileges and voting powers that are not
materially less favorable than the rights, preferences,
privileges or voting powers of Series G Preferred Stock,
taken as a whole.
21
Common Stock: Holders of shares of our Common
Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on
by our stockholders. There are no cumulative voting rights for
the election of directors.
Common
Stock
We have no obligation or right to redeem our Common Stock.
Redemption
Preferred Stock: Optional Redemption by First
BanCorp. We may redeem all or a portion of
each series of shares of Preferred Stock, at our option on or
after the date set forth in the table below at the redemption
prices set forth below, on any dividend payment date for which
dividends have been declared in full.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per
|
CUSIP
|
|
Title of Securities Represented by Shares of Preferred
Stock
|
|
Redemption Period
|
|
Share
|
|
|
318672201
|
|
|
7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series A
|
|
April 30, 2006
and thereafter
|
|
|
$25.00
|
|
|
318672300
|
|
|
8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series B
|
|
October 31, 2007
and thereafter
|
|
|
$25.00
|
|
|
318672409
|
|
|
7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series C
|
|
June 30, 2008
and thereafter
|
|
|
$25.00
|
|
|
318672508
|
|
|
7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series D
|
|
January 31, 2009
and thereafter
|
|
|
$25.00
|
|
|
318672607
|
|
|
7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series E
|
|
September 30, 2009
to September 29, 2010
|
|
|
$25.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
and thereafter
|
|
|
$25.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Cumulative Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock,
Series G
|
|
See below.
|
|
|
See below.
|
|
Series G Preferred Stock may not be redeemed prior to
January 16, 2012 unless we have received aggregate gross
proceeds from one or more Qualified Equity Offerings (as defined
below) of at least $100 million. In such a case, we may
redeem Series G Preferred Stock, subject to the approval of
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in whole
or in part, up to a maximum amount equal to the aggregate net
cash proceeds received by us from such qualified equity
offerings. A Qualified Equity Offering is a sale and
issuance for cash by us, to persons other than the Corporation
or its subsidiaries after January 16, 2009, of shares of
perpetual Preferred Stock, Common Stock or a combination
thereof, that in each case qualify as Tier 1 capital of the
Corporation at the time of issuance under the applicable
risk-based capital guidelines. Qualified Equity Offerings do not
include issuances made in connection with agreements or
arrangements entered into, or pursuant to financing plans that
were publicly announced, on or prior to October 13, 2008.
After January 16, 2012, Series G Preferred Stock may be
redeemed, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to
time, subject to the approval of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System. In any redemption of Series G
Preferred Stock, the redemption price is an amount equal to the
per-share liquidation amount plus accrued and unpaid dividends
to but excluding the date of redemption.
Redemption at Option of Holder. The shares of
Preferred Stock and Series G Preferred Stock are not
redeemable at the option of the holders.
Common Stock: We have no obligation or right
to redeem our Common Stock.
Listing
Shares of Preferred Stock: Each series of
Preferred Stock is listed on the NYSE. However, we intend to
delist each series of Preferred Stock from the NYSE after
completion of the Exchange Offer and we do not intend to apply
for listing of any series of shares of Preferred Stock on any
other securities exchange. To the extent permitted by law, we
intend to deregister each outstanding series of Preferred Stock
under the Exchange
22
Act after delisting each such series from the NYSE.
Series G Preferred Stock is not listed on a national
securities exchange. If requested by the U.S. Treasury, we
are required to list, and maintain such listing, of the
Series G Preferred Stock and the amended warrant on the
NYSE or a different national stock exchange, to the extent such
securities comply with applicable listing requirements.
Common Stock: The Common Stock is listed for
trading on the NYSE.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to the actions contemplated by
Proposal No. 1.
Required
Vote
Approval of this Proposal No. 1 to issue 256,401,610
newly issued shares of Common Stock in exchange for shares of
Preferred Stock requires the affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the votes cast on the proposal, provided that the
total votes cast on the proposal, whether for or against,
represent over 50% of all of the shares of Common Stock
outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be
counted in determining the number of votes cast.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK IN THE EXCHANGE BECAUSE
IT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF STOCKHOLDERS.
PROPOSAL NO. 2
ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER TO DIRECTOR
HÉCTOR M. NEVARES-LACOSTA
Overview
and Reason for the Proposal
The Board of Directors seeks stockholder approval of the
issuance of shares of Common Stock to
Héctor M. Nevares-LaCosta
in connection with his participation in the Exchange Offer.
Mr. Nevares-LaCosta, a member of our Board of Directors,
currently beneficially owns 196,100 shares of Preferred
Stock. If stockholders approve Proposal No. 1 and this
Proposal No. 2, we will issue shares of Common Stock
to Mr. Nevares-LaCosta in the Exchange Offer based on the
same terms as those offered to other holders of Preferred Stock
in the Exchange Offer. Mr. Nevares-LaCosta has advised us
that, if Proposal Nos. 1 and 2 are approved, he will tender
all of his shares of Preferred Stock in the Exchange Offer.
Under NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03(b),
stockholder approval is required prior to the issuance of Common
Stock, or securities convertible into or exercisable for Common
Stock, in any transaction or series of related transactions with
a director or officer if the number of shares of Common
Stock to be issued, or if the number of shares of Common Stock
into which the securities may be convertible or exercisable,
exceeds either one percent of the number of shares of Common
Stock or one percent of the voting power outstanding before the
issuance. Subject to stockholder approval of this
Proposal No. 2 and Proposal No. 1 relating
to the Exchange Offer itself, upon
Mr. Nevares-LaCostas tender of shares of Preferred
Stock in the Exchange Offer, we will issue shares of Common
Stock to him based on the same terms as those offered to other
participants in the Exchange Offer, which amount may exceed 1%
of shares of outstanding Common Stock prior to the Exchange
Offer depending upon the number of shares of Preferred Stock he
tenders and the number of shares tendered by other participants.
Accordingly, we are seeking stockholder approval of the issuance
of such shares of Common Stock to Mr. Nevares-LaCosta.
Consequences
if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
Dilution. The issuance of our shares of Common
Stock in connection with the Exchange Offer to
Mr. Nevares-LaCosta would increase the number of
outstanding shares. An increased number of shares would
23
reduce the loss per share for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 on a pro forma basis, would decrease any future earnings
per share and would have a dilutive effect on each
stockholders percentage voting power.
The following table summarizes (1) the total number of
shares that would be issued and outstanding assuming
Proposal Nos. 1 and 2 are approved and all of the offered
shares are issued in the Exchange Offer, (2) the total
number of shares of Common Stock Mr. Nevares-LaCosta would
beneficially own if he tenders all of his shares of Preferred
Stock, and (3) the resulting percentage of outstanding
shares that Mr. Nevares-LaCosta would beneficially own if
we issue all of the shares offered in the Exchange Offer.
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares of
|
|
Total Number of Shares of
|
|
|
Common Stock to be Outstanding
|
|
Common Stock to be Owned by
|
|
Mr. Nevares-LaCostas
|
if All Shares Offered in the
|
|
Mr. Nevares-LaCosta after
|
|
Percentage Ownership after
|
Exchange Offer are Issued
|
|
Tender of All Shares
|
|
Tender of All Shares
|
|
348,944,332
|
|
6,828,451
|
|
1.96%(a)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
This percentage will decrease if (i) the Series G
Preferred Stock is converted into Common Stock, (ii) we
sell Common Stock in a Capital Raise or (iii) BNS acquires
shares of Common Stock to maintain its percentage interest after
the Exchange Offer, the conversion of the Series G
Preferred Stock or a Capital Raise. |
Consequences
if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
If stockholders do not approve this Proposal, we will be unable
to exchange Mr. Nevares-LaCostas tendered shares of
Preferred Stock for Common Stock.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to the actions contemplated by
Proposal No. 2.
Required
Vote
Approval of this Proposal No. 2 to exchange
Mr. Nevares-LaCostas shares of Preferred Stock for
shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast
on such proposal, provided that the total votes cast on the
proposal, whether for or against, represent over 50% of all of
the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will not be counted in determining the number of votes
cast.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER TO MR.
NEVARES-LACOSTA.
PROPOSAL NO. 3
AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF OUR RESTATED ARTICLES OF
INCORPORATION TO DECREASE OUR COMMON STOCK PAR VALUE
Overview
and Reason for the Amendment
On July 27, 2010, our Board of Directors adopted a
resolution to amend our Articles of Incorporation to decrease
the par value of our shares of Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10
per share if necessary to complete the Exchange Offer. Adoption
of this amendment will be necessary to complete the Exchange
Offer if, for example, the market value of a share of Preferred
Stock tendered in the exchange is less than $10 at a time when
the market value of the Common Stock would result in the
issuance of more than 10 shares of Common Stock per
tendered share of Preferred Stock. Under Puerto Rico law, shares
of Common Stock, other than Treasury shares, cannot be sold for
a price equal to less than the par value of the stock. In
addition, adoption of this amendment is one of the conditions
that must be satisfied for us to compel the conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock.
24
In accordance with Puerto Rico law, approval and adoption of an
amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to decrease the par
value of our Common Stock requires stockholder approval.
Consequences
if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
If stockholders approve this proposal, the Board of Directors
currently intends to file, with the Secretary of Puerto Rico,
the Articles of Incorporation reflecting such amendment as soon
as practicable following stockholders approval. This amendment,
if adopted, will not change or affect the number of shares of
Common Stock held by any stockholder. The change in par value
will cause technical changes on our balance sheet as to the
amounts shown as Common Stock and additional
paid-in capital.
If approved, the amendment would amend and restate
Article Sixth of our Articles of Incorporation. The text of
the proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is
attached to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit A. The proposed
amendment also reflects an increase in the number of authorized
shares of Common Stock from 750,000,000 shares to
2,000,000,000 shares, as discussed in
Proposal No. 6 below.
Consequences
if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
If stockholders do not approve the proposal to reduce the par
value of the Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 per share and the
decrease in the par value of the Common Stock is necessary to
complete the Exchange Offer, such as, because the market value
of a share of Preferred Stock tendered in the Exchange Offer is
less than $10 at a time when the market value of the Common
Stock would result in the issuance of more than 10 shares
of Common Stock for a share of Preferred Stock, we will not be
able to complete the Exchange Offer. In addition, if
stockholders do not approve this proposal, we will not meet one
of the conditions necessary for us to compel the conversion into
Common Stock of the Series G Preferred Stock that we issued
to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F
Preferred Stock on July 20, 2010. Finally, our inability to
complete the Exchange Offer would hinder our efforts to sell
Common Stock in a Capital Raise. If we need to continue to
recognize significant reserves and we cannot complete a Capital
Raise, the Corporation and FirstBank may not be able to comply
with the minimum capital requirements included in the capital
plans required by the Agreements. These capital plans, which are
subject to the approval of our regulators, set forth our plan to
attain the capital ratio requirements set forth in the Order
over time. See Overview of the Proposals
Background for further discussion of consequences if we
are unable to complete the Exchange Offer.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, our stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to this proposed amendment to our
Articles of Incorporation to decrease the par value of our
Common Stock.
Required
Vote
Approval of Proposal No. 3 to amend our Articles of
Incorporation to decrease the par value of our Common Stock from
$1.00 to $0.10 requires the affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions
and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes against
this proposal.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE AMENDMENT TO
ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE RESTATED ARTICLES OF
INCORPORATION TO DECREASE THE PAR VALUE OF OUR COMMON STOCK FROM
$1.00 TO $0.10 PER SHARE.
25
PROPOSAL NO. 4
ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK TO THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA IN
CONNECTION WITH THE EXCHANGE OFFER
Overview
and Reason for the Proposal
The Board of Directors seeks stockholder approval of the
issuance of up to 28,476,121 shares of Common Stock to BNS
if it exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder
Agreement in connection with the Exchange Offer.
In connection with our sale in 2007 of 9,250,450 shares of
Common Stock, or approximately 10%, to BNS at a price of $10.25
per share, we and BNS entered into the Stockholder Agreement.
Pursuant to the terms of the Stockholder Agreement, for as long
as BNS beneficially owns at least 5% of our outstanding Common
Stock, BNS has a right of first refusal, which does not apply to
our issuance of shares of Common Stock in the Exchange Offer,
and an anti-dilution right. If we complete the Exchange Offer,
BNS would be entitled to acquire up to the number of shares of
our Common Stock that would enable it to maintain its percentage
interest in the Corporation after we consummate the transaction.
BNSs anti-dilution right entitles it to pay a price equal
to the price per share at which the shares of our Common Stock
were issued in the transaction. If BNS declines to exercise its
anti-dilution right, BNSs beneficial ownership would be
reduced by the issuance of the additional shares.
Under NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03(b), any
sale of additional shares of Common Stock to BNS in an amount
that exceeds 1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock
requires the prior approval of our stockholders under the
listing requirements of the NYSE unless the sale is at a price
in cash at least as great as the higher of the book or market
value of Common Stock, provided that the number of shares to be
issued does not exceed 5% of the number of shares of Common
Stock outstanding before the issuance. Since BNSs
anti-dilution right permits it to acquire more than 5% of the
number of shares of common Stock outstanding before the issuance
to BNS, stockholder approval is required.
Pursuant to the Federal Reserves Order approving
BNSs acquisition of our Common Stock in 2007, BNS is
required to file an application and receive the Federal
Reserves approval before it may directly or indirectly
acquire additional shares of our Common Stock or attempt to
exercise a controlling influence over First BanCorp. As a
result, if BNS desires to exercise its anti-dilution right in
connection with the Exchange Offer, BNS will be required to
obtain the consent of the Federal Reserve.
Consequences
if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
Dilution. The issuance of our shares of Common
Stock to BNS would increase the number of outstanding shares. An
increased number of shares would reduce the loss per share for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010 on a pro forma basis,
would decrease any future earnings per share and would have a
dilutive effect on each stockholders percentage voting
power. Thus, current stockholders interests in the
Corporation would be diluted while BNS would be able to maintain
its ownership percentage.
The following table summarizes (1) the maximum number of
shares that will be outstanding if Proposal Nos. 1 and 4
are approved, we issue all of the offered shares in the Exchange
Offer, and BNS exercises its anti-dilution right in full,
(2) the total number of shares of Common Stock that BNS
will own if it fully exercises its anti-dilution right, and
(3) BNSs percentage ownership assuming the maximum
number of shares of Common Stock are issued in the Exchange
Offer and to BNS. This table does not include the shares of
Common Stock that are issuable upon conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock, that may be issued in a Capital
Raise or that may be acquired by BNS pursuant to its
anti-dilution right in connection with the conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock or a Capital Raise.
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock to be Outstanding if
|
|
Total Number of Shares of
|
|
|
All Shares Offered in the Exchange Offer
|
|
Common Stock to be Owned by
|
|
BNSs Percentage Ownership
|
are Issued and BNS Acquires
|
|
BNS Upon Acquisition of
|
|
Upon Acquisition of
|
Maximum Number of Shares
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares
|
|
377,420,453
|
|
37,726,571
|
|
9.9959%
|
26
Consequences
if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
If BNS exercises its anti-dilution right and stockholders do not
approve the issuance of such shares, we will not issue shares to
BNS in an amount that exceeds 1% of the shares of Common Stock
outstanding prior to the issuance, notwithstanding the terms of
the Stockholder Agreement. This may constitute a breach of the
Stockholder Agreement and might entitle BNS to damages or other
relief against us.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to the actions contemplated by
Proposal No. 4.
Required
Vote
Approval of this Proposal No. 4 to issue shares of
Common Stock to BNS pursuant to its anti-dilution right in
connection with the Exchange Offer requires the affirmative vote
of holders of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal,
provided that the total votes cast on the proposal, whether for
or against, represent over 50% of all of the shares of Common
Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be
counted in determining the number of votes cast.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK TO BNS PURSUANT TO BNSS
ANTI-DILUTION RIGHT UNDER THE STOCKHOLDER AGREEMENT IN
CONNECTION WITH THE EXCHANGE OFFER.
PROPOSAL NO. 5
ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK TO THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA IN
CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF SERIES G PREFERRED
STOCK
Overview
and Reason for the Proposal
The Board of Directors seeks stockholder approval of the
issuance of up to 42,224,017 shares of Common Stock to BNS
if it exercises its anti-dilution right under the Stockholder
Agreement in connection with the conversion into Common Stock of
the shares of Series G Preferred Stock that we issued to
the U.S. Treasury in exchange for the Series F
Preferred Stock or such higher number of shares of Common Stock
determined as a result of the impact of any adjustment to the
conversion price of the Series G Preferred Stock. The
42,224,017 shares is based on the current conversion price
of the Series G.
As noted in Proposal No. 4, pursuant to the terms of
the Stockholder Agreement, for as long as BNS beneficially owns
at least 5% of our outstanding Common Stock, BNS has a right of
first refusal, which does not apply to our issuance of the
Series G Preferred Stock or the shares of Common Stock upon
conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock, and an
anti-dilution right. We have been discussing with BNS an
amendment to the Stockholder Agreement pursuant to which BNS
would have the ability to decide whether to exercise its
anti-dilution right after we have issued shares of Common Stock
in the Exchange Offer, any Capital Raise and the conversion of
the Series G Preferred Stock rather than in connection with
the issuance of shares of Common Stock in each of those
transactions. If BNS agrees, its anti-dilution right will
entitle it to acquire as a result of the conversion of the
Series G Preferred Stock up to the number of shares of our
Common Stock that would enable it to maintain its percentage
interest in the Corporation after the conversion at a price
equal to the price per share at which the Series G
Preferred Stock is converted into Common Stock. If BNS declines
to exercise its anti-dilution right, BNSs beneficial
ownership would be reduced by the issuance of the additional
shares.
Under NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 312.03(b), any
sale of additional shares of Common Stock or securities
convertible into Common Stock to BNS in an amount that exceeds
1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock requires the prior
approval of our stockholders under the listing requirements of
the NYSE unless the sale is at a price in cash at least as great
as the higher of the book or market value of Common
27
Stock, provided that the number of shares to be issued does not
exceed 5% of the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding
before the issuance. Since BNSs anti-dilution right
permits it to acquire more than 5% of the number of shares of
common Stock outstanding before the issuance of shares to BNS,
stockholder approval is required.
Pursuant to the Federal Reserves Order approving
BNSs acquisition of our Common Stock in 2007, BNS is
required to file an application and receive the Federal
Reserves approval before it may directly or indirectly
acquire additional shares of our Common Stock or attempt to
exercise a controlling influence over First BanCorp. As a
result, if BNS desires to exercise its anti-dilution right and
purchase additional shares of our Common Stock, BNS will be
required to obtain the consent of the Federal Reserve.
Consequences
if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
Dilution. The issuance of our shares of Common
Stock upon conversion of Series G Preferred Stock issued to
BNS would increase the number of outstanding shares. An
increased number of shares would reduce the loss per share for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010 on a pro forma basis,
would decrease any future earnings per share and would have a
dilutive effect on each stockholders percentage voting
power. Thus, while BNS would be able to maintain its ownership
percentage, other stockholders interests in the
Corporation would be diluted.
The following table summarizes (1) the maximum number of
shares that will be outstanding if Proposal Nos. 1, 4, and
5 are approved, we issue all of the offered shares of Common
Stock in the Exchange Offer, we issue shares of Common Stock to
the U.S. Treasury in the conversion, and BNS exercises its
anti-dilution right in full, (2) the total number of shares
of Common Stock that BNS will own if it fully exercises its
anti-dilution right in connection with the Exchange Offer and
the conversion of Series G Preferred Stock, and
(3) BNSs percentage ownership assuming
636,590,675 shares of Common Stock are issued in the
Exchange Offer and the conversion of Series G Preferred
Stock and BNS fully exercises its anti-dilution rights. This
table does not reflect the issuance of shares in a Capital Raise
even though the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock
by the Corporation requires the issuance of $500 million of
equity in a Capital Raise. BNS has waived its right of first
refusal in connection with a Capital Raise but will have an
anti-dilution right in connection with a Capital Raise. This
table also does not reflect the issuance of shares to BNS as a
result of its exercise of its anti-dilution right in connection
with a Capital Raise. Completion of such a Capital Raise may
require stockholder approval.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock to be Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
if All Shares Offered in the Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
Offer and the Conversion are
|
|
Total Number of Shares of
|
|
|
Issued and BNS Acquires the
|
|
Common Stock to be Owned by
|
|
BNSs Percentage Ownership
|
Maximum Number of Shares to
|
|
BNS Upon Acquisition of
|
|
Upon Acquisition of
|
Maintain its Percentage Interest
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares
|
|
Maximum Number of Shares
|
|
|
799,833,535
|
|
|
|
79,950,588
|
|
|
|
9.9959
|
%
|
Consequences
if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
If BNS exercises its anti-dilution right and stockholders do not
approve the issuance of such shares, we will not issue shares of
Common Stock to BNS in an amount that exceeds 1% of the shares
outstanding prior to the issuance, notwithstanding the terms of
the Stockholder Agreement. This may constitute a breach of the
Stockholder Agreement and might entitle BNS to damages or other
relief against us.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to the actions contemplated by
Proposal No. 5.
28
Required
Vote
Approval of this Proposal No. 5 to issue shares of
Series G Preferred Stock convertible into Common Stock to
BNS pursuant to its anti-dilution right in connection with the
conversion of Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock
requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the
votes cast on the proposal, provided that the total votes cast
on the proposal, whether for or against, represent over 50% of
all of the shares of Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and
broker non-votes will not be counted in determining the number
of votes cast.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF SHARES
OF COMMON STOCK TO BNS PURSUANT TO BNSS ANTI-DILUTION
RIGHT UNDER THE STOCKHOLDER AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE
ISSUANCE OF SERIES G PREFERRED STOCK.
PROPOSAL NO. 6
AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE RESTATED ARTICLES OF
INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED
SHARES OF OUR
COMMON STOCK
Overview
and Reasons for the Amendment
On July 27, 2010, our Board of Directors adopted
resolutions approving and authorizing an amendment to our
Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized
shares of our Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000 and
directing that the amendment be submitted to a vote of the
stockholders at the Special Meeting. In accordance with Puerto
Rico law, approval and adoption of an amendment to our Articles
of Incorporation to increase the authorized shares of our Common
Stock or Preferred Stock requires stockholder approval.
The Board of Directors determined that the amendment is in the
best interests of First BanCorp and its stockholders. If the
proposed amendment is approved by stockholders, the Board of
Directors currently intends to file, with the Puerto Rico
Department of State, the Articles of Incorporation reflecting
such amendment as soon as practicable following stockholder
approval. Attached hereto as Exhibit A to this Proxy
Statement is the proposed amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation. (The amendment included as Exhibit A also
reflects the proposed amendment to decrease the par value of a
share of Common Stock from $1.00 to $0.10 per share.)
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 27, 2010,
our stockholders approved the increase in our authorized shares
of Common Stock from 250,000,000 to 750,000,000. Since then, we
have commenced the Exchange Offer to issue
256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in exchange for our
outstanding Preferred Stock and issued shares of Series G
Preferred Stock in exchange for Series F Preferred Stock.
In addition, we plan to seek to raise $500 million in a
Capital Raise. Finally, we expect to offer to our current
stockholders the opportunity to buy one share of Common Stock
for each share of Common Stock they own at the purchase price
set forth in a Capital Raise. In our prospectus for the Exchange
Offer, we disclosed that we estimated that we would issue an
additional 1.43 billion shares after the completion of the
Exchange Offer as a result of conversion of the Series G
Preferred Stock, the Capital Raise and the issuance of shares to
BNS. This estimate was based on a sale in a Capital Raise of
$500 million at an assumed per-share price of $0.57, the
market price of our Common Stock on July 14, 2010, and a
sale to BNS of the maximum number of shares it could buy upon
exercise of its anti-dilution right. No assurance can be given
as to the price at which shares would be sold in any Capital
Raise or whether any such Capital Raise can be completed. Since
we had 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of
July 22, 2010, we do not have enough shares of Common Stock
authorized for issuance to complete the above transactions.
Accordingly, our Board of Directors has proposed this increase
to enable us to complete the transactions described above.
29
Our Articles of Incorporation currently authorize the issuance
of up to 750,000,000 shares of Common Stock and
50,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. If adopted, the
proposed amendment will not result in an increase in the number
of authorized shares of Preferred Stock.
Of the 750,000,000 shares of Common Stock currently
authorized, as of the close of business on the Record Date,
there were 92,542,722 shares of Common Stock issued and
outstanding. Furthermore, we have reserved for future issuance
or are currently offering to issue:
a) 380,189,051 shares of Common Stock reserved for
issuance upon conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock,
based on the initial conversion price;
b) 5,842,259 shares of Common Stock upon the exercise
of an outstanding warrant held by the U.S. Treasury;
c) 2,073,200 shares of Common Stock subject to
outstanding options under the 1997 Stock Option Plan;
d) 3,767,784 shares of Common Stock for issuance under
the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan; and
e) subject to the approval of our stockholders,
(i) 256,401,610 shares of Common Stock in the Exchange
Offer, (ii) assuming the issuance of all of the offered
shares in the Exchange Offer and subject to the approval of our
stockholders, 28,476,121 shares of Common Stock for
issuance to BNS if it exercises its anti-dilution right, and
(iii) assuming the issuance of 380,189,065 shares of
Common Stock in exchange for Series G Preferred Stock that
we issued to the U.S. Treasury, and subject to the approval
of our stockholders, 42,224,017 shares of Common Stock for
issuance to BNS if it exercises its anti-dilution right.
Consequences
if Stockholders Approve this Proposal
Dilution. As is the case with the current
authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock, the additional
shares of Common Stock authorized by this proposed amendment
could be issued upon approval by our Board of Directors without
further vote of our stockholders except as may be required in
particular cases by our Articles of Incorporation, applicable
law, regulatory agencies or the NYSE. Under our Articles of
Incorporation, stockholders do not have preemptive rights to
subscribe to additional securities that we issue, which means
that current stockholders do not have a prior right to purchase
any new issue of Common Stock in order to maintain their
proportionate ownership interest in the Corporation. If we issue
additional shares of Common Stock or securities convertible into
or exercisable for Common Stock, such issuances would have a
dilutive effect on the voting power and would reduce loss per
share and any future earnings per share of our currently
outstanding shares of Common Stock. We will not need stockholder
approval of a Capital Raise in the form of a public offering.
The following table sets forth the total number of
(1) authorized shares of our Common Stock as of
July 22, 2010, (2) outstanding shares of our Common
Stock as of July 22, 2010, (3) reserved shares of our
Common Stock, including pursuant to the Exchange Offer and the
conversion of Series G Preferred Stock but excluding shares
issuable to BNS upon its exercise of its anti-dilution right,
(4) shares of our Common Stock available for issuance,
which excludes the reserved shares, (5) proposed authorized
shares, subject to stockholder approval pursuant to this
Proposal 6 and (6) Common Stock available for issuance
if this Proposal 6 is approved by the stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently
|
|
Currently
|
|
Shares Currently
|
|
Shares Currently
|
|
Proposed
|
|
Shares Potentially
|
Authorized
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Reserved for
|
|
Available for
|
|
Authorized
|
|
Available for
|
Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
Issuance
|
|
Issuance
|
|
Shares
|
|
Issuance
|
|
750,000,000
|
|
92,542,722
|
|
648,273,918
|
|
9,183,360
|
|
2,000,000,000
|
|
1,259,183,360
|
The number of shares potentially available for issuance if
stockholders approve this Proposal would enable us to issue
shares in a Capital Raise, if we can complete such a Capital
Raise and obtain any required stockholder approval. This would
enable us to convert the Series G Preferred Stock as long
as we satisfy the
30
other conditions to such conversion. In addition, we believe
that we would have enough shares to conduct a rights offering.
