Document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
| |
☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019
or
| |
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the period from to
Commission File No. 001-31390
CHRISTOPHER & BANKS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| |
Delaware | 06 - 1195422 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
| |
2400 Xenium Lane North, Plymouth, Minnesota | 55441 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (763) 551-5000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | |
Title of each class | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share | | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
☐ YES ☒ NO
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ YES ☒ NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ YES ☐ NO
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ YES ☐ NO
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| |
Large accelerated filer ¨ | Accelerated filer ¨ |
| |
Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company x |
| |
| Emerging growth company ¨ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ☐ YES ☒ NO
The aggregate market value of the Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of August 4, 2018, was approximately $31.1 million based on the closing price of such stock as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange ($0.9442) on such date.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, was 38,334,473 shares as of March 15, 2019 (excluding treasury shares of 10,026,098).
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held (the “Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference into Part III.
CHRISTOPHER & BANKS CORPORATION
2018 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Christopher & Banks Corporation is a national specialty retailer featuring exclusively-designed, privately-branded women’s apparel and accessories. We offer our customers an assortment of classic and versatile clothing for her everyday needs at a good value. Our merchandise is developed for women of all sizes, typically age 50 and older with an income level from moderate to above average.
We operate an integrated, omni-channel business platform that is designed to provide customers a seamless retail experience with the ability to shop when and where they want, including our retail stores, outlet stores, and website. This allows our customers to browse, purchase, return, or exchange our merchandise through the channel that is optimal for her.
Unless otherwise noted, the use of the terms “the Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Annual Report") refers to Christopher & Banks Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Christopher & Banks, Inc. and Christopher & Banks Company.
Our Brand
Christopher & Banks Corporation was incorporated in 1986 to acquire Braun’s Fashions, Inc., which had operated as a family-owned business since 1956. We became a publicly traded corporation in 1992 and, in July 2000, our stockholders approved a company name change from Braun’s Fashions Corporation to Christopher & Banks Corporation. Christopher & Banks caters to missy and petite sized customers. In 2000, we introduced our women’s plus sized collection under the name C.J. Banks.
We offer merchandise assortments that reflect a balance of novelty and basic core items, at affordable prices. We emphasize comfort and easy care in relevant fashions with a consistent fit. To differentiate ourselves from our competitors, our buyers, working in conjunction with our product development teams and suppliers, strive to create a merchandise assortment of coordinated outfits, the majority of which are manufactured exclusively for us under our proprietary Christopher & Banks® and C.J. Banks® names.
Our Store Formats
Our Christopher and Banks (“CB”) stores offer merchandise assortments in women’s apparel and accessories for missy sizes 4 to 16 and petite sizes 4P to 16P.
Our C.J. Banks (“CJ”) stores offer merchandise assortments in similar women’s apparel and accessories for women’s sizes 14W to 26W.
Our Missy, Petite, Women (“MPW”) and outlet stores, and our website offer merchandise assortments from both Christopher and Banks and C.J. Banks in all three size ranges resulting in greater opportunity to service our customers and improve our sales productivity.
Our Vision
Our vision is to be our customer’s trusted brand by delivering style and value every day.
Our Mission
Our mission is to provide her with the style and versatility that reflects who she is, the lasting quality and affordable value that she expects, and the personalized attention that she deserves.
Our Strategy
Our overall business strategy is to significantly improve our operating results and thereby begin the path towards sustainable, long-term revenue growth and consistent profitability through the following strategic initiatives:
| |
• | Enhance the customer shopping experience; |
| |
• | Improve marketing and promotional effectiveness; |
| |
• | Leverage omni-channel capabilities; |
| |
• | Build loyalty and grow our file; |
| |
• | Optimize our real estate portfolio; and |
| |
• | Right-size our cost structure. |
Enhance the Customer Shopping Experience
We are committed to enhancing our customer's shopping experience by providing a well curated product assortment that is presented in a way that is easier for her to shop. We are focused on improving the flow and depth of our inventory buys which are intended to help her build an outfit and drive units per transaction. Additionally, we have recently launched a new Style and Selling model to support our store associates in providing even better service and, more importantly, driving sales.
Improve Marketing and Promotional Effectiveness
Our goals include executing disciplined markdown management, leveraging improved analytics to inform what types and depth of promotions and targeted offers are used and to increase our return on our marketing investments.
Leverage Omni-Channel Capabilities
Our integrated, omni-channel strategy is designed to provide customers with a seamless retail experience, allowing her to shop whenever, however and wherever she chooses. In January of 2018, we launched “Buy online ship to store,” and in November of 2018, we launched “Buy online ship from store.” We currently are fulfilling eCommerce orders from 170 of our stores. We plan on launching “Buy online pick up in store” during the first quarter of fiscal 2019. These flexible fulfillment options not only serve a customer need, they allow us to better leverage our inventory across our chain.
Build Loyalty and Grow our Customer File
We have a very loyal customer base that is highly engaged. Our uniquely designed product, our value positioning and our customer service are key differentiators for us and contribute to the loyalty of our customers with approximately 90% of our active customers participating in our loyalty rewards program.
We continue to focus on maximizing the benefits of our customer relationship management (“CRM”) database, Friendship Rewards Loyalty Program (“Friendship Rewards”), and private-label credit card program to strengthen engagement with our customers. Our Friendship Rewards program, in conjunction with our CRM system, allows us to personalize communications and customize our offers. We continue to leverage our direct and digital marketing channels to encourage additional customer visits and increased spending per visit.
To grow our existing customer file, we intend to reallocate our marketing spend in an effort to drive acquisition of new customers, reactivate lapsed customers, and also capitalize on market disruptions. In addition, we intend to refresh our Friendship Rewards program and to continue to leverage that program. Finally, we plan to capitalize on our unique positioning in the market to drive engagement with customers on a grass roots level.
Optimize our Real Estate Portfolio
Between 2011 and 2015 we consolidated our store formats and reduced our store count by 33% in an effort to improve store productivity. Additionally, approximately 44% of our stores have a lease action arising within 12 months and 57% within 24 months. This should provide us with flexibility to close underperforming stores and the opportunity to renegotiate occupancy costs where applicable.
Right-size our Cost Structure
We intend to take a holistic approach in driving cost reductions. To help us in accomplishing this we have hired a third-party, non-merchandise procurement specialist to assist us in analyzing relationships and negotiating cost reductions. In addition, we intend to continue to aggressively negotiate rent reductions, optimize our marketing spend, review and reduce our corporate overhead and reduce our shipping and fulfillment expense.
Our Merchandise
Our merchandise assortments include mostly exclusive designs of women’s apparel, generally consisting of casual clothing, everyday basics, wear-to-work, leisure / active wear, and seasonal sleepwear in missy, petite and women sizes. The Company also offers a selection of jewelry and accessories to complement our customer’s wardrobe.
While each store offers a base merchandise assortment, store assortments vary to reflect individual store demands, sales levels, and local market preferences. We design our products and merchandise them in our stores and through our website in a coordinated manner intended to drive the number of units per transaction. On average, our customers purchase 2 to 3 items per transaction.
Our Operations
All of the Company operations are located in the United States ("U.S."). Merchandise selection, pricing and promotions, procurement and sourcing, marketing and advertising, and labor deployment across all channels are centrally managed at our corporate headquarters. In addition, functional support capabilities (e.g. human resources, finance, legal) are also performed at our corporate location. We also have field operations that support our retail teams. Our retail stores have procedures for transaction processing, customer experience, merchandise display, inventory management, asset protection, and staff training.
Our Stores
As of February 2, 2019, we operated 455 stores in 45 states. The following table illustrates the change in store count and store format for the past five fiscal years:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Store Count Rollforward | | 2018 |
| | 2017 |
| | 2016 |
| | 2015 |
| | 2014 |
|
Stores as beginning of year | | 463 |
| | 484 |
| | 518 |
| | 518 |
| | 560 |
|
Opened | | 10 |
| | 1 |
| | 9 |
| | 42 |
| | 23 |
|
Closed | | (14 | ) | | (16 | ) | | (27 | ) | | (19 | ) | | (21 | ) |
Conversions | | (4 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (16 | ) | | (23 | ) | | (44 | ) |
Stores at end of year | | 455 |
| | 463 |
| | 484 |
| | 518 |
| | 518 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stores by Format | | 2018 |
| | 2017 |
| | 2016 |
| | 2015 |
| | 2014 |
|
MPW | | 312 |
| | 314 |
| | 318 |
| | 314 |
| | 216 |
|
Outlet | | 80 |
| | 78 |
| | 82 |
| | 77 |
| | 44 |
|
Christopher and Banks | | 33 |
| | 37 |
| | 43 |
| | 67 |
| | 173 |
|
C.J. Banks | | 30 |
| | 34 |
| | 41 |
| | 60 |
| | 85 |
|
Total Stores | | 455 |
| | 463 |
| | 484 |
| | 518 |
| | 518 |
|
We continue to evaluate converting the remaining CB stores and CJ stores to MPW stores. MPW stores provide a unified store format that simplifies merchandising and allocation processes, promotes cross shopping among sizes, enhances the customer experience, and enables more economies of scale across functions.
Our Website
Our website at www.christopherandbanks.com provides customers the ability to browse our offerings, locate our stores, and order merchandise online. Our website is designed to be an extension of our brand and is key to our developing omni-channel strategy. The online merchandise assortment consists of a combination of exclusive styles as well as special sizes and lengths. We offer online customers the option to return items in our stores.
Competition
The women’s retail apparel business is highly competitive and includes regional, national and international department stores, specialty stores, boutique stores, catalog companies, off-price and online retailers. Many of these competitors have greater name recognition and some of these competitors may have greater financial, marketing and other resources compared to us. We compete in the specialty retail space by offering unique, classic and versatile clothing that fits her everyday needs at a good value. We believe our visual merchandise presentation, attentive customer service and physical store locations complement our compelling value proposition.
Global Sourcing and Products
We utilize a broad base of manufacturers located primarily in China, Indonesia and Vietnam with some domestic manufacturing. We believe we produce goods at the level of quality that our customers desire, at a competitive cost. For the most recently completed fiscal year, our ten largest suppliers accounted for approximately 67% of the merchandise we purchased, and our two largest suppliers accounted for 16% and 10% of our goods, respectively.
We purchase our merchandise using individual purchase orders and, therefore, are not subject to long-term production contracts with any of our vendors, manufacturers, or buying agents. We intend to continue our efforts to optimize our purchasing power with consideration for the potential risk of limiting our manufacturing flexibility.
We may take ownership of product either in the foreign country where the factory is located, at a designated point of entry into the United States, or at our distribution center depending on the specific terms of the sale. Most of our sourcing activities are performed by a single-shared sourcing and procurement function. We believe that this function, working in concert with our key supply chain partners, will deliver high quality apparel and accessories at a lower cost while providing the opportunity to minimize freight costs through consolidation. We believe that the decision to centralize our sourcing and procurement operations has helped us mitigate the impact of higher sourcing costs.
Typical lead times for delivery of our merchandise are 90 to 150 days from the date of order placement, however we have some ability to expedite the sourcing of merchandise in those cases where we see an opportunity to garner incremental sales on those items that have resonated with our customer. In addition, we will make purchases domestically when demand warrants.
Although we expect the cost of cotton and synthetics to remain relatively stable in fiscal 2019, our average unit cost may change based on other factors, including overall mix of fashion versus core merchandise, fluctuations in transportation costs and potential changes in tariffs. To the extent that we cannot offset increases in the cost of goods with other cost reductions or efficiencies, we may be forced to sell the product at higher prices, which is subject to customer receptivity.
Merchandise Distribution
We distribute most of our products that are sold in our stores and online from our distribution center located in Plymouth, Minnesota. New merchandise is generally received each weekday at our corporate distribution center. After arrival, merchandise is sorted and packaged for shipment to individual stores or to our third party eCommerce fulfillment center or is held for future store or eCommerce replenishment. Merchandise is generally pre-ticketed with price and related informational tags at the point of manufacture.
Merchandise is typically shipped to our stores via third-party delivery services multiple times per week, providing our stores with a steady flow of new inventory.
Merchandise sold through our eCommerce channel is fulfilled directly to the customer through either our third-party service provider or from one of our stores. In fiscal year 2019, we intend to launch the ability for a customer to buy online and to pick up merchandise in the store.
Information Technology
Our information technology strategy is intended to provide a platform for an integrated, omni-channel retail experience. Our information systems are designed to enable us to obtain, analyze, and take action on information in a timely fashion. We are committed to leveraging technology to maintain effective financial and operational controls.
We continue to make investments in capabilities that will allow us to better manage the flow of product. Existing and anticipated system enhancements are intended to allow our teams to analyze store-level data to tailor the merchandise assortment to the demographics of the surrounding community. We expect these insights will lead to improved merchandise assortments thereby generating higher unit velocity and improved average unit retail, which should translate into higher merchandise margins.
We are committed to evolving change management and portfolio management processes and standards to improve the security of our data and our customers’ information as well as to maintain effective financial and operational controls. We have established an information security infrastructure and methodology which can adapt to the evolving needs of the business in an effort to ensure the appropriate safeguarding of assets and secure, reliable customer transactions.
In fiscal 2018 and 2017, we leveraged omni-channel capability investments to further enable us to address multiple customer touch points to drive spend and build brand affinity.
Employees
As of February 2, 2019, we employed approximately 3,700 associates, approximately 32% of whom were full-time employees and the balance of whom were part-time employees. The number of part-time employees fluctuates during peak selling periods. Approximately 190 of our associates are employed at our corporate office and distribution center facility, with the majority of the associate population employed in our store field organization. We have no collective bargaining agreements covering any of our employees, have never experienced a work stoppage and are unaware of any efforts or plans to organize our employees. We consider relations with our employees to be good.
Trademarks and Service Marks
We are the owner of certain registered and common law trademarks and service marks (collectively referred to as “Marks”).
Our wholly owned subsidiary, Christopher & Banks Company, is the owner of the federally registered Marks “christopher & banks®,” which is our predominant private brand, and “cj banks®,” our private brand for women sizes 14W to 26W.
Our rights in the Marks are important to our business and are recognized in the women’s retail apparel industry. Accordingly, we intend to maintain our Marks and the related registrations and applications. United States trademark registrations are for a term of ten years and are renewable every ten years as long as the trademarks are used in the regular course of trade. We are not aware of any claims of infringement or other challenges to our rights to use any registered Marks in the United States.
Seasonality
Our quarterly results may fluctuate significantly depending on a number of factors, including general economic conditions, consumer confidence, customer response to our seasonal merchandise mix, timing of new store openings, adverse weather conditions, and shifts in the timing of certain holidays and promotional events.
Working Capital
We fund our business operations through a combination of cash and cash equivalents and cash flows generated from operations. In addition, our revolving credit facilities are available for additional working capital needs, for general corporate purposes and investment opportunities.
Effective inventory management is critical to our success. We employ various methods to manage inventory levels including demand forecasting, optimal allocations, and various forms of inventory replenishment. We seek to minimize markdowns through effective inventory management.
Available Information
Our investor relations website is located at www.christopherandbanks.com. Through this website, we make available free of charge, our Annual Reports, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such material with, or furnish it to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Conduct, and our Board of Directors' committee charters are also available free of charge at our investor relations website.
Table of Contents
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business is subject to a variety of risks. Thus, an investment in our stock is also subject to risk. The following risk factors should be read carefully in connection with evaluating our business and the forward-looking statements that are contained in this Annual Report, as well as certain of our other filings made or to be made with the SEC. Any of the following risks and uncertainties could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, cash flows, the trading price of our stock and/or the outcome of matters with respect to which forward-looking statements are made in this Annual Report.
The risk factors have been separated into four groups: (1) Macroeconomic and Industry Risks; (2) Operational Risks; (3) Capital Risks; and (4) Legal and Regulatory Risks. Based upon information currently known to us, the Company believes that the following information identifies the most significant risk factors affecting our Company and our securities. The risk factors described below should not be construed as an exhaustive list of all the risks we face nor are they listed in order of the likelihood that the risk may occur or the severity of the impact if the risk should occur. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report.
We operate in a continually changing business environment and new risk factors emerge from time to time. There can be no assurance that we have identified, assessed and appropriately addressed all risks affecting our business operations. Additional risks and uncertainties could adversely affect our business, operational results, financial position, liquidity and cash flows.
| |
1. | MACROECONOMIC AND INDUSTRY RISKS |
General economic conditions in the U.S. may adversely affect our business.
All of our stores are located within the U.S., making us highly susceptible to macroeconomic conditions and consumer confidence in the United States. Apparel retailing is a volatile industry that is highly dependent upon the overall level of consumer spending and consumer confidence. Because apparel typically is a discretionary purchase, declines in consumer spending may have a more negative effect on apparel retailers than on other retailers.
In addition, there is a risk that consumer sentiment may decline as a result of market disruptions caused by severe or unseasonable weather conditions, natural disasters, public health concerns, terrorist activities, political crises or other major events or the prospect of these events. Such macroeconomic and other factors could have a negative effect on consumer spending in the U.S., which in turn could have a material effect on our business, operational results, financial position and cash flows.
The ability to attract customers to our stores depends heavily on customer traffic at malls and centers in which our stores are located.
The majority of our stores are located in shopping malls and other retail centers. Sales at these stores are derived in considerable part from the volume of traffic generated in those malls or retail centers and surrounding areas. The continued decrease in traffic at malls and shopping centers where our stores are located and/or, the closing of anchor stores important to driving mall traffic could result in lower sales and leave us with excess inventory. In such circumstances, we may have to respond by increasing markdowns or initiating marketing promotions to reduce excess inventory, which could adversely impact our financial results, business and cash flows.
We are subject to risks associated with leasing all of our store locations.
We currently lease all of our store locations. Our leases range from month-to-month to approximately ten years in length. A number of our leases have early termination provisions that apply if we do not achieve specified sales levels, such that we or the landlord may terminate the lease or alternatively we may seek to re-negotiate rent if we do not achieve such sales levels. The leases for approximately 44% of our store base expire between February 3, 2019 and January 29, 2020, including those leases which are month-to-month. We believe that, over the last few years, we have generally been able to negotiate favorable rental rates. Going forward we may need to close additional stores if we fail to achieve certain sales levels or we may not be able to renew our leases on as favorable terms or terms which we deem acceptable. In addition, some landlords may choose to rent to another entity that is prepared to pay higher rents. As a result, we may need to pay higher occupancy costs or close stores, which could adversely impact our financial performance, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows. In addition, economic conditions could negatively impact the Company's retail landlords, particularly class C & D quality malls where the majority of our brick-and-mortar stores are located. That, in turn, could affect their ability to maintain their shopping centers, including a high level of sustained occupancy, and otherwise perform their obligations, which could negatively impact customer traffic, our sales, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows.
We have, and will continue to have, significant lease obligations. If an existing or future store is not profitable, and we decide to close it, we may nonetheless be committed to fulfill our obligations under the applicable lease including paying the base rent for the balance of the lease term. Additionally, continued consolidation in the commercial retail real estate market could affect our ability to successfully negotiate favorable rental terms for our stores in the future and could concentrate our leases with fewer landlords who may then be in a position to dictate unfavorable terms to us due to their significant negotiating leverage. If we are unable to enter into new leases or renew existing leases on terms acceptable to us or be released from our obligations under leases for stores that could have a material effect on our business, operational results, financial condition and cash flows.
Fundamental shifts in the retail industry and the competitive environment could impact our revenues, operational results and market share.
The women's specialty retail apparel business is highly competitive. We believe we compete primarily with department stores, specialty stores, discount stores, mass merchandisers, and on line businesses that sell women's apparel. Many of our competitors are significantly larger with greater resources available to them, may offer a broader selection of merchandise than we do, and have greater brand recognition and comparatively lower costs of operations. They also may be able to adapt to changes in customer preferences more quickly, as well as respond faster to economic, operational, regulatory or organizational changes. In addition to competing for sales, we compete for favorable store locations, lease terms and qualified associates. Increased competition in any of these areas could result in higher costs, which could reduce our revenue and gross margins.
In addition, the growth and prominence of fast-fashion and value-fashion retailers and expansion of off-price retailers have fundamentally shifted customers’ expectations of affordable pricing of apparel. The rise of these retailers as well as the shift in shopping preferences away from brick-and-mortar stores to the direct channel, where online-only businesses or those with robust direct channel capabilities can facilitate competitive entry and comparison shopping in our brands, have increased the difficulty of maintaining or gaining market share. The Company’s execution of its own omni-channel strategy to adapt to these changes, in relation to its competitors’ actions as well as to our customers’ adoption of new technology, presents a specific risk. Further, unanticipated changes in pricing and other practices of the Company’s competitors, including promotional activity, such as free shipping and pricing pressures, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operational results, financial position and cash flows.
