Edgar Filing: COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP INC /KY/

ctbi10q0312.htm

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

	Or

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

Commission file number 0-11129

COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Kentucky	61-0979818
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	IRS Employer Identification No.

346 North Mayo Trail Pikeville, Kentucky (address of principal executive offices)	41501 (Zip Code)

(606) 432-1414

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ü

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.)

Yes ü

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	Accelerated filer ü	Non-accelerated filer	Smaller reporting company
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes

No ü

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

Common stock – 15,538,293 shares outstanding at April 30, 2012

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain of the statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. CTBI’s actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may increase,” “may fluctuate,” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” and “could.” These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, economic conditions, portfolio growth, the credit performance of the portfolios, including bankruptcies, and seasonal factors; changes in general economic conditions including the performance of financial markets, prevailing inflation and interest rates, realized gains from sales of investments, gains from asset sales, and losses on commercial lending activities; results of various investment activities; the effects of competitors’ pricing policies, changes in laws and regulations, competition, and demographic changes on target market populations’ savings and financial planning needs; industry changes in information technology systems on which we are highly dependent; failure of acquisitions to produce revenue enhancements or cost savings at levels or within the time frames originally anticipated or unforeseen integration difficulties; the adoption by CTBI of a Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) policy that provides guidance on the reporting of delinquent consumer loans and the timing of associated credit charge-offs for financial institution subsidiaries; and the resolution of legal proceedings and related matters. In addition, the banking industry in general is subject to various monetary and fiscal policies and regulations, which include those determined by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and state regulators, whose policies and regulations could affect CTBI’s results. These statements are representative only on the date hereof, and CTBI undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanying information has not been audited by independent registered public accountants; however, in the opinion of management such information reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim period. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and consequently do not include all of the disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America or those normally made in the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, the reader of the Form 10-Q should refer to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 for further information in this regard.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands)	(unaudited) March 31 2012			December 31 2011
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	69,240		$	69,723
Interest bearing deposits		170,525			166,057
Federal funds sold		3,456			2,701
Cash and cash equivalents		243,221			238,481

Certificates of deposit in other banks		12,992			11,875
Securities available-for-sale at fair value (amortized cost of $600,513 and $511,731, respectively)		613,978			527,398
Securities held-to-maturity at amortized cost (fair value of $1,664 and $1,661, respectively)		1,662			1,662
Loans held for sale		1,642			536

Loans		2,542,168			2,556,548
Allowance for loan losses		(33,172	)		(33,171	)
Net loans		2,508,996			2,523,377

Premises and equipment, net		54,725			54,297
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		25,674			25,673
Federal Reserve Bank stock		4,883			4,883
Goodwill		65,490			65,490
Core deposit intangible (net of accumulated amortization of $7,552 and $7,499, respectively)		1,063			1,117
Bank owned life insurance		43,827			43,483
Mortgage servicing rights		2,640			2,282
Other real estate owned		59,154			56,965
Other assets		34,066			33,660
Total assets	$	3,674,013		$	3,591,179

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Deposits
Noninterest bearing	$	629,293		$	584,735
Interest bearing		2,318,260			2,293,624
Total deposits		2,947,553			2,878,359

Repurchase agreements		225,301			217,177
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings		20,753			13,104
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		1,562			21,609
Long-term debt		61,341			61,341
Other liabilities		42,507			32,723
Total liabilities		3,299,017			3,224,313

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, 300,000 shares authorized and unissued		-			-
Common stock, $5 par value, shares authorized 25,000,000; shares outstanding 2012 – 15,526,895; 2011 – 15,429,992		77,635			77,151
Capital surplus		158,092			156,101
Retained earnings		130,517			123,431
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax		8,752			10,183
Total shareholders’ equity		374,996			366,866

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	3,674,013		$	3,591,179

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Other Comprehensive Income

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31
(in thousands except per share data)	2012			2011

Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans, including loans held for sale	$	35,052		$	36,686
Interest and dividends on securities
Taxable		2,771			2,282
Tax exempt		477			396
Interest and dividends on Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock		364			356
Other, including interest on federal funds sold		162			140
Total interest income		38,826			39,860

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		4,471			5,830
Interest on repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowings		338			428
Interest on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		11			28
Interest on long-term debt		1,000			1,000
Total interest expense		5,820			7,286

Net interest income		33,006			32,574
Provision for loan losses		1,160			4,387
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		31,846			28,187

Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		5,872			5,880
Gains on sales of loans, net		617			381
Trust income		1,613			1,616
Loan related fees		1,287			883
Bank owned life insurance		428			410
Other noninterest income		1,370			1,568
Total noninterest income		11,187			10,738

Noninterest expense:
Officer salaries and employee benefits		2,356			2,173
Other salaries and employee benefits		10,457			9,911
Occupancy, net		1,853			2,097
Equipment		918			868
Data processing		1,579			1,792
Bank franchise tax		1,155			1,164
Legal fees		601			930
Professional fees		260			406
FDIC insurance		657			1,124
Other real estate owned provision and expense		790			846
Other noninterest expense		5,124			5,236
Total noninterest expense		25,750			26,547

Income before income taxes		17,283			12,378
Income taxes		5,414			3,074
Net income		11,869			9,304

Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale		(2,202	)		1,027
Deferred tax expense (benefit)		(771	)		359
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		(1,431	)		668
Comprehensive income	$	10,438		$	9,972

Basic earnings per share	$	0.77		$	0.61
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.77		$	0.61

Weighted average shares outstanding-basic		15,407			15,294
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted		15,456			15,324

Dividends declared per share	$	0.31		$	0.305

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31
(in thousands)	2012			2011

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	11,869		$	9,304
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,061			1,007
Deferred taxes		771			(337	)
Stock-based compensation		146			154
Excess tax benefits of stock-based compensation		336			16
Provision for loan losses		1,160			4,387
Write-downs of other real estate owned and other repossessed assets		179			418
Gains on sale of mortgage loans held for sale		(617	)		(381	)
(Gains)/losses on sale of assets, net		(35	)		37
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale		26,731			18,181
Funding of mortgage loans held for sale		(27,220	)		(18,296	)
Amortization of securities premiums and discounts, net		1,287			656
Change in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		(344	)		(332	)
Mortgage servicing rights:
Fair value adjustments		(207	)		46
New servicing assets created		(151	)		(136	)
Changes in:
Other assets		(392	)		(2,785	)
Other liabilities		10,090			(224	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		24,664			11,715

Cash flows from investing activities:
Certificates of deposit in other banks:
Maturity of certificates of deposit		(1,117	)		3,973
Securities available-for-sale (AFS):
Purchase of AFS securities		(123,695	)		(90,186	)
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities of AFS securities		33,626			18,902
Change in loans, net		8,803			8,752
Purchase of premises and equipment		(1,436	)		(1,774	)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment		73			0
Additional investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock		(1	)		(34	)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate and other repossessed assets		2,089			1,169
Additional investment in other real estate and other repossessed assets		(90	)		(14	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(81,748	)		(59,212	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Change in deposits, net		69,194			86,118
Change in repurchase agreements, federal funds purchased, and other short-term borrowings, net		15,773			11,102
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		0			570
Payments on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		(20,047	)		(49	)
Issuance of common stock		1,993			396
Excess tax benefits of stock-based compensation		(336	)		(16	)
Dividends paid		(4,753	)		(4,660	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		61,824			93,461
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		4,740			45,964
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		238,481			158,983
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	243,221		$	204,947

Supplemental disclosures:
Income taxes paid	$	3,800		$	3,600
Interest paid		5,290			6,808
Non-cash activities:
Loans to facilitate the sale of other real estate and other repossessed assets		952			40
Common stock dividends accrued, paid in subsequent quarter		4,783			4,695
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans		5,370			6,322

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (which consist of normal recurring accruals) necessary, to present fairly the condensed consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2012, the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and the cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, these statements do not include certain information and footnote disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete annual financial statements. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and the cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”) for that period. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011, included in our annual report on Form 10-K.

Principles of Consolidation – The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CTBI and its separate and distinct, wholly owned subsidiaries Community Trust Bank, Inc. (the “Bank”) and Community Trust and Investment Company. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications – Certain reclassifications considered to be immaterial have been made in the prior year condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to current year classifications. These reclassifications had no effect on net income.

New Accounting Standards –

Ø Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements – In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. The main objective in developing this ASU was to improve the accounting for repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The amendments in this ASU remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. Other criteria applicable to the assessment of effective control were not changed by the amendments in this Update. The guidance in this Update is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-03 did not have a material impact on CTBI’s consolidated financial statements.

Ø Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs – In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments in this ASU generally represent clarifications of Topic 820, but also include some instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed. This ASU results in common principles and requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.

The amendments in this ASU are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Ø Amendments to Topic 220, Comprehensive Income – In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Amendments to Topic 220, Comprehensive Income. Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. This ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. The amendments in this ASU do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income.

The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The amendments do not require any transition disclosures. In October 2011, the FASB decided that the specific requirement to present items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income alongside their respective components of net income and other comprehensive income will be deferred. Therefore, those requirements will not be effective for public entities for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassification of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU No. 2011-05. The amendments in this ASU supersede certain pending paragraphs in ASU No. 2011-05 to effectively defer only those changes that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments will be temporary to allow the FASB time to redeliberate the presentation requirements for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for annual and interim financial statements for public, private, and non-profit entities.

Ø Testing Goodwill for Impairment – In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The amendments in this ASU will allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under these amendments, an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments include a number of events and circumstances for an entity to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued. CTBI will adopt this ASU by the date required and does not anticipate that it will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 – Stock-Based Compensation

CTBI’s compensation expense related to stock option grants was $19 thousand and $24 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Restricted stock expense for the first three months of 2012 and 2011 was $157 thousand and $160 thousand, respectively, including $30 thousand in dividends paid for each quarter. As of March 31, 2012, there was a total of $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards that will be recognized as expense as the awards vest over a weighted average period of 0.6 years and a total of $1.5 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock grants that will be recognized as expense as the awards vest over a weighted average period of 1.8 years.

There were 331 shares of restricted stock granted during the three months ended March 31, 2012, and 45,542 shares granted during the three months ended March 31, 2011. The restrictions on the restricted stock will lapse at the end of five years. However, in the event of a change in control of CTBI or the death of the participant, the restrictions will lapse. In the event of the disability of the participant, the restrictions will lapse on a pro rata basis (with respect to 20% of the participant’s restricted stock for each year since the date of award). The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors will have discretion to review and revise restrictions applicable to a participant’s restricted stock in the event of the participant’s retirement. There were no options granted to purchase shares of CTBI common stock during the three months ended March 31, 2012 or 2011.