Anti-takeover Effects. Under certain
circumstances, the proposed amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation could have an anti-takeover effect. The proposed
increase in the number of authorized shares of Common Stock may
discourage or make more difficult a change in control of the
Corporation. For example, we could issue additional shares to
dilute the voting power of, create voting impediments for, or
otherwise frustrate the efforts of persons seeking to take over
or gain control of the Corporation, whether or not the change in
control is favored by a majority of our unaffiliated
stockholders. We could also privately place shares of Common
Stock with purchasers who would side with our Board of Directors
in opposing a hostile takeover bid, except that we would need
stockholder approval of any such private sales that exceed 20%
of the outstanding shares prior to the sale. Except for the
possible acquisition of approximately 21% of Common Stock by the
U.S. Treasury if we are able to compel the conversion of
the Series G Preferred Stock into Common Stock, assuming we
issue approximately 1.68 billion shares in the Exchange
Offer, in a Capital Raise and to BNS at the market price of our
Common Stock on July 14, 2010 of $0.57, the Board of
Directors is not aware of any plans for or attempt to effect a
change in control of the Corporation.
Consequences
if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
If stockholders do not approve this proposal, we will not be
able to issue shares of Common Stock to investors in a
$500 million Capital Raise, which will preclude us from
compelling the conversion of the Series G Preferred Stock
into Common Stock. In addition, if stockholders do not approve
this proposal, we will not be able to issue shares to BNS if it
exercises its anti-dilution right or in a rights offering.
If BNS exercises it anti-dilution right and we cannot issue
shares to BNS, this may constitute a breach of the Stockholder
Agreement and might entitle BNS to damages or other relief
against us. If we need to continue to recognize significant
reserves and we cannot complete a Capital Raise, the Corporation
and FirstBank may not be able to comply with the minimum capital
requirements included in the capital plans required by the
Agreements. These capital plans, which are subject to the
approval of our regulators, set forth our plan to attain the
capital ratio requirements set forth in the Order over time. See
Overview of the Proposals Background for
further discussion of consequences if we are unable to complete
the Exchange Offer.
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, our stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to this proposed amendment to our
Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized
shares of Common Stock.
Required
Vote
Approval of Proposal No. 6 to amend our Articles of
Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of
Common Stock from 750,000,000 to 2,000,000,000 requires the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of
Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will
have the same effect as votes against this proposal.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE AMENDMENT TO
ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO
INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
FROM 750,000,000 TO 2,000,000,000.
31
PROPOSAL NO. 7
AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE RESTATED ARTICLES OF
INCORPORATION TO IMPLEMENT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
Overview
and Reasons for the Amendment
On July 27, 2010, our Board of Directors adopted
resolutions approving and authorizing an amendment to our
Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split at
a ratio of not less than one-for-ten and not more than
one-for-twenty and directing that the amendment be submitted to
a vote of the stockholders at the Special Meeting. In accordance
with Puerto Rico law, approval and adoption of an amendment to
our Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split
requires stockholder approval.
On July 9, 2010, First BanCorp. received notice from the
New York Stock Exchange that the Corporation was not in
compliance with the minimum price per share continued listing
requirement set forth in Section 802.01C of the NYSE Listed
Company Manual (the Notice). The Notice indicated
that the Corporation was not in compliance with such continued
listing requirement because, as of July 6, 2010, the
average closing price of the Common Stock was less than $1.00
over the consecutive 30
trading-day
period immediately prior to the Notice.
On July 22, 2009, the Corporation informed the NYSE that it
intended to cure this deficiency within six months following the
date of the Notice by bringing the Common Stock share price and
average share price for 30 consecutive trading days above $1.00.
Specifically, the Corporation has informed the NYSE of its
intent to cure the deficiency by implementing a reverse stock
split, if necessary.
If the proposed amendment is approved by stockholders, the Board
of Directors will determine, prior to the filing of the
amendment with the Puerto Rico Department of State, whether a
reverse stock split is in the best interest of stockholders, and
if so, the ratio for such split. The Board of Directors will
consider, among other things, the market price and liquidity of
our Common Stock prior to implementing a reverse stock split.
Attached hereto as Exhibit B to this Proxy Statement is the
proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation.
If stockholders approve this Proposal at the Special Meeting but
the Board does not implement a reverse stock split by the close
of business on January 9, 2011, the Board will not have
authority to implement a reverse stock split pursuant to such
approval.
Consequences
if Stockholders Approve this Proposal and the Board Implements a
Reverse Stock Split
If stockholders approve this proposal and the Board determines
that it is in the best interests of stockholders to implement
the reverse stock split, a number of outstanding shares of
Common Stock ranging from 10 to 20 shares, depending on the
reverse stock split ratio determined by the Board, of
outstanding Common Stock will be converted into one share of
Common Stock.
Reduction of Shares Held by Individual
Stockholders. Each common stockholder will own
fewer shares of Common Stock, but the proposed reverse stock
split will affect all common stockholders proportionately and
will not affect any stockholders percentage ownership
interest or proportionate voting power, except for differences
resulting from the treatment of fractional shares.
However, if the reverse stock split were implemented, it may
increase the number of stockholders who own odd
lots, or a number of shares that is less than
100 shares. Such stockholders may find it difficult to sell
such shares and in connection with any sale may have to pay
higher commissions and other transaction costs as compared to a
sale involving a round lot, or a number that is in
even multiples of 100.
Impact on Authorized and Outstanding
Shares. In connection with the reverse stock
split, we will not reduce the total number of authorized shares
of Common Stock. As previously disclosed, as a result of the
continuing difficult economic conditions, we decided to seek to
improve our capital structure. Thus, we have been taking steps
to implement strategies to increase tangible common equity and
regulatory capital through (1) the issuance of shares of
Common Stock in the Exchange Offer, (2) the issuance of
approximately $500 million of equity in a Capital Raise,
(3) the conversion into Common Stock of the shares of
Series G
32
Preferred Stock that we issued to the U.S. Treasury in
exchange for Series F Preferred Stock, and (4) a
rights offering to common stockholders. Since we have
92,542,722 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of
July 22, 2010, we do not have enough shares of Common Stock
authorized for issuance to complete the above transactions. As
outlined in Proposal No. 6, the Board of Directors has
proposed an increase in the number of authorized shares of
Common Stock to enable us to complete the transactions described
above.
If adopted and implemented by the Board of Directors, this
amendment will become effective upon filing with the Puerto Rico
Department of State. We expect that the Board will implement a
reverse stock split only if necessary to comply with the NYSE
continued listing requirement.
Anti-takeover Effects. Similar to
Proposal No. 6, under certain circumstances, the
proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation could have
an anti-takeover effect. The resulting increase in the number of
authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock may discourage or
make more difficult a change in control of the Corporation. For
example, we could issue additional shares to dilute the voting
power of, create voting impediments for, or otherwise frustrate
the efforts of persons seeking to take over or gain control of
the Corporation, whether or not the change in control is favored
by a majority of our unaffiliated stockholders. We could also
privately place shares of Common Stock with purchasers who would
side with our Board of Directors in opposing a hostile takeover
bid, except that we would need stockholder approval of any such
private sales that exceed 20% of the outstanding shares prior to
the sale. Except for the possible acquisition of approximately
21% of Common Stock by the U.S. Treasury if the
Series G Preferred Stock is converted into Common Stock,
assuming we issue approximately 1.68 billion shares in the
Exchange Offer, in a Capital Raise and to BNS at the market
price of our Common Stock on July 14, 2010 of $0.57, the
Board of Directors is not aware of any plans for or attempt to
effect a change in control of the Corporation.
Impact on Equity Compensation Plans and Outstanding
Awards. The reverse stock split will impact the
number of shares of common stock available for issuance under
the Corporations equity incentive plans in proportion to
the reverse stock split ratio. Under the terms of the
Corporations outstanding equity awards, the reverse stock
split would cause a reduction in the number of shares of Common
Stock issuable upon exercise, settlement or vesting of such
awards in proportion to the exchange ratio of the reverse stock
split and would cause a proportionate increase in the exercise
price of such awards to the extent they are stock options or
similar awards. The aggregate number of shares authorized for
future issuance under the Corporations equity incentive
plans will also be proportionately reduced, as will the maximum
aggregate limit on the number of shares that may be granted to
any one participant under the respective plans. In implementing
the proportionate reduction, the number of shares issuable upon
exercise, settlement or vesting of outstanding equity awards
will be rounded up to the nearest whole share.
No Assurance Regarding Impact on the Corporations Stock
Price. If the Board implements a reverse stock
split, the Board expects that the reverse stock split would
increase the market price of our Common Stock so that the
Corporation is able to bring the Common Stock share price and
average share price for 30 consecutive trading days above $1.00
and, thereby, regain compliance with this NYSE continued listing
requirement. No assurance can be provided, however, that the
market price of the Corporations Common Stock will exceed
or remain in excess of the $1.00 per share minimum price after a
reverse stock split. It is possible that the per share price of
common stock after the reverse stock split will not rise in
proportion to the reduction in the number of shares of common
stock outstanding resulting from the reverse stock split.
Furthermore, the market price of the stock may be affected by
other factors that may be unrelated to the number of shares
outstanding, including the Corporations performance.
Consequences
if Stockholders Do Not Approve this Proposal
If stockholders do not approve this proposal we will not be able
to implement a reverse stock split. The inability to implement a
reverse stock split may hinder our ability to bring our Common
Stock share price and average share price for 30 consecutive
trading days above $1.00, which is a listing requirement of the
NYSE. The NYSE will commence suspension and delisting procedures
if we cannot regain compliance with this requirement by
January 9, 2011. If the NYSE delisted the Common Stock, the
market liquidity of our Common Stock would be adversely affected.
33
Board
Discretion to Implement the Reverse Stock Split
If the proposed amendment is approved by our stockholders, it
will be implemented, if at all, only upon a determination by our
Board of Directors that a reverse stock split, at a ratio
determined by the Board of Directors within the range of
one-for-ten
and one-for-twenty, is in the best interests of stockholders.
The Board of Directors determination as to whether such a
split will be implemented and, if so, the ratio, will be based
upon several factors, including existing and expected
marketability and liquidity of our Common Stock, prevailing
market conditions and the likely effect on the market price of
our Common Stock. If our Board of Directors determines to
implement a reverse stock split, the Board of Directors will
consider various factors in selecting the ratio including the
overall market conditions at the time and the recent trading
history of our Common Stock.
Fractional
Shares
Stockholders will not receive fractional shares in connection
with a reverse stock split. Instead, our exchange agent, The
Bank of New York Mellon Shareowner Services, LLC, will aggregate
all fractional shares and arrange for them to be sold as soon as
practicable after the split is implemented at the then
prevailing prices on the open market on behalf of those
stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a
fractional share. We expect that the exchange agent will cause
the sale to be conducted in an orderly fashion at a reasonable
pace and that it may take several days to sell all of the
aggregated fractional shares of Common Stock. After completing
the sale, stockholders will receive a cash payment from the
exchange agent in an amount equal to the stockholders pro
rata share of the total net proceeds of these sales. No
transaction costs will be assessed on the sale; however, the
proceeds will be subject to certain taxes as discussed below. In
addition, stockholders will not be entitled to receive interest
for the period of time between implementation of a reverse stock
split and the date a stockholder receives payment for the
cashed-out shares. The payment amount will be paid to the
stockholder in the form of a check.
After a reverse stock split, stockholders will have no further
interest in the Corporation with respect to their cashed-out
fractional shares. A stockholder will not have any voting,
dividend or other rights with respect to its fractional share
except to receive payment as described above.
Stock
Certificates
If stockholders approve the amendment to our Articles of
Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split and the reverse
stock split is implemented, as soon as practicable after the
date the Board decides to implement the reverse stock split and
the amendment implementing the reverse stock split becomes
effective, the Corporation will send a letter of transmittal to
each stockholder of record at the effective time for use in
transmitting old stock certificates to our transfer agent, The
Bank of New York Mellon Shareowner Services, LLC, who will serve
as our exchange agent. The letter of transmittal will contain
instructions for the surrender of old certificates to the
exchange agent in exchange for new certificates representing the
number of shares of Common Stock into which such holders
shares represented by the old certificates have been converted
as a result of the reverse stock split. Until so surrendered,
each current certificate representing shares of our stock will
be deemed for all corporate purposes after the effective time of
the amendment implementing the reverse stock split to evidence
ownership of shares in the appropriately reduced whole number of
shares of Common Stock. Stockholders should not destroy any
stock certificates and should not send in their old certificates
to the exchange agent until they have received the letter of
transmittal.
Persons holding their shares in street name through
banks, brokers or other nominees will be contacted by such
banks, brokers or nominees and will not receive a letter of
transmittal from the Corporation. Banks, brokers, and other
nominees holding shares of Common Stock for stockholders will be
instructed to implement the reverse stock split for such
beneficial holders, and these banks, brokers, and other nominees
may apply their own specific procedures for processing the
reverse stock split.
34
No
Appraisal Rights
Under Puerto Rico law, our stockholders are not entitled to
appraisal rights with respect to this proposed amendment to our
Articles of Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split.
Certain
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a general summary of certain U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the reverse stock split that may be
relevant to stockholders. This summary is based upon the
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
(the Code), Treasury regulations promulgated
thereunder, published administrative rulings and judicial
decisions as of the date hereof, all of which may change,
possibly with retroactive effect, resulting in U.S. federal
income tax consequences that may differ from those discussed
below. This summary does not purport to be complete and does not
address all aspects of federal income taxation that may be
relevant to stockholders in light of their particular
circumstances or to stockholders that may be subject to special
tax rules, including, without limitation: (1) stockholders
subject to the alternative minimum tax; (2) banks,
insurance companies, or other financial institutions;
(3) tax-exempt organizations; (4) dealers in
securities or commodities; (5) regulated investment
companies or real estate investment trusts; (6) traders in
securities that elect to use a
mark-to-market
method of accounting for their securities holdings;
(7) foreign stockholders or U.S. stockholders whose
functional currency is not the U.S. dollar;
(8) persons holding the Common Stock as a position in a
hedging transaction, straddle, conversion
transaction or other risk reduction transaction;
(9) persons who acquire shares of the Common Stock in
connection with employment or other performance of services;
(10) dealers and other stockholders that do not own their
shares of Common Stock as capital assets;
(11) U.S. expatriates, (12) foreign entities; or
(13) non-resident alien individuals. In addition, this
summary does not address the tax consequences arising under the
laws of any foreign, state or local jurisdiction and
U.S. federal tax consequences other than federal income
taxation. Furthermore, this summary also assumes that shares of
Common Stock, both before and after the reverse stock split, are
held as a capital asset as defined in the Code,
which is generally property held for investment. If a
partnership (including any entity or arrangement treated as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds
shares of the Common Stock, the tax treatment of a partner in
the partnership generally will depend upon the status of the
partner and the activities of the partnership.
We have not sought, and will not seek, an opinion of counsel or
a ruling from the IRS regarding the U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the reverse stock split and there can be no
assurance the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will
not challenge the statements and conclusions set forth below or
that a court would not sustain any such challenge. You should
consult your tax advisor as to the application to your
particular situation of the tax consequences discussed below, as
well as the application of any state, local, foreign or other
tax.
Tax Consequences Generally. The reverse stock
split should constitute a recapitalization for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a result, a
stockholder generally should not recognize gain or loss upon the
reverse stock split, except with respect to cash received in
lieu of a fractional share of the Common Stock, as discussed
below. A stockholders aggregate tax basis in the shares of
the Common Stock received pursuant to the reverse stock split
should equal the aggregate tax basis of the shares of the Common
Stock surrendered (excluding any portion of such basis that is
allocated to any fractional share of the Common Stock), and such
stockholders holding period (i.e., acquired date)
in the shares of the Common Stock received should include the
holding period in the shares of the Common Stock surrendered.
Treasury regulations promulgated under the Code provide detailed
rules for allocating the tax basis and holding period of the
shares of the Common Stock surrendered to the shares of the
Common Stock received pursuant to the reverse stock split.
Stockholders who acquired their shares of Common Stock on
different dates and at different prices should consult their tax
advisors regarding the allocation of the tax basis and holding
period of such shares.
Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares. A
stockholder who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of
the Common Stock pursuant to the reverse stock split generally
should recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the
difference between the amount of cash received and the
holders tax basis in the shares of the Common Stock
surrendered that is allocated to such fractional share of the
Common Stock. Such capital gain
35
or loss should be long term capital gain or loss if the
holders holding period for the Common Stock surrendered
exceeded one year at the effective time of the reverse stock
split.
Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding. Information returns generally will
be required to be filed with the IRS with respect to the receipt
of cash in lieu of a fractional share of the Common Stock
pursuant to the reverse stock split. In addition, stockholders
may be subject to a backup withholding tax (currently at an
applicable rate of 28%) on the payment of such cash if they do
not provide their taxpayer identification numbers in the manner
required or otherwise fail to comply with applicable backup
withholding tax rules. Backup withholding is not an additional
tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may
be refunded or allowed as a credit against the
stockholders federal income tax liability, if any,
provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Certain
Puerto Rico Tax Consequences
The following discussion describes the material Puerto Rico tax
consequences relating to the proposed stock split. It does not
purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax
considerations arising from or relating to the proposed reverse
stock split and does not describe any tax consequences arising
under the laws of any state, locality or taxing jurisdiction
other than Puerto Rico. It does not address special classes of
holders, such as life insurance companies, special partnerships,
corporations of individuals, registered investment companies,
estate and trusts and tax-exempt organizations.
This discussion is based on the tax laws of Puerto Rico as in
effect on the date of this Proxy Statement, as well as
regulations, administrative pronouncements and judicial
decisions available on or before such date and now in effect.
All of the foregoing are subject to change, which change could
apply retroactively and could affect the continued validity of
this summary.
You should consult your own tax advisor as to the application to
your particular situation of the tax considerations discussed
below, as well as the application of any state, local, foreign
or other tax.
Subject to the above stated, Puerto Rico income tax consequences
of the proposed reversed stock split described herein may be
summarized as follows:
1. The reverse stock split will qualify as a tax-free
recapitalization under the Puerto Rico Puerto Rico Internal
Revenue Code of 1994, as amended. Accordingly, except for any
cash received in lieu of fractional shares, a shareholder will
not recognize any gain or loss for Puerto Rico income tax
purposes as a result of the receipt of the post-reverse stock
split common stock pursuant to the reverse stock split.
2. The shares of post-reverse stock split common stock in
the hands of a shareholder will have an aggregate basis for
computing gain or loss on a subsequent disposition equal to the
aggregate basis of the shares of pre-reverse stock split common
stock held by that shareholder immediately prior to the reversed
stock split, reduced by the basis allocable to any fractional
shares which the shareholder is treated as having sold for cash,
as discussed in paragraph 4 below.
3. A shareholders holding period for the post-reverse
stock split common stock will include the holding period of the
pre-reverse stock split common stock exchanged.
4. Shareholders who receive cash for fractional shares will
generally be treated for Puerto Rico income tax purposes as
having sold their fractional shares and will recognize gain or
loss in an amount equal to the difference between the cash
received and the portion of the of their basis for the
pre-reverse stock split common stock allocated to the fractional
shares. Such gain or loss will generally be a capital gain or
loss if the stock was held as a capital asset, and such gain or
loss will be long-term gain or loss to the extent that the
shareholders holding period exceeds 6 months for
Puerto Rico income tax purposes.
5. Shareholders who do not hold fractional shares and only
receive post-reverse stock split common stock for their
pre-reverse stock split common stock pursuant to the reverse
stock split should not recognize any gain or loss for Puerto
Rico income tax purposes as a result of the reverse stock split.
36
6. Any gain or loss from the sale of fractional shares as
discussed above realized by a shareholder that is not a resident
of Puerto Rico will not be subject to income taxation in Puerto
Rico.
7. Puerto Rico information reporting requirements will
apply with respect to the cash proceeds to be received by the
non-corporate shareholders in lieu of fractional shares.
Required
Vote
Approval of Proposal No. 7 to amend our Articles of
Incorporation to implement a reverse stock split requires the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of
Common Stock outstanding. Abstentions and broker non-votes will
have the same effect as votes against this proposal.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE AMENDMENT TO
ARTICLE SIXTH OF THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION TO
IMPLEMENT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT AT AN EXCHANGE RATIO THAT WILL
BE WITHIN A RANGE OF ONE-FOR-TEN AND ONE-FOR-TWENTY, WHICH WILL
BE DETERMINED BY THE CORPORATIONS BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
SEC rules provide that stockholders must submit to a company any
proposals that they would like included in a companys
proxy statement no later than 120 days before the first
anniversary of the date on which the previous years proxy
statement was first mailed to stockholders unless the date of
the annual meeting has been changed by more than 30 days
from the date of the previous years meeting. When the date
is changed by more than 30 days from the date of the
previous years meeting, the deadline is a reasonable time
before the company begins to print and send its proxy materials.
In accordance with our By-laws, we expect to hold our 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders on or before April 26, 2011,
subject to the right of the Board of Directors to change such
date based on changed circumstances.
Any proposal that a stockholder wishes to have considered for
presentation at the 2011 Annual Meeting and included in our
proxy statement and form of proxy used in connection with such
meeting must be forwarded to the Secretary of the Corporation at
the principal executive offices of the Corporation no later than
December 7, 2010. Any such proposal must comply with the
requirements of
Rule 14a-8
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Under the Corporations By-laws, if a stockholder seeks to
propose a nominee for director for consideration at the annual
meeting of stockholders, notice must be received by the
Secretary of the Corporation at least 30 days prior to the
date of the annual meeting of stockholders. Accordingly, under
the By-laws, any stockholders nominations for directors for
consideration at the 2011 Annual Meeting must be received by the
Secretary of the Corporation at the principal executive offices
of the Corporation no later than March 25, 2011.
37
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND OTHER INFORMATION
The financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007 and the related managements discussion
and analysis of financial condition and results of operations,
including the selected quarterly financial data and quantitative
and qualitative disclosures about market risk, set forth in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
and the financial statements for the interim period ended March
31, 2010 and the related managements discussion and
analysis of financial condition and results of operations,
including quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market
risk, set forth in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 attached as Exhibits C and D,
respectively, to this Proxy Statement, are incorporated herein
by reference. Our auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, are not
expected to be represented at the Special Meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Lawrence Odell
Secretary
Santurce, Puerto Rico
August 2, 2010
38
Exhibit A
Proposed
Amendment to
Article SIXTH of the Restated Articles of
Incorporation
(new language in bold and deleted language in brackets)
SIXTH
The authorized capital of the Corporation shall be [EIGHT
HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS ($800,000,000)] TWO HUNDRED FIFTY
MILLION DOLLARS ($250,000,000) represented by [SEVEN
HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION (750,000,000)] TWO BILLION
(2,000,000,000) shares of common stock, [ONE DOLLAR ($1.00)]
TEN CENTS ($0.10) par value per share, and FIFTY MILLION
(50,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, ONE DOLLAR ($1.00) par
value per share.
The shares may be issued by the Corporation from time to time as
authorized by the board of directors without the further
approval of shareholders, except as otherwise provided in this
Article Sixth or to the extent that such approval is
required by governing law, rule or regulations. No shares of
capital stock (including shares issuable upon conversion,
exchange or exercise of other securities) shall be issued,
directly or indirectly, to officers, directors or controlling
persons of the Corporation other than as part of a general
public offering, unless their issuance or the plan (including
stock option plans) under which they would be issued has been
approved by a majority of the total votes to be cast at a legal
meeting of stockholders.
The board of directors is expressly authorized to provide, when
it deems necessary, for the issuance of shares of preferred
stock in one or more series, with such voting powers, and with
such designations, preferences, rights, qualifications,
limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be expressed in
resolution or resolutions of the board of directors, authorizing
such issuance, including (but without limiting the generality of
the foregoing) the following:
(a) the designation of such series;
(b) the dividend rate of such series, the conditions and
dates upon which the dividends shall be payable, the preference
or relation which such dividends shall bear to the dividends
payable on any other class or classes of capital stock of the
Corporation, and whether such dividends shall be cumulative or
non-cumulative;
(c) whether the shares of such series shall be subject to
redemption by the Corporation, and if made subject to such
redemption, the terms and conditions of such redemption;
(d) the terms and amount of any sinking fund provided for
the purchase or redemption of the shares of such series;
(e) whether the shares of such series shall be convertible
and if provision be made for conversion, the terms of such
conversion;
(f) the extent, if any, to which the holders of such shares
shall be entitled to vote; provided however, that in no event,
shall any holder of any series of preferred stock be entitled to
more than vote for each such share;
(g) the restrictions and conditions, if any, upon the issue
or re-issue of any additional preferred stock ranking on a
parity with or prior to such shares as to dividends or upon
dissolution; and
(h) the rights of the holders of such shares upon
dissolution of, or upon distribution of assets of the
Corporation, which rights may be different in the case of
voluntary dissolution.
A-1
Exhibit B
Proposed Amendment to
Article SIXTH of the Restated Articles of
Incorporation
(new language in bold)
The following is hereby added to the end of Article SIXTH:
Effective upon the filing of this Restated Articles of
Incorporation with Puerto Rico Department of State (the
Effective Time), every [number ranging from 10 to
20] shares of Common Stock, par value [$1.00 per share][or
$0.10 per share if Proposal No. 3 is adopted], issued
and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall,
automatically and without any action on the part of the
respective holders thereof, be combined, reclassified and
changed into one fully paid and non-assessable share of Common
Stock, par value [$1.00/$0.10] per share; provided, however,
that no fractional shares shall be issued. Stockholders who
would otherwise be entitled to a fractional share will receive a
cash payment in lieu of such fractional share.
Any Stockholder who, immediately prior to the Effective
Time, owns a number of shares of Old Common Stock which is not
evenly divisible by [number ranging from 10 to 20] shall, with
respect to such fractional interest, be entitled to receive cash
in lieu of any fractional share of New Common Stock in an amount
equal to the Stockholders pro rata share of net proceeds
attributable to the sale of such fractional shares following the
aggregation and sale by the Corporations exchange agent of
all fractional shares of New Common Stock otherwise issuable.
Each certificate that theretofore represented shares of Old
Common Stock shall thereafter represent the number of shares of
New Common Stock into which shares of Old Common Stock
represented by such certificate shall have been reclassified and
combined; provided, that each person holding of record a stock
certificate or certificates that represented shares of Old
Common Stock shall receive upon surrender of such certificate or
certificates, a new certificate or certificates evidencing and
representing the number of shares of New Common Stock to which
such person is entitled under the foregoing reclassification and
combination.
B-1
Exhibit C
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the Year Ended December 31, 2009
C-1
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Fiscal
Year Ended December 31,
2009
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER
001-14793
FIRST BANCORP.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
66-0561882
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1519 Ponce de León Avenue, Stop 23
Santurce, Puerto Rico
(Address of principal
executive office)
|
|
00908
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(787)
729-8200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock ($1.00 par value)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Stock, Series A (Liquidation Preference $25 per
share)
|
|
|
8.35% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Stock, Series B (Liquidation Preference $25 per
share)
|
|
|
7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Stock, Series C (Liquidation Preference $25 per
share)
|
|
|
7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Stock, Series D (Liquidation Preference $25 per
share)
|
|
|
7.00% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Stock, Series E (Liquidation Preference $25 per
share)
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well- known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definite proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by
non affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2009 (the
last day of the registrants most recently completed second
quarter) was $328,696,232 based on the closing price of $3.95
per share of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on
June 30, 2009. The registrant had no nonvoting common
equity outstanding as of June 30, 2009. For the purposes of
the foregoing calculation only, registrant has treated as common
stock held by affiliates only common stock of the registrant
held by its directors and executive officers and voting stock
held by the registrants employee benefit plans. The
registrants response to this item is not intended to be an
admission that any person is an affiliate of the registrant for
any purposes other than this response.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date: 92,542,722 shares as of January 31,
2010.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be held in April 2010, which will be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within
120 days after the end of the registrants fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009, are incorporated by reference into
Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, of this
Form-10-K.