Changes in U.S. trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs on apparel or accessories and a potential resulting trade war, could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Most of our merchandise is produced in foreign countries, primarily in China, making the price and availability of our merchandise susceptible to international trade risks and other international conditions. The imposition of tariffs, duties, border adjustment taxes or other trade restrictions by the United States could also result in the adoption of new or increased tariffs or other trade restrictions by other countries. Recently, the current U.S. administration and China have imposed significant tariffs on goods imported from the other's country, and have threatened the imposition of additional tariffs in retaliation, which could apply to apparel and accessories. If the current administration follows through with such tariffs, or if additional tariffs or trade restrictions are implemented by the United States or other countries, the resulting trade barriers could have a significant adverse impact on our business as we may not be able to successfully shift production to factories located outside of China.
We are not able to predict future trade policy of the United States or of any foreign countries in which we purchase goods, or the terms of any renegotiated trade agreements, or their impact on our business. The adoption and expansion of trade restrictions and tariffs, quotas and embargoes, the occurrence of a trade war, or other governmental action related to tariffs or trade agreements or policies, has the potential to adversely impact demand for our products, our costs, our customers, our suppliers and the world economy, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, operational results, financial position, liquidity and cash flows.
Instability in the shipping industry or a shortage of qualified truck drivers could increase our costs, result in delays in the receipt or loss of merchandise and adversely impact our results of operations.
While we do not rely on a single ocean carrier company to transport our goods, disruption or instability among transportation carriers could result in reduced capacity, increased rates, delay in the receipt of or the loss of goods. This, in turn, could increase our costs, result in lost sales or sales at lower margins negatively impacting our operations, financial results, cash flows and liquidity. In addition, a shortage of qualified truck drivers has impacted the trucking industry, causing delays and increases in prices. While the Company transports most of its imports by rail, the driver shortage could make it more difficult to hire trucks to transport rail shipments to us. If that were to occur, it would likely increase our costs, and possibly delay receipt of merchandise which in turn could lead to lost sales and sales at lower margins negatively impacting our operations, financial results, cash flows and liquidity.
Extreme and/or unseasonable weather conditions in the United States could have a disproportionate effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows.
Extreme weather conditions in the areas in which our stores are located could negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operation and cash flows. For example, inclement weather or extreme conditions can make it difficult for our customers to travel to our stores, result in temporary store closures and/or reduced hours of operation and may cause a disruption in the shipment or receipt of merchandise. Our business is also susceptible to unseasonable weather conditions. For example, extended periods of unseasonably warm temperatures during the winter season or cool weather during the summer season could render a portion of our merchandise offerings incompatible with those unseasonable conditions in the affected areas. Such unseasonable weather conditions could have an adverse effect on our sales, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Acts of terrorism, natural disasters, acts of war, other catastrophes or political unrest could have a material adverse effect on our business.
The threat, or actual acts, of terrorism continue to be a significant risk to the global economy. Terrorism and potential military responses, political unrest, natural disasters, pandemics and other health issues have disrupted or could in the future disrupt commerce, impact our ability to operate our stores, offices or distribution centers in the affected areas or impact our ability to provide critical functions or services necessary to the operation of our business. A disruption of commerce, or an inability to recover critical functions or services from such a disruption, could interfere with the production, shipment or receipt of our merchandise in a timely manner or increase our costs to do so, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, operational results, financial position and cash flows. In addition, any of the above disruptions could undermine consumer confidence, which could negatively impact consumer spending or customer traffic, and thus have an adverse effect on our operational results.
Our ability to mitigate the adverse impact of any of the above disruptions also depends, in part, upon the effectiveness of our planning and response. However, we cannot be certain that our plans will be adequate or implemented properly in the event of an actual disaster or other catastrophic situation.
Costs of raw materials, commodities, transportation or labor may rise resulting in an increase in component and delivery costs, and overall product costs, all of which could erode margins and impact our profitability.
The raw materials and labor used to manufacture our products, and our transportation and contract manufacturing labor costs are subject to availability constraints and price volatility. The results of our business operations could suffer due to significant increases or volatility in the prices of certain commodities, including but not limited to cotton, synthetics and other items used in the production of our apparel, as well as increases in fuel, oil, natural gas or labor costs as well as shortages of skilled labor. Price increases of these items or other inflationary pressures may result in significant cost increases for our raw materials, product components and finished products, as well as increases in the cost of distributing merchandise to our retail locations. To the extent that we cannot offset increases in the cost of goods with other cost reductions or efficiencies or the sale of products at higher prices and with the desired level of gross margin, it could have a negative effect on our gross profits. Additionally, substantially increased uncertainty with respect to trade relations, such as the imposition of unilateral tariffs on imported products, could result in trade wars, higher barriers and tariffs, and higher product costs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operational results, financial position, cash flows and liquidity.
2. OPERATIONAL RISKS
Improving our store productivity will be largely dependent upon the performance of our missy, petite and women’s format (“MPW stores”) including our outlet stores.
Improving the performance of our existing stores and optimizing our store productivity is critical to improving our sales and returning to profitability. Over the past several years, the Company has opened a number of outlet stores and converted existing C&B and C.J. Banks’ stores into MPW stores such that approximately 86% of our stores (including outlets) at fiscal year-end were in the MPW format. If we are unable to improve the overall performance and store productivity of the MPW stores, our revenues, margins, liquidity, cash flows and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our business underwent a number of leadership changes in fiscal 2018 resulting in changes to our strategies and tactical initiatives. If we do not successfully implement and adapt to these changes, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Keri L. Jones joined the Company as Chief Executive Officer in mid-March 2018. In July of 2018 we hired a new Chief Financial Officer and a new Chief Merchandising Officer, and in December 2018 a new Chief Stores Officer. In connection with these changes in management, there have been (and likely will be additional) changes to the Company’s operations and also to some of our key strategies and tactical initiatives. If we do not successfully implement and adapt to these changes they may not lead to the desired improvement in our business and results of operation. This in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
If we are unable to increase sales and achieve and sustain an acceptable level of gross margin, it could have a material adverse impact on our business, profitability and liquidity.
For the recently completed fiscal year, total sales, comparable stores sales and gross margin rate were below our expectations. Our ability to reverse this trend is subject to a variety of challenges. If we cannot increase our comparable store sales and improve our gross margin rate; it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and financial condition.
Our fiscal 2019 plan to improve the Company’s financial performance is dependent upon our ability to successfully implement our strategic and tactical initiatives.
The Company’s fiscal 2019 operational plan contemplates growth in comparable store sales; improved selling, general and administrative expense leverage; and gross margin rate improvement intended to result in improved financial results as compared to fiscal 2018. We plan to achieve this through a variety of initiatives, including enhancing and simplifying her shopping experience, executing a disciplined promotional strategy, continuing to expand our omni-channel capabilities, building our customer base and reducing our cost structure. Our ability to achieve this plan depends upon a variety of factors, including a number of factors that are beyond our control. If we are unable to successfully implement and execute the strategic and tactical initiatives underlying our fiscal 2019 plan, our results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and liquidity could be adversely affected.
Our sales and results of operations could be adversely affected if we fail to attract, retain or recruit key personnel as well as attract, develop and retain qualified employees.
Our performance is highly dependent on attracting and retaining qualified employees, including our new executives, and other key personnel. A significant amount of turnover of management employees with specific knowledge relating to our operations and industry could result in a loss of organizational focus and an inability to identify or properly execute key strategies and tactical initiatives. Also, if we are unable to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified sales associates at acceptable wage levels that may impair our efficiency and effectiveness in serving our customers and in generating sales. That, in turn, could adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and liquidity.
We may be unable to maintain our brand image, engage new and existing customers or gain market share.
Our ability to maintain our brand image and reputation is integral to our business as well as the implementation of strategies to expand it. Maintaining, promoting and growing our brand will depend largely on the success of our merchandising and marketing efforts and our ability to provide a consistent, high-quality customer experience that retains existing customers and attracts a sufficient level of new customers to shop our brand, both in-store and online. In addition, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected if we fail to achieve these objectives for any of our brands. Our ability to address the challenges of declining store traffic at our brick-and-mortar stores, in a highly promotional, low growth environment may impact our ability to maintain or gain market share and also impact our sales, business, operational results, financial position and cash flows.
Further, the use of social media by the Company and consumers has also increased the risk that the Company’s image and reputation could be negatively impacted. The availability of information, reviews and opinions on social media is immediate, as is its impact. The opportunity for dissemination of information, including inaccurate and inflammatory information and opinion, is nearly infinite. Even if we react quickly and appropriately to negative social media about us or our brands, our reputation and customers’ perception of our brands could be negatively impacted. Damage to the brand image and reputation of the Company in any aspect of its operations could have a material adverse effect on our business, operational results, financial position and cash flows.
Our business depends on effective marketing, advertising and promotional programs.
Customer traffic and demand for our merchandise is influenced by our advertising, marketing, promotional and social media activities, the name recognition and reputation of our brands, and the location and service offered in our stores. Although we use marketing, advertising and promotional programs to attract customers through various media, including social media, our competitors may spend more or use different approaches, which could provide them with a competitive advantage. If our marketing, advertising and promotional expenses increase, if our programs become less effective than that of our competitors, or if we do not adequately leverage technology and data analytic capabilities needed to generate concise and effective competitive insight, our business, operational results, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted.
Customer tastes and fashion apparel trends tend to change rapidly. Our ability to anticipate or react to changing consumer preferences in a timely and accurate manner and offer a compelling product at an attractive price impacts our sales, gross margins, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
Our success depends on our ability to consistently gauge and respond on a timely basis to fashion trends and customer preferences. Forecasting consumer demand for our merchandise and allocating the right amount and sizes of such merchandise to individual stores and to our eCommerce business can be challenging. In addition, our merchandise assortment differs from season to season. This may involve changes in our overall mix of fashion versus core merchandise which in turn may impact our overall product cost as the average unit cost of fashion product is generally higher than that of core product. Because the lead times required for many of our design and purchase decisions must be made well in advance of the applicable selling season, we are vulnerable to changes in consumer trends, preferences, price shifting, and the optimal selection and timing of merchandise purchases.
If we are unable to successfully identify or react to changing styles or trends or misjudge the market for our products or any new product lines, our sales and gross margins may be lower and the Company may be faced with a significant amount of unsold finished goods inventory. In response, the Company may be forced to increase its marketing promotions or price markdowns, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
On the other hand, if we underestimate demand for our merchandise, we may experience inventory shortages, resulting in missed sales opportunities and lost revenues.
There are risks associated with our eCommerce business.
We sell merchandise over the Internet through our web site, www.christopherandbanks.com, which represents a growing percentage of our overall net sales. The successful operation of our eCommerce business depends on our ability to maintain the continuous operation of our eCommerce website and our fulfillment operations, and to provide a shopping experience that will generate both orders and return visits to our site. Our eCommerce operations are subject to numerous risks, including:
| |
• | disruption to the Internet; |
| |
• | unanticipated operating problems; |
| |
• | rapid technological change; |
| |
• | the successful implementation of, and costs to implement, new systems and upgrades including those related to the operation of our website platform; |
| |
• | inability to maintain efficient and uninterrupted order-taking and fulfillment processes; |
| |
• | reliance on third parties with respect to the operation of the website, order fulfillment and customer service and such third parties' infrastructure; |
| |
• | diversion of sales from our stores; |
| |
• | liability for online content; |
| |
• | lack of compliance with, or violations of, applicable state or federal laws and regulations; |
| |
• | increased or unfavorable governmental regulation of eCommerce (which may include regulation of privacy, data protection, eCommerce payment services, content, accessibility and other related subjects); |
| |
• | the ability to process credit card transactions; |
| |
• | system failures or disruptions and security breaches and the costs to address and remedy such failures, disruptions or breaches; |
| |
• | computer viruses or malware; |
| |
• | lack of sufficient levels of inventory of product or sizes to meet online demand; and |
| |
• | untimely delivery of our merchandise to our customers by third parties. |
If we fail to successfully address and respond to these risks, it could negatively impact our brand and reputation and have a material adverse effect on our eCommerce sales, operating results, financial position, liquidity and cash flows. There also can be no assurance that our eCommerce operations will meet our sales and profitability plans, and the failure to do so also could negatively impact our revenues, earnings, cash flows and liquidity.
If we are unable to successfully implement and optimize our omni-channel retail strategy, our financial results would be adversely affected.
We are committed to growing our business through our omni-channel retail strategy. Our omni-channel initiatives include exploring additional ways to develop an omni-channel shopping experience, including further direct channel integration, use of advance analytics, customer personalization, and the assessment and implementation of emerging technologies. These initiatives involve significant investments in information technology systems, operational changes, and employee resources. Our goal is to offer our customers seamless access to our brands and merchandise whenever and wherever she chooses to shop. In that regard, the Company in fiscal 2018 implemented “buy on-line, ship to store”, and “buy anywhere, ship from store” and intends to launch “buy on-line pick up in store” this fiscal year.
Our success in the omni-channel arena also depends on our ability to anticipate and implement innovations in sales and marketing strategies to appeal to existing and potential customers who increasingly rely on multiple channels to meet their shopping needs and on our third-party service provider's ability to adapt to and implement system improvements in response. In addition, our competitors are also investing in omni-channel programs, some of which may be more successful than our own. Failing to successfully implement and optimize our omni-channel retail strategy or if we do not realize our expected return on our investment in these initiatives could have a material adverse effect on our business, operational results, financial position and cash flows.
Our reliance on foreign sources of production poses various risks.
Because a significant portion of our merchandise is produced overseas, primarily in China, Indonesia and Vietnam, we are subject to the additional risks of doing business in foreign markets and importing merchandise from abroad, such as:
| |
• | the ability to find qualified vendors and access products in a timely and efficient manner; |
| |
• | delays in the delivery of cargo; |
| |
• | new and additional U.S. government initiatives may be proposed or implemented that may have an impact on the trading status of certain countries and may include retaliatory duties, tariffs or other trade sanctions that, if enacted, could increase the cost of products purchased from suppliers in such countries or restrict the importation of products from such countries; |
| |
• | violation of applicable laws or regulations including but not limited to violations under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act or similar laws or regulations by us, our subsidiaries or our local agents; |
| |
• | the adoption of new legislation or regulations in the U.S or foreign countries that make it more difficult, more costly or impossible to continue our foreign activities; |
| |
• | financial or political instability in any of the countries in which our merchandise is manufactured; |
| |
• | significant fluctuations in the value of the dollar against foreign currencies or restrictions on the transfer of funds; |
| |
• | supply chain security initiatives undertaken by the United States or foreign governments that delay or impede the delivery of imports and the normal flow of product; |
| |
• | delayed receipt or non-delivery of goods due to the failure of suppliers to comply with applicable import regulations; |
| |
• | delayed receipt or non-delivery of goods due to labor strikes or unexpected or significant port congestion at United States or foreign ports; |
| |
• | potential recalls or cancellations of orders for any merchandise that does not meet our quality standards; |
| |
• | inability to meet our production needs due to labor shortages; and |
| |
• | natural disasters, extreme weather, political or military conflicts, terrorism, disease epidemics and public health related concerns, which could result in closed factories, reduced workforces, scarcity of raw materials and embargoing or increased scrutiny (and the resulting delays) of goods produced in affected areas. |
Any of the foregoing factors, or a combination of them, could increase our costs or result in our inability to obtain sufficient quantities of merchandise, thereby negatively impacting our sales, gross profit, operating income, financial condition and liquidity.
It is also possible that restrictions on or the inability of our suppliers to access credit may cause them or their factors to extend less favorable terms to us, which could adversely affect our cash flows, gross margins, financial condition and liquidity. Additionally, delays by our vendors in supplying our inventory needs could cause us to incur more expensive transportation charges, which may adversely affect our margins.
A significant portion of our merchandise is ordered through a small number of suppliers and our business could suffer if we needed to replace them.
We do not own or operate any manufacturing facilities. Instead we depend on independent third parties to manufacture our merchandise. For the most recently completed fiscal year, our ten largest suppliers accounted for approximately 67% of the merchandise we purchased, and we purchased 16% and 10% of our goods, respectively, from our two largest suppliers.
We generally maintain non-exclusive relationships with the suppliers that manufacture our merchandise, and we compete with other companies for production facilities. As a result, we have no contractual assurances of continued supply or pricing, and any supplier, including our key suppliers, could discontinue selling to us at any time. Moreover, a key supplier may not be able to supply our inventory needs due to capacity constraints, financial instability or other factors beyond our control, or we could decide to stop using a supplier due to quality or other performance or cost issues. If we determine to cease doing business with one or more of our key suppliers or if a key supplier becomes unable to supply desired merchandise in sufficient quantities on acceptable terms, we could experience delays in the receipt of inventory until alternative supply arrangements are secured; such delays could result in lost sales and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
If third parties with whom we do business do not adequately perform, or are unable or unwilling to perform, their functions, we might experience disruptions in our business, resulting in decreased profits, or losses, and damage to our reputation.
We depend upon independent third parties, both domestic and foreign, for the manufacture of all of the goods that we sell. The inability of a manufacturer to ship orders in a timely manner or to meet our standards could have a material adverse impact on our business.
We are party to contracts, transactions and business relationships with various third parties, including vendors, suppliers, service providers and lenders, pursuant to which such third parties have performance, payment and other obligations to us. In some cases, the Company depends upon such third parties to provide essential products, services or other benefits in order to operate the Company’s business in the ordinary course.
Adverse economic, industry or market conditions could result in an increased risk to the Company associated with the potential financial distress or insolvency of such third parties. Failure by any of these third parties to perform these functions effectively, properly and timely, or any disruption in our business relationships with any of these third parties, could negatively impact our operations, profitability, cash flows and reputation.
Our business and reputation could suffer if one or more of our suppliers or the factories they use fails to comply with applicable laws, follow acceptable labor practices or is accused of such non-compliance.
Our success depends, in part, on the suppliers of our goods and the factories that they use to operate in compliance with applicable laws and regulations and to comply with our vendor code of conduct. Each of our purchase orders requires adherence to accepted labor practices, applicable laws and compliance with our vendor code of conduct. However, we do not supervise or control our suppliers or the factories that produce the merchandise we sell or their labor and business practices. We rely on the staff of third-party auditing services and our non-exclusive buying agents to periodically visit and monitor the operations of a number of our independent factories to, among other things, assess compliance with our vendor code of conduct and applicable laws. Moreover, apparel companies can, in some cases, be held jointly liable for the wrongdoings of the suppliers of their products. In addition, we cannot control the public’s perceptions of such suppliers or factories, even if they are compliant with applicable law but are nonetheless viewed in a negative light by the public. Their failure to comply with our vendor code of conduct, applicable laws or to otherwise avoid creating negative consumer perceptions about their manufacturing methods and work environment, could damage our reputation, interrupt or disrupt the shipment of products, result in a decrease in customer traffic to our stores and website, and adversely affect our sales and consequently our results of operations.
There are risks relating to the operation of the ports through which our goods are shipped and to the transportation of our merchandise to our distribution center, to our eCommerce fulfillment center, to our stores, and to our eCommerce customers.
The vast majority of our products are shipped by ocean from overseas. There are risks associated with a disruption in the operation of ports through which our products are shipped, which are primarily ports on the West Coast. If that were to occur, we are likely to experience delays in the receipt of products, and we or our suppliers may have to find alternative shipping methods, possibly at greater expense and costs as shipping by air is significantly more expensive. Similarly shipping to alternate destinations in the United States could lead to increased lead times and overall costs for our products. We currently rely upon independent third-party transportation providers for substantially all of our merchandise shipments, including shipments to our distribution center, our stores, our eCommerce fulfillment center and our eCommerce customers. Our use of outside delivery services for shipments is subject to a variety of risks which may impact a shipper's ability to provide delivery services that adequately meet our shipping needs at an acceptable cost. If we change shipping companies, we could face logistical difficulties that could adversely impact deliveries and we would incur costs and expend resources in connection with such a change. Moreover, we may not be able to obtain terms as favorable as those received from the independent third-party transportation providers we currently use, which would increase our costs. If we were to experience any of these risks, it could adversely affect our costs, results of operations, gross profit, financial condition and cash flows.
We depend on a single facility to conduct our operations and distribute our merchandise. Our business could suffer a material adverse effect if this facility’s operations was shut down or severely disrupted.
Our corporate headquarters, data center and our only distribution facility are located in one facility in Plymouth, Minnesota which facility is more than 45 years old. Our distribution facility supplies merchandise to our retail stores and our third party eCommerce fulfillment center. Any serious disruption to our distribution facility or a facility closure for any reason, could delay shipments to stores and our eCommerce fulfillment center and result in inventory shortages which could negatively impact our sales, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, our main data center and all of our senior management, including critical resources dedicated to merchandising, operations, marketing, finance, information technology and administrative functions, are located at our corporate headquarters. In the event of a disaster or other calamity impacting our corporate facility or data center, our management and staff would have to find and operate out of other suitable locations and/or rely on alternative sources for computer, telecommunications and data storage systems. We have little experience operating essential functions away from our main corporate office and are uncertain what effect operating such satellite facilities might have on business, personnel and results of operations.
