SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the quarterly period ended JUNE 30, 2014
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the transition period from ___________ to___________
Commission file number 1-8339
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) |
52-1188014 (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
Three Commercial Place Norfolk, Virginia (Address of principal executive offices) |
23510-2191 (Zip Code) |
(757) 629-2680 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
|
No Change (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [X] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2014 |
Common Stock ($1.00 par value per share) |
|
309,515,208 (excluding 20,320,777 shares held by the registrant’s consolidated subsidiaries) |
|
|
|
|
|
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES (NS) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
Part I. |
Financial Information: |
|||
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income Second Quarters and First Six Months of 2014 and 2013 |
|
3 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Second Quarters and First Six Months of 2014 and 2013 |
|
4 |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 |
|
5 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows First Six Months of 2014 and 2013 |
|
6 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
7 |
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
19 |
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
20 |
|
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
29 |
|
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
|
29 |
Part II. |
Other Information: |
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
|
30 |
|
Item 1A. |
Risk Factors |
|
30 |
|
Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
31 |
|
Item 6. |
Exhibits |
|
31 |
Signatures |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Index |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
Second Quarter |
|
First Six Months |
|||||||||
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
||||
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Railway operating revenues |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Railway operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Purchased services and rents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Materials and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total railway operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income from railway operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other income – net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest expense on debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Per share amounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
|
|
||||||||
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
Second Quarter |
|
First Six Months |
|||||||||
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
||||
|
($ in millions) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
||||||||
Other comprehensive income, before tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Pension and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other comprehensive income of equity investees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other comprehensive income, before tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income tax expense related to items of other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|||
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
||
|
($ in millions) |
||||
|
|
||||
Assets |
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
||||
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable – net |
|
|
|
||
Materials and supplies |
|
|
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
||
Other current assets |
|
|
|
||
Total current assets |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Investments |
|
|
|
||
Properties less accumulated depreciation of $10,634 and |
|
|
|
||
$10,387, respectively |
|
|
|
||
Other assets |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
||||
Short-term debt |
|
|
|
||
Income and other taxes |
|
|
|
||
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
||
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
||
Common stock $1.00 per share par value, 1,350,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
||
authorized; outstanding 309,515,208 and 308,878,402 shares, |
|
||||
respectively, net of treasury shares |
|
||||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
||
Retained income |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Total stockholders’ equity |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
First Six Months |
|||||
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
||
|
($ in millions) |
||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
||||
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
||
Depreciation |
|
|
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
||
Gains and losses on properties and investments |
|
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities affecting operations: |
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
||
Materials and supplies |
|
|
|
||
Other current assets |
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities other than debt |
|
|
|
||
Other – net |
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
||
Property additions |
|
|
|
||
Property sales and other transactions |
|
|
|
||
Investments, including short-term |
|
|
|
||
Investment sales and other transactions |
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
||
Dividends |
|
|
|
||
Common stock issued – net |
|
|
|
||
Purchase and retirement of common stock |
|
|
|
||
Debt repayments |
|
|
|
||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
||
At beginning of period |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
At end of period |
|
||||
|
|
||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information |
|
|
|
||
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
||
Interest (net of amounts capitalized) |
|
||||
Income taxes (net of refunds) |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly Norfolk Southern Corporation (Norfolk Southern) and subsidiaries’ (collectively, NS, we, us, and our) financial condition at June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, our results of operations and comprehensive income for the second quarters and first six months of 2014 and 2013, and our cash flows for the first six months of 2014 and 2013 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K.
During the first quarter of 2014, a committee of non-employee directors of our Board of Directors granted stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance share units (PSUs) pursuant to the Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and granted stock options pursuant to the Thoroughbred Stock Option Plan (TSOP) as discussed below. Stock-based compensation expense was $10 million and $6 million during the second quarters of 2014 and 2013, respectively. For the first six months of 2014 and 2013, stock-based compensation was $42 million and $43 million, respectively. The total tax effects recognized in income in relation to stock-based compensation were net benefits of $4 million and $2 million for the second quarters of 2014 and 2013, and net benefits of $14 million for the first six months of both 2014 and 2013.
