UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
¨ | Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
x | Definitive Proxy Statement |
¨ | Definitive Additional Materials |
¨ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to 240.14a-12 |
First National Community Bancorp, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant) |
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x | No fee required. |
¨ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
¨ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) Amount previously paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.
FIRST NATIONAL COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC.
102 East Drinker Street
Dunmore, Pennsylvania 18512
NOTICE OF 2014 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of First National Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held at First National Community Bank’s (the “Bank”) Exeter Branch Office located at 1625 Wyoming Avenue, Exeter, Pennsylvania 18643, on May 21, 2014 at 9:00 A.M. Eastern Time, for the following purposes:
1. | To elect three (3) directors to the Board of Directors for terms expiring in 2017 and until their successors are elected; |
2. | To approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (referred to as the Company’s 2014 say-on-pay
proposal); and |
3. | To transact any other business properly presented at the annual meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. |
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” each of the proposals named above.
The Board of Directors fixed April 8, 2014, as the record date (the “Record Date”) for determining shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting. Only shareholders of record of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on that date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting.
Please refer to the attached proxy statement and the 2013 Annual Report to Shareholders. You may obtain a copy of this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K including the financial statements and exhibits for the 2013 fiscal year at no cost on our website at www.fncb.com/investorrelations.
IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOUR SHARES BE REPRESENTED REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER YOU OWN. EVEN IF YOU PLAN TO BE PRESENT, YOU ARE URGED TO COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN YOUR PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED SELF-ADDRESSED, STAMPED ENVELOPE OR VOTE VIA THE TOLL-FREE NUMBER OR VIA THE INTERNET. YOU MAY REVOKE ANY PROXY GIVEN IN WRITING OR IN PERSON AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO THE VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING.
By Order of the Board of Directors, | |
/s/ Dominick L. DeNaples | |
Dominick L. DeNaples, Chairman | |
Dunmore, Pennsylvania | |
April 18, 2014 |
2 |
PROXY STATEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE | |
Frequently Asked Questions and Answers | 4 |
General Information | 6 |
Date, Time and Place of Meeting | 6 |
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials | 6 |
Purpose of the Annual Meeting | 6 |
Record Date, Quorum and Voting Rights | 7 |
Solicitation of Proxies and Voting | 7 |
Revocation of Proxies | 8 |
Principal Beneficial Owners of the Company’s Common Stock | 9 |
Principal Owners | 9 |
Beneficial Ownership by Directors, Executive Officers and Nominees | 9 |
PROPOSAL 1 Election of Directors | 11 |
Nomination of Directors | 12 |
Information as to Nominees | 12 |
Information as to Directors Who Will Continue in Office | 13 |
Information as to Executive Officers and Significant Employees | 15 |
Corporate Governance | 17 |
Code of Ethics | 18 |
Shareholder Communications | 18 |
Submission of Shareholder Proposals | 18 |
The Board of Directors | 19 |
Committees of the Board of Directors | 20 |
Compensation Committee | 21 |
Risk Management Committee | 21 |
Corporate Governance Committee | 21 |
Director Nominations | 22 |
Audit Committee | 22 |
Report of the Audit Committee | 23 |
Executive Compensation | 23 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 23 |
Summary Compensation Table | 34 |
Grants of Plan-Based Awards | 36 |
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control | 38 |
Director Compensation | 39 |
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation | 41 |
Compensation Committee Report | 41 |
Stock Performance Graph and Table | 43 |
PROPOSAL 2 Say-On-Pay Proposal | 44 |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions | 44 |
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 46 |
Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 47 |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance | 47 |
Other Matters | 47 |
Additional Information | 48 |
3 |
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Who is entitled to vote?
Only those shareholders who held their shares of record as of the close of business on April 8, 2014, the Record Date, are entitled to vote. As of April 8, 2014, there were 16,471,569 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each of the Company’s shareholders on the Record Date is entitled to one vote per share.
How do I vote?
If you are a shareholder of record as of April 8, 2014, you may vote your shares by using one of four methods: mail, via the internet, telephone or in person. (See instructions on the proxy card).
How does discretionary authority apply?
If you are a shareholder of record and vote by proxy but make no specification on your proxy card that you have otherwise properly executed, the named agent(s) may vote the shares represented by your proxy by voting FOR each of the proposals listed on the proxy card.
Is my vote confidential?
Yes. Only the Judge of Election, the proxy holders and the transfer agent will have access to your proxy. All comments will remain confidential unless you ask that your name be disclosed.
Who will count the votes?
A representative of Registrar and Transfer Company, the Company’s transfer agent, will tabulate the votes and act as Judge of Election.
What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy?
Your shares are probably registered differently or are held in more than one account. Vote all proxies to ensure that all your shares are voted.
What constitutes a quorum?
As of April 8, 2014, 16,471,569 shares of common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. The presence, in person or by proxy, of shareholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes which all shareholders are entitled to cast, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the annual meeting. If you vote by proxy or in person, you will be considered part of the quorum.
What percentage of stock do the directors and officers own?
Approximately 16.60% of our common stock as of March 31, 2014 is owned by the directors and officers combined. (See page 10 of the proxy statement for more details).
4 |
What are the solicitation expenses?
The Company has retained Registrar and Transfer Company of Cranford, New Jersey as its transfer agent. In its capacity as transfer agent, Registrar and Transfer Company will assist in the distribution of proxy materials and solicitation of votes, and will act as the Judge of Election. The estimated fee to provide these services is $8,600 plus out-of-pocket expenses.
Who is the largest principal shareholder?
The largest principal shareholder as of April 8, 2014 is Louis A. DeNaples (see page 9 of the proxy statement for more details).
How many votes are needed to approve each proposal and what are the effects of abstentions or broker nonvotes on the voting results?
Proposal Number |
Item |
Vote Required for Approval of Each Item |
Abstentions* |
Uninstructed Shares/Effect of Broker Nonvotes |
Signed but Unmarked Proxy Cards |
||||||
1 | Election of Directors | Plurality | No effect | Not voted/No effect | Voted “for” | ||||||
2 | Advisory Vote for Say-on-Pay | Majority of votes cast | No effect | Not voted/No effect | Voted “for” |
* Abstentions are included in determining whether a quorum is present.
5 |
First National Community Bancorp, Inc.
102 E. Drinker Street
Dunmore, PA 18512
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS, May 21, 2014
Date, Time and Place of Annual Meeting
This proxy statement is being furnished for the solicitation by the Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or “Board”) of First National Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), a Pennsylvania business corporation and registered bank holding company, of proxies to be voted at the Company’s 2014 annual meeting of shareholders. The annual meeting will be held at First National Community Bank’s (the “Bank”) Exeter Branch Office, 1625 Wyoming Avenue, Exeter, Pennsylvania 18643 on Monday, May 21, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., prevailing time. All inquiries regarding the annual meeting should be directed to Michael J. Cestone, Jr., Secretary of the Company. This proxy statement and the enclosed form of proxy are first being sent to shareholders of the Company on or about April 18, 2014.
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
The proxy materials relating to the 2014 annual meeting of shareholders and the 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available on the Internet. Please go to www.fncb.com/investorrelations to view and obtain the materials online.
Purpose of the Annual Meeting
At the annual meeting, shareholders will be requested:
· | to elect three (3) directors to the Board of Directors for terms expiring in 2017 and until their successors are duly elected and qualified; |
· | to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (referred to as the Company’s “say-on-pay” proposal); and |
· | to transact any other business properly presented at the annual meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. |
We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information about the Company; therefore, you should rely only on the information contained in this document or on documents to which we refer you. Although we believe we have provided you with all the information helpful to you in your decision to vote, events may occur at the Company subsequent to printing this proxy statement that might affect your decision or the value of your stock.
6 |
Record Date, Quorum and Voting Rights
The Company’s Board of Directors fixed April 8, 2014 as the Record Date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. On the Record Date, the Company had 16,471,569 shares of common stock, par value $1.25 per share, outstanding and entitled to vote, held by approximately 2,185 shareholders. The Company’s common stock is the only authorized class of stock entitled to vote.
Under Pennsylvania law and the Company’s bylaws, the presence of a quorum, in person or by proxy, is required for each matter to be acted upon at the annual meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of shareholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes which all shareholders are entitled to cast, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the annual meeting. Votes withheld and abstentions will be counted in determining the presence of a quorum. A broker nonvote occurs when a member firm of the New York Stock Exchange that holds shares in “street name” for its customer votes the customer’s shares on one or more, but not all, matters on the proxy card because: (1) the broker or other nominee was instructed not to vote on certain matters; or (2) the broker or other nominee did not receive instructions from its customer as to how to vote on the unvoted matter, and therefore, does not have authority to vote on the matter. The missing vote on each such matter is a “broker nonvote.” Under applicable rules and regulations, member firms are not permitted to vote on certain matters without instructions from the beneficial owner of the underlying shares. We believe that brokers have no authority to vote their customers’ shares with respect to any proposal unless instructed how to vote, and as a result, we do not expect broker nonvotes to occur. In general, however, broker nonvotes will be counted in determining the presence of a quorum for the particular matter as to which the broker withheld authority.
Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote, in person or by proxy, for each share of common stock held in his or her name in the Company’s books as of the Record Date. Assuming the presence of a quorum, the three (3) nominees for director receiving the highest number of votes will be elected at the annual meeting. The advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, and any other matters that may come before the annual meeting, will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal. In all matters, any abstention or broker nonvotes will not be counted as a vote cast.
Solicitation of Proxies and Voting
The cost of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing and soliciting proxies, and any additional material that the Company sends to its shareholders in connection with the annual meeting, will be paid by the Company. In addition to solicitation by Registrar and Transfer Company, the directors, officers and employees of the Company and First National Community Bank may solicit proxies from shareholders personally or by telephone, facsimile or other electronic means without additional compensation. Arrangements will be made with brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of the common stock held of record by these persons, and upon their request, the Company will reimburse them for their reasonable forwarding expenses.
You can vote your shares by completing and returning a written proxy card. You may also vote your shares using the Internet. To do so, go to www.rtcoproxy.com/fncb and follow the on screen instructions. Have your control number from your proxy card available when you access the web page. Telephone voting is also available, toll free, by calling 1-866-702-2546 from a touch tone phone.
You can also vote in person at the meeting. Submitting your voting instructions by returning a proxy card or by voting over the telephone or over the Internet will not affect your right to attend the meeting and vote. The method by which you vote will in no way limit your right to vote in person at the annual meeting, after giving written notice to Michael J. Cestone, Jr., Secretary of the Company.
7 |
If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, Registrar and Transfer Company, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the shareholder of record, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you by the Company. As the shareholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the proxy holder, to cast your vote electronically or to vote in person at the meeting. The Company has enclosed a proxy card for your use.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of the shares held in street name, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker or nominee which is considered, with respect to those shares, the shareholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker how to vote and are also invited to attend the meeting. However, because you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the meeting. Your broker or nominee has enclosed a voting instruction card for you to use in directing the broker or nominee how to vote your shares. Shares represented by a properly executed proxy, unless subsequently revoked, will be voted at the annual meeting in accordance with the instructions made by the shareholder. If a proxy is signed, executed and returned without indicating any voting instructions, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors.
Revocation of Proxies
A shareholder of the Company who returns a proxy may revoke the proxy prior to the time it is voted in any one of the following ways:
· | by giving written notice of revocation to Michael J. Cestone, Jr., Secretary of First National Community Bancorp, Inc., 102 East Drinker Street, Dunmore, Pennsylvania 18512; or |
· | by executing a later-dated proxy and giving written notice to the Secretary of the Company; or |
· | by voting in person after giving written notice to the Secretary of the Company. |
Attendance by a shareholder at the annual meeting will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of the proxy.
You have the right to vote and, if so desired, to revoke your proxy any time before the annual meeting. Should you have any questions, please contact Michael J. Cestone, Jr., Secretary of the Company, at (570) 346-7667.
8 |
PRINCIPAL BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK
Principal Owners
The following table sets forth information as of April 8, 2014 with respect to the beneficial ownership of common stock by any person or group as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) who is known by the Board of Directors to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5.0%) of the Company’s outstanding common stock. As of April 8, 2014, the Company had 16,471,569 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.
Name and Address | Shares Beneficially Owned (1) | Percent of Outstanding Common Stock Beneficially Owned | ||||||
Louis A. DeNaples 400 Mill Street Dunmore, PA 18512 | 1,625,531 | 9.85 | % |
(1) | All shares are owned individually or jointly with a spouse unless otherwise indicated. For additional details on the shares beneficially owned, see “Beneficial Ownership by Directors, Executive Officers and Nominees” on page 10. |
Beneficial Ownership by Directors, Executive Officers and Nominees
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the number and percentage of whole shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned by its directors and executive officers whose compensation is disclosed in this Proxy Statement, its principal shareholders and by its current directors and all executive officers as a group, as of April 8, 2014. The address of each of the beneficial owners identified is 102 E. Drinker Street, Dunmore, PA 18512. Except as otherwise indicated, each person included in this table owns their shares directly and possesses sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all such shares; none of such shares are pledged as security. Except as set forth below, the Company knows of no other person or persons who beneficially own in excess of five percent (5.0%) of the Company’s common stock. Further, the Company is not aware of any arrangement which at a subsequent date may result in a change of control of the Company.