FIRST
BANCORP
2009
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
2
Forward
Looking Statements
This
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
When used in this
Form 10-K
or future filings by First BanCorp (the Corporation)
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),
in the Corporations press releases or in other public or
stockholder communications, or in oral statements made with the
approval of an authorized executive officer, the word or phrases
would be, will allow, intends
to, will likely result, are expected
to, should, anticipate and similar
expressions are meant to identify forward-looking
statements.
First BanCorp wishes to caution readers not to place undue
reliance on any such forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date made, and represent First
BanCorps expectations of future conditions or results and
are not guarantees of future performance. First BanCorp advises
readers that various factors could cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in any
forward-looking statement. Such factors include, but
are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about whether the Corporations actions to
improve its capital structure will have their intended effect;
|
|
|
|
the strength or weakness of the real estate market and of the
consumer and commercial credit sector and their impact on the
credit quality of the Corporations loans and other assets,
including the Corporations construction and commercial
real estate loan portfolios, which have contributed and may
continue to contribute to, among other things, the increase in
the levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs and the
provision expense;
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in general economic conditions in the United
States and in Puerto Rico, including the interest rate scenario,
market liquidity, housing absorption rates, real estate prices
and disruptions in the U.S. capital markets, which may
reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect
demand for all of the Corporations products and services
and the value of the Corporations assets, including the
value of derivative instruments used for protection from
interest rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
the Corporations reliance on brokered certificates of
deposit and its ability to continue to rely on the issuance of
brokered certificates of deposit to fund operations and provide
liquidity;
|
|
|
|
an adverse change in the Corporations ability to attract
new clients and retain existing ones;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in demand for the Corporations products and
services and lower revenues and earnings because of the
continued recession in Puerto Rico and the current fiscal
problems and budget deficit of the Puerto Rico government;
|
|
|
|
a need to recognize additional impairments of financial
instruments or goodwill relating to acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about regulatory and legislative changes for
financial services companies in Puerto Rico, the United States
and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, which could affect
the Corporations financial performance and could cause the
Corporations actual results for future periods to differ
materially from prior results and anticipated or projected
results;
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about the effectiveness of the various actions
undertaken to stimulate the U.S. economy and stabilize the
U.S. financial markets, and the impact such actions may
have on the Corporations business, financial condition and
results of operations;
|
|
|
|
changes in the fiscal and monetary policies and regulations of
the federal government, including those determined by the
Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve), the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC),
government-sponsored housing agencies and local regulators in
Puerto Rico and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the FDIC may further increase the deposit
insurance premium
and/or
require special assessments to replenish its insurance fund,
causing an additional increase in our non-interest expense;
|
|
|
|
risks of an additional allowance as a result of an analysis of
the ability to generate sufficient income to realize the benefit
of the deferred tax asset;
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
risks of not being able to recover the assets pledged to Lehman
Brothers Special Financing, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
changes in the Corporations expenses associated with
acquisitions and dispositions;
|
|
|
|
developments in technology;
|
|
|
|
the impact of Doral Financial Corporations financial
condition on the repayment of its outstanding secured loans to
the Corporation;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with further downgrades in the credit ratings
of the Corporations securities;
|
|
|
|
general competitive factors and industry consolidation; and
|
|
|
|
the possible future dilution to holders of our Common Stock
resulting from additional issuances of Common Stock or
securities convertible into Common Stock.
|
The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims
any obligation, to update any of the forward- looking
statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events
or circumstances after the date of such statements except as
required by the federal securities laws.
Investors should carefully consider these factors and the risk
factors outlined under Item 1A, Risk Factors, in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
4
PART I
FirstBanCorp, incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, is sometimes referred to in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
as the Corporation, we, our,
the Registrant.
GENERAL
First BanCorp is a publicly-owned financial holding company that
is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the
Federal Reserve Board (the FED). The Corporation was
incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
to serve as the bank holding company for FirstBank Puerto Rico
(FirstBank or the Bank). The Corporation
is a full service provider of financial services and products
with operations in Puerto Rico, the United States and the US and
British Virgin Islands. As of December 31, 2009, the
Corporation had total assets of $19.6 billion, total
deposits of $12.7 billion and total stockholders
equity of $1.6 billion.
The Corporation provides a wide range of financial services for
retail, commercial and institutional clients. As of
December 31, 2009, the Corporation controlled three
wholly-owned subsidiaries: FirstBank, FirstBank Insurance
Agency, Inc. (FirstBank Insurance Agency) and Grupo
Empresas de Servicios Financieros (d/b/a PR Finance
Group). FirstBank is a Puerto Rico-chartered commercial
bank, FirstBank Insurance Agency is a Puerto Rico-chartered
insurance agency and PR Finance Group is a domestic corporation.
FirstBank is subject to the supervision, examination and
regulation of both the Office of the Commissioner of Financial
Institutions of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
(OCIF) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(the FDIC). Deposits are insured through the FDIC
Deposit Insurance Fund. In addition, within FirstBank, the
Banks United States Virgin Islands operations are subject
to regulation and examination by the United States Virgin
Islands Banking Board, and the British Virgin Islands operations
are subject to regulation by the British Virgin Islands
Financial Services Commission. FirstBank Insurance Agency is
subject to the supervision, examination and regulation of the
Office of the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico and operates nine offices in Puerto Rico. PR Finance
Group is subject to the supervision, examination and regulation
of the OCIF.
FirstBank conducted its business through its main office located
in San Juan, Puerto Rico, forty-eight full service banking
branches in Puerto Rico, sixteen branches in the United States
Virgin Islands (USVI) and British Virgin Islands (BVI) and ten
branches in the state of Florida (USA). FirstBank had six
wholly-owned subsidiaries with operations in Puerto Rico: First
Leasing and Rental Corporation, a vehicle leasing company with
two offices in Puerto Rico; First Federal Finance Corp. (d/b/a
Money Express La Financiera), a finance company specializing in
the origination of small loans with twenty-seven offices in
Puerto Rico; First Mortgage, Inc. (First Mortgage),
a residential mortgage loan origination company with
thirty-eight offices in FirstBank branches and at stand alone
sites; First Management of Puerto Rico, a domestic corporation;
FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities Corp, a broker-dealer
subsidiary created in March 2009 and engaged in municipal bond
underwriting and financial advisory services on structured
financings principally provided to government entities in the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and FirstBank Overseas Corporation,
an international banking entity organized under the
International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico. FirstBank had
three subsidiaries with operations outside of Puerto Rico: First
Insurance Agency VI, Inc., an insurance agency with three
offices that sells insurance products in the USVI; and First
Express, a finance company specializing in the origination of
small loans with three offices in the USVI.
Effective July 1, 2009, the Corporation consolidated the
operations of FirstBank Florida, formerly a stock savings and
loan association indirectly owned by the Corporation, with and
into FirstBank Puerto Rico and dissolved Ponce General
Corporation, former holding company of FirstBank Florida. On
October 30, 2009, the Corporation divested its motor
vehicle rental operations held through First Leasing and Rental
Corporation through the sale of such business.
5
BUSINESS
SEGMENTS
The Corporation has six reportable segments: Commercial and
Corporate Banking; Mortgage Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking;
Treasury and Investments; United States Operations; and Virgin
Islands Operations. These segments are described below:
Commercial
and Corporate Banking
The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the
Corporations lending and other services for the public
sector and specialized industries such as healthcare, tourism,
financial institutions, food and beverage, shopping centers and
middle-market clients. The Commercial and Corporate Banking
segment offers commercial loans, including commercial real
estate and construction loans, and other products such as cash
management and business management services. A substantial
portion of this portfolio is secured by the underlying value of
the real estate collateral, and collateral and the personal
guarantees of the borrowers are taken in abundance of caution.
Although commercial loans involve greater credit risk than a
typical residential mortgage loan because they are larger in
size and more risk is concentrated in a single borrower, the
Corporation has and maintains a credit risk management
infrastructure designed to mitigate potential losses associated
with commercial lending, including strong underwriting and loan
review functions, sales of loan participations and continuous
monitoring of concentrations within portfolios.
Mortgage
Banking
The Mortgage Banking segment conducts its operations mainly
through FirstBank and its mortgage origination subsidiary,
FirstMortgage. These operations consist of the origination, sale
and servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loans
products. Originations are sourced through different channels
such as branches, mortgage bankers and real estate brokers, and
in association with new project developers. FirstMortgage
focuses on originating residential real estate loans, some of
which conform to Federal Housing Administration
(FHA), Veterans Administration (VA) and
Rural Development (RD) standards. Loans originated
that meet FHA standards qualify for the federal agencys
insurance program whereas loans that meet VA and RD standards
are guaranteed by their respective federal agencies. In December
2008, the Corporation obtained from the Government National
Mortgage Association (GNMA) the necessary Commitment
Authority to issue GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Under this
program, during 2009, the Corporation completed the
securitization of approximately $305.4 million of FHA/VA
mortgage loans into GNMA MBS.
Mortgage loans that do not qualify under these programs are
commonly referred to as conventional loans. Conventional real
estate loans could be conforming and non-conforming. Conforming
loans are residential real estate loans that meet the standards
for sale under the Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac
(FHLMC) programs whereas loans that do not meet the
standards are referred to as non-conforming residential real
estate loans. The Corporations strategy is to penetrate
markets by providing customers with a variety of high quality
mortgage products to serve their financial needs faster and
simpler and at competitive prices. The Mortgage Banking segment
also acquires and sells mortgages in the secondary markets.
Residential real estate conforming loans are sold to investors
like FNMA and FHLMC. More than 90% of the Corporations
residential mortgage loan portfolio consists of fixed-rate,
fully amortizing, full documentation loans that have a lower
risk than the typical
sub-prime
loans that have adversely affected the U.S. real estate
market. The Corporation is not active in negative amortization
loans or option adjustable rate mortgage loans (ARMs) including
ARMs with teaser rates.
Consumer
(Retail) Banking
The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment consists of the
Corporations consumer lending and deposit-taking
activities conducted mainly through its branch network and loan
centers in Puerto Rico. Loans to consumers include auto, boat,
lines of credit, and personal loans. Deposit products include
interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking and savings
accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) and retail
certificates of deposit. Retail deposits gathered through each
branch of FirstBanks retail network serve as one of the
funding sources for the lending and investment activities.
6
Consumer lending has been mainly driven by auto loan
originations. The Corporation follows a strategy of seeking to
provide outstanding service to selected auto dealers that
provide the channel for the bulk of the Corporations auto
loan originations. This strategy is directly linked to our
commercial lending activities as the Corporation maintains
strong and stable auto floor plan relationships, which are the
foundation of a successful auto loan generation operation. The
Corporations commercial relations with floor plan dealers
are strong and directly benefit the Corporations consumer
lending operation and are managed as part of the consumer
banking activities.
Personal loans and, to a lesser extent, marine financing and a
small revolving credit portfolio also contribute to interest
income generated on consumer lending. Credit card accounts are
issued under the Banks name through an alliance with FIA
Card Services (Bank of America), which bears the credit risk.
Management plans to continue to be active in the consumer loans
market, applying the Corporations strict underwriting
standards.
Treasury
and Investments
The Treasury and Investments segment is responsible for the
Corporations treasury and investment management functions.
In the treasury function, which includes funding and liquidity
management, this segment sells funds to the Commercial and
Corporate Banking, Mortgage Banking, and Consumer (Retail)
Banking segments to finance their lending activities and
purchases funds gathered by those segments. Funds not gathered
by the different business units are obtained by the Treasury
Division through wholesale channels, such as brokered deposits,
Advances from the FHLB and repurchase agreements with investment
securities, among others.
Since the Corporation is a net borrower of funds, the securities
portfolio does not result from the investment of excess funds.
The securities portfolio is a leverage strategy for the purposes
of liquidity management, interest rate management and earnings
enhancement.
The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and
Investments are based on market rates.
United
States Operations
The United States operations segment consists of all banking
activities conducted by FirstBank in the United States mainland.
The Corporation provides a wide range of banking services to
individual and corporate customers in the state of Florida
through its ten branches and two specialized lending centers. In
the United States, the Corporation originally had an agency
lending office in Miami, Florida. Then, it acquired Coral
Gables-based Ponce General (the parent company of Unibank, a
savings and loans bank in 2005) and changed the savings and
loans name to FirstBank Florida. Those two entities were
operated separately. In 2009, the Corporation filed an
application with the Office of Thrift Supervision to surrender
the Miami-based FirstBank Florida charter and merge its assets
into FirstBank Puerto Rico, the main subsidiary of First
BanCorp. The Corporation placed the entire Florida operation
under the control of a new appointed Executive Vice President.
The merger allows the Florida operations to benefit by
leveraging the capital position of FirstBank Puerto Rico and
thereby provide them with the support necessary to grow in the
Florida market.
Virgin
Islands Operations
The Virgin Islands operations segment consists of all banking
activities conducted by FirstBank in the U.S. and British
Virgin Islands, including retail and commercial banking
services. In 2002, after acquiring Chase Manhattan Bank
operations in the Virgin Islands, FirstBank became the largest
bank in the Virgin Islands (USVI & BVI), serving St.
Thomas, St. Croix, St. John, Tortola and Virgin Gorda, with
16 branches. In 2008, FirstBank acquired the Virgin Island
Community Bank (VICB) in St. Croix, increasing
its customer base and share in this market. The Virgin Islands
operations segment is driven by its consumer and commercial
lending and deposit-taking activities. Loans to consumers
include auto, boat, lines of credit, personal loans and
residential mortgage loans. Deposit products include interest
bearing and non-interest bearing checking and savings accounts,
Individual Retirement Accounts (IRA) and retail certificates of
deposit. Retail deposits gathered through each branch serve as
the funding sources for the lending activities.
7
For information regarding First BanCorps reportable
segments, please refer to Note 33, Segment
Information, to the Corporations financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
Employees
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation and its
subsidiaries employed 2,713 persons. None of its employees
are represented by a collective bargaining group. The
Corporation considers its employee relations to be good.
SIGNIFICANT
EVENTS DURING 2009
Participation
in the U.S. Treasury Departments Capital Purchase
Program
On January 16, 2009, the Corporation entered into a Letter
Agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury
(Treasury) pursuant to which Treasury invested
$400,000,000 in preferred stock of the Corporation under the
Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase
Program. Under the Letter Agreement, which incorporates the
Securities Purchase Agreement Standard Terms (the
Purchase Agreement), the Corporation issued and sold
to Treasury (1) 400,000 shares of the
Corporations Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred
Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference per share
(the Series F Preferred Stock), and (2) a
warrant dated January 16, 2009 (the Warrant) to
purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporations common
stock (the Warrant shares) at an exercise price of
$10.27 per share. The exercise price of the Warrant was
determined based upon the average of the closing prices of the
Corporations common stock during the 20-trading day period
ended December 19, 2008, the last trading day prior to the
date the Corporations application to participate in the
program was preliminarily approved. The Purchase Agreement is
incorporated into Exhibit 10.4 hereto by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Corporations
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on January 20, 2009.
The Series F Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1
regulatory capital. Cumulative dividends on the Series F
Preferred Stock will accrue on the liquidation preference amount
on a quarterly basis at a rate of 5% per annum for the first
five years, and thereafter at a rate of 9% per annum, but will
only be paid when, as and if declared by the Corporations
Board of Directors out of assets legally available therefore.
The Series F Preferred Stock will rank pari passu with the
Corporations existing 7.125% Noncumulative Perpetual
Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A, 8.35%
Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series B, 7.40% Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income
Preferred Stock, Series C, 7.25% Noncumulative Perpetual
Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series D, and 7.00%
Noncumulative Perpetual Monthly Income Preferred Stock,
Series E, in terms of dividend payments and distributions
upon liquidation, dissolution and winding up of the Corporation.
The Purchase Agreement contains limitations on the payment of
dividends on common stock, including limiting regular quarterly
cash dividends to an amount not exceeding the last quarterly
cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced
(if lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008,
which is $0.07 per share. The ability of the Corporation to
purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, any
shares of its common stock, preferred stock or trust preferred
securities are subject to restrictions outlined in the Purchase
Agreement, including upon a default in the payment of dividends.
The Corporation suspended the payment of dividends effective in
August 2009. These restrictions will terminate on the earlier of
(a) January 16, 2012 and (b) the date on which
the Series F Preferred Stock is redeemed in whole or
Treasury transfers all of the Series F Preferred Stock to
third parties that are not affiliates of Treasury.
The shares of Series F Preferred Stock are non-voting,
other than having class voting rights on certain matters that
could adversely affect the Series F Preferred Stock. If
dividends on the Series F Preferred Stock have not been
paid for an aggregate of six quarterly dividend periods or more,
whether or not consecutive, the Corporations authorized
number of directors will be increased automatically by two and
the holders of the Series F Preferred Stock, voting
together with holders of any then outstanding parity stock, will
have the right to elect two directors to fill such newly created
directorships at the Corporations next annual meeting of
stockholders or at a special meeting of stockholders called for
that purpose prior to such annual meeting.
8
These preferred share directors will be elected annually and
will serve until all accrued and unpaid dividends on the
Series F Preferred Stock have been declared and paid in
full.
On January 13, 2009, the Corporation filed a Certificate of
Designations (the Certificate of Designations) with
the Puerto Rico Department of State for the purpose of amending
its Certificate of Incorporation to fix the designations,
preferences, limitations and relative rights of the
Series F Preferred Stock.
As per the Purchase Agreement, prior to January 16, 2012,
the Corporation may redeem, subject to the approval of the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the shares of
Series F Preferred Stock only with proceeds from one or
more Qualified Equity Offerings, as such term is
defined in the Certificate of Designations. After
January 16, 2012, the Corporation may redeem, subject to
the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, in whole or in part, out of funds legally available
therefore, the shares of Series F Preferred Stock then
outstanding. Pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009, subject to consultation with the appropriate
Federal banking agency, the Secretary of Treasury may permit a
TARP recipient to repay any financial assistance previously
provided under TARP without regard to whether the financial
institution has replaced such funds from any other source.
The Warrant has a ten-year term and is exercisable at any time
for 5,842,259 shares of First BanCorp common stock at an
exercise price of $10.27. The exercise price and the number of
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are
adjustable in a number of circumstances, as discussed below. The
exercise price and the number of shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise of the Warrant will be adjusted proportionately:
|
|
|
|
|
in the event of a stock split, subdivision, reclassification or
combination of the outstanding shares of common stock;
|
|
|
|
until the earlier of the date the Treasury no longer holds the
Warrant or any portion thereof or January 16, 2012, if the
Corporation issues shares of common stock or securities
convertible into common stock for no consideration or at a price
per share that is less than 90% of the market price on the last
trading day preceding the date of the pricing of such sale. Any
amounts that the Corporation receives in connection with the
issuance of such shares or convertible securities will be deemed
to be equal to the sum of the net offering price of all such
securities plus the minimum aggregate amount, if any, payable
upon exercise or conversion of any such convertible securities;
no adjustment will be required with respect to
(i) consideration for or to fund business or asset
acquisitions, (ii) shares issued in connection with
employee benefit plans and compensation arrangements in the
ordinary course consistent with past practice approved by the
Corporations Board of Directors, (iii) a public or
broadly marketed offering and sale by the Corporation or its
affiliates of the Corporations common stock or convertible
securities for cash pursuant to registration under the
Securities Act or issuance under Rule 144A on a basis
consistent with capital raising transactions by comparable
financial institutions, and (iv) the exercise of preemptive
rights on terms existing on January 16, 2009;
|
|
|
|
in connection with the Corporations distributions to
security holders (e.g., stock dividends);
|
|
|
|
in connection with certain repurchases of common stock by the
Corporation; and
|
|
|
|
in connection with certain business combinations.
|
None of the shares of Series F Preferred Stock, the
Warrant, or the Warrant shares are subject to any contractual
restriction on transfer. The Series F Preferred Stock and
the Warrant were issued in a private placement exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended. The Corporation registered for resale
shares of Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant and the
Warrant shares, and the sale of the Warrant shares by the
Corporation to any purchasers of the Warrant. In addition, under
the shelf registration, the Corporation registered the resale of
9,250,450 shares of common stock by or on behalf of the
Bank of Nova Scotia, its pledges, donees, transferees or other
successors in interest.
Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, (i) the
Corporation amended its compensation, bonus, incentive and other
benefit plans, arrangements and agreements (including severance
and employment agreements), to the extent necessary to be in
compliance with the executive compensation and corporate
9
governance requirements of Section 111(b) of the Emergency
Economic Stability Act of 2008 and applicable guidance or
regulations and (ii) each Senior Executive Officer, as
defined in the Purchase Agreement, executed a written waiver
releasing Treasury and the Corporation from any claims that such
officers may otherwise have as a result of the
Corporations amendment of such arrangements and agreements
to be in compliance with Section 111(b). Until such time as
Treasury ceases to own any debt or equity securities of the
Corporation acquired pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the
Corporation must maintain compliance with these requirements.
Reduction
of credit exposure with financial institutions
The Corporation has continued working on the reduction of its
credit exposure with Doral and R&G Financial. During
the second quarter of 2009, the Bank purchased from
R&G Financial $205 million of residential
mortgages that previously served as collateral for a commercial
loan extended to R&G . The purchase price of the
transaction was retained by the Corporation to fully pay off the
commercial loan, thereby significantly reducing the
Corporations exposure to a single borrower. As of
December 31, 2009, there still an outstanding balance of
$321.5 million due from Doral.
Surrender
of the stock savings and loans association charter in
Florida
Effective July 1, 2009 as part of the merger of FirstBank
Florida with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico, FirstBank Florida
surrendered its stock savings and loans association charter
granted by the Office of Thrift Supervsion. Under the regulatory
oversight of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and under
the FirstBank Florida trade name, FirstBank continues to offer
the same services offered by the former stock savings and loans
association through its branch network in Florida.
Dividend
Suspension
On July 30, 2009, after reporting a net loss for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation announced that
the Board of Directors resolved to suspend the payment of the
common and preferred dividends, including the Series F
Preferred Stock, effective with the preferred dividend payments
for the month of August 2009.
Business
Developments
Effective July 1, 2009, the Corporation consolidated the
operations of FirstBank Florida, formerly a stock savings and
loan association indirectly owned by the Corporation, with and
into FirstBank Puerto Rico and dissolved Ponce General
Corporation, former holding company of FirstBank Florida.
On October 31, 2009, First Leasing and Rental Corporation
sold its motor vehicle rental operations and realized a nominal
gain of $0.2 million.
Credit
Ratings
The Corporations credit as long-term issuer is currently
rated B by Standard & Poors
(S&P) and B- by Fitch Ratings Limited
(Fitch); both with negative outlook.
FirstBanks long-term senior debt rating is currently rated
B1 by Moodys Investor Service (Moodys), four
notches below their definition of investment grade; B by
S&P, and B by Fitch, both five notches under their
definition of investment grade. The outlook on the Banks
credit ratings from the three rating agencies is negative.
WEBSITE
ACCESS TO REPORT
The Corporation makes available annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, free of charge on or through its internet website at
www.firstbankpr.com,
10
(under the Investor Relations section), as soon as
reasonably practicable after the Corporation electronically
files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC.
The Corporation also makes available the Corporations
corporate governance guidelines, the charters of the audit,
asset/liability, compensation and benefits, credit, strategic
planning, corporate governance and nominating committees and the
codes and principles mentioned below, free of charge on or
through its internet website at www.firstbankpr.com
(under the Investor Relations section):
|
|
|
|
|
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers
|
|
|
|
Code of Ethics applicable to all employees
|
|
|
|
Independence Principles for Directors
|
The corporate governance guidelines, and the aforementioned
charters and codes may also be obtained free of charge by
sending a written request to Mr. Lawrence Odell, Executive
Vice President and General Counsel, PO Box 9146,
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00908.
The public may read and copy any materials First BanCorp files
with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. In addition,
the public may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy,
and information statements, and other information regarding
issuers that file electronically with the SEC at its website
(www.sec.gov).
MARKET
AREA AND COMPETITION
Puerto Rico, where the banking market is highly competitive, is
the main geographic service area of the Corporation. As of
December 31, 2009, the Corporation also had a presence in
the state of Florida and in the United States and British Virgin
Islands. Puerto Rico banks are subject to the same federal laws,
regulations and supervision that apply to similar institutions
in the United States mainland.
Competitors include other banks, insurance companies, mortgage
banking companies, small loan companies, automobile financing
companies, leasing companies, brokerage firms with retail
operations, and credit unions in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands
and the state of Florida. The Corporations businesses
compete with these other firms with respect to the range of
products and services offered and the types of clients,
customers, and industries served.
The Corporations ability to compete effectively depends on
the relative performance of its products, the degree to which
the features of its products appeal to customers, and the extent
to which the Corporation meets clients needs and
expectations. The Corporations ability to compete also
depends on its ability to attract and retain professional and
other personnel, and on its reputation.
The Corporation encounters intense competition in attracting and
retaining deposits and its consumer and commercial lending
activities. The Corporation competes for loans with other
financial institutions, some of which are larger and have
greater resources available than those of the Corporation.
Management believes that the Corporation has been able to
compete effectively for deposits and loans by offering a variety
of transaction account products and loans with competitive
features, by pricing its products at competitive interest rates,
by offering convenient branch locations, and by emphasizing the
quality of its service. The Corporations ability to
originate loans depends primarily on the rates and fees charged
and the service it provides to its borrowers in making prompt
credit decisions. There can be no assurance that in the future
the Corporation will be able to continue to increase its deposit
base or originate loans in the manner or on the terms on which
it has done so in the past.
SUPERVISION
AND REGULATION
Recent
Events affecting the Corporation
Events since early 2008 affecting the financial services
industry and, more generally, the financial markets and the
economy as a whole, have led to various proposals for changes in
the regulation of the financial
11
services industry. In 2009, the House of Representatives passed
the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009,
which, among other things, calls for the establishment of a
Consumer Financial Protection Agency having broad authority to
regulate providers of credit, savings, payment and other
consumer financial products and services; creates a new
structure for resolving troubled or failed financial
institutions; requires certain
over-the-counter
derivative transactions to be cleared in a central clearinghouse
and/or
effected on the exchange; revises the assessment base for the
calculation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) assessments; and creates a structure to
regulate systemically important financial companies, including
providing regulators with the power to require such companies to
sell or transfer assets and terminate activities if they
determine that the size or scope of activities of the company
pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the company or the
financial stability of the United States. Other proposals have
been made, including additional capital and liquidity
requirements and limitations on size or types of activity in
which banks may engage. It is not clear at this time which of
these proposals will be finally enacted into law, or what form
they will take, or what new proposals may be made, as the debate
over financial reform continues in 2010. The description below
summarizes the current regulatory structure in which the
Corporation operates. In the event the regulatory structure
change significantly, the structure of the Corporation and the
products and services it offers could also change significantly
as a result.
Bank
Holding Company Activities and Other Limitations
The Corporation is subject to ongoing regulation, supervision,
and examination by the Federal Reserve Board, and is required to
file with the Federal Reserve Board periodic and annual reports
and other information concerning its own business operations and
those of its subsidiaries. In addition, the Corporation is
subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of
1956, as amended (Bank Holding Company Act). Under
the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act, a bank holding
company must obtain Federal Reserve Board approval before it
acquires direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5%
of the voting shares of another bank, or merges or consolidates
with another bank holding company. The Federal Reserve Board
also has authority under certain circumstances to issue cease
and desist orders against bank holding companies and their
non-bank subsidiaries.
A bank holding company is prohibited under the Bank Holding
Company Act, with limited exceptions, from engaging, directly or
indirectly, in any business unrelated to the businesses of
banking or managing or controlling banks. One of the exceptions
to these prohibitions permits ownership by a bank holding
company of the shares of any corporation if the Federal Reserve
Board, after due notice and opportunity for hearing, by
regulation or order has determined that the activities of the
corporation in question are so closely related to the businesses
of banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper
incident thereto.