Note 3 – Securities

Securities are classified into held-to-maturity and available-for-sale categories. Held-to-maturity (HTM) securities are those that CTBI has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost. Available-for-sale (AFS) securities are those that CTBI may decide to sell if needed for liquidity, asset-liability management or other reasons. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses included as a separate component of equity, net of tax.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at March 31, 2012 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	31,270	$	783	$	(3	)	$	32,050
State and political subdivisions		77,959		3,354		(187	)		81,126
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		470,250		9,583		(610	)		479,223
Collateralized mortgage obligations		452		12		0			464
Total debt securities		579,931		13,732		(800	)		592,863
Marketable equity securities		20,582		625		(92	)		21,115
Total available-for-sale securities	$	600,513	$	14,357	$	(892	)	$	613,978

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
State and political subdivisions	$	1,182	$	2	$	0	$	1,184
Other debt securities		480		0		0		480
Total held-to-maturity securities	$	1,662	$	2	$	0	$	1,664

The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	32,077	$	1,171	$	0		$	33,248
State and political subdivisions		68,358		3,816		(30	)		72,144
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		390,213		10,180		(57	)		400,336
Collateralized mortgage obligations		501		6		0			507
Total debt securities		491,149		15,173		(87	)		506,235
Marketable equity securities		20,582		718		(137	)		21,163
Total available-for-sale securities	$	511,731	$	15,891	$	(224	)	$	527,398

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
State and political subdivisions	$	1,182	$	0	$	0		$	1,182
Other debt securities		480		0		(1	)		479
Total held-to-maturity securities	$	1,662	$	0	$	(1	)	$	1,661

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at March 31, 2012 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Available-for-Sale				Held-to-Maturity
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	4,744	$	4,791	$	0	$	0
Due after one through five years		22,717		23,444		0		0
Due after five through ten years		44,651		46,008		1,182		1,184
Due after ten years		37,117		38,933		0		0
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		470,250		479,223		0		0
Collateralized mortgage obligations		452		464		0		0
Other securities		0		0		480		480
Total debt securities		579,931		592,863		1,662		1,664
Marketable equity securities		20,582		21,115		0		0
Total securities	$	600,513	$	613,978	$	1,662	$	1,664

There were no pre-tax gains or losses as of March 31, 2012 or 2011.

The amortized cost of securities pledged as collateral, to secure public deposits and for other purposes, was $188.2 million at March 31, 2012 and $198.6 million at December 31, 2011.

The amortized cost of securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to $239.7 million at March 31, 2012 and $217.2 million at December 31, 2011.

Certain investments in debt and marketable equity securities are reported in the financial statements at amounts less than their historical costs. CTBI evaluates its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for impairment. The analysis performed as of March 31, 2012 indicates that all impairment is considered temporary, market driven, and not credit-related. The percentage of total investments with unrealized losses as of March 31, 2012 was 20.2% compared to 4.8% as of December 31, 2011. The following tables provide the amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair market value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2012 that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	1,977	$	(3	)	$	1,974
State and political subdivisions		11,917		(186	)		11,731
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		110,833		(610	)		110,223
Collateralized mortgage obligations		0		0			0
Total debt securities		124,727		(799	)		123,928
Marketable equity securities		0		0			0
Total <12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities		124,727		(799	)		123,928

12 Months or More
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		0		0			0
State and political subdivisions		106		(1	)		105
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		0		0			0
Collateralized mortgage obligations		0		0			0
Total debt securities		106		(1	)		105
Marketable equity securities		329		(92	)		237
Total ≥12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities		435		(93	)		342

Total
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		1,977		(3	)		1,974
State and political subdivisions		12,023		(187	)		11,836
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		110,833		(610	)		110,223
Collateralized mortgage obligations		0		(0	)		0
Total debt securities		124,833		(800	)		124,033
Marketable equity securities		329		(92	)		237
Total temporarily impaired AFS securities	$	125,162	$	(892	)	$	124,270

As of March 31, 2012, there were no held-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses.

The analysis performed as of December 31, 2011 indicated that all impairment was considered temporary, market driven, and not credit-related. The following tables provide the amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair market value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2011 that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	0	$	0		$	0
State and political subdivisions		6,173		(25	)		6,148
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		17,900		(57	)		17,843
Total debt securities		24,073		(82	)		23,991
Marketable equity securities		0		0			0
Total <12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities		24,073		(82	)		23,991

12 Months or More
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		0		0			0
State and political subdivisions		613		(5	)		608
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		0		0			0
Total debt securities		613		(5	)		608
Marketable equity securities		329		(137	)		192
Total ≥12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities		942		(142	)		800

Total
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		0		0			0
State and political subdivisions		6,786		(30	)		6,756
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		17,900		(57	)		17,843
Total debt securities		24,686		(87	)		24,599
Marketable equity securities		329		(137	)		192
Total temporarily impaired AFS securities	$	25,015	$	(224	)	$	24,791

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
State and political subdivisions	$	0	$	0		$	0
Other debt securities		480		(1	)		479
Total temporarily impaired HTM securities	$	480	$	(1	)	$	479

Note 4 – Loans

Major classifications of loans, net of unearned income and deferred loan origination costs, are summarized as follows:

(in thousands)	March 31 2012		December 31 2011
Commercial construction	$	114,161	$	120,577
Commercial secured by real estate		806,909		798,887
Equipment lease financing		8,219		9,706
Commercial other		381,946		374,597
Real estate construction		52,558		53,534
Real estate mortgage		648,338		650,075
Home equity		83,498		84,841
Consumer direct		121,645		123,949
Consumer indirect		324,894		340,382
Total loans	$	2,542,168	$	2,556,548

CTBI has segregated and evaluates its loan portfolio through nine portfolio classes. The nine classes are commercial construction, commercial secured by real estate, equipment lease financing, commercial other, real estate construction, real estate mortgage, home equity, consumer direct, and consumer indirect. CTBI serves customers in small and mid-sized communities in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky, southern West Virginia, and northeastern Tennessee. Therefore, CTBI’s exposure to credit risk is significantly affected by changes in these communities.

Commercial construction loans are for the purpose of erecting or rehabilitating buildings or other structures for commercial purposes, including any infrastructure necessary for development. Included in this category are improved property, land development, and tract development loans. The terms of these loans are generally short-term with permanent financing upon completion.

Commercial real estate loans include loans secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties, 1-4 family/ multi-family properties, farmland, and other commercial real estate. These loans are originated based on the borrower’s ability to service the debt and secondarily based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.

Equipment lease financing loans are fixed, variable, and tax exempt leases for commercial purposes.

Commercial other loans consist of commercial check loans, agricultural loans, receivable financing, floorplans, loans to financial institutions, loans for purchasing or carrying securities, and other commercial purpose loans. Commercial loans are underwritten based on the borrower’s ability to service debt from the business’s underlying cash flows. As a general practice, we obtain collateral such as real estate, equipment, or other assets, although such loans may be uncollateralized but guaranteed.

Real estate construction loans are typically for owner-occupied properties. The terms of these loans are generally short-term with permanent financing upon completion.

Residential real estate loans are a mixture of fixed rate and adjustable rate first and second lien residential mortgage loans. As a policy, CTBI holds adjustable rate loans and sells the majority of its fixed rate first lien mortgage loans into the secondary market. Changes in interest rates or market conditions may impact a borrower’s ability to meet contractual principal and interest payments. Residential real estate loans are secured by real property.

Home equity lines are revolving adjustable rate credit lines secured by real property.

Consumer direct loans are fixed rate products comprised of unsecured loans, consumer revolving credit lines, deposit secured loans, and all other consumer purpose loans.

Consumer indirect loans are fixed rate loans secured by automobiles, trucks, vans, and recreational vehicles originated at the selling dealership underwritten and purchased by CTBI’s indirect lending department. Both new and used products are financed. Only dealers who have executed dealer agreements with CTBI participate in the indirect lending program.

Not included in the loan balances above were loans held for sale in the amount of $1.6 million at March 31, 2012 and $0.5 million at December 31, 2011. The amount of capitalized fees and costs under ASC 310-20, included in the above loan totals were $0.5 million and $0.7 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

CTBI acquired loans through the acquisition of First National Bank of LaFollette in the fourth quarter 2010. At acquisition, the transferred loans with evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination were not significant; therefore, none of the loans acquired were accounted for under the guidance in ASC 310-30.

Credit discounts representing principal losses expected over the life of the loans are a component of the initial fair value for purchased loans acquired that are not deemed impaired at acquisition. Accordingly, an allowance for credit losses related to these loans is not carried over and recorded at the acquisition date. Subsequent to the acquisition date, the methods used to estimate the required allowance for credit losses for these loans is similar to originated loans; however, CTBI records a provision for loan losses only when the required allowance exceeds any remaining credit discounts. The remaining difference between the purchase price and the unpaid principal balance at the date of acquisition is recorded in interest income over the life of the loans. Management estimated the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition using a third party that incorporated estimates of current key assumptions, such as default rates, severity, and prepayment speeds. The carrying amounts of those loans included in the balance sheet are $83.6 million and $88.5 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

Changes in accretable yield for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 are as follows:

(in thousands)	March 31 2012			December 31 2011
Beginning balance	$	720		$	2,995
Additions		0			0
Accretion		(259	)		(1,067	)
Disposals		(35	)		(1,208	)
Ending balance	$	426		$	720

Refer to note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our nonaccrual policy. Nonaccrual loans segregated by class of loans were as follows:

(in thousands)	March 31 2012		December 31 2011
Commercial:
Commercial construction	$	7,246	$	7,029
Commercial secured by real estate		7,440		9,810
Commercial other		3,300		3,914

Residential:
Real estate construction		397		607
Real estate mortgage		3,184		4,204
Home equity		202		189
Total nonaccrual loans	$	21,769	$	25,753

The following tables present CTBI’s loan portfolio aging analysis, segregated by class, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	March 31, 2012
(in thousands)	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90+ Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		90+ and Accruing*
Commercial:
Commercial construction	$	825	$	0	$	9,859	$	10,684	$	103,477	$	114,161	$	2,911
Commercial secured by real estate		3,588		1,390		12,480		17,458		789,451		806,909		5,191
Equipment lease financing		0		0		0		0		8,219		8,219		0
Commercial other		1,233		4,124		3,331		8,688		373,258		381,946		881
Residential:
Real estate construction		460		12		480		952		51,606		52,558		84
Real estate mortgage		1,844		2,908		6,153		10,905		637,433		648,338		3,110
Home equity		459		117		588		1,164		82,334		83,498		406
Consumer:
Consumer direct		693		129		36		858		120,787		121,645		36
Consumer indirect		1,721		495		209		2,425		322,469		324,894		209
Total	$	10,823	$	9,175	$	33,136	$	53,134	$	2,489,034	$	2,542,168	$	12,828

	December 31, 2011
(in thousands)	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90+ Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		90+ and Accruing*
Commercial:
Commercial construction	$	362	$	33	$	10,171	$	10,566	$	110,011	$	120,577	$	3,292
Commercial secured by real estate		4,566		2,978		11,998		19,542		779,345		798,887		3,969
Equipment lease financing		0		0		0		0		9,706		9,706		0
Commercial other		2,286		688		2,504		5,478		369,119		374,597		619
Residential:
Real estate construction		305		91		622		1,018		52,516		53,534		16
Real estate mortgage		2,067		4,974		6,547		13,588		636,487		650,075		2,719
Home equity		968		312		482		1,762		83,079		84,841		346
Consumer:
Consumer direct		1,723		171		71		1,965		121,984		123,949		71
Consumer indirect		2,684		755		483		3,922		336,460		340,382		483
Total	$	14,961	$	10,002	$	32,878	$	57,841	$	2,498,707	$	2,556,548	$	11,515

*90+ and Accruing are also included in 90+ Days Past Due column.