9 |
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP BY DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND NOMINEES
Number | ||||||||||
Name | Position | of Shares | Percentage (14) | |||||||
Michael J. Cestone, Jr. (1) | Director of the Company and Bank; Secretary of the Board of Directors | 206,716 | 1.25 | % | ||||||
Joseph Coccia (2) | Director of the Company and Bank | 181,820 | 1.10 | % | ||||||
Dominick L. DeNaples (3) | Director, Chairman of the Boards of the Company and Bank | 49,755 | * | |||||||
Louis A. DeNaples (4) | Shareholder and Director of the Bank; Former Chairman of the Boards of the Company and the Bank | 1,625,531 | 9.85 | % | ||||||
Louis A. DeNaples, Jr. (5) | Director of the Company and Bank | 79,736 | * | |||||||
Joseph J. Gentile (6) | Director of the Company and Bank | 444,794 | 2.69 | % | ||||||
Thomas J. Melone (7) | Director of the Company and Bank | 800 | * | |||||||
John P. Moses (8) | Director of the Company and Bank | 84,877 | * | |||||||
Steven R. Tokach (9) | Director of Company and Bank; President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Bank | 900 | * | |||||||
James M. Bone, Jr. (10) | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and Bank | 17,982 | * | |||||||
Gerard A. Champi (11) | Chief Operating Officer of the Bank; Former Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Bank | 22,086 | * | |||||||
Mary Griffin Cummings (12) | Senior Vice President and General Counsel | 100 | * | |||||||
Joseph J. Earyes (13) | First Senior Vice President and Chief Retail Banking and Operations Officer of the Bank | 3,041 | * | |||||||
All current directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons)(14) + | 2,731,409 | 16.55 | % |
*Indicates ownership of less than 1%.
+Includes all options held by all current directors and executive officers that are exercisable within 60 days.
(1) Comprises 37,047 shares held individually by Mr. Cestone, 4,918 shares jointly held with Mr. Cestone’s spouse, 44,495 shares held individually by Mr. Cestone’s spouse, 120,256 shares held by a family partnership.
10 |
(2) Comprises 9,075 shares held jointly with Mr. Coccia’s spouse and 172,745 shares held by a family limited partnership.
(3) Comprises 47,316 shares held jointly with Mr. DeNaples’s spouse and 2,439 shares held by a business in which he is a 33.33% owner with his brother, Louis A. DeNaples.
(4) Comprises 1,604,145 shares held individually by Louis A. DeNaples, 14,016 shares owned individually by his spouse, 4,931 shares owned jointly with Mr. DeNaples’ spouse and 2,439 shares held by a business in which he is a 33.33% owner with his brother, Dominick L. DeNaples.
(5) Comprises 53,244 shares held individually, 25,217 co-owned with Louis A. DeNaples, Jr.’s children and 1,275 shares held for the benefit of a minor nephew.
(6) Comprises 342,621 shares held individually, 1,705 shares held for his benefit, 99,209 shares held individually by Mr. Gentile’s spouse, and 1,259 shares held for the benefit of his spouse.
(7) Comprises 800 shares held individually by Mr. Melone.
(8) Comprises 2,673 shares held individually by Mr. Moses and 82,204 shares held jointly with Mr. Moses’ spouse.
(9) Comprises 900 shares held individually by Mr. Tokach.
(10) Comprises 2,142 shares held jointly with Mr. Bone’s spouse, 100 shares held individually, 249 shares held for the benefit of minor children, 4,316 shares co-owned with Mr. Bone’s father and three of his siblings, and exercisable options to purchase 11,175 shares.
(11) Comprises 1,795 shares held individually by Mr. Champi, 2,857 shares held jointly with Mr. Champi’s spouse, 1,735 shares held for the benefit of a minor, and exercisable options to purchase 15,699 shares.
(12) Comprises 100 shares held individually by Ms. Cummings.
(13) Comprises 100 shares held individually by Mr. Earyes, 1,941 shares held in an individual retirement account, and 1,000 shares held in an irrevocable family trust, of which Mr. Earyes is the sole trustee and also a beneficiary.
(14) Percentages are calculated in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act. Accordingly, represents percentage of 16,471,569 shares issued, outstanding and entitled to vote as of March 31, 2014, except with respect to individuals holding options exercisable within 60 days of that date, in which event, represents percentage of shares issued, outstanding and entitled to vote plus the number of shares for which that person holds options exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2014 and except with respect to all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, in which case represents percentage of shares issued, outstanding and entitled to vote plus the number of shares for which those persons hold such options. The above table excludes unvested shares of restricted stock because, though those shares are outstanding, the holder does not have the power to vote or transfer the shares. Certain shares beneficially owned by the Company’s directors and executive officers may be held in accounts with third-party firms, where such shares may from time to time be subject to a security interest for margin credit provided in accordance with such firm’s policies.
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
In accordance with Section 2.02 of the Company’s bylaws, the Company has a classified Board of Directors with staggered three-year terms of office. In a classified Board, the directors are generally divided into separate classes of equal number. The terms of the separate classes expire in successive years. The Company’s Board of Directors is classified into three classes – Class A, Class B, and Class C. Thus, at each annual meeting of shareholders, successors to the class of directors whose term then expires are elected to hold office for a term of three years. Therefore, the term of office of one class of directors expires in each year. The Board of Directors is authorized to increase the number of directors that constitutes the whole Board of Directors provided that the total number of directors in each class remains relatively proportionate to the others.
11 |
Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holder will vote the proxies received for the election of the three (3) nominees for Class A Director named below. If any nominee should become unavailable to serve for any reason, proxies will be voted in favor of a substitute nominee as designated by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors currently believes that the nominees named will be able to serve if elected notwithstanding that Louis A. DeNaples’ ability to serve may be subject to regulatory approval. Any vacancy on the Board of Directors, including vacancies resulting from an increase in the number of directors, will be filled by a majority of the remaining members of the Board of Directors and each person so appointed will be a director until the expiration of the term of office of the class to which he or she was appointed. Assuming the presence of a quorum, the three (3) nominees for director receiving the highest number of votes will be elected at the annual meeting.
Cumulative voting rights do not exist with respect to the election of directors. Except as may otherwise be provided by statute or by the articles of incorporation, at every shareholders meeting, each shareholder entitled to vote has the right to one vote for each common share owned on the Record Date fixed for the meeting. For example, if a shareholder owns 100 shares of common stock, he or she may cast up to 100 votes for each of the nominees for director in the class to be elected.
Information As To Nominees
The following section contains, as of April 8, 2014, certain information with respect to the nominees for directors for terms to expire in 2017. You will find information about their share ownership on page 10.
NOMINEES FOR CLASS A DIRECTORS FOR TERMS TO EXPIRE IN 2017
Michael J. Cestone, Jr. (Director of the Company since 1998)
Mr. Cestone, 82, has served as a Director and Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Company since 1998. Mr. Cestone has also served has a Director of the Bank since 1969 and as Secretary of the Bank since 1971. Mr. Cestone has been Chief Executive Officer of Mastriani Realty Co., a company that he also owns, since 1959. Mr. Cestone’s understanding of land development and the building industry, involvement in the community and service as a director of the Bank for over 44 years qualify him to serve as a director of the Company.
Joseph J. Gentile (Director of the Company since 1998)
Mr. Gentile, 83, is an independent Director of the Company since 1998 and also of the Bank since 1989. Mr. Gentile retired in 2010 as President of Dunmore Oil Company, Inc., a fuel distributor, after 30 years with that company. He also has been a director and President of Five Star Equipment, Inc., an industrial equipment dealer, since 1989. Mr. Gentile’s strong business background, understanding of the local business and social community, community and charitable involvement and service as a director of the Bank for over 23 years qualify him to serve as a director of the Company.
Louis A. DeNaples (Director of the Company from 1998 to 2012)
Mr. Louis A. DeNaples, 73, is a director of the Bank. He is President of DeNaples Auto Parts, Inc., President of Keystone Landfill Inc. and Vice President of Rail Realty Corp each of which he co-owns with Dominick L. DeNaples. He has been a director of the Bank since 1972 and served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company from 1998 until he took a leave of absence from involvement with the Company and the Bank in February 2008. In 2013, Mr. DeNaples was recommended for nomination as a director by the Corporate Governance Committee, his nomination was approved by the Board of Directors and he was elected by the shareholders at the 2013 Annual Shareholder Meeting on December 23, 2013. Even though Mr. DeNaples was elected at the 2013 Annual Shareholders Meeting, he has not served as a director of the Company. If Mr. DeNaples is elected at the annual meeting of shareholders on May 21, 2014, his ability to serve as a director of the Company may be subject to the satisfaction of any FRB Notice or approval requirements deemed applicable. Mr. DeNaples has extensive business knowledge, community and charitable involvement and association with the Bank for many years which qualify him to serve as a director of the Company (subject to regulatory approval) and the Bank. Mr. DeNaples is the brother of director Dominick L. DeNaples and the father of director Louis A. DeNaples, Jr.
12 |
Board Recommendation
The Company’s Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR the election for each of the nominees for director listed above.
Information As to Directors Who Will Continue In Office
The Class B and Class C directors listed below are continuing directors who are not standing for election at the annual meeting:
CLASS B DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS WILL EXPIRE IN 2015
Louis A. DeNaples, Jr. (Director of the Company since 2008)
Dr. Louis A. DeNaples, Jr., 46, is an independent Director of the Company and the Bank since 2008. He was elected Vice-Chairman of the Company and the Bank in December 2013. Dr. DeNaples is a licensed physician and practices emergency medicine at Geisinger-Community Medical Center Emergency Department in Scranton, Pennsylvania. Dr. DeNaples served as Director and Vice Chairman for The Community’s Bank of Bridgeport Connecticut from 2001 through September 2013. Dr. DeNaples’ understanding of the banking and medical industries, considerable community and charitable involvement and service as director of the Company and the Bank since 2008 qualify him to serve as a director of the Company. Dr. DeNaples is the son of nominee for director, Louis A. DeNaples and the nephew of director, Dominick L. DeNaples.
Mr. Thomas J. Melone, CPA (Director of the Company since 2011)
Mr. Thomas J. Melone, CPA, 55, was appointed as an independent Director of the Company and the Bank on May 25, 2011. Mr. Melone is a Partner with the Albert B. Melone Company, a leading provider of accounting, tax and consulting services throughout the Northeastern Pennsylvania region. Mr. Melone, who has been with this firm since 1984, leads the firm’s Tax Preparation and Advisory Services line as well as its Small Business Advisory and Consulting Services line. Additionally, he has extensive experience in the financial management of public school districts operating in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Mr. Melone is also an owner of Pro-Data Processing, Inc. Mr. Melone is an active member of several professional, business and community organizations including the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Allied Services Board, specifically serving as Chairman of the Allied Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine and the John Heinz Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine. Mr. Melone is a graduate of King’s College in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. Mr. Melone’s community involvement, extensive business and accounting experience and service as director of the Company and the Bank qualify him to serve as a director of the Company.
13 |
Mr. Steven R. Tokach (Director of the Company since 2011)
Mr. Steven R. Tokach, 67, was appointed as Director of the Company and the Bank on November 21, 2011 and serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank. Previously, Mr. Tokach was retired from banking since 2006. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Administrator for Community Bank, N.A., a multi-billion dollar bank with locations in upstate New York and Northeastern Pennsylvania, from 2004 to 2006. Mr. Tokach served as Regional President of First Liberty Bank & Trust, N.A., the Pennsylvania bank division of Community Bank, N.A, from 2001 to 2004. He served as President of First Liberty Bank in Jermyn, Pennsylvania from 1996 to 2001 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 1991 to 1996. Prior to that, Mr. Tokach worked for three other banks located in Pennsylvania, serving as Vice President of First Eastern Bank from 1989 to 1991, as Vice President of Guaranty Bank, N.A. from 1986 to 1989 and as Vice President of The First National Bank of Jermyn from 1982 to 1986. Prior to his banking career, Mr. Tokach was a Bank Examiner with the OCC from 1968 to 1982, supervising or assisting in the examination of national banks. Mr. Tokach is a graduate of King’s College in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, where he earned his bachelor’s degree in accounting. He is a former member of the boards of directors of the Scranton Chamber of Commerce and the United One Credit Bureau and the Scranton Chapter of the American Red Cross. Mr. Tokach’s extensive banking experience, knowledge of bank regulatory matters from his time with the OCC and accounting and financial background qualify him to serve as a director of the Company.
CLASS C DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS WILL EXPIRE IN 2016
Joseph Coccia (Director of the Company since 1998)
Mr. Joseph Coccia, 59, is a Director of the Company and the Bank since 1998. Mr. Coccia is President of Coccia Ford, Inc. (doing business as Coccia Ford Lincoln), a car dealership in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, and President of Eastern Auto Exchange, Inc. Mr. Coccia also served on the Lincoln Mercury Dealer Association Board. Mr. Coccia’s strong business background and knowledge of owning and operating a large local business, his broad community involvement, and his service as a director of the Company and Bank for over 14 years qualify him to serve as a director of the Company.
Dominick L. DeNaples (Director of the Company since 1998)
Mr. Dominick L. DeNaples, 76, is an independent Director of the Company since 1998 and of the Bank since 1987. Mr. DeNaples has served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and Bank since 2010. Previously, he served as Vice Chairman of the Boards of Directors of the Company and Bank from December 2009 until he was elected Chairman in May 2010. He is President of Rail Realty Corporation, Vice President of DeNaples Auto Parts Inc., and Vice President of Keystone Landfill, Inc., each of which he is also co-owner with his brother Louis A. DeNaples. Mr. DeNaples currently serves as Chairman of the Board and Finance of Lackawanna College’s Board of Trustees, St. Joseph’s Center and St. Joseph’s Foundation. Mr. DeNaples serves on the Board of Geisinger Health Services and also on the Advisory Board of Penn State University – Worthington campus. He formerly served as President of the Council and Chairman of Finance of the Northeastern Pennsylvania Council of Boy Scouts of America, and currently serves as a board member. Mr. DeNaples’ extensive business background, years of community and charitable involvement and service as a Director of the Company and the Bank for over 26 years qualify him to serve as Director of the Company. Mr. DeNaples is the brother of nominee for director, Louis A. DeNaples and the uncle of director Louis A. DeNaples, Jr.
John P. Moses (Director of the Company since 1999)
Mr. John P. Moses, 67, is an independent Director of the Company and the Bank since 1999. Mr. Moses has served as the Chairman of Blue Cross of Northeastern Pennsylvania since 1997 and as an attorney in private practice since 1971, including as Of Counsel at the law firm of Cozen & O’Connor since 2009. During his career, he also has served as chair of the Northeast Pennsylvania Heart Association and as Chairman and President of the Board of Governors of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital (“St. Jude”), and as Chief Executive Officer for ALSAC, the fundraising arm of St. Jude. Mr. Moses also has had a distinguished career in public service, having served as a member of various state commissions and as counsel to various state and local judicial, executive, legislative and administrative offices and non-profit organizations. He has received numerous awards for his contributions in public service, business, the law and charitable causes, including the Ellis Island Medal of Honor. He also serves on the boards of Villanova University School of Law and The Commonwealth Medical College. Admitted to practice law in Pennsylvania and before the U.S. Supreme Court, he is a graduate of the Villanova University School of Law. Mr. Moses’ extensive business and legal background, community and charitable involvement and service as a director of the Company and Bank for over 13 years qualify him to serve as a director of the Company.
14 |
Certain Legal Proceedings
On May 24, 2012, a putative shareholder by the name of Lori Gray filed a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas in Lackawanna County against certain present and former directors of the Company (including all of the current directors except Steven R. Tokach and Thomas J. Melone) (the “Individual Defendants”) and Demetrius & Company, LLC (“Demetrius”) alleging, inter alia, breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, corporate waste, unjust enrichment and, in the case of Demetrius, professional negligence, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. The Company was named as a nominal defendant. The Board had appointed a special committee in January 2012 to investigate the matters raised in the Gray complaint. The special committee retained independent counsel to assist with its investigation. Following the investigation, the special committee found that the Individual Defendants had not breached their fiduciary duties to shareholders. Subsequently, the parties commenced settlement discussions and on December 18, 2013, the Court entered an Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Proposed Settlement subject to notice to shareholders. On February 4, 2014, the Court issued a Final Order and Judgment for the matter granting approval of a Stipulation of Settlement (the “Settlement”) and dismissing all claims against the Company and the Individual Defendants. As part of the Settlement, there was no admission of liability by the Individual Defendants. Pursuant to the Settlement, the Individual Defendants, without admitting any fault, wrongdoing or liability, agreed to settle the derivative litigation for $5 million, which was paid to the Company on March 28, 2014. The Individual Defendants have reserved their rights to indemnification under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, resolutions adopted by the Board, the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law and any and all rights they have against the Company’s and the Bank’s insurance carriers. The Company has indemnified the Individual Defendants for a portion of their claim in the amount of $2.5 million. In addition, in conjunction with the Settlement, the Company has accrued $2.5 million related to fees and costs of the plaintiff’s attorneys, which has been included in non-interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Information As To Executive Officers and Significant Employees
Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors
Information regarding persons who are executive officers of the Company or the Bank and who are not directors of the Company is set forth below. Except as otherwise indicated, the occupation listed has been such person’s principal occupation for at least the last five years.
James M. Bone, Jr.
Mr. James M. Bone, Jr., 52, is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Bank, a position he has held since September 2012. Mr. Bone has been an employee of the Bank since 1986, serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer from May 2010 to August 2012; First Senior Vice President and Administrative Services Division Manager from July 2000 to April 2010; as Senior Vice President and Branch Administrator from January 1995 to June 2000; Vice President and Community Office Manager/Commercial Loan Officer from May 1992 to December 1994; Vice President and Loan Administration/Compliance Division Manager from January 1989 to May 1992; and Internal Auditor from July 1986 to December 1988. Mr. Bone is a licensed Certified Public Accountant. In addition, Mr. Bone owns a limited liability company through which he provides tax and consulting services to various individual clients and small businesses.
15 |
Gerard A. Champi
Mr. Gerard A. Champi, 53, is Chief Operating Officer of the Bank since March 2011. Prior to holding this position, he served as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank and as a director of the Bank from March 2010 until February 2011. Mr. Champi has been with the Bank since 1991 and has served in various leadership roles in the Retail and Commercial Sales Divisions. He also currently serves on the Boards of the Greater Pittston Chamber of Commerce, the Greater Scranton Chamber of Commerce and the Lackawanna Blind Association. Mr. Champi also serves as member of the Advisory Board of Penn State Worthington Scranton, a campus of the Pennsylvania State University.
Cathy Conrad
Ms. Cathy J. Conrad, 41, is Senior Vice President and Credit Administration Officer of the Bank, a position she has held since September 2013. Ms. Conrad has been with the Bank since 1995. Her previous roles include Senior Vice President and Credit Administration Manager from 2010 until September 2013 and Vice President, Credit Department Manager from 2004 to 2009.
Mary Griffin Cummings
Atty. Mary Griffin Cummings, 51, is Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Bank, a position she has held since October 1, 2012. Prior to joining the Bank, she was Associate General Counsel, Resident Counsel and General Counsel for Wyoming Valley Health Care System, Inc. (“WVHCS”), a large health care system located in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, from May 2000 to May 2009. From May 2009 through October 2012, Ms. Cummings practiced law both in her own private practice and for Wyoming Valley Health and Education Foundation and WVHCS Retention Company. Ms. Cummings is a licensed attorney and admitted to practice law in the Courts of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. She is a member of the Wilkes-Barre Law and Library Association and the Pennsylvania Bar Association. Ms. Cummings serves as a member of the board for the American Red Cross/Wyoming Valley Chapter and the Catherine McAuley Center, Scranton, PA.
Joseph J. Earyes
Mr. Joseph J. Earyes, 57, is First Senior Vice President and Chief Retail Banking & Operations Officer of the Bank, a position he has held since March 2013. Prior to holding this position, he served as First Senior Vice President and Retail Banking Officer of the Bank from February 2011 to February 2013 and Senior Vice President and Retail Banking Officer of the Bank since December 2008. Mr. Earyes, who has FINRA Series 7 and 63 licenses, also is a financial services representative of Invest Financial Corporation through that entity’s third party brokerage arrangement with the Bank. Prior to joining the Bank, Mr. Earyes was Chief Financial Officer of State Petroleum Distributors LLC, a wholesale fuel distributor, from February 2006 to August 2008. Mr. Earyes has previous banking experience from his time as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of Fidelity Deposit and Discount Bancorp, Inc. of Dunmore, Pennsylvania, the holding company for The Fidelity Deposit and Discount Bank, from April 2001 to April 2004. Mr. Earyes is a licensed Certified Public Accountant and worked as a partner in the Earyes/Alu LLP CPA firm that he co-owned from July 2004 to January 2006.
Lisa L. Kinney
Ms. Lisa L. Kinney, 44, is Senior Vice President and Retail Lending Officer and Consumer Lending Manager of the Bank, a position she has held since September 2008. Ms. Kinney has been an employee of the Bank since 1994, with her previous roles including Vice President and Indirect Lending Manager from January 2007 to September 2008; Vice President and Indirect Lending Officer from December 2005 to December 2006; and Assistant Cashier and Indirect Lending Officer from May 1998 to November 2005.
16 |
Brian C. Mahlstedt
Mr. Brian C. Mahlstedt, 54, is First Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of the Bank since September 2013. Mr. Mahlstedt first joined the Bank in 1999 and served as Senior Vice President and Commercial Manager until 2009. From 2011 to September 2013, when he rejoined the Bank, Mr. Mahlstedt was a Senior Vice President, Senior Commercial Loan Officer at Wayne Bank. Mr. Mahlstedt also served as Vice President, Senior Loan Officer at Pennstar Bank from 2009 to 2011.
Donald H. Ryan
Mr. Donald H. Ryan, 62, is the Human Resources Officer and Senior Vice President of the Bank since November 2011. Before joining the Company, Mr. Ryan was the Operations Director at Johnson College from June 2009 until September 2011 with responsibility for human resources, information technology and facilities. From 1997 to 2009, he was President and principal of The Ryan Group, a Northeastern Pennsylvania based human resources consulting firm. Prior thereto, Mr. Ryan held senior human resources positions at National Westminster Bancorp, U.S. Trust Company of New York and The Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Our Board of Directors believes that the purpose of corporate governance is to promote shareholder value in a manner consistent with legal requirements and the highest standards of integrity. The Board has adopted and adheres to corporate governance practices that the Board and senior management believe promote this purpose, are sound and represent best practices. We continually review these governance practices, Pennsylvania law (the state in which we are incorporated), the rules and listing standards of NASDAQ, and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations, as well as best practices suggested by recognized governance authorities to maintain the highest governance standards.
The Board of Directors has four standing committees: Audit Committee, Risk Management Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee, which is the committee that makes director nominating recommendations to the Board of Directors. The charters of these committees have been approved by the Board and are available on our corporate website at www.fncb.com/investorrelations.
Currently, the Board of Directors has eight members, with one vacancy expected to be filled by Louis A. DeNaples if he is elected at the annual meeting and regulatory approval, if necessary, is received, thereafter. The Company evaluates the independence of directors under the SEC and NASDAQ stock market’s standards for independence. The NASDAQ standards require the Board of Directors to be comprised of a majority of independent directors. The NASDAQ standards also require that, except for exceptional and limited circumstances, the Board of Directors maintain an audit committee comprised only of independent directors and that compensation and nomination decisions must be made only by independent directors.
Independence is reviewed at least annually to determine whether all existing and potential committee members are independent. The Board of Directors has determined that Louis A. DeNaples, Louis A. DeNaples, Jr., Joseph J. Gentile, John P. Moses, Dominick L. DeNaples and Thomas J. Melone met the standards for independence.
17 |
In making its independence determinations, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances in making an independence determination, and not merely from the standpoint of the director, but also from that of persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation. The Board considered that in the ordinary course of business the Company and the Bank may provide commercial banking and other services to some of the independent directors and to business organizations and to individuals associated with them. The Board also considered that in the ordinary course of business some business organizations with which an independent director is associated may provide products and services to the Company and the Bank. The Board has determined that, based on the information available to the Board, none of these relationships were material.
Mr. Moses, a director, is Of Counsel at the law firm of Cozen & O’Connor (“Cozen”), which has provided legal services to the Company during 2013. Mr. Moses does not have any ownership or profit sharing interest in Cozen. The Board has considered this relationship and determined that it did not impair Mr. Moses’ independence. Please see the relationships discussed under “CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS” for a description of the other relationships considered by our board of directors.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) that applies to the Company’s directors and employees, including the President and Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”), Principal Financial Officer (“PFO”) and Principal Accounting Officer (“PAO”). The Code includes guidelines relating to compliance with laws, the ethical handling of actual or potential conflicts of interest, the use of corporate opportunities, protection and use of the Company’s confidential information, accepting gifts and business courtesies, accurate financial and regulatory reporting, and procedures for promoting compliance with, and reporting violations of, the Code. The Code is available on the Company’s website at www.fncb.com/investorrelations/ under the heading “Governance Documents.” The Company intends to post any amendments to the Code on its website and also to disclose any waivers (to the extent applicable to the Company’s President, PEO, PFO or PAO) on a Form 8-K within the prescribed time period.
Shareholder Communications
Any shareholder who wishes to communicate with the Board of Directors may send correspondence to Michael J. Cestone, Jr., Secretary, at 102 East Drinker St., Dunmore, PA 18512, or by sending an electronic message to corporatesecretary@fncb.com. Mr. Cestone will submit your correspondence to the Board of Directors or the appropriate committee as applicable.
Submission of Shareholder Proposals for 2015 Annual Meeting
Shareholder proposals for the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders must comply with applicable SEC rules and regulations and must be received by the Secretary of the Company prior to December 19, 2014 to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement for that meeting. If the December 19, 2014 deadline is missed, a shareholder proposal may still be submitted for consideration at the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders, although it will not be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement, if it is received no earlier than February 20, 2015 and no later than March 12, 2015. If notification of a shareholder proposal is not received by December 19, 2014, the Company may vote, in its discretion, any and all of the proxies received in its solicitation against such proposal. See “Director Nominations” on page 22 for more information on director nominations.
In addition, any shareholder who intends to nominate a candidate for election to the Board of Directors (other than a candidate proposed by the Company’s then existing Board of Directors) or submit a proposal for consideration at the 2015 annual meeting must comply with the advance notice provisions of the Company’s bylaws. The advance notice provisions in the Company’s bylaws require that the following additional information must be provided to the Company by a shareholder submitting a shareholder proposal:
18 |
a) | the name and address of the shareholder who intends to make the nomination or propose the business, and, as the case may be, of the person or persons to be nominated; |
b) | a representation that the shareholder is a holder of record of shares of the Company and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice or to make the proposal; |
c) | the number of and class of shares owned by the shareholder and any Shareholder Associated Person (as defined in the bylaws), which information must be supplemented as of the record date; |
d) | a description of any agreement, arrangement or understandings between the shareholder or any other person or persons, pursuant to which the nominations or nominations are to be made by the shareholder, or the business is to be proposed, which information must be supplemented as of the record date; |
e) | information regarding the shareholder’s, Shareholder Associated Person’s or certain affiliated partnership’s ownership of derivative instruments (such as options, warrants, convertible security, etc.) or any other opportunity of the shareholder or Shareholder Associated Person to profit from a change in the value of shares of the Company and the existence of any hedging transactions, which information must be supplemented as of the record date; |
f) | if applicable, the consent of each nominee to serve as a director of the Company if so elected; and |
g) | any other information regarding the nominee or each matter of business to be proposed by such shareholder that would be required under the SEC’s proxy rules and regulations had the nominee been nominated, or the matter been proposed, by the Board of Directors. |
Copies of the full text of the bylaw provision relating to advance notice can be obtained by writing to Michael J. Cestone, Jr. Secretary, at 102 East Drinker St., Dunmore, PA 18512. A copy of our bylaws was filed with the SEC as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013, filed November 12, 2013.
The Board of Directors
Our business is managed under the direction of our Board of Directors, in accordance with the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law and our bylaws. We separate the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. We believe separation of these positions enhances the independent oversight of the Company and the monitoring and objective evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance. Mr. Dominick L. DeNaples serves as non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors and is independent of management.
The Board of Directors is actively involved in the oversight of risks that could affect the Company. For 2013, this oversight was conducted primarily through the Audit Committee, but the full Board retained responsibility for general oversight of risks. The Audit Committee, pursuant to its charter, considers and reviews with the Company’s internal audit department, independent registered public accounting firm, and management, the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls, including the processes for identifying significant risks or exposures, and elicits recommendations for the improvements of such procedures where desirable. In addition to the Audit Committee’s role, the full Board of Directors is involved in oversight and administration of risk and risk management practices by overseeing members of senior management in their risk management capacities, regularly reviewing and analyzing the Company’s investment portfolio and accompanying risk levels, and considering the potential impact on our objectives. Members of the Company’s senior management have day-to-day responsibility for risk management and establishing risk management practices, and members of management are expected to report matters relating specifically to the Audit Committee directly thereto, and to report all other matters directly to the Board of Directors as a whole. Members of the Company’s senior management have an open line of communication to the Board of Directors and have the discretion to raise issues from time-to-time in any manner they deem appropriate, and management’s reporting on issues relating to risk management typically occurs through direct communication with directors or committee members as matters requiring attention typically arise. On February 26, 2014, the Board established a Risk Management Committee. The Board of Directors expects that that Risk Management Committee will take on a primary role in risk management going forward. For further detail about the Risk Management Committee, see “Committees of the Board—Risk Management Committee” below.
19 |
The Bank maintains a Directors Loan Committee which meets bi-weekly before each Bank board meeting or more often as necessary. In addition to the Bank’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Lending Officer, the following Directors are members of this committee: Joseph Coccia, Dominick L. DeNaples, Louis A. DeNaples, Joseph J. Gentile, and Thomas J. Melone. In 2013, this committee met twenty-eight (28) times.
During 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors held twenty-two (22) meetings. Each of the directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Company’s Board of Directors and of the committees on which he served. Pursuant to the Company’s policy, the directors are expected to attend the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, Risk Management Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee. The charters of these committees have been approved by the Board of Directors and are available on the Company’s website www.fncb.com under the link for “Investor Relations.”
Compensation Committee | Corporate Governance Committee | Audit Committee | Risk Management Committee | |||||||||||||
Michael J. Cestone, Jr. | ||||||||||||||||
Joseph J. Gentile | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
Louis A. DeNaples, Jr. | X | (1) | X | X | X | |||||||||||
Thomas J. Melone | X | X | X | (1) | X | |||||||||||
Steven R. Tokach | ||||||||||||||||
Joseph Coccia | X | (1) | ||||||||||||||
Dominick L. DeNaples | ||||||||||||||||
John P. Moses | X | X | (1) | X | X | |||||||||||
Number of meetings in 2013 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 0 | (2) |
X | Current member |
(1) | Chairperson |
(2) | Formed on February 26, 2014 |
20 |
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter that has been approved by the Board of Directors. The Charter is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee with any recommended changes approved by the Board of Directors. The current Compensation Committee charter is available in the Investor Relations section on the Company’s website at www.fncb.com by clicking on Corporate Information and then Committee Charting under the heading “Compensation Committee Charter.” As noted above, each of the directors serving on this committee was determined to meet the standards for independence. The Compensation Committee is responsible for evaluating and approving the Company’s compensation plans, policies and programs. The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain and terminate a compensation consulting firm, including the authority to approve the firm’s fees and other terms of retention. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to delegate responsibility to subcommittees. For a discussion of the role of the Compensation Committee in determining executive and director compensation, see the discussion under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
On February 26, 2014, the Board of Directors established a new Risk Management Committee. The Risk Management Committee operates under a written charter that has been approved by the Board of Directors. The current Risk Management Committee charter is available in the Investor Relations section on the Company’s website at www.fncb.com by clicking on Corporate Information and then Governance Documents under the heading “Risk Management Committee Charter.” The Risk Management Committee is responsible for ensuring management has established an enterprise-wide risk management program and for providing oversight and guidance to management regarding the Company’s risks. The Risk Management Committee has authority to retain independent counsel, experts and advisors it believes are appropriate in carrying out its duties, including the authority to approve the advisor’s fees and other terms of retention. The Risk Management Committee also has the authority to delegate responsibility to subcommittees. The Risk Management Committee was established in 2014 and therefore did not play a role in risk management oversight for the 2013 fiscal year; however, the Board expects that this committee will play a primary role in risk management oversight during 2014 and going forward.
Corporate Governance Committee
The Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter that has been approved by the Board of Directors. The Charter is reviewed annually by the Corporate Governance Committee with any recommended changes approved by the Board of Directors. The current Corporate Governance Committee charter is available in the Investor Relations section on the Company’s website at www.fncb.com by clicking on Corporate Information and then Committee Charting under the heading “Corporate Governance Committee Charter.” Each of the directors serving on this committee was determined to meet the standards for independence. The Corporate Governance Committee (1) recommends to the Board of Directors for its selection (i) potential nominees for director to stand for election at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders, including without limitation, those proposed by shareholders, and (ii) individuals to be considered by the Board of Directors to fill vacancies; (2) in its discretion, considers candidates based on criteria for selecting new directors; (3) evaluates the background and qualifications of new director candidates; and (4) evaluates directors before nomination for reelection. The Corporate Governance Committee also oversees and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to corporate governance of the Company.
21 |
Director Nominations
The Corporate Governance Committee recommends director nominees to the Board of Directors. The Corporate Governance Committee seeks individuals who are qualified to be directors based on the committee’s judgment of the potential candidate’s experience, skills and knowledge of business and management practices. If needed, the Corporate Governance Committee will use a third party search firm to assist in finding director candidates. No third parties were engaged to evaluate or assist in identifying potential director nominees in 2013 or 2014.
The Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors have not established a specific diversity component in their consideration of candidates for director and instead consider the diversity of directors as part of the overall mix of factors when identifying and evaluating candidates for the Board of Directors. The Company considers diversity broadly to include differences of viewpoint, professional experience, individual characteristics, qualities and skills, resulting in naturally varying perspectives among the directors and individual skills that complement the full Board. Therefore, the Board, as a unit, possesses the appropriate skills and experience to oversee the Company’s business.
The Corporate Governance Committee will give appropriate consideration to qualified persons recommended by shareholders for nomination as directors and will evaluate such qualified persons in the same manner as other identified candidates, when submitted prior to the shareholder proposal date referred to in the “Submission of Shareholder Proposals for 2015 Annual Meeting” section of this Proxy Statement (the “Proposals Section”), provided such recommendations comply with the advance notice procedures in the Company’s bylaws, which are summarized in the Proposals Section. Such recommendations must also include: (i) sufficient biographical information about the proposed nominee to permit the Corporate Governance Committee to evaluate their qualifications and experience, and (ii) the nominee’s consent to serving as a director if elected. Shareholders must deliver any proposals or nominations in writing to the Corporate Governance Committee or the Secretary of First National Community Bancorp, Inc. at its principal executive office, 102 E. Drinker Street, Dunmore, Pennsylvania 18512.
Any nomination for director not made in accordance with Section 1.07 of the Company’s bylaws will be disregarded by the presiding officer of the annual meeting, and votes cast for each such nominee will be disregarded by the judge of election. In the event that the same person is nominated by more than one shareholder, if at least one nomination for such person complies with Section 1.07, the nomination will be honored and all votes cast for the nominee will be counted.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is considered independent, as that term is defined by the SEC and in the NASDAQ listing standards related to audit committees. The current Audit Committee charter is available in the Investor Relations section on the Company’s website at www.fncb.com by clicking on Corporate Information and then on Committee Charting under the heading “Audit Committee Charter.” The principal duties of the Audit Committee, as set forth in its charter, include reviewing significant audit and accounting principles, policies and practices, reviewing performance of internal auditing procedures, reviewing reports of examination received from regulatory authorities, and recommending, annually, to the Board of Directors the engagement of an independent certified public accountant.
22 |
Currently, the Board has identified Thomas J. Melone as the Audit Committee financial expert. Mr. Melone qualifies as a financial expert based on his extensive accounting experience as a certified public accountant and as a partner of the Albert B. Melone Company.
Report of the Audit Committee
To the Shareholders of First National Community Bancorp, Inc.:
The Audit Committee provides oversight of the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management is responsible for the financial statements and the financial reporting process, including internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee discussed the financial statements in the annual report with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just acceptability, of the accounting principles; the reasonableness of significant judgments; and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.
The Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles, and such other matters as required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under generally accepted auditing standards. The independent auditors are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the auditors’ independence from management and the Company, including the matters in written disclosures required by the Independence Standards Board, and considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the auditors’ independence.
The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.
Based on these discussions, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Audit Committee
/s/Thomas J. Melone, Chairman
/s/John P. Moses
/s/Joseph J. Gentile
/s/Louis A. DeNaples, Jr.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The Company is committed to responsible compensation practices and strives to balance sound risk management with the need to attract, hire, motivate and retain executive team members who will maximize successful performance. The Company intends to provide executives with a balanced mix of fixed and variable pay. The purpose of all incentive plans is to motivate, reward and reinforce performance and achievement of team and/or individual goals in support of the Company’s strategic objectives for growth and profitability. They provide the opportunity for reward for meeting and exceeding established financial goals as well as recognition of individual achievements.
23 |
Under the heading “Executive Compensation Tables,” you will find a series of tables containing specific information about the compensation earned or paid in 2013 to Mr. Steven R. Tokach, the President and Chief Executive Officer and PEO of the Company, and Mr. James M. Bone, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer and PFO of the Company. Compensation information is also presented for Mr. Gerard A. Champi, the Chief Operating Officer of the Bank, Mr. Joseph J. Earyes, the Chief Retail Banking and Operations Officer of the Bank and Mary Griffin Cummings, the General Counsel of the Bank, the three most highly compensated executive officers of the Company (including officers of the Bank) who received total compensation of $100,000 or more during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, referred to as our “named executive officers” or “named executives.”
The overall executive compensation philosophy and strategy and primary objective of the Board of Directors with respect to executive compensation at the Company is to provide a total compensation package that meets a number of interrelated goals. The Company’s compensation package is designed to:
1. | Be balanced and competitive in the external market in a manner consistent with the Company’s size and industry; |
2. | Correlate with the Company’s strategic business plan; |
3. | Align the interests of executives with those of shareholders; |
4. | Drive superior performance and reward executives for achievement; |
5. | Enable the Company to attract, motivate, develop and retain key executives whose experience, expertise and abilities will promote the Company’s performance for the benefit of its shareholders without encouraging undue risk-taking that could materially threaten the safety and soundness of the Company; |
6. | Achieve an appropriate mix of fixed and variable compensation; |
7. | Equally support annual and long-term financial and strategic performance objectives as well as the stability of the organization; |
8. | Ensure compliance with applicable regulations; |
9. | Deliver executive compensation in a manner that is prudent and cost-effective; and |
10. | Support the mission, vision and values of the Company. |
Design of Compensation Program
In 2013 and 2014, executive compensation decisions were made by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors’ fundamental policy is to provide our executive officers with competitive compensation for their positions and to provide opportunities based upon their contributions to the Company’s development and financial success as well as their personal performance in accordance with the overall design of the Company’s compensation package.
24 |
The Role of Consultants
In 2012, management engaged Mosteller and Associates (“Mosteller”), a Pennsylvania-based human resources consulting firm, to conduct an Executive Compensation Review (the “2012 Report”). The 2012 Report included: (1) a market review of the Company’s compensation for executive positions against compensation levels of executive positions at other similar financial institutions; and (2) recommendations for enhancements to the Company’s overall executive compensation programs. The Report has served as a foundation for executive compensation decisions in 2012, 2013 and 2014.
The 2012 Report included market data from proxy statement analysis of a peer group of banks as well as three published survey sources. Specific analysis and comments were provided for each of the executive pay components (base, short term incentive, long-term incentive, and all other) as well as total compensation. The 2012 Report provided the Compensation Committee, the Board and management with what they believe was a solid base of relevant information upon which to develop compensation strategy and to base compensation-related decisions throughout the 2012, 2013 and 2014.
In January 2014, management engaged Mosteller and Associates to update the 2012 Report to provide the Compensation Committee with current competitive salary data (the “Updated Report”). This data assisted the Compensation Committee with making initial awards under a new Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “LTIP”) in February 2014 and with evaluating current executive salaries.
The Company continues to engage Mosteller to provide consulting services on an ongoing basis, advising with regard to executive and broad-based compensation matters as well as a variety of human resources topics. Mosteller was chosen because of its expertise in the field of human resources, the financial services industry and the geographic footprint of the Bank and its understanding of the organization. The Compensation Committee has evaluated the independence of Mosteller and concluded that no conflict of interest exists.
Incentive Plans
On December 19, 2012, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors approved three Short-Term Incentive Plans (the “Incentive Plans”), which came into effect January 1, 2013. These consist of an Executive Incentive Plan (the “EIP”), a Commercial Incentive Plan (the “CIP”) and a Staff Incentive Plan (the “SIP”). The Incentive Plans are designed to link annual cash compensation awards to specific Bank financial targets and individual performance metrics. According to the terms of these Incentive Plans, the Board of Directors is responsible for establishing the Bank-wide financial targets that are utilized to trigger funding of the Plans. The Board of Directors determines the individual performance goals used to evaluate the President and Chief Executive Officer. For all other executives and employees, management is responsible for establishing individual performance goals which, in conjunction with achievement of Bank-wide financial goals, are used to determine individual awards. Each of the incentive plans provides for a potential claw-back of award payments if the relevant performance measures on which they are based are restated or otherwise adjusted within a 36-month period following the public release of the financial information.
No annual cash incentive awards were granted under the EIP or the SIP in 2013. Awards were granted to non-executive employees in the commercial division] under the CIP in February 2014, based on 2013 results.
On February 26, 2014 the Board approved a 2014 Performance Target for purposes of the Incentive Plans. The Compensation Committee recommended the use of net income (excluding certain non-core items) as the key measure of performance for the 2014 fiscal year. The Compensation Committee established threshold, budget, stretch and maximum targets for net income. It is expected that decisions regarding compensation and awards under the Incentive Plans for the 2014 fiscal year will be made in the first quarter of 2015 and will be based on the achievement of the net income targets established for 2014.
25 |
Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the LTIP was formally adopted by the Board of Directors on October 23, 2013, subject to approval of the shareholders. The LTIP was approved by the shareholders at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on December 23, 2013.
The LTIP is designed to reward directors, executives and key employees for their contributions to the long-term success of the Company, primarily as measured by the increase in the Company’s stock price. The LTIP design provides the Board with the authority to offer several different types of long-term incentives, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units and performance shares.
Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board approved initial awards under the terms of the LTIP, which were granted to executives and key employees on March 1, 2014. The initial grant, which was comprised solely of restricted stock, utilized 47,750 common shares of the 1.2 million common shares reserved for issuance under the LTIP.
The Role of Management
Input from senior management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Human Resources Officer, along with our external consultants was critical in order to permit the Board of Directors and Compensation Committee to make informed and appropriate decisions. Input from senior management may include:
· | Performance summaries for management team members and recommendations regarding compensation; |
· | Results from executive compensation studies and related recommendations and analysis; and |
· | Data and recommendations for changes necessary to ensure the continued market competitive nature of the Company’s overall compensation package and/or the individual components of executive compensation. |
Each member of senior management excuses himself or herself from all Board and Compensation Committee discussions of that individual’s compensation.
Benchmarking and Peer Group
During 2013, the Company utilized a peer group based on industry, asset size, organizational structure, performance levels and geographic location. The Company selected that peer group to provide comparative market data for executive compensation pay levels.
This peer group, which was the same group the Company considered in 2012, included financial organizations from the Mid-Atlantic states with asset size ranging from approximately $580 million to almost $2.3 billion as of December 31, 2011, the most recent year for which information was available at the time of the 2012 Report. We believe these companies were an appropriate group against which to benchmark our compensation for 2013.
26 |
Below is a listing of the peer group used by the Company in 2013 to benchmark its executive compensation:
ACNB Corp. | Citizens & Northern Corp. | Norwood Financial Corp. | ||
Alliance Financial Corp. | Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc. | Orrstown Financial Services Inc. | ||
AmeriServe Financial, Inc. | Dimeco, Inc | Penseco Financial Services Corp. | ||
Bryn Mawr Bank Corp. | ESSA Bancorp, Inc. | Republic First Bancorp, Inc. | ||
CNB Financial Corp. | Fidelity D&D Bancorp, Inc. | Univest Corp of Pennsylvania | ||
Canandaigua National Corp. | First United Corporation | VIST Financial Corp. |
For purposes of evaluating 2014 executive compensation and the initial group of LTIP awards, the Compensation Committee and management used the Updated Report, which had been updated by Mosteller to include executive compensation information of banks more representative of the Company’s asset size as of December 31, 2013.
Material Differences in Named Executive Officers’ Compensation
The overall factors that come into consideration when making executive compensation decisions include the following:
· | Compensation philosophy and strategy; |
· | Individual performance relative to goals; |
· | Corporate performance; |
· | Budgetary constraints; |
· | Regulatory requirements; |
· | Competitive market data received from external compensation consultant including best practices in the marketplace; |
· | Ability to retain and attract executive employees; |
· | External economic and industry environment; and |
· | Risk assessment considerations. |
The named executive officers receive base salaries commensurate with their positions and responsibilities. In determining the appropriate types and amounts of compensation for the President and Chief Executive Officer each year, the Board of Directors evaluates both corporate and individual performance. The corporate factors include the financial performance of the Company, including return on stockholders’ equity, return on assets, asset quality and trends in the foregoing measures, the performance of the Company’s stock price, comparative results achieved by the Company’s peer group institutions, and progress in realizing the Company’s long-term strategic plan. The individual factors include initiation and implementation of successful business strategies, formation of an effective management team and various personal qualities, including leadership. In determining the appropriate types and amounts of compensation for the named executive officers other than the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors takes into consideration the officer’s experience, expected personal performance and salary levels for comparable positions.
Compensation Components
The compensation package for each named executive officer is comprised primarily of base salary, short-term incentives in the form of cash bonuses and long-term stock-based incentive awards. The Company also offers executives who meet the eligibility requirements the opportunity to participate in a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, in addition to a 401(k) Plan and health and welfare benefits available to all of the Bank’s employees.
27 |
Base Salary - The Bank has established salary ranges that are competitive with our peer group and the banking industry in our local region. Each job classification has been evaluated based upon the required skills, knowledge, responsibility and experience needed. Salary increases are based upon merit, performance, quality of work, and other job related factors. Salary increases are not guaranteed and a satisfactory performance review may not warrant an increase. The base salary for each named executive officer is determined based upon experience, personal performance, salary levels in effect for comparable positions in the banking industry, internal base salary comparability considerations and the responsibilities assumed by the named executive officer. The weights given to these factors differ from individual to individual as the Board determines is appropriate. Base salaries are reviewed annually and adjusted from time to time, based on our review of market data and assessment of Company and individual executive performance.
Please refer to “Executive Compensation Tables” below for additional information on compensation of our named executive officers.
Short-Term Incentive Program/Cash Bonuses
On December 19, 2012, the Board approved the EIP which became effective during calendar year 2013. The EIP is designed to link annual cash bonus awards to specific bank financial targets and individual performance metrics. According to the terms of the EIP, the Board of Directors is responsible for establishing the Bank-wide financial targets which are utilized to trigger funding of the EIP. The Board of Directors determines the individual performance goals used to evaluate the President and Chief Executive Officer. For all other executives, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer are responsible for establishing individual performance goals which, in conjunction with achievement of Bank-wide financial goals, are used to determine individual awards. The EIP provides for a potential claw-back of award payments if the relevant performance measures on which they are based are restated or otherwise adjusted with a 36-month period following the public release of the financial information. There were no cash bonuses awarded under the EIP in 2013.
Long-Term Incentive Programs - The Company believes that stock ownership by management and equity-based performance compensation arrangements are useful tools to align the interests of management with those of the Company’s shareholders. Where executives are shareholders themselves, the executives will realize a direct benefit by achieving the objective of maximizing shareholder value.
Prior Plans
During 2013, the Company had in place two expired stock incentive plans: the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”) and the 2000 Independent Directors’ Stock Incentive Plan (the “Directors’ Stock Plan,” and together with the Stock Incentive Plan, the “Company Plans”), each of which expired on August 30, 2010 and, as such, no additional awards have been granted from either plan, though the expiration of these plans does not affect any awards outstanding as of the expiration date of the plan.
Prior to the expiration of the Company Plans, the Company’s executives were eligible to receive “qualified” stock options, “non-qualified” stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted stock under the Company Plans, which have each been approved by the Company’s shareholders. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, generally denies publicly-held corporations a federal income tax deduction for compensation exceeding $1,000,000 paid to the Chief Executive Officer or any of the four other highest paid executive officers, excluding performance-based compensation. The Stock Incentive Plan was designed and has been administered in a manner to enable the Company to deduct compensation attributable to options and without regard to such deduction limitation. The Company has outstanding awards of stock options issued under each of the Company Plans. During 2009, the Company granted 74,600 shares worth of stock options. No stock options or other equity based awards were granted under the Company Plans in 2011, 2012 or 2013.
28 |
Under the Stock Incentive Plan, shares of common stock are subject to issuance upon the exercise of incentive stock options (“ISOs”), non-incentive stock options (“Non-ISOs”) and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), and the award of shares of restricted stock to such key officers or other employees of the Company or the Bank as the Compensation Committee may designate. However, only ISOs were ever awarded under the Stock Incentive Plan. The exercise price of qualified stock options under the Stock Incentive Plan was not permitted to be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant, as determined in the Stock Incentive Plan.
If a participant who was awarded a qualified incentive stock option ceases to be employed by the Company or the Bank for any reason other than his or her death or disability, the participant may be permitted to exercise the option during its remaining term for a period of not more than three (3) months after cessation of employment to the extent that the qualified option was then and remains exercisable.
The grants are to be exercised at a fixed price of fair market value on the date of grant. The grant dates are based on the last Company meeting of the applicable year in which they were granted. The awards are not timed to the release of any information. Under the Stock Incentive Plan, the time period during which any qualified incentive stock option is exercisable, as determined by the Compensation Committee, does not commence before the expiration of six (6) months or continue beyond the expiration of ten (10) years after the date such option is awarded.
2013 Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan
Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the LTIP was formally adopted by the Board of Directors on October 23, 2013 and was approved by shareholders at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on December 23, 2013. We have reserved 1,200,000 shares under the LTIP. The LTIP became effective as of January 1, 2014 and will remain in effect, subject to the right of the Board of Directors to terminate the LTIP at any time, until all awards granted under the LTIP have been paid or otherwise disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the LTIP. Awards may not be made under the LTIP on or after January 1, 2024. The Company has filed a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), that registers the shares to be issued pursuant to the LTIP.
The LTIP is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the discretionary authority to: (i) select the persons to be granted awards under the LTIP; (ii) determine the terms, conditions and types of awards to be made to each person selected; (iii) determine when awards are to be made and the conditions that must be satisfied before an award is to be made; (iv) establish objectives and conditions for earning awards; (v) determine the terms of each award agreement; (vi) determine whether the conditions for earning an award have been met and whether an award should be paid at the end of a performance period; (vii) determine if and when an award may be deferred; (viii) determine whether the amount or payment of an award should be reduced or eliminated and (iv) determine the guidelines and procedures for the payment or exercise of an award. The Compensation Committee may delegate to the Chief Executive Officer or to other officers of the Company its authority under the LTIP except with respect to the grant of awards or the exercise of discretion with respect to awards to employees who are “covered employees” (as defined in the LTIP). The Compensation Committee determines whether to grant awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units, performance units and performance share awards, each of which is described in further detail below.
29 |
Stock Options
The Compensation Committee determines the number of shares of stock subject to each option, the terms and conditions including vesting and expiration, and whether the option is an “incentive stock option” or a “nonqualified stock option.” The exercise price for each option is determined by the Compensation Committee but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the stock on the date the option is granted. No option may be exercisable after the expiration date as determined by the Compensation Committee and defined in the award agreement; provided, however, that no incentive stock option is exercisable later than ten years after the date of its grant, and no nonqualified stock option is exercisable later than ten years and one month after the date of its grant. No options were granted in 2013 under the LTIP. The Compensation Committee believes that including stock options in the compensation program serves the Company’s longer-term goals in the same manner as other equity-based compensation.
Stock Appreciation Rights
A stock appreciation right, or “SAR,” may be exercised upon such terms and conditions and for the term the Compensation Committee determines in the award agreement; provided, however, that no stock appreciation right will be exercisable later than ten years after the date of its grant. Upon exercise of a SAR, the participant is entitled to receive an amount determined by multiplying: (i) the difference between the fair market value of a share of stock on the exercise date and the price fixed by the Compensation Committee on the date of the grant (which price may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of stock on the date of the grant); by (ii) the number of shares of stock with respect to which the SAR is exercised. The payment to the recipient of the amount due upon exercise of a SAR is made in shares of stock having a fair market value as of the date of exercise equal to the amount determined by multiplying (i) and (ii) above, unless the Compensation Committee otherwise provides for payment in cash in the applicable award agreement or any amendment or modification of the award agreement. The Compensation Committee believes that stock appreciation rights, which provide value to our executives only if the Company’s share price increases relative to the share price on the date the awards are granted, generally serve the Company’s longer-term goals and fit into the Company’s overall compensation philosophy. No SARs were granted in 2013 under the LTIP.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
Shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until the termination of the applicable restricted period or for such period of time as is established by the Compensation Committee and as is specified in the award agreement. After the last day of a restricted period, shares of restricted stock covered by such restricted period will become freely transferrable by the recipient, and the recipient will receive one share of stock with respect to each restricted stock unit covered by such restricted period. Participants holding shares of restricted stock may exercise full voting rights with respect to those shares, unless otherwise specified in the applicable award agreement. The form of award agreement adopted by the Compensation Committee (the “Form of Restricted Stock Agreement”) provides for voting rights with respect to vested shares of restricted stock, but not for unvested shares. During the restricted period, participants holding shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units are entitled to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to those shares while they are so held, unless otherwise specified in the applicable award agreement. The Form of Restricted Stock Agreement only permits participants holding shares of restricted stock to receive dividends and distributions with respect to vested shares of restricted stock, but not for unvested shares. Effective March 1, 2014, grants aggregating to a total of 45,750 shares of restricted stock were made in accordance with the terms of the Form of Restricted Stock Agreement to the named executive officers and to other officers of the Bank. The Compensation Committee believes that restricted stock awards generally share the same beneficial characteristics of stock options, with a significant retention element, and fit into the Company’s overall compensation philosophy in the same manner. No restricted stock or restricted stock units were granted in 2013 under the LTIP.
30 |
Performance Unit and Performance Share Awards
The Compensation Committee has discretion in determining the number of performance units or performance shares granted to each participant and the terms and condition of such awards, except that the maximum dollar amount of performance units that may be granted to any single Participant is $200,000 during any one calendar year. The Compensation Committee may establish in advance performance goals over performance periods for each award. Prior to each grant of performance units or performance shares, the Compensation Committee will establish an initial value for each performance unit and an initial number of shares of stock for each performance share granted to each participant for that performance period. Prior to each grant of performance units or performance shares, the Compensation Committee also will set the performance goals that will be used to determine the extent to which the participant receives a payment of the value of the performance units or number of shares of stock for the performance shares awarded for such performance period. Each performance unit award entitles the participant to a payment in cash or stock upon the attainment of performance criteria and other terms and conditions specified in the award. Subject to limitations applicable to payments to covered employees, the Compensation Committee has the authority to modify, amend or adjust the terms and conditions of any award of performance units or performance shares, including any performance goals that are established. No performance units or performance share awards were granted in 2013.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
To the extent the recipient of an award recognizes ordinary income, generally the Company will be entitled (subject to the requirement of reasonableness, the provisions of Code Section 162(m), and the satisfaction of any tax reporting obligations) to a corresponding income tax deduction. Wherever possible, the Company structures compensation for its executive officers in a way that preserves tax deductibility under Section 162(m).
The Company does not generally consider the tax consequences to named executive officers of cash compensation or of equity-based compensation, though it considers the tax treatment to the Company for non-qualified options and the non-qualifying disposition of qualified options to be favorable.
Employee Stock Grant Plans
On November 28, 2012, the Board of Directors adopted the 2012 Employee Stock Grant Plan (the “2012 Grant Plan”), which became effective upon implementation on December 17, 2012, pursuant to which the Board authorized the grant of up to 16,000 common shares in order to make one-time grants of 50 common shares (plus a one-time payment of $25 to partially offset such employee’s 2012 tax obligations in connection with the grant) to each active full and part-time employee of the Company, including executive officers. This one-time program was implemented to provide employees with a long-term financial interest in the Company’s future growth and profitability by providing them with Company ownership in the form of common shares.
On November 27, 2013, the Board of Directors adopted the 2013 Employee Stock Grant Plan (the “2013 Grant Plan”), which became effective upon implementation on December 2, 2013, pursuant to which the Board authorized the grant of up to 15,000 common shares in order to make one-time grants of 50 common shares to each active full and part-time employee of the Company, including executive officers. This one-time program was implemented to provide employees with a long-term financial interest in the Company’s future growth and profitability by providing them with Company ownership in the form of common shares.
31 |
Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan - Supplemental compensation is provided in the form of a profit sharing and 401(k) plan. The profit sharing and 401(k) plan is structured to be moderately competitive within the peer market. The amount of money which the Bank contributed to the profit sharing and 401(k) plan is not taken into account when determining the amounts of other forms of compensation.
The Bank has adopted the First National Community Bank 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), a tax qualified retirement savings plan pursuant to which our employees, including the named executive officers, are able to make pre-tax or Roth contributions from their cash compensation. The 401(k) Plan provides for a discretionary employer contribution, which is determined each year by the Board of Directors, in the form of profit sharing. For the year 2013, the Board of Directors did not declare a profit sharing contribution.
The 401(k) Plan permits the Bank to match employee 401(k) contributions to employees who are 21 on the first day of the month following their day of hire. The Board of Directors has approved a 50% match to an employee’s first 4% of payroll contribution. The match is subject to amendment at the Board of Director’s discretion.
Deferred Compensation Plan - All officers of the Bank employed at the beginning of a year for at least two (2) years with earnings in excess of $40,000 annually are entitled to participate in the Bank’s Director’s and Officer’s Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended (“Deferred Compensation Plan”). The Deferred Compensation Plan allows named executive officers who have been employed by the Bank for ten or more years to defer up to 25% of their compensation, including base salary and cash bonuses. All other eligible named executive officers may defer up to 15% of their compensation. The Deferred Compensation Plan is designed to provide a long-term incentive to remain in the employ of the Bank.
An account for each participant is maintained and credited with deferred compensation on the date such compensation would have been paid to a participant had no election to defer been made. The interest rate to be credited on account balances in the Deferred Compensation Plan was reviewed by the Board during 2010 and the Deferred Compensation Plan was amended prior to December 31, 2010. The amendment provides for the interest rate to be determined each year based on the sum of 1% plus the average of the one-year U.S. Treasury Bill rates in effect on and between December 1 and December 15 of the Plan Year to which it applies. There is no minimum rate in this amendment. This amendment was adopted by the Board on December 29, 2010 and applied to accounts for the December 31, 2010 interest crediting and thereafter.
The Bank’s obligation under the Deferred Compensation Plan is an unfunded and unsecured promise to pay. The Bank is not obligated to fund any of such obligations, but it may, in its sole discretion, elect to fund the Deferred Compensation Plan in whole or in part. To date, the Company has not funded any Deferred Compensation Plan obligations. As such, executive officer and other participant account balances in the Deferred Compensation Plan are unsecured and at-risk, meaning the balances may be forfeited in the event of the Company’s financial distress such as bankruptcy. The Bank does not match executive deferrals to the Deferred Compensation Plan.
Participants, including each of the named executive officers, are immediately vested in their account balance in the deferred compensation plan. The benefit payments to be made to a participant under the Deferred Compensation Plan begin on the first business day of the month after the participant’s “normal retirement date,” which is the date on which a participant reaches age 60, the date on which he has been a participant for five years, or his or her termination of service, whichever is later. “Termination of service” means the participant’s ceasing to serve as a director or officer of the Bank for any reason whatsoever, voluntary or involuntary, including by reason of death or disability. The participant will receive equal monthly or annual installments over the period chosen, the amount of such payments being determined by annuitizing the amount in his Deferred Compensation Plan account, plus interest.
32 |
Distributions are paid in a lump sum or in annual or monthly installments according to the participant’s designation, provided, however, that the Bank may, subject to approval by the Board of Directors, pay the participant’s deferred compensation account in annual payments upon such Participant’s termination of service. All distributions are also subject to any regulatory requirements, as in effect from time to time.
Additional Employee Benefit Plans - The Bank also provides additional benefit programs to employees including health, vision and dental insurance, life and long-term and short-term disability insurance.
Supplemental Life Insurance for Certain Executive Officers - Certain executive officers also participate in the Company’s supplemental executive life insurance plan which provides a split-dollar share of death benefits to the executive’s beneficiary, depending upon the executive’s eligibility to receive payments. The plan is funded with bank-owned life insurance and is used to provide an additional benefit to certain executives with a minimal cost to the Company. Split-dollar life insurance plans are widely available in the banking industry, because it allows the employer to recover its plan costs upon the death of the executive, and the executive’s beneficiary to receive a split of the insurance proceeds. This benefit provides additional incentive for continued employment with the Company.
These benefits are provided to further incent longevity with the Company and also to provide an executive benefit package that is fully competitive within our industry and market place. The costs of providing such benefits to all eligible employees are not considered when determining specific salaries of the named executive officers and are seen as a worthwhile investment in employees that will help keep the employee productive and engaged.
Perquisites - The Company provides a Company-owned vehicle to several of the named executive officers, as their positions require travel offsite frequently for Bank business. The provision of a Company vehicle to these individuals is viewed by the Board of Directors as a normal benefit in the highly competitive financial services industry.
Country club memberships, the dues for which are paid by the Company, are provided to certain of our named executive officers and used as a vehicle to attract, retain and expand customer relationships. They are viewed as an important resource for certain named executive officers to further the business of the Bank.
Employment and Severance Arrangements - Other than as described below under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control,” none of the executive officers or directors of the Company or the Bank is currently a party to an individual employment contract or any other agreement with the Company or the Bank containing severance and/or change in control arrangements with the Company or the Bank.
On July 25, 2013, the Bank submitted for regulatory non-objection/concurrence a proposed Change of Control Agreement (the “Change of Control Agreement”) for Steven R. Tokach, President and Chief Executive Officer. On the same day, the Bank submitted for regulatory non-objection/concurrence proposed employment agreements (the “Employment Agreements”) for Gerard A. Champi, Chief Operating Officer, James M. Bone, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Brian C. Mahlstedt, Chief Lending Officer. Because they are officers of the Company and the Bank, regulatory non-objection is required for Mr. Tokach’s proposed Change of Control Agreement and Mr. Bone’s proposed Employment Agreement from the Federal Reserve Bank and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and regulatory concurrence is required from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. As they are solely officers of the Bank, regulatory non-objection is required for the proposed Employment Agreements for Messrs. Champi and Mahlstedt from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and regulatory concurrence is required from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The proposed Change of Control Agreement and Employment Agreements for Messrs. Tokach, Champi, Bone and Mahlstedt remain under regulatory review. The Company and Bank intend to enter into the proposed Agreements as soon as practical after receiving regulatory non-objection/concurrence.
33 |
Inter-Relationship of Elements of Total Compensation
The Company’s executive compensation philosophy and strategy is intended to be competitive in the marketplace and reward executives for strong performance through multiple compensation vehicles and to not reward executives for weak performance. All of the components are balanced, integrated, and designed to provide a total compensation environment which will enhance the executives’ relationship with the Company and support the growth of overall shareholder value.
The various elements of the total compensation package are subtly interrelated based on a variety of factors. While there is not a direct relationship between components, if in a given year the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee decides, for purposeful reasons, to “overweight” one component of total compensation (as compared to the market) they may “underweight” another so that total compensation remains competitive. The Company held its first “say-on-pay” vote at the 2013 annual meeting and intends to continue to hold an advisory vote on the compensation of executives on an annual basis. In setting 2013 compensation, however, the Company had not previously held or considered the results of a shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation.
Equity Ownership Guidelines
We have no equity or security ownership requirements or guidelines for executive officers; however, all of the executive officers, except those who joined the Bank since 2010 (other than Steven R. Tokach who is required to own shares of the Company as a director of the Bank), own common stock or options to purchase common stock pursuant to our equity compensation plans. Pursuant to the Company’s bylaws, shareholders who submit proposals for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement must disclose details regarding hedged positions.
Risk Analysis of Incentive Compensation Programs
The Board of Directors evaluated the Company’s compensation policies and practices for its employees and concluded that our compensation programs (1) are appropriately structured to reward prudent risk taking, (2) do not encourage or promote inappropriate risk taking, (3) do not pose a material risk to the Company, and (4) are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Summary Compensation Table
Shown below is information concerning the annual compensation for services in all capacities to the Company and the Bank for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company and the Bank, to the extent such persons’ total compensation exceeded $100,000.
34 |
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Stock Awards [1] | Change in pension value and non- qualified deferred compensation earnings [2] | All Other Compensation | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Steven R. Tokach, President | 2013 | $ | 300,300 | $ | 213 | $ | — | $ | 6,727 | [3] | $ | 307,240 | ||||||||||||
and Chief Executive | 2012 | 300,025 | 153 | — | 6,290 | [3] | 306,468 | |||||||||||||||||
Officer of the Company | 2011 | 17,308 | [4] | — | — | — | 17,308 | |||||||||||||||||
and the Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
James M. Bone, Jr., | 2013 | $ | 190,300 | $ | 213 | $ | 426 | $ | 7,208 | [5] | $ | 198,147 | ||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and | 2012 | 173,267 | 153 | 476 | 1,516 | [5] | 175,412 | |||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer of | 2011 | 148,000 | — | 456 | 91 | [5] | 148,547 | |||||||||||||||||
the Company and the Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
and former Chief Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Officer of the Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gerard A. Champi, Chief | 2013 | $ | 235,505 | $ | 213 | $ | 3,371 | $ | 43,136 | [6] | $ | 282,225 | ||||||||||||
Operating Officer of the | 2012 | 230,463 | 153 | 3,766 | 76,877 | [6] | 311,259 | |||||||||||||||||
Bank and former Interim | 2011 | 223,500 | — | 3,607 | 11,339 | [6] | 238,446 | |||||||||||||||||
President and Chief | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Officer of the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company and Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph J. Earyes, First | 2013 | $ | 143,800 | $ | 213 | $ | — | $ | 7,965 | [7] | $ | 151,978 | ||||||||||||
Senior Vice President and | 2012 | 121,786 | 153 | — | 16,738 | [7] | $ | 138,677 | ||||||||||||||||
Chief Retail Banking and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operations Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mary G. Cummings, Senior | 2013 | $ | 140,301 | $ | 213 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 140,514 | |||||||||||||
Vice President and General Counsel |
[1] The amounts listed represent the fair market value of the shares awarded on December 2, 2013 and December 17, 2012, the dates of the grant computed in accordance with the accounting standard regarding share-based compensation payments. For additional information as to the assumptions made in valuation, see Note 2 to the financial statements filed with the SEC in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
[2] The amounts listed represent the sum of the change in actuarial present value of the officer’s benefit under the plan for each measurement date and interest earned on the balances in the named executive officers non-qualified deferred compensation plan accounts.
[3] For Mr. Tokach, this amount represents country club dues in the amount of $3,500 and $3,075 and an automobile allowance in the amount of $3,227 and $3,215 for 2013 and 2012, respectively.
[4] For Mr. Tokach, this amount represents the portion of his base salary earned from December 5, 2011, when he started with the Company, until the end of 2011.
[5] For Mr. Bone, this amount includes an employer match to the Bank’s 401(k) Plan earned and accrued in the amounts of $3,800, $1,417, and $0, premiums paid to purchase split-dollar life insurance in the amounts of $108, $99 and $91, country club dues of $2,250, $0 and $0 and an automobile allowance of $1,050, $0 and $0, in each case, for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
[6] For Mr. Champi, this amount includes contributions to the Bank’s 401(k) Plan earned and accrued in the amounts of $4,704, $1,417 and $0, country club dues in the amounts of $7,130, $12,430 and $8,553, an automobile allowance of $2,914, $2,750 and $2,687, premiums paid to purchase split-dollar life insurance in the amounts of $118, $108, and $99, and a vacation payout in the amount of $28,270, $60,172 and $0 in each case, for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
35 |
[7] For Mr. Earyes, this amount includes country club dues in the amount of $5,677 and $5,079, an automobile allowance in the amount of $2,288 and $2,313, and a vacation payout in the amount of $0 and $9,346 for 2013 and 2012, respectively.
The Company’s compensation philosophy to provide executives with a balanced mix of compensation components to enable the Company to attract, retain and motivate key executives. It is also the Company’s compensation philosophy to provide for base compensation levels that are in line with the market together with a more conservative bonus opportunity also in alignment with the market. Where appropriate, the Company adjusts the base salaries of its key executives to reflect market-competitive compensation levels and to recognize current responsibilities and expectations. As the Company’s performance did not warrant bonus payments with respect to 2013, 2012 or 2011, none were made. The Company did, however, make one-time grants of 50 common shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to both the 2013 and 2012 Grant Plans (described above) to each eligible employee, including executive officers, in order to align the employees’ interests with the long-term financial interest of the Company.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
All Other Stock | Grant Date | |||||||
Grant | Awards: Number of | Fair Value of Stock | ||||||
Name | Date | Shares of Stock or Units | and Option Awards | |||||
Steven R. Tokach | December 31, 2013 | 50 | $ | 213 | ||||
James M. Bone, Jr. | December 31, 2013 | 50 | $ | 213 | ||||
Gerard A. Champi | December 31, 2013 | 50 | $ | 213 | ||||
Joseph J. Earyes | December 31, 2013 | 50 | $ | 213 | ||||
Mary G. Cummings | December 31, 2013 | 50 | $ | 213 |
The Company’s equity compensation plans include the Directors’ Stock Plan and the Stock Incentive Plan which were approved by shareholders on May 16, 2001. Both of the Company Plans expired on August 30, 2010. No stock options were awarded under either of the Company Plans in 2011, 2012 or 2013.
On November 28, 2012, the Board of Directors adopted the 2012 Grant Plan pursuant to which the Board of Directors granted 50 shares of the Company’s common stock to each eligible employee of the Company, including executive officers. On November 27, 2013, the Board of Directors adopted the 2013 Grant Plan pursuant to which the Board of Directors granted 50 shares of the Company’s common stock to each eligible employee of the Company, including executive officers. The 2012 and 2013 Grant Plans are described under the heading, “Compensation Components-Employee Stock Grant Plans” on page 28.
On March 1, 2014, the Board of Directors granted awards of restricted stock to executive officers under the terms of the LTIP. No awards under the LTIP were made in 2013.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth, on an award by award basis, information concerning all awards of stock options held by named executive officers at December 31, 2013. All options were granted with an exercise or base price of 100% of market value as determined in accordance with the applicable plan. The number of shares subject to each award as well as the exercise and/or base price has been adjusted to reflect all stock dividends and stock splits effected after the date of such award but have not otherwise been modified.
36 |
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End | ||||||||||||||
Option Awards | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 | ||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (1) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price | Option Expiration Date | ||||||||||
Steven R. Tokach | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
James M. Bone, Jr. | 1,375 | - | 16.71 | 11/24/2014 | ||||||||||
1,650 | - | 19.31 | 11/23/2015 | |||||||||||
1,650 | - | 23.13 | 11/29/2016 | |||||||||||
2,500 | - | 16.90 | 11/13/2017 | |||||||||||
4,000 | - | 10.81 | 1/5/2019 | |||||||||||
Gerard A. Champi | 1,925 | - | 16.71 | 11/24/2014 | ||||||||||
2,337 | - | 19.31 | 11/23/2015 | |||||||||||
2,337 | - | 23.13 | 11/29/2016 | |||||||||||
3,500 | - | 16.90 | 11/13/2017 | |||||||||||
5,600 | - | 10.81 | 1/5/2019 | |||||||||||
Joseph J. Earyes | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Mary G. Cummings | - | - | - | - |
(1) | All options listed in this table are fully vested. |
Options Exercised and Stock Vested
None of the named executive officers exercised any options during 2013. No awards other than stock options were outstanding under the Company’s Plans at December 31, 2013.
Nonqualified Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans
The following table provides information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 for the named executive officers regarding their participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Executive Contributions in Last FY | Registrant Contributions in Last FY | Aggregate Earnings in Last FY | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE | |||||||||||||||
Steven R. Tokach | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
James M. Bone, Jr. | - | - | 426 | - | 42,518 | |||||||||||||||
Gerard A. Champi | - | - | 3,371 | - | 336,280 | |||||||||||||||
Joseph J. Earyes | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Mary G. Cummings | - | - | - | - | - |
The aggregate earnings listed in this table are included in the non-qualified deferred compensation earnings column of the Summary Compensation Table. For a discussion of the types of compensation permitted to be deferred (and any limitations), the measures for calculating interest and the material terms with respect to payouts, withdrawals and other distributions, see the above discussion under the heading “Compensation Components—Deferred Compensation Plan.”
37 |
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control
Directors’ and Officers’ Deferred Compensation Plan
The named executive officers and all other participants are vested in their account balance in the Deferred Compensation Plan. As such, upon ceasing to serve as an officer of the Bank for any reason whatsoever, voluntary or involuntary, including involuntary termination for cause, termination on a change of control, voluntary termination, early retirement or by reason of death or disability, the amount of the Deferred Compensation Plan account balance of such named executive officer will be payable pursuant to the terms of the Deferred Compensation Plan. Amounts payable under the Deferred Compensation Plan are unsecured, unfunded obligations of the Bank. Information regarding amounts to which named executives would be entitled under any such termination scenario, in the event of a termination as of December 31, 2013, are set forth in the table below. See the narrative detail above under “Compensation Discussion & Analysis — Deferred Compensation Plan” for additional information on the timing of such payments, which are subject in part to an election by such officer, and the age and length of such officer’s service with the Bank.
Deferred Compensation upon Severence | ||||
December 31, 2013 | ||||
Amount Payable | ||||
Upon | ||||
Name | Termination Event (1) | |||
Steven R. Tokach | $ | - | ||
James M. Bone, Jr. | 42,518 | |||
Gerard A. Champi | 336,280 | |||
Joseph J. Earyes | - | |||
Mary G. Cummings | - |
(1) | Represents the amount payable to the indicated named executive officer under the Deferred Compensation Plan upon the following triggering events, assuming that such event occurred as of December 31, 2013: Voluntary Termination; Early Retirement; Normal Retirement, Involuntary Termination — Not for Cause; Involuntary Termination - For Cause; Involuntary Termination - For Good Reason (Change in Control); Disability; Death. Participants may elect to have their account paid commencing at the time prescribed by the Plan, in equal annual payments beginning with five (5) years and increasing in five (5) year increments up to thirty (30) years. Participants may also elect a lump sum payment or equal monthly payments which correspond to the annual yearly schedule. |
Equity Incentive Plans
Options issued under the Company Plans are subject to accelerated vesting and remain exercisable upon or in connection with the occurrence of certain change of control events; all currently outstanding stock options under the Company Plans are fully vested. In addition, any such stock option awards may remain exercisable for up to three months (or longer in the case of death or disability) upon the termination of any of our named executive officers’ employment for any reason. As of April 8, 2014 based on the closing market price of $5.80 per share, the exercise price of all options held by executive officers is greater than the current market price per share. Therefore, we do not expect that the options would be exercised upon a change in control or termination of employment.
38 |
Notwithstanding any other provisions of the LTIP, and except as otherwise provided in an award agreement, if there is a change in control, all stock-based awards granted under the LTIP will immediately vest 100% in each Participant, including incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units. However, no stock-based award granted or made during a period when the Company is subject to FDIC Part 359 golden parachute requirements will be subject to acceleration of vesting pursuant to the LTIP. In addition, no stock-based awards, whenever granted or made, will vest if the Change in Control occurs during a period when the Company is subject to FDIC Part 359. Currently, the Company is subject to FDIC Part 359. As of December 31, 2013, no awards were outstanding under the LTIP.
The foregoing narrative regarding payments on a change in control or other termination of employment does not reflect payments that would be provided to each named executive officer under the 401(k) Plan following termination of employment, or under the Company’s disability or life insurance plan in the event of death or disability, as applicable, on the last business day of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 because these plans are generally available to all regular employees similarly situated in age, years of service and date of hire and do not discriminate in favor of executive officers.
Director Compensation
The following table sets forth information regarding compensation paid to, or earned by, non-employee directors of the Company during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 for service as members of the Company and Bank Boards of Directors.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
December 31, 2013
Name | Fees
Earned or Paid in Cash | Stock Awards | Option
Awards | Change
in Pension value and Non- Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | All
Other Compensation | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Michael J. Cestone | $ | 40,000 | [1] | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 40,000 | |||||||||||
Joseph Coccia | 30,000 | - | - | - | - | 30,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dominick L. DeNaples | 30,000 | - | - | - | - | 30,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Louis A. DeNaples [3] | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Louis A. DeNaples, Jr. | 30,000 | - | - | - | - | 30,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Joseph J. Gentile | 30,000 | - | - | - | - | 30,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Thomas J. Melone | 30,000 | - | - | - | - | 30,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
John P. Moses | 30,000 | - | - | 3,925 | - | 33,925 | ||||||||||||||||||
Steven R. Tokach [2] | - | - | - | - | - | - |
[1] Includes a $30,000 director’s fee and $10,000 for service as Secretary of the Board of Directors.
[2] Mr. Tokach does not receive compensation as a member of the Board of Directors.
[3] Mr. Louis A. DeNaples did not receive any director’s fees during 2013.
Directors receive no remuneration for attendance at the Company’s board meetings. All non-employee members of the Bank’s Board of Directors receive an annual retainer of $30,000, payable at a rate of $2,500 per month, for each month or portion thereof that the director serves as a director of the Bank. The aggregate amount of director fees paid in 2013 was $210 thousand. In 2013, Michael J. Cestone, Jr. was compensated $10,000 for services rendered as Secretary of the Board of Directors to the Bank. Members of committees of the Board of Directors of the Company or the Bank, as applicable, do not receive fees for attending meetings of those committees.
39 |
Directors serving on the Board of Directors of the Bank are entitled to participate in the Bank’s Deferred Compensation Plan. Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, directors may voluntarily defer up to 50% of the director fees paid to them for service on the Board of Directors of the Bank. Prior to December 31, 2010, the Bank paid interest on deferred amounts on December 31 of each year at a rate equal to 200% of the one-year Treasury Bill rate in effect not more than thirty (30) days nor less than fifteen (15) days prior to the plan year to which the rates apply, but in no case less than 8% (the rate determined as described, the “Plan Rate”). For all participants who had been in the Deferred Compensation Plan for over five years there also was an enhanced interest rate of 1% greater than the Plan Rate, beginning with the sixth year of participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan. An account for each participant is maintained and credited with deferred compensation on the date such compensation would have been paid to a participant had no election to defer been made. The Deferred Compensation Plan was amended on December 29, 2010 to provide for the interest rate to be determined each year based on the sum of 1% plus the average of the one-year U.S. Treasury Bill rates in effect on and between December 1 and December 15 of the Deferred Compensation Plan year to which it applies, with no minimum rate. The amendment applied to accounts for December 31, 2010 and future interest crediting. For additional information regarding the Deferred Compensation Plan, please refer to Executive Compensation — Compensation Disclosure and Analysis - Deferred Compensation Plan.”
Directors’ Stock Plan
Directors who were not employees or officers of the Company were eligible to be granted options to purchase stock of the Company under the Directors’ Stock Plan. The Directors’ Stock Plan expired during 2013, and no additional awards may be made thereunder. No awards were made under the Directors’ Stock Plan during 2013 and there were no awards outstanding thereunder at December 31, 2013.
Directors who are not employees or officers of the Company are eligible to participate in the LTIP adopted on December 23, 2013 at the annual meeting of shareholders. No awards have been made to directors under the LTIP plan.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The Company Plans approved by our shareholders expired on August 30, 2010, and as such, no new grants of awards have been or will be made pursuant to these Company Plans. Options, however, can be exercised up to ten years following their date of grant; accordingly, exercisable options remain outstanding.
On November 28, 2012, the Board of Directors adopted the 2012 Grant Plan, pursuant to which the Board authorized the grant of up to 16,000 common shares in order to make one-time grants of 50 common shares (plus a one-time payment of $25 to partially offset such employee’s 2012 tax obligations in connection with the grant) to each active full and part-time employee of the Company, including executive officers.
On November 27, 2013, the Board of Directors adopted the 2013 Grant Plan, which became effective upon implementation on December 2, 2013, pursuant to which the Board authorized the grant of up to 15,000 common shares in order to make one-time grants of 50 common shares to each active full and part-time employee of the Company, including executive officers.
The LTIP was formally adopted by the Board of Directors on October 23, 2013 and was approved by shareholders at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on December 23, 2013. The LTIP became effective as of January 1, 2014.
The following table summarizes our equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2013. Information is included for both equity compensation plans approved by First National Community Bancorp, Inc. shareholders and equity compensation plans not approved by First National Community Bancorp, Inc. shareholders.
40 |
Equity Compensation Plan Information
December 31, 2013
Number of | Weighted Average | Securities Remaining | ||||||||||
Securities to be | Exercise Price | Available for Future | ||||||||||
Issued upon Exercise of | of Outstanding | Issuance Under Equity | ||||||||||
Outstanding Options, | Options, Warrants | Compensation Plans (Excluding | ||||||||||
Warrants, and Rights (1)(2) | and Rights (1)(2) | Securities in Column [a]) (2) | ||||||||||
Plan Category | [a] | [b] | [c] | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by First National Community Bancorp, Inc. shareholders | 82,598 | $ | 15.98 | - | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by First National Community Bancorp, Inc. shareholders (3) (4) | - | - | 1,550 | |||||||||
Total | 82,598 | $ | 15.98 | 1,550 |
(1) The number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and the weighted average exercise price includes any options that become exercisable within sixty (60) days after December 31, 2013.