Under the Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company
such as the Corporation is expected to act as a source of
financial strength to its banking subsidiaries and to commit
support to them. This support may be required at times when,
absent such policy, the bank holding company might not otherwise
provide such support. In the event of a bank holding
companys bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding
company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain capital
of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee
and be entitled to a priority of payment. In addition, any
capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary
banks must be subordinated in right of payment to deposits and
to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary bank. As of
December 31, 2009, FirstBank was the only depository
institution subsidiary of the Corporation.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the GLB Act) revised and
expanded the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act by
including a section that permits a bank holding company to elect
to become a financial holding company and engage in a full range
of financial activities. In April 2000, the Corporation filed an
election with the Federal Reserve Board and became a financial
holding company under the GLB Act. The GLB Act requires a bank
holding company that elects to become a financial holding
company to file a written declaration with the appropriate
Federal Reserve Bank and comply with the following (and such
compliance must continue while the entity is treated as a
financial holding company): (i) state that the bank holding
company elects to become a financial holding company;
(ii) provide the name and head office address of the bank
holding company and each depository institution controlled by
the bank holding company; (iii) certify
12
that all depository institutions controlled by the bank holding
company are well-capitalized as of the date the bank holding
company files for the election; (iv) provide the capital
ratios for all relevant capital measures as of the close of the
previous quarter for each depository institution controlled by
the bank holding company; and (v) certify that all
depository institutions controlled by the bank holding company
are well-managed as of the date the bank holding company files
the election. All insured depository institutions controlled by
the bank holding company must have also achieved at least a
rating of satisfactory record of meeting community credit
needs under the Community Reinvestment Act during the
depository institutions most recent examination.
A financial holding company ceasing to meet these standards is
subject to a variety of restrictions, depending on the
circumstances. If the Federal Reserve Board determines that any
of the financial holding companys subsidiary depository
institutions are either not well-capitalized or not
well-managed, it must notify the financial holding company.
Until compliance is restored, the Federal Reserve Board has
broad discretion to impose appropriate limitations on the
financial holding companys activities. If compliance is
not restored within 180 days, the Federal Reserve Board may
ultimately require the financial holding company to divest its
depository institutions or in the alternative, to discontinue or
divest any activities that are permitted only to non-financial
holding company bank holding companies.
The potential restrictions are different if the lapse pertains
to the Community Reinvestment Act requirement. In that case,
until all the subsidiary institutions are restored to at least
satisfactory Community Reinvestment Act rating
status, the financial holding company may not engage, directly
or through a subsidiary, in any of the additional activities
permissible under the GLB Act or make additional acquisitions of
companies engaged in the additional activities. However,
completed acquisitions and additional activities and
affiliations previously begun are left undisturbed, as the GLB
Act does not require divestiture for this type of situation.
Financial holding companies may engage, directly or indirectly,
in any activity that is determined to be (i) financial in
nature, (ii) incidental to such financial activity, or
(iii) complementary to a financial activity and does not
pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of
depository institutions or the financial system generally. The
GLB Act specifically provides that the following activities have
been determined to be financial in nature:
(a) lending, trust and other banking activities;
(b) insurance activities; (c) financial or economic
advice or services; (d) pooled investments;
(e) securities underwriting and dealing; (f) existing
bank holding company domestic activities; (g) existing bank
holding company foreign activities; and (h) merchant
banking activities. The Corporation offers insurance agency
services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, FirstBank
Insurance Agency and through First Insurance Agency V. I., Inc.,
a subsidiary of FirstBank. In association with JP Morgan Chase,
the Corporation, through FirstBank Puerto Rico Securities, Inc.,
a wholly owned subsidiary of FirstBank, also offers municipal
bond underwriting services focused mainly on municipal and
government bonds or obligations issued by the Puerto Rico
government and its public corporations. Additionally, FirstBank
Puerto Rico Securities, Inc. offers financial advisory services.
In addition, the GLB Act specifically gives the Federal Reserve
Board the authority, by regulation or order, to expand the list
of financial or incidental activities,
but requires consultation with the Treasury, and gives the
Federal Reserve Board authority to allow a financial holding
company to engage in any activity that is
complementary to a financial activity and does not
pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of
depository institutions or the financial system generally.
Under the GLB Act, if the Corporation fails to meet any of the
requirements for being a financial holding company and is unable
to resolve such deficiencies within certain prescribed periods
of time, the Federal Reserve Board could require the Corporation
to divest control of one or more of its depository institution
subsidiaries or alternatively cease conducting financial
activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies
that are not financial holding companies.
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOA) implemented a
range of corporate governance and accounting measures to
increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced
penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly
traded companies, and to protect investors by improving the
accuracy and reliability
13
of disclosures under federal securities laws. In addition, SOA
has established membership requirements and responsibilities for
the audit committee, imposed restrictions on the relationship
between the Corporation and external auditors, imposed
additional responsibilities for the external financial
statements on our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, expanded the disclosure requirements for corporate
insiders, required management to evaluate its disclosure
controls and procedures and its internal control over financial
reporting, and required the auditors to issue a report on the
internal control over financial reporting.
Since the 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
the Corporation has included in its annual report on
Form 10-K
its management assessment regarding the effectiveness of the
Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
The internal control report includes a statement of
managements responsibility for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting
for the Corporation; managements assessment as to the
effectiveness of the Corporations internal control over
financial reporting based on managements evaluation, as of
year-end; and the framework used by management as criteria for
evaluating the effectiveness of the Corporations internal
control over financial reporting. As of December 31, 2009,
First BanCorps management concluded that its internal
control over financial reporting was effective. The
Corporations independent registered public accounting firm
reached the same conclusion.
Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization
Act of 2008 (the EESA) was signed into law. The EESA
authorized the Treasury to access up to $700 billion to
protect the U.S. economy and restore confidence and
stability to the financial markets. One such program under the
Treasury Departments Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)
was action by Treasury to make significant investments in
U.S. financial institutions through the Capital Purchase
Program (CPP). The Treasurys stated purpose in
implementing the CPP was to improve the capitalization of
healthy institutions, which would improve the flow of credit to
businesses and consumers, and boost the confidence of
depositors, investors, and counterparties alike. All federal
banking and thrift regulatory agencies encouraged eligible
institutions to participate in the CPP.
The Corporation applied for, and the Treasury approved, a
capital purchase in the amount of $400,000,000. The Corporation
entered into a Letter Agreement with the Treasury, pursuant to
which the Corporation issued and sold to the Treasury for an
aggregate purchase price of $400,000,000 in cash
(i) 400,000 shares of the Series F Preferred
Stock, and (2) the Warrant to purchase
5,842,259 shares of the Corporations common stock at
an exercise price of $10.27 per share, subject to certain
anti-dilution and other adjustments. The TARP transaction closed
on January 16, 2009.
Under the terms of the Letter Agreement with the Treasury,
(i) the Corporation amended its compensation, bonus,
incentive and other benefit plans, arrangements and agreements
(including severance and employment agreements) to the extent
necessary to be in compliance with the executive compensation
and corporate governance requirements of Section 111(b) of
the Emergency Economic Stability Act of 2008 and applicable
guidance or regulations issued by the Secretary of Treasury on
or prior to January 16, 2009 and (ii) each Senior
Executive Officer, as defined in the Purchase Agreement,
executed a written waiver releasing Treasury and the Corporation
from any claims that such officers may otherwise have as a
result the Corporations amendment of such arrangements and
agreements to be in compliance with Section 111(b). Until
such time as Treasury ceases to own any debt or equity
securities of the Corporation acquired pursuant to the Purchase
Agreement, the Corporation must maintain compliance with these
requirements.
American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
On February 17, 2009, the Congress enacted the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Stimulus
Act). The Stimulus Act includes federal tax cuts,
expansion of unemployment benefits and other social welfare
provisions, and domestic spending in education, health care, and
infrastructure, including energy sector. The Stimulus Act
includes new provisions relating to compensation paid by
institutions that receive government assistance under TARP,
including institutions that have already received such
assistance, effectively amending the existing compensation and
corporate governance requirements of Section 111(b) of the
EESA. The provisions include restrictions on the amounts and
forms of compensation payable, provision
14
for possible reimbursement of previously paid compensation and a
requirement that compensation be submitted to non-binding
say on pay shareholders votes.
On June 10, 2009, the Treasury issued regulations
implementing the compensation requirements under ARRA, which
amended the requirements of EESA. The regulations became
applicable to existing and new TARP recipients upon publication
in the Federal Register on June 15, 2009. The regulations
make effective the compensation provisions of ARRA and include
rules requiring: (i) review of prior compensation by a
Special Master; (ii) restrictions on paying or accruing
bonuses, retention awards or incentive compensation for certain
employees; (iii) regular review of all employee
compensation arrangements by the companys senior risk
officer and compensation committee to ensure that the
arrangements do not encourage unnecessary and excessive
risk-taking or manipulation of reporting earnings;
(iv) recoupment of bonus payments based on materially
inaccurate information; (v) prohibition on severance or
change in control payments for certain employees;
(vi) adoption of policies and procedures to avoid excessive
luxury expenses; and (vii) mandatory say on pay
votes (which was effective beginning in February 2009). In
addition, the regulations also introduce several additional
requirements and restrictions, including: (i) Special
Master review of ongoing compensation in certain situations;
(ii) prohibition on tax
gross-ups
for certain employees; (iii) disclosure of perquisites; and
(iv) disclosure regarding compensation consultants.
Homeowner
Affordability and Stability Plan
On February 18, 2009, President Obama announced a
comprehensive plan to help responsible homeowners avoid
foreclosure by providing affordable and sustainable mortgage
loans. The Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, a
$75 billion federal program, provides for a sweeping loan
modification program targeted at borrowers who are at risk of
foreclosure because their incomes are not sufficient to make
their mortgage payments. It also includes refinancing
opportunities for borrowers who are current on their mortgage
payments but have been unable to refinance because their homes
have decreased in value. Under the Homeowner Stability
Initiative, Treasury will spend up to $50 billion dollars
to make mortgage payments affordable and sustainable for
middle-income American families that are at risk of foreclosure.
Borrowers who are delinquent on the mortgage for their primary
residence and borrowers who, due to a loss of income or increase
in expenses, are struggling to keep their payments current may
be eligible for a loan modification. Under the Homeowner
Affordability and Stability Plan, borrowers who are current on
their mortgage but have been unable to refinance because their
house has decreased in value may have the opportunity to
refinance into a
30-year,
fixed-rate loan. Through the program, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
will allow the refinancing of mortgage loans that they hold in
their portfolios or that they guarantee in their own
mortgage-backed securities. Lenders were able to begin accepting
refinancing applications on March 4, 2009. The Obama
Administration announced on March 4, 2009 the new
U.S. Department of the Treasury guidelines to enable
servicers to begin modifications of eligible mortgages under the
Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan. The guidelines
implement financial incentives for mortgage lenders to modify
existing first mortgages and sets standard industry practice for
modifications.
Temporary
Liquidity Guarantee Program
The FDIC adopted the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
(TLGP) in October 2008 following a determination of
systemic risk by the Secretary of the Treasury (after
consultation with the President) that was supported by
recommendations from the FDIC and the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System. The TLGP is part of a coordinated effort
by the FDIC, the Treasury, and the Federal Reserve System to
address unprecedented disruptions in the credit markets and the
resultant difficulty of many financial institutions to obtain
funds and to make loans to creditworthy borrowers. On
October 23, 2008, the FDICs Board of Directors
(Board) authorized the publication in the Federal Register of an
interim rule that outlined the structure of the TLGP. The
interim rule was finalized and a final rule was published in the
Federal Register on November 26, 2008. Designed to assist
in the stabilization of the nations financial system, the
FDICs TLGP is composed of two distinct components: the
Debt Guarantee Program (DGP) and the Transaction
Account Guarantee Program (TAG program). Under the
DGP, the FDIC guarantees certain senior unsecured debt issued by
participating entities. Under the TAG program, the FDIC
guarantees all funds held in qualifying
15
noninterest-bearing transaction accounts at participating
insured depository institutions (IDIs). The DGP
initially permitted participating entities to issue
FDIC-guaranteed senior unsecured debt until June 30, 2009,
with the FDICs guarantee for such debt to expire on the
earlier of the maturity of the debt (or the conversion date, for
mandatory convertible debt) or June 30, 2012. To reduce the
potential for market disruptions at the conclusion of the DGP
and to begin the orderly phase-out of the program, on
May 29, 2009 the Board issued a final rule that extended
for four months the period during which certain participating
entities could issue FDIC-guaranteed debt. All IDIs and those
other participating entities that had issued FDIC-guaranteed
debt on or before April 1, 2009 were permitted to
participate in the extended DGP without application to the FDIC.
Other participating entities that received approval from the
FDIC also were permitted to participate in the extended DGP. The
expiration of the guarantee period was also extended from
June 30, 2012 to December 31, 2012. As a result, all
such participating entities were permitted to issue
FDIC-guaranteed debt through and including October 31,
2009, with the FDICs guarantee expiring on the earliest of
the debts mandatory conversion date (for mandatory
convertible debt), the stated maturity date, or
December 31, 2012.
On October 20, 2009, the FDIC established a limited,
six-month emergency guarantee facility upon expiration of the
DGP. Under this emergency guarantee facility, certain
participating entities can apply to the FDIC for permission to
issue FDIC-guaranteed debt during the period starting
October 31, 2009 through April 30, 2010. The fee for
issuing debt under the emergency facility will be at least
300 basis points, which the FDIC reserves the right to
increase on a
case-by-case
basis, depending upon the risks presented by the issuing entity.
The TAG Program has been extended until June 30, 2010. The
cost of participating in the program increased after
December 31, 2009. Separately, Congress extended the
temporary increase in the standard coverage limit to $250,000
until December 31, 2013. FirstBank currently participates
in the TLGP solely through the TAG program.
USA
Patriot Act
Under Title III of the USA Patriot Act, also known as the
International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorism
Financing Act of 2001, all financial institutions are required
to, among other things, identify their customers, adopt formal
and comprehensive anti-money laundering programs, scrutinize or
prohibit altogether certain transactions of special concern, and
be prepared to respond to inquiries from U.S. law
enforcement agencies concerning their customers and their
transactions. Presently, only certain types of financial
institutions (including banks, savings associations and money
services businesses) are subject to final rules implementing the
anti-money laundering program requirements of the USA Patriot
Act.
Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA
Patriot Acts requirements could have serious legal and
reputational consequences for the institutions. The Corporation
has adopted appropriate policies, procedures and controls to
address compliance with the USA Patriot Act and Treasury
regulations.
Privacy
Policies
Under Title V of the GLB Act, all financial institutions
are required to adopt privacy policies, restrict the sharing of
nonpublic customer data with parties at the customers
request and establish policies and procedures to protect
customer data from unauthorized access. The Corporation and its
subsidiaries have adopted policies and procedures in order to
comply with the privacy provisions of the GLB Act and the Fair
and Accurate Credit Transaction Act of 2003 and the regulations
issued thereunder.
State
Chartered Non-Member Bank and Banking Laws and Regulations in
General
FirstBank is subject to regulation and examination by the OCIF
and the FDIC, and is subject to certain requirements established
by the Federal Reserve Board. The federal and state laws and
regulations which are applicable to banks regulate, among other
things, the scope of their businesses, their investments, their
reserves against deposits, the timing and availability of
deposited funds, and the nature and amount of and collateral for
certain loans. In addition to the impact of regulations,
commercial banks are affected significantly by the actions of
the Federal Reserve Board as it attempts to control the money
supply and credit availability in order to influence the
economy. Among the instruments used by the Federal Reserve Board
to implement these
16
objectives are open market operations in U.S. government
securities, adjustments of the discount rate, and changes in
reserve requirements against bank deposits. These instruments
are used in varying combinations to influence overall economic
growth and the distribution of credit, bank loans, investments
and deposits. Their use also affects interest rates charged on
loans or paid on deposits. The monetary policies and regulations
of the Federal Reserve Board have had a significant effect on
the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are
expected to continue to do so in the future. The effects of such
policies upon our future business, earnings, and growth cannot
be predicted.
References herein to applicable statutes or regulations are
brief summaries of portions thereof which do not purport to be
complete and which are qualified in their entirety by reference
to those statutes and regulations. Any change in applicable laws
or regulations may have a material adverse effect on the
business of commercial banks, and bank holding companies,
including FirstBank and the Corporation.
As a creditor and financial institution, FirstBank is subject to
certain regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board,
including, without limitation, Regulation B (Equal Credit
Opportunity Act), Regulation DD (Truth in Savings Act),
Regulation E (Electronic Funds Transfer Act),
Regulation F (Limits on Exposure to Other Banks),
Regulation O (Loans to Executive Officers, Directors and
Principal Shareholders), Regulation W (Transactions Between
Member Banks and Their Affiliates), Regulation Z (Truth in
Lending Act), Regulation CC (Expedited Funds Availability
Act), Regulation X (Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act),
Regulation BB (Community Reinvestment Act) and
Regulation C (Home Mortgage Disclosure Act).
During 2008, federal agencies adopted revisions to several rules
and regulations that will impact lenders and secondary market
activities. In 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank revised
Regulation Z, adopted under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA)
and the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA), by
adopting a final rule which prohibits unfair, abusive or
deceptive home mortgage lending practices and restricts certain
mortgage lending practices. The final rule also establishes
advertisement standards and requires certain mortgage
disclosures to be given to the consumers earlier in the
transaction. The rule was effective in October 2009. The final
rule regarding the TILA also includes amendments revising
disclosures in connection with credit cards accounts and other
revolving credit plans to ensure that information provided to
customers is provided in a timely manner and in a form that is
readily understandable.
There are periodic examinations by the OCIF and the FDIC of
FirstBank to test the Banks compliance with various
statutory and regulatory requirements. This regulation and
supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities
in which an institution can engage and is intended primarily for
the protection of the FDICs insurance fund and depositors.
The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities
discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement
activities and examination policies, including policies with
respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of
adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. This
enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability
to assess civil money penalties, to issue
cease-and-desist
or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions against
banking organizations and institution-affiliated parties. In
general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for
violations of laws and regulations and for engaging in unsafe or
unsound practices. In addition, certain bank actions are
required by statute and implementing regulations. Other actions
or failure to act may provide the basis for enforcement action,
including the filing of misleading or untimely reports with
regulatory authorities.
Dividend
Restrictions
The Corporation is subject to certain restrictions generally
imposed on Puerto Rico corporations with respect to the
declaration and payment of dividends (i.e., that dividends may
be paid out only from the Corporations net assets in
excess of capital or, in the absence of such excess, from the
Corporations net earnings for such fiscal year
and/or the
preceding fiscal year). The Federal Reserve Board has also
issued a policy statement that as a matter of prudent banking, a
bank holding company should generally not maintain a given rate
of cash dividends unless its net income available to common
shareholders has been sufficient to fund fully the dividends and
the prospective rate of earnings retention appears to be
consistent with the organizations capital needs, asset
quality, and overall financial condition.
17
On February 24, 2009, the Federal Reserve published the
Applying Supervisory Guidance and Regulations on the
Payment of Dividends, Stock Redemptions, and Stock Repurchases
at Bank Holding Companies (the Supervisory
Letter) which discusses the ability of bank holding
companies to declare dividends and to redeem or repurchase
equity securities. The Supervisory Letter is generally
consistent with prior Federal Reserve supervisory policies and
guidance, although places greater emphasis on discussions with
the regulators prior to dividend declarations and redemption or
repurchase decisions even when not explicitly required by the
regulations. The Federal Reserve provides that the principles
discussed in the letter are applicable to all bank holding
companies, but are especially relevant for bank holding
companies that are either experiencing financial difficulties
and/or
receiving public funds under the Treasurys TARP Capital
Purchase Program. To that end, the Supervisory Letter
specifically addresses the Federal Reserves supervisory
considerations for TARP participants.
The Supervisory Letter provides that a board of directors should
eliminate, defer, or severely limit dividends if:
(i) the bank holding companys net income available to
shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends paid
during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the
dividends; (ii) the bank holding companys rate of
earnings retention is inconsistent with capital needs and
overall macroeconomic outlook; or (iii) the bank holding
company will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its
minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. The Supervisory
Letter further suggests that bank holding companies should
inform the Federal Reserve in advance of paying a dividend that:
(i) exceeds the earnings for the quarter in which the
dividend is being paid; or (ii) could result in a material
adverse change to the organizations capital structure.
As of December 31, 2009, the principal source of funds for
the Corporations parent holding company is dividends
declared and paid by its subsidiary, FirstBank. The ability of
FirstBank to declare and pay dividends on its capital stock is
regulated by the Puerto Rico Banking Law, the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act (the FDIA), and FDIC regulations. In
general terms, the Puerto Rico Banking Law provides that when
the expenditures of a bank are greater than receipts, the excess
of expenditures over receipts shall be charged against
undistributed profits of the bank and the balance, if any, shall
be charged against the required reserve fund of the bank. If the
reserve fund is not sufficient to cover such balance in whole or
in part, the outstanding amount must be charged against the
banks capital account. The Puerto Rico Banking Law
provides that, until said capital has been restored to its
original amount and the reserve fund to 20% of the original
capital, the bank may not declare any dividends.
In general terms, the FDIA and the FDIC regulations restrict the
payment of dividends when a bank is undercapitalized, when a
bank has failed to pay insurance assessments, or when there are
safety and soundness concerns regarding such bank.
In addition, the Purchase Agreement entered into with the
Treasury contains limitations on the payment of dividends on
common stock, including limiting regular quarterly cash
dividends to an amount not exceeding the last quarterly cash
dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly announced (if
lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008, which is
$0.07 per share. Also, upon issuance of the Series F
Preferred Stock, the ability of the Corporation to purchase,
redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, any shares of its
common stock, preferred stock or trust preferred securities is
subject to restrictions, including limitations when the
Corporation has not paid dividends. These restrictions will
terminate on the earlier of (a) the third anniversary of
the closing date of the issuance of the Series F Preferred
Stock and (b) the date on which the Series F Preferred
Stock has been redeemed in whole or Treasury has transferred all
of the Series F Preferred Stock to third parties that are
not affiliates of Treasury. The restrictions described in this
paragraph are set forth in the Purchase Agreement.
On July 30, 2009, after reporting a net loss for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation announced that
the Board of Directors resolved to suspend the payment of the
common and preferred dividends, including the TARP preferred
dividends, effective with the preferred dividend payments for
the month of August 2009.
18
Limitations
on Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders
Certain transactions between financial institutions such as
FirstBank and its affiliates are governed by Sections 23A
and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and by Regulation W. An
affiliate of a financial institution is any corporation or
entity, that controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with the financial institution. In a holding company
context, the parent bank holding company and any companies which
are controlled by such parent bank holding company are
affiliates of the financial institution. Generally,
Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act
(i) limit the extent to which the financial institution or
its subsidiaries may engage in covered transactions
(defined below) with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10%
of such financial institutions capital stock and surplus,
and contain an aggregate limit on all such transactions with all
affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such financial
institutions capital stock and surplus and
(ii) require that all covered transactions be
on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the
financial institution or affiliate, as those provided to a
non-affiliate. The term covered transaction includes
the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a guarantee
and other similar transactions. In addition, loans or other
extensions of credit by the financial institution to the
affiliate are required to be collateralized in accordance with
the requirements set forth in Section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act.
The GLB Act requires that financial subsidiaries of banks be
treated as affiliates for purposes of Sections 23A and 23B
of the Federal Reserve Act, but (i) the 10% capital
limitation on transactions between the bank and such financial
subsidiary as an affiliate is not applicable, and
(ii) notwithstanding other provisions in Sections 23A
and 23B, the investment by the bank in the financial subsidiary
does not include retained earnings of the financial subsidiary.
The GLB Act provides that: (1) any purchase of, or
investment in, the securities of a financial subsidiary by any
affiliate of the parent bank is considered a purchase or
investment by the bank; and (2) if the Federal Reserve
Board determines that such treatment is necessary, any loan made
by an affiliate of the parent bank to the financial subsidiary
is to be considered a loan made by the parent bank.
The Federal Reserve Board has adopted Regulation W which
interprets the provisions of Sections 23A and 23B. The
regulation unifies and updates staff interpretations issued over
the years, incorporates several new interpretations and
provisions (such as to clarify when transactions with an
unrelated third party will be attributable to an affiliate), and
addresses new issues arising as a result of the expanded scope
of nonbanking activities engaged in by banks and bank holding
companies in recent years and authorized for financial holding
companies under the GLB Act.
In addition, Sections 22(h) and (g) of the Federal
Reserve Act, implemented through Regulation O, place
restrictions on loans to executive officers, directors, and
principal stockholders. Under Section 22(h) of the Federal
Reserve Act, loans to a director, an executive officer, a
greater than 10% stockholder of a financial institution, and
certain related interests of these, may not exceed, together
with all other outstanding loans to such persons and affiliated
interests, the financial institutions loans to one
borrower limit, generally equal to 15% of the institutions
unimpaired capital and surplus. Section 22(h) of the
Federal Reserve Act also requires that loans to directors,
executive officers, and principal stockholders be made on terms
substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to
other persons and also requires prior board approval for certain
loans. In addition, the aggregate amount of extensions of credit
by a financial institution to insiders cannot exceed the
institutions unimpaired capital and surplus. Furthermore,
Section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act places additional
restrictions on loans to executive officers.
Federal
Reserve Board Capital Requirements
The Federal Reserve Board has adopted capital adequacy
guidelines pursuant to which it assesses the adequacy of capital
in examining and supervising a bank holding company and in
analyzing applications to it under the Bank Holding Company Act.
The Federal Reserve Board capital adequacy guidelines generally
require bank holding companies to maintain total capital equal
to 8% of total risk-adjusted assets, with at least one-half of
that amount consisting of Tier I or core capital and up to
one-half of that amount consisting of Tier II or
supplementary capital. Tier I capital for bank holding
companies generally consists of the sum of
19
common stockholders equity and perpetual preferred stock,
subject in the case of the latter to limitations on the kind and
amount of such perpetual preferred stock that may be included as
Tier I capital, less goodwill and, with certain exceptions,
other intangibles. Tier II capital generally consists of
hybrid capital instruments, perpetual preferred stock that is
not eligible to be included as Tier I capital, term
subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock and,
subject to limitations, allowances for loan losses. Assets are
adjusted under the risk-based guidelines to take into account
different risk characteristics, with the categories ranging from
0% (requiring no additional capital) for assets such as cash to
100% for the bulk of assets, which are typically held by a bank
holding company, including multi-family residential and
commercial real estate loans, commercial business loans and
commercial loans. Off-balance sheet items also are adjusted to
take into account certain risk characteristics.
The federal bank regulatory agencies risk-based capital
guidelines for years have been based upon the 1988 capital
accord (Basel I) of the Basel Committee, a committee
of central bankers and bank supervisors from the major
industrialized countries. This body develops broad policy
guidelines for use by each countrys supervisors in
determining the supervisory policies they apply. In 2004, it
proposed a new capital adequacy framework (Basel II)
for large, internationally active banking organizations to
replace Basel I. Basel II was designed to produce a more
risk-sensitive result than its predecessor. However, certain
portions of Basel II entail complexities and costs that
were expected to preclude their practical application to the
majority of U.S. banking organizations that lack the
economies of scale needed to absorb the associated expenses.
Effective April 1, 2008, the U.S. federal bank
regulatory agencies adopted Basel II for application to
certain banking organizations in the United States. The new
capital adequacy framework applies to organizations that:
(i) have consolidated assets of at least $250 billion;
or (ii) have consolidated total on-balance sheet foreign
exposures of at least $10 billion; or (iii) are
eligible to, and elect to, opt-in to the new framework even
though not required to do so under clause (i) or
(ii) above; or (iv) as a general matter, are
subsidiaries of a bank or bank holding company that uses the new
rule. During a two-year phase in period, organizations required
or electing to apply Basel II will report their capital
adequacy calculations separately under both Basel I and
Basel II on a parallel run basis. Given the
high thresholds noted above, FirstBank is not required to apply
Basel II and does not expect to apply it in the foreseeable
future.