Credit Quality Indicators:

CTBI categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. CTBI also considers the fair value of the underlying collateral and the strength and willingness of the guarantor(s). CTBI analyzes commercial loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. Loans classified as loss, doubtful, substandard, or special mention are reviewed quarterly by CTBI for further deterioration or improvement to determine if appropriately classified and valued if deemed impaired. All other commercial loan reviews are completed every 12 to 18 months. In addition, during the renewal process of any loan, as well as if a loan becomes past due or if other information becomes available, CTBI will evaluate the loan grade. CTBI uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Pass grades include investment grade, low risk, moderate risk, and acceptable risk loans. The loans range from loans that have no chance of resulting in a loss to loans that have a limited chance of resulting in a loss. Customers in this grade have excellent to fair credit ratings. The cash flows are adequate to meet required debt repayments.

Watch graded loans are loans that warrant extra management attention but are not currently criticized. Loans on the watch list may be potential troubled credits or may warrant “watch” status for a reason not directly related to the asset quality of the credit. The watch grade is a management tool to identify credits which may be candidates for future classification or may temporarily warrant extra management monitoring.

Other assets especially mentioned (OAEM) reflects loans that are currently protected but are potentially weak. These loans constitute an undue and unwarranted credit risk but not to the point of justifying a classification of substandard. The credit risk may be relatively minor yet constitute an unwarranted risk in light of circumstances surrounding a specific asset. Loans in this grade display potential weaknesses which may, if unchecked or uncorrected, inadequately protect CTBI’s credit position at some future date. The loans may be adversely affected by economic or market conditions.

Substandard grading indicates that the loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged. These loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the orderly liquidation of the debt with the distinct possibility that CTBI will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful graded loans have the weaknesses inherent in the substandard grading with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The probability of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors which may work to CTBI’s advantage or strengthen the asset(s), its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined. Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition, or liquidation procedures, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral, and refinancing plans.

A loss grading applies to loans that are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off the asset. Losses must be taken in the period in which they surface as uncollectible, or in the case of collateral-dependent loans, a specific reserve in the amount of the expected loss is applied to the loan until the collateral is liquidated or we have taken possession and moved it into other real estate owned.

The following tables present the credit risk profile of CTBI’s commercial loan portfolio based on rating category and payment activity, segregated by class of loans, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

(in thousands)	Commercial Construction		Commercial Secured by Real Estate		Commercial Other		Equipment Leases		Total
March 31, 2012
Pass	$	81,848	$	659,812	$	322,849	$	8,219	$	1,072,728
Watch		14,948		76,821		39,855		0		131,624
OAEM		1,435		19,262		8,662		0		29,359
Substandard		8,793		43,596		7,309		0		59,698
Doubtful		7,137		7,418		3,271		0		17,826
Loss		0		0		0		0		0
Total	$	114,161	$	806,909	$	381,946	$	8,219	$	1,311,235

December 31, 2011
Pass	$	85,886	$	643,312	$	323,471	$	9,706	$	1,062,375
Watch		17,721		78,611		38,185		0		134,517
OAEM		1,379		21,087		1,668		0		24,134
Substandard		8,783		46,238		7,364		0		62,385
Doubtful		6,808		9,639		3,909		0		20,356
Loss		0		0		0		0		0
Total	$	120,577	$	798,887	$	374,597	$	9,706	$	1,303,767

The following tables present the credit risk profile of the CTBI’s residential real estate and consumer loan portfolios based on performing or nonperforming status, segregated by class, as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

(in thousands)	Real Estate Construction		Real Estate Mortgage		Home Equity		Consumer Direct		Consumer Indirect		Total
March 31, 2012
Performing	$	52,077	$	642,044	$	82,890	$	121,609	$	324,685	$	1,223,305
Nonperforming (1)		481		6,294		608		36		209		7,628
Total	$	52,558	$	648,338	$	83,498	$	121,645	$	324,894	$	1,230,933

December 31, 2011
Performing	$	52,911	$	643,152	$	84,306	$	123,878	$	339,899	$	1,244,146
Nonperforming (1)		623		6,923		535		71		483		8,635
Total	$	53,534	$	650,075	$	84,841	$	123,949	$	340,382	$	1,252,781

(1) A loan is considered nonperforming if it is 90 days or more past due or on nonaccrual.

A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when based on current information and events, it is probable CTBI will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans but also include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions intended to maximize collection.

The following table presents impaired loans, the average investment in impaired loans, and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the periods ended March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011:

	March 31, 2012
(in thousands)	Recorded Balance		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Specific Allowance		Average Investment in Impaired Loans		*Interest Income Recognized
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction	$	4,594	$	4,595	$	0	$	4,683	$	18
Commercial secured by real estate		36,312		37,778		0		36,506		332
Commercial other		6,696		7,406		0		6,785		16
Real estate construction		0		0		0		0		0
Real estate mortgage		279		279		0		280		3
Consumer direct		0		0		0		0		0
Consumer indirect		0		0		0		0		0

Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction		5,912		6,764		2,180		5,809		0
Commercial secured by real estate		3,382		3,508		1,246		3,385		0
Commercial other		2,791		5,391		1,104		2,829		0

Totals:
Commercial		59,687		65,442		4,530		59,997		366
Residential		279		279		0		280		3
Consumer		0		0		0		0		0
Total	$	59,966	$	65,721	$	4,530	$	60,277	$	369

	December 31, 2011
(in thousands)	Recorded Balance		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Specific Allowance		Average Investment in Impaired Loans		*Interest Income Recognized
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction	$	4,778	$	4,778	$	0	$	8,992	$	252
Commercial secured by real estate		27,811		29,765		0		31,480		1,543
Commercial other		1,770		2,501		0		3,392		143
Real estate construction		27		27		0		19		1
Real estate mortgage		82		82		0		84		5
Consumer direct		93		93		0		82		9
Consumer indirect		112		112		0		99		12

Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction		5,794		6,643		2,203		7,681		0
Commercial secured by real estate		3,525		3,669		1,156		4,747		23
Commercial other		3,432		6,022		1,310		5,071		22

Totals:
Commercial		47,110		53,378		4,669		61,363		1,983
Residential		109		109		0		103		6
Consumer		205		205		0		181		21
Total	$	47,424	$	53,692	$	4,669	$	61,647	$	2,010

	March 31, 2011
(in thousands)	Recorded Balance		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Specific Allowance		Average Investment in Impaired Loans		*Interest Income Recognized
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction	$	7,537	$	8,394	$	0	$	7,540	$	71
Commercial secured by real estate		30,903		33,279		0		32,777		257
Commercial other		3,870		4,970		0		3,886		56
Real estate construction		0		0		0		0		0
Real estate mortgage		85		85		0		85		2
Consumer direct		43		43		0		43		1
Consumer indirect		89		89		0		89		2

Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction		9,356		9,788		2,805		9,356		0
Commercial secured by real estate		5,189		5,379		1,622		5,219		23
Commercial other		7,247		8,645		2,913		7,963		0

Totals:
Commercial		64,102		70,455		7,340		66,741		407
Residential		85		85		0		85		2
Consumer		132		132		0		132		3
Total	$	64,319	$	70,672	$	7,340	$	66,958	$	412

*Cash basis interest is substantially the same as interest income recognized.

Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are certain loans and leases that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring, where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions. Modifications of terms for our loans and their inclusion as troubled debt restructurings are based on individual facts and circumstances. Loan modifications that are included as troubled debt restructurings may involve either an increase or reduction of the interest rate, extension of the term of the loan, or deferral of principal and/or interest payments, regardless of the period of the modification. All of the loans identified as troubled debt restructuring were modified due to financial stress of the borrower. In order to determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed to determine the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future with the modification. This evaluation is performed under CTBI’s internal underwriting policy.

When we modify loans and leases in a troubled debt restructuring, we evaluate any possible impairment similar to other impaired loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan or lease agreement, or use the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. If we determined that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance. In periods subsequent to modification, we evaluate all troubled debt restructuring, including those that have payment defaults, for possible impairment and recognize impairment through the allowance.

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, commitments to extend credit of $0.5 million and a standby letter of credit in the amount of $0.8 million were outstanding and are not included in the above table.

During 2012, certain loans were modified in troubled debt restructurings, where economic concessions were granted to borrowers consisting of reductions in the interest rates, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, and forbearances. Presented below, segregated by class of loans, are troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2012:

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Post-Modification Outstanding Balance		Net Charge-offs Resulting from Modification
Commercial:
Commercial construction		0	$	0	$	0
Commercial secured by real estate		3		1,665		0
Commercial other		1		48		0
Residential:
Real estate construction		0		0		0
Real estate mortgage		3		165		0
Consumer:
Consumer direct		1		10		0
Consumer indirect		4		52		0
Total troubled debt restructurings		12	$	1,940	$	0

Loans retain their accrual status at the time of their modification. As a result, if a loan is on nonaccrual at the time it is modified, it stays as nonaccrual, and if a loan is on accrual at the time of the modification, it generally stays on accrual. Commercial and consumer loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default. If loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring subsequently default, CTBI evaluates the loan for possible further impairment. The allowance for loan losses may be increased, adjustments may be made in the allocation of the allowance, or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan. Presented below, segregated by class of loans, are loans that were modified as troubled debt restructurings which have subsequently defaulted. CTBI considers a loan in default when it is 90 days or more past due or transferred to nonaccrual.