In the first quarter of 2014, 515,240 options were granted under LTIP and 181,070 options were granted under TSOP. In each case, the grant price was $94.17, which was the greater of the average fair market value of Norfolk Southern common stock (Common Stock) or the closing price of Common Stock on the effective date of the grant, and the options have a term of ten years. The options granted under LTIP and TSOP in 2014 may not be exercised prior to the fourth and third anniversaries of the date of grant, respectively. Holders of the 2014 options granted under LTIP who remain actively employed receive cash dividend equivalent payments for four years in an amount equal to the regular quarterly dividends paid on Common Stock. Dividend equivalent payments are not made on TSOP options.
The fair value of each option award in 2014 was measured on the date of grant using a lattice-based option valuation model. Expected volatilities are based on implied volatilities from traded options on, and historical volatility of, Common Stock. Historical data is used to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model. The average expected option life is derived from the output of the valuation model and represents the period of time that all options granted are expected to be outstanding, including the branches of the model that result in options expiring unexercised. The average risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. For options granted that include dividend equivalent payments, a dividend yield of zero was used. A dividend yield of 2.29% was used for LTIP options for periods where no dividend equivalent payments are made as well as for TSOP options, which do not receive dividend equivalents.
The assumptions for the 2014 LTIP and TSOP grants are shown in the following table:
23% - 27% |
|
Average expected volatility |
25% |
Average risk-free interest rate |
2.79% |
Average expected option term LTIP |
8.9 years |
Per-share grant-date fair value LTIP |
$29.87 |
Average expected option term TSOP |
8.8 years |
Per-share grant-date fair value TSOP |
$24.38 |
For the second quarter of 2014, options relating to 353,327 shares were exercised, yielding $16 million of cash proceeds and $4 million of tax benefit recognized as additional paid-in capital. For the second quarter of 2013, options relating to 546,886 shares were exercised, yielding $18 million of cash proceeds and $7 million of tax benefit recognized as additional paid-in capital.
For the first six months of 2014, options relating to 1,234,071 shares were exercised, yielding $56 million of cash proceeds and $15 million of tax benefit recognized as additional paid-in capital. For the first six months of 2013, options relating to 1,571,500 shares were exercised, yielding $53 million of cash proceeds and $20 million of tax benefit recognized as additional paid-in capital.
During the first quarter of 2014, there were 113,505 RSUs granted with a grant-date fair value of $94.17 and a five-year restriction period that will be settled through the issuance of shares of Common Stock. The RSU grants include cash dividend equivalent payments during the restriction period commensurate with regular quarterly dividends paid on Common Stock.
No RSUs were earned or paid out in the second quarters of 2014 and 2013. During the first six months of 2014, 318,150 of the RSUs granted in 2009 vested, with 187,449 shares of Common Stock issued net of withholding taxes. For the first six months of 2013, 298,400 of the RSUs granted in 2008 vested, with 178,250 shares of Common Stock issued net of withholding taxes. The total related tax benefits recognized as additional paid-in capital were less than $1 million for the second quarters of both 2014 and 2013 and $6 million and $2 million for the first six months of 2014 and 2013, respectively.
PSUs provide for awards based on achievement of certain predetermined corporate performance goals at the end of a three-year cycle and are paid in the form of shares of Common Stock. During the first quarter of 2014, there were 399,530 PSUs granted. PSUs will earn out based on the achievement of a return on average invested capital target (a performance condition) and a total shareholder return target (a market condition). The grant-date fair values of the PSUs associated with the performance and market conditions were $94.17 and $50.31, respectively, with the market condition fair value measured on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation model.
No PSUs were earned or paid out in the second quarters of 2014 and 2013. During the first six months of 2014, 374,099 of the PSUs granted in 2011 were earned, with 223,253 shares of Common Stock issued net of withholding taxes. For the first six months of 2013, 577,585 of the PSUs granted in 2010 were earned, with 348,189 shares of Common Stock issued net of withholding taxes. The total related tax benefits recognized as additional paid-in capital were $5 million for the first six months of both 2014 and 2013.