(2) The Company’s equity compensation plans include the Directors’ Stock Plan and the Stock Incentive Plan which were approved
by shareholders on May 16, 2001. All share and per share information has been adjusted to reflect prior stock dividends paid.
(3) On December 17, 2012, 15,050 common shares were issued under the 2012 Grant Plan. Recipients of grants made pursuant to the 2012 Grant Plan may not sell the shares granted under the 2012 Grant Plan until after January 1, 2014. The Board of Directors authorized the grant of up to 16,000 common shares, but the Company does not intend to issue any additional shares pursuant to the 2012 Grant Plan.
(4) On December 2, 2013, 14,400 common shares were issued under the 2013 Grant Plan. Recipients of grants made pursuant to the 2013 Grant Plan may not sell the shares granted under the 2013 Grant Plan until after January 1, 2015. The Board of Directors authorized the grant of up to 15,000 common shares, but the Company does not intend to issue any additional shares pursuant to the 2013 Grant Plan.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Louis A. DeNaples, Jr., Joseph J. Gentile, Thomas J. Melone and John P. Moses currently serve as the members of the Compensation Committee. Certain employees of the Company, as discussed under the heading “Role of Management,” participate in the deliberations of the Board concerning executive officer compensation. No executive officer of the Company served as a director or a member of the compensation committee of another company, one of whose executive officers serves as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors or participates in the Company’s compensation decisions.
Compensation Committee Report
The following report is not deemed to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and the report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any prior or subsequent filing by the Company under the Securities Act, or the Exchange Act. The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (collectively, the “Committee”) submitted the following report for inclusion in this proxy statement:
41 |
Our Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement. Based on our Committee’s review of and the discussions with management with respect to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, our Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this this proxy statement for filing with the SEC.
The foregoing report is provided by the following directors, who constitute the Compensation Committee as of April 8, 2014:
Louis A. DeNaples, Jr., Chairman
Joseph J. Gentile
Thomas J. Melone
John P. Moses
42 |
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH AND TABLE
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return (i.e. price change, reinvestment of cash dividends and stock dividends received) on our common shares against the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S. Companies) Index, the SNL Bank Index for banks with $500 million to $1 billion in assets and the SNL Bank Index for banks with $1 billion to $5 billion in assets. The stock performance graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2008. The graph further assumes the reinvestment of dividends into additional shares of the same class of equity securities at the frequency with which dividends are paid on such securities during the relevant fiscal year. The yearly points marked on the horizontal axis correspond to December 31 of that year. The Company calculates each of the referenced indices in the same manner. All are market-capitalization-weighted indices, so companies judged by the market to be more important (i.e. more valuable) count for more in all indices.
Period Ending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Index | 12/31/08 | 12/31/09 | 12/31/10 | 12/31/11 | 12/31/12 | 12/31/13 | ||||||||||||||||||
First National Community Bancorp, Inc. | 100.00 | 56.58 | 28.34 | 23.54 | 28.53 | 81.90 | ||||||||||||||||||
NASDAQ Composite | 100.00 | 145.36 | 171.74 | 170.38 | 200.63 | 281.22 | ||||||||||||||||||
SNL Bank $1B-$5B | 100.00 | 71.68 | 81.25 | 74.10 | 91.37 | 132.87 | ||||||||||||||||||
SNL Bank $500M-$1B | 100.00 | 95.24 | 103.96 | 91.46 | 117.25 | 152.05 |
(*) | Source: SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA © 2011. SNL Securities is a research and publishing firm specializing in the collection and dissemination of data on the banking, thrift and financial services industries. |
43 |
PROPOSAL 2
ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Pursuant to SEC rules, the Company is asking you to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and any related material contained in this Proxy Statement.
This proposal, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” proposal, gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our executive pay program and policies through a non-binding advisory vote on the following resolution:
“Resolved, that the Shareholders approve the compensation of the Company’s named executives, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and any related material contained in this Proxy Statement.”
The vote on this proposal is advisory and non-binding. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
Board Recommendation
The Company’s Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR this proposal to approve, on an advisory basis, the named executive officers’ compensation as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and any related information contained in this Proxy Statement. Proxies solicited by the Board of Directors will be voted in favor of PROPOSAL 2 unless shareholders specify otherwise.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Company and the Bank have engaged in and intend to continue to engage in banking and financial transactions in the ordinary course of business with directors and officers of the Company and the Bank and their affiliates on comparable terms and with similar interest rates as those prevailing from time to time for other Bank customers not related to the Bank. The Code applies to all directors, officers and employees of the Company and provides guidelines for those covered persons who may have a potential or apparent conflict of interest. Pursuant to the Code, a “conflict of interest” exists any time a covered person’s private interest interferes/conflicts, or even appears to interfere/conflict, in any way with the interests of the Company and the Bank. Under the Code, if a conflict of interest arises, the Board must act with care to avoid even the appearance that any actions were not in the best interest of the Company and the Bank.
Board of Directors approval is required for the Company to do business with a company in which a member of the Board of Directors, an officer, an employee or a family member of a director, officer or employee owns, directly or indirectly, an interest. To identify related party transactions, each year, we submit and require our directors and officers to complete Director and Officer Questionnaires identifying any transaction with the Company or any of its subsidiaries in which the officer or director or their family members have an interest. The Board of Directors reviews related party transactions due to the potential for a conflict of interest. Each year, our directors and executive officers also review our Code.
44 |
Additionally, the Company has further obligations for the review and approval of loans that are made to directors and officers pursuant to Regulation O (Loans to Executive Officers, Directors and Principal Shareholders of Member Banks) and the Company’s written Loan Policy. Any business dealing, including extensions of credit, between the Company or the Bank and a director or officer of the Company or the Bank, or with an affiliate of a director or officer, other than a deposit, trust service or other product or service provided by a bank in the ordinary course of business, is required to be approved by a majority of disinterested directors. In considering a proposed insider transaction, the disinterested directors are to reasonably determine whether the transaction would be in the best interest of the Company or the Bank and on the terms and conditions, including price, substantially the same as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-insiders. The responsibility for monitoring compliance with Regulation O rests with the Bank’s Credit Administration Unit and Internal Auditor as required by the Bank’s Loan Policy.
There have been no loan transactions originated during 2013 which were required to be reported where such policy and procedures were not followed. Except for those loans described in more detail below, loans to directors, executive officers and their related parties (i) were made in the ordinary course of business, (ii) were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons not related to the Company or Bank and (iii) did not involve more than the normal risk of collection or present other unfavorable features. Each of these transactions was made in compliance with applicable law, including the Exchange Act and the Federal Reserve Board Regulation O.
The Bank extended a line of credit (“line”) to a corporation wholly owned by Joseph Coccia, a director of the Company. The total aggregate outstanding amount of this line as of December 31, 2013 was $8.5 million. Mr. Coccia has a participation agreement with the Bank to purchase up to a maximum of a $5.2 million interest in this line from the Bank. This line bears interest at a rate of 4.75%. The largest aggregate outstanding amount of principal outstanding under this line during 2013 was $8.5 million. Under the line, $44.5 million was advanced and $44.0 million in principal and $412 thousand in interest was paid during 2013. The total amount paid by the Bank to Mr. Coccia with respect to his participation in this line during 2013 was $156 thousand. The Bank receives a 25 basis point annual servicing fee from Mr. Coccia on the participation balance. This credit is performing in accordance with the terms of the agreement. Mr. Coccia also received dealer reserve payments in the amount of $304 thousand in 2013. The Bank paid an additional $137 thousand to a corporation that provides vehicle restoration services on repossessed automobiles. Mr. Coccia owns 18% of this corporation.
The Bank extended three (3) loans to an entity which were guaranteed by several individuals, including Michael Conahan and Michael G. Cestone, both former directors of the Company. Mr. Cestone is the son of current Director Michael J. Cestone, Jr. The total aggregate outstanding amount of these loans as of December 31, 2013 was $3.4 million. These loans bear interest at a rate of 4.25%. In 2013, the total amount of principal paid was $20 thousand and the total amount of interest paid was $0 thousand. The largest aggregate amount of principal outstanding under these loans during 2013 was $3.4 million.
John P. Moses is an attorney and Of Counsel at a law firm that provides legal services to the Company. In 2013, the total amount paid by the Company for legal services was $260 thousand. Mr. Moses does not have any ownership or profit sharing interest in the law firm.
Subordinated notes held by officers and directors and/or their related parties totaled $10 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012. Pursuant to the November 24, 2010 written Agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (the “Reserve Bank”) that the Company entered into, the Company and its nonbank subsidiary may not make any payment of interest, principal or other amounts on the Company’s subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities without the prior written approval of the Reserve Bank and the Director. Accordingly, no interest was paid to officers and directors and/or their related parties on these notes during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Interest accrued and unpaid on subordinated notes held by directors and/or their related parties totaled $3.0 million and $2.1 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
45 |
Certain Business Relationships
In the course of its operations, the Company acquires goods and services from and transacts business with various companies of related parties. The Company believes these transactions were made on the same terms as those for comparable transactions. The Company recorded aggregate payments for these services of $2.6 million, $1.6 million, and $1.8 million in 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. None of these transactions exceeded $120 thousand, except as described below.
Louis A. DeNaples’ son-in-law and brother-in-law to Louis A. DeNaples, Jr. is a principal owner of an insurance agency that provides services for the Company. In 2013, the total amount paid by the Company for the services was approximately $1.5 million and represents premiums paid for insurance coverage. Mr. DeNaples son-in-law acts as an agent and derives a commission on the placement of insurance coverage. These services were awarded based on the results of a competitive bidding process.
Dominick L. DeNaples’ son is an attorney at a law firm that provides legal services to the Company. In 2013, the total amount paid by the Company for these services was approximately $320 thousand. Mr. DeNaples’ son does not receive any direct payment for these services. Additionally, he is not a partner in this firm and therefore, does not derive any interest in the law firm’s profit from these payments.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
McGladrey LLP (“McGladrey”), an independent registered public accounting firm, audited the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010. As the Company disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 28, 2014 (the “Form 8-K”), McGladrey advised the Company on March 25, 2014, that it will not seek reappointment as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company. McGladrey has agreed to perform review services through the filing of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2014. The Audit Committee has instituted a search for an independent registered public accounting firm to replace McGladrey for the year ending December 31, 2014.
McGladrey’s reports on the financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and from January 1, 2014 through March 25, 2014, there were no disagreements between the Company and McGladrey on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of McGladrey would have caused it to make reference thereto in its reports on the Company’s financial statements for such periods.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and from January 1, 2014 through March 25, 2014, there have been no “reportable events,” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
The Company provided McGladrey with a copy of the disclosures in the Form 8-K and requested that McGladrey furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agrees with the statements in Item 4.01 of the Form 8-K. A copy of that letter from McGladrey dated March 28, 2014 is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Form 8-K.
Representatives of McGladrey are not expected to be present at the 2014 annual meeting of shareholders. Therefore, they will not be making a statement and will not be available to respond to appropriate questions.
46 |
FEES PAID TO MCGLADREY LLP
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to the Company by McGladrey, for services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Audit fees (1) | $ | 372,778 | $ | 484,717 | ||||
Audit-related fees | - | - | ||||||
Tax fees (2) | 16,800 | - | ||||||
All other fees | - | - |
(1) | Audit fees include fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the Company’s reports on Form 10-Q and for services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. |
(2) | Tax fees include fees billed for tax advisory services. |
The Audit Committee has considered whether, and determined that, the provision of services rendered above was compatible with maintaining the independence of McGladrey in 2013 and 2012 as the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee concluded that the independence of the firm was maintained.
Pursuant to the Audit Committee Charter, the Company is required to obtain pre-approval by the Audit Committee for all audit and permissible non-audit services obtained from its independent registered public accounting firm to the extent required by applicable law. In accordance with this pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee pre-approved all audit services for fiscal years 2013 and 2012.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities (“10% Shareholders”) to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors and 10% Shareholders are required to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on the Company’s review of the copies of such forms received and a written representation from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required for those persons, the Company believes that, during the year ended December 31, 2013 all filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and 10% Shareholders under Section 16(a) were complied with on a timely basis, except for a Form 5 for Louis A. DeNaples, Jr. filed on February 14, 2013 inadvertently omitted shares he holds for the benefit of a minor nephew. An amended Form 5 was filed on April 8, 2014.
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors knows of no other business which will be presented for consideration at the meeting other than as stated in the Notice of Meeting. However, if other matters properly come before the meeting, the shares of common stock represented by the signed proxies will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors, and authority to do so is included in the proxy.
47 |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A copy of the Company’s annual report to shareholders for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, was mailed on April 18, 2014. Any shareholder may obtain additional copies of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, including the financial statements and related schedules and exhibits, required to be filed with the SEC, without charge, from our website at www.fncb.com or via email to stephanie.westington@fncb.com. This information may also be obtained by submitting a written request to Michael J. Cestone, Jr., Secretary, 102 East Drinker Street, Dunmore, Pennsylvania 18512.
In accordance with SEC Rule 14a-3(3)(1), in the future, the Company intends to deliver only one annual report and proxy statement to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless we receive contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. This method of delivery is known as “householding”. Upon written or oral request, the Company will promptly deliver a separate copy of the annual report or proxy statement, as applicable, to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered. Further, shareholders can notify the Company by writing or calling Michael J. Cestone, Jr., Secretary of First National Community Bancorp, Inc. at 102 E. Drinker Street, Dunmore, PA 18512 or (570) 346-7667 and inform us that the shareholder wishes to receive a separate copy of an annual report or proxy statement in the future. In addition, if you are receiving multiple copies of the Company’s annual report or proxy statement, you may request that we deliver only a single copy of annual reports or proxy statements by notifying us at the above address or telephone number.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Dominick L. DeNaples
Dominick L. DeNaples,
Chairman of the Board
April 18, 2014
48 |