PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

COMMON STOCK INFORMATION

Our Common Stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “UNF”, while our Class B Common Stock is not publicly traded. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices of our Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange, and the dividends per share paid on our Common Stock and Class B Common Stock.

The approximate number of shareholders of record of our Common Stock and Class B Common Stock as of November 7, 2008 were 95 and 20, respectively. We believe that the number of beneficial owners of our Common Stock is substantially greater than the number of record holders because a large portion of our Common Stock is held of record in broker ‘‘street names.’’

We have paid regular quarterly dividends since 1983 and intend to continue such policy subject to, among other factors, our earnings, financial condition and capital requirements. No dividends will be payable unless declared by our Board of Directors and then only to the extent funds are legally available for the payment of such dividends. In the event that our Board of Directors votes to pay a dividend, our Common Stock must receive a dividend equal to no less than 125% of any dividend paid on the Class B Common Stock. On July 8, 2008, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.0375 and $0.0300 per share on our Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, respectively, that was paid on October 3, 2008 to shareholders of record on September 12, 2008.

The following table sets forth information concerning our equity compensation plans as of August 30, 2008.

Stock Performance Graph

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return on our Common Stock, based on the market price of our Common Stock, with the cumulative total shareholder return of a peer group and of companies within the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index, in each case assuming reinvestment of dividends. The peer group is composed of Cintas Corporation, G & K Services, Inc. and Angelica Corporation. The calculation of cumulative total shareholder return assumes a $100 investment in our Common Stock, the peer group and the S&P 500 Stock Index on August 31, 2003.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.

The selected consolidated balance sheet data set forth below as of August 30, 2008 and August 25, 2007 and the selected consolidated income statement data for the three years in the period ended August 30, 2008 are derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All other selected consolidated financial data set forth below are derived from our audited financial statements not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The per share data listed below is accounted for in accordance with the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FAS 128. EITF Issue No. 03-6 provides guidance in determining when the two-class method, as defined in Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 128, Earnings per Share, should be utilized in calculating earnings per share. Our Common Stock has a 25% dividend preference to our Class B Common Stock. The Class B Common Stock, which has ten votes per share as opposed to one vote per share for the Common Stock, is not freely transferable but may be converted at any time on a one-for-one basis into Common Stock at the option of the holder of the Class B Common Stock. EITF Issue No. 03-6 requires the income per share for each class of common stock to be calculated assuming 100% of our earnings are distributed as dividends to each class of common stock based on their respective dividend rights.

Five Year Financial Summary

UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Business Overview

UniFirst Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, hereunder referred to as “we”, “our”, the “Company” or “UniFirst” is one of the largest providers of workplace uniforms and protective clothing in the United States. We design, manufacture, personalize, rent, clean, deliver, and sell a wide range of uniforms and protective clothing, including shirts, pants, jackets, coveralls, lab coats, smocks, aprons and specialized protective wear, such as flame resistant and high visibility garments. We also rent industrial wiping products, floor mats, facility service products and other non-garment items, and provide first aid cabinet services and other safety supplies, to a variety of manufacturers, retailers and service companies.

We serve businesses of all sizes in numerous industry categories. Our typical customers include automobile service centers and dealers, delivery services, food and general merchandise retailers, food processors and service operations, light manufacturers, maintenance facilities, restaurants, service companies, soft and durable goods wholesalers, transportation companies, and others who require employee clothing for image, identification, protection or utility purposes. We also provide our customers with restroom supplies, including air fresheners, paper products and hand soaps.

At certain specialized facilities, we also decontaminate and clean work clothes that may have been exposed to radioactive materials and service special clean room protective wear. Our typical customers for these specialized services include government agencies, research and development laboratories, high technology companies and utilities operating nuclear reactors.

We continue to expand into additional geographic markets through acquisitions and organic growth. We currently service over 200,000 customer locations in the United States, Canada and Europe from 201 customer service, distribution and manufacturing facilities.

SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information of those segments to be presented in interim financial reports issued to shareholders. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance. Our chief operating decision maker, as defined under SFAS No. 131, is our chief executive officer. We have six operating segments based on the information reviewed by our chief executive officer: US Rental and Cleaning, Canadian Rental and Cleaning, Manufacturing (“MFG”), Specialty Garments Rental and Cleaning (“Specialty Garments”), First Aid and Corporate. The US Rental and Cleaning and Canadian Rental and Cleaning operating segments have been combined to form the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment. Refer to Note 14 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for our disclosure of segment information.

The US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment purchases, rents, cleans, delivers and sells, uniforms and protective clothing and non-garment items in the United States and Canada. The operations of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment are referred to by us as our ‘industrial laundry operations’ and we refer to the locations related to this reporting segment as our ‘industrial laundries’.

The MFG operating segment designs and manufactures uniforms and non-garment items primarily for the purpose of providing these goods to the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment. The amounts reflected as revenues of MFG are generated when goods are shipped from our manufacturing facilities to our other locations. These revenues are recorded at a transfer price which is typically in excess of the actual manufacturing cost. The transfer price is determined by our management and may not necessarily represent the fair value of the products manufactured. Products are carried in inventory and subsequently placed in service and amortized at this transfer price. On a consolidated basis, intercompany MFG revenues and MFG income are eliminated and the carrying value of inventories and rental merchandise in service is reduced to the manufacturing cost. Income before income taxes from MFG, net of the intercompany MFG elimination, was $29.1 million, $25.1 million, and $23.8 million for the years ended August 30, 2008, August 25, 2007 and August 26, 2006, respectively. This income offsets the merchandise amortization costs incurred by the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment as the merchandise costs of this reporting segment are amortized and recognized based on inventories purchased from MFG at the transfer price which is above our manufacturing cost.

The Corporate operating segment consists of costs associated with our distribution center, sales and marketing, information systems, engineering, materials management, manufacturing planning, finance, budgeting, human resources, other general and administrative costs and interest expense. The revenues generated from the Corporate operating segment represent certain direct sales made directly from our distribution center. The products sold by this operating segment are the same products rented and sold by the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment. In the segment disclosures in Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements, no assets or capital expenditures are presented for the Corporate operating segment as no assets are allocated to this operating segment in the information reviewed by our chief executive officer. However, depreciation and amortization expense related to certain assets are reflected in income from operations and income before income taxes for the Corporate operating segment. The assets that give rise to this depreciation and amortization are included in the total assets of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment as this is how they are tracked and reviewed by us.

We refer to our US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning, MFG, and Corporate segments combined as our ‘core laundry operations’.

The Specialty Garments operating segment purchases, rents, cleans, delivers and sells, specialty garments and non-garment items primarily for nuclear and clean room applications. The First Aid operating segment sells first aid cabinet services and other safety supplies.

Approximately 90% of our revenues in fiscal 2008 were derived from US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning, and Corporate. A key driver of this business is the number of workers employed by our customers. Our revenues are directly impacted by fluctuations in these employment levels. Revenues from Specialty Garments, which accounted for 7% of our 2008 revenues, increase during outages and refueling by nuclear power plants, as garment usage increases at these times. First Aid represented 3% of our total revenue in fiscal 2008.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We believe the following critical accounting policies reflect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are based on historical information, current trends, and information available from other sources. The actual results could differ from our estimates.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of our foreign operations is the local country’s currency. Transaction gains and losses, including gains and losses on our intercompany transactions, are included in Other expense (income), in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Assets and liabilities of operations outside the United States are translated into U.S. dollars using period-end exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates in effect during each month of the fiscal year. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included in shareholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We recognize revenue from rental operations in the period in which the services are provided. Direct sale revenue is recognized in the period in which the services are performed or when the product is shipped. Our judgment and estimates are used in determining the collectability of accounts receivable and evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. We consider specific accounts receivable and historical bad debt experience, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and the age of outstanding balances as part of our evaluation. Changes in our estimates are reflected in the period they become known. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Material changes in our estimates may result in significant differences in the amount and timing of bad debt expense recognition for any given period.

Inventories and Rental Merchandise in Service

Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value, net of any reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the likelihood that new goods on hand can be sold to our customers or used in our rental operations. Historical inventory usage and current revenue trends are considered in estimating both excess and obsolete inventories. If actual product demand and market conditions are less favorable than the amount we projected, additional inventory write-downs may be required. We use the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method to value our inventories, which primarily consist of finished goods.

Rental merchandise in service is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated service lives of the merchandise, which range from 6 to 36 months. In establishing estimated lives for merchandise in service, our management considers historical experience and the intended use of the merchandise. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of operating profit for any period if we make significant changes to our estimates.

Goodwill, Intangibles and Other Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is not amortized. SFAS No. 142 requires that companies test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis. In addition, SFAS No. 142 also requires that companies test goodwill if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit to which goodwill is assigned below its carrying amount. Our evaluation considers changes in the operating environment, competitive information, market trends, operating performance and cash flow modeling. We complete our annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and there have been no impairments of goodwill or other intangible assets in fiscal 2008, 2007 or 2006 or any events or circumstances that would indicate that there may have been any impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets during such periods. Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill or other intangibles associated with previously acquired businesses are impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Property and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets are depreciated or amortized over their useful lives. Useful lives are based on our estimates of the period that the assets will generate revenue. Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate an asset may be impaired. There were no material impairments of property and equipment or definite-lived intangible assets in fiscal 2008, 2007 or 2006.

Insurance

We self-insure for certain obligations related to health, workers’ compensation, vehicles and general liability programs. We also purchase stop-loss insurance policies to protect ourselves from catastrophic losses. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the potential value associated with reported claims and for events that have occurred, but have not been reported. Our estimates consider historical claim experience and other factors. Our liabilities are based on our estimates, and, while we believe that our accruals are adequate, the ultimate liability may be significantly different from the amounts recorded. Changes in our claim experience, our ability to settle claims or other estimates and judgments we use could have a material impact on the amount and timing of expense for any given period.

Environmental and Other Contingencies

We are subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of our business operations, including environmental matters, personal injury, customer contract matters and employment claims. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. We regularly consult with our attorneys and outside consultants to ensure that all of the relevant facts and circumstances are being considered, before a contingent liability is recorded. We record accruals for environmental and other contingencies based on enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, our estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments, and the input of our attorneys and outside consultants.

The estimated liability for environmental contingencies has been discounted using risk-free interest rates ranging from 4% to 4.5% over periods ranging from ten to thirty years. The estimated current costs, net of legal settlements with insurance carriers, have been adjusted for the estimated impact of inflation at 3% per year. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, our estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments and the input of our attorneys and outside consultants based on changing legal or factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for our environmental and other contingent liabilities. Refer to Note 10 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion and analysis.

Asset Retirement Obligations

We follow the provisions of SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which generally applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset. Under this accounting method, we recognize asset retirement obligations in the period in which they are incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset.

We have recognized as a liability the present value of the estimated future costs to decommission our nuclear laundry facilities in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 143. We depreciate, on a straight-line basis, the amount added to property and equipment and recognize accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the various remaining lives which range from approximately one to twenty-three years.

Our estimated liability has been based on historical experience in decommissioning nuclear laundry facilities, estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, external vendor estimates as to the cost to decommission these assets in the future, and federal and state regulatory requirements. The estimated current costs have been adjusted for the estimated impact of inflation at 3% per year. The liability has been discounted using credit-adjusted risk-free rates that range from approximately 3% to 7%. Revisions to the liability could occur due to changes in the estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, estimated dates of decommissioning, changes in decommissioning costs, changes in federal or state regulatory guidance on the decommissioning of such facilities, or other changes in estimates. Changes due to revisions in our estimates will be recognized by adjusting the carrying amount of the liability and the related long-lived asset if the assets are still in service, or charged to expense in the period if the assets are no longer in service.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We account for our derivative instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and related authoritative guidance. All derivative instruments are recorded as other assets or other liabilities at fair value, which is calculated as an estimate of the future cash flows, and subsequent changes in a derivative’s fair value are recognized in income, unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Cash flows associated with derivatives are classified in the same category as the cash flows hedged in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting are classified as a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be paid related to a recognized liability or a forecasted transaction. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is highly effective and designated as a cash flow hedge are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income until expense from the cash flows of the hedged items are recognized. We perform an assessment at the inception of the hedge and on a quarterly basis thereafter, to determine whether our derivatives are highly effective in offsetting changes in the value of the hedged items. Any changes in the fair value resulting from hedge ineffectiveness, is immediately recognized as income or expense.

Our hedging activities are transacted only with highly rated institutions, reducing our exposure to credit risk in the event of nonperformance.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and other Pension Plans

We account for our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and other pension plans in accordance with SFAS No. 87, Employer’s Accounting for Pension, as amended by SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. Under SFAS No. 87, pension expense is recognized on an accrual basis over employees’ estimated service periods. Pension expense calculated under SFAS No. 87 is generally independent of funding decisions or requirements.

The calculation of pension expense and the corresponding liability requires us to use of a number of critical assumptions, including the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the assumed discount rate. Changes in our assumptions can result in different expense and liability amounts, and future actual experience can differ from these assumptions. Pension expense increases as the expected rate of return on pension plan assets decreases. Future changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the participants in our pension plans will impact our future pension expense and liabilities. We cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the amounts recognized for income tax and financial reporting purposes at currently enacted tax rates. We compute income tax expense by jurisdiction based on our operations in each jurisdiction.

We are periodically reviewed by domestic and foreign tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due. These reviews include questions regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposure associated with various filing positions, we recorded estimated reserves for probable exposures, in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, through August 25, 2007. On August 26, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which fundamentally changed the way we are required to treat our uncertain tax positions for financial accounting purposes. Refer to “Recent Accounting Pronouncements”, in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Note 3, “Income Taxes”, for further discussion regarding our adoption of FIN No. 48.

Results of Operations

The following table presents (in thousands, except for percentages), as a percent of total revenue, certain selected financial data for our three fiscal years ended August 30, 2008, August 25, 2007 and August 26, 2006. Operating costs presented below include merchandise costs related to the amortization of rental merchandise in service and direct sales as well as labor and other production, service and delivery costs associated with operating our industrial laundries, Specialty Garments facilities, First Aid locations and our distribution center. Selling and administrative costs include costs related to our sales and marketing functions as well as general and administrative costs associated with our corporate offices and operating locations including information systems, engineering, materials management, manufacturing planning, finance, budgeting, and human resources.

(1) Exclusive of depreciation on our property and equipment and amortization of our intangible assets.

Revenues and income (loss) from operations by reporting segment for the three fiscal years ended August 30, 2008, August 25, 2007, and August 26, 2006, are presented in the following table. Refer to Note 14 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of our reporting segments.

General

We derive our revenues through the design, manufacture, personalization, rental, cleaning, delivering, and selling of a wide range of uniforms and protective clothing, including shirts, pants, jackets, coveralls, lab coats, smocks and aprons and specialized protective wear, such as flame resistant and high visibility garments. We also rent industrial wiping products, floor mats, facility service products, other non-garment items, and provide first aid cabinet services and other safety supplies, to a variety of manufacturers, retailers and service companies. We have five reporting segments, US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning, Manufacturing (“MFG”), Corporate, Specialty Garments Rental and Cleaning (“Specialty Garments”), and First Aid. We refer to the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning, MFG, and Corporate reporting segments combined as our “core laundry operations.”

Operating costs include merchandise costs related to the amortization of rental merchandise in service and direct sales as well as labor and other production, service and delivery costs, and distribution costs associated with operating our core laundry operations, Specialty Garments facilities, and First Aid locations. Selling and administrative costs include costs related to our sales and marketing functions as well as general and administrative costs associated with our corporate offices and operating locations including information systems, engineering, materials management, manufacturing planning, finance, budgeting, and human resources.

Fiscal Year Ended August 30, 2008 Compared with Fiscal Year Ended August 25, 2007

Revenues

In fiscal 2008, our consolidated revenues increased by $121.1 million from the comparable period in 2007, or 13.4%. This increase was primarily due to organic growth, which accounted for a 7.2% increase in revenue. The remaining increase was attributable to incremental acquisition-related revenues, which accounted for a 2.9% increase in revenue, the effect of an extra week in fiscal 2008 compared to 2007, which accounted for a 2.2% increase in revenue, and the effect of foreign exchange fluctuations, which accounted for a 1.1% increase in revenue. On a segment reporting basis, the core laundry operation’s revenues increased in fiscal 2008 by 13.9% compared to fiscal 2007. This increase was due to organic growth of 7.5%, acquisition-related growth of 3.2%, the effect of the extra week in fiscal 2008 of 2.2%, and the effect of foreign exchange fluctuations of 1.0%. Specialty Garments’ revenues increased in fiscal 2008 by 13.9% compared to fiscal 2007, which was driven by strong growth in the segment’s Canadian and European business, the benefit of the extra week as well as the effect of favorable foreign exchange fluctuations. First Aid revenues decreased by 0.7% in fiscal 2008 compared to the prior year due to a difficult selling environment as well as the discontinuance of a product line in fiscal 2008.

Operating costs

Operating costs increased to $643.9 million, or 62.9% of revenues, for fiscal 2008 as compared to $572.2 million, or 63.4% of revenues, for fiscal 2007. The decrease in costs as a percent of revenue was primarily attributable to lower merchandise costs in our core laundry business as a percentage of revenues compared to fiscal 2007. In addition, the strong revenue growth within our core laundry operations resulted in a decrease in production payroll as a percentage of revenues. These benefits were partially offset by higher energy costs associated with operating our fleet of delivery trucks, as well as by higher overall operating costs as a percentage of revenues in our Specialty Garments segment.

Selling and administrative expense

Selling and administrative expenses increased to $216.9 million, or 21.2% of revenues, for fiscal 2008 from $197.2 million, or 21.9% of revenues, for fiscal 2007. The decrease in selling and administrative expenses as a percent of revenues was primarily due to the strong revenue growth within our core laundry operations, which resulted in a decrease in certain administrative payroll costs as a percentage of revenues. In addition, we made adjustments to our environmental reserves as well as severance expense related to the departure of one of our senior executives in fiscal 2007, both affecting the core laundry operations. Overall selling and administrative costs associated with our Specialty Garments segment increased as a percentage of segment revenues in fiscal 2008.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $5.3 million, from $48.5 million in fiscal 2007 to $53.8 million in fiscal 2008. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was due to capital expenditure and acquisition activity. As a percent of revenues, however, depreciation and amortization expense decreased to 5.3% in fiscal 2008 compared to 5.4% in fiscal 2007.

Income from operations

For the year ended August 30, 2008, the revenue growth in our core laundry operations and Specialty Garments segments, as well as the changes in our costs discussed above, resulted in the following changes in our income from operations:

Other expense (income)

Other expense (income), which includes interest expense, interest income and foreign currency exchange (gain) loss, decreased by $0.8 million to $9.9 million in fiscal 2008 compared to $10.7 million in 2007. Net interest expense decreased due to lower interest rates affecting our variable interest borrowings under our Floating Rate Notes. The effect of the lower average interest rates more than offset an increase in our average debt outstanding during the period. Our average debt outstanding increased from $208.3 million during fiscal 2007 to $220.8 million during fiscal 2008. In fiscal 2008, we experienced a foreign exchange loss of $0.2 million compared to a gain of $0.1 million in fiscal 2007.

Provision for income taxes

Our effective income tax rate was 38.2% for fiscal 2008 and 38.5% for fiscal 2007. The decrease in our effective income tax rate in fiscal 2008 was primarily due to the reduction of tax reserves the Company determined were no longer required and a lower Canadian tax rate.

Fiscal Year Ended August 25, 2007 Compared with Fiscal Year Ended August 26, 2006

Revenues

In 2007, our consolidated revenues increased by $81.1 million from the comparable period in 2006, or 9.9%. This increase was primarily due to organic growth, which accounted for a 6.9% increase in revenue. The remaining increase was attributable to incremental acquisition related revenues, which accounted for 2.4% of the increase, and the effect of foreign exchange fluctuations, which accounted for the remaining 0.5% of the increase. On a segment reporting basis, the core laundry operation’s revenues increased in 2007 by 9.2% compared to fiscal 2006. This increase was due to organic growth of 6.4%, acquisition-related growth of 2.6% and the effect of foreign exchange fluctuations of 0.2%. Specialty Garments’ revenue increased in 2007 by 21.9% compared to fiscal 2006, and was primarily driven by strong growth in the segment’s Canadian and European business. First Aid revenues increased by 5.0% in fiscal 2007 compared to the prior fiscal year.

Operating costs

Operating costs increased to $572.2 million, or 63.4% of revenues, for 2007 as compared to $524.7 million, or 63.9% of revenues, for 2006. The decrease in costs as a percent of revenue was primarily attributable to lower energy costs associated with operation of our industrial laundries and our fleet of delivery vehicles. In addition, our core laundry operations saw modest reductions in its production payroll costs as a percentage of revenues. Overall, operating costs from Specialty Garments also decreased as a percent of segment revenues due to its increase in revenues as well as an incremental $0.8 million in expense incurred in fiscal 2006 related to the decommissioning of two of its facilities. During fiscal 2007, First Aid operating costs increased as a percent of segment revenues due to transition costs it experienced while consolidating its distribution facilities.

Selling and administrative expense

Selling and administrative expenses increased to $197.2 million, or 21.9% of revenues, for 2007 from $177.6 million, or 21.6% of revenues, for 2006. The increase in selling and administrative expenses as a percent of revenues was primarily due to adjustments made in fiscal 2007 to our environmental reserves as well as severance expense related to the departure of one of our senior executives, both affecting the core laundry operations. In addition, we recorded a $0.6 million gain from the sale of one of our industrial laundry facilities in fiscal 2006. Overall, selling and administrative costs associated with our Specialty Garments segment decreased as a percentage of segment revenues due to the increase in revenues discussed above.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $3.2 million, from $45.3 million in fiscal 2006 to $48.5 million in fiscal 2007, but decreased as a percent of revenues from 5.5% to 5.4%. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was due to capital expenditure and acquisition activity.

Income from operations

For the year ended August 25, 2007, the revenue growth in our core laundry operations, Specialty Garments and First Aid Segments, as well as the change in our costs, discussed above, resulted in the following changes in our income from operations:

Other expense (income)

Other expense, which includes interest expense, interest income and foreign currency gain (loss), increased by $1.5 million to $10.7 million in 2007, compared to $9.2 million in 2006. Net interest expense increased due to an increase in our average debt outstanding, which increased from $193.6 million during fiscal 2006 to $208.3 million during 2007, as well as higher interest rates affecting our variable interest borrowings under our Floating Rate Notes. In fiscal 2007, we had a foreign exchange gain of $0.1 million compared to a gain of $0.4 million in fiscal 2006.

Provision for income taxes

Our effective income tax rate was 38.5% for 2007 and 39.0% for 2006. The decrease in our effective income tax rate in fiscal 2007 was primarily due to lower state income tax expenses and other permanent items as a percentage of pretax income as compared to 2006.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General.  For the fiscal year ended August 30, 2008, we had a net increase in cash and cash equivalents of $13.0 million. As of August 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $25.7 million and working capital of $133.2 million. We believe that current cash and cash equivalent balances, cash generated from operations and amounts available under our Amended Credit Agreement (defined below) will be sufficient to meet our currently anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements.

Sources and uses of cash. During the fiscal year ended August 30, 2008, we generated cash from operating activities of $119.5 million resulting primarily from net income of $61.0 million, amounts charged for depreciation and amortization of $53.8 million, increases in accounts payable and accruals of $13.4 million, increases in accrued and deferred income taxes of $1.8 million, and amounts charged to share-based compensation of $1.1 million. These inflows were partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $8.5 million, an increase in rental merchandise in service of $2.0 million, and an increase in inventories of $1.8 million. We used cash to, among other things, fund $73.8 million in capital expenditures and fund the acquisition of businesses of approximately $61.0 million. Our long-term debt increased by approximately $29.8 million as a result of $175.4 million of borrowings offset by $145.6 million of payments during the year ended August 30, 2008

Long-term debt and borrowing capacity. As of September 26, 2006, we had a $125.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of banks, which would have matured on September 2, 2007. However, on September 13, 2006, we amended our Credit Agreement. This new agreement (“Amended Credit Agreement”) matures on September 13, 2011 and allows for maximum outstanding borrowings of $225.0 million. Under the Amended Credit Agreement, we can borrow funds at variable interest rates based on the Eurodollar rate or the bank’s prime rate, as selected by us. Availability of credit requires our compliance with certain amended financial and other covenants, including a maximum funded debt ratio and minimum interest coverage as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement. We generally test our compliance with these financial covenants on a fiscal quarterly basis. At August 30, 2008, the interest rates applicable to our borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement were calculated as LIBOR plus 50 basis points at the time of the respective borrowing and ranged from 2.96% to 5.00%. As of August 30, 2008, we had outstanding borrowings of approximately $54.9 million and outstanding letters of credit of $32.3 million, which leaves $137.8 million available for borrowing.

On June 14, 2004, we issued $165.0 million of fixed and floating rate notes pursuant to a Note Purchase Agreement (“Note Agreement”). Under the Note Agreement, we issued $75.0 million of notes with a seven year term (June 2011) bearing interest at 5.27% (“Fixed Rate Notes”). We also issued $90.0 million of floating rate notes due in ten years (June 2014) (“Floating Rate Notes”). Of the Floating Rate Notes, $15.0 million bore interest at LIBOR plus 75 basis points and were repaid in September 2005. The remaining $75.0 million bore interest at LIBOR plus 70 basis points and were repaid at face value on September 14, 2006.

On September 14, 2006, we issued $100.0 million of floating rates notes (“2006 Floating Rate Notes”) pursuant to a Note Purchase Agreement (“2006 Note Agreement”). The 2006 Floating Rate Notes mature on September 14, 2013, bear interest at LIBOR plus 50 basis points and may be repaid at face value two years from the date of issuance. The proceeds from the issuance of the 2006 Floating Rate Notes were used to first repay the $75.0 million of outstanding Floating Rate Notes and then to pay down outstanding amounts under the Amended Credit Agreement.

As of August 30, 2008, we were in compliance with all the covenants under the Amended Credit Agreement, the Note Agreement and the 2006 Note Agreement.

In January 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement to manage our exposure to interest rate movements and the related effect on our variable rate debt. The swap agreement, with a notional amount of $100.0 million, matures on March 14, 2011. We pay a fixed rate of 3.51% and receive a variable rate tied to the three month LIBOR rate. We have accounted for this instrument as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133 and, as a result, have recorded all changes in the fair value of the swap agreement in accumulated other comprehensive income, a component of shareholders’ equity. For additional information on the interest rate swap, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Environmental and Legal Contingencies

We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous wastes and other substances. In particular, industrial laundries currently use and must dispose of detergent waste water and other residues, and, in the past, used perchloroethylene and other dry cleaning solvents. We are attentive to the environmental concerns surrounding the disposal of these materials and have, through the years, taken measures to avoid their improper disposal. Over the years, we have settled, or contributed to the settlement of, actions or claims brought against us relating to the disposal of hazardous materials and there can be no assurance that we will not have to expend material amounts to remediate the consequences of any such disposal in the future.

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. We regularly consult with attorneys and outside consultants to ensure that all of the relevant facts and circumstances are considered, before a contingent liability is recorded. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, management’s estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments and the input of outside consultants and attorneys based on changing legal or factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for environmental and other contingent liabilities.

Under environmental laws, an owner or lessee of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances located on, or in, or emanating from such property, as well as related costs of investigation and property damage. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or lessee knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. There can be no assurances that acquired or leased locations have been operated in compliance with environmental laws and regulations or that future uses or conditions will not result in the imposition of liability upon our Company under such laws or expose our Company to third party actions such as tort suits. We continue to address environmental conditions under terms of consent orders negotiated with the applicable environmental authorities or otherwise with respect to sites located in or related to Woburn, Massachusetts, Somerville, Massachusetts, Springfield, Massachusetts, Uvalde, Texas, Stockton, California, three sites in Williamstown, Vermont, as well as a number of additional locations that we acquired as part of our acquisition of Textilease Corporation in September 2003.

We have accrued certain costs related to the sites described above as it has been determined that the costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. We continue to investigate environmental conditions at the Somerville, Massachusetts site. The full nature and extent of those conditions, and of the remedial solutions that may be employed to address them, have not yet been finally determined. In the interim, as the investigation proceeds, we are implementing measures to mitigate potential impacts in the vicinity of the site. We also have potential exposure related to an additional parcel of land (the ‘‘Central Area’’) related to the Woburn, Massachusetts site discussed above. Currently, the consent order for the Woburn, Massachusetts site discussed above does not define or require any remediation work in the Central Area. We have not accrued for this contingency as we believe, at this time, the liability is not probable and the amount of such contingent liability cannot be reasonably estimated.

We routinely review and evaluate sites that may require remediation and monitoring and determine our estimated costs based on various estimates and assumptions. These estimates are developed using our internal sources or by third-party environmental engineers or other service providers. Internally developed estimates are based on:

There is usually a range of reasonable estimates of the costs associated with each site. We generally use the amount within the range that constitutes our best estimate. When we believe that both the amount of a particular liability and the timing of the payments are reliably determinable, we adjust the cost in current dollars using a rate of 3% for inflation until the time of expected payment and discount the cost to present value using risk-free interest rates ranging from 4% to 4.5%.

For environmental liabilities that have been discounted, we include interest accretion, based on the effective interest method, in operating costs on the consolidated statements of income. The changes to our environmental liabilities for the years ended August 30, 2008 and August 25, 2007 are as follows (in thousands):

In fiscal 2008 and 2007, we made adjustments to increase our environmental related reserves by $2.5 million and $6.6 million, respectively. These increases were primarily due to an ongoing investigation at one of our environmental exposure sites.

Anticipated payments and insurance proceeds of currently identified environmental remediation liabilities as of August 30, 2008 for the next five years and thereafter as measured in current dollars are reflected below.