On January 21, 2010, the federal banking agencies,
including the Federal Reserve Board, issued a final risk-based
regulatory capital rule related to the Financial Accounting
Standards Boards adoption of amendments to the accounting
requirements relating to transfers of financial assets and
variable interests in variable interest entities. These
accounting standards make substantive changes to how banks
account for securitized assets that are currently excluded from
their balance sheets as of the beginning of the
Corporations 2010 fiscal year. The final regulatory
capital rule seeks to better align regulatory capital
requirements with actual risks. Under the final rule, banks
affected by the new accounting requirements generally will be
subject to higher minimum regulatory capital requirements.
The final rule permits banks to include without limit in
tier 2 capital any increase in the allowance for lease and
loan losses calculated as of the implementation date that is
attributable to assets consolidated under the requirements of
the variable interests accounting requirements. The rule
provides an optional delay and phase-in for a maximum of one
year for the effect on risk-based capital and the allowance for
lease and loan losses related to the assets that must be
consolidated as a result of the accounting change. The final
rule also eliminates the risk-based capital exemption for
asset-backed commercial paper assets. The transitional relief
does not apply to the leverage ratio or to assets in conduits to
which a bank provides implicit support. Banks will be required
to rebuild capital and repair balance sheets to accommodate the
new accounting standards by the middle of 2011.
Deposit
Insurance
Under current FDIC regulations, each depository institution is
assigned to a risk category based on capital and supervisory
measures. In 2009, the FDIC revised the method for calculating
the assessment rate for depository institutions by introducing
several adjustments to an institutions initial base
assessment rate. A depository institution is assessed premiums
by the FDIC based on its risk category as adjusted and the
amount
20
of deposits held. Higher levels of banks failures over the past
two years have dramatically increased resolution costs of the
FDIC and depleted the deposit insurance fund. In addition, the
amount of FDIC insurance coverage for insured deposits has been
increased generally from $100,000 per depositor to $250,000 per
depositor. In light of the increased stress on the deposit
insurance fund caused by these developments, and in order to
maintain a strong funding position and restore the reserve
ratios of the deposit insurance fund, the FDIC: (i) imposed
a special assessment in June, 2009, (ii) increased
assessment rates of insured institutions generally, and
(iii) required them to prepay on December 30, 2009 the
premiums that are expected to become due over the next three
years. FirstBank obtained a waiver from the FDIC to make such
prepayment.
FDIC
Capital Requirements
The FDIC has promulgated regulations and a statement of policy
regarding the capital adequacy of state-chartered non-member
banks like FirstBank. These requirements are substantially
similar to those adopted by the Federal Reserve Board regarding
bank holding companies, as described above.
The regulators require that banks meet a risk-based capital
standard. The risk-based capital standard for banks requires the
maintenance of total capital (which is defined as Tier I
capital and supplementary (Tier 2) capital) to
risk-weighted assets of 8%. In determining the amount of
risk-weighted assets, weights used (ranging from 0% to 100%) are
based on the risks inherent in the type of asset or item. The
components of Tier I capital are equivalent to those
discussed below under the 3.0% leverage capital standard. The
components of supplementary capital include certain perpetual
preferred stock, mandatorily convertible securities,
subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock and,
generally, allowances for loan and lease losses. Allowance for
loan and lease losses includable in supplementary capital is
limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Overall,
the amount of capital counted toward supplementary capital
cannot exceed 100% of core capital.
The capital regulations of the FDIC establish a minimum 3.0%
Tier I capital to total assets requirement for the most
highly-rated state-chartered, non-member banks, with an
additional cushion of at least 100 to 200 basis points for
all other state-chartered, non-member banks, which effectively
will increase the minimum Tier I leverage ratio for such
other banks from 4.0% to 5.0% or more. Under these regulations,
the highest-rated banks are those that are not anticipating or
experiencing significant growth and have well-diversified risk,
including no undue interest rate risk exposure, excellent asset
quality, high liquidity and good earnings and, in general, are
considered a strong banking organization and are rated composite
I under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System.
Leverage or core capital is defined as the sum of common
stockholders equity including retained earnings,
non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus,
and minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries, minus all
intangible assets other than certain qualifying supervisory
goodwill and certain purchased mortgage servicing rights.
In August 1995, the FDIC published a final rule modifying its
existing risk-based capital standards to provide for
consideration of interest rate risk when assessing the capital
adequacy of a bank. Under the final rule, the FDIC must
explicitly include a banks exposure to declines in the
economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates
as a factor in evaluating a banks capital adequacy. In
June 1996, the FDIC adopted a joint policy statement on interest
rate risk. Because market conditions, bank structure, and bank
activities vary, the agency concluded that each bank needs to
develop its own interest rate risk management program tailored
to its needs and circumstances. The policy statement describes
prudent principles and practices that are fundamental to sound
interest rate risk management, including appropriate board and
senior management oversight and a comprehensive risk management
process that effectively identifies, measures, monitors and
controls such interest rate risk.
Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject an insured bank
to a variety of prompt corrective actions and enforcement
remedies under the FDIA (as amended by Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA), and
the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act
of 1994, including, with respect to an insured bank, the
termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, and certain
restrictions on its business.
21
Under certain circumstances, a well-capitalized, adequately
capitalized or undercapitalized institution may be treated as if
the institution were in the next lower capital category. A
depository institution is generally prohibited from making
capital distributions (including paying dividends), or paying
management fees to a holding company if the institution would
thereafter be undercapitalized. Institutions that are adequately
capitalized but not well-capitalized cannot accept, renew or
roll over brokered deposits except with a waiver from the FDIC
and are subject to restrictions on the interest rates that can
be paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions may not
accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits.
The federal bank regulatory agencies are permitted or, in
certain cases, required to take certain actions with respect to
institutions falling within one of the three undercapitalized
categories. Depending on the level of an institutions
capital, the agencys corrective powers include, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
prohibiting the payment of principal and interest on
subordinated debt;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting the holding company from making distributions
without prior regulatory approval;
|
|
|
|
placing limits on asset growth and restrictions on activities;
|
|
|
|
placing additional restrictions on transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
restricting the interest rate the institution may pay on
deposits;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting the institution from accepting deposits from
correspondent banks; and
|
|
|
|
in the most severe cases, appointing a conservator or receiver
for the institution.
|
A banking institution that is undercapitalized is required to
submit a capital restoration plan, and such a plan will not be
accepted unless, among other things, the banking
institutions holding company guarantees the plan up to a
certain specified amount. Any such guarantee from a depository
institutions holding company is entitled to a priority of
payment in bankruptcy.
As of December 31, 2009, FirstBank was well-capitalized. A
banks capital category, as determined by applying the
prompt corrective action provisions of law, however, may not
constitute an accurate representation of the overall financial
condition or prospects of the Bank, and should be considered in
conjunction with other available information regarding financial
condition and results of operations.
Set forth below are the Corporations, FirstBanks
capital ratios as of December 31, 2009, based on Federal
Reserve and FDIC guidelines, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well-Capitalized
|
|
|
First BanCorp
|
|
First Bank
|
|
Minimum
|
|
As of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
13.44
|
%
|
|
|
12.87
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted
assets)
|
|
|
12.16
|
%
|
|
|
11.70
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Leverage ratio(1)
|
|
|
8.91
|
%
|
|
|
8.53
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets. |
Activities
and Investments
The activities as principal and equity investments
of FDIC-insured, state-chartered banks such as FirstBank are
generally limited to those that are permissible for national
banks. Under regulations dealing with equity investments, an
insured state-chartered bank generally may not directly or
indirectly acquire or retain any equity investments of a type,
or in an amount, that is not permissible for a national bank.
Federal
Home Loan Bank System
FirstBank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
system. The FHLB system consists of twelve regional Federal Home
Loan Banks governed and regulated by the Federal Housing Finance
Agency.
22
The Federal Home Loan Banks serve as reserve or credit
facilities for member institutions within their assigned
regions. They are funded primarily from proceeds derived from
the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB system, and
they make loans (advances) to members in accordance with
policies and procedures established by the FHLB system and the
board of directors of each regional FHLB.
FirstBank is a member of the FHLB of New York (FHLB-NY) and as
such is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in
that FHLB for a certain amount, which is calculated in
accordance with the requirements set forth in applicable laws
and regulations. FirstBank is in compliance with the stock
ownership requirements of the FHLB-NY. All loans, advances and
other extensions of credit made by the FHLB-NY to FirstBank are
secured by a portion of FirstBanks mortgage loan
portfolio, certain other investments and the capital stock of
the FHLB-NY held by FirstBank.
Ownership
and Control
Because of FirstBanks status as an FDIC-insured bank, as
defined in the Bank Holding Company Act, First BanCorp, as the
owner of FirstBanks common stock, is subject to certain
restrictions and disclosure obligations under various federal
laws, including the Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in
Bank Control Act (the CBCA). Regulations pursuant to
the Bank Holding Company Act generally require prior Federal
Reserve Board approval for an acquisition of control of an
insured institution (as defined in the Act) or holding company
thereof by any person (or persons acting in concert). Control is
deemed to exist if, among other things, a person (or persons
acting in concert) acquires more than 25% of any class of voting
stock of an insured institution or holding company thereof.
Under the CBCA, control is presumed to exist subject to rebuttal
if a person (or persons acting in concert) acquires more than
10% of any class of voting stock and either (i) the
corporation has registered securities under Section 12 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or (ii) no person will
own, control or hold the power to vote a greater percentage of
that class of voting securities immediately after the
transaction. The concept of acting in concert is very broad and
also is subject to certain rebuttable presumptions, including
among others, that relatives, business partners, management
officials, affiliates and others are presumed to be acting in
concert with each other and their businesses. The regulations of
the FDIC implementing the CBCA are generally similar to those
described above.
The Puerto Rico Banking Law requires the approval of the OCIF
for changes in control of a Puerto Rico bank. See Puerto
Rico Banking Law.
Standards
for Safety and Soundness
The FDIA, as amended by FDICIA and the Riegle Community
Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994, requires the
FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies to prescribe
standards of safety and soundness, by regulations or guidelines,
relating generally to operations and management, asset growth,
asset quality, earnings, stock valuation, and compensation. The
FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies adopted,
effective August 9, 1995, a set of guidelines prescribing
safety and soundness standards pursuant to FDIA, as amended. The
guidelines establish general standards relating to internal
controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan
documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure,
asset growth and compensation, fees and benefits. In general,
the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems
and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures
specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive
compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe
compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable
or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive
officer, employee, director or principal shareholder.
Brokered
Deposits
FDIC regulations adopted under the FDIA govern the receipt of
brokered deposits by banks.
Well-capitalized
institutions are not subject to limitations on brokered
deposits, while adequately-capitalized institutions are able to
accept, renew or rollover brokered deposits only with a waiver
from the FDIC and subject to certain restrictions on the
interest paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized institutions
are not permitted to accept brokered deposits. As of
December 31, 2009, FirstBank was a well-capitalized
institution
23
and was therefore not subject to these limitations on brokered
deposits. The FDIC and other bank regulators may also exercise
regulatory discretion to enforce limits on the acceptance of
brokered deposits if they have safety and soundness concerns as
to an over reliance on such funding.
Puerto
Rico Banking Law
As a commercial bank organized under the laws of the
Commonwealth, FirstBank is subject to supervision, examination
and regulation by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Commissioner
of Financial Institutions (Commissioner) pursuant to
the Puerto Rico Banking Law of 1933, as amended (the
Banking Law). The Banking Law contains provisions
governing the incorporation and organization, rights and
responsibilities of directors, officers and stockholders as well
as the corporate powers, lending limitations, capital
requirements, investment requirements and other aspects of
FirstBank and its affairs. In addition, the Commissioner is
given extensive rule-making power and administrative discretion
under the Banking Law.
The Banking Law authorizes Puerto Rico commercial banks to
conduct certain financial and related activities directly or
through subsidiaries, including the leasing of personal property
and the operation of a small loan business.
The Banking Law requires every bank to maintain a legal reserve
which shall not be less than twenty percent (20%) of its demand
liabilities, except government deposits (federal, state and
municipal) that are secured by actual collateral. The reserve is
required to be composed of any of the following securities or
combination thereof: (1) legal tender of the United States;
(2) checks on banks or trust companies located in any part
of Puerto Rico that are to be presented for collection during
the day following the day on which they are received;
(3) money deposited in other banks provided said deposits
are authorized by the Commissioner, subject to immediate
collection; (4) federal funds sold to any Federal Reserve
Bank and securities purchased under agreements to resell
executed by the bank with such funds that are subject to be
repaid to the bank on or before the close of the next business
day; and (5) any other asset that the Commissioner
identifies from time to time.
The Banking Law permits Puerto Rico commercial banks to make
loans to any one person, firm, partnership or corporation, up to
an aggregate amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the sum of:
(i) the banks paid-in capital; (ii) the
banks reserve fund; (iii) 50% of the banks
retained earnings; subject to certain limitations; and
(iv) any other components that the Commissioner may
determine from time to time. If such loans are secured by
collateral worth at least twenty five percent (25%) more than
the amount of the loan, the aggregate maximum amount may reach
one third (33.33%) of the sum of the banks paid-in
capital, reserve fund, 50% of retained earnings and such other
components that the Commissioner may determine from time to
time. There are no restrictions under the Banking Law on the
amount of loans that are wholly secured by bonds, securities and
other evidence of indebtedness of the Government of the United
States, or of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or by bonds, not
in default, of municipalities or instrumentalities of the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The revised classification of the
mortgage-related transactions as secured commercial loans to
local financial institutions described in the Corporations
restatement of previously issued financial statements
(Form 10-K/A
2004) caused the mortgage-related transactions to be
treated as two secured commercial loans in excess of the lending
limitations imposed by the Banking Law. In this regard,
FirstBank received a ruling from the Commissioner that results
in FirstBank being considered in continued compliance with the
lending limitations. The Puerto Rico Banking Law authorizes the
Commissioner to determine other components which may be
considered for purposes of establishing its lending limit, which
components may lie outside the traditional elements mentioned in
Section 17. After consideration of other components, the
Commissioner authorized the Corporation to retain the secured
loans to the two financial institutions as it believed that
these loans were secured by sufficient collateral to diversify,
disperse and significantly diffuse the risks connected to such
loans thereby satisfying the safety and soundness considerations
mandated by Section 28 of the Banking Law. In July 2009,
FirstBank entered into a transaction with one of the
institutions to purchase $205 million in mortgage loans
that served as collateral to the loan to this institution.
The Banking Law prohibits Puerto Rico commercial banks from
making loans secured by their own stock, and from purchasing
their own stock, unless such purchase is made pursuant to a
stock repurchase
24
program approved by the Commissioner or is necessary to prevent
losses because of a debt previously contracted in good faith.
The stock purchased by the Puerto Rico commercial bank must be
sold by the bank in a public or private sale within one year
from the date of purchase.
The Banking Law provides that no officers, directors, agents or
employees of a Puerto Rico commercial bank may serve as an
officer, director, agent or employee of another Puerto Rico
commercial bank, financial corporation, savings and loan
association, trust corporation, corporation engaged in granting
mortgage loans or any other institution engaged in the money
lending business in Puerto Rico. This prohibition is not
applicable to the affiliates of a Puerto Rico commercial bank.
The Banking Law requires that Puerto Rico commercial banks
prepare each year a balance summary of their operations, and
submit such balance summary for approval at a regular meeting of
stockholders, together with an explanatory report thereon. The
Banking Law also requires that at least ten percent (10%) of the
yearly net income of a Puerto Rico commercial bank be credited
annually to a reserve fund. This credit is required to be done
every year until such reserve fund shall be equal to the total
paid-in-capital
of the bank.
The Banking Law also provides that when the expenditures of a
Puerto Rico commercial bank are greater than receipts, the
excess of the expenditures over receipts shall be charged
against the undistributed profits of the bank, and the balance,
if any, shall be charged against the reserve fund, as a
reduction thereof. If there is no reserve fund sufficient to
cover such balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount
shall be charged against the capital account and no dividend
shall be declared until said capital has been restored to its
original amount and the reserve fund to twenty percent (20%) of
the original capital.
The Banking Law requires the prior approval of the Commissioner
with respect to a transfer of capital stock of a bank that
results in a change of control of the bank. Under the Banking
Law, a change of control is presumed to occur if a person or a
group of persons acting in concert, directly or indirectly,
acquire more than 5% of the outstanding voting capital stock of
the bank. The Commissioner has interpreted the restrictions of
the Banking Law as applying to acquisitions of voting securities
of entities controlling a bank, such as a bank holding company.
Under the Banking Law, the determination of the Commissioner
whether to approve a change of control filing is final and
non-appealable.
The Finance Board, which is composed of the Commissioner, the
Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Commerce, the
Secretary of Consumer Affairs, the President of the Economic
Development Bank, the President of the Government Development
Bank, and the President of the Planning Board, has the authority
to regulate the maximum interest rates and finance charges that
may be charged on loans to individuals and unincorporated
businesses in Puerto Rico. The current regulations of the
Finance Board provide that the applicable interest rate on loans
to individuals and unincorporated businesses, including real
estate development loans but excluding certain other personal
and commercial loans secured by mortgages on real estate
properties, is to be determined by free competition.
Accordingly, the regulations do not set a maximum rate for
charges on retail installment sales contracts, small loans, and
credit card purchases and set aside previous regulations which
regulated these maximum finance charges. Furthermore, there is
no maximum rate set for installment sales contracts involving
motor vehicles, commercial, agricultural and industrial
equipment, commercial electric appliances and insurance premiums.
International
Banking Act of Puerto Rico (IBE Act)
The business and operations of First BanCorp Overseas
(First BanCorp IBE, the IBE division of First
BanCorp), FirstBank International Branch (FirstBank
IBE, the IBE division of FirstBank) and FirstBank Overseas
Corporation (the IBE subsidiary of FirstBank) are subject to
supervision and regulation by the Commissioner. Under the IBE
Act, certain sales, encumbrances, assignments, mergers,
exchanges or transfers of shares, interests or participation(s)
in the capital of an international banking entity (an
IBE) may not be initiated without the prior approval
of the Commissioner. The IBE Act and the regulations issued
thereunder by the Commissioner (the IBE Regulations)
limit the business activities that may be carried out by an IBE.
Such activities are limited in part to persons and assets
located outside of Puerto Rico.
25
Pursuant to the IBE Act and the IBE Regulations, each of First
BanCorp IBE, FirstBank IBE and FirstBank Overseas Corporation
must maintain books and records of all its transactions in the
ordinary course of business. First BanCorp IBE, FirstBank IBE
and FirstBank Overseas Corporation are also required thereunder
to submit to the Commissioner quarterly and annual reports of
their financial condition and results of operations, including
annual audited financial statements.
The IBE Act empowers the Commissioner to revoke or suspend,
after notice and hearing, a license issued thereunder if, among
other things, the IBE fails to comply with the IBE Act, the IBE
Regulations or the terms of its license, or if the Commissioner
finds that the business or affairs of the IBE are conducted in a
manner that is not consistent with the public interest.
Puerto
Rico Income Taxes
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994 (the
Code), all companies are treated as separate taxable
entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns.
The Corporation, and each of its subsidiaries are subject to a
maximum statutory corporate income tax rate of 39% or an
alternative minimum tax (AMT) on income earned from
all sources, whichever is higher. The excess of AMT over regular
income tax paid in any one year may be used to offset regular
income tax in future years, subject to certain limitations. The
Code provides for a dividend received deduction of 100% on
dividends received from wholly owned subsidiaries subject to
income taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on dividends received
from other taxable domestic corporations.
On March 9, 2009, the Puerto Rico Government approved Act
No. 7 (the Act), to stimulate Puerto
Ricos economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico
Governments fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series of
temporary and permanent measures, including the imposition of a
5% surtax over the total income tax determined, which is
applicable to corporations, among others, whose combined income
exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an increase in the
maximum statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95%. This temporary
measure is effective for tax years that commenced after
December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012.
In computing the interest expense deduction, the
Corporations interest deduction will be reduced in the
same proportion that the average exempt assets bear to the
average total assets. Therefore, to the extent that the
Corporation holds certain investments and loans that are exempt
from Puerto Rico income taxation, part of its interest expense
will be disallowed for tax purposes.
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than
the maximum statutory tax rate of 40.95% during 2009 mainly by
investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed
securities exempt from U.S. and Puerto Rico income tax
combined with income from the IBE units of the Corporation and
the Bank and the Banks subsidiary, FirstBank Overseas
Corporation. The IBE, and FirstBank Overseas Corporation were
created under the IBE Act, which provides for Puerto Rico tax
exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico
(except for year tax years commenced after December 31,
2008 and before January 1, 2012, in which all IBEs
are subject to the special 5% tax on their net income not
otherwise subject to tax pursuant to the PR Code, as provided by
Act. No. 7). Pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 13
of January 8, 2004, the IBE Act was amended to impose
income tax at regular rates on an IBE that operates as a unit of
a bank, to the extent that the IBE net income exceeds 20% of the
banks total net taxable income (including net income
generated by the IBE unit) for taxable years that commenced on
July 1, 2005, and thereafter. These amendments apply only
to IBEs that operate as units of a bank; they do not impose
income tax on an IBE that operates as a subsidiary of a bank.
United
States Income Taxes
The Corporation is also subject to federal income tax on its
income from sources within the United States and on any item of
income that is, or is considered to be, effectively connected
with the active conduct of a trade or business within the United
States. The U.S. Internal Revenue Code provides for tax
exemption of portfolio interest received by a foreign
corporation from sources within the United States; therefore,
the Corporation is not subject to federal income tax on certain
U.S. investments which qualify under the term
portfolio interest.
26
Insurance
Operations Regulation
FirstBank Insurance Agency is registered as an insurance agency
with the Insurance Commissioner of Puerto Rico and is subject to
regulations issued by the Insurance Commissioner relating to,
among other things, licensing of employees, sales, solicitation
and advertising practices, and by the FED as to certain consumer
protection provisions mandated by the GLB Act and its
implementing regulations.
Community
Reinvestment
Under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA),
federally insured banks have a continuing and affirmative
obligation to meet the credit needs of their entire community,
including low- and moderate-income residents, consistent with
their safe and sound operation. The CRA does not establish
specific lending requirements or programs for financial
institutions nor does it limit an institutions discretion
to develop the type of products and services that it believes
are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the
CRA. The CRA requires the federal supervisory agencies, as part
of the general examination of supervised banks, to assess the
banks record of meeting the credit needs of its community,
assign a performance rating, and take such record and rating
into account in their evaluation of certain applications by such
bank. The CRA also requires all institutions to make public
disclosure of their CRA ratings. FirstBank received a
satisfactory CRA rating in their most recent
examinations by the FDIC.
Mortgage
Banking Operations
FirstBank is subject to the rules and regulations of the FHA,
VA, FNMA, FHLMC, HUD and GNMA with respect to originating,
processing, selling and servicing mortgage loans and the
issuance and sale of mortgage-backed securities. Those rules and
regulations, among other things, prohibit discrimination and
establish underwriting guidelines that include provisions for
inspections and appraisals, require credit reports on
prospective borrowers and fix maximum loan amounts, and with
respect to VA loans, fix maximum interest rates. Moreover,
lenders such as FirstBank are required annually to submit to
FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA and HUD audited financial statements,
and each regulatory entity has its own financial requirements.
FirstBanks affairs are also subject to supervision and
examination by FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA and HUD at all times
to assure compliance with the applicable regulations, policies
and procedures. Mortgage origination activities are subject to,
among others, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Federal
Truth-in-Lending
Act, and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the
regulations promulgated thereunder which, among other things,
prohibit discrimination and require the disclosure of certain
basic information to mortgagors concerning credit terms and
settlement costs. FirstBank is licensed by the Commissioner
under the Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law, and as such is
subject to regulation by the Commissioner, with respect to,
among other things, licensing requirements and establishment of
maximum origination fees on certain types of mortgage loan
products.
Section 5 of the Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law requires
the prior approval of the Commissioner for the acquisition of
control of any mortgage banking institution licensed under such
law. For purposes of the Puerto Rico Mortgage Banking Law, the
term control means the power to direct or influence
decisively, directly or indirectly, the management or policies
of a mortgage banking institution. The Puerto Rico Mortgage
Banking Law provides that a transaction that results in the
holding of less than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of
a mortgage banking institution shall not be considered a change
in control.
Certain risk factors that may affect the Corporations
future results of operations are discussed below.
RISK
RELATING TO THE CORPORATIONS BUSINESS
Credit
quality, which is continuing to deteriorate, may result in
future additional losses.
The quality of First BanCorps credits has continued to be
under pressure as a result of continued recessionary conditions
in Puerto Rico and the state of Florida that have led to, among
other things, higher
27
unemployment levels, much lower absorption rates for new
residential construction projects and further declines in
property values. The Corporations business depends on the
creditworthiness of its customers and counterparties and the
value of the assets securing its loans or underlying our
investments. When the credit quality of the customer base
materially decreases or the risk profile of a market, industry
or group of customers changes materially, the Corporations
business, financial condition, allowance levels, asset
impairments, liquidity, capital and results of operations are
adversely affected.
While the Corporation has substantially increased our allowance
for loan and lease losses in 2009, there is no certainty that it
will be sufficient to cover future credit losses in the
portfolio because of continued adverse changes in the economy,
market conditions or events negatively affecting specific
customers, industries or markets both in Puerto Rico and
Florida. The Corporation periodically review the allowance for
loan and lease losses for adequacy considering economic
conditions and trends, collateral values and credit quality
indicators, including charge-off experience and levels of past
due loans and non-performing assets. First BanCorps future
results may be materially and adversely affected by worsening
defaults and severity rates related to the underlying collateral.
The
Corporation may have more credit risk and higher credit losses
due to its construction loan portfolio.
The Corporation has a significant construction loan portfolio,
in the amount of $1.49 billion as of December 31,
2009, mostly secured by commercial and residential real estate
properties. Due to their nature, these loans entail a higher
credit risk than consumer and residential mortgage loans, since
they are larger in size, concentrate more risk in a single
borrower and are generally more sensitive to economic downturns.
Rapidly changing collateral values, general economic conditions
and numerous other factors continue to create volatility in the
housing markets and have increased the possibility that
additional losses may have to be recognized with respect to the
Corporations current nonperforming assets. Furthermore,
given the current slowdown in the real estate market, the
properties securing these loans may be difficult to dispose of
if they are foreclosed.
The
Corporation is subject to default risk on loans, which may
adversely affect its results.
The Corporation is subject to the risk of loss from loan
defaults and foreclosures with respect to the loans it
originates. The Corporation establishes a provision for loan
losses, which leads to reductions in its income from operations,
in order to maintain its allowance for inherent loan losses at a
level which its management deems to be appropriate based upon an
assessment of the quality of the loan portfolio. Although the
Corporations management utilizes its best judgment in
providing for loan losses, there can be no assurance that
management has accurately estimated the level of inherent loan
losses or that the Corporation will not have to increase its
provision for loan losses in the future as a result of future
increases in non-performing loans or for other reasons beyond
its control.
Any such increases in the Corporations provision for loan
losses or any loan losses in excess of its provision for loan
losses would have an adverse effect on the Corporations
future financial condition and results of operations. Given the
difficulties facing some of the Corporations largest
borrowers, the Corporation can give no assurance that these
borrowers will continue to repay their loans on a timely basis
or that the Corporation will continue to be able to accurately
assess any risk of loss from the loans to these financial
institutions.
Changes
in collateral valuation for properties located in stagnant or
distressed economies may require increased
reserves.