There have been no material changes to the balance of unrecognized tax benefits reported at December 31, 2013. IRS examinations have been completed for all years prior to 2011. Our consolidated federal income tax returns for 2011 and 2012 are currently being audited by the IRS.
Basic |
|
Diluted |
|||||||||
|
Second Quarter |
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
||||
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts, |
||||||||||
|
shares in millions) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|||||||||||
Dividend equivalent payments |
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Income available to common stockholders |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Dilutive effect of outstanding options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
and share-settled awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
Diluted |
|||||||||
|
First Six Months |
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
||||
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts, |
||||||||||
|
shares in millions) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|||||||||||
Dividend equivalent payments |
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Income available to common stockholders |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Dilutive effect of outstanding options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
and share-settled awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Earnings per share |
|
During the second quarters and first six months of 2014 and 2013, dividend equivalent payments were made to holders of stock options and RSUs. For purposes of computing basic earnings per share, dividend equivalent payments made to holders of stock options and RSUs were deducted from net income to determine income available to common stockholders. For purposes of computing diluted earnings per share, we evaluate on a grant-by-grant basis those stock options and RSUs receiving dividend equivalent payments under the two-class and treasury stock methods to determine which method is the more dilutive for each grant. For those grants for which the two-class method was more dilutive, net income was reduced by dividend equivalent payments to determine income available to common stockholders. The dilution calculations exclude options having exercise prices
exceeding the average market price of Common Stock as follows: 0.7 million and 0.8 million in the first quarters of 2014 and 2013, respectively, and zero for the second quarters of both 2014 and 2013.
Common Stock
Common Stock is reported net of shares held by our consolidated subsidiaries (Treasury Shares). Treasury Shares at June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, amounted to 20,320,777 shares, with a cost of $19 million at both dates.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
“Accumulated other comprehensive loss” reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|||
|
Pensions |
|
Other |
|
Accumulated |
|||
|
and Other |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Other |
|||
|
Postretirement |
|
Loss of Equity |
|
Comprehensive |
|||
|
Benefits |
|
Investees |
|
Loss |
|||
|
($ in millions) |
|||||||
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2014 |
||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|||||||
Amounts reclassified into net income |
|
|||||||
Net gain |
|
|||||||
Tax expense |
|
|||||||
Other comprehensive income |
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
June 30, 2014 |
Pensions |
|
Other |
|
Accumulated |
||||
|
and Other |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Other |
|||
|
Postretirement |
|
Loss of Equity |
|
Comprehensive |
|||
|
Benefits |
|
Investees |
|
Loss |
|||
|
($ in millions) |
|||||||
Second Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2013 |
||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|||||||
Amounts reclassified into net income |
|
|||||||
Net gain |
|
|||||||
Tax expense |
|
|||||||
Other comprehensive income |
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
June 30, 2013 |
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
||
|
Pensions |
|
Other |
|
Accumulated |
|||
|
and Other |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Other |
|||
|
Postretirement |
|
Loss of Equity |
|
Comprehensive |
|||
|
Benefits |
|
Investees |
|
Loss |
|||
|
($ in millions) |
|||||||
First Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|||||||
Prior service benefit |
|
|||||||
Amounts reclassified into net income |
|
|||||||
Net gain (loss) |
|
|||||||
Tax expense |
|
|||||||
Other comprehensive income |
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
June 30, 2014 |
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
||
|
Pensions |
|
Other |
|
Accumulated |
|||
|
and Other |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Other |
|||
|
Postretirement |
|
Loss of Equity |
|
Comprehensive |
|||
|
Benefits |
|
Investees |
|
Loss |
|||
|
($ in millions) |
|||||||
First Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
December 31, 2012 |
||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|||||||
Amounts reclassified into net income |
|
|||||||
Net gain |
|
|||||||
Tax expense |
|
|||||||
Other comprehensive income |
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
June 30, 2013 |
(1) These items are included in the computation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs. See
Note 7, “Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits” for additional information.