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
	Number of Loans		Recorded Balance
Commercial:
Commercial construction		0	$	0
Commercial secured by real estate		3		370
Commercial other		2		32

Residential:
Real estate construction		0		0
Real estate mortgage		2		12
Home equity		1		8

Consumer:
Consumer direct		2		2
Consumer indirect		0		0
Total defaulted restructured loans		10	$	424

The following tables present the activity in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio class and impairment method for the periods ended March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011:

	March 31, 2012
(in thousands)	Commercial Construction		Commercial Secured by Real Estate		Commercial Other		Equipment Lease Financing			Real Estate Construction		Real Estate Mortgage		Home Equity		Consumer Direct			Consumer Indirect			Total
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance	$	4,023	$	11,753	$	5,608	$	112		$	354	$	4,302	$	562	$	917		$	5,540		$	33,171
Provision charged to expense		42		1,280		718		(7	)		155		71		29		(117	)		(1,011	)		1,160
Losses charged off		18		96		612		0			171		190		46		146			847			2,126
Recoveries		19		40		251		0			6		57		1		192			401			967
Ending balance	$	4,066	$	12,977	$	5,965	$	105		$	344	$	4,240	$	546	$	846		$	4,083		$	33,172

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,180	$	1,246	$	1,104	$	0		$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0		$	0		$	4,530
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,886	$	11,731	$	4,861	$	105		$	344	$	4,240	$	546	$	846		$	4,083		$	28,642

Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	10,506	$	39,694	$	9,487	$	0		$	0	$	279	$	0	$	0		$	0		$	59,966
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	103,655	$	767,215	$	372,459	$	8,219		$	52,558	$	648,059	$	83,498	$	121,645		$	324,894		$	2,482,202

	December 31, 2011
(in thousands)	Commercial Construction		Commercial Secured by Real Estate		Commercial Other		Equipment Lease Financing			Real Estate Construction		Real Estate Mortgage		Home Equity		Consumer Direct		Consumer Indirect		Total
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance	$	4,332	$	12,327	$	7,392	$	148		$	271	$	2,982	$	407	$	1,169	$	5,777	$	34,805
Provision charged to expense		2,171		3,304		1,867		(36	)		376		2,827		310		257		2,186		13,262
Losses charged off		2,510		4,018		4,092		0			319		1,589		171		961		3,874		17,534
Recoveries		30		140		441		0			26		82		16		452		1,451		2,638
Ending balance	$	4,023	$	11,753	$	5,608	$	112		$	354	$	4,302	$	562	$	917	$	5,540	$	33,171

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,203	$	1,156	$	1,310	$	0		$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	4,669
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,820	$	10,597	$	4,298	$	112		$	354	$	4,302	$	562	$	917	$	5,540	$	28,502

Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	10,572	$	31,336	$	5,202	$	0		$	27	$	82	$	0	$	93	$	112	$	47,424
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	110,005	$	767,551	$	369,395	$	9,706		$	53,507	$	649,993	$	84,841	$	123,856	$	340,270	$	2,509,124

	March 31, 2011
(in thousands)	Commercial Construction		Commercial Secured by Real Estate		Commercial Other		Equipment Lease Financing			Real Estate Construction			Real Estate Mortgage		Home Equity		Consumer Direct		Consumer Indirect		Total
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance	$	4,332	$	12,327	$	7,392	$	148		$	271		$	2,982	$	407	$	1,169	$	5,777	$	34,805
Provision charged to expense		433		1,613		906		(10	)		(17	)		683		78		43		658		4,387
Losses charged off		98		2,015		875		0			0			342		46		291		995		4,662
Recoveries		1		27		81		0			8			22		0		140		343		622
Ending balance	$	4,668	$	11,952	$	7,504	$	138		$	262		$	3,345	$	439	$	1,061	$	5,783	$	35,152

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,805	$	1,622	$	2,913	$	0		$	0		$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	7,340
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,863	$	10,330	$	4,591	$	138		$	262		$	3,345	$	439	$	1,061	$	5,783	$	27,812

Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	16,893	$	36,092	$	11,117	$	0		$	0		$	85	$	0	$	43	$	89	$	64,319
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	116,887	$	755,741	$	384,217	$	12,359		$	50,046		$	637,754	$	83,767	$	121,642	$	359,316	$	2,521,729

Note 5 – Mortgage Banking and Servicing Rights

Mortgage banking activities primarily include residential mortgage originations and servicing. As discussed in note 1 above, mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) are carried at fair market value. The fair value is determined quarterly based on an independent third-party valuation using a discounted cash flow analysis and calculated using a computer pricing model. The system used in this evaluation, Compass Point, attempts to quantify loan level idiosyncratic risk by calculating a risk derived value. As a result, each loan’s unique characteristics determine the valuation assumptions ascribed to that loan. Additionally, the computer valuation is based on key economic assumptions including the prepayment speeds of the underlying loans generated using the Andrew Davidson Prepayment Model, FHLMC/FNMA guidelines, the weighted-average life of the loan, the discount rate, the weighted-average coupon, and the weighted-average default rate, as applicable. Along with the gains received from the sale of loans, fees are received for servicing loans. These fees include late fees, which are recorded in interest income, and ancillary fees and monthly servicing fees, which are recorded in noninterest income. Costs of servicing loans are charged to expense as incurred. Changes in fair market value of the MSRs are reported as an increase or decrease to mortgage banking income.

The following table presents the components of mortgage banking income:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31
(in thousands)	2012		2011
Net gain on sales of loans held for sale	$	617	$	381
Net loan servicing income (expense)
Servicing fees		271		268
Late fees		22		22
Ancillary fees		86		66
Fair value adjustments		207		(46	)
Net loan servicing income		586		310
Mortgage banking income	$	1,203	$	691

Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying balance sheets. Loans serviced for the benefit of others (primarily FHLMC) at March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011, were $427 million, $425 million, and $422 million, respectively. Servicing loans for others generally consists of collecting mortgage payments, maintaining escrow accounts, disbursing payments to investors, and processing foreclosures. Custodial escrow balances maintained in connection with the foregoing loan servicing, and included in demand deposits, were approximately $924 thousand at March 31, 2012, $579 thousand at December 31, 2011, and $828 thousand at March 31, 2011.

Activity for capitalized mortgage servicing rights using the fair value method was as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31
(in thousands)	2012			2011
Fair value, beginning of period	$	2,282		$	3,161
New servicing assets created		151			136
Change in fair value during the period due to:
Time decay (1)		(40	)		(59	)
Payoffs (2)		(94	)		(131	)
Changes in valuation inputs or assumptions (3)		341			144
Fair value of MSRs, end of period	$	2,640		$	3,251

(1)	Represents decrease in value due to regularly scheduled loan principal payments and partial loan paydowns.

(2)	Represents decrease in value due to loans that paid off during the period.

(3)	Represents change in value resulting from market-driven changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds.

The fair value of capitalized mortgage servicing rights was $2.6 million at March 31, 2012 compared to $2.3 million at December 31, 2011 and $3.3 million at March 31, 2011. Major assumptions used included a discounted rate of 10.0% for the quarters ended March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, and weighted average default rates of 2.30%, 2.61%, and 2.30% respectively. Prepayment speeds generated using the Andrew Davidson Prepayment Model averaged 16.3%, 19.2%, and 13.1% at March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011, respectively. These assumptions are prepared by the third party provider and reviewed and approved by management prior to final determination of the fair value. MSR values are very sensitive to movement in interest rates as expected future net servicing income depends on the projected balance of the underlying loans, which can be greatly impacted by the level of prepayments. CTBI does not currently hedge against changes in the fair value of its MSR portfolio.

Note 6 – Other Real Estate Owned

Activity for other real estate owned during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:

(in thousands)	2012			2011
Beginning balance of other real estate owned	$	56,965		$	42,935
New assets acquired		5,370			6,321
Capitalized costs		90			13
Fair value adjustments		(179	)		(418	)
Sale of assets		(3,092	)		(1,184	)
Ending balance of other real estate owned	$	59,154		$	47,667

Foreclosed properties at March 31, 2012 and 2011 were $58.6 million and $47.7 million, respectively. Also included in other real estate owned are two properties totaling $0.6 million which were not acquired through foreclosure. Carrying costs and fair value adjustments associated with foreclosed properties at March 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010 respectively were $0.79 million, $0.85 million, and $0.87 million.

Note 7 – Borrowings

Short-term debt consists of the following:

(in thousands)	March 31 2012		December 31 2011
Subsidiaries:
Repurchase agreements	$	225,301	$	217,177
Federal funds purchased		20,753		13,104
Total short-term debt	$	246,054	$	230,281

All federal funds purchased and the majority of repurchase agreements mature and reprice daily. The average rates paid for federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements on March 31, 2012 were 0.15% and 0.60%, respectively.

The maximum balance for repurchase agreements at any month-end during the three months ended March 31, 2012 occurred at March 31, 2012, with a month-end balance of $225.3 million. The average balance of repurchase agreements for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $217.3 million.

Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances consisted of the following monthly amortizing and term borrowings:

(in thousands)	March 31 2012		December 31 2011
Monthly amortizing	$	1,562	$	1,609
Term		0		20,000
Total FHLB advances	$	1,562	$	21,609

The advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank that require monthly principal payments were due for repayment as follows:

	Principal Payments Due by Period at March 31, 2012
(in thousands)	Total		Within 1 Year		2 Years		3 Years		4 Years		5 Years		After 5 Years
Outstanding advances, weighted average interest rate – 2.15%	$	1,562	$	189	$	126	$	116	$	113	$	107	$	911

At December 31, 2011, CTBI had monthly amortizing FHLB advances totaling $1.6 million at a weighted average rate of 2.20%.

The term advances that require the total payment to be made at maturity follow:

(in thousands)		March 31 2012				December 31 2011
Advance #271, 0.25%, due 1/18/12		$	0			$	20,000

Advances totaling $1.6 million at March 31, 2012 were collateralized by FHLB stock of $25.7 million and a blanket lien on qualifying first mortgage loans. As of March 31, 2012, CTBI had a $409.4 million FHLB borrowing capacity with $1.6 million in advances and $120.5 million in letters of credit used for public fund pledging leaving $287.3 million available for additional advances. The advances had fixed interest rates ranging from 0.00% to 7.42% with a weighted average rate of 2.15%. The advances are subject to restriction or penalties in the event of prepayment. Advance #271 matured and was paid off on January 18, 2012.

Long-term debt consists of the following:

(in thousands)		March 31 2012				December 31 2011
Junior subordinated debentures, 6.52%, due 6/1/37		$	61,341			$	61,341

On March 31, 2007, CTBI issued $61.3 million in junior subordinated debentures to a newly formed unconsolidated Delaware statutory trust subsidiary which in turn issued $59.5 million of capital securities in a private placement to institutional investors. The debentures, which mature in 30 years but are redeemable at par at CTBI's option after five years, were issued at a rate of 6.52% until June 1, 2012, and thereafter at a floating rate based on the three-month LIBOR plus 1.59%. The underlying capital securities were issued at the equivalent rates and terms. The proceeds of the debentures were used to fund the redemption on April 2, 2007 of all CTBI's outstanding 9.0% and 8.25% junior subordinated debentures in the total amount of $61.3 million.

On October 27, 2011, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. entered into a revolving credit promissory note for a line of credit in the amount of $12 million at a floating interest rate of 2.25% in excess of the one-month LIBOR Rate, with an unused commitment fee of 0.15%. Currently, all $12 million remain available for general corporate purposes. The agreement, which was effective October 27, 2011, replaced the agreement dated October 28, 2010, and will mature on October 26, 2012.

Note 8 – Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31
(in thousands except per share data)	2012		2011
Numerator:
Net income	$	11,869	$	9,304

Denominator:
Basic earnings per share:
Weighted average shares		15,407		15,294
Diluted earnings per share:
Effect of dilutive stock options		49		30
Adjusted weighted average shares		15,456		15,324

Earnings per share:
Basic earnings per share	$	0.77	$	0.61
Diluted earnings per share		0.77		0.61

Options to purchase 248,555 common shares were excluded from the diluted calculations above for the three months ended March 31, 2012, because the exercise prices on the options were greater than the average market price for the period. Unvested restricted stock grants were also used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share based on the treasury method. Options to purchase 293,322 common shares were excluded from the diluted calculations above for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Note 9 – Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. Fair value measurements must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. In this standard, the FASB clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. In support of this principle, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1 Inputs – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

Recurring Measurements

The following tables present the fair value measurements of assets recognized in the accompanying balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.

			Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2012 Using
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets measured – recurring basis
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	32,050	$	0	$	32,050	$	0
State and political subdivisions		81,126		0		81,126		0
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		479,223		0		479,223		0
Collateralized mortgage obligations		464		0		464		0
Marketable equity securities		21,115		20,904		0		211
Mortgage servicing rights		2,640		0		0		2,640

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets measured – recurring basis
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	33,248	$	0	$	33,248	$	0
State and political subdivisions		72,144		0		72,144		0
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		400,336		0		400,336		0
Collateralized mortgage obligations		507		507		0		0
Marketable equity securities		21,163		20,675		277		211
Mortgage servicing rights		2,282		0		0		2,282

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy. These valuation methodologies were applied to all of CTBI’s financial assets carried at fair value. CTBI had no liabilities measured at fair value as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. There have been no significant changes in the valuation techniques during the quarter ended March 31, 2012. For assets classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value is described below.

Available-for-Sale Securities

Securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value on a recurring basis. CTBI’s CRA investment funds (included in marketable equity securities) are classified as Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy where quoted market prices are available in the active market on which the individual securities are traded.

If quoted market prices are not available, CTBI obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service, such as Interactive Data, which utilizes pricing models to determine fair value measurement. CTBI reviews the pricing quarterly to verify the reasonableness of the pricing. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other factors. U.S. Treasury and government agencies, state and political subdivisions, and U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities are classified as Level 2 inputs.

In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. The securities owned by CTBI that were measured using Level 3 criteria are auction rate securities (included in marketable equity securities) issued by FNMA. Fair value determinations for Level 3 measurements of auction rate securities are estimated on a quarterly basis where assumptions used are reviewed to ensure the estimated fair value complies with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States. The fair market value for these auction rate securities are determined by valuing the underlying collateral which includes the public preferred stock of FNMA. Consideration is also given for the relative illiquidity of these shares. The securities that remain in the auction-rate security structure are valued assuming that they are exchanged into the contractual shares of public preferred stock. Likewise, consideration is given for the uncertainty of the reorganization process currently on-going. See the table below for inputs and valuation techniques used for Level 3 securities.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. CTBI reports mortgage servicing rights at fair value on a recurring basis with subsequent remeasurement of MSRs based on change in fair value.

In determining fair value, CTBI utilizes the expertise of an independent third party. Accordingly, fair value is determined by the independent third party by utilizing assumptions about factors such as mortgage interest rates, discount rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds, market trends and industry demand. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, mortgage servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. Fair value determinations for Level 3 measurements of mortgage servicing rights are tested for impairment on a quarterly basis where assumptions used are reviewed to ensure the estimated fair value complies with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States. See the table below for inputs and valuation techniques used for Level 3 mortgage servicing rights.

Transfers between Levels

Transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3 and the reasons for those transfers are as follows:

(in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Reason for Transfer
Transfers from level:
Collateralized mortgage obligations	$	464	$	0	$	0	Quoted prices in exact security not available on the measurement date

Marketable equity securities		0		323		0	Quoted prices available on the measurement date
Total transfers from level	$	464	$	323	$	0

Transfers to level:
Collateralized mortgage obligations	$	0	$	464	$	0	Quoted prices in exact security not available on the measurement date

Marketable equity securities		323		0		0	Quoted prices available on the measurement date
Total transfers to level	$	323	$	464	$	0

Level 3 Reconciliation

Following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of recurring fair value measurements recognized in the accompanying balance sheet using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs for March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
(in thousands)	Marketable Equity Securities		Mortgage Servicing Rights
Beginning balance	$	211	$	2,282
Total recognized gains (losses)
Included in net income		0		341
Included in other comprehensive income		0		0
Net realized gains		0		0
Purchases		0		0
Issues		0		151
Sales		0		0
Settlements		0		(134	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		0		0
Ending balance	$	211	$	2,640

Total gains for the period included in net income attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the reporting date	$	0	$	341

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
(in thousands)	Marketable Equity Securities		Mortgage Servicing Rights
Beginning balance	$	211	$	3,161
Total recognized gains (losses)
Included in net income		0		144
Included in other comprehensive income		0		0
Net realized gains		0		0
Purchases		0		0
Issues		0		136
Sales		0		0
Settlements		0		(190	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		0		0
Ending balance	$	211	$	3,251

Total gains for the period included in net income attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the reporting date	$	0	$	144

Realized and unrealized gains and losses for items reflected in the table above are included in net income in the consolidated statements of income as follows:

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
	Noninterest Income		Noninterest Expense
Total gains	$	207	$	0
Change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the balance sheet date		0		0

Nonrecurring Measurements

The following table presents the fair value measurements of assets recognized in the accompanying balance sheets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.

			Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2012 Using
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets measured – nonrecurring basis
Impaired loans (collateral dependent)	$	598	$	0	$	0	$	598
Other real estate/assets owned		985		0		0		985

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets measured – nonrecurring basis
Impaired loans (collateral dependent)	$	7,898	$	0	$	0	$	7,898
Other real estate/assets owned		16,362		0		0		16,362

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheet, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy. For assets classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value is described below.

Impaired Loans (Collateral Dependent)

The estimated fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans is based on the appraised fair value of the collateral, less estimated cost to sell. Collateral-dependent impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

CTBI considers the appraisal or evaluation as the starting point for determining fair value and then considers other factors and events in the environment that may affect the fair value. Appraisals of the collateral underlying collateral-dependent loans are obtained when the loan is determined to be collateral-dependent and subsequently as deemed necessary by the Chief Credit Officer. Appraisals are reviewed for accuracy and consistency by the Chief Credit Officer. Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management. The appraised values are reduced by discounts to consider lack of marketability and estimated cost to sell if repayment or satisfaction of the loan is dependent on the sale of the collateral. These discounts and estimates are developed by the Chief Credit Officer by comparison to historical results.

Loans considered impaired under ASC 310-35, Impairment of a Loan, are loans for which, based on current information and events, it is probably that the creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect subsequent (1) partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral or (2) the full charge-off of the loan carrying value. Adjustments for the quarters ended March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011 were $0.1 million, $2.1 million, and $1.3 million, respectively.

Other Real Estate Owned

In accordance with the provisions of ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, other real estate owned (OREO) is carried at the lower of fair value at acquisition date or current estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell when the real estate is acquired. Estimated fair value of OREO is based on appraisals or evaluations. OREO is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Long-lived assets are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect subsequent partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral. Fair value adjustments on other real estate/assets owned for the quarters ended March 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011 were $0.2 million, $3.7 million, and $0.4 million, respectively.

Appraisals of OREO are obtained when the real estate is acquired and subsequently as deemed necessary by the Chief Credit Officer. Appraisals are required at least every 12 to 18 months and reviewed for accuracy and consistency by the Chief Credit Officer. Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.

Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs

The following table presents quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in recurring and nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements.

	Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
(in thousands)	Fair Value at March 31, 2012		Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Marketable equity securities	$	211	Discount cash flows, Market comparable	Offered quotes of underlying securities held as collateral	Not applicable

Mortgage servicing rights	$	2,640	Discount cash flows, computer pricing model	Constant prepayment rate		8.0% - 24.2% (16.3%)
				Probability of default		0.97% - 4.95% (2.3%)
				Discount rate	Not applicable (10.0%)

Impaired loans (collateral-dependent)	$	598	Market comparable properties	Marketability discount		0.0% - 10.0% (7.0%)

Other real estate/assets owned	$	985	Market comparable properties	Comparability adjustments (%)		5.0% - 10.0% (6/0%)

Sensitivity of Significant Unobservable Inputs

The following is a discussion of the sensitivity of significant unobservable inputs, the interrelationships between those inputs and other unobservable inputs used in recurring fair value measurement and of how those inputs might magnify or mitigate the effect of changes in the unobservable inputs on the fair value measurement.

Marketable Equity Securities

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of CTBI’s marketable equity securities is offered quotes on underlying securities held as collateral of public preferred stock. Significant increases (decreases) in the assumptions for the underlying securities would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement by affecting the implied market price of the public preferred stock for FNMA.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Market value for mortgage servicing rights is derived based on unobservable inputs, such as prepayment speeds of the underlying loans generated using the Andrew Davidson Prepayment Model, FHLMC/FNMA guidelines, the weighted-average life of the loan, the discount rate, the weighted average coupon, and the weighted average default rate. Significant increases (decreases) in either of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption used for prepayment speeds is accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the assumption for interest rates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table presents estimated fair value of CTBI’s financial instruments as of March 31, 2012 and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.

	Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2012 Using
(in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	243,221	$	243,221	$	0	$	0
Certificates of deposit in other banks		12,992		0		13,011		0
Securities available-for-sale		613,978		20,904		592,863		211
Securities held-to-maturity		1,662		0		1,664		0
Loans held for sale		1,642		1,677		0		0
Loans, net		2,508,996		0		0		2,524,493
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		25,674		0		25,674		0
Federal Reserve Bank stock		4,883		0		4,883		0
Accrued interest receivable		12,412		0		12,412		0
Mortgage servicing rights		2,640		0		0		2,640

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	2,947,553	$	629,293	$	2,321,090	$	0
Repurchase agreements		225,301		0		0		225,300
Federal funds purchased		20,753		0		20,753		0
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		1,562		0		1,889		0
Long-term debt		61,341		0		0		31,067
Accrued interest payable		2,701		0		2,701		0

Unrecognized financial instruments:
Letters of credit	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Commitments to extend credit		0		0		0		0
Forward sale commitments		0		0		0		0

The following table presents estimated fair value of CTBI’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2011 and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
(in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	238,481	$	238,481	$	0	$	0
Certificates of deposit in other banks		11,875		0		11,860		0
Securities available-for-sale		527,398		21,182		506,005		211
Securities held-to-maturity		1,662		0		1,661		0
Loans held for sale		536		550		0		0
Loans, net		2,523,377		0		0		2,520,297
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		25,673		0		25,673		0
Federal Reserve Bank stock		4,883		0		4,883		0
Accrued interest receivable		12,280		0		12,280		0
Mortgage servicing rights		2,282		0		0		2,282

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	2,878,359	$	584,735	$	2,294,987	$	0
Repurchase agreements		217,177		0		0		217,062
Federal funds purchased		13,104		0		13,104		0
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		21,609		0		21,617		0
Long-term debt		61,341		0		0		31,030
Accrued interest payable		2,171		0		2,171		0

Unrecognized financial instruments:
Letters of credit	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Commitments to extend credit		0		0		0		0
Forward sale commitments		0		0		0		0

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and cash equivalents – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Certificates of deposit in other banks – Fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes for similar instruments.

Securities held-to-maturity – Fair values are based on quoted market prices, if available. If a quoted price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted prices for similar securities. The fair value estimate is provided to management from a third party using modeling assumptions specific to each type of security that are reviewed and approved by management. Quarterly sampling of fair values provided by additional third parties supplement the fair value review process.

Loans held for sale – The fair value is predetermined at origination based on sale price.

Loans (net of the allowance for loan and lease losses) – The fair value of fixed rate loans and variable rate mortgage loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. For other variable rate loans, the carrying amount approximates fair value. Loans acquired through acquisition were booked at their fair value on their date of acquisition. Management utilized a third party to assist in the valuation of the acquired loans and considered such factors as coupon rate on the acquired loans versus the current rate for similar instruments on the date of acquisition, weighted average expected life and expected loss rates using both national and regional loss rates on similar loans, and the historic loss rates on the pools of loans acquired.

Federal Home Loan Bank stock – The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Home Loan Bank.

Federal Reserve Bank stock – The carrying value of Federal Reserve Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Reserve Bank.

Accrued interest receivable – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Deposits – The fair value of fixed maturity time deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. For deposits including demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts, and certain money market accounts, the carrying value approximates fair value.

Repurchase agreements – The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates.

Federal funds purchased – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank – The fair value of these fixed-maturity advances is estimated by discounting future cash flows using rates currently offered for advances of similar remaining maturities.

Long-term debt – The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates.

Accrued interest payable – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Commitments to originate loans, forward sale commitments, letters of credit, and lines of credit – The fair value of commitments to originate loans is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of forward sale commitments is estimated based on current market prices for loans of similar terms and credit quality. The fair values of letters of credit and lines of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date. The fair values of these commitments are not material.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

and Results of Operations

Overview

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand Community Trust Bancorp, Inc., our operations, and our present business environment. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to—and should be read in conjunction with—our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes contained in this quarterly report. The MD&A includes the following sections:

v	Our Business

v	Results of Operations and Financial Condition

v	Liquidity and Market Risk

v	Interest Rate Risk

v	Capital Resources

v	Impact of Inflation, Changing Prices, and Economic Conditions

v	Stock Repurchase Program

v	Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our Business

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Pikeville, Kentucky. Currently, we own one commercial bank and one trust company. Through our subsidiaries, we have eighty banking locations in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky, southern West Virginia, and northeastern Tennessee, four trust offices across Kentucky, and one trust office in northeastern Tennessee. At March 31, 2012, we had total consolidated assets of $3.7 billion and total consolidated deposits, including repurchase agreements, of $3.2 billion, making us the largest bank holding company headquartered in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Total shareholders’ equity at March 31, 2012 was $375.0 million.

Through our subsidiaries, we engage in a wide range of commercial and personal banking and trust and wealth management activities, which include accepting time and demand deposits; making secured and unsecured loans to corporations, individuals and others; providing cash management services to corporate and individual customers; issuing letters of credit; renting safe deposit boxes; and providing funds transfer services. The lending activities of our Bank include making commercial, construction, mortgage, and personal loans. Lease-financing, lines of credit, revolving lines of credit, term loans, and other specialized loans, including asset-based financing, are also available. Our corporate subsidiaries act as trustees of personal trusts, as executors of estates, as trustees for employee benefit trusts, as registrars, transfer agents, and paying agents for bond and stock issues, as depositories for securities, and as providers of full service brokerage services. For further information, see Item 1 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Results of Operations and Financial Condition

For the quarter ended March 31, 2012, we reported record earnings of $11.9 million, or $0.77 per basic share, an increase of 27.6% from the $9.3 million, or $0.61 per basic share, earned during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

First Quarter 2012 Highlights

CTBI's basic earnings per share for the quarter increased $0.16 per share from first quarter 2011 and were $0.13 per share above fourth quarter 2011. The increase in earnings was supported by increased net interest income and decreased provision for loan loss and noninterest expense. Noninterest income increased from prior year first quarter, but decreased from prior quarter.

Net interest income increased $0.4 million from prior year first quarter as average earning assets increased 6.1%. Due to increased liquidity and changes in earning asset mix, CTBI’s quarterly net interest margin of 4.05% was a decrease from 4.27% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011; however, the margin improved 7 basis points from prior quarter.

v	Nonperforming loans at $34.6 million decreased from $57.4 million at March 31, 2011 and $37.3 million at December 31, 2011. Nonperforming assets at $93.2 million decreased $11.9 million from prior year and $0.6 million from prior quarter.

v	Net loan charge-offs for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 were $1.2 million, or 0.18% of average loans annualized, compared to $4.0 million, or 0.63%, experienced for the first quarter 2011 and prior quarter’s $4.9 million, or 0.75%.

Our loan loss provision for the quarter decreased $3.2 million from prior year first quarter and $1.9 million from prior quarter as net charge-offs declined $2.9 million and $3.7 million, respectively, for the same periods, while our loan portfolio decreased $43.9 million from prior year and $14.4 million from prior quarter.

Our loan loss reserve as a percentage of total loans outstanding remained at 1.30% from December 31, 2011 to March 31, 2012, a decrease from the 1.36% at March 31, 2011. Our reserve coverage (allowance for loan loss reserve to nonperforming loans) continued to improve to 95.9% at March 31, 2012 compared to 61.3% at March 31, 2011 and 89.0% at December 31, 2011. Several of the matrices and factors utilized in evaluating the adequacy of our loan loss reserve also continued to show significant improvement, including the level of past dues and nonperforming loans.

v	Noninterest income increased 4.2% for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 with increases in gains on sales of loans and loan related fees but decreased 3.2% compared to prior quarter as these increases were offset by a decline in deposit service charges.

v	Noninterest expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 decreased 3.0% from prior year first quarter and 4.2% from prior quarter.

v	Our investment portfolio increased $203.6 million from prior year and $86.6 million during the quarter.

v	Deposits, including repurchase agreements, increased $186.1 million from prior year and $77.3 million from prior quarter.

v	Our tangible common equity/tangible assets ratio remains strong at 8.55%.

Income Statement Review

(dollars in thousands)							Change 2012 vs. 2011
Quarter Ended March 31	2012			2011			Amount			Percent
Net interest income	$	33,006		$	32,574		$	432			1.3	%
Provision for loan losses		1,160			4,387			(3,227	)		(73.6	)
Noninterest income		11,187			10,738			449			4.2
Noninterest expense		25,750			26,547			(797	)		(3.0	)
Income taxes		5,414			3,074			2,340			76.1
Net income	$	11,869		$	9,304		$	2,565			27.6	%

Average earning assets	$	3,319,597		$	3,130,203		$	189,394			6.1	%

Yield on average earnings assets		4.76	%		5.21	%		(0.45	)%		(8.7	)%
Cost of interest bearing funds		0.90	%		1.19	%		(0.29	)%		(24.2	)%

Net interest margin		4.05	%		4.27	%		(0.22	)%		5.1	%

Net Interest Income

Net interest income for the quarter increased 1.3% from prior year and 0.3% from prior quarter with average earning assets increasing 6.1% from prior year and remaining relatively flat to prior quarter. CTBI experienced a 22 basis point decline in its net interest margin for the first quarter 2012 compared to prior year but increased 7 basis points from prior quarter. The yield on average earning assets decreased 45 basis points from prior year first quarter but increased 4 basis points from prior quarter. The decline in yield on earning assets from prior year is the result of a change in our earning asset mix with an increase in our investment portfolio as loan demand remains tepid. Loans represented 77.1% of our average earning assets for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 compared to 82.9% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. The cost of interest bearing funds decreased 29 basis points from prior year first quarter and 4 basis points from prior quarter; however, we expect our cost of funds to increase during the next three quarters from our Hoops CD product. Our Hoops CD customers received a 100 basis point increase in rate as a result of the University of Kentucky’s NCAA Championship win. This increase in rate will result in an increase in interest paid of approximately $0.6 million pre-tax in each of the 2nd and 3rd quarters of 2012 and $0.2 million pre-tax in the 4th quarter of 2012. We have offered our Hoops CD product for over 15 years, and having paid this premium in 1996 and 1998 as well as this year, we believe this product provides a marketing and promotional benefit to our company and helps to retain and serve our customers.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses that was added to the allowance for 2012 of $1.2 million was a $3.2 million decrease from prior year. This provision represented a charge against current earnings in order to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level determined using the accounting estimates described in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 increased 4.2% from prior year first quarter but decreased 3.2% from prior quarter. Gains on sales of loans increased $0.2 million from March 31, 2011, and loan related fees increased $0.4 million due to the variance in the fair value adjustments of our mortgage servicing rights. Increases in gains on sales of loans and loan related fees from December 31, 2011 were offset by a decline in deposit service charges of $0.7 million.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense decreased 3.0% for the first quarter 2012 compared to first quarter 2011 primarily due to the $0.5 million impact of expected losses in investments in limited partnerships that were offset by tax credits during 2011, as well as decreases in FDIC insurance premiums, legal and professional fees, and repossession expense. Noninterest expense decreased 4.2% from prior quarter as other real estate owned expense decreased $3.3 million compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2011, partially offset by increased personnel costs. During the fourth quarter of 2011, other real estate owned expense was impacted by the write down to fair value of two properties that had been vandalized. The insurance claims relative to these vandalisms have been resolved with no significant recoveries.

Balance Sheet Review

CTBI’s total assets at $3.7 billion increased $214.7 million, or 6.2%, from March 31, 2011 and $82.8 million, or an annualized 9.3%, during the quarter. Loans outstanding at March 31, 2012 were $2.5 billion, decreasing $43.9 million, or 1.7%, from March 31, 2011, and $14.4 million, or an annualized 2.3%, during the quarter. Loan growth during the quarter of $7.5 million in the commercial loan portfolio was offset by declines of $4.1 million in the residential loan portfolio and $17.8 million in the consumer loan portfolio. CTBI's investment portfolio increased $203.6 million, or 49.4%, from March 31, 2011 and $86.6 million, or an annualized 65.8%, during the quarter. Deposits, including repurchase agreements, at $3.2 billion increased $186.1 million, or 6.2%, from March 31, 2011 and $77.3 million, or an annualized 10.0%, from prior quarter.

Shareholders’ equity at March 31, 2012 was $375.0 million compared to $344.5 million at March 31, 2011 and $366.9 million at December 31, 2011. CTBI's annualized dividend yield to shareholders as of March 31, 2012 was 3.87%.

Loans

(in thousands)	March 31, 2012
Loan Category	Balance		Variance from Prior Quarter			Net Charge-Offs			Nonperforming		ALLL
Commercial:
Construction	$	114,161		(5.3	)%	$	(1	)	$	10,157	$	4,066
Secured by real estate		806,909		1.0			56			12,631		12,977
Equipment lease financing		8,219		(15.3	)		0			0		105
Other commercial		381,946		2.0			361			4,181		5,965
Total commercial		1,311,235		0.6			416			26,969		23,113

Residential:
Real estate construction		52,558		(1.8	)		165			481		344
Real estate mortgage		648,338		(0.3	)		133			6,294		4,240
Home equity		83,498		(1.6	)		45			608		546
Total residential		784,394		(0.5	)		343			7,383		5,130

Consumer:
Consumer direct		121,645		(1.9	)		(46	)		36		846
Consumer indirect		324,894		(4.6	)		446			209		4,083
Total consumer		446,539		(3.8	)		400			245		4,929

Total loans	$	2,542,168		(0.6	)%	$	1,159		$	34,597	$	33,172

Asset Quality

CTBI's total nonperforming loans were $34.6 million at March 31, 2012, a 39.7% decrease from the $57.4 million at March 31, 2011 and a 7.2% decrease from the $37.3 million at December 31, 2011. The decrease for the quarter included a $4.0 million decrease in nonaccrual loans partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in the 90+ days past due category. Loans 30-89 days past due at $19.4 million is a decline of $11.2 million from March 31, 2011 and a $2.3 million decline from prior quarter. Our loan portfolio management processes focus on the immediate identification, management, and resolution of problem loans to maximize recovery and minimize loss. Our loan risk management processes include weekly delinquent loan review meetings at the market levels and monthly delinquent loan review meetings involving senior corporate management to review all nonaccrual loans and loans 30 days or more past due. Any activity regarding a criticized/classified loan (i.e. problem loan) must be approved by CTB's Watch List Asset Committee (i.e. Problem Loan Committee). CTB's Watch List Asset Committee also meets on a quarterly basis and reviews every criticized/classified loan of $100,000 or greater. We also have a Loan Review Department that reviews every market within CTB annually and performs extensive testing of the loan portfolio to assure the accuracy of loan grades and classifications for delinquency, troubled debt restructuring, impaired status, impairment, nonaccrual status, and adequate loan loss reserves.

Impaired loans, loans not expected to meet contractual principal and interest payments, at March 31, 2012 totaled $60.0 million, compared to $64.3 million at March 31, 2011 and $47.4 million at December 31, 2011. Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings that were classified as impaired. At March 31, 2012, CTBI had $21.0 million in commercial loans secured by real estate, $5.6 million in commercial real estate construction loans, $2.9 million in commercial other loans, and $5.9 million in consumer loans that were modified in troubled debt restructurings and impaired. Included in these amounts are troubled debt restructurings that were performing in accordance with their modified terms of $18.9 million in commercial loans secured by real estate, $1.3 million in commercial real estate construction loans, $0.4 million in commercial other loans, and $5.3 million in consumer loans. Management evaluates all impaired loans for impairment and provides specific reserves when necessary.

For further information regarding nonperforming and impaired loans, see note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

CTBI generally does not offer high risk loans such as option ARM products, high loan to value ratio mortgages, interest-only loans, loans with initial teaser rates, or loans with negative amortizations, and therefore, CTBI would have no significant exposure to these products.

Our level of foreclosed properties at $58.6 million at March 31, 2012 was an increase from $47.7 million at March 31, 2011 and $56.5 million at December 31, 2011. Sales of foreclosed properties for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 totaled $3.1 million while new foreclosed properties totaled $5.4 million. At March 31, 2012, the book value of properties under contracts to sell was $5.0 million; however, the closings had not occurred at quarter-end. The proceeds of these sales per the contracts is $5.4 million, representing 108% of the book value of those properties.

When foreclosed properties are acquired, appraisals are obtained and the properties are booked at the current market value less expected sales expense. Additionally, periodic updated appraisals are obtained on unsold foreclosed properties. When an updated appraisal reflects a market value below the current book value, a charge is booked to current earnings to reduce the property to its new market value less expected sales expense. There were 35 properties reappraised during the first quarter of 2012 totaling $4.4 million. Of these, eleven were written down by a total of $0.2 million or 4.0%. Charges during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2011 were $0.4 million and $3.6 million, respectively. Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic reviews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 18 months. Sixty-nine percent of our OREO properties have been reappraised within the past 12 months. Our nonperforming loans and foreclosed properties remain primarily concentrated in our Central Kentucky Region. Management anticipates that our foreclosed properties will remain elevated as we work through current market conditions.

The major classifications of foreclosed properties are shown in the following table:

(in thousands)	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
1-4 family	$	19,210	$	20,065
Agricultural/farmland		653		652
Construction/land development/other		24,300		23,006
Multifamily		1,740		1,841
Non-farm/non-residential		12,699		10,981
Total foreclosed properties	$	58,602	$	56,545

The appraisal aging analysis of foreclosed properties, as well as the holding period, at March 31, 2012 is shown below:

(in thousands)
Appraisal Aging Analysis			Holding Period Analysis
Days Since Last Appraisal	Current Book Value		Holding Period	Current Book Value
Up to 90 days	$	4,440	Less than one year	$	28,068
91 to 180 days		10,349	1 to 2 years		8,813
181 to 270 days		7,510	2 to 3 years		15,434
271 to 365 days		18,051	3 to 4 years		3,949
Over one year		18,252	Over 4 years		2,338

Net loan charge-offs for the quarter were $1.2 million, or 0.18% of average loans annualized, a decrease from prior year first quarter's $4.0 million, or 0.63%, and prior quarter’s $4.9 million, or 0.75%. Of the total net charge-offs for the quarter, $0.4 million were in commercial loans, $0.4 million were in indirect auto loans, and $0.3 million were in residential real estate mortgage loans. Allocations to loan loss reserves were $1.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 compared to $4.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and $3.0 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2011.

Our loan loss reserve as a percentage of total loans outstanding was 1.30% at March 31, 2012 compared to 1.36% at March 31, 2011 and 1.30% at December 31, 2011. Our reserve coverage continued to improve to 95.9% at March 31, 2012. Several of the matrices and factors utilized in evaluating the adequacy of our loan loss reserve also continued to show significant improvement, including the level of past dues and nonperforming loans. Generally accepted accounting principles require that expected credit losses associated with loans obtained in an acquisition be reflected in the estimation of loan fair value as of the acquisition date and prohibits any carryover of an allowance for credit losses. Excluding amounts related to loans obtained in the fourth quarter 2010 acquisition of LaFollette, the allowance-to-legacy loan ratio was 1.35%, 1.42%, and 1.34%, respectively, at March 31, 2012, March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2011.

Liquidity and Market Risk

The objective of CTBI’s Asset/Liability management function is to maintain consistent growth in net interest income within our policy limits. This objective is accomplished through management of our consolidated balance sheet composition, liquidity, and interest rate risk exposures arising from changing economic conditions, interest rates, and customer preferences. The goal of liquidity management is to provide adequate funds to meet changes in loan and lease demand or deposit withdrawals. This is accomplished by maintaining liquid assets in the form of cash and cash equivalents and investment securities, sufficient unused borrowing capacity, and growth in core deposits. As of March 31, 2012, we had approximately $243.2 million in cash and cash equivalents and approximately $614.0 million in securities valued at estimated fair value designated as available-for-sale and available to meet liquidity needs on a continuing basis. Additional asset-driven liquidity is provided by the remainder of the securities portfolio and the repayment of loans. In addition to core deposit funding, we also have a variety of other short-term and long-term funding sources available. We also rely on Federal Home Loan Bank advances for both liquidity and management of our asset/liability position. Federal Home Loan Bank advances were $1.6 million at March 31, 2012 compared to $21.6 million at December 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2012, we had a $287.3 million available borrowing position with the Federal Home Loan Bank. We generally rely upon net inflows of cash from financing activities, supplemented by net inflows of cash from operating activities, to provide cash for our investing activities. As is typical of many financial institutions, significant financing activities include deposit gathering, use of short-term borrowing facilities such as repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased, and issuance of long-term debt. At March 31, 2012, we had $72 million in lines of credit with various correspondent banks available to meet any future cash needs. Our primary investing activities include purchases of securities and loan originations. We do not rely on any one source of liquidity and manage availability in response to changing consolidated balance sheet needs. At March 31, 2012, federal funds sold were $3.5 million compared to $2.7 million at December 31, 2011, and deposits with the Federal Reserve were $167.9 million compared to $159.0 million at December 31, 2011. Additionally, we project cash flows from our investment portfolio to generate additional liquidity over the next 90 days.

The investment portfolio consists of investment grade short-term issues suitable for bank investments. The majority of the investment portfolio is in U.S. government and government sponsored agency issuances. The average life of the portfolio is 4.16 years. At the end of March 31, 2012, available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities comprised approximately 99.7% of the total investment portfolio, and the AFS portfolio was approximately 164% of equity capital. Seventy-two percent of the pledge eligible portfolio was pledged.

Interest Rate Risk

We consider interest rate risk one of our most significant market risks. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income due to changes in interest rates. Consistency of our net interest revenue is largely dependent upon the effective management of interest rate risk. We employ a variety of measurement techniques to identify and manage our interest rate risk including the use of an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to changing interest rates. The model is based on actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for on and off-balance sheet instruments and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the effect of changing interest rates on the prepayment rates of certain assets and liabilities. Assumptions based on the historical behavior of deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into the model. These assumptions are inherently uncertain, and as a result, the model cannot precisely measure net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies.

CTBI’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO), which includes executive and senior management representatives and reports to the Board of Directors, monitors and manages interest rate risk within Board-approved policy limits. Our current exposure to interest rate risks is determined by measuring the anticipated change in net interest income spread evenly over the twelve-month period.

Capital Resources

We continue to grow our shareholders’ equity while also providing an annual dividend yield for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 of 3.87% to shareholders. Shareholders’ equity increased 8.8% from March 31, 2011 to $375.0 million at March 31, 2012. Our primary source of capital growth is the retention of earnings. Cash dividends were $0.31 per share for March 31, 2012 and $0.305 per share for March 31, 2011. We retained 59.7% of our earnings for the first three months of 2012 compared to 50.0% for the first three months of 2011.

Regulatory guidelines require bank holding companies, commercial banks, and savings banks to maintain certain minimum capital ratios and define companies as “well-capitalized” that sufficiently exceed the minimum ratios. The banking regulators may alter minimum capital requirements as a result of revising their internal policies and their ratings of individual institutions. To be “well-capitalized” banks and bank holding companies must maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of no less than 5.0%, a Tier 1 risk based ratio of no less than 6.0%, and a total risk based ratio of no less than 10.0%. Our ratios as of March 31, 2012 were 10.17%, 14.24%, and 15.49%, respectively, all exceeding the threshold for meeting the definition of “well-capitalized.”

As of March 31, 2012, we are not aware of any current recommendations by banking regulatory authorities which, if they were to be implemented, would have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material adverse impact on our liquidity, capital resources, or operations, except as provided for in the Dodd-Frank Act which is discussed in the Supervision and Regulation section of Item 1. Business in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Impact of Inflation, Changing Prices, and Economic Conditions

The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Therefore, CTBI differs greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investment in nonmonetary assets, such as fixed assets and inventories. However, inflation does have an important impact on the growth of assets in the banking industry and on the resulting need to increase equity capital at higher than normal rates in order to maintain an appropriate equity to assets ratio. Inflation also affects other expenses, which tend to rise during periods of general inflation.

We believe one of the most significant impacts on financial and operating results is our ability to react to changes in interest rates. We seek to maintain an essentially balanced position between interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities in order to protect against the effects of wide interest rate fluctuations.

Our success is dependent on the general economic conditions of the communities we serve. Unlike larger banks that are more geographically diversified, we provide financial and banking services primarily to eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky, southern West Virginia, and northeastern Tennessee. The economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on loan demand, the ability of borrowers to repay loans, and the value of the collateral securing loans. A significant decline in general economic conditions will affect these local economic conditions and will negatively affect the financial results of our banking operations. Factors influencing general conditions include inflation, recession, unemployment, and other factors beyond our control.

We believe that we will continue to experience a challenging environment in 2012. CTBI is a part of the financial system and a continuation of systemic lack of available credit, lack of confidence in the financial sector, increased volatility in the financial markets, and reduced business activity could materially and adversely impact CTBI’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Stock Repurchase Program

CTBI’s stock repurchase program currently has 288,519 shares remaining under CTBI’s current repurchase authorization. We have not repurchased any shares of our common stock since February 2008. As of March 31, 2012, a total of 2,211,481 shares have been repurchased through this program.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates. Such differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements.

We believe the application of accounting policies and the estimates required therein are reasonable. These accounting policies and estimates are constantly reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change. Historically, we have found our application of accounting policies to be appropriate, and actual results have not differed materially from those determined using necessary estimates.

Our accounting policies are described in note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. We have identified the following critical accounting policies:

Investments – Management determines the classification of securities at purchase. We classify securities into held-to-maturity, trading, or available-for-sale categories. Held-to-maturity securities are those which we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 320, Investment Securities, investments in debt securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity and equity securities that have readily determinable fair values shall be classified in one of the following categories and measured at fair value in the statement of financial position:

a. Trading securities. Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term (thus held for only a short period of time) shall be classified as trading securities. Trading generally reflects active and frequent buying and selling, and trading securities are generally used with the objective of generating profits on short-term differences in price.

b. Available-for-sale securities. Investments not classified as trading securities (nor as held-to-maturity securities) shall be classified as available-for-sale securities.

We do not have any securities that are classified as trading securities. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax. If declines in fair value are other than temporary, the carrying value of the securities is written down to fair value as a realized loss with a charge to income for the portion attributable to credit losses and a charge to other comprehensive income for the portion that is not credit related.

Gains or losses on disposition of securities are computed by specific identification for all securities except for shares in mutual funds, which are computed by average cost. Interest and dividend income, adjusted by amortization of purchase premium or discount, is included in earnings.

When the fair value of a security is below its amortized cost, and depending on the length of time the condition exists and the extent the fair market value is below amortized cost, additional analysis is performed to determine whether an other than temporary impairment condition exists. Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are analyzed quarterly for possible other than temporary impairment. The analysis considers (i) whether we have the intent to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and (ii) whether it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity. Often, the information available to conduct these assessments is limited and rapidly changing, making estimates of fair value subject to judgment. If actual information or conditions are different than estimated, the extent of the impairment of the security may be different than previously estimated, which could have a material effect on the CTBI’s results of operations and financial condition.

Loans – Loans with the ability and the intent to be held until maturity and/or payoff are reported at the carrying value of unpaid principal reduced by unearned interest, an allowance for loan and lease losses, and unamortized deferred fees or costs. Income is recorded on the level yield basis. Interest accrual is discontinued when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions, collateral value, and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful. Any loan greater than 90 days past due must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue accruing interest. Cash payments received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied against principal, and interest income is only recorded once principal recovery is reasonably assured. Loans are not reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments remain current for a period of time, generally six months, and future payments appear reasonably certain. Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings that were classified as impaired. A restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the creditor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.

Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and the net amount amortized over the estimated life of the related loans, leases, or commitments as a yield adjustment.

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses – We maintain an allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) at a level that is appropriate to cover estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans determined to be impaired, as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio. Since arriving at an appropriate ALLL involves a high degree of management judgment, we use an ongoing quarterly analysis to develop a range of estimated losses. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we use our best estimate within the range of potential credit loss to determine the appropriate ALLL. Credit losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the ALLL.

We utilize an internal risk grading system for commercial credits. Those larger commercial credits that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review. The borrower’s cash flow, adequacy of collateral coverage, and other options available to CTBI, including legal remedies, are evaluated. The review of individual loans includes those loans that are impaired as defined by ASC 310-35, Impairment of a Loan. We evaluate the collectability of both principal and interest when assessing the need for loss provision. Historical loss rates are analyzed and applied to other commercial loans not subject to specific allocations. The ALLL allocation for this pool of commercial loans is established based on the historical average, maximum, minimum, and median loss ratios.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that CTBI will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Homogenous loans, such as consumer installment, residential mortgages, and home equity lines are not individually risk graded. The associated ALLL for these loans is measured under ASC 450, Contingencies.

All closed-end commercial loans (excluding loans secured by real estate) are charged off no later than 90 days delinquent. If a loan is considered uncollectable, it is charged off earlier than 90 days delinquent. When a commercial loan secured by real estate is past due, a current assessment of the value of the real estate is made. If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the property, the loan is placed on nonaccrual with a specific reserve equal to the difference between book value and fair value assigned to the credit until such time as the property has been foreclosed. When the foreclosed property has been legally assigned to CTBI, a charge-off is taken with the remaining balance, reflecting the fair value less estimated costs to sell, transferred to other real estate owned.

All closed-end consumer loans (excluding conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate) are charged off no later than 120 days (5 monthly payments) delinquent. If a loan is considered uncollectable, it is charged off earlier than 120 days delinquent. For conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate, when a loan is 90 days past due, a current assessment of the value of the real estate is made. If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the property, the loan is placed on nonaccrual and foreclosure proceedings are initiated. When the foreclosed property has been legally assigned to CTBI, a charge-off is taken with the remaining balance, reflecting the fair value less estimated costs to sell, transferred to other real estate owned.

Historical loss rates for loans are adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition. We generally review the historical loss rates over eight quarters and four quarters on a rolling average basis. Factors that we consider include delinquency trends, current economic conditions and trends, strength of supervision and administration of the loan portfolio, levels of underperforming loans, level of recoveries to prior year’s charge-offs, trend in loan losses, industry concentrations and their relative strengths, amount of unsecured loans and underwriting exceptions. Based upon management’s judgment, “best case,” “worst case,” and “most likely” scenarios are determined. The total of each of these weighted factors is then applied against the applicable portion of the portfolio and the ALLL is adjusted accordingly.

Other Real Estate Owned – When foreclosed properties are acquired, appraisals are obtained and the properties are booked at the current market value less expected sales costs. Additionally, periodic updated appraisals are obtained on unsold foreclosed properties. When an updated appraisal reflects a market value below the current book value, a charge is booked to current earnings to reduce the property to its new market value less expected sales costs. Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic reviews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 18 months. All revenues and expenses related to the carrying of other real estate owned are recognized by a charge to income.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest rate risk management focuses on maintaining consistent growth in net interest income within Board-approved policy limits. CTBI uses an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to movements in interest rates. Given a 200 basis point increase to the yield curve used in the simulation model, it is estimated net interest income for CTBI would increase by 0.38 percent over one year and would decrease by 2.04 percent over two years. A 25 basis point decrease in the yield curve would decrease net interest income by an estimated 0.15 percent over one year and by 0.43 percent over two years. For further discussion of CTBI’s market risk, see the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and Market Risk included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

CTBI’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by CTBI’s management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President/Treasurer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2012 were effective in ensuring material information required to be disclosed in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in CTBI’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, CTBI’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	None

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	None

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	None

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	None

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	Not applicable

Item 5.	Other Information:
	CTBI’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have furnished to the SEC the certifications with respect to this Form 10-Q that are required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Item 6.	a. Exhibits:
	(1) Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Exhibit 31.1 Exhibit 31.2
	(2) Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Exhibit 32.1 Exhibit 32.2
	(3) XBRL Instance Document*	Exhibit 101.INS
	(4) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema*	Exhibit 101.SCH
	(5) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase*	Exhibit 101.CAL
	(6) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase*	Exhibit 101.LAB
	(7) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase*	Exhibit 101.PRE

* These interactive data files are being submitted electronically with this report and, in accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, are not deemed filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, CTBI has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.

Date: May 9, 2012	By:	/s/ Jean R. Hale
		Jean R. Hale
		Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

		/s/ Kevin J. Stumbo
		Kevin J. Stumbo
		Executive Vice President and Treasurer
		(Principal Financial Officer)