Edgar Filing: TILE SHOP HOLDINGS, INC.

tts20140213_10k.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☒

Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

☐

Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-35629

TILE SHOP HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	45-5538095
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

14000 Carlson Parkway, Plymouth, Minnesota 55441

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(763) 852-2901

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value	The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form -10K or any amendment to this Form 10K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12-b2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☒ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was approximately: $1,118,716,430

At February 21, 2014, the registrant had 51,230,600 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

TILE SHOP HOLDINGS, INC.

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
	ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	3
	ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	6
	ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	14
	ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	14
	ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	15
	ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	15

PART II
	ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	16
	ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	18
	ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	19
	ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	27
	ITEM 8.	CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	28
	ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	28
	ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	28
	ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	29

PART III
	ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	30
	ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	34
	ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	43
	ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	45
	ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	49

PART IV
	ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	51

SIGNATURES			76

POWER OF ATTORNEY			77

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

We are a specialty retailer of manufactured and natural stone tiles, setting and maintenance materials, and related accessories in the United States. We offer a wide selection of products, attractive prices, and exceptional customer service in an extensive showroom setting. We sell over 4,500 products from around the world, including ceramic, porcelain, glass, and stainless steel manufactured tiles and, marble, granite, quartz, sandstone, travertine, slate, and onyx natural tiles, primarily under our proprietary Rush River and Fired Earth brands. We purchase our tile products and accessories directly from producers. We manufacture our own setting and maintenance materials, such as thinset, grout, and sealers under our Superior brand name. As of December 31, 2013, we operated 88 stores in 28 states, with an average size of 23,000 square feet. We also sell our products on our website.

We believe that our long-term producer relationships, together with our design, manufacturing and distribution capabilities, enable us to offer a broad assortment of high-quality products to our customers, who are primarily homeowners, at competitive prices. We have invested significant resources to develop our proprietary brands and product sources and believe that we are a leading retailer of stone tiles, accessories, and related materials in the United States.

In 2013, we reported net sales and income from operations of $229.6 million and $33.1 million, respectively. We opened 20 new stores in 2013 and intend to open 20 stores in 2014. As of fiscal year end 2013, 2012 and 2011, we had total assets of $242.8 million, $176.1 million and $119.0 million, respectively.

Organizational History

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”, and together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware in June 2012. On August 21, 2012, Holdings consummated the transactions contemplated pursuant to that certain Contribution and Merger Agreement dated as of June 27, 2012, among Holdings, JWC Acquisition Corp., a publicly-held Delaware corporation (“JWCAC”), The Tile Shop, LLC, a privately-held Delaware limited liability company (“The Tile Shop”), and certain other parties. Through a series of transactions, The Tile Shop was contributed to and became a subsidiary of Holdings and Holdings effected a business combination with and became a successor issuer to JWCAC. These transactions are referred to herein as the “Business Combination.”

Competitive Strengths

We believe that the following factors differentiate us from our competitors and position us to continue to grow our specialty tile business.

Inspiring Customer Experience Our showrooms bring our products to life. Each showroom features up to 70 different mockups, or vignettes, of bathrooms, kitchens, fireplaces, foyers, and other settings that showcase our broad array of products. Each store also features over 1,400 hand- crafted display boards showing tile that we offer for sale. Our stores are spacious, well-lit, and organized by product type to make our customers’ shopping experience easy.

Broad Product Assortment at Attractive Prices We offer over 4,500 manufactured and natural tile products, setting and maintenance materials, and accessories. We are able to maintain every-day low prices by purchasing tile and accessories directly from producers and manufacturing our own setting and maintenance materials.

Customer Service and Satisfaction Our sales personnel are highly-trained and knowledgeable about the technical and design aspects of our products. We offer weekly do-it-yourself classes in all of our showrooms. In addition, we provide one-on-one installation training as required to meet customer needs. We offer a liberal return policy, with no restocking fees.

Worldwide Sourcing Capabilities We have long-standing relationships with producers of our tiles throughout the world and work with them to design products exclusively for us. We believe that these direct relationships differentiate us from our competitors, who generally purchase commodity products through distributors. We are often the largest or exclusive customer for many of our producers.

Proprietary Branding We sell the majority of our products under our proprietary brand names, which help us to differentiate our products from those of our competitors. We offer products across a range of price points and quality levels that allow us to target discrete market segments and to appeal to diverse groups of customers.

Centralized Distribution System We service our retail locations from four distribution centers. Our distribution centers can cost-effectively service stores within a 700-mile radius, providing us with the ability to open new locations in markets where we believe that we have a competitive advantage or see attractive demographics.

Growth Strategy

We intend to increase our net sales and profitability through a combination of new store openings, store re-models and same store sales growth. In the five years ended December 31, 2013, we grew through a combination of opening 47 new retail locations and increases in same store sales. We expect to continue to gain market share. Specific elements of our strategy for continued growth include the following:

Open New Stores We believe that the highly-fragmented U.S. retail tile market provides us with a significant opportunity to expand our store base. During 2013, we opened 20 new stores. We intend to open 20 new stores in 2014, in new markets and our existing markets, northeast, southeast, midwest, and mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. We believe that there will continue to be additional expansion opportunities in the United States. We expect our store base growth to increase operational efficiencies.

Increase Sales and Profitability of Existing Stores We believe that our ongoing investment in new products, store re-models and training program for our sales associates, together with our associate incentive compensation structure, will result in continued same store sales growth.

Sales Model

We appeal to customers who desire high-quality products at an attractive value. We principally sell our products directly to homeowners. We also sell products to contractors, who are primarily small businesses that have been hired by homeowners to complete tile projects. We believe that due to the average cost and relative infrequency of a tile purchase, many of our customers conduct extensive research using multiple channels before making a purchase decision. Our sales strategy emphasizes customer service by providing comprehensive and convenient education tools on our website and in our stores for our customers to learn about our products and the tile installation process. Our website contains a broad range of information regarding our tile products, setting and maintenance materials, and accessories. Customers can order samples, view catalogs, or purchase products from either our stores or website. Customers can choose to have their purchases delivered or picked up at one of our stores. We strive to make our customers’ transactions easy and efficient.

Our stores are designed to emphasize our products in a visually appealing showroom format. Our typical store is approximately 23,000 square feet, with approximately 19,000 square feet devoted to the showroom and the balance being warehouse space, which is used primarily to hold customer orders waiting to be picked up or delivered. Our stores are typically accessible from major roadways and have significant visibility to passing traffic. We can adapt to a range of existing buildings, whether free-standing or in shopping centers.

Unlike many of our competitors, we devote a substantial portion of our retail store space to showrooms, including samples of our over 4,500 products and up to 70 different vignettes of bathrooms, kitchens, fireplaces, foyers, outdoor living, and other settings that showcase our products. Our showrooms are designed to provide our customers with a better understanding of how to integrate various types of tile in order to create an attractive presentation in their homes. Each store is also equipped with a consumer training center designed to teach customers how to properly install tile.

A typical store staff consists of a manager and 6 to 15 sales and warehouse associates. Our store managers are responsible for store operations and for overseeing our customers’ shopping experience. Our store associates have flexibility to meet or beat competitor pricing.

We offer financing to customers through a branded credit card provided by a third-party consumer finance company. These credit cards, which can only be used in our stores and on our website, provide customers with a 10% discount on all purchases. In 2013, approximately 6.3% of our sales were made using our branded credit card.

Marketing

We utilize a variety of methods to market to our customer base and attract new customers to our retail locations and website. We establish and maintain our market presence through strong execution of our in-store branding and execution, best-in-class and unique product assortment, personalized customer service, and attractive and competitive pricing. In addition, we are very active in social media and employ a dynamic, data-driven marketing approach that focuses on the most qualified customers that are actively researching our products. We also partner extensively with local and national designers as well as sponsoring nationally recognized home improvement shows. Our advertising expenditures largely fall into the above mentioned categories.

Our website is designed to educate consumers and to generate in-store and online sales. Visitors to our website can purchase our products directly as well as search a comprehensive knowledge base on tile, including frequently asked questions, installation guides, detailed product information, catalogs, and how-to videos that explain the installation process. Our website and social media efforts have also been devoted to building brand awareness, connecting with potential customers, and building relationships with satisfied customers.

Products

We offer a complete assortment of tile products, generally sourced directly from producers, including ceramic, porcelain, glass, and stainless steel manufactured tiles, marble, granite, quartz, sandstone, travertine, slate, and onyx natural tiles. We also offer a broad range of setting and maintenance materials, such as thinset, grout and sealers, and accessories, including installation tools, shower and bath caddies, drains, and similar products. We sell most of our products under our proprietary brand names. In total, we offer over 4,500 different tile, setting and maintenance materials, and accessory products. In 2013, our net sales were 52% from stone products, 32% from ceramic products, and 16% from setting and maintenance products. These amounts compare to 53% from stone products, 30% from ceramic products, and 17% from setting and maintenance products in 2012.

Manufacturers

We have long-standing relationships with manufacturers of our tiles throughout the world and work with them to design products exclusively for us. We believe that these direct relationships differentiate us from our competitors, who generally purchase commodity products through distributors. We are often the largest or exclusive customer for many of our suppliers, which we believe enables us to obtain better prices in some circumstances.

We currently purchase tile products from approximately 130 different producers. Our top 10 tile suppliers accounted for approximately 52% of our tile purchases in 2013. We believe that alternative and competitive suppliers are available for most of our products. In 2013, approximately 60% of our purchased product was sourced from Asia, 33% from Europe, 4% from North America and 3% from South America. Our foreign purchases are negotiated and paid for in U.S. dollars.

Distribution and Order Fulfillment

We take possession of our products in the country of origin and arrange for transportation to our distribution centers located in Wisconsin, Michigan, Virginia and Oklahoma. We maintain a large inventory of products in order to fulfill customer orders and minimize delays in delivery. We manufacture our setting and maintenance materials at our Wisconsin, Michigan, Virginia and Oklahoma locations.

We fulfill customer orders primarily by shipping our products to our stores where customers can either pick them up or arrange for home delivery. Orders placed on our website are shipped directly to customers’ homes from our distribution centers. We continue to evaluate logistics alternatives to best service our retail store base and our customers. We believe that our existing distribution facilities will continue to play an integral role in our growth strategy, and we expect to establish one or more additional distribution centers in the next five years to support geographic expansion of our retail store base.

Competition

The retail tile market is highly-fragmented. We compete directly with large national home centers that offer a wide range of home improvement products in addition to tile, such as Home Depot and Lowe’s; regional and local specialty retailers of tile, such as Tile America, World of Tile, Arizona Tile, Century Tile, and Floor and Décor; factory-direct stores, such as Dal-Tile and Florida Tile; and a large number of privately-owned, single-site stores. We also compete indirectly with companies that sell other types of floor coverings, including wood floors, carpet, and vinyl sheet. The barriers to entry into the retail tile industry are relatively low and new or existing tile retailers could enter our markets and increase the competition that we face. Many of our competitors enjoy competitive advantages over us, such as greater name recognition, longer operating histories, more varied product offerings, and greater financial, technical, and other resources.

We believe that the key competitive factors in the retail tile industry include:

•

product assortment;

•

product presentation;

•

customer service;

•

store location;

•

immediacy of inventory; and

•

price.

We believe that we compete favorably with respect to each of these factors by providing a highly diverse selection of products to our customers, at an attractive value, in appealing and convenient retail store locations, with exceptional customer service and on-site instructional opportunities. Further, while some larger factory-direct competitors manufacture their own products, most of our competitors purchase their tile from domestic manufacturers or distributors when they receive an order from a customer. As a result, we believe that it takes these retailers longer than us to deliver products to customers and that their prices tend to be higher than our prices. We also believe that we offer a broader range of products and stronger in-store customer support than these competitors.

Employees

As of December 31, 2013, we had 1,214 employees, 1,200 of whom were full-time and none of whom were represented by a union. Of these employees, 834 work in our stores, 72 work in corporate, store support, infrastructure or similar functions, and 308 work in distribution and manufacturing facilities. We believe that we have good relations with our employees.

Property and Trademarks

We have registered and unregistered trademarks for all of our brands, including 15 registered marks and 2 pending trademark applications marks in the United States. We regard our intellectual property as having significant value and our brands are an important factor in the marketing of our products. Accordingly, we have taken, and continue to take, appropriate steps to protect our intellectual property.

Government Regulation

We are subject to extensive and varied federal, state and local government regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate, including laws and regulations relating to our relationships with our employees, public health and safety, zoning, and fire codes. We operate each of our stores, offices, and distribution and manufacturing facilities in accordance with standards and procedures designed to comply with applicable laws, codes, and regulations.

Our operations and properties are also subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the use, storage, handling, generation, transportation, treatment, emission, release, discharge and disposal of hazardous materials, substances and wastes and relating to the investigation and cleanup of contaminated properties, including off-site disposal locations. We do not incur significant costs complying with environmental laws and regulations. However, we could be subject to material costs, liabilities, or claims relating to environmental compliance in the future, especially in the event of changes in existing laws and regulations or in their interpretation.

Products that we import into the United States are subject to laws and regulations imposed in conjunction with such importation, including those issued and/or enforced by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. We work closely with our suppliers to ensure compliance with the applicable laws and regulations in these areas.

Financial Information about Geographic Areas

All of our revenues are generated within the United States and all of our long-lived assets are located within the United States as well.

Available Information

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and its rules and regulations (the “1934 Act”). The 1934 Act requires us to file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Copies of these reports, proxy statements and other information can be read and copied at the SEC Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a Web site that contains reports, proxy statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. These materials may be obtained electronically by accessing the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.

We maintain a Web site at www.tileshop.com, the contents of which are not part of or incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports available on our Web site, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports have been filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as well as any waivers from and amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, are also posted on our Web site.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following are significant factors known to us that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or operating results, as well as adversely affect the value of an investment in our common stock. These risks could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical experience and from results predicted by forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements made by us are qualified by the risks described below. There may be additional risks that are not presently material or known. You should carefully consider each of the following risks and all other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our business is dependent on general economic conditions in our markets.

Our revenues depend, in part, on discretionary spending by our customers. Pressure on discretionary income brought on by economic downturns and slow recoveries, including housing market declines, rising energy prices, and weak labor markets, may cause consumers to reduce the amount that they spend on discretionary items. If recovery from the current economic downturn continues to be slow or prolonged, our growth, prospects, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition could be adversely impacted. General economic conditions and discretionary spending are beyond our control and are affected by, among other things:

•

consumer confidence in the economy;

•

unemployment trends;

•

consumer debt levels;

•

consumer credit availability;

•

data security and privacy concerns;

•

the housing market;

•

gasoline and fuel prices;

•

interest rates and inflation;

•

price deflation, including due to low-cost imports;

•

slower rates of growth in real disposable personal income;

•

natural disasters and unpredictable weather;

•

national security concerns;

•

tax rates and tax policy; and

•

other matters that influence consumer confidence and spending.

Increasing volatility in financial markets may cause some of the above factors to change with an even greater degree of frequency and magnitude than in the past.

Our ability to grow and remain profitable may be limited by direct or indirect competition in the retail tile industry, which is highly competitive.

The retail tile industry in the United States is highly competitive. Participants in the tile industry compete primarily based on product variety, customer service, store location, and price. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to compete favorably with our competitors in these areas. Our store competitors include large national home centers (such as Home Depot and Lowe’s), regional and local specialty retailers of tile (such as Tile America, World of Tile, Century Tile, and Floor and Décor), factory direct stores (such as Dal-Tile and Florida Tile) and privately-owned, single-site stores. We also compete indirectly with companies that sell other types of floor coverings, including wood floors, carpet, and vinyl sheet. In the past, we have faced periods of heightened competition that materially affected our results of operations. Certain of our competitors have greater name recognition, longer operating histories, more varied product offerings, and substantially greater financial and other resources than us. Accordingly, we may face periods of intense competition in the future that could have a material adverse effect on our planned growth and future results of operations. Moreover, the barriers to entry into the retail tile industry are relatively low. New or existing retailers could enter our markets and increase the competition that we face. In addition, manufacturers and vendors of tile and related products, including those whose products we currently sell, could enter the U.S. retail tile market and start directly competing with us. Competition in existing and new markets may also prevent or delay our ability to gain relative market share. Any of the developments described above could have a material adverse effect on our planned growth and future results of operations.

If we fail to successfully manage the challenges that our planned growth poses or encounter unexpected difficulties during our expansion, our revenues and profitability could be materially adversely affected.

One of our long term objectives is to increase revenues and profitability through market share leadership. Our ability to achieve market share leadership, however, is contingent upon our ability to open new stores and achieve operating results in new stores at the same level as our similarly situated current stores. There can be no assurance that we will be able to open stores in new markets at the rate required to achieve market leadership in such markets, identify and obtain favorable store sites, arrange favorable leases for stores, or obtain governmental and other third- party consents, permits, and licenses needed to open or operate stores in a timely manner, train and hire a sufficient number of qualified managers for new stores, attract a strong customer base and brand familiarity in new markets, or successfully compete with established retail tile stores in the new markets that we enter. Failure to open new stores in an effective and cost-efficient manner could place us at a competitive disadvantage as compared to retailers who are more adept than us at managing these challenges, which, in turn, could negatively affect our overall operating results.

Our same store sales fluctuate due to a variety of economic, operating, industry and environmental factors and may not be a fair indicator of our overall performance.

Our same store sales have experienced fluctuations, which can be expected to continue. Numerous factors affect our same store sales results, including among others, the timing of new and relocated store openings, the relative proportion of new and relocated stores to mature stores, cannibalization resulting from the opening of new stores in existing markets, changes in advertising and other operating costs, the timing and level of markdowns, changes in our product mix, weather conditions, retail trends, the retail sales environment, economic conditions, inflation, the impact of competition, and our ability to execute our business strategy efficiently. As a result, same store sales or operating results may fluctuate, and may cause the price of our securities to fluctuate significantly. Therefore, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our same store sales may not be a reliable indicator of our future overall operating performance.

We intend to open additional stores in both our existing markets and new markets, which poses both the possibility of diminishing sales by existing stores in our existing markets and the risk of a slow ramp-up period for stores in new markets.

Our expansion strategy includes plans to open 20 additional stores in existing markets and new markets in 2014. Because our stores typically draw customers from their local areas, additional stores may draw customers away from nearby existing stores and may cause same store sales performance at those existing stores to decline, which may adversely affect our overall operating results. Additionally, stores in new markets typically have a ramp-up period before sales become steady enough for such stores to be profitable. Our ability to open additional stores will be dependent on our ability to promote and/or recruit enough qualified field managers, store managers, assistant store managers, and sales associates. The time and effort required to train and supervise a large number of new managers and associates and integrate them into our culture may divert resources from our existing stores. If we are unable to profitably open additional stores in both new and existing markets and limit the adverse impact of those new stores on existing stores, it may reduce our same store sales and overall operating results during the implementation of our expansion strategy.

Our expansion strategy will be dependent upon, and limited by, the availability of adequate capital.

Our expansion strategy will require additional capital for, among other purposes, opening new stores, distribution centers, and manufacturing facilities as well as entering new markets. Such capital expenditures will include researching real estate and consumer markets, lease, inventory, property and equipment costs, integration of new stores and markets into company-wide systems and programs, and other costs associated with new stores and market entry expenses and growth. If cash generated internally is insufficient to fund capital requirements, we will require additional debt or equity financing. Adequate financing may not be available or, if available, may not be available on terms satisfactory to us. In addition, our credit facility may limit the amount of capital expenditures that we may make annually, depending on our leverage ratio. If we fail to obtain sufficient additional capital in the future or we are unable to make capital expenditures under our credit facility, we could be forced to curtail our expansion strategies by reducing or delaying capital expenditures relating to new stores and new market entry. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will be able to fund our current plans for the opening of new stores or entry into new markets.

We depend on a number of suppliers, and any failure by any of them to supply us with products may impair our inventory and adversely affect our ability to meet customer demands, which could result in a decrease in revenues and/or gross margin.

Our current suppliers may not continue to sell products to us on acceptable terms or at all, and we may not be able to establish relationships with new suppliers to ensure delivery of products in a timely manner or on terms acceptable to us. We do not have long-term contractual supply agreements with our suppliers which obligate them to supply us with products at specified quantities or prices. We may not be able to acquire desired merchandise in sufficient quantities on terms acceptable to us in the future. We are also dependent on suppliers for assuring the quality of merchandise supplied to us. Our inability to acquire suitable merchandise in the future or the loss of one or more of our suppliers and our failure to replace them may harm our relationship with our customers and our ability to attract new customers, resulting in a decrease in net sales.

We source the approximately 4,500 products that we stock and sell from over 130 domestic and international vendors. We source a large number of those products from foreign manufacturers, including approximately 52% of our products from a group of 10 suppliers located in Asia and Europe. We generally take title to these products overseas and are responsible for arranging shipment to our distribution centers. Financial instability among key vendors, political instability, trade restrictions, tariffs, currency exchange rates, and transport capacity and costs are beyond our control and could negatively impact our business if they seriously disrupt the movement of products through our supply chain or increased the costs of our products.

If our suppliers do not use ethical business practices or comply with applicable laws and regulations, our reputation could be harmed due to negative publicity and we could be subject to legal risk.

We do not control the operations of our suppliers. Accordingly, we cannot guarantee that our suppliers will comply with applicable environmental and labor laws and regulations or operate in a legal, ethical, and responsible manner. Violation of environmental, labor or other laws by our suppliers or their failure to operate in a legal, ethical, or responsible manner, could reduce demand for our products if, as a result of such violation or failure, we attract negative publicity. Further, such conduct could expose us to legal risks as a result of the purchase of products from non-compliant suppliers.

If customers are unable to obtain third-party financing at satisfactory rates, sales of our products could be materially adversely affected.

Our business, financial condition, and results of operations have been, and may continue to be affected, by various economic factors. Deterioration in the current economic environment could lead to reduced consumer and business spending, including by our customers. It may also cause customers to shift their spending to products that we either do not sell or that generate lower profitably for us. Further, reduced access to credit may adversely affect the ability of consumers to purchase our products. This potential reduction in access to credit may adversely impact our ability to offer customers credit card financing through third party credit providers on terms similar to those offered currently, or at all. In addition, economic conditions, including decreases in access to credit, may result in financial difficulties leading to restructuring, bankruptcies, liquidations and other unfavorable events for our customers, which may adversely impact our industry, business, and results of operations.

Any failure by us to successfully anticipate consumer trends may lead to loss of consumer acceptance of our products, resulting in reduced revenues.

Our success depends on our ability to anticipate and respond to changing trends and consumer demands in a timely manner. If we fail to identify and respond to emerging trends, consumer acceptance of our merchandise and our image with current or potential customers may be harmed, which could reduce our revenues. Additionally, if we misjudge market trends, we may significantly overstock unpopular products and be forced to reduce the sales price of such products, which would have a negative impact on our gross profit and cash flow. Conversely, shortages of products that prove popular could also reduce our revenues.

We depend on a few key employees, and if we lose the services of certain of our executive officers, we may not be able to run our business effectively.

Our future success depends in part on our ability to attract and retain key executive, merchandising, marketing, and sales personnel. Our executive officers include Robert Rucker, president and chief executive officer; Chris Homeister, chief operating officer; Timothy Clayton, chief financial officer; Carl Randazzo, senior vice president — retail; and Joseph Kinder, senior vice president — operations. We have employment and non-compete arrangements with each of Messrs. Rucker, Homeister, Clayton, Randazzo, and Kinder. If any of these executive officers ceases to be employed by us, we would have to hire additional qualified personnel. Our ability to successfully hire other experienced and qualified executive officers cannot be assured, and may be difficult because we face competition for these professionals from our competitors, our suppliers and other companies operating in our industry. As a result, the loss or unavailability of any of our executive officers could have a material adverse effect on us.

We have entered into a $120 million credit facility. The burden of this additional debt could adversely affect us, make us more vulnerable to adverse economic or industry conditions, and prevent us from fulfilling our debt obligations or from funding our expansion strategy.

In connection with the Business Combination, we issued promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $70 million, which we fully repaid as of December 31, 2013. We have entered into a credit facility with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and The Huntington National Bank, as syndication agent, for $120 million, including a term loan of $25 million and a revolving credit facility of $95 million, which we have used, in part, to repay the promissory notes issued in connection with the Business Combination. The terms of our credit facility and the burden of the indebtedness incurred thereunder could have serious consequences for us, such as:

•

limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund our working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, expansion strategy, or other needs;

•

placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors with less debt;

•

increasing our vulnerability to, and reducing our flexibility in planning for, adverse changes in economic, industry, and competitive conditions; and

•

increasing our vulnerability to increases in interest rates if borrowings under the credit facility are subject to variable interest rates.

Our credit facility also contains negative covenants that limit our ability to engage in specified types of transactions. These covenants limit our ability to, among other things:

•

incur indebtedness;

•

create liens;

•

engage in mergers or consolidations;

•

sell assets (including pursuant to sale and leaseback transactions);

•

pay dividends and distributions or repurchase our capital stock;

•

make investments, acquisitions, loans, or advances;

•

make capital expenditures;

•

repay, prepay, or redeem certain indebtedness;

•

engage in certain transactions with affiliates;

•

enter into agreements limiting subsidiary distributions;

•

enter into agreements limiting the ability to create liens;

•

amend our organizational document in a way that has a material effect on the lenders or administrative agent under our credit facility; and

•

change our lines of business.

A breach of any of these covenants could result in an event of default under our credit facility. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the lender could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under such facility to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit, or seek amendments to our debt agreements that would provide for terms more favorable to such lender and that we may have to accept under the circumstances. If we were unable to repay those amounts, the lender under our credit facility could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness.

If we fail to hire, train, and retain qualified store managers, sales associates, and other employees, our enhanced customer service could be compromised and we could lose sales to our competitors.

A key element of our competitive strategy is to provide product expertise to our customers through our extensively trained, commissioned sales associates. If we are unable to attract and retain qualified personnel and managers as needed in the future, including qualified sales personnel, our level of customer service may decline, which may decrease our revenues and profitability.

If we are unable to renew or replace current store leases or if we are unable to enter into leases for additional stores on favorable terms, or if one or more of our current leases is terminated prior to expiration of its stated term and we cannot find suitable alternate locations, our growth and profitability could be negatively impacted.

We currently lease all of our store locations. Many of our current leases provide us with the unilateral option to renew for several additional rental periods at specific rental rates. Our ability to re-negotiate favorable terms on an expiring lease or to negotiate favorable terms for a suitable alternate location, and our ability to negotiate favorable lease terms for additional store locations, could depend on conditions in the real estate market, competition for desirable properties, our relationships with current and prospective landlords, or on other factors that are not within our control. Any or all of these factors and conditions could negatively impact our growth and profitability.

Compliance with laws or changes in existing or new laws and regulations or regulatory enforcement priorities could adversely affect our business.

We must comply with various laws and regulations at the local, regional, state, federal, and international levels. These laws and regulations change frequently and such changes can impose significant costs and other burdens of compliance on our business and vendors. Any changes in regulations, the imposition of additional regulations, or the enactment of any new legislation that affect employment/labor, trade, product safety, transportation/logistics, energy costs, health care, tax, or environmental issues, or compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Changes in enforcement priorities by governmental agencies charged with enforcing existing laws and regulations can increase our cost of doing business.

We may also be subject to audits by various taxing authorities. Changes in tax laws in any of the multiple jurisdictions in which we operate, or adverse outcomes from tax audits that we may be subject to in any of the jurisdictions in which we operate, could result in an unfavorable change in our effective tax rate, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

As our stores are generally concentrated in the midwestern, mid-Atlantic and northeast regions of the United States, we are subject to regional risks.