Although we maintain business interruption and property insurance, we cannot be assured that our insurance coverage will be sufficient or that any insurance proceeds will be timely paid to us if our distribution center or corporate office were shut down for any unplanned reason.
We are heavily dependent on our information technology systems and our ability to maintain and upgrade these systems from time-to-time and operate them in a secure manner.
The efficient operation of our business is heavily dependent on our information technology systems (“IT systems”). In particular, we rely (i) on point-of-sale terminals, which provide information to our host analysis systems used to track sales and inventory; (ii) on our eCommerce website through which we sell merchandise to our customers and (iii) on a third party to process payroll for our employees. Although our data is backed up and securely stored off-site, our main data center is located at our headquarters in Plymouth, Minnesota. The data center and our operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption due to a variety of factors.
The reliability and capacity of our IT systems (including third-party hardware and software systems or services) are critical to our continued operations. Despite our precautionary efforts, our IT systems, as well as those of our services providers, are vulnerable to damage or interruption from a variety of sources, including natural or man-made disasters, technical malfunctions, inadequate systems capacity, power outages, computer viruses, malicious human acts, security breaches and similar disruptive problems, which may require significant investment to fix or replace, and we may suffer loss of critical data and interruptions or delays to our operations.
Any disruption in the operation of our IT systems, our inability to maintain sufficient staffing levels, the loss of key employees knowledgeable about such systems or our failure to continue to effectively integrate, monitor and enhance such systems could interrupt our operations resulting in the temporary loss of or ability to access data or interfere with our ability to sell goods at our stores, which could result in reduced sales and affect our operations and financial performance. In addition, any interruption in the operation of our website could cause us to lose sales due to the temporary inability of customers to purchase merchandise through our website.
Periodically, we improve and upgrade portions of our IT systems and the functionality of our Internet website in an effort to ensure they meet our evolving business and security needs and are adequate to handle business growth. If we are unable to effectively maintain, operate, secure and timely upgrade our IT systems and our website, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. While we believe that we are diligent in selecting vendors, systems and third party providers to assist us in maintaining the integrity of our IT systems, we realize that there are risks and no assurance can be provided that future disruptions, service outages and failures or unauthorized intrusions will not occur. Any failure, interruption or compromise of these systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operation and cash flows.
We are subject to cyber security risks and may incur additional expenses in order to mitigate such risks or in response to unauthorized access to our data. In addition, an incident in which we or our third-party service providers fail to protect our customers' or employee’s information against a security breach could result in costly government enforcement actions and monetary damages against us from private litigation. Such an incident could otherwise damage our reputation, harm our business and adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
The Company and our third-party service providers, which manage portions of the Company’s data, are subject to cyber security risks. The nature of our business involves the receipt and transmission, and in some cases storage by us or third parties on our behalf, of customers’ personal information, shopping preferences and our customers’ credit card information, in addition to employee information and the Company’s financial and strategic data. The protection of our customers’ data, as well as confidential Company data is vitally important to the Company. The Company and its third-party service providers employ systems and/or websites that are intended to protect the storage and/or transmission of proprietary or confidential information by us and these third-party service providers. While the Company has implemented measures to prevent and detect security breaches and cyber incidents and to monitor its computer network, any failure of these measures and any failure of third parties that assist the Company in managing its data could adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.
Although the Company expects our third-party service providers to implement and use reasonable security measures to protect the proprietary and confidential information once it is received by them, we cannot control these service providers and cannot guarantee that a security breach will not occur in the future either at their location or within their systems.
Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to data, disable or degrade storage service, or sabotage systems evolve and change frequently and may be difficult to detect, we and the service providers we use may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventive measures. Unauthorized parties may also attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities, or those of third parties acting on our behalf, through fraud, trickery or other forms of deceiving our employees or those of our third-party providers. Despite our preventative efforts and those of our third-party service providers, we may be vulnerable to targeted or random security breaches, privacy or denial of service attacks, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors, or other similar events which could expose us and our third-party service providers to a risk of loss or misuse of proprietary and confidential information, litigation and potential liability. Cyber security attacks may be targeted at us, our third-party service providers, or our customers. Actual or anticipated attacks may cause us to incur significant additional expense, including costs to deploy additional personnel and protection technologies, train employees, and engage third-party experts and consultants. Any cyber security or security breaches, including any breaches that result in theft, transfer or unauthorized disclosure of customer, employee or company information, or our lack of compliance with information security and privacy laws and regulations, may result in significant legal and financial exposure, including claims for unauthorized purchases with stolen credit card information, impersonation or other similar fraud claims, and considerable other additional expenses. Although we maintain cyber-security insurance there can be no assurance that our insurance coverage will cover the particular cyber incident at issue or that such coverage will be sufficient, or that insurance proceeds will be paid to us in a timely manner.
Consumer awareness and sensitivity to privacy breaches and cyber security threats is prevalent. Any misappropriation of confidential or personally identifiable information gathered, stored or used by us or our service providers, be it intentional or accidental, could have a material impact on the operation of our business, including severely damaging our reputation and our relationships with our customers, employees and investors. Should customers lose confidence in our ability to protect their information, they may discontinue shopping in our stores or on our website.
Our ability to maintain the value of our trademarks impacts our business and financial performance.
We believe that our “christopher & banks”, “cj banks” and related trademarks are important to our success. Even though we take actions to protect our trademarks and other proprietary rights, we cannot be sure that we will be successful or that others will not imitate or infringe upon our intellectual property rights. In addition, we cannot assure that others will not seek to block the sale of our products as infringements of their trademark and proprietary rights. If we cannot adequately protect our existing and future trademarks or prevent infringement of them, our business and financial performance could suffer.
3. CAPITAL RISKS
The sufficiency and availability of our sources of liquidity may be affected by a variety of factors.
The sufficiency and availability of our sources of liquidity may be affected by a variety of factors, including, without limitation: (i) the level of our operating cash flows, which is impacted by our overall sales and gross margins, general economic conditions and the level of consumer discretionary spending; (ii) our capital expenditures; and (iii) our ability to maintain borrowing availability and to comply with applicable covenants contained in our amended and restated credit agreement ("the Credit Facility").
Our ability to return to profitability and to generate positive cash flows is dependent upon many factors, including favorable economic conditions and consumer confidence and our ability to successfully execute our financial plan and strategic and tactical initiatives in order to improve overall sales levels and gross margins. There can be no assurance that our cash flows from operations will be sufficient at all times to support our Company without additional financing or credit availability. An inability to generate sufficient cash flows could have important consequences. For example, it could:
| |
• | increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
| |
• | limit the amount of orders our vendors will produce, or their factors will allow them to produce for us, or result in their imposing unfavorable business terms or possibly refusing to do future business with us; |
| |
• | limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; |
| |
• | limit our ability to borrow money or to invest in our business operations; |
| |
• | make it more difficult for us to open new stores or improve existing stores; and |
| |
• | require us to incur significant additional indebtedness. |
Should we be unable in the future to borrow under the Credit Facility, it is possible, depending on the cause of our inability to borrow, that we may not have sufficient cash resources for our operations. If that were to occur, our liquidity would be significantly impaired, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our amended revolving credit agreement contains various covenants that impose restrictions that may affect our ability to operate our businesses.
The amended revolving credit agreement contains various affirmative and negative covenants that, subject to certain exceptions, restrict the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to, among other things, have liens on their property, change the nature of their business, transact business with affiliates or sell or convey certain of their assets to any one person. In addition, the agreement contains a financial covenant that requires the Company to maintain certain financial ratios related to its borrowing base. The ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to comply with these provisions may be affected by our operating results as well as events beyond our control. Failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could cause our lenders to restrict or eliminate access to funds under the Credit Facility.
Access to additional financing from the capital markets may be limited.
Changes in the credit and capital markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity and interest rate fluctuations, may increase the cost of financing or restrict the Company’s access to potential sources of future liquidity. As a result of general unpredictability in the global financial markets, there can be no assurance that our liquidity will not be affected or that our capital resources will at all times be sufficient to satisfy our liquidity needs. Although we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, cash provided by operations, and our availability under our amended revolving credit agreement, will be adequate to satisfy our capital needs for the foreseeable future, any renewed tightening of the credit or capital markets could make it more difficult for us to access funds, enter into an agreement for new indebtedness or obtain funding through the issuance of our securities. Our amended Credit Facility has covenants and restrictions which, if not met, may limit our ability to access funds.
While we have availability under our Credit Facility to bolster our liquidity, we may need additional capital to fund our operations, particularly if our cash flows from operating activities were to decrease or if the Credit Facility were unavailable or used to capacity. The sale of additional equity securities or convertible debt securities in order to improve our liquidity could result in additional dilution to our stockholders. If we borrow under our Credit Facility or incur other debt, our expenses will increase and we could be subject to additional restrictions that may limit our operating flexibility. Newly issued securities may have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior or otherwise superior to those of our common stock. There is no assurance that equity or debt financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us. Without sufficient liquidity, we will be more vulnerable to any future downturns in our business or the general economy. Future increases in interest rates or other tightening of the credit markets, or future turmoil in the financial markets, could make it more difficult for us to access funds, to refinance our indebtedness (if necessary), to enter into agreements for new indebtedness, or to obtain funding through the issuance of our securities. Also, if we are unable to obtain credit on commercially reasonable terms in the future that could adversely impact our liquidity and results of operations.
We may incur additional indebtedness in the future, which may require us to use a substantial portion of our cash flows to service debt and limit our financial and operating flexibility in important ways.
We may incur additional indebtedness in the future. Any borrowings under any future debt financing will require interest payments and need to be repaid or refinanced, could require us to divert funds identified for other purposes to debt service and would create additional cash demands and could impair our liquidity position and add financial risk for us. Diverting funds identified for other purposes for debt service may adversely affect our business and growth prospects. If we cannot generate sufficient cash flows from operations to service our debt, we may need to refinance our debt, dispose of assets or issue equity to obtain necessary funds. We do not know whether we would be able to take any of these actions on a timely basis, on terms satisfactory to us, or at all.
Our stock price may be volatile.
The Company’s stock price has experienced volatility over time and this volatility may continue, in part due to factors such as those discussed in this Item 1A of this Annual Report. Stock volatility may adversely affect stockholder confidence, as well as associate morale and retention for those associates who receive equity grants as part of their compensation packages, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operational results, financial position and cash flows.
Future announcements or disclosure by us or others could affect the market price for our common stock, including but not limited to:
| |
• | our ability to accomplish our tactical initiatives or operating goals and to do so in accordance with the timing estimates we have publicly announced; |
| |
• | the performance of third-party contract manufacturers and suppliers; |
| |
• | actual or anticipated variations in our results of operations or those of our competitors; |
| |
• | sales of common stock or other securities by us or our stockholders in the future; |
| |
• | additions or departures of key management or personnel; |
| |
• | the trading volume of our common stock; |
| |
• | changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts, failure to obtain or maintain analyst coverage of our common stock or our failure to achieve analyst earnings estimates; |
| |
• | decreases in market valuations of other retailers; and |
| |
• | general market conditions and other factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors. |
In addition, the stock market has experienced price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of many retail and other stocks that have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. This volatility could affect the price at which shares of our stock could be sold. Securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the overall market and in the market price of such company’s securities. Such litigation could result in substantial costs, divert our management’s attention and resources and have a material adverse effect on our business, operational results, financial position and cash flows.
4. LEGAL AND REGULATORY RISKS
If our long-lived assets become impaired, we may need to record significant non-cash impairment charges.
Periodically, we review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever economic events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. If an individual store location is unable to generate sufficient future cash flows, we may be required to record a partial or full impairment of that store’s assets. In addition, significant negative industry or general economic trends, disruptions to our business and unexpected significant changes or planned changes in our use of the assets (such as store relocations or closures) may also result in impairment charges. Any such impairment charges, if significant, could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.
Laws on privacy continue to evolve and further limits on how we collect or use customer information could adversely affect our business.
We collect and store customer information primarily for marketing purposes and to improve the services we provide. The use or retention of certain customer information is subject to applicable privacy laws. As privacy, data protection and information security laws, are interpreted and applied, compliance costs may increase, particularly in the context of providing adequate data protection and adequate data transfer mechanisms. Individual states are increasingly adopting or revising privacy, data protection and information security laws, that could have significant impact on our current and planned privacy, data protection and information security-related practices, our collection, use, sharing, retention and safeguarding of customer and/or employee information, and some of our current or future business plans. New legislation or regulation, and the interpretation and application of existing laws and regulations, could increase our costs of compliance, technology and business operations and could reduce revenues from certain business initiatives. Moreover, the application of existing or new laws to existing technology and practices can be uncertain and may lead to additional compliance risk and cost.
In recent years, there has been increasing regulatory enforcement and litigation activity in the area of privacy, data protection and information security in the United States. Our failure to comply with privacy, data protection and information security laws could result in potentially significant regulatory and/or governmental investigations and/or actions, litigation, fines, sanctions, ongoing regulatory monitoring customer attrition, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, operational results, financial position and cash flows. In addition to the extent our or our business partners’ security procedures and protection of customer information prove to be insufficient or inadequate, we may become subject to litigation or other claims, which could expose us to liability and cause damage to our reputation, brand, results of operations and liquidity.
A failure to comply with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are highly dependent on the use of credit and debit cards to complete sale transactions in our stores and through our website, and because of such use are subject to the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (“PCI Standards”). If we or our business partners fail to comply with the PCI Standards or to adequately protect sensitive customer information, we may become subject to fines or limitations on our ability to accept credit or debit cards, which could adversely affect our sales, operating income, brand and reputation. Also, any changes we may be required to make to our private label credit card program in the future could adversely affect the promotional financing arrangements available to our credit card customers and therefore our operating results.
Changes in accounting rules and regulations could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Generally accepted accounting principles and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regards to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our business are highly complex and involve many subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments. Changes in these rules or their interpretation or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments could significantly change or increase volatility of our reported or expected financial performance or financial condition. See Note 1, “Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for a description of recently issued accounting pronouncements, and “Critical Accounting Policies,” included herein which discusses accounting policies considered to be important to our operational results and financial condition. These and other future changes to accounting rules or regulations could have an adverse impact on our business, operational results, financial position and cash flows.
Union attempts to organize our employees could negatively affect our business.
None of our employees are currently subject to a collective bargaining agreement. It is possible unions may attempt to organize all or part of our employee base at certain stores or within certain regions. Responding to such organization attempts may distract management and employees and may have a negative financial impact on individual stores, or on our business as a whole.
We incur significant costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management is required to devote
substantial time to compliance initiatives.
As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Sarbanes-Oxley Act"), as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"), have imposed various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and changes in corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations result in increased legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal controls for financial reporting and disclosure. In particular, we are required to perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal controls over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Our testing may reveal deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses.
We have incurred and continue to expect to incur significant expense and devote substantial management effort toward ensuring compliance with Section 404. Moreover, if we do not comply with the requirements of Section 404 the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the NYSE, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would entail expenditure of additional financial and management resources.
Provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover. We are entitled to certain other protective provisions under Delaware law.
We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law impose various impediments to the ability of a third-party to acquire control of the Company, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and by-laws contain provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition involving us that our stockholders may consider favorable by, among other things:
| |
• | prohibiting cumulative voting in the election of directors; |
| |
• | authorizing the Board to designate and issue "blank check" preferred stock; |
| |
• | limiting persons who can call special meetings or the Board of Directors or stockholders; |
| |
• | prohibiting stockholder action by written consent; and |
| |
• | establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted on by stockholders at a stockholders' meeting. |
Increases in labor costs related to changes in employment laws and regulations could impact our business, operational results, financial position and cash flows.
Our retail store operations are subject to federal, state and local laws governing such matters as minimum wages, working conditions, work scheduling, healthcare reform, paid time off, overtime pay and workers’ compensation.
A number of factors could adversely affect our operating costs, including additional government-imposed regulations regarding minimum wages, overtime, sick pay, predictive scheduling, paid leaves of absence, mandated health benefits, and changing regulations from the National Labor Relations Board or other agencies. In fact, recent changes in minimum wage laws have resulted in higher starting wage levels at a number of our stores. Complying with new legislation or regulations could be time consuming and expensive and if we are unable to offset increased labor costs by increased sales or improved gross margins, it could have a material adverse impact on our business, operational results, financial position and cash flows.
We are currently out of compliance with the NYSE listing requirements, and we are at risk of the NYSE delisting our common stock, which could materially impair the liquidity and value of our common stock.
We are currently listed on the NYSE. On June 14, 2018, we received written notice from the NYSE that we are not in compliance with the continued listing standards set forth in Section 8 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The Company is considered below the criteria established by the NYSE for continued listing because (i) its average market capitalization has been less than $50 million over a consecutive 30 trading-day period, and at the same time its stockholders’ equity was less than $50 million; and (ii) its 30-day average closing price was below $1.00. As a result, we are required to bring our share price and consecutive 30 trading-day average share price, as measured on the last trading day of any calendar month during the sixth month period following receipt of the NYSE notice, above $1.00 per share or the NYSE may commence suspension and delisting procedures, unless shareholder approval is required for corporate action, such as a reverse stock split, at the Company’s next annual meeting which is anticipated to be held in June 2019. In addition, if our common stock price remains below the $1.00 per share threshold and falls to the point where the NYSE considers the stock price to be “abnormally low”, or our market capitalization falls below $15.0 million over a consecutive 30-day trading period, the NYSE has the discretion to begin delisting procedures immediately.
We have submitted a continued listing plan (“Plan”) to the NYSE that outlines the steps we are taking to regain compliance with the market capitalization and stockholders’ equity listing standard within eighteen months. On August 23, 2018 the NYSE notified us that they accepted our Plan, subject to quarterly reviews by the NYSE Listing and Compliance Committee to ensure progress against the Plan. Our most recent quarterly update was provided to the NYSE on January 18, 2019 and accepted by the NYSE a few days later. The Company’s common stock continues to trade on the NYSE. The current noncompliance with the standards described above does not affect the Company’s ongoing business operations or its reporting requirements with the SEC. If our common stock is delisted and we are not able to list our common stock on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities would be quoted on an over-the-counter market.
If the NYSE were to delist our common stock and we were unable to list our stock on another national securities exchange, it could, among other things: (i) reduce the liquidity and, quite possibly, the market price of our common stock; (ii) reduce the number of institutional investors willing to hold or acquire our common stock, which could negatively affect our ability to raise equity financing; (iii) limit our access to public capital markets; (iv) impair our ability to provide equity incentives that would be attractive to our employees; (v) result in a limited availability for market quotations for our common stock; and (vi) result in the loss of analyst coverage of the Company.
Our business could be impacted as a result of actions by activist stockholders or others.
We may be subject, from time to time, to legal and business challenges in the operation of our Company due to proxy contests, shareholder proposals, media campaigns and other actions instituted by activist shareholders or others. Responding to such actions can be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our operations, may not align with our business strategies and could divert the attention of our Board of Directors and senior management from the pursuit of our current or future business strategies. Perceived uncertainties as to our future direction as a result of stockholder activism or potential changes to the composition of the Board of Directors or senior management may lead to the perception of instability in our business and may also make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified and experienced senior management and Board members.
We may be subject to adverse outcomes in current or future litigation matters or regulatory proceedings which could result in the unexpected expenditure of time and resources.
From time-to-time, we may be involved in litigation, regulatory actions and other claims against our business. There are also other types of claims that could be asserted against us based on litigation that has been asserted against others, particularly in the retail industry such as intellectual property infringement (as discussed below) customer and employment claims, including class action claims or lawsuits alleging violations of federal or state laws. These matters could raise complex factual and legal issues requiring significant management time and, if determined to be adverse to the Company, could subject the Company to material liabilities.
In recent years, there has been increasing activity by companies which have acquired intellectual property rights, but do not practice those rights (sometimes referred to as “patent trolls”), to engage in very broad licensing programs aimed at a large number of companies in a wide variety of businesses, or at retail companies specifically. These efforts typically involve proposing licenses in exchange for a payment of money and may also include the threat or actual initiation of litigation. Any such litigation can be costly to defend, even if unsubstantiated or invalid. It is not possible to predict the impact, if any, of such claims on our business and operations.
An unfavorable outcome in any such litigation, claims or regulatory proceedings could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations and/or our reputation. In addition, regardless of the outcome of any legal or regulatory proceedings, such proceedings can be expensive and require that we devote substantial resources and executive time to them, thereby diverting management’s attention and resources that are needed to successfully run our business.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
There are no matters which are required to be reported under Item 1B.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Store Locations
Our stores are located primarily in shopping malls and retail centers in smaller to mid-sized cities and suburban areas. Approximately 77% of our stores are located in enclosed malls that typically have numerous specialty stores and two or more general merchandise chains or department stores as anchor tenants. The remainder of our Christopher & Banks, C.J. Banks and MPW stores are located in power, strip and lifestyle shopping centers.
At February 2, 2019, MPW stores, outlet stores, Christopher & Banks stores, and C.J. Banks stores averaged approximately 3,900, 4,000, 3,300 and 3,600 square feet, respectively. Approximately 84% of the total aggregate store square footage is allocated to selling space.
At February 2, 2019, we operated 455 stores in 45 states as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
State | | MPW | | Outlet | | Christopher & Banks | | C.J. Banks | | Total Stores |
Alabama | | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Arizona | | 3 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
|
Arkansas | | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
|
California | | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4 |
|
Colorado | | 8 |
| | 3 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 15 |
|
Connecticut | | 1 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
|
Delaware | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
Florida | | 3 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
|
Georgia | | 1 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
|
Idaho | | 6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
|
Illinois | | 19 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 22 |
|
Indiana | | 12 |
| | 3 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 19 |
|
Iowa | | 17 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 23 |
|
Kansas | | 9 |
| | 1 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 14 |
|
Kentucky | | 6 |
| | 1 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 11 |
|
Maine | | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 5 |
|
Maryland | | 5 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
|
Massachusetts | | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Michigan | | 20 |
| | 4 |
| | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | 27 |
|
Minnesota | | 26 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 30 |
|
Mississippi | | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
Missouri | | 10 |
| | 3 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 17 |
|
Montana | | 5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5 |
|
Nebraska | | 7 |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | 3 |
| | 13 |
|
New Hampshire | | 1 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
|
New Jersey | | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
New Mexico | | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
New York | | 16 |
| | 4 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 22 |
|
North Carolina | | 2 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
|
North Dakota | | 5 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 7 |
|
Ohio | | 20 |
| | 4 |
| | 3 |
| | 2 |
| | 29 |
|
Oklahoma | | 4 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5 |
|
Oregon | | 5 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9 |
|
Pennsylvania | | 24 |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 29 |
|
South Carolina | | 1 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
|
South Dakota | | 6 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 8 |
|
Tennessee | | 10 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13 |
|
Texas | | 5 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
|
Utah | | 6 |
| | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 10 |
|
Vermont | | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
|
Virginia | | 6 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 9 |
|
Washington | | 10 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13 |
|
Wisconsin | | 11 |
| | 4 |
| | 4 |
| | 4 |
| | 23 |
|
West Virginia | | 6 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 8 |
|
Wyoming | | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
TOTAL | | 312 |
| | 80 |
| | 33 |
| | 30 |
| | 455 |
|
Store Leases
All of our store locations are leased. Lease terms typically include a rental period of 10 years and may contain a renewal option. Certain leases do not have a specified termination date and operate on a month-to-month term. Leases generally require payments of fixed minimum rent and/or contingent percentage rent, calculated based on a percent of sales in excess of a specified threshold, as well as other typical charges such as common area maintenance, media/marketing funds, real estate taxes and insurance. Most of our leases allow the Company to exercise a sales volume kick-out prior to the end of the lease if certain sales thresholds are not achieved.
The following table, which covers all of the stores operated by us at February 2, 2019, indicates the number of leases expiring during the periods indicated and the number of such leases with renewal options. The number of stores with leases expiring in the next fiscal year includes stores which currently are operating on month-to-month terms.
|
| | | | | | |
Fiscal Years | | Number of Leases Expiring | | Number with Renewal Options |
2019 | | 200 |
| | — |
|
2020 | | 58 |
| | 2 |
|
2021 | | 48 |
| | — |
|
2022 | | 9 |
| | 4 |
|
2023 | | 19 |
| | — |
|
2024 and thereafter | | 121 |
| | 10 |
|
Total | | 455 |
| | 16 |
|
For leases that expire in a given period, we plan to evaluate the projected future performance of each store location prior to lease expiration to determine if we will seek to negotiate a new lease for that particular location, potentially, with a shorter term, identify an alternate location or close the store.
Corporate Office and Distribution Center Facility
Our 221,000 square foot corporate office and distribution center facility is located in Plymouth, Minnesota. We utilize the entire facility for our corporate office and distribution center requirements to receive and distribute all of our merchandise for all of our stores through this facility. Management believes our corporate office and distribution center facility space is sufficient to meet our requirements for the next fiscal year.
On April 27, 2018, we completed the sale of and entered into an agreement to leaseback the Plymouth, Minnesota corporate headquarters and distribution facility. The agreement provided for the sale of the facility for a purchase price of $13.7 million and the subsequent leaseback of the facility for a 15-year period, excluding a 5-year renewal option (see additional information regarding this sale and leaseback transaction in Note 11 - Lease Commitments to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019 included as part of this Annual Report).
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are subject, from time to time, to various claims, lawsuits or actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. We accrue for loss contingencies associated with outstanding litigation or legal claims for which management has determined it is probable that a loss contingency exists and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. If we determine an unfavorable outcome is not probable or reasonably estimable, we do not accrue a potential loss contingency. The ultimate resolution of matters can be inherently uncertain and for some matters, we may be unable to predict the ultimate outcome, determine whether a liability has been incurred or make an estimate of the reasonably possible liability that could result from an unfavorable outcome because of these uncertainties. We do not, however, currently believe that the resolution of any pending matter will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers as of March 14, 2019:
|
| | | | |
Name | | Age | | Positions and Offices |
Keri Jones | | 55 | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Richard Bundy | | 39 | | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
Monica Dahl | | 52 | | Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer, Omni-Channel and Public Relations |
Andrea Kellick | | 56 | | Senior Vice President, Chief Merchandising Officer |
Luke Komarek | | 65 | | Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
Cindy Stemper | | 61 | | Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer |
Carmen Wamre | | 49 | | Senior Vice President, Chief Stores Officer |
Keri Jones has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and a director since March 12, 2018. From May 2017 until February 2018, Ms. Jones served as Executive Vice President, Chief Merchant of Dick's Sporting Goods. Prior to Dick's, Ms. Jones spent 27 years at Target Corporation, where she served in a variety of leadership roles, including as Executive Vice President, Global Supply Chain, from 2015 to 2016; Executive Vice President, Merchandise Planning and Operations, from 2014 to 2015; Senior Vice President, Merchandise Planning, from 2011 to 2014; Senior Vice President, Health and Beauty, from 2008 to 2011; and Vice President, General Merchandise Manager, Toys and Sporting Goods, from 2001 to 2008.
Richard Bundy joined the Company as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer in July 2018. Mr. Bundy was with Chico’s FAS, Inc. for approximately ten years serving in a variety of ever increasing financial roles, including as Vice President, Brand Finance & Strategy, Chico’s from 2015 to May 2018; Senior Director, Brand Finance & Strategy, Soma Intimates from 2014 to 2015 and Director, Brand Finance & Strategy, Soma Intimates from 2013 to 2014. Prior to joining Chico’s FAS, Inc., Mr. Bundy served as a financial analyst at Limited Brands, Inc. and Albertsons Companies, Inc. and as a project resource analyst with NASA.
Monica Dahl has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer, Omni-Channel and Public Relations since April 2016 and previously served as Senior Vice President, Marketing, Omni-Channel and Public Relations from November 2014 to April 2016. From April 2013 to November 2014, she was Senior Vice President, Marketing (SVP, Marketing”). Ms. Dahl joined the Company in 2004 and served in a variety of roles prior to becoming SVP, Marketing in 2013. Before joining the Company, Ms. Dahl held various positions with Wilsons Leather and Arthur Andersen LLP.
Andrea Kellick joined the Company as Senior Vice President, Chief Merchandising Officer in July 2018. Ms. Kellick was with Target Corporation for approximately sixteen years serving in a variety of merchandising and planning roles including jewelry, accessories, domestics and apparel, most recently as Vice President, Women’s Apparel from 2016 to March 2018 and Vice President, Bedding, Bath & Home Decor from 2011 to 2015. Prior to joining Target Corporation, Ms. Kellick served in various merchandising and sourcing roles for Old Navy, Express, Inc. and Spiegel Inc.
Luke Komarek has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel since May 2007. He was named Corporate Secretary in August 2007. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Komarek served as General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary at PNA Holdings, an office imaging and parts supplier, from March 2004 to May 2007. Previously, Mr. Komarek served as Vice President of Legal Affairs and Compliance at Centerpulse Spine-Tech Inc. from February 2003 to March 2004. Mr. Komarek was employed by FSI International, Inc., a semiconductor equipment company, from 1995 to 2002, most recently serving as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.
Cindy Stemper has served as the Company's Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer since April 2016 and previously served as Senior Vice President, Human Resources from April 2013 to April 2016. From September 2010 to April 2013, she served as the Company’s Vice President, Human Resources. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Stemper worked at MoneyGram International for approximately 25 years in a variety of Human Resources roles, most recently as Executive Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Services from 2005 to 2009.
Carmen Wamre joined the Company as Senior Vice President, Chief Stores Officer in December 2018. Ms. Wamre was with Express, Inc. for approximately 28 years in a variety of leadership roles including as Zone Vice President from 2008 to 2017 and as a Regional Director from 2002 to 2008.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol “CBK”.
As of March 15, 2019, there were approximately 132 holders of record of our common stock. The last reported sales price on the NYSE of our common stock on March 15, 2019 was $0.39.
The following table summarizes information in connection with purchases made by, or on behalf of, the Company or any
affiliated purchaser of the Company, of shares of the Company’s common stock during the 13 week period ended February 2, 2019.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1) | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Program |
November 4, 2018 - December 1, 2018 | | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
|
December 2, 2018 - January 5, 2019 | | 111,505 |
| | $ | 0.50 |
| | 111,505 |
| | $ | 1,944,738 |
|
January 6, 2019 - February 2, 2019 | | 76,574 |
| | $ | 0.57 |
| | 76,574 |
| | $ | 1,901,012 |
|
Total | | 188,079 |
| | $ | 0.53 |
| | 188,079 |
| | $ | 1,901,012 |
|
(1) On December 20, 2018, the Company announced that the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to purchase up to $2.0 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock during the period ending December 31, 2019. The shares may be repurchased from time to time through open market purchases, block transactions, privately negotiated transactions or derivative transactions in a manner consistent with applicable securities laws and regulations.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not required.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report. Unless otherwise noted, transactions and other factors significantly impacting our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity are discussed in order of magnitude. We refer to the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2019 and the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2018 in this MD&A as “fiscal 2018” and “fiscal 2017”, respectively.
Executive Overview
We are a specialty retailer of women’s privately branded women’s apparel and accessories. We offer our customer an assortment of unique, classic and versatile clothing that fits her everyday needs at a good value.
We operate an integrated, omni-channel platform that provides our customer the ability to shop when and where she wants, including online or at retail stores and outlet stores. This approach allows our customers to browse, purchase, return, or exchange our merchandise through the channel that is optimal for her.
As of February 2, 2019, we operated 455 stores in 45 states, including 312 Missy, Petite, Women ("MPW") stores, 80 outlet stores, 33 Christopher & Banks ("CB") stores, and 30 C.J. Banks ("CJ") stores. Our CB brand offers unique fashions and accessories featuring exclusively designed assortments of women’s apparel in sizes 4 to 16 and in petite sizes 4P to 16P. Our C.J. Banks brand offers similar assortments of women’s apparel in sizes 14W to 26W. Our MPW concept and outlet stores offer an assortment of both Christopher & Banks and C.J. Banks apparel servicing the Missy, Petite and Women-sized customer in one location.
Other Developments
On February 1, 2018, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had elected Keri Jones as Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and as a member of the Board effective as of her March 12, 2018 start date. In connection with the election of Ms. Jones as CEO of the Company, Joel Waller ceased serving as interim President and CEO when Ms. Jones commenced employment but has continued as a Board member.
In addition, during fiscal year 2018, the Company had the following other additions to its executive leadership team: Richard Bundy (Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer in July 2018); Andrea Kellick (Senior Vice President, Chief Merchandising Officer in July 2018); and Carmen Wamre (Senior Vice President, Chief Stores Officer in December 2018).
Strategic Priorities
Our overall business strategy is to build sustainable, long-term revenue growth and consistent profitability through the following strategic initiatives:
| |
• | Enhance the customer shopping experience; |
| |
• | Improve marketing and promotional effectiveness; |
| |
• | Leverage omni-channel capabilities; |
| |
• | Build loyalty and grow our customer file; |
| |
• | Optimize our real estate portfolio; and |
| |
• | Right-size our cost structure. |
Enhance the Customer Shopping Experience
We are committed to enhancing our customer's shopping experience by providing a well curated product assortment that is presented in a way that is easier for her to shop. We are focused on improving the flow and depth of our inventory buys which are intended to help her build an outfit and drive units per transaction. Additionally, we have recently launched a new Style and Selling model to support our store associates in providing even better service and importantly drive sales.
Improve Marketing and Promotional Effectiveness
Our goals include executing disciplined markdown management, leveraging improved analytics to inform what types and depth of promotions and targeted offers are used and to increase our return our on marketing investments.
Leverage Omni-Channel Capabilities
Our integrated, omni-channel strategy is designed to provide customers with a seamless retail experience, allowing her to shop whenever, however and wherever she chooses. In January of 2018, we launched “Buy online ship to store,” and in November of 2018, we launched “Buy online ship from store.” We currently are fulfilling eCommerce orders from 170 of our stores. We plan on launching “Buy online pick up in store” during the first quarter of fiscal 2019. These flexible fulfillment options not only meet a customer need, they allow us to better leverage our inventory across our chain.
Build Loyalty and Grow our Customer File
We have a very loyal customer base that is highly engaged. Our uniquely designed product, our value positioning and our customer service are key differentiators for us and contribute to the loyalty of our customers with approximately 90% of our active customers participating in our loyalty rewards program.
We continue to focus on maximizing the benefits of our customer relationship management (“CRM”) database, Friendship Rewards Loyalty Program (“Friendship Rewards”), and private-label credit card program to strengthen engagement with our customers. Our Friendship Rewards program, in conjunction with our CRM system, allows us to personalize communications and customize our offers. We continue to leverage our direct and digital marketing channels to encourage additional customer visits and increased spending per visit.
To grow our existing customer file, we intend to reallocate our marketing spend in an effort to drive acquisition of new customers, reactivate lapsed customers, and also capitalize on market disruptions. In addition, we intend to refresh our Friendship Rewards program and to continue to leverage that program. Finally, we plan to capitalize on our unique positioning in the market to drive engagement with customers on a grass roots level.
Optimize our Real Estate Portfolio
Between 2011 and 2015 we consolidated our store formats and reduced our store count by 33% in an effort to improve store productivity. Additionally, approximately 44% of our stores have a lease action arising within 12 months and 57% within 24 months. This should provide us with flexibility to close underperforming stores and the opportunity to renegotiate occupancy costs where applicable.
Right-size our Cost Structure
We intend to take a holistic approach in driving cost reductions. To help us in accomplishing this we have hired a third-party, non-merchandise procurement specialist to assist us in analyzing relationships and negotiating cost reductions. In addition, we intend to continue to aggressively negotiate rent reductions, optimize our marketing spend, review and reduce our corporate overhead and reduce our shipping and fulfillment expense.
Performance Measures
Management evaluates our financial results based on the following key performance measures.
Comparable sales
Comparable sales is a measure that highlights the performance of our store channel and eCommerce channel sales by measuring the changes in sales over the comparable, prior-year period of equivalent length.
Our comparable sales calculation includes merchandise sales for:
| |
• | Stores operating for at least 13 full months; |
| |
• | Stores relocated within the same center; and |
Our comparable sales calculation excludes:
| |
• | Stores converted to the MPW format for 13 full months post conversion. |
We believe our eCommerce operations are interdependent with our brick-and-mortar store sales and, as such, we believe that reporting combined store and eCommerce comparable sales is a more appropriate presentation. Our customers are able to browse merchandise in one channel and consummate a transaction in a different channel. At the same time, our customers have the option to return merchandise to a store or our third-party distribution center, regardless of the original channel used for purchase.
Comparable sales measures vary across the retail industry. As a result, our comparable sales calculation is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
Other performance measures
To supplement our comparable sales performance measure, we also monitor changes in net sales, net sales per store, net sales per gross square foot, gross profit, gross margin rate, operating income, cash, inventory and liquidity.
Results of Operations
The following table presents selected consolidated financial data for each of the past two fiscal years:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Net Change | | Percent of Net Sales |
(dollars in thousands) | | 52 Weeks Ended February 2, 2019 | | 53 Weeks Ended February 3, 2018 | | Amount | | Percent | | February 2, 2019 | | February 3, 2018 |
Net sales | | $ | 348,900 |
| | $ | 365,906 |
| | $ | (17,006 | ) | | (4.6 | )% | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
Merchandise, buying and occupancy costs | | 246,269 |
| | 252,399 |
| | (6,130 | ) | | (2.4 | )% | | 70.6 | % | | 69.0 | % |
Gross profit | | 102,631 |
| | 113,507 |
| | (10,876 | ) | | (9.6 | )% | | 29.4 | % | | 31.0 | % |
Other operating expenses: | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | | 120,371 |
| | 123,398 |
| | (3,027 | ) | | (2.5 | )% | | 34.5 | % | | 33.7 | % |
Depreciation and amortization | | 10,158 |
| | 12,434 |
| | (2,276 | ) | | (18.3 | )% | | 2.9 | % | | 3.4 | % |
Impairment of long-lived assets | | 4,384 |
| | 318 |
| | 4,066 |
| | 1,278.6 | % | | 1.3 | % | | 0.1 | % |
Total other operating expenses | | 134,913 |
| | 136,150 |
| | (1,237 | ) | | (0.9 | )% | | 38.7 | % | | 37.2 | % |
Operating loss | | (32,282 | ) | | (22,643 | ) | | (9,639 | ) | | 42.6 | % | | (9.3 | )% | | (6.2 | )% |
Interest expense, net | | (183 | ) | | (154 | ) | | (29 | ) | | 18.8 | % | | (0.1 | )% | | — | % |
Other income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — | % | | — | % | | — | % |
Loss before income taxes | | (32,465 | ) | | (22,797 | ) | | (9,668 | ) | | 42.4 | % | | (9.3 | )% | | (6.2 | )% |
Income tax provision (benefit) | | 374 |
| | (773 | ) | | 1,147 |
| | (148.4 | )% | | 0.1 | % | | (0.2 | )% |
Net loss | | $ | (32,839 | ) | | $ | (22,024 | ) | | $ | (10,815 | ) | | 49.1 | % | | (9.4 | )% | | (6.0 | )% |
|
| | | | | | |
Rate trends as a percentage of net sales | | Fiscal 2018 | | Fiscal 2017 |
Gross margin | | 29.4 | % | | 31.0 | % |
Selling, general, and administrative | | 34.5 | % | | 33.7 | % |
Depreciation and amortization | | 2.9 | % | | 3.4 | % |
Operating loss | | (9.3 | )% | | (6.2 | )% |
Fiscal 2018 Summary
| |
• | Net sales decreased 4.6% compared to the same period last year primarily due to the prior year containing $5.0 million of sales attributable to the 53rd week, a 2.5% decline in units sold per transaction, and a 2.6% decline in average store count. These declines were partially offset by a 1.2% increase in average retail sales dollars per unit sold; |
| |
• | Comparable sales in fiscal 2018 decreased 2.6%, compared to a 2.5% decrease in fiscal 2017; |
| |
• | eCommerce comparable sales increased 15.3% in fiscal 2018 compared to a 13.7% increase in fiscal 2017; |
| |
• | Net sales per store decreased 2.0% and net sales per square foot decreased 2.7% in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017; |
| |
• | Gross margin rate decreased 161 basis points compared to the same period last year primarily driven by higher product costs in the early part of the year, markdowns of higher beginning of year inventory and lower than anticipated sales for fiscal 2018. Additionally, the gross margin rate declined due to higher fulfillment expense resulting from increased sales penetration in the eCommerce channel and the launch of the Ship from Store initiative; |
| |
• | Net loss of $32.8 million, a $0.88 loss per share, in fiscal 2018 compared to a net loss of $22.0 million, a $0.59 loss per share, in fiscal 2017; |
| |
• | As of February 2, 2019, we held $10.2 million of cash and cash equivalents, compared to $23.1 million as of February 3, 2018. |
Net Sales
The components of the 4.6% net sales decrease in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 were as follows:
|
| | | |
Sales driver change components | | Fiscal 2018 |
Number of transactions | | 0.1 | % |
Store count | | (1.1 | )% |
Units per transaction | | (3.1 | )% |
Average unit retail | | 0.7 | % |
53rd week impact | | (1.2 | )% |
Total sales driver change decrease | | (4.6 | )% |
|
| | | |
Comparable sales | | Fiscal 2018 |
Comparable sales | | (2.6 | )% |
Sales decreased primarily due to a 2.5% decrease in units per transaction, a 2.7% decline in the average number of stores and the fact that fiscal 2017 sales contained $5.0 million of sales attributable to a 53rd week. The number of transactions in 2018 was slightly higher than in 2017, though transactions in stores were down due to continued weakness in store traffic while eCommerce transactions were up. These declines were partially offset by an increase of 1.2% in average unit retail sales.
To supplement our comparable sales measure, we also monitor changes in other store sales metrics as illustrated in the table below:
|
| | | |
Store metrics | | Fiscal 2018 |
Net sales per store % change | | (2.0 | )% |
Net sales per square foot % change | | (2.6 | )% |
Net sales per store and net sales per square foot decreased consistently with the overall decline in sales.
Store count, openings, closings, and square footage for our stores were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Store Count | | Square Footage (1) |
Stores by Format | | February 3, 2018 | | Open | | Close | | MPW Conversions | | February 2, 2019 | | Avg Store Count | | February 2, 2019 | | February 3, 2018 |
MPW | | 314 |
| | 5 |
| | (7 | ) | |
|
| | 312 |
| | 314 |
| | 1,227 |
| | 1,225 |
|
Outlet | | 78 |
| | 5 |
| | (3 | ) | | — |
| | 80 |
| | 79 |
| | 321 |
| | 314 |
|
Christopher and Banks | | 37 |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | | 33 |
| | 35 |
| | 109 |
| | 122 |
|
C.J. Banks | | 34 |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | | 30 |
| | 33 |
| | 109 |
| | 123 |
|
Total Stores | | 463 |
| | 10 |
| | (14 | ) | | (4 | ) | | 455 |
| | 461 |
| | 1,766 |
| | 1,784 |
|
________________________________________ | |
(1) | Square footage presented in thousands. |
Gross Profit
Gross margin rate decreased 161 basis points compared to the same period last year primarily driven by higher product costs in the early part of the year, markdowns of higher beginning of year inventory and lower than anticipated sales for fiscal 2018. Additionally, the gross margin rate declined due to higher fulfillment expense resulting from increased sales penetration in the eCommerce channel and the launch of the Ship from Store initiative.
Selling, General, and Administrative ("SG&A") Expenses
SG&A decreased by $3.0 million, driven by lower store operating expenses of $4.1 million, lower net employee compensation expense of $0.5 million, lower insurance expenses of approximately $0.8 million and lower executive search fees of approximately $0.5 million. Approximately $1.7 million of these SG&A expense reductions were attributable to fiscal 2018 being a 52-week year versus fiscal 2017 being a 53-week year. These SG&A expense decreases were partially offset by increases of approximately $1.6 million in outside professional services and $1.1 million of eCommerce operating expenses. As a percent of net sales, SG&A expenses increased by 78 basis points to 34.5%.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased primarily due to the sale-leaseback of the corporate facility in April 2018, a decrease in average store count and a decline in depreciation due to the impairment charges expensed in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2018 for store fixed assets.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We recorded non-cash impairment charges totaling $4.4 million during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2018 as leasehold improvements and equipment at certain under-performing stores were written down to their estimated fair value.
Operating Loss
Our operating loss increase in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 was primarily due to a $17.0 million decline in net sales, $5.0 million of which is attributable to the inclusion of a 53rd week of sales in fiscal 2017, a 161 basis point decline in gross margin, and an increase of $4.1 million in impairment charges. The increases in the operating loss were partially offset by a $3.0 million decrease in SG&A expenses.
Interest expense, net
The change in interest expense, net is not material.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
The income tax benefit in 2017 resulted from the repeal of the Alternative Minimum Tax ("AMT") under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("the Act") enacted in December 2017. In conjunction with the Act, previous AMT payments resulted in carryforward tax credits that will be refundable over time. Income tax expense during fiscal 2018 primarily reflected current state income taxes and minimum fees, net changes in the income tax valuation allowance.
Net earnings
Our net loss increase in fiscal 2018 compared to our net loss in 2017 was primarily due to a gross margin rate decline, a net sales decrease, impairment charges related to long-lived assets, and an increase in income tax expense. These items were partially offset by a decline in SG&A expenses.
Fiscal 2019 Outlook
Sales for the early part of the fiscal 2019 first quarter have been trending below plan, largely attributable to an overall decline in traffic related to the extremely cold and snowy weather in the Upper Midwest and Great Lakes area where a majority of our stores are located. In response to the sales trends to-date we have adjusted our marketing and promotional calendar and as the weather improves we expect sales to trend more in line with our expectations for the remainder of the first quarter. Despite the recent pressure on sales, the Company is maintaining its overall fiscal 2019 guidance, as it believes that the headwinds created largely by weather are mostly behind it and that its strategic initiatives will yield improved financial performance as the year progresses. In addition, the Company expects:
| |
• | Net sales to increase 2% to 3% as the result of expanded omni-channel capabilities, enhancements to the overall product assortment, and more impactful marketing promotions to drive customer file growth. Gross margin expansion of 300 to 350 basis points as a result of improved inventory management including supply chain and omni-channel initiatives, greater discipline around promotions and the continued reduction of occupancy costs. |
| |
• | SG&A as a percentage of sales to decline 150 to 200 basis points due to ongoing cost reduction initiatives. |
| |
• | Inventory turns to improve as compared to fiscal 2018. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Summary
We expect to operate our business and execute our strategic initiatives principally with funds generated from operations and from our Credit Facility, subject to compliance with the financial covenant and the other terms of the Company’s Credit Facility with Wells Fargo Bank N.A (“Wells Fargo”).
Our cash and cash equivalents balance as of the end of fiscal 2018 and 2017 was $10.2 million and $23.1 million, respectively.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities for each of the past three fiscal years:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(in thousands) | | Fiscal 2018 | | Fiscal 2017 |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | | $ | (21,508 | ) | | $ | (6,745 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | 9,035 |
| | (5,158 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | | (365 | ) | | (26 | ) |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | | $ | (12,838 | ) | | $ | (11,929 | ) |
Operating Activities
The change in cash used in operating activities in fiscal 2018 compared to fiscal 2017 was primarily due to an increase in the net loss, excluding non-cash expenses. Uses of cash for working capital increased for the period primarily due to changes in inventories and accounts payable.
Investing Activities
The increase in cash from investment activities in fiscal 2018 is driven primarily by the Company completing the sale and leaseback of its corporate headquarters facility and distribution center. The agreement provided for the sale of the facility for a purchase price of $13.7 million and the subsequent leaseback of the facility for a 15-year period. As part of the transaction, the Company deposited $1.7 million in escrow for certain repairs to the building of which approximately $1.0 million was spent prior to February 2, 2019. Store-related capital expenditures declined $2.7 million from the prior year as the Company utilized more used furniture and fixtures in conjunction with new store openings. Information technology capital expenditures increased approximately $0.8 million from 2017 due primarily to eCommerce initiatives.
Financing Activities
In December 2018, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a Stock Repurchase Program (the “Program”) to repurchase up to $2.0 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock during the period ending December 31, 2019. The shares may be repurchased from time to time through open market purchases, block transactions, privately negotiated transactions or derivative transactions in a manner consistent with applicable securities laws and regulations. The Program may be modified, suspended or terminated at any time by the Board of Directors.
During fiscal 2018, the Company repurchased 188,079 shares at a cost of approximately $0.1 million. As of February 2, 2019, approximately $1.9 million remains available for use under the Program.
We have not paid any dividends since 2010.
Sources of Liquidity
Funds generated by operating activities, available cash and cash equivalents, and our Credit Facility are our most significant sources of liquidity. We believe that our sources of liquidity will be sufficient to sustain operations and to finance anticipated capital investments and strategic initiatives over the next twelve months. However, in the event our liquidity is not sufficient to meet our operating needs, we may be required to limit our spending. There can be no assurance that we will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels or that we will be able to maintain our ability to borrow under our existing facilities or obtain additional financing, if necessary, on favorable terms.
The Credit Facility with Wells Fargo was most recently amended and extended on August 3, 2018. The current expiration date is August 3, 2023. The Credit Facility amendment in 2018 supplemented the Company's existing $50.0 million revolving Credit Facility by adding a new $5.0 million revolving "first-in, last out" ("FILO Facility") tranche, subject to the borrowing base restrictions applicable to the FILO facility.
In addition to these changes, the amendment removed the Company's real property from the borrowing base, as this property was the subject of a sale-leaseback transaction during fiscal 2018.
The total borrowing base at February 2, 2019, was approximately $26.7 million. As of February 2, 2019, the Company had open on-demand letters of credit of approximately $6.9 million. Accordingly, after reducing the borrowing base for the open letters of credit and the required minimum availability of the greater of $3.0 million, or 10.0% of the borrowing base, the net availability of revolving credit loans under the Credit Facility was approximately $19.4 million at February 2, 2019.
See Note 5 - Credit Facility for additional details regarding our Credit Facility.
Off-Balance Sheet Obligations
We do not have relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purposes entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet financial arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
Sourcing
We directly imported approximately 52% and 39% of our merchandise purchases during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, respectively. A significant amount of our merchandise was manufactured overseas during each of these fiscal periods, primarily in China and Vietnam. Our reliance on sourcing from foreign countries may cause us to be exposed to certain risks as indicated below and in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.
We do not have long-term purchase commitments or arrangements with any of our suppliers or buying agents. Our ten largest vendors represented approximately 67% and 71% of our total merchandise purchases in fiscal 2018, and fiscal 2017, respectively. One of our suppliers accounted for approximately 16% and 27% of our purchases during fiscal 2018, and fiscal 2017, respectively. Another supplier accounted for approximately 10% and 9% of our purchases during fiscal 2018, and fiscal 2017, respectively. No other vendor supplied greater than 10% of the Company's merchandise purchases during the last two fiscal years.
Import restrictions, including tariffs and quotas, and changes in such restrictions, could affect the importation of apparel and might result in increased costs, delays in merchandise receipts or reduced supplies of apparel available to us, and could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Our merchandise flow could also be adversely affected by political instability in any of the countries where our merchandise is manufactured or by changes in the United States government’s policies toward such foreign countries. In addition, merchandise receipts could be delayed due to interruptions in air, ocean, and ground shipments.
Although we expect the cost of cotton and synthetics to remain relatively stable in fiscal 2019, our average unit cost may change based on other factors, including overall mix of fashion versus core merchandise, fluctuations in transportation costs and potential changes in tariffs. To the extent that we cannot offset increases in the cost of goods with other cost reductions or efficiencies, we may be forced to sell the product at higher prices, which our customers may be less prone to accept.
Seasonality
Our quarterly results may fluctuate significantly depending on a number of factors, including general economic conditions, consumer confidence, customer response to our seasonal merchandise mix, timing of new store openings, adverse weather conditions, and shifts in the timing of certain holidays and shifts in the timing of promotional events.
Inflation
We do not believe that inflation had a material effect on our results of operations in the last two fiscal years.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles used in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during a reporting period. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable. As a result, actual results could differ because of the use of these estimates and assumptions.
Our significant accounting policies can be found in Note 1 - Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Annual Report. We believe that the following accounting estimates are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, and they require our most challenging and complex judgments, resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Inventory valuation
Merchandise inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market utilizing the retail inventory method. The retail inventory method inherently requires management judgments and estimates, such as the amount and timing of permanent markdowns to clear unproductive or slow-moving inventory, which may impact the ending inventory valuation as well as gross margins.
Permanent markdowns designated for clearance activity are recorded when the utility of the inventory has diminished. Factors considered in the determination of permanent markdowns include current and anticipated demand, customer preferences, age of the merchandise and fashion trends. When a decision is made to permanently mark down merchandise, the resulting gross profit reduction is recognized.
Physical inventories are taken annually, and inventory records are adjusted accordingly, resulting in the recording of actual shrinkage. Physical inventories are taken at all store locations approximately three weeks before the end of the fiscal year. Shrinkage is estimated as a percentage of net sales at interim periods and for this approximate three-week period, based on historical shrinkage rates.
We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use to calculate our inventory markdowns or shrinkage rates. However, if estimates regarding consumer demand are inaccurate or actual physical inventory shrink differs significantly from our estimate, our operating results could be materially affected.
Long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
When evaluating long-lived assets for potential impairment, we first compare the carrying value of the asset to the asset's estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges). If the sum of the estimated future cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, we calculate an impairment loss. The impairment loss calculation compares the carrying value of the asset to the asset's estimated fair value, which is typically based on estimated discounted future cash flows. We recognize an impairment loss if the amount of the asset's carrying value exceeds the asset's estimated fair value. If we recognize an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of the asset becomes its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis is depreciated over the remaining useful life of that asset.
When reviewing long-lived assets for impairment, we group long-lived assets with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. For long-lived assets deployed at store locations, we review for impairment at the individual store level. These reviews involve comparing the carrying value of all leasehold improvements, fixtures and equipment located at each store to the net cash flow projections for each store. In addition, we conduct separate impairment reviews at other levels as appropriate. For example, shared assets such as our corporate office and distribution center would be evaluated by reference to the aggregate assets, liabilities and projected residual cash flows of all areas of the businesses utilizing those shared assets.
Our impairment loss calculations involve uncertainty because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future cash flows and asset fair values, including estimating useful lives of the assets and selecting the
discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows. If actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values, we may be exposed to losses that could be material. However, we do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate long-lived asset impairment losses.
We recorded long-lived asset impairment charges of approximately $4.4 million and $0.3 million in fiscal 2018, and fiscal 2017, respectively, related to underperforming store locations.
Customer loyalty program
The Company’s Friendship Rewards loyalty program grants customers the ability to accumulate points based on purchase activity. Once a Friendship Rewards member achieves a certain point level, the member earns award certificates that may be redeemed towards future merchandise purchases. Points are accrued as unearned revenue and recorded as a reduction of net sales and a current liability as they are accumulated by members and certificates are earned. The liability is recorded net of estimated breakage based on historical redemption patterns and trends. Revenue and the related cost of sales are recognized upon redemption of the reward certificates, which expire approximately six weeks after issuance.
A customer loyalty liability of $3.8 million and $3.5 million is included in accrued liabilities as of the end of fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, respectively.
Income taxes
Our income tax returns are subject to or are in the process of being audited by various taxing authorities. To the extent our estimates of settlements change or the final tax outcome is different from the amounts recorded, such differences will impact the income tax provision in the period in which such determinations are made. Our income tax expense includes changes in our estimated liability for exposures associated with our various tax filing positions. Although we believe that our judgments are reasonable, actual results could differ, and we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material.
We record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, management is required to make judgments regarding future income, taxable income, and the potential effects of the mix of income or losses in the jurisdictions in which we operate.
Forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult when negative evidence such as cumulative losses exists. Based on available objective evidence and cumulative losses, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets are not recognizable and will not be recognized until the Company has sufficient taxable income. Accordingly, the net deferred tax assets with the exception of certain deferred state benefits, have been offset by a valuation allowance. The valuation allowance increased by $5.5 million and decreased by $11.0 million during the years ended February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, respectively. The increase in the valuation allowance in the current year is a result of the increase in deferred taxes. The valuation allowance does not have any impact on cash and does not prevent the Company from using the deferred tax assets in future periods when profits are realized.
We have analyzed equity ownership changes and determined our net operating losses will not be limited under Section 382.
Forward-Looking Statements
We may make forward-looking statements reflecting our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. These forward-looking statements, which may be included in reports filed under the Exchange Act, in press releases and in other documents and materials as well as in written or oral statements made by or on behalf of the Company, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those discussed in Item 1A - Risk Factors of this Annual Report, which could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or anticipated future results.
The words or phrases “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “expect,” “should,” “anticipate,” “forecast,” “intend” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21e of the Exchange Act and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as enacted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). In particular, we desire to take advantage of the protections of the PSLRA in connection with the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date such statements are made. In addition, we wish to advise readers that the factors listed in Item 1A of this Annual Report, as well as other factors, could affect our performance and could cause our actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not required.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
| |
| Page |
Financial Statements: | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Christopher & Banks Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets of Christopher & Banks Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of February 2, 2019, and February 3, 2018, the related Consolidated Statements of Operations, Comprehensive Loss, Stockholders' Equity, and Cash Flows, for each of the two years in the period ended February 2, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended February 2, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 18, 2019
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2017.
CHRISTOPHER & BANKS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | |
| February 2, 2019 | | February 3, 2018 |
ASSETS | | | |
Current assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 10,239 |
| | $ | 23,077 |
|
Accounts receivable | 2,767 |
| | 2,626 |
|
Merchandise inventories | 41,039 |
| | 41,361 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 3,372 |
| | 2,715 |
|
Income taxes receivable | 268 |
| | 172 |
|
Total current assets | 57,685 |
| | 69,951 |
|
| | | |
Property, equipment and improvements, net | 31,643 |
| | 47,773 |
|
| | | |
Other non-current assets: | | | |
Deferred income taxes | 499 |
| | 597 |
|
Other assets | 1,276 |
| | 1,043 |
|
Total other non-current assets | 1,775 |
| | 1,640 |
|
Total assets | $ | 91,103 |
| | $ | 119,364 |
|
| | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | |
Accounts payable | $ | 17,834 |
| | $ | 20,825 |
|
Accrued salaries, wages and related expenses | 4,954 |
| | 5,309 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities | 25,894 |
| | 26,201 |
|
Total current liabilities | 48,682 |
| | 52,335 |
|
Non-current liabilities: | | | |
Deferred lease incentives | 6,267 |
| | 7,762 |
|
Deferred rent obligations | 6,661 |
| | 6,621 |
|
Other non-current liabilities | 8,970 |
| | 2,237 |
|
Total non-current liabilities | 21,898 |
| | 16,620 |
|
| | | |
Commitments | — |
| | — |
|
| | | |
Stockholders’ equity: | | | |
Preferred stock — $0.01 par value, 1,000 shares authorized, none outstanding | — |
| | — |
|
Common stock — $0.01 par value, 74,000 shares authorized, 48,365 and 47,625 shares issued, and 38,386 and 37,834 shares outstanding at February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, respectively | 481 |
| | 475 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 128,714 |
| | 127,652 |
|
Retained earnings | 4,137 |
| | 34,993 |
|
Common stock held in treasury, 9,979 and 9,791 shares at cost at February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, respectively | (112,809 | ) | | (112,711 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | 20,523 |
| | 50,409 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 91,103 |
| | $ | 119,364 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CHRISTOPHER & BANKS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Fiscal Year Ended |
| February 2, 2019 | | February 3, 2018 |
| (52 weeks) | | (53 weeks) |
Net sales | $ | 348,900 |
| | $ | 365,906 |
|
Merchandise, buying and occupancy costs | 246,269 |
| | 252,399 |
|
Gross profit | 102,631 |
| | 113,507 |
|
Other operating expenses: | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | 120,371 |
| | 123,398 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 10,158 |
| | 12,434 |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets | 4,384 |
| | 318 |
|
Total other operating expenses | 134,913 |
| | 136,150 |
|
Operating loss | (32,282 | ) | | (22,643 | ) |
Interest expense, net | (183 | ) | | (154 | ) |
Loss before income taxes | (32,465 | ) | | (22,797 | ) |
Income tax provision (benefit) | 374 |
| | (773 | ) |
Net loss and comprehensive loss | $ | (32,839 | ) | | $ | (22,024 | ) |
| | | |
Basic loss per share: | | | |
Net loss | $ | (0.88 | ) | | $ | (0.59 | ) |
Basic shares outstanding | 37,492 |
| | 37,212 |
|
| | | |
Diluted loss per share: | | | |
Net loss | $ | (0.88 | ) | | $ | (0.59 | ) |
Diluted shares outstanding | 37,492 |
| | 37,212 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CHRISTOPHER & BANKS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Treasury | | Common Stock | | | | | | |
| Shares Held | | Amount Held | | Shares Outstanding | | Amount Outstanding | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Total |
January 28, 2017 | 9,791 |
| | $ | (112,711 | ) | | 37,634 |
| | $ | 473 |
| | $ | 126,516 |
| | $ | 57,017 |
| | $ | 71,295 |
|
Net loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (22,024 | ) | | (22,024 | ) |
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures | — |
| | — |
| | 200 |
| | 2 |
| | (28 | ) | | — |
| | (26 | ) |
Stock-based compensation expense | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,164 |
| | — |
| | 1,164 |
|
February 3, 2018 | 9,791 |
| | $ | (112,711 | ) | | 37,834 |
| | $ | 475 |
| | $ | 127,652 |
| | $ | 34,993 |
| | $ | 50,409 |
|
Net loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (32,839 | ) | | (32,839 | ) |
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures | — |
| | — |
| | 740 |
| | 7 |
| | (39 | ) | | — |
| | (32 | ) |
Stock-based compensation expense | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,101 |
| | — |
| | 1,101 |
|
Acquisition of common stock held in treasury, at cost | 188 |
| | (98 | ) | | (188 | ) | | (1 | ) | | | | | | (99 | ) |
Cumulative effect of accounting change | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,983 |
| | 1,983 |
|
February 2, 2019 | 9,979 |
| | $ | (112,809 | ) | | 38,386 |
| | $ | 481 |
| | $ | 128,714 |
| | $ | 4,137 |
| | $ | 20,523 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CHRISTOPHER & BANKS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Fiscal Year Ended |
| February 2, 2019 | | February 3, 2018 |
| (52 weeks) | | (53 weeks) |
Cash flows used by operating activities: | | | |
Net loss | $ | (32,839 | ) | | $ | (22,024 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 10,158 |
| | 12,434 |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets | 4,384 |
| | 318 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net | 98 |
| | (276 | ) |
Amortization of financing costs | 61 |
| | 62 |
|
Deferred lease-related liabilities | (950 | ) | | (1,322 | ) |
Stock-based compensation expense | 1,101 |
| | 1,164 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets | 3 |
| | — |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | |
Accounts receivable | (141 | ) | | (77 | ) |
Merchandise inventories | 323 |
| | (4,527 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | (605 | ) | | 242 |
|
Income taxes receivable | (96 | ) | | 344 |
|
Accounts payable | (2,857 | ) | | 6,796 |
|
Accrued liabilities | 251 |
| | (1,293 | ) |
Other liabilities | (399 | ) | | 1,414 |
|
Net cash used by operating activities | (21,508 | ) | | (6,745 | ) |
Cash flows provided from (used by) investing activities: | | | |
Purchases of property, equipment and improvements | (4,294 | ) | | (5,158 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of assets | 13,329 |
| | — |
|
Net cash provided from (used by) investing activities | 9,035 |
| | (5,158 | ) |
Cash flows used by financing activities: | | | |
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures | (32 | ) | | (26 | ) |
Proceeds from short-term borrowings | 9,100 |
| | — |
|
Payments of short-term borrowings | (9,100 | ) | | — |
|
Acquisition of common stock held in treasury, at cost | (99 | ) | | — |
|
Payment of deferred financing costs | (234 | ) | | — |
|
Net cash used by financing activities | (365 | ) | | (26 | ) |
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (12,838 | ) | | (11,929 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 23,077 |
| | 35,006 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 10,239 |
| | $ | 23,077 |
|
Supplemental cash flow information: | | | |
Interest paid | $ | 190 |
| | $ | 188 |
|
Income taxes paid (refunded) | $ | 147 |
| | $ | (243 | ) |
Accrued purchases of property, equipment and improvements | $ | 156 |
| | $ | 324 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
CHRISTOPHER & BANKS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 — Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
Christopher & Banks Corporation, through its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “Christopher & Banks”, “the Company”, “we” or “us”), operates retail stores selling women’s apparel and accessories in the United States ("U.S."). The Company operated 455 and 463 stores as of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, respectively. The Company also operates an eCommerce website for its Christopher & Banks and C.J. Banks brands at www.christopherandbanks.com.
Fiscal year and basis of presentation
The Company follows the standard fiscal year of the retail industry, which is a fifty-two or fifty-three week period ending on the Saturday closest to January 31, and is designated by the calendar year in which the fiscal year commences. The fiscal year ended February 2, 2019 ("fiscal 2018") consisted of fifty-two weeks while the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018 ("fiscal 2017") consisted of fifty-three weeks.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Christopher & Banks Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during reporting periods. As a result, actual results could differ because of the use of these estimates and assumptions.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and in banks and investments purchased with an original maturity of ninety days or less.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts receivable from customers and other receivables. Credit card receivables relate to amounts due from payment processing entities that are collected one to five days after the related sale transaction occurs.
Accounts receivable consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| February 2, 2019 | | February 3, 2018 |
Credit card receivables | $ | 1,999 |
| | $ | 2,229 |
|
Other receivables | 768 |
| | 397 |
|
Total accounts receivable | $ | 2,767 |
| | $ | 2,626 |
|
Inventory valuation
Merchandise inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market utilizing the retail inventory method. The retail inventory method inherently requires management judgments and estimates, such as the amount and timing of permanent markdowns to clear unproductive or slow-moving inventory, which may impact the ending inventory valuation as well as gross margins.
Permanent markdowns designated for clearance activity are recorded when the utility of the inventory has diminished. Factors considered in the determination of permanent markdowns include current and anticipated demand, customer preferences, age of the merchandise and fashion trends. When a decision is made to permanently mark down merchandise, the resulting gross profit reduction is recognized.
Physical inventories are generally taken annually, and inventory records are adjusted accordingly, resulting in the recording of actual shrinkage. Physical inventories are taken at all store locations approximately three weeks before the end of the fiscal year. Shrinkage is estimated as a percentage of net sales at interim periods and for this approximate three-week period based on historical shrinkage rates.
Merchandise inventory consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| February 2, 2019 | | February 3, 2018 |
Merchandise - in store/eCommerce | $ | 29,859 |
| | $ | 34,225 |
|
Merchandise - in transit | 11,180 |
| | 7,136 |
|
Total merchandise inventories | $ | 41,039 |
| | $ | 41,361 |
|
Property, equipment and improvements, net
Property, equipment and improvements are initially recorded at cost. Property and equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life as follows:
|
| | |
Description | | Estimated Useful Lives |
Building and building improvements | | 25 years |
Computer hardware and software | | 3 to 5 years |
Equipment, furniture and fixtures | | 3 to 10 years |
Store leasehold improvements | | Shorter of the useful life or term of the lease, typically 10 years |
Repairs and maintenance which do not extend an asset’s useful life are expensed as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in income for that period.
Long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
When evaluating long-lived assets for potential impairment, we first compare the carrying value of the asset to the asset's estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges). If the sum of the estimated future cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, we calculate an impairment loss. The impairment loss calculation compares the carrying value of the asset to the asset's estimated fair value, which is typically based on estimated discounted future cash flows. We recognize an impairment loss if the amount of the asset's carrying value exceeds the asset's estimated fair value. If we recognize an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of the asset becomes its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis is depreciated over the remaining useful life of that asset.
When reviewing long-lived assets for impairment, we group long-lived assets with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. For long-lived assets deployed at store locations, we review for impairment at the individual store level.
Our impairment loss calculations involve uncertainty because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future cash flows and asset fair values, including estimating useful lives of the assets and selecting the discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows. If actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values, we may be exposed to losses that could be material.
Revenue recognition
We sell merchandise through our brick and mortar and eCommerce sales channels. Revenues are recognized when control of the promised merchandise is transferred to our customers. Within our brick and mortar sales channel, control is transferred at the point of sale. Within our eCommerce sales channel, control is transferred upon delivery of the merchandise to our customers. Shipping revenues associated with the eCommerce channel are recognized upon the completion of the delivery. The revenue recorded reflects the consideration that we expect to receive in exchange for our merchandise. The Company has elected, as an accounting policy, to exclude from the transaction price all taxes assessed by governmental authorities imposed on merchandise sales.
Sales are recognized at the point of purchase when a customer takes possession of the merchandise and pays for the purchase with cash, credit card, debit card or gift card. The Company records eCommerce revenue upon the estimated date the customer receives the merchandise. Shipping and handling revenues are included in net sales. Sales are recognized net of a sales return reserve, which is based on historical sales return data. Sales taxes collected from customers are remitted to the appropriate taxing jurisdictions and are excluded from net sales.
Gift cards are recorded as a liability when issued and until they are redeemed, at which point a sale is recorded. Unredeemed gift cards (“gift card breakage”) is recognized as a reduction of merchandise, buying and occupancy costs when the likelihood of a gift card being redeemed by a customer in the future is deemed remote and the Company determines that there is no legal obligation to remit the value of the unredeemed gift card to any state or local jurisdiction as unclaimed or abandoned property. The Company utilizes historical redemption patterns in order to estimate the rate and timing of breakage associated with gift cards.
Customer loyalty program
The Company’s Friendship Rewards loyalty program grants customers the ability to accumulate points based on purchase activity. Once a Friendship Rewards member achieves a certain point level, the member earns award certificates that may be redeemed towards future merchandise purchases. Points are accrued as unearned revenue and recorded as a reduction of net sales and a current liability as they are accumulated by members and certificates are earned. The liability is recorded net of estimated breakage based on historical redemption patterns and trends. Revenue and the related cost of sales are recognized upon redemption of the reward certificates, which expire approximately six weeks after issuance.
Private label credit card program
The Company has a private label credit card program with Comenity Bank which provides for the issuance of credit cards bearing the Christopher & Banks and C.J. Banks brands. The sponsoring bank manages and extends credit to the Company's customers and is the sole owner of the accounts receivable generated under the program.
In April 2017, the Company entered into a second amendment to the private label credit card plan agreement. As part of the amendment, the Company received a signing bonus of approximately $2 million from Comenity Bank and also earns revenue based on card usage by its customers. In addition, the sponsoring bank reimburses the Company for certain marketing expenditures related to the program, subject to an annual cap on the amount of reimbursable expenses.
Vendor allowances
At certain times the Company receives allowances or credits from its merchandise vendors primarily related to goods that do not meet our quality standards. These allowances or credits are reflected as a reduction of merchandise inventory in the period they are received. The majority of merchandise is produced exclusively for the Company. Accordingly, the Company does not enter into any arrangements with vendors where payments or other consideration might be received in connection with the purchase or promotion of a vendor’s products such as buy-down agreements or cooperative advertising programs.
Merchandise, buying and occupancy costs
Merchandise, buying and occupancy costs include the cost of merchandise, markdowns, shrink, freight, shipping and handling charges, buyer and distribution center salaries, buyer travel, rent and other occupancy related costs, various merchandise design and development costs, miscellaneous merchandise-related expenses and other costs related to the Company's distribution network. Merchandise, buying and occupancy costs do not include any depreciation or amortization expense.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses include salaries, with the exception of buyer and distribution center salaries, other employee benefits, marketing, store supplies, payment processing fees, information technology-related costs, insurance, professional services, non-buyer travel and miscellaneous other selling and administrative related expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses do not include any depreciation or amortization expense.
Rent expense, deferred rent obligations and deferred lease incentives
The Company leases its headquarters and distribution center building and all of its store locations under operating leases. Most of the store lease agreements contain tenant improvement allowances, funded by landlord cash incentives or rent abatements, which are recorded as a deferred lease incentive liability and amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the term of the lease. For purposes of recognizing landlord incentives and minimum rental expense, the Company utilizes the date that it obtains the legal right to use and control the leased space, which is generally when the Company enters the space and begins to make improvements in preparation for opening a new store location.
Certain lease agreements contain rent escalation clauses which provide for scheduled rent increases during the lease term or for rental payments commencing at a date other than the date of initial occupancy. Such escalating rent expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term, not including any renewal option periods, and the difference between the recognized rent expense and amounts payable under the lease are recorded as deferred rent obligations.
The Company's leases may also provide for contingent rents, which are determined as a percentage of sales in excess of specified levels. When specified levels have been achieved or when management determines that achieving the specified levels during the fiscal year is probable, the Company records a current accrued liability along with the corresponding rent expense.
A small portion of our leases contain renewal options that generally allow us to extend the lease for an additional five years.
Lease termination costs
Discounted liabilities for future lease costs and the fair value of related subleases of closed locations are recorded when the stores are closed prior to the expiration of the lease or execution of a lease termination agreement. In assessing the discounted liabilities for future costs of obligations related to closed stores, the Company makes assumptions regarding amounts of future subleases. If these assumptions or their related estimates change in the future, the Company may be required to record additional exit costs or reduce exit costs previously accrued. Actual settlements may vary substantially from recorded obligations. As of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, our lease termination liability is not material.
Advertising
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Advertising costs for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, were approximately $8.7 million and $8.4 million, respectively.
Fair value measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value are categorized using defined hierarchical levels directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair value measurements, as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; and
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value of the asset or liability.
Categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Certain of the Company's financial assets and liabilities are recorded at their carrying amounts which approximate fair value, based on their short-term nature. These financial assets and liabilities include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The Company measures certain of its long-lived assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
Long-lived asset impairment charges recorded during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 were measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs.
Stock-based compensation
Stock-based compensation is calculated using the estimated fair value of stock options on the date of grant, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the Company to estimate key assumptions such as expected term, volatility, risk-free interest rates and dividend yield to determine the fair value of stock options, based on both historical information and management judgment regarding market factors and trends. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the corresponding vesting period of the entire award, net of estimated forfeiture rates. The Company estimates expected forfeitures of share-based awards at the grant date and recognizes compensation cost only for those awards expected to vest.
In estimating expected forfeitures, the Company analyzes historical forfeiture and termination information and considers how future termination rates are expected to differ from historical termination rates. The Company ultimately adjusts this forfeiture assumption to actual forfeitures. Any changes in the forfeiture assumptions do not impact the total amount of expense ultimately recognized over the vesting period. Instead, different forfeiture assumptions only impact the timing of expense recognition over the vesting period. If the actual forfeitures differ from management estimates, additional adjustments to compensation expense are recorded.
Restricted stock awards are generally subject to forfeiture if employment or service terminates prior to the lapse of the restrictions. In addition, certain restricted stock awards have performance-based vesting provisions and are subject to forfeiture, in whole or in part, if these performance conditions are not achieved. Management assesses, on an ongoing basis, the probability of whether the performance criteria will be achieved and, once it is deemed probable, compensation expense is recognized over the relevant performance period. For those awards not subject to performance criteria, the cost of the restricted stock awards is expensed, which is determined to be the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant, on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Time-based grants of restricted stock participate in dividend payments to the extent dividends are declared and paid prior to vesting.
Income taxes
Income taxes are calculated using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future income taxes attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. We record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, management is required to make judgments regarding future income, taxable income and the potential effects of the mix of income or losses in jurisdictions in which we operate. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date of such change.
Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive loss is the change in equity (net assets) of a business entity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from nonowner sources. It includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Comprehensive loss is the sum of net loss from operations and other items that must bypass the Statement of Operations because they have not been realized, including items like an unrealized holding gain or loss from available for sale securities and foreign currency translation gains or losses. There was no difference between the reported net loss and comprehensive loss for fiscal years ended February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018.
Net loss per common share
The Company utilizes the two-class method of calculating earnings per share (“EPS”) where nonvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to receive dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities, and thus, are included in the two-class method of computing EPS. Participating securities include nonvested employee restricted stock awards with time-based vesting, which contain non-forfeitable rights to receive dividend payments.
Basic EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the applicable period, while diluted EPS is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common and common equivalent shares outstanding.
Segment reporting
The Company reports its operations as one reportable segment, Retail Operations, which consists of one operating segment. The Company defines an operating segment on the same basis that it uses to evaluate performance and to allocate resources. The Company has also considered its organizational structure and design of its executive compensation programs. Therefore, the Company reports results as a single segment, which includes the operation of its retail stores, outlet stores, and online purchases.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, related to leases to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring the recognition of right-of-use (ROU) assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. Most prominent among the changes in the standard is the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under current U.S. GAAP. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. Under the new standard, disclosures are required to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.
The guidance permits the use of a modified retrospective approach, which requires an entity to recognize and measure leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. Alternatively, the guidance permits a “Comparatives Under 840 Option” that changes the date of initial application to the beginning of the period of adoption. We will be electing the Comparatives Under 840 Option in which we will apply ASC 840 to all comparative periods, including disclosures, and recognize the effects of applying ASC 842 as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the effective date (date of initial application). We will elect the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which among other things, allows us to carryforward the historical lease classification. In addition, we elected certain practical expedients and accounting policies including the lessee practical expedient to not separate lease components. We will also make an accounting policy election to keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off of the balance sheet. We will recognize those lease payments in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The standard will have a material impact on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, but will not have a material impact on our Consolidated Statement of Operations and Statements of Cash Flows. The most significant impact will be the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities for operating leases, while our accounting for capital leases remains substantially unchanged.
Adoption of the standard will result in the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities for operating leases of approximately $135 million and $154 million, respectively, as of February 3, 2019, the date of initial application. We currently estimate the cumulative pre-tax impact of these changes to increase retained earnings by approximately $3.5 million, which includes the recognition of the deferred gain on the sale-leaseback transaction of our corporate headquarters facility, see Note 3 - PPE. We do not believe the standard will materially affect our consolidated net earnings.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 addresses simplification of several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the Statement of Cash Flows. ASU 2016-09 was adopted in the current year on a prospective basis. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements mostly due to the impact of the tax valuation allowance.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. ASU 2016-18 requires that a Statement of Cash Flows explain the change during the period among the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is effective for public companies for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. There was no adjustment to prior year financial statements as the Company had no restricted cash in prior years. As of February 2, 2019, the Company included $0.8 million of restricted cash in cash and cash equivalents within the Statement of Cash Flows related to cash held in escrow in conjunction with the sale leaseback transaction.
In August 2018, the SEC adopted a final rule under SEC Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification that amends certain disclosure requirements that were redundant, duplicative, overlapping, outdated or superseded. The amendments also expanded the disclosure requirements on the analysis of shareholders' equity for interim financial statements, in which registrants must now analyze changes in shareholders’ equity, in the form of reconciliation, for the current and comparative year-to-date periods, with subtotals for each interim period. This final rule was effective on November 5, 2018. The Company has adopted all relevant disclosure requirements, with the exception of the shareholders’ equity interim disclosures, which is allowed to be adopted in a future interim period. The Company will include a Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity with its interim financial statements beginning with the fiscal quarter ending April 4, 2019.
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The Company adopted ASC 606, and all the related amendments on February 4, 2018 using the modified retrospective method for all contracts. The additional disclosures required by the ASC 606 have been included in Note 2 - Revenue. Results for reporting periods beginning February 4, 2018 reflect the application of ASC Topic 606, while the results for prior reporting periods were prepared under the guidance of ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. We recorded a net increase to opening equity of $2.0 million as of February 4, 2018 due to the cumulative impact of adopting the new standard, with the impact primarily related to the recognition of gift card breakage. For further detailed discussion, see Note 2 - Revenue.
We reviewed all other recently issued accounting pronouncements and concluded they are either not applicable to our operations, or that no material effect is expected on our Consolidated Financial Statements as a result of future adoption.
NOTE 2 — Revenue
On February 4, 2018 (the first day of fiscal 2018), we adopted ASC 606. In general, this ASC requires an entity to allocate the transaction price received from customers to each separate and distinct performance obligation and recognize revenue as these performance obligations are satisfied.
We adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method for all contracts. Accordingly, results for reporting periods beginning February 4, 2018 reflect the application of ASC 606, while the results for prior reporting periods were prepared under previous revenue recognition guidance. We recorded a net increase to opening equity of approximately $2.0 million as of February 4, 2018 due to the cumulative impact of adopting ASC 606, with the impact primarily related to the recognition of gift card breakage as discussed below. Further, as a result of applying the modified retrospective method, the following adjustments were made to accounts on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 4, 2018 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | February 3, 2018 | | ASC 606 Adjustments | | February 4, 2018 |
Assets: | | | | | | |
Merchandise inventories | | $ | 41,361 |
| | $ | (482 | ) | | $ | 40,879 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current asset | | 2,715 |
| | 482 |
| | 3,197 |
|
| | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | |
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities | | 26,201 |
| | (1,983 | ) | | 24,218 |
|
| | | | | | |
Equity: | | | | | | |
Retained earnings | | 34,993 |
| | 1,983 |
| | 36,976 |
|
Impact on Financial Statements
The following summarize the impact of adopting ASC 606 on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2019 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | February 2, 2019 |
| | As reported | | Balance without adoption of ASC 606 | | Effect of change higher (lower) |
Consolidated Balance Sheets | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | |
Merchandise inventories | | $ | 41,039 |
| | $ | 41,552 |
| | $ | 513 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 3,372 |
| | 2,859 |
| | (513 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | |
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities | | 25,894 |
| | 27,640 |
| | 1,746 |
|
| | | | | | |
Equity | | | | | | |
Retained earnings | | 4,137 |
| | 2,391 |
| | (1,746 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 52 Weeks Ended February 2, 2019 |
| | As reported | | Balance without adoption of ASC 606 | | Effect of change higher (lower) |
Consolidated Statements of Operations | | | | | | |
Net sales | | $ | 348,900 |
| | $ | 348,466 |
| | $ | (434 | ) |
Net loss | | (32,839 | ) | | (32,603 | ) | | 236 |
|
| | | | | | |
Net loss per share -- basic | | $ | (0.88 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (0.88 | ) |
Net loss per share -- diluted | | $ | (0.88 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | (0.88 | ) |
Merchandise sales
We sell merchandise through our brick and mortar and eCommerce sales channels. Revenues are recognized when control of the promised merchandise is transferred to our customers. Within our brick and mortar sales channel, control is transferred at the point of sale. Within our eCommerce sales channel, control is transferred upon delivery of the merchandise to our customers. Shipping revenues associated with the eCommerce channel are recognized upon the completion of the delivery. The revenue recorded reflects the consideration that we expect to receive in exchange for our merchandise. The Company has elected, as an accounting policy, to exclude from the transaction price all taxes assessed by governmental authorities imposed on merchandise sales.
Right of return
As part of our merchandise sales, we offer customers a right of return on merchandise that lapses based on the original purchase date. The Company estimates the amount of sales that may be returned by our customers and records this estimate as a reduction of revenue in the period in which the related revenues are recognized. We utilize historical and industry data to estimate the total return liability. Conversely, the reduction in revenue results in a corresponding reduction in merchandise,buying and occupancy costs which results in a contract asset for the anticipated merchandise returned. The total reduction in revenue from estimated returns was $1.2 million as of February 2, 2019, which is included in accrued liabilities and other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Friendship® Rewards Program
The Company established its Friendship® Rewards Program as a loyalty program where customers earn points towards future discount certificates based on their purchase activity. We have identified the additional benefits received from this program as a separate performance obligation within a sales contract in the form of the discount certificates earned by customers. Accordingly, we assess any incremental discounts issued to our customers through the program and allocate a portion of the transaction price associated with merchandise sales from the loyalty program members to the future discounts earned. The transaction price allocated to future discounts is recorded as deferred revenue until the discounts are used or forfeited. In addition, the Company estimates breakage on the points earned within the program that will not be used by customers for future discounts. The Company estimates breakage based on the historical redemption rate and considers industry trends. Breakage is recorded as a reduction to the deferred revenue associated with the program. As of February 2, 2019, and February 3, 2018, the Company recorded $3.8 million and $3.5 million, respectively, in deferred revenue associated with the program, which is included in accrued liabilities and other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Gift card revenue
The Company sells gift cards to customers which can be redeemed for merchandise within our brick and mortar and eCommerce sales channels. Gift cards are recorded as deferred revenue when issued and are subsequently recorded as revenue upon redemption. The Company estimates breakage related to gift cards when the likelihood of redemption is remote. This estimate utilizes historical trends based on the vintage of the gift card. Breakage on gift cards is recorded as revenue in proportion to the rate of gift card redemptions by vintage. This represents a change in the methodology used to estimate breakage as, prior to the adoption of ASC 606, we had historically recognized breakage for the portion of the gift card balances that remained outstanding following 36 months of issuance. As of February 2, 2019, the Company had $4.6 million of deferred revenue associated with the issuance of gift cards. The deferred gift card revenue is included in accrued liabilities and other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Private label credit card
The Company offers a private label credit card ("PLCC") under the Christopher and Banks brand name offered under an agreement with Comenity Bank. Pursuant to this agreement, there are several obligations on behalf of Comenity Bank that impact the recording of revenue.
As part of the agreement, the Company received a signing bonus. We have determined that the benefits associated with signing the agreement are recognized over time throughout its term. This is the most accurate depiction of the transfer of services as the customer receives and consumes the benefits by obtaining and having the ability to use financing through Comenity Bank for purchases within our brick and mortar and eCommerce sales channels throughout the agreement's term. The deferred signing bonus is included in other liabilities and is being recognized in net sales ratably over the term of the contract. The other revenue based on customer usage of the card is recognized in net sales in the periods in which the related customer transaction occurs. As of February 2, 2019, the Company had $1.6 million recorded as deferred revenue associated with the signing bonus, of which $0.3 million is included in accrued liabilities and other current liabilities and the remaining $1.3 million is included in Other non-current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company recorded $0.3 million of revenue for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019 associated with the signing bonus.
The Company records revenue associated with royalties received for purchases made using the PLCC. Royalty revenue is recognized based on the total amount to which we have a right to invoice in accordance with the practical expedient included in ASC 606. Accordingly, royalty revenue is recognized in the period in which the related purchases is recognized.
The Company receives a performance bonus based on the total amount of new PLCC accounts that are opened during the year. We have determined that this is a form of variable consideration. Variable consideration is recorded if, in the Company’s judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of revenue under the contract will not occur. For the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019, the Company met certain performance metrics within the contract and recorded a small amount of revenue associated with performance bonuses.
Disaggregation of revenue
The following table provides information about disaggregated revenue by sales channel. All revenue illustrated below is included within our one reportable segment.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 52 Weeks Ended February 2, 2019 | | 53 Weeks Ended February 3, 2018 |
Brick and mortar stores | | $ | 262,143 |
| | $ | 289,439 |
|
eCommerce sales | | 84,808 |
| | 75,053 |
|
Other | | 1,949 |
| | 1,414 |
|
Net sales | | $ | 348,900 |
| | 365,906 |
|
Amounts included within other revenue relate to revenues earned from our private label credit card, net of any revenue adjustments and accruals.
Contract balances
The following table provides information about contract assets and liabilities from contracts with customers (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Contract Liabilities |
| | February 2, 2019 | | February 4, 2018 |
| | Current | | Non-Current | | Current | | Non-Current |
Right of return | | $ | 1,176 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,079 |
| | $ | — |
|
Friendship Rewards Program | | 3,768 |
| | — |
| | 3,501 |
| | — |
|
Gift card revenue | | 4,646 |
| | — |
| | 4,986 |
| | — |
|
Private label credit card | | 274 |
| | 1,348 |
| | 274 |
| | 1,622 |
|
Total | | $ | 9,864 |
| | $ | 1,348 |
| | $ | 9,840 |
| | $ | 1,622 |
|
The Company recognized revenue of $4.5 million in the fifty-two week period ended February 2, 2019, related to contract liabilities recorded at the beginning of the period. Such revenues were comprised of the redemption and forfeiture of Friendship Rewards Program discount certificates, redemption of gift cards, and amortization of the PLCC signing bonus. The Company does not have any material contract assets as of February 2, 2019. For the fifty-two week period ended February 2, 2019, the Company did not recognize any revenue resulting from changes in the estimated variable consideration to be received associated with performance obligations satisfied or partially satisfied in prior periods.
Transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations
The following table includes the estimated revenue expected to be recognized in future periods related to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied as of February 2, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Revenue Expected to be Recognized by Period |
| | Total | | Less than 1 year | | 1-3 years | | 3-5 years |
Private label credit card | | $ | 1,348 |
| | $ | 274 |
| | $ | 822 |
| | $ | 252 |
|
Total | | $ | 1,348 |
| | $ | 274 |
| | $ | 822 |
| | $ | 252 |
|
Contract Costs
The Company has not incurred any costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.
NOTE 3 — Property, Equipment and Improvements, Net
Property, equipment and improvements, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
Description | | February 2, 2019 | | February 3, 2018 |
Land | | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,597 |
|
Corporate office, distribution center and related building improvements | | — |
| | 12,753 |
|
Store leasehold improvements | | 50,305 |
| | 50,094 |
|
Store furniture and fixtures | | 70,815 |
| | 70,447 |
|
Corporate office and distribution center furniture, fixtures and equipment | | 6,179 |
| | 5,053 |
|
Computer and point of sale hardware and software | | 33,098 |
| | 33,126 |
|
Construction in progress | | 419 |
| | 1,275 |
|
Total property, equipment and improvements, gross | | 160,816 |
| | 174,345 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | (129,173 | ) | | (126,572 | ) |
Total property, equipment and improvements, net | | $ | 31,643 |
| | $ | 47,773 |
|
Sale-Leaseback
On April 27, 2018, the Company completed the sale of and entered into an agreement to leaseback its corporate headquarters facility, including the distribution center, in Plymouth, Minnesota. The agreement provided for the sale of the facility for a purchase price of $13.7 million and the subsequent leaseback of the facility for a 15-year period. The lease is classified as an operating lease. As a result of this transaction, the Company recorded a deferred gain of $7.7 million. The Company is recognizing this deferred gain on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Through February 2, 2019, the Company has recognized $0.4 million of this deferred gain in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of February 2, 2019, the unamortized deferred gain is $7.3 million of which $6.8 million is reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Other non-current liabilities, with the remaining $0.5 million included in Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities. As part of the transaction, the Company deposited $1.7 million in escrow for certain repairs to the building. As of February 2, 2019, $0.8 million remained in escrow for repairs to the building. This amount is considered to be restricted cash and is included within cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
When evaluating long-lived assets for potential impairment, we first compare the carrying value of the asset to the asset's estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges). If the sum of the estimated future cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, we calculate an impairment loss. The impairment loss calculation compares the carrying value of the asset to the asset's estimated fair value, which is typically based on estimated discounted future cash flows. We recognize an impairment loss if the amount of the asset's carrying value exceeds the asset's estimated fair value. If we recognize an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of the asset becomes its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis is depreciated over the remaining useful life of that asset.
When reviewing long-lived assets for impairment, we group long-lived assets with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. For long-lived assets deployed at store locations, we review for impairment at the individual store level.
Our impairment loss calculations involve uncertainty because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future cash flows and asset fair values, including estimating useful lives of the assets and selecting the discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows. If actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values, we may be exposed to losses that could be material.
Due to declining sales and continued operating losses, the Company performed impairment analyses during the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019. Leasehold improvements, store furniture and fixtures at certain underperforming stores, and stores identified for closure were analyzed for impairment. As a result of these analyses, the Company recorded $4.4 million of long-lived asset impairment during the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2019. The Company recorded long-lived asset impairment of $0.3 million during the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2018. See Note 9 - Fair Value Measurements, for further additional discussion.
NOTE 4 — Accrued Liabilities and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| February 2, 2019 | | February 3, 2018 |
Gift card and store credit liabilities | $ | 4,646 |
| | $ | 6,931 |
|
Accrued Friendship Rewards Loyalty Program liability | 3,768 |
| | 3,539 |
|
Accrued income, sales and other taxes payable | 911 |
| | 1,587 |
|
Accrued occupancy-related expenses | 3,700 |
| | 3,432 |
|
Sales return reserve | 1,176 |
| | 1,079 |
|
eCommerce obligations | 6,194 |
| | 3,824 |
|
Other accrued liabilities | 5,499 |
| | 5,809 |
|
Total accrued liabilities and other current liabilities | $ | 25,894 |
| | $ | 26,201 |
|
NOTE 5 — Credit Facility
The Company is party to an amended and restated credit agreement ("the Credit Facility") with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Wells Fargo"), as lender. On August 3, 2018, the Company entered into a second amendment ("Second Amendment") to the Credit Facility.
The Second Amendment, among other changes, (i) extended the term of the Credit Facility to August 3, 2023; and (ii) supplemented the existing $50.0 million revolving Credit Facility by adding a new $5.0 million revolving "first-in, last-out" tranche Credit Facility (the "FILO Facility"), subject to borrowing base restrictions applicable to the FILO Facility. The Company must draw under the FILO Facility before making any borrowings under the revolving Credit Facility.
Loans under the FILO Facility will bear interest based on quarterly excess available under the borrowing base as defined in the Credit Facility. The interest rate under the FILO Facility will be either (i) the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus 3.00% for FILO loans that are LIBOR loans; or (ii) 2.00% above the Base Rate for FILO loans that are Base Rate loans as such terms are defined in the Credit Facility. Borrowings under the Credit Facility will generally accrue interest at a rate ranging from 1.50% to 1.75% over the LIBOR or 0.50% to 0.75% over the Wells Fargo Prime Rate based on the amount of Average Daily Availability for the Fiscal Quarter immediately preceding each Adjustment Date, as such terms are defined in the Credit Facility. The Company has the ability to select between the LIBOR or prime based rate at the time of the cash advance. The Credit Facility has an unused commitment fee of 0.25%.
In addition to these changes, the Second Amendment eliminates availability against the Company's real property, which was the subject of a sale-leaseback transaction on April 27, 2018. The Company has recorded approximately $0.2 million of deferred financing costs during the fifty-two weeks ended February 2, 2019 in connection with the Second Amendment. The deferred financing costs have been combined with the balance of the deferred financing costs remaining from the prior amendment entered into on September 8, 2014. Deferred financing costs are included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are being amortized as interest expense over the related term of the Second Amendment.
The Credit Facility contains customary events of default and various affirmative and negative covenants. The sole financial covenant contained in the Credit Facility requires the Company to maintain Availability at least equal to the greater of (a) ten percent (10%) of the borrowing base or (b) $3.0 million. In addition, the Credit Facility permits the payment of dividends to the Company's stockholders if certain financial conditions are met. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants and other financial provisions of the Credit Facility as of February 2, 2019.
The Company's obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company has pledged substantially all of its assets as collateral security for the loans, including accounts owed to the Company, bank accounts, inventory, other tangible and intangible personal property, intellectual property (including patents and trademarks), and stock or other evidences of ownership of 100% of all of the Company's subsidiaries.
There were no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility as of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018. The total borrowing base at February 2, 2019 was approximately $26.7 million. As of February 2, 2019, the Company had open on-demand letters of credit of approximately $6.9 million. Accordingly, after reducing the borrowing base for the open letters of credit and the required minimum availability of the greater of $3.0 million, or 10.0% of the borrowing base, the net availability of revolving credit loans under the Credit Facility was approximately $19.4 million at February 2, 2019.
NOTE 6 — Stockholder's Equity and Stock-Based Compensation
Dividends
The Credit Facility allows payment of dividends to the Company's stockholders if certain financial conditions are met. We have paid no dividends since 2010.
Share repurchase program
In December 2018, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a Stock Repurchase Program (the “Program”) to repurchase up to $2.0 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock during the period ending December 31, 2019. The shares may be repurchased from time to time through open market purchases, block transactions, privately negotiated transactions or derivative transactions in a manner consistent with applicable securities laws and regulations. The Program may be modified, suspended or terminated at any time by the Board of Directors.
During fiscal 2018, the Company repurchased 188,079 shares at a cost of approximately $0.1 million. As of February 2, 2019, approximately $1.9 million remains available under this Program for future purchases of common stock.
Stock-based compensation
The Company maintains the following stock plans approved by stockholders: the 2013 Directors' Equity Incentive Plan (the "2013 Stock Plan") and the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2018 Stock Plan”).
On June 13, 2018, the Company adopted, after stockholder approval, the 2018 Stock Plan. With the adoption of the 2018 Stock Plan, no further awards may be made under the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2014 Stock Plan”). The aggregate number of shares that may be issued under all stock-based awards made under the 2018 Stock Plan will be (i) the sum of 3,000,000 and (ii) any shares subject to any outstanding award under the 2014 Stock Plan that after June 13, 2018 are not purchased, are forfeited or are reacquired by the Company due to the termination or cancellation of such award. In general, if an award entitles the holder thereof to receive or purchase shares, the number of shares covered by such award will be counted on the date of grant against the aggregate number of shares available under the 2018 Stock Plan. If awards under the 2018 Stock Plan or, after June 13, 2018, awards under the 2014 Stock Plan that expire or otherwise terminate without being exercised, the shares of common stock not acquired pursuant to such awards again become available for issuance under the 2018 Stock Plan in accordance with the share counting provisions in the 2018 Stock Plan. However, under the share counting provisions of the 2018 Stock Plan, the following shares will not again be available for issuance: (i) shares unissued due to a “net exercise” of a stock option, (ii) any shares withheld or shares tendered to satisfy tax withholding obligations under any award, (iii) shares covered by a SAR that is not settled in shares upon exercise and (iv) shares repurchased using stock option exercise proceeds.
On June 13, 2018, the 2013 Stock Plan was amended and restated to increase the number of shares authorized by 500,000 shares of common stock.
Under the 2018 Stock Plan and the 2013 Stock Plan, the Company may grant options to purchase common stock to employees and non-employee members of the Board, respectively, at a price not less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the option grant date. In general, (i) time-based stock options granted to employees vest over three years and are exercisable up to 10 years from the date of grant; and (ii) performance-based stock options vest, 50% following a determination that the performance criteria have been met and 50% on the second anniversary of the date of grant, with the number of options vesting based on the extent to which, if at all, the performance criteria have been achieved.
The Company may also grant shares of restricted stock or units representing the right to receive shares of stock to its employees and non-employee members of the Board. The grantee cannot transfer the shares or units before the respective shares or units vest. Shares of nonvested restricted stock are considered to be currently issued and outstanding, but units representing the right to receive stock are not. Grants to employees of restricted stock or restricted stock units generally have original vesting schedules of one to three years, while restricted grants to Directors typically vest approximately one year after the date of grant. On June 13, 2018, restricted stock and unit awards for 250,000 shares, in the aggregate, were granted to Directors.
Approximately 1.5 million and 3.0 million shares were authorized for issuance under the 2013 Stock Plan and the 2018 Stock Plan, respectively. As of February 2, 2019, there were approximately 0.6 million and 2.7 million shares available for future grants under the 2013 Stock Plan and the 2018 Stock Plan, respectively.
As an inducement to join the Company, our new Chief Executive Officer, Keri Jones, was awarded 500,000 shares of non-qualified stock options and 250,000 shares of time-based restricted stock on March 12, 2018 outside of the above plans. Each of the awards vests 1/36th each month and the non-qualified stock option has a ten-year term.
The total pre-tax compensation expense related to all stock-based awards for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 was approximately $1.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense is included in merchandise, buying and occupancy expenses for the buying and distribution employees, and in selling, general and administrative expense for all other employees.
Black-Scholes assumptions
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value stock options for grants to employees and non-employee directors. Using this option-pricing model, the fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, as the stock options are subject to pro-rata vesting. The expected volatility assumption is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock over a term equal to the expected term of the option granted. The expected term of stock option awards granted is derived from the Company’s historical experience and represents the period of time that awards are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield on a U.S. Treasury constant maturity with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the option granted.
The table below shows the weighted average assumptions relating to the valuation of stock options granted during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017.
|
| | | |
| Fiscal 2018 | | Fiscal 2017 |
Expected dividend yield | —% | | —% |
Expected volatility | 70.16-77.24% | | 76.65-84.94% |
Risk-free interest rate | 2.64-3.05% | | 1.66-2.05% |
Expected term | 3.00-5.00 years | | 3.00-5.00 years |
Stock-Based Compensation Activity — Stock Options
The following tables present a summary of stock option activity for fiscal 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
Outstanding, beginning of period | 3,543,826 |
| | $ | 2.19 |
| | |
| | |
Granted | 2,312,303 |
| | 0.99 |
| | | | |
Exercised | — |
| | — |
| | | | |
Canceled - Vested | (349,670 | ) | | 3.50 |
| | | | |
Canceled - Nonvested (Forfeited) | (1,221,559 | ) | | 1.32 |
| | | | |
Outstanding, end of period | 4,284,900 |
| | $ | 1.68 |
| | $ | — |
| | 6.36 years |
Exercisable, end of period | 1,888,430 |
| | $ | 2.44 |
| | $ | — |
| | 4.51 years |
|
| | | | | | |
| Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Nonvested, beginning of period | 2,231,750 |
| | $ | 0.74 |
|
Granted | 2,312,303 |
| | 0.57 |
|
Vested | (926,024 | ) | | 0.72 |
|
Forfeited | (1,221,559 | ) | | 0.72 |
|
Nonvested, end of period | 2,396,470 |
| | 0.59 |
|
The weighted average fair value for options granted during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 was $0.57 and $0.74, respectively. The grant date fair value of options vesting during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 was approximately $0.72 and $0.84, respectively. There were no options exercised during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017.
As of February 2, 2019, there was approximately $0.8 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested stock options granted, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.98 years.
During fiscal 2018, as part of its Annual Incentive Plan, the Company made awards of performance-based non-qualified stock options to a limited number of employees which entitles these employees to receive an option to purchase a specified number of shares of the Company's common stock at the specified option price, provided that the performance criteria are met. This performance criteria involves meeting the designated threshold for operating income and generating positive cash flow. These stock options vest, in whole or in part, on the vesting date if the operating income threshold under the Stock Option Award agreement is met or exceeded for fiscal 2018 and the Company generated positive cash flow. The weighted average fair value of the options upon the grant date was $0.73. At February 2, 2019, options for approximately 574,534 shares remain outstanding.
The Company made similar awards of performance-based non-qualified stock options to a limited number of employees in fiscal 2017. In March 2018, all of the outstanding awards of non-qualified stock options granted in fiscal 2017 were forfeited as the Company failed to achieve the threshold operating income goal.
Stock-Based Compensation Activity — Restricted Stock
The following table presents a summary of restricted stock activity for fiscal 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) |
Nonvested, beginning of period | 544,933 |
| | $ | 1.48 |
| | |
Granted | 848,203 |
| | 0.85 |
| | |
Vested | (365,981 | ) | | 1.43 |
| | |
Forfeited | (21,717 | ) | | 1.43 |
| | |
Nonvested, end of period | 1,005,438 |
| | 0.97 |
| | $ | 575 |
|
The weighted average fair value for restricted stock granted during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 was $0.85 and $1.34, respectively. The total grant date fair value of restricted stock vested during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 was approximately $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock vested during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 was approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
As of February 2, 2019, there was approximately $0.5 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.91 years.
Other Stock-Based Awards
During fiscal 2017, as part of the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Company made awards of non-qualified stock options to a limited number of employees which entitles these employees to receive an option to purchase a specified number of shares of the Company's common stock at the specified option price. The actual number of options issued on the vesting dates could range from zero to 465,900 shares. The weighted average grant date fair value of the options is $0.74.
Employee Inducement Awards
In connection with the appointment of Joel Waller as interim President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 17, 2017, the Company granted to Mr. Waller employee inducement equity awards, including 200,000 shares of performance-based, restricted common stock. One tranche of 100,000 shares will vest if, on any date prior to the "Vesting Date" (as defined in the award agreement), the Company’s common stock has a closing price equal to or greater than $3.00 on the NYSE, and the second tranche of 100,000 shares will vest if, on any date prior to the Vesting Date, the Company’s common stock has a closing price equal to or greater than $4.00 on the NYSE. If a threshold is not met, the tranche of shares of restricted stock subject to such threshold will be forfeited during fiscal 2019.
NOTE 7 — Income Taxes
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("the Act") tax reform legislation was enacted. This legislation marked significant change in U.S. tax law including a reduction in the corporate tax rates, changes to net operating loss carryforwards and carrybacks and a repeal of the corporate Alternative Minimum Tax ("AMT"). The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ('SAB 118') that allows companies to record provisional estimates of the impacts of the Act during a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment. For fiscal 2017, the Company estimated the effects of the Act.
The Act reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% as of January 1, 2018. As a result of the enacted law, the Company was required to revalue deferred tax assets and liabilities at the enacted rate. This revaluation resulted in additional expense of $20.7 million and a corresponding offset of $20.7 million to the valuation allowance within continuing operations of the Company. Although the net expense represented what the Company believed was a reasonable estimate of the impact of the income tax effects of the Act on the Company as of February 3, 2018, it was considered provisional. During fiscal 2018, the Company finalized its accounting for this matter and concluded that no material adjustments were required.
The phase-in of the lower corporate tax rate resulted in a blended rate of 33.8% for the Company for fiscal 2017. At February 3, 2018 we had not fully completed our accounting for the tax effects of enactment of the Act; however, we made a reasonable estimate of the effects on our existing deferred tax balances and valuation allowances. We remeasured U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future.
The Act eliminated the corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) and deemed accumulated AMT credits to be fully refundable by the year 2022. As of February 2, 2019, accumulated AMT tax credits totaled $0.4 million of which we now expect to be refunded.
The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2018 | | Fiscal 2017 |
Current: | | | |
Federal tax benefit | $ | (78 | ) | | $ | (439 | ) |
State tax expense (benefit) | 354 |
| | (59 | ) |
Current tax expense (benefit) | 276 |
| | (498 | ) |
Deferred tax expense (benefit) | 98 |
| | (275 | ) |
Income tax provision (benefit) | $ | 374 |
| | $ | (773 | ) |
The reconciliations of the federal statutory tax rate to the Company's effective tax rate for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 are as follows:
|
| | | | | |
| Fiscal 2018 | | Fiscal 2017 |
Federal income tax at statutory rate | 21.0 | % | | 33.8 | % |
State income tax, net of federal benefit | (2.5 | ) | | 1.4 |
|
Change in valuation allowance | (17.0 | ) | | 56.7 |
|
Reserve for unrecognized tax benefits | 0.2 |
| | 0.4 |
|
Officer's compensation | — |
| | 1.3 |
|
Impact of tax rate change on deferred taxes | — |
| | (89.7 | ) |
Tax credits | 0.3 |
| | — |
|
Prior year true-ups | (2.9 | ) | | (0.5 | ) |
Other | (0.3 | ) | | — |
|
Effective income tax rate | (1.2 | )% | | 3.4 | % |
Significant components of the Company's deferred income tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| February 2, 2019 | | February 3, 2018 |
Deferred tax assets: | | | |
Accrued Friendship Rewards loyalty liability | $ | 772 |
| | $ | 773 |
|
Accrued gift card liability | — |
| | 495 |
|
Merchandise inventories | 827 |
| | 845 |
|
Deferred rent and deferred lease incentives | 3,829 |
| | 4,147 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense | 749 |
| | 769 |
|
Net operating loss carryforwards | 34,819 |
| | 30,550 |
|
Contribution carryforwards | 176 |
| | 226 |
|
Tax credit carryforwards | 859 |
| | 766 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 746 |
| | — |
|
Other accrued liabilities | 1,189 |
| | 1,152 |
|
Total deferred tax assets | 43,966 |
| | 39,723 |
|
Less: Valuation allowance | (43,060 | ) | | (37,555 | ) |
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance | 906 |
| | 2,168 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | (1,235 | ) |
Accrued gift card liability | (127 | ) | | — |
|
Other | (280 | ) | | (336 | ) |
Total deferred tax liabilities | (407 | ) | | (1,571 | ) |
Net deferred tax assets | $ | 499 |
| | $ | 597 |
|
Deferred income tax assets represent potential future income tax benefits. Realization of these assets is ultimately dependent upon future taxable income. ASC Topic 740 Income Taxes ("ASC Topic 740") requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on all available evidence, it is considered more likely than not that some or all of the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in a future period. Forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult when negative evidence such as cumulative losses exists. Based on available objective evidence and cumulative losses, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets are not recognizable and will not be recognized until the Company has sufficient taxable income. Accordingly, the net deferred tax assets, with the exception of certain deferred state benefits, have been offset by a valuation allowance. The valuation allowance increased $5.5 million and decreased $11.0 million during the fiscal years ended February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, respectively.
As of February 2, 2019, the Company has gross federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $145.5 million and $73.6 million, respectively. A portion of the federal net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2032. The state net operating loss carryforwards have carryforward periods of 5 to 20 years and begin to expire in 2019. The Company also has federal tax credits of $0.9 million which will begin to expire in 2030 and gross charitable contribution carryforwards of $0.7 million that will begin to expire in 2020.
A company’s ability to utilize a portion of its net operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income may be subject to certain limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code due to changes in the equity ownership of the Company. The Company has analyzed equity ownership changes and determined its net operating losses will not be limited under Section 382.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
Balance at January 28, 2017 | $ | 1,033 |
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 55 |
|
Additions for tax positions of previous years | — |
|
Reductions for tax positions of previous years | (300 | ) |
Reductions for tax positions of previous years due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations | (161 | ) |
Balance at February 3, 2018 | 627 |
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year | 8 |
|
Additions for tax positions of previous years | 128 |
|
Reductions for tax positions of related to the current years | (161 | ) |
Reductions for tax positions of previous years due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations | (159 | ) |
Balance at February 2, 2019 | $ | 443 |
|
The Company's liability for unrecognized tax benefits is recorded within the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Other non-current liabilities. The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate as of February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018 were $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $(47) thousand and $27 thousand were recognized as components of income tax expense in fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, respectively. At February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, approximately $47 thousand and $93 thousand, respectively, were accrued for the potential payment of interest and penalties.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions. In March 2017, the Company settled the IRS examination of the fiscal 2013 tax year. Both settlements were related to certain issues which the Company had previously reflected net of tax within deferred tax assets. The settlements did not result in any cash payments nor any impact to tax expense. As of February 2, 2019, with few exceptions, the Company or its subsidiaries are no longer subject to examination prior to fiscal 2011.
NOTE 8 — Earnings Per Share ("EPS")
The calculation of EPS shown below excludes the income attributable to participating securities from the numerator.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2018 | | Fiscal 2017 |
Numerator (in thousands): | | | |
Net loss attributable to Christopher & Banks Corporation | $ | (32,839 | ) | | $ | (22,024 | ) |
Income allocated to participating securities | — |
| | — |
|
Net loss available to common stockholders | $ | (32,839 | ) | | $ | (22,024 | ) |
Denominator (in thousands): | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic | 37,492 |
| | 37,212 |
|
Dilutive shares | — |
| | — |
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding - diluted | 37,492 |
| | 37,212 |
|
Net loss per common share: | | | |
Basic | $ | (0.88 | ) | | $ | (0.59 | ) |
Diluted | $ | (0.88 | ) | | $ | (0.59 | ) |
Total stock options of approximately 3.9 million and 2.9 million were excluded from the shares used in the computation of diluted earnings per share for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, respectively, as they were anti-dilutive.
NOTE 9 — Fair Value Measurements
Assets that are Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis:
The following table summarizes certain information for non-financial assets for the fiscal years ended February 2, 2019 and February 3, 2018, that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in periods subsequent to an initial recognition period. The Company places amounts into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date.
|
| | | | | | | | |
Long-Lived Assets Held and Used (in thousands): | | Fiscal 2018 | | Fiscal 2017 |
Carrying value | | $ | 4,829 |
| | $ | 318 |
|
Fair value measured using Level 3 inputs | | 445 |
| | $ | — |
|
Impairment charge | | $ | 4,384 |
| | $ | 318 |
|
All of the fair value measurements included in the table above were based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Company determines fair value for measuring assets on a non-recurring basis using a discounted cash flow approach as discussed in Note 1 - Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies. In determining future cash flows, the Company uses its best estimate of future operating results, which requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including estimated sales, merchandise margin and expense levels, and the selection of an appropriate discount rate; therefore, differences in the estimates or assumptions could produce significantly different results. General economic uncertainty impacting the retail industry and continuation of recent trends in company performance makes it reasonably possible that additional long-lived asset impairments could be identified and recorded in future periods.
Fixed asset fair values were derived using a discounted cash flow ("DCF") model to estimate the present value of net cash flows that the asset or asset group is expected to generate. The key inputs to the DCF model generally included our forecasts of net cash generated from revenue, expenses and other significant cash outflows, such as capital expenditures, as well as an appropriate discount rate. In the case of assets for which the impairment was the result of restructuring activities, no future cash flows have been assumed as the assets will cease to be used and expected sale values are nominal.
NOTE 10 — Employee Benefit Plans
401(k) Plan
The Company has established a defined contribution plan qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code for the benefit of all employees who meet certain eligibility requirements, which are primarily age, length of service and hours of service. The plan allows eligible employees to invest from 1% to 60% of their compensation, subject to dollar limits as established by the federal government. The plan allows for discretionary Company matching contributions. The Company made no matching contributions during fiscal 2018. During fiscal 2017, the Company made matching contributions of approximately $0.5 million. The Company does not offer any other post-retirement, post-employment or pension benefits to directors or employees.
NOTE 11 — Lease Commitments
The Company leases its store locations and vehicles under operating leases. The store lease terms, including rental period, renewal options, escalation clauses and rent as a percentage of sales, vary among the leases. Most store leases require the Company to pay real estate taxes and common area maintenance charges.
Total rental expense for all leases was as follows for the fiscal periods ended (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2018 | | Fiscal 2017 |
Minimum rent | $ | 36,370 |
| | $ | 39,903 |
|
Contingent rent | 1,033 |
| | 790 |
|
Maintenance, taxes and other | 15,194 |
| | 16,483 |
|
Amortization of deferred lease incentives | (1,635 | ) | | (1,792 | ) |
Total rent expense | $ | 50,962 |
| | $ | 55,384 |
|
Future minimum rental payments as of February 2, 2019, and the estimated timing and effect that such obligations are expected to have on the Company’s liquidity and cash flows for operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Payments Due by Period |
Contractual Obligations | Fiscal 2019 | | Fiscal 2020 | | Fiscal 2021 | | Fiscal 2022 | | Fiscal 2023 | | Thereafter | | Total |
Operating leases (1) | $ | 36,821 |
| | $ | 25,828 |
| | $ | 21,370 |
| | $ | 18,439 |
| | $ | 17,811 |
| | $ | 38,827 |
| | $ | 159,096 |
|
Vehicle operating leases | 144 |
| | 59 |
| | 16 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 219 |
|
Total obligations | $ | 36,965 |
| | $ | 25,887 |
| | $ | 21,386 |
| | $ | 18,439 |
| | $ | 17,811 |
| | $ | 38,827 |
| | $ | 159,315 |
|
| |
(1) | Includes retail stores and the corporate headquarters facility, including the distribution center. |
NOTE 12 — Legal Proceedings
We are subject, from time to time, to various claims, lawsuits or actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. We accrue for loss contingencies associated with outstanding litigation or legal claims for which management has determined it is probable that a loss contingency exists and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. If we determine an unfavorable outcome is not probable or reasonably estimable, we do not accrue a potential loss contingency. The ultimate resolution of matters can be inherently uncertain and for some matters, we may be unable to predict the ultimate outcome, determine whether a liability has been incurred or make an estimate of the reasonably possible liability that could result from an unfavorable outcome because of these uncertainties. We do not, however, currently believe that the resolution of any pending matter will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
NOTE 13 — Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2018 Quarters (1) |
(in thousands, except per share data) | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth |
Net sales | $ | 85,901 |
| | $ | 87,418 |
| | $ | 91,288 |
| | $ | 84,293 |
|
Gross profit | 27,344 |
| | 24,872 |
| | 27,193 |
| | 23,222 |
|
Net loss | (5,319 | ) | | (7,426 | ) | | (8,817 | ) | | (11,277 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Net loss per share data: | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | (0.14 | ) | | $ | (0.20 | ) | | $ | (0.24 | ) | | $ | (0.30 | ) |
Diluted | $ | (0.14 | ) | | $ | (0.20 | ) | | $ | (0.24 | ) | | $ | (0.30 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2017 Quarters (1) |
(in thousands, except per share data) | First | | Second | | Third | | Fourth |
Net sales | $ | 88,556 |
| | $ | 86,618 |
| | $ | 98,468 |
| | $ | 92,265 |
|
Gross profit | 30,538 |
| | 24,628 |
| | 33,239 |
| | 25,102 |
|
Net (loss) income | (3,688 | ) | | (7,889 | ) | | (1,622 | ) | | (8,825 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income per share data: | | | | | | | |
Basic | $ | (0.10 | ) | | $ | (0.21 | ) | | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.23 | ) |
Diluted | $ | (0.10 | ) | | $ | (0.21 | ) | | $ | (0.05 | ) | | $ | (0.23 | ) |
__________________________________________
| |
(1) | The summation of quarterly per share data may not equate to the calculation for the full fiscal year as quarterly calculations are performed on a discrete basis. |
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including its CEO and CFO, management evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of February 2, 2019. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and its CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) were effective as of February 2, 2019.
Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control- Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on management’s testing and evaluation under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013), management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was designed and operated effectively as of February 2, 2019.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm because as a smaller reporting company we are not subject to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002.
Inherent Limitations on Control Systems
Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, will be or have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During our fourth fiscal quarter, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
There are no matters which are required to be reported under Item 9B.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information regarding our directors required by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled, “Item 1-Election of Directors,” in the Proxy Statement. Information regarding our executive officers is included in Part I, Item 4A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K in the section entitled “Executive Officers of the Registrant.” Information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is included in the Proxy Statement under the section entitled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and such information is incorporated herein by reference. Information regarding our Audit Committee and audit committee financial experts is included in the Proxy Statement under the section entitled “Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors - The Audit Committee,” and such information is incorporated by reference.
We have adopted a Code of Conduct (the “Code”) applicable to all of our employees, directors and officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller and other employees performing similar functions. The Code is available on our website at www.christopherandbanks.com — under the “Investor Relations” link and then the “Corporate Governance” link — and is available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy from our Corporate Secretary. Any changes or amendments to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller or persons performing similar functions will be posted on our website at the address and location specified above.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Executive Compensation,” “Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors — Compensation Program for Non-Employee Directors” and “Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors —Non-Employee Director Compensation for Fiscal 2018” in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT, AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Security Ownership” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the sections entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Information Regarding the Board and Corporate Governance — Director Independence” in the Proxy Statement.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Audit Committee Report and Payment of Fees to Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees” and “Audit Committee Report and Payment of Fees to Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — Auditor Services Pre-Approval Policy” in the Proxy Statement.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The following documents are filed as a part of this Report:
All schedules omitted are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Incorporated by Reference |
Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Exhibit | | Filing Date |
3.1 | | | | S-8 | | 4.1 | | May 26, 2011 |
3.2 | | | | 8-K | | 3.1 | | December 24, 2013 |
3.3 | | | | 8-K | | 3.1 | | February 29, 2016 |
4.1 | | | | 10-Q | | 4.1 | | October 7, 2010 |
10.1 | | | | 8-K | | 10.2 | | August 5, 2008 |
10.2 | | | | 8-K | | 10.2 | | August 2, 2010 |
10.3 | | | | 10-K | | 10.15 | | May 12, 2011 |
10.4 | | | | 10-K | | 10.16 | | May 12, 2011 |
10.5 | | | | 10-K | | 10.17 | | May 12, 2011 |
10.6 | | | | 10-K | | 10.18 | | May 12, 2011 |
10.7 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | April 15, 2011 |
10.8 | | | | 10-K | | 10.48 | | May 12, 2011 |
10.9 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | March 30, 2012 |
10.10 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | July 16, 2012 |
10.11 | | | | 8-K | | 10.2 | | July 16, 2012 |
10.12 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | June 27, 2014 |
10.13 | | | | 8-K | | 10.2 | | June 27, 2014 |
10.14 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | September 8, 2014 |
10.15 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | December 10, 2014 |
10.16 | | | | 8-K | | 10.2 | | March 26, 2015 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
10.17 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | April 10, 2015 |
10.18 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | November 13, 2015 |
10.19 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | March 10, 2016 |
10.20 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | March 18, 2016 |
10.21 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | July 5, 2016 |
10.22 | | | | 8-K | | 10.2 | | July 5, 2016 |
10.23 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | August 26, 2016 |
10.24 | | | | 8-K | | 10.2 | | August 26, 2016 |
10.25 | | | | 8-K/A | | 10.1 | | February 24, 2017 |
10.26 | | | | 8-K/A | | 10.2 | | February 24, 2017 |
10.27 | | | | 8-K/A | | 10.3 | | February 24, 2017 |
10.28 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | March 16, 2017 |
10.29 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | June 20, 2017 |
10.30 | | | | 8-K/A | | 10.1 | | July 26, 2017 |
10.31 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | September 21, 2017 |
10.32 | | | | 8-K | | 10.2 | | September 21, 2017 |
10.33 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | December 8, 2017 |
10.34 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | January 16, 2018 |
10.35 | | | | 8-K | | 10.2 | | January 16, 2018 |
10.36 | | | | 8-K | | 10.3 | | January 16, 2018 |
10.37 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | February 2, 2018 |
10.38 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | February 6, 2018 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
10.39 | | | | 8-K/A | | 10.1 | | March 13, 2018 |
10.40 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | March 13, 2018 |
10.41 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | May 2, 2018 |
10.42 | | | | 8-K | | 10.2 | | May 2, 2018 |
10.43 | | | | 8-K | | 10.3 | | May 2, 2018 |
10.44 | | | | 8-K | | 10.4 | | May 2, 2018 |
10.45 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | June 18, 2018 |
10.46 | | | | 8-K | | 10.2 | | June 18, 2018 |
10.47 | | | | 8-K | | 10.3 | | June 18, 2018 |
10.48 | | | | 8-K | | 10.4 | | June 18, 2018 |
10.49 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | June 27, 2018 |
10.50 | | | | 8-K | | 10.2 | | June 27, 2018 |
10.51 | | | | 8-K/A | | 10.1 | | July 11, 2018 |
10.52 | | | | 8-K/A | | 10.2 | | July 11, 2018 |
10.53 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | August 6, 2018 |
10.54 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | October 19, 2018 |
10.55 | | | | 8-K | | 10.1 | | March 15, 2019 |
10.56 | | | | 8-K | | 10.2 | | March 15, 2019 |
14.1 | | | | 8-K | | 14.1 | | November 18, 2016 |
21.1 | | | | 10-K | | 21.1 | | May 15, 2008 |
23.1* | | | | | | | | |
24.1* | | | | | | | | |
31.1* | | | | | | | | |
31.2* | | | | | | | | |
32.1* | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
32.2* | | | | | | | | |
101* | | Financial statements from the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Christopher & Banks Corporation for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2019, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language ("XBRL"): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Net Loss; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | | | | | | |
________________________________________________
* Filed herewith
** Management agreement or compensatory plan or arrangement
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 18, 2019.
|
| | | |
| CHRISTOPHER & BANKS CORPORATION |
| |
| | By: | /s/ Keri L. Jones |
| | | Keri L. Jones |
| | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | | |
Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | |
/s/ Keri L. Jones | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | | March 18, 2019 |
Keri L. Jones | | (Principal Executive Officer) | | |
| | | | |
/s/ Richard Bundy | | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | | March 18, 2019 |
Richard Bundy | | (Principal Financial Officer and | | |
| | Principal Accounting Officer) | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
* | | Non-Executive Chair and Director | | |
Kent Kleeberger | | | | |
| | | | |
* | | Director | | |
Jonathan Duskin | | | | |
| | | | |
* | | Director | | |
Seth Johnson | | | | |
| | | | |
* | | Director | | |
William F. Sharpe, III | | | | |
| | | | |
* | | Director | | |
Laura Weil | | | | |
| | | | |
* | | Director | | |
Joel Waller | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
*By: | /s/ Richard Bundy | | | | |
| Richard Bundy | | | | |
| Attorney-in-Fact pursuant to Powers of Attorney filed herewith | | |