We repurchased and retired 1.0 million and 4.2 million shares of Common Stock in each of the first six months of 2014 and 2013, respectively, at a cost of $100 million and $314 million, respectively. The timing and volume of purchases is guided by our assessment of market conditions and other pertinent factors. Any near-term share repurchases are expected to be made with internally generated cash, cash on hand, or proceeds from borrowings. Since the beginning of 2006, we have repurchased and retired 137.8 million shares at a total cost of $8.2 billion.
Through a limited liability company, we and CSX Corporation (CSX) jointly own Conrail Inc. (Conrail), whose primary subsidiary is Consolidated Rail Corporation (CRC). We have a 58% economic and 50% voting interest in the jointly owned entity, and CSX has the remainder of the economic and voting interests. Our investment in Conrail was $1.1 billion at both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
CRC owns and operates certain properties (the Shared Assets Areas) for the joint and exclusive benefit of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR) and CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT). The costs of operating the Shared Assets Areas are borne by NSR and CSXT based on usage. In addition, NSR and CSXT pay CRC a fee for access to the Shared Assets Areas. “Purchased services and rents” and “Fuel” include expenses for the use of the Shared Assets Areas totaling $34 million and $39 million for the second quarters of 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $68 million and $73 million for the first six months of 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our equity in the earnings of Conrail, net of amortization, included in “Purchased services and rents” was $10 million and $16 million for the second quarter and the first six months of 2014, respectively. For the second quarter and first six months of 2013, this amounted to $9 million and $18 million, respectively, and was included in “Other income – net.”
“Accounts payable” includes $192 million at June 30, 2014, and $187 million at December 31, 2013, due to Conrail for the operation of the Shared Assets Areas. In addition, “Other liabilities” includes $133 million at both June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, for long-term advances from Conrail, maturing 2035, that bear interest at an average rate of 4.4%.
7. Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
We have both funded and unfunded defined benefit pension plans covering principally salaried employees. We also provide specific health care and life insurance benefits to eligible retired employees; these plans can be amended or terminated at our option. Under our self-insured retiree health care plan, a defined percentage of health care expenses is covered for retired employees and their dependents, reduced by any deductibles, coinsurance, and, in some cases, coverage provided under other group insurance policies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|||||
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Benefits |
||||||||
|
Second Quarter |
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
||||
|
($ in millions) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Service cost |
|
||||||||||
Interest cost |
|
|
|
||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
|
||||||||
Amortization of net losses |
|
|
|
||||||||
Amortization of prior service benefit |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Net cost (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|||||
|
Pension Benefits |
|
Benefits |
||||||||
|
First Six Months |
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
||||
|
($ in millions) |
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Service cost |
$ |
|
$ |
||||||||
Interest cost |
|
|
|
||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
|
||||||||
Amortization of net losses |
|
|
|
||||||||
Amortization of prior service benefit |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Net cost |
|
In the first quarter of 2014, we amended our retiree medical plan for participants who are Medicare eligible resulting in a remeasurement of our plan assets and obligations. Effective July 1, 2014, participants who are Medicare-eligible are not covered under the self-insured retiree health care plan but instead are provided with an employer-funded health reimbursement account which can be used for reimbursement of health insurance premiums or eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses. As required, the discount rate assumption was revised as a result of the remeasurement to 3.90% from 4.65% at December 31, 2013, and there were no significant changes to the expected return on plan assets, asset mix, mortality rates, or health care trend rates. The prior service benefit associated with the plan amendment was $367 million and the actuarial losses associated with the change in discount rate were $80 million, resulting in a decrease in the benefit obligation of $287 million. The estimated prior service benefit for the other postretirement benefit plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic cost during the remainder of the year is $12 million.