We have a high concentration of stores in the midwestern, mid-Atlantic and northeast regions. If these markets individually or collectively suffer an economic downturn or other significant adverse event, there could be an adverse impact on same store sales, revenues, and profitability, and the ability to implement our planned expansion program. Any natural disaster, extended adverse weather or other serious disruption in these markets due to fire, tornado, hurricane, or any other calamity could damage inventory and could result in decreased revenues.

Our results may be adversely affected by fluctuations in material and energy costs.

Our results may be affected by the prices of the materials used in the manufacture of tile, setting and maintenance materials, and related accessories that we sell. These prices may fluctuate based on a number of factors beyond our control, including: oil prices, changes in supply and demand, general economic conditions, labor costs, competition, import duties, tariffs, currency exchange rates, and government regulation. In addition, energy costs have fluctuated dramatically in the past and may fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations may result in an increase in our transportation costs for distribution from the manufacturer to our distribution center and from our regional distribution centers to our retail stores, utility costs for our distribution and manufacturing centers and retail stores, and overall costs to purchase products from our vendors.

We may not be able to adjust the prices of our products, especially in the short-term, to recover these cost increases in materials and energy. A continual rise in material and energy costs could adversely affect consumer spending and demand for our products and increase our operating costs, both of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our success is highly dependent on our ability to provide timely delivery to our customers, and any disruption in our delivery capabilities or our related planning and control processes may adversely affect our operating results.

Our success is due in part to our ability to deliver products quickly to our customers, which relies on successful planning and distribution infrastructure, including ordering, transportation and receipt processing, and the ability of suppliers to meet distribution requirements. Our ability to maintain this success depends on the continued identification and implementation of improvements to our planning processes, distribution infrastructure, and supply chain. We also need to ensure that our distribution infrastructure and supply chain keep pace with our anticipated growth and increased number of stores. The cost of these enhanced processes could be significant and any failure to maintain, grow, or improve them could adversely affect our operating results. Our business could also be adversely affected if there are delays in product shipments due to freight difficulties, strikes, or other difficulties at our suppliers’ principal transport providers, or otherwise.

Damage, destruction, or disruption of our distribution and manufacturing centers could significantly impact our operations and impede our ability to produce and distribute our products.

We rely on four regional distribution centers to supply products to all of our retail stores. In addition, we rely on our manufacturing centers, located at our distribution centers, to manufacture our setting and maintenance materials. If any of these facilities, or the inventory stored in these facilities, were damaged or destroyed by fire or other causes, our distribution or manufacturing processes would be disrupted, which could cause significant delays in delivery. This could negatively impact our ability to stock our stores and deliver products to our customers, and cause our revenues and operating results to deteriorate.

Our ability to control labor costs is limited, which may negatively affect our business.

Our ability to control labor costs is subject to numerous external factors, including prevailing wage rates, the impact of legislation or regulations governing healthcare benefits or labor relations, such as the Employee Free Choice Act, and health and other insurance costs. If our labor and/or benefit costs increase, we may not be able to hire or maintain qualified personnel to the extent necessary to execute our competitive strategy, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our business exposes us to personal injury and product liability claims, which could result in adverse publicity and harm to our brands and our results of operations.

We are from time to time subject to claims due to the injury of an individual in our stores or on our property. In addition, we may be subject to product liability claims for the products that we sell. Our purchase orders generally do not require the manufacturer to indemnify us against any product liability claims arising from products purchased by us. Any personal injury or product liability claim made against us, whether or not it has merit, could be time-consuming and costly to defend, resulting in adverse publicity or damage to our reputation, and have an adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, any negative publicity involving our vendors, employees, and other parties who are not within our control could negatively impact us.

Our business operations could be disrupted if our information technology systems fail to perform adequately or we are unable to protect the integrity and security of our customers’ information.

We depend upon our information technology systems in the conduct of all aspects of our operations. If our information technology systems fail to perform as anticipated, we could experience difficulties in virtually any area of our operations, including but not limited to replenishing inventories or delivering products to store locations in response to consumer demands. It is also possible that our competitors could develop better online platforms than us, which could negatively impact our internet sales. Any of these or other systems-related problems could, in turn, adversely affect our revenues and profitability.

In addition, in the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store certain personal information from individuals, such as our customers and suppliers, and we process customer payment card and check information. We are continually evaluating our systems associated with the collection, security, and handling of personal information and intend to make any required changes or enhancements in our systems and policies in response to this assessment. Our failure to properly comply with relevant laws, a breach of our network security and systems, or other events that cause the loss or public disclosure of, or access by third parties to, our customers’ personal information could have serious negative consequences for our business, including possible fines, penalties and damages, an unwillingness of customers to provide us with their credit card or payment information, harm to our reputation and brand, loss of our ability to accept and process customer credit card orders, and time-consuming and expensive litigation.

Computer hackers may attempt to penetrate our computer systems and, if successful, misappropriate personal information, payment card or check information, or confidential business information. In addition, an employee, contractor, or other third party with whom we do business may attempt to circumvent our security measures in order to obtain such information. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or sabotage systems change frequently and may originate from less regulated or remote areas around the world. As a result, we may be unable to proactively address these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures.

Many states have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals of data security breaches involving their personal data. These mandatory disclosures regarding a security breach often lead to widespread negative publicity, which may cause our customers to lose confidence in the effectiveness of our data security measures. Any security breach, whether successful or not, would harm our reputation and could cause the loss of customers.

Concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control.

Our directors, executive officers, and holders of more than 5% of our common stock, together with their affiliates, beneficially hold approximately 45% of our outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, these stockholders, if acting together, have the ability to influence the outcome of corporate actions requiring stockholder approval. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control and might adversely affect the market price of our securities.

Future sales of our common stock may cause the market price of our securities to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.

In connection with the Business Combination and the underwritten public offerings of our common stock by certain of our stockholders in December 2012 and June 2013, our officers, directors and certain stockholders, who, immediately following the Business Combination, collectively held an aggregate of 34,305,233 shares of our common stock, agreed to refrain from selling such shares for periods of time that have now passed. As a result, our directors, officers and the selling stockholders in the December 2012 and June 2013 underwritten public offerings may sell their shares at any time, subject to compliance with applicable securities laws. The presence of these additional securities trading in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

In addition, the former direct and indirect holders of equity interests in The Tile Shop and the JWCAC founders hold registration rights, subject to certain limitations, with respect to our common stock that they received in the Business Combination pursuant to a registration rights agreement. The holders of a majority in interest of our common stock held by the former direct and indirect holders of equity interests in The Tile Shop will be entitled to require us, on up to four occasions, to register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, the shares of common stock that they received in the Business Combination. The holders of a majority in interest of our common stock held by the JWCAC founders will be entitled to require us, on up to two occasions, to register under the Securities Act the shares of common stock that they received in the Business Combination, and any shares that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of certain warrants held by them. As of the date of this report, we have effected two registrations pursuant to such agreements. The presence of these additional securities trading in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Although our common stock is currently listed on The NASDAQ Global Market, there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the continued listing standards.

The NASDAQ Global Market may delist our common stock from trading on its exchange for failure to meet the continued listing standards. If our common stock were delisted from The NASDAQ Global Market, we and our stockholders could face significant material adverse consequences including:

•

a limited availability of market quotations for our common stock;

•

a determination that our common stock is a “penny stock” would require brokers trading in our common stock to adhere to more stringent rules, possibly resulting in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our common stock;

•

a limited amount of analyst coverage; and

•

a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.

The market price of our securities may decline and/or be volatile.

Fluctuations in the price of our securities could contribute to the loss of all or part of your investment. Prior to the Business Combination, there had not been a public market for our securities or The Tile Shop’s securities, and trading in JWCAC’s securities had not been active. An active, liquid, and orderly market for our securities may not be sustained and the trading price of our securities could be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. Any of the factors listed below could have a material adverse effect on your investment in our securities and our securities may trade at prices significantly below the price that you paid for them. In such circumstances, the trading price of our securities may not recover and may experience a further decline.

Factors affecting the trading price of our securities may include:

•

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial results or the quarterly financial results of companies perceived to be similar to us;

•

changes in the market’s expectations about our operating results;

•

the effects of seasonality on our business cycle;

•

success of competitive retailers;

•

our operating results failing to meet the expectation of securities analysts or investors in a particular period;

•

research reports published regarding our business;

•

changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts concerning us, the housing market, the retail specialty tile market, or the retail market in general;

•

operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us;

•

our ability to market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;

•

changes in laws and regulations affecting our business;

•

commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving us;

•

changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt;

•

the volume of shares of our common stock available for public sale;

•

any major change in our board of directors or management;

•

sales of substantial amounts of common stock by our directors, executive officers, or significant stockholders or the perception that such sales could occur; and

•

general economic and political conditions such as recessions, interest rates, fuel prices, international currency fluctuations, and acts of war or terrorism.

Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our securities irrespective of our operating performance. The NASDAQ Global Market and the stock market in general have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the particular companies affected. The trading prices and valuations of these securities, and of our securities, may not be predictable. A loss of investor confidence in the market for retail securities or the securities of other companies that investors perceive to be similar to us could depress the price of our securities regardless of our business, prospects, financial conditions, or results of operations. A decline in the market price of our securities also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional securities and our ability to obtain additional financing in the future.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports about us, our business, or our market, or if they change their recommendations regarding our common stock adversely, the price and trading volume of our common stock could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about us, our business, our market, or our competitors. If any of the analysts who cover us change their recommendation regarding our common stock adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about our competitors, the price of our common stock would likely decline. If any analyst who covers us were to cease coverage of us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our common stock price or trading volume to decline.

We are a holding company with no business operations of our own and depend on cash flow from The Tile Shop to meet our obligations.

We are a holding company with no business operations of our own or material assets other than the equity of our subsidiaries. All of our operations are conducted by our subsidiary, The Tile Shop. As a holding company, we will require dividends and other payments from our subsidiaries to meet cash requirements. The terms of any future credit facility may restrict our subsidiaries from paying dividends and otherwise transferring cash or other assets to us, although our current facility does not restrict this action. If there is an insolvency, liquidation, or other reorganization of any of our subsidiaries, our stockholders likely will have no right to proceed against their assets. Creditors of those subsidiaries will be entitled to payment in full from the sale or other disposal of the assets of those subsidiaries before us, as an equity holder, would be entitled to receive any distribution from that sale or disposal. If The Tile Shop is unable to pay dividends or make other payments to us when needed, we will be unable to satisfy our obligations.

Anti-takeover provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a takeover attempt.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control or changes in our management without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions include:

•

a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms, which may delay the ability of stockholders to change the membership of a majority of our board of directors;

•

no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates;

•

the exclusive right of our board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or the resignation, death, or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill vacancies on our board of directors;

•

the ability of our board of directors to determine to issue shares of preferred stock and to determine the price and other terms of those shares, including preferences and voting rights, without stockholder approval, which could be used to significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer;

•

a prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which forces stockholder action to be taken at an annual or special meeting of our stockholders;

•

the requirement that a special meeting of stockholders may be called only by the chairman of the board of directors, the chief executive officer, or the board of directors, which may delay the ability of our stockholders to force consideration of a proposal or to take action, including the removal of directors;

•

limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, our directors and officers;

•

controlling the procedures for the conduct and scheduling of stockholder meetings;

•

providing the board of directors with the express power to postpone previously scheduled annual meetings of stockholders and to cancel previously scheduled special meetings of stockholders;

•

providing that directors may be removed prior to the expiration of their terms by stockholders only for cause; and

•

advance notice procedures that stockholders must comply with in order to nominate candidates to our board of directors or to propose matters to be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting, which may discourage or deter a potential acquiror from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the acquiror’s own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.

These provisions, alone or together, could delay hostile takeovers and changes in control of us or changes in our management.

As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prevents some stockholders holding more than 15% of our outstanding common stock from engaging in certain business combinations without approval of the holders of substantially all of our outstanding common stock. Any provision of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2013, we operated 88 stores located in 28 states with an average square footage of approximately 23,000 square feet.

We lease all of our stores. Our 15,000 square foot headquarters in Plymouth, Minnesota is attached to our flagship retail store. We own four regional facilities used for distribution of purchased product and manufacturing of maintenance and setting materials, located in Spring Valley, Wisconsin; Ottawa Lake, Michigan; Ridgeway, Virginia; and Durant, Oklahoma, which consist of 51,000, 271,000, 134,000, and 150,000 square feet, respectively.

We believe that our material property holdings are suitable for our current operations and purposes. In order to continue executing our growth strategy, we intend to open 20 new retail locations in 2014.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we have been and may become involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. Although the results of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we are not presently involved in any legal proceeding which we expect to have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, and other factors.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

Part II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock has been traded on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “TTS” since the consummation of the Business Combination on August 21, 2012. Prior to this time, there was no public market for our common stock. Our Public Warrants (as defined in Item 13. “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions-Warrant Agreement,”) were previously on the Over- the-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol “TTSAW.” The following table shows the high and low sale prices per share of our common stock and Public Warrants as reported on The NASDAQ Global Market and the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board for the periods indicated:

		Common Stock				Public Warrants ⁽¹⁾
	Quarter	High		Low		High		Low
Fiscal 2012	Third (beginning August 21, 2012)	$	16.99	$	11.75	$	3.60	$	1.05
	Fourth	$	17.56	$	12.00	$	6.85	$	3.05

Fiscal 2013	First	$	22.39	$	16.41	$	5.21	$	10.48
	Second	$	30.33	$	19.69	$	9.57	$	9.82
	Third	$	30.88	$	24.72	$	-	$	-
	Fourth	$	29.90	$	10.05	$	-	$	-

(1)

Following the second quarter of fiscal 2013, no warrants remain outstanding.

As of February 21, 2014, we had approximately 33 holders of record of our common stock. All our Public Warrants were either exercised or redeemed during the year ended December 31, 2013. This figure does not include the number of persons whose securities are held in nominee or “street” name accounts through brokers.

As of February 21, 2014, we had outstanding a total of 51,230,600 shares of common stock and no warrants.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid, and do not anticipate declaring or paying, any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. While our board of directors may consider whether or not to institute a dividend policy, it is our present intention to retain any earnings for use in our business operations. In addition, our credit facility restricts our ability to pay dividends.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

For information on our equity compensation plans, refer to Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.”

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

Stock Performance Graph

The graph and table below present the Company’s cumulative total stockholder returns relative to the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 and the Dow Jones U.S. Furnishings Index for the period commencing August 22, 2012, the date of the Business Combination, and ending December 31, 2013, the last trading day of fiscal 2013. The comparison assumes $100 invested at the close of trading on August 22, 2012 in (i) the Company’s common stock, (ii) the stocks comprising the S&P SmallCap 600, and (iii) the stocks comprising the Dow Jones U.S. Furnishings Index. All values assume that all dividends were reinvested on the date paid. The points on the graph represent fiscal quarter-end amounts based on the last trading day in each fiscal quarter. The stock price performance included in the line graph below is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

	August 22, 2012		December 31, 2012		March 31, 2013		June 30, 2013		September 30, 2013		December 31, 2013

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.	$	100.00	$	129.46	$	161.62	$	222.77	$	226.85	$	139.00
S&P Small Cap 600	$	100.00	$	104.18	$	116.44	$	120.57	$	133.11	$	145.76
Dow Jones U.S. Furnishings Index	$	100.00	$	114.95	$	148.24	$	141.74	$	150.66	$	167.14


Source: Market Watch

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected historical financial information derived from (i) our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this report as of December 31, 2013 and for the year ended December 31, 2013, (ii) The Tile Shop’s audited financial statements included elsewhere in this report as of December 31, 2012 and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and (iii) The Tile Shop’s audited financial statements not included in this report as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this report.

	As of December 31, or for the year ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011			2010			2009
	(in thousands, except per share)
Statement of Income Data
Net sales	$	229,564		$	182,650		$	152,717		$	135,340		$	116,247
Cost of sales		68,755			49,626			40,321			36,124			31,706
Gross profit		160,809			133,024			112,396			99,216			84,541
Selling, general and administrative expenses		127,731			94,716			78,368			68,105			60,051
Deferred compensation expense		-			3,897			1,415			450			120
Income from operations		33,078			34,411			32,613			30,661			24,370
Interest expense		2,581			1,252			443			467			545
Change in fair value of warrants		54,219			82,063			-			-			-
Other income (expense)		4			15			(77	)		124			73
(Loss) income before income taxes		(23,718	)		(48,889	)		32,093			30,318			23,898
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes⁽¹⁾		(11,942	)		2,002			(733	)		(609	)		(675	)
Net (loss) income	$	(35,660	)	$	(46,887	)	$	31,360		$	29,709		$	23,223
Earnings per share⁽¹⁾		(0.72	)	$	(1.31	)	$	0.97		$	0.92		$	0.72
Weighted average shares outstanding		49,600			35,838			32,261			32,330			32,330
Balance Sheet Data
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,761		$	2,987		$	6,283		$	14,117		$	17,850
Inventories		67,756			46,890			43,744			35,358			26,342
Total assets		242,769			176,074			119,005			108,890			95,632
Warrant liability		-			95,645			-			-			-
Total debt and capital lease obligations, including current maturities		96,396			74,824			4,853			5,582			4,574
Total stockholders' equity		79,863			(44,763	)		75,147			69,437			62,000
Working capital		51,719			35,934			34,852			34,895			31,851
Cash Flow Data
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	21,211		$	47,222		$	34,722		$	32,461		$	34,729
Net cash used in investing activities		(52,955	)		(29,064	)		(18,561	)		(14,376	)		(8,267	)
Net cash used in financing activities		30,518			(21,454	)		(23,995	)		(21,818	)		(12,243	)
Other Selected Financial Data (unaudited)
Adjusted EBITDA⁽²⁾	$	54,294		$	50,634		$	42,602		$	38,472		$	31,576
Adjusted EBITDA margin⁽²⁾		23.7	%		27.7	%		27.9	%		28.4	%		27.2	%
Gross margin⁽³⁾		70.0	%		72.8	%		73.6	%		73.3	%		72.7	%
Operating income margin⁽⁴⁾		14.4	%		18.8	%		21.4	%		22.7	%		21.0	%
Same stores sales growth⁽⁵⁾		12.4	%		7.1	%		6.4	%		11.4	%		(4.6	%)
Stores open - end of period		88			68			53			48			41

	(1)	Historical amounts do not include pro forma adjustments for income taxes as a result of our change in tax status, which was effective on August 21, 2012 upon consummation of the Business Combination.
	(2)	We calculate Adjusted EBITDA by taking net income calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and adjusting interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-cash change in fair value of warrants, non-recurring items including equity related transaction costs, other items (including special investigation costs), deferred compensation expense, and stock based compensation expense. Adjusted EBITDA margin is equal to Adjusted EBITDA divided by net sales. We believe that these non-GAAP measures of financial results provide useful information to management and investors regarding certain financial and business trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations. Our management uses these non-GAAP measures to compare our performance to that of prior periods for trend analyses, for purposes of determining management incentive compensation, and for budgeting and planning purposes. These measures are used in financial reports prepared for management and our board of directors. We believe that the use of these non-GAAP financial measures provides an additional tool for investors to use in evaluating ongoing operating results and trends and in comparing our financial measures with other specialty retailers, many of which present similar non-GAAP financial measures to investors.

(3)

Gross margin is gross profit divided by net sales.

(4)

Operating income margin is income from operations divided by net sales.

(5)

Same store sales growth is the percentage change in sales of comparable stores period over period. A store is considered comparable on the first day of the 13th month of operation. Same store sales growth amounts include total charges to customers less any actual returns. We do not include estimated return provisions or sale allowances in the same store sales calculation, as return reserves are calculated on a consolidated level. Same store sales data reported by other companies may be prepared on a different basis and therefore may not be useful for purposes of comparing our results to those of other businesses.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA to GAAP Net Income (loss)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011		2010		2009
	(in thousands)
Net (loss) income	$	(35,660	)	$	(46,887	)	$	31,360	$	29,709	$	23,223
Interest expense		2,581			1,252			443		467		545
Income taxes		11,942			(2,002	)		733		609		675
Change in fair value of warrants		54,219			82,063			-		-		-
Depreciation and amortization		14,316			10,530			8,651		7,237		7,013
Deferred compensation expense		-			3,897			1,415		450		120
Non-recurring transaction related costs		2,216			400			-		-		-
Stock-based compensation		4,680			1,381			-		-		-
Adjusted EBITDA	$	54,294		$	50,634		$	42,602	$	38,472	$	31,576

Our management does not consider these non-GAAP measures in isolation or as an alternative to financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP. The principal limitation of these non-GAAP financial measures is that they exclude significant expenses and income that are required by GAAP to be recorded in our consolidated financial statements. In addition, they are subject to inherent limitations as they reflect the exercise of judgments by management about which expenses and income are excluded or included in determining these non-GAAP financial measures. In order to compensate for these limitations, management presents non-GAAP financial measures in connection with GAAP results. We urge investors to review the reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP financial measures and not to rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis together with “Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. Among other things, those historical consolidated financial statements include more detailed information regarding the basis of presentation for the financial data than are included in the following discussion. This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “will likely result,” “should,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “potential,” “continue,” “believes” and similar expressions, although some forward-looking statements are expressed differently. The forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K relate to, among others things, statements relating to our anticipated new store openings; our business strengths and competitive advantages; expenses as a result of becoming a public company; legal proceedings; our intended future process for determining and assessing compensation; our expectations for the future use of equity incentive plans; our expectations regarding financing arrangements; our retail sales and market share expectations; depreciation and amortization expense; supply costs and expectations; costs and adequacy of insurance; our expectations with respect to ongoing compliance with the terms of our credit facility; the effect of regulations on us and our industry and our compliance with such regulations; and our anticipated revenues, expenses, and capital requirements.

These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from any expected future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

•

the level of demand for our products;

•

our ability to grow and remain profitable in the highly competitive retail tile industry;

•

our ability to access additional capital;

•

our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;

•

changes in general economic, business and industry conditions;

•

our ability to introduce new products that satisfy market demand; and

•

legal, regulatory, and tax developments, including additional requirements imposed by changes in domestic and foreign laws and regulations.

There is no assurance that our expectations will be realized. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those expected, estimated, or projected. Such risks and uncertainties also include those set forth under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Form 10-K. Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the time that they are made and do not necessarily reflect our outlook at any other point in time. Except as required by law or regulation, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or for any other reason.

Overview

We purchase our tile products and accessories directly from producers and manufacture our own setting and maintenance materials, such as thinset, grout, and sealers. We believe that our long-term producer relationships, together with our design, manufacturing and distribution capabilities, enable us to offer a broad assortment of high-quality products to our customers, who are primarily homeowners, at competitive prices. We have invested significant resources to develop our proprietary brands and product sources and believe that we are a leading retailer of stone tiles, accessories, and related materials in the United States.

We believe that the highly-fragmented U.S. retail tile market provides us with a significant opportunity to expand our store base. We opened 20 new stores in the U.S. in 2013, and plan to open 20 stores in 2014. We believe that there will continue to be additional expansion opportunities in the United States and Canada. We expect store base growth will drive productivity and operational efficiencies.

In 2013, we reported net sales and income from operations of $229.6 million and $33.1 million, respectively. From December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2013, our net sales and income from operations increased at compounded annual growth rates of 18.5% and 7.9%, respectively. During that period, we opened 47 new retail locations and focused on cost control and implementing selected price increases in order to maintain our gross profit and income from operations. We plan to continue to focus on store growth.

Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $21.2 million and $47.2 million for 2013 and 2012, respectively, which were used to fund capital expenditures for opening new stores and daily operations. We expect to continue to fund our capital expenditures and daily operations from our operating cash flows and with borrowings pursuant to our credit facility. As of December 31, 2013, we had cash of $1.8 million and working capital of $51.7 million.

We plan to continue to invest in strong customer service by leveraging our highly-trained staff from our existing store base to train new store staff. We also continue to invest in our marketing and brand management, website improvements, and growing use of social media. We also plan to maintain our marketing and brand management by periodically remodeling our in-store displays and developing content about our store and products for smart phones and tablets. In 2013, approximately 50% of our net sales were from repeat customers.

As a result of the Business Combination, during 2013 we incurred incremental general and administrative expenses of approximately $2.5 million that are attributable to operating as a publicly traded company, and supporting our more rapid growth strategy. These incremental public company expenses include annual and quarterly reporting; Sarbanes-Oxley compliance expenses; expenses associated with listing on The NASDAQ Global Market; chief financial officer, chief operating officer and additional staff compensation; legal fees; independent auditor fees; investor relations expenses; registrar and transfer agent fees; director and officer liability insurance costs; and director compensation. In addition, we incurred approximately $4.7 million of non-cash, stock-based compensation expense in 2013.

We also incurred a non-cash charge related to the change in the fair value of the warrant liability of $54.2 million in 2013, based on the fluctuation in the trading price of the stock purchase warrants.

Key Components of our Consolidated Statements of Income

Net Sales Net sales represents total charges to customers and includes freight charged to customers. We recognize sales at the time that the customer takes possession of the merchandise. We recognize service revenue, which consists primarily of freight charges for home delivery, when the service has been rendered. We are required to charge and collect sales and other taxes on sales to our customers and remit these taxes back to government authorities. Sales and other taxes are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets but excluded from the consolidated statements of income. The increase in net sales in recent years has been a result of store base growth, increases in same store sales, expansion of product lines, and a gradually improving national economy.

The table below sets forth information about our same store sales growth from fiscal 2011 to fiscal 2013. Our increase in same store sales growth is primarily attributable to increases in number of orders, as well as average order size. The increase in net sales has also been a result of growing our store base in recent years. Same store sale amounts include total charges to customers less any actual returns. We do not include estimated return provisions or sales allowances in the same store sales calculation, as return reserves are calculated at the consolidated level. In general, we consider a store comparable on the first day of the 13th month of operation.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2013		2012	2011
Same store sales growth		12.4%	7.1%	6.4%

We opened twenty, fifteen and five new stores in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Net sales at new stores are generally lowest in the first few months after a location is opened and generally increase over time. We expect a store’s net sales to increase faster during its first three years of operation than in its later years. Store locations opened in existing markets tend to have higher net sales in the first year of operation than store locations opened in new markets, as a portion of such net sales come from more mature stores in those markets.

Cost of Sales Cost of sales consists primarily of material costs, freight, duties, and storage and delivery of product to customers from stores, as well as costs associated with manufacturing of maintenance materials.

Gross Profit Gross profit is net sales less cost of sales. Gross margin is the percentage determined by dividing gross profit by net sales. In 2013, 2012 and 2011, our gross margin was 70.0%, 72.8%, and 73.6%, respectively. We have been able to maintain relatively stable gross margins as a result of product cost control and retail price adjustments, in the past. However, increases in freight and distribution costs, along with increased discounts and promotional activity adversely impacted our gross margins by approximately 200 basis points in 2013.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Payroll costs and occupancy expenses have historically been our most significant selling, general, and administrative expenses. Payroll costs exclude costs associated with manufacturing labor costs, as those costs are included in cost of sales. In 2013, 2012, and 2011, our selling, general, and administrative expense as a percentage of net sales was 55.6%, 51.9% and 51.3%, respectively. Our payroll costs have increased as a percentage of net sales over the last three years primarily due to increased store base growth and investments in support infrastructure. Advertising costs have increased as a percentage of net sales due new marketing efforts. Our selling, general and administrative expenses have increased as we add administrative and sales personnel, continue making investments in our corporate infrastructure to support our growth, and incur expenses attributable to operating as a publicly traded company. These costs include those associated with SEC reporting, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, and listing on The NASDAQ Global Market, as well as increased financial personnel, professional fees, insurance costs and director compensation. In addition, since becoming a public company, we have utilized stock options and restricted stock as a significant element of our long term incentive plan for executive and non-executive employees. These costs were new in 2012 and grew significantly in 2013 to $4.7 million from $1.4 million in the prior year. They will continue to grow in 2014, but at a slower rate.

Pre-opening costs Our pre-opening costs are those typically associated with the openings of a new store and generally include rent expense, payroll costs, occupancy costs and promotional costs. Pre-opening costs are expensed as incurred and recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Income Taxes As of August 21, 2012, we are subject to income tax in the United States as well as other tax jurisdictions in which we conduct business. Our effective tax rates in fiscal 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the effective tax rate that may be expected for fiscal year 2014 or future periods.

Adjusted EBITDA

We calculate Adjusted EBITDA by taking net income calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, and adjusting interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-cash change in fair value of warrants, non-recurring items including equity related transaction costs, other items (including special investigation costs), deferred compensation expense, and stock based compensation expense. Adjusted EBITDA margin is equal to Adjusted EBITDA divided by net sales. We believe that these non-GAAP measures of financial results provide useful information to management and investors regarding certain financial and business trends relating to our financial condition and results of operations. Our management uses these non-GAAP measures to compare our performance to that of prior periods for trend analyses, for purposes of determining management incentive compensation, and for budgeting and planning purposes. These measures are used in financial reports prepared for management and our board of directors. We believe that the use of these non-GAAP financial measures provides an additional tool for investors to use in evaluating ongoing operating results and trends and in comparing our financial measures with other specialty retailers, many of which present similar non-GAAP financial measures to investors.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011		2010		2009
	(in thousands)
Net (loss) income	$	(35,660	)	$	(46,887	)	$	31,360	$	29,709	$	23,223
Interest expense		2,581			1,252			443		467		545
Income taxes		11,942			(2,002	)		733		609		675
Change in fair value of warrants		54,219			82,063			-		-		-
Depreciation and amortization		14,316			10,530			8,651		7,237		7,013
Deferred compensation expense		-			3,897			1,415		450		120
Non-recurring transaction related costs		2,216			400			-		-		-
Stock-based compensation		4,680			1,381			-		-		-
Adjusted EBITDA	$	54,294		$	50,634		$	42,602	$	38,472	$	31,576

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2013 to the Year Ended December 31, 2012

	Years Ended December 31,
	2013			% of sales			2012			% of sales
	(in thousands)
Net sales	$	229,564					$	182,650
Cost of sales		68,755			30.0%			49,626			27.2%
Gross profit		160,809			70.0%			133,024			72.8%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		127,731			55.6%			94,716			51.9%
Deferred compensation expense		-			0.0%			3,897			2.1%
Income from operations		33,078			14.4%			34,411			18.8%
Interest expense		2,581			1.1%			1,252			0.7%
Change in fair value of warrants		54,219			23.6%			82,063			44.9%
Other income (expense)		4			0.0%			15			0.0%
Loss before income taxes		(23,718	)		(10.3%	)		(48,889	)		(26.8%	)
(Provision) benefit for income taxes		(11,942	)		(5.2%	)		2,002			1.1%
Net income (loss)	$	(35,660	)		(15.5%	)	$	(46,887	)		(25.7%	)

Net Sales Net sales from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2013, our net sales increased by $46.9 million, or 25.7%, to $229.6 million. This increase is primarily due to net sales of $24.4 million from 20 new stores, a full year of the 15 stores opened in 2012, and strong same store sales growth.

Gross Profit Gross profit increased $27.8 million, or 20.9%, from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2013 primarily due to the increase in net sales. Gross margin decreased from 72.8% in 2012 to 70.0% in 2013, or (3.8%). The decrease in margin can be attributed to slight increases in product acquisition, freight and distribution costs during the year ended December 31, 2013. In addition, we have used selective product related promotions and shipping discounts to generate or secure sales. All of these actions are specifically designed to drive traffic and enhance customer satisfaction. In view of our overall strong gross margins, we believe that an aggressive approach to capturing market share, while impacting gross margins slightly in the short term, serves to enhance our long-term prospects.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased by $33.0 million, or 34.9%, in fiscal year 2013 compared to fiscal year 2012. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from 51.9% in 2012 to 55.6%, or by 7.1%. The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses was primarily due to increased payroll, rent and occupancy costs, as well as depreciation and amortization due to opening 20 new stores during the year ended December 31, 2013 as well as a full year of costs associated to 15 stores that we opened during the year ended December 31, 2012. Payroll costs increased by $11.0 million, driven by growing store base and new employee additions on store and corporate levels, as well as increased employee compensation costs, including increased stock-based compensation expense of $3.3 million. Rent, depreciation and amortization increased by $3.8 million from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2013. Professional fees associated with being a public company and fulfilling certain resale registration obligations increased approximately $2.4 million in 2013 as compared to 2012.

Pre-opening Costs Our pre-opening costs are those typically associated with the openings of a new store and generally include rent expense, payroll costs and promotional costs. We expense pre-opening costs as incurred and include these costs in selling, general and administrative expenses. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we reported pre-opening costs of $2.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively.

Deferred Compensation Expense We had no deferred compensation expense in 2013 compared to $3.9 million in 2012. The decrease in deferred compensation expense was due to the termination of The Tile Shop’s historical equity incentive deferred compensation plan, or the Deferred Compensation Plan, and the related cash payment to each former participant in our Deferred Compensation Plan in August 2013, as well as accelerated vesting of certain membership interests in The Tile Shop in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination during 2012. We will not recognize any additional expense related to the foregoing Business Combination matters in 2014.

Income From Operations and Operating Margin As a result of the above, income from operations decreased by $1.3 million, or (3.9%), from fiscal year 2012 to fiscal year 2013. Operating income margin decreased from 18.8% to 14.4%, or by (23.4%).

Interest Expense Interest expense increased $1.3 million, or 106.2%, for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase is due to an increase in debt outstanding from borrowings under our credit facility, which was outstanding for the full year.

Change in Fair Value of Warrants The decrease in change in fair value of warrant liability of $27.8 million relates to a non-cash charge for the change in the fair value of the outstanding warrants during the year ended December 31, 2013. The warrants were assumed by the Company in connection with the Business Combination on August 21, 2012. As of December 31, 2013, the warrants were fully exercised or redeemed, and no further expense will be recorded for these warrants in future periods.

Income Tax (Provision) Benefit Income tax provision increased by $14.0 million to $11.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to a benefit of $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 due to higher taxable income. The Company was not a taxable entity until August 21, 2012.

Net (Loss) Income Primarily as a result of the change in the fair value of the warrant liability described above, we recorded a net loss of $35.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to a net loss of $46.9 million in the previous year. Excluding the change in fair value of warrants, which was $54.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and $82.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, net income was $18.6 million and $35.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which represents a decrease of $16.6 million, or 47% as compared to the previous year. This decrease is primarily the result of becoming a taxable entity late in 2102. We believe this non-GAAP measure is useful because it excludes a significant item that is considered to be non- operational and of a non-cash nature, and which will change from period to period due to the impact of market fluctuations. The non-GAAP measure thereby facilitates our evaluation of current operating performance and comparisons to past operating performance.

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2012 and the Year Ended December 31, 2011

	Years Ended December 31,
	2012			% of sales			2011			% of sales
	(in thousands)
Net sales	$	182,650					$	152,717
Cost of sales		49,626			27.2%			40,321			26.4%
Gross profit		133,024			72.8%			112,396			73.6%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		94,716			51.9%			78,368			51.3%
Deferred compensation expense		3,897			2.1%			1,415			0.9%
Income from operations		34,411			18.8%			32,613			21.4%
Interest expense		1,252			0.7%			443			0.3%
Change in fair value of warrants		82,063			44.9%			-			0.0%
Other income (expense)		15			0.0%			(77	)		(0.1%	)
(Loss) income before income taxes		(48,889	)		(26.8%	)		32,093			21.0%
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		2,002			1.1%			(733	)		(0.5%	)
Net (loss) income	$	(46,887	)		(25.7%	)	$	31,360			20.5%

Net Sales From fiscal year 2011 to fiscal year 2012, our net sales increased by $29.9 million, or 19.6%, to $182.7 million. This increase is primarily due to net sales of $11.5 million from 15 new stores and strong same store sales growth.

Gross Profit Gross profit increased $20.6 million, or 18.4% from fiscal year 2011 to fiscal year 2012 primarily due to the increase in net sales. Gross margin decreased from 73.6% in 2011 to 72.8% in 2012, or 0.1%. The change was primarily driven by slightly higher product related costs and transportation expenses.

Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased by $16.3 million, or 20.9%, in fiscal year 2012 compared to fiscal year 2011. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from 51.3% in 2011 to 51.9%, or by 1.2%. The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses was primarily due to increased payroll, rent and occupancy costs, as well as depreciation and amortization. Payroll costs increased by $9.2 million, driven by growing store base and new employee additions on store and corporate levels, as well as increased employee compensation costs, including stock-based compensation expense of $1.4 million. Rent expense increased from by $2.6 million from fiscal year 2011 to fiscal year 2012. Depreciation and amortization increased by $1.9 million from fiscal year 2011 to fiscal year 2012. Higher compliance, regulatory, and personnel costs associated with being a public company also had an impact on selling, general, and administrative expense.

Pre-opening Costs Our pre-opening costs are those typically associated with the openings of a new store and generally include rent expense, payroll costs and promotional costs. Pre-opening costs are expensed as incurred and recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we reported pre-opening costs of approximately $1.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

Deferred Compensation Expense Deferred compensation expense increased $2.5 million, or 175.4% in fiscal year 2012 compared to fiscal year 2011. The increase in deferred compensation expense was primarily due to the termination of The Tile Shop’s historical equity incentive deferred compensation plan, or the Deferred Compensation Plan, and the related agreement to make a lump-sum cash payment to each former participant in our Deferred Compensation Plan, as well as accelerated vesting of certain membership interests in The Tile Shop in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination. We will not recognize any additional expense related to the foregoing.

Income From Operations and Operating Margin As a result of the above, income from operations increased by $1.8 million, or 5.5%, fromfiscal year 2011 to fiscal year 2012. Operating income margin decreased from 21.4% to 18.8%, or by 12.1%. Excluding the non-recurring deferred compensation costs in each period, income from operations would have been $38.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and $34.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Interest Expense Interest expense increased $0.8 million, or 183%, for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase is primarily due to interest incurred on the promissory notes issued in connection with the Business Combination, which have been repaid in full, and our new credit facility.

Change in Fair Value of Warrants The increase in change in fair value of warrant liability of $82.1 million, relates to a non-cash charge for the change in the fair value of the outstanding warrants for the year ended December 31, 2012. The warrants were assumed by the Company in connection with the Business Combination on August 21. Subsequent to December 31, 2012, all warrants were fully exercised or redeemed.

Income Tax Benefit (Provision) Income tax benefit increased $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to a provision of $.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 as a result of becoming a taxable entity due to the Business Combination, and because of these developments, we recognized $5.9 million of net deferred tax assets, which was offset by a tax expense of $3.9 million for the period from August 21, 2012 through December 31, 2012.

Net (Loss) Income Primarily as a result of the change in the fair value of the warrant liability described above, we recorded a net loss of $46.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $31.4 million of net income in the previous year. Excluding the change in fair value of warrants, which was $82.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, net income would have been $35.2 million, which represented an increase of $3.8 million, or 12.2% as compared to the previous year. We believe this non-GAAP measure is useful because it excludes a significant item that is considered to be nonoperational and of a non-cash nature, and which will change from period to period due to the impact of market fluctuations. The non-GAAP measure thereby facilitates our evaluation of current operating performance and comparisons to past operating performance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal liquidity requirements have been for working capital and capital expenditures. Our principal sources of liquidity are $2.6 million of cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2013, our cash flow from operations, and borrowings available under our credit facility. We expect to use this liquidity for general corporate purposes, including opening new stores, purchasing additional merchandise inventory and maintaining our existing stores.

On October 3, 2012, the Company and its operating subsidiary, The Tile Shop, LLC, entered into a credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement, as amended, provides the Company with a $120 million senior secured credit facility, comprised of a five-year $25 million term loan and a $95 million revolving line of credit. The Amended Credit Agreement is secured by virtually all of the assets of the Company, including but not limited to, inventory, receivables, equipment and real property. Borrowings pursuant to the Credit Agreement bear interest at either a base rate or a LIBOR-based rate, at the option of the Company. The LIBOR-based rate will range from LIBOR plus 1.75% to 2.25%, depending on The Tile Shop’s leverage ratio. The base rate is equal to the greatest of: (a) the Federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) the Bank of America “prime rate,” and (c) the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%, in each case plus 0.75% to 1.25% depending on The Tile Shop’s leverage ratio. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the base interest rate was 4.25%. At December 31, 2013 and 2012 the LIBOR-based interest rate was 2.408% and 2.615%, respectively. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had outstanding borrowings related to the revolving line of credit of $73.5 million and $47.6 million, respectively. The term loan requires quarterly principal payments of $0.9 million. The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, conditions to borrowings, and restrictive covenants, including restrictions on the Company’s and The Tile Shop’s ability to dispose of assets, make acquisitions, incur additional debt, incur liens, make investments, or enter into transactions with affiliates on other than on terms that could be obtained in an arm’s length transaction. The Credit Agreement also includes financial and other covenants including covenants to maintain certain fixed charge coverage ratios and rent adjusted leverage ratios. In addition, except with respect to pro rata payments made by The Tile Shop or other subsidiaries to the Company or any other equity owner of such entity, the Credit Agreement prohibits the payment of cash dividends. The Company was in compliance with the covenants during the year ended December 31, 2013, based on an amendment dated April 30, 2013 which excluded the impact of the repurchase of warrants and the repurchase of capital stock, up to the amount of cash proceeds received from warrant exercises, from the calculation of certain financial covenants and an amendment dated July 8, 2013 which excluded the liabilities related to the New Market Tax Credit transaction (see Note 13 to Part II, Item 8) from our leverage ratio.

We have used borrowings during the year ended December 31, 2013 pursuant to the credit agreement for general corporate purchases, working capital, building of new stores and distribution centers and manufacturing facilities, and improvements to existing stores, corporate headquarters and distribution centers. Additional borrowings pursuant to the credit facility may be used to support our growth and for working capital purposes.

We believe that our cash flow from operations, together with our existing cash and cash equivalents, and borrowings available under our credit facility will be sufficient to fund our operations and anticipated capital expenditures over at least the next 12 months.

In 2013, we made capital expenditures of approximately $52.9 million. The expenditures included cash paid for new stores, with an aggregate cost of approximately $31.1 million. Approximately $4.6 million was spent to renovate our existing in-store displays and $4.8 million to expand our distribution centers, $8.2 million to complete a new distribution and manufacturing facility and $3.7 million to expand corporate headquarters and expand our existing information technology infrastructure. The remainder of capital expenditures related to general corporate matters.

Our future capital requirements will vary based on the number of additional stores, distribution centers, and manufacturing facilities that we open and the number of stores that we choose to renovate. Our decisions regarding opening, relocating, or renovating stores, and whether to engage in strategic acquisitions, will be based in part on macroeconomic factors and the general state of the U.S. economy, as well as the local economies in the markets in which our stores are located. As of now, we intend to open 20 stores at an expected aggregate cost of approximately $28 million in 2014.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2013			2012			2011
	(in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	21,211		$	47,222		$	34,722
Net cash used in investing activities		(52,955	)		(29,064	)		(18,561	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		30,518			(21,454	)		(23,995	)

Operating Activities

Cash flows from operating activities were significantly influenced by net income, depreciation and amortization of property, plant and equipment, amortization of deferred rent, changes in warrant liability, deferred compensation payments and changes in working capital.

In 2013 net cash provided by operating activities was $21.2 million. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to our net income from operations, decreased accounts payable and other liability payments, and a decrease in our prepaid expenses. These items were partially offset by a $6.2 payment on deferred compensation , $7 million of estimated tax payments, and a $20.9 million in inventory purchases. The increase in inventory purchases related to the opening of a new distribution center during 2013, the opening of 20 new stores during 2013, and the anticipation of opening 20 new stores in 2014. Also, the increased inventory balances are in anticipation of the expected increase in our net sales in 2014.

In 2012, cash provided by operating activities was $47.2 million, driven primarily by our net loss of $46.9 million, which was reduced by non- cash charges of $98.3 million, including $82.1 million of change in fair value of warrants, $10.5 million of depreciation and amortization, $1.4 million of stock-based compensation, $3.0 million of deferred rent, and $3.9 million of deferred compensation costs, offset by a non-cash income tax benefit of $2.6 million. In addition, these cash inflows were decreased by an increase in working capital of $4.2 million, which included a $0.3 million increase in trade receivables, a $0.3 million increase in inventories, a $4.6 million increase in prepaid expenses, prepaid inventory and other current assets, a $1.1 million increase in accounts payable, and a $3.4 million decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities, and a $2.5 million increase in income tax receivable.

In 2011, cash provided by operating activities was $34.7 million, driven primarily by our net income of $31.4 million, which was reduced by non- cash charges of $12.8 million, including $8.7 million of depreciation and amortization, $2.5 million of deferred rent, $1.4 million of deferred compensation expense, and a $0.2 million loss on disposal of property, plant, and equipment. These cash inflows were offset by an increase in working capital of $9.4 million, which included a $0.2 million decrease in trade receivables, an $8.4 million increase in inventories, a $0.4 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets, a $1.8 million decrease in accounts payable, and a $1.0 million increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $53.0 million, $29.1 million and $18.6 million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities in each period included capital purchases of store fixtures, equipment, building improvements and leasehold improvements for stores opened or remodeled, new distribution and manufacturing facilities, and corporate headquarters expansion, internally developed software and routine capital purchases of computer hardware and software.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $30.5 million, ($21.5) million and ($24.0) million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Cash provided by financing in 2013 was primarily from the proceeds of exercises of warrants, net advances on our credit facility, and cash provided by the NMTC transaction (Note 13). Cash used by financing was primarily for repurchase of common stock and warrants and principal payments on long-term debt. Net cash used in financing activities in 2012 and 2011 included capital purchases of store fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements for stores opened or remodeled, and routine capital purchases of computer hardware and software.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we did not have any “off-balance sheet arrangements” (as such term is defined in Item 303 of Regulation S-K) that could have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, net sales or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Contractual Arrangements

The following table summarizes certain of our contractual obligations at December 31, 2013 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods:

	Payment Due by Period
	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		4-5 Years		5+ Years
Long-term debt including principal and interest⁽¹⁾	$	106,719	$	5,884	$	11,777	$	88,443	$	615
Operating lease obligations ⁽²⁾		398,392		20,669		42,303		43,355		292,065
Capital lease obligations ⁽³⁾		2,270		472		635		426		737
Total contractual obligations	$	507,381	$	27,025	$	54,715	$	132,224	$	293,417

(1)	Includes total interest of $11.5 million, comprised of $2.3 million of interest for the period of less than 1 year, $4.6 million of interest for the period of 1 – 3 years, $4.6 million of interest for the period of 4 – 5 years, and $0 million of interest for the period of 5+ years.

(2)	Includes the base or current renewal period for our operating leases, which contain varying renewal provisions.

(3)	Includes total interest of $0.8 million, comprised of $0.2 million of interest for the period of less than 1 year, $0.3 million of interest for the period of 1 – 3 years, $0.2 million of interest for the period of 4 – 5 years, and $0.2 million of interest for the period of 5+ years.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of our financial statements and related disclosures requires us to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses, and related disclosures. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, but all such estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions, and it is possible that other professionals, applying their own judgment to the same facts and circumstances, could develop and support alternative estimates and assumptions that would result in material changes to our operating results and financial condition. Our most critical accounting policies are summarized below. For further information on our critical and other significant accounting policies, see the notes to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this 10-K.

Recognition of Revenue

We recognize sales at the time that the customer takes possession of the merchandise. We recognize service revenue, which consists primarily of freight charges for home delivery, when the service has been rendered. We are required to charge and collect sales and other taxes on sales to our customers and remit these taxes back to government authorities. Sales and other taxes are recorded net in the consolidated balance sheets but excluded from the consolidated statements of income. Net sales are reduced by an allowance for anticipated sales returns that we estimate based on historical sales trends and experience. Any reasonably likely changes that may occur in the assumptions underlying our allowance estimates would not be expected to have a material impact on our financial condition or operating performance.

Our revenue recognition accounting methodology contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future sales returns and exchanges and the associated costs. The customer may receive a refund or exchange the original product for a replacement of equal or similar quality for an indefinite period of time after the original purchase. Products received back under this policy are reconditioned pursuant to state laws and resold.

Stock-based Compensation

We have granted equity-linked incentives to certain of our employees. We account for equity-linked incentives in accordance with ASC 718 “Stock Compensation”. ASC 718 addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for equity instruments of the enterprise or liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments.

We have granted cash-settled and equity-settled awards. Prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, the cash-settled awards were classified as liabilities as required under ASC 718. At each reporting date, the liability was measured at intrinsic value with resulting changes recognized in our consolidated statements of income.

As of the consummation of Business Combination, we have only equity-settled awards. We measure compensation cost for equity-settled awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognize compensation cost in our consolidated statements of income over the service or performance period through which the award is expected to vest. We determine compensation cost by using option pricing models.

Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation, which is amortized over the useful life of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or lease period (including expected renewal periods). Property, plant, and equipment are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Our investment in store leasehold improvements, including fixtures and equipment, is the most significant component of property, plant, and equipment.

When evaluating property, plant, and equipment for potential impairment, if certain impairment indicators exist, we first compare the carrying value of the asset’s undiscounted estimated future cash flows. If the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, we calculate an impairment loss. The impairment loss calculation compares the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated fair value, which is based on estimated future discounted cash flows. We recognize impairment if the amount of the asset’s carrying value exceeds the asset’s estimated fair value. Based upon the impairment review, there were no impairment losses reported in the financial statements.

We have not made any material changes in the policy that we use to assess impairment losses.

We have not incurred any material impairment losses in the past and do not believe that a reasonable likelihood exists that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate property, plant, and equipment asset impairment losses. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values, we may be exposed to losses that could be material.

Income taxes

As a result of the Business Combination, beginning August 21, 2012, our results of operations are taxed as a C Corporation. Prior to the Business Combination, The Tile Shop’s operations were taxed as a limited liability company, whereby The Tile Shop elected to be taxed as a partnership and the income or loss was required to be reported by each respective member on their separate income tax returns. Therefore, no provision for federal income taxes has been provided in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for periods prior to August 21, 2012. The provision recorded prior to August 21, 2012, represents income taxes primarily payable by the LLC, due to minimum fees in several states and income tax in the state of Michigan.

Since August 21, 2012, we have recognized deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. We estimate the degree to which tax assets and credit carryforwards will result in a benefit based on expected profitability by tax jurisdiction. A valuation allowance for such tax assets and loss carryforwards is provided when it is determined to be more likely than not that the benefit of such deferred tax asset will not be realized in future periods. If it becomes more likely than not that a tax asset will be used, the related valuation allowance on such assets would be reduced.

New Accounting Pronouncements

There have been no new accounting pronouncements that we would expect to have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business. These risks include primarily inflation, interest rate risk, and credit concentration risk.

Inflation

Inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our products and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results. Although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date, a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk through the investment of our cash and cash equivalents and in connection with borrowings under our $120 million credit facility. Borrowings under our revolving credit facility bear interest at either a base rate or a LIBOR-based rate, at our option. The LIBOR-based rate ranges from LIBOR plus 1.75% to 2.25%, depending on The Tile Shop’s leverage ratio. The base rate will be equal to the greatest of: (a) the Federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) the Bank of America “prime rate,” and (c) the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%, in each case plus 0.75% to 1.25% depending on The Tile Shop’s leverage ratio. The base rate was 4.25% at December 31, 2013. Based upon balances and interest rates as of December 31, 2013, holding other variables constant, a one percentage point increase in interest rates for the next 12-month period would decrease pre-tax earnings and cash flow by approximately $1.0 million. Conversely, a one percentage point decrease in interest rates for the next 12-month period would result in an increase to pre-tax earnings and cash flow of approximately $1.0 million. We invest in short-term investments with maturities of three months or less. Changes in interest rates affect the interest income that we earn in connection with these investments, and therefore impact our cash flows and results of operations.

We currently do not engage in any significant interest rate hedging activity. However, we may do so in the future to mitigate market risk rate. We do not, and do not intend to, engage in the practice of trading derivative securities for profit.

Credit Concentration Risk

Financial instruments, which may subject us to concentration of credit risk, consist principally of cash deposits. We maintain cash balances at financial institutions with strong credit ratings. However, the amounts invested with financial institutions are generally in excess of FDIC insurance limits.

ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The consolidated financial statements of the Company and the reports of the independent registered public accounting firms, listed under Item 15 “Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules”, are included as a separate section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K beginning on page 34 and are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that the material weaknesses identified by our auditors in connection with their audit of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 were effectively remediated as of December 31, 2013 and that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2013.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of an issuer’s assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that an issuer’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of its management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of an issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. An internal control material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibilities that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, the application of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

As disclosed in our Form 10Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012, in connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, management identified that previously issued financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, contained a misstatement relating to the Company’s accounting for its outstanding common stock purchase warrants. As a result of this restatement, a material weakness was identified in our internal controls related to the Company’s identification and analysis of the complex accounting and financial reporting attributes associated with certain non-routine transactions such as our common stock purchase warrant agreements, including not utilizing qualified external experts to supplement internal resources. We implemented additional procedures to remediate this material weakness, including (1) developing common processes for identifying non-routine events and transactions that may require the involvement of subject matter experts, (2) developing a common methodology for assessing the accounting, disclosure and reporting implications surrounding non-routine transactions, (3) increasing our critical analysis of the guidance and recommendations provided by subject matter experts and (4) developing an appropriate concluding framework that enables management to consider all relevant input in arriving at a conclusion.

As required by Rule 13a-15(c) promulgated under the Exchange Act, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. Management’s assessment was based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (1992 Framework) (“COSO”). Based on Management’s assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2013, the material weakness identified above was remediated as of December 31, 2013 and our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Ernst & Young, LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has issued a report on our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. See “Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Except as discussed below, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Remediation of the 2012 Material Weakness

We implemented additional procedures to remediate the 2012 material weakness described above. Those additional procedures included (1) developing a common process for identifying non-routine events and transactions that may require the involvement of subject matter experts, (2) developing a common methodology for assessing the accounting, disclosure and reporting implications surrounding non-routine transactions, (3) increasing our critical analysis of the guidance and recommendations provided by subject matter experts and (4) developing an appropriate concluding framework that enables management to consider all relevant input in arriving at a conclusion. Management believes the efforts effectively remediated the material weakness as of December 31, 2013.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, intends that our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. However, our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Executive Officers

The following table provides information about our executive officers, including their ages, as of the date of this Form 10-K.

Name	Age	Position
Robert A. Rucker	61	Chief Executive Officer and President; Director
Chris Homeister	45	Chief Operating Officer
Timothy C. Clayton	59	Chief Financial Officer; Senior Vice President
Joseph Kinder	48	Senior Vice President – Operations
Carl Randazzo	49	Senior Vice President – Retail
Leigh M. Behrman	60	Vice President – Human Resources and Compliance

Robert A. Rucker has been our Chief Executive Officer and president, and a member of our Board since June 2012. Previously, Mr. Rucker served as The Tile Shop’s Chief Executive Officer and president, and as a member of its board of managers. Mr. Rucker holds a B.E.S. in Psychology and History from the University of Minnesota. We believe that Mr. Rucker is qualified to serve on our Board based on his historic knowledge of The Tile Shop as its founder and his strategic vision for our Company.

Chris Homeister has been our Chief Operating Officer since October 2013. From May 2012 through September 2013, Mr. Homeister was chief executive officer and founder of Homeister Ventures LLC, a provider of consulting services for private equity, venture capital, retail, and consumer electronics firms. Prior thereto, from June 2009 through April 2012, Mr. Homeister served as senior vice president and general manager of Best Buy Co., Inc.’s Entertainment Business Group, where he was responsible for all elements and the management of the business unit. From April 2005 to May 2009, he held various roles at Best Buy, including senior vice president of Digital Merchandising and Strategic Planning; vice president of Merchandising, Mobile Electronics and Computing; and senior director of Business Team Finance. Prior to Best Buy, Mr. Homeister held management positions at Gateway, Inc. and Amoco Oil Company. Mr. Homeister earned an M.B.A. from the University of Notre Dame and a B.B.A. in finance from the University of Iowa.

Timothy C. Clayton has been our Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President since August 2012. From June 2012 to August 2012 Mr. Clayton served as a financial consultant to The Tile Shop. From June 2010 through August 2012 Mr. Clayton served as the chief financial officer of Sajan, Inc., a publicly-traded provider of language translation services and software. Prior to June 2010, Mr. Clayton has been the principal of Emerging Capital, LLC, a management consulting firm he founded in 2000, and, in such capacity, has served as the chief financial officer of ADESA, Inc., an automotive services company, and of numerous other public and private companies. From November 1997 to June 2000, Mr. Clayton was the executive vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer of Building One Services Corporation, a publicly-traded facilities services company, of which he was also a co-founder. From August 1976 until November 1997, Mr. Clayton served in various capacities at Price Waterhouse, LLP, an independent public accounting firm, including serving as an audit and business advisory services partner from July 1988 to November 1997. From January 2005 until March 2013, Mr. Clayton served as a director and chairman of the audit committee of Agribank, FSB, a wholesale bank serving the rural agricultural market. Mr. Clayton holds a B.A. in accounting from Michigan State University and is a certified public accountant.

Joseph Kinder has been our Senior Vice President — Operations since June 2012. Previously, Mr. Kinder served as The Tile Shop’s supply chain manager from August 1995 until June 2012, as an assistant store manager for The Tile Shop from March 1994 to August 1995, and as a sales person at The Tile Shop from March 1993 to March 1994. Mr. Kinder holds a B.A. in Business from the College of Saint Thomas.

Carl Randazzo has been our Senior Vice President — Retail since June 2012. Previously, Mr. Randazzo served as The Tile Shop’s national sales manager from October 2006 until June 2012, as a regional sales manager for The Tile Shop from June 2004 to October 2006, as a store manager for The Tile Shop from April 1994 to June 2004, and as a sales person at The Tile Shop from October 1992 to April 1994. Mr. Randazzo holds a B.S. in Economics from Arizona State University.

Leigh M. Behrman has been our Vice President — Human Resources and Compliance since June 2012. Previously, Mr. Behrman served as The Tile Shop’s human resources manager from October 2007 until June 2012, as The Tile Shop’s facility manager from June 1999 to October 2007, and as The Tile Shop’s corporate controller from January 1988 to June 1999.

Non-Management Directors

The following table provides information about our non-management directors, including their ages, as of the date of this Form 10-K.

Name	Age	Position
Class I Directors:
Peter J. Jacullo III⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	59	Director
Adam L. Suttin⁽¹⁾	46	Director
Class II Directors:
Peter H. Kamin⁽¹⁾⁽³⁾	51	Director
Todd Krasnow⁽²⁾⁽³⁾	56	Director
Class III Directors:
Robert A. Rucker	61	Chief Executive Officer and President; Director
William E. Watts⁽²⁾	61	Director; Chairman of the Board

(1) Member of the Audit Committee.

(2) Member of the Compensation Committee.

(3) Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Peter J. Jacullo III has served as a member of our Board since August 2012. Previously, Mr. Jacullo served as a member of The Tile Shop’s board of managers from December 2007 to August 2012. Since July 1987, Mr. Jacullo has been a self-employed investor and consultant, and he currently serves on the board of directors of various privately-held companies. Previously, Mr. Jacullo was a vice president and director of the Boston Consulting Group from May 1984 to July 1987, where he was also employed in various other capacities from May 1978 to May 1984. He is currently a director of ANZ Terminals Pty Limited, an Australian-based independent operator of bulk liquid and gas storage facilities with facilities located in Australia and New Zealand, and of Magnatech International Inc., a provider of equipment for the hydraulic hose industry. Mr. Jacullo holds an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago and a B.A. in Economics from Johns Hopkins University. We believe that Mr. Jacullo is qualified to serve on our Board in light of the continuity that he provides on our Board and his experience as a professional investor.

Adam L. Suttin has served as a member of our Board since August 2012. Previously, Mr. Suttin served as president of JWC Acquisition Corp. Mr. Suttin co-founded J.W. Childs Associates, L.P., a private equity investment firm, in 1995 and is a partner of that firm. From 1989 to 1995, Mr. Suttin was an investment professional at Thomas H. Lee Company. He is currently a member of the board of directors of Brookstone, Inc., Sunny Delight Beverages Co., Esselte Ltd., Mattress Firm Holdings, Inc., and The NutraSweet Company. Mr. Suttin holds a B.S. in Economics from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a B.A.S. in Engineering from the Moore School of Engineering of the University of Pennsylvania. We believe that Mr. Suttin is qualified to serve on our Board in light of his experience as a co-founder of J.W. Childs and his experience as a director of various companies.

Peter H. Kamin has served as a member of our Board since August 2012. Previously, Mr. Kamin served as a member of The Tile Shop’s board of managers from January 2012 to August 2012. Mr. Kamin has served as managing partner of 3K Limited Partnership, an investment fund, since January 2012. Previously, Mr. Kamin was the founding partner of ValueAct Capital, an investment fund, from January 2000 to January 2012. Since June 2012, Mr. Kamin has been a director and member of the audit committee of Ambassadors Group, Inc., a publicly-traded educational travel company; since May 2012, Mr. Kamin has been a director and member of the governance committee of MAM Software Group, Inc., a publicly-traded provider of business automation and ecommerce solutions for the automotive aftermarket; and since April 2012, Mr. Kamin has been a director and member of the audit committee of Rand Worldwide, Inc., a provider of technology solutions and professional services to engineering and design companies. Mr. Kamin previously served on the board of directors and as a member of the audit committee of Adesa, Inc., a publicly-traded provider of vehicle auction and remarketing services, from April 2007 to December 2011; on the board of directors and as a member of the audit and compensation committees of Seitel, Inc., a publicly-traded provider of onshore seismic data to the oil and gas industry, from February 2007 to December 2011; and on the board of directors and as a member of the governance committee of Exterran Holdings, Inc., a provider of natural gas compression products and services, from January 2007 to September 2008. Mr. Kamin holds an M.B.A. from the Harvard University Graduate School of Business and a B.A. in Economics from Tufts University. We believe that Mr. Kamin is qualified to serve on our Board due to his significant experience as a director of publicly-traded companies and his substantial experience as an investor.

Todd Krasnow has served as a member of our Board since August 2012. Previously, Mr. Krasnow served as a member of The Tile Shop’s board of managers from January 2012 to August 2012. Mr. Krasnow has served as the president of Cobbs Capital, Inc., a private consulting company, since January 2005, and as marketing domain expert with Highland Consumer Fund, a venture capital firm, since June 2007. Previously, Mr. Krasnow was the chairman of Zoots, Inc., a dry cleaning company, from June 2003 to January 2008, and chief executive officer of Zoots, Inc. from February 1998 to June 2003. He served as the executive vice president of sales and marketing of Staples, Inc. from May 1993 to January 1998 and in other sales and marketing positions for Staples, Inc. from March 1986 to May 1993. Since September 2005, Mr. Krasnow has served as a director of Carbonite, Inc., a publicly-traded provider of online backup solutions for consumers and small and medium sized businesses; since December 2005, Mr. Krasnow has served as chairman of Carbonite’s compensation committee; and since September 2009, he has served as a member of Carbonite’s audit committee. Mr. Krasnow is also a director of OnForce, Inc., an online marketplace that enables enterprises to hire information technology service professionals; and a member of the advisory boards of C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc. and of Kids II, a manufacturer of baby and toddler products. Mr. Krasnow previously served as a director of Piedmont, Ltd., a Japanese storage company, which conducts business as Quraz which was sold in September 2013, and of Global Customer Commerce, Inc., an internet retailer of blinds and wall coverings which was sold in January 2014. Mr. Krasnow holds an M.B.A. from the Harvard University Graduate School of Business and an A.B. in Chemistry from Cornell University. We believe that Mr. Krasnow is qualified to serve on our Board due to his operating and management experience and his expertise in sales and marketing.

William E. Watts has served as a member of our Board since August 2012. Previously, Mr. Watts served as vice president of JWC Acquisition Corp. Mr. Watts has been a partner of J. W. Childs Associates, L.P., a private equity investment firm, since June 2001. From 1991 to 2001, he was president and chief executive officer of General Nutrition Companies. Prior to being named president and chief executive officer, Mr. Watts held the positions of president and chief operating officer of General Nutrition, president and chief operating officer of General Nutrition Center, and senior vice president of retailing and vice president of retail operations of General Nutrition Center. Mr. Watts currently serves as non-executive chairman of the board of directors of Mattress Firm Holdings, Inc. and as non-executive chairman of the board of directors of JA Apparel Corp. (Joseph Abboud), and director of Brookstone, Inc. Mr. Watts holds a B.A. in Social Science from the State University of New York at Buffalo. We believe that Mr. Watts is qualified to serve on our Board in light of his experience as a director of various companies and his experience as chief executive officer of a company with a well-known brand.

In accordance with our certificate of incorporation, our Board is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election and qualification until the third annual meeting following election. Except as otherwise provided by law and subject to the rights of any class or series of preferred stock, vacancies on our board of directors (including a vacancy created by an increase in the size of the board of directors) may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors. A director elected by the board of directors to fill a vacancy (other than a vacancy created by an increase in the size of the board of directors) serves for the unexpired term of such director’s predecessor in office and until such director’s successor is elected and qualified. A director appointed to fill a position resulting from an increase in the size of the board of directors serves until the next annual meeting of stockholders at which the class of directors to which such director is assigned by the board of directors is to be elected by stockholders and until such director’s successor is elected and qualified. Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of the directors.

Our directors are divided among the three classes as follows:

•

The Class I directors are Messrs. Jacullo and Suttin, with terms expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2016;

•

The Class II directors are Messrs. Kamin and Krasnow, with terms expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2014; and

•

The Class III directors are Messrs. Rucker and Watts, with terms expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2015.

Our Board met ten times between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. Each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and of any committee of the Board on which such director served that was held between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013.

INVOLVEMENT IN CERTAIN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In October 2011, Mr. Joseph Kinder, our senior vice president – operations, was involved in a domestic dispute (misdemeanor charge stayed) and a verbal altercation with police officers (pled guilty to a gross misdemeanor).

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

To the Company’s knowledge, based on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company, the officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, except that one sale transaction by Nabron International, Inc. was not reported on a timely-filed Form 4, but such transaction was subsequently reported on a timely-filed Form 5.

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all officers, directors and employees. We intend to maintain the highest standards of ethical business practices and compliance with all laws and regulations applicable to our business. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the “Investor Relations” section of our website, at http://investors.tileshop.com, under the “Governance” heading. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct by posting such information on our website at the web address and location specified above.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors has established the following committees: an audit committee, a compensation committee, and a nominating and corporate governance committee. The composition and responsibilities of each committee are described below. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our Board.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee oversees our corporate accounting and financial reporting process, the audit of our financial statements, and our internal control processes. Among other matters, the Audit Committee evaluates our independent auditors’ qualifications, independence, and performance; determines the engagement, retention, and compensation of the independent auditors; reviews and approves the scope of the annual audit and the audit fee; discusses with management and the independent auditors the results of the annual audit and the review of our quarterly financial statements, including the disclosures in our annual and quarterly reports to be filed with the SEC; approves the retention of the independent auditors to perform any proposed permissible non-audit services; reviews our risk assessment and risk management processes; establishes procedures for receiving, retaining, and investigating complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or audit matters; monitors the rotation of partners of the independent auditors on our engagement team as required by law; reviews our critical accounting policies and estimates; and oversees any internal audit function. Additionally, the Audit Committee reviews and approves related person transactions and reviews and evaluates, on an annual basis, the Audit Committee charter and the committee’s performance. Our independent registered public accounting firm and management each periodically meet privately with our Audit Committee.

The current members of our Audit Committee are Messrs. Jacullo, Kamin, and Suttin, with Mr. Kamin serving as the chair of the committee. All members of our Audit Committee meet the requirements for financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq. Our Board has determined that Mr. Kamin is an audit committee financial expert as defined under the applicable rules of the SEC and has the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of Nasdaq. A description of Mr. Kamin’s experience is set forth above under “Non-Management Directors.” Messrs. Jacullo, Kamin, and Suttin are independent directors as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC, Nasdaq and Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and Nasdaq, and which is available at our website, www.tileshop.com, in the “Info – Legal/Investors– Investor Relations” section, under “Governance – Governance Documents.” The Audit Committee met thirteen times between December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee reviews and recommends policies relating to compensation and benefits of our executive officers and employees. The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation of our chief executive officer and other executive officers, evaluates the performance of these officers in light of those goals and objectives, and sets the compensation of these officers based on such evaluations. The Compensation Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to director compensation and administers the issuance of stock options and other awards under our equity compensation plans. The Compensation Committee reviews and prepares the necessary compensation disclosures required by the SEC. Additionally, the Compensation Committee reviews and evaluates, on an annual basis, the Compensation Committee charter and the Committee’s performance.

The current members of our Compensation Committee are Messrs. Jacullo, Krasnow, and Watts, with Mr. Krasnow serving as the chair of the Committee. All of the members of our Compensation Committee are independent under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC, Nasdaq, and Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the SEC and Nasdaq, and which is available at our website, www.tileshop.com, in the “Info – Legal/Investors– Investor Relations” section, under “Governance – Governance Documents.” The Compensation Committee met four times between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for making recommendations regarding corporate governance; identification, evaluation and nomination of candidates for directorships; and the structure and composition of our Board and committees thereof. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees our corporate governance guidelines, approves our committee charters, oversee compliance with our code of business conduct and ethics, contributes to succession planning, reviews actual and potential conflicts of interest of our directors and officers other than related person transactions reviewed by the Audit Committee, and oversees the Board of Director self-evaluation process. Additionally, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and evaluates, on an annual basis, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter and the Committee’s performance.

The current members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Kamin and Krasnow, with Mr. Krasnow serving as the chair of the Committee. All of the members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent under the applicable rules and regulations of Nasdaq. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter, which is available at our website, www.tileshop.com, in the “Info – Legal/Investors– Investor Relations” section, under “Governance – Governance Documents.” The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met one time between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013.

DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION AND NOMINATION PROCESS

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the following criteria, among other criteria that it deems appropriate, in recommending candidates for service on the Board:

	•	Personal and professional integrity;
	•	Experience in corporate management, such as service as an officer of a publicly held company and a general understanding of marketing, finance and other elements relevant to the success of a publicly held company;
	•	Experience in the Company’s industry;
	•	Experience as a member of the board of directors of another publicly held company;
	•	Academic expertise in the area of the Company’s operations;
	•	Practical and mature business judgment, including the ability to make independent analytical inquires; and
	•	The manner in which a candidate’s appointment to the Board would impact the overall composition of the Board with regard to diversity of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skill, race, gender and national origin.

In assessing director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers diversity, age, skills, and such other factors as it deems appropriate given the current needs of the Board of Directors and the Company, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capability. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal diversity policy and does not follow any ratio or formula with respect to diversity in order to determine the appropriate composition of the Board. In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews these directors’ overall service to the Company during their terms, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance, and any other relationships and transactions that might impair the directors’ independence. In the case of new director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also determines whether the nominee is independent for Nasdaq purposes, which determination is based upon applicable Nasdaq listing standards, applicable SEC rules and regulations and the advice of counsel, if necessary. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts any appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates after considering the function and needs of the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets to discuss and consider the candidates’ qualifications and then selects a nominee by majority vote.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not intend to alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates, including the minimum criteria set forth above, based on whether or not the candidate was recommended by a stockholder. To nominate a director for the fiscal 2015 Annual Meeting, stockholders must submit such nomination in writing to our Secretary at 14000 Carlson Parkway, Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 not later than the close of business on April 23, 2015, nor earlier than the close of business on March 24, 2015. You are advised to review the Company’s Bylaws for requirements relating to director nominees.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2015 ANNUAL MEETING

In order to be considered for inclusion in this year’s proxy statement, stockholder proposals must be submitted in writing to the Company no later February 12, 2014. The Company suggests that proposals for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested. The proposal must be in accordance with the provision of Rule 14a-8 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Stockholders who intend to present a proposal or director nomination at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders without including such proposal or nomination in the Company’s proxy statement must, pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws, deliver to the Company notice of such proposal no earlier than March 24, 2015 and no later than April 23, 2015. The Company reserves the right to reject, rule out of order, or take appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This section discusses our policies and decisions with respect to the compensation of our executive officers and employees who are named in the “2013 Summary Compensation Table” and the most important factors relevant to an analysis of these policies and decisions. We expect that our executive compensation philosophy as a publicly traded company will differ from our historical compensation philosophy as a result on our Compensation Committee’s continued review and evaluation of our compensation philosophy and structure. The “named executive officers,” to whom this discussion applies are:

	•	Robert A. Rucker, chief executive officer;
	•	Chris Homeister, chief operating officer;
	•	Timothy Clayton, chief financial officer;
	•	Joseph Kinder, senior vice president – operations; and
	•	Carl Randazzo, senior vice president – retail.

All of our named executive officers served as executive officers during the entire 2013 fiscal year, with the exception of Chris Homeister, who joined the Company in October 2013.

Overview

We recognize that our ability to excel depends on the integrity, knowledge, imagination, skill, diversity, and teamwork of our employees. To this end, we strive to create an environment of mutual respect, encouragement, and teamwork that rewards commitment and performance and that is responsive to the needs of our employees. The principles and objectives of our compensation and benefits programs for our employees generally, and for our named executive officers specifically, are to:

	•	align compensation incentives with our corporate strategies, business, and financial objectives and the long-term interests of our stockholders;
	•	motivate, reward and retain executives whose knowledge, skills, and performance ensure our continued success; and
	•	ensure that total compensation is fair, reasonable, and competitive.

Prior to completion of the Business Combination in August 2012, the compensation for our named executive officers has consisted of (i) base salary, (ii) performance bonus, (iii) phantom equity units, (iii) perquisites and health and welfare benefits, and (v) 401(k) plan retirement savings opportunities. Effective immediately prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, we terminated our Deferred Compensation Plan, pursuant to which we previously granted phantom equity units. We made a lump-sum cash payment to each former holder of phantom equity units, including certain of our named executive officers, on August 20, 2013, in full satisfaction of all phantom equity units previously held by such individuals.

Effective upon consummation of the Business Combination, we adopted an equity award plan, and made grants to certain of our named executive officers thereunder. For a further description of the plan, see “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Program Components — 2012 Omnibus Award Plan” beginning on page 26 of this Form 10-K.

Each of the primary elements of our executive compensation program are discussed in more detail below. While we have identified particular compensation objectives that each element of executive compensation serves, our compensation programs are designed to be flexible and complementary and to collectively serve all of the executive compensation objectives described above. Accordingly, whether or not specifically mentioned below, we believe that each individual element, to some extent, serves each of our objectives. Further, while each of our executive officers has not been, and may not be, compensated with all individual compensation elements, we believe that the compensation provided to each individual executive officer is, and will be, consistent with the overall compensation philosophy and objectives set forth above.

Compensation Determination Process

We review executive compensation annually, including evaluating our philosophy and compensation programs as circumstances require. As part of this review process, we expect to apply the values and the objectives outlined above, together with consideration for the levels of compensation that we would be willing to pay to ensure that our compensation remains competitive and that it is meeting our retention objectives in light of the cost to us if we were required to replace a key employee. In addition, we consider the results of non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation, commonly referred to as “say-on-pay” votes. At our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, we held a say-on-pay vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as described in the proxy statement for that meeting. Stockholders approved the compensation of the named executive officers by a favorable vote of approximately 99% of votes cast, including abstentions. We are mindful of the opinions of our stockholders and considered these results when deciding to retain our general compensation philosophy and core objectives for the upcoming fiscal year.

Historically, The Tile Shop’s board of managers did not review anonymous private company compensation surveys in setting the compensation of our named executive officers. In the future, we anticipate that our Compensation Committee will determine executive compensation, at least in part, by reference to the compensation information for the executives of a peer group of comparable companies, although no such peer group has yet been determined. Additionally, our Compensation Committee may consider engaging a compensation consultant in future years to provide market data on a peer group of companies in our industry. We believe that such information, together with other information obtained by the members of our Compensation Committee would help ensure that our compensation program remains competitive. We anticipate that our Compensation Committee may make adjustments in executive compensation levels in the future as a result of this more formal market comparison process.

The compensation levels of our named executive officers reflect, to a significant degree, the varying roles and responsibilities of such executives. As a result of the assessment by our Board of Robert Rucker’s roles and responsibilities, there is and has been a significant compensation differential between his compensation levels and those of our other named executive officers.

Executive Compensation Program Components

Base Salary. Base salaries of our named executive officers are initially established through arm’s-length negotiation at the time an executive is hired, taking into account such executive’s qualifications, experience, and prior salary. Base salaries of our named executive officers are approved and reviewed periodically by our Chief Executive Officer, and in the case of our Chief Executive Officer’s base salary, by our Board, and adjustments to base salaries are based on the scope of an executive’s responsibilities, individual contribution, prior experience, and sustained performance. Decisions regarding salary increases may take into account the executive officer’s current salary, equity or equity-linked interests, and the amounts paid to an executive officer’s peers within our Company. In making decisions regarding salary increases, we may also draw upon the experience of members of our Board of Directors with other companies. Base salaries are also reviewed in the case of promotions or other significant changes in responsibility. No formulaic base salary increases are provided to our named executive officers. This strategy is consistent with our intent of offering base salaries that are cost-effective while remaining competitive.

In anticipation of the consummation of the Business Combination in August 2012, we entered into offer letter agreements with each of Messrs. Rucker, Clayton, Kinder and Randazzo, which provide for annual base salaries of $303,991, $200,000, $200,000, and $200,000, respectively. Pursuant to the terms of his offer letter, Mr. Rucker’s base salary increased to $500,000 effective January 1, 2013. We entered into an offer letter agreement in connection with hiring Mr. Homeister in October 2013, which provides for an annual base salary of $300,000. For a further description of these offer letter agreements, see “Executive Compensation — Offer Letter Agreements” beginning on page 40 of this 10-K.

The actual base salaries earned by all of our named executive officers in 2013, 2012 and 2011 are set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table.” In February 2014, the Compensation Committee approved increases to the base salaries of Messrs. Clayton, Kinder and Randazzo, to $208,000 each, on an annualized basis.

2012 Omnibus Award Plan. In June 2012, our Board and stockholders adopted an equity award plan, which became effective upon the consummation of the Business Combination. The principal purpose of the equity award plan is to attract, retain, and motivate selected employees, consultants, and directors. As initially adopted, the equity award plan provided for stock-based compensation awards. In February 2013, the Compensation Committee and the Board amended the equity award plan to authorize grants of performance-based awards. At the same time, the plan was renamed the 2012 Omnibus Award Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”). The Compensation Committee of our Board administers the Omnibus Plan, subject to the right of our Board to assume authority for administration or delegate such authority to another committee of the Board. Awards under the Omnibus Plan may be granted to individuals who are then our officers, employees, directors, or consultants or are the officers, employees, directors, or consultants of our subsidiaries.

Under the Omnibus Plan, 2,500,000 shares of our common stock were initially reserved for issuance pursuant to a variety of stock-based compensation awards, including stock options and restricted stock awards. As initially adopted, the number of shares initially reserved for issuance or transfer pursuant to awards under the Omnibus Plan would increase on the first day of each calendar year beginning in 2013 and ending in 2022, in an amount equal to the least of (A) 2,500,000 shares, (B) six percent (6%) of the shares of common stock outstanding (on an as-converted basis) on the last day of the immediately preceding calendar year, and (C) such smaller number of shares of common stock as determined by our Board. In February 2013, the Compensation Committee and the Board acknowledged that 2,500,000 shares of common stock were added to the Omnibus Plan reserve effective January 1, 2013 in accordance with the automatic share increase provision, and amended the Omnibus Plan to eliminate the automatic share increase for subsequent years.

In the event of a change of control, as such term is defined in the Omnibus Plan, the administrator may, in its sole discretion, accelerate vesting of awards issued under the Omnibus Plan such that 100% of any such award may become vested and exercisable. Additionally, the administrator has complete discretion to structure one or more awards under the Omnibus Plan to provide that such awards will become vested and exercisable on an accelerated basis. The administrator may also make appropriate adjustments to awards under the Omnibus Plan and is authorized to provide for the acceleration, termination, assumption, substitution, or conversion of such awards in the event of a change of control or certain other unusual or nonrecurring events or transactions.

The types of awards we intend to grant under the Omnibus Plan are as follows:

Cash Performance Awards. Historically, annual cash bonuses have been awarded to our named executive officers when The Tile Shop’s board of managers or our Chief Executive Officer determined that such bonuses were merited in light of corporate performance.

During 2011 and 2012, Mr. Rucker was awarded an annual cash bonus in an amount sufficient to provide him with total actual after-tax bonus compensation equal to 3% of our net income, inclusive of the bonus compensation and associated tax adjustment payable to him, for the corresponding period. Our other named executive officers were historically awarded annual cash bonuses in an amount determined by our Chief Executive Officer and approved by our Board or The Tile Shop’s board of managers, as applicable, reflecting (i) our annual operating performance, (ii) our year-over-year operating growth, (iii) attainment of individual and corporate goals, and (iv) other discretionary factors deemed relevant.

In February 2013, the Board and the Compensation Committee of the Board adopted specific performance targets and payout levels for each executive officer for fiscal year 2013. Mr. Rucker is eligible to earn target cash incentive compensation equal to 100% of his base salary and each of Messrs. Clayton, Kinder, and Randazzo is eligible to earn target cash incentive compensation equal to 50% of their base salary, based on our Adjusted EBITDA for the year. The target incentive compensation is payable if we achieve the Adjusted EBITDA target set forth in our budget. Each of Messrs. Rucker, Clayton, Kinder, and Randazzo is entitled to receive a partial incentive payment if we achieve at least 85% of our budgeted Adjusted EBITDA, and an incentive of up to double the target incentive amount if we achieve 115% of our budgeted Adjusted EBITDA and attain targeted sales goals. Similarly, pursuant to his Offer Letter Agreement, Mr. Homeister is eligible to earn target cash incentive compensation equal to 50% of his base salary based on our earnings for the applicable year, which may be measured in the discretion of the Compensation Committee based on one or more of Earnings Per Share, Net Income or Adjusted EBITDA. Mr. Homeister is entitled to receive a partial incentive payment if we achieve at least 85% of our budgeted earnings, and an incentive of up to double the target incentive amount if we achieve 115% of our budgeted earnings. For the 2013 fiscal year, Mr. Homeister’s cash incentive arrangement was pro-rated for the partial year during which he was employed with the Company. The Compensation Committee reviews and certifies performance following the end of each fiscal year and may also consider discretionary factors when making awards. Accordingly, in 2014 the Compensation Committee approved incentive awards in the amount of $30,000 to each of Messrs. Homeister, Clayton, Kinder and Randazzo, partially based on the forgoing performance measures and partially based on discretion.

The actual cash bonuses earned by all of our named executive officers in 2013, 2012 and 2011 are set forth in the “2013 Summary Compensation Table.”

In February 2014, the Compensation Committee determined to continue the same cash incentive award structure and performance measures as used in 2013, adjusted to reflect performance targets that correspond to the fiscal 2014 budget.

Equity and Equity-Linked Incentives. Historically, in order to align the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders, we granted certain of our employees and each of our named executive officers, other than Mr. Rucker, phantom equity units pursuant our Deferred Compensation Plan that were payable in cash based on the appreciation in the value of The Tile Shop’s Common Units. Due to Mr. Rucker’s significant beneficial equity interest in The Tile Shop, The Tile Shop’s board of managers determined that it was not necessary or appropriate to grant Mr. Rucker any such phantom equity units. The phantom equity units granted to The Tile Shop’s other executives were fully-vested upon grant and payable to the holders thereof upon the earlier of (i) the tenth or fifteenth anniversary of the date of grant, as applicable, or (ii) immediately prior to a change of control of The Tile Shop. Upon the occurrence of either such event, the holder of each unit of phantom equity is entitled to receive, in respect of each such unit, a payment in cash equal to the change in the fair market value of The Tile Shop’s Common Units between the date of grant and (a) the last day of the fiscal year immediately preceding the tenth or fifteenth anniversary of the date of grant, as applicable, or (b) the date of the change of control, as applicable. At all times from January 1, 2009 until the termination of our Deferred Compensation Plan in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, Messrs. Kinder and Randazzo each held 300,000 phantom equity units of The Tile Shop. Effective immediately prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, we terminated our Deferred Compensation Plan. We made a lump-sum cash payment to each former holder of phantom equity units, including a $2,060,000 payment to each of Messrs. Kinder and Randazzo, on August 20, 2013, in full satisfaction of all phantom equity units previously held by such individuals.

Going forward, we intend to continue to use equity incentive awards pursuant to our Omnibus Plan to link the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders. The Omnibus Plan provides that the administrator may grant or issue stock options and restricted stock or any combination thereof. Stock options may be either nonqualified stock options or incentive stock options. We expect vesting of these equity incentive awards to be dependent in whole or in part on continued employment, in order to encourage the retention of our named executive officers through the vesting period of the awards. In some cases, vesting may also be partially based on the annual appreciation of our common stock. In determining the size of inducement and ongoing equity awards to our named executive officers, our Compensation Committee considers a number of internal factors, such as the relative job scope, the value of outstanding equity awards, individual performance history, prior contributions to us, and the size of prior awards, as well as external factors such as the levels of unvested equity awards held by our executive officers in relation to their peers at comparable companies. The Compensation Committee also intends to consider the foregoing factors for future awards.

In 2013, we granted 50,000 units of restricted common stock and 200,000 incentive stock options to Chris Homeister pursuant to the Omnibus Plan, both of which are subject to time-based vesting over a four-year period. The equity grants made to our named executive officers in 2013 are set forth in the “Grants of Plan Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2013” table and are discussed in the “Equity Grants” section of this item.

To date in 2014, we have granted options or issued an aggregate of 105,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to named executive officers under the Omnibus Plan. See the subsection below entitled “Equity Grants”. We do not have any securities ownership requirements for our named executive officers.

Retirement Savings. All of our full-time employees, including our named executive officers, are eligible to participate in The Tile Shop 401(k) Retirement Plan. Employees may elect to reduce their current compensation by up to the statutorily prescribed annual limit, which was $17,500 in 2013 (or $23,000 for employees over 50), and to have the amount of this reduction contributed to the 401(k) plan. In 2013, 2012 and 2011, we made a matching contribution of $0.25 for every $1.00 that each applicable employee contributed to the 401(k) plan, up to a maximum of 5% of such employee’s salary. Each year, this matching contribution vests as to 20% of the aggregate matching contributions for such employee, such that all previous and future matching contributions will be vested after the employee has been employed by us for a period of five years.

Perquisites. From time-to-time, we have provided certain of our named executive officers with perquisites that we believe are reasonable. We do not view perquisites as a significant element of our comprehensive compensation structure, but do believe they can be useful in attracting, motivating, and retaining executive talent. We believe that these additional benefits may assist our executive officers in performing their duties and provide time efficiencies for our executive officers in appropriate circumstances, and may consider providing additional perquisites in the future. There are no material perquisites to our named executive officers that are contractual obligations pursuant to written agreement. All future practices regarding perquisites will be approved and subject to periodic review by our Compensation Committee.

Tax Considerations. Our Board considers the potential effects of Section 162(m) of the Code on the compensation paid to our executive officers. Section 162(m) disallows a tax deduction for any publicly-held corporation for individual compensation exceeding $1.0 million in any taxable year for the Chief Executive Officer and each of the next three most highly compensated executive officers (other than the Chief Financial Officer, if any), unless the compensation is “performance based” or based on another available exemption. Prior to being a publicly-held corporation, The Tile Shop’s board of managers did not take the deductibility limit imposed by Section 162(m) into consideration in setting compensation. The restricted stock granted to Mr. Rucker in August 2012 was not “performance based,” and the restricted stock granted to Mr. Homeister in October, 2013 was not “performance based.” We expect that our Compensation Committee will, where reasonably practicable, seek to qualify the variable compensation paid to our executive officers for an exemption from the deductibility limitations of Section 162(m), including by awarding stock options that satisfy the “qualified performance-based compensation” exception by virtue of being approved by a qualifying compensation committee of two or more outside directors, being issued pursuant to an underlying plan that sets the maximum number of shares that can be granted to any person within a specified period and compensating recipients based solely on an increase in the stock price after the grant date (i.e., the exercise price or base price is greater than or equal to the fair market value of the stock subject to the award on the grant date). In approving the amount and form of compensation for our executive officers in the future, our Compensation Committee will consider all elements of the cost to us of providing such compensation, including the potential impact of Section 162(m). However, our Compensation Committee may, in its judgment, authorize compensation payments that do not comply with the exemptions in Section 162(m) when it believes that such payments are appropriate to attract and retain executive talent.

Taxation of “Parachute” Payments and Deferred Compensation. In 2011 and 2012, we provided Mr. Rucker, with a “gross-up” or reimbursement payment in the amount of $844,225 and $782,444, respectively,for tax liability relating to the cash incentives he earned in those years. We have not provided any named executive officer with any “gross-ups” relating to tax liability that he or she might owe as a result of the application of Sections 280G, 4999 or 409A of the Code, and we have not agreed, nor are otherwise obligated, to provide any executive officer with any “gross-up” or other reimbursement in the future. Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code provide that executive officers and directors who hold significant equity interests and certain other service providers may be subject to an excise tax if they receive payments or benefits in connection with a change of control that exceeds certain prescribed limits, and that we, or a successor, may forfeit a deduction on the amounts subject to this additional tax. Section 409A of the Code also imposes additional significant taxes on the individual in the event that an executive officer, director, or other service provider received “deferred compensation” that does not meet the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our proxy statement and in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:

Todd Krasnow, Chairman

Peter J. Jacullo III

William E. Watts

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information regarding the compensation earned during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 through December 31, 2013 by each of the Named Executive Officers for each year in which each was a Named Executive Officer:

Name and Principal Position	Fiscal Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)⁽¹⁾		Option Awards ($)⁽¹⁾		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		All Other Compensation ($)⁽²⁾		Total ($)
Robert A. Rucker	2013			500,000		—		—		—		—		—		500,000
Chief Executive Officer	2012			303,991		—		2,762,500		—		1,936,983		847,075		5,850,549
	2011			262,302		—		—		—		1,032,971		788,144		2,083,417
Chris Homeister⁽³⁾	2013			75,000⁽⁴⁾		—		1,447,000		2,740,180		30,000		—		4,292,180
Chief Operating Officer		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Timothy Clayton⁽⁶⁾	2013			200,000		—		—		—		30,000		—		230,000
Chief Financial Officer	2012			66,667		39,690		—		1,102,993		—		—		1,209,350
Joseph Kinder	2013			200,000		—		—		—		30,000		—		230,000
Senior Vice President – Operations	2012			192,970		112,660		—		1,654,383		—		—		1,960,013
	2011			162,000		91,345		—		—		—		—		253,345
Carl Randazzo	2013			200,000		—		—		—		30,000		—		230,000
Senior Vice President – Retail	2012			178,375		118,834		—		1,654,383		—		—		1,951,592
	2011			162,000		135,227		—		—		—		—		297,227

	(1)	The value of stock awards and options in this table represent the fair value of such awards granted or modified during the fiscal year, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. The assumptions used to determine the valuation of the awards are discussed in Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements, included herein.

	(2)	The amount under “All Other Compensation” for Mr. Rucker for fiscal 2011 includes $782,444 in tax “gross-ups” related to Mr. Rucker’s non-equity incentive plan compensation and $5,700 in insurance premium payments made on behalf of Mr. Rucker. The amount under “All Other Compensation” for Mr. Rucker for fiscal 2012 includes $844,225 in tax “gross-ups” related to Mr. Rucker’s non-equity incentive plan compensation and $2,850 in insurance premium payments made on behalf of Mr. Rucker.

	(3)	Mr. Homeister was not a named executive officer in fiscal 2011 or fiscal 2012.

	(4)	Includes pro rata compensation received by Mr. Homeister for services as Chief Operating Officer from October 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013.

	(5)	Mr. Clayton was not a named executive officer in fiscal 2011.

	(6)	Includes compensation received by Mr. Clayton for services as Chief Financial Officer since August 21, 2012.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 2013

The following table sets forth certain information regarding grants of plan-based awards during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013:

Name	Grant Date	Estimated future payouts under equity incentive plan awards Target (#)		All other stock awards: Number of shares of stock or units (#)		All other option awards: Number of securities underlying options (#)		Exercise or base price of option awards ($/Sh)		Grant date fair value of stock and option awards ($)
Chris Homeister	10/1/2013		—		50,000		—		—		1,447,000
	10/1/2013		—		—		200,000⁽¹⁾		28.94		2,740,180

(1)	Represents options to acquire shares of common stock. These options will vest and become exercisable in four equal annual installments beginning on October 1, 2014 based on continued service.

Offer Letter Agreements

In June 2012, as the result of arm’s length negotiations, we entered into an offer letter agreement with Mr. Rucker setting forth the terms and conditions of his employment effective upon consummation of the Business Combination. The offer letter agreement provided for an annual base salary of $303,991 for the remainder of the 2012 fiscal year and provides for an annual base salary of $500,000 for the 2013 fiscal year. In future years, Mr. Rucker’s base salary will be subject to increases and modifications as determined by our Board and its Compensation Committee. Pursuant to the offer letter agreement, Mr. Rucker is entitled to receive severance benefits if his employment is terminated by us without cause at any time or if he resigns with good reason, subject to execution of a full release in our favor. In such an event, Mr. Rucker is entitled to continued payment of his base salary for twelve months and an additional payment in an amount equal to twelve times our contribution amount for the monthly health insurance premium for him during the month immediately prior to termination. Upon a change of control, Mr. Rucker is also entitled to full vesting acceleration with respect to any unvested equity awards if he is not offered employment by the successor entity, or if he is terminated without cause or constructively terminated prior to the first anniversary of the change of control.

In June 2012, as the result of arm’s length negotiations, we entered into offer letter agreements with each of Messrs. Kinder and Randazzo, setting forth the terms and conditions of each such individual’s respective employment effective upon consummation of the Business Combination. The offer letter agreements provide for annual base salaries $200,000, respectively, for Messrs. Kinder and Randazzo, subject to increases and modifications as determined by our Board and its Compensation Committee. Pursuant to the offer letter agreements, each of Messrs. Kinder and Randazzo is entitled to receive severance benefits if his employment is terminated by us without cause at any time or if he resigns for good reason, subject to execution of a full release in our favor. In such an event, each of Messrs. Kinder and Randazzo is entitled to continued payment of his base salary for six months and an additional payment in an amount equal to six times our contribution amount for the monthly health insurance premium for him during the month immediately prior to termination. Upon a change of control, each of Messrs. Kinder and Randazzo is also entitled to full vesting acceleration with respect to any unvested equity awards if he is not offered employment by the successor entity, or if he is terminated without cause or is constructively terminated prior to the first anniversary of the change of control.

In July 2012, as the result of arm’s length negotiations, we entered into an offer letter agreement with Mr. Clayton setting forth the terms and conditions of his employment, effective upon consummation of the Business Combination. The offer letter agreement provides for an annual base salary of $200,000, subject to increases and modifications as determined by our Board and its Compensation Committee. Mr. Clayton’s current base salary is $200,000. Pursuant to the offer letter agreement, Mr. Clayton is entitled to receive severance benefits if his employment is terminated by us without cause at any time or if he resigns for good reason, subject to execution of a full release in our favor. In such an event, Mr. Clayton is entitled to continued payment of his base salary for six months and an additional payment in an amount equal to six times our contribution amount for the monthly health insurance premium for him during the month immediately prior to termination. Upon a change of control, Mr. Clayton is also entitled to full vesting acceleration with respect to any unvested equity awards if he is not offered employment by the successor entity, or if he is terminated without cause or constructively terminated prior to the first anniversary of the change of control.

In October 2013, as the result of arm’s length negotiations, we entered into an offer letter agreement with Mr. Homeister setting forth the terms and conditions of his employment, effective as of October 1, 2013. The offer letter agreement provides for an annual base salary of $300,000, in addition to cash bonus compensation by achieving target performance determined by our Compensation Committee. Pursuant to the offer letter agreement, Mr. Homeister is entitled to receive severance benefits if his employment is terminated by us without cause at any time or if he resigns for good reason, subject to execution of a full release in our favor. In such an event, Mr. Homeister is entitled to continued payment of his base salary for six months and an additional payment in an amount equal to six times our contribution amount for the monthly health insurance premium for him during the month immediately prior to termination. Upon a change of control, Mr. Homeister is also entitled to full vesting acceleration with respect to any unvested equity awards if he is not offered employment by the successor entity, or if he is terminated without cause or constructively terminated prior to the first anniversary of the change of control.

In connection with their offer letter agreements, each of Messrs. Rucker, Clayton, Kinder, Randazzo, and Homeister agreed not to compete, directly or indirectly, with us or solicit any of our employees or business contacts during the term of his employment and for a period of two years, one year, one year, one year, and one year thereafter, respectively. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we may, at our election, extend the term of the non-compete and non-solicit obligations to which Messrs. Clayton, Kinder, and Randazzo are subject to be for a period of two years following termination of employment; provided, that we provide the applicable individual with continued payment of his base salary for twelve months (in lieu of six months) and an additional payment in an amount equal to twelve times (in lieu of six times) our contribution amount for the monthly health insurance premium for him during the month immediately prior to termination.

Equity Grants

In August 2012, upon the consummation of the Business Combination, Messrs. Kinder, Randazzo, and Clayton received initial grants of options to purchase 330,000, 330,000, and 220,000 shares of our common stock, respectively, at an exercise price per share of $10.00. Two-thirds of the total number of shares subject to each such stock option grant are subject to vesting in equal annual installments over four years from the date of grant, based only upon the applicable executive officer’s continued service to us, and one-third of the total number of shares subject to each such stock option grant are subject to vesting in equal annual installments over four years from the date of grant, based both on the appreciation in the price of our common stock and continued service to us. The portion of stock option grants tied to appreciation in the price of our common stock will vest on each anniversary of the date of grant if the trading price of our common stock has increased by at least 20% over the applicable one-year period. The increase will be measured by reference to the average closing price on the Nasdaq Stock Market of our common stock over the 30 trading days immediately preceding the date of grant or anniversary date thereof, as applicable. We believe that these vesting schedules will appropriately encourage long-term employment with us while allowing our executives to realize compensation in line with the value that they create for our stockholders.

In August 2012, upon the consummation of the Business Combination, we also granted to Mr. Rucker an award of 250,000 restricted shares of our common stock. The risk of forfeiture for such shares will lapse as to one-third of the total number of shares of common stock on each of December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2015, subject to Mr. Rucker’s continued service as an employee, officer, or director of our Company.

In October 2013, in connection with his Offer Letter Agreement, we granted Mr. Homeister 50,000 shares of restricted stock pursuant to the Omnibus Plan. These shares are subject to restrictions on transfer and a purchase option in favor of the Company in the event that Mr. Homeister is no longer an employee of the Company. These restrictions on transfer and the purchase option will be eliminated as to 25% of the shares on each of October 1, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. In addition, Mr. Homeister was granted incentive stock options to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Omnibus Plan. The stock options will be exercisable at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, will vest in equal installments over a four year period beginning on the first anniversary date of the date of grant and expire 10 years from the date of the grant.

Following completion of the 2013 fiscal year, in February 2014, we granted Timothy C. Clayton incentive stock options in the amount of 55,000 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Omnibus Plan. The stock options will be exercisable at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, will vest in three equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary date of the date of grant and expire 7 years from the date of the grant. Also in February 2014, Chris Homeister received incentive stock options in the amount of 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Omnibus Plan. The stock options will be exercisable at 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, will vest in five equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary date of the date of grant and expire 7 years from the date of the grant.

We have provided for the acceleration of vesting of equity awards granted to each of Messrs. Rucker, Clayton, Kinder, Randazzo, and Homeister in the event of a change of control of our Company. In the event of a change of control, if the individual is terminated without cause or is otherwise constructively terminated prior to the first anniversary of the change of control, the vesting of any unvested awards will be accelerated in full immediately prior to such termination. We believe that these acceleration opportunities will further align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders by providing our executives an opportunity to benefit alongside our stockholders in a corporate transaction.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-end for Fiscal 2013

The following table sets forth certain information regarding outstanding equity awards held by the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2013:

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name

Grant
Date

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable
(#)

Number of Securities Underlying Options Unexercisable
(#)

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
(#)

Option Exercise
Price
($)

Option Expiration Date

Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
(#)

Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)

Robert A. Rucker

8/21/12

—

166,666⁽¹⁾

3,011,655

Chris Homeister

10/1/13

—

200,000⁽²⁾

—

28.94

10/1/23

50,000⁽³⁾

903,500

Timothy Clayton

8/21/12

55,000

110,000⁽⁴⁾

55,000⁽⁵⁾

10.00

8/21/22

—

Joseph Kinder

8/21/12

82,500

165,000⁽⁴⁾

82,500⁽⁵⁾

10.00

8/21/22

—

Carl Randazzo

8/21/12

82,500

165,000⁽⁴⁾

82,500⁽⁵⁾

10.00

8/21/22

—

(1)	These shares of restricted stock will become unrestricted as 83,333 shares of common stock on each of December 31, 2014, and 2015.
(2)		These options become exercisable in four equal annual installments beginning on October 1, 2014.
(3)		These shares of restricted stock will become unrestricted in equal annual installments beginning on October 1, 2014.
(4)		These options became exercisable in four equal annual installments beginning on August 21, 2013.
(5)		These options became exercisable in four equal annual installments beginning on August 21, 2013 provided that the Company meets or exceeds certain annual stock price increase targets.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 2013

None of the named executive officers exercised options during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Mr. Rucker had 83,334 shares of restricted common stock vest in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

Pension Benefits

The Company did not sponsor any defined benefit pension or other actuarial plan for its named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2013.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

As discussed above in the section “— 2012 Omnibus Award Plan — Equity and Equity-Linked Incentives,” prior to the Business Combination, The Tile Shop maintained a Deferred Compensation Plan for its executive officers, with the exception of Mr. Rucker. At all times from January 1, 2009 until the termination of our Deferred Compensation Plan in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, Messrs. Kinder and Randazzo each held 300,000 phantom equity units of The Tile Shop. Effective immediately prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, we terminated our Deferred Compensation Plan. We made a lump-sum cash payment to each former holder of phantom equity units, including Messrs. Kinder and Randazzo in the amount of $2,060,000 each, on August 20, 2013, in full satisfaction of all phantom equity units previously held by such individuals.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding nonqualified deferred compensation paid to and earned by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2013:

Name	Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)		Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($)		Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)		Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)⁽¹⁾		Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)
Robert A. Rucker		—		—		—		—		—
Chris Homeister		—		—		—		—
Timothy Clayton		—		—		—		—		—
Joseph Kinder		—		—		—		2,060,000		—
Carl Randazzo		—		—		—		2,060,000		—

(1) Represents the amounts paid in lump sum to the identified participants on August 20, 2013, which amounts were based on change in value of the phantom equity units from January 1, 2012 through the effective date of the Business Combination, at which time the Deferred Compensation Plan was terminated.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

As discussed above in connection with each named executive officer’s offer letter agreement, each named executive officer may be eligible to receive severance benefits in the event that his employment is terminated by the Company without cause or by the named executive officer for good reason. Additionally, each named executive officer is entitled to full vesting of any outstanding equity awards in the event of a change of control, if the individual is terminated without cause or is otherwise constructively terminated prior to the first anniversary of the change of control.

The amounts payable to each of the named executive officers, assuming that each individual's employment had terminated on December 31, 2013, under each scenario, are as follows:

	Termination
Name	In Connection with a Change in Control ($)⁽¹⁾		By Company Not for Cause ($)⁽²⁾		By NEO for Good Reason ($)⁽²⁾
Robert A. Rucker		2,347,686		506,027		506,027
Chris Homeister		4,340,193		153,013		153,013
Timothy Clayton		959,913		103,013		103,013
Joseph Kinder		1,388,363		103,013		103,013
Carl Randazzo		1,388,363		103,013		103,013

	(1)	Represents lapse of the risks of forfeiture on all outstanding shares of restricted stock, in the case of Mr. Rucker, and full vesting of all outstanding options to purchase common stock, in the case of the other named executive officers.
	(2)	Represents payments of one year of base salary and company-contributed health-insurance costs, in the case of Mr. Rucker, and six months of base salary and company-contributed health insurance costs, in the case of the other named executive officers, with the exception of Mr. Randazzo who does not participate in company-sponsored health insurance.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Each of our non-employee directors receives an annual fee of $100,000 and the chairperson of our Board receives an additional annual fee of $150,000, which annual period runs based on the anniversary date of the Business Combination. In fiscal year 2013, Mr. Kamin elected to received compensation in the form of one-half in cash, payable quarterly, and one-half in the form of restricted common stock granted pursuant to the Omnibus Plan upon the anniversary of consummation of the Business Combination. Messrs. Krasnow and Watts elected to receive compensation fully in the form of restricted common stock granted pursuant to the Omnibus Plan upon the anniversary of consummation of the Business Combination. The number of shares of our restricted common stock granted were equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the amount of the annual fee payable to such non-employee director in the form of restricted stock, as set forth above, by (ii) the average closing price on Nasdaq of our common stock over 30 trading days immediately preceding the date of grant. In 2013, Messrs. Kamin, Krasnow, and Watts received 1,779, 3,557, and 8,894 shares of restricted stock, respectively. The risks of forfeiture for the restricted stock grants will lapse in full on second anniversary date of the Business Combination, contingent upon the applicable non-employee director’s continued service on our Board. If any restricted stock remains for which the risks of forfeiture have not lapsed at the time of a non-employee director’s termination of service on the Board, the Company has the option to purchase such shares of restricted stock at a price set forth in the agreements governing such restricted stock.

Each of Messrs. Jacullo and Suttin agreed to forego all compensation for their service as directors of our Company during the 2013 fiscal year. Messrs. Jacullo and Suttin will receive pro-rated director compensation in accordance with the above-described terms from January 1, 2014 through August 21, 2014 and intend to participate in the above-described director compensation program thereafter.

Director Compensation Table for Fiscal 2013

The following table summarizes the compensation paid to each non-employee director in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013:

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($) ^{(1) (2)}		Total ($)
Peter H. Kamin		25,000		46,094		71,094
Todd Krasnow		—		92,162		92,162
Peter J. Jacullo III		—		—		—
Adam L. Suttin		—		—		—
William E. Watts		—		230,444		230,444

(1)

The value of stock awards in this table represent the fair value of such awards granted during the fiscal year, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. The assumptions used to determine the valuation of the awards are discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 11 to Part II, Item 8.

(2)

The aggregate number of shares of restricted stock held by each of the directors listed in the table above as of December 31, 2013 was as follows: Mr. Kamin 11,779 shares, Mr. Krasnow 13,557 shares, and Mr. Watts 33,894 shares. These shares of restricted stock were granted to the directors on August 21, 2012 and upon the one-year anniversary date of the consummation of the Business Combination and the risks of forfeiture will lapse in full on August 21, 2014.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Jacullo, Krasnow, and Watts. None of the individuals who currently serve as a member of our Compensation Committee has ever been an executive officer or employee of ours. In connection with the Business Combination, each of Messrs. Jacullo, Krasnow and Watts received compensation from and entered into agreements with the Company as described in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” None of our executive officers currently serves, nor in the past year has served, as a member of the Board or Compensation Committee (or other Board committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee. During the fiscal year completed December 31, 2013, none of The Tile Shop’s executive officers or employees, other than Mr. Rucker, participated in the deliberations of The Tile Shop’s board of managers concerning executive officer compensation.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth, as of February 21, 2014, information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock by:

•

each person, or group of affiliated persons, known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock;

each of our named executive officers;

•

each of our directors; and

•

all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC and generally means that a person has beneficial ownership of a security if he, she, or it possesses sole or shared voting or investment power of that security, including options and warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown that they beneficially own, subject to community property laws where applicable. The information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose.

Common stock subject to options and warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 21, 2014 are deemed to be outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the person holding these options and/or warrants and the percentage ownership of any group in which the holder is a member but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person.

We have based our calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership based on 51,230,600 shares of our common stock outstanding on February 21, 2014.

Unless otherwise noted below, the address for each of the stockholders in the table below is c/o Tile Shop Holdings, Inc., 14000 Carlson Parkway, Plymouth, Minnesota, 55441.

Name of Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned		Percent
5% Stockholders:
Nabron International, Inc.⁽¹⁾		10,560,616		20.6	%
The Tile Shop, Inc.⁽²⁾		6,274,250		12.3
JWTS, Inc.⁽³⁾		4,441,731		8.7
Tremblant Capital Group⁽⁴⁾		4,203,817		8.2
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.⁽⁵⁾		4,131,911		8.1
Executive Officers and Directors:
Robert A. Rucker⁽²⁾⁽⁶⁾		6,524,250		12.7
Timothy C. Clayton⁽⁷⁾		55,000		*
Joseph Kinder⁽⁸⁾		82,500		*
Carl Randazzo⁽⁹⁾		82,500		*
Chris Homeister		50,000		*
Peter J. Jacullo III^{(3) (10)}		4,445,563		8.7
Peter H. Kamin⁽¹¹⁾		487,300		1.0
Todd Krasnow⁽¹²⁾		156,786		*
Adam L. Suttin⁽¹³⁾		437,178		*
William E. Watts		279,814		*

All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (11 persons)		12,629,391		24.7	%

* Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding common stock.

(1) Based upon a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on June 18, 2013 by Nabron International, Inc., a Bahamas company (“Nabron”), Raymond Long Sing Tang (“Tang”), Lars Soren Sorensen (“Sorensen”), and Louise Mary Garbarino (“Garbarino”). Tang, Sorensen, and Garbarino are directors of Nabron and may be deemed to have shared voting and investment power over the securities held by Nabron. The business address of Nabron is 2nd Floor, Le Prince de Galles, 3-5 Avenue des Citronniers, MC98000 Monaco.

(2) Based upon a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on June 13, 2013 by The Tile Shop, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“TS, Inc.”) and Robert A. Rucker (“Rucker”). Rucker is the sole director of TS, Inc. and may be deemed to have sole voting and investment power over the securities held by TS, Inc.

(3) Based upon a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on June 13, 2013 by JWTS, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“JWTS”) and Peter J. Jacullo III (“Jacullo”). Jacullo is the sole director of JWTS and may be deemed to have sole voting and investment power over the securities held by JWTS. The business address of JWTS is c/o Peter J. Jacullo III 61 High Ridge Avenue, Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877.

(4) Based upon a schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2014 by Tremblant Capital Group (“Tremblant”). The business address of Tremblant is 767 Fifth Ave, New York, New York, 10153.

(5) Based upon Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2014 by T. Rowe Price Associates (“T. Rowe Price”). The business address of T. Rowe Price is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.

(6) Includes 166,667 shares of restricted common stock held by Mr. Rucker that are subject to a repurchase option held by the Company.

(7) Represents options to purchase 55,000 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of February 21, 2014.

(8) Represents options to purchase 82,500 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of February 21, 2014.

(9) Represents options to purchase 82,500 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of February 21, 2014.

(10) Includes 3,832 shares of restricted common stock held by Peter J. Jacullo III and 551 shares of common stock held by Mr. Jacullo’s son. Mr. Jacullo disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock held by his son, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(11) Includes 195,059 shares of common stock held by the Peter H. Kamin Revocable Trust dated February 2003 (“2003 Trust”), 137,035 shares of common stock held by the Peter H. Kamin Childrens Trust dated March 1997 (“1997 Trust”), 35,361 shares of common stock held by the Peter H. Kamin GST Trust (“GST”), 108,023 shares of common stock held by 3K Limited Partnership (“3K” and, together with Kamin, 2003 Trust, 1997 Trust, GST, and 3K, the “Kamin Entities”), and 100 shares of common stock held by Kamin’s son. Kamin is the sole trustee of the 2003 Trust, the sole trustee of the 1997 Trust, a trustee of GST, and sole general partner of 3K and may be deemed to have sole voting and investment power over the securities held by these entities. Kamin disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock held by his son, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(12) Includes 100 shares of common stock held by Todd Krasnow’s spouse and 100 shares of common stock held by Todd Krasnow’s son. Mr. Krasnow disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock held by his spouse and his son, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(13) Includes 3,832 shares of restricted common stock held by Adam Suttin and 33,689 shares of common stock held by the Adam L. Suttin Irrevocable Family Trust. Mr. Suttin’s spouse is the trustee of the trust and Mr. Suttin disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of common stock held by the trust, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table presents our equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2013:

	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights ($)		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders⁽¹⁾		2,274,917		14.02		2,365,853
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders		-		-		-
TOTAL		2,274,917		14.02		2,365,853

(1)

Represents shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of currently outstanding options to purchase common stock, granted pursuant to our Omnibus Plan.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

INDEPENDENCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

As required under the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Stock Market, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his background, employment, and affiliations, including family relationships, we have determined that Messrs. Jacullo, Kamin, Krasnow, Suttin, and Watts, representing five of our six directors, do not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors will be “independent” as that term is defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, and the listing requirements and rules of Nasdaq.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

We describe below transactions and series of similar transactions, occurring since the beginning of our 2012 fiscal year (as well as certain transactions occurring during The Tile Shop’s 2011 fiscal year), to which we were a participant or will be a participant, in which:

	•	the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and
	•	any of our directors, executive officers, holders of more than 5% of our common stock or any member of their immediate family, as defined in Item 404 of Item S-K of the 1934 Act and interpreted by the SEC in related guidance (collectively, the “Related Persons”) had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Compensation arrangements with our named executive officers and directors are described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

BUSINESS COMBINATION

In August 2012, we consummated the Business Combination pursuant to the terms of that certain Contribution and Merger Agreement (the “Merger Agreement”), dated as of June 27, 2012, by and among JWC Acquisition Corp., an entity for which Adam Suttin and Mr. William Watts served as president and vice president, respectively, (“JWCAC”), on the one hand, and The Tile Shop, the members of The Tile Shop, including Todd Krasnow, various entities controlled by Peter Kamin, The Tile Shop, Inc. (controlled by Robert Rucker) and JWTS, Inc. (controlled by John Jacullo), (the “Members”), Nabron International Inc., a Bahamas corporation, a holder of greater than 5% of our outstanding common stock (“Nabron” and, together with the Members other than ILTS, LLC, the “Sellers”), the Company, Tile Shop Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and Peter Jacullo, in his capacity as Sellers’ Representative, on the other hand. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, (i) the Sellers contributed, directly or indirectly, all of the membership interests in The Tile Shop to the Company in exchange for an aggregate of approximately $75,000,000 in cash, promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $70,000,000 (the “Promissory Notes”), and 32,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company and (ii) each share of common stock of JWCAC was exchanged for one share of the Company’s common stock. In connection with the Business Combination, we acquired all of the outstanding equity securities of The Tile Shop and JWCAC. Prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, JWCAC redeemed 5,500,000 shares of its outstanding common stock from its stockholders who purchased shares in JWCAC’s initial public offering.

The consideration received, directly or indirectly, by each of the Related Persons in connection with the Business Combination is set forth below:

Related Person	Cash Consideration		Promissory Notes		Shares of Common Stock
Nabron International, Inc.	$	37,732,065	$	37,479,696		17,445,432
The Tile Shop, Inc. (entity controlled by Mr. Rucker)	$	23,792,481	$	18,887,729		8,313,792
JWTS, Inc. (entity controlled by Mr. Jacullo)	$	11,843,840	$	11,764,632		5,476,003
Peter H. Kamin Revocable Trust dated February 2003 (entity controlled by Mr. Kamin)	$	584,101	$	580,194		270,059
Peter H. Kamin Childrens Trust dated March 2007 (entity controlled by Mr. Kamin)	$	350,460	$	348,116		162,035
3K Limited Partnership (entity controlled by Mr. Kamin)	$	233,639	$	232,077		108,023
Peter H. Kamin GST Trust (entity controlled by Mr. Kamin)	$	65,239	$	73,984		35,361
Todd Krasnow	$	298,878	$	306,060		143,384

The Promissory Notes had a three year term, subject to pre-payment at any time without penalty, and bore interest at a rate of 4% per annum, payable quarterly. The largest aggregate outstanding principal amount under these Promissory Notes since the beginning of 2011 was $69,771,111, as of the consummation of the Business Combination. On October 3, 2012, we paid the entire outstanding principal balance of the Promissory Notes together with all accrued interest thereon, in an aggregate amount of $70,099,895, which consisted of $69,771,111 of principal and $328,784 of accrued interest thereon, in full satisfaction of our obligations pursuant to the Promissory Notes.

In connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, JWC Acquisition LLC (the “Sponsor”), an affiliate of JWCAC, distributed 208,734 shares of common stock to Mr. Suttin, 39,284 shares of common stock to an trust affiliated with Mr. Suttin, and 151,123 shares of common stock to Mr. Watts.

Nabron Loan

In August 2012, prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, we issued a $5,500,000 variable term promissory note to Nabron, which bore interest at a rate of 4% per annum and was subject to pre-payment at any time without penalty. The largest aggregate outstanding principal amount under this promissory note since the beginning of 2012 was $5,500,000, as of the date of issuance. On September 28, 2012, we paid the entire outstanding principal balance of this promissory note together with all accrued interest thereon, in an aggregate amount of $5,520,777, which consisted of $5,500,000 of principal and $20,777 of accrued interest thereon, in full satisfaction of our obligations pursuant to this promissory note.

Private Placement

In August 2012, in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, we issued and sold an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of our common stock to a total of nine accredited investors at a purchase price of $10.00 per share, generating total gross proceeds of $15.0 million (the “Private Placement”), including 1,080,000 shares of common stock issued to John W. Childs, a former holder of greater than 5% of our outstanding common stock, 110,000 shares of common stock issued to Mr. Suttin, and 100,000 shares of common stock issued to Mr. Watts.

Registration Rights

In connection with the Business Combination, the Sellers, the members of the Sponsor, including, but not limited to, Adam Suttin, William Watts and John W. Childs (the “Sponsor” and the “Sponsor Members”) and the Company entered into a registration rights agreement under which the Sellers and the Sponsor Members hold registration rights with respect to their shares of our common stock. The holders of a majority in interest of our common stock held by the Sellers are entitled to require us, on up to four occasions, to register under the Securities Act the shares of common stock that they received in the Business Combination. The holders of a majority in interest of our common stock held by the Sponsor Members are entitled to require us, on up to two occasions, to register under the Securities Act the shares of common stock that they received in the Business Combination, any shares issued to the Sponsor Members pursuant to the exercise of the warrant held by them where such shares of common stock are not otherwise registered under the Securities Act, and the shares issued in connection with the Private Placement. The securities that may be registered pursuant to the registration rights agreement are referred to as registrable securities. Demand registration may be made pursuant to the registration rights agreement so long as the estimated market value of the shares of common stock to be registered is at least $10,000,000. The majority in interest of each of the Sellers and the Sponsor Members may elect to exercise these registration rights at any time. In addition, these stockholders will have certain “piggyback” registration rights on other registration statements that we may file. We will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.

On May 24, 2013, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 for an underwritten secondary offering, referred to herein as the May 2013 public offering. The parties to the registration rights agreement waived the application of the registration rights agreement to the May 2013 public offering and consented to the filing of the registration statement therefor.

Lock-Up Agreements

At the time of the Business Combination, the Sellers and the Sponsor Members entered into lock-up agreements pursuant to which they agreed not to sell any of their shares of our common stock issued in connection with or prior to the Business Combination for certain periods. In addition, we, our officers and directors, and the selling stockholders in our December 2012 public offering signed additional lock-up agreements under which we and they agreed not to dispose of or hedge any shares or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock for certain periods. On March 12, 2013, the early release provisions of these lock-up agreements were triggered. As a result, the Sellers, the Sponsor Members, our directors, officers and the selling stockholders in our December 2012 public offering may sell their shares at any time, subject to compliance with applicable securities laws and any applicable restrictions in connection with our May 2013 public offering.

In connection with our May 2013 public offering, we, our officers and directors, and the selling stockholders agreed that we and they would not, without the prior written consent of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, dispose of or hedge any shares or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock, with the exception of the Post-offering Nabron Stock Purchase. For us, Nabron, Noble Resources Limited, Peter J. Jacullo III, JWTS, Inc., and TS, Inc. the period was 150 days from May 24, 2013, and for the remaining officers, directors and selling stockholders the period was 60 days from May 24, 2013. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated in their sole discretion could release any of the securities subject to the lock-up agreements at any time without notice. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if (i) during the last 17 days of the applicable restricted period, we issued an earnings release or material news or a material event relating to our company occurred; or (ii) prior to the expiration of the applicable restricted period, we announced that we would release earnings results during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the applicable restricted period, the restrictions described above would continue to apply until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the occurrence of the material news or material event.

Warrant Agreements

In connection with the Business Combination, the Sellers and an affiliate of the Sponsor entered into an agreement pursuant to which the Sellers or their assignees purchased from such affiliate an aggregate of 4,466,885 warrants, for an aggregate purchase price of $3,419,327. These warrants were among those sold in connection with JWCAC’s initial public offering (collectively, the “Public Warrants”) and were acquired by the affiliate following JWCAC’s initial public offering for an aggregate purchase price of $3,419,327. These Public Warrants were all exercised in March and April 2013.

In connection with the Business Combination, we entered into an agreement with the Sponsor and the Sponsor Members under which (i) the Sponsor Members waived their rights and the rights of their permitted transferees to exercise warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,333,333 shares of common stock, which were issued in a private placement, (the “Sponsor Warrants”) for cash and agreed that such Sponsor Warrants may only be exercised on a cashless basis. These Sponsor Warrants were all exercised in March and April 2013.

In connection with the Business Combination, we entered into a letter agreement with The Tile Shop, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (“TS, Inc.”) and an entity controlled by Mr. Rucker, pursuant to which TS, Inc. and its affiliates agreed (i) to exercise Public Warrants only on a cashless exercise basis and (ii) that the maximum number of shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of Public Warrants is the lesser of (A) 434,968 shares of common stock or (B) the number of shares of common stock that may be issued without Mr. Rucker’s beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock exceeding 20 percent. These warrants were all exercised prior to December 31, 2013.

PRE-BUSINESS COMBINATION RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

In June 2011, TS, Inc., a holder of 5% of the membership interests of The Tile Shop prior to the Business Combination and an entity controlled by Mr. Rucker, sold (i) an aggregate of 1,710,000 Common Units of The Tile Shop to ILTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“ILTS”), a holder of 5% of the membership interests in The Tile Shop prior to the Business Combination and an entity of which Mr. Jacullo was a manager and (ii) an aggregate of 290,000 Common Units of The Tile Shop to three trusts that are now stockholders of JWTS, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“JWTS”), a holder of 5% of the membership interests in The Tile Shop and an entity controlled by Mr. Jacullo, in each case for $4.4434 per unit. The Common Units purchased by the three trusts were contributed to JWTS and were contributed to the Company in connection with the Business Combination in exchange for the cash, Promissory Notes and shares described above, under the subheading “Business Combination.” Immediately prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, TS Inc. sold an additional 1,710,000 and 290,000 Common Units of The Tile Shop to ILTS and JWTS, respectively, for $4.7583 per unit. In connection with these transactions, The Tile Shop released a security interest in the Common Units that were the subject of these sales.

In January 2012, TS, Inc., ILTS and JWTS sold (i) an aggregate of 129,333 Common Units of The Tile Shop to Mr. Krasnow, (ii) an aggregate of 646,667 Common Units of The Tile Shop to the Peter H. Kamin Revocable Trust dated February 2003, the Peter H. Kamin Childrens Trust dated March 2007, and 3K Limited Partnership, entities of which Mr. Kamin is trustee or general partner, as applicable, (iii) an aggregate of 25,867 Common Units of The Tile Shop to Family Office Investors LLC, an entity in which Mark Riser, a member of the board of managers of The Tile Shop prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, is the sole member, and (iv) an aggregate of 19,400 Common Units of The Tile Shop to a third party, in each case for $7.732 per unit. In connection with these transactions, The Tile Shop made certain representations and warranties.

On each of December 31, 2011 and June 21, 2012, The Tile Shop made a $300,000 payment to TS, Inc. in connection with the final redemption of an aggregate of 3,000,000 special cash distribution units of The Tile Shop issued to TS, Inc., which were fully redeemed by The Tile Shop and no longer outstanding as of June 21, 2012. In lieu of paying such amounts to TS, Inc. in cash, The Tile Shop reduced the outstanding amount under a promissory note, dated December 30, 2002, made by TS, Inc. and payable to The Tile Shop. The original principal amount of this promissory note was $13,241,800 with simple interest accruing at a rate of five percent per annum on any unpaid balance. The largest aggregate outstanding principal amount under this promissory note since the beginning of 2011 was $1,468,291.75, as of January 1, 2011. On June 21, 2012, TS, Inc. made a final payment to The Tile Shop of $919,444.22 in full satisfaction of all obligations pursuant to this promissory note. Taken together, the aggregate payment of $1,519,444.22 made by TS, Inc. pursuant to this promissory note since the beginning of 2011 fiscal year consisted of a payment of $1,468,291.75 of principal and $51,152.47 of accrued interest.

FISCAL YEAR 2013 STOCK TRANSACTIONS

In March 2013, we purchased 357,464 outstanding warrants from Adam Suttin and 324,969 outstanding warrants from William Watts at a purchase price of $8.41 per warrant. Since Messrs. Suttin and Watts are members of our Board, the independent directors considered and approved the transactions on terms which reflected a purchase price based on the public market price of the warrants.

In March 2013, Mr. Suttin exercised 357,464 warrants on a cashless basis, pursuant to which 230,301 shares were withheld to satisfy the exercise price and 127,166 shares were issued. In March 2013 Mr. Watts exercised 324,969 warrants on a cashless basis, pursuant to which 209,364 shares were withheld to satisfy the exercise price and 115,605 shares were issued. The terms of exercise were as provided in the warrant agreements, which were consistent with terms in warrants held by non-directors of the Company.

On May 24, 2013, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Nabron, whereby we agreed to repurchase a number of shares of our common stock having an aggregate value of $46.0 million at a price per share equal to the public offering price for our May 2013 public offering less the underwriters discount for our May 2013 public offering. We refer to this agreement to repurchase as the “Post-offering Nabron Stock Purchase.” The closing of the Post-offering Nabron Stock Purchase was conditioned upon the completion of the May 2013 public offering. The closing of the May 2013 public offering was not conditioned upon the completion of the Post-offering Nabron Stock Purchase. We funded the purchase price for the Post-offering Nabron Stock Purchase with the proceeds from the warrant exercise as described above.

ADDITIONAL RELATIONSHIPS

During the 2011, 2012 and 2013 fiscal years, The Tile Shop and the Company utilized the services of Beijing Pingxiu (“BP”), a licensed Chinese export trading company that was acquired in late 2011 by Fumitake Nishi, who is a former Company employee and the brother-in-law of Robert Rucker, our CEO. Prior to Mr. Nishi's acquisition of BP, the entity was jointly owned by Zhang Jian, who is related through marriage to Mr. Rucker’s wife, and Zhang Jian’s son, who is Mr. Rucker’s nephew. The role of a licensed Chinese export trading company is to coordinate the export process on behalf of Chinese vendors, which includes processing export paperwork, managing registration of exports with the Chinese government, invoicing and receiving payments from the purchaser, and processing payments to sellers. The total amount of payments processed by and through BP during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 was $6.3 million, $12.5 million and $16.9 million, respectively. BP primarily processed export transactions on an agency basis on behalf of Company vendors. During the 2011, 2012 and 2013 fiscal years, the aggregate value of transactions processed by BP on an agency basis was $6.2 million, $9.5 million and $9.5 million, respectively. For a portion of transactions, BP processed the transaction by acquiring title to the product and reselling the product to the Company. The aggregate value of transactions processed by BP on a reseller basis was $0.1 million, $3.0 million and $7.4 million, respectively, during the 2011, 2012 and 2013 fiscal years. As of December 1, 2013, we discontinued our business relationship with BP.

During the 2011, 2012 and 2013 fiscal years, The Tile Shop and the Company purchased a portion of stone accessory products from a Chinese entity, Nanyang Helin Stone Co. Ltd. (“Nanyang”), which is majority-owned by Mr. Nishi. Total amounts paid by The Tile Shop and the Company to Nanyang during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 were $1.7 million, $2.1 million and $2.8, respectively. We have determined that the prices paid for products purchased from Nanyang were consistent with what we paid other unrelated vendors for the same or similar products.

During the 2011, 2012 and 2013 fiscal years, Mr. Nishi was employed by us as a purchasing supervisor. For his services, Mr. Nishi was paid aggregate W-2 wages of $95,000 in each of 2011 and 2012 and $107,500 in 2013, and in each year received the standard benefits provided to other non-executive Company employees. Consistent with the compensation provided to other non-executive Company employees, on August 21, 2012, Mr. Nishi received an option to purchase 35,000 options of Company common stock with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. As of January 1, 2014, Mr. Nishi is no longer employed by the Company and has forfeited all options, none of which were exercised.

The Audit Committee conducted an investigation with regard to Mr. Nishi’s activities which included a review of our past transactions with BP and uncovered Mr. Nishi’s interest in Nanyang, resulting in its review of our past transactions with Nanyang as well. The Audit Committee investigation found no evidence that the Company had underpaid or overpaid vendors on account of the BP relationship. The Audit Committee investigation also reviewed the cost of products the Company purchased from Nanyang and concluded that the cost of such products was consistent with the prices the Company paid other vendors for the same or similar SKUs. Mr. Nishi’s undisclosed activities with regard to BP and Nanyang violated Company policies and therefore the Company has terminated its business relationship with BP and Mr. Nishi’s employment has been terminated. Subject to the condition that Mr. Nishi’s ownership interest be transferred to a party or parties unrelated to the Company and that Mr. Nishi be removed and barred from holding any officer or director position of Nanyang, the Company has approved ongoing business with Nanyang for the 2014 fiscal year.

We are also aware that Mr. Nishi is a director of, and through BP a 10% owner of, Best Cheer Construction Materials (Shanghai) Co. Ltd, a Chinese company which was formed in September 2013 (“Best Cheer Construction”). Neither the Tile Shop nor the Company has purchased any product from Best Cheer Construction. The Company does purchase product from Best Cheer Stone Group LTD (“Best Cheer Stone”), which we understand is a 10% owner of Best Cheer Construction (we also understand an entity known as Best Cheer Development Limited, which may be related to Best Cheer Stone, owns approximately 50% of Best Cheer Construction). The Tile Shop and the Company purchased approximately $0, $0.4 million and $1.1 million of product from Best Cheer Stone during the 2011, 2012 and 2013 fiscal years, respectively.

From time to time, the Company may employ related persons and other family members of its officers and directors. Consistent with the policy described below, all such employment arrangements involving amounts exceeding $50,000 are reviewed by our Audit Committee.

Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions

Effective upon consummation of the Business Combination, our board of directors adopted a written related person transaction policy that sets forth the policies and procedures for the review and approval or ratification of related person transactions. This policy is administered by our audit committee and will covers any transaction, arrangement, or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements, or relationships, in which we were or are to be a participant, the amount involved exceeds $50,000 and a related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. While the policy covers related person transactions in which the amount involved exceeds $50,000, the policy states that related person transactions in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 are required to be disclosed in applicable filings as required by the Securities Act, Exchange Act, and related rules. Our board of directors determined to set the threshold for approval of related person transactions in the policy at an amount lower than that which is required to be disclosed under the Securities Act, Exchange Act, and related rules because we believe that it is appropriate for our audit committee to review transactions or potential transactions in which the amount involved exceeds $50,000, as opposed to $120,000. Pursuant to this policy, our audit committee will (i) review the relevant facts and circumstances of each related person transaction, including if the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s-length dealings with an unrelated third party and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction, and (ii) take into account the conflicts of interest and corporate opportunity provisions of our code of business conduct and ethics. Each director, director nominee and executive officer of will present to our audit committee each proposed related person transaction to which such director, director nominee or executive officer is a party, including all relevant facts and circumstances relating thereto, and will update the audit committee as to any material changes to any related person transaction. All related person transactions may only be consummated if our audit committee has approved or ratified such transaction in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the policy. Related party transactions do not include: (i) the payment of compensation by the company to an executive officer or director of the company ; (ii) indebtedness due from a related person for transactions in the ordinary course of business; (iii) a transaction in which the interest of the related person arises solely from ownership of a class of securities of the Company where all holders of that class of securities receive the same benefit, on a pro-rata basis, from the transaction; or (iv) a transaction in which the rates or charges involved are determined by competitive bids. Additionally, certain types of transactions have been pre-approved by our audit committee under the policy as not involving a material interest. These pre-approved transactions include transactions in the ordinary course of business where the related party’s interest arises only: (a) from his or her position as a director of another entity that is party to the transaction, (b) from an equity interest of less than 5% in another entity that is party to the transaction, or (c) from a limited partnership interest of less than 5%, subject to certain limitations. No director will be permitted to participate in the approval of a related person transaction for which he or she is a related party.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young, LLP our principal accountants for the fiscal year 2013 and Deloitte & Touche, LLP our principal account for the fiscal year 2012:

	2013		2012
Audit Fees⁽¹⁾	$	300,000	$	266,000
Audit-Related Fees⁽²⁾		34,600		753,000
Tax Fees⁽³⁾		5,132		14,500
All Other Fees⁽⁴⁾		—		—
	$	339,732	$	1,033,500

	(1)	Audit Fees were principally for services rendered for the audit and/or review of our consolidated financial statements.
	(2)	Audit-Related Fees includes fees for services rendered in connection with the filing of registration statements with the SEC, and the issuance of accountant consents and comfort letters.
	(3)	Tax Fees consist of fees billed in the indicated year for professional services with respect to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
	(4)	All Other Fees consist of fees billed in the indicated year for other permissible work that is not included within the above category descriptions.

PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Pursuant to its written charter, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by our independent auditors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, separate Audit Committee pre-approval shall not be required (a) if the engagement for services is entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the Audit Committee regarding the Company’s engagement of the independent auditor (the “Pre-Approval Policy”) as to matters within the scope of the Pre-Approval Policy or (b) for de minimus non-audit services that are approved in accordance with applicable SEC rules. The Audit Committee has determined that the rendering of the services other than audit services by its principal accountant is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Documents filed as part of report

1. Financial Statements.

The following consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

		Page #
(i)	Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms		34
(ii)	Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012		36
(iii)	Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011		37
(iv)	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011		38
(v)	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011		39
(vi)	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		40

2.	Exhibits.

	See “Exhibit Index” immediately following the signature page of this Form 10-K

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Plymouth, Minnesota

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated February 28, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

February 28, 2014

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Plymouth, Minnesota

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries (formerly known as The Tile Shop, LLC and Subsidiary) (the "Company") as of December 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Chicago, Illinois

March 18, 2013 (February 28, 2014 as to the effects of the related party transactions disclosed in Note 9)

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Plymouth, Minnesota

We have audited Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2013 of Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries and our report dated February 28, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

February 28, 2014

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

	December 31, 2013			December 31, 2012
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,761		$	2,987
Restricted cash		985			-
Trade receivables, net		1,198			1,009
Inventories		67,756			46,890
Prepaid inventory		4,311			6,051
Income tax receivable		9,528			2,529
Deferred tax assets - current		3,588			9,364
Other current assets, net		2,577			2,983
Total Current Assets		91,704			71,813
Property, plant and equipment, net		125,317			82,080
Deferred tax assets		23,291			20,865
Other assets, net		2,457			1,316
TOTAL ASSETS	$	242,769		$	176,074

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	22,867		$	14,968
Current portion of long-term debt		3,590			3,860
Other accrued liabilities		13,528			10,880
Deferred compensation		-			6,171
Total Current Liabilities		39,985			35,879
Long-term debt, net		91,646			69,310
Capital lease obligation, net		1,161			1,420
Deferred rent		25,560			18,583
Warrant liability		-			95,645
Other long-term liabilities		4,554			-
TOTAL LIABILITIES		162,906			220,837

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $0.0001; authorized: 100,000,000 shares; issued: 51,229,720 and 43,177,822 shares outstanding		5			4
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001; authorized: 10,000,000 shares; issued: 0 shares		-			-
Additional paid-in-capital		169,719			9,434
Accumulated deficit		(89,861	)		(54,201	)
Total stockholders’ equity		79,863			(44,763	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	242,769		$	176,074

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

	2013			2012			2011
Net sales	$	229,564		$	182,650		$	152,717
Cost of sales		68,755			49,626			40,321
Gross profit		160,809			133,024			112,396
Selling, general and administrative expenses		127,731			94,716			78,368
Deferred compensation expense		-			3,897			1,415
Income from operations		33,078			34,411			32,613
Interest expense		2,581			1,252			443
Change in fair value of warrants		54,219			82,063			0
Other income (expense)		4			15			(77	)
(Loss) income before income taxes		(23,718	)		(48,889	)		32,093
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes		(11,942	)		2,002			(733	)
Net (loss) income	$	(35,660	)	$	(46,887	)	$	31,360

(Loss) income per common share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.72	)	$	(1.31	)	$	0.97

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted		49,600,396			35,837,609			32,261,168

Pro forma computation related to conversion to C Corporation for income tax purposes (unaudited)
Historical loss before income taxes	$	-		$	(48,889	)	$	32,093
Pro forma provision for income taxes		-			(13,270	)		(12,837	)
Pro forma net (loss) income	$	-		$	(62,159	)	$	19,256

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

(In thousands, except share data)

	Common stock
	Shares			Amount		Additional paid-in- capital			Treasury units			Retained earnings (deficit)			Total
Balance at January 1, 2011		32,329,897		$	3	$	8,259		$	(261	)	$	61,436		$	69,437
Redemption of common units of Tile Shop LLC		(329,897	)		-		(84	)		-			(1,400	)		(1,484	)
Distributions to members of Tile Shop LLC		-			-		-			-			(24,166	)		(24,166	)
Net income		-			-		-			-			31,360			31,360
Balance at December 31, 2011		32,000,000			3		8,175			(261	)		67,230			75,147
Merger of JWC Acquisition Corp		10,534,884			1		(13,909	)		-			-			(13,908	)
Issuance of promissory note		-			-		(17,282	)		-			(52,489	)		(69,771	)
Distributions to members of Tile Shop LLC		-			-		-			-			(22,055	)		(22,055	)
Cancellation of treasury units		-			-		(261	)		261			-			-
Issuance of restricted shares		295,000			-		-			-			-			-
Exercise of warrants		347,938			-		5,569			-			-			5,569
Stock based compensation		-			-		1,953			-			-			1,953
Expenses for business combination		-			-		(2,490	)		-			-			(2,490	)
Deferred income taxes		-			-		27,679			-			-			27,679
Net loss		-			-		-			-			(46,887	)		(46,887	)
Balance at December 31, 2012		43,177,822			4		9,434			-			(54,201	)		(44,763	)
Exercise of warrants		7,166,381			1		82,413			-			-			82,414
Repurchase of warrants		-			-		(30,108	)		-			-			(30,108	)
Non-cash exercise of warrants		2,790,061			-		(1	)		-			-			(1	)
Reclass warrant liability to equity		-			-		149,865			-			-			149,865
Common stock repurchase		(1,986,290	)		-		(46,000	)		-			-			(46,000	)
Issuance of restricted shares		64,230			-		-			-			-			-
Stock based compensation		-			-		4,680			-			-			4,680
Stock option exercises		17,516			-		100			-			-			100
Adjustment to merger consideration							(1,102	)		-			-			(1,102	)
Deferred income taxes							438			-			-			438
Net loss		-			-		-			-			(35,660	)		(35,660	)
Balance at December 31, 2013		51,229,720		$	5	$	169,719		$	-		$	(89,861	)	$	79,863

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(In thousands)

	2013			2012			2011
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income (loss)	$	(35,660	)	$	(46,887	)	$	31,360
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of debt issuance costs		148			19			-
Depreciation and amortization		14,316			10,530			8,651
Loss on disposals of property, plant and equipment		101			23			260
Change in fair value of warrants		54,219			82,063			-
Deferred rent		6,977			2,999			2,468
Stock based compensation		4,680			1,381			-
Deferred compensation expense		-			3,897			1,415
Deferred income taxes		3,788			(2,550	)		-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables		(189	)		(270	)		208
Inventories		(20,866	)		(280	)		(8,386	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,173			(4,693	)		(386	)
Accrued interest		60			349
Accounts payable		2,013			1,121			(1,890	)
Income tax receivable/ payable		(6,999	)		(2,529	)		-
Payment of deferred compensation		(6,171	)		-			-
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		2,621			2,049			1,022
Net cash provided by operating activities		21,211			47,222			34,722

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Change in value of life insurance policy		(86	)		(11	)		-
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(52,869	)		(29,053	)		(18,561	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(52,955	)		(29,064	)		(18,561	)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Release of restricted cash		2,471			-			-
Payments on promissory notes		-			(69,771	)		-
Payments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations		(3,714	)		(2,628	)		(729	)
Distributions to members of Tile Shop LLC		-			(26,306	)		(21,744	)
Repurchase of warrants		(30,108	)
Repurchase of common shares		(46,000	)		-			(1,485	)
Proceeds from exercise of warrants		82,413			4,001			-
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		100			-			-
Cash received in merger with JWC Acquisition Corp		-			62,904			-
Proceeds from issuance of common shares to JWC Acquisition Corp's shareholders		-			15,000			-
Payment to members of Tile Shop LLC for contribution		-			(75,000	)		-
Expenses for business combination		-			(2,463	)		-
Net advances on line of credit		25,566			72,600			-
Payment towards special cash distribution units		-			(300	)		(300	)
Receipt on note from member		-			1,205			263
Debt issuance costs		(300	)		(594	)		-
Security deposits		90			(102	)		-
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		30,518			(21,454	)		(23,995	)

Net change in cash		(1,226	)		(3,296	)		(7,834	)

Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period		2,987			6,283			14,117
Cash and cash equivalents end of period	$	1,761		$	2,987		$	6,283

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1: Organization and Nature of Business

The Tile Shop, LLC (“The Tile Shop”) was formed on December 30, 2002, as a Delaware limited liability company and began operations on January 1, 2003. Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings,” and together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, the “Company”) is incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware. The Company was formed for the purpose of consummating the transactions contemplated by the Contribution and Merger Agreement (the “Contribution and Merger Agreement”), dated June 27, 2012, by and among JWC Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (“JWCAC”), The Tile Shop, the member of The Tile Shop other than ILTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“ILTS”), Nabron International, Inc., a Bahamas corporation (“Nabron”), Tile Shop Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Merger Sub”), and Peter J. Jacullo III, as representative (“Business Combination”), which was completed on August 21, 2012 and is fully discussed in Note 2 below. JWCAC was incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware in 2010 for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization, or similar business combination involving JWCAC and one or more businesses.

The Company is engaged in the sale of manufactured and natural stone tiles, setting and maintenance materials, and related accessories in the United States. We offer a wide selection of products, attractive prices, and exceptional customer service in an extensive showroom setting. We sell over 4,500 products from around the world, including ceramic, porcelain, glass, and stainless steel manufactured tiles and, marble, granite, quartz, sandstone, travertine, slate, and onyx natural tiles. The Company also fabricates or manufactures certain products in Michigan, Virginia, Oklahoma and Wisconsin. The Company’s primary market is retail sales to consumers; however, the Company does have sales to contractors. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had 88 stores and an on-line retail operation. The retail stores are located in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Kansas, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Maryland, Missouri, Kentucky, New York, Virginia, Iowa, North Carolina, New Jersey, Tennessee, Nebraska, Delaware, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Florida, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Colorado, Connecticut and Oklahoma. The Company also has distribution centers located in Wisconsin, Michigan, Virginia and Oklahoma.

The consolidated financial statements of the company include the accounts of its wholly owned subsidiaries, and variable interest entities. See Note 13, “New Market Tax Credit Entities” (NMTC) for the discussion of financing arrangements involving certain entities that are variable interest entities that are included in our consolidated financial statements. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Note 2: Business Combination and the Basis of Presentation

On August 21, 2012, Holdings completed a business combination pursuant to the terms of the Contribution and Merger Agreement dated June 27, 2012 (the “Contribution and Merger Agreement”), whereby the former members of The Tile Shop, LLC (“The Tile Shop”) directly or indirectly, contributed all of their membership interests in The Tile Shop to Holdings (the “Contribution”), in exchange for (i) a cash payment of $75 million, (ii) 32,000,000 shares of the common stock of Holding’s valued at $320 million, and (iii) promissory notes issued by Holdings in the aggregate principal amount of $69.8 million. As a result of the Contribution, all ownership interests in The Tile Shop were contributed to Holdings. Concurrent with the Contribution, (i) all outstanding shares of JWC Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (“JWCAC”) common stock were exchanged for one share of Holding’s common stock and (ii) each outstanding JWCAC warrant, which was exercisable for one share of JWCAC common stock, became exercisable for one share of Holding’s common stock. This transaction is referred to as the “Business Combination”. Immediately following the Business Combination, the former members of The Tile Shop held 75.2% of the 42,534,884 issued and outstanding shares of Holding’s common stock.

The Tile Shop was considered the acquirer for accounting purposes because it obtained effective control of JWCAC. The Tile Shop did not have a change in control since The Tile Shop’s operations comprise the ongoing operations of the combined entity, its senior management became the senior management of the combined entity, and its former owners own a majority voting interest in the combined entity and are able to elect a majority of the combined entity’s board of directors. Accordingly, the Business Combination does not constitute the acquisition of a business for purposes of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standard Codification 805, “Business Combinations,” or ASC 805. As a result, the assets and liabilities of The Tile Shop and JWCAC are carried at historical cost and the Company has not recorded any step-up in basis or any intangible assets or goodwill as a result of the Business Combination. All direct costs of the Business Combination were offset to additional paid-in capital. The historical financial statements presented herein are that of The Tile Shop.

The recapitalization of the number of shares of common stock attributable to The Tile Shop members were reflected retroactive to January 1, 2010. Accordingly, the number of shares of common stock presented as outstanding as of January 1, 2010 totaled 32,329,897 consisting of 32,000,000 shares of common stock issued to The Tile Shop members as consideration for the Contribution, and 329,897 of common units held by the former owners of The Tile Shop, LLC which were fully redeemed in 2011. This number of shares was also used to calculate the Company’s earnings per share for all periods prior to the Business Combination.

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The cash flows related to the business combination, as reported in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows is summarized as follows (in thousands):

	Amount
Cash in trust at JWCAC	$	124,950
Add: proceeds from issue of shares		15,000
Less: redemption of JWCAC public shares		(54,960	)
Less: cash paid to The Tile Shop members		(75,000	)
Less: payment of deferred offering cost by JWCAC		(4,588	)
Less: payment of transaction expenses		(4,644	)
Remaining cash received by the Company in the merger	$	758

The number of shares of common stock of the Company issued and outstanding immediately following the consummation of the Business Combination is summarized as follows:

	Number of Shares
JWCAC public shares outstanding prior to the Business Combination		12,500,000
JWCAC founder shares		2,034,884
Total JWCAC shares outstanding prior to the Business Combination		14,534,884
Less: redemption of JWCAC public shares		(5,500,000	)
Total JWCAC shares outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the Business Combination		9,034,884
Common shares issued as consideration to members of The Tile Shop		32,000,000
Common shares issued to sponsor of JWCAC		1,500,000
Total common shares outstanding at closing, August 21, 2012		42,534,884

Because the former Tile Shop members retained a significant ownership interest in the Company following the Business Combination, a portion of the $69.8 million of notes payable issued to the former members of The Tile Shop as part of the Business Combination was treated as a leveraged dividend and accordingly $52.5 million was been reflected as a distribution of retained earnings in the accompanying financial statements. The remainder of the notes payable was deducted from additional paid in capital.

Pro Forma Information:

The pro forma computation related to the conversion to a C Corporation for income tax purposes assumes that such conversion occurred as of January 1, 2011. These amounts are not necessarily indicative of the consolidated results of income for future years or actual results that would have been realized had the change in tax status occurred as of the beginning of each such year.

Note 3: Summary of Selected Significant Accounting Polices

Basis of preparation:

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) to reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company. These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company reviewed subsequent events through the issue date for inclusion in these consolidated financial statements.

Use of estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. The Company bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The amount of assets and liabilities reported on the Company's balance sheets and the amounts of income and expenses reported for each of the periods presented are affected by estimates and assumptions, which are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for revenue recognition and related reserves for sales returns, useful lives of property, plant and equipment, determining impairment on long-lived assets, valuation of inventory, determining compensation expense on stock based compensation plans and accruals for incentive compensation. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Reclassification:

Certain amounts in the prior year’s audited consolidated financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the current year’s presentation. The reclassification for 2012 was to present the long-term portion of debt issuance costs as a long-term asset, and condense items in current assets, and current liabilities on the balance sheet.

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Cash and cash equivalents:

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with initial maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Trade receivables:

Trade receivables are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful receivables. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts on a specific identification basis as well as by using historical experience applied to an aging of accounts. Trade receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously written off are recorded when received. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the allowance for doubtful accounts was not significant. The Company does not accrue interest on accounts receivable.

Inventories:

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined on the first-in, first-out method) or market. Inventories consist primarily of merchandise held for sale. Inventories were comprised of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

	2013		2012
Finished goods	$	62,690	$	39,353
Raw materials		1,370		858
Finished goods in transit		3,696		6,679
Total	$	67,756	$	46,890

Income taxes:

Subsequent to August 21, 2012, the Company has recognized deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company estimates the degree to which tax assets and credit carry forwards will result in a benefit based on expected profitability by tax jurisdiction. A valuation allowance for such tax assets and loss carry forwards is provided when it is determined to be more likely than not that the benefit of such deferred tax asset will not be realized in future periods. If it becomes more likely than not that a tax asset will be used, the related valuation allowance on such assets would be reduced.

Revenue recognition:

Sales are recognized upon pick up or delivery of products which is when transfer of title to a customer occurs, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. The Company is required to charge and collect sales and other taxes on sales to its customers and remit the taxes back to the government authorities. Sales and other taxes are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets but excluded from the consolidated statements of income.

The Company accrues a liability for sales returns in the period that the related sales are recognized. The customer may receive a refund or exchange the original product for a replacement of equal or similar quality for an indefinite period of time after the original purchase. Revenues are recognized net of expected returns, which we estimate using historical return rates and lag patterns as a percentage of sales.

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Cost of sales:

Cost of sales includes the total cost of our products sold, including, operating and transportation costs to move our products from our vendors to the Company’s distribution centers, inventory reserves and adjustments, and shipping charges associated with sales to our customers.

Stock based compensation:

The Company has given equity linked incentives to certain employees. The Company accounts for equity linked incentives in accordance with ASC 718 “Stock Compensation”. ASC 718 addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for equity instruments of the enterprise or liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments.

Prior to the Business Combination, the Company has issued cash settled and equity settled awards. Until consummation of the Business Combination, the cash settled awards were classified as liabilities as required under ASC 718. At each reporting date the liability was measured at intrinsic value with resulting changes recognized in the consolidated statements of income.

Since consummation of the Business Combination, the Company has only equity settled awards. The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based payments on the grant date at fair value, net of estimated forfeitures. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation costs over the requisite service period of the award. The financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 recognize compensation cost for the portion of outstanding awards which have vested during the applicable year.

Restricted stock:

The Company awards restricted common shares to selected employees, and non-employee directors. Recipients are not required to provide any consideration other than continued service. Company share awards are subject to certain restrictions on transfer, and all or part of the shares awarded may be subject to forfeiture upon the occurrence of certain events, including employment termination. The restricted stock is valued at its grant date fair value and expensed over the requisite service period or the vesting term of the award.

Concentration of risk:

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits. By their nature, all such instruments involve risks including credit risks of non-performance by counterparties. A substantial portion of the Company's cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits are invested with banks with high investment grade credit ratings.

Segments:

The Company’s operations consist primarily of retail sales of manufactured and natural stone tiles, setting and maintenance materials, and related accessories in stores located in the United States and through its website. The Company’s chief operating decision maker only reviews the consolidated results of the Company and accordingly the Company has concluded it has one reportable segment.

Advertising costs:

Advertising costs are charged to expense as incurred. Advertising costs were $6.2 million; $2.9 million and $2.1 million, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income. Magazine advertisements, internet advertisements, media broadcasts and billboard advertising made up the majority of our advertising costs in all three years.

Pre-opening costs:

Our pre-opening costs are those typically associated with the openings of a new store and generally include rent expense, payroll costs and promotional costs. We expense pre-opening costs as incurred which are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, we reported pre-opening costs of $2.4 million, $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Property and equipment:

Property, equipment and leasehold improvements are recorded at cost. Improvements are capitalized while repairs and maintenance costs are charged to operations when incurred. Property and equipment is depreciated or amortized using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from three to seven years. Assets purchased under a capital lease are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease (including renewal terms) term or the estimated useful life of the asset. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. The cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold or otherwise disposed of are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss thereon is included in the results of operations.

	Asset life (in years)
Buildings and building improvements		40
Leasehold improvements	8	-	26
Furniture and fixtures	3	-	7
Machinery and equipment	5	-	7
Computer equipment	5	-	7
Purchased, and internally developed computer software	3	-	5
Vehicles	3	-	5

Internal use software:

The Company capitalizes software development costs incurred during the application development stage related to new software or major enhancements to the functionality of existing software that is developed solely to meet the Company’s internal operational needs and when no substantive plans exist or are being developed to market the software externally. Costs capitalized include external direct costs of materials and services and internal payroll and payroll-related costs. Any costs during the preliminary project stage or related to training or maintenance is expensed as incurred. Capitalization ceases when the software project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. The capitalization and ongoing assessment of recoverability of development costs requires considerable judgment by management with respect to certain external factors, including, but not limited to, technological and economic feasibility, and estimated economic life. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, $0.6 million and $0 was included in construction in progress. When the software is ready for the intended use, these costs will be amortized over their estimated useful lives of three years. There was no amortization expense related to capitalized software during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Debt issuance costs:

The Company capitalized approximately $1.3 million and $0.6 million of debt issuance costs during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company amortizes the debt issuance costs using the effective interest method over the life of the related debt instrument and includes these costs with other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Amortization of debt issuance costs of approximately $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and $0 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, is included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of income. The remaining balance of deferred costs was approximately $1.8 million at December 31, 2013.

Accrued warrant liability:

Warrants were accounted for as derivative instruments in accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 815-40, Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity. As such, changes in the fair value of the warrants were recorded in the statements of income as “Change in fair value of warrant liability.” As of December 31, 2013, the Company had no outstanding warrants.

Leases:

The Company classifies all leases at the inception date as either a capital lease or an operating lease. Leases of assets under which there is transfer of substantially the entire risk and rewards incidental to ownership as per ASC 840 “Leases” are classified as capital leases. All other leases are classified as operating leases.

Assets under capital leases are capitalized and lease payments are allocated to the lease obligation and interest on the obligation amount.

Rent expense on operating leases is charged to expense in accordance with the terms of the agreement. For leases that contain fixed escalation of the minimum rent, rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis through the end of the lease term. The start of the lease term is the earlier of the lease commencement date or the date the Company takes possession of the asset. The difference between the straight-line rent amounts and amounts payable under the leases is recorded as deferred rent.

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Self insurance:

The Company is self-insured for certain employee health benefit claims. The Company estimates a liability for aggregate losses below stop-loss coverage limits based on estimates of the ultimate costs to be incurred to settle known claims and claims not reported as of the balance sheet date. The estimated liability is not discounted and is based on a number of assumptions and factors including historical trends, and economic conditions. This liability could be affected if future occurrences and claims differ from these assumptions and historical trends. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, an accrual of approximately $0.1 and $0.2 million related to estimated claims was included in other current liabilities, respectively.

Note 4: Property Plant and Equipment:

Property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

	2013			2012
Land	$	703		$	703
Building and building improvements		18,685			13,246
Leasehold improvements		56,239			40,513
Furniture and fixtures		83,925			64,979
Machinery and equipment		21,360			13,258
Computer equipment		7,849			6,044
Purchased computer software		2,775			2,663
Vehicles		2,518			2,154
Construction in progress		8,480			2,434
Total property, plant and equipment		202,534			145,994
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(75,288	)		(62,103	)
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization of capital leases		(1,929	)		(1,811	)
Total property, plant and equipment, net	$	125,317		$	82,080

Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment, including capital leases, was approximately $14.3 million, $10.5 million and $8.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Note 5: Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

	2013		2012
Customer deposits	$	5,301	$	4,080
Accrued wages and salaries		2,905		2,912
Taxes - other		1,783		1,490
Interest payable		409		349
Sales return reserve		2,850		1,815
Current portion of capital lease obligation		280		234
Total accrued liabilities	$	13,528	$	10,880

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6: Long-term debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

	2013		2012
Variable interest rate (0.37% at both December 31, 2013 and 2012) bonds, which mature April 1, 2023, collateralized by buildings and equipment	$	1,085	$	1,445
Term note payable - quarterly installments of $0.875 million, interest at 2.4084% and 2.6154% at December 31, 2013 and 2012, through October 2017		20,625		24,125
Commercial bank credit facility		73,526		47,600
		95,236		73,170
Less: current portion		3,590		3,860
Debt obligations, net of current portion	$	91,646	$	69,310

Approximate annual aggregate maturities of debts are as follows: (thousands):

Fiscal year
2014	$	3,590
2015		3,595
2016		3,595
2017		83,751
2018		105
Thereafter		600
Total future maturities payments	$	95,236

On October 3, 2012, the Company and its operating subsidiary, The Tile Shop, LLC, entered into a credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement, as amended, provides the Company with a $120 million senior secured credit facility, comprised of a five-year $25 million term loan and a $95 million revolving line of credit. The Amended Credit Agreement is secured by virtually all of the assets of the Company, including but not limited to, inventory, receivables, equipment and real property. Borrowings pursuant to the Credit Agreement bear interest at either a base rate or a LIBOR-based rate, at the option of the Company. The LIBOR-based rate will range from LIBOR plus 1.75% to 2.25%, depending on The Tile Shop’s leverage ratio. The base rate is equal to the greatest of: (a) the Federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) the Bank of America “prime rate,” and (c) the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%, in each case plus 0.75% to 1.25% depending on The Tile Shop’s leverage ratio. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the base interest rate was 4.25%. At December 31, 2013 and 2012 the LIBOR-based interest rate was 2.408% and 2.615%, respectively. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had outstanding borrowings related to the revolving line of credit of $73.5 million and $47.6 million, respectively. The term loan requires quarterly principal payments of $0.875 million. The Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, conditions to borrowings, and restrictive covenants, including restrictions on the Company’s and The Tile Shop’s ability to dispose of assets, make acquisitions, incur additional debt, incur liens, make investments, or enter into transactions with affiliates on other than on terms that could be obtained in an arm’s length transaction. The Credit Agreement also includes financial and other covenants including covenants to maintain certain fixed charge coverage ratios and rent adjusted leverage ratios. In addition, except with respect to pro rata payments made by The Tile Shop or other subsidiaries to the Company or any other equity owner of such entity, the Credit Agreement prohibits the payment of cash dividends. The Company was in compliance with the covenants during the year ended December 31, 2013, based on an amendment dated April 30, 2013 which excluded the impact of the repurchase of warrants and the repurchase of capital stock, up to the amount of cash proceeds received from warrant exercises, from the calculation of certain financial covenants and an amendment dated July 8, 2013 which excluded the liabilities related to the New Market Tax Credit transaction (Note 13) in our leverage ratio.

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Capital Leases:

The Company has several leases for store facilities that are accounted for as capital leases. These leases expire at various dates through 2022. Assets acquired under capital leases are included in property, plant and equipment.

As of December 31, 2013, minimum lease payments under the Company's capital lease obligation were as follows (thousands):

Fiscal year
2014	$	472
2015		418
2016		217
2017		211
2018		216
Thereafter		737
Less: amounts representing interest		(830	)
Present value of future minimum lease payments		1,441
Less: current portion		280
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion	$	1,161

Note 7: Commitments and Contingencies

Operating leases:

The Company leases buildings and office space under various operating lease agreements. In addition to rent, most leases require payment of real estate taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance. The leases generally have an initial lease term of 10 to 15 years and contain renewal options and escalation clauses. For leases that contain fixed escalation of the minimum rent, or rent holidays, rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis through the end of the lease term including renewals. The difference between the straight-line rent amounts and amounts payable under the leases is recorded as deferred rent. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, rent expense was approximately $19.5 million, $14.0 million, and $11.4 million, respectively.

Annual minimum rentals under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows, for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

Fiscal year
2014	$	20,669
2015		21,150
2016		21,152
2017		21,466
2018		21,889
Thereafter		292,065
Total future maturities payments	$	398,391

Legal proceedings:

As a retail company, we are subject to various claims relating to workers compensation, disclosure inaccuracies and employee matters. Some litigation against us could take the form of class action complaints or derivative actions by stockholders. The Company establishes accruals for potential exposure, as appropriate, for claims against the Company when losses become probable and reasonably estimable. Where the Company is able to reasonably estimate a range of potential losses, the Company records the amount within that range that constitutes the Company’s best estimate. The Company also discloses the nature and range of loss for claims against the Company when losses are reasonably possible and material. In the opinion of management, the outcome of litigation currently pending will not materially impact the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8: Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

These consolidated financial statements include the following financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, accounts payable, accrued expenses, capital leases, notes payable, debt and warrant liability. At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the carrying amount of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximated their fair values due to their short-term maturities. The carrying value of the Company’s borrowings and capital lease obligation approximates fair value based upon the market interest rates available to the Company for debt and capital lease obligations with similar risk and maturities.

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. To measure fair value, the Company uses a three-tier valuation hierarchy based upon observable and non-observable inputs:

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

Level 2 – Significant other observable inputs available at the measurement date, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, either directly or indirectly, including:

	■	Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
	■	Quoted prices for identical or similar assets in non-active markets;
	■	Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and
	■	Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by other observable market data.

Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions.

Our common stock warrants were listed for trading on the OTC market. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had $0 and $95.6 million, respectively, in an accrued liability classified as a Level 1 security, related to warrants to purchase common stock. Warrant expense related to the change in fair value of warrants was $54.2 million and $82.1 million for years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Note 9: Related Party Transactions

In January 2012, TS, Inc., ILTS and JWTS sold (i) an aggregate of 129,333 Common Units of The Tile Shop to Mr. Krasnow, (ii) an aggregate of 646,667 Common Units of The Tile Shop to the Peter H. Kamin Revocable Trust dated February 2003, the Peter H. Kamin Childrens Trust dated March 2007, and 3K Limited Partnership, entities of which Mr. Kamin is trustee or general partner, as applicable, (iii) an aggregate of 25,867 Common Units of The Tile Shop to Family Office Investors LLC, an entity in which Mark Riser, a member of the board of managers of The Tile Shop prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, is the sole member, and (iv) an aggregate of 19,400 Common Units of The Tile Shop to Warren Garden, in each case for $7.732 per unit. In connection with these transactions, The Tile Shop made certain representations and warranties.

During the years ended 2012 and 2011 The Tile Shop made payments of $300,000 to TS, Inc. in connection with the final redemption of an aggregate of 3,000,000 special cash distribution units of The Tile Shop issued to TS, Inc., which were fully-redeemed by The Tile Shop during 2012. In lieu of paying such amounts to TS, Inc. in cash, The Tile Shop reduced the outstanding amount under a promissory note, dated December 30, 2002, made by TS, Inc. and payable to The Tile Shop. Total principal payments made in cash related to this promissory note were approximately $1,205,000 and $263,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Between November 2013 and January 2014, the Company learned about certain related party transactions that existed during 2011 and 2012 that had not been previously disclosed. These relationships are described in the paragraphs that follow.

During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Tile Shop made payments of $16.9 million, $12.5 million and $6.3 million, respectively to Beijing Pingxiu (“BP”), a Chinese entity that primarily processed export transactions on behalf of the Company's vendors. In Novemeber 2011, a former employee and brother-in-law of the Company's CEO became the owner of BP. The payments made to BP for the period of November 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 were $1.7 million. The Company had approximately $0 and $1.0 million in accounts payable due to BP at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Tile Shop made payments of $2.8 million, $2.1 million and $1.7 million, respectively, to Nanyang Helin Stone Co. Ltd. (“Nanyang”), a company partially owned by a former Company employee and brother-in-law of the Company’s CEO. The Company has notified Nanyang that it will continue business with Nanyang only if the former employee’s ownership is transferred to an unrelated party and the former employee is not an officer or director of Nanyang. The Company had approximately $0.5 million and $0.2 million in accounts payable due to Nanyang at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 10: Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted- average number of common shares outstanding, after giving effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Common stock issued to The Tile Shop members in exchange for their ownership interests in The Tile Shop are retroactively reflected from January 1, 2010 as the number of shares outstanding in all periods prior to August 21, 2012 for the purpose of the earnings (loss) per share calculation. The additional shares issued as part of the business combination have been reflected as outstanding shares from August 21, 2012. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, diluted net loss per share is identical to basic net loss per share as potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per common share because the inclusion of such securities would be anti-dilutive.

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share was calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

	2013			2012			2011
Net (loss) income	$	(35,660	)	$	(46,887	)	$	31,360
Weighted-average shares outstanding - basic and diluted		49,600,396			35,837,609			32,261,168
Basic and diluted net (loss) income per share	$	(0.72	)	$	(1.31	)	$	0.97

Note 11: Equity Incentive Plans

2006 Plan:

In 2006, The Tile Shop created an equity incentive deferred compensation plan for certain key employees. The plan provisions called for granting participation units to key employees to allow them to participate in the increased value of The Tile Shop. Under the plan, the units granted were payable in cash on the 10th or 15th anniversary of the award, except in the event of death or a change of control in The Tile Shop, in which case settlement would occur on date of death of employee or date of change or control. On the settlement date, the participants would be paid cash equal to the difference between Fair Market Value as determined in accordance with the plan (“FMV”) of The Tile Shop’s common units as of the valuation date immediately preceding the exercise date less the initial FMV multiplied by the number of units.

In June 2006, 600,000 units were granted, which were exercisable on the 10th anniversary of the award. The initial FMV of the units was $1.203 per unit. The second grant of 200,000 units occurred on May 25, 2007 at an initial FMV of $2.1245 per unit which were exercisable on the 15th anniversary of the award. The final grant under the plan was on made January 1, 2009 for 200,000 units, which were exercisable on the 15th anniversary of the award. The initial FMV for these units was $3.1725 per unit. All the units vested immediately. These awards were accounted for under ASC 718 and classified as liabilities. The Company measured the liability at intrinsic value at each reporting period. Fluctuations in the intrinsic value of the liability award were recorded as increases or decreases in compensation expense immediately as the awards were fully vested at the grant date. The intrinsic value was calculated based on the difference between FMV of the Company’s common unit, based on an analysis of enterprise value at each valuation date, and the initial FMV determined in accordance with the plan.

Effective immediately prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, The Tile Shop terminated the 2006 Plan and agreed to make a lump- sum cash payment to each holder of the equity units one day following the first anniversary of the effective date of the Business Combination. The Company recognized compensation expense of $3.9 million and $1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to this plan. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company paid the entire balance of the deferred compensation liability.

January 2012 Plan:

On January 1, 2012, The Tile Shop granted and issued 233,500 Series 2012 Participating Capital Appreciation Common Units (“Restricted Stock Units”) to two members of its board of managers. The Restricted Stock Units were a new series of common units designated by the board of managers. These awards vested equally over a four year period on the anniversary of issuance, except on occurrence of a significant event in which they will vest immediately. The Restricted Stock Units were subject to a recapture amount of $300 million as of the issue date, reduced from time to time by the aggregate amount of distributions (not including tax distributions) made, from and after the issue date, by The Tile Shop to the common holders with respect to their common units. No distributions were to be paid to the Series 2012 holders with respect to their Series 2012 units until the date that the common holders collectively have received distributions (not including tax distributions) of $300 million.

These awards were accounted for under ASC 718 and were classified as liabilities and measured at intrinsic value. Pursuant to the plan, effective immediately prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, the Restricted Stock Units fully vested. As a result, the Company recorded a $0.5 million charge during the year ended December 31, 2012 to the income statement to record the deferred compensation expense resulting from the accelerated vesting of the Restricted Stock Units. The Company recognized compensation cost of $0 and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 related to these units. As a part of the Business Combination transaction the Restricted Stock Units were exchanged for common shares of the Company.

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2012 Plan:

Under the 2012 Omnibus Award Plan (the “2012 Plan”), 2,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were initially reserved for issuance pursuant to a variety of stock-based compensation awards, including stock options, and restricted stock awards. The number of shares initially reserved for issuance or transfer pursuant to awards under the 2012 Plan was to be increased on the first day of each calendar year beginning in 2013 and ending in 2022, in an amount equal to the lesser of (A) 2,500,000 shares, (B) six percent (6%) of the shares of common stock outstanding (on an as-converted basis) on the last day of the immediately preceding calendar year, and (C) such smaller number of shares of stock as determined by the Company’s board of directors. During 2013, (i) 2,500,000 shares of common stock were added to the 2012 Plan reserve effective January 1, 2013 in accordance with the automatic share increase provision of the 2012 Plan, (ii) the 2012 Plan was amended to eliminate the automatic share increase for subsequent years, and (iii) the 2012 Plan was amended to authorize grants of performance-based awards, which may be paid in cash or equity. The 2102 Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders in July 2013.

Stock Options:

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company granted stock options to its employees that included service condition requirements.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company granted stock options to its employees that included both service condition requirements and market conditions. The options issued provide for the options to be vested in two different tranches:

(1)	two-thirds of the total grant vests 25% on each anniversary of the grant date for four years provided the employee has provided continued service; and

(2)	one-third of the total grant vests 25% on each anniversary of the grant date based both on the appreciation in the price of the Company’s common stock by 20% annually and continued service to the Company.

The options provide for certain acceleration of vesting and cancellation of options under different circumstances, such as a change in control, death, disability and termination of service. For the portion of the options that vest only based upon a service condition, the Company recognizes compensation expense net of estimated forfeitures on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. For the portion of the options that contain both a market and service condition, the Company recognizes compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, using graded vesting over the requisite service period.

The fair value of each option grant containing only a service condition was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing. The assumptions used in the option valuation models are outlined in the following table:

	2013				2012
Risk-free interest rate	.81%	to	1.6	%	.60	-	.62
Expected life (years)		7			5.5	-	7
Expected volatility	45%	-	46	%	38%	-	46	%

The fair value of each option grant containing market and service conditions was estimated on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo Simulation analysis valuation model and assumes that price target thresholds will be achieved. If such price target thresholds are not met, compensation cost is not reversed. The inputs for expected volatility, expected dividends, and risk-free rate used in estimating those options’ fair value are the same as those noted in the table related to options issued with service conditions only, except the expected life for the options granted that contain market conditions is derived from the pricing model.

The computation of the expected volatility assumptions used in the option valuation models was based on historical volatilities and implied volatilities of the Company and peer companies. The Company utilized the volatilities of peer companies due to its lack of extensive history. For the options containing only a service condition, the Company used the “simplified” method for an expected life as prescribed in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 110, for companies that do not have adequate historical data. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield was zero based on the fact the company has not paid dividends, nor does it intend to pay dividends in the future.

Stock based compensation related to options for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $3.3 million ($0.07 per share basic), $1.3 million ($0.02 per share basic), and $0, respectively, and was included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income. As of December 31, 2013, the total future compensation cost related to non-vested options not yet recognized in the consolidated statement of income was $11.0 million, of which $0.9 million is attributable to vesting upon price target thresholds being met and $10.1 million is attributable to time-based vesting. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years. This is an estimate based on options currently outstanding and therefore this projected expense could be more in the future. Using the closing stock price of $18.07, on December 31, 2013, the number of non-vested shares outstanding was 1,868,918 with an intrinsic value of $9.8 million.

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table summarizes stock option activity:

	Options			Weighted Avg Exercise price		Weighted Avg Grant Date Fair Value		Weighted Avg Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
Outstanding at beginning of period		1,751,000		$	10.10	$	5.19		9.7
Granted		709,500		$	23.54	$	11.12
Exercised		(22,999	)	$	10.00	$	5.00
Cancelled/Forfeited		(162,584	)	$	13.96	$	6.87
Outstanding at end of period		2,274,917		$	14.02	$	6.92		8.9
Options exercisable at end of period		405,999		$	10.11	$	5.13		8.7
Vested during the year		430,248		$	10.10	$	5.12
Non vested at December 31, 2012		1,751,000		$	10.10	$	5.19
Non vested at December 31, 2013		1,868,918		$	14.86	$	7.32

Using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, management has determined that the service conditions only options issued in 2012 have a weighted-average grant date fair value of $5.56. Using the Monte Carlo Simulation analysis valuation model for the portion of the options that have a market and a service condition, management has determined the weighted-average grant date fair value to be $4.46.

Aggregate fair value of options vested during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $2.0 million and $0 million, respectively. Intrinsic value as of December 31, 2013 is based on the fair value price of $18.07, which was the closing price of the stock on December 31, 2013. Based on the $18.07 fair value of the stock, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding at December 31, 2013, and exercisable, and exercised during the year ended December 31, 2013 is $13.1 million and $3.2 million, and $0.3 million, respectively. There were no options vested or exercised during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Options outstanding as of December 31, 2013 are as follows:

Range of Exercise Price					Weighted Average
			Options		Exercise Price		Remaining Contractual Life-Years
$10.00	to	$15.00		1,602,917	$	10.00		8.64
$15.01	to	$20.00		233,000	$	17.57		9.11
$20.01	to	$25.00		166,000	$	23.03		9.60
$25.01	to	$30.00		273,000	$	29.07		9.70

Restricted Stock:

On October 1, 2013, the Company granted an executive officer an award of 50,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company, which vests and becomes unrestricted as to one-quarter of the total number of shares of common stock on each of October 1, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017, subject to continued service as an employee, officer, or director of the Company. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The grant-date fair value of these awards, as determined by the fair market value on date of grant, was $28.94 per share.

On August 21, 2012, the Company granted an executive officer an award of 250,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company, which vests and becomes unrestricted as to one-third of the total number of shares of common stock on each of December 31, 2013, 2014, and 2015, subject to continued service as an employee, officer, or director of the Company. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The grant-date fair value of these awards, as determined by the fair market value on date of grant, was $11 per share.

Furthermore, on August 21, 2013 and 2012, the Company granted 14,230 and 45,000, respectively, shares of restricted common stock to its directors which vest at the end of one year from date of grant subject to continued service as directors of the Company. The grant-date fair value of these awards, as determined by the fair market value on date of grant, was $25.91 and $11 per share, respectively. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The total expense associated with restricted stock for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $1.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, there was $3.3 million of total unrecognized expense related to unvested restricted stock awards, which are expected to vest, and are being amortized through 2017. The fair value of restricted stock granted in the 2013 fiscal year was $1.2 million. The total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended December 31, 2013 was $2.3 million. Using the closing stock price of $18.07, on December 31, 2013, the number of restricted shares outstanding and expected to vest was 230,896, with an intrinsic value of $4.2 million.

Warrants:

In connection with the Merger, each outstanding JWCAC warrant that was formerly exercisable for one share of JWCAC common stock became exercisable for one share of the Company’s common stock. Total warrants outstanding as of the merger date was 17,833,333 warrants at an exercise price of $11.50 per share, and an expiration date of August 21, 2017.

The warrants were listed for trading on the OTC market. The terms of the warrants include a provision (the “Price Reduction Provision”) that requires the Company to reduce the exercise price by a stated formula if (i) the Company completes a transaction involving a reclassification or reorganization of the outstanding shares of its common stock, a merger or consolidation in which it is not the surviving company, or a sale of its assets and (ii) at least 30% of the consideration payable to common stockholders as a result of that transaction is not common stock listed on a national securities exchange or the OTC Bulletin Board.

The Company evaluated the warrants under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 815-40, Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity. ASC Section 815-40-15 addresses equity versus liability treatment and classification of equity-linked financial instruments, including common stock purchase warrants, and states that a warrant may be classified as a component of equity only if, among other things, the warrant is indexed only to the issuer’s common stock. Under ASC Section 815-40-15, a warrant is not indexed to the issuer’s common stock if the terms of the warrant require an adjustment to the exercise price upon a specified event and that event is not an input to the fair value of the warrant. Based on its evaluation, the Company concluded that the warrants are not indexed to the Company’s common stock in the manner contemplated by ASC Section 815-40-15 because the transactions that will trigger the Price Reduction Provision are not inputs to the fair value of the warrants. Accordingly, the existence of the Price Reduction Provision in the warrants required us to classify the warrants as a derivative liability.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had no outstanding warrants. During the year ended December 31, 2013, 1) 7,166,381 warrants were exercised for cash proceeds of $82.4 million and 2) 6,731,938 warrants were exercised on a cashless basis in exchange for of 2,790,061 shares.

In March 2013, we completed the purchase of 3,580,004 outstanding warrants in private transactions. The aggregate purchase price to acquire the warrants was approximately $30.1 million. These purchases were funded with the cash proceeds received from the exercise of publicly held warrants.

In April 2013, we directed our transfer agent to notify the holders of any remaining outstanding warrants of the call for early exercise. These warrant holders had until May 12, 2013 to exercise their outstanding warrants on a cashless basis. Thereafter, any warrants that remained unexercised were automatically redeemed by the Company at a redemption price of $0.01 per warrant in cash. On May 15, 2013, we automatically redeemed 7,071 warrants.

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 12: Income Taxes

As a result of the Business Combination, beginning August 21, 2012, the Company’s results of operations are taxed as a C Corporation. Prior to the Business Combination, The Tile Shop’s operations were taxed as a limited liability company, whereby The Tile Shop elected to be taxed as a partnership and the income or loss was required to be reported by each respective member on their separate income tax returns. Therefore, no provision for federal income taxes was provided in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for periods prior to August 21, 2012. The provision recorded prior to August 21, 2012, represents income taxes primarily payable by the LLC, due to minimum fees in several states and income tax in the state of Michigan. The following amounts represent the determination of the deferred tax assets and liabilities recognized in the Business Combination. The change in status to a taxable entity and the transactions consummated as part of the Business Combination resulted in the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of The Tile Shop’s assets and liabilities at the date of the Business Combination including the following: (i) historical outside basis difference at December 31, 2011, (ii) outside basis differences occurring in 2012 prior to the Business Combination, and (iii) the tax basis increase of The Tile Shop membership interests directly held by TS Holdings related to the Business Combination. At December 31, 2013, outside basis differences originating prior to the Business Combination related primarily to temporary basis differences in inventory, fixed assets, accruals, and Section 743, totaled approximately $6.4 million, which have been tax-effected at a 40% combined federal and state rate. This deferred tax assets of $.6 million and $5.9 million were recognized and included in the tax benefit for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. In addition, deferred tax assets of $0.4 million and $27.7 million, during the periods ending December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, were recognized in connection with the Business Combination transactions (related to item (iii) above), which enables the Company to realize future tax deductions for the step-up in basis of the Tile Shop member ownership interests that have been contributed to the Company. These basis differences were credited directly to additional paid in capital as of the closing of the Business Combination.

We have adopted ASC 740-10 relating to “Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes”. As a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10, no adjustment for uncertain tax positions was required. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we have not recognized any liabilities for uncertain tax positions nor have we accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. It is our policy to record interest and penalties through income tax expense.

Components of net deferred income taxes are as follows at December 31 (thousands):

	2013		2012
Deferred income tax assets:
Section 743 carryforward	$	35,300	$	37,657
Deferred compensation accrual		-		2,416
Leasehold improvement reimbursements		4,435		3,264
Inventory		1,102		2,126
Deferred rent		2,290		-
Stock based compensation		248		-
Other		985		1,178
Total deferred income tax assets	$	44,360	$	46,641

Deferred income tax liabilities
Stock based compensation		-		824
Depreciation		17,481		15,588
Total deferred income tax liabilities		17,481		16,412
Net deferred income tax assets	$	26,879	$	30,229

Components of (provision for) benefit from income taxes is as follows (thousands):

	2013
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes	Federal			State			Total
Current	$	(5,634	)	$	(2,520	)	$	(8,154	)
Deferred		(4,007	)		218			(3,788	)
	$	(9,640	)	$	(2,301	)	$	(11,942	)

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	2012
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes	Federal			State			Total
Current		(149	)		(570	)		(719	)
Deferred		2,381			340			2,721
Total	$	2,232		$	(230	)	$	2,002

The following table reflects the effective income tax rate reconciliation for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (thousands):

	2013			2012			2011
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes:	$	(23,718	)	$	(48,889	)	$	32,093
Income tax benefit (provision) at federal statutory rate (35%), (34%) and (34%)		8,301			16,622			(10,912	)

Income from entity not subject to tax		-			8,561			10,912
State tax, net of federal tax benefit		(1,529	)		3,450			-
Change in warrant liability		(18,976	)		(31,734	)		-
Minimum state fees before business combination		98			(534	)		(733	)
Section 743 step up		561			5,900			-
Stock based compensation		(573	)		(182	)		-
Domestic production activities deduction		57			-			-
Change in deferred rate		(94	)		-			-
Other, net		214			(81	)		-
	$	(11,942	)	$	(2,002	)	$	(733	)

The Tile Shop, LLC tax returns for periods 2010 through the Business Combination on August 21, 2012, are subject to examination by the IRS however, these tax liabilities are the responsibility of the former Tile Shop members. The Company’s federal and state tax returns for the period ended December 31, 2012 remains subject to examination

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 13: New Market Tax Credit

In July 2013 we entered into a financing transaction with Chase Community Equity or “Chase,”, and U.S. Bank Community, LLC or “U.S. Bank”, collectively the “investors” related to a $19.1 million acquisition, rehabilitation and construction of our new distribution and manufacturing center in Durant, Oklahoma. The investors made a capital contribution to, and Tile Shop Lending made a loan to Chase New Market Tax Credit, The Tile Shop of Oklahoma Investment Fund, LLC, and The Tile Shop Investment Fund LLC, or the “Investment Funds,” under a qualified New Markets Tax Credit, or “NMTC,” program. The NMTC program was provided for in the Community Renewal Tax Relief Act of 2000, or the “Act,” and is intended to induce capital investment in qualified lower income communities. The Act permits taxpayers to claim credits against their Federal income taxes for up to 39% of qualified investments in the equity of community development entities, or “CDEs.” CDEs are privately managed investment institutions that are certified to make qualified low-income community investments, or “QLICIs.”

In July 2013 Tile Shop Lending loaned $13.5 million to the Investment Funds at an interest rate of 1.35% per year and with a maturity of September 30, 2043. The Investment Funds then contributed the loan to certain CDEs, which, in turn, loaned the funds on similar terms to Tile Shop of Oklahoma, LLC, our indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary. The proceeds of the loans from the CDEs (including loans representing the capital contribution made by the investors, net of syndication fees) were used to partially fund the new manufacturing and distribution center project.

In July 2013, the investors also contributed $5.6 million to the Investment Funds and, by virtue of such contribution, are entitled to substantially all of the tax benefits derived from the NMTCs, while we effectively received net loan proceeds equal to investor’s contributions to the Investment Fund. This transaction includes a put/call provision whereby we may be obligated or entitled to repurchase the investors’ interest. We believe that the investors will exercise the put option in September 2020 at the end of the recapture period. The value attributed to the put/call is de minimis. The NMTC is subject to 100% recapture for a period of seven years as provided in the Internal Revenue Code. We are required to be in compliance with various regulations and contractual provisions that apply to the NMTC arrangement. Non-compliance with applicable requirements could result in projected tax benefits not being realized and, therefore, could require us to indemnify the investors for any loss or recapture of NMTCs related to the financing until such time as our obligation to deliver tax benefits is relieved. We do not anticipate any credit recaptures will be required in connection with this arrangement.

We have determined that the financing arrangement with the Investment Funds and CDEs contains a variable interest entity, or “VIE.” The ongoing activities of the Investment Funds – collecting and remitting interest and fees and NMTC compliance – were all considered in the initial design and are not expected to significantly affect economic performance throughout the life of the Investment Funds. Management considered the contractual arrangements that obligate us to deliver tax benefits and provide various other guarantees to the structure; Chase’s and U.S. Bank Community LLC’s lack of a material interest in the underling economics of the project; and the fact that we are obligated to absorb losses of the Investment Fund. We concluded that we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE and consolidated the Investment Funds, as a VIE, in accordance with the accounting standards for consolidation. Chase’s and U.S. Bank Community LLC’s contributions of $4.4 million, net of syndication fees, are included in cash, restricted cash, and other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The benefit of this net $4.4 million contribution will be recognized as a decrease in depreciation expense as we amortize the contribution liability over the seven-year compliance period as it is being earned through our on-going compliance with the conditions of the NMTC program. Direct costs of $1.0 million incurred in structuring the financing arrangement are deferred and will be recognized as expense over the term of the loans. Incremental costs to maintain the structure during the compliance period are recognized as incurred. The restricted cash is expected to be released in during 2014.

Note 14: Retirement Savings Plan

The Company has a 401(k) profit sharing plan covering substantially all full-time employees. Employee contributions are limited to the maximum amount allowable by the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matched approximately $0.4 million, $0.3 million, and $0 million of employee contributions in 2013, 2012, and 2011 and made no discretionary contributions for any of the years presented.

Note 15: Supplemental Cash Flows Information (thousands)

	2013		2012		2011
Cash paid for interest	$	2,521	$	349	$	443
Cash paid for income taxes	$	15,006	$	195	$	527
Non cash items:
Issuance of promissory note as a part of merger transaction	$	-	$	69,771	$	-
Increase in accrued expenses and APIC through merger transactions	$	-	$	1,662	$	-
Increase in APIC for merger consideration	$	1,102	$	2,490	$	-
Warrants recorded as a liability as part of merger transaction	$	-	$	15,150	$	-
Reclassification of warrant liability to equity	$	149,865	$	1,568	$	-
Increase in fixed assets through accounts payable	$	4,783	$	1,516	$	100
Cashless exercises of warrants	$	-	$	-	$	-
Cashless exercises of stock options	$	-	$	-	$	-
Increase in long-term liabilities and restricted cash, net of debt issuance costs	$	3,465	$	-	$	-

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 15: - Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31 are summarized below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	First Quarter				Second Quarter		Third Quarter				Fourth Quarter
2013
Net sales	$	56,835			$	58,123	$	56,800			$	57,806
Gross profit		40,373				40,866		39,814				39,756
Income from operations		12,019				10,476		7,607				2,976
Net income (loss)		(44,717	)	⁽¹⁾		3,584		4,050				1,423
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share		(1.00	)			0.07		0.08				0.82

2012
Net sales	$	45,861			$	46,314	$	44,288			$	46,187
Gross profit		33,688				33,659		32,092				33,585
Income from operations		10,464				10,903		5,569				7,475
Net income (loss)		10,133				10,657		(31,865	)	⁽¹⁾		(34,412	)	⁽¹⁾
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share		0.32				0.33		(0.87	)			(1.01	)

(1) Includes non-recurring, non-cash change in fair value of warrants.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	TILE SHOP HOLDINGS, INC.
Date: February 28, 2014	/s/ ROBERT A. RUCKER
	Robert A. Rucker
	Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes ROBERT A. RUCKER and TIMOTHY C. CLAYTON, or either of them, as his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all said attorney-in-fact and agent, or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

Signature			Date

/s/ ROBERT A. RUCKER			February 28, 2014

Robert A. Rucker
Chief Executive Officer,
Director (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ TIMOTHY C. CLAYTON			February 28, 2014

Timothy C. Clayton
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/ WILLIAM E. WATTS			February 28, 2014

William E. Watts
Director and Chairman of the Board of Directors

/s/ PETER J. JACULLO			February 28, 2014

Peter J. Jacullo, Director

/s/ PETER H. KAMIN			February 28, 2014

Peter H. Kamin, Director

/s/ TODD KRASNOW			February 28, 2014

Todd Krasnow, Director

/s/ADAM L. SUTTIN			February 28, 2014

Adam L. Suttin, Director

TILE SHOP HOLDINGS, INC.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.

Description

2.1

Contribution and Merger Agreement, dated June 27, 2012, by and among JWC Acquisition Corp., The Tile Shop, LLC, members of The Tile Shop, LLC, Nabron International, Inc. Tile Shop Merger Sub, Inc. and Sellers’ representative – incorporated by reference to exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by JWCAC on June 27, 2012.

3.1

Certificate of Incorporation of Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form S-4 dated July 2, 2012.

3.2

Bylaws of Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Form S-4 dated July 2, 2012.

4.1

Specimen Common Stock Certificate – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Form S-4 dated July 23, 2012.

10.1

Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 27, 2012, by and among JWC Acquisition Corp., Tile Shop Holdings, Inc., certain members of JWC Acquisition, LLC, Nabron International, Inc., The Tile Shop, Inc., JWTS, Inc. and certain other members of The Tile Shop, LLC – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by JWC Acquisition Corp. on June 27, 2012.

10.2*

Offer Letter Agreement, dated June 24, 2012, by and between Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Robert A. Rucker – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Form S-4 dated July 2, 2012.

10.3*

Offer Letter Agreement, dated June 24, 2012, by and between Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Joseph Kinder – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Form S-4 dated July 2, 2012.

10.4*

Offer Letter Agreement, dated June 24, 2012, by and between Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Carl Randazzo – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Form S-4 dated July 2, 2012.

10.5*

Offer Letter Agreement, dated June 24, 2012, by and between Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Leigh H. Behrman – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Form S-4 dated July 2, 2012.

10.6*

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. 2012 Omnibus Award Plan (f/k/a 2012 Equity Award Plan) – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 26, 2013.

10.7*

Amended And Restated Amendment No. 1 to The Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. 2012 Omnibus Award Plan (f/k/a 2012 Equity Award Plan) – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 26, 2013.

10.8

Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and each of its directors and executive officers – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Form S-4 dated July 23, 2012.

10.9*

Offer Letter Agreement, dated July 28, 2012, by and between Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Timothy C. Clayton – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Form S-4 dated July 31, 2012.

10.10

Credit Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2012, by and among the Company, The Tile Shop, certain subsidiaries of The Tile Shop, each lender from time to time party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated October 3, 2012.

10.11

Security Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2012, by and among the Company, The Tile Shop, ILTS, LLC, JWC Acquisition Corp., The Tile Shop of Michigan, LLC, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated October 3, 2012.

10.12

Guaranty Agreement, dated as of October 3, 2012, by and among the Company, The Tile Shop, ILTS, LLC, JWC Acquisition Corp., The Tile Shop of Michigan, LLC, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated October 3, 2012.

10.13

Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2013, by and among Tile Shop Holdings, Inc., The Tile Shop, LLC, certain subsidiaries of The Tile Shop, LLC and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender, and L/C Issuer – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

10.14

Stock Purchase Agreement by and between Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Nabron International, Inc., dated May 24, 2013 – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 30, 2013.

10.15*

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Agreement – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 26, 2013.

10.16*

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 26, 2013.

10.17*

Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. Stock Restriction Agreement – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 26, 2013.

10.18

Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2013, by and among Tile Shop Holdings, Inc., The Tile Shop, LLC, certain subsidiaries of The Tile Shop, LLC and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender, and L/C Issuer – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013.

10.19*

Employment Agreement, between Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. and Chris Homeister, effective October 1, 2013 – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 1, 2013.

21.1

Subsidiaries of Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. – filed herewith.

23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm – filed herewith.

23.2

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public accounting firm – filed herewith.

24.1

Power of Attorney (included on the “Signatures” page of this Form 10-K).

31.1

Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – filed herewith.

31.2

Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – filed herewith.

32.1**

Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – filed herewith.

32.2**

Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – filed herewith.

101.INS+

XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH+

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL+

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF+

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB+

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE+

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

	*	Management compensatory plan or arrangement.
	**	These certificates are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference in any filing we make under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) documents are furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections.