e10vkza
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K/A
Amendment No. 2
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007
Commission File Number 1-5620
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
23-1609753 |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer ID No.) |
|
|
|
435 Devon Park Drive |
|
|
Building 800 |
|
|
Wayne, PA
|
|
19087 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(610) 293-0600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock ($.10 par value)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
o Accelerated filer
þ
Non-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of June 30, 2007, the aggregate market value of the Registrants common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was $338,086,524 based on the closing sale price as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants Common Stock, as of April 25, 2008 was
121,564,111.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Explanatory Note
Explanatory Note
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. (Safeguard, the Company, we, us, and our) is filing this
Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 (Form 10-K/A) to amend our
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) on March 31, 2008 (the Original 10-K). The Company is hereby amending the Form 10-K
as follows:
|
|
To include Part III of the Original 10-K in its entirety (which includes an updated list of
the Companys executive officers that was initially included as an Annex to Part I of the
Original 10-K), which items were originally expected to be incorporated by reference in our
definitive proxy statement to be delivered to our shareholders in connection with our 2008
annual meeting of shareholders; |
|
|
|
To amend and restate Item 8 of the Original 10-K to correct the last paragraph of the report of our independent registered public accounting firm on
the companys consolidated financial statements, which report appears on page 3, that incorrectly
referred to an unqualified audit report on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting when the report of our independent registered public accounting firm on
internal control over financial reporting, which report appears on
page 2, expressed an adverse
opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting; Although we are required to file the
complete text of Item 8 in accordance with Rule 12b-15 under the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, there has been no change to the financial statements other than the referenced change
in the audit report of our independent registered public accounting firm; and |
|
|
|
On the cover page, (i) to delete the reference in the Original 10-K to the incorporation by
reference of the Companys proxy statement for its 2008 annual shareholders meeting and
(ii) to update the date as of which the number of outstanding shares of the Companys common
stock is being provided. |
This Form 10-K/A does not reflect events that occurred after the filing of the Original 10-K. As a
result of this amendment, we also are filing the certifications pursuant to Section 302 and
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as exhibits to this Form 10-K/A. These
certifications are included as Exhibits 31.3, 31.4, 32.3 and 32.4.
Except for the amendments and updates described above, this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A does not
modify or update in any other way the Original 10-K.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The following Consolidated Financial Statements, and the related Notes thereto, of Safeguard
Scientifics, Inc. and the Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are filed as a
part of this Form 10-K/A.
1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.:
We have audited Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.s (the Company) internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Item 9A.(b)). Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over
financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of
the companys annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely
basis. The following material weaknesses related to the following have been identified and included in managements
assessment: (i) Ineffective policies and procedures for ensuring financial reporting risks are
identified timely and corresponding control activities implemented and (ii) the combined effect of significant deficiencies related to accounting for
refunds due to customers and the allowance for doubtful accounts.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
income (loss), shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2007. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature,
timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2007 consolidated financial
statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 31, 2008, which expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, because of the effect of the aforementioned material weaknesses on the achievement
of the objectives of the control criteria, Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. has not maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.
/s/ KPMG
LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 31, 2008
2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. (the
Company) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders equity and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financials statements, the Company adopted the
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, effective January 1,
2007. Also, as discussed in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted
the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment,
effective January 1, 2006.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
issued by the of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our
report dated March 31, 2008 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 31, 2008
3
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands except per |
|
|
|
share data) |
|
ASSETS |
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
99,965 |
|
|
$ |
67,012 |
|
Cash held in escrow current |
|
|
20,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
94,155 |
|
Restricted marketable securities |
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
3,869 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances ($3,818 2007; $1,713 2006) |
|
|
37,578 |
|
|
|
33,481 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
5,080 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
168,382 |
|
|
|
215,300 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
35,573 |
|
|
|
34,209 |
|
Ownership interests in and advances to companies |
|
|
92,985 |
|
|
|
54,548 |
|
Long-term marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
Long-term restricted marketable securities |
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
5,737 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
9,960 |
|
|
|
11,984 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
76,824 |
|
|
|
80,418 |
|
Cash held in escrow long term |
|
|
2,341 |
|
|
|
19,398 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,848 |
|
|
|
3,764 |
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
391,862 |
|
|
$ |
443,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of credit line borrowings |
|
$ |
40,012 |
|
|
$ |
25,014 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
3,752 |
|
|
|
3,192 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
7,654 |
|
|
|
10,581 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
13,467 |
|
|
|
13,432 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
18,925 |
|
|
|
19,256 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
6,100 |
|
|
|
3,560 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
89,910 |
|
|
|
78,500 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
4,746 |
|
|
|
4,010 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
9,765 |
|
|
|
10,319 |
|
Convertible senior debentures |
|
|
129,000 |
|
|
|
129,000 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
2,692 |
|
|
|
5,404 |
|
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
Commitments and contingencies
Redeemable consolidated partner company stock-based compensation |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
2,021 |
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.10 par value; 1,000 shares authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.10 par value; 500,000 shares authorized; 121,123
and 120,419 shares issued and outstanding in 2007 and 2006,
respectively |
|
|
12,112 |
|
|
|
12,042 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
758,515 |
|
|
|
750,361 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(616,013 |
) |
|
|
(551,180 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
154,639 |
|
|
|
211,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
391,862 |
|
|
$ |
443,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share data) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
176,119 |
|
|
$ |
162,642 |
|
|
$ |
103,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
124,739 |
|
|
|
118,749 |
|
|
|
81,437 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
97,108 |
|
|
|
93,016 |
|
|
|
66,309 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Purchased in-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
5,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
231,716 |
|
|
|
216,764 |
|
|
|
150,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(55,597 |
) |
|
|
(54,122 |
) |
|
|
(47,162 |
) |
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
(4,866 |
) |
|
|
5,559 |
|
|
|
7,066 |
|
Recovery related party |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
6,907 |
|
|
|
4,974 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(7,660 |
) |
|
|
(6,630 |
) |
|
|
(6,365 |
) |
Equity loss |
|
|
(14,143 |
) |
|
|
(3,267 |
) |
|
|
(6,597 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
5,829 |
|
|
|
6,112 |
|
|
|
6,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(68,886 |
) |
|
|
(45,081 |
) |
|
|
(41,134 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(68,105 |
) |
|
|
(43,895 |
) |
|
|
(40,904 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
89,803 |
|
|
|
8,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(64,833 |
) |
|
$ |
45,908 |
|
|
$ |
(32,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.34 |
) |
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic and diluted income
(loss) per share |
|
|
122,352 |
|
|
|
121,476 |
|
|
|
120,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(68,105 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,895 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), before taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Holding losses on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
(2,824 |
) |
|
|
(8,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
(2,819 |
) |
|
|
(8,584 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(68,616 |
) |
|
|
(46,714 |
) |
|
|
(49,488 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
89,803 |
|
|
|
8,834 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(65,344 |
) |
|
$ |
43,278 |
|
|
$ |
(40,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance December 31, 2004 |
|
|
119,893 |
|
|
$ |
11,989 |
|
|
$ |
745,991 |
|
|
$ |
(565,018 |
) |
|
$ |
11,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3,518 |
) |
|
$ |
201,230 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,070 |
) |
Stock options exercised, net |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
Acceleration of vesting of
restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
Amortization of deferred
compensation, net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
Impact of subsidiary equity
transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
2,697 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
85 |
|
Employee stock option expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2005 |
|
|
119,935 |
|
|
|
11,993 |
|
|
|
747,953 |
|
|
|
(597,088 |
) |
|
|
3,166 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(1,043 |
) |
|
|
164,975 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,908 |
|
Stock options exercised, net |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377 |
|
Reclassification of unamortized
deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of redeemable
subsidiary stock-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,021 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,021 |
) |
Impact of subsidiary equity
transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,763 |
) |
Issuance of restricted stock, net |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
continuing and discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,842 |
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006 |
|
|
120,419 |
|
|
|
12,042 |
|
|
|
750,361 |
|
|
|
(551,180 |
) |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,759 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,833 |
) |
|
Stock options exercised, net |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
741 |
|
Change in redeemable subsidiary
stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167 |
|
Stock-based compensation
expense continuing and
discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,379 |
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2007 |
|
|
121,123 |
|
|
$ |
12,112 |
|
|
$ |
758,515 |
|
|
$ |
(616,013 |
) |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
154,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(64,833 |
) |
|
$ |
45,908 |
|
|
$ |
(32,070 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(3,272 |
) |
|
|
(89,803 |
) |
|
|
(8,834 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,666 |
|
|
|
9,816 |
|
|
|
6,440 |
|
Purchased in-process research and development |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304 |
|
Equity loss |
|
|
14,143 |
|
|
|
3,267 |
|
|
|
6,597 |
|
Other (income) loss, net |
|
|
4,866 |
|
|
|
(5,559 |
) |
|
|
(7,066 |
) |
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
5,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recovery related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
6,603 |
|
|
|
6,637 |
|
|
|
2,034 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(5,829 |
) |
|
|
(6,112 |
) |
|
|
(6,922 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(3,652 |
) |
|
|
2,296 |
|
|
|
(2,595 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue and other |
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
10,568 |
|
|
|
7,261 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
4,963 |
|
|
|
10,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(36,253 |
) |
|
|
(18,379 |
) |
|
|
(21,910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale and trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
Proceeds from sales of and distributions from companies and funds |
|
|
2,783 |
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
28,242 |
|
Advances to partner companies |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,299 |
) |
Acquisitions of ownership interests in partner companies and funds, net of cash
acquired |
|
|
(62,759 |
) |
|
|
(43,596 |
) |
|
|
(35,034 |
) |
Acquisitions by consolidated partner companies, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of note receivable-related party, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
Increase in marketable securities |
|
|
(111,858 |
) |
|
|
(208,514 |
) |
|
|
(55,602 |
) |
Decrease in marketable securities |
|
|
205,422 |
|
|
|
146,129 |
|
|
|
57,387 |
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
4,170 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(9,336 |
) |
|
|
(14,555 |
) |
|
|
(5,913 |
) |
Capitalized software costs |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
(171 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations, net |
|
|
29,967 |
|
|
|
99,649 |
|
|
|
14,680 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
(7,466 |
) |
|
|
(6,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
53,063 |
|
|
|
(27,590 |
) |
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of convertible senior debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on revolving credit facilities |
|
|
153,364 |
|
|
|
137,221 |
|
|
|
101,936 |
|
Repayments on revolving credit facilities |
|
|
(138,366 |
) |
|
|
(124,842 |
) |
|
|
(100,521 |
) |
Borrowings on term debt |
|
|
5,093 |
|
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
Repayments on term debt |
|
|
(3,805 |
) |
|
|
(4,057 |
) |
|
|
(6,623 |
) |
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508 |
|
Issuance of Company common stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Issuance of subsidiary common stock, net |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
6,196 |
|
Purchase of subsidiary common stock, net |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
(1,112 |
) |
|
|
(611 |
) |
Offering costs on issuance of subsidiary common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(343 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
(5,527 |
) |
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
34,310 |
|
|
|
(51,496 |
) |
|
|
(18,139 |
) |
Changes in Cash and Cash Equivalents from Pacific Title & Art Studio and Mantas
included in assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
(1,357 |
) |
|
|
(3,561 |
) |
|
|
(1,866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,953 |
|
|
|
(55,057 |
) |
|
|
(20,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of period |
|
$ |
67,012 |
|
|
$ |
122,069 |
|
|
$ |
142,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
99,965 |
|
|
$ |
67,012 |
|
|
$ |
122,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Significant Accounting Policies
Description of the Company
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. (Safeguard or the Company) seeks to build value in
growth-stage technology and life sciences businesses. The Company provides capital as well as a
range of strategic, operational and management resources to our partner companies. The Company
participates in expansion financings, carve-outs, management buy-outs, recapitalizations, industry
consolidations and early-stage financings. The Companys vision is to be the preferred catalyst
for creating great technology and life sciences companies.
The Company strives to create long-term value for its shareholders through building value in
its partner companies. Safeguard helps its partner companies in their efforts to increase market
penetration, grow revenue and improve cash flow in order to create long-term value. The Company
concentrates on companies that operate in two categories:
|
|
|
Technology including companies focused on providing software as a service (SaaS),
technology-enabled services and information technology services for analytics, enterprise
applications and infrastructure, security and communication; and |
|
|
|
|
Life Sciences including companies focused on specialty pharmaceuticals, drug
delivery, diagnostics and medical devices. |
Basis of Presentation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and all partner
companies in which it directly or indirectly owned more than 50% of the outstanding voting
securities during the periods presented.
The Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations, Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Cash
Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007 and the Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 include the following partner companies in
continuing operations:
Acsis, Inc. (Acsis) (since December 2005)
Alliance Consulting Group Associates, Inc. (Alliance Consulting)
Clarient, Inc. (Clarient)
Laureate Pharma, Inc. (Laureate Pharma)
As discussed in Note 24, in February 2008, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to
sell its interests in Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate Pharma, which is expected to close
during the second quarter of 2008.
Alliance Consulting operates on a 52 or 53-week fiscal year, ending on the Saturday closest to
December 31. Alliance Consultings last three fiscal years have ended on December 29, 2007,
December 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. Fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 were periods of 52
weeks. The Company and all other consolidated partner companies operate on a calendar year.
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, certain consolidated partner companies, or components thereof,
were sold. See Note 2 for discontinued operations treatment of Pacific Title & Art Studio, Inc.,
Clarients technology group, Mantas, Inc., Alliance Consultings Southwest region business and
Laureate Pharmas Totowa operation.
Principles of Accounting for Ownership Interests in Companies
The Companys ownership interests in its companies are accounted for under three methods:
consolidation, equity or cost. The applicable accounting method generally is determined based on
the Companys voting interest in the entity.
9
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Consolidation Method. The Company accounts for partner companies in which it directly or
indirectly owns more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities under the consolidation method
of accounting. Under this method, the Company includes these partner companies financial
statements within the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements, and all significant intercompany
accounts and transactions are eliminated. The Company reflects participation of other stockholders
in the net assets and in the income or losses of these consolidated partner companies in Minority
interest in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Operations. Minority interest adjusts
the Companys consolidated operating results to reflect only the Companys share of the earnings or
losses of the consolidated partner company. However, if no minority interest balance remains on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets related to a consolidated partner company, the Company records 100% of
such consolidated partner companys losses; the Company records 100% of subsequent earnings of such
consolidated partner company to the extent of such previously recognized losses in excess of the
Companys proportionate share. The Company accounts for results of operations and cash flows of a
consolidated partner company through the latest date in which it owned a 50% or greater voting
interest. If control falls below 50%, the accounting method is adjusted to the equity or cost
method of accounting, as appropriate.
Equity Method. The Company accounts for partner companies whose results are not consolidated,
but over whom it exercises significant influence, under the equity method of accounting. Whether or
not the Company exercises significant influence with respect to a partner company depends on an
evaluation of several factors including, among others, representation of the Company on the partner
companys board of directors and the Companys ownership level, which is generally a 20% to 50%
interest in the voting securities of a partner company (including voting rights associated with the
Companys holdings in common, preferred and other convertible instruments in the company). The
Company also accounts for its interests in some private equity funds under the equity method of
accounting based on its general and limited partner interests in such funds. Under the equity
method of accounting, the Company does not reflect a partner companys financial statements within
the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements; however, the Companys share of the income or loss
of such partner company is reflected in Equity loss in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company includes the carrying value of equity method partner companies in Ownership interests
in and advances to companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company reports its share of
the income or loss of the equity method partner companies on a one quarter lag. This reporting lag
could result in a delay in recognition of the impact of changes in the business or operations of
these partner companies.
When the Companys interest in an equity method partner company is reduced to zero, the
Company records no further losses in its Consolidated Statements of Operations unless the Company
has an outstanding guarantee obligation or has committed additional funding to such equity method
partner company. When such equity method partner company subsequently reports income, the Company
will not record its share of such income until it exceeds the amount of the Companys share of
losses not previously recognized.
Cost Method. The Company accounts for partner companies not consolidated or accounted for
under the equity method under the cost method of accounting. Under the cost method, the Company
does not include its share of the income or losses of partner companies in the Companys
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company includes the carrying value of cost method
partner companies in Ownership interests in and advances to companies on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
In addition to holding voting and non-voting equity and debt securities, the Company also
periodically makes advances to its partner companies in the form of promissory notes which are
accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 114, Accounting By Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and judgments that affect amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results may differ from these estimates. These
10
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
estimates include the evaluation of the
recoverability of the Companys ownership interests in and advances to companies and investments in
marketable securities, the evaluation of the impairment of goodwill, intangible assets
and property and equipment, revenue recognition, income taxes, stock-based compensation and
commitments and contingencies.
Certain amounts recorded to reflect the Companys share of income or losses of partner
companies accounted for under the equity method are based on unaudited results of operations of
those companies and may require adjustments in the future when audits of these entities financial
statements are completed.
It is reasonably possible that the Companys accounting estimates with respect to the ultimate
recoverability of the carrying value of the Companys ownership interests in and advances to
companies, goodwill and intangible assets and the estimated useful life of amortizable intangible
assets could change in the near term and that the effect of such changes on the financial
statements could be material. At December 31, 2007, the Company believes the recorded amount of
carrying value of the Companys ownership interests in and advances to companies, goodwill and
intangible assets is not impaired, although there can be no assurance that the Companys future
results will confirm this assessment, that a significant write-down or write-off will not be
required in the future, or that a significant loss will not be recorded in the future upon the sale
of a company.
Reclassifications
and Revisions
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation,
including the reclassification to discontinued operations of Pacific Title & Art Studio which was
sold in March 2007, Clarients technology group which was sold in March 2007, Mantas which was sold
in October 2006, Alliance Consultings Southwest region business which was sold in May 2006 and
Laureate Pharmas Totowa, New Jersey operation which was sold in December 2005. The impact of
these reclassifications did not affect the Companys net income (loss).
During the fourth quarter of 2007, an accounting error at Clarient was identified. The error
related to Clarients accounting for customer refunds which affected the Companys previously
reported quarterly results in 2007 and 2006, totaling $0.9 million.
In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, the Company evaluated the materiality of
the error from qualitative and quantitative perspectives, and evaluated the quantified error under
both the iron curtain and the roll-over methods. The Company concluded that the error was not
material to the Consolidated Financial Statements in any interim or annual prior periods. Clarient
determined that the error was not material to its financial statements for any interim or annual
prior periods, but that its correction in the fourth quarter of 2007 would be material to its
fourth quarter results. Consequently, Clarient, which is a public company, recorded an immaterial
correction of an error in prior periods as a reduction in revenue with a corresponding increase in
accrued expenses and other current liabilites in its financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006. The Company revised its Consolidated Financial Statements as summarized
in Note 20. Accordingly, the quarterly financial information (unaudited) presented in Note 22 has
also been revised.
The Company has disclosed the operating, investing and financing portions of the cash flows
attributable to its discontinued operations. Included in these amounts were net cash flows of
$(1.2) million, $(4.6) million and $3.8 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, attributable
to Clarients technology group, Alliance Consultings Southwest region business and Laureate
Pharmas Totowa operation. Because these businesses did not maintain separate bank accounts, any
net cash provided by (used in) these businesses increased (decreased) the cash and cash equivalents
balance of the Companys continuing operations as shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash
flows related to Pacific Title & Art Studio in 2007, 2006 and 2005 and Mantas in 2006 and 2005 are
adjusted in the Statement of Cash Flows to reconcile to cash and cash equivalents associated with
continuing operations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Marketable Securities
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of 90 days or
less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of deposits
that are readily convertible into cash. The Company determines the appropriate classification of
marketable securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation as of each balance
sheet date. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair
value. Short-term marketable securities consist of held-to-maturity securities, primarily
consisting of commercial paper and certificates of deposits.
Restricted Marketable Securities
Restricted marketable securities include held-to-maturity securities, based upon the Companys
ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity. The securities are U.S. Treasury
securities with various maturity dates. Pursuant to terms of the 2.625% convertible senior
debentures due March 15, 2024 (2024 Debentures), as a result of the sale of CompuCom in 2004, the
Company pledged the U.S. Treasury securities to an escrow agent for interest payments through March
15, 2009 on the 2024 Debentures (See Note 4).
11
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Long-Term Marketable Securities
The Company records its ownership interest in cost method equity securities that have readily
determinable fair value as available-for-sale or trading securities in accordance with SFAS No.
115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair
value, based on quoted market prices, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported as
a separate component of Shareholders Equity. Unrealized losses are charged against net loss when
a decline in the fair value is determined to be other than temporary. Trading securities are
carried at fair value, based on quoted market prices, with the unrealized gain or loss included in
Other Income, Net, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company records its ownership
interest in debt securities at amortized cost based on its ability and intent to hold these
securities until maturity.
Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments (principally cash and cash equivalents, marketable
securities, restricted marketable securities, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts
payable and accrued expenses) are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to the
short-term maturity of these instruments. The Companys long-term debt is carried at cost. At
December 31, 2007, the market value of the Companys outstanding 2024 Debentures was approximately
$106.5 million, based on quoted market prices.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Equipment under capital leases is stated at the
present value of minimum lease payments. Provision for depreciation and amortization is based on
the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the remaining lease term (buildings and
leasehold improvements, 5 to 15 years; machinery and equipment, 3 to 15 years) and is computed
using the straight-line method.
Intangible Assets, net
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized but instead are tested for
impairment at least annually, in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their respective
estimated useful lives to their estimated residual value.
Purchased in-process research and development (IPR&D) represents the value assigned in a purchase
business combination to research and development projects of the acquired business that had
commenced but had not yet been completed at the date of acquisition and which have no alternative
future use. In accordance with SFAS No. 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs, as
clarified by FASB Interpretation No. 4, Applicability of FASB Statement No. 2 to Business
Combinations Accounted for by the Purchase Method, amounts assigned to IPR&D meeting the above
criteria must be charged to expense as part of the allocation of the purchase price of the business
combination.
Goodwill Impairment
The Company conducts an annual review for impairment of goodwill as of December 1st
and as otherwise required by circumstances or events in accordance with SFAS No. 142.
Additionally, on an interim basis, the Company assesses the impairment of goodwill whenever events
or changes in circumstances would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit
below its carrying amount. Impairment charges related to goodwill of consolidated partner
companies are included in Goodwill impairment in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Impairment of Equity Method and Cost Method Companies
On a periodic basis, but no less frequently than at the end of each quarter, the Company
evaluates the carrying value of its equity and cost method partner companies for possible
impairment based on achievement of business
12
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
plan objectives and milestones, the fair value of each
partner company relative to its carrying value, the financial condition and prospects of the
partner company and other relevant factors. The business plan objectives and milestones the Company
considers include, among others, those related to financial performance, such as achievement of
planned financial results or completion of capital raising activities, and those that are not
primarily financial in nature, such as hiring of key employees or the establishment of strategic
relationships. Management then
determines whether there has been an other than temporary decline in the value of its
ownership interest in the company. Impairment is measured by the amount by which the carrying value
of an asset exceeds its fair value.
The fair value of privately held companies is generally determined based on the value at which
independent third parties have invested or have committed to invest in these companies or based on
other valuation methods, including discounted cash flows, valuation of comparable public companies
and the valuation of acquisitions of similar companies. The fair value of the Companys ownership
interests in private equity funds generally is determined based on the value of its pro rata
portion of the fair value of the funds net assets.
Impairment charges related to equity method partner companies are included in Equity loss in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Impairment charges related to cost method partner
companies are included in Other income (loss), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The reduced cost basis of a previously impaired partner company is not written-up if
circumstances suggest the value of the company has subsequently recovered.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed of
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets, the Company reviews long-lived assets, including property and equipment and amortizable
intangibles, for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used
is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to forecasted undiscounted cash
flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets
exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Recoverability of Note Receivable Related Party
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its Note Receivable Related Party in accordance with
SFAS No. 114 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan an Amendment of FASB Statements
No. 5 and 15. Under SFAS No. 114, a loan is impaired when, based on current information and
events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Company does not accrue interest when a note is
considered impaired. All cash receipts from impaired notes are applied to reduce the original
principal amount of such note until the principal has been fully recovered and would be recognized
as interest income thereafter. Cash receipts in excess of the carrying value of the note are
included in Recovery Related Party in the Consolidated Statements of Operations until such time
that the original principal has been recovered.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue represents cash collections on contracts in advance of performance of
services or delivery of products and is recognized as revenue when the related services are
performed or products are delivered.
Revenue Recognition
Acsis generates revenue from (i) software fees, which consist of revenue from the licensing of
software, (ii) services revenue, which consist of fees from consulting, implementation and
training services, plus customer support services, and (iii) hardware and reimbursed project
expenses. Acsis recognizes software fees in accordance with
13
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Statement of Position No. 97-2,
Software Revenue Recognition (SOP 97-2), as amended. Acsis recognizes software license revenue
when the following criteria are met: (1) a signed contract is obtained; (2) delivery of the
products has occurred; (3) the license fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectibility is
probable. Acsis generally recognizes license revenue using the residual method when there is
vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair values of all undelivered elements in a
multiple-element arrangement that is not accounted for using long-term contract accounting. For
those contracts that contain significant customization or modifications, Acsis recognizes license
revenue using the percentage-of-completion method. Acsis recognizes revenue from professional
consulting
services under fixed-price arrangements, using the proportional-performance method based on
direct labor costs incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated labor costs required to
complete the project. Project losses are provided for in their entirety in the period they become
known, without regard to the percentage-of-completion. Acsis recognizes hardware revenue upon
shipment by the vendor to the customer unless the hardware is an element of an arrangement that
includes services involving significant customization or modifications to software, in which case,
hardware revenue is bundled with the software and services, and recognized on a
percentage-of-completion basis.
Alliance Consulting generates revenue primarily from consulting services. Alliance Consulting
generally recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services are
performed, the service fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. Alliance
Consulting recognizes revenue from services as services are performed. Alliance Consulting also
performs certain services under fixed-price service contracts related to discrete projects.
Alliance Consulting recognizes revenue from these contracts using the percentage-of-completion
method, primarily based on the actual labor hours incurred to date compared to the estimated total
hours of the project. Any losses expected to be incurred on jobs in process are charged to income
in the period such losses become known. Changes in estimates of total costs could result in
changes in the amount of revenue recognized.
Clarient generates revenue from diagnostic services and recognizes such revenue at the time of
completion of services at amounts equal to the contractual rates allowed from third parties
including Medicare, insurance companies and, to a small degree, private-pay patients. These
expected amounts are based both on Medicare allowable rates and Clarients collection experience
with other third-party payors.
Laureate Pharmas revenue is derived primarily from contract manufacturing work, process
development services, and formulation and filling. Laureate Pharma may enter into contractual
arrangements with multiple deliverables in order to meet its customers needs. Multiple element
revenue agreements are evaluated under Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue Number 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, to determine whether the delivered item has
value to the customer on a stand-alone basis and whether objective and reliable evidence of the
fair value of the undelivered item exists. Deliverables in an arrangement that do not meet the
separation criteria in EITF 00-21 are treated as one unit of accounting for purposes of revenue
recognition. Revenue generally is recognized upon the performance of services. Certain services
are performed under fixed-price contracts. Revenue from these contracts is recognized on a
percentageof-completion basis. When current cost estimates indicate a loss is expected to be
incurred, the entire loss is recorded in the period in which it is identified. Changes in
estimates of total costs could result in changes in the amount of revenue recognized.
Taxes collected from customers and remitted to government authorities are presented on a net
basis (excluded from revenue).
Defined Contribution Plans
Defined contribution plans are contributory and cover eligible employees of the Company and
certain consolidated partner companies. The Companys defined contribution plan allows eligible
employees, as defined in the plan, to contribute to the plan up to 75% of their pre-tax
compensation, subject to the maximum contributions allowed by the Internal Revenue Code. The
Company determines the amount, if any, of the employer-paid matching contribution at the end of
each calendar year. Additionally, the Company may make annual discretionary contributions under the
plan based on a participants eligible compensation. Certain consolidated partner companies
14
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
also generally match from 25% to 50% of the first 3% to 6% of employee contributions to these plans.
Expense relating to defined contribution plans was $1.0 million in 2007, $0.8 million in 2006 and
$0.7 million in 2005.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, under the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases. The Company measures deferred tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect
for the year in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The Company recognizes the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates in income in the period of the enactment date. The Company provides valuation allowances
against the net deferred tax asset for amounts which are not considered more likely than not to be
realized.
Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The Company computes net income (loss) per share (EPS) using the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during each year. The Company includes in diluted EPS common stock
equivalents (unless anti-dilutive) which would arise from the exercise of stock options and
conversion of other convertible securities and is adjusted, if applicable, for the effect on net
income (loss) of such transactions. Diluted EPS calculations adjust net income (loss) for the
dilutive effect of common stock equivalents and convertible securities issued by the Companys
consolidated partner companies.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period
from non-owner sources. Excluding net income (loss), the Companys sources of other comprehensive
income (loss) are from net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on available-for-sale securities
and foreign currency translation adjustments. Reclassification adjustments result from the
recognition in net income (loss) of unrealized gains or losses that were included in comprehensive
income (loss) in prior periods.
Segment Information
The Company reports segment data based on the management approach which designates the
internal reporting which is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing
performance as the source of the Companys reportable operating segments.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2007, the AICPA issued Statement of Position 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of the
Audit and Accounting Guide: Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity
Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies (SOP 07-1). SOP 07-1 provides guidance
for determining whether an entity is within the scope of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide:
Investment Companies (the Guide). SOP 07-1 amends the Guide to include criteria for determining
whether an entity is an investment company for accounting purposes and is therefore within the
Guides scope. Those criteria include a definition of an investment company and factors to consider
in determining whether an entity meets that definition. Entities meeting the definition of an
investment company, as well as entities regulated by the Investment Company Act of 1940 or similar
requirements, are required to follow the Guides specialized accounting guidance. In October 2007,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) indefinitely delayed the effective date of SOP
07-01.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 allows companies to choose, at specific election
dates, to measure eligible financial assets and liabilities that are not otherwise required to be
measured at fair value, at fair value. Under SFAS
15
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
No. 159, companies would report unrealized gains
and losses for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent
reporting date, and recognize up-front costs and fees related to those items in earnings as
incurred. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 159 to have a material impact on its financial
statements due to its election to not measure partner company holdings accounted for under the
equity method at fair value.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157
is applicable whenever another accounting pronouncement requires or permits assets and liabilities
to be measured at fair value. The requirements of SFAS No. 157 are first effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. However, in February 2008 the FASB decided that an entity need
not apply this standard to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized
or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis until the subsequent
year. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material impact on its
financial statements.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 defines the
threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as
more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority. FIN 48
also includes guidance concerning accounting for income tax uncertainties in interim periods and
increases the level of disclosures associated with any recorded income tax uncertainties. FIN 48
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company adopted FIN 48
effective January 1, 2007 (See Note 14).
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R) significantly changes the accounting for business combinations. Under
SFAS No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date at fair value with limited exceptions.
SFAS No. 141(R) further changes the accounting treatment for certain specific items, including:
|
|
|
Acquisition costs will be generally expensed as incurred; |
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests (formerly known as minority interests
see SFAS No. 160 discussion below) will be valued at fair value at the
acquisition date; |
|
|
|
|
Acquired contingent liabilities will be recorded at fair value at the
acquisition date and subsequently measured at either the higher of
such amount or the amount determined under existing guidance for
non-acquired contingencies; |
|
|
|
|
In-process research and development (IPR&D) will be recorded at fair
value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset at the acquisition date; |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs associated with a business combination will be
generally expensed subsequent to the acquisition date; and |
|
|
|
|
Changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax
uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will affect income
tax expense. |
SFAS No. 141(R) includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 141(R)
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after
January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes new
accounting and
16
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of
noncontrolling interests (minority interests) as equity in the consolidated financial statements
and separate from the parents equity. The amount of net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. SFAS No.
160 clarifies that changes in a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary that does not result in
deconsolidation are treated as equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial
interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income
when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the
noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded
disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest.
SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS
No. 160 will result in the reclassification of minority interests from long term liabilities to
shareholders equity. Minority interest at December 31, 2007 was $3.0 million.
2. Discontinued Operations
The following are reported in discontinued operations for all periods through their respective
sale date.
Pacific Title & Art Studio
In March 2007, the Company sold Pacific Title & Art Studio for net cash proceeds of
approximately $21.9 million, including $2.3 million cash deposited into escrow. As a result of the
sale, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain of $2.7 million in 2007.
Clarient Technology Group
In March 2007, Clarient sold its technology group (which developed, manufactured and marketed
the ACIS Automated Image Analysis System) and related intellectual property to Carl Zeiss
MicroImaging, Inc. (the ACIS Sale) for cash proceeds of $11.0 million (excluding $1.5 million in
contingent purchase price). As a result of the sale, Clarient recorded a pre-tax gain of $3.5
million in 2007. Goodwill of $2.1 million related to the technology group was included in
discontinued operations.
Mantas
In October 2006, the Company completed the sale of its interest in Mantas for net cash
proceeds of approximately $112.8 million, including $19.3 million deposited into escrow. The
Company recorded a pre-tax gain of $83.9 million in 2006. Mantas sold its telecommunications
business and certain related assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2006 for $2.1 million
in cash. As a result of the sale, Mantas recorded a gain of $1.9 million in 2006 which is also
reported in discontinued operations. Goodwill of $19.9 million related to Mantas was included in
discontinued operations.
Alliance Consulting Southwest Region Business
Alliance Consulting completed the sale of its Southwest region business in May 2006 for
proceeds of $4.5 million, including cash of $3.0 million and stock of the acquiror of $1.5 million
which was subsequently sold. As a result of the sale, Alliance Consulting recorded a gain of $1.6
million in 2006. Goodwill of $3.0 million related to the Southwest region business was included in
discontinued operations.
17
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Laureate Pharma Totowa Operation
In December 2005, Laureate Pharma sold its Totowa operation for $16.0 million in cash.
Laureate Pharma recorded a $7.7 million gain in 2005 related to such sale.
Results of the discontinued operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
7,386 |
|
|
$ |
64,685 |
|
|
$ |
89,279 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
(8,107 |
) |
|
|
(62,434 |
) |
|
|
(87,579 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(680 |
) |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
and minority interest |
|
|
(824 |
) |
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interest |
|
|
(816 |
) |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
1,703 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(2,185 |
) |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
(566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from operations |
|
|
(3,001 |
) |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
Gain on disposal, net of tax |
|
|
6,273 |
|
|
|
87,528 |
|
|
|
7,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
3,272 |
|
|
$ |
89,803 |
|
|
$ |
8,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The assets and liabilities of discontinued operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash |
|
$ |
4,239 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances |
|
|
5,393 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
1,525 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
11,703 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
10,680 |
|
Intangibles |
|
|
4,442 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
2,080 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
29,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current debt |
|
$ |
746 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
530 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1,499 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,465 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,057 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
5,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
$ |
24,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Business Combinations
Acquisitions by the Company 2007
In October 2007, the Company acquired 50.0% of Alverix, Inc. (Alverix) for $2.4 million in
cash. Alverix has developed a next-generation platform for quantifying and analyzing assays in the
point-of-care diagnostics market. The technology utilizes optical sensors, image processing
software and signal enhancement algorithms to achieve more accurate measurements in an inexpensive,
miniaturized meter. The Company accounts for its holdings in Alverix under the equity method. The
difference between the Companys cost and its interest in the underlying net assets of Alverix was
allocated to intangible assets and goodwill as reflected in the carrying value in Ownership
interests and advances to companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In October 2007, the Company increased its ownership interest in NuPathe, Inc (NuPathe) from
21.3% to 26.2% for $2.0 million in cash. The Company previously had acquired an interest in
NuPathe in September 2006 for $3.0 million in cash. NuPathe develops therapeutics in conjunction
with novel delivery technologies. The Company accounts for its holdings in NuPathe under the
equity method. The difference between the Companys cost and its interest in the underlying net
assets of NuPathe has been allocated to in-process research and development, resulting in charges
of $0.2 million and $1.0 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively, which are reflected in Equity loss
in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and goodwill as reflected in the carrying value in
Ownership interests in and advances to companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In September 2007, the Company increased its ownership interest in NexTone Communications,
Inc. (NexTone) from 16.1% to 16.5%, for $2.2 million in cash. In December 2007, the Company
funded an additional $2.1 million in cash which was held in an escrow account until January 2008,
at which time NexTone merged with Reef Point Systems, Inc. to form NextPoint Networks, Inc.
(NextPoint). The January 2008 merger and related
19
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
financing resulted in the Company holding
approximately 12.2% of NextPoint. The Company accounted for its holdings in NexTone under the cost
method.
In August 2007, the Company acquired 21.1% of Bridgevine, Inc. (Bridgevine), formerly known
as Broadband National, Inc., for $8.0 million in cash. Bridgevine is an internet media company
that operates a network of shopping websites focused on digital services and products such as high
speed internet, digital phone, VoIP, TV and music. The Company accounts for its holdings in
Bridgevine under the equity method. The difference between the Companys cost and its interest in
the underlying net assets of Bridgevine was allocated to intangible assets and goodwill as
reflected in the carrying value in Ownership interests in and advances to companies on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In August 2007, the Company acquired 14.0% of a yet-to-be-publicly launched web-based software
company for $2.2 million in cash, which acquisition is accounted for under the cost method.
In June 2007, the Company acquired 40.3% of Cellumen, Inc. (Cellumen) for $6.0 million in
cash. Cellumen is a cellular systems biology company whose technology optimizes the drug discovery
process. The Company accounts for its holdings in Cellumen under the equity method. The
difference between the Companys cost and its interest in the underlying net assets of Cellumen was
allocated to in-process research and development, resulting in a $0.2 million charge in the second
quarter of 2007, and to intangible assets and goodwill as reflected in the carrying value in
Ownership interests in and advances to companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In June 2007, the Company increased its ownership interest in Authentium, Inc. (Authentium)
to 19.9%, for an additional $3.0 million in cash. The Company previously had acquired a 12.4%
interest in Authentium in April 2006 for $5.5 million in cash. Authentium is a provider of
security software to internet service providers. The Company accounts for its holdings in
Authentium under the cost method.
In May 2007, the Company acquired 14.2% of Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Avid) for $7.3
million in cash. Avid develops molecular imaging products for neurodegenerative diseases and
diabetes. The Company accounts for its holdings in Avid under the cost method.
In May 2007, the Company increased its ownership interest in Advanced BioHealing, Inc. (ABH)
to 28.3% for $2.8 million in cash. The Company previously had acquired a 23.9% interest in ABH in
February 2007 for $8.0 million in cash. ABH is a specialty biotechnology company focused on the
development and marketing of cell-based and tissue engineered products. The Company accounts for
its holdings in ABH under the equity method. The difference between the Companys cost and its
interest in the underlying net assets of ABH was allocated to intangible assets and goodwill as
reflected in the carrying value in Ownership interests in and advances to companies on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In March 2007, the Company acquired 37.1% of Beyond.com, Inc. (Beyond.com) for $13.5 million
in cash. Beyond.com is a provider of online technology and career services to job seekers and
corporations. The Company accounts for its holdings in Beyond.com under the equity method. The
difference between the Companys cost and its interest in the underlying net assets of Beyond.com
was allocated to intangible assets and goodwill as reflected in the carrying value in Ownership
interests in and advances to companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Acquisitions by the Company 2006
In November 2006, the Company acquired 32.2% of Advantedge Healthcare Solutions (AHS) for
$5.8 million in cash. AHS is a technology-enabled service provider that delivers medical billing
services to physician groups. The Company accounts for its holdings in AHS under the equity
method. The difference between the Companys cost and its interest in underlying net assets of AHS
was allocated to intangible assets and goodwill as reflected in the carrying value in Ownership
interests in and advances to companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
20
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In September 2006, the Company acquired additional common shares of Clarient for $3.0 million
in cash to fund Clarients acquisition of Trestle Holdings, Inc. (Trestle). The difference
between the Companys cost and its interest in the underlying net assets of Clarient was allocated
to fixed assets of $0.2 million with estimated depreciable lives of three years and to intangible
assets which were subsequently sold in the ACIS Sale.
In August 2006, the Company acquired 46.9% of Portico Systems (Portico) for $6.0 million in
cash. Portico is a software solutions provider for regional and national health plans looking to
optimize provider network operations and streamline business processes. The Company accounts for
its holdings in Portico under the equity method. The difference between the Companys cost and its
interest in the underlying net assets of Portico has been allocated to intangible assets and
goodwill, as reflected in the carrying value in Ownership interests in and advances to companies on
the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In August 2006, the Company acquired 35.7% of Rubicor Medical, Inc. (Rubicor) for $20.0
million in cash. Rubicor develops and distributes technologically advanced, disposable,
minimally-invasive breast biopsy devices. The Company accounts for its holdings in Rubicor under
the equity method. The difference between the Companys cost and its interest in the underlying
net assets of Rubicor has been allocated to in-process research and development resulting in a $0.6
million charge, which is reflected in Equity loss in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for
2006, and intangible assets as reflected in the carrying value in Ownership interests in and
advances to companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In June 2006, the Company acquired additional common shares of Acsis for an aggregate purchase
price of $6.0 million in cash at the same per share value as our December 2005 purchase. The
result of the June 2006 incremental equity purchase was an increase in ownership in Acsis to 96.2%.
Acquisitions by Consolidated Partner Companies
Acquisitions by Consolidated Partner Companies 2006
In September 2006, Clarient completed the purchase of substantially all of the assets of
Trestle for $3.4 million of cash and assumed liabilities and transaction costs.
In June 2006, Alliance Consulting completed the acquisition of Fusion Technologies, Inc.
(Fusion) for $5.6 million, including $5.3 million in cash and $0.3 million in its stock. Based
on achievement of earnings targets by the Fusion business in the post-acquisition period and
settlement of a claim under the escrow agreement, additional purchase price consideration of
$2.0 million was paid by Alliance Consulting, reduced by a
$0.2 million settlement of a claim under the escrow agreement in
2007.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alliance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Clarient |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
Property and equipment |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
2,820 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
6,217 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
7,460 |
|
|
$ |
3,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The intangible assets acquired by Alliance Consulting consist of customer lists with a seven
year life and property and equipment which are being depreciated over their weighted average lives
(three to five years). The assets acquired by Clarient were subsequently sold in the ACIS Sale and
are reflected in assets of discontinued operations on the 2006 Consolidated Balance Sheet.
21
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. Marketable Securities
Marketable securities included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Non Current |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
$ |
94,155 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
3,869 |
|
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
5,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,494 |
|
|
$ |
98,024 |
|
|
$ |
1,949 |
|
|
$ |
6,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, the contractual maturities of securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years to Maturity |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Less Than |
|
One to |
|
No Single |
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
Five Years |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Total |
Held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
4,494 |
|
|
$ |
1,949 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,443 |
|
During 2007, the Companys investment in available-for-sale securities was written-off due to
the cancellation of the underlying securities in connection with a bankruptcy liquidation. The
change is reflected in Accumulated other comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
5. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Building and improvements |
|
$ |
23,642 |
|
|
$ |
21,176 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
38,106 |
|
|
|
30,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,748 |
|
|
|
51,867 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(26,175 |
) |
|
|
(17,658 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,573 |
|
|
$ |
34,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. Ownership Interests in and Advances to Companies
The following summarizes the carrying value of the Companys ownership interests in and
advances to partner companies and private equity funds accounted for under the equity method or
cost method of accounting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Equity Method: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner companies |
|
$ |
60,822 |
|
|
$ |
32,155 |
|
Private equity funds |
|
|
2,326 |
|
|
|
4,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,148 |
|
|
|
36,724 |
|
Cost Method: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner companies |
|
|
26,048 |
|
|
|
14,283 |
|
Private equity funds |
|
|
3,370 |
|
|
|
3,541 |
|
Advances to partner companies |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
92,985 |
|
|
$ |
54,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2005, the Company sold certain interests in private equity funds and recorded a gain of $7
million. Following the sale, the Company retained an indirect interest in certain publicly traded
securities held by a private equity fund and the carried interest in a portion of its general
partner interest in certain funds. During 2006, the Company received a distribution of the
publicly traded securities and sold these securities for a gain of $0.1 million.
Impairment charges related to cost method partner companies were $5.3 million and $1.4 million for
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2005, respectively. The amount of each impairment charge was
determined by comparing the carrying value of the company to its estimated fair value. Impairment
charges associated with equity method partner companies are included in Equity loss in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Impairment charges related to cost method partner companies
are included in Other income (loss), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
23
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following unaudited summarized financial information for partner companies and funds
accounted for under the equity method at December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the three years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, has been compiled from the unaudited financial statements of our
respective partner companies and funds and reflects certain historical adjustments. Results of
operations of the partner companies and funds are excluded for periods prior to their acquisition
and subsequent to their disposition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance Sheets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
83,845 |
|
|
$ |
41,025 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
102,196 |
|
|
|
104,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
186,041 |
|
|
$ |
145,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
24,808 |
|
|
$ |
6,021 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
9,311 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
151,922 |
|
|
|
139,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
186,041 |
|
|
$ |
145,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Results of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
35,505 |
|
|
$ |
956 |
|
|
$ |
14,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
18,248 |
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
9,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(35,567 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,544 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,302 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company reports its share of the income or loss of the equity method partner companies
on a one quarter lag.
7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment (In
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alliance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
Clarient |
|
|
Acsis |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
51,782 |
|
|
$ |
12,179 |
|
|
$ |
11,931 |
|
|
$ |
75,892 |
|
Additions |
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,923 |
|
Purchase price adjustments (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
56,155 |
|
|
|
12,729 |
|
|
|
11,534 |
|
|
|
80,418 |
|
Additions (2) |
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,844 |
|
Impairment |
|
|
(5,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
52,561 |
|
|
$ |
12,729 |
|
|
$ |
11,534 |
|
|
$ |
76,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The above purchase price adjustments represent activity to complete the final
purchase price allocation. |
|
(2) |
|
In July 2006, Alliance Consulting acquired Fusion for $5.6 million. Based on
achievement of earnings targets by the Fusion business in the post-acquisition period,
additional purchase price consideration of $2.0 million was paid, reduced by a $0.2 million
settlement of a claim under the escrow agreement. |
24
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In the third quarter of 2007, the Company conducted a goodwill impairment review related to its Alliance Consulting
segment, due to underperformance relative to historical and expected operating results. The
Company engaged an outside valuation firm to assist in determining the fair value of Alliance
Consulting using valuation methods which included discounted cash flows and revenue and acquisition
multiples for comparable public companies. The Company determined that the carrying value of
Alliance Consulting exceeded its fair value, indicating a potential impairment of goodwill. The
Company then estimated the implied fair value of the Alliance Consulting goodwill. The excess of
the carrying value of goodwill over the implied fair value of goodwill was $5.4 million, which
amount was recognized as an impairment loss within Goodwill impairment in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated
useful lives to their estimated residual values. The following table provides a summary of the
Companys intangible assets with definite and indefinite useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Customer-related |
|
7 - 10-years |
|
|
$ |
9,721 |
|
|
$ |
3,845 |
|
|
$ |
5,876 |
|
Technology-related |
|
3 years |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
Process-related |
|
3 years |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names |
|
20 years |
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,682 |
|
|
|
6,289 |
|
|
|
7,393 |
|
Trade names |
|
Indefinite |
|
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,249 |
|
|
$ |
6,289 |
|
|
$ |
9,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Customer-related |
|
7 - 10 years |
|
|
$ |
9,721 |
|
|
$ |
2,719 |
|
|
$ |
7,002 |
|
Technology-related |
|
3 years |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
Process-related |
|
3 years |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
Trade names |
|
20 years |
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,682 |
|
|
|
4,265 |
|
|
|
9,417 |
|
Trade names |
|
Indefinite |
|
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,249 |
|
|
$ |
4,265 |
|
|
$ |
11,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $2.0 million, $2.5 million and $1.1
million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The following table
provides estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets (assuming there is not
an impairment associated with these intangible assets causing an acceleration of expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
1,610 |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,164 |
|
2010 |
|
|
670 |
|
2011 |
|
|
670 |
|
2012 and thereafter |
|
|
3,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
25
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
8. Long-term Debt and Credit Arrangements
Consolidated long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Subsidiary credit line borrowings (guaranteed by the Company) |
|
$ |
27,500 |
|
|
$ |
22,000 |
|
Subsidiary credit line borrowings (not guaranteed by the Company) |
|
|
12,512 |
|
|
|
3,014 |
|
Subsidiary term loans and other borrowings (guaranteed by the
Company) |
|
|
6,019 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,031 |
|
|
|
28,014 |
|
Capital lease obligations and other borrowings |
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
4,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,510 |
|
|
|
32,216 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
(43,764 |
) |
|
|
(28,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, less current portion |
|
$ |
4,746 |
|
|
$ |
4,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company maintains a revolving credit facility that provides for borrowings and issuances
of letters of credit and guarantees up to $75.0 million. This revolving credit facility expires
June 30, 2008. Borrowing availability under the facility is reduced by the amounts outstanding for
the Companys borrowings and letters of credit and amounts guaranteed under consolidated partner
company facilities maintained with that same lender. This credit facility bears interest at the
prime rate (7.25% at December 31, 2007) for outstanding borrowings. The credit facility is subject
to an unused commitment fee of 0.125%, which is subject to reduction based on deposits maintained
at the bank. The credit facility requires the Company to maintain an unrestricted cash collateral
account at that same bank, equal to the Companys borrowings and letters of credit and amounts
borrowed by partner companies under the guaranteed portion of the partner company facilities
maintained with that same bank. At December 31, 2007, the required cash collateral, pursuant to
the Companys credit facility agreement, was $38.8 million, which amount was included within Cash
and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2007.
In November 2006, the Company entered into an additional revolving credit facility with a
separate bank that provided for borrowings and issuances of letters of credit and guarantees of up
to $20.0 million. This facility expired in November 2007 and the Company chose not to renew it.
Availability under the Companys revolving credit facility at December 31, 2007 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Size of facility |
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
Guarantees of consolidated partner company facilities at
same bank (a) |
|
|
(40,800 |
) |
Outstanding letter of credit (b) |
|
|
(6,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amount available at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
27,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Companys ability to borrow under its credit facility is limited by the amounts
outstanding for the Companys borrowings and letters of credit and amounts guaranteed under
partner company facilities maintained at the same bank. Of the total facilities, $33.5
million was outstanding under this facility at December 31, 2007 and was included as debt
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
|
(b) |
|
In connection with the sale of CompuCom, the Company provided a letter of credit, to
the landlord of CompuComs Dallas headquarters which letter of credit will expire on March
19, 2019, in an amount equal to $6.3 million. |
26
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Alliance Consulting, Clarient and Laureate Pharma maintain credit facilities with the same
lender as the Company. Borrowings are secured by substantially all of the assets of the respective
consolidated partner companies. These obligations bear interest at variable rates ranging between
the prime rate minus 0.5% and the prime rate plus 0.5%. These facilities contain financial and
non-financial covenants. At December 31, 2007, Alliance Consulting and Clarient did not comply
with certain financial covenants under their facilities and subsequently received waivers from the
lender regarding such non-compliance.
On February 28, 2008, the credit facilities for Alliance Consulting, Clarient and Laureate
Pharma were extended through February 26, 2009. In addition to the extension of the maturity date,
Laureate Pharmas equipment facility was increased by $3.0 million, which the Company guaranteed, and it
entered into a new non-guaranteed $4.0 million working capital facility. Alliance Consultings
credit facility was amended to reduce its aggregate facility by $3.0 million. Interest rates on
outstanding borrowings and unused facility fees for certain consolidated partner companies were
also amended. Availability under the Companys $75.0 million revolving credit facility at March
28, 2008 was $ 31.3 million.
In July 2007, Acsis amended and restated its credit facility with its bank, providing up to
$4.5 million of availability subject to a borrowing base calculation. The facility expires in July
2008 and bears interest at rates ranging from the prime rate (7.25% at December 31, 2007) plus 1.5%
to the prime rate plus 2.25%, depending on Acsis liquidity. As of December 31, 2007, Acsis had
$1.6 million outstanding borrowings under this facility and had $0.4 million availability based on
the level of qualified accounts receivable.
In September 2006, Clarient entered into a $5.0 million senior secured revolving credit
agreement. Borrowing availability under the agreement was based on the level of Clarients
qualified accounts receivable, less certain reserves. The agreement bore interest at variable
rates based on the lower of the one month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) (5.24% at December
31, 2007) plus 3.25% or the prime rate plus 0.5%. As of December 31, 2007, under this facility
Clarient had $5.0 million outstanding borrowings under this facility, had no availability based on
the level of qualified accounts receivable and was not in compliance with certain financial
covenants. On March 17, 2008, Clarient borrowed $4.6 million from the Company under its
subordinated revolving credit line to repay and terminate this facility, and borrowed $2.8 million
from the Company under its subordinated revolving credit line to repay and terminate its equipment
line of credit with the same lender (see Note 24).
Debt as of December 31, 2007 bore interest at fixed rates between 4.62% and 20.33%, with a
weighted average rate of 5.1%, and variable rates between the prime rate minus 0.5% and the prime
rate plus 1.5%. Debt as of December 31, 2006 bore interest at fixed rates between 4.62% and 20.33%
with a weighted average rate of 13.0%, and variable rates indexed to prime rate plus 1.75%.
The Companys debt matures as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
43,764 |
|
2009 |
|
|
3,229 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,302 |
|
2011 |
|
|
215 |
|
2012 and thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
48,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
27
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
9. Convertible Senior Debentures
In February 2004, the Company completed the sale of $150 million of 2.625% convertible senior
debentures with a stated maturity of March 15, 2024 (the 2024 Debentures). Interest on the 2024
Debentures is payable semi-annually. At the debenture holders option, the 2024 Debentures are
convertible into the Companys common stock through March 14, 2024, subject to certain conditions.
The conversion rate of the debentures is $7.2174 of principal amount per share. The closing price
of the Companys common stock at December 31, 2007 was $1.80. The 2024 Debenture holders have the
right to require the Company to repurchase the 2024 Debentures on March 21, 2011, March 20, 2014 or
March 20, 2019 at a repurchase price equal to 100% of their face amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest. The 2024 Debenture holders also have the right to require repurchase of the 2024
Debentures upon certain events, including sale of all or substantially all of our common stock or
assets, liquidation, dissolution or a change in control. Subject to certain conditions, the
Company may redeem all or some of the 2024 Debentures commencing March 20, 2009. During 2006, the
Company repurchased $21 million of face value of the 2024 Debentures for $16.4 million in cash,
including accrued interest. The Company recorded $0.4 million of expense related to the
acceleration of deferred debt issuance costs associated with the 2024 Debentures, resulting in a
net gain of $4.3 million, which is included in Other income (loss), net in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. At December 31, 2007, the market value of the 2024 Debentures was
approximately $106.5 million based on quoted market prices.
As required by the terms of the 2024 Debentures, after completing the sale of CompuCom in
October 2004, the Company escrowed $16.7 million for interest payments through March 15, 2009 on
the 2024 Debentures. A total of $5.9 million is included in Restricted marketable securities on
the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2007, of which $3.9 million is classified as a
current asset.
10. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Accrued professional fees |
|
$ |
2,831 |
|
|
$ |
2,810 |
|
Other |
|
|
16,094 |
|
|
|
16,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,925 |
|
|
$ |
19,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Shareholders Equity
Preferred Stock
Shares of preferred stock, par value $0.10 per share, are voting and are issuable in one or
more series with rights and preferences as to dividends, redemption, liquidation, sinking funds and
conversion determined by the Board of Directors. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, there were one
million shares authorized and none outstanding.
Shareholders Rights Plan
In February 2000, the Company adopted a shareholders rights plan. Under the plan, each
shareholder of record on March 24, 2000 received the right to purchase 1/1000 of a share of the
Companys Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at the rate of one right for each share of
the Companys common stock then held of record. Each 1/1000 of a share of the Companys Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock is designed to be equivalent in voting and dividend rights to
one share of the Companys common stock. The rights will be exercisable only if a person or group
acquires beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Companys common stock or commences a tender or
exchange offer that would result in such a person or group owning 15% or more of the Companys
common stock. If the rights do become exercisable, the Companys shareholders, other than the
shareholders that caused the rights to become exercisable, will be able to exercise each right at
an exercise price of $300 and receive
28
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
shares of the Companys common stock having a market value equal to approximately twice the
exercise price. As an alternative to paying the exercise price in cash, if the directors of the
Company so determine, shareholders may elect to exercise their rights and, without the payment of
any exercise price, receive half the number of shares of common stock that would have been received
had the exercise price been paid in cash.
12. Stock-Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123(R)). SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to measure all employee stock-based
compensation awards using a fair value method and record such expense in its consolidated financial
statements. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method.
Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated. Under this application, the Company is
required to record compensation expense for all awards granted after the date of adoption and for
the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption.
Equity Compensation Plans
The Company has three equity compensation plans: the 1999 Equity Compensation Plan, with 9.0
million shares authorized for issuance; the 2001 Associates Equity Compensation Plan with 5.4
million shares authorized for issuance; and the 2004 Equity Compensation Plan, with 6.0 million
shares authorized for issuance. Employees and consultants are eligible for grants of stock
options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights, stock units, performance units and
other stock-based awards under each of these plans; directors and executive officers are eligible
for grants only under the 1999 and 2004 Equity Compensation Plans. During 2007 and 2005, 2.5
million and 6.0 million options, respectively, were awarded outside of existing plans as inducement
awards in accordance with New York Stock Exchange rules.
To the extent allowable, all grants are incentive stock options. Options granted under the
plans are at prices equal to the fair market value at the date of grant. Upon exercise of stock
options, the Company issues shares first from treasury stock, if available, then from authorized
but unissued shares. At December 31, 2007, the Company had reserved 25.2 million shares of common
stock for possible future issuance under its equity compensation plans. Several subsidiaries also
maintain separate equity compensation plans for their employees, directors and advisors.
Classification of Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Stock-based compensation expense was recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
6,411 |
|
|
|
6,518 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,603 |
|
|
$ |
6,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the expense above is stock-based compensation and mark-to-market adjustments
related to liability-classified awards.
29
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Prior to adopting SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based
compensation in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
Had compensation cost been recognized consistent with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, the Companys consolidated net loss from continuing operations and discontinued
operations and loss per share from continuing operations and from discontinued operations would
have been as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss from continuing operations |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
(40,904 |
) |
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in
net loss from continuing operations, net of minority
interest |
|
As reported |
|
|
1,809 |
|
Deduct: Total stock based employee
compensation expense from continuing
operations determined under fair value based
method for all awards, net of minority interest
and related tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss from continuing operations |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
(46,392 |
) |
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in
net loss of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
630 |
|
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
As reported |
|
|
8,834 |
|
Deduct: Total stock based employee
compensation expense from discontinued
operations determined under fair value based
method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,009 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(37,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
(0.34 |
) |
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
As reported |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.38 |
) |
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
Pro forma |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company
The fair value of the Companys stock-based awards to employees during the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at
the end of the quarter in which the grant occurred. The expected life of stock options granted was
estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees. Expected volatility was based on
historical volatility for a period equal to the stock options expected life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Service-Based Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
Average expected option life |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Market-Based Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
67 |
% |
Average expected option life |
|
5 7 years |
|
5 7 years |
|
5 7 years |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options issued by the Company during the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $1.46, $1.36 and $0.95 per share, respectively.
The Company granted 2.4 million, 1.6 million and 8.6 million market-based stock option awards
to employees during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The awards
entitle participants to vest in a number of options determined by achievement of certain target
market capitalization increases (measured by reference to stock price increases on a specified
number of outstanding shares) over an eight-year period. The requisite service periods for the
market-based awards are based on the Companys estimate of the dates on which the market conditions
will be met as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Compensation expense is recognized
over the requisite service periods using the straight-line method, but is accelerated if market
capitalization targets are achieved earlier than estimated. Based on the achievement of market
capitalization targets, 0.9 million and 1.7 million shares vested during the years ended December
31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
0.5 million and 0.8 million market-based awards were canceled or forfeited. The Company recorded
$1.7 million and $1.9 million of compensation expense related to the market-based awards in the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The maximum number of unvested shares at
December 31, 2007 attainable under these grants is 8.7 million shares.
Substantially all other outstanding options are service-based awards that generally vest over
four years after the date of grant and expire eight years after the date of grant. Compensation
expense is recognized over the requisite service period using the straight-line method. The
requisite service period for service-based awards is the period over which the award vests. The
Company recorded $1.8 million and $2.0 million of compensation expense related to these awards
during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, the Company granted 23
thousand and 21 thousand stock options to members of its advisory boards, which comprise
non-employees. Such awards vest one year following grant, are equity classified and are
marked-to-market each period.
31
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Option activity of the Company is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2004 |
|
|
9,216 |
|
|
$ |
4.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
10,924 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options canceled/forfeited |
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
|
|
10.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
18,971 |
|
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options canceled/forfeited |
|
|
(2,728 |
) |
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
18,728 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
3,835 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(492 |
) |
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options canceled/forfeited |
|
|
(652 |
) |
|
|
3.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
21,419 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
$ |
4,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
10,035 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
Options vested and expected to vest at
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
15,596 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
Shares available for future grant |
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and
2005 was $0.5 million, $0.2 million and $0.0 million, respectively.
At December 31, 2007, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options
granted under the plans for service-based awards was $2.3 million. That cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.4 years.
At December 31, 2007, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options
granted under the plans for market-based awards was $3.9 million. That cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.9 years, but would be accelerated if market
capitalization targets are achieved earlier than estimated.
Total compensation expense for restricted stock issuances was approximately $0.1 million, $0.0
million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively,
including amounts recorded by consolidated partner companies. Unrecognized compensation expense
related to restricted stock issuances was $0.1 million at December 31, 2007.
The Company has previously issued deferred stock units to certain employees. The Company
issued deferred stock units during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 to directors
who elected to defer all or a portion of directors fees earned. Deferred stock units issued to
directors in lieu of directors fees are 100% vested at the grant date; matching deferred stock
units equal to 25% of directors fees deferred vest one year following the grant date. Deferred
stock units are payable in stock on a one-for-one basis. Payments in respect of the deferred stock
units are generally distributable following termination of employment or service, death, permanent
disability or retirement. Total compensation expense for deferred stock units was approximately
$0.1 million, $0.4 million and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, including amounts recorded by consolidated partner companies. Unrecognized
compensation expense related to deferred stock units at December 31, 2007 was $0.0 million. The
total fair value of deferred stock units vested during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
was $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
32
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred stock unit and restricted stock activity is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
71 |
|
|
$ |
2.82 |
|
Granted |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
3.20 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Partner Companies
The fair value of the Companys consolidated partner companies stock-based awards issued to
employees during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was estimated at the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free rate was based on the U.S.
Treasury yield curve in effect at the end of the quarter in which the grant occurred. The expected
life of stock options granted was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees.
The expected life of stock options granted by consolidated partner companies that do not have
sufficient historical exercise behavior of employees was calculated using the simplified method of
determining expected term as provided in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment. Expected volatility for Clarient, the Companys only publicly-held consolidated
partner company, was based on historical volatility for a period equal to the stock options
expected life. Expected volatility for the Companys privately-held consolidated partner companies
was based on the average historical volatility of comparable companies for a period equal to the
stock options expected life. The fair value of the underlying stock of the Companys privately
held consolidated partner companies on the date of grant was determined based on a number of
valuation methods, including discounted cash flows and revenue and acquisition multiples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
36% to 87 |
% |
|
38% to 92 |
% |
|
50% to 103 |
% |
Average expected option life |
|
|
5 to 6 years |
|
|
|
5 to 8 years |
|
|
|
4 to 5 years |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
3.4% to 3.6 |
% |
|
4.5% to 5.3 |
% |
|
3.9% to 4.5 |
% |
Stock options granted by consolidated partner companies generally are service-based awards
that vest four years after the date of grant and expire seven to 10 years after the date of grant.
Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period using the straight-line
method. The requisite service period is the period over which the award vests. The Companys
consolidated partner companies recorded $3.1 million, $2.6 million and $0.8 million of stock-based
compensation expense in continuing operations related to these awards during the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
At December 31, 2007, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options
granted under the consolidated partner companies plans was $3.0 million. That cost is expected to
be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, certain consolidated partner companies granted stock
options to advisory boards, which comprise non-employees. Such awards vest over four years, are
equity classified and are marked-to-market each period.
33
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Certain employees of the Companys consolidated partner companies have the right to require
the respective consolidated partner company to purchase shares of its common stock received by the
employee pursuant to the exercise of options or the conversion of deferred stock units. The
employee must hold the shares for at least six months prior to exercising this right. The required
purchase price is 75% to 100% of the fair market value at the time the right is exercised. These
options and deferred stock units qualify for equity classification under SFAS No. 123(R). In
accordance with EITF Issue No. D-98, however, these instruments are classified outside of permanent
equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as Redeemable consolidated partner company stock-based
compensation at their current redemption amount based on the number of options and deferred stock
units vested as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Following the sale of Pacific Title &
Art Studio, amounts payable related to deferred stock units issued to a former employee of Pacific
Title & Art Studio were classified in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2007 at the expected redemption amount. At December 31,
2006, these instruments were classified outside of permanent equity as Redeemable consolidated
partner company stock-based compensation.
13. Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Gain on sale of companies and funds, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
|
$ |
7,292 |
|
Gain (loss) on trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
Impairment charges on cost method partner companies |
|
|
(5,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,425 |
) |
Other |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
4,057 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,866 |
) |
|
$ |
5,559 |
|
|
$ |
7,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of companies and funds for the year ended December 31, 2006 of $1.2 million
primarily related to the sale of a cost method holding whose carrying value was zero. Total
proceeds from the sales of certain interests in private equity funds during 2005 were $27.6
million. As a result of the sale, the Company also was relieved of $9.1 million of future fund
commitments.
Gain on trading securities in 2006 primarily reflects a net gain of $0.4 million on the sale
of our holdings in Traffic.com. Loss on trading securities in 2005 reflects the loss on the sale
of our holdings in stock distributed from a private equity fund, which was sold in the third
quarter of 2005.
We have recorded impairment charges for certain holdings accounted for under the cost method
determined to have experienced an other than temporary decline in value in accordance with our
existing policy regarding impairment of ownership interests in and advances to companies. In 2007,
we recorded impairment charges of $5.3 million for Ventaira Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Ventaira).
The carrying value of Ventaira was $0.0 million at December 31, 2007, and as of that date, Ventaira
had permanently ceased operations.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recognized a net gain of $4.3 million on the
repurchase of $21 million of face value of the 2024 Debentures, which is included in Other above.
34
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
14. Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Current, primarily state |
|
$ |
(781 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,186 |
) |
|
$ |
(230 |
) |
Deferred, primarily state |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(781 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,186 |
) |
|
$ |
(230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total income tax provision (benefit) differed from the amounts computed by applying the
U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to net loss from continuing operations before income taxes as a
result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Statutory tax benefit |
|
|
(35.0 |
)% |
|
|
(35.0 |
)% |
|
|
(35.0 |
)% |
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Non-deductible amortization and impairment |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of the
deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Deferred tax asset (liability): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying values of partner companies and other holdings |
|
$ |
33,908 |
|
|
$ |
41,468 |
|
Tax loss and credit carryforwards |
|
|
207,405 |
|
|
|
185,177 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
5,473 |
|
|
|
4,417 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
(2,164 |
) |
|
|
(2,095 |
) |
Other |
|
|
8,456 |
|
|
|
4,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253,078 |
|
|
|
233,046 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(254,104 |
) |
|
|
(234,072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
(1,026 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has not recognized gross deferred tax assets for the difference between the book
and tax basis of its holdings in the stock of certain consolidated partner companies where it does
not believe it will dispose of the asset in the foreseeable future.
35
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2007, the Company and its subsidiaries consolidated for tax purposes had
federal net operating loss carryforwards and federal capital loss carryforwards of approximately
$274.5 million and $175.4 million, respectively. These carryforwards expire as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
24,886 |
|
2009 |
|
|
101,565 |
|
2010 |
|
|
14,055 |
|
2011 |
|
|
3,215 |
|
2012 and thereafter |
|
|
306,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
449,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
Limitations on utilization of both the net operating loss carryforward and capital loss
carryforward may apply.
In assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
Company has determined that it is more likely than not that certain future tax benefits may not be
realized as a result of current and future income. Accordingly, a valuation allowance has been
recorded against substantially all of the Companys deferred tax assets. In the event of a
decrease in the valuation allowance in future years, a portion of the decrease will reduce the
Companys recorded goodwill for certain deferred tax assets acquired as part of the purchase of
consolidated partner companies and currently requiring a valuation allowance.
Clarient, the Companys consolidated partner company, which is not consolidated for tax return
purposes, had additional federal net operating loss carryforwards of $122.0 million, which expire
in various amounts from 2011 to 2027. Limitations on utilization of the net operating loss
carryforwards may apply. Accordingly, valuation allowances have been provided to account for the
potential limitations on utilization of these tax benefits.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48
clarifies the criteria for recognizing tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions under SFAS
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and requires additional financial statement disclosure.
FIN 48 requires that the Company recognizes in its consolidated financial statements the impact of
a tax position if that position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination, based on
the technical merits of the position.
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had accrued $0.8 million for unrecognized tax benefits,
including $0.2 million for the payment of penalties and interest. Upon adoption of FIN 48 the
Company identified an additional $3.2 million of uncertain tax positions that the Company did not
believe met the recognition threshold under FIN 48 which is more likely than not to be sustained
upon examination. Because the $3.2 million of uncertain tax positions had not been utilized and had
a full valuation allowance established, the Company reduced its gross deferred tax asset and
valuation allowance by $3.2 million. The adoption of FIN 48 had no net impact on the Companys
consolidated results of operations and financial position. All uncertain tax positions relate to
unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective tax rate when recognized.
The Company does not expect any material increase or decrease in its income tax expense, in
the next twelve months, related to examinations or changes in uncertain tax positions.
36
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Changes in the Companys uncertain tax positions for the year ended December 31, 2007 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
754 |
|
Settlements / lapses in statutes of limitation |
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company and its consolidated partner companies file income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction, and various states and foreign jurisdictions. Tax years 2004 and forward remain open
for examination for federal tax purposes and tax years 2002 and forward remain open for examination
for the Companys more significant state tax jurisdictions. To the extent utilized in future
years tax returns, net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards at December 31, 2007 will
remain subject to examination until the respective tax year is closed. The Company recognizes
penalties and interest accrued related to income tax liabilities in the provision (benefit) for
income taxes in its Consolidated Statements of Operations.
15. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
The calculations of net income (loss) per share were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share data) |
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(67,715 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,773 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,904 |
) |
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
89,803 |
|
|
|
8,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(64,443 |
) |
|
$ |
46,030 |
|
|
$ |
(32,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
122,352 |
|
|
|
121,476 |
|
|
|
120,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.34 |
) |
Net income per share from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(67,715 |
) |
|
$ |
(43,773 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,904 |
) |
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
89,803 |
|
|
|
8,834 |
|
Effect of holdings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(64,443 |
) |
|
$ |
45,904 |
|
|
$ |
(32,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
122,352 |
|
|
|
121,476 |
|
|
|
120,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.34 |
) |
Net income per share from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.53 |
) |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding for purposes of computing net income
(loss) per share includes outstanding common shares and vested deferred stock units (DSUs).
If a consolidated or equity method partner company has dilutive stock options, unvested
restricted stock, DSUs, warrants or securities outstanding, diluted net loss per share is computed
by first deducting from net loss the income attributable to the potential exercise of the dilutive
securities of the partner company. This impact is shown as an adjustment to net loss for purposes
of calculating diluted net loss per share.
The following potential shares of common stock and their effects on income were excluded from
the diluted net loss per share calculation because their effect would be anti-dilutive:
37
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, options to purchase 21.4 million, 18.7 million
and 19.0 million shares of common stock, respectively, at prices ranging from $1.03 to
$45.47 per share, were excluded from the calculation. |
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, unvested restricted stock units and DSUs
convertible into 0.1 million, 0.1 million and 0.2 million shares of stock,
respectively, were excluded from the calculations. |
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 a total of 17.9 million, 19.3 million, and 20.8
million shares, respectively, related to the Companys 2024 Debentures (See Note 9)
representing the weighted average effect of assumed conversion of the 2024 Debentures
were excluded from the calculation. |
16. Related Party Transactions
In May 2001, the Company entered into a $26.5 million loan agreement with Warren V. Musser,
the Companys former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Through December 31, 2007, the Company
recognized impairment charges against the loan of $15.7 million. The Companys efforts to collect
Mr. Mussers outstanding loan obligation have included the sale of existing collateral, obtaining
and selling additional collateral, litigation and negotiated resolution. Since 2001 and through
December 31, 2007, the Company received a total of $16.3 million in cash payments on the loan. In
December 2006, the Company restructured the obligation to reduce the amount outstanding to $14.8
million, bearing interest at a rate of 5.0% per annum, in order to obtain new collateral, which is
expected to be the primary source of repayment. Subsequent to the restructuring of the obligation,
the Company received cash from the sale of collateral of approximately $1.0 million in 2006, and
$12 thousand in 2007, which exceeded the Companys then carrying value of the loan. The excess is
reflected as Recovery-related party in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The carrying
value of the loan at December 31, 2007 was zero.
In the normal course of business, the Companys directors, officers and employees hold board
positions of companies in which the Company has a direct or indirect ownership interest.
The Companys Chairman is the President and CEO of TL Ventures. The Company had deployed or
committed a total of $67.0 million in the seven TL Ventures and EnerTech Capital funds (a fund
family related to TL Ventures). The Company owned less than 7% of the partnership interests of each
of these funds prior to the sale of certain interests the Company had in the funds.
As described in Note 6, the Company sold certain holdings in private equity funds in 2005.
17. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company, and its partner companies, are involved in various claims and legal actions
arising in the ordinary course of business and which may from time to time arise from facility
lease terminations. While in the current opinion of the Company the ultimate disposition of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or
results of operations, no assurance can be given as to the outcome of these actions, and one or
more adverse rulings could have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial
position and results of operations or that of its partner companies.
The Company and its consolidated partner companies conduct a portion of their operations in
leased facilities and lease machinery and equipment under leases expiring at various dates to 2015.
Total rental expense under operating leases was $6.0 million, $5.0 million and $4.0 million in
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating
leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more at December 31, 2007, are (in millions):
$6.0 2008; $5.2 2009; $4.4 2010; $3.1 2011; $3.1 2012; and $9.3 thereafter.
38
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company had the following outstanding guarantees at December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Included on |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Consolidated Balance |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated partner companies guarantees credit facilities |
|
$ |
40,800 |
|
|
$ |
33,519 |
|
Other consolidated partner company guarantees operating
leases |
|
|
4,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other guarantees |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
49,298 |
|
|
$ |
33,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has committed capital of approximately $4.2 million, including conditional
commitments to provide non-consolidated partner companies with additional funding and commitments
made to various private equity funds in prior years. These commitments will be funded over the
next several years, including approximately $3.5 million which is expected to be funded during the
next 12 months.
Under certain circumstances, the Company may be required to return a portion or all the
distributions it received as a general partner of certain private equity funds (the clawback).
Assuming the private equity funds in which the Company was a general partner were liquidated or
dissolved on December 31, 2007 and assuming for these purposes the only distributions from the
funds were equal to the carrying value of the funds on the December 31, 2007 financial statements,
the maximum clawback the Company would be required to return due to our general partner interest is
approximately $8.0 million. The Company estimates its liability to be approximately $6.7 million,
of which $5.3 million was reflected in Accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $1.4
million was reflected in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Companys ownership in the funds which have potential clawback liabilities range from
19-30%. The clawback liability is joint and several, such that the Company may be required to fund
the clawback for other general partners should they default. The funds have taken several steps to
reduce the potential liabilities should other general partners default, including withholding all
general partner distributions in escrow and adding rights of set-off among certain funds. The
Company believes its liability due to the default of other general partners is remote.
In anticipation of the sale of Pacific Title & Art Studio in the first quarter of 2007, the
Company permitted the employment agreement of the Pacific Title & Art Studio CEO to expire without
renewal, and thereby his employment ceased. Following the sale, the former CEOs counsel demanded
payment of severance benefits under his employment agreement, as well as payment of his deferred
stock units and other amounts substantially in excess of the maximum amounts the Company believed
were arguably due. The former CEO and the Company thereafter engaged in negotiations, but were
ultimately unable to settle on the appropriate amounts due. On or about August 13, 2007, the
former CEO filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los
Angeles, Central District, against the Company and Pacific Title & Art Studio, alleging, among
other things: wrongful termination, conversion, unfair competition, violation of the labor code,
breach of contract and negligence. On or about March 28, 2008,
the Plaintiff amended his complaint to add as a defendant the party
which purchased Pacific Title and Art Studio from the company and to
add several further causes of action. In his amended complaint, the former CEO makes claims for compensatory
damages in excess of $24.6 million, plus exemplary and punitive damages and interest. While the
Company does not dispute that certain amounts may be due the former CEO under various agreements,
the Company and the other defendants deny the majority of the claims under his complaint and
the amounts claimed and intend to vigorously defend against such claims. The Company has engaged
counsel to represent the Company and Pacific Title & Art Studio in this matter, and has also put
the Companys insurance carriers on notice of the claims.
Counsel answered the original complaint and filed
a cross-complaint on the Companys and Pacific Title & Art Studios behalf. The answer denied the
relief sought and the cross complaint alleged breach of fiduciary
duty and breach of contract. A response to the amended complaint is
not yet due. The
case is proceeding through the discovery phase. It is the Companys belief that amounts
presently reserved in its financial statements in connection with
this matter are sufficient to cover the portion of any amounts ultimately due under the various agreements that
existed between the former CEO and Pacific Title & Art Studio
and the Company for which the Company may have
responsibility.
39
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In October 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Musser, its former Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, to provide for annual payments of $650,000 per year and certain health
care and other benefits for life. The related current liability of $0.8 million was included in
Accrued expenses and the long-term portion of $2.0 million was included in Other long-term
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2007.
The Company has agreements with certain employees that provide for severance payments to the
employee in the event the employee is terminated without cause or an employee terminates his
employment for good reason. The maximum aggregate exposure under the agreements was
approximately $8.0 million at December 31, 2007.
18. Parent Company Financial Information
Parent company financial information is provided to present the financial position and results
of operations of the Company as if the consolidated partner companies (see Note 1) were accounted
for under the equity method of accounting for all periods presented during which the Company owned
its interest in these companies.
Parent Company Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
94,685 |
|
|
$ |
59,933 |
|
Cash held in escrow current |
|
|
20,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
94,155 |
|
Restricted marketable securities |
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
3,869 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
Assets held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
120,233 |
|
|
|
177,787 |
|
Ownership interests in and advances to companies |
|
|
177,136 |
|
|
|
160,435 |
|
Long-term marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
Long-term restricted marketable securities |
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
5,737 |
|
Cash held in escrow long-term |
|
|
2,341 |
|
|
|
19,398 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
3,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
304,224 |
|
|
$ |
367,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
15,489 |
|
|
$ |
18,816 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
5,012 |
|
|
|
5,625 |
|
Convertible senior debentures |
|
|
129,000 |
|
|
|
129,000 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
154,723 |
|
|
|
213,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
304,224 |
|
|
$ |
367,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
(22,783 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,346 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,063 |
) |
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
(5,089 |
) |
|
|
5,441 |
|
|
|
6,343 |
|
Recovery related party |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
7,460 |
|
|
|
6,703 |
|
|
|
4,871 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(4,220 |
) |
|
|
(4,617 |
) |
|
|
(4,914 |
) |
Equity loss |
|
|
(44,195 |
) |
|
|
(28,720 |
) |
|
|
(29,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(68,815 |
) |
|
|
(45,179 |
) |
|
|
(40,904 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income attributable to discontinued operations |
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
89,803 |
|
|
|
8,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(64,833 |
) |
|
$ |
45,908 |
|
|
$ |
(32,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Parent Company Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(64,833 |
) |
|
$ |
45,908 |
|
|
$ |
(32,070 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income from discontinued operations |
|
|
(3,272 |
) |
|
|
(89,803 |
) |
|
|
(8,834 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Equity loss |
|
|
44,195 |
|
|
|
28,720 |
|
|
|
29,169 |
|
Non-cash compensation charges |
|
|
3,530 |
|
|
|
4,037 |
|
|
|
1,264 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
5,089 |
|
|
|
(5,441 |
) |
|
|
(6,343 |
) |
Recovery related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions
and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(1,681 |
) |
|
|
4,703 |
|
|
|
2,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(16,777 |
) |
|
|
(12,039 |
) |
|
|
(13,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale and trading securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
Proceeds from sales of and distributions from companies and funds |
|
|
2,783 |
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
29,467 |
|
Advances to partner companies |
|
|
(4,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,898 |
) |
Acquisitions of ownership interests in partner companies and
funds, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(61,025 |
) |
|
|
(52,596 |
) |
|
|
(44,964 |
) |
Repayment of note receivable-related party, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
Increase in restricted cash and short-term investments |
|
|
(111,858 |
) |
|
|
(208,514 |
) |
|
|
(55,602 |
) |
Decrease in restricted cash and short-term investments |
|
|
205,422 |
|
|
|
146,129 |
|
|
|
57,387 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
19,655 |
|
|
|
93,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
50,788 |
|
|
|
(16,159 |
) |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of convertible senior debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advance (to) from consolidated partner company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,500 |
) |
|
|
9,511 |
|
Issuance of Company common stock, net |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
(20,169 |
) |
|
|
9,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
34,752 |
|
|
|
(48,367 |
) |
|
|
(19,962 |
) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
59,933 |
|
|
|
108,300 |
|
|
|
128,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
94,685 |
|
|
$ |
59,933 |
|
|
$ |
108,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company Cash and cash equivalents excludes Marketable securities, which consists of
longer-term securities, including commercial paper and certificates of deposit.
19. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company converted $0.2 million and $2.3
million, respectively, of advances to partner companies into ownership interests in partner
companies.
Interest paid in 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $7.4 million, $6.7 million and $6.5 million,
respectively, of which $3.4 million in 2007, $3.7 million in 2006 and $3.9 million in 2005 was
related to the Companys 2024 Debentures.
Cash paid for taxes in the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $0.0 million, $0.3
million and $0.2 million, respectively.
41
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company received distributions from a
private equity fund of common shares of Arbinet-the-exchange (Arbinet), valued at $0.5 million
and $0.5 million on the date of distribution, respectively. The Arbinet shares were sold during
2006 and 2005 for net cash proceeds of $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
20. Immaterial Correction of an Error in Period Periods
During the fourth quarter of 2007, an accounting error at Clarient was identified. The error
related to Clarients accounting for customer refunds which affected the Companys previously
reported quarterly results in 2007 and 2006, totaling $0.9 million.
In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, the Company evaluated the materiality of
the error from qualitative and quantitative perspectives, and evaluated the quantified error under
both the iron curtain and the roll-over methods. The Company concluded that the error was not
material to the Consolidated Financial Statements in any interim or annual prior periods. Clarient
determined that the error was not material to its financial statements for any interim or annual
prior periods, but that its correction in the fourth quarter of 2007 would be material to its
fourth quarter results. Consequently, Clarient, which is a public company, recorded an immaterial
correction of an error in prior periods as a reduction in revenue with a corresponding increase in
accrued expenses and other current liabilites in its financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006. The Company revised its Consolidated Financial Statements as summarized
below. Accordingly, the quarterly financial information (unaudited) presented in Note 22 has also
been revised.
The following tables summarize the quarterly and annual effects of the revision (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
Previously |
|
As |
|
Previously |
|
As |
|
Previously |
|
As |
|
|
Reported |
|
Revised |
|
Reported |
|
Revised |
|
Reported |
|
Revised |
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
34,837 |
|
|
$ |
35,192 |
|
|
$ |
36,427 |
|
|
$ |
36,427 |
|
|
$ |
37,573 |
|
|
$ |
37,573 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
428,518 |
|
|
|
428,873 |
|
|
|
422,678 |
|
|
|
422,678 |
|
|
|
402,738 |
|
|
|
402,738 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
73,146 |
|
|
|
73,738 |
|
|
|
81,150 |
|
|
|
81,850 |
|
|
|
84,941 |
|
|
|
85,763 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
225,498 |
|
|
|
225,992 |
|
|
|
231,419 |
|
|
|
231,834 |
|
|
|
233,964 |
|
|
|
234,451 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(562,723 |
) |
|
|
(562,862 |
) |
|
|
(576,288 |
) |
|
|
(576,703 |
) |
|
|
(600,338 |
) |
|
|
(600,825 |
) |
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
202,496 |
|
|
|
202,357 |
|
|
|
190,687 |
|
|
|
190,272 |
|
|
|
168,636 |
|
|
|
168,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
39,509 |
|
|
$ |
39,481 |
|
|
$ |
43,732 |
|
|
$ |
43,269 |
|
|
$ |
45,747 |
|
|
$ |
45,625 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
10,134 |
|
|
|
10,106 |
|
|
|
12,814 |
|
|
|
12,351 |
|
|
|
14,338 |
|
|
|
14,216 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
1,173 |
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(14,946 |
) |
|
|
(14,963 |
) |
|
|
(13,544 |
) |
|
|
(13,820 |
) |
|
|
(24,122 |
) |
|
|
(24,194 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(11,665 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,682 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,565 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,841 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,050 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
42
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Previously |
|
As |
|
|
Reported |
|
Revised |
Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
33,167 |
|
|
$ |
33,481 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
443,381 |
|
|
|
443,695 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
77,977 |
|
|
|
78,500 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
229,479 |
|
|
|
229,915 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(551,058 |
) |
|
|
(551,058 |
) |
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
211,881 |
|
|
|
211,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Previously |
|
As |
|
Previously |
|
As |
|
|
Reported |
|
Revised |
|
Reported |
|
Revised |
Statement of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
44,422 |
|
|
$ |
44,213 |
|
|
$ |
162,851 |
|
|
$ |
162,642 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
12,267 |
|
|
|
12,058 |
|
|
|
44,102 |
|
|
|
43,893 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
7,120 |
|
|
|
7,032 |
|
Net loss from
continuing operations |
|
|
(12,170 |
) |
|
|
(12,292 |
) |
|
|
(43,773 |
) |
|
|
(43,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
71,324 |
|
|
$ |
71,202 |
|
|
$ |
46,030 |
|
|
$ |
45,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss
per share from
continuing
operations |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
21. Operating Segments
The Company presents its consolidated partner companies as separate segments Acsis,
Alliance Consulting, Clarient and Laureate Pharma. The results of operations of the Companys
non-consolidated partner companies and the Companys ownership in private equity funds are reported
in the Other Companies segment. The Other Companies segment also includes the gain or loss on
the sale of companies and funds, except for gains and losses included in discontinued operations.
Management evaluates segment performance based on segment revenue, operating income (loss) and
income (loss) before income taxes, which reflects the portion of income (loss) allocated to
minority shareholders.
Other items includes certain expenses which are not identifiable to the operations of the
Companys operating business segments. Other items primarily consists of general and
administrative expenses related to the Companys corporate operations including employee
compensation, insurance and professional fees, including legal, finance and consulting. Other
items also includes interest income, interest expense and income taxes, which are reviewed by
management independent of segment results.
The following tables reflect the Companys consolidated operating data by reportable segment.
Segment results include the results of the consolidated partner companies, impairment charges,
gains or losses related to the disposition of the partner companies (except those reported in
discontinued operations) the Companys share of
income or losses for entities accounted for under the equity method and the mark-to-market of
trading securities. All significant intersegment activity has been eliminated in consolidation.
Accordingly, segment results reported by the Company exclude the effect of transactions between the
Company and its consolidated partner companies and among the Companys consolidated partner
companies .
43
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Segment assets in Other items included primarily cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities of $95.3 million and $154.1 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Revenue is attributed to geographic areas based on where the services are performed or the
customers shipped to location. A majority of the Companys revenue is generated in the United
States.
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Companys assets were located primarily in the United
States.
The following represents the segment data from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alliance |
|
|
|
|
|
Laureate |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Other |
|
Continuing |
|
|
Acsis |
|
Consulting |
|
Clarient |
|
Pharma |
|
Other Companies |
|
Segments |
|
Items |
|
Operations |
Revenue |
|
$ |
20,344 |
|
|
$ |
85,673 |
|
|
$ |
42,996 |
|
|
$ |
27,106 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
176,119 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
176,119 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(8,184 |
) |
|
|
(10,023 |
) |
|
|
(11,918 |
) |
|
|
(2,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,814 |
) |
|
|
(22,783 |
) |
|
|
(55,597 |
) |
Net loss from
continuing operations |
|
|
(8,284 |
) |
|
|
(10,732 |
) |
|
|
(7,379 |
) |
|
|
(3,728 |
) |
|
|
(19,499 |
) |
|
|
(49,622 |
) |
|
|
(18,483 |
) |
|
|
(68,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
23,209 |
|
|
$ |
76,225 |
|
|
$ |
39,502 |
|
|
$ |
32,853 |
|
|
$ |
92,985 |
|
|
$ |
264,774 |
|
|
$ |
127,088 |
|
|
$ |
391,862 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
27,266 |
|
|
$ |
83,766 |
|
|
$ |
34,002 |
|
|
$ |
25,626 |
|
|
$ |
55,035 |
|
|
$ |
225,695 |
|
|
$ |
188,447 |
|
|
$ |
414,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alliance |
|
|
|
|
|
Laureate |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
Other |
|
Continuing |
|
|
Acsis |
|
Consulting |
|
Clarient |
|
Pharma |
|
Companies |
|
Segments |
|
Items |
|
Operations |
Revenue |
|
$ |
18,634 |
|
|
$ |
104,571 |
|
|
$ |
27,723 |
|
|
$ |
11,714 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
162,642 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
162,642 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(8,776 |
) |
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
(12,679 |
) |
|
|
(9,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,776 |
) |
|
|
(24,346 |
) |
|
|
(54,122 |
) |
Net income (loss) from
continuing operations |
|
|
(8,264 |
) |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
(7,481 |
) |
|
|
(9,737 |
) |
|
|
(2,455 |
) |
|
|
(27,810 |
) |
|
|
(16,085 |
) |
|
|
(43,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alliance |
|
|
|
|
|
Laureate |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
Other |
|
Continuing |
|
|
Acsis |
|
Consulting |
|
Clarient |
|
Pharma |
|
Companies |
|
Segments |
|
Items |
|
Operations |
Revenue |
|
$ |
2,022 |
|
|
$ |
82,604 |
|
|
$ |
11,440 |
|
|
$ |
7,709 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
103,775 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
103,775 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(2,579 |
) |
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
(15,627 |
) |
|
|
(10,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,099 |
) |
|
|
(18,063 |
) |
|
|
(47,162 |
) |
Net loss from
continuing operations |
|
|
(2,556 |
) |
|
|
(1,194 |
) |
|
|
(8,912 |
) |
|
|
(10,870 |
) |
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
(24,323 |
) |
|
|
(16,581 |
) |
|
|
(40,904 |
) |
Other Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Corporate operations |
|
$ |
(19,264 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,271 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,811 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(18,483 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,085 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,581 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
22. Selected Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
39,481 |
|
|
$ |
43,269 |
|
|
$ |
45,625 |
|
|
$ |
47,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
29,375 |
|
|
|
30,918 |
|
|
|
31,409 |
|
|
|
33,037 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
24,020 |
|
|
|
23,283 |
|
|
|
24,606 |
|
|
|
25,199 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
54,791 |
|
|
|
55,235 |
|
|
|
62,474 |
|
|
|
59,216 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(15,310 |
) |
|
|
(11,966 |
) |
|
|
(16,849 |
) |
|
|
(11,472 |
) |
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(747 |
) |
|
|
(4,260 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
Recovery related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
2,159 |
|
|
|
2,169 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,832 |
) |
|
|
(1,853 |
) |
|
|
(1,965 |
) |
|
|
(2,010 |
) |
Equity loss |
|
|
(1,729 |
) |
|
|
(3,450 |
) |
|
|
(4,169 |
) |
|
|
(4,795 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(14,949 |
) |
|
|
(14,530 |
) |
|
|
(24,194 |
) |
|
|
(15,213 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(14,963 |
) |
|
|
(13,820 |
) |
|
|
(24,194 |
) |
|
|
(15,128 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
3,281 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(11,682 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,841 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,122 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
37,306 |
|
|
$ |
39,286 |
|
|
$ |
41,837 |
|
|
$ |
44,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
28,042 |
|
|
|
28,733 |
|
|
|
29,819 |
|
|
|
32,155 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
22,025 |
|
|
|
23,022 |
|
|
|
23,145 |
|
|
|
24,824 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
51,327 |
|
|
|
52,823 |
|
|
|
54,226 |
|
|
|
58,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(14,021 |
) |
|
|
(13,537 |
) |
|
|
(12,389 |
) |
|
|
(14,175 |
) |
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
(1,228 |
) |
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
Recovery related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
|
2,394 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,595 |
) |
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
|
|
(1,712 |
) |
Equity income (loss) |
|
|
(605 |
) |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
(1,910 |
) |
|
|
(1,087 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
1,503 |
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(9,809 |
) |
|
|
(12,951 |
) |
|
|
(10,116 |
) |
|
|
(12,205 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(9,818 |
) |
|
|
(11,667 |
) |
|
|
(10,118 |
) |
|
|
(12,292 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
3,366 |
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
83,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6,452 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,235 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,607 |
) |
|
$ |
71,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share (a)
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Per share amounts for the quarters have each been calculated separately. Accordingly,
quarterly amounts may not add to the annual amounts because of differences in the average
common shares outstanding during each period. Additionally, in regard to diluted per share
amounts only, quarterly amounts may not add to the annual
amounts because of the inclusion of the effect of potentially dilutive securities only in the
periods in which such effect would have been dilutive, and because of the adjustments to net
income (loss) for the dilutive effect of partner company common stock equivalents and
convertible securities. |
45
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
23. Trade Accounts Receivable
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
974 |
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
1,578 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(1,152 |
) |
Other |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,650 |
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
932 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(869 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,713 |
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
4,073 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(1,968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
3,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
24. Subsequent Events
In March 2007, the Company provided a subordinated revolving credit line (the Mezzanine
Facility) to Clarient. Under the Mezzanine Facility, the Company committed to provide Clarient
access to up to $12.0 million in working capital funding, which was reduced to $6.0 million as a
result of the ACIS Sale. At December 31, 2007, $2.0 million was outstanding under the Mezzanine
Facility. The Mezzanine Facility originally had a term expiring on December 8, 2008. On March 14,
2008, the Mezzanine Facility was extended through April 15, 2009 and increased from $6.0 million to
$21.0 million. The Mezzanine Facility is subject to reduction back to $6.0 million under certain
circumstances involving the completion of replacement financing by Clarient.
As reported in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, Clarients independent
auditors have determined that there is substantial doubt about Clarients ability to continue as a
going concern. Clarients bank credit facility matures in February 2009, at which time, Clarient will need to
extend, renew or refinance such debt and possibly secure additional debt or equity financing in
order to fund anticipated working capital needs and capital expenditures and to execute its
strategy. There can be no assurance Clarient will be able to maintain compliance with financial
covenants in its credit facility which could result in the lender requiring repayment of the debt
earlier than the scheduled maturity. Clarient has not had a history
of complying with such covenants. This facility is guaranteed by the Company. Should
Clarients sources of funding be inadequate, Clarient managements plans would include seeking
waivers from existing lenders, pursuing additional sources of funding or curtailment of expenses.
On February 29, 2008, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the
equity and debt securities held by the Company in Acsis, Alliance Consulting, Laureate Pharma,
ProModel, NextPoint and Neuronyx (the Six Partner Companies) for
approximately $100.0 million in
cash (the Bundle Transaction).
The Company presently intends to use the cash proceeds from the pending sale to acquire
interests in new partner companies, increase its ownership interest in certain existing partner
companies, consider steps to modify the Companys capital structure (which may include the
repurchase of a portion of the Companys outstanding 2024 Debentures, and for general corporate
purposes.
The Bundle Transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2008. In its quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, the Company expects to present the
results of operations of its consolidated partner companies that are included in the Bundle
Transaction, Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate Pharma, as discontinued operations for all
periods presented. The Company expects to record a net gain on the Bundle Transaction of
approximately $16.3 million, based on the carrying amount of the Six Partner Companies at December
31, 2007. The amount of the gain on sale of the Six Partner Companies will be affected by certain
factors, including the Six Partner Companies results of operations from January 1, 2008 to
closing, and any adjustments to current estimates of proceeds and transaction costs.
46
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Pro Forma Financial Information
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information as of December
31, 2007 and for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, gives effect to the consummation
of the Bundle Transaction. The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet assumes the
disposition of the Six Partner Companies in the pending sale as if it had occurred as of December
31, 2007. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 assume the disposition of the Companys interests in the Six
Partner Companies occurred on January 1, 2005.
47
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deconsolidate / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Interests in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Six Partner |
|
|
Pending |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Companies |
|
|
Transaction |
|
|
2007(1) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
99,965 |
|
|
$ |
(3,764 |
) |
|
$ |
98,250 |
(2)(3) |
|
$ |
194,451 |
|
Cash held in escrow current |
|
|
20,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,345 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
590 |
|
Restricted marketable securities |
|
|
3,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,904 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
37,578 |
|
|
|
(24,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,754 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
(4,245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,904 |
|
|
|
(81,904 |
)(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
168,382 |
|
|
|
49,071 |
|
|
|
16,346 |
|
|
|
233,799 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
35,573 |
|
|
|
(23,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership interests in and advances to
companies |
|
|
92,985 |
|
|
|
(5,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,286 |
|
Long-term restricted marketable securities |
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,949 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
9,960 |
|
|
|
(9,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
76,824 |
|
|
|
(64,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,729 |
|
Cash held in escrow long term |
|
|
2,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,341 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,848 |
|
|
|
(1,506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
391,862 |
|
|
$ |
(56,048 |
) |
|
$ |
16,346 |
|
|
$ |
352,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of credit line borrowings |
|
$ |
40,012 |
|
|
$ |
(26,015 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,997 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
3,752 |
|
|
|
(2,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
7,654 |
|
|
|
(4,520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,134 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
13,467 |
|
|
|
(6,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,934 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
18,925 |
|
|
|
(4,722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,203 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
6,100 |
|
|
|
(6,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
89,910 |
|
|
|
(50,132 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,778 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
4,746 |
|
|
|
(3,840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
906 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
9,765 |
|
|
|
(654 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,111 |
|
Convertible senior debentures |
|
|
129,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,000 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
2,692 |
|
|
|
(396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,296 |
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable subsidiary stock-based compensation |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.10 par value; 1,000
shares authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.10 par value; 500,000 shares
authorized; 121,124 shares issued and
outstanding |
|
|
12,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,112 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
758,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758,515 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(616,013 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,346 |
(4) |
|
|
(599,667 |
) |
Accumulated and other comprehensive income |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
154,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,346 |
|
|
|
170,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
391,862 |
|
|
$ |
(56,048 |
) |
|
$ |
16,346 |
|
|
$ |
352,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The pro forma consolidated balance sheet gives effect to the Bundle Transaction, assuming the
sale occurred on December 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Pending Transaction. |
|
|
|
The pending Bundle Transaction assumes the following for the Company (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross proceeds |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
Estimated transaction costs |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash proceeds |
|
$ |
98,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Use of Proceeds. |
|
|
|
The pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet assumes for the purpose of this presentation
that the net sale proceeds of $96.6 million from the Bundle Transaction are maintained in short
term deposit accounts classified as Cash and cash equivalents. |
|
(4) |
|
Gain on Sale. |
|
|
|
The pro forma consolidated balance sheet assumes that the Company recognized a gain on sale of
$16.3 million, net of tax, representing the excess of the
estimated net proceeds of $98.3 million over the
carrying value of the Six Partner Companies as of December 31, 2007 of $81.9 million. |
49
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
For The Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported for |
|
|
Deconsolidate/ |
|
|
Pro Forma for |
|
|
|
the Year Ended |
|
|
Remove Interests |
|
|
the Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
in Six Partner |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Companies |
|
|
2007(1) |
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
176,119 |
|
|
$ |
(133,123 |
) |
|
$ |
42,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
124,739 |
|
|
|
(102,353 |
) |
|
|
22,386 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
97,108 |
|
|
|
(41,797 |
) |
|
|
55,311 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
(2,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
(2,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
5,438 |
|
|
|
(5,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
231,716 |
|
|
|
(154,019 |
) |
|
|
77,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(55,597 |
) |
|
|
20,896 |
|
|
|
(34,701 |
) |
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
(4,866 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(5,089 |
) |
Recovery related party |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
7,539 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
7,519 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(7,660 |
) |
|
|
2,171 |
|
|
|
(5,489 |
) |
Equity loss |
|
|
(14,143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,143 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
5,829 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
5,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
(68,886 |
) |
|
|
22,744 |
|
|
|
(46,142 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(68,105 |
) |
|
$ |
22,659 |
|
|
$ |
(45,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
from continuing operations (2) |
|
$ |
(0.56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
For The Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deconsolidate / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported for |
|
|
Remove |
|
|
Pro Forma for |
|
|
|
the Year Ended |
|
|
Interests in |
|
|
the Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Six Partner |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Companies |
|
|
2006(1) |
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
162,642 |
|
|
$ |
(134,919 |
) |
|
$ |
27,723 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
118,749 |
|
|
|
(103,136 |
) |
|
|
15,613 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
93,016 |
|
|
|
(43,881 |
) |
|
|
49,135 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
(2,501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
(2,498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
216,764 |
|
|
|
(152,016 |
) |
|
|
64,748 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(54,122 |
) |
|
|
17,097 |
|
|
|
(37,025 |
) |
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
5,559 |
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
5,402 |
|
Recovery related party |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
6,907 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
6,805 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,630 |
) |
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
|
(5,203 |
) |
Equity loss |
|
|
(3,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,267 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
6,112 |
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
5,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
(45,081 |
) |
|
|
17,874 |
|
|
|
(27,207 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(43,895 |
) |
|
$ |
17,958 |
|
|
$ |
(25,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
from continuing operations (2) |
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statement of Operations
For The Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deconsolidate / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported for |
|
|
Remove |
|
|
Pro Forma for |
|
|
|
the Year Ended |
|
|
Interests in |
|
|
the Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Six Partner |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Companies |
|
|
2005(1) |
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
103,775 |
|
|
$ |
(92,335 |
) |
|
$ |
11,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
81,437 |
|
|
|
(72,638 |
) |
|
|
8,799 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
66,309 |
|
|
|
(29,979 |
) |
|
|
36,330 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Purchased in-process research and
development |
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
(1,974 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
150,937 |
|
|
|
(105,807 |
) |
|
|
45,130 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(47,162 |
) |
|
|
13,472 |
|
|
|
(33,690 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
7,066 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7,073 |
|
Recovery related party |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
4,974 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
4,972 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,365 |
) |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
(5,195 |
) |
Equity loss |
|
|
(6,597 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,597 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
6,922 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
6,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
(41,134 |
) |
|
|
14,620 |
|
|
|
(26,514 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(40,904 |
) |
|
$ |
14,390 |
|
|
$ |
(26,514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share from
continuing operations (2) |
|
$ |
(0.34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The pro forma consolidated statements of operations give effect to the Bundle Transaction,
assuming it occurred on January 1, 2005. The Company expects to record a gain on the sale of
the Six Partner Companies based upon the difference between the carrying value and the net
cash proceeds ultimately received. The gain on sale is not reflected in the unaudited pro
forma consolidated statements of operations above. |
|
(2) |
|
If a consolidated or equity method public company has dilutive options or securities
outstanding, diluted loss per share is computed first by deducting from net loss the income
attributable to the potential exercise of the dilutive options or securities of the company.
The impact is shown as an adjustment to net loss for purposes of calculating diluted loss per
share. The pro forma diluted loss per share shown in the above tables excludes the effect of
the Six Partner Companies diluted options and securities. |
52
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Directors
The members of the Board of Directors of the Company, as of the date of this Form 10-K/A, are as
follows:
Peter J. Boni, age 62, joined Safeguard as President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of
the Board in August 2005. Mr. Boni also is a director of Clarient, Inc. Positions held include
Operating Partner for Advent International, Inc., a global private equity firm with $10 billion
under management (April 2004 to August 2005); Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Surebridge,
Inc., an applications outsourcer serving the mid-market (March 2002 to April 2004); Managing
Principal of Vested Interest LLC, a management consulting firm (January 2001 to March 2002); and
President and Chief Executive Officer of Prime Response, Inc., an enterprise applications software
provider (February 1999 to January 2001).
Michael J. Cody, age 58, has served on our Board since 2006. Positions held include Senior Vice
President of Corporate Development (November 2007 to present) of Ensign-Bickford Industries, a
provider of ordnance initiation systems for the aerospace and defense industries and pet food
palatability products; Partner, Meadowood Capital, LLC, a private equity firm (April 2007 to
November 2007); Vice President of Corporate Development, responsible for mergers, acquisitions and
divestitures at EMC Corporation, a provider of products, services and solutions for information
storage and management (1998 until his retirement in March 2007); Director of Corporate Development
at United Technologies Corporation, a diversified technology company (1993 to 1998); Managing
Director of the investment banking group at Price Waterhouse (1990 to 1993); and Vice President of
Investment Banking at Kidder Peabody & Co. (1980 to 1989).
Julie A. Dobson, age 51, has served on our Board since 2003. Ms. Dobson also is a director of
PNM Resources, Inc. and non-executive Chairperson of the Board of LCC International, Inc.
Positions held include Chief Operating Officer (1998 until February 2002) of TeleCorp PCS, Inc., a
wireless/mobile phone company that was acquired by AT&T Wireless, Inc. in late 2001; President of
Bell Atlantic Corporations New York/ New Jersey Metro Region mobile phone operations (1997 to
1998); and a number of executive positions during her 18-year career with Bell Atlantic
Corporation, including sales, operations, and strategic planning and development in the chief
executive officers office.
Robert E. Keith, Jr., age 66, has served on our Board since 1996 and was appointed Chairman of the
Board in October 2001, prior to which he served as Vice Chairman since February 1999. Mr. Keith
also is a director of Internet Capital Group, Inc. Positions held include Managing Director of TL
Ventures, a group of venture capital funds, and its predecessor funds (1988 to present); senior
adviser to, and co-founder of, EnerTech Capital Partners (1996 to present); member of the Office of
the Chief Executive of Safeguard (April 2001 to October 2001); and President (1991 to December
2002) and Chief Executive Officer (February 1996 to December 2002), of Technology Leaders
Management, Inc., a private equity capital management company.
Andrew E. Lietz, age 69, has served on our Board since 2003. Mr. Lietz also is a director of
Amphenol Corporation and DDi Corp. and a member of the Board of Trustees of the University System
of New Hampshire. Positions held include Managing Director and Founder of Rye Capital Management,
LLC, a private equity investment firm (2001 to present); Executive Chairman (late 2000 until mid
2002) of Clare Corporation, a designer and manufacturer of integrated circuits, solid-state relays
and electronic switches, which was acquired by Ixys Corporation in June 2002; President and Chief
Executive Officer (1995 to 2000) of, and several other executive positions during his 16-year
career with, Hadco Corporation, a global manufacturer of electronic interconnect products and
services; and a variety of positions at IBM Corporation.
53
George MacKenzie, age 59, has served on our Board since 2003. Mr. MacKenzie also is a director of
American Water Works Company, Inc., C&D Technologies, Inc. and Tractor Supply Company. Positions
held include non-executive Chairman of the Board (May 2006 to present) and interim Chief Executive
Officer (January 2006 to April 2006) of American Water, a provider of water services in North
America; interim Chief Executive Officer of C&D Technologies, Inc., a technology company that
produces and markets systems for the conversion and storage of electrical power (March 2005 to July
2005); Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of P.H. Glatfelter Company, a
manufacturer of specialty papers and engineered products (September 2001 to June 2002); Vice
Chairman (2000 to 2001) and Chief Financial Officer (1995 until his retirement in 2001) of, and
several other executive positions during his 22-year career with, Hercules, Incorporated, a global
chemical specialties manufacturer.
George D. McClelland, age 61, has served on our Board since 2006. Positions held include Chairman,
CEO and Founder of eSecLending, a provider of securities lending services to the pension industry
(2000 to 2001); a director of Riverstone Networks, Inc. and Storage Networks, Inc.; Senior Vice
President, responsible for managing many of the portfolio companies of United Asset Management
Corporation, a public holding company (1994-2001); multiple corporate management roles at FMR
Corp., a diversified financial services company (1987-1991); and Corporate Treasurer of Data
General Corporation, a technology company (1972-1987).
Jack L. Messman, age 68, has served on our Board since 1994. Mr. Messman also is a director of AMG
Advanced Metallurgical Group N.V., RadioShack Corporation and Timminco Limited. Positions held
include Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Novell, Inc., a provider of
infrastructure software products focused around Linux and identity management (2001 to 2006); Chief
Executive Officer and President of Cambridge Technology Partners (Massachusetts), Inc., an
e-business systems integration company (August 1999 until its acquisition by Novell, Inc. in July
2001); Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Union Pacific Resources Group Inc., an independent
oil and gas exploration and production company (April 1991 to August 1999); and Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of USPCI, Inc., Union Pacifics environmental services company (May 1988 to April
1991).
Dr. John W. Poduska, Sr., age 70, has served on our Board since 1987. Dr. Poduska also is a
director of Novell, Inc. and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation. Positions held include Chairman of
Advanced Visual Systems, Inc., a provider of visualization software and solutions (January 1992 to
December 2001); President and Chief Executive Officer of Stardent Computer, Inc, a computer
manufacturer (December 1989 to December 1991); and Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Stellar Computer, Inc., a computer manufacturer and the predecessor of Stardent Computer, Inc.
(December 1985 to December 1989).
John J. Roberts, age 63, has served on our Board since 2003. Mr. Roberts also is a director of
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. and Vonage Holdings Corp. and a trustee of Pennsylvania Real
Estate Investment Trust. Mr. Roberts is a C.P.A. Positions held include Global Managing Partner
and a Member of the Leadership Team of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP at the time of his retirement in
June 2002, completing a 35-year career with the professional services firm during which he served
in a variety of client service and operating positions.
Dr. Robert J. Rosenthal, age 51, has served on our Board since 2007. Dr. Rosenthal also is a member
of the Board of Advisors of the University of Maryland. Positions held include President, Chief
Executive Officer and a director of Magellan Biosciences, Inc., a provider of clinical diagnostics
and life sciences research tools (October 2005 to present); President, Chief Executive Officer and
a director of TekCel, Ltd., a provider of life sciences research tools (October 2003 to January
2007); President and Chief Executive Officer of Boston Life Sciences, Inc., a diagnostic and
therapeutic development company (July 2002 to October 2003); President and Chief Executive Officer
of Magellan Discovery Technologies, LLC, a life sciences acquisition company (January 2001 to July
2002); Senior Vice President of PerkinElmer Corporation and President of its instrument division
(March 1999 to November 2000); and in various executive positions at Thermo Optek Corporation
(September 1995 to February 1999).
54
Executive Officers
The executive officers of the Company, as of the date of this Form 10-K/A, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
|
Executive Officer Since |
Peter J. Boni
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
|
|
|
2005 |
|
James A. Datin
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Managing Director, Life Sciences
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Raymond J. Land
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2007 |
|
John A. Loftus
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Managing Director, Technology
|
|
|
2004 |
|
Brian J. Sisko
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Senior Vice President and General
Counsel
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Mr. Boni joined Safeguard as President and Chief Executive Officer in August 2005. Prior to
joining Safeguard, Mr. Boni was an Operating Partner for Advent International, a global private
equity firm with $10 billion under management, from April 2004 to August 2005; Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Surebridge, Inc., an applications outsourcer serving the mid-market, from
March 2002 to April 2004; Managing Principal of Vested Interest LLC, a management consulting firm,
from January 2001 to March 2002; and President and Chief Executive Officer of Prime Response, Inc.,
an enterprise applications software provider, from February 1999 to January 2001. Mr. Boni is a
director of Clarient, Inc.
Mr. Datin joined Safeguard as Executive Vice President and Managing Director, Life Sciences Group
in September 2005. Mr. Datin served as Chief Executive Officer of Touchpoint Solutions, Inc., a
provider of software that enables customers to develop and deploy applications, content and media
on multi-user interactive devices, from December 2004 to June 2005; Group President in 2004, and as
Group President, International, from 2001 to 2003, of Dendrite International, a provider of sales,
marketing, clinical and compliance solutions and services to global pharmaceutical and other life
sciences companies; Group Director, Corporate Business Strategy and Planning at GlaxoSmithKline,
from 1999 to 2001, where he also was a member of the companys Predictive Medicine Board of
Directors that evaluated acquisitions and alliances; and Chief Executive Officer of Isuta Holdings
Berhad, a publicly traded distributor and manufacturer of medical and clean room products, from
1997 to 1999. His prior experience also includes international assignments with and identifying
strategic growth opportunities for E Merck and Baxter. Mr. Datin is a director of Clarient, Inc.
Mr. Land joined Safeguard as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in June 2007. Prior
to joining Safeguard, Mr. Land served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from
August 2006 through May 2007 of Medcenter Solutions, Inc., a global pharmaceutical marketing
company specializing in online solutions for physicians, patients and sales representatives; Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from June 2005 to July 2006 of Orchid Cellmark, Inc., a
publicly traded DNA profiling company; Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1997
to June 2005, of Genencor International, Inc., a biotechnology company; Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer of West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., a publicly traded global
manufacturer of packing and drug delivery products; multiple financial and managerial roles at
Campbell Soup Company; and audit manager at Coopers & Lybrand (now PricewaterhouseCoopers). Mr.
Land is a director of Anika Therapeutics, Inc., a publicly traded manufacturer of therapeutic
products.
Mr. Loftus joined Safeguard in May 2002, became Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
in December 2003 and Executive Vice President and Managing Director, Technology Group in September
2005. Mr. Loftus is a founder of Gestalt LLC where he served as Chief Technology Officer from
September 2001 to May 2002. Mr. Loftus served as Senior Vice President, e-Solutions (and in other
executive roles) at Breakaway Solutions from May 1999 until August 2001 (Breakaway Solutions filed
for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in September 2001);
and served as Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer of WPL Laboratories from February
1997 to May 1999. Mr. Loftus spent the first 14 years of his career in a variety of executive,
management and engineering positions at GE and PECO Energy.
55
Mr. Sisko joined Safeguard as Senior Vice President and General Counsel in August 2007. Prior to
joining Safeguard, Mr. Sisko served as Chief Legal Officer, Senior Vice President and General
Counsel of Traffic.com (at the time, a public company), a former partner company of Safeguard that
is a leading provider of accurate, real-time traffic information in the United States, from
February 2006 until June 2007 (following its acquisition by NAVTEQ Corporation in March 2007);
Chief Operating Officer from February 2005 to January 2006 of Halo Technology Holdings, Inc., a
public holding company for enterprise software businesses (Halo Technology Holdings filed for
bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in August 2007); ran
B/T Business and Technology, an advisor and strategic management consultant to a variety of public
and private companies, from January 2002 to February 2005; and was a Managing Director from
April 2000 to January 2002, of Katalyst, LLC, a venture capital and consulting firm. Mr. Sisko
also previously served as Senior Vice PresidentCorporate Development and General Counsel of
National Media Corporation, at the time a New York Stock Exchange-listed multi-media marketing
company with operations in 70 countries, and as a partner in the corporate finance, mergers and
acquisitions practice group of the Philadelphia-based law firm, Klehr, Harrison, Harvey,
Branzburg & Ellers LLP.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors, executive officers and
greater than 10% holders of our common stock to file with the SEC reports of ownership of our
securities and changes in ownership of our securities. Based solely on our review of the copies of
reports we have received and upon written representations from the reporting persons that no Form 5
reports were required to be filed by those persons, Safeguard believes there were no late filings
by our directors and executive officers during 2007 other than one transaction reported late on a
Form 5 by Michael J. Cody. There were no known holders of greater than 10% of our common stock
during 2007.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS
Safeguards Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and the charters
for the Boards Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating & Corporate Governance
Committee are available at www.safeguard.com/governance. Shareholders also may obtain a print
copy of these documents, at no cost, by writing to our Secretary at 435 Devon Park Drive, Building
800, Wayne, PA 19087-1945. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is applicable to all employees
of Safeguard, including each of our executive and financial officers, and the members of our Board.
Safeguard intends to post information regarding amendments to or waivers from our Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics (to the extent applicable to Safeguards directors or executive officers) in the
Corporate Governance section of our website. Our website is not part of this Form 10-K/A. All
references to our website address are intended to be inactive textual references only.
Board Independence. Safeguards common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, which we
refer to below as the NYSE. To assist the Board in making independence determinations, the Board
has adopted categorical standards which are reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Generally, under these standards, a director does not qualify as an independent director if any of
the following relationships exist:
|
|
Currently or within the previous three years, the director has been employed by us, someone
in the directors immediate family has been one of our executive officers, or the director or
someone in the directors immediate family has been employed as an executive officer of
another company where any of our present executive officers at the same time serves or served
on that companys compensation committee; |
|
|
|
The director or someone in the directors immediate family is a current partner of a firm
that is our internal or external auditor, the director is a current employee of the firm,
someone in the directors family is a current employee of the firm who participates in the
firms audit, assurance or tax compliance (but not tax planning) practice, or the director or
someone in the directors immediate family is a former partner or employee of such a firm and
personally worked on our audit within the last three years; |
|
|
|
The director or someone in the directors immediate family received, during any 12-month
period within the last three years, more than $100,000 in direct compensation from us (other
than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior
service that are not contingent in any way on continued service); |
56
|
|
The director is a current employee or holder of more than 10% of the equity of another
company, or someone in the directors immediate family is a current executive officer or
holder of more than 10% of the equity of another company, that has made payments to or
received payments from us, in any of the last three fiscal years of the other company, that
exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other companys consolidated gross revenues;
or |
|
|
|
The director is a current executive officer of a charitable organization to which we have
made charitable contributions in any of the charitable organizations last three fiscal years
that exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of that charitable organizations consolidated
gross revenues. |
The Board has determined that Michael Cody, Julie Dobson, Andrew Lietz, George MacKenzie, George
McClelland, Jack Messman, John Poduska, John Roberts and Robert Rosenthal have no direct or
indirect material relationships with us other than their directorship and, therefore, are
independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards and satisfy the categorical standards
contained in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Board Structure and Committee Composition. At the date of this Form 10-K/A, Safeguards Board has
11 members and four standing committees. The Board held seven meetings in 2007. Each incumbent
director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees of which
he or she was a member. Directors are invited, but not required, to attend annual meetings of
Safeguard shareholders. All directors who were serving on our Board at the time of the meeting
attended the 2007 annual meeting of shareholders. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and
NYSE listing standards, non-employee directors meet in executive session at each regularly
scheduled Board meeting, outside of the presence of any management directors and any other members
of Safeguards management who may otherwise be present, and during at least one session per year,
only independent directors are present. The Chairperson of the Nominating & Corporate Governance
Committee presides at these sessions. The table below describes the membership of each of the
standing committees during 2007 and the number of meetings held by each of these committees during
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating & |
|
|
Acquisition |
|
Audit |
|
Compensation |
|
Corporate Governance |
Number of Meetings held in 2007 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Membership: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Cody |
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
Julie A. Dobson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairperson |
|
|
|
|
Robert E. Keith, Jr. |
|
Chairperson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew E. Lietz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairperson |
George MacKenzie |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairperson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George D. McClelland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
Jack L. Messman |
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
John W. Poduska, Sr. |
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
John J. Roberts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Rosenthal |
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An denotes former committee member. Ms. Dobson and Mr. Lietz served on the Audit Committee and
Compensation Committee, respectively, until June 2007; Messrs. McClelland and Cody were appointed
to the Compensation Committee and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee, respectively, in
June 2007. Dr. Rosenthal was appointed to the Acquisition Committee when he joined our Board in
July 2007 and to the Audit Committee in September 2007.
Acquisition Committee. The Board has delegated to the Acquisition Committee the authority to
approve, between regularly scheduled Board meetings, the following transactions:
|
|
follow-on transactions in existing partner companies involving amounts between $5 million
and $20 million; |
|
|
|
new transactions involving amounts between $10 million and $20 million; and |
|
|
|
divestitures of existing partner companies involving amounts between $10 million and $20
million. |
Audit Committee. The Audit Committees responsibilities, which are described in detail in its
charter, include, among other duties, the responsibility to:
57
|
|
Assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities regarding general oversight of the
integrity of Safeguards financial statements, Safeguards compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements, and the performance of Safeguards internal audit function; |
|
|
|
Interact with and evaluate the performance, qualifications and independence of Safeguards
independent registered public accounting firm; |
|
|
|
Review and approve related party transactions; and |
|
|
|
Prepare the report required by SEC regulations to be included in the proxy statement. |
The Audit Committee has the sole authority to retain, set compensation and retention terms for,
terminate and oversee the relationship with Safeguards independent registered public accounting
firm (which reports directly to the Audit Committee). The Audit Committee also oversees the
activities of the internal auditor, reviews the effectiveness of the internal audit function and
approves the appointment of the internal auditor. The Audit Committee has the authority to obtain
advice, counsel and assistance from internal and external legal, accounting or other advisors as
the Audit Committee deems necessary to carry out its duties and to receive appropriate funding from
Safeguard for such advice and assistance. The full responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set
forth in the Audit Committee Charter, which is reviewed annually by the Committee. The Audit
Committee Charter is available through the Corporate Governance link on our website at
www.safeguard.com/governance.
The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence
requirements established by SEC regulations, the NYSE listing standards and by our Corporate
Governance Guidelines. The Board has determined that Messrs. MacKenzie, McClelland and Roberts and
Dr. Rosenthal are audit committee financial experts within the meaning of the SEC regulations,
and the Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee has accounting and related
financial management expertise within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards. Mr. MacKenzie and
Mr. Roberts each serve as a member of the audit committee of the board of directors of four
publicly traded companies, including our Audit Committee. The Board has determined that such
simultaneous service does not impair Mr. MacKenzies or Mr. Roberts ability to effectively serve
on our Audit Committee.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committees responsibilities, which are described in
detail in its charter, include, among other duties, the responsibility to:
|
|
Approve the philosophy for compensation of our executive officers and other employees; |
|
|
|
Establish compensation (including base salary, incentive compensation and equity-based
programs) for our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; |
|
|
|
Administer the long- and short-term compensation and performance-based incentive plans
(which are cash and equity based); |
|
|
|
Approve employment agreements and perquisites provided to our executive officers; |
|
|
|
Review managements recommendations for our broad-based employee benefit plans; |
|
|
|
Evaluate and recommend to the Board the compensation for all non-employee directors for
service on the Board and its committees; and |
|
|
|
Review and discuss with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and recommend
to the Board its inclusion in our Form 10-K and proxy statement. |
The Compensation Committee Charter is available through the Corporate Governance link on our
website at www.safeguard.com/governance. The Board has determined that each member of the
Compensation Committee meets the independence requirements established in the NYSE listing
standards and by our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
A discussion of some of the Compensation Committees processes and procedures for the consideration
and determination of executive compensation is contained in Compensation Discussion and
AnalysisSetting Executive Compensation. Additional processes and procedures include the
following:
58
|
|
Meetings. The Compensation Committee generally meets five times each year, with additional
meetings being scheduled as needed. The annual committee calendar is established prior to the
beginning of each year, and agendas for each meeting are established in consultation with the
Compensation Committee Chairperson. The Compensation Committee meets in executive session
during or prior to the end of each regularly scheduled meeting. |
|
|
|
Role of Consultant. The Compensation Committee has retained the services of a third party
compensation consultant to assist the Compensation Committee in its deliberations regarding
senior executive and director compensation. Hewitt Associates LLC served as the Compensation
Committees consultant from December 2003 until October 2007, at which time the Compensation
Committee retained Mercer LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of March & McLennan Companies, Inc.
Specifically, the consultant provides the Compensation Committee with information relating to
competitiveness of pay levels, compensation design, market trends and technical
considerations, concerning both executive officers and directors, and assists the Compensation
Committee with the reporting of executive compensation under the SECs proxy disclosure rules.
These services, which are provided in support of decision-making by the Compensation
Committee, are the only formal services that the compensation consultant performs for
Safeguard. From time to time since its hire, Mercer has provided miscellaneous data and
research to the Compensation Committee relating to various compensation topics generally. The
consultant reports to and acts at the direction of, and attends selected meetings as requested
by, the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the sole
authority to hire and terminate the consultant and evaluates the performance of its consultant
annually. |
|
|
|
Role of Executive Team. Our Chief Executive Officer, with the assistance of other company
employees as he requests, provides support to the Compensation Committee by preparing
materials to assist the Committee in making its compensation decisions; conferring with the
Committee and its consultant on the selection of peer companies and industries used for
comparison purposes; providing suggestions to the Committee in the area of executive
compensation, including suggestions in the context of terms of employment agreements,
performance measures and targets under our management incentive plan, and equity awards; and
ultimately implementing the Committees compensation decisions. Management also provides the
Compensation Committee with comprehensive tally sheets on an annual basis to facilitate the
Committees review of the total compensation of our senior executives. The tally sheets
include both historical data and estimated forward looking amounts for the current calendar
year. The tally sheets summarize: cash compensation (salary, actual/target cash incentive
awards and perquisites); the dollar value of benefits provided; potential severance amounts
payable under various scenarios; and outstanding equity awards held by each senior executive.
The Compensation Committee discusses its compensation views with the Chief Executive Officer,
and the Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee for salary
adjustments and equity and non-equity plan participation and awards to the named executive
officers and other senior executives. However, other than for compensation that has been
established contractually or under quantitative formulas established by the Compensation
Committee each year under our management incentive plan, the Compensation Committee exercises
its own discretion in determining additional compensation, which may take the form of cash or
equity, for the named executive officers and other senior executives. Additional information
can be found in Compensation Discussion and AnalysisRole of Executive Team in Compensation
Decisions. |
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees
responsibilities, which are described in detail in its charter, include, among other duties, the
responsibility to:
|
|
Establish criteria for the selection of directors; |
|
|
|
Consider qualified Board candidates recommended by shareholders; |
|
|
|
Recommend to the Board the nominees for director, including nominees for director in
connection with Safeguards annual meeting of shareholders; |
|
|
|
Conduct an annual evaluation of the Board and its members and oversee the evaluations of
each of the Board committees; |
|
|
|
Take a leadership role in shaping Safeguards corporate governance policies, including
developing and recommending to the Board Safeguards Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics; |
59
|
|
Evaluate the performance of the Chief Executive Officer; and |
|
|
|
Monitor the process of succession planning for the Chief Executive Officer and executive
management. |
The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Charter is available through the Corporate
Governance link on our website at www.safeguard.com/governance. The Board has determined that each
member of the committee meets the independence requirements established in the NYSE listing
standards and by our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee considers properly submitted shareholder
recommendations of director candidates in substantially the same manner as it considers director
candidate recommendations from other sources. Any shareholder recommendation must include the
following: the nominees name and the information about the nominee that would be required in a
proxy statement under the SECs rules; information about the relationship between the nominee and
the nominating shareholder; proof of the number of shares of Safeguard common stock that the
nominating shareholder owns and the length of time the shares of Safeguard common stock have been
owned; and a letter from the nominee certifying his or her willingness to serve, if elected, as a
director.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Overview
The Compensation Committee (for purposes of this analysis, the Committee) is responsible for
establishing our company-wide compensation philosophy and for determining the compensation provided
to the individuals who serve as our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the other
individuals included in the Summary Compensation Table (collectively referred to as the named
executive officers) and our other senior executives. As of the date hereof, our senior executive
group is comprised of a total of nine persons, including the named executive officers. The
Committee reviews our compensation philosophy each year to assure that its principles and
objectives are aligned to our overall business strategy and aligned with the interests of
shareholders in increasing the value of our common stock over the long-term.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our overall goals in compensating our senior executives are to:
|
|
Attract, retain and motivate executives who are particularly qualified, as a result of
their prior professional experience, to shape Safeguards business model and pursue our
business plan, and whose experience and skills can be leveraged across our partner companies
to facilitate the partner companies growth and success; |
|
|
|
Promote and reward the achievement of short-term and long-term corporate and individual
objectives that our Board and management believe will lead to long-term growth in shareholder
value; and |
|
|
|
Encourage meaningful equity ownership and the alignment of executive and shareholder
interests as an incentive to increase shareholder value. |
The executive compensation program the Committee has created is intended to: provide an appropriate
mix of fixed and variable, at-risk cash compensation; balance rewards for short-term performance
with our ultimate goal of producing long-term shareholder value; and facilitate executive
recruitment and retention. There is no pre-established target for the allocation between either
cash or non-cash; short-term or long-term compensation; and/or fixed or variable items of
compensation. Rather, the Committee reviews information provided by management as well as its
consultant to determine the appropriate level and mix of each of these components. During 2007, we
used the following principal elements of compensation to meet our overall goals:
60
|
|
|
|
|
Base Pay
|
|
à
|
|
Fixed compensation, based on competitive market practice and existing
salary levels, that rewards an executives core competencies relative to
his skills, experience and anticipated contributions to us and our partner
companies; |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Cash Incentives
|
|
à
|
|
Variable, at-risk, performance-based incentive compensation, based on
competitive market practice and existing incentive compensation levels,
that rewards an executives contributions towards the achievement of
short-term corporate and individual performance objectives; |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentives
|
|
à
|
|
Equity awards that encourage executive ownership of our stock and promote
continued employment with us during the long-term vesting period, thereby
aligning our executives interests with those of our shareholders regarding
increases in shareholder value through improvement in our stock price over
the long-term; |
|
|
|
|
|
Health and Welfare Benefits
|
|
à
|
|
Benefits that are part of our broad-based employee benefit programs,
including medical, dental, life insurance, and disability plans, our 401(k)
plan and our nonqualified deferred compensation plan; |
|
|
|
|
|
Perquisites
|
|
à
|
|
Limited additional benefits that are available to our senior executives; and |
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and
Change-in-Control
Arrangements
|
|
à
|
|
Severance benefits that are payable in the event a termination of
employment occurs without cause or for good reason and which provide
retention incentives for our senior executives as well as continuity of
executive management in the event of an actual or threatened change in
control. |
Role of Executive Team in Compensation Decisions
The Committee makes or has final approval authority regarding all compensation decisions with
respect to our senior executives. Within the parameters approved by the Committee each year,
senior management is responsible for evaluating and setting compensation with respect to our other
employees.
Our Chief Executive Officer, with the assistance of other company employees as he requests,
provides support to the Committee by preparing materials to assist the Committee in making its
compensation decisions; conferring with the Committee and its consultant on the selection of peer
companies and industries used for comparison purposes; providing suggestions to the Committee in
the area of executive compensation, including suggestions in the context of terms of employment
agreements, performance measures and targets under our management incentive plan, and equity
awards; and ultimately implementing the Committees compensation decisions. Management also
provides the Committee with comprehensive tally sheets on an annual basis to
facilitate the Committees review of the total compensation of our senior executives. The tally
sheets include both historical data and estimated forward looking amounts for the current calendar
year. The tally sheets summarize: cash compensation (salary, actual/target cash incentive awards
and perquisites); the dollar value of benefits provided; potential severance amounts payable under
various scenarios; and outstanding equity awards held by each senior executive.
In determining the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, the Committee considers the results
of the performance assessment conducted each year by our Nominating & Corporate Governance
Committee, which includes our Chief Executive Officers self-assessment of achievement of his
individual prior year objectives and the assessment of his performance by each Board member. The
Committee also discusses its compensation views with our Chief Executive Officer directly. Our
Chief Executive Officer is not present when the Committee makes its determinations concerning his
compensation.
Our Chief Executive Officer annually assesses each other senior executives performance and makes a
recommendation to the Committee concerning achievement of individual objectives. Our Chief
Executive Officer also makes recommendations to the Committee concerning salary adjustments and
equity and non-equity grants to the named executive officers and other senior executives. In
determining the compensation of other senior executives, the Committee considers our Chief
Executive Officers assessment and recommendations. However, other than for compensation that has
been established contractually or under quantitative formulas established by the Committee each
year under our management incentive plan, the Committee exercises its own discretion in
61
determining whether to accept or modify our Chief Executive Officers recommendations. These
individuals are not present when the Committee and our Chief Executive Officer review their
performance or when the Committee makes its determinations concerning their compensation.
From time to time during the year, our Chief Executive Officer may recommend to the Committee
one-time cash bonuses or stock option or other equity grants to certain senior executives or other
employees relating to instances of superior performance. The Committee acts on such
recommendations on a case-by-case basis.
Role of Consultant
Hewitt Associates LLC assisted the Committee in its deliberations regarding executive officer and
director compensation levels for 2007. Specifically, Hewitt Associates provided information
relating to competitiveness of pay levels, compensation design, market trends and technical
considerations, concerning both executive officers and directors, and assisted the Committee with
the reporting in the 2007 proxy statement of executive compensation under the SECs proxy
disclosure rules. These services, which were provided in support of decision-making by the
Committee, are the only services that Hewitt Associates performed for Safeguard. Hewitt Associates
reported to and acted at the direction of, and attended selected meetings as requested by, the
Chairperson of the Committee.
The Committee, which has the sole authority to hire and terminate its consultant, evaluates the
performance of its consultant annually. During 2007, the Committee not only evaluated the services
provided by Hewitt Associates but also solicited and reviewed proposals from Hewitt Associates and
a number of other compensation consulting firms concerning the Committees 2008 compensation
decisions. Following its evaluation, the Committee directly retained Mercer LLC as its consultant
to assist the Committee in its evaluation of senior executive and director compensation for 2008
and with the reporting in the 2008 proxy statement of executive compensation under the SECs proxy
disclosure rules. Because Mercer was hired in October 2007, the Committee also consulted with
Mercer concerning certain of its deliberations regarding payments to be made under the 2007 MIP.
Setting Executive Compensation
The Committee believes that a significant portion of each senior executives total compensation
should be variable or at-risk. These variable components are not guaranteed. The components that
make up the at-risk portion of our executive compensation program are of two different types: cash
and equity. The at-risk variable cash component requires the achievement of strategic and
operating corporate objectives, as well as the achievement of individual performance objectives,
before any cash payment is triggered. Theoretically, the same achievements are required to drive
stock price appreciation, which makes it possible for senior executives to realize value from stock
options and other equity incentive awards granted as long-term incentives.
As described above, management provides the Committee with comprehensive tally sheets on an annual
basis to facilitate the Committees review of the total compensation of our senior executives. The
Committee has found these tally sheets to be useful in its evaluation of the total compensation
program for our senior executives.
The Committee from time to time has reviewed a comparison of each element of total compensation
against a group of specific companies and industries against which we believe we compete for talent
and for shareholder investment, including the venture capital and private equity industries, as
well as by reference to industry-specific compensation surveys. The analysis provided by Hewitt
Associates in December 2006 for purposes of the Committees consideration of 2007 cash and total
compensation levels measured our compensation against data from the following sources:
62
|
|
|
|
|
Proxy data
|
|
à
|
|
The following two comparator groups were specifically identified by us
in consultation with Hewitt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business development companies, registered investment companies
and holding companies that are representative of the unique nature of
our business model for a publicly owned company. Included in this
group were: Allied Capital Corporation; American Capital Strategies,
Ltd.; Capital Southwest Corporation; Harris & Harris Group, Inc.;
Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc.; Internet Capital Group,
Inc.;
Leucadia National Corporation; MCG Capital Corporation; MVC Capital,
Inc.; TICC Capital Corp.; and Wesco Financial Corporation; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating companies that are representative of peers to certain
of our partner companies. Included in this group were: Actuate
Corporation; Answerthink Inc.; Bio-Reference Laboratories, Inc.; Ciber
Inc.; Covansys Corporation; Cytyc Corporation; i2 Technologies, Inc.;
JDA Software Group, Inc.; Keane, Inc.; Logility, Inc.; Manhattan
Associates, Inc.; Point.360; S1 Corporation; and Sapient Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
Culpepper Global
Compensation &
Benefits Survey -
2006
|
|
à
|
|
The following industry cuts from this survey were selected to be
representative of our partner companies while the size scope was
selected to represent the unique business model of Safeguard and the
skill set of the executives needed to execute our strategy:
Life sciences companies with $200 to $600 million in revenue;
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software companies with $200 to $600 million in revenue. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mercer Private
Equity Firms
Compensation Survey
Report 2006
|
|
à
|
|
The following cuts from this survey were selected as comparables based
on assets under management:
Private firms with over $500 million committed capital and
median committed capital of $1,300 million; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All private firms with median committed capital of $719 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
Private Equity
Analyst-Holt
Compensation
Study 2006
Edition
|
|
|
|
The following cuts from this survey were selected as comparables based
on assets under management and geographical location:
Independent ventures;
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-size independent ventures with $300 $1,000 million assets
under management; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeastern United States independent venture firms with
median assets under management of $628 million. |
The Committee annually evaluates the companies and surveys used for comparison purposes to be
certain that the comparables reviewed by the Committee remain appropriate. For 2007, based on
surveys and other information available to us, the Committee utilized data derived from the private
equity industry as a proxy for data relating to the venture capital industry, which data was not
readily available. In connection with its 2008 compensation review, the Committee determined that
reviewing compensation from multiple perspectives was still appropriate given Safeguards unique
business model. However, the Committee felt that the analysis could be improved by refining the
comparables utilized. In particular, the Committee eliminated the comparisons to operating
companies that are representative of peers to certain of Safeguards partner companies and limited
the industry classifications and asset size parameters of companies used as proxy comparables.
Prior to 2006, we historically targeted base pay levels generally at or near the 50th
percentile of base salaries for executives having comparable duties and responsibilities to our
senior executives. Total compensation, including both annual cash incentives and long-term
incentives, was targeted historically to fall at or near the 75th percentile of total
compensation for executives having substantially comparable duties and responsibilities to our
senior executives, assuming achievement of Safeguards corporate, and officers individual,
objectives. However, recognizing that our business strategy, industry focus and diverse array of
partner companies make comparisons to
63
other companies difficult, and based on the inherent challenge in matching companies, job positions
and skill sets, the Committee has viewed some of these comparisons as more appropriate for some
positions than for others and has looked to this data for general guidance rather than rigid
adherence to specific percentages. The Committee continues to review compensation in comparison to
the historically targeted 50th and 75th percentiles for base pay and total
compensation, respectively, but has determined that the overall objectives of our compensation
philosophy would be better achieved through flexibility in determining pay levels to address
differences in duties and responsibilities, individual experience, skill levels and achievements,
and any retention concerns.
2007 Compensation Program
Base Pay. Base pay is established initially on the basis of several factors, including market
competitiveness; past practice; individual performance and experience; the level of responsibility
assumed; the level of skills and experience that can be leveraged across our partner companies to
facilitate their growth and success; and individual employment negotiations with newly hired
executives. Each of our named executive officers has an employment agreement with us which sets
his minimum base salary. The Committee acknowledges, in particular, that as senior executives
leave Safeguard and new officers are hired, candidates for hire typically will review publicly
available information regarding our existing compensation levels and will condition their interest
in working for Safeguard upon receiving compensation comparable to that of the officer they are
replacing and of other senior executives of Safeguard. This situation impacts the Committees
ability to measurably change overall compensation levels over short periods of time.
Base salaries typically are reviewed annually by the Committee, as well as in connection with a
promotion or other changes in job responsibilities. As noted above, Safeguard competes for
executive talent with venture capital and private equity firms. In considering whether to adjust
base salary levels for 2007, the Committee took into account:
|
|
The private equity market data provided by Hewitt Associates (which showed that base
salaries for Messrs. Boni, Datin and Loftus ranged from approximately 14% to 50%, depending
upon position, below the medians in the Mercer and Holt private equity compensation studies); |
|
|
|
The Committees assessment of Mr. Bonis initial base salary, which was somewhat below
market based on the private equity median values noted in the consultants survey data, as
well as Mr. Bonis performance during his first full year as our President and Chief Executive
Officer; and |
|
|
|
Mr. Bonis assessment of the individual performance of each of the other named executive
officers. |
Based on the Committees review of the market data and its desire to bring base salaries closer to
the median base salaries in venture capital and private equity; align the compensation of Messrs.
Datin and Loftus to reflect their comparable roles within our
organization; and provide for
internal consistency in 2007 base salary increases, in December 2006, the Committee approved the
following changes in base salary levels for our then named executive officers for 2007 as shown
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
2006 Base Salary |
|
2007 Base Salary |
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
650,000 |
|
James A. Datin |
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
John A. Loftus |
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
Steven J. Feder |
|
$ |
325,000 |
|
|
$ |
340,000 |
|
During 2007, the Committee also approved the following employment agreements which established the
compensation terms for newly hired executive officers based on employment negotiations:
|
|
Raymond J. Land joined us as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in June 2007
at an initial base salary of $325,000. Mr. Lands base salary was based on the salary paid to
his predecessor as our Chief Financial Officer, adjusted to reflect that Mr. Land would not be
assuming the Chief Administrative Officer title which his predecessor also held; and |
|
|
|
Brian J. Sisko joined us as Senior Vice President and General Counsel in August 2007at an
initial base salary of $340,000. Mr. Siskos base salary was based on his prior experience as
the general counsel of multiple public companies, his experience in the private equity and
venture capital industries, and the salary paid to his predecessor as our General Counsel. |
64
Subsequent to the departure of Christopher Davis as the Companys Chief Administrative and
Financial Officer in December 2006 and until Mr. Land assumed the position of Chief Financial
Officer in June 2007, Stephen Zarrilli served as our Acting Senior Vice President, Acting Chief
Administrative Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer. Under the terms of his consulting
agreement with us, Mr. Zarrilli received a retainer of $2,500 per day, subject to a maximum monthly
retainer of $50,000, and a retainer of $50,000 during the 30-day transition period following Mr.
Lands commencement of employment. During 2007, we paid Mr. Zarrilli $327,500 for his services.
Beginning in December 2007, the Committee reviewed its compensation philosophy and the market data
provided by Mercer and determined that 2008 base salary levels for our named executive officers
satisfied the Committees stated objectives for the role of fixed cash compensation within our
overall compensation philosophy and would remain the same as in 2007.
Cash Incentives.
Incentive Opportunity. In April 2007, the Committee adopted the 2007 Management Incentive Plan
(the 2007 MIP) to provide variable cash incentives to our senior executives and other employees
based on 2007 performance. The 2007 MIP program, which emphasized teamwork among members of
management to achieve key business objectives under our 2007 strategic plan, was based on the
following mix of corporate and individual objectives for our senior executives and professional
staff.
|
|
80% on the achievement of corporate objectives; and |
|
|
|
20% on the achievement of individual objectives. |
As of year-end 2007, this grouping consisted not only of our senior-most executives but also a
total of 21 out of our 34 employees (our remaining employees also participated in our 2007 MIP, but
their incentives were based 50% on corporate objectives and 50% on
individual objectives).
We believe that short-term compensation (such as base salary and annual cash incentive awards)
should not be based on the short-term performance of our stock, whether favorable or unfavorable,
but rather on our executives management of the Company towards achieving our goal of long-term
growth in shareholder value. We also believe that under our MIP, all of our executives and
professional staff should earn their incentive payments based on the same relative weighting of
corporate and individual objectives. The price of our stock should, in the long term, reflect our
performance, and the performance of our stock will directly affect the value of stock options and
other equity incentive awards provided to our senior executives as part of our compensation
program.
Performance Measures. To align the 2007 MIP with our 2007 business strategy, the Committee
established the following corporate objectives and weightings (representing 80% (or up to 80
points) of the total 2007 MIP target award):
|
|
|
|
|
Weighting |
|
Corporate Objectives |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
Achievement of specified levels of deployment of capital in new partner companies; capital
funding based on reserves established at initial acquisition of certain partner companies;
and/or funding to support growth through acquisitions or other strategic opportunities
(but excluding working capital funding) for existing partner companies, with achievement
being measured based on a matrix involving the amount of capital deployed and the number
of transactions completed; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
Achievement of capital generation through exit transactions (including transactions by our
partner companies as well as transactions by us relating to our interests in partner
companies), with achievement being measured based on a matrix involving the amount of
capital generated and the number of transactions completed; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
Achievement of explicit milestones or specified levels of revenues or profitability for
the 15 partner companies in which we held an interest as of the adoption of the 2007 MIP,
with each measure selected to reflect the respective partner companys stage of growth and
with greater emphasis being placed on those companies reported as consolidated in our
financial statements; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
Overall corporate performance of Safeguard, based on the Committees subjective evaluation. |
65
The Committee established these objectives by taking into consideration the anticipated level of
difficulty in achieving our 2007 business plan and the Committees judgment of acceptable
performance. The award criteria were designed to provide management with a meaningful opportunity
to meet the criteria for a target award but not guarantee achievement or make achievement somewhat
inevitable. This approach was intended to provide increased economic incentives for exceeding the
target award and some economic recognition, albeit reduced, for near achievement of the target.
In connection with the development of the 2007 MIP, each then executive officer also prepared
written individual objectives that were reviewed and approved by our Chief Executive Officer. Our
Chief Executive Officers individual objectives were reviewed and approved by the Committee. The
individual objectives varied depending upon each participants roles and responsibilities.
Consistent with their respective employment agreements and the Companys overall compensation
philosophy, the Committee set the following variable cash target awards for 2007 for our then
eligible named executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Variable |
Name |
|
Cash Incentive |
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
$ |
650,000 |
|
James A. Datin |
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
John A. Loftus |
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
Steven J. Feder |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
Mr. Zarrilli was not an eligible participant in our 2007 MIP.
Under the terms of their respective employment agreements with us, entered into during the 2007
calendar year, Messrs. Land and Sisko are eligible for a target MIP bonus of $195,000 and $250,000,
respectively, beginning in 2008. In lieu of any actual participation in our 2007 MIP, Mr. Land and
Mr. Sisko each received, upon commencement of employment, a payment equal to 100% of the pro rata
portion of their variable cash target bonus ($109,375 and $91,096, respectively) based upon hire
date. Mr. Land and Mr. Sisko each are required to use 100% of their respective payment, net of
taxes, to purchase shares of our common stock in open market transactions in accordance with our
insider trading procedures.
There were no mandatory minimum awards payable under the 2007 MIP. The actual cash incentive
awards paid to participants were determined based upon the level of achievement of the quantitative
and qualitative corporate and individual performance objectives and were measured in the aggregate
on a sliding scale basis (e.g., for executives and professional staff, achievement of objectives
totaling 50 points would result in payment of 50% of the target award, achievement of objectives
totaling 100 points would result in payment of 100% of the target award and achievement of
objectives totaling 150 points would result in payment of 150% of the target award). Payments
under the 2007 MIP were limited to 150% of each individuals target award.
Payouts. In February 2008, the Committee reviewed our performance against the quantitative and
qualitative corporate objectives set forth above and preliminarily determined the following payout
levels, subject to final approval upon completion of the audits of our 2007 financial statements
and internal controls over financial reporting, which final approval occurred on April 1, 2008.
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target |
|
Payout |
|
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
Level |
|
|
Corporate Objectives |
|
(in points) |
|
(in points) |
|
Factors Affecting Determination |
|
Capital Deployment
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Deployment of $57.4 million of newly committed capital in
12 transactions $47.4 million relating to acquisitions
of new partner companies (Advanced BioHealing,
Beyond.com, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Cellumen,
Bridgevine, Veralyte, and a stealth pre-launch technology
company; the balance related to capital funded to
existing partner companies based on reserves established
at the time of acquisition. No credit was given for
capital deployment to support partner companies outside
of amounts properly reserved for follow-on funding or
otherwise earmarked for specific merger and acquisition
transactions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Generation
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Generation of $30.7 million of capital through exit
transactions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner Company
Performance
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Achievement by approximately one-half of our partner
companies of explicit milestones or specified levels of
revenue or profitability. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Corporate
Performance
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Overall corporate performance, including execution of our
business strategy; deal sourcing and pipeline
development; organizational staffing and development;
facilitating partner company milestone achievements;
building value in our partner companies through strategy,
management and performance; and management of core
corporate functions, including performance of our
investor relations and marketing programs, financial
reporting and other compliance responsibilities, and
management of our corporate operating budget. The
Committee specifically noted the following significant
2007 achievements in its review: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued execution of our strategy of
eliminating from our roster of partner companies those
companies that no longer fit within our stated areas of
capital deployment focus and accomplishing new capital
deployment in partner companies that do fit our current
parameters; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reception and better understanding of our
business model by the financial markets/institutional investors; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvement in our ability to establish a
consistent communication platform with our investors; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued upgrading of our advisory boards and
the efficient and meaningful utilization of such advisory
board members to assist our partner companies to increase
their value to us; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued improvement in the overall view of our
partner companies regarding the value that we bring to
our partner company relationships. |
|
Total Points
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
(which equates to 65% achievement of corporate objectives) |
At the end of the year, each senior executive also completed a self-assessment of his achievement
of individual objectives (representing 20% (or up to 20 points) of the total 2007 MIP target
award). The Chief Executive Officers self-assessment was a component of the annual performance
review conducted by the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee. The Committee reviewed with
the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee its assessment of the performance of the Chief
Executive Officer, including his achievement of
67
individual objectives, and discussed with the Chief Executive Officer his review of each other
named executive officers achievement of each officers specific individual objectives.
Based on its review of the achievement of both quantitative and qualitative 2007 MIP objectives,
the Committee (i) authorized the payment of an aggregate company-wide pool equal to approximately
70% of the 2007 MIP target, with payment to each participant, other than the Companys senior
executive group, made up, as of year-end 2007, of eight eligible persons, including the named
executive officers, to be determined by management based upon an assessment of the achievement of
individual objectives, with individual performance being capped at 110%; and (ii) limited
acknowledgment of personal achievement for each of Messrs. Boni, Datin and Loftus, and for our
other senior executives as a group, to a maximum of 90% of personal objectives.
Based on the Committees review of the 2007 MIP and the actual achievements of Safeguard and our
individual senior executives, the Committee approved the following 2007 MIP payments to the named
executive officers eligible for a payment under the 2007 MIP (which amounts are presented in the
Summary Compensation Table under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation). Such amounts were paid
following the completion of the audit of our financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout Level |
|
Approved Variable |
Name |
|
(in points) |
|
Cash Incentive |
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
|
70 |
|
|
$ |
455,000 |
|
James A. Datin |
|
|
70 |
|
|
$ |
273,000 |
|
John A. Loftus |
|
|
70 |
|
|
$ |
273,000 |
|
Under the terms of his agreements with us (see Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements
below), Mr. Feder received $135,000 (representing an amount equal to his pro rata MIP payment as of
September 30, 2007) as part of his severance package.
By way of comparison, after taking into consideration the achievement of both corporate and
individual objectives, payments to our then senior executives ranged from 102% to 114% of target
under our 2006 MIP and from 88.5% to 130% of target under our 2005 MIP.
Long-Term Incentives. Our executive compensation programs include a significant equity component,
primarily in the form of stock options. Our equity compensation plans also allow for the grant of
restricted stock awards and such other equity-based awards as the Committee may determine to be
appropriate from time to time.
As noted above, we compete for executive talent with venture capital and private equity firms, and
we review comparative information regarding venture capital and private equity industry
compensation practices. In such industries, executives (referred to as managing partners)
typically have compensation programs that include a share of the funds profits (referred to as
carry). We do not provide our executives with a compensation program tied directly to gains from
our partner company holdings. Instead, we attempt to utilize our equity compensation plans as an
alternative to approximate the economic benefit that would be provided by a carry. The equity
awards made to our senior executives were based on our assessment of the carry which would
typically be provided to our executives in positions of comparable responsibility at private equity
and/or venture capital firms. For example, based upon information available to the Committee
through its consultant, as well as directly through the professional experience of committee
members, a managing partner of a venture capital or private equity firm would typically expect a
carry ranging from about 1% to 5% of profits realized on portfolio transactions. To provide a
different, but somewhat comparable, long-term economic benefit to our executive officers, we grant
stock options to our executive officers, with each officers stock option grants ranging in the
aggregate from about 1% to 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock, dependent upon the
individuals position and responsibilities. The grants, which generally are made upon hire, are
intended by the Committee to cover a multi-year period and to be competitive with those held by
comparable executives in the comparison data reviewed by the Committee (as adjusted for the senior
executives experience).
Since stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the average of the high and low
trading prices of our common stock on the date of grant, the options will have value only if the
market price increases after that date and, in the case of options that vest upon achievement of
specified stock price levels, only if the specified stock price levels are achieved. We refer to
options that vest upon achievement of specified stock price levels as market-based
68
vesting options. The Committee has established the following allocation between options subject
to time-based vesting and market-based vesting for our executive officers:
|
|
25% of the total underlying shares are subject to time-based vesting; of such amount, 25%
vests on the first anniversary date of the grant date and the remaining 75% vests in 36 equal
monthly installments on the same date of each month thereafter; and |
|
|
|
75% of the total underlying shares are subject to market-based vesting. |
The Committee believes that granting 75% of the principal option grants held by our executive
officers based on a market-based vesting model aligns the long-term interests of Safeguard
management and our shareholders. Our senior executives generally will not benefit from such option
grants unless the Safeguard stock price achieves and sustains a targeted stock price (based on the
average closing price of a share of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange
consolidated tape for 20 consecutive trading days).
The following table shows the per share stock price levels at which portions of the shares
underlying the market-based vesting options granted in 2005 to Messrs. Boni, Datin and Loftus will
vest:
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares Underlying Options That Vest |
|
Per
Share Stock Price |
|
First 10% |
|
$ |
2.0359 |
|
Next 20% |
|
$ |
3.1548 |
|
Next 30% |
|
$ |
4.6466 |
|
Final 40% |
|
$ |
6.5114 |
|
The options also may vest on a pro rata basis if the per share stock price is between the
designated stock price levels set forth in the table for 20 consecutive trading days. We measure
for these pro-rata vestings every six months. For example, based on the stock price levels in the
above table, if the first 10% of the options have already vested and within the next six month
window, the highest average closing price of a share of our common stock as reported on the New
York Stock Exchange consolidated tape over 20 consecutive trading days equals $2.5954, an
additional 10% of the shares underlying the options will vest.
Upon joining Safeguard, Mr. Land and Mr. Sisko received stock options to purchase 1,500,000 shares
and 1,000,000 shares, respectively. These option grants met the employment inducement award
exemption provided under Section 303A.08 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Of these stock options
awarded, 25% of the stock options were subject to time-based vesting and 75% of the stock options
were subject to the market-based vesting model described in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares Underlying Options That Vest |
|
Per
Share Stock Price |
|
First 20%
|
|
$ |
3.1548 |
|
Next 30%
|
|
$ |
4.6466 |
|
Next 40%
|
|
$ |
6.5114 |
|
Final 10%
|
|
$ |
7.2246 |
|
The Committee annually reviews the equity awards held by our senior executives and other employees
and also may consider awards periodically during a year in an effort to retain and motivate
employees and to ensure continuing alignment of executive and shareholder interests. Other than
the grants made to newly hired executive officers who joined us during 2007, the Committee
determined that during 2007 and so far through 2008, no additional grants to executive officers
were necessary to achieve our compensation objectives.
We expect to continue to use stock options and other equity awards as part of our compensation
program, including market-based vesting options. We expect to make appropriate adjustments in the
per share stock price levels and vesting schedules used for additional market-based vesting option
grants based on our stock price level.
Stock Option Granting Process. The Committee is responsible for equity grants under our equity
compensation plans. The Committee approves and grants all equity awards to our senior executives,
employees and advisory board members, with the exception of those grants for which the Committee
has delegated authority to the Chief Executive Officer which are described below. Equity grants to
directors are generally approved by the Board; however, in those cases where the Board has approved
the size and form of recurring annual service grants, the Committee may authorize grants without
further Board approval.
69
Grants may be made at regularly scheduled meetings or at special meetings convened to approve
compensation arrangements for newly hired executive officers or for executive officers who have
been promoted or are otherwise subject to changes in responsibilities. During 2007, the Committee
determined that, as a matter of best practice, recurring grants to directors and advisory board
members would be made on the date of Safeguards annual meeting of shareholders.
The Committee has delegated to our Chief Executive Officer the authority to make equity grants
between regularly scheduled Committee meetings (primarily to new hires and new advisory board
members), provided that the aggregate number of shares granted may not exceed 300,000 shares, the
maximum number of shares allocated to any one employee may not exceed 125,000 shares and the
aggregate number of shares allocated to any one advisory board member may not exceed 5,000 shares.
A report is made to the Committee at each of its regularly scheduled meetings regarding any grants
that our Chief Executive Officer has approved, following which the aggregate number of shares
available is reset to 300,000 shares. The Chief Executive Officer is not authorized to make equity
grants to senior executives or directors without prior Committee approval of the specific grant
contemplated.
It recently has become our practice to make all employee grants of options, subject to limited
exceptions for new hires, on fixed quarterly grant dates. Grants to newly retained consultants or
advisors may be made on the later of the date the award is approved or the date of commencement of
services. The exercise price for all stock options granted under our equity compensation plans is
the average of the high and low trading prices of our common stock as reported on the New York
Stock Exchange consolidated tape on the date of grant, which we believe reflects common practice.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation. Our senior executives may defer compensation under our
qualified 401(k) plan (subject to the limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code) but generally
are not eligible to receive matching company contributions under that plan. Our senior executives
are eligible to participate in our nonqualified deferred compensation plan, which is an unfunded
plan that does not allow deferral of compensation but does allow participants to obtain credits, in
the form of Safeguard contributions that are allocated to accounts for the benefit of a
participant. We offer this nonqualified deferred compensation plan to selected employees in light
of their ineligibility to obtain a company matching contribution under our qualified 401(k) plan.
Additional information regarding participation in this plan by named executive officers can be
found below under Executive CompensationNonqualified Deferred Compensation 2007.
Perquisites (fringes). Contractually, our executives are entitled to a few benefits that are not
otherwise available to all of our employees. We do not provide a defined benefit pension
arrangement, post-retirement health coverage or similar benefits for our executive officers. The
additional perquisites we provided to our executive officers in fiscal 2007 consisted of the
following:
|
|
$10,000 annual car allowance; |
|
|
|
$8,000 non-accountable annual expense allowance; |
|
|
|
Universal life insurance coverage ranging from $750,000 to $1,000,000; |
|
|
|
Up to $5,000 reimbursement annually for medical, vision or dental expenses not covered
under our other benefit plans; and |
|
|
|
Certain relocation expenses and related tax obligations under the terms of negotiated
employment agreements. |
The Committee believes that these perquisites, which represent a relatively modest portion of each
named executive officers compensation, are not out of the ordinary for executives of the caliber
that we need to be able to attract to Safeguard. These perquisites are taken into consideration by
the Committee in determining total compensation payable to the named executive officers. It is the
Committees stated intention to begin to treat certain of such perquisites as fully discretionary
in the case of any new hires to our senior executive ranks.
70
Severance and Change-in-Control Arrangements
Messrs. Boni, Datin, Loftus, Land and Sisko each have agreements with Safeguard which provide
certain benefits in the event of termination of their employment by Safeguard without cause or by
the officer for good reason (as defined in the agreements).
Upon the occurrence of a termination event, each executive will be entitled to those benefits
outlined in his agreement with us, which may include a multiple of his then current base salary,
payment of his pro rata bonus for the year of termination or a multiple of the greater of his
target bonus for the year of termination or the average of his actual bonuses for up to the last
three years, accelerated vesting of equity awards and extension of the post-termination exercise
period within which some or all of the equity awards held by the executive may be exercised,
coverage under our medical, health and life insurance plans for a designated period of time, and
outplacement services or office space. See Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in
Control in this Form 10-K/A for a summary of the specific benefits that each executive will
receive upon the occurrence of a termination event.
Unlike single trigger change-in-control arrangements that pay out immediately upon a change in
control, most of the benefits to which our named executive officers are entitled under their
agreements in the event of a change in control require a double trigger, namely a change in
control coupled with a loss of employment or a substantial change in job duties. We believe a
double trigger provides retention incentives as well as continuity of management in the event of
an actual or threatened change in control. However, we note that the acceleration of the vesting
of the stock options that were granted to Mr. Boni when he joined Safeguard in 2005 require only a
single trigger to be effective that is, only a change in control. This arrangement was
specifically negotiated by Mr. Boni as a condition to his agreement to join Safeguard. Since
equity represents a significant portion of Mr. Bonis total compensation, we believe that this
single trigger can be an important retention device during change-in-control discussions.
Steven J. Feder, our former Senior Vice President and General Counsel, resigned in
August 2007. We and Mr. Feder agreed that Mr. Feders resignation would be treated as having been
for good reason, as defined in his agreement with us, and Mr. Feder received the severance benefits
described in that agreement consisting of the following:
|
|
A payment equal to his pro rata 2007 MIP payout, as of September 30, 2007, of $135,000,
plus one and one-half times his base salary of $340,000, for an aggregate payment of $645,000; |
|
|
|
Coverage under our medical, health and life insurance plans for 12 months; |
|
|
|
$15,000 for outplacement services; and |
|
|
|
Full vesting of all time-vested stock options (which will remain exercisable for 36 months)
and a 12-month period within which to exercise vested market-based stock options. |
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
The Committee considers the potential impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code in
structuring executive compensation. Section 162(m) disallows a tax deduction for any publicly held
corporation for certain executive compensation exceeding $1,000,000 per person in any taxable year
unless it is performance based within the meaning of Section 162(m). We believe the stock
options awarded under our equity compensation plans are in compliance with the provisions of
Section 162(m). The portion of cash compensation paid to Mr. Boni for 2007 in excess of $1,000,000
was not performance-based compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) and, therefore, was
not deductible by Safeguard. We believe that providing an appropriate level of cash compensation
and maintaining flexibility in determining compensation may be more important than preserving this
tax deduction. Therefore, the Committee does not currently plan to take any action to qualify any
of our cash incentive compensation plans under Section 162(m).
71
Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our Board established stock ownership guidelines, effective December 31, 2005, that are designed to
closely align the long-term interests of our executive officers with the long-term interests of our
shareholders. The guidelines provide that each executive officer should attain an equity position
in our common stock equal to two times annual base salary. The ownership level should be achieved
(i) within five years of December 31, 2005 for executive officers who were employed on that date or
(ii) for individuals who were not employees on December 31, 2005, by the end of the fifth full
calendar year following the year in which the executive officer was hired. The Nominating &
Corporate Governance Committee monitors compliance as of the end of each calendar year. Shares
counted toward these guidelines include:
|
|
Shares beneficially owned by the executive officer; |
|
|
|
Vested shares of restricted stock; |
|
|
|
Vested deferred stock units that have been credited to the executive officer; and |
|
|
|
Shares underlying vested, in-the-money options. |
Based on information they have provided to us, our named executive officers are working toward
meeting the guidelines within the prescribed time frame.
Prohibition on Speculation in Safeguard Stock
Our company policy on securities trading by company personnel prohibits our named executive
officers, directors and other employees from engaging in activities with regard to our stock that
can be considered as speculative, including but not limited to, short selling (profiting if the
market price of our securities decreases); buying or selling publicly traded options (e.g., a put
option, which is an option or right to sell stock at a specific price prior to a specified date, or
a call option, which is an option or right to buy stock at a specific price prior to a specified
date); and hedging or any other type of derivative arrangement that has a similar economic effect.
Our executive officers and directors are also prohibited from pledging, directly or indirectly, our
common stock or the stock of any of our partner companies, as collateral for indebtedness.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
We have reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management.
Based on our review and discussion with management, we have recommended to the Board of Directors
that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Companys
proxy statement.
Members of the Compensation Committee:
Julie A. Dobson, Chair George D. McClelland John J. Roberts
72
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
The table below is a summary of total compensation paid to or earned by our named executive
officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
Compen- |
|
Compensation |
|
All Other |
|
|
Name and |
|
|
|
|
|
Salary |
|
Bonus |
|
Awards |
|
Option Awards |
|
sation |
|
Earnings |
|
Compensation |
|
Total |
Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
($) |
|
($)(1) |
|
($)(2) |
|
($)(2) |
|
($)(3) |
|
($)(4) |
|
($)(5) |
|
($) |
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
710,745 |
|
|
|
455,000 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
116,049 |
|
|
|
1,932,061 |
|
President
and Chief |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,185,249 |
|
|
|
684,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,935 |
|
|
|
2,718,814 |
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond J. Land (6) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
182,292 |
|
|
|
109,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,367 |
|
|
|
616,378 |
|
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Datin |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435,321 |
|
|
|
273,000 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
47,441 |
|
|
|
1,146,029 |
|
Executive
Vice
President |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713,813 |
|
|
|
382,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,989 |
|
|
|
1,516,302 |
|
and Managing
Director, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John A. Loftus |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,330 |
|
|
|
448,866 |
|
|
|
273,000 |
|
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
42,919 |
|
|
|
1,191,782 |
|
Executive Vice President |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
|
745,102 |
|
|
|
308,000 |
|
|
|
7,684 |
|
|
|
43,279 |
|
|
|
1,655,526 |
|
and Managing Director, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian J. Sisko (6) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
126,410 |
|
|
|
91,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,238 |
|
|
|
372,089 |
|
Senior Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Counsel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven J. Feder (7) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
231,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
700,552 |
|
|
|
1,192,738 |
|
Former
Senior Vice |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
325,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,142 |
|
|
|
185,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,783 |
|
|
|
881,425 |
|
President and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Counsel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Zarrilli (8) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
327,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,063 |
|
Former
Acting
Senior Vice |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,577 |
|
President,
Acting Chief |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Acting
Chief |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For 2007, the amounts reported for Messrs. Land and Sisko represent amounts paid to each of
Messrs. Land and Sisko upon their respective hires in lieu of payments under Safeguards 2007
management incentive plan (100% of such payments, net of taxes, was required to be used by
each of them to purchase Safeguard common stock in orderly open market purchases in accordance
with our insider trading procedures). Amounts earned by Messrs. Boni, Datin and Loftus under
our 2007 Management Incentive Plan are reported under Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Compensation. |
|
(2) |
|
These amounts do not represent compensation actually received. Rather, these amounts
represent the aggregate expense we recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 for restricted stock awards and stock options granted
during and prior to 2007, in accordance with FAS 123(R). In accordance with SEC rules, the
amounts shown exclude the effect of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting
conditions other than forfeitures that actually occurred during 2007. In August 2007, Mr.
Feder forfeited 359,410 stock options that were subject to market-based vesting upon his
termination of employment. The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions for the years indicated: |
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Service-Based Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
Average expected option
life |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market-Based Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Average expected option
life |
|
5 - 7 years |
|
5 - 7 years |
|
5 - 7 years |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
For information regarding the grant date fair value of awards granted in 2007, see the Grants
of Plan-Based Awards-2007 below. |
|
(3) |
|
For 2007, the amounts reported in this column represent payments made in April 2008 for
awards earned under our 2007 Management Incentive Plan, which is described in detail under
Compensation Discussion and Analysis2007 Compensation Program. |
|
(4) |
|
For 2007, the amounts reported in this column represent the earnings on account balances
under our nonqualified deferred compensation plan; these amounts also are reported
below under Nonqualified Deferred Compensation 2007. |
|
(5) |
|
For 2007, All Other Compensation included the following amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
Group Life |
|
|
|
|
Perquisites |
|
Deferred |
|
Life |
|
Insurance |
|
|
|
|
and Personal |
|
Compensation |
|
Insurance |
|
Imputed |
|
Severance |
Name |
|
Benefits |
|
Plan |
|
Premiums |
|
Income |
|
Benefits |
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
$ |
65,101 |
|
|
$ |
16,875 |
|
|
$ |
30,509 |
|
|
$ |
3,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond J. Land |
|
|
6,956 |
|
|
|
16,875 |
|
|
|
7,265 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Datin |
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
16,875 |
|
|
|
6,930 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
|
|
John A. Loftus |
|
|
19,383 |
|
|
|
16,875 |
|
|
|
6,032 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
Brian J. Sisko |
|
|
4,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
Steven J. Feder |
|
|
19,327 |
|
|
|
16,529 |
|
|
|
4,465 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
$ |
660,000 |
|
|
|
The perquisites and personal benefits include a $10,000 car allowance (prorated for individuals
employed for less than the full year), an $8,000 non-accountable annual expense allowance (for
Messrs. Boni, Datin, Loftus and Feder), and reimbursement of up to $5,000 for medical, vision or
dental expenses not covered under our other benefit plans. The amount reported for Mr. Boni
also includes $25,425 for reimbursement of relocation expenses and $16,676 for reimbursement of
tax obligations to respect to such relocation reimbursement. Our executive officers also have
occasional personal use of tickets to various sporting events at no incremental cost to us and
are eligible to receive matching charitable contributions under our program, which is available
to all employees, subject to a maximum of $1,000 in matching contributions for each individual
for each calendar year. |
|
|
|
The severance benefits reported for Mr. Feder represent the following lump sum payments that he
received under his agreements with us dated November 17, 2004 and August 16, 2007: $510,000,
representing one and one-half times his salary; $135,000, representing an amount equal to his
prorated 2007 MIP payout as of September 30, 2007; and $15,000 for outplacement fees. For
further information, see Compensation Discussion and AnalysisSeverance and Change-in-Control
Arrangements. |
|
(6) |
|
Messrs. Land and Sisko joined Safeguard in June 2007 and August 2007, respectively. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Feder resigned in August 2007. |
74
(8) |
|
Mr. Zarrilli served as our Acting Senior Vice President, Acting Chief Administrative Officer
and Acting Chief Financial Officer from December 2006 until mid-June 2007 and for a 30-day
transition period following Mr. Lands commencement of employment. Mr. Zarrilli was not
covered under our health, welfare and other employee benefit plans (with the exception of the
stock option granted to him in December 2006 under his consulting agreement with us) and was
not entitled to any compensation upon his termination of service other than amounts earned
during his term of service under the terms of his consulting agreement with us. |
Each of our named executive officers has an employment agreement with us that sets his initial base
salary and initial annual cash incentive target award. The initial base salary and initial annual
cash incentive target award for each named executive officer were as follows: Mr. Boni ($600,000
salary; $600,000 target award); Mr. Land ($325,000 salary; $195,000 target award); Mr. Datin
($375,000 salary; $375,000 target award); Mr. Loftus ($250,000 salary; $150,000 target award); and
Mr. Sisko ($340,000 salary; $250,000 target award). Base salaries and annual cash incentive target
awards, which are reviewed by the Compensation Committee each year, currently exceed these
contractual amounts for Messrs. Boni, Datin and Loftus. The primary focus of these agreements is
to provide our executive officers with severance benefits in the event of a termination of
employment involuntarily, for good reason or upon a change in control, as described below under
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control. The components of compensation
reported in the Summary Compensation Table, including an explanation of the amount of salary and
cash incentive compensation in proportion to total compensation, are described in detail under
Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
75
Grants of Plan-Based Awards 2007
The following table shows non-equity incentive plan awards and option awards granted during 2007 to
our named executive officers. There were no stock awards granted to our named executive officers
during 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
Awards: |
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts Under |
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
or Base |
|
|
|
|
|
Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
|
Shares of |
|
Securities |
|
Price of |
|
Market |
|
Stock and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stock or |
|
Underlying |
|
Option |
|
Price on |
|
Option |
|
|
Grant |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Units |
|
Options |
|
Awards |
|
Grant Date |
|
Awards |
Name |
|
Date |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
(#) |
|
(#)(2) |
|
($/Sh) |
|
($/Sh)(3) |
|
($)(4) |
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
|
4/24/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
975,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond J. Land |
|
|
6/11/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/11/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.620 |
|
|
$ |
2.640 |
|
|
|
560,513 |
|
|
|
|
6/11/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.620 |
|
|
$ |
2.640 |
|
|
|
1,651,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Datin |
|
|
4/24/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
585,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John A. Loftus |
|
|
4/24/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
585,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian J. Sisko |
|
|
8/20/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/20/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.106 |
|
|
$ |
2.090 |
|
|
|
284,175 |
|
|
|
|
8/20/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
$ |
2.106 |
|
|
$ |
2.090 |
|
|
|
921,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven J. Feder |
|
|
4/24/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Zarrilli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These awards were made under the 2007 Management Incentive Plan (or, in the case of Messrs.
Land and Sisko, payments made upon hire in lieu of participation in the 2007 Management
Incentive Plan). There were no mandatory minimum awards payable under the 2007 Management
Incentive Plan and the maximum awards payable were 150% of the target amounts. The amounts in
the table represent payouts that might have been achieved based on performance at target or
maximum performance levels. The amounts actually paid under this plan for 2007 to Messrs.
Boni, Datin and Loftus have been reported in the Summary Compensation Table under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation. The amount actually paid under this plan for 2007 to Mr. Feder
is included in the severance benefits paid to him, which are reported in the Summary
Compensation Table under All Other Compensation. For further information, see Compensation
Discussion and Analysis2007 Compensation Program. |
|
(2) |
|
The 375,000 options awarded to Mr. Land and the 250,000 options awarded to Mr. Sisko vest as
to 25% of the underlying shares on the first anniversary date of the grant date and as to the
remaining 75% of the underlying shares in 36 equal monthly installments thereafter. The
1,125,000 options awarded to Mr. Land and the 750,000 options granted to Mr. Sisko are subject
to market-based vesting and vest upon the achievement of the following per share stock price
levels (based on the average closing price of a share of our common stock as reported on the
New York Stock Exchange consolidated tape for 20 consecutive trading days): |
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares Underlying Options That Vest |
|
Per Share Stock Price |
|
First 20% |
|
$ |
3.1548 |
|
Next 30% |
|
$ |
4.6466 |
|
Next 40% |
|
$ |
6.5114 |
|
Final 10% |
|
$ |
7.2246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to vesting upon the achievement of a specified per share stock price level, the
shares underlying the options may vest on a pro rata basis on each six-month anniversary of
the grant date if the per share stock price is between the designated levels (based on the
highest average closing price of a share of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange consolidated tape for 20 consecutive trading days during each six-month period). |
|
|
|
The options have an eight-year term. The options subject to time-based vesting will vest
fully upon an individuals death, permanent disability, retirement on or after his 65th
birthday, or termination of employment without cause or for good reason (as defined in each
individuals employment agreement with us). All options subject to time-based vesting and
market-based vesting will vest fully upon an individuals termination of employment without
cause or for good reason within 18 months following a change in control. |
76
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The market price reported in this column is the closing price of Safeguard common stock as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange consolidated tape on the grant date. Under the terms
of Safeguards equity compensation plans, the exercise price of an option is determined based
upon the average of the high and low trading prices of Safeguards common stock as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange consolidated tape on the grant date. |
|
(4) |
|
The amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of the awards computed in
accordance with FAS 123(R). For a discussion of the valuation assumptions, see footnote 2 to
the Summary Compensation Table. |
77
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2007
The following table shows the equity awards we have made to our named executive officers that were
outstanding at December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
Number of |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or |
|
Market Value |
|
|
Underlying |
|
Securities |
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of |
|
of Shares or |
|
|
Unexercised |
|
Underlying |
|
Unexercised |
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock That |
|
Units of Stock |
|
|
Options |
|
Unexercised Options |
|
Unearned |
|
Exercise |
|
Option |
|
Have Not |
|
That Have |
|
|
(#)(1) |
|
(#)(1)(2) |
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Expiration |
|
Vested |
|
Not Vested |
Name |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
(#)(2)(3) |
|
($) |
|
Date |
|
(#)(2)(4) |
|
($)(5) |
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
|
583,333 |
|
|
|
416,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2750 |
|
|
|
08/16/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
861,245 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,138,755 |
|
|
|
1.2750 |
|
|
|
08/16/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond J. Land |
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6200 |
|
|
|
06/11/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,112,107 |
|
|
|
2.6200 |
|
|
|
06/11/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Datin |
|
|
281,250 |
|
|
|
218,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5600 |
|
|
|
09/07/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,622 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,069,378 |
|
|
|
1.5600 |
|
|
|
09/07/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John A. Loftus |
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1700 |
|
|
|
05/13/10 |
|
|
|
28,551 |
|
|
|
51,392 |
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6850 |
|
|
|
12/18/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5600 |
|
|
|
12/19/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,750 |
|
|
|
56,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1250 |
|
|
|
12/15/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,122 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,069,378 |
|
|
|
1.5550 |
|
|
|
09/13/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian J. Sisko |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1060 |
|
|
|
08/20/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
|
|
2.1060 |
|
|
|
08/20/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven J. Feder (6) |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7800 |
|
|
|
08/19/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3800 |
|
|
|
08/19/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,590 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3800 |
|
|
|
08/19/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Zarrilli |
|
|
150,000 |
(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3350 |
|
|
|
06/11/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unless otherwise identified by footnote, options subject to time-based vesting vest as to 25%
of the underlying shares on the first anniversary date of the grant date and in 36 equal
installments on the same date of each month thereafter. The vesting dates for each option are
listed in the table below by expiration date: |
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration Date |
|
Initial Vest Date |
|
Subsequent Monthly Vest Dates |
|
05/13/10
|
|
05/13/03
|
|
06/13/03 through 05/13/06 |
12/18/10
|
|
12/18/03
|
|
01/18/04 through 12/18/06 |
12/19/11
|
|
12/19/04
|
|
01/19/05 through 12/19/07 |
12/15/12
|
|
12/15/05
|
|
01/15/06 through 12/15/08 |
08/16/13
|
|
08/16/06
|
|
09/16/06 through 08/16/09 |
09/07/13
|
|
09/07/06
|
|
10/07/06 through 09/07/09 |
09/13/13
|
|
09/13/06
|
|
10/13/06 through 09/13/09 |
06/11/15
|
|
06/11/08
|
|
07/11/08 through 06/11/11 |
08/20/15
|
|
08/20/08
|
|
09/20/08 through 08/20/11 |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Vesting of equity awards may be accelerated upon death, permanent disability, retirement on
or after 65th birthday, termination of employment for good reason or without cause,
or termination of employment in connection with a change in control, and, in the case of Mr.
Bonis equity awards, upon the occurrence of a change in control. Further information
regarding the equity awards that are subject to acceleration of vesting in each circumstance
can be found below under Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control. |
78
(3) |
|
These options are market-based vesting options and vest only upon the achievement of
improvement in Safeguards stock price. Achievement is measured based on the average daily
closing price of Safeguard common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite
tape for 20 consecutive trading days. The following table shows the per share stock prices at
which portions of the shares underlying the market-based vesting options held by Messrs. Boni,
Datin and Loftus vest: |
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares Underlying Options that Vest |
|
Per Share Stock Price |
|
First 10% |
|
$ |
2.0359 |
|
Additional 20% |
|
|
3.1548 |
|
Additional 30% |
|
|
4.6466 |
|
Remaining 40% |
|
|
6.5114 |
|
|
|
The following table shows the per share stock prices at which portions of the shares underlying
the market-based vesting options held by Messrs. Land and Sisko vest: |
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares Underlying Options that Vest |
|
Per Share Stock Price |
|
First 20% |
|
$ |
3.1548 |
|
Next 30% |
|
|
4.6466 |
|
Next 40% |
|
|
6.5114 |
|
Final 10% |
|
|
7.2246 |
|
|
|
In addition to vesting upon the achievement of a specified per share stock price, the shares
underlying the options may vest on a pro rata basis on each six-month anniversary of the grant
date if the per share stock price is between the designated stock prices (based on the highest
average closing price of a share of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange
consolidated tape for 20 consecutive trading days during each six-month period). |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Loftus stock award vests as to 50% of the shares on each of December 15, 2008 and
December 15, 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
Under SEC rules, the value is calculated based on the year-end closing stock price of $1.80
per share, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange consolidated tape, multiplied by the
number of shares that have not vested. |
|
(6) |
|
Under the terms of Mr. Feders agreements with Safeguard, upon his separation from our
employment in August 2007: |
|
|
|
He forfeited options to purchase 359,410 shares that were subject to market-based
vesting; and |
|
|
|
|
We accelerated the vesting of options to purchase 206,250 shares that were subject to
time-based vesting. |
(7) |
|
Mr. Zarrillis option vested as to 30,000 underlying shares on March 27, 2007; 15,000
underlying shares on the first day of each of April 1, May 1, June 1 and July 1, 2007; and
75,000 underlying shares on July 11, 2007. |
79
Option Exercises and Stock Vested 2007
The following table shows stock options exercised by the named executive officers during 2007 and
restricted stock awards that vested during 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
Acquired |
|
Value Realized |
|
Acquired |
|
Value Realized |
|
|
on Exercise |
|
on Exercise |
|
on Vesting |
|
on Vesting |
Name |
|
(#) |
|
($)(1) |
|
(#) |
|
($)(2) |
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond J. Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Datin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John A. Loftus |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
4,358 |
|
|
|
14,276 |
|
|
|
25,411 |
|
Brian J. Sisko |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven J. Feder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Zarrilli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The value realized on exercise is determined by multiplying the number of shares acquired on
exercise by the difference between the average of the high and low trading prices of Safeguard
common stock, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange consolidated tape, on the exercise date
and the exercise price. |
|
(2) |
|
The value realized on vesting is determined by multiplying the number of shares vested by the
average of the high and low trading prices of Safeguards common stock, as reported on the New
York Stock Exchange consolidated tape, on each vesting date. |
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation 2007
In 2003, Safeguard adopted the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, which is a nonqualified,
unfunded plan that provides for a designated group of employees to obtain credits in the form of
Safeguard contributions that are allocated to accounts for the benefit of each participant.
Participants may not defer compensation under the plan.
Contributions by Safeguard are discretionary and may vary from year to year. For 2007, we credited
each eligible participants account with an amount equal to 4% of up to $225,000 of the
participants 2007 salary and bonus (which amount was fully vested) and 3.5% of up to $225,000 of
the participants 2007 base salary (which amount vests 20% for each year of service in which the
participant has attained 1,000 hours of service).
Lump sum distributions of the vested balance in a named executive officers account are made
following termination of employment as follows:
|
|
Amounts that were earned and vested at December 31, 2005, are distributed within 30
business days following termination; and |
|
|
The remaining amount is distributed six months following termination. |
A committee appointed by Safeguards Board selects the funds or indices that are used for purposes
of calculating the earnings that are credited to each participants account based on a notional
investment in the selected funds or indices. Since the plans inception, we have calculated
earnings based on the performance of the notional investment in the Principal Investors Fund, Inc.
Large-Cap S&P 500 Index Fund (PLFPX), which is one of the investment choices available to
participants in Safeguards 401(k) plan. The committee, in its discretion, may replace this fund
and add new funds.
The following table shows contributions and earnings for 2007 and account balances at December 31,
2007 for the named executive officers. There were no withdrawals or distributions by the named
executive officers during 2007.
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions in |
|
Aggregate Earnings |
|
Aggregate Withdrawals/ |
|
Aggregate Balance |
|
|
Last Fiscal Year |
|
in Last Fiscal Year |
|
Distributions |
|
at Last Fiscal Year End |
Name |
|
($)(1) |
|
($)(1) |
|
($) |
|
($)(2)(3) |
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
|
16,875 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,642 |
|
Raymond J. Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Datin |
|
|
16,875 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,642 |
|
John A. Loftus |
|
|
16,875 |
|
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,868 |
|
Brian J. Sisko |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven J. Feder |
|
|
16,529 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,301 |
|
Stephen Zarrilli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Contributions are included in the Summary Compensation Table under All Other Compensation.
Earnings in the last fiscal year are included in the Summary Compensation Table under Change
in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings. |
|
(2) |
|
The balance in each named executive officers account consists of contributions credited by
us and notional accrued gains or losses. In prior years, the amounts credited by us under
this plan for the benefit of executive officers were reported in our proxy statement as
compensation in the Summary Compensation Table. |
|
(3) |
|
At December 31, 2007, Mr. Loftus was fully vested, and Messrs. Boni, Datin and Feder had
vested account balances of $24,157, $24,157 and $27,116, respectively. Mr. Feders vested
account balance was distributed to him in 2008. |
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Messrs. Boni, Land, Datin, Loftus and Sisko each have agreements with us which provide certain
benefits upon termination of employment without cause or for good reason, either involuntarily
or in connection with a change in control. Under these agreements, the following definitions
apply:
|
|
|
|
|
Cause
|
|
à
|
|
Violation of any of our written policies; appropriation of a material
business opportunity of our company; misappropriation of company
assets; conviction of a felony or any other crime with respect to which
imprisonment is a possible punishment; or breach of any material term
of the executives employment agreement or any other agreement with, or
duty owed to, us or any of our partner companies. |
|
|
|
|
|
Good Reason
|
|
à
|
|
A material diminution, without the executives consent, in the nature
or status of the executives position, title, reporting relationship,
duties, responsibilities or authority; a reduction of the executives
base salary or target bonus opportunity; a material breach by us of the
executives agreement; the relocation of our principal office by more
than 30 miles; or an executives assignment, without his consent, to be
based anywhere other than our principal office. |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Control
|
|
à
|
|
A change in control generally occurs when: |
|
|
|
A person becomes the beneficial owner of securities having 50%
or more of the combined voting power of our securities; |
|
|
|
|
Less than a majority of our Board consists of continuing
directors (which means a director who either is a member of the Board
as of the effective date of the change in control or is nominated or
appointed to serve as a director by a majority of the then continuing
directors); |
|
|
|
|
We are subject to a merger or other business combination
transaction as a result of which holders of a majority of our equity
securities do not own a majority of the equity securities of the
surviving company; |
|
|
|
|
We sell all or substantially all of our assets or are
liquidated. |
81
Mr. Zarrilli was not covered under our health, welfare and other employee benefit plans and
received no compensation upon his termination of service other than amounts earned during his
term of service under the terms of his consulting agreement with us.
Payments Made upon Involuntary Termination of Employment without Cause or for Good Reason
Messrs. Boni, Land, Datin, Loftus and Sisko will receive the following benefits upon
involuntary termination of employment without cause or for good reason:
|
|
Messrs. Boni and Datin: |
|
o |
|
A lump sum payment equal to 12 months of the executives then current base salary and
the greater of the executives target bonus (not less than 100% of current base salary) for
the year of termination or the average of the executives actual bonuses for the last three
completed fiscal years; |
|
|
o |
|
All vested stock options will remain exercisable for 12 months; and |
|
|
o |
|
12 months continued coverage under our medical, health and life insurance plans. |
|
|
Messrs. Land, Loftus and Sisko: |
|
o |
|
A lump sum payment equal to the executives prorated bonus for the year of termination
and 1.5 times the executives then current base salary; |
|
|
o |
|
All time-vested stock options will fully vest and remain exercisable for 36 months and
vested market-based stock options will remain exercisable for 12 months; |
|
|
o |
|
12 months continued coverage under our medical, health and life insurance plans; and |
|
|
o |
|
Up to $20,000 for outplacement services or office space. |
Payments Made upon a Change in Control or Involuntary Termination of Employment without Cause
or for Good Reason in Connection with a Change in Control
Upon a change in control, the stock options held by Mr. Boni that have not otherwise vested
will become fully vested. Our named executive officers will not be entitled to any other
payments or benefits (except those that are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to our
employees generally upon termination of employment) unless the change in control is coupled
with a loss of employment or a substantial change in job duties as described below.
Upon involuntary termination of employment without cause or for good reason within six months
before or 12 months following a change in control (for Messrs. Boni and Datin) or within 18
months following a change in control (for Messrs. Land, Loftus and Sisko), Messrs. Boni, Land,
Datin, Loftus and Sisko will receive the following benefits:
|
|
Messrs. Boni and Datin: |
|
o |
|
A lump sum payment equal to a multiple of the executives then current base salary and
a multiple of the greater of the executives target bonus (not less than 100% of current
base salary) for the year of termination or the average of the executives actual bonuses
for the last three completed fiscal years (the multiple is three times for Mr. Boni and two
times for Mr. Datin); |
|
|
o |
|
All stock options that have not otherwise vested will fully vest and will remain
exercisable for three years for Mr. Boni and two years for Mr. Datin; and |
|
|
o |
|
Continued coverage under our medical, health and life insurance plans for three years
for Mr. Boni and two years for Mr. Datin. |
|
|
Messrs. Land, Loftus and Sisko: |
|
o |
|
A lump sum payment equal to the executives prorated bonus for the year of termination
and 1.5 times the executives then current base salary; |
|
|
o |
|
All time-vested stock options will fully vest and remain exercisable for 36 months, all
market-based stock options that have not otherwise vested will vest and remain exercisable
for 24 months and restricted stock awards held by Mr. Loftus will fully vest; |
|
|
o |
|
12 months continued coverage under our medical, health and life insurance plans; and |
|
|
o |
|
Up to $20,000 for outplacement services or office space. |
82
Other Payments Made upon Termination of Employment
Regardless of the manner in which a named executive officers employment terminates, he also
generally will receive payments and benefits that are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to
our employees upon termination of employment, including the following:
|
|
Amounts earned during his term of employment; |
|
|
Accrued unused vacation pay; |
|
|
Amounts contributed by us for the year of termination under our 401(k) plan or nonqualified
deferred compensation plan (if he has completed the required hours of service, if any, and is
an employee on the date as of which we make a contribution); |
|
|
Distribution of accrued and vested plan balances under our 401(k) plan and nonqualified
deferred compensation plan; |
|
|
Reimbursement of eligible dental expenses for services incurred prior to termination; |
|
|
Upon his death, disability or retirement on or after his 65th birthday, accelerated vesting
of stock options subject to time-based vesting and restricted stock awards that have not
otherwise vested and extension of the post-termination exercise period for all stock options
from 90 days to 12 months; and |
|
|
Upon his death or disability, payment of benefits under our other broad-based employee
benefit programs, including short-term and long-term disability plans, life insurance program,
accidental death and dismemberment plan and business travel insurance plan, as applicable. |
The following table shows the potential incremental payments and benefits which the named executive
officers would be entitled to receive upon termination of employment in each situation listed in
the table below under their respective agreements and our broad-based employee benefit programs.
The amounts shown do not include certain payments and benefits available generally to salaried
employees upon termination of employment, such as distributions from our 401(k) and deferred
compensation plans. The amounts shown in the table are based on an assumed termination as of
December 31, 2007 and represent estimates of the maximum incremental amounts and benefits that
would be paid to each executive upon his termination which we have calculated: (i) by multiplying
the 2007 annualized base salary for each named executive officer by the multiplier in each scenario
that is specified in each such executives agreement with us; (ii) for Messrs. Boni and Datin, by
multiplying their respective 2007 target incentive awards by the multiplier in each scenario that
is specified in their respective agreements with us; (iii) for Messrs. Land, Loftus and Sisko, by
assuming they would be entitled to their respective full-year 2007 annualized target incentive
award; and (iv) by using our 2008 premium costs for calculating the value of the health and welfare
benefits. With the exception of Mr. Feder, whose employment was terminated in August 2007, the
actual amounts to be paid would depend on the time and circumstances of an executives separation
from Safeguard. For Mr. Feder, the amounts included in the Summary Compensation Table under All
Other Compensation and the amounts shown in the table below reflect the actual severance benefits
that he received or will receive (with the exception of the medical and welfare benefits which are
estimated based on our current premium costs).
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary |
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
Proceeds or |
|
|
Health and |
|
|
Acceleration |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
and |
|
|
Vacation |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
Welfare |
|
|
of Equity |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
|
Bonus |
|
|
Pay |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Awards |
|
|
Benefits |
|
Current |
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($)(1) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Normal Retirement (65+) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,750 |
|
|
|
226,875 |
|
· Permanent disability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,125 |
|
|
|
1,029,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,750 |
|
|
|
1,256,675 |
|
· Death |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,125 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,750 |
|
|
|
1,726,875 |
|
· Involuntary termination
without cause or for good reason |
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
|
8,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,359,955 |
|
· Change in control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,341,597 |
|
|
|
1,341,597 |
|
· Change-in-control
termination, involuntarily or for
good reason |
|
|
3,900,000 |
|
|
|
8,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,491 |
|
|
|
1,341,597 |
|
|
|
5,405,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond J. Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Normal Retirement (65+) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
· Permanent disability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
476,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476,897 |
|
· Death |
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
1,075,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,075,230 |
|
· Involuntary termination
without cause or for good reason |
|
|
682,500 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
742,284 |
|
· Change-in-control
termination, involuntarily or for
good reason |
|
|
682,500 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
742,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Datin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Normal Retirement (65+) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
57,375 |
|
· Permanent disability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
4,727,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
4,784,825 |
|
· Death |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.875 |
|
|
|
1,140,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
1,197,375 |
|
· Involuntary termination
without cause or for good reason |
|
|
780,000 |
|
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814,216 |
|
· Change-in-control
termination, involuntarily or for
good reason |
|
|
1,560,000 |
|
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,683 |
|
|
|
309,151 |
|
|
|
1,932,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John A. Loftus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Normal Retirement (65+) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,392 |
|
|
|
51,392 |
|
· Permanent disability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,452,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,392 |
|
|
|
4,503,892 |
|
· Death |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,392 |
|
|
|
1,191,392 |
|
· Involuntary termination
without cause or for good reason |
|
|
975,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,443 |
|
|
|
51,392 |
|
|
|
1,074,835 |
|
· Change-in-control
termination, involuntarily or for
good reason |
|
|
975,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,443 |
|
|
|
313,389 |
|
|
|
1,336,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian J. Sisko |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Normal Retirement (65+) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
· Permanent disability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
3,698,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,702,317 |
|
· Death |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
1,090,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,094,250 |
|
· Involuntary termination
without cause or for good reason |
|
|
760,000 |
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
812,473 |
|
· Change-in-control
termination, involuntarily or for
good reason |
|
|
760,000 |
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
812,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve J. Feder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
Termination for good reason |
|
|
645,000 |
|
|
|
16,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,199 |
|
|
|
215,065 |
|
|
|
919,610 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
With the exception of Mr. Feder, for whom he have shown the actual expense relating to the
acceleration of his equity awards upon his termination of employment in August 2007, the
values in this column were calculated based on (i) the number of shares underlying stock
options for which vesting would have been accelerated as of December 31, 2007 in each
scenario, multiplied by the difference between our year-end closing stock price of $1.80 per
share, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange consolidated tape, and the exercise price of
stock options for which vesting would have been accelerated, plus (ii) the number of
restricted stock awards for which vesting would have been accelerated as of December 31, 2007
in each scenario, multiplied by our year-end closing stock price of $1.80 per share. |
84
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
During 2007, each of our non-employee directors was compensated for his or her service as a
director as shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Item |
|
Amount |
|
Annual Board Retainers: |
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
Other Directors |
|
|
35,000 |
|
Additional Annual Chairperson Retainers: |
|
|
|
|
Audit Committee |
|
|
15,000 |
|
Compensation Committee |
|
|
7,500 |
|
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee |
|
|
5,000 |
|
Meeting Attendance Fees: |
|
|
|
|
Board |
|
|
2,000 |
|
Committee |
|
|
1,500 |
|
We also reimburse our directors for expenses they incur to attend our Board and Committee meetings
and to attend a directors continuing education program during each calendar year.
Each director who is not an employee of Safeguard receives an initial option grant to purchase
50,000 shares of Safeguard common stock upon initial election to the Board. Since 2005, each
non-employee director also has received an annual service option grant to purchase 25,000 shares.
Historically, recurring grants to directors generally have been made in December of each year.
Beginning in 2007, the Compensation Committee determined that, as a matter of best practice, the
annual service option grants to directors would be awarded on the date of Safeguards annual
meeting of shareholders. Directors options have an eight-year term. Initial option grants vest
as to 25% of the underlying shares on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date.
Annual service option grants fully vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. The exercise
price is equal to the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the grant date. On May
24, 2007, each non-employee director received an annual service option grant to purchase 25,000
shares at an exercise price of $2.64 per share. Upon his appointment to the Board, on July 25,
2007, Dr. Rosenthal received an initial option grant to purchase 50,000 shares at an exercise price
of $2.44 per share. For the Board service year beginning with our 2008 annual meeting of
shareholders, in addition to our non-employee directors annual service option grant, each
non-employee director also will receive 12,500 deferred stock units annually. The deferred stock
unit grants will fully vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. The deferred stock units
are payable, on a one-for-one basis, in shares of Safeguard common stock following an individuals
termination of service on the Safeguard Board.
Safeguard maintains a Group Deferred Stock Unit Program for Directors (Directors DSU Program)
which allows each director, at his or her election, to receive deferred stock units in lieu of
retainer and meeting fees paid to directors (Directors Fees). The deferral election applies to
Directors Fees to be received for the calendar year following the year in which the election is
made and remains in effect for each subsequent year unless the director elects otherwise by the end
of the calendar year prior to the year in which the services are rendered. The number of deferred
stock units awarded is determined by dividing the Directors Fees by the fair market value of
Safeguards stock on the date on which the director would have otherwise received the Directors
Fees. Each director also receives a number of matching share units, based on the same fair market
value calculation, equal to 25% of the Directors Fees deferred. A director is always fully vested
in Directors Fees deferred; the matching share units vest fully on the first anniversary of the
date the matching share units are credited to the directors account. Each deferred stock unit
entitles the director to receive one share of Safeguard common stock on or about the first
anniversary of the date upon which the director leaves the Safeguard Board. A director also may
elect to receive the stock in annual installments over a period of up to five years after leaving
the Board.
85
The following table provides information on compensation earned during 2007 by each non-employee
director who served on our Board at any time during 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or |
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
Paid in Cash |
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
|
Compensation |
|
Total |
Name |
|
($)(1) |
|
($)(2)(3)(5) |
|
($)(3)(4)(5) |
|
($)(6) |
|
($)(7) |
|
Michael J. Cody |
|
|
64,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,054 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
137,304 |
|
Julie A. Dobson |
|
|
77,500 |
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
57,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,361 |
|
Robert E. Keith, Jr. |
|
|
73,000 |
|
|
|
16,999 |
|
|
|
37,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,652 |
|
Andrew E. Lietz |
|
|
66,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,853 |
|
George MacKenzie |
|
|
80,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,698 |
|
George D. McClelland |
|
|
74,500 |
|
|
|
5,730 |
|
|
|
70,632 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
152,112 |
|
Jack L. Messman |
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,653 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
103,903 |
|
John W. Poduska, Sr. |
|
|
65,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,653 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
104,403 |
|
John J. Roberts |
|
|
72,500 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
57,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,749 |
|
Robert J. Rosenthal (8) |
|
|
28,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,869 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ms. Dobson deferred payment of 25%, and Messrs. Keith and McClelland each deferred payment of
100%, of Directors Fees they earned for services provided during 2007. Ms. Dobson, Mr. Keith
and Mr. McClelland each received deferred stock units in lieu of Directors Fees that they
deferred and matching deferred stock units equal to 25% of the Directors Fees that they
deferred. Directors who defer fees and receive deferred stock units are essentially investing
in common stock equivalents that are initially valued based on the current market value of our
common stock on the date of issuance. As a result, the value of their deferred stock units
fluctuates with the market value of our common stock. |
|
(2) |
|
These amounts do not represent compensation actually received. Rather, these amounts
represent the aggregate expense we recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 for matching deferred stock units awarded during and
prior to 2007, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised), which we refer to as FAS 123(R). In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts shown
exclude the effect of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. The
fair value of the matching deferred stock units is determined by multiplying the number of
shares underlying the matching deferred stock units by the average of the high and low trading
prices of Safeguards common stock, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange consolidated
tape, on the grant date. The grant date fair values of the matching deferred stock units
issued to Ms. Dobson and Messrs. Keith and McClelland during 2007 were $3,522, $16,999 and
$12,687, respectively. A portion of the matching deferred stock units issued to Mr. Keith
during 2007 related to fees deferred by him that were earned during the fourth quarter of
2006. These were the only matching deferred stock units issued to directors during 2007. For
a discussion of valuation assumptions, see footnote 2 to the Summary Compensation Table under
the heading Executive Compensation. |
|
(3) |
|
The directors aggregate holdings of deferred stock units and stock options to purchase
shares of our common stock (both vested and unvested), as of December 31, 2007, were as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Name |
|
Stock Units |
|
Stock Options |
|
Michael J. Cody |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Julie A. Dobson |
|
|
6,554 |
|
|
|
122,500 |
|
Robert E. Keith, Jr. |
|
|
154,462 |
|
|
|
229,500 |
|
Andrew E. Lietz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
George MacKenzie |
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,500 |
|
George D. McClelland |
|
|
23,806 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Jack L. Messman |
|
|
20,654 |
|
|
|
154,500 |
|
John W. Poduska, Sr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,500 |
|
John J. Roberts |
|
|
26,779 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
Robert J. Rosenthal (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
These amounts do not represent compensation actually received. Rather, these amounts
represent the aggregate expense we recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 for stock options awarded during and prior to 2007, in
accordance with FAS 123(R). In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the
effect of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. |
86
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value
of the stock options is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. The grant date fair values of the stock options issued during 2007 were as follows: Dr.
Rosenthal $68,850; and each of Ms. Dobson and Messrs. Cody, Keith, Lietz, MacKenzie,
McClelland, Messman, Poduska and Roberts $37,653. For a discussion of valuation assumptions,
see footnote 2 to the Summary Compensation Table under the heading Executive Compensation. |
|
(5) |
|
Our equity compensation plans provide for the accelerated vesting of deferred stock units and
stock options granted to non-employee directors upon retirement from the Board on or after
their 65th birthday. Messrs. Keith, Lietz, Messman and Poduska are currently
eligible for accelerated vesting if they retire. In accordance with FAS 123(R), the amounts
shown for these four directors include the entire expense for all grants awarded to them
during 2007. |
|
(6) |
|
The amounts in this column represent reimbursement of expenses incurred by these directors
for attendance at a directors continuing education program. |
|
(7) |
|
Directors also are eligible for reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with
attendance at Board and Committee meetings. These amounts are not included in the table
above. |
|
(8) |
|
Dr. Rosenthal joined our Board in July 2007. |
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
Our equity compensation plans provide a broad-based program designed to attract and retain talent
while creating alignment with the long-term interests of our shareholders. Employees at all levels
participate in our equity compensation plans. In addition, members of our Board of Directors
(Board) and members of our Technology and Life Sciences Advisory Boards (Advisory Boards)
receive stock options for their service on our Board and Advisory Boards, respectively. Members of
our Board also are eligible to defer directors fees and receive deferred stock units with a value
equal to the directors fees deferred and matching deferred stock units equal to 25% of the
directors fees deferred.
Our Board is authorized to administer our equity compensation plans, adopt, amend and repeal the
administrative rules relating to the plans, and interpret the provisions of the plans. Our Board
has delegated to the Compensation Committee of the Board (the Compensation Committee) authority
to administer our equity compensation plans.
Our Compensation Committee has the authority to select the recipients of grants under our equity
compensation plans and determine the terms and conditions of the grants, including but not limited
to (i) the number of shares of common stock covered by such grants; (ii) the type of grant; (iii)
the dates upon which such grants vest (which for time-based vesting options is typically 25% on the
first anniversary of the grant date and in 36 equal monthly installments thereafter) and for
market-based vesting options is based upon the achievement of improvement in Safeguards market
capitalization above the base market capitalization established at the time of grant); (iv) the
exercise price of options (which is equal to the average of the high and low prices of a share of
our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange consolidated tape on the grant date) or
the consideration to be paid in connection with restricted stock, stock units or other stock-based
grants (which may be no consideration); and (iv) the term of the grant. Deferred stock units
issued to directors are payable, on a one-for-one basis, in shares of Safeguard common stock
following a directors termination of service on the Board.
The 2001 Plan provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, performance units, and other stock-based awards to employees, consultants or
advisors of Safeguard and its subsidiaries, provided that no grants can be made under this plan to
executive officers and directors of Safeguard. Under the NYSE rules that were in effect at the
time this plan was adopted in 2001, shareholder approval of the plan was not required. This plan
is administered by the Compensation Committee which, as described above, has the authority to issue
equity grants under the 2001 Plan and to establish the terms and conditions of such grants. Except
for the persons eligible to participate in the 2001 Plan and the inability to grant incentive stock
options under the 2001 Plan, the terms of the 2001 plan are substantially the same as the other
equity compensation plans approved by our shareholders (which have been described in previous
filings).
87
A total of 5,400,000 shares of our common stock are authorized for issuance under the 2001 Plan.
At December 31, 2007, 3,715,001 shares were subject to outstanding options, 18,936 shares were
available for future issuance, and 1,666,063 shares had been issued under the 2001 Plan. If any
option granted under the 2001 Plan expires or is terminated, surrendered, canceled or forfeited, or
if any shares of restricted stock, performance units or other stock-based grants are forfeited, the
unused shares of common stock covered by such grants will again be available for grant under the
2001 Plan.
Our Board is authorized to make appropriate adjustments in connection with the 2001 Plan to reflect
any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, liquidation, spin-off or other similar event.
The 2001 Plan also contains provisions addressing the consequences of any Reorganization Event or
Change in Control (as such terms are defined in the 2001 Plan). If a Reorganization or Change of
Control Event occurs, unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, all outstanding
options and stock appreciation rights (SARs) that are not exercised will be assumed by, or replaced
with comparable options or rights by, the surviving corporation (or a parent of the surviving
corporation), and other outstanding grants will be converted to similar grants of the surviving
corporation or a parent of the surviving corporation). Notwithstanding that provision, the
Compensation Committee has the authority to take one or both of the following actions: (i) require
that grantees surrender their outstanding options and SARs in exchange for a payment by Safeguard
in cash or company stock, as determined by the Compensation Committee, in an amount equal to the
amount by which the then fair market value of the shares of stock subject to the unexercised
options and SARs exceeds the exercise price of the options or the base amount of the SARs, as
applicable, or (ii) after giving grantees an opportunity to exercise their outstanding options and
SARs or otherwise realize the value of all of their other grants, terminate any or all unexercised
options, SARs and grants at such time as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.
During 2005, the Compensation Committee granted employee inducement awards to two newly-hired
executive officers. The awards were granted outside of Safeguards existing equity compensation
plans in accordance with NYSE rules and consisted of options to purchase up to an aggregate of
6,000,000 shares of Safeguard common stock. During 2007, the Compensation Committee granted
similar employee inducement awards to two other newly-hired executive officers. These awards
were likewise granted outside of Safeguards existing equity compensation plans in accordance with
NYSE rules and consisted of options to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,500,000 shares of Safeguard
common stock. All of these employee inducement awards have an eight-year term and a per share
exercise price equal to the average of the high and low prices of Safeguard common stock on the
respective executives employment commencement date. Of the shares underlying the employee
inducement awards, 2,125,000 shares are subject to time-based vesting, with an aggregate of
531,250 shares vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date and 1,593,750 shares vesting in
36 equal monthly installments thereafter. The remaining 6,375,000 shares underlying the employee
inducement awards vest incrementally based upon the achievement of certain specified levels of
increase in Safeguards market capitalization. With the exception of the market-based vesting
provisions, the terms and provisions of the employee inducement awards are substantially the same
as options previously awarded to other executives under Safeguards equity compensation plans.
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2007 about the securities authorized
for issuance under our equity compensation plans.
88
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available for |
|
|
Number of securities to |
|
Weighted-average |
|
future issuance under |
|
|
be issued upon exercise |
|
exercise price of |
|
equity compensation plans |
|
|
of outstanding options, |
|
outstanding options, |
|
(excluding securities |
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
warrants and rights(1) |
|
reflected in column (a)) |
Plan Category |
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders(2) |
|
|
10,350,097 |
|
|
$ |
2.2223 |
|
|
|
2,570,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders(3) |
|
|
12,215,001 |
|
|
$ |
1.8967 |
|
|
|
18,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
22,565,098 |
|
|
$ |
2.0366 |
|
|
|
2,589,026 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The weighted average exercise price calculation excludes 1,145,902 shares underlying
outstanding deferred stock units included in column (a) which are payable in stock, on a
one-for-one basis. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents awards granted, and shares available for issuance, under the 1999 Equity
Compensation Plan and the 2004 Equity Compensation Plan. Includes 960,098 shares underlying
deferred stock units awarded for no consideration and 185,804 shares underlying deferred stock
units awarded to directors in lieu of all or a portion of directors fees. Payments in
respect of deferred stock units are generally distributable following termination of
employment or service, death, permanent disability or retirement. The value of the deferred
stock units was approximately $3.2 million based on the fair value of the stock on the various
grant dates. The deferred stock units generally vest over a period of four years, with the
exception of deferred stock units issued to directors in lieu of compensation, which are fully
vested at grant, and matching deferred stock units awarded to directors, which vest on the
first anniversary of the grant date. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes awards granted and shares available for issuance under the 2001 Plan and 8,500,000
employee inducement awards. |
89
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
The following table shows the number of shares of Safeguard common stock beneficially owned (unless
otherwise indicated) as of April 25, 2008, by each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of
more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock, our directors, persons named in the Summary
Compensation Table in this Form 10-K/A, and our directors and executive officers as a group. For
purposes of reporting total beneficial ownership, shares that may be acquired within 60 days of
April 25, 2008 through the exercise of Safeguard stock options are included. On April 25, 2008,
there were 121,564,111 shares of common stock outstanding and 4,595,708 shares underlying stock
options held by executive officers and directors that were exercisable within 60 days of April 25,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Owned Assuming |
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
Other Stock-Based |
|
|
|
Beneficially |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Exercise of |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Holdings (2) |
|
Name |
|
Owned |
|
|
Within 60 Days |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Shares (1) |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
Unvested |
|
|
Dimensional
Fund Advisors LP
1299 Ocean Avenue |
|
|
7,842,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,842,467 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Monica, CA 90401 (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
1,569,578 |
|
|
|
1,759,578 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Cody |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Julie A. Dobson |
|
|
40,500 |
|
|
|
122,500 |
|
|
|
163,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
11,681 |
|
|
|
2,407 |
|
Robert E. Keith, Jr. |
|
|
153,366 |
|
|
|
229,500 |
|
|
|
382,866 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
175,597 |
|
|
|
9,311 |
|
Andrew E. Lietz |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George MacKenzie |
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
144,500 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George D. McClelland |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
72,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
52,026 |
|
|
|
11,299 |
|
Jack L. Messman |
|
|
38,000 |
|
|
|
154.500 |
|
|
|
192,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
30,654 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
John W. Poduska, Sr. |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
154,500 |
|
|
|
167,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John J. Roberts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
26,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Rosenthal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James A. Datin |
|
|
60,072 |
|
|
|
774,372 |
|
|
|
834,444 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John A. Loftus |
|
|
61,827 |
|
|
|
863,997 |
|
|
|
925,824 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond J. Land |
|
|
26,100 |
|
|
|
106,643 |
|
|
|
132,743 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian J. Sisko |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,618 |
|
|
|
40,618 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven J. Feder |
|
|
16,959 |
|
|
|
640,590 |
|
|
|
657,549 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen T. Zarrilli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive officers and
directors as a group (15
persons)(4) |
|
|
655,365 |
|
|
|
4,595,708 |
|
|
|
5,251,073 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
296,737 |
|
|
|
25,517 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Each director and named executive officer has the sole power to vote and to dispose of the
shares (other than shares held jointly with an individuals spouse) except 900 shares held by
Mr. Keiths spouse, as to which Mr. Keith disclaims beneficial ownership, and 3,125 shares
held by Mr. Feders spouse. An * indicates ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding
shares. |
|
(2) |
|
The shares in this column represent deferred stock units that have been credited to each
individual. The deferred stock units, which may not be voted or transferred, are payable, on
a one-for-one basis, in shares of Safeguard common stock following an individuals termination
of service on the Safeguard Board. See Corporate Governance and Board MattersBoard
Compensation. |
|
(3) |
|
As reflected in Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Dimensional
Fund Advisors LP (Dimensional) is a registered investment advisor which furnishes investment
advice to four investment companies and serves as investment manager to certain other
commingled group trusts and separate accounts (the Funds). In its role, Dimensional
possesses investment and/or voting power over the securities held by the Funds and may be
deemed to have beneficial ownership of such shares. Dimensional disclaims beneficial
ownership of such shares. |
|
(4) |
|
Excludes Messrs. Feder and Zarrilli, who resigned in August 2007 and June 2007, respectively. |
As of April 25, 2008, the executive officers and directors of Safeguard owned less than 1% of the
shares of common stock outstanding of Clarient, Inc., a publicly traded partner company of
Safeguard. The executive officers and directors of Safeguard did not own shares of any other
Safeguard subsidiary.
90
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons. The Board has adopted a written policy
which charges the Audit Committee with the responsibility of reviewing with management at each
regularly scheduled meeting and determining whether to approve any transaction (other than a
transaction that is available to all employees generally on a non-discriminatory basis) between us
and our directors, director nominees and executive officers or their immediate family members.
Between regularly scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee, management may preliminarily approve a
related party transaction, subject to ratification of the transaction by the Audit Committee. If
the Audit Committee does not ratify the transaction, management will make all reasonable efforts to
cancel the transaction.
Relationships And Related Transactions With Management And Others
As part of our business, we participate in the management of private equity funds. Robert E.
Keith, Jr., Chairman of our Board, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of TL Ventures, the
management company for TL Ventures III, TL Ventures IV, and TL Ventures V, and the Chairman of the
management companies for EnerTech Capital Partners and EnerTech Capital Partners II. In December
2005, Safeguard sold substantially all of its interests in TL Ventures and EnerTech Capital
Partners funds for approximately $24 million in cash with the buyers also assuming approximately $9
million of Safeguards remaining unfunded capital commitments to these funds. Safeguard retained
certain limited rights and obligations related primarily to its former role as a general partner of
some of the funds. Under certain circumstances, Safeguard may be required to return a portion or
all the distributions we received as a general partner of a fund for further distribution to such
funds limited partners (the clawback). Assuming for these purposes only that the funds were
liquidated or dissolved on December 31, 2007 and the only distributions from the funds were equal
to the carrying value of the funds on the December 31, 2007 financial statements, the maximum
clawback we would be required to return for our general partner
interest is $5.8 million.
Director Independence
In accordance with the guidelines set forth above in Item 10 under the caption Board
Independence, the Board has determined that Michael Cody, Julie Dobson, Andrew Lietz, George
MacKenzie, George McClelland, Jack Messman, John Poduska, John Roberts and Robert Rosenthal have no
direct or indirect material relationships with us other than their directorship and, therefore, are
independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards and satisfy the categorical standards
contained in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The Audit Committee, composed entirely of independent, non-employee members of the Board, approved
the reappointment of KPMG LLP (KPMG) as Safeguards independent registered public accounting firm
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.
Services provided to Safeguard and its subsidiaries by KPMG in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 are
described below under Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmAudit Fees. Representatives
of KPMG are expected to attend our annual meeting of shareholders. They will have an opportunity
to make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate
questions.
91
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmAudit Fees
The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by KPMG for the audit of
Safeguards consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 and fees billed for
audit-related services, tax services and all other services rendered by KPMG for fiscal 2007 and
fiscal 2006. This table includes fees billed to Safeguards consolidated subsidiaries for services
rendered by KPMG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees (1) |
|
$ |
2,148,774 |
|
|
$ |
1,999,974 |
|
Audit-Related Fees (2) |
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
99,786 |
|
Tax Fees (3) |
|
|
331,740 |
|
|
|
379,119 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,498,014 |
|
|
$ |
2,478,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit fees include the aggregate fees for professional services rendered in connection with
the audit of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K, the review of the condensed consolidated financial statements included in our Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q, consents and other services related to SEC and other regulatory
filings, and KPMGs assurance services provided in connection with the assessment and testing
of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit-related fees include the aggregate fees billed by KPMG principally for audits of
financial statements of certain employee benefit plans, statutory audits of non-U.S.
subsidiaries and officer expense review. |
|
(3) |
|
Tax fees include the aggregate fees billed by KPMG for tax consultation and tax compliance
services. |
The Audit Committee pre-approves each service to be performed by KPMG at its regularly scheduled
meetings. For any service that may require pre-approval between regularly scheduled meetings, the
Audit Committee has delegated to the Chairperson of the Audit Committee the authority to
pre-approve services not prohibited by law to be performed by Safeguards independent registered
public accounting firm and associated fees up to a maximum for non-audit services of $100,000, and
the Chairperson communicates such pre-approvals to the Audit Committee at its next regularly
scheduled meeting.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
To the extent that this Amendment No. 2 is incorporated by reference into any other filing by us
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the section of this
Amendment No. 2 entitled Compensation Committee Report, to the extent permitted by the rules of
the SEC, will not be deemed incorporated unless specifically provided otherwise in such filing.
92
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(b) Exhibits
The exhibits required to be filed as part of this Report are listed in the exhibit index
below.
Exhibits
The following is a list of exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K filed as part of
this Report. For exhibits that previously have been filed, the Registrant incorporates those
exhibits herein by reference. The exhibit table below includes the Form Type and Filing Date of
the previous filing and the location of the exhibit in the previous filing which is being
incorporated by reference herein. Documents which are incorporated by reference to filings by
parties other than the Registrant are identified in footnotes to this table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated Filing |
|
|
|
|
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Form Type & |
|
Exhibit |
Number |
|
Description |
|
Filing Date |
|
Number |
31.3
|
|
Certification of Peter J. Boni
pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.4
|
|
Certification of Raymond J. Land
pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
Certification of Peter J. Boni
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.4
|
|
Certification of Raymond J. Land
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
93
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
PETER J. BONI
|
|
|
|
PETER J. BONI |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Dated: April 29, 2008
94