Substantially all of the loan portfolio of the Corporation is
located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether
the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin
Islands, British Virgin Islands or the U.S. mainland, the
performance of the Corporations loan portfolio and the
collateral value backing the transactions are dependent upon the
performance of and conditions within each specific real estate
market. Recent economic reports related to the real estate
market in Puerto Rico indicate that certain pockets of the real
estate market are subject to readjustments in value driven not
by demand but more by the purchasing
28
power of the consumers and general economic conditions. In South
Florida, we have been seeing the negative impact associated with
low absorption rates and property value adjustments due to
overbuilding. A significant decline in collateral valuations for
collateral dependent loans may require increases in the
Corporations specific provision for loan losses and an
increase in the general valuation allowance. Any such increase
would have an adverse effect on the Corporations future
financial condition and results of operations.
Worsening
in the financial condition of critical counterparties may result
in higher losses than expected.
The financial stability of several counterparties is critical
for their continued financial performance on covenants that
require the repurchase of loans, posting of collateral to reduce
our credit exposure or replacement of delinquent loans. Many of
these transactions expose the Corporation to credit risk in the
event of a default by one of the Corporations
counterparties. Any such losses could adversely affect the
Corporations business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Interest
rate shifts may reduce net interest income.
Shifts in short-term interest rates may reduce net interest
income, which is the principal component of the
Corporations earnings. Net interest income is the
difference between the amount received by the Corporation on its
interest-earning assets and the interest paid by the Corporation
on its interest-bearing liabilities. When interest rates rise,
the Corporation must pay more in interest on its liabilities
while the interest earned on its assets does not rise as
quickly. This may cause the Corporations profits to
decrease. This adverse impact on earnings is greater when the
slope of the yield curve flattens, that is, when short-term
interest rates increase more than long-term rates.
Increases
in interest rates may reduce the value of holdings of
securities.
Fixed-rate securities acquired by the Corporation are generally
subject to decreases in market value when interest rates rise,
which may require recognition of a loss (e.g., the
identification of
other-than-temporary
impairment on its available for sale or held to maturity
investments portfolio), thereby adversely affecting the results
of operations. Market-related reductions in value also affect
the capabilities of financing these securities.
Increases
in interest rates may reduce demand for mortgage and other
loans.
Higher interest rates increase the cost of mortgage and other
loans to consumers and businesses and may reduce demand for such
loans, which may negatively impact the Corporations
profits by reducing the amount of loan origination income.
Accelerated
prepayments may adversely affect net interest
income.
Net interest income of future periods may be affected by the
acceleration in prepayments of mortgage-backed securities.
Acceleration in the prepayments of mortgage-backed securities
would lower yields on securities purchased at a premium, as the
amortization of premiums paid upon acquisition of these
securities would accelerate. Conversely, acceleration in the
prepayments of mortgage-backed securities would increase yields
on securities purchased at a discount, as the amortization of
the discount would accelerate.
Also, net interest income in future periods might be affected by
the Corporations investment in callable securities.
Approximately $945 million of U.S. Agency debentures
with an average yield of 5.82% were called during 2009. The
Corporation re-invested the proceeds of the securities calls in
callable Agency debentures of approximately 2.7 years
average final maturity with a weighted average yield to maturity
of 2.12%.
Decreases in interest rates may increase the probability
embedded call options in investment securities are exercised.
Future net interest income could be affected by the
Corporations holding of callable securities. The recent
drop in long-term interest rates has the effect of increasing
the probability of the exercise of embedded calls in
U.S. Agency securities portfolio of approximately
$1.1 billion that if substituted with new lower-yield
investments may negatively impact the Corporations
interest income.
29
Decreases
in interest rates may reduce net interest income due to the
current unprecedented re-pricing mismatch of assets and
liabilities tied to short-term interest rates, which is referred
to as basis risk.
Basis risk occurs when market rates for different financial
instruments or the indices used to price assets and liabilities,
change at different times or by different amounts. The liquidity
crisis that erupted in late 2008, and that slowly began to
subside during 2009 caused a wider than normal spread between
brokered CD costs and LIBOR rates for similar terms. This in
turn, has prevented the Corporation from capturing the full
benefit of drops in interest rates as the Corporations
loan portfolio, funded by LIBOR-based brokered CDs, continue to
maintain the same spread to short-term LIBOR rates, while the
spread on brokered CDs widened. To the extent that such
pressures fail to subside in the near future, the margin between
the Corporations LIBOR-based assets and LIBOR-based
liabilities may compress and adversely affect net interest
income.
If all
or a significant portion of the unrealized losses in our
investment securities portfolio on our consolidated balance
sheet were determined to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired, we would recognize a material charge to our earnings
and our capital ratios would be adversely
affected.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation recognized
$1.7 million in other than temporary impairments. To the
extent that any portion of the unrealized losses in its
investment securities portfolio is determined to be other than
temporary, and the loss is related to credit factors, the
Corporation recognizes a charge to earnings in the quarter
during which such determination is made and capital ratios could
be adversely affected. If any such charge is significant, a
rating agency might downgrade the Corporations credit
rating or put it on credit watch. Even if the Corporation does
not determine that the unrealized losses associated with this
portfolio requires an impairment charge, increases in these
unrealized losses adversely affect the tangible common equity
ratio, which may adversely affect credit rating agency and
investor sentiment towards the Corporation. This negative
perception also may adversely affect the Corporations
ability to access the capital markets or might increase the cost
of capital.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation recognized
other-than-temporary
impairment on its private label MBS. Valuation and
other-than-temporary
impairment determinations will continue to be affected by
external market factors including default rates, severity rates
and macro-economic factors.
Downgrades
in the Corporations credit ratings could further increase
the cost of borrowing funds.
Both, the Corporation and the Bank suffered credit rating
downgrades in 2009. Fitch Ratings Ltd. (Fitch)
currently rates the Corporations long-term senior debt
B-, six notches below investment grade. Standard and
Poors rates the Corporation B, or five notches below investment
grade. Moodys Investor Service (Moodys) rates
FirstBanks long-term senior debt B1, and
Standard & Poors rates it B. The
three rating agencies outlooks on FirstBank and the
Corporations credit ratings are negative. The Corporation
does not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements that
would be affected by a credit downgrade. The Corporations
liquidity is contingent upon its ability to obtain external
sources of funding to finance its operations. Any future
downgrades in credit ratings could put additional pressure on
the Corporations access to external funding
and/or cause
external funding to be more expensive, which could in turn
adversely affect the results of operations. Changes in credit
ratings may also affect the fair value of certain liabilities
and unsecured derivatives, measured at fair value in the
financial statements, for which the Corporations own
credit risk is an element considered in the fair value
determination.
These debt and financial strength ratings are current opinions
of the rating agencies. As such, they may be changed, suspended
or withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies as a result of
changes in, or unavailability of, information or based on other
circumstances.
The
Corporations funding is significantly dependent on
brokered deposits.
The Corporations funding sources include core deposits,
brokered deposits, borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank,
borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank and repurchase
agreements with several counterparties.
30
A large portion of the Corporations funding is retail
brokered CDs issued by FirstBank. As of December 31, 2009,
the Corporation had $7.6 billion in brokered deposits
outstanding, representing approximately 60% of our total
deposits, and a reduction from $8.4 billion at year end
2008. The Corporation issues brokered CDs to, among other
things, pay operating expenses, maintain our lending activities,
replace certain maturing liabilities, and to control interest
rate risk.
FDIC regulations govern the issuance of brokered deposit
instruments by banks. Well-capitalized institutions are not
subject to limitations on brokered deposits, while
adequately-capitalized institutions are able to accept, renew or
rollover brokered deposits only with a waiver from the FDIC and
subject to certain restrictions on the interest paid on such
deposits. Undercapitalized institutions are not permitted to
accept brokered deposits. As of December 31, 2009, the
Corporation was a well-capitalized institution and was therefore
not subject to these limitations on brokered deposits. If the
Corporation became subject to such restrictions on its brokered
deposits, the availability of such deposits would be limited and
could, in turn, adversely affect the results of operations and
the liquidity of the Corporation. The FDIC and other bank
regulators may also exercise regulatory discretion to enforce
limits on the acceptance of brokered deposits if they have
safety and soundness concerns as to an over reliance on such
funding.
The use of brokered CDs has been particularly important for the
growth of the Corporation. The Corporation encounters intense
competition in attracting and retaining regular retail deposits
in Puerto Rico. The brokered CDs market is very competitive and
liquid, and the Corporation has been able to obtain substantial
amounts of funding in short periods of time. This strategy
enhances the Corporations liquidity position, since the
brokered CDs are insured by the FDIC up to regulatory limits and
can be obtained faster compared to regular retail deposits.
Demand for brokered CDs has recently increased as a result of
the move by investors from riskier investments, such as
equities, to federally guaranteed instruments such as brokered
CDs and the recent increase in FDIC deposit insurance from
$100,000 to $250,000. For the year ended December 31, 2009,
the Corporation issued $8.3 billion in brokered CDs
(including rollover of short-term broker CDs and replacement of
brokered CDs called) compared to $9.8 billion for the
2008 year.
The average term to maturity of the retail brokered CDs
outstanding as of December 31, 2009 was approximately
1.08 years. Approximately 1.55% of the principal value of
these certificates is callable at the Corporations option.
Another source of funding is Advances from the Discount Window
of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Currently, the
Corporation has $800 million of borrowings outstanding with
the Federal Reserve Bank. As part of the mechanisms to ease the
liquidity crisis, during 2009 the Federal Reserve Bank
encouraged banks to utilize the Discount Window as a source of
funding. With the market conditions improving, the Federal
Reserve announced in early 2010 its intention of withdrawing
part of the economic stimulus measures, including replacing
restrictions on the use of Discount Window borrowings, thereby
returning to its function of lender of last resort.
The
Corporations funding sources may prove insufficient to
replace deposits and support future growth.
The Corporations banking subsidiary relies on customer
deposits, brokered deposits and advances from the Federal Home
Loan Bank (FHLB) to fund its operations. Although
the Bank has historically been able to replace maturing deposits
and advances if desired, no assurance can be given that it would
be able to replace these funds in the future if the
Corporations financial condition or general market
conditions were to change. The Corporations financial
flexibility will be severely constrained if the Bank is unable
to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not
available to accommodate future growth at acceptable interest
rates. Finally, if the Corporation is required to rely more
heavily on more expensive funding sources to support future
growth, revenues may not increase proportionately to cover
costs. In this case, profitability would be adversely affected.
Although the Corporation considers such sources of funds
adequate for its liquidity needs, the Corporation may seek
additional debt financing in the future to achieve its long-term
business objectives. There can be no assurance additional
borrowings, if sought, would be available to the Corporation or,
on what terms. If additional financing sources are unavailable
or are not available on reasonable terms, growth and future
prospects could be adversely affected.
31
Adverse
credit market conditions may affect the Corporations
ability to meet liquidity needs.
The Corporation needs liquidity to, among other things, pay its
operating expenses, interest on its debt and dividends on its
capital stock, maintain its lending activities and replace
certain maturing liabilities. Without sufficient liquidity, the
Corporation may be forced to curtail its operations. The
availability of additional financing will depend on a variety of
factors such as market conditions, the general availability of
credit and the Corporations credit ratings and credit
capacity. The Corporations financial condition and cash
flows could be materially affected by continued disruptions in
financial markets.
Our
controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented, our risk
management policies and procedures may be inadequate, and
operational risk could adversely affect our consolidated results
of operations.
The Corporation may fail to identify and manage risks related to
a variety of aspects of its business, including, but not limited
to, operational risk, interest-rate risk, trading risk,
fiduciary risk, legal and compliance risk, liquidity risk and
credit risk. The Corporation has adopted various controls,
procedures, policies and systems to monitor and manage risk.
While the Corporation currently believes that its risk
management process is effective, the Corporation cannot provide
assurance that those controls, procedures, policies and systems
will always be adequate to identify and manage the risks in the
various businesses. In addition, the Corporations
businesses and the markets in which it operates are continuously
evolving. The Corporation may fail to fully understand the
implications of changes in its businesses or the financial
markets and fail to adequately or timely enhance its risk
framework to address those changes. If the Corporations
risk framework is ineffective, either because it fails to keep
pace with changes in the financial markets or its businesses or
for other reasons, the Corporation could incur losses, suffer
reputational damage or find itself out of compliance with
applicable regulatory mandates or expectations.
The Corporation may also be subject to disruptions from external
events that are wholly or partially beyond its control, which
could cause delays or disruptions to operational functions,
including information processing and financial market settlement
functions. In addition, our customers, vendors and
counterparties could suffer from such events. Should these
events affect us, or the customers, vendors or counterparties
with which we conduct business, our consolidated results of
operations could be negatively affected. When we record balance
sheet reserves for probable loss contingencies related to
operational losses, we may be unable to accurately estimate our
potential exposure, and any reserves we establish to cover
operational losses may not be sufficient to cover our actual
financial exposure, which may have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations or financial condition for
the periods in which we recognize the losses.
Competition
for our employees is intense, and we may not be able to attract
and retain the highly skilled people we need to support our
business.
Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract
and/or
retain key people. Competition for the best people in most
activities in which we engage can be intense, and we may not be
able to hire people or retain them, particularly in light of
uncertainty concerning evolving compensation restrictions
applicable to banks but not applicable to other financial
services firms. The unexpected loss of services of one or more
of our key personnel could adversely affect our business because
the loss of their skills, knowledge of our markets, and years of
industry experience and, in some cases, because of the
difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.
Similarly, the loss of key employees, either individually or as
a group, can adversely affect our customers perception of
our ability to continue to manage certain types of investment
management mandates.
Banking
regulators could take adverse action against the
Corporation.
The Corporation is subject to supervision and regulation by the
FED. The Corporation is a bank holding company that qualifies as
a financial holding corporation. As such, the Corporation is
permitted to engage in a broader spectrum of activities than
those permitted to bank holding companies that are not financial
holding companies. To continue to qualify as a financial holding
corporation, each of the Corporations banking subsidiaries
must continue to qualify as well-capitalized and
well-managed. As of December 31, 2009, the
32
Corporation and the Bank continue to satisfy all applicable
capital guidelines. This, however, does not prevent banking
regulators from taking adverse actions against the Corporation
if they should conclude that such actions are warranted. If the
Corporation were not to continue to qualify as a financial
holding corporation, it might be required to discontinue certain
activities and may be prohibited from engaging in new activities
without prior regulatory approval. The Bank is subject to
supervision and regulation by the FDIC, which conducts annual
inspections, and, in Puerto Rico the OCIF. The primary
regulators of the Corporation and the Bank have significant
discretion and power to initiate enforcement actions for
violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound
practices in the performance of their supervisory and
enforcement duties and may do so even if the Corporation and the
Bank continue to satisfy all capital requirements. Adverse
action against the Corporation
and/or the
Bank by their primary regulators may affect their businesses.
Further
increases in the FDIC deposit insurance premium may have a
significant financial impact on the Corporation.
The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC insured financial institutions
up to certain limits. The FDIC charges insured financial
institutions premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund
(the DIF). Current economic conditions have resulted
in higher bank failures and expectations of future bank
failures. In the event of a bank failure, the FDIC takes control
of a failed bank and ensures payment of deposits up to insured
limits (which have recently been increased) using the resources
of the DIF. The FDIC is required by law to maintain adequate
funding of the DIF, and the FDIC may increase premium
assessments to maintain such funding.
On February 27, 2009, the FDIC determined that it would
assess higher rates for institutions that relied significantly
on secured liabilities or on brokered deposits but, for
well-managed and well-capitalized banks, only when accompanied
by rapid asset growth. On May 22, 2009, the FDIC adopted a
final rule imposing a 5 basis-point special assessment on
each insured depository institutions assets minus
Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. On
November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule imposing a
13-quarter
prepayment of FDIC premiums due on December 30, 2009.
Although FirstBank obtained a waiver from the FDIC to make such
prepayment, the FDIC may further increase our premiums or impose
additional assessments or prepayment requirements on the
Corporation in the future.
The
Corporation may not be able to recover all assets pledged to
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (Lehman) was
the counterparty to the Corporation on certain interest rate
swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed
to pay the scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation,
which constitutes an event of default under those interest rate
swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate
swaps with Lehman and replaced them with other counterparties
under similar terms and conditions. In connection with the
unpaid net cash settlement due as of December 31, 2009
under the swap agreements, the Corporation has an unsecured
counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on
October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This
exposure was reserved in the third quarter of 2008. The
Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with
Lehman to guarantee its performance under the swap agreements in
the event payment thereunder was required. The book value of
pledged securities with Lehman as of December 31, 2009
amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
The Corporation believes that the securities pledged as
collateral should not be part of the Lehman bankruptcy estate
given that the posted collateral constituted a performance
guarantee under the swap agreements and was not part of a
financing agreement, and that ownership of the securities was
never transferred to Lehman. Upon termination of the interest
rate swap agreements Lehmans obligation was to return the
collateral to the Corporation. During the fourth quarter of
2009, the Corporation discovered that Lehman Brothers, Inc.,
acting as agent of Lehman, had deposited the securities in a
custodial account at JP Morgan/Chase, and that, shortly before
the filing of the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings, it had provided
instructions to have most of the securities transferred to
Barclays Capital in New York. After Barclays refusal
to turn over the securities, the Corporation, during the month
of December, 2009, filed a lawsuit against Barclays
Capital in federal court in New York demanding the return of the
securities. While the Corporation believes it has valid reasons
to support its claim for the return of the securities, there are
no assurances that it
33
will ultimately succeed in its litigation against Barclays
Capital to recover all or a substantial portion of the
securities.
Additionally, the Corporation continues to pursue its claim
filed in January 2009 in the proceedings under the Securities
Protection Act with regard to Lehman Brothers Incorporated in
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. The Corporation
can provide no assurances that it will be successful in
recovering all or substantial portion of the securities through
these proceedings.
Our
businesses may be adversely affected by
litigation.
From time to time, our customers, or the government on their
behalf, may make claims and take legal action relating to our
performance of fiduciary or contractual responsibilities. We may
also face employment lawsuits or other legal claims. In any such
claims or actions, demands for substantial monetary damages may
be asserted against us resulting in financial liability or
having an adverse effect on our reputation among investors or on
customer demand for our products and services. We may be unable
to accurately estimate our exposure to litigation risk when we
record balance sheet reserves for probable loss contingencies.
As a result, any reserves we establish to cover any settlements
or judgments may not be sufficient to cover our actual financial
exposure, which may have a material impact on our consolidated
results of operations or financial condition.
In the ordinary course of our business, we are also subject to
various regulatory, governmental and law enforcement inquiries,
investigations and subpoenas. These may be directed generally to
participants in the businesses in which we are involved or may
be specifically directed at us. In regulatory enforcement
matters, claims for disgorgement, the imposition of penalties
and the imposition of other remedial sanctions are possible.
In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of
legal actions and regulatory matters, we cannot provide
assurance as to the outcome of any pending matter or, if
determined adversely against us, the costs associated with any
such matter, particularly where the claimant seeks very large or
indeterminate damages or where the matter presents novel legal
theories, involves a large number of parties or is at a
preliminary stage. The resolution of certain pending legal
actions or regulatory matters, if unfavorable, could have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated results of
operations for the quarter in which such actions or matters are
resolved or a reserve is established.
Further information with respect to the foregoing and our other
ongoing litigation matters is provided in Legal Proceedings
included under Item 3 herein.
Our
businesses may be negatively affected by adverse publicity or
other reputational harm.
Our relationships with many of our customers are predicated upon
our reputation as a fiduciary and a service provider that
adheres to the highest standards of ethics, service quality and
regulatory compliance. Adverse publicity, regulatory actions,
litigation, operational failures, the failure to meet customer
expectations and other issues with respect to one or more of our
businesses could materially and adversely affect our reputation,
ability to attract and retain customers or sources of funding
for the same or other businesses. Preserving and enhancing our
reputation also depends on maintaining systems and procedures
that address known risks and regulatory requirements, as well as
our ability to identify and mitigate additional risks that arise
due to changes in our businesses, the market places in which we
operate, the regulatory environment and customer expectations.
If any of these developments has a material adverse effect on
our reputation, our business will suffer.
Changes
in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board or other
standard-setting
bodies may adversely affect the Corporations financial
statements.
The Corporations financial statements are subject to the
application of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the
United States (GAAP), which is periodically revised
and/or
expanded. Accordingly, from time to time, the Corporation is
required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued by
FASB.
34
Market conditions have prompted accounting standard setters to
promulgate new requirements that further interprets or seeks to
revise accounting pronouncements related to financial
instruments, structures or transactions as well as to issue new
standards expanding disclosures. The impact of accounting
pronouncements that have been issued but not yet implemented is
disclosed in the Corporations annual and quarterly reports
on
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q.
An assessment of proposed standards is not provided as such
proposals are subject to change through the exposure process
and, therefore, the effects on the Corporations financial
statements cannot be meaningfully assessed. It is possible that
future accounting standards that the Corporation is required to
adopt could change the current accounting treatment that the
Corporation applies to its consolidated financial statements and
that such changes could have a material adverse effect on the
Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
The
Corporation may need additional capital resources in the future
and these capital resources may not be available when needed or
at all.
Due to financial results during 2009 the Corporation may need to
access the capital markets in order to raise additional capital
in the future to absorb potential future credit losses due to
the distressed economic environment, maintain adequate liquidity
and capital resources or to finance future growth, investments
or strategic acquisitions. The Corporation cannot provide
assurances that such capital will be available on acceptable
terms or at all. If the Corporation is unable to obtain
additional capital, it may not be able to maintain adequate
liquidity and capital resources or to finance future growth,
make strategic acquisitions or investments.
Unexpected
losses in future reporting periods may require the Corporation
to adjust the valuation allowance against our deferred tax
assets.
The Corporation evaluates the deferred tax assets for
recoverability based on all available evidence. This process
involves significant management judgment about assumptions that
are subject to change from period to period based on changes in
tax laws or variances between the future projected operating
performance and the actual results. The Corporation is required
to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if
the Corporation determines, based on available evidence at the
time the determination is made, that it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. In determining the more-likely-than-not criterion, the
Corporation evaluates all positive and negative evidence as of
the end of each reporting period. Future adjustments, either
increases or decreases, to the deferred tax asset valuation
allowance will be determined based upon changes in the expected
realization of the net deferred tax assets. The realization of
the deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of
sufficient taxable income in either the carryback or
carryforward periods under the tax law. Due to significant
estimates utilized in establishing the valuation allowance and
the potential for changes in facts and circumstances, it is
reasonably possible that the Corporation will be required to
record adjustments to the valuation allowance in future
reporting periods. Such a charge could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial condition and
capital position.
If the
Corporations goodwill or amortizable intangible assets
become impaired, it may adversely affect the operating
results.
If the Corporations goodwill or amortizable intangible
assets become impaired the Corporation may be required to record
a significant charge to earnings. Under generally accepted
accounting principles, the Corporation reviews its amortizable
intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicated the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least
annually. Factors that may be considered a change in
circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of the
goodwill or amortizable intangible assets may not be
recoverable, include reduced future cash flow estimates, and
slower growth rates in the industry.
The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the
Corporation to make estimates and assumptions with regards to
the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ
significantly from these
35
estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of
goodwill that would, in turn, negatively impact the
Corporations results of operations and the reporting unit
where goodwill is recorded.
The Corporation conducted its annual evaluation of goodwill
during the fourth quarter of 2009. This evaluation is a two-step
process. The Step 1 evaluation of goodwill allocated to the
Florida reporting unit, which is one level below the United
States business segment, indicated potential impairment of
goodwill. The Step 1 fair value for the unit was below the
carrying amount of its equity book value as of the
December 31, 2009 valuation date, requiring the completion
of Step 2. The Step 2 required a valuation of all assets and
liabilities of the Florida unit, including any recognized and
unrecognized intangible assets, to determine the fair value of
net assets. To complete Step 2, the Corporation subtracted from
the units Step 1 fair value the determined fair value of
the net assets to arrive at the implied fair value of goodwill.
The results of the Step 2 analysis indicated that the implied
fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value of
$27 million, resulting in no goodwill impairment. If the
Corporation is required to record a charge to earnings in the
consolidated financial statements because an impairment of the
goodwill or amortizable intangible assets is determined, the
Corporations results of operations could be adversely
affected.
RISK
RELATED TO BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND OUR INDUSTRY
Difficult
market conditions have affected the financial industry and may
adversely affect the Corporation in the future.
Given that almost all of our business is in Puerto Rico and the
United States and given the degree of interrelation between
Puerto Ricos economy and that of the United States, the
Corporation is particularly exposed to downturns in the
U.S. economy. Dramatic declines in the U.S. housing
market over the past few years, with falling home prices and
increasing foreclosures, unemployment and under-employment, have
negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage loans and
resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial
institutions, including government-sponsored entities as well as
major commercial banks and investment banks. These write-downs,
initially of mortgage-backed securities but spreading to credit
default swaps and other derivative and cash securities, in turn,
have caused many financial institutions to seek additional
capital from private and government entities, to merge with
larger and stronger financial institutions and, in some cases,
fail.
Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets
in general and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and
institutional investors have reduced or ceased providing funding
to borrowers, including other financial institutions. This
market turmoil and tightening of credit have led to an increased
level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, erosion of
consumer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread
reduction of business activity in general. The resulting
economic pressure on consumers and erosion of confidence in the
financial markets has already adversely affected our industry
and may adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations. The Corporation does not expect that the
difficult conditions in the financial markets are likely to
improve in the near future. A worsening of these conditions
would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult
market conditions on the Corporation and other financial
institutions. In particular, the Corporation may face the
following risks in connection with these events:
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation expects to face increased regulation of the
financial industry resulting from the recent instability in
capital markets, financial institutions and financial system in
general. Compliance with such regulation may increase our costs
and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities.
|
|
|
|
The Corporations ability to assess the creditworthiness of
our customers may be impaired if the models and approaches we
use to select, manage, and underwrite the loans become less
predictive of future behaviors.
|
|
|
|
The models used to estimate losses inherent in the credit
exposure require difficult, subjective, and complex judgments,
including forecasts of economic conditions and how these
economic predictions might impair the ability of the borrowers
to repay their loans, which may no longer be capable of accurate
estimation and which may, in turn, impact the reliability of the
models.
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations ability to borrow from other financial
institutions or to engage in sales of mortgage loans to third
parties (including mortgage loan securitization transactions
with government-sponsored entities) on favorable terms, or at
all could be adversely affected by further disruptions in the
capital markets or other events, including deteriorating
investor expectations.
|
|
|
|
Competitive dynamics in the industry could change as a result of
consolidation of financial services companies in connection with
current market conditions.
|
A
prolonged economic slowdown or decline in the real estate market
in the U.S. mainland could continue to harm the results of
operations.
The residential mortgage loan origination business has
historically been cyclical, enjoying periods of strong growth
and profitability followed by periods of shrinking volumes and
industry-wide losses. The market for residential mortgage loan
originations is currently in decline and this trend could also
reduce the level of mortgage loans the Corporation may produce
in the future and adversely affect our business. During periods
of rising interest rates, refinancing originations for many
mortgage products tend to decrease as the economic incentives
for borrowers to refinance their existing mortgage loans are
reduced. In addition, the residential mortgage loan origination
business is impacted by home values. Over the past eighteen
months, residential real estate values in many areas of the
U.S. mainland have decreased significantly, which has led
to lower volumes and higher losses across the industry,
adversely impacting our mortgage business.
The actual rates of delinquencies, foreclosures and losses on
loans have been higher during the current economic slowdown.
Rising unemployment, higher interest rates or declines in
housing prices have had a greater negative effect on the ability
of borrowers to repay their mortgage loans. Any sustained period
of increased delinquencies, foreclosures or losses could
continue to harm the Corporations ability to sell loans,
the prices the Corporation receives for loans, the values of
mortgage loans
held-for-sale
or residual interests in securitizations, which could harm the
Corporations financial condition and results of
operations. In addition, any material decline in real estate
values would weaken the collateral
loan-to-value
ratios and increase the possibility of loss if a borrower
defaults. In such event, the Corporation will be subject to the
risk of loss on such real asset arising from borrower defaults
to the extent not covered by third-party credit enhancement.
The
Corporations business concentration in Puerto Rico imposes
risks.
The Corporation conducts its operations in a geographically
concentrated area, as its main market is Puerto Rico. This
imposes risks from lack of diversification in the geographical
portfolio. The Corporations financial condition and
results of operations are highly dependent on the economic
conditions of Puerto Rico, where adverse political or economic
developments, natural disasters, and other events could affect
among others, the volume of loan originations, increase the
level of non-performing assets, increase the rate of foreclosure
losses on loans, and reduce the value of the Corporations
loans and loan servicing portfolio.
The
Corporations credit quality may be adversely affected by
Puerto Ricos current economic condition.
Beginning in March 2006 and continuing to todays date, a
number of key economic indicators have showed that the economy
of Puerto Rico has been in recession during that period of time.
Construction remained weak during 2009, as the
Commonwealths fiscal situation and decreasing public
investment in construction projects affected the sector. During
the period from January to December 2009, cement sales, an
indicator of construction activity, declined by 29.6% as
compared to 2008. As of October 2009, exports decreased by 6.8%,
while imports decreased by 8.9%, a negative trade, which
continues since the first negative trade balance of the last
decade was registered in November 2006. Tourism activity also
declined during 2009. Total hotel registrations for January to
October 2009 declined 0.8% as compared to the same period for
2008. During January to September 2009 new vehicle sales
decreased by 23.7%. In 2009, unemployment in Puerto Rico reached
15.0%, up 3.5 points compared with 2008.
On January 14, 2010 the Puerto Rico Planning Board
announced the release of Puerto Ricos macroeconomic data
for fiscal year 2009, ended June 30, 2009, as well as
projected figures for fiscal year ending on
37
June 30, 2010. The fiscal year 2009 showed a reduction of
real GNP of -3.7%, while the projections for the fiscal year of
2010 point toward a positive growth of 0.7%. In general, the
Puerto Rico economy continued its trend of decreasing growth,
primarily due to weaker manufacturing, softer consumption and
decreased government investment in construction.
The above economic concerns and uncertainty in the private and
public sectors may also have an adverse effect on the credit
quality of the Corporations loan portfolios, as
delinquency rates are expected to increase in the short-term,
until the economy stabilizes. Also, a potential reduction in
consumer spending may also impact growth in other interest and
non-interest revenue sources of the Corporation.
Rating
downgrades on the Government of Puerto Ricos debt
obligations may affect the Corporations credit
exposure.
Even though Puerto Ricos economy is closely integrated to
that of the U.S. mainland and its government and many of
its instrumentalities are investment-grade rated borrowers in
the U.S. capital markets, the current fiscal situation of
the Government of Puerto Rico has led nationally recognized
rating agencies to downgrade its debt obligations in the past.
Between May 2006 and mid-2009, the Governments bonds were
downgraded as a result of factors such as the Governments
inability to implement meaningful steps to curb operating
expenditures, improve managerial and budgetary controls, high
debt levels, chronic deficits, and the governments
continued reliance on operating budget loans from the Government
Development Bank for Puerto Rico.
In October and December 2009 both S&P and Moodys
confirmed the Governments bond rating at BBB- and Baa3
with stable outlook, respectively. At present, both rating
agencies maintain the stable outlooks for the general obligation
bonds. In May 2009, S&P and Moodys upgraded the sales
and use tax senior bonds from A+ to AA- and from A1 to Aa3,
respectively due to a modification in its bond resolution.
It is uncertain how the financial markets may react to any
potential future ratings downgrade in Puerto Ricos debt
obligations. However, the fallout from the recent budgetary
crisis and a possible ratings downgrade could adversely affect
the value of Puerto Ricos Government obligations.
The
failure of other financial institutions could adversely affect
the Corporation.
The Corporations ability to engage in routine funding
transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and
commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial
institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing,
counterparty and other relationships. The Corporation has
exposure to different industries and counterparties, and
routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the
financial services industry, including brokers and dealers,
commercial banks, investment banks, investment companies and
other institutional clients. In certain of these transactions
the Corporation is required to post collateral to secure the
obligations to the counterparties. In the event of a bankruptcy
or insolvency proceeding involving one of such counterparties,
the Corporation may experience delays in recovering the assets
posted as collateral or may incur a loss to the extent that the
counterparty was holding collateral in excess of the obligation
to such counterparty. There is no assurance that any such losses
would not materially and adversely affect the Corporations
financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, many of these transactions expose the Corporation
to credit risk in the event of a default by our counterparty or
client. In addition, the credit risk may be exacerbated when the
collateral held by the Corporation cannot be realized or is
liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount
of the loan or derivative exposure due to the Corporation. There
is no assurance that any such losses would not materially and
adversely affect the Corporations financial condition and
results of operations.
38
Legislative
and regulatory actions taken now or in the future as a result of
the current crisis in the financial industry may impact our
business, governance structure, financial condition or results
of operations.
Current economic conditions, particularly in the financial
markets, have resulted in government regulatory agencies and
political bodies placing increased focus and scrutiny on the
financial services industry. The U.S. government has
intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to what has
been commonly referred to as the financial crisis, by
temporarily enhancing the liquidity support available to
financial institutions, establishing a commercial paper funding
facility, temporarily guaranteeing money market funds and
certain types of debt issuances and increasing insurance on bank
deposits.
These programs have subjected financial institutions,
particularly those participating in the
U.S. Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief Program (the
TARP), to additional restrictions, oversight and
costs. In addition, new proposals for legislation continue to be
introduced in the U.S. Congress that could further
substantially increase regulation of the financial services
industry, impose restrictions on the operations and general
ability of firms within the industry to conduct business
consistent with historical practices, including in the areas of
compensation, interest rates, financial product offerings and
disclosures, and have an effect on bankruptcy proceedings with
respect to consumer residential real estate mortgages, among
other things. Federal and state regulatory agencies also
frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the
manner in which existing regulations are applied.
The Corporation also faces increased regulation and regulatory
scrutiny as a result of our participation in the TARP. In
January 2009, the Corporation issued Series F Preferred
Stock and warrants to purchase the Corporations Common
Stock to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP. Pursuant to the
terms of this issuance, the Corporation is prohibited from
increasing the dividend rate on our Common Stock in an amount
exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or
the amount publicly announced (if lower), of Common Stock prior
to October 14, 2008, which was $0.07 per share, without
approval. Furthermore, as long as Series F Preferred Stock
issued to the U.S. Treasury is outstanding, dividend
payments and repurchases or redemptions relating to certain
equity securities, including the Corporations Common
Stock, are prohibited unless all accrued and unpaid dividends
are paid on Series F Preferred Stock, subject to certain
limited exceptions.
On January 21, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives
approved legislation amending the TARP provisions of Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act (EESA) to include
quarterly reporting requirements with respect to lending
activities, examinations by an institutions primary
federal regulator of the use of funds and compliance with
program requirements, restrictions on acquisitions by depository
institutions receiving TARP funds and authorization for the
U.S. Treasury to have an observer at board meetings of
recipient institutions, among other things. On February 17,
2009, President Obama signed into law the American Reinvestment
and Recovery Act of 2009 (the ARRA). The ARRA
contains expansive new restrictions on executive compensation
for financial institutions and other companies participating in
the TARP. The ARRA amends the executive compensation and
corporate governance provisions of EESA. In doing so, it
continues all the same compensation and governance restrictions
and adds substantially to restrictions in several areas. In
addition, on June 10, 2009, the U.S. Treasury issued
regulations implementing the compensation requirements under the
ARRA. The regulations became applicable to existing TARP
recipients upon publication in the Federal Register on
June 15, 2009. The aforementioned compensation requirements
and restrictions may adversely affect our ability to retain or
hire senior bank officers.
The U.S. House of Representatives approved a regulatory
reform package on December 11, 2009 (H.R. 4173). The
U.S. Senate is also expected to consider financial reform
legislation during 2010. H.R. 4173 and a Discussion
Draft of legislation that may be introduced in the
U.S. Senate contain provisions, which would, among other
things, establish a Consumer Financial Protection Agency,
establish a systemic risk regulator, consolidate federal bank
regulators and give shareholders an advisory vote on executive
compensation. Separate legislative proposals call for partial
repeal of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the GLB
Act), which is discussed below.
The Obama administration is also requesting Congressional action
to limit the growth of the largest U.S. financial firms and
to bar banks and bank-related companies from engaging in
proprietary trading and
39
from owning, investing in or sponsoring hedge funds or private
equity funds. A separate legislative proposal would impose a new
fee or tax on U.S. financial institutions as part of the
2010 budget plans in an effort to reduce the anticipated budget
deficit and to recoup losses anticipated from the TARP. Such an
assessment is estimated to be 15-basis points, levied against
bank assets minus Tier 1 capital and domestic deposits. It
appears that this fee or tax would be assessed only against the
50 or so largest financial institutions in the U.S., which are
those with more than $50 billion in assets, and therefore
would not directly affect First BanCorp. However, the large
banks that are affected by the tax may choose to seek additional
deposit funding in the marketplace, driving up the cost of
deposits for all banks. The administration has also considered a
transaction tax on trades of stock in financial institutions and
a tax on executive bonuses.
The U.S. Congress has also recently adopted additional
consumer protection laws such as the Credit Card Accountability
Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, and the Federal
Reserve has adopted numerous new regulations addressing
banks credit card, overdraft and mortgage lending
practices. Additional consumer protection legislation and
regulatory activity is anticipated in the near future.
Internationally, both the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
(the Basel Committee) and the Financial Stability
Board (established in April 2009 by the Group of Twenty Finance
Ministers and Central Bank Governors to take action to
strengthen regulation and supervision of the financial system
with greater international consistency, cooperation and
transparency) have committed to raise capital standards and
liquidity buffers within the banking system.
Such proposals and legislation, if finally adopted, would change
banking laws and our operating environment and that of our
subsidiaries in substantial and unpredictable ways. The
Corporation cannot determine whether such proposals and
legislation will be adopted, or the ultimate effect that such
proposals and legislation, if enacted, or regulations issued to
implement the same, would have upon its financial condition or
results of operations.
Monetary
policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
In addition to being affected by general economic conditions,
the earnings and growth of First BanCorp are affected by the
policies of the Federal Reserve. An important function of the
Federal Reserve is to regulate the money supply and credit
conditions. Among the instruments used by the Federal Reserve to
implement these objectives are open market operations in
U.S. Government securities, adjustments of the discount
rate and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits.
These instruments are used in varying combinations to influence
overall economic growth and the distribution of credit, bank
loans, investments and deposits. Their use also affects interest
rates charged on loans or paid on deposits.
On January 6, 2010, the member agencies of the Federal
Financial Institutions Examination Council (the
FFIEC), which includes the Federal Reserve, issued
an interest rate risk advisory reminding banks to maintain sound
practices for managing interest rate risk, particularly in the
current environment of historically low short-term interest
rates.
The monetary policies and regulations of the Federal Reserve
have had a significant effect on the operating results of
commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do
so in the future. The effects of such policies upon our
business, financial condition and results of operations cannot
be predicted.
The
Corporation faces extensive and changing government regulation,
which may increase our costs of and expose us to risks related
to compliance.
Most of our businesses are subject to extensive regulation by
multiple regulatory bodies. These regulations may affect the
manner and terms of delivery of our services. If we do not
comply with governmental regulations, we may be subject to
fines, penalties, lawsuits or material restrictions on our
businesses in the jurisdiction where the violation occurred,
which may adversely affect our business operations. Changes in
these regulations can significantly affect the services that we
are asked to provide as well as our costs of compliance with
such regulations. In addition, adverse publicity and damage to
our reputation arising
40
from the failure or perceived failure to comply with legal,
regulatory or contractual requirements could affect our ability
to attract and retain customers. In recent years, regulatory
oversight and enforcement have increased substantially, imposing
additional costs and increasing the potential risks associated
with our operations. If this regulatory trend continues, it
could adversely affect our operations and, in turn, our
consolidated results of operations.
We are
subject to regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, and if we
fail to meet these guidelines our business and financial
condition may be adversely affected.
Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, and other
regulatory requirements, the Corporation and the Bank must meet
guidelines that include quantitative measures of assets,
liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items, subject to
qualitative judgments by regulators regarding components, risk
weightings and other factors. If we fail to meet these minimum
capital guidelines and other regulatory requirements, our
business and financial condition will be materially and
adversely affected. If we fail to maintain well-capitalized
status under the regulatory framework, or are deemed to be not
well-managed under regulatory exam procedures, or if we
experience certain regulatory violations, our status as a
financial holding company and our related eligibility for a
streamlined review process for acquisition proposals, and our
ability to offer certain financial products will be compromised.
The
imposition of additional property tax payments in Puerto Rico
may further deteriorate our commercial, consumer and mortgage
loan portfolios.
On March 9, 2009, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed into
law the Special Act Declaring a State of Fiscal Emergency and
Establishing an Integral Plan of Fiscal Stabilization to Save
Puerto Ricos Credit, Act No. 7 the Act).
The Act imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures,
including the imposition of a 0.591% special tax applicable to
properties used for residential (excluding those exempt as
detailed in the Act) and commercial purposes, and payable to the
Puerto Rico Treasury Department. This temporary measure will be
effective for tax years that commenced after June 30, 2009
and before July 1, 2012. The imposition of this special
property tax could adversely affect the disposable income of
borrowers from the commercial, consumer and mortgage loan
portfolios and may cause an increase in our delinquency and
foreclosure rates.
RISKS
RELATING TO AN INVESTMENT IN THE CORPORATIONS
SECURITIES
The
market price of the Corporations common stock may be
subject to significant fluctuations and
volatility.
The stock markets have recently experienced high levels of
volatility. These market fluctuations have adversely affected,
and may continue to adversely affect, the trading price of the
Corporations common stock. In addition, the market price
of the Corporations common stock has been subject to
significant fluctuations and volatility because of factors
specifically related to its businesses and may continue to
fluctuate or further decline. Factors that could cause
fluctuations, volatility or further decline in the market price
of the Corporations common stock, many of which could be
beyond its control, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
changes or perceived changes in the condition, operations,
results or prospects of the Corporations businesses and
market assessments of these changes or perceived changes;
|
|
|
|
announcements of strategic developments, acquisitions and other
material events by the Corporation or its competitors;
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations or proposals, or new
governmental regulations or proposals, affecting the
Corporation, including those relating to the recent financial
crisis and global economic downturn and those that may be
specifically directed to the Corporation;
|
|
|
|
the continued decline, failure to stabilize or lack of
improvement in general market and economic conditions in the
Corporations principal markets;
|
|
|
|
the departure of key personnel;
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the credit, mortgage and real estate markets;
|
|
|
|
operating results that vary from the expectations of management,
securities analysts and investors; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating and stock price performance of companies that
investors deem comparable to the Corporation.
|
Our
suspension of dividends could adversely affect our stock price
and result in the expansion of our board of
directors.
In March of 2009, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System issued a supervisory guidance letter intended to provide
direction to bank holding companies (BHCs) on the
declaration and payment of dividends, capital redemptions and
capital repurchases by BHCs in the context of their capital
planning process. The letter reiterates the long-standing
Federal Reserve supervisory policies and guidance to the effect
that BHCs should only pay dividends from current earnings. More
specifically, the letter heightens expectations that BHCs will
inform and consult with the Federal Reserve supervisory staff on
the declaration and payment of dividends that exceed earnings
for the period for which a dividend is being paid. In
consideration of the financial results reported for the second
quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation decided, as a
matter of prudent fiscal management and following the Federal
Reserve guidance, to suspend payment of common stock dividends
and dividends on all series of preferred stock. The Corporation
cannot anticipate if and when the payment of dividends might be
reinstated.
This suspension could adversely affect the Corporations
stock price. Further, in general, if dividends on our preferred
stock are not paid for six quarterly dividend periods or more,
the authorized number of directors of the board will be
increased by two and the preferred stockholders will have the
right to elect two additional members of the Corporations
board of directors until all accrued and unpaid dividends for
all past dividend periods have been declared and paid in full.
Dividends
on the Corporations common stock have been suspended and a
holder may not receive funds in connection with its investment
in our common stock without selling its shares of common
stock.
Holders of common stock are only entitled to receive such
dividends as the Corporations board of directors may
declare out of funds legally available for such payments. The
Corporation announced the suspension of dividend payments on its
common stock. In general, so long as any shares of preferred
stock remain outstanding and until the Corporation satisfies
various Federal regulatory considerations, the Corporation
cannot declare, set apart or pay any dividends on shares of the
Corporations common stock unless all accrued and unpaid
dividends on its preferred stock for the twelve monthly dividend
periods ending on the immediately preceding dividend payment
date have been paid or are paid contemporaneously and the full
monthly dividend on its preferred stock for the then current
month has been or is contemporaneously declared and paid or
declared and set apart for payment. Furthermore, prior to
January 16, 2012, unless the Corporation has redeemed all
of the shares of Series F Preferred Stock (or any successor
security) or the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of
Series F Preferred Stock (or any successor security) to
third parties, the consent of the U.S. Treasury will be
required for the Corporation to, among other things, increase
the dividend rate per share of Common Stock above $0.07 per
share or to repurchase or redeem equity securities, including
the Corporations common stock, subject to certain limited
exceptions. This could adversely affect the market price of the
Corporations common stock. Also, the Corporation is a bank
holding company and its ability to declare and pay dividends is
dependent on certain Federal regulatory considerations,
including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding
capital adequacy and dividends. Moreover, the Federal Reserve
and the FDIC have issued policy statements stating that bank
holding companies and insured banks should generally pay
dividends only out of current operating earnings. In the current
financial and economic environment, the Federal Reserve has
indicated that bank holding companies should carefully review
their dividend policy and has discouraged dividend pay-out
ratios that are at the 100% or higher level unless both asset
quality and capital are very strong.
In addition, the terms of the Corporations outstanding
junior subordinated debt securities held by trusts that issue
trust preferred securities prohibit the Corporation from
declaring or paying any dividends or distributions on its
capital stock, including its common stock and preferred stock,
or purchasing, acquiring, or
42
making a liquidation payment on such stock, if the Corporation
has given notice of its election to defer interest payments but
the related deferral period has not yet commenced or a deferral
period is continuing.
Offerings
of debt, which would be senior to the common stock upon
liquidation and/or to preferred equity securities, which may be
senior to the common stock for purposes of dividend
distributions or upon liquidation, may adversely affect the
market price of the common stock.
The Corporation may attempt to increase its capital resources
or, if its or the capital ratios of FirstBank fall below the
required minimums, the Corporation or FirstBank could be forced
to raise additional capital by making additional offerings of
debt or preferred equity securities, including medium-term
notes, trust preferred securities, senior or subordinated notes
and preferred stock. Upon liquidation, holders of debt
securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with
respect to other borrowings will receive distributions of the
Corporations available assets prior to the holders of the
common stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the
holdings of existing stockholders or reduce the market price of
the common stock, or both.
The Corporations board of directors is authorized to issue
one or more classes or series of preferred stock from time to
time without any action on the part of the stockholders. The
Corporations board of directors also has the power,
without stockholder approval, to set the terms of any such
classes or series of preferred stock that may be issued,
including voting rights, dividend rights and preferences over
the common stock with respect to dividends or upon the
Corporations dissolution, winding up and liquidation and
other terms. If the Corporation issues preferred shares in the
future that have a preference over the common stock with respect
to the payment of dividends or upon liquidation, or if the
Corporation issues preferred shares with voting rights that
dilute the voting power of the common stock, the rights of
holders of the common stock or the market price of the common
stock could be adversely affected.
There
may be future dilution of the Corporations common
stock.
In January 2009, in connection with the
U.S. Treasurys TARP Capital Purchase Program,
established as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
of 2008, the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury
400,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference
value per share. In connection with this investment, the
Corporation also issued to the U.S. Treasury a warrant to
purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporations common
stock (the Warrant) at an exercise price of $10.27
per share. The Warrant has a
10-year term
and is exercisable at any time. The exercise price and the
number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are
subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments. In addition, in
connection with its sale of 9,250,450 shares of common
stock to the Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS), the
Corporation agreed to give BNS an anti-dilution right and a
right of first refusal when the Corporation sells shares of
common stock to third parties. The possible future issuance of
equity securities through the exercise of the Warrant or to BNS
as a result of its rights could affect the Corporations
current stockholders in a number of ways, including by:
|
|
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of the current holders of common stock
(the shares underlying the Warrant represent approximately 6% of
the Corporations outstanding shares of common stock as of
December 31, 2009 and BNS owns 10% of the
Corporations shares of common stock);
|
|
|
|
diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the
outstanding shares of common stock; and
|
|
|
|
making the payment of dividends on common stock more expensive.
|
Also, recent increases in the allowance for loan and lease
losses resulted in a reduction in the amount of the
Corporations tangible common equity. Given the focus on
tangible common equity by regulatory authorities and rating
agencies, the Corporation may be required to raise additional
capital through the issuance of additional common stock in
future periods to increase that tangible common equity. However,
no assurance can be given that the Corporation will be able to
raise additional capital. An increase in the Corporations
capital through an issuance of common stock could have a
dilutive effect on the existing holders of our Common Stock and
may adversely affect its market price.
43
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
As of December 31, 2009, First BanCorp owned the following
three main offices located in Puerto Rico:
Main offices:
|
|
|
|
|
Headquarters Located at First Federal Building, 1519
Ponce de Leïon Avenue, Santurce, Puerto Rico, a 16 story
office building. Approximately 60% of the building, an
underground three level parking lot and an adjacent parking lot
are owned by the Corporation.
|
|
|
|
EDP & Operations Center A five-story
structure located at 1506 Ponce de Leïon Avenue, Santurce,
Puerto Rico. These facilities are fully occupied by the
Corporation.
|
|
|
|
Consumer Lending Center A three-story building with
a three-level parking lot located at 876 Muônoz Rivera
Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. These facilities are fully
occupied by the Corporation.
|
|
|
|
In addition, during 2006, First BanCorp purchased a building
located on 1130 Muônoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto
Rico. These facilities are being renovated and expanded to
accommodate branch operations, data processing, administrative
and certain headquarter offices. FirstBank expects to commence
occupancy in summer 2010.
|
The Corporation owned 24 branch and office premises and auto
lots and leased 117 branch premises, loan and office centers and
other facilities. In certain situations, financial services such
as mortgage, insurance businesses and commercial banking
services are located in the same building. All of these premises
are located in Puerto Rico, Florida and in the U.S. and
British Virgin Islands. Management believes that the
Corporations properties are well maintained and are
suitable for the Corporations business as presently
conducted.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are defendants in various
lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business. In the
opinion of the Corporations management the pending and
threatened legal proceedings of which management is aware will
not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or
results of operations of the Corporation.
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Information
about Market and Holders
The Corporations common stock is traded on the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol FBP. On
December 31, 2009, there were 540 holders of record of the
Corporations common stock.
44
The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters
indicated, the high and low closing sales prices and the cash
dividends declared on the Corporations common stock during
such periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Last
|
|
per Share
|
|
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
$
|
2.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
|
$
|
2.30
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
September
|
|
|
4.20
|
|
|
|
3.01
|
|
|
|
3.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
|
|
|
7.55
|
|
|
|
3.95
|
|
|
|
3.95
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
March
|
|
|
11.05
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
$
|
12.17
|
|
|
$
|
7.91
|
|
|
$
|
11.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
September
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
|
|
11.06
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
June
|
|
|
11.20
|
|
|
|
6.34
|
|
|
|
6.34
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
March
|
|
|
10.97
|
|
|
|
7.56
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
|
|
$
|
10.16
|
|
|
$
|
6.15
|
|
|
$
|
7.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
September
|
|
|
11.06
|
|
|
|
8.62
|
|
|
|
9.50
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
June
|
|
|
13.64
|
|
|
|
10.99
|
|
|
|
10.99
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
March
|
|
|
13.52
|
|
|
|
9.08
|
|
|
|
13.26
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
First BanCorp has five outstanding series of non convertible
preferred stock: 7.125% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income
preferred stock, Series A (liquidation preference $25 per
share); 8.35% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred
stock, Series B (liquidation preference $25 per share);
7.40% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock,
Series C (liquidation preference $25 per share); 7.25%
non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock,
Series D (liquidation preference $25 per share,); and 7.00%
non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock,
Series E (liquidation preference $25 per share)
(collectively Preferred Stock), which trade on the
NYSE.
On January 16, 2009, the Corporation issued to the
U.S. Treasury the Series F Preferred Stock and the
Warrant, which transaction is described in
Item 1 Recent Significant Events on page 9.
The Series A, B, C, D, E and F Preferred Stock rank on
parity with respect to dividend rights and rights upon
liquidation, winding up or dissolution. Holders of each series
of preferred stock are entitled to receive cash dividends, when,
as and if declared by the board of directors of First BanCorp
out of funds legally available for dividends. The Purchase
Agreement of the Series F Preferred stock contains
limitations on the payment of dividends on common stock,
including limiting regular quarterly cash dividends to an amount
not exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share,
or the amount publicly announced (if lower), of common stock
prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.07 per share.
The terms of the Corporations preferred stock do not
permit the Corporation to declare, set apart or pay any dividend
or make any other distribution of assets on, or redeem,
purchase, set apart or otherwise acquire shares of common stock
or of any other class of stock of First BanCorp ranking junior
to the preferred stock, unless all accrued and unpaid dividends
on the preferred stock and any parity stock, for the twelve
monthly dividend periods ending on the immediately preceding
dividend payment date, shall have been paid or are paid
contemporaneously; the full monthly dividend on the preferred
stock and any parity stock for the then current month has been
or is contemporaneously declared and paid or declared and set
apart for payment; and the Corporation has not defaulted in the
payment of the redemption price of any shares of the preferred
stock and any parity stock called for redemption. If the
Corporation is unable to pay in full the dividends on the
preferred stock and on any other shares of stock of equal rank
as to the payment of dividends, all dividends declared upon the
preferred stock and any such other shares of stock will be
declared pro rata.
The Corporation may not issue shares ranking, as to dividend
rights or rights on liquidation, winding up and dissolution,
senior to the Series A, B, C, D, E and F Preferred Stock,
except with the consent of the
45
holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding aggregate
liquidation preference of the Series A, B, C, D, E and F
Preferred Stock.
Dividends
The Corporation has a policy of paying quarterly cash dividends
on its outstanding shares of common stock subject to its
earnings and financial condition. On July 30, 2009 after
reporting a net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
the Corporation announced that the Board of Directors resolved
to suspend the payment of the common and preferred dividends
(including the Series F Preferred Stock dividends),
effective with the preferred dividend for the month of August
2009. During 2009, the Corporation declared a cash dividend of
$0.07 per share for the first two quarters of the year. During
years 2008 and 2007, the Corporation declared a cash dividend of
$0.07 per share for each quarter of such years. The
Corporations ability to pay future dividends will
necessarily depend upon its earnings and financial condition.
See the discussion under Dividend Restrictions under
Item 1 for additional information concerning restrictions
on the payment of dividends that apply to the Corporation and
FirstBank.
First BanCorp did not purchase any of its equity securities
during 2009 or 2008.
The Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code requires the withholding
of income tax from dividend income derived by resident
U.S. citizens, special partnerships, trusts and estates and
non-resident U.S. citizens, custodians, partnerships, and
corporations from sources within Puerto Rico.
Resident
U.S. Citizens
A special tax of 10% is imposed on eligible dividends paid to
individuals, special partnerships, trusts, and estates to be
applied to all distributions unless the taxpayer specifically
elects otherwise. Once this election is made it is irrevocable.
However, the taxpayer can elect to include in gross income the
eligible distributions received and take a credit for the amount
of tax withheld. If the taxpayer does not make this election on
the tax return, then he can exclude from gross income the
distributions received and reported without claiming the credit
for the tax withheld.
Nonresident
U.S. Citizens
Nonresident U.S. citizens have the right to certain
exemptions when a Withholding Tax Exemption Certificate
(Form 2732) is properly completed and filed with the
Corporation. The Corporation, as withholding agent, is
authorized to withhold a tax of 10% only from the excess of the
income paid over the applicable tax-exempt amount.
U.S.
Corporations and Partnerships
Corporations and partnerships not organized under Puerto Rico
laws that have not engaged in trade or business in Puerto Rico
during the taxable year in which the dividend is paid are
subject to the 10% dividend tax withholding. Corporations or
partnerships not organized under the laws of Puerto Rico that
have engaged in trade or business in Puerto Rico are not subject
to the 10% withholding, but they must declare the dividend as
gross income on their Puerto Rico income tax return.
46
Securities
authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans
The following summarizes equity compensation plans approved by
security holders and equity compensation plans that were not
approved by security holders as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Equity Compensation
|
|
|
|
Exercise of Outstanding
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Plans (Excluding Securities
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Options
|
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (A))
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
|
|
(B)
|
|
|
(C)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders
|
|
|
2,481,310
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
13.46
|
|
|
|
3,767,784
|
(2)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,481,310
|
|
|
$
|
13.46
|
|
|
|
3,767,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stock options granted under the 1997 stock option plan which
expired on January 21, 2007. All outstanding awards under
the stock option plan continue in full forth and effect, subject
to their original terms and the shares of common stock
underlying the options are subject to adjustments for stock
splits, reorganization and other similar events. |
|
(2) |
|
Securities available for future issuance under the First BanCorp
2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Omnibus Plan)
approved by stockholder on April 29, 2008. The Omnibus Plan
provides for equity-based compensation incentives (the
awards) through the grant of stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units,
performance shares, and other stock-based awards. This plan
allows the issuance of up to 3,800,000 shares of common
stock, subject to adjustments for stock splits, reorganization
and other similar events. |
47
STOCK
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following Performance Graph shall not be deemed
incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating
by reference this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the Securities Act) or the Exchange Act, except to
the extent that First BanCorp specifically incorporates this
information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed
filed under these Acts.
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return
of First BanCorp during the measurement period with the
cumulative total return, assuming reinvestment of dividends, of
the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Supercom Banks Index
(the Peer Group). The Performance Graph assumes that
$100 was invested on December 31, 2004 in each of First
BanCorp common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the Peer
Group. The comparisons in this table are set forth in response
to SEC disclosure requirements, and are therefore not intended
to forecast or be indicative of future performance of First
BanCorps common stock.
The cumulative total stockholder return was obtained by dividing
(i) the cumulative amount of dividends per share, assuming
dividend reinvestment since the measurement point,
December 31, 2004, plus (ii) the change in the per
share price since the measurement date, by the share price at
the measurement date.
48
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following table sets forth certain selected consolidated
financial data for each of the five years in the period ended
December 31, 2009. This information should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements
and the related notes thereto.
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except for per share data and financial
ratios results)
|
|
Condensed Income Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
996,574
|
|
|
$
|
1,126,897
|
|
|
$
|
1,189,247
|
|
|
$
|
1,288,813
|
|
|
$
|
1,067,590
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
477,532
|
|
|
|
599,016
|
|
|
|
738,231
|
|
|
|
845,119
|
|
|
|
635,271
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
519,042
|
|
|
|
527,881
|
|
|
|
451,016
|
|
|
|
443,694
|
|
|
|
432,319
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
579,858
|
|
|
|
190,948
|
|
|
|
120,610
|
|
|
|
74,991
|
|
|
|
50,644
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
142,264
|
|
|
|
74,643
|
|
|
|
67,156
|
|
|
|
31,336
|
|
|
|
63,077
|
|
Non-interest expenses
|
|
|
352,101
|
|
|
|
333,371
|
|
|
|
307,843
|
|
|
|
287,963
|
|
|
|
315,132
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(270,653
|
)
|
|
|
78,205
|
|
|
|
89,719
|
|
|
|
112,076
|
|
|
|
129,620
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(4,534
|
)
|
|
|
31,732
|
|
|
|
(21,583
|
)
|
|
|
(27,442
|
)
|
|
|
(15,016
|
)
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(275,187
|
)
|
|
|
109,937
|
|
|
|
68,136
|
|
|
|
84,634
|
|
|
|
114,604
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
(322,075
|
)
|
|
|
69,661
|
|
|
|
27,860
|
|
|
|
44,358
|
|
|
|
74,328
|
|
Per Common Share Results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share basic
|
|
$
|
(3.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.92
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
(3.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Average shares outstanding
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
92,508
|
|
|
|
86,549
|
|
|
|
82,835
|
|
|
|
80,847
|
|
Average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
92,511
|
|
|
|
92,644
|
|
|
|
86,866
|
|
|
|
83,138
|
|
|
|
82,771
|
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$
|
7.25
|
|
|
$
|
10.78
|
|
|
$
|
9.42
|
|
|
$
|
8.16
|
|
|
$
|
8.01
|
|
Tangible book value per common share(1)
|
|
$
|
6.76
|
|
|
$
|
10.22
|
|
|
$
|
8.87
|
|
|
$
|
7.50
|
|
|
$
|
7.29
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
13,949,226
|
|
|
$
|
13,088,292
|
|
|
$
|
11,799,746
|
|
|
$
|
11,263,980
|
|
|
$
|
12,685,929
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
528,120
|
|
|
|
281,526
|
|
|
|
190,168
|
|
|
|
158,296
|
|
|
|
147,999
|
|
Money market and investment securities
|
|
|
4,866,617
|
|
|
|
5,709,154
|
|
|
|
4,811,413
|
|
|
|
5,544,183
|
|
|
|
6,653,924
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
44,698
|
|
|
|
52,083
|
|
|
|
51,034
|
|
|
|
54,908
|
|
|
|
58,292
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
109,197
|
|
|
|
128,039
|
|
|
|
90,130
|
|
|
|
162,096
|
|
|
|
130,140
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
19,628,448
|
|
|
|
19,491,268
|
|
|
|
17,186,931
|
|
|
|
17,390,256
|
|
|
|
19,917,651
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
12,669,047
|
|
|
|
13,057,430
|
|
|
|
11,034,521
|
|
|
|
11,004,287
|
|
|
|
12,463,752
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
5,214,147
|
|
|
|
4,736,670
|
|
|
|
4,460,006
|
|
|
|
4,662,271
|
|
|
|
5,750,197
|
|
Total preferred equity
|
|
|
928,508
|
|
|
|
550,100
|
|
|
|
550,100
|
|
|
|
550,100
|
|
|
|
550,100
|
|
Total common equity
|
|
|
644,062
|
|
|
|
940,628
|
|
|
|
896,810
|
|
|
|
709,620
|
|
|
|
663,416
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
26,493
|
|
|
|
57,389
|
|
|
|
(25,264
|
)
|
|
|
(30,167
|
)
|
|
|
(15,675
|
)
|
Total equity
|
|
|
1,599,063
|
|
|
|
1,548,117
|
|
|
|
1,421,646
|
|
|
|
1,229,553
|
|
|
|
1,197,841
|
|
Selected Financial Ratios (In Percent):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profitability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Average Assets
|
|
|
(1.39
|
)
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
Return on Average Total Equity
|
|
|
(14.84
|
)
|
|
|
7.67
|
|
|
|
5.14
|
|
|
|
7.06
|
|
|
|
8.98
|
|
Return on Average Common Equity
|
|
|
(34.07
|
)
|
|
|
7.89
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
6.85
|
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Average Total Equity to Average Total Assets
|
|
|
9.36
|
|
|
|
7.74
|
|
|
|
7.70
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
7.09
|
|
Interest Rate Spread(1)(2)
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
|
Interest Rate Margin(1)(2)
|
|
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
|
|
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
Tangible common equity ratio(1)
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
|
|
|
4.79
|
|
|
|
3.60
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
Dividend payout ratio
|
|
|
(4.03
|
)
|
|
|
37.19
|
|
|
|
88.32
|
|
|
|
52.50
|
|
|
|
30.46
|
|
Efficiency ratio(3)
|
|
|
53.24
|
|
|
|
55.33
|
|
|
|
59.41
|
|
|
|
60.62
|
|
|
|
63.61
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except for per share data and financial
ratios results)
|
|
Asset Quality:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to loans receivable
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs
|
|
|
1.74
|
x
|
|
|
1.76
|
x
|
|
|
1.36
|
x
|
|
|
1.16
|
x
|
|
|
1.12
|
x
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
8.71
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
2.56
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans receivable
|
|
|
11.23
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
Allowance to total non-performing loans
|
|
|
33.77
|
|
|
|
47.95
|
|
|
|
46.04
|
|
|
|
62.79
|
|
|
|
110.18
|
|
Allowance to total non-performing loans, excluding residential
real estate loans
|
|
|
47.06
|
|
|
|
90.16
|
|
|
|
93.23
|
|
|
|
115.33
|
|
|
|
186.06
|
|
Other Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Price: End of period
|
|
$
|
2.30
|
|
|
$
|
11.14
|
|
|
$
|
7.29
|
|
|
$
|
9.53
|
|
|
$
|
12.41
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-gaap measures. Refer to Capital discussion below
for additional information of the components and reconciliation
of these measures. |
|
(2) |
|
On a tax equivalent basis (see Net Interest Income
discussion below). |
|
(3) |
|
Non-interest expenses to the sum of net interest income and
non-interest income. The denominator includes non-recurring
income and changes in the fair value of derivative instruments
and financial instruments measured at fair value. |
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations relates to the
accompanying consolidated audited financial statements of First
BanCorp (the Corporation or First
BanCorp) and should be read in conjunction with the
audited financial statements and the notes thereto.
DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS
First BanCorp is a diversified financial holding company
headquartered in San Juan, Puerto Rico offering a full
range of financial products to consumers and commercial
customers through various subsidiaries. First BanCorp is the
holding company of FirstBank Puerto Rico (FirstBank
or the Bank), Grupo Empresas de Servicios
Financieros (d/b/a PR Finance Group) and FirstBank
Insurance Agency. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the
Corporation operates offices in Puerto Rico, the United States
and British Virgin Islands and the State of Florida (USA)
specializing in commercial banking, residential mortgage loan
originations, finance leases, personal loans, small loans, auto
loans, insurance agency and broker-dealer activities.
OVERVIEW
OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
First BanCorps results of operations depend primarily upon
its net interest income, which is the difference between the
interest income earned on its interest-earning assets, including
investment securities and loans, and the interest expense on its
interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits and borrowings.
Net interest income is affected by various factors, including:
the interest rate scenario; the volumes, mix and composition of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and
the re-pricing characteristics of these assets and liabilities.
The Corporations results of operations also depend on the
provision for loan and lease losses, which significantly
affected the results for the year ended December 31, 2009,
non-interest expenses (such as personnel, occupancy and other
costs), non-interest income (mainly service charges and fees on
loans and deposits and insurance income), the results of its
hedging activities, gains (losses) on investments, gains
(losses) on mortgage banking activities, and income taxes which
also significantly affected 2009 results.
50
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 amounted to
$275.2 million or $(3.48) per diluted common share,
compared to net income of $109.9 million or $0.75 per
diluted common share for 2008 and net income of
$68.1 million or $0.32 per diluted common share for 2007.
The Corporations financial results for 2009, as compared
to 2008, were principally impacted by: (i) an increase of
$388.9 million in the provision for loan and lease losses
attributable to the significant increase in the volume of
non-performing and impaired loans, the migration of loans to
higher risk categories, increases in loss factors used to
determine general reserves to account for increases in
charge-offs, delinquency levels and weak economic conditions,
and the overall growth of the loan portfolio, (ii) an
increase of $36.3 million in income tax expense, affected
by a non-cash increase of $184.4 million in the
Corporations deferred tax asset valuation allowance due to
losses incurred in 2009, (iii) an increase of
$18.7 million in non-interest expenses driven by increases
in the FDIC deposit insurance premium partially offset by a
reduction in employees compensation and benefit expenses,
and (iv) a decrease of $8.8 million in net interest
income mainly due to lower loan yields adversely affected by the
higher volume of non-performing loans and the repricing of
adjustable rate commercial and construction loans tied to
short-term indexes. These factors were partially offset by an
increase of $67.6 million in non-interest income primarily
due to realized gains of $86.8 million on the sale of
investment securities in 2009, mainly U.S. Agency
mortgage-backed securities.
The following table summarizes the effect of the aforementioned
factors and other factors that significantly impacted financial
results in previous years on net (loss) income attributable to
common stockholders and (loss) earnings per common share for the
last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per common share amounts)
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders for prior year
|
|
$
|
69,661
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
27,860
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
44,358
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
Increase (decrease) from changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
(8,839
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
76,865
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
7,322
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses
|
|
|
(388,910
|
)
|
|
|
(4.20
|
)
|
|
|
(70,338
|
)
|
|
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
|
(45,619
|
)
|
|
|
(0.55
|
)
|
Net gain (loss) on investments and impairments
|
|
|
63,953
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
23,919
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
5,468
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
Gain (loss) on partial extinguishment and recharacterization of
secured commercial loans to local financial institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,497
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
13,137
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
Gain on sale of credit card portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,819
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Insurance reimbursement and other agreements related to a
contingency settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,075
|
)
|
|
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
15,075
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
Other non-interest income
|
|
|
3,668
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
3,959
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Employees compensation and benefits
|
|
|
9,119
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
(1,490
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(12,840
|
)
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
4,942
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
11,344
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
Deposit insurance premium
|
|
|
(30,471
|
)
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
(3,424
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(5,073
|
)
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Net loss on REO operations
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(18,973
|
)
|
|
|
(0.22
|
)
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Core deposit intangible impairment
|
|
|
(3,988
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other operating expenses
|
|
|
6,508
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
(6,583
|
)
|
|
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
(10,929
|
)
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(36,266
|
)
|
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
53,315
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
5,859
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before changes in preferred stock dividends,
preferred discount amortization and change in average common
shares
|
|
|
(315,463
|
)
|
|
|
(3.41
|
)
|
|
|
69,661
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
27,860
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
Change in preferred dividends and preferred discount amortization
|
|
|
(6,612
|
)
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in average common shares(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(322,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
69,661
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
27,860
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For 2008, mainly attributed to the sale of 9.250 million
common shares to the Bank of Nova Scotia
(Scotiabank) in the second half of 2007. |
51
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
$275.2 million compared to net income of
$109.9 million and net income of $68.1 million for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share for the year ended
December 31, 2009 amounted to $(3.48) compared to earnings
per diluted share of $0.75 and $0.32 for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
was $519.0 million compared to $527.9 million and
$451.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. Net interest spread and margin on an
adjusted tax equivalent basis (for definition and reconciliation
of this non-GAAP measure, refer to the Net Interest
Income discussion below) were 2.62% and 2.93%,
respectively, down 21 and 27 basis points from 2008. The
decrease for 2009 compared to 2008 was mainly associated with a
significant increase in non-performing loans and the repricing
of floating-rate commercial and construction loans at lower
rates due to decreases in market interest rates such as
three-month LIBOR and the Prime rate, even though the
Corporation is actively increasing spreads on loan renewals. The
Corporation increased the use of interest rate floors in new
commercial and construction loans agreements and renewals in
2009 to protect net interest margins going forward. Lower loan
yields more than offset the benefit of lower short-term rates in
the average cost of funding and the increase in average
interest-earning assets. Refer to the Net Interest
Incomediscussion below for additional information.
|
The increase in net interest income for 2008, compared to 2007,
was mainly associated with a decrease in the average cost of
funds resulting from lower short-term interest rates and, to a
lesser extent, a higher volume of interest-earning assets. The
decrease in funding costs more than offset lower loans yields
resulting from the repricing of variable-rate construction and
commercial loans tied to short-term indexes and from a higher
volume of non-accrual loans.
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan and lease losses for 2009 was
$579.9 million compared to $190.9 million and
$120.6 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
increase for 2009, as compared to 2008, was mainly attributable
to the significant increase in non-performing loans and
increases in specific reserves for impaired commercial and
construction loans. Also, the migration of loans to higher risk
categories and increases to loss factors used to determine the
general reserve allowance contributed to the higher provision.
|
The increase for 2008, as compared to 2007, was mainly
attributable to the significant increase in delinquency levels
and increases in specific reserves for impaired commercial and
construction loans. During 2008, the Corporation experienced
continued stress in the credit quality of and worsening trends
on its construction loan portfolio, in particular,
condo-conversion loans affected by the continuing deterioration
in the health of the economy, an oversupply of new homes and
declining housing prices in the United States and on its
commercial loan portfolio which was adversely impacted by
deteriorating economic conditions in Puerto Rico. Also, higher
reserves for residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico and in
the United States were necessary to account for the credit risk
tied to recessionary conditions in the economy.
Refer to the Provision for Loan and Lease Losses and
Risk Management discussions below for additional
information and further analysis of the allowance for loan and
lease losses and non-performing assets and related ratios.
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009
was $142.3 million compared to $74.6 million and
$67.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The increase in non-interest income in
2009, compared to 2008, was mainly related to a
$59.6 million increase in realized gains on the sale of
investment securities, primarily reflecting a $79.9 million
gain on the sale of mortgage-backed securities (MBS)
(mainly U.S. agency fixed-rate MBS), compared to realized
gains on the sale of MBS of $17.7 million in 2008. In an
effort to manage interest rate risk, and taking advantage of
favorable market valuations, approximately $1.8 billion of
U.S. agency MBS (mainly
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
30 year fixed-rate U.S. agency MBS) were sold in 2009,
compared to approximately $526 million of U.S. agency
MBS sold in 2008. Also contributing to higher non-interest
income was the $5.3 million increase in gains from mortgage
banking activities, due to the increased volume of loan sales
and securitizations. Servicing assets recorded at the time of
sale amounted to $6.1 million for 2009 compared to
$1.6 million for 2008. The increase was mainly related to
$4.6 million of capitalized servicing assets in connection
with the securitization of approximately $305 million
FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS. For the first time in
several years, the Corporation has been engaged in the
securitization of mortgage loans since early 2009.
|
The increase in non-interest income in 2008, compared to 2007,
was related to a realized gain of $17.7 million on the sale
of investment securities (mainly U.S. sponsored agency
fixed-rate MBS) and to the gain of $9.3 million on the sale
of part of the Corporations investment in VISA in
connection with VISAs initial public offering
(IPO). A surge in MBS prices, mainly due to
announcements of the Federal Reserve (FED) that it
will invest up to $600 billion in obligations from
U.S. government-sponsored agencies, including
$500 billion in MBS, provided an opportunity to realize a
sale of approximately $284 million fixed-rate
U.S. agency MBS at a gain of $11.0 million. Early in
2008, a spike and subsequent contraction in yield spread for
U.S. agency MBS also provided an opportunity for the sale
of approximately $242 million and a realized gain of
$6.9 million. Higher point of sale (POS) and ATM
interchange fee income and an increase in fee income from cash
management services provided to corporate customers also
contributed to the increase in non-interest income. The increase
in non-interest income attributable to these activities was
partially offset, when comparing 2008 to 2007, by isolated
events such as the $15.1 million income recognition for
reimbursement of expenses, mainly from insurance carriers,
related to the class action lawsuit settled in 2007, and a gain
of $2.8 million on the sale of a credit card portfolio and
of $2.5 million on the partial extinguishment and
recharacterization of a secured commercial loan to a local
financial institution that were all recognized in 2007.
Refer to Non-Interest Income discussion below for
additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses for 2009 was $352.1 million compared
to $333.4 million and $307.8 million for 2008 and
2007, respectively. The increase in non-interest expenses for
2009, as compared to 2008, was principally attributable to:
(i) an increase of $30.5 million in the FDIC deposit
insurance premium, including $8.9 million for the special
assessment levied by the FDIC in 2009 and increases in regular
assessment rates, (ii) a $4.0 million core deposit
intangible impairment charge, and (iii) a $1.8 million
increase in the reserve for probable losses on outstanding
unfunded loan commitments. The aforementioned increases were
partially offset by decreases in certain controllable expenses
such as: (i) a $9.1 million decrease in
employees compensation and benefit expenses, due to a
lower headcount and reductions in bonuses, incentive
compensation and overtime costs, (ii) a $3.4 million
decrease in business promotion expenses due to a lower level of
marketing activities, and (iii) a $1.1 million
decrease in taxes, other than income taxes, driven by a
reduction in municipal taxes which are assessed based on taxable
gross revenues.
|
The increase in non-interest expenses for 2008, as compared to
2007, was principally attributable to: (i) a higher net
loss on REO operations that increased to $21.4 million for
2008 from $2.4 million for 2007, driven by a higher
inventory of repossessed properties and declining real estate
prices, mainly in the U.S. mainland, that have caused
write-downs on the value of repossessed properties, and
(ii) an increase of $3.4 million in deposit insurance
premium expense, as the Corporation used available one-time
credits to offset the premium increase in 2007 resulting from a
new assessment system adopted by the FDIC, and (iii) higher
occupancy and equipment expenses, an increase of
$2.9 million tied to the growth of the Corporations
operations. The Corporation was able to continue the growth of
its operations without incurring substantial additional
non-interest expenses as reflected by a slight increase of 2% in
non-interest expenses, excluding the increase in REO operations
losses. Modest increases were observed in occupancy and
equipment expenses, an increase of $2.9 million, and in
employees compensation and benefit, an increase of
$1.5 million. Refer to Non-Interest
Expensesdiscussion below for additional information.
53
|
|
|
|
|
For 2009, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of
$4.5 million, compared to an income tax benefit of
$31.7 million for 2008. The income tax expense for 2009
mainly resulted from the aforementioned $184.4 million
non-cash increase in the valuation allowance for the
Corporations deferred tax asset. The increase in the
valuation allowance was driven by the losses incurred in 2009
that placed FirstBank in a three-year cumulative loss position
as of the end of the third quarter of 2009.
|
For 2008, the Corporation recorded an income tax benefit of
$31.7 million, compared to an income tax expense of
$21.6 million for 2007. The fluctuation was mainly related
to lower taxable income. A significant portion of revenues was
derived from tax-exempt assets and operations conducted through
the international banking entity, FirstBank Overseas
Corporation. Also, the positive fluctuation in financial results
was impacted by two transactions: (i) a reversal of
$10.6 million of Unrecognized Tax Benefits
(UTBs) during the second quarter of 2008 for
positions taken on income tax returns due to the lapse of the
statute of limitations for the 2003 taxable year, and
(ii) the recognition of an income tax benefit of
$5.4 million in connection with an agreement entered into
with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury during the first
quarter of 2008 that established a multi-year allocation
schedule for deductibility of the $74.25 million payment
made by the Corporation during 2007 to settle a securities class
action suit.
Refer to Income Taxes discussion below for
additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets as of December 31, 2009 amounted to
$19.6 billion, an increase of $137.2 million compared
to $19.5 billion as of December 31, 2008. The
Corporations loan portfolio increased by
$860.9 million (before the allowance for loan and lease
losses), driven by new originations, mainly credit facilities
extended to the Puerto Rico Government
and/or its
political subdivisions. Also, an increase of $298.4 million
in cash and cash equivalents contributed to the increase in
total assets, as the Corporation improved its liquidity position
as a precautionary measure given current volatile market
conditions. Partially offsetting the increase in loans and
liquid assets was a $790.8 million decrease in investment
securities, driven by sales and principal repayments of MBS.
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, total liabilities amounted to
$18.0 billion, an increase of $86.2 million as
compared to $17.9 billion as of December 31, 2008. The
increase in total liabilities was mainly attributable to an
increase of $818 million in short-term advances from the
FED and FHLB and an increase of $480 million in
non-brokered deposits, partially offset by a decrease of
$868.4 million in brokered CDs and a decrease of
$344.4 million in repurchase agreements. The Corporation
has been reducing the reliance on brokered CDs and is focused on
core deposit growth initiatives in all of the markets served.
|
|
|
|
The Corporations stockholders equity amounted to
$1.6 billion as of December 31, 2009, an increase of
$50.9 million compared to the balance as of
December 31, 2008, driven by the $400 million
investment by the United States Department of the Treasury (the
U.S. Treasury) in preferred stock of the
Corporation through the U.S. Treasury Troubled Asset Relief
Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program. This was partially
offset by the net loss of $275.2 million recorded for 2009,
dividends paid amounting to $43.1 million in 2009
($13.0 million on common stock, or $0.14 per share, and
$30.1 million on preferred stock) and a $30.9 million
decrease in other comprehensive income mainly due to a
noncredit-related impairment of $31.7 million on private
label MBS.
|
|
|
|
Total loan production, including purchases and refinancings, for
the year ended December 31, 2009 was $4.8 billion
compared to $4.2 billion and $4.1 billion for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
increase in loan production in 2009, as compared to 2008, was
mainly associated with a $977.9 million increase in
commercial loan originations driven by approximately
$1.7 billion in credit facilities extended to the Puerto
Rico Government
and/or its
political subdivisions. Partially offsetting the increase in the
originations of commercial loans was a decrease of
$303.3 million in originations of consumer loans and of
$98.5 million in residential mortgage loan originations
adversely affected by weak economic conditions in Puerto Rico.
The increase in loan production in 2008, as compared to 2007,
was mainly associated with an increase in commercial loan
originations and the purchase of a $218 million auto loan
portfolio.
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets as of December 31, 2009 was
$1.71 billion compared to $637.2 million as of
December 31, 2008. Even though deterioration in credit
quality was observed in all of the Corporations
portfolios, it was more significant in the construction and
commercial loan portfolios, which were affected by both the
stagnant housing market and further weakening in the economies
of the markets served during most of 2009. The increase in
non-performing assets was led by an increase of
$518.0 million in non-performing construction loans, of
which $314.1 million is related to the construction loan
portfolio in the Puerto Rico portfolio and $205.2 million
is related to construction projects in Florida. Other portfolios
that experienced a significant growth in credit risk, mainly in
Puerto Rico, include: (i) a $183.0 million increase in
non-performing commercial and industrial (C&I) loans,
(ii) a $166.7 million increase in non-performing
residential mortgage loans, and (ii) a $110.6 million
increase in non-performing commercial mortgage loans. Also,
during 2009, the Corporation classified as non-performing
investment securities with a book value of $64.5 million
that were pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc., in
connection with several interest rate swap agreements entered
into with that institution. Considering that the investment
securities have not yet been recovered by the Corporation,
despite its efforts, the Corporation decided to classify such
investments as non-performing. Refer to the Risk
Management Non-accruing and Non-performing
Assets section below for additional information with
respect to non-performing assets by geographic areas and recent
actions taken by the Corporation to reduce its exposure to
troubled loans.
|
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES
The accounting principles of the Corporation and the methods of
applying these principles conform with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (GAAP).
The Corporations critical accounting policies relate to
the 1) allowance for loan and lease losses;
2) other-than-temporary
impairments; 3) income taxes; 4) classification and
related values of investment securities; 5) valuation of
financial instruments; 6) derivative financial instruments;
and 7) income recognition on loans. These critical
accounting policies involve judgments, estimates and assumptions
made by management that affect the recorded assets and
liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities disclosed as
of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual
results could differ from estimates, if different assumptions or
conditions prevail. Certain determinations inherently require
greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and
judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing
results that could be materially different than those originally
reported.
Allowance
for Loan and Lease Losses
The Corporation maintains the allowance for loan and lease
losses at a level considered adequate to absorb losses currently
inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance for loan
and lease losses provides for probable losse