For the remainder of 2014, we expect to contribute approximately $26 million to our other postretirement benefit plans for retiree health and life insurance benefits. Benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid as follows:
Other |
||||
|
Postretirement |
|||
|
Benefits |
|||
|
($ in millions) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2014 |
||||
2015 |
|
|||
2016 |
|
|||
2017 |
|
|||
2018 |
|
|||
Years 2019 - 2023 |
|
Fair Value Measurements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codifications (ASC) 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements,” established a framework for measuring fair value and a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels, as follows:
Level 1 |
Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. |
|
|
Level 2 |
Inputs to the valuation methodology include: |
|
• quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; • quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; • inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; • inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
|
|
|
If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, the Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
|
|
Level 3 |
Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. |
The asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Other than those assets and liabilities described below that approximate fair value, there were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
We have evaluated the fair values of financial instruments and methods used to determine those fair values. The fair values of “Cash and cash equivalents,” “Short-term investments,” “Accounts receivable,” “Accounts payable,” and “Short-term debt” approximate carrying values because of the short maturity of these financial instruments. The carrying value of corporate-owned life insurance is recorded at cash surrender value and, accordingly, approximates fair value. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values for the remaining financial instruments, excluding investments accounted for under the equity method, consisted of the following:
June 30, 2014 |
|
December 31, 2013 |
|||||||||
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
||||
|
Amount |
|
Value |
|
Amount |
|
Value |
||||
|
($ in millions) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
|
||||||||
Long-term debt, including current maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying net assets were used to estimate the fair value of investments with the exception of notes receivable, which are based on future discounted cash flows. The fair values of long-term debt were estimated based on quoted market prices or discounted cash flows using current interest rates for debt with similar terms, company rating, and remaining maturity.
The following table sets forth the fair value of long-term investment and long-term debt balances disclosed above by valuation technique level, within the fair value hierarchy (there were no level 3 valued assets or liabilities).
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Total |
||||
|
($ in millions) |
|||||||
June 30, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
||||||
Long-term debt, including current maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
December 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Long-term investments |
|
|
||||||
Long-term debt, including current maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Lawsuits
We and/or certain subsidiaries are defendants in numerous lawsuits and other claims relating principally to railroad operations. When we conclude that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated, it is accrued through a charge to earnings. While the ultimate amount of liability incurred in any of these lawsuits and claims is dependent on future developments, in our opinion, the recorded liability is adequate to cover the future payment of such liability and claims. However, the final outcome of any of these lawsuits and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, and unfavorable or unexpected outcomes could result in additional accruals that could be significant to results of operations in a particular year or quarter. Any adjustments to the recorded liability will be reflected in earnings in the periods in which such adjustments are known and estimable.
Two of our customers, DuPont and Sunbelt Chlor Alkai Partnership (Sunbelt), filed rate reasonableness complaints before the Surface Transportation Board (STB) alleging that our tariff rates for transportation of regulated movements are unreasonable. Since June 1, 2009, in the case of DuPont, and April 1, 2011, in the case
of Sunbelt, we have been billing and collecting amounts based on the challenged tariff rates. On March 14, 2014, the STB resolved DuPont’s rate reasonableness complaint in our favor, and on June 20, 2014, the STB resolved Sunbelt’s rate case in our favor. The STB’s findings in both cases remain subject to technical corrections, requests for reconsideration, and appeal. We believe the estimate of any reasonably possible loss will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. With regard to rate cases, we record adjustments to revenues in the periods if and when such adjustments are probable and estimable.
On November 6, 2007, various antitrust class actions filed against us and other Class I railroads in various Federal district courts regarding fuel surcharges were consolidated in the District of Columbia by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. On June 21, 2012, the court certified the case as a class action. The defendant railroads appealed this certification, and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated the District Court’s decision and remanded the case for further consideration. We believe the allegations in the complaints are without merit and intend to vigorously defend the cases. We do not believe the outcome of these proceedings will have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. A lawsuit containing similar allegations against us and four other major railroads that was filed on March 25, 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff subject to a tolling agreement entered into in August 2008, and most recently extended in August 2013.
Casualty claims include employee personal injury and occupational claims as well as third-party claims, all exclusive of legal costs. To aid in valuing our personal injury liability and determining the amount to accrue with respect to such claims during the year, we utilize studies prepared by an independent consulting actuarial firm. Job-related accidental injury and occupational claims are subject to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), which is applicable only to railroads. FELA’s fault-based system produces results that are unpredictable and inconsistent as compared with a no-fault workers’ compensation system. The variability inherent in this system could result in actual costs being different from the liability recorded. While the ultimate amount of claims incurred is dependent on future developments, in our opinion, the recorded liability is adequate to cover the future payments of claims and is supported by the most recent actuarial study. In all cases, we record a liability when the expected loss for the claim is both probable and estimable.
Employee personal injury claims – The largest component of casualties and other claims expense is employee personal injury costs. The independent actuarial firm engaged by us provides quarterly studies to aid in valuing our employee personal injury liability and estimating personal injury expense. The actuarial firm studies our historical patterns of reserving for claims and subsequent settlements, taking into account relevant outside influences. The actuarial firm uses the results of these analyses to estimate the ultimate amount of liability, which includes amounts for incurred but unasserted claims. We adjust the liability quarterly based upon our assessment and the results of the study. Our estimate of loss liabilities is subject to inherent limitation given the difficulty of predicting future events such as jury decisions, court interpretations, or legislative changes and as such the actual loss may vary from the estimated liability recorded.
Occupational claims – Occupational claims (including asbestosis and other respiratory diseases, as well as conditions allegedly related to repetitive motion) are often not caused by a specific accident or event but rather allegedly result from a claimed exposure over time. Many such claims are being asserted by former or retired employees, some of whom have not been employed in the rail industry for decades. The independent actuarial firm provides an estimate of the occupational claims liability based upon our history of claim filings, severity, payments, and other pertinent facts. The liability is dependent upon judgments we make as to the specific case reserves as well as judgments of the actuarial firm in the quarterly studies. The actuarial firm’s estimate of ultimate loss includes a provision for those claims that have been incurred but not reported. This provision is derived by analyzing industry data and projecting our experience into the future as far as can be reasonably determined. We adjust the liability quarterly based upon our assessment and the results of the study. However, it is possible that the recorded liability may not be adequate to cover the future payment of claims. Adjustments to the recorded liability are reflected in operating expenses in the periods in which such adjustments become known.
Third-party claims – We record a liability for third-party claims including those for highway crossing accidents, trespasser and other injuries, automobile liability, property damage, and lading damage. The actuarial firm assists us with the calculation of potential liability for third-party claims, except lading damage, based upon our experience including the number and timing of incidents, amount of payments, settlement rates, number of open claims, and legal defenses. The actuarial estimate includes a provision for claims that have been incurred but not reported. We adjust the liability quarterly based upon our assessment and the results of the study. Given the inherent uncertainty in regard to the ultimate outcome of third-party claims, it is possible that the actual loss may differ from the estimated liability recorded.
We are subject to various jurisdictions’ environmental laws and regulations. We record a liability where such liability or loss is probable and its amount can be estimated reasonably. Claims, if any, against third parties, for recovery of cleanup costs we have incurred are reflected as receivables (when collection is probable) in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are not netted against the associated liability. Environmental engineers regularly participate in ongoing evaluations of all known sites and in determining any necessary adjustments to liability estimates. We have an Environmental Policy Council, composed of senior managers, to oversee and interpret our environmental policy.
Our Consolidated Balance Sheets include liabilities for environmental exposures of $65 million at June 30, 2014, and $58 million at December 31, 2013 (of which $15 million is classified as a current liability at the end of each period). At June 30, 2014, the liability represents our estimate of the probable cleanup, investigation, and remediation costs based on available information at 147 known locations and projects compared with 142 locations and projects at December 31, 2013. At June 30, 2014, 11 sites accounted for $36 million of the liability, and no individual site was considered to be material. We anticipate that much of this liability will be paid out over five years; however, some costs will be paid out over a longer period.
At 12 locations, one or more of our subsidiaries in conjunction with a number of other parties have been identified as potentially responsible parties under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, or comparable state statutes that impose joint and several liability for cleanup costs. We calculate our estimated liability for these sites based on facts and legal defenses applicable to each site and not solely on the basis of the potential for joint liability.
With respect to known environmental sites (whether identified by us or by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or comparable state authorities), estimates of our ultimate potential financial exposure for a given site or in the aggregate for all such sites can change over time because of the widely varying costs of currently available cleanup techniques, unpredictable contaminant recovery and reduction rates associated with available cleanup technologies, the likely development of new cleanup technologies, the difficulty of determining in advance the nature and full extent of contamination and each potential participant’s share of any estimated loss (and that participant’s ability to bear it), and evolving statutory and regulatory standards governing liability.
The risk of incurring environmental liability – for acts and omissions, past, present, and future – is inherent in the railroad business. Some of the commodities we transport, particularly those classified as hazardous materials, pose special risks that we work diligently to minimize. In addition, several of our subsidiaries own, or have owned, land used as operating property, or which is leased and operated by others, or held for sale. Because environmental problems that are latent or undisclosed may exist on these properties, there can be no assurance that we will not incur environmental liabilities or costs with respect to one or more of them, the amount and materiality of which cannot be estimated reliably at this time. Moreover, lawsuits and claims involving these and potentially other unidentified environmental sites and matters are likely to arise from time to time. The resulting liabilities could have a significant effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity in a particular year or quarter.
Based on our assessment of the facts and circumstances now known, we believe we have recorded the probable and reasonably estimable costs for dealing with those environmental matters of which we are aware. Further, we believe that it is unlikely that any known matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
We obtain on behalf of ourself and our subsidiaries insurance for potential losses for third-party liability and first-party property damages. We are currently self-insured up to $50 million and above $1.0 billion per occurrence and/or policy year for bodily injury and property damage to third parties and up to $25 million and above $200 million per occurrence and/or policy year for property owned by us or in our care, custody, or control.
At June 30, 2014, we had outstanding purchase commitments totaling approximately $889 million for freight cars and containers, locomotives, track material, and track and yard expansion projects in connection with our capital programs through 2018 as well as long-term service contracts through 2018.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Norfolk Southern Corporation:
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Norfolk Southern Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income and cash flows for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and the related consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
KPMG LLP
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Subsidiaries
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes.
OVERVIEW
We are one of the nation’s premier transportation companies. Our Norfolk Southern Railway Company subsidiary operates approximately 20,000 miles of road in 22 states and the District of Columbia, serves every major container port in the eastern United States, and provides efficient connections to other rail carriers. We operate the most extensive intermodal network in the East and are a major transporter of coal, automotive, and industrial products.
For the second quarter, increased revenues, driven primarily by higher volumes, outpaced growth in our operating expenses, resulting in record-setting financial results. Net income for the second quarter was $562 million, or $1.79 per diluted share (up $97 million, or $0.33 per diluted share, respectively) and our railway operating revenues reached $3.0 billion (up $240 million), all of which are all-time records. Despite higher operating expenses (up $57 million, or 3%), we still achieved an all-time record low operating ratio of 66.5% for the quarter.
Cash provided by operating activities for the first six months of 2014 totaled $1.4 billion, which along with cash on hand allowed for property additions, dividends, debt repayments, and share repurchases. In the first six months of 2014, we repurchased 1.0 million shares of Norfolk Southern common stock (Common Stock) at a total cost of $100 million. Since inception of our stock repurchase program in 2006, we have repurchased and retired 137.8 million shares of Common Stock at a total cost of $8.2 billion. At June 30, 2014, cash and cash equivalents totaled $1.7 billion.
SUMMARIZED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Second quarter 2014 net income was $562 million, up 21% compared with the same period last year. The increase in net income for the quarter reflected higher income from railway operations, up $183 million, or 22%, primarily due to a $240 million, or 9%, improvement in railway operating revenues as a result of an 8% rise in volumes. The railway operating ratio (a measure of the amount of operating revenues consumed by operating expenses) improved to 66.5% for the second quarter of 2014, compared with 70.2% for the second quarter of 2013.
For the first six months of 2014 net income was $930 million, up $15 million, or 2%, compared with the same period last year. Prior year results included a gain from the sale of certain assets to the Michigan Department of Transportation, which benefited net income by $60 million and earnings per share by $0.19. Current year results were favorably impacted by higher income from railway operations (up $159 million, or 10%).
Oil prices affect our results of operations in a variety of ways and can have an overall favorable or unfavorable impact in any particular period. In addition to the impact of oil prices on general economic conditions, volume, and supplier costs, oil prices directly affect our revenues through market-based fuel surcharges and contract escalators (see “Railway Operating Revenues”) and also affect fuel costs (see “Railway Operating Expenses”). For the second quarter of 2014, excluding the impact of increased consumption, fuel surcharge revenue increased more than fuel expense. For the first six months of 2014, excluding the impact of increased consumption, fuel surcharge revenue increased, whereas fuel expense decreased. Future changes in oil prices may cause volatility in operating results that could be material to a particular year or quarter.
DETAILED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Railway Operating Revenues
Second quarter railway operating revenues were $3.0 billion in 2014, up $240 million, or 9%, compared with the second quarter of 2013. For the first six months of 2014, railway operating revenues were $5.7 billion, up $191 million, or 3%, compared with the same period last year. As shown in the following table, the increases resulted from higher volume and average revenue per unit (which includes the effects of fuel surcharges). Fuel surcharge revenue for the second quarters of 2014 and 2013 totaled $358 million and $306 million, respectively, and $653 million and $580 million for the first six months of 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Second Quarter |
|
First Six Months |
|||||||
|
2014 vs. 2013 |
|
2014 vs. 2013 |
||||||
|
Increase |
||||||||
|
($ in millions) |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Volume (units) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Revenue per unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Many of our negotiated fuel surcharges for coal and industrial products shipments are based on the monthly average price of West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil (WTI Average Price). These surcharges are reset the first day of each calendar month based on the WTI Average Price for the second preceding calendar month. This two-month lag in applying WTI Average Price decreased fuel surcharge revenue by approximately $11 million for the quarter and $28 million for the first six months of 2014. This two-month lag decreased fuel surcharge revenue by approximately $4 million for the second quarter of 2013 and $27 million the first six months of 2013.
Two of our customers, DuPont and Sunbelt Chlor Alkai Partnership (Sunbelt), filed rate reasonableness complaints before the Surface Transportation Board (STB) alleging that our tariff rates for transportation of regulated movements are unreasonable. Since June 1, 2009, in the case of DuPont, and April 1, 2011, in the case of Sunbelt, we have been billing and collecting amounts based on the challenged tariff rates. On March 14, 2014, the STB resolved DuPont’s rate reasonableness complaint in our favor, and on June 20, 2014, the STB resolved Sunbelt’s rate case in our favor. The STB’s findings in both cases remain subject to technical corrections, requests for reconsideration, and appeal. We believe the estimate of any reasonably possible loss will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. With regard to rate cases, we record adjustments to revenues in the periods if and when such adjustments are probable and estimable.
Revenues, units, and average revenue per unit for our market groups were as follows:
Second Quarter |
|||||||||||||||
|
Revenues |
|
Units |
|
Revenue per Unit |
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
||||
|
($ in millions) |
|
(in thousands) |
|
($ per unit) |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Coal |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
General merchandise: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Chemicals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Agriculture/consumer/gov’t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Metals and construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Automotive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Paper/clay/forest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
General merchandise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Intermodal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Six Months |
|||||||||||||||
|
Revenues |
|
Units |
|
Revenue per Unit |
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
2013 |
||||
|
($ in millions) |
|
(in thousands) |
|
($ per unit) |
||||||||||